![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 16, 13732-13738, April 19, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
,
From the
Cell Biology Program and the
§ Molecular Pharmacology and Therapeutics Program, Memorial
Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10021 and the
¶ Basic Research Laboratory and Laboratory of Immunobiology,
Division of Basic Sciences, NCI-Frederick Cancer Research and
Development Center, Frederick, Maryland 21702
Received for publication, January 10, 2002
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Dok-1 is an adaptor protein that is a substrate
for Bcr-Abl and other tyrosine protein kinases. The presence of
pleckstrin homology and phosphotyrosine binding domains as well
as multiple tyrosine phosphorylation sites suggests that Dok-1 is
involved in protein-protein and/or protein-lipid interactions. Here we show that stimulation of Mo7 hematopoietic cells with c-Kit ligand (KL)
induces phosphatidylinositol (PI) 3-kinase-dependent
tyrosine phosphorylation and membrane recruitment of Dok-1. Addition of the K-Ras membrane-targeting motif to Dok-1 generated a constitutively membrane-bound Dok-1 protein whose tyrosine phosphorylation was independent of PI 3-kinase. Membrane localization of Dok-1 was required
for its ability to function as a negative regulator of cell
proliferation. Additional experiments revealed that Dok-1 associated
with the juxtamembrane region and C-terminal tail of c-Kit. Lyn
promoted phosphorylation of c-Kit and association of c-Kit and Dok-1.
Both Lyn and Tec were capable of phosphorylating Dok-1. However, the
use of primary bone marrow mast cells from normal and Lyn-deficient
mice demonstrated that Lyn is required for KL-dependent
Dok-1 tyrosine phosphorylation. Taken together, these data indicate
that activation of PI 3-kinase by KL promotes binding of the Dok
pleckstrin homology domain and Dok-1 recruitment to the plasma membrane
where Dok-1 is phosphorylated by Src and/or Tec family kinases.
In patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia, the
c-abl gene is translocated from chromosome 9 to chromosome
22 to produce a hybrid bcr-abl gene (1-3). The fusion
protein that results from this translocation, p210Bcr-Abl, encodes a
tyrosine kinase whose activation results in phosphorylation of a number
of cellular proteins including SHIP1, SHIP2, Cbl, Lyn, SHC, and Dok-1
(4). These proteins are also tyrosine-phosphorylated when cells are stimulated with c-Kit ligand
(KL),1 a growth factor that
is critical for normal hematopoiesis. KL binding to the c-Kit receptor
results in dimerization and autophosphorylation of c-Kit and
phosphorylation of PI 3-kinase, Tec, phospholipase C We have been studying the role of Dok-1 in normal and malignant cell
signaling. Dok-1 is tyrosine-phosphorylated in response to a variety of
growth factors including platelet-derived growth factor, insulin-like
growth factor, vascular endothelial growth factor,
granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulated factor, interleukin-3 (IL-3),
and KL. Cloning of the Dok-1 cDNA revealed that the overall structure of Dok-1 is similar to insulin receptor substrate-1 (IRS-1),
which harbors an N-terminal pleckstrin homology (PH) domain, a central
phosphotyrosine binding domain, and a C-terminal tail containing
multiple tyrosine phosphorylation sites (8, 9). The PH domain of Dok-1
is thought to mediate protein interaction with the plasma membrane
possibly by binding to phospholipids. The phosphotyrosine binding
domain of Dok-1 is thought to mediate protein-protein interactions by
binding to phosphotyrosine-containing motifs with the sequence of
NPXpY (10, 11). The multiple tyrosine residues at the
C-terminal region are phosphorylated in response to various growth
factors. When phosphorylated they act as docking sites for
SH2-containing proteins such as p120RasGAP and NCK (12).
Analysis of Dok-1 In this study, we examine the mechanisms involved in tyrosine
phosphorylation, membrane recruitment, and signal transduction by Dok-1
during KL stimulation. Here we report that Dok-1 becomes tyrosine-phosphorylated and recruited to the membrane in a PI 3-kinase-dependent manner when Mo7 hematopoietic cells are
stimulated with KL. Removal of the PH domain of Dok-1 results in loss
of membrane localization and phosphorylation. However, Dok-1
phosphorylation can be restored by replacing the PH domain with the
membrane-targeting motif of K-Ras, implying that membrane localization
is required for Dok-1 phosphorylation. We demonstrate that Dok-1
associates with the juxtamembrane region and C-terminal tail of c-Kit.
Moreover, we show that Lyn is necessary for KL-stimulated tyrosine
phosphorylation of Dok-1 during c-Kit signal transduction.
cDNA Constructs--
Constitutively membrane-targeted Dok
proteins were generated by attaching the K-Ras tail
(farnesyl/polybasic) to the C terminus of wild type Dok-1 or the
Immunoprecipitation and Antibodies--
Mo7 cells, BMMC, or
COS-1 cells were lysed in lysis buffer containing 50 mM
Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 1% Nonidet P-40, 1 mM Na3VO4, 10 mM NaF, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride,
0.5 µg/ml leupeptin, and 0.5 µg/ml aprotinin. COS-1 cells
expressing membrane-targeted Dok-1 were lysed in radioimmune precipitation buffer (15). Prior to immunoprecipitation cell lysates
were clarified by centrifugation at 100,000 × g for 15 min. The antibodies used in this study were affinity-purified rabbit
anti-Dok-1 (8), rabbit anti-Tec raised against a synthetic peptide
corresponding to amino acid residues 165-182 (KRRPPPPIPPEEENTEEI), rabbit anti-SHIP1 (a gift from Dr. W. M. Kavanaugh, Chiron
Corporation, Emeryville, CA), rabbit anti-SHIP2 prepared as described
(4), rabbit anti-Lyn, rabbit anti-c-Kit, mouse anti-Dok-1, anti-Tyr(P) 99 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, CA), rabbit anti-p85 (Upstate
Biotechnology, Lake Placid, NY), mouse anti-Lyn, and mouse anti-SHC
(Transduction Laboratories). Western blots were detected with ECL
reagents (Amersham Biosciences).
