Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M111906200 on February 5, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 16, 13796-13803, April 19, 2002
Critical Role of Tumor Necrosis Factor-
and NF-
B
in Interferon-
-induced CD40 Expression in
Microglia/Macrophages*
Vince T.
Nguyen
and
Etty N.
Benveniste§
From the Department of Cell Biology, University of Alabama at
Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35294
Received for publication, December 13, 2001, and in revised form, January 29, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
CD40 is a member of the tumor necrosis factor
(TNF) receptor superfamily. CD40 expression on antigen-presenting cells
(including macrophages and microglia) is crucial for T-cell activation.
Aberrant expression of CD40 has been associated with autoimmune
inflammatory diseases such as multiple sclerosis and rheumatoid
arthritis. We have recently shown that the cytokine interferon
(IFN)-
is the most potent inducer of CD40 expression in macrophages
and microglia, and this induction is mediated by the IFN-
-activated transcription factor STAT-1
and constitutively expressed PU.1 and/or
Spi-B. In this study, we have discovered that a major component of
IFN-
-induced CD40 expression involves the endogenous production of
the cytokine TNF-
. The inclusion of anti-TNF-
-neutralizing antibody significantly inhibits IFN-
-induced CD40 mRNA and CD40 promoter activity. IFN-
-induced CD40 protein expression is
attenuated in TNF-
-deficient microglia and can be restored with
exogenous TNF-
. Site-directed mutagenesis studies demonstrate that
three of the four NF-
B elements in the CD40 promoter are required
for IFN-
-induced CD40 promoter activity. IFN-
treatment leads to the activation of NF-
B in a time-dependent manner, which
is inhibited in the presence of anti-TNF-
-neutralizing antibody.
These results indicate that IFN-
-induced TNF-
production and
subsequent NF-
B activation are integral parts of the mechanism of
IFN-
-induced CD40 expression.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
CD40 is a 50-kDa type I member of the
TNF1 receptor superfamily.
CD40 is expressed by a wide variety of cells such as B-cells, macrophages, dendritic cells, keratinocytes, endothelial cells, thymic
epithelial cells, fibroblasts, and tumor cells. The interaction between
CD40 and its cognate ligand, CD40L (CD154), is critical for a
productive immune response (for review see Ref. 1). X-linked hyper IgM
syndrome individuals have defects in CD154-CD40 interactions between their T-cells and antigen-presenting B-cells, exhibit elevated
levels of IgM with the virtual absence of other antibody isotypes, and
are extremely susceptible to bacterial, viral, and opportunistic
infections (for review see Ref. 2). CD154-CD40 interactions promote
B-cell growth, differentiation, and immunoglobulin class switching.
Also, up-regulation of various co-stimulatory molecules (ICAM-1,
VCAM-1, E-selectin, LFA-3, B7.1, B7.2, and CD40) occurs upon
CD40-CD154 contact, as does production of numerous cytokines and
chemokines (IL-1, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12, TNF-
, and MIP-1
) and
cytotoxic radicals (for review see Ref. 1). The production of IL-12 is
particularly important for promoting T-cell maturation toward the Th1
pathway (3-5).
CD40 has been implicated in participating in many human diseases,
particularly autoimmune diseases (for review see Ref. 6). Aberrant
expression of CD40 and CD154 has been described in rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, and other diseases that involve a
hyperactive immune system (7-9). Because CD40 is functionally critical
and nonredundant for the activation of immune responses, blocking the
interaction between CD40-CD154 with anti-CD154 or CD40-Ig has been
shown to be beneficial in animal models of autoimmune diseases
(10-14). These findings illustrate the importance of CD40-CD154 interactions for homeostasis of immune responses. Despite the importance of CD40 in regulating the immune system, little is known
about the regulation of CD40 expression.
We have previously shown that microglia/macrophages constitutively
express CD40 at a low level, which is enhanced by IFN-
(15, 16). In
these cells, IFN-
-activated STAT-1
cooperates with the
constitutive transcription factors PU.1 and/or Spi-B that directly bind
to the CD40 promoter to activate CD40 gene expression (16). In addition
to the binding sites for STAT-1
, PU.1, and Spi-B, the CD40 promoter
also contains four potential NF-
B-binding sites (16). We have shown
previously that TNF-
alone is a very weak inducer of CD40 expression
and modestly enhances IFN-
-induced CD40 expression (15). Based on
these observations, we attempted to unravel the potential role of
TNF-
in IFN-
-induced CD40 expression.
In this study, we demonstrate that production of TNF-
is critical
for IFN-
-induced CD40 expression, because blocking endogenous production of TNF-
significantly attenuates the ability of IFN-
to induce CD40 expression. TNF-
-deficient microglia express low levels of CD40 in comparison with wild type cells upon treatment with
IFN-
, emphasizing the importance of endogenous TNF-
in this
response. We further show that blocking NF-
B activation by the use
of dominant-negative I
B kinase (IKK) constructs reduces IFN-
-induced CD40 promoter activity. IFN-
-activated NF-
B, both the p65 and p50 members, binds to the distal NF-
B site (dNBS) at
530, the medial NF-
B site (mNBS) at
494, and another medial NF-
B site (m2NBS) at
442, in the human CD40 promoter. Inclusion of
anti-TNF-
-neutralizing antibody prevents IFN-
activation of
NF-
B. Targeted disruption of these NF-
B elements significantly decreases IFN-
-induced CD40 promoter activity. These data indicate that IFN-
-induced production of TNF-
and subsequent NF-
B
activation are an integral part of CD40 gene expression in
microglia/macrophages.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Recombinant Proteins and Reagents--
Recombinant murine
IFN-
was purchased from Genzyme (Boston, MA), and murine TNF-
and
neutralizing antibody was purchased from Endogen (Woburn, MA).
