![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 16, 13739-13744, April 19, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Department of Biochemistry, Juntendo University School of
Medicine, 2-1-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan
Received for publication, January 14, 2002
Autophagy is a process of bulk degradation
of cytoplasmic components by the lysosome/vacuole and has a significant
relationship to several neurodegenerative disorders and myopathies in
mammals. One of APG gene products essential for autophagy
in yeast, Apg3p, is a protein-conjugating enzyme for Apg8p lipidation
(Ichimura, Y., Kirisako, T., Takao, T., Satomi, Y., Shimonishi, Y.,
Ishihara, N., Mizushima, N., Tanida, I., Kominami, E., Ohsumi, M.,
Noda, T., and Ohsumi, Y. (2000) Nature 408, 488-492). In
this study, the cloning of a human Apg3p homologue (hApg3p) as an E2
enzyme essential for human Apg8p homologues (i.e. GATE-16,
GABARAP, and MAP-LC3) is shown, and its unique characteristics are
described. The predicted amino acid sequence of the isolated clone
shows 34.1% identity and 48.1% similarity to yeast Apg3p.
Site-directed mutagenesis revealed that Cys264 of hApg3p is
an authentic active-site cysteine residue essential for the formation
of hApg3p·hApg8p homologue intermediates. Overexpression of hApg7p
enhances the formation of a stable E2-substrate complex between
hApg3pC264S and each of the hApg8p homologues, and MAP-LC3
is preferred as the substrate over the other two Apg8p homologues.
These results indicate that hApg3p is an E2-like enzyme essential for
three human Apg8p homologues. Co-immunoprecipitation of hApg7p with hApg3p indicates that hApg3p forms an E1·E2 complex with hApg7p as in
the case of yeast Apg3p and Apg7p. Furthermore, hApg3p
coimmunoprecipitates with hApg12p, and the overexpression of
hApg3p facilitates the formation of the GFPhApg12p·hApg5p conjugate,
suggesting that hApg3p cross-talks with the hApg12p conjugation system.
Autophagy is a process of bulk degradation of cytoplasmic
components by the lysosomal/vacuolar system (1-3). In the initial step
of macroautophagy, a cup-shaped membrane sac surrounds cytosolic components to form an autophagosome (4, 5), and the outer membrane of
the autophagosome fuses with a lysosome/vacuole. The APG and
AUT genes (autophagy or
autophagy), which play indispensable roles in autophagy,
have been identified and characterized in yeast, Saccharomyces
cerevisiae (6, 7). The analyses of the gene products revealed two
modifier-conjugation systems (the modifiers are Apg12p and Apg8p/Aut7p)
that are essential for autophagy and the
Cvt1 pathway, and these
modifiers have been shown to be processed by an enzymatic system
similar to ubiquitylation (8-12, for review see Refs. 1, 3, 13, and
14).
In the yeast S. cerevisiae, Apg8p/Aut7p is unique
among ubiquitin and other modifiers (9). Unlike the other modifiers, the target of Apg8p is a lipid, not a protein. Apg8p is activated by an
E1 enzyme, Apg7p, and transferred to an E2 enzyme, Apg3p/Aut1p (9, 10,
15). In the last step, Apg8p is conjugated to phosphatidylethanolamine on a preautophagosomal membrane sac (9). After the formation of the
autophagosome, luminal Apg8p is released into the luminal space and
degraded in the vacuole (12, 16). At the same time, Apg8p on the
cytosolic surface of the autophagosome is detached into the cytosol by
Apg4p, a cysteine protease that is also essential for the activation of
Apg8p (9). Apg8p/Aut7p also interacts with two ER-to-Golgi vacuole
SNAREs (Bet1p and Sec22p) and vacuolar target SNARE and vacuole SNARE
(Vam3p and Nyv1p) (17). For the reaction, the carboxyl-terminal Gly in
Apg8p is essential as in ubiquitin and other modifiers. Furthermore, in
addition to the Apg8p-lipidation system, the Apg12p-conjugation system
is also essential for the Cvt pathway and autophagy (8). Apg12p is activated by the common E1 enzyme, Apg7p, transferred to a second E2
enzyme, Apg10p, and finally conjugates with Apg5p (8, 10, 11). The
carboxyl-terminal Gly of Apg12p is also essential for conjugation.
After the formation of the Apg12p·Apg5p conjugate, Apg16p attaches to
Apg5p, forming an Apg12p·Apg5p·Apg16p complex for autophagy (18).
Apg5p and the Apg12p·Apg5p conjugate localize to the membrane
fraction but not the autophagosome, suggesting that they play a role in
an initial step in the formation of autophagosomes and Cvt vesicles
(8).
Unlike other modifier-conjugation systems, two conjugation systems play
indispensable roles in the formation of membrane structures including
autophagosomes and Cvt vesicles. Apg7p is a unique E1 enzyme for two
substrates in two independent modification systems of autophagy and the
Cvt-pathway and exists as a homodimer (19). More interestingly,
Apg3p/Aut1p forms an E1·E2 enzyme complex with Apg7p, and Apg3p also
interacts with Apg12p, which is a substrate for Apg7p and Apg10p but
not Apg3p (19, 20). These results suggest that the E1·E2 complex is a
key to the cooperative regulation of two modification systems.
In mammalian cells, two modification systems seem to be conserved. A
human Apg12p homologue (hApg12p) conjugates with the human Apg5p
homologue (hApg5p), which was first identified as an apoptosis-specific
protein (21, 22). Recently, experiments using embryonic stem cells that
knocked out the mouse APG5 gene demonstrated that a murine
Apg5p homologue is essential for autophagy (23). With regard to
mammalian Apg8p modification, there are three mammalian Apg8p/Aut7p
homologue candidates, the Golgi-associated ATPase enhancer of 16 kDa
(GATE-16), GABAA receptor-associated protein (GABARAP), and
microtubule-associated protein light chain 3 (MAP-LC3) (16, 24-27).