Cell Culture and DNA Transfection--
The Mo7 megakaryoblastic
cell line was maintained in Iscove's modified Dulbecco's medium
(IMDM) containing 20% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (HyClone
Laboratories, Logan, UT) supplemented with 10 ng/ml human rIL-3 (BD
PharMingen) at 37 °C and 5% CO2. BMMC were maintained
in IMDM containing 10% fetal bovine serum and murine 30 ng/ml rIL-3.
Mo7 cells were transfected by electroporation with 15-30 µg of
plasmid DNA. Mo7 cells (20 × 106/300 µl) were
pulsed at 126 V and 1700 µF using an ECM 600 (BTX) electroporator and
were collected 18 h after transfection. For stimulation with c-Kit
ligand Mo7 cells or BMMC were washed free of growth factor and starved
overnight at 37 °C in IMDM containing 1% fetal bovine serum. Cells
were harvested by centrifugation, resuspended in IMDM + 1% serum at a
concentration of 10 × 106/ml, and stimulated with
human or mouse c-Kit ligand (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) at a
concentration of 100 ng/ml for 5 min at 37 °C. For treatments with
wortmannin (Sigma) or Src family kinase inhibitor PP2 (Calbiochem, La
Jolla, CA), Mo7 cells were first starved overnight and then incubated
with various concentrations of drugs for 1 h before the cells were
stimulated with human c-Kit ligand. Cells were then pelleted, lysed,
and processed for immunoprecipitation and Western blot analysis.
COS-1 cells were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium
containing 10% fetal bovine serum at 37 °C and 5% CO2.
Cells were transfected with LipofectAMINE 2000 (Invitrogen) as
described by the manufacturer. For stimulation with c-Kit ligand, COS-1 cells first were starved overnight in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 1% fetal bovine serum and then were stimulated with
200 ng/ml c-Kit ligand for 10 min at 37 °C.
Cell Fractionation--
Cells were resuspended in hypotonic
buffer, lysed by homogenization with 30 strokes of a Dounce
homogenizer, and centrifuged at 100,000 × g for
1 h to obtain a cytosolic fraction (S100) and a membrane fraction
(P100) as described (16).
Immune Complex Kinase Assays--
Mo7 cell lysates were
immunoprecipitated with either polyclonal anti-Lyn, anti-c-Kit, or
anti-Tec antibodies. Immune complexes were washed with lysis buffer and
resuspended in 30 µl of kinase buffer containing 20 mM
Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM MnCl2, 10 mM MgCl2, and 10 µCi of
[ GST Binding Assays--
GST fusion proteins of juxtamembrane,
kinase 1, kinase insert, and C-terminal tail domains of c-Kit were
purified using glutathione-Sepharose 4B as described by the
manufacturer (Amersham Biosciences). The protein concentration of the
various GST fusion proteins was determined using the Bradford method
(Bio-Rad). Phosphorylated GST fusion proteins were generated by
incubating 5 µg of GST fusion proteins in kinase assay buffer with
Lyn immunoprecipitates from Mo7 cell lysates. Lyn immunoprecipitates
were removed by centrifugation. The supernatant containing
phosphorylated GST fusion proteins was then added to KL-treated Mo7
cell lysates in the presence of 12 µl of glutathione-Sepharose 4B
beads. Unphosphorylated GST fusion proteins were used as control. The
mixture was gently agitated at 4 °C for 2 h, and the beads were
washed three times with Mo7 lysis buffer. The samples were boiled for 5 min in SDS sample buffer and analyzed by SDS-PAGE.
[3H]Thymidine Incorporation Assay--
COS-1 cells
were transfected with either wild type Dok-1, membrane-targeted wild
type Dok-1 (Dok-1-KRas), Tyrosine Phosphorylation of Dok-1 Is Inhibited by the PI 3-Kinase
Inhibitor Wortmannin--
Previous studies have established that Dok-1
is tyrosine-phosphorylated in KL-stimulated Mo7 cells (8). Because
Dok-1 contains a PH domain, and many PH domains bind to the products of
PI 3-kinase, we tested whether PI 3-kinase was involved in a
KL-mediated signaling pathway leading to Dok-1 phosphorylation. Mo7
cells were starved overnight and then incubated in the presence or
absence of 100 nM wortmannin for 1 h prior to
stimulation with KL. As indicated in Fig.
1, Dok-1 was tyrosine-phosphorylated in
response to KL. Addition of wortmannin inhibited KL-stimulated
phosphorylation of Dok-1 by >90%. Wortmannin had no effect on the
level of tyrosine phosphorylation of the c-Kit. Western blotting with
anti-Dok-1 or anti-c-Kit antibodies revealed the presence of the same
amount of Dok-1 and c-Kit in each sample. These data suggest that
KL-stimulated tyrosine phosphorylation of Dok-1 is PI
3-kinase-dependent.
Dok-1 Is Recruited to the Membrane upon c-Kit Stimulation--
The
products of PI 3-kinase enzymatic activity (PI(3,4)P2 and
PI(3,4,5)P3) form a binding site in the plasma
membrane for proteins with PH domains. We tested whether activation of
Mo7 cells with KL promoted recruitment of Dok-1 to the membrane via a
PI 3-kinase-dependent mechanism. Mo7 cells were starved
overnight and treated with or without wortmannin for 1 h prior to
stimulation with KL. Cells were lysed in hypotonic buffer and separated
into cytosolic (S100) and membrane (P100) fractions by differential ultracentrifugation. As indicated in Fig.
2A, in the absence of KL
stimulation little or no [Tyr(P)]Dok-1 was observed. However, when
Mo7 cells were stimulated with KL most (70%) of the [Tyr(P)]Dok-1 was localized to the membrane fraction (P100). Western blotting with
anti-Dok-1 antibody revealed that there was no significant change in
the distribution of total Dok-1 before and after KL stimulation,
suggesting that only a small amount of Dok-1 was phosphorylated upon KL
stimulation.
