Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M111624200 on February 7, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 16, 13682-13692, April 19, 2002
Separate Functions for the Two Modules of the Membrane-proximal
Cytokine Binding Domain of Glycoprotein 190, the Leukemia Inhibitory
Factor Low Affinity Receptor, in Ligand Binding and Receptor
Activation*
Mathieu-Benoît
Voisin
,
Juliette
Bitard
§,
Sophie
Daburon,
Jean-François
Moreau, and
Jean-Luc
Taupin¶
From the CNRS UMR 5540, Université de Bordeaux II, 146 Rue
Léo Saignat, 33076 Bordeaux, France
Received for publication, December 6, 2001, and in revised form, February 7, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
The receptor for the cytokine leukemia inhibitory
factor (LIF) associates the low affinity binding component gp190 and
the high affinity converter gp130. Both are members of the
hematopoietic receptors family characterized by the cytokine receptor
homology (CRH) domain, which consists of two barrel-like modules of
around 100 amino acids each. The gp190 is among the very few members of
this large family to contain two CRH domains. The membrane-distal one
(herein called D1) is followed by an immunoglobulin-like domain, a
membrane-proximal CRH domain called D2, and three type III
fibronectin-like repeats. A minimal D1IgD2 fragment is required for
binding LIF. By using transmembrane forms of deletion mutants in gp190
ectodomain, we demonstrated that removal of D1 led to spontaneous
activation of the receptor and that this property was devoted to a
peptidic sequence localized within the last 42 amino acids of the
carboxyl-terminal module of D2. By using soluble forms of deletion
mutants made by progressive truncations from the end of the D1IgD2
fragment, we demonstrated that the carboxyl-terminal module of D2 was
dispensable for LIF binding and that the correct conformation of the
D1Ig fragment required a full amino-terminal module of D2. Therefore, the two constitutive modules of the membrane-proximal CRH domain D2 of
gp190 fulfill two distinct roles in gp190 function, i.e. in
stabilizing the conformation of gp190 allowing LIF binding and in
activating the receptor.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The leukemia inhibitory factor
(LIF)1 low affinity receptor gp190 belongs to the large
family of the hematopoietic receptors, which are characterized by a
consensus cytokine receptor homology (CRH) domain, the so-called
cytokine binding domain, consisting of two modules of around 100 amino
acids each. The amino-terminal module contains several conserved
disulfide bonds, whereas the carboxyl-terminal one contains the
consensus WSXWS amino acid sequence. The extracellular
region of gp190 is unusual in that it has two CRH domains, which we
called D1 for amino-terminal membrane-distal and D2 for
membrane-proximal, respectively. D1 and D2 are separated by an
immunoglobulin-like module consisting of ~100 residues, and D2 is
followed by three 100 residues long type III fibronectin modules, the
FN region (1).
The gp190 receptor participates in the high affinity receptor complex
for five human cytokines (reviewed in Ref. 2), namely LIF, oncostatin M
(OSM), ciliary neurotrophic factor, cardiotrophin-1, and the very
recently discovered neurotrophin-1/B cell-stimulating factor 3 (NNT-1/BSF-3) (3). Given its structural complexity, little information
relative to the function of each module is available to date. Other
members of the family in human also have two CRH domains. These consist
of the common chain for the IL-3, IL-5, and
granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor receptors (the
-common chain), the TPO receptor, the leptin receptor, and also the
OSM-specific receptor, which lacks the amino-terminal half of the
membrane-distal CRH. In the
-common and the TPO receptor, the two
CRH domains are adjacent to each other, and the available data suggest
that only the membrane-proximal domain for the
-common chain (4, 5)
or the membrane-distal one for the TPO receptor (6) is involved in
interactions with the ligand. Recently, crystallographic structure of
the
-common ectodomain has been solved, showing that this receptor
is expressed at the cell surface as an homodimer in the absence of any
ligand, with two monomers tightly bound to each other (7).
In an attempt to determine the respective roles of D1 and D2 in the
receptor function, we reported previously (8) that c-Myc-tagged
truncation mutants of gp190 ectodomain lacking D2 were either never
produced as secreted proteins and retained inside the cell
(e.g. D1Igmyc and D1myc) or were secreted
(e.g. D1IgFNmyc) but in both cases were not recognized
by conformation-dependent anti-D1Ig mAb. In
contrast, D1IgD2myc was efficiently secreted and bound LIF,
whereas deletion mutants containing D2 but lacking D1,
i.e. mutants IgD2FNmyc, D2Fnmyc, and D2myc, were efficiently secreted and folded but were unable to bind LIF (8). Therefore, it was
concluded that D2 was required for a functional receptor to be produced
and that the ability to bind LIF relied on both the presence of D1 and
a superstructure involving direct contacts between the two CRH domains.
Recently, we generated specific monoclonal antibodies (mAb) for human
gp190, which displayed antagonistic or agonistic activity toward the
receptor (9). One antagonistic mAb called 1C7 was directed against the
D1Ig region and displayed a LIF blocking activity via impairment of
LIF/gp190 interaction, whereas another called 12D3 was directed against
the D2 domain and displayed a LIF blocking activity via impairment of
gp130 recruitment to the LIF-gp190 complex. In addition, a pair
combination of anti-D2 mAb, including mAb 12D3, displayed a potent
agonistic activity in the absence of LIF, a phenotype that was never
obtained with a large panel of anti-D1Ig mAb (9). Taken together, these findings strongly suggested that the two CRH domains have distinct roles in receptor conformation, LIF binding, and receptor activation.
Here, we attempted to address these questions more specifically for the
D2 domain. In a first step, deletion mutants lacking one or several
domains of gp190 extracellular region, as well as deletion mutants
within D2, were fused to a transmembrane and intracellular transducing
region, and their ability to trigger cytokine-dependent or
-independent proliferation of Ba/F3 cells was studied. In a second
step, progressive deletions were performed in the D2 domain starting
from the carboxyl terminus of the shortest LIF-binding receptor
(i.e.D1IgD2) backward to the Ig-like domain. These mutants
were expressed in a soluble form, and their ability to bind LIF and
maintain the general conformation of the receptor was analyzed.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Monoclonal Antibodies and Cytokines--
The anti-gp190 mAbs
specific for domains D1 (6G8) or D2 (12D3, 8C2) have already been
described (9, 10). The anti-gp130 mAb B-S12 was purchased from Diaclone
(Besançon, France). The anti-c-Myc mAb 9E10 was purified from
cell culture supernatants of the secreting hybridoma provided by Dr.
Ramsay (see Ref. 11). Human OSM and murine interleukin (IL)-3 were as
supernatants of transiently transfected COS cells. Human LIF was
produced in stably transfected CHO cells (12). The cytokines were used
as crude supernatants along with control supernatants of nontransfected recipient cells.