GATE-16 interacts with N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive fusion
protein and the 28-kDa Golgi SNARE protein (26). The mRNA for GATE-16 is expressed ubiquitously but at significantly higher levels in brain tissue. GABARAP interacts with GABAA
receptors, the cytoskeleton, and gephyrin, suggesting its functional
importance in brain or neuronal cells (24, 28, 29). MAP-LC3
co-polymerizes with tubulin and is a component of the MAP-1 complex,
which is composed of light chains 1, 2, and 3 and heavy chains (30,
31). Rat MAP-LC3 is localized on autophagosomal membranes, suggesting that rat MAP-LC3 is also a functional Apg8p homologue (25). These
results suggest that mammalian Apg8p homologues have divergent functions in mammalian cells, especially in neuronal cells. Recently, we showed that the human Apg7p homologue (hApg7p) is an E1 enzyme essential for multiple substrates such as hApg12p, GATE-16, GABARAP, and MAP-LC3 and forms a homodimer (27). Considering the functional divergence of GATE-16, GABARAP, and MAP-LC3, it is assumed that a
regulatory system for the conjugation system exists in mammalian cells.
To reveal the three mammalian Apg8p homologue-modification systems, we
are interested in the human Apg3p homologue (hApg3p). In this paper, we
report the isolation and characterization of hApg3p as an E2 enzyme for
mammalian Apg8p homologues. Furthermore, we showed a functional
relationship between hApg3p- and the hApg12p-conjugation system.
Strains, Media, Materials, and Molecular Biological
Techniques--
Escherichia coli strain DH5 Cloning the cDNA of the Human APG3 Homologue--
Based on
the DNA sequence of two EST clones (GenBankTM accession
numbers AI830763 and AI857615), two oligonucleotides were
synthesized (hAPG3-GSP1, 5'-AAGTTCTCCCCCTCCTTCTG-3', and hAPG3-GSP2,
5'-TGCCGTTGCTCATCATAGCC-3'). Using these primers, 5'-RACE was
performed by high fidelity PCR with human brain
MarathonTM-ready cDNA (normal whole brain from a
50-year-old Caucasian male) as a template according to the
manufacturer's protocol (CLONTECH).
Plasmid Construction and Site-directed Mutagenesis--
Based on
the obtained DNA sequence of the human APG3 homologue, we
amplified an open reading frame of the human APG3 cDNA by PCR with high fidelity introducing a BglII site before
the start codon, and a SalI site after the termination codon
cloned the fragment into pGEM-T and designated the resultant plasmid as
pGEMhAPG3. To express GFPhApg3p under the control of the
cytomegalovirus promoter, a BglII-SalI fragment
of the pGEMhAPG3 plasmid was introduced into a pEGFP-C1 vector
(CLONTECH) and designated pEGFPhAPG3. To express
FLAGhApg3p in COS7 cells, a BglII-SalI fragment
of the pGEMhAPG3 plasmid was introduced into the
BamHI-SalI site of pCMV-Tag2B vector (Stratagene)
and designated pTag2BhAPG3. Mammalian expression vectors for each of
the enhanced GFP modifier fusion proteins (EGFPhApg12p, EGFPhMAP-LC3,
EGFPhGATE-16, and EGFPhGABARAP) have been described previously (27). To
express both hApg7p and enhanced GFP modifier fusion proteins, we
inserted the internal ribosome entry site sequence between the
DNA sequences of each of the enhanced GFP modifiers and hApg7p using
the pIRES vector. Cys264 within hApg3p was replaced by Ser,
mutagenized by the Gene-Editor in vitro site-directed
mutagenesis system (Promega) with an oligonucleotide (hAPG3CS,
5'-ATGTGTTCAGTTCACCCAAGCAGGCATGCTGA-3') according to the
manufacturer's protocol. The expression plasmid for mutant hApg3pC264S was constructed as in the case of pEGFP-hAPG3
and designated pEGFPhAPG3CS.
Antibodies and Immunoprecipitation--
A polyclonal antibody
against a synthetic polypeptide corresponding to residues 550-571 of
hApg7p has been described previously (27). For the preparation of
antiserum against hApg3p, rabbits were immunized with a glutathione
S-transferase-hApg3p fusion protein. The resultant antiserum
against hApg3p recognized a recombinant green fluorescent protein
(GFP)-hApg3p fusion protein in COS7 cells. The polyclonal and
monoclonal anti-GFP antibodies were purchased from
CLONTECH. The monoclonal anti-FLAG antibody (M2) was purchased from Sigma. Co-immunoprecipitation of interacting proteins has been described previously (27).
Expression of Human Apg Homologues in COS7 and HEK293
Cells--
COS7 and HEK293 cells were maintained in Dulbecco's
modified Eagle's medium containing 10% fetal calf serum. For
transfection, 2 × 105 cells were seeded on 60-mm
dishes. After incubation for 24 h at 37 °C, the cells were
transfected with a mixture of 1 µg of plasmid DNA and 15 µl of
FuGENE 6 (Roche Diagnostics). For co-transfection, 1 µg of each
plasmid was used. The transfectant was harvested after incubation for
an additional 48 h.
Other Techniques--
The subcellular fractionation of HEK293
cells has been described by Kabeya et al. (25).
Isolation of a Human Apg3p/Aut1p Homologue That Is Expressed
Ubiquitously in Human Tissues--
To investigate factors in the
modification system for mammalian hApg8p homologues, we isolated a
cDNA to hApg3p. A BLAST search of the EST data base with the amino
acid sequence of yeast Apg3p indicated candidate hApg3p homologues
(GenBankTM accession numbers AI830763 and AI857615). Based
on the DNA sequences of two EST clones, a cDNA to hApg3p was
amplified by 5'-RACE with a human brain cDNA library as a template.