To test whether the PH domain of Dok-1 was required for membrane
association, a precise deletion of the PH domain was generated within
Dok-1. The wild type and Membrane Binding of Dok-1 Is Required for Tyrosine
Phosphorylation--
The next set of experiments was designed to
determine whether tyrosine phosphorylation of Dok-1 precedes or follows
membrane binding. To distinguish between these two possibilities, we
generated a chimeric Dok-1 protein that was constitutively targeted to
the plasma membrane. This was accomplished by fusing the
membrane-targeting motif of K-Ras (farnesyl + polybasic) to the C
terminus of wild type and Membrane-targeted Dok-1-KRas Is Hyperphosphorylated, and Its
Phosphorylation Is PI 3-Kinase-independent--
We next tested whether
the addition of a K-Ras tail to full-length Dok-1 could bypass the
requirement for PI 3-kinase for Dok-1 tyrosine phosphorylation. COS-1
cells were transfected with wild type Dok-1 or Dok-1-KRas and empty
vector or Expression of the Constitutively Membrane-targeted Dok-1 Inhibits
Cell Proliferation--
Dok-1 has been reported to be a negative
regulator of cell growth (17). To determine the significance of
membrane localization for Dok-1 function, COS-1 cells were transfected
with wild type Dok-1, Dok-1-KRas,
The mechanism by which membrane translocation contributes to the
ability of Dok-1 to inhibit cell proliferation is not yet known. In B
cells, binding of Dok-1 to the membrane-bound Fc Dok-1, Lyn, and Tec Form Complexes with c-Kit--
The next set of
experiments was designed to identify the kinase(s) responsible for
KL-stimulated phosphorylation of Dok-1. The likely candidates were
c-Kit itself as well as Lyn and Tec kinases, which have been shown to
interact with c-Kit. Mo7 cells were incubated in the presence or
absence of KL, and cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with antibodies
to Dok-1, Lyn, or Tec. Western blotting of anti-Dok-1
immunoprecipitates with anti-Tyr(P) antibody revealed the presence of a
145-kDa phosphoprotein that coprecipitated with Dok-1 with higher
levels present in KL-stimulated cells. Reprobing of the Western blot
with anti-c-Kit antibody revealed that the 145-kDa protein was c-Kit
(Fig. 6A). c-Kit also associated with Lyn in a KL-independent manner as has previously been
reported (7). Probing of anti-Tec immunoprecipitates with anti-Tyr(P)
antibody revealed the presence of c-Kit in the KL-treated samples. The
level of tyrosine phosphorylation of endogenous Tec was very low, and
little tyrosine-phosphorylated Dok-1 was observed in these complexes.
Two proteins with molecular masses of 62 and 70 kDa were detected when
the blot was stripped and reprobed with anti-Tec antibody. These likely
represent isoforms of Tec kinases, which have been reported to result
from alternative splicing (18). Upon KL stimulation,
tyrosine-phosphorylated SHC was detected in the anti-Tec
immunoprecipitates (data not shown). These data indicate that c-Kit
forms complexes with Dok-1, Lyn, and Tec.
Dok-1 Interacts with the Juxtamembrane Region and C-terminal
Tail of c-Kit--
GST fusion pulldown experiments were performed to
identify the region(s) of c-Kit that interacts with Dok-1. GST fusion
proteins containing the juxtamembrane, kinase insert, and C-terminal
tail regions as well as the first half of the kinase domain of c-Kit were purified from Escherichia coli. Because the interaction
between Dok-1 and c-Kit was likely to be Tyr(P)-dependent,
the fusion proteins were first phosphorylated by incubation with Lyn
immunoprecipitates from Mo7 cells. As depicted in Fig. 6B
the juxtamembrane region and C-terminal tail of c-Kit were
phosphorylated. The fusion proteins were then incubated with lysates
from KL-stimulated Mo7 cells, and the amount of Dok-1 that was bound
was determined. As indicated in Fig. 6C only the
phosphorylated juxtamembrane region and C-terminal tail of c-Kit
associated with phosphorylated Dok-1. Phosphorylation of the GST fusion
proteins was necessary for association with Dok-1 because no
interaction occurred when the fusion proteins were not
prephosphorylated by Lyn (data not shown).
Tyrosine Phosphorylation of Dok-1 and c-Kit by Src Family
Kinases--
The Src family member Lyn has been shown to be required
for KL-mediated responses of mast cells and progenitor cells (25). Because Lyn constitutively associates with c-Kit in Mo7 cells, we
tested whether Lyn is necessary for c-Kit to achieve maximum tyrosine
phosphorylation and activation. c-Kit was expressed alone or was
coexpressed with Lyn in COS-1 cells, and c-Kit tyrosine phosphorylation
was examined upon stimulation with c-Kit ligand. As depicted in Fig.
7A, upon KL stimulation
tyrosine phosphorylation of c-Kit was detected. However, in the
presence of Lyn, KL stimulation of c-Kit phosphorylation increased
~10-fold, indicating that Src family kinases promote maximal
phosphorylation of c-Kit.
Because Src family kinases (especially Lyn) are activated in response
to KL, we tested whether Dok-1 is phosphorylated by Src family kinases.
Dok-1 was expressed alone or coexpressed with the Src family kinase
Fyn, and tyrosine phosphorylation of Dok-1 was examined. As depicted in
Fig. 7B, tyrosine phosphorylation of Dok-1 increased
~20-fold when wild type Fyn was coexpressed, whereas expression of a
kinase-inactive mutant of Fyn mutant (K299M) had no effect on Dok-1
tyrosine phosphorylation.
To study the role of Src family kinases in the c-Kit pathway, we
attempted to reconstitute the KL signaling system in COS-1 cells. As
depicted in Fig. 7C, when COS-1 cells were transfected with
Dok-1 alone Dok-1 was phosphorylated to low levels by endogenous kinases, and addition of KL had no effect. KL stimulation of COS-1 cells expressing Dok-1 and c-Kit resulted in a 2-fold increase in the
tyrosine phosphorylation of Dok-1 compared with cells without KL
stimulation. However, when COS-1 cells were cotransfected with Dok-1,
c-Kit, and Fyn the tyrosine phosphorylation of Dok-1 increased 10-fold,
and stimulation with KL resulted in an additional 2-fold increase.