Construction of the gp190 Mutants--
We have already described
the generation of the secreted carboxyl-terminally c-Myc-tagged gp190
(sgp190myc) and its deletion mutants D1IgD2myc, IgD2FNmyc, D1IgFNmyc,
D2FNmyc, D2myc, and FNmyc (8). The creation of the gp190/130 chimeric
transmembrane form that contains the full-length gp190 ectodomain fused
to the transmembrane and intracellular region of gp130 has also been
described (8). The same strategy was used to obtain the D1IgD2/130,
IgD2FN/130, D1IgFN/130, D2FN/130, D2/130, and FN/130 transmembrane
forms of the deletion mutants. We used the transmembrane and
intracellular region of gp130 instead of that of gp190, because the
homodimerization of the intracellular segment of gp190 is not able to
transduce any proliferative signal in contrast to gp130 (9, 13). The truncations within the D2 domain were carried out by PCR, using specific primers. We first prepared the series of mutants containing fragments of D2 deleted from its carboxyl terminus and then fused them
to the D1Ig-encoding region as follows. The piece of D2 domain was
amplified using a sense primer that contained an EcoRV site and a specific antisense primer that contained an XbaI site.
The PCR product was digested and ligated into the pEDr plasmid (14) encoding D1IgD2myc, digested with EcoRV and XbaI
to remove D2. The EcoRV site is located at the beginning of
D2 in the wild-type receptor, and the XbaI site fuses the D2
domain to the c-Myc tag. The following mutants were made, named with
the residue in gp190 sequence after which the deletion was performed:
345,
355,
371,
381,
391,
398,
415,
431,
448,
459,
472,
489,
499, and
514. Residue numbering is
according to Gearing et al. (1). We also prepared mutants
containing fragments of D2 deleted from its amino terminus or its
carboxyl terminus, which we fused to the transmembrane and
intracellular region of gp130 as follows. The D2 domain coding region
was amplified using a specific sense primer that contained an
SpeI site and an antisense primer that contained an
XbaI site for those deleted from D2 amino terminus, or a
sense primer that contained an SpeI site and a specific
antisense primer that contained an XbaI site for those
deleted from D2 carboxyl terminus. The PCR product was digested and
ligated into the pEDr plasmid encoding mycD2/130, digested with
SpeI at the beginning of D2 and XbaI at the
junction between D2 and the transmembrane region. The plasmid
pEDr-mycD2/130 was obtained by digesting the plasmid pEDr-D2/130 with
SpeI and inserting a double-stranded DNA sequence encoding
the c-Myc epitope flanked by XbaI and SpeI sites.
The following mutants bearing deletions from D2 amino terminus were
made, mycD2(432-541)/130 and mycD2(500-541)/130. The following mutants bearing deletions from D2 carboxyl terminus were made, mycD2(332-431)/130, mycD2(332-459)/130, and mycD2(332-499)/130. The
plasmid pEDr-myc/130 was obtained by digesting the plasmid pEDr-mycD2/130 with SpeI and XbaI and then
religating the empty vector. The constructs encoding chimeras fused to
DHFR-(1,2), and DHFR-(3) fragments were obtained as follows. Fragments
encoding DHFR-(1,2) and DHFR-(3) preceded by a 10-amino acid long
linker were excised with XbaI and SmaI from pBS
plasmids, provided by Dr. Michnick, and subcloned in a pZ plasmid,
which corresponds to a pEdr plasmid (14) from which the DHFR gene has
been replaced by the neomycin resistance gene. This pZ plasmid also
contained a gp130 coding sequence that was mutated to bear an
XbaI site at the junction between the transmembrane and the
intracellular region. Then the sequence encompassing the transmembrane,
the linker, and each of the DHFR fragment regions was amplified by PCR
with oligonucleotides bearing SpeI and EcoNI
restriction sites. The digested PCR products were subcloned into the
pEDr-D2/130 and pEDr-myc/130 digested by XbaI and
EcoNI, leading to pEDr-D2-DHFR-(1,2), pEDr-D2-DHFR-(3),
pEDr-myc-DHFR-(1,2), and pEDR-myc-DHFR-(3). All the mutants were
sequenced (Cybergene, Evry, France). The sequences of all the primers
used are available upon request.
Cell Transfection Experiments--
Parent Ba/F3 cells were
maintained in RPMI supplemented with 8% fetal calf serum, 2 mM L-glutamine, and murine IL-3 at a final 1/200 dilution. They were washed and electroporated (280 V, 900 microfarads, infinite resistance) using an Easyject+ electroporator (Eurogentec, Seraing, Belgium), with plasmids pRcglo or pRcglo-gp130, which bore the neomycin resistance gene, in the presence or absence of
the pEDr plasmid containing either the gp190/130 chimera or the
chimeric transmembrane deletion mutants of the gp190 ectodomain. The
cells were plated in medium containing IL-3. At day 1, G418 was added
at 1 mg/ml. Every other day between day 4 and 14, 80% of the culture
medium was replaced by fresh medium containing G418 supplemented or not
with LIF at 50 ng/ml. At day 16, the cells were washed to eliminate
residual traces of IL-3; G418 selection was stopped, and the living
cells were maintained in medium with LIF or without any added cytokine.
For the transient transfection of COS cells, we used the DEAE-dextran
method, as described previously (8). Supernatants were harvested at day
5 after the transfection. For the metabolic labeling experiments, the
35S substrate was added at day 3 for an overnight
incubation before supernatants were harvested. The stable transfection
of the DHFR-deficient CHO-DUCKX cell line was as described elsewhere
(8). All the gp190 deletion mutants we used in this study were cloned
in the pEDr plasmid, which contains a functional DHFR encoding sequence that confers to the transfected CHO-DUCKX cells, the ability to grow in
the nucleoside-free selection medium. All the experiments using
transfected CHO cell lines were performed on confluent monolayers of
cells, at least 3-4 weeks after transfection (around 107
cells per 10-cm diameter dish).
Flow Cytometric Detection of Cell Surface Receptors--
Ba/F3
cells were grown in suspension, and adherent CHO cells were released
following treatment with PBS containing 25 mM EDTA for 10 min at 37 °C prior to staining. For each staining, 2 × 105 cells were incubated for 30 min at 4 °C with
saturating concentrations (10 µg/ml) of the indicated antibody in 0.1 ml of PBS supplemented with 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) and 0.1%
human polyclonal IgG (w/v, both from Sigma). The cells were then washed
twice with the same buffer and incubated for 30 min at 4 °C with the
FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG. After washing with PBS, the cells
were fixed by resuspension in 0.14 ml of PBS containing 1%
formaldehyde (v/v) and analyzed by flow cytometry with a three-color
FACSCalibur flow cytometer (Becton-Dickinson, Mountain View, CA) using
the CellQuest software.
Immunoprecipitation Experiments--
Metabolic labeling of the
recombinant protein expressed in CHO cells was performed as follows.