The DNA sequence of each of the four isolated clones contains a single open reading frame and a 5' sequence identical to that of another EST
clone (GenBank accession number AW408464). The predicted amino
acid sequence of the isolated clone (calculated molecular mass of 35.8 kDa) shows 34.1% identity and 48.1% similarity to yeast Apg3p, and
the region corresponding to the predicted active-site cysteine residue
is significantly conserved between the isolated clones and yeast Apg3p
(Fig. 1A). Therefore, we
conclude that the clone is a cDNA to hApg3p.
To investigate the expression of the human APG3 mRNA in
human tissues, we performed Northern blot analysis using a multiple tissue-specific mRNA blot and a DNA fragment encoding the open reading frame of hApg3p. The human APG3 mRNA is
expressed ubiquitously in all human tissues examined with especially
high levels of expression in heart, skeletal muscle, kidney, liver, and
placenta (Fig. 1B).
The Human Apg3p Homologue Is an Authentic E2-like
Protein-conjugating Enzyme for Three Human Apg8p Homologues, MAP-LC3,
GATE-16, and GABARAP--
If the isolated clone encodes an authentic
E2 enzyme essential for hApg8p homologues, its gene product, hApg3p,
will form E2·hApg8p intermediates. To investigate this possibility,
we employed site-directed mutagenesis of the predicted active-site
cysteine residue within hApg3p (Fig. 1A,
Cys264). Wild type hApg3p forms an enzyme/substrate
intermediate via a thiol ester bond. Because of the rapid turnover of
the Apg3p reaction, it is difficult to recognize such an intermediate
in sufficient quantity. If the active-site cysteine residue of Apg3p is
replaced by serine, a stable O-ester bond instead of a thiol ester bond will be formed between the enzyme and substrate(s), and the
formation of a high molecular mass Apg8p·Apg3p intermediate will be
clearly detected in immunoblots as demonstrated previously with hApg7p
(27). We changed Cys264 within hApg3p to serine by
site-directed mutagenesis and expressed both the mutant
GFPhApg3pC264S and each GFPhApg8ps (GFPhGATE-16,
GFPhGABARAP, and GFPhMAP-LC3) in COS7 cells (Fig.
2). Wild type GFPhApg3p, mutant
GFPhApg3pC264S, and GFP-hApg8ps were well expressed in COS7
cells; however, contrary to our expectations, no high molecular mass
band corresponding to the predicted intermediate was recognized (Fig.
2, Short Exposure and Long Exposure, lanes
2, 4, and 6). We reasoned that because of
the sparse content of endogenous Apg7p, the overexpressed Apg8p homologues could not be activated efficiently and could not be subsequently transferred to hApg3p. When hApg7p was expressed together with mutant GFPhApg3pC264S and GFPhApg8ps, higher
molecular mass bands consistent with stable GFPhApg8p·GFPhApg3pC264S intermediates (~105 kDa) were
recognized by immunoblot with anti-GFP antibody (Fig. 2, Long
Exposure, lanes 8, 10, and 12).
hMAP-LC3 preferentially forms an intermediate with
hApg3pC264S in COS7 cells (Fig. 2, Short
Exposure, lane 12). The interactions of hApg3p with hApg8ps were
also confirmed by co-immunoprecipitation (data not shown). These
results indicate that hApg3p is an authentic E2 enzyme essential for
hGATE-16, hGABARAP, and hMAP-LC3, and that the activation of the hApg8p
homologue by hApg7p is essential for a further reaction mediated by
hApg3p.
To investigate the intracellular localization of hApg3p, we performed
subcellular fractionation. HEK293 cells expressing GFPhApg3p and
FLAGhMAP-LC3 were lysed and fractionated by ultracentrifugation at
100,000 × g for 1 h. Total proteins in the
supernatant and pellet were analyzed by SDS-PAGE, and GFPhApg3p was
recognized by immunoblot with anti-GFP antibody (Fig.
3, WB: anti-GFP). GFPhApg3p fractionated mainly in the supernatant, and the
FLAGhMAP-LC3·GFPhApg3pC264S intermediate also
fractionated in the supernatant (Fig. 3, WB: anti-GFP,
LC3-GFPhApg3p). The results suggest that hApg3p is present in the
cytosol, and that the reaction of hMAP-LC3 mediated by hApg3p occurs
predominantly in the cytosol.
The Human Apg3p Homologue Forms an E1·E2 Complex with the Human
Apg7p Homologue--
In yeast, Apg3p forms an E1·E2 complex with
Apg7p, which is one of its unique characteristics compared with other
protein-conjugation systems. To investigate whether hApg3p interacts
with hApg7p as in the case of yeast, co-immunoprecipitation was
performed. We expressed FLAGhApg3p and hApg7p in COS7 cells (Fig.
4, Expression, lanes
1-3), and FLAGhApg3p in the lysate of the transfectant was immunoprecipitated well with anti-hApg3p antibody (Fig. 4, IP: anti-hApg3, WB: anti-FLAG, lanes 1 and 3).
When both FLAGhApg3p and hApg7p were expressed in the cells, hApg7p
co-immunoprecipitated with FLAGhApg3p by the anti-hApg3p antibody (Fig.
4, IP: anti-hApg3, WB: anti-hApg7, lane 3). When
hApg7p alone was expressed in the cells, hApg7p was not
immunoprecipitated by the anti-hApg3p antibody (Fig. 4, IP:
anti-hApg3, WB: anti-hApg7, lane 2). The
co-immunoprecipitation of hApg7p with hApg3p was confirmed using
another hApg3p fusion protein (Fig. 4, GFPhApg3p,
lanes 4-6). When GFPhApg3p was expressed in COS7 cells,
GFPhApg3p in the lysate immunoprecipitated with anti-hApg3p antibody,
whereas GFP itself did not immunoprecipitate with this antibody (Fig.
4, Expression, IP: anti-hApg3, WB:
anti-GFP, lanes 4-6). Only when both GFPhApg3p and
hApg7p were co-expressed in COS7 cells did hApg7p co-immunoprecipitate
with GFPhApg3p using the anti-hApg3p antibody (Fig. 4, IP:
anti-hApg3, WB: anti-hApg7, lane 6).