Moreover, the Dok-1·c-Kit receptor complex was only detected when Fyn
was present (data not shown). When the kinase-inactive mutant of Fyn
was expressed in place of wild type Fyn, tyrosine phosphorylation of
Dok-1 dramatically decreased. These data strongly suggest that Src
family kinases mediate tyrosine phosphorylation of Dok-1.
Tyrosine Phosphorylation of Dok-1 by Tec--
Both Lyn and Tec are
expressed in KL-responsive Mo7 cells (6, 7). The abilities of Lyn and
Tec kinases to phosphorylate Dok-1 were compared directly as follows.
Mo7 cells were starved overnight and then stimulated with KL. Lyn and
Tec kinases were immunoprecipitated from the same amount of cell
lysate. In vitro kinase assays were performed using
recombinant Dok-1 as substrate in the presence of
[
It is possible that the inability to detect phosphorylated Dok-1 in
anti-Tec immunoprecipitates was due to low levels of Tec kinase in Mo7
cells. Experiments designed to increase the level of Tec were not
feasible in Mo7 cells because of low transfection efficiencies combined
with a loss of KL responsiveness following electroporation. We
therefore expressed Tec in COS-1 cells and directly compared the
ability of Tec and Lyn kinases to phosphorylate Dok-1 in
vivo. As depicted in Fig. 8C both Tec and Lyn were
capable of phosphorylating Dok-1 to equivalent extents. Cotransfection of both Tec and Lyn resulted in a 2-fold increase in Dok-1
phosphorylation compared with Tec alone. A similar effect was recently
noted by van Dijk et al. (13). This is consistent with the
ability of Src family kinases to phosphorylate and thereby activate Tec
family kinases (18, 24). We conclude that both Lyn and Tec are capable of phosphorylating Dok-1.
Src Family Kinases Are Required for Tyrosine Phosphorylation of
Dok-1--
To further determine the role of Src family kinases in
mediating Dok-1 tyrosine phosphorylation, Mo7 cells were starved
overnight and incubated with various concentrations of Src family
kinase inhibitor PP2 for 1 h prior to stimulation with KL. As
depicted in Fig. 9A,
inhibition of KL-stimulated tyrosine phosphorylation of Dok-1 was
dose-dependent. Tyrosine phosphorylation of Dok-1 was
completely inhibited by 5 µM PP2. As a control the
inactive analog PP3 had no effect on tyrosine phosphorylation of Dok-1 (data not shown).
Lyn has been shown to be an important contributor to KL-induced
proliferation of primary hematopoietic cells (25). We therefore determined the requirement for Lyn in Dok-1 tyrosine phosphorylation during c-Kit signaling. Primary BMMC isolated from normal and Lyn-deficient mice were starved overnight and then stimulated with KL.
Phosphorylated Dok-1 was immunoprecipitated with agarose-conjugated anti-Tyr(P) antibodies and blotted with anti-Dok-1 antibody. As depicted in Fig. 9B, upon c-Kit stimulation tyrosine
phosphorylation of Dok-1 was increased ~2-fold in primary normal BMMC
but not in Lyn-deficient BMMC, indicating that Lyn is required for
KL-dependent tyrosine phosphorylation of Dok-1. Western
blotting with anti-Dok-1 antibody revealed the presence of the same
amount of Dok-1 in each sample.
A Model for the Role of Dok-1 in c-Kit Signal Transduction--
In
conclusion, the data presented in this manuscript support the following
model. Binding of KL to c-Kit results in activation of PI 3-kinase and
generation of inositol phospholipids at the plasma membrane that serve
as binding sites for PH domains. Dok-1 and Tec are recruited to the
plasma membrane via their respective PH domains. In addition, Dok-1
binds to the juxtamembrane region and C-terminal tail of c-Kit, placing
it in close proximity to membrane-bound c-Kit-associated Lyn. Several
lines of evidence indicate that Lyn plays a critical role in c-Kit
signaling. A recent study reported that Lyn is required for an optimal
response to KL-mediated cell proliferation and chemotaxis in primary
hematopoietic progenitor cells and mast cells (25). Here we show that
Lyn is required for association of Dok-1 and c-Kit most likely because Lyn phosphorylates sites on c-Kit that promote Dok-1 binding. Moreover,
Lyn is required for tyrosine phosphorylation of Dok-1 in KL-stimulated
Mo7 cells and BMMC. This may occur by direct phosphorylation of Dok-1
by Lyn. Alternatively, or in parallel, Lyn phosphorylation of Tec would
result in Tec activation and phosphorylation of Dok-1 by Tec. Other
studies in B and T cells have revealed that Tec can phosphorylate Dok-1
(19, 20), and Lyn, Tec, and Dok have been shown to form a complex in
hematopoietic cells stimulated with KL (13). Regardless of which
kinase(s) phosphorylates Dok-1, it is clear that membrane localization
of Dok-1 is essential for its tyrosine phosphorylation during c-Kit signaling. Identification of Dok-1 tyrosine phosphorylation sites will
ultimately be important for understanding the function of Dok-1 as an
adaptor protein in c-Kit-mediated signal transduction.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
, and Vav in
addition to the signaling proteins listed above (5-7).
/
mice reveals that Dok-1 is a negative regulator
of cell proliferation. Cells derived from Dok
/
mice hyperproliferate in response to a number of cytokines and growth factors including KL (17, 21). However, the mechanism responsible for
the hyperproliferative effect has not yet been elucidated. Moreover,
the kinase(s) that phosphorylates Dok-1 in c-Kit-mediated signaling has
not been identified. Lyn (a Src family kinase) and Tec (a Tec family
kinase) have been reported to be activated upon c-Kit activation
(5-7). Tec forms a trimolecular complex with Dok-1 and Lyn in
KL-stimulated cells, and activation of Tec and phosphorylation of Dok-1
have been shown to require PI 3-kinase activity (13). Other studies
have documented a role for Src family kinases in Dok-1 phosphorylation.