Cells were starved for 2 h in 4 ml of Dulbecco's modified
Eagle's medium without methionine and cysteine supplemented with 2 mM glutamine and 5% dialyzed fetal calf serum. Then 200 µCi of [35S]methionine/cysteine (Translabel, ICN,
Orsay, France) were added per dish. When supernatants were to be
analyzed, they were harvested 12 h later, centrifuged to remove
debris, and stored at 4 °C until use. For the preparation of cell
lysates, the supernatant was discarded 4 h after the labeling had
begun; the cell layer was washed with PBS, and the cells were lysed in
4 ml of an isotonic lysis buffer (50 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA, 150 mM sodium chloride, 0.2% Nonidet
P-40, pH 8.0) in the presence of protease inhibitors (1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, and 10 µg/ml leupeptin) for 10 min on ice. Then the cell lysate was harvested, centrifuged to remove debris, and stored at
80 °C until use. For
the immunoprecipitation, 1 ml of CHO supernatant or lysate was
pre-cleared one or four times, respectively, with 0.05 ml of a 50%
suspension of protein A-Sepharose beads (Affi-Gel protein A, Bio-Rad)
for 1 h at 4 °C under continuous rolling. Beads were eliminated
by centrifugation, and supernatants were incubated with 20 µg of the
indicated mAb for 2 h under similar conditions. Immune complexes
bound to protein A were sedimented by rapid centrifugation, and beads
were washed three times with 1 ml of lysis buffer. Bead pellets were
resuspended in 0.025 ml of sample loading buffer containing 0.1 M dithiothreitol and boiled for 5 min. Proteins were
separated by SDS-PAGE on 10% gels and visualized by fluorography.
Proliferation Experiments with Transfected Ba/F3 Cell
Lines--
The proliferation assays were conducted as follows. Ba/F3
cells were washed three times with RPMI, and then cells (5 × 103 per well, in 50 µl, in duplicate) were incubated in
the presence of 50 µl of 3-fold dilutions of LIF or OSM or of IL-3 as
a positive control and culture medium without any added cytokine as a
negative control, as indicated. After 3 days at 37 °C, 0.015 ml of a
5 mg/ml solution of 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyl
tetrazolium bromide (MTT, Sigma) in PBS was added to each well. After
4 h at 37 °C, 0.11 ml of a mixture of 95% isopropyl
alcohol + 5% formic acid was added to the wells, and the absorbance
values were read in a Titertek Multiskan microplate reader (Labsystems,
Les Ullis, France) at 570 nm. The blank consisted of eight wells
containing only culture medium.
ELISAs for gp190--
The sandwich ELISA for soluble gp190
measurement has been described previously (15). It uses mAb 6G8 as the
capture mAb and biotinylated 10B2 mAb as the tracing mAb. Both mAb are
directed at the D1Ig fragment of gp190, and the assay has a detection
limit of 0.5 ng/ml. To estimate the relative affinity of the soluble deletion mutants for LIF, we set up a sandwich ELISA as follows. All
steps were performed at room temperature, and plate washes were
performed in PBS containing 0.05% Tween 20. The anti-gp190 mAb 6G8 was
used as a capture mAb. After saturation with PBS containing 1% BSA for
1 h, plates were washed once and then incubated with a saturating
and constant concentration of 200 ng/ml wild-type sgp190myc or its
mutants for 2 h and washed three times. Serial dilutions of
CHO-derived human LIF ranging from 0.256 to 4000 ng/ml were added for
2 h. After 3 washes, plates were incubated with the biotinylated
non-blocking anti-LIF mAb 1F10 at a final concentration of 2 µg/ml
for 1.5 h and washed again 3 times. The plates were then incubated
with peroxidase-labeled streptavidin for 30 min and washed 3 times. The
plates were revealed by the addition of the substrate
tetramethylbenzidine (Sigma) and read at 450 nm after the addition of
half a volume of 1 N sulfuric acid.
Analysis of STAT3 Phosphorylation--
When grown in the
presence of IL-3 or in cytokine-free medium, Ba/F3 cell lines were
washed twice with serum- and cytokine-free RPMI medium before the
activation step. When grown in the presence of LIF, Ba/F3 cells were
first washed twice and starved for 2 days in the presence of IL-3 and
then washed with serum-free and cytokine-free medium. The cells were
activated by incubation for 2 h with cytokine-free medium or
medium containing 50 ng/ml hLIF, in the presence of 8% fetal calf
serum. The cells were then rinsed with ice-cold phosphate-buffered
saline and immediately lysed on ice for 15 min with lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM
EDTA, 1% Triton X-100) in the presence of the phosphatase inhibitor
sodium orthovanadate (2 mM) and proteinase inhibitors. After centrifugation for 10 min at 4 °C, the supernatant was
harvested, and the total protein concentration was determined using the
bicinchoninic acid method (Sigma) using BSA as a standard. The cell
lysate (10 µg of proteins/lane) was boiled for 5 min and separated by
SDS-PAGE on 8% gels and then transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane
(Amersham Biosciences). The membrane was blocked with 0.1% Tween
20/Tris-buffered saline (TBST) supplemented with 5% (w/v) skimmed milk
overnight at 4 °C. The membrane was then incubated in TBST
supplemented with 5% (w/v) milk with a 1:2000 dilution of rabbit
anti-STAT3 serum (R & D Systems Europe, Abingdon, UK) or a 1:1000
dilution of a rabbit anti-phospho-STAT3 antibody (Cell Signaling
Technology, Ozyme, St-Quentin-en-Yvelines, France) for 3 h at room
temperature. After three washes in TBST, the membrane was incubated
with a horseradish peroxidase-labeled goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulin polyclonal antibody (Zymed Laboratories Inc.,
CliniSciences, Montrouge, France) for another hour at room temperature.
The membrane was washed again three times in TBST, and the proteins
were visualized using the chemiluminescence ECL system (Amersham Biosciences).
DHFR Protein Complementation Assay--
The ability of the DHFR
reconstituted from its separated fragments to bind its ligand
methotrexate was studied as described in Remy et al. (16).
DHFR-lacking CHO DUCKX cells, both parent and stable transfectants,
were plated in 24-well plates at 3 × 105 cells/well
and cultured in medium containing dialyzed serum for 22 h at
37 °C in the absence of added nucleosides and in the presence of 10 µM of FITC-labeled methotrexate (fMTX, Molecular Probes, Leiden, The Netherlands). The cell layer was gently washed once in PBS
and incubated for 30 min in the absence of fMTX to allow the efflux of
unbound fMTX from the cell cytoplasm. The cell layer was washed four
times on ice with ice-cold PBS, and the cells were detached with
trypsin in PBS. After neutralization of trypsin with 1:10 volume of
serum, fMTX-DHFR intracellular complexes were analyzed by flow cytometry.
 |
RESULTS |
Proliferative Capacity of Deletion Mutants within gp190
Ectodomain--
A series of deletion mutants within the gp190
ectodomain, which lacked one or several of its constitutive D1, Ig, D2,
or FN modules, namely DIIgD2, IgD2FN, D2FN, D2, D1IgFN, and FN, were obtained fused to gp130 transmembrane and intracellular region (Fig.