Finally, we confirmed the interaction using an anti-hApg7p antibody.
When hApg7p was expressed in COS7 cells, the hApg7p immunoprecipitated well with anti-hApg7p antibody (Fig. 4, IP: hApg7, WB:
anti-hApg7, lanes 2, 3, 5, and 6). When FLAG-hApg3p or
GFP-hApg3p was co-expressed with hApg7p in COS7 cells, they
co-immunoprecipitated with hApg7p using the anti-hApg7p antibody (Fig.
4, IP: anti-hApg7, WB: anti-FLAG, WB: anti-GFP, lanes 3 and 6). Considering these results, we conclude that hApg3p
forms an E1·E2 complex with hApg7p as is the case in yeast.
The Human Apg3p Homologue Interacts with the Human Apg12p
Homologue--
Another characteristic feature of Apg3p is that it also
interacts with a second modifier protein, Apg12p, which is a substrate for Apg7p but not for Apg3p in yeast (19, 20). We then investigated the
interaction of hApg3p with hApg12p in mammalian cells by
co-immunoprecipitation. We expressed GFPhApg12p and FLAGhApg3p in COS7
cells (Fig. 5, Expression, WB:
anti-FLAG, anti-GFP, lanes 1-3). When FLAGhApg3p was
expressed in the cells, FLAGhApg3p in the cell lysate
immunoprecipitated well with the anti-hApg3p antibody (Fig. 5,
IP: anti-hApg3, WB: anti-FLAG, lanes 1 and
3). When FLAGhApg3p and GFPhApg12p were expressed together
in the cells, GFPhApg12p co-immunoprecipitated with FLAGhApg3p (Fig. 5,
IP: anti-hApg3, WB: anti-GFP, lane 3). These
results indicate that hApg3p interacts with hApg12p.
The Overexpression of hApg3p Facilitates the Formation of the
hApg12p·hApg5p Conjugate--
Recent analyses using murine
APG5 gene-deficient embryonic stem cells revealed that the
Apg12p·Apg5p conjugate cooperates sequentially with MAP-LC3 in the
formation of a preautophagosomal membrane sac (23). As described in the
previous section, hApg3p interacts with both hApg7p and hApg12p (Figs.
4 and 5). Considering these interactions, it is interesting to see
whether the hApg7p·hApg3p complex and/or the hApg3p·hApg12p complex
play some roles in the two conjugation reactions. As reported
previously (27), when both hApg7p and GFPhApg12p were expressed in COS7
cells, the formation of the GFPhApg12p-hApg5p conjugate was recognized
(Fig. 6,
GFPhApg12p-Apg5p, lane 5). We next examined the
effects of the overexpression of hApg3p, hApg12p, and hApg7p in
conjugate formation. When GFPhApg3p was expressed together with hApg7p
and GFPhApg12p, the amount of the hApg12p·hApg5p conjugate increased
significantly (Fig. 6, GFPhApg12p-Apg5p conjugate,
lane 7). The carboxyl-terminal Gly in hApg12p is reported to be
essential for the formation of the conjugate (22). We constructed a
mutant hApg12p In this study, we show that the human Apg3p homologue is an
authentic E2 enzyme for the hApg8p-conjugation system(s), and that
human GATE-16, GABARAP, and MAP-LC3, the three hApg8p homologues, are
substrates for hApg3p (Table I).
We show that hApg3pC264S in which the active-site cysteine
is changed to serine can bind to GATE-16, GABARAP, and MAP-LC3 to form
stable enzyme-substrate intermediates. The overexpression of hApg7p
facilitates this reaction. Overexpressed hApg7p may be required for the
efficient activation of overexpressed hApg8p homologues, which is
necessary for the accumulation of substantial quantities of
hApg3p·hApg8p intermediate via an O-ester bond.
Alternatively, overexpressed hApg7p may enhance the formation of the
E1·E2 complex with hApg3p, which may facilitate the sequential E2
reaction after the activation of hApg8p homologues by hApg7p.
Furthermore, the overexpressed hApg3p facilitates the formation of
hApg12p·hApg5p, whereas hApg3p is not an E2 enzyme for hApg12p (Table
I).
There are two unique characteristics of hApg3p. 1) It forms an E1-E2
complex with hApg7p. 2) It interacts with hApg12p. More importantly, we
showed for the first time that the overexpression of hApg3p together
with hApg7p and hApg12p enhances the formation of the hApg12p-hApg5p
conjugate. The overexpression of hApg12p and hApg3p in the presence of
endogenous hApg7p did not cause an enhancement of conjugate formation.
Thus, the enhancement appears to be attributed to the formation of the
hApg7p-hApg3p (E1-E2) complex rather than the hApg12p-hApg3p complex.
These results strongly suggest that the formation of a complex between
hApg7p and hApg3p, two indispensable members of the hApg8p-conjugation system, also plays an important role in the hApg12p-conjugation system.
Mizushima et al. (23) reported that the formation of the
mApg12p·mApg5p conjugate precedes the lipidation and subsequent targeting of MAP-LC3 to autophagosomal precursors. Our data on the
facilitation of the hApg12p-conjugation reaction by hApg3p indicate
that there is intimate cross-talk between hApg12p-conjugation and the
hApg8p-modification systems in the formation of autophagosomes. To our
knowledge, this is the first observation of a cooperative relationship
between the two different conjugation systems. In Fig.