For example, Lck is required for CD2-mediated phosphorylation of Dok-1
in JcaM1.6 cells, and Src, Fyn, and Lck can phosphorylate Dok-1 in
COS-7 cells (14).
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
PHDok-1 mutant. The following primers were used for PCR and cloning:
5'-CGG AAT TCG CCA CC ATG GGC TAC CCA TAC GAC GTC CCA GAC TAC GCT GAC
GGA GCA GTG ATG GAA GGG CCG-3'; 5'-CGG AAT TCG CCA CC ATG GGC TAC CCA
TAC GAC GTC CCA GAC TAC GCT AAA GGC AGC TGG ACT CTG-3'; 5'-AA CTG CAG
TCA CAT AAT TAC ACA CTT TGT CTT TGA CTT CTT TTT CTT CTT TTT ACC
ATC TTT GCT GGT AGA GCC CTC TGA CTT GAC-3'. The
p85 gene was
kindly provided by Dr. Kurt Ballmer-Hofer (Villigen, Paul Scherrer
Institute, Switzerland). BMMC from normal and Lyn-deficient mice
and GST fusion proteins of c-Kit receptor were kind gifts from Dr.
Diana Linnekin (Frederick Cancer Research and Development Center,
Frederick, MD). pcDNA3-c-Kit was a generous gift from Dr. Hava
Avraham (Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA). PME18s-WTTec was
generously provided by Dr. Leslie J. Berg (University of Massachusetts
Medical School, Worcester, MA) and was subcloned into pcDNA3.1 at
the EcoRI site. The kinase-inactive form of Fyn (K299M) was
prepared previously by Dr. Wouter van't Hof in our laboratory
(15).
-32P]ATP. Recombinant Dok-1 (2 µg) was used as
substrate for Lyn and Tec kinase assays. The reaction mixtures were
incubated at 30 °C for 20 min, and reactions were terminated by the
addition of SDS sample buffer.
PHDok-1, or membrane-targeted
PHDok-1
(
PHDok-1-KRas) for 24 h and then trypsinized and seeded in
triplicate in 96-well plates with a cell concentration of 5 × 104 cells/0.2 ml/well. 1 µCi of
[3H]thymidine (PerkinElmer Life Sciences) was added to
each well, and the cells were incubated for 16 h at 37 °C and
5% CO2. Cells were harvested, and 3H
radioactivity was measured in a scintillation counter.
![]()
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (26K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Wortmannin inhibits KL-stimulated tyrosine
phosphorylation of Dok-1. Mo7 cells were deprived of IL-3
overnight and then treated with and without 100 nM
wortmannin for 1 h followed by activation with 100 ng/ml KL. The
cell lysate was immunoprecipitated with either anti-Dok-1 antibody or
anti-c-Kit antibody, blotted with anti-Tyr(P)
(pTyr)antibody, and stripped and reprobed with anti-Dok-1 or
anti-c-Kit antibody, respectively. Each experiment was performed four
times with similar results.

View larger version (24K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Subcellular distribution of Dok-1 upon
stimulation with KL. Mo7 cells were deprived of IL-3 overnight and
treated with or without 100 nM wortmannin for 1 h
followed by activation with 100 ng/ml KL. Cells were homogenized in
hypotonic buffer and fractionated into S100 (S) and P100
(P) fractions. A, fractions were
immunoprecipitated with anti-Dok-1 antibody, blotted with anti-Tyr(P)
(pTyr) antibody, and then reprobed with anti-Dok-1 antibody.
B, wild type and PH mutant Dok-1 constructs were transfected
into Mo7 cells by electroporation. 18 h later the cells were
fractionated into S100 (S) and P100 (P) fractions
followed by Western blotting using anti-Dok-1 antibody. Each experiment
was performed three times with similar results.
PH mutant Dok-1 were transfected into Mo7
cells by electroporation. As depicted in Fig. 2B, the
PHDok-1 mutant was localized nearly exclusively in the S100
fraction, whereas wild type Dok-1 was evenly distributed in the S100
and P100 fractions. These data support a model in which activation of
PI 3-kinase by KL generates a binding site for the Dok-1 PH domain that
serves to recruit Dok-1 to the plasma membrane.
PH mutant Dok-1, respectively. Because the
efficiency of transfection in Mo7 cells was very low the proteins were
expressed in transfected COS-1 cells. As depicted in Fig.
3, wild type Dok-1 was evenly distributed
in the S100 and P100 fractions and was tyrosine-phosphorylated (most
likely by endogenous tyrosine kinases). The
PHDok-1 mutant was
localized to the cytosolic fraction (S100) and was not phosphorylated.
In contrast the
PHDok-1 mutant with the K-Ras tail was primarily
associated with the membrane fraction (P100) and was constitutively
tyrosine-phosphorylated. These results indicate that the PH domain of
Dok-1 is required for membrane localization and phosphorylation and
that membrane binding is required for Dok-1 tyrosine
phosphorylation.

View larger version (25K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Membrane-targeted
PHDok-1-KRas is constitutively
tyrosine-phosphorylated in COS-1 cells. COS-1 cells were
transfected with either empty vector,
PHDok-1,
PHDok-1-KRas, or
wild type Dok-1, respectively. A, cell lysates either were
immunoprecipitated with anti-Dok-1 and Western blotted with anti-Tyr(P)
(pTyr) antibodies or were directly Western blotted with
anti-Dok-1 antibody. B, cells were lysed in hypotonic
buffer, fractionated into S100 (S) and P100 (P)
fractions, and then subjected to SDS-PAGE and Western blotting with
anti-Dok-1 antibody. The experiments were performed in
triplicate.
p85, a dominant negative mutant of PI 3-kinase. Cell
lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-Dok-1 antibody and analyzed
by SDS-PAGE, followed by Western blotting with anti-Tyr(P) and
anti-Dok-1 antibodies. Compared with wild type Dok-1, Dok-1-KRas was
hyperphosphorylated, with an approximately 2-fold enhancement of Tyr(P)
levels per unit of protein (Fig.