1). They were transfected alone or in
combination with full-length gp130 in Ba/F3 cells. The transfectants
were selected by progressive replacement of IL-3, which is required to
sustain parental Ba/F3 cells proliferation, by plain culture medium
without any added cytokine or by culture medium containing LIF. Table
I summarizes the results of these stable
transfection experiments, in terms of ability for the deletion mutants
to confer long term proliferation of the Ba/F3 cell recipient. At least
four transfections were performed, with up to six for the remaining
deletion mutants that were unable to allow cell growth after four
attempts. As already reported, in the presence of LIF, gp130 alone
never led to cell proliferation, because gp190 is required for LIF
binding. Chimeric gp190/130, which contained the full gp190 ectodomain,
only triggered cell proliferation in the presence of gp130 and LIF. The
mutants D1IgD2/130, D1IgFN/130, and FN/130 were not able to sustain
cell survival and proliferation under any of the conditions tested. In
contrast, the IgD2FN, D2FN, and D2 deletion mutants reproducibly conferred long term cell proliferation, which was independent of gp130
or LIF, because it occurred even upon transfection of the gp190 mutant
alone. We also designed a construct where the entire ectodomain of
gp190, but not its signal peptide encoding sequence, was removed and
replaced by a c-Myc tag. This construct called Myc/130 was transfected
under the same conditions. As can be seen in Table I, it did not lead
to gp130- or LIF-dependent or -independent proliferation of
Ba/F3 cells. Therefore, the spontaneous proliferation occurring with
several of the deletion mutants could not be attributed to the
transmembrane and intracellular region of gp130 by itself, which then
was considered to be unable to trigger a productive signal on its
own.

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Schematic description of the deletion mutants
in gp190 ectodomain fused to the transmembrane and intracellular region
of gp130. Membrane-distal CRH (D1), immunoglobulin-like
(Ig), membrane-proximal CRH (D2), type III
fibronectin (FN) domains from gp190 ectodomain were or were
not deleted before fusion to the gp130 transmembrane and intracellular
region (tm+ic130). Filled and open
arrowheads depict the position of residues at the junctions
between the domains or between the two modules constituting D2,
respectively.
|
|
We then verified by flow cytometry using specific anti-gp190 mAb that
the truncated gp190 mutants were expressed on the cell surface for the
stable cell lines raised (Fig. 2,
left panels). Parent murine Ba/F3 cells were not stained
with the anti-D1 monoclonal antibody (mAb) 6G8, the anti-D2 mAb 8C2, or
the anti-gp130 mAb B-S12, all specific to the human receptor chains. As
expected, the Ba/F3 gp190/130+gp130 cell line was stained with these
three antibodies demonstrating the expression of both receptor chains. For the IgD2FN/130, D2FN/130, and D2/130 Ba/F3 cell lines, the D2
domain but not the D1 domain of gp190 nor the gp130 could be detected
on the surface of transfected cells, suggesting a direct relationship
between receptor expression at the cell surface and proliferation. We
then analyzed in a 3-day MTT proliferation assay the cytokine
dependence of the established Ba/F3 transfected cell lines toward
murine IL-3, human LIF, human OSM, or culture medium devoid of any
exogenously added cytokine and compared them with non-transfected
parental Ba/F3 cells (Fig. 2, right panels). As expected, non-transfected Ba/F3 cells proliferated in a
dose-dependent manner only with IL-3 and died in the
absence of cytokine, whereas Ba/F3 gp190/130+gp130 were able to grow in
response to IL-3, LIF, and OSM and died in the absence of these growth
factors. In contrast, the Ba/F3 cell lines expressing D2/130, D2FN/130,
or IgD2FN/130 were completely insensitive to all these cytokines,
indicating that they had already reached their maximal proliferation
potential in the basal state. This result was confirmed by daily
counting a known starting number of each of these cell lines in plain
culture medium over a period of 6 days, because we found that these
cell lines proliferated at very close rates with a doubling time of around 20 h, which is similar to the proliferation rate of the LIF-dependent gp190/130+gp130 Ba/F3 cell line (results not
shown).

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Analysis of membrane expression of gp190
deletion mutants and analysis of cytokine dependence for proliferation
of the stably transfected Ba/F3 cell lines. For flow cytometry
staining, non-transfected (parent) Ba/F3 cells or cells transfected
with gp190/130+gp130, with D2FN/130, with IgD2FN/130, or with D2/130
were labeled with anti-gp130 mAb B-S12 (dotted line,
only for parent and gp190/130+gp130 cells), with anti-D1 mAb 6G8
(thin line), with anti-D2 mAb 8C2 (thick line),
or with an irrelevant antibody (dashed line), before
analysis by flow cytometry. For proliferation assays, each cell line
was incubated with 3-fold dilutions of either murine IL-3 (filled
circles), human LIF (filled squares), human OSM
(open triangles), or plain culture medium (open
squares) for 3 days before analysis of cell viability with the
colorimetric MTT assay at 570 nm. Stock solutions were at 50 ng/ml for
LIF, whereas IL-3 and OSM were in the form of a COS supernatant diluted
1:200.
|
|
As the D1IgD2/130, FN/130, D1IgFN/130, and Myc/130 deletion mutants
might be abnormally processed intracellularly and degraded, and/or not
stable on the cell surface, thereby abrogating any signaling functions,
we stably transfected these mutants in CHO cells and analyzed by flow
cytometry the presence of these molecules at the cell surface of the
emerging cell lines (Fig. 3). For the FN/130 chimera, in the absence of mAb specific for the FN region, the
construct was slightly modified to include a c-Myc tag between the
signal peptide sequence and the beginning of the FN region. Mock-transfected CHO cells were not stained with anti-c-Myc, anti-D1, and anti-D2 mAb, whereas the D1IgD2/130 chimera could be labeled by
both anti-gp190 mAbs, and the mycFN/130 and Myc/130 chimeras could only
be detected with the anti-c-Myc mAb. This demonstrated that D1IgD2/130,
FN/130, and Myc/130 could be stably expressed on the cell surface but
were unable to trigger a productive signal in Ba/F3 cells. In contrast,
the D1IgFN/130 chimera was not detectable on the cell surface. This is
consistent with our previous finding that a D1IgFNmyc-soluble truncated
mutant, despite being abundantly secreted by CHO cells, has a
profoundly altered conformation precluding recognition by anti-gp190
antibodies. Therefore, 1) removal from gp190 ectodomain of the CRH D1
confers to the truncated remaining receptor the ability for Ba/F3 cells
to proliferate in a gp130-independent and cytokine-independent manner
and, 2) the CRH D2 is, by itself, mandatory and sufficient to generate
this phenotype.