Rat IgG2a-
anti-mouse CD40 antibody (clone 3/23),
biotinylated mouse anti-rat IgG2a, and
phycoerythrine-conjugated strepavidin were purchased from
PharMingen (San Diego, CA). Anti-human NF-
B p50, p65, p52,
c-Rel, and RelB antisera were a generous gift from Dr. Nancy
Rice (National Cancer Institute, Frederick Cancer Research and
Development Center, Frederick, MD). The expression vectors of wild type
and dominant-negatives of IKK-
and -
(17) were kindly provided by
Dr. Rudolph Noelle (Dartmouth Medical School, Lebanon, NH).
Cells--
The microglial cell line EOC13 was derived from
C3H/HeJ CH-2k mice using a nonviral immortalization procedure as
described previously (15). These colony stimulating
factor-1-dependent lines are B7.1+,
Mac-1+, CD45+, and class I MHC+, as
well as phagocytic. The murine macrophage cell line RAW264.7 was
maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with
10% fetal bovine serum as described previously (16). Primary microglia
from wild type B6129SF2 mice and TNF-
-deficient mice were prepared
as described previously (16). TNF-
-deficient mice were purchased
from the Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). The targeting vector was
constructed by replacing with a MC1neopA cassette the 438-bp
Narl-BglII fragment containing 40 bp of the 5'-untranslated region, all the coding region, including the ATG translation initiation codon of the first axon and part of the first
intron of the murine TNF-
gene.
CD40 Promoter Constructs--
The characterization of the human
CD40 promoter construct (hCD40p0.7) was described previously (16). The
NF-
B mutant constructs were generated on the hCD40p0.7 plasmid
backbone using the QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis kit
(Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) following the manufacturer's instructions
and were confirmed by sequencing.
RNA Isolation, Riboprobes, and Ribonuclease Protection
Assay--
Total cellular RNA was isolated from confluent monolayers
of EOC13 and RAW264.7 cells. The riboprobes for murine CD40, IRF-1, and
GAPDH prepared from in vitro transcription with T7
polymerase are 576, 367, and 270 nucleotides, respectively. 20 µg of
total RNA from RAW264.7 or EOC13 cells was hybridized with CD40, IRF-1, and GAPDH riboprobes (25 × 103 cpm) at 42 °C
overnight in 20 µl of 40 mM PIPES (pH 6.4), 80% deionized formamide, 400 mM NaOAc, and 1 mM
EDTA. The hybridized mixture was then treated with RNase A/T1 (1:200
dilution in 200 µl of the RNase digestion buffer) at room temperature
for 1 h and analyzed by 5% denaturing (8 M urea)
polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and the gels were exposed to x-ray
film for varying periods of time. The protected fragments of the CD40,
IRF-1, and GAPDH riboprobes are 419, 314, and 212 nucleotides in
length, respectively. Quantification of the protected RNA fragments was
performed by scanning with the PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics,
Sunnyvale, CA). The values for CD40 and IRF-1 mRNA expression were
normalized to GAPDH mRNA levels for each experimental condition.
GAPDH mRNA was utilized as a "housekeeping gene," because its
levels are not affected by cytokine treatment.
Nuclear Extracts and Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assays
(EMSA)--
The cells were incubated with medium or IFN-
(5 ng/ml)
for various time periods (0-24 h), and nuclear extracts were prepared. EMSA was performed with 5-10 µg of nuclear extract in a total volume
of 15 µl of binding buffer (50 mM NaCl, 1 mM
MgCl2, 0.1 mM EDTA, 4% glycerol, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol, 4 mM Tris-Cl, pH 7.5, 1 µg
of polydeoxyinosinic-deoxycytidyl acid, and 20,000 cpm of
32P-labeled oligonucleotide probe) and incubated on ice for
15 min. Bound and free DNA were then resolved by electrophoresis
through a 6% polyacrylamide gel in 0.5× TBE buffer at 250 V for
1 h. For supershift analysis, 1 µg of indicated antibody was
added, or for competition analysis, a 100-fold molar excess of the
indicated cold oligonucleotide was added to the nuclear extracts and
incubated on ice for 30 min, followed by an additional incubation for
15 min with the labeled probe.