4A). Phosphorylation of the
wild type Dok-1 was inhibited by expression of a dominant negative
mutant of PI 3-kinase. In contrast, the tyrosine phosphorylation of
Dok-1-KRas was insensitive to
p85 expression. The Dok-1-KRas
construct was nearly exclusively localized to the membrane fraction
(Fig. 4B). These results indicate that constitutive
targeting of Dok-1 to the membrane via a K-Ras tail results in PI
3-kinase-independent hyperphosphorylation of Dok-1.

View larger version (18K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Membrane-targeted Dok-1-KRas is
hyperphosphorylated, and its tyrosine phosphorylation is
insensitive to a dominant negative mutant of PI
3-kinase. A, COS-1 cells were transfected with wild
type Dok-1 or Dok-1-KRas alone, or they were cotransfected with a
dominant negative mutant of PI 3-kinase (
p85). The cell
lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-Dok-1 antibody, blotted with
anti-Tyr(P) (pTyr) antibody, and then reprobed with
anti-Dok-1 antibody. Expression of the mutant
p85 was confirmed by
direct Western blotting using anti-p85 antibody. Levels of endogenous
p85 were below the detection limits of this Western blot. B,
S100 and P100 fractions of COS cells transfected with Dok-1 were
subjected to SDS-PAGE and Western blotting with anti-Dok-1 antibody.
The data are representative of four independent experiments.
PHDok-1, or
PHDok-1-KRas, and
[3H]thymidine incorporation was measured. As depicted in
Fig. 5A, expression of wild
type Dok-1 inhibited cell growth by ~22%. The constitutively
membrane-bound Dok-1-KRas or
PHDok-1-KRas exhibited a greater
negative effect on cell proliferation with ~45% reduction in
[3H]thymidine incorporation. Western blotting with
anti-Dok-1 antibody revealed that the expression level for each
construct was the same (Fig. 5B). These data suggest that
membrane localization of Dok-1 is required for negative regulation of
cell proliferation.

View larger version (15K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Membrane localization of Dok-1 is required
for inhibition of cell proliferation. A, COS-1 cells
were transfected for 24 h with either empty vector, wild type
Dok-1, Dok-1-KRas,
PHDok-1, or
PHDok-1-KRas, and then
[3H]thymidine was added for 16 h. Cells were
harvested on a fiber filter, and 3H radioactivity was
determined. B, expression levels of each construct were
similar. The experiments were performed three times.
RIIB receptor
promotes Dok-1 phosphorylation and association with RasGAP (22). This
results in formation of RasGDP and attenuation of the
Ras/Raf/MAP kinase signaling pathway. However, recent studies using
fibroblasts from Dok-1
/
mice revealed that RasGAP binding is not
required for negative regulation of cell proliferation by Dok-1 (23).
It is likely that association of Dok-1 with other downstream effector
proteins mediates cell growth inhibition.

View larger version (20K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Dok-1 coimmunoprecipitates with c-Kit and
associates with the juxtamembrane region and C-terminal tail.
A, Mo7 cells were deprived of IL-3 overnight and then
stimulated with 100 ng/ml KL for 5 min. Cell lysates were
immunoprecipitated with anti-Dok-1, anti-Lyn, or anti-Tec antibodies,
blotted with anti-Tyr(P) (pTyr) antibody, and reprobed with
anti-c-Kit, anti-Dok-1, anti-Lyn, or anti-Tec antibodies, respectively.
B, purified GST fusion proteins encoding the juxtamembrane
region (JXM), kinase region 1 (K1), kinase insert
(KI), and C-terminal tail (C-tail) of c-Kit were
incubated for 20 min with Lyn immunoprecipitates from Mo7 cells in the
presence of [
-32P]ATP and kinase assay buffer.
Aliquots of the reaction mixture were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and either
phosphorimaging or Western blotting with anti-GST antibody.
C, 5 µg of the above GST or GST fusion proteins previously
treated with Lyn kinase were incubated with KL-treated Mo7 cell
lysates for 2 h at 4 °C in the presence of
glutathione-Sepharose 4B. The beads were washed and analyzed by
SDS-PAGE, followed by Western blotting with anti-Tyr(P) antibody. A
sample containing immunoprecipitated Dok-1 was run alongside as a
control. The data depicted are representative of three independent
experiments.

View larger version (12K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Src family kinases mediate tyrosine
phosphorylation of Dok-1. A, COS-1 cells were
transfected with c-Kit alone or cotransfected with c-Kit and Lyn. Cells
were starved overnight and stimulated with KL. Cell lysates were
immunoprecipitated with anti-c-Kit antibody and analyzed by SDS-PAGE
followed by Western blotting with anti-Tyr(P) (pTyr)
antibody and reprobing with anti-c-Kit antibody. The tyrosine
phosphorylation level of c-Kit was quantitated by normalizing the
amount of [Tyr(P)]c-Kit to the total amount of c-Kit in each sample.
B, COS-1 cells were transfected with Dok-1 alone or
cotransfected with either Fyn or a kinase-inactive form of Fyn
(FynK299M). Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with
anti-Dok-1 antibody and analyzed by SDS-PAGE followed by Western
blotting with anti-Tyr(P) antibody and reprobing with anti-Dok-1
antibody. The tyrosine phosphorylation level of Dok-1 was quantitated.
C, COS cells were transfected for 24 h with Dok alone
or cotransfected with c-Kit in the presence or absence of wild type Fyn
or the kinase-inactive Fyn mutant. The cells were starved overnight and
then stimulated with KL. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with
anti-Dok-1 antibody and analyzed by SDS-PAGE followed by sequential
Western blotting with anti-Tyr(P) and anti-Dok-1 antibodies,
respectively. The tyrosine phosphorylation level of c-Kit was
quantitated. Bars where no error bar is shown
reflect a standard deviation of the data of <8%. The experiments were
performed four times with similar results.
-32P]ATP. As shown in Fig.