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Flow cytometric detection of membrane
expression of gp190 deletion mutants on the surface of stably
transfected CHO cells. Mock-transfected CHO cells or cells
transfected with gp190/130+gp130, with D1IgD2/130, with D1IgFN/130,
with mycFN/130, or with myc/130 were labeled with anti-D1 mAb 6G8
(thin line), with anti-D2 mAb 8C2 (thick line),
or with the anti-c-Myc antibody 9E10 (dashed line) before
analysis by flow cytometry.
|
|
A 42-Residue Carboxyl-terminal Fragment of D2 Confers Autonomous
Cell Proliferation via Constitutive Activation of STAT3--
We then
attempted to identify a putative fragment within D2 that could be
responsible for the cytokine- and gp130-independent proliferation of
Ba/F3 cells. We designed deletion mutants of D2 that were fused to the
transmembrane and intracellular region of gp130. Because only two mAbs
specific for D2 are available (8C2 and 12D3), both
conformation-dependent, we also inserted between the signal
peptide and the beginning of the mutated D2 fragments the c-Myc
epitope. Three constructs bearing deletions from the carboxyl terminus
of D2, one called mycD2(332-431)/130, which encompassed the full
amino-terminal module of D2 (see Fig. 1), and two called
mycD2(332-459)/130 and mycD2(332-499)/130, which also encompassed
fragments of the carboxyl-terminal module of D2, were designed. We also
designed two constructs bearing deletions from D2 amino terminus, one
called mycD2(432-541)/130, which encompassed the full
carboxyl-terminal module of D2, and a shorter one called
mycD2(500-541)/130. As a positive control, we used mycD2/130 composed
of the entire D2 segment. These constructs were stably transfected
alone in Ba/F3 cells, and IL-3 was progressively replaced by culture
medium devoid of any added cytokine. The results of these
experiments are summarized in Table II.
Stably transfected cell lines were reproducibly obtained with mycD2/130
and with the deletion mutants mycD2(432-541)/130 and
mycD2(500-541)/130 in all the transfections performed
(n = 3 experiments). For these, the gp190 truncation
mutant could be detected by flow cytometry with the anti-D2 mAb 8C2
and/or the anti-c-Myc mAb 9E10 (Fig. 4,
panel A). The proliferation of the cells was not influenced by the addition of LIF, OSM or IL-3 to their culture medium in a 3-day
MTT assay (Fig. 4, panel B) or by counting cells daily as
already described (results not shown), and was comparable in growth
rate to that obtained with D2/130 (compare Fig. 4, panel B,
with Fig. 2). In contrast, deletion mutants mycD2(332-431)/130, mycD2(332-459)/130, and mycD2(332-499)/130 did not confer autonomous cell proliferation of Ba/F3 cells because no Ba/F3 cell lines could be
obtained (Table II). When stably transfected in CHO cells, the
truncation mutant mycD2(332-459)/130 could be detected by mAb 8C2 and
9E10, whereas mycD2(332-431)/130 and mycD2(332-499)/130 could not,
suggesting that they were not correctly expressed (results not
shown).

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Analysis of membrane expression of D2
deletion mutants and analysis of the phosphorylation status of STAT3
for the stably transfected Ba/F3 cell lines. Panel
A, flow cytometric detection of D2 fragments of receptor.
Ba/F3 cells transfected with mycD2/130, with mycD2(432-541)/130, or
with mycD2(500-541)/130 were labeled with anti-c-Myc mAb 9E10
(continuous line) with anti-D2 mAb 8C2 (bold
line, for the mycD2/130 cell line only) or with an irrelevant
antibody (dashed line) before analysis by flow cytometry.
Panel B, three days MTT proliferation assay of the stable
cell lines in the presence of cytokines were performed as in Fig. 2.
Panel C, immunoblotting of STAT3 and
phospho-STAT3 (pSTAT3). The indicated cell lines were grown
for 2 days in IL-3-containing medium and then washed and activated in
the presence (+) or the absence ( ) of LIF (50 ng/ml) for 2 h.
Cell lysates (10 µg/lane) were separated by SDS-PAGE on an 8% gel
and immunoblotted with anti-STAT3 or anti-phospho-STAT3 polyclonal
antibodies.
|
|
We hypothesized that the spontaneous growth of Ba/F3 cells expressing
D2/130 and mycD2(500-541)/130 occurred via constitutive activation of
the gp130 signaling pathway. To demonstrate this, we analyzed the
phosphorylation state of the signal transducer and activator of
transcription 3 (STAT3) in these cell lines in the absence of any added
cytokine. As controls, we used parent Ba/F3 cells grown in IL-3 and
Ba/F3 gp190/130+gp130 cells, which were washed to remove the
LIF-containing culture medium and cultured for 2 days in the presence
of IL-3. After final washes, the cells were incubated with a
cytokine-free medium or with LIF for 2 h before lysis and
immunoblotting of phospho-STAT3 as well as STAT3 which served as an
internal control of the amount of protein loaded on the gels (Fig. 4,
panel C). STAT3 was not phosphorylated in parent Ba/F3
cells, even upon stimulation with LIF. In Ba/F3 gp190/130+gp130 cells,
phospho-STAT3 was strongly induced upon incubation with LIF, whereas
small amounts of phospho-STAT3 could still be detected in the presence
of IL-3, which could represent residual activity after the 48-h
starving period. In contrast, phospho-STAT3 was readily strongly
detectable in Ba/F3 expressing D2/130 or mycD2(500-541)/130 in the
absence of stimulation by an exogenous cytokine. Because these cell
lines have been raised in the absence of any cytokine known to activate
STAT3, we concluded that STAT3 was constitutively activated in these
cell lines and that this occurred via an autonomous activation of the
signaling pathway normally triggered by the intracellular region of
gp130. Therefore, a minimal fragment of 42 amino acids of D2
encompassing its two most carboxyl-terminal
-strands was sufficient
to confer cytokine- and gp130-independent growth by gp190 ectodomain
deletion mutants in Ba/F3 cells, via a constitutive activation of the
gp130-triggered STAT3 signaling pathway.
The Ability of D2 to Trigger Autonomous Cell Growth Occurred via
Receptor Homodimerization--
To analyze whether the ability of
D2/130 to trigger autonomous cell proliferation occurred via
spontaneous homodimerization of the D2 fragment, we replaced in the
D2/130 and myc/130 chimeras the intracellular region of gp130 by each
of the DHFR fragments 1-3, respectively, amino-terminal and
carboxyl-terminal, as described by Remy et al. (16) for the
erythropoietin receptor. This system allows the reconstitution of the
enzymatic activity from its two inactive fragments, but only when the
proteins to which they are fused can interact with each other. The
resulting pairs of constructs D2/DHFR-(1,2) and D2/DHFR-(3) on one side
and myc/DHFR-(1,2) and myc/DHFR-(3) on the other as a negative control
were co-transfected in the DHFR-deficient CHO-DUCKX cell line. As a
positive control, we used the pEDr plasmid that encodes a full-length
functional DHFR. Cells were selected by culturing for 2 weeks in
nucleoside-free medium. From a total of six transfections, stable cell
lines were obtained with the full-length DHFR-positive control and
D2-containing constructs in all the transfection experiments performed.