7, we present a hypothetical scheme based
on our experimental results. Although the precise mechanism by which
the hApg7p·hApg3p complex facilitates hApg12p·hApg5p conjugation is
still unknown, it is reasonable to assume that it may be possible by
the activation of some step(s) in the hApg12p-conjugation pathway. For
example, hApg7p complexed with hApg3p may be more active as an E1
enzyme than uncomplexed hApg7p. It is also possible that the
presumptive hApg10p may be directly or indirectly involved in this
mechanism. So far, authentic hApg10p has not been identified (Table I). We are now attempting to isolate and characterize an hApg10p homologue. In summary, hApg3p, which interacts with hApg12p on the one hand, forms
an E1-E2 complex with hApg7p on the other and functions as a
facilitating factor in the hApg12p-conjugation system in addition to an
authentic E2 enzyme for hApg8p homologues. An enhanced level of the
hApg12p-hApg5p conjugate in turn promotes the recruitment of the
lipidated form of MAP-LC3 onto autophagosomal membranes. In the end,
the activation of hApg12p-conjugation by the hApg7p-hApg3p complex
promotes hApg8p-conjugation reaction. Thus, the two autophagic conjugation systems, which comprise the one activation enzyme (E1,
hApg7p) in common, two distinct E2 enzymes (hApg3p and hApg10p) and
four different modifiers (hApg12p and three hApg8p homologues) interact
and cooperate with each other.
Human Apg3p/Aut1p Homologue Is an Authentic E2 Enzyme for
Multiple Substrates, GATE-16, GABARAP, and MAP-LC3, and Facilitates
the Conjugation of hApg12p to hApg5p*
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
cells, the
host for plasmids and protein expression, were grown in Luria
Broth medium in the presence of antibiotics as required (32).
pGEM-T was purchased from Promega (Madison, WI), pCMV-Tag2B was from
Stratagene, pEGFP-C1 and pIRES were from CLONTECH,
and pGEX4T-1 was from Amersham Biosciences. A membrane blotted
poly(A) RNA derived from human tissues for Northern analysis was
purchased from CLONTECH, and Northern analysis was
performed according to the manufacturer's protocol using the cDNA
of the open reading frame of hAPG3 as a probe.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (51K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Homology and tissue distribution of the human
Apg3p homologue. A, a comparison of the amino acid
sequences of the human Apg3p homologue with that of yeast Apg3p. The
amino acid sequence of hApg3p is compared with that of yeast Apg3p by
the ClustalW program. Asterisks, identical amino acids;
dots, similar amino acids. The region containing the
predicted active-site cysteine is underlined. B, Northern
analysis of human APG3 mRNA in human tissues. A DNA
fragment of an open reading frame of the human APG3
homologue was used as a probe.

View larger version (43K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
hApg7p-dependent formation of
hApg3pC264S·hApg8p intermediates. Wild type
GFPhApg3p (hApg3p, Wt) or mutant GFPhApg3pC264S
(CS) was expressed together with GFPhGATE-16, GFPhGABARAP,
or GFPhMAP-LC3 in COS7 cells. GFP fusion proteins in the cell lysates
were recognized by immunoblot with anti-GFP antibody. hApg7p was
recognized by immunoblot with anti-hApg7p antibody. Long
exposure is 10 times longer than Short exposure.
Asterisk indicate nonspecific bands.

View larger version (28K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Human Apg3p reacts with hMAP-LC3 in the
cytosol. FLAGhMAP-LC3 and GFPhApg3p wild type (Wt),
GFPhApg3pC264S mutant (CS), and vector control
(
) were expressed in HEK293 cells. The cell lysate was
fractionated by ultracentrifugation at 100,000 × g for
1 h. GFPhApg3p and FLAGhMAP-LC3 in the resultant supernatant and
pellet were recognized by immunoblot with anti-GFP (WB:
anti-GFP) and anti-FLAG (WB: anti-FLAG) antibodies,
respectively.

View larger version (34K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
hApg3p interacts with hApg7p to form an
E1·E2 complex. Plasmids pTag2BhAPG3, pGFPhAPG3, and/or pCMVhAPG7
were transfected into COS7 cells to express FLAGhApg3p, GFPhApg3p,
and/or hApg7p, respectively. pCMV-Tag2B and pEGFP-C1 were used as
controls. When pGFPhAPG3 and pTag2BhAPG3 were transfected into COS7
cells, the respective GFPhApg3p and FLAGhApg3p were expressed well (see
Expression, WB: anti-hApg3p, anti-FLAG,
anti-GFP). When pCMVhAPG7 was transfected into COS7 cells, hApg7p
was also expressed well (see Expression, WB: anti-hApg7p).
After both FLAGhApg3p and hApg7p were expressed in COS7 cells,
FLAGhApg3p in the cell lysate was immunoprecipitated with anti-hApg3p
antibody, and hApg7p co-immunoprecipitated with FLAGhApg3p (see
IP: anti-hApg3p, WB: anti-FLAG, anti-hApg7, lane
3) and vice versa (see IP: anti-hApg7p, WB:
anti-FLAG, anti-hApg7). When both GFPhApg3p and hApg7p were
expressed in COS7 cells, hApg7p also co-immunoprecipitated with
GFPhApg3p (see IP: anti-hApg3p, WB: anti-GFP,
anti-hApg7, lane 6) and vice versa (see IP:
anti-hApg7p, WB: anti-GFP, anti-hApg7).

View larger version (47K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
hApg3p interacts with hApg12p. Plasmids
pTag2BhAPG3 and pGFPhAPG12 were transfected into COS7 cells to express
FLAGhApg3p and GFPhApg12p, respectively. pCMV-Tag2B and pEGFP-C1 were
used as controls. When pTag2BhAPG3 was transfected into COS7 cells,
FLAGhApg3p was expressed well in the cells (see Expression,
WB: anti-FLAG). When pGFPhAPG12 was transfected into COS7
cells, GFPhApg12p was also expressed (see Expression, WB:
anti-GFP). When both FLAGhApg3p and GFPhApg12p were expressed in
COS7 cells, FLAGhApg3p in the cell lysate was immunoprecipitated with
anti-hApg3p antibody, and GFPhApg12p co-immunoprecipitated with
FLAGhApg3p (see IP: anti-hApg3p, WB: anti-FLAG,
anti-GFP, lane 3).