8A, Lyn was constitutively
active in Mo7 cells, and incubation with recombinant Dok-1 resulted in
robust phosphorylation of Dok-1. The ~140-kDa phosphoprotein detected in Lyn immune complex kinase assays was identified as c-Kit because it
comigrated with the c-Kit band in anti-c-Kit immunoprecipitates (data
not shown). No detectable phosphorylation of recombinant Dok-1 by Tec
was observed. Tec protein was clearly present in the anti-Tec
immunoprecipitate (Fig. 8, A and B), but the
autophosphorylation activity of Tec kinase was only detectable when the
intensity on the phosphorimaging device was greatly increased (20-fold) (Fig. 8B). Others have also observed that Tec
autophosphorylation activity is relatively weak (20).

View larger version (35K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 8.
Phosphorylation of Dok-1 by Lyn and Tec.
Mo7 cells were deprived of IL-3 overnight and incubated with 100 ng/ml
KL for 5 min. Equal amounts of Mo7 cell lysates were immunoprecipitated
with either anti-Lyn, anti-c-Kit, or anti-Tec antibodies. A,
immune complexes formed with anti-Lyn, anti-c-Kit, or anti-Tec
antibodies were incubated in the presence or absence of recombinant
Dok-1 and [
-32P]ATP in kinase assay buffer. The
reaction mixture was analyzed by SDS-PAGE and either phosphorimaging or
Western blotting with the indicated antibodies. B,
autophosphorylation of Tec in vitro. Anti-Tec
immunoprecipitates were incubated with [
-32P]ATP and
analyzed by SDS-PAGE and either phosphorimaging or Western blotting
with anti-Tec antibody. The intensity on the phosphorimaging device was
increased to visualize the Tec bands. C, COS-1 cells were
transfected with Dok-1, Lyn, and/or Tec, and cell lysates were analyzed
by immunoprecipitation and/or Western blotting with the indicated
antibodies. The experiments were performed three times with similar
results.

View larger version (13K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 9.
Src family kinases are required for tyrosine
phosphorylation of Dok-1. A, Mo7 cells were starved
overnight and treated with PP2 for 1 h prior to a 5-min
stimulation with KL. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with
anti-Dok-1 antibody and analyzed by SDS-PAGE followed by sequential
Western blotting with anti-Tyr(P) and anti-Dok-1 antibodies. The
tyrosine phosphorylation level of c-Kit was quantitated.
Bars where no error bar is shown reflect a
standard deviation of the data of <8%. B, BMMC from normal
and Lyn-deficient mice were stimulated with c-Kit. Cell lysates were
immunoprecipitated with agarose-conjugated anti-Tyr(P)
(pTyr) antibodies and blotted with anti-Dok-1 antibody. The
total amount of Dok-1 in each sample was determined by blotting with
anti-Dok-1 antibody. The experiments were performed twice with similar
results.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Raisa Louft-Nisenbaum, Chong-Yuan Liu, and Carol Lambek for technical support, Dr. Steve Swendeman for helpful advice, and Debra Alston for secretarial support. We also thank Drs. Kurt Ballmer-Hofer, Diana Linnekin, Leslie Berg, Hava Abraham, and Mike Kavanaugh for generous gifts of reagents.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant PO1 CA64593.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Cell Biology
Program, Sloan-Kettering Inst. for Cancer Research, 1275 York Ave., Box
143, New York, NY 10021. Tel.: 212-639-2514; Fax: 212-717-3317; E-mail: m-resh@ski.mskcc.org.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, February 1, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M200277200
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: KL, Kit ligand; PI, phosphatidylinositol; PH, pleckstrin homology; GST, glutathione S-transferase; IMDM, Iscove's modified Dulbecco's medium; IL, interleukin; GAP, GTPase-activating protein; MAP, mitogen-activated protein; BMMC, bone marrow mast cells.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
de Klein, A.,
van Kessel, A. G.,
Grosveld, G.,
Bartram, C. R.,
Hagemeijer, A.,
Bootsma, D.,
Spurr, N. K.,
Heisterkamp, N.,
Groffen, J.,
and Stephenson, J. R.
(1982)
Nature
300,
765-767[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 2. |
Heisterkamp, N.,
Stephenson, J. R.,
Groffen, J.,
Hansen, P. F.,
de Klein, A.,
Bartram, C. R.,
and Grosveld, G.
(1983)
Nature
306,
239-242[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 3. |
Shtivelman, E.,
Lifshitz, B.,
Gale, R. P.,
and Canaani, E.
(1985)
Nature
315,
550-554[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 4. |
Wisniewski, D.,
Strife, A.,
Swendeman, S.,
Erdjument-Bromage, H.,
Geromanos, S.,
Kavanaugh, W. M.,
Tempst, P.,
and Clarkson, B.
(1999)
Blood
93,
2707-2720 |
| 5. |
Tang, B.,
Mano, H., Yi, T.,
and Ihle, J. N.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
8432-8437 |
| 6. |
Price, D. J.,
Rivnay, B.,
and Avraham, H.
(1999)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
259,
611-616[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 7. |
Linnekin, D.,
DeBerry, C. S.,
and Mou, S.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
27450-27455 |
| 8. |
Carpino, N.,
Wisniewski, D.,
Strife, A.,
Marshak, D.,
Kobayashi, R.,
Stillman, B.,
and Clarkson, B.
(1997)
Cell
88,
197-204[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 9. |
Yamanashi, Y.,
and Baltimore, D.
(1997)
Cell
88,
205-211[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 10. |
Zhou, M. M.,
Ravichandran, K. S.,
Olejniczak, E. F.,
Petros, A. M.,
Meadows, R. P.,
Sattler, M.,
Harlan, J. E.,
Wade, W. S.,
Burakoff, S. J.,
and Fesik, S. W.
(1995)
Nature
378,
584-592[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 11. |
Eck, M. J.,
Dhe-Paganon, S.,
Trub, T.,
Nolte, R. T.,
and Shoelson, S. E.
(1996)
Cell
85,
695-705[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 12. |
Noguchi, T.,
Matozaki, T.,
Inagaki, K.,
Tsuda, M.,
Fukunaga, K.,
Kitamura, Y.,
Kitamura, T.,
Shii, K.,
Yamanashi, Y.,
and Kasuga, M.