In this latter case only, the cells expressed D2 on the cell surface, as shown by flow cytometry staining (Fig.
5, panel A). In contrast, no
cell line could be obtained with the D2 chimeric constructs when
transfected separately nor with the myc/DHFR-(1,2) and myc/DHFR-(3) constructs when transfected together (0 of 6 transfections), although these chimeric proteins could be observed separately on the cell surface of transiently transfected HEK cells by flow cytometry staining
with the 9E10 mAb, thereby ruling out an anomaly in protein expression
(results not shown). This result confirmed that the DHFR fragments did
not tend to dimerize spontaneously, as already shown (16). To ensure
that the DHFR activity was reconstituted, we determined the ability of
the transfectants to bind methotrexate, an inhibitor of DHFR. Parent
CHO cells and CHO cells transfected with full-length DHFR or the
combination of D2 chimeras were incubated or not with fMTX. Following
efflux of the unbound chemical, the cell suspensions were analyzed by
flow cytometry for residual fluorescence, a probe for the folding and
reconstitution of the functional enzyme from its separate fragments
(Fig. 5, panel B). Parent CHO cells did not significantly
retain fMTX, whereas cells expressing DHFR or the D2 chimeric
constructs efficiently did. Therefore, both the establishment of stable
CHO cell lines and fMTX binding showed that D2 had a propensity to
homodimerize.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Spontaneous homodimerization of the D2 domain
of gp190. Panel A, non-transfected
(parent) CHO cell line or CHO cells stably transfected with the full
DHFR gene or the combination of chimeric D2/DHFR-(1,2) and D2/DHFR-(3)
(D2/DHFR cell line) were stained with an isotype-matched control
antibody (dashed line) or the anti-D2 antibody 8C2
(continuous line). Panel B, the
same cell lines were incubated without (dashed line) or with
(continuous line) fMTX and analyzed by flow cytometry after
efflux of the unbound chemical.
|
|
A Role for the Amino-terminal Module of D2 in Receptor Conformation
and Ligand Binding--
We reported previously (8) that D2 was
required to stabilize the conformation of the minimal LIF-binding
receptor D1IgD2myc via interactions with the D1 fragment. To analyze
which part(s) of D2 was (were) required for this, we constructed a
series of 14 deletion mutants containing the intact D1Ig domain fused
to truncations of the D2 domain from its carboxyl terminus upstream to
the Ig-like module. Following alignment of the protein sequence of D2
with that of the unique gp130 CRH domain, the truncations were designed
to take place at the end of the putative
-strands of gp190 D2, which
were inferred from a comparison with the known three-dimensional
structure of the unique gp130 CRH (Fig.
6). All the constructs were fused
carboxyl-terminally in-frame to the c-Myc epitope recognized by mAb
9E10.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Schematic description of the deletions
performed from the carboxyl terminus of D2. The figure depicts the
sequence of the full D2 domain of gp190, aligned to the unique CRH
domain of gp130 using the Matcher® program, with the identical
residues marked by dots. The deletion mutants created are
named by the symbol followed by the position of the last residue in
the gp190 sequence preceding the truncation. The -strands
constitutive of gp130 CRH domain (23) are boxed. Asterisks
depict, for gp190, the exon junctions between Ig and D2 (exons E7/E8),
D2 and FN (exons E11/E12), or the two modules constitutive of D2
(E9/E10).
|
|
All these mutants were stably transfected in CHO cells, and the
production of the protein was assessed in the cell culture supernatants
using immunoprecipitation with the anti-c-Myc mAb 9E10 after
35S metabolic labeling, as well as by using a sandwich
ELISA specific for gp190 based on two
conformation-dependent mAbs directed against distinct
epitopes in the D1Ig region (Fig. 7,
panel A). The combination of both methods would enable the
detection of all the mutants produced and give information about their
conformation. As shown previously (8) by immunoprecipitation, mutant
D1IgD2myc was efficiently secreted, whereas mutant
332, which
contained the D1Ig fragment but lacked any sequence from D2, was not
detectable. None of the mutants within the amino-terminal module of D2
(i.e.
345,
355,
371,
381,
391,
398, and
415) could be immunoprecipitated from cell culture supernatants, and
none could be measured by ELISA. In contrast, all the mutants within
the carboxyl-terminal module of D2 (right panel) were
immunoprecipitated from supernatants with mAb 9E10 and were present at
levels consistent with those measured by ELISA. Among these, the
shortest two (i.e.
448 and
459) were produced at
levels in the same order of magnitude as D1IgD2myc, whereas the longer
mutants were secreted in much lower amounts (10 times less for
472
and 100 times less for
489,
499, and
514). Among the whole
series of deletion mutants, the shortest secreted mutant that could be
detected by both methods was
431, which encompassed the full
amino-terminal module of D2 and was produced in amounts comparable with
D1IgD2myc.

View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Production of the soluble forms of the gp190
mutants truncated in the D2 domain after stable transfection in CHO
cells. Panel A, analysis of cell culture
supernatants. In upper panels, CHO cells stably transfected
with the indicated c-Myc-tagged truncation mutants were metabolically
labeled with [35S]methionine and -cysteine, and
supernatants were immunoprecipitated (IP) with the
anti-c-Myc mAb 9E10 and separated by SDS-PAGE on 10% gels before
autoradiography. The band that can be seen at around 46 kDa on the
left panel is not specific because it can also be detected
when immunoprecipitation is performed with an isotype-matched control
antibody (data not shown). Mutant 514 in the right panel
is barely detectable because it is secreted very weakly. In lower
panels, mutants of gp190 were quantitated by a sandwich ELISA
based on mAb 6G8 and 10B2 which are conformation-dependent
and specific to the D1Ig region. The detection limit of the ELISA is
around 0.5 ng/ml. The production is expressed in ng/ml as an order of
magnitude (mean from three experiments). Panel B,
analysis of cell lysates. CHO cells were metabolically labeled, and
cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with the anti-Myc antibody 9E10
(upper panels) or the anti-D1 antibody 6G8 (lower
panels) before electrophoresis and autoradiography. In this
figure, left and right panels depict the
truncation mutants performed within the amino-terminal and
carboxyl-terminal modules, respectively. Mutants 459 and 472
within D2 carboxyl-terminal module were analyzed only by ELISA. For the
gels, size markers (kDa) are also indicated.
|
|
To verify that the mutants were efficiently expressed by the cells,
they were immunoprecipitated from cell lysates with the anti-c-Myc mAb
9E10 or the anti-D1 mAb 6G8 (Fig. 7, panel B). All could be
recovered with mAb 9E10, including the deletion mutants within the D2
amino-terminal module. However, none of the deletion mutants within the
D2 amino-terminal module were recognized by the
conformation-dependent mAb 6G8. These results strongly
suggested the following: 1) deletions within the amino-terminal module
of D2 led to profound conformational alterations precluding the
secretion of the mutants, and 2) the amino-terminal module of D2 is
required for a correct conformation of D1Ig.