G with a deletion of the carboxyl-terminal Gly. When
mutant GFPhApg12p
G was expressed in cells instead of GFPhApg12p, no
conjugate was formed even in the presence of both hApg7p and hApg3p
(Fig. 6, lanes 6 and 8). The enhanced
conjugate formation is dependent on hApg7p, because when hApg7p was not
expressed, the conjugate was not recognized even in the presence of
overexpressed hApg3p and hApg12p (Fig. 6, lane 9).
These results indicate that the overexpression of hApg3p in addition to
hApg12p and hApg7p further facilitates the formation of the
hApg12p·hApg5p conjugate.

View larger version (25K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Formation of the hApg12p·hApg5p conjugate
is facilitated by the overexpression of hApg3p. GFPhApg12p wild
type hApg12p (Wt) or mutant hApg12p
G (
G)]
and/or GFPhApg3p were expressed in COS7 cells in the presence
(+) or absence (
) of hApg7p. hApg12p
G, the
carboxyl-terminal Gly within hApg12p, which is essential for the
formation of the hApg12p·hApg5p conjugate
(GFPhApg12p-hApg5p), was deleted by site-directed
mutagenesis (
G). GFPhApg12p and GFPhApg3p were recognized
by immunoblot with anti-GFP antibody and confirmed with anti-mApg12p
and anti-hApg3p antibodies. hApg7p was recognized by immunoblot with
anti-hApg7p antibody.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
Summary of two conjugation systems in yeast and human

View larger version (33K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Working hypothesis of the facilitation of the
hApg12p-conjugation system by the hApg7p·hApg3p (E1·E2) complex in
autophagy. In the hApg12p-conjugation system, hApg12p is activated
by hApg7p (E1 enzyme), transferred to hApg10p (hypothetic E2 enzyme),
and finally conjugated to hApg5p. The hApg12p·hApg5p conjugate plays
an indispensable role in the formation of the autophagosomal precursor.
The second modification system is essential for the next step in the
formation of the autophagosome. MAP-LC3 is activated by the same E1
enzyme, transferred to hApg3p, and finally conjugated to
phosphatidylethanolamine. The modification of MAP-LC3 is essential for
the formation of the preautophagosomal membrane. Thereafter, the
cup-shaped preautophagosome is closed to form the autophagosome. The
hApg7p·hApg3p (E1·E2) complex facilitates the formation of the
hApg12p·hApg5p conjugate to promote the cooperation of the
hApg12p-conjugation system with the MAP-LC3-modification system for the
formation of the autophagosome.
GATE-16, which interacts with NSF and 28 kDa Golgi SNARE protein, is localized in the Golgi and is expressed in the largest amounts in brain (26). GABARAP is a GABAA-receptor-associated protein that co-localizes with the GABAA receptor in cultured cortical neurons and interacts with gephyrin (24, 28). MAP-LC3 is localized on autophagosomal membranes (25). Considering the divergent functions and intracellular localizations of the three Apg8p homologues, it is surprising that all three hApg8p homologues, MAP-LC3, GATE-16, and GABARAP, are substrates for hApg3p. The affinity of hApg3p for these substrates differs from that of hApg7p. hApg3p preferentially conjugates with MAP-LC3 in COS7 cells, whereas hApg7p conjugates almost equally with each of the hApg8p homologues. What are the implications of the difference in substrate specificity between the E1 and E2 enzymes? The higher affinity of hApg3p for MAP-LC3 is coincident with the autophagosomal localization of MAP-LC3 considering the function of hApg3p in autophagy (25). With regard to GATE-16 and GABARAP, it is possible that there is another Apg3p homologue specific for GATE-16 and/or GABARAP. But no further candidate was obtained from further BLAST search on the EST data base and 5'-RACE, and genomic Southern analysis of the murine genome suggests that there are no further Apg3p homologues.2 Another possibility is that there is a cofactor or E3-like complex that determines the specificity for substrates. In COS7 cells, MAP-LC3 is expressed, whereas little GABARAP or GATE-16 is expressed.3 The expression of each of the hApg8p homologues in mammalian tissues and cultured cell lines is diverse, whereas hApg7p and hApg3p are expressed ubiquitously.4 In some cases of ubiquitylation, an E3 complex specifies the target protein. It is probable that there is a regulatory factor(s) that facilitates the conjugation of hApg3p with MAP-LC3 in COS7 cells. We are now investigating whether there is a regulatory factor or not by co-immunoprecipitation using anti-hApg3p antibody.
Considering the divergent functions and intracellular localizations of
the three Apg8p homologues, MAP-LC3, GABARAP, and GATE-16, it is
necessary to determine the final target of each hApg8p homologue and to
investigate the regulatory system. Recent findings suggest that the Apg
machinery plays an important role at least in brain and in cardiac and
skeletal muscles. Clinical and biochemical analyses of a group of
severe inheritable neurodegenerative disorders and X-linked vacuolar
cardiomyopathy, myopathy in humans, and lysosome-associated
membrane glycoprotein-deficient mice have also suggested that lysosomal
degradation via autophagy occurs actively during neuronal development
and in normal mammalian bodies (33-36). We will investigate these
problem using murine APG3 and APG7 homologue
knock-out mice.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Drs. Y. Ohsumi, T. Yoshimori, T. Noda, Y. Ichimura, K. Kirisako (National Institute for Basic Biology, Okazaki, Japan), N. Mizushima (PRESTO, Kawaguchi, Japan), and D. J. Klionsky (University of California, Davis, CA) for significant discussion and information, and Drs. K. Ishidoh, J. Ezaki, and D. Muno (Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan) for helpful discussion. We also thank Margaret Dooley-Ohto for editing language of the manuscript.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported in part by Grants-in-aid 12780543 (to I. T.), 09680629 (to T. U.), and 12470040 (to E. K.) for Scientific Research, Grants-in-aid 12146205 for Scientific Research on Priority Areas from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture of Japan, and The Science Research Promotion Fund from the Japan Private School Promotion Foundation (to E. K.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EBI Data Bank with accession number AB079384.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 81-3-5802-1031;
Fax: 81-3-5802-5889; E-mail: kominami@med.juntendo.ac.jp.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, February 1, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M200385200
2 M. Komatsu, I. Tanida, T. Ueno, and E. Kominami, unpublished results.
3 I. Tanida and E. Kominami, unpublished results.
4 I. Tanida, T. Ueno, and E. Kominami, unpublished results.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are:
Cvt, cytoplasm-to-vacuole targeting;
E1, protein-activating enzyme;
E2, protein-conjugating enzyme;
MAP-LC3, microtubule-associated protein
light chain 3;
FLAGhApg3p, FLAG-tagged human Apg3p/Aut1p homologue;
FLAGhMAP-LC3, FLAG-tagged human MAP-LC3;
EST, expressed sequence tag;
GABAA,
-aminobutyric acid, type A;
GABARAP, GABAA receptor-associated protein;
GATE-16, Golgi-associated ATPase enhancer of 16 kDa;
GFP, green fluorescent
protein;
GFPhApg3p, GFP-tagged hApg3p;
GFPhApg12p, GFP-tagged hApg12p;
mApg12p, murine Apg12p homologue;
SNARE, soluble NSF attachment protein
receptors;
RACE, rapid amplification of cDNA ends.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Klionsky, D. J.,
and Ohsumi, Y.
(1999)
Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol.
15,
1-32[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 2. |
Ohsumi, Y.
(1999)
Trends Cell Biol.
9,
162[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 3. |
Klionsky, D. J.,
and Emr, S. D.
(2000)
Science
290,
1717-1721 |
| 4. |
Baba, M.,
Takeshige, K.,
Baba, N.,
and Ohsumi, Y.
(1994)
J. Cell Biol.
124,
903-913 |
| 5. |
Baba, M.,
Ohsumi, M.,
and Ohsumi, Y.
(1995)
Cell Struct. Funct.
20,
465-471[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 6. |
Tsukada, M.,
and Ohsumi, Y.
(1993)
FEBS Lett.
333,
169-174[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 7. |
Thumm, M.,
Egner, R.,
Koch, B.,
Schlumpberger, M.,
Straub, M.,
Veenhuis, M.,
and Wolf, D. H.
(1994)
FEBS Lett.
349,
275-280[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 8. |
Mizushima, N.,
Noda, T.,
Yoshimori, T.,
Tanaka, Y.,
Ishii, T.,
George, M. D.,
Klionsky, D. J.,
Ohsumi, M.,
and Ohsumi, Y.
(1998)
Nature
395,
395-398[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 9. |
Ichimura, Y.,
Kirisako, T.,
Takao, T.,
Satomi, Y.,
Shimonishi, Y.,
Ishihara, N.,
Mizushima, N.,
Tanida, I.,
Kominami, E.,
Ohsumi, M.,
Noda, T.,
and Ohsumi, Y.
(2000)
Nature
408,
488-492[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 10. |
Tanida, I.,
Mizushima, N.,
Kiyooka, M.,
Ohsumi, M.,
Ueno, T.,
Ohsumi, Y.,
and Kominami, E.
(1999)
Mol. Biol. Cell
10,
1367-1379 |
| 11. |
Shintani, T.,
Mizushima, N.,
Ogawa, Y.,
Matsuura, A.,
Noda, T.,
and Ohsumi, Y.
(1999)
EMBO J.
18,
5234-5241[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 12. |
Kirisako, T.,
Ichimura, Y.,
Okada, H.,
Kabeya, Y.,
Mizushima, N.,
Yoshimori, T.,
Ohsumi, M.,
Takao, T.,
Noda, T.,
and Ohsumi, Y.
(2000)
J. Cell Biol.
151,
263-276 |
| 13. |
Ohsumi, Y.
(1999)
Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond-Biol. Sci.
354,
1580-1581 |
| 14. |
Ohsumi, Y.
(2001)
Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.
2,
211-216[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 15. |
Schlumpberger, M.,
Schaeffeler, E.,
Straub, M.,
Bredschneider, M.,
Wolf, D. H.,
and Thumm, M.
(1997)
J. Bacteriol.
179,
1068-1076 |
| 16. |
Kirisako, T.,
Baba, M.,
Ishihara, N.,
Miyazawa, K.,
Ohsumi, M.,
Yoshimori, T.,
Noda, T.,
and Ohsumi, Y.
(1999)
J. Cell Biol.
147,
435-446 |
| 17. |
Legesse-Miller, A.,
Sagiv, Y.,
Glozman, R.,
and Elazar, Z.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
32966-32973 |
| 18. |
Mizushima, N.,
Noda, T.,
and Ohsumi, Y.
(1999)
EMBO J.
15,
3888-3896[CrossRef] |
| 19. |
Komatsu, M.,
Tanida, I.,
Ueno, T.,
Ohsumi, M.,
Ohsumi, Y.,
and Kominami, E.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
9846-9854 |
| 20. |
Uetz, P.,
Giot, L.,
Cagney, G.,
Mansfield, T. A.,
Judson, R. S.,
Knight, J. R.,
Lockshon, D.,
Narayan, V.,
Srinivasan, M.,
Pochart, P.,
Qureshi-Emili, A., Li, Y.,
Godwin, B.,
Conover, D.,
Kalbfleisch, T.,
Vijayadamodar, G.,
Yang, M.,
Johnston, M.,
Fields, S.,
and Rothberg, J. M.
(2000)
Nature
403,
601-603[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 21. |
Hammond, E. M.,
Brunet, C. L.,
Johnson, G. D.,
Parkhill, J.,
Milner, A. E.,
Brady, G.,
Gregory, C. D.,
and Grand, R. J.
(1998)
FEBS Lett.
425,
391-395[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 22. |
Mizushima, N.,
Sugita, H.,
Yoshimori, T.,
and Ohsumi, Y.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
33889-33892 |
| 23. |
Mizushima, N.,
Yamamoto, A.,
Hatano, M.,
Kobayashi, Y.,
Kabeya, Y.,
Suzuki, K.,
Tokuhisa, T.,
Ohsumi, Y.,
and Yoshimori, T.
(2001)
J. Cell Biol.
152,
657-668 |
| 24. |
Wang, H.,
Bedford, F. K.,
Brandon, N. J.,
Moss, S. J.,
and Olsen, R. W.
(1999)
Nature
397,
69-72[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 25. |
Kabeya, Y.,
Mizushima, N.,
Ueno, T.,
Yamamoto, A.,
Kirisako, T.,
Noda, T.,
Kominami, E.,
Ohsumi, Y.,
and Yoshimori, T.
(2000)
EMBO J.
19,
5720-5728[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 26. |
Sagiv, Y.,
Legesse-Miller, A.,
Porat, A.,
and Elazar, Z.
(2000)
EMBO J.
19,
1494-1504[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 27. |
Tanida, I.,
Tanida-Miyake, E.,
Ueno, T.,
and Kominami, E.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
1701-1706 |
| 28. |
Kneussel, M.,
Haverkamp, S.,
Fuhrmann, J. C.,
Wang, H.,
Wassle, H.,
Olsen, R. W.,
and Betz, H.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
97,
8594-8599 |
| 29. |
Wang, H.,
and Olsen, R. W.
(2000)
J. Neurochem.
75,
644-655[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 30. |
Mann, S. S.,
and Hammarback, J. A.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
11492-11497 |
| 31. |
Mann, S. S.,
and Hammarback, J. A.
(1996)
J. Neurosci. Res.
43,
535-544[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 32. | Ausubel, F., Brent, R., Kingston, R. E., Moore, D. D., Seidman, J. G., Smith, J. A., and Struhl, K. (1995) Short Protocols in Molecular Biology , 3rd Ed. , John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York |
| 33. |
Gardiner, R. M.
(1993)
J. Inherit. Metab. Dis.
16,
787-790[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 34. |
Bennett, M. J.,
and Hofmann, S. L.
(1999)
J. Inherit. Metab. Dis.
22,
535-544[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 35. |
Tanaka, Y.,
Guhde, G.,
Suter, A.,
Eskelinen, E. L.,
Hartmann, D.,
Lullmann-Rauch, R.,
Janssen, P. M.,
Blanz, J.,
von Figura, K.,
and Saftig, P.
(2000)
Nature
406,
902-906[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 36. |
Saftig, P.,
von Figura, K.,
Tanaka, Y.,
and Lullmann-Rauch, R.
(2001)
Mol. Med. Today
7,
37-39 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y.-s. Sou, S. Waguri, J.-i. Iwata, T. Ueno, T. Fujimura, T. Hara, N. Sawada, A. Yamada, N. Mizushima, Y. Uchiyama, et al. The Atg8 Conjugation System Is Indispensable for Proper Development of Autophagic Isolation Membranes in Mice Mol. Biol. Cell, November 1, 2008; 19(11): 4762 - 4775. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Oh-oka, H. Nakatogawa, and Y. Ohsumi Physiological pH and Acidic Phospholipids Contribute to Substrate Specificity in Lipidation of Atg8 J. Biol. Chem., August 8, 2008; 283(32): 21847 - 21852. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Xie, U. Nair, and D. J. Klionsky Atg8 Controls Phagophore Expansion during Autophagosome Formation Mol. Biol. Cell, August 1, 2008; 19(8): 3290 - 3298. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Melendez and T. P. Neufeld The cell biology of autophagy in metazoans: a developing story Development, July 15, 2008; 135(14): 2347 - 2360. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Fujita, T. Itoh, H. Omori, M. Fukuda, T. Noda, and T. Yoshimori The Atg16L Complex Specifies the Site of LC3 Lipidation for Membrane Biogenesis in Autophagy Mol. Biol. Cell, May 1, 2008; 19(5): 2092 - 2100. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Koike, M. Shibata, M. Tadakoshi, K. Gotoh, M. Komatsu, S. Waguri, N. Kawahara, K. Kuida, S. Nagata, E. Kominami, et al. Inhibition of Autophagy Prevents Hippocampal Pyramidal Neuron Death after Hypoxic-Ischemic Injury Am. J. Pathol., February 1, 2008; 172(2): 454 - 469. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Fujioka, N. N. Noda, K. Fujii, K. Yoshimoto, Y. Ohsumi, and F. Inagaki In Vitro Reconstitution of Plant Atg8 and Atg12 Conjugation Systems Essential for Autophagy J. Biol. Chem., January 25, 2008; 283(4): 1921 - 1928. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. P. Taylor and K. Kirkegaard Modification of Cellular Autophagy Protein LC3 by Poliovirus J. Virol., November 15, 2007; 81(22): 12543 - 12553. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Marino, N. Salvador-Montoliu, A. Fueyo, E. Knecht, N. Mizushima, and C. Lopez-Otin Tissue-specific Autophagy Alterations and Increased Tumorigenesis in Mice Deficient in Atg4C/Autophagin-3 J. Biol. Chem., June 22, 2007; 282(25): 18573 - 18583. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z.-W. Chen, C.-S. S. Chang, T. A. Leil, and R. W. Olsen C-Terminal Modification Is Required for GABARAP-Mediated GABAA Receptor Trafficking J. Neurosci., June 20, 2007; 27(25): 6655 - 6663. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Fass, E. Shvets, I. Degani, K. Hirschberg, and Z. Elazar Microtubules Support Production of Starvation-induced Autophagosomes but Not Their Targeting and Fusion with Lysosomes J. Biol. Chem., November 24, 2006; 281(47): 36303 - 36316. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
|