(1999)
EMBO J.
18,
1748-1760[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 13. |
van Dijk, T. B.,
van Den Akker, E.,
Amelsvoort, M. P.,
Mano, H.,
Lowenberg, B.,
and von Lindern, M.
(2000)
Blood
96,
3406-3413 |
| 14. |
Nemorin, J. G.,
and Duplay, P.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
14590-14597 |
| 15. |
van't Hof, W.,
and Resh, M. D.
(1999)
J. Cell Biol.
145,
377-389 |
| 16. |
Alland, L.,
Peseckis, S. M.,
Atherton, R. E.,
Berthiaume, L.,
and Resh, M. D.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
16701-16705 |
| 17. |
Yamanashi, Y.,
Tamura, T.,
Kanamori, T.,
Yamane, H.,
Nariuchi, H,
Yamamoto, T.,
and Baltimore, D.
(2000)
Genes Dev.
14,
11-16 |
| 18. |
Mano, H.,
Yamashita, Y.,
Sato, K.,
Yazaki, Y.,
and Hirai, H.
(1995)
Blood
85,
343-350 |
| 19. |
Yoshida, K.,
Yamashita, Y.,
Miyazato, A.,
Ohya, K.,
Kitanaka, A.,
Ikeda, U.,
Shimada, K.,
Yamanaka, T.,
Ozawa, K.,
and Mano, H.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
24945-24952 |
| 20. |
Yang, W.-C.,
Ghiotto, M.,
Barbarat, B.,
and Olive, D.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
607-617 |
| 21. |
Di Cristofano, A.,
Niki, M.,
Zhao, M.,
Karnell, F. G.,
Clarkson, B.,
Pear, W. S.,
Van Aelst, L.,
and Pandolfi, P-P.
(2001)
J. Exp. Med.
194,
275-284 |
| 22. |
Tamir, I.,
Stolpa, J. C.,
Helgason, C. D.,
Nakamura, K.,
Bruhns, P.,
Daeron, M.,
and Cambier, J. C.
(2000)
Immunity
12,
347-358[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 23. |
Zhao, M.,
Schmitz, A. A. P., Yi, Q., Di,
Cristofano, A.,
Pandolfi, P-P.,
and Van Aelst, L.
(2001)
J. Exp. Med.
194,
265-274 |
| 24. |
Wahl, M. I.,
Fluckiger, A. C.,
Kato, R. M.,
Park, H.,
Witte, O. N.,
and Rawlings, D. J.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
11526-11533 |
| 25. |
O'Laughlin-Bunner, B.,
Radosevic, N.,
Taylor, M. L.,
Shivakrupa,
DeBerry, C.,
Metcalfe, D. D.,
Zhou, M.,
Lowell, C.,
and Linnekin, D.
(2001)
Blood
98,
343-350 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
V. G. Karur, C. A. Lowell, P. Besmer, V. Agosti, and D. M. Wojchowski Lyn kinase promotes erythroblast expansion and late-stage development Blood, September 1, 2006; 108(5): 1524 - 1532. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Niu, F. Roy, F. Saltel, C. Andrieu-Soler, W. Dong, A.-L. Chantegrel, R. Accardi, A. Thepot, N. Foiselle, M. Tommasino, et al. A nuclear export signal and phosphorylation regulate dok1 subcellular localization and functions. Mol. Cell. Biol., June 1, 2006; 26(11): 4288 - 4301. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Biswas, D. Stein, and E. R. Stanley Drosophila Dok is required for embryonic dorsal closure Development, January 15, 2006; 133(2): 217 - 227. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Itoh, S. Lemay, M. Osawa, W. Che, Y. Duan, A. Tompkins, P. S. Brookes, S.-S. Sheu, and J.-i. Abe Mitochondrial Dok-4 Recruits Src Kinase and Regulates NF-{kappa}B Activation in Endothelial Cells J. Biol. Chem., July 15, 2005; 280(28): 26383 - 26396. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Lennartsson, T. Jelacic, D. Linnekin, and R. Shivakrupa Normal and Oncogenic Forms of the Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Kit Stem Cells, January 1, 2005; 23(1): 16 - 43. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Lee, C. Andrieu, F. Saltel, O. Destaing, J. Auclair, V. Pouchkine, J. Michelon, B. Salaun, R. Kobayashi, P. Jurdic, et al. I{kappa}B kinase {beta} phosphorylates Dok1 serines in response to TNF, IL-1, or {gamma} radiation PNAS, December 14, 2004; 101(50): 17416 - 17421. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Crowder, H. Enomoto, M. Yang, E. M. Johnson Jr., and J. Milbrandt Dok-6, a Novel p62 Dok Family Member, Promotes Ret-mediated Neurite Outgrowth J. Biol. Chem., October 1, 2004; 279(40): 42072 - 42081. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Bedirian, C. Baldwin, J.-i. Abe, T. Takano, and S. Lemay Pleckstrin Homology and Phosphotyrosine-binding Domain-dependent Membrane Association and Tyrosine Phosphorylation of Dok-4, an Inhibitory Adapter Molecule Expressed in Epithelial Cells J. Biol. Chem., April 30, 2004; 279(18): 19335 - 19349. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Jones, S. H. Chen, C. Sturk, Z. Master, J. Tran, R. S. Kerbel, and D. J. Dumont A Unique Autophosphorylation Site on Tie2/Tek Mediates Dok-R Phosphotyrosine Binding Domain Binding and Function Mol. Cell. Biol., April 15, 2003; 23(8): 2658 - 2668. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. W. Lindwasser and M. D. Resh Myristoylation as a target for inhibiting HIV assembly: Unsaturated fatty acids block viral budding PNAS, October 1, 2002; 99(20): 13037 - 13042. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Takada, T. Noguchi, K. Inagaki, T. Hosooka, K. Fukunaga, T. Yamao, W. Ogawa, T. Matozaki, and M. Kasuga Induction of Apoptosis by Stomach Cancer-associated Protein-tyrosine Phosphatase-1 J. Biol. Chem., September 6, 2002; 277(37): 34359 - 34366. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||