We then analyzed the LIF binding capacity of
431,
448, and
459, the shortest truncation mutants with the highest
secretion levels, by comparison with D1IgD2myc. For this purpose, we
set up a sandwich ELISA based on the capture of the receptor fragment at a saturating concentration by the non-blocking anti-D1 mAb 6G8,
followed by the incubation with serial dilutions of LIF. The LIF bound
to the receptor is subsequently detected using as a tracer the
non-neutralizing anti-LIF mAb 1F10. As shown in Fig. 8, the three mutants displayed a
comparable ability to bind LIF, which was slightly better than that of
D1IgD2myc which itself is known to behave like gp190myc (8). Therefore,
the carboxyl-terminal module of D2 is dispensable for LIF binding as it
does not seem to be necessary for a functional conformation of the
entire ectodomain of gp190.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
ELISA determination of the LIF binding
ability of gp190 deletion mutants truncated within the D2 domain.
A constant and saturating (200 ng/ml) concentration of CHO cell
supernatants containing D1IgD2myc (filled circles), 431
(open squares), 448 (open circles), 459
(open triangles), or a negative control supernatant
(filled triangles) were adsorbed on an ELISA plate coated
with the anti-D1 antibody 6G8. After washing and incubation of serial
dilutions of LIF, bound LIF was detected with the 1F10 antibody.
Results are expressed as percentage of the maximal binding obtained
with D1IgD2myc (OD ~0.8 unit, with background in the absence of LIF
at 0.02 unit). One representative of three experiments is shown.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
We demonstrated in a previous work (8) that domain D2 of gp190 was
required for a functional receptor to be produced and that the ability
to bind LIF relied on both the presence of D1 and a superstructure
involving direct contacts between the two CRH domains. We report here
that this property of D2 lies within its amino-terminal module that
needs to be intact for both appropriate secretion of the receptor and
LIF binding, because even the deletion of its most distal putative
-strand leads to a dramatic disruption of receptor conformation. To
date, it is not yet known whether this interaction between the two
domains occurs in cis (i.e. within the same
molecule) or in trans between two gp190 molecules. However, the recent discovery that the
-common receptor chain exists as an
homodimer of tightly bound monomers may also be true for gp190. Like
gp190,
-common consists of two CRH domains, and the most carboxyl-terminal strand of the amino-terminal module in the
membrane-distal CRH of one partner is shown to interact with the
amino-terminal module of the membrane-proximal CRH of the other partner
in the dimer (7). Here we demonstrate that the membrane-proximal domain of gp190 seems to behave like that of the
-common chain. Therefore, it is conceivable that impairment of the dimerization of the two chains
would dramatically alter the conformation of the full receptor ectodomain. The
-common model might therefore suggest that gp190 also exists as a preformed homodimer in the absence of ligand. We
previously raised this hypothesis following the determination of
binding stoichiometries of anti-human gp190 antibodies by the Scatchard
method. In this work, we noticed that several mAbs bound to 2-fold less
receptors than other mAbs on the surface of cells expressing either
recombinant or natural gp190 molecules, which could suggest that
certain epitopes might be masked, possibly due to receptor
homodimerization (17). If so, the stoichiometry of the LIF signaling
receptor complex would be more complex than the currently acknowledged
heterodimer of gp190 and gp130 (18, 19), because it could associate two
gp190 and at least one gp130.
Our results also suggest that the carboxyl-terminal module of D2 has a
different task in the receptor function. It is able to trigger
cytokine- and gp130-independent proliferation of Ba/F3 cells when fused
to the transmembrane and intracellular region of gp130 via a
spontaneous homodimerization. A more thorough analysis of this module
showed that this property lies within the carboxyl-terminal module of
D2, and more precisely within a 42-residue-long fragment at the
carboxyl terminus of this module. This short stretch contains a
(Y/F)XX(R/Q)XR consensus sequence, where
X can be any residue, which has been found to exert a
similar function in the
-common receptor chain using a similar
approach of progressive truncation in the receptor ectodomain (4). This
sequence is upstream of the conserved WSXWS motif and makes
the F
-strand within the CRH carboxyl-terminal module. In the
unique CRH of gp130, this sequence is also found and in a similar
position. It is striking that the unique gp130 CRH is closer to gp190
CRH D2 than to D1, both at the amino acid sequence level and in a
predictive model of D2 spatial conformation (20). Especially within
this 42-amino acid-long stretch, 19 residues are identical (45.2 versus 25.7% over the whole CRH domain), and the consensus
motif pointed out above differs by only 1 amino acid between gp130 and
D2 (YVFRIR for gp130 and YTFRIR for gp190 D2). Because spatial modeling
suggested that D2 could directly interact with the gp130 CRH (20) and because we demonstrated that D2 spontaneously homodimerizes, we suggest
that interaction between gp190 and gp130 in the high affinity signal-transducing LIF receptor could occur via this highly conserved motif. However, more work is needed to confirm this hypothesis, because
in the experiments reported in the present work the occurrence of
spontaneous homodimerization of D2 precluded the analysis of heterodimerization with gp130. The situation may be even more complex,
because in the case of the D2FN/130 mutant, the presence of gp130
abrogated its capacity to trigger autonomous proliferation. We have no
clues to explain this, but it remains possible that non-productive
heterodimerization of both chains could occur. In this regard, recent
work (21, 22) documented an important role for the FN region of gp130
in the receptor function.