Transient Transfection and Analysis--
0.2 µg of the hCD40
promoter constructs were co-transfected with 0.02 µg of the
pCMV-
-galactosidase construct into 2 × 105
RAW264.7 cells in 12-well plates using the LipofectAMINE Plus method as
described previously (16). pGL3-Basic was used as a negative
(background) control in all experiments. After 3 h of
transfection, the cells were allowed to recover for 6 h prior to
treatment with IFN-
(5 ng/ml) for 12 h, which we have
previously determined to be optimal for IFN-
-induced activation of
the hCD40p0.7 construct (16). The cells were washed with
phosphate-buffered saline and lysed with 250 µl of lysis buffer (25 mM trisphosphate, pH 7.8, 2 mM dithiothreitol,
2 mM diaminocyclohexane tetraacetic acid, 10% glycerol,
and 1% Triton X-100). The extracts were assayed in triplicate for
luciferase activity in a total volume of 130 µl (30 µl of cell
extract, 20 mM Tricine, 0.1 mM EDTA, 1 mM MgCO3, 2.67 mM
MgSO4, 33.3 mM dithiothreitol, 0.27 mM coenzyme A, 0.47 mM luciferin, and 0.53 mM ATP), and light intensity was measured using a
luminometer (Promega, Madison, WI). Luciferase activity was integrated
over a 10-s time period. The extracts were also assayed in triplicate
for
-galactosidase enzyme activity as described previously (16). The
luciferase activity of each sample was normalized to
-galactosidase
activity to yield relative luciferase activity. Fold induction was
calculated as the ratio of relative luciferase activity between IFN-
and medium-treated samples that were transfected with the same
construct. For comparison between different constructs, the percentage
of wild type was calculated as the ratio of fold induction of mutated
constructs to that of the full-length promoter, which was set at 100%.
For transfections that include the IKK-
and IKK-
expression
constructs, differences in the amount of DNA were adjusted with
appropriate empty vector.
Measurement of TNF-
Activity--
TNF-
activity in culture
supernatants was determined in a biologic assay by using the WEHI 164 clone 13 mouse fibrosarcoma cells as described previously (18). TNF-
activity was expressed as TNF-
pg/µg protein of total cell lysate.
The absolute amount of TNF-
was determined by extrapolation from the
standard curve that was generated by using known amounts of mouse
recombinant TNF-
. All samples were tested in triplicate.
 |
RESULTS |
Involvement of TNF-
in IFN-
-induced CD40 Gene
Expression--
We have previously shown that IFN-
is the most
potent inducer of CD40 expression in microglia and macrophages (15,
16). Curiously, TNF-
stimulation had a minimal influence on CD40
expression (protein, mRNA, or promoter activity) and only modestly
augmented IFN-
-induced CD40 expression (15). The CD40 promoter
contains four putative NF-
B sites, suggestive of an influence of
TNF-
on this particular gene. Based on this, we sought to elucidate the potential involvement of TNF-
in CD40 gene expression.
Because IFN-
is known to induce TNF-
expression in a variety of
cell types, including microglia and macrophages (19, 20), we assessed
whether the inclusion of neutralizing antibody against TNF-
would
influence IFN-
-induced CD40 expression. The murine microglial cell
line EOC13 and the macrophage cell line RAW264.7 were incubated with
medium or IFN-
in the presence of 10 µg/ml of TNF-
-neutralizing
antibody or isotype control antibody, and then total RNA was harvested
and analyzed for CD40, IRF-1, and GAPDH mRNA expression using
ribonuclease protection assay (Fig. 1A). Low levels of CD40
mRNA were expressed constitutively (lanes 1 and
5), and IFN-
enhanced CD40 mRNA expression by
~22-fold in RAW264.7 cells and ~37-fold in EOC13 cells (lanes
2 and 6). The inclusion of isotype antibody had no
effect on IFN-
-induced CD40 mRNA expression (lanes 3 and 7), whereas incubation with anti-TNF-
-neutralizing
antibody inhibited IFN-
-induced CD40 mRNA expression by ~73
and ~85% in RAW264.7 and EOC13 cells, respectively (lanes
4 and 8). Anti-TNF-
antibody treatment had a minimal
effect on the ability of IFN-
to induce IRF-1 expression, suggesting specific suppression of IFN-
-induced CD40 mRNA expression (Fig. 1A). Comparable results were obtained when examining the
effect of anti-TNF-
-neutralizing antibody on IFN-
-induced CD40
promoter activity in RAW264.7 cells (~66% inhibition) (Fig.
1B). These results indicate that endogenously produced
TNF-
contributes to IFN-
-induced CD40 expression and that the
effect of TNF-
is on CD40 gene transcription.

View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Endogenously produced TNF-
is important for optimal IFN- -induced
CD40 expression. RAW264.7 or EOC13 cells were treated with medium
or IFN- (5 ng/ml) in the presence of 10 µg/ml of isotype antibody
or TNF- -neutralizing antibody for 8 h (RAW cells) or 20 h
(EOC13 cells). Total RNA was harvested and analyzed by ribonuclease
protection assay for CD40, IRF-1, and GAPDH mRNA expression
(A). The data shown are representative of three experiments.
The human CD40 promoter (hCD40p0.7) was co-transfected with the
reference plasmid -galactosidase into RAW264.7 cells. Transfected
cells were treated with medium or IFN- (5 ng/ml) in the presence of
10 µg/ml of isotype antibody or TNF- -neutralizing antibody for
12 h and then assayed for luciferase and -galactosidase
activities. Fold induction was calculated as described under
"Experimental Procedures" (B). The data shown are the
mean ± S.E. of three experiments.
|
|
To formally demonstrate that IFN-
stimulation led to the production
of TNF-
, cells were incubated with medium or IFN-
for 24 h,
and then the supernatants were harvested and analyzed for biologically
active TNF-
(Table I). RAW264.7 cells
constitutively produced TNF-
protein, which was enhanced upon
IFN-
treatment. Also, EOC13 cells constitutively expressed low
levels of TNF-
that were elevated with IFN-
stimulation. IFN-
enhancement of TNF-
production was observed as early as 4 h and
persisted for 48 h (data not shown).
TNF-
Is Required for Optimal IFN-
-induced CD40
Expression--
To further confirm the importance of TNF-
in
IFN-
-induced CD40 expression, primary microglia from
TNF-
-deficient mice were examined. Wild type or TNF-
-deficient
primary microglia were incubated with medium or IFN-
for 48 h,
and then CD40 surface protein expression was assessed by
fluorescence-activated cell sorter analysis. IFN-
induced expression
of CD40 in wild type primary microglia, whereas only a modest induction
of CD40 expression was seen in TNF-
-deficient cells (Fig.
2). The inclusion of exogenous TNF-
modestly augmented IFN-
-induced CD40 expression in wild type
microglia, whereas in TNF-
-deficient cells, the addition of TNF-
plus IFN-
induced CD40 levels comparable with wild type microglia
(Fig. 2). These results illustrate that optimal expression of CD40
in response to IFN-
requires TNF-
.

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
IFN- -induced CD40
expression is attenuated in TNF- -deficient
microglia. Murine primary microglia isolated from wild type or
TNF- -deficient mice were incubated with medium, IFN- (5 ng/ml),
or IFN- plus TNF- (50 ng/ml) for 48 h. Surface expression of
CD40 protein expression was assessed by fluorescence-activated cell
sorter analysis. The data shown are representative of two
experiments.
|
|
IFN-
-induced CD40 Promoter Activity Requires NF-
B
Activation--
We have shown that an autocrine response to
IFN-
-induced TNF-
is important for IFN-
-induced CD40 mRNA
expression and CD40 promoter activity (Fig. 1). Because the activation
of NF-
B is one of the major signaling pathways that TNF-
initiates (for review see Ref. 21), we wished to determine the
involvement of NF-
B in IFN-
-induced CD40 expression.
Dominant-negative (DN) expression constructs of IKK-
or -
(17)
that contain substitutions of alanine for an essential lysine in the
ATP-binding site, rendering the proteins catalytically inactive, were
utilized. The DN constructs, as well as wild type IKK-
and IKK-
constructs, were co-transfected with hCD40p0.7 into RAW264.7 cells,
treated with medium or IFN-
, and then assayed for luciferase
activity (Fig. 3). The IKK-
DN partially suppressed IFN-
-induced CD40 promoter activity (~50% inhibition), whereas the IKK-
DN construct abolished IFN-
-induced CD40 promoter activity (Fig. 3A). Inclusion of both IKK-
and -
DN led to levels of inhibition comparable with that of IKK-
DN alone. Co-transfection with IKK-
or -
wild type constructs did
not significantly affect IFN-
-induced CD40 promoter activity. IKK-
and -
DN inhibition of IFN-
-induced CD40 promoter
activity occurred in a dose-dependent manner (Fig.
3B), with the IKK-
DN having the more pronounced effect.
These data indicate that activation of NF-
B is critical for IFN-
induction of CD40 promoter activity.

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Dominant-negative IKK-
and IKK- suppress
IFN- -induced CD40 promoter activity. The
human CD40 promoter (hCD40p0.7) was transiently co-transfected with the
reference plasmid -galactosidase and expression vectors containing
wild type or dominant-negatives of IKK- or IKK- cDNA (100 ng)
into RAW264.7 cells. Differences in the amount of DNA were adjusted
with the empty vector pcDNA3. Transfected cells were treated with
IFN- (5 ng/ml) for 12 h and then assayed for luciferase and
-galactosidase activity (A). The data shown are the
mean ± S.E. of three experiments. Varying amounts of the IKK
dominant-negative expression vectors were co-transfected with the human
CD40 promoter and the reference vector -galactosidase into RAW264.7
cells (B). The total amount of DNA was adjusted with the
empty vector pcDNA3. The experiments were carried out as described
in A. The data shown are the mean ± S.E. of three
experiments.
|
|
Three NF-
B-binding Sites in the Human CD40 Promoter Are
Important for IFN-
-induced CD40 Promoter Activity--
Within the
human CD40 promoter, we identified at least four potential NBS. They
are named according to their position with respect to the
transcription initiation sites: dNBS, mNBS, m2NBS, and pNBS (Fig.
4A). To ascertain the
functional roles of these NF-
B cis-regulatory elements,
site-directed mutagenesis was performed either individually or in
combination (see "Experimental Procedures"). Mutation of the dNBS
led to a partial inhibitory effect on IFN-
-induced CD40 promoter
activity (~60%) compared with the full-length promoter construct
(Fig. 4B). Also, mutation of the mNBS and m2NBS caused a
40% inhibition in IFN-
-induced CD40 promoter activation. Curiously, mutation of the pNBS led to a reproducible increase in IFN-
-induced CD40 promoter activity. Combining mutations of the dNBS with the mNBS,
m2NBS, or both did not significantly affect CD40 promoter activity
relative to that of the dNBS mutation alone (Fig. 4B), whereas the combination mutation of mNBS and m2NBS led to a ~50% inhibition of IFN-
-induced CD40 promoter activity. These results suggest that the dNBS, mNBS, and m2NBS elements are involved in IFN-
induction of CD40 promoter activity.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Three NF- B-binding
sites in the human CD40 promoter are important for
IFN- -induced CD40 promoter activity.
Sequences of the four potential NBS in the human CD40 promoter are
shown and underlined. Mutations are indicated as
lowercase letters (A). Wild type, NBS mutants, or
empty vector pGL3-Basic constructs were co-transfected with the
reference plasmid -galactosidase into RAW264.7 cells. The
transfected cells were treated with medium or IFN- (5 ng/ml) for
12 h and then analyzed for luciferase and -galactosidase
activity as described under "Experimental Procedures." The values
of each construct are plotted as percentages of the wild type promoter,
which is set at 100% (B). The data shown are the mean ± S.E. of three experiments.
|
|
To confirm that NF-
B actually binds to the NBS identified
functionally as important for CD40 promoter activity, EOC13 cells were
treated with IFN-
for 30 min to 24 h, nuclear extracts were prepared, and EMSA were performed using dNBS oligonucleotides as probes
and/or competitors. Fig. 5A
demonstrates a low basal binding activity using nuclear extracts from
untreated cells (lane 1), which increases in intensity upon
IFN-
stimulation (lanes 2-8). Optimal complex formation
over the dNBS probe was detected after 6-12 h of IFN-
stimulation
(lanes 6 and 7). The complexes were competed by a
100-fold molar excess of unlabeled dNBS oligonucleotide (data not
shown). The identity of the IFN-
-induced complex was confirmed by
supershifting with antibodies to NF-
B family members. Anti-p50
antibody partially supershifted the upper complex (Fig. 5B,
lane 2), whereas anti-p65 antibody supershifted both the
upper and lower complexes (lane 3). Incubation of nuclear
extracts with antibodies against p50 and p65 led to a complete
supershift of both complexes (lane 4). Normal rabbit serum
(lane 1) and antibodies against p52, c-Rel, or RelB
(lanes 5-7) did not affect complex formation. These data
suggest that the IFN-
-induced protein complexes bound to the dNBS of
the CD40 promoter are composed of p65 homodimers and p65/p50
heterodimers. Similar binding patterns and composition of the complexes
were observed using mNBS and m2NBS oligonucleotides as probes (data not
shown). Similar results were obtained using nuclear extracts from
RAW264.7 cells (data not shown).

View larger version (67K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
IFN- -activated
NF- B binds to the human CD40 distal
NF- B-binding site. EOC13 cells were
incubated with medium (lane 1) or IFN- (5 ng/ml) for 30 min to 24 h (lanes 2-8), and then nuclear extracts
were prepared. EMSA was performed using the human CD40 dNBS as a probe
(A). Nuclear extracts from EOC13 cells stimulated with
IFN- for 6 h were incubated with normal rabbit serum
(lane 1) or with 1 µl of the indicated antisera
(lanes 2-7) for 30 min before the addition of labeled dNBS
probe (B). The data shown are representative of three
experiments. EOC13 cells were incubated with medium (lane 1)
or IFN- (lane 2) in the presence of 10 µg/ml of isotype
antibody (lane 3) or TNF- -neutralizing antibody
(lane 4) for 6 h. Nuclear extracts were prepared, and
EMSA were performed using the human CD40 dNBS as a probe
(C). RAW264.7 cells were incubated with medium (lane
1), TPCK (30 µM, lane 2), PDTC (30 µM, lane 3), IFN- (5 ng/ml, lane
4), IFN- plus TPCK (lane 5), or IFN- plus PDTC
(lane 6) for 8 h. Total RNA was harvested and analyzed
by ribonuclease protection assay for CD40, IRF-1, and GAPDH mRNA
expression (D). The data shown are representative of two
experiments.
|
|
To demonstrate the involvement of IFN-
-induced TNF-
production in
NF-
B activation, nuclear extracts were prepared from cells treated
with IFN-
alone, IFN-
plus isotype control antibody, or IFN-
plus neutralizing TNF-
antibody for 6 h. As shown in Fig.
5C, the inclusion of anti-TNF-
antibody prevents IFN-
induction of NF-
B (lane 4), whereas the isotype-matched
control has no effect (lane 3). These findings indicate that
IFN-
treatment leads to TNF-
production, which is subsequently
responsible for activation of NF-
B.
As another measure of the involvement of NF-
B in this response, we
utilized broad spectrum pharmacological inhibitors of NF-
B such as
TPCK and PDTC. RAW264.7 cells were incubated with medium or
IFN-
in the absence or presence of TPCK (30 µM) or PDTC (30 µM) for 8 h, and then CD40 mRNA
expression was examined. As shown in Fig. 5D, low levels of
CD40 mRNA were expressed constitutively (lane 1) and
were not influenced by the inclusion of TPCK or PDTC (lanes
2 and 3). Stimulation with IFN-
enhanced CD40
mRNA levels (lane 4), and addition of TPCK and PDTC
strongly inhibited expression by ~74 and ~63%, respectively
(lanes 5 and 6). These findings confirm the
importance of NF-
B in IFN-
-induced CD40 expression.
 |
DISCUSSION |
CD40 has been implicated as a proinflammatory molecule that is
involved in a variety of critical immunologic functions, yet its
regulation remains an enigma. This study is a extension of our previous
report describing the involvement of IFN-
-activated STAT-1
and
constitutively expressed PU.1/Spi-B transcription factors in
IFN-
-induced CD40 expression in macrophages and microglia (16). In
this study, we present data that IFN-
induction of CD40 gene
expression is critically dependent on the endogenous production of
TNF-
, which then leads to NF-
B activation and binding to NF-
B
regulatory elements within the CD40 promoter. Our results indicate that
co-treatment of macrophages and microglia with IFN-
and neutralizing
antibodies to TNF-
attenuates the induction of IFN-
-induced CD40
mRNA expression and CD40 promoter activity (Fig. 1). To
substantiate the importance of endogenous TNF-
production in this
response, microglia from TNF-
-deficient mice were examined for
IFN-
induction of CD40 protein expression. Such cells were
refractive to IFN-
stimulation; however, the inclusion of exogenous
TNF-
plus IFN-
induced CD40 protein levels comparable with wild
type primary microglia (Fig. 2). These results suggest that the
autocrine response to IFN-
-induced TNF-
production in macrophages
and microglia is critical for optimal CD40 expression. Indeed, we
demonstrated that IFN-
treatment of RAW264.7 and EOC13 cell lines
induced the production of TNF-
(Table I). The levels of TNF-
produced are clearly sufficient for subsequent CD40 expression, because
the addition of exogenous TNF-
(50 ng/ml) only modestly enhanced
IFN-
-induced CD40 expression (15). Synergistic interactions between
IFN-
and TNF-
are known for many genes such as class I MHC,
IP-10, IRF-1 and ICAM-1 (22-26). However, these synergistic responses
are achieved upon inclusion of exogenous sources of both TNF-
and
IFN-
. In contrast, for IFN-
-induced CD40 expression in
macrophages and microglia, the autocrine response to IFN-
-induced endogenous TNF-
production is sufficient for optimal CD40 expression.
Signaling through TNF receptors leads to the activation of the NF-
B
pathway and subsequent expression of a wide array of genes (for review
see Refs. 27 and 28). NF-
B is sequestered in an inactive form in the
cytoplasm through interaction with inhibitory proteins, the I
Bs.
Exposure to TNF-
leads to the rapid phosphorylation, ubiquitination,
and proteolytic degradation of I
B, allowing NF-
B to translocate
to the nucleus to regulate gene transcription. The multi-subunit IKK,
which is responsible for inducible I
B phosphorylation, contains
several catalytic subunits; among them are IKK-
and IKK-
(27). We
employed a variety of strategies to assess the importance of NF-
B in
IFN-
induction of CD40 gene expression. First, blocking the
activation of NF-
B by transfection of DN constructs of IKK-
and
IKK-
inhibited IFN-
-induced CD40 promoter activity (Fig. 3).
Differences were observed using the two constructs; the IKK-
DN
partially inhibited CD40 promoter activity, whereas the IKK-
DN
construct abolished IFN-
-induced CD40 promoter activation. DN
versions of IKK have been shown to inhibit TNF-
activation of VCAM-1
promoter activity (29). In this system, similar to ours, DN IKK-
was
a more potent inhibitor than IKK-
. These findings may reflect the
fact that IKK-
may be the IKK isoform critical for inflammatory
responses. Broad spectrum pharmacological inhibitors of NF-
B such as
TPCK and PDTC also suppressed IFN-
-induced CD40 mRNA expression
(Fig. 5D). Collectively, these results suggest that the
pathways leading to NF-
B activation are important for subsequent
IFN-
-induced CD40 gene expression.
Within the human CD40 promoter, there are four potential NBS. Mutation
of each NBS individually or in combination suggested that the dNBS,
mNBS, and m2NBS are involved in IFN-
-induced CD40 promoter activity,
with the dNBS being most important for IFN-
-induced CD40 promoter
activity (Fig. 4). Nuclear extracts from IFN-
-stimulated cells
formed a complex over the dNBS probe (Fig. 5). This complex contains
both p50 and p65 NF-
B family members as determined by gel shift
analysis. The importance of TNF-
in this response was demonstrated
by the inclusion of anti-TNF-
neutralizing antibody, which inhibited
IFN-
induction of NF-
B activation (Fig. 5C). The
kinetics of IFN-
-induced NF-
B activation are delayed (optimal response after 6-12 h of IFN-
stimulation); this reflects the need
for TNF-
synthesis in response to IFN-
treatment. We have previously observed that inclusion of the protein synthesis inhibitor puromycin partially inhibits (~50%) IFN-
induction of CD40
mRNA expression in EOC13 cells (15). This effect may be due in part to inhibition of TNF-
production.
Interestingly, we consistently observed an enhancement of
IFN-
-induced CD40 promoter activity when the pNBS was mutated, suggesting that negative regulatory element(s) may reside in this region. Curiously, IFN-
induced NF-
B binding to the pNBS (data not shown) similar to what was observed with the dNBS, mNBS, and m2NBS.
The importance of this region in regulating CD40 expression is
currently under investigation.
The results from this study suggest the importance of autocrine
responsiveness to IFN-
-induced TNF-
and the subsequent activation of NF-
B in IFN-
-induced CD40 expression. The combination of the
data from this study and our previous reports promoted us to provide a
revised model of IFN-
-induced CD40 expression (Fig. 6). In this model, seven
cis-regulatory elements are involved in IFN-
-induced CD40
promoter activation; two Ets elements, two
activated
sequence elements, and three NF-
B elements. Constitutively expressed
PU.1/Spi-B binds to EtsA and EtsB sites, IFN-
-activated STAT-1
binds to the medial and distal
activated sequence elements, and
IFN-
-induced TNF-
-activated NF-
B binds to the dNBS, mNBS, and
m2NBS. Together, these transcription factors recruit and coordinate a
complex that we tentatively call "integrator," which mediates CD40
gene transcription. The cAMP response element-binding protein-binding protein is a likely candidate given its ability to interact with PU.1,
STAT-1
, and NF-
B (for review see Ref. 30). In this regard, we
have preliminary data that inclusion of a cAMP response element-binding protein-binding protein expression construct enhances IFN-
-induced CD40 promoter activity (data not shown). The involvement and components of this integrator are currently being investigated in our
laboratory.

View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Involvement of
TNF- and NF- B in
IFN- -induced CD40 expression.
IFN- -activated STAT-1 binds to the distal and medial activated sequence elements on the human CD40 promoter. Concurrently,
IFN- -induced TNF- activates NF- B, which binds to three NF- B
binding sites (dNBS, mNBS, and m2NBS) in the CD40 promoter. The
cooperation between STAT-1 , NF- B, and the Ets proteins mediates
optimal IFN- -induced CD40 expression in microglia/macrophages.
|
|
The model proposed above has only been tested thus far in macrophages
and microglial cells. CD40 gene expression occurs in a cell
type-specific manner, depending on the stimulus utilized. For example,
in cultured rat vascular smooth muscle cells, IFN-
and TNF-
alone
induce only a modest increase in CD40 expression, whereas combined
stimulation leads to a significant increase in CD40 (31).
Interestingly, IL-1
alone induced significant levels of CD40 in
these cells (31). In human endothelial cells and thymic epithelial
cells, IFN-
, IL-1
, and TNF-
individually enhance CD40
expression (32, 33). Fibroblasts do not express CD40 in response to
IFN-
alone and are weakly inducible by TNF-
, and IFN-
plus
TNF-
synergistically induce CD40 mRNA expression (34).
Interestingly, the induction by IFN-
plus TNF-
was abrogated in
fibroblasts from p65-deficient mice, demonstrating a role for NF-
B
in this response (34). The inability of IFN-
alone to induce CD40 in
fibroblasts may reflect the fact that IFN-
alone has no influence on
NF-
B binding activity, likely because of the inability to induce
TNF-
production (24, 35). Macrophages/microglia are one of the few
cell types that can produce TNF-
in response to IFN-
alone; most
cell types need a combination of stimuli such as lipopolysaccharide
plus IFN-
or IL-1
plus IFN-
(for review see Ref. 36). Thus,
the molecular mechanisms underlying CD40 gene expression are complex
and will reflect the availability of transcription factors such as
PU.1/Spi-B, NF-
B, and STAT-1
and possibly others.
CD40 expression by resident cells of the central nervous system, most
likely microglia, is critical for the infiltration/retention of
inflammatory cells in the central nervous system, leading to the
disease of experimental allergic encephalomyclitis (10). Given
the important role of CD40 in inflammatory events in the central
nervous system as well as other organ systems (for review see Refs. 6
and 37), it is imperative to understand the molecular mechanisms
contributing to both CD40 induction and repression in various cell
types. We have previously shown that IL-4 inhibits IFN-
-induced CD40
expression in microglia in a STAT-6-dependent manner (38).
Several recent studies have shown that IL-4 inhibits E-selectin gene
transcription and osteoclastogenesis through
STAT-6-dependent inhibition of NF-
B (39, 40). Given our
findings of the importance of NF-
B in IFN-
-induced CD40
expression, future studies will assess whether IL-4/STAT-6 inhibition
is operative by antagonism of NF-
B binding. Other inhibitors of CD40
expression on microglia include neurotrophins, IL-10, and IL-11 (41).
It will be of interest to elucidate the molecular basis of their
inhibitory actions.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grant NS-36765 and American Foundation for AIDS Research Grant amFAR 02797-RG (to E. N. B.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Supported by the National Institutes of Health Predoctoral
Fellowship T32AI07493.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Cell Biology,
University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1530 3rd Ave. S., MCLM
395, Birmingham, AL 35294-0005. Tel.: 205-934-7667; Fax:
205-975-6748; E-mail: tika@uab.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, February 5, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M111906200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
TNF, tumor necrosis
factor;
ICAM-1, intercellular adhesion molecule 1;
VCAM-1, vascular
cell adhesion molecule 1;
IL, interleukin;
IKK, I
B kinase;
IFN, interferon;
NBS, NF-
B-binding site(s);
dNBS, distal NBS;
mNBS, medial NBS;
m2NBS, second medial NBS;
pNBS, proximal NBS;
GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase;
PIPES, 1,4-piperazinediethanesulfonic acid;
EMSA, electrophoretic mobility
shift assay(s);
Tricine, N-[2-hydroxy-1,1-bis(hydroxymethyl)ethyl]glycine;
DN, dominant-negative;
TPCK, tosylphenylalanyl chloromethyl ketone;
PDTC, ammonium pyrrolidinecarbodithioate;
STAT, signal transducers and
activators of transcription.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Schönbeck, U.,
and Libby, P.
(2001)
Cell Mol. Life Sci.
58,
4-43[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Fuleihan, R. L.
(1998)
Semin. Hematol.
35,
321-331[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Becher, B.,
Blain, M.,
and Antel, J. P.
(2000)
J. Neuroimmunol.
102,
44-50[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Aloisi, F.,
Penna, G.,
Polazzi, E.,
Minghetti, L.,
and Adorini, L.
(1999)
J. Immunol.
162,
1384-1391[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Du, C.,
Bright, J. J.,
and Sriram, S.
(2001)
J. Neuroimmunol.
114,
69-79[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Grewal, I. S.,
and Flavell, R. A.
(1998)
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
16,
111-135[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
MacDonald, K. P. A.,
Nishioka, Y.,
Lipsky, P. E.,
and Thomas, R.
(1997)
J. Clin. Invest.
100,
2404-2414[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Gerritse, K.,
Laman, J. D.,
Noelle, R. J.,
Aruffo, A.,
Ledbetter, J. A.,
Boersma, W. J. A.,
and Claassen, E.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
2499-2504[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Laman, J. D., De,
Smet, B. J. G. L.,
Schoneveld, A.,
and van Meurs, M.
(1997)
Immunol. Today
18,
272-277[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Becher, B.,
Durell, B. G.,
Miga, A. V.,
Hickey, W. F.,
and Noelle, R. J.
(2001)
J. Exp. Med.
193,
967-974[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Boon, L.,
Brok, H. P. M.,
Bauer, J.,
Ortiz-Buijsse, A.,
Schellekens, M. M.,
Ramdien-Murli, S.,
Blezer, E.,
van Meurs, M.,
Ceuppens, J.,
de Boer, M.,
`t Hart, B. A.,
and Laman, J. D.
(2001)
J. Immunol.
167,
2942-2949[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Abromson-Leeman, S.,
Maverakis, E.,
Bronson, R.,
and Dorf, M. E.
(2001)
Eur. J. Immunol.
31,
527-538[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Howard, L. M.,
Miga, A. J.,
Vanderlugt, C. L.,
Dal Canto, M. C.,
Laman, J. D.,
Noelle, R. J.,
and Miller, S. D.
(1999)
J. Clin. Invest.
103,
281-290[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Samoilova, E. B.,
Horton, J. L.,
Zhang, H.,
and Chen, Y.
(1997)
J. Mol. Med.
75,
603-608[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Nguyen, V.,
Walker, W. S.,
and Benveniste, E. N.
(1998)
Eur. J. Immunol.
28,
2537-2548[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Nguyen, V. T.,
and Benveniste, E. N.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
23674-23684
|
| 17.
|
Regnier, C. H.,
Song, H. Y.,
Gao, X.,
Goeddel, D. V.,
Cao, Z.,
and Rothe, M.
(1997)
Cell
90,
373-383[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Chung, I. Y.,
and Benveniste, E. N.
(1990)
J. Immunol.
144,
2999-3007[Abstract]
|
| 19.
|
Frei, K.,
Siepl, C.,
Groscurth, P.,
Bodmer, S.,
Schwerdel, C.,
and Fontana, A.
(1987)
Eur. J. Immunol.
17,
1271-1278[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Renno, T.,
Krakowski, M.,
Piccirillo, C.,
Lin, J.-Y.,
and Owens, T.
(1995)
J. Immunol.
154,
944-953[Abstract]
|
| 21.
|
Baldwin, A. S., Jr.
(1996)
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
14,
649-681[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Johnson, D. R.,
and Pober, J. S.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
1322-1332[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Collins, T.,
Read, M. A.,
Neish, A. S.,
Whitley, M. Z.,
and Thanos, D.
(1995)
FASEB J.
9,
899-909[Abstract]
|
| 24.
|
Ohmori, Y.,
and Hamilton, T. A.
(1995)
J. Immunol.
154,
5235-5244[Abstract]
|
| 25.
|
Lee, S. J.,
Park, J. Y.,
Hou, J.,
and Benveniste, E. N.
(1999)
GLIA
25,
21-31[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Cheshire, J. L.,
and Baldwin, A. S., Jr.
(1997)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17,
6746-6754[Abstract]
|
| 27.
|
Karin, M.,
and Ben-Neriah, Y.
(2000)
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
18,
621-663[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Locksley, R. M.,
Killeen, N.,
and Lenardo, M. J.
(2001)
Cell
104,
487-501[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Tu, Z.,
Kelley, V. R.,
Collins, T.,
and Lee, F. S.
(2001)
J. Immunol.
166,
6839-6846[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Goodman, R. H.,
and Smolik, S.
(2000)
Genes Dev.
14,
1553-1577[Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Krzesz, R.,
Wagner, A. H.,
Cattaruzza, M.,
and Hecker, M.
(1999)
FEBS Lett.
453,
191-196[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Karmann, K.,
Hughes, C. C. W.,
Schechner, J.,
Fanslow, W. C.,
and Pober, J. S.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
4342-4346[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Galy, A. H. M.,
and Spits, H.
(1992)
J. Immunol.
149,
775-782[Abstract]
|
| 34.
|
Ouaaz, F., Li, M.,
and Beg, A. A.
(1999)
J. Exp. Med.
189,
999-1004[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Suk, K.,
Chang, I.,
Kim, Y. H.,
Kim, S.,
Kim, J. Y.,
Kim, H.,
and Lee, M.-S.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
13153-13159[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
McDermott, M. F.
(2001)
Cell. Mol. Biol.
47,
619-635[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Vogel, L. A.,
and Noelle, R. J.
(1998)
Semin. Immunol.
10,
435-442[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 38.
|
Nguyen, V.,
and Benveniste, E. N.
(2000)
J. Immunol.
165,
6235-6243[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 39.
|
Bennett, B. L.,
Cruz, R.,
Lacson, R. G.,
and Manning, A. M.
(1997)
J. Biochem. (Tokyo)
272,
10212-10219 |