It is intriguing to note that none of the D2-containing receptor
mutants that triggered autonomous signaling contained the D1 CRH,
because neither gp190/130 nor D1IgD2/130 chimeras were able to
stimulate cell proliferation when transfected alone. Therefore, these
results suggest that the dimerization motif on the gp190/130 and
D1IgD2/130 receptors is not free to interact with another chain and
that D1 is also involved in this restriction. If gp190 does exist as an
homodimer, spontaneous homodimerization via D2 could be prevented
simply by virtue of the distance between the carboxyl-terminal modules
of D2 monomers resulting from their spatial locations in the dimer, as
is the case for the
-common. Indeed, the present available model of
the ligand-receptor
-chain-
-common complex does not favor a
ligand-induced movement of these modules toward each other but on the
contrary suggests that the low affinity complex between the ligand and
its specific
-chain could sneak into the cavity delineated by the
interlocked
-common chains (7). In the absence of the
membrane-distal CRH domain, these structural constraints disappear
allowing for the two membrane-proximal gp190 CRHs to interact freely
between each other, leading to constitutive signaling. In the presence
of LIF, a possible scenario could be that after the cytokine has bound
to gp190, a conformational adjustment in the D2 domain is induced that
unmasks its dimerization motif. Simultaneously, recruitment of gp130 by
the LIF-gp190 complex could trigger a similar change in gp130 unique
CRH, allowing the two motifs to interact with each other, and bring the
downstream regions of the receptor in close enough proximity to lead to
the transduction of the activation signal. Therefore, as suggested for
the
-common model, the LIF-gp190-gp130 functional complex would
contain two molecules of each partner. Further experiments are needed
to evaluate this hypothesis.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We are indebted to Dr. Stephen W. Michnick
and Dr. Ingrid Remy, from the Département de Biochimie,
Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec,
Canada, for providing the DHFR protein complementation assay, for
helpful advice, and for critical reading of the manuscript.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by the Ligue Nationale
Contre le Cancer (Comités de la Gironde, de la Dordogne, des
Pyrénées-Atlantiques) and by the Association pour la
Recherche sur le Cancer.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Both authors contributed equally to this work.
§
Supported by a grant from the Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer.
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.:
33-5-57-57-14-71; Fax: 33-5-57-57-14-72; E-mail:
jean-luc.taupin@umr5540.u-bordeaux2.fr.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, February 7, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M111624200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
LIF, leukemia
inhibitory factor;
CRH, cytokine receptor homology domain;
D1, gp190
membrane-distal cytokine binding domain;
D2, gp190 membrane-proximal
cytokine binding domain;
Ig-like, immunoglobulin-like module;
FN, type
III fibronectin repeats;
OSM, oncostatin M;
CNTF, ciliary neurotrophic
factor;
CT-1, cardiotrophin-1;
TPO, thrombopoietin;
mAb, monoclonal
antibody;
IL, interleukin;
MTT, 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide;
DHFR, dihydrofolate reductase;
STAT3, signal transducer and activator of
transcription 3;
fMTX, fluorescein-labeled methotrexate;
ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay;
gp, glycoprotein;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
BSA, bovine serum albumin;
CHO, Chinese
hamster ovary.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Gearing, D. P.,
Thut, C. J.,
VandenBos, T.,
Gimpel, S. D.,
Delaney, P. J.,
King, J.,
Price, V.,
Cosman, D.,
and Beckmann, M. P.
(1991)
EMBO J.
10,
2839-2848[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Heinrich, P. C.,
Behrmann, I.,
Muller-Newen, G.,
Schaper, F.,
and Graeve, L.
(1998)
Biochem. J.
334,
2297-2314
|
| 3.
|
Senaldi, G.,
Varnum, B. C.,
Sarmiento, U.,
Starnes, C.,
Lile, J.,
Scully, S.,
Guo, J.,
Elliott, G.,
McNinch, J.,
Shaklee, C. L.,
Freeman, D.,
Manu, F.,
Simonet, W. S.,
Boone, T.,
and Chang, M. S.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
11458-11463[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 4.
|
D'Andrea, R. J.,
Barry, S. C.,
Moretti, P. A. B.,
Jones, K.,
Ellis, S.,
Vadas, M. A.,
and Goodall, G. J.
(1996)
Blood
87,
2641-2648[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Woodcock, J. M.,
Bagley, C. J.,
Zacharakis, B.,
and Lopez, A. F.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
25999-26006[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Sabath, D. F.,
Kaushansky, K.,
and Broudy, V. C.
(1999)
Blood
94,
365-367[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Carr, P. D.,
Gustin, S. E.,
Church, A. P.,
Murphy, J. M.,
Ford, S. C.,
Mann, D. A.,
Woltring, D. M.,
Walker, I.,
Ollis, D. L.,
and Young, I. G.
(2001)
Cell
104,
291-300[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Taupin, J.-L.,
Miossec, V.,
Pitard, V.,
Blanchard, F.,
Daburon, S.,
Raher, S.,
Jacques, Y.,
Godard, A.,
and Moreau, J. F.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
14482-14489[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Taupin, J.-L.,
Legembre, P.,
Bitard, J.,
Daburon, S.,
Pitard, V.,
Blanchard, F.,
Duplomb, L.,
Godard, A.,
Jacques, Y.,
and Moreau, J. F.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
47975-47981[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Pitard, V.,
Taupin, J.-L.,
Miossec, V.,
Blanchard, F.,
Cransac, M.,
Jollet, I.,
Vernallis, A.,
Hudson, K.,
Godard, A.,
Jacques, Y.,
and Moreau, J. F.
(1997)
J. Immunol. Methods
205,
177-190[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Evan, G. I.,
Lewis, G. K.,
Ramsay, G.,
and Bishop, J. M.
(1985)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
5,
3610-3616[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Taupin, J.-L.,
Gualde, N.,
and Moreau, J. F.
(1997)
Cytokine
9,
112-118[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Starr, R.,
Novak, U.,
Willson, T. A.,
Inglese, M.,
Murphy, V.,
Alexander, W. S.,
Metcalf, D.,
Nicola, N. A.,
Hilton, D. J.,
and Ernst, M.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
19982-19986[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Kaufman, R. J.,
Davies, M. V.,
Wasley, L. C.,
and Michnick, D.
(1991)
Nucleic Acids Res.
19,
4485-4490[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Pitard, V.,
Lorgeot, V.,
Taupin, J.-L.,
Aubard, Y.,
Praloran, V.,
and Moreau, J. F.
(1998)
Eur. Cytokine Netw.
9,
599-605[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Remy, I.,
Wilson, I. A.,
and Michnick, S. W.
(1999)
Science
283,
990-993[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Blanchard, F.,
Pitard, V.,
Taupin, J.-L.,
Raher, S.,
Hallet, M. M.,
Moreau, J. F.,
Godard, A.,
and Jacques, Y.
(1997)
Int. Immunol.
9,
1775-1784[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Grotzinger, J.,
Kernebeck, T.,
Kallen, K. J.,
and Rose-John, S.
(1999)
Biol. Chem.
380,
803-813[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Bravo, J.,
and Heath, J. K.
(2000)
EMBO J.
19,
2399-2411[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Smith, D. K.,
and Treutlein, H. R.
(1998)
Protein Sci.
7,
886-896[Abstract]
|
| 21.
|
Hammacher, A.,
Wijdenes, J.,
Hilton, D. J.,
Nicola, N. A.,
Simpson, R. J.,
and Layton, J. E.
(2000)
Biochem. J.
345,
25-32[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Kurth, I.,
Horsten, U.,
Pflanz, S.,
Timmermann, A.,
Kuster, A.,
Dahmen, H.,
Tacken, I.,
Heinrich, P. C.,
and Muller-Newen, G.
(2000)
J. Immunol.
164,
273-282[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Bravo, J.,
Staunton, D.,
Heath, J. K.,
and Jones, E. Y.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
1665-1674[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit