Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M105441200 on January 24, 2002

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 16, 13959-13965, April 19, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/16/13959    most recent
M105441200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Poschet, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Deretic, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Poschet, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Deretic, V.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Hyperacidification of Cellubrevin Endocytic Compartments and Defective Endosomal Recycling in Cystic Fibrosis Respiratory Epithelial Cells*

Jens F. PoschetDagger §, Jennifer SkidmoreDagger , John C. BoucherDagger ||, Aaron M. FirovedDagger , Rebecca W. Van Dyke**, and Vojo DereticDagger §Dagger Dagger §§

From the Departments of Dagger  Microbiology and Immunology and ** Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-0620 and the Departments of § Molecular Genetics and Microbiology and Dagger Dagger  Cell Biology and Physiology, University of New Mexico, Health Science Center, School of Medicine, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131

Received for publication, June 12, 2001, and in revised form, January 24, 2002

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR), which is aberrant in patients with cystic fibrosis, normally functions both as a chloride channel and as a pleiotropic regulator of other ion transporters. Here we show, by ratiometric imaging with luminally exposed pH-sensitive green fluorescent protein, that CFTR affects the pH of cellubrevin-labeled endosomal organelles resulting in hyperacidification of these compartments in cystic fibrosis lung epithelial cells. The excessive acidification of intracellular organelles was corrected with low concentrations of weak base. Studies with proton ATPase and sodium channel inhibitors showed that the increased acidification was dependent on proton pump activity and sodium transport. These observations implicate sodium efflux in the pH homeostasis of a subset of endocytic organelles and indicate that a dysfunctional CFTR in cystic fibrosis leads to organellar hyperacidification in lung epithelial cells because of a loss of CFTR inhibitory effects on sodium transport. Furthermore, recycling of transferrin receptor was altered in CFTR mutant cells, suggesting a previously unrecognized cellular defect in cystic fibrosis, which may have functional consequences for the receptors on the plasma membrane or within endosomal compartments.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR)1 functions as an apical membrane chloride channel (1). Different CFTR mutations causing cystic fibrosis (CF) affect the processing, intracellular localization, and function of the corresponding protein (2, 3). The most common mutant form of CFTR in CF, Delta F508 CFTR, does not enter the organelles of the secretory pathway and is not delivered to the plasma membrane as it is not properly folded and remains trapped in the endoplasmic reticulum. Mutations in CFTR result in reduced apical chloride transport but also have pleiotropic effects on the function of other ion transporters including the amiloride-sensitive epithelial sodium channel (ENaC) (4, 5), outwardly rectifying chloride channels (6, 7), the Na+/H+ exchanger via EBP50 (ezrin-binding protein), Na+/H+ exchanger regulatory factor (8), bicarbonate conductance (9, 10), and aquaporin 3 (5).

It has been proposed that CFTR also plays a role in facilitating acidification of intracellular compartments, such as endosomes, by providing anions (Cl-) and maintaining charge neutrality as protons are pumped into the lumen of these organelles (11). According to this proposal, a loss of CFTR and chloride conductance would result in increased pH (11, 12). However, repeated studies have failed to detect alkalinization of intracellular compartments in CF (13-17).

It has been shown that CFTR is present in endosomes of stably transfected Swiss 3T3 and T84 cells, which normally express CFTR (15). The absence of CFTR on the plasma membrane and organelles of the secretory pathway, which communicate with the endocytic pathway, prompted us to re-examine potential consequences in CF on the pH of endocytic organelles by specific targeting of pH-sensitive GFP (18) to a defined endocytic compartment. Here we show that cellubrevin-labeled endosomes are hyperacidified in CF lung epithelial cells and that the pH of the recycling endosome depends on CFTR and its effects on sodium transport. In addition, we show physiological defects in the function of the endocytic pathway in CF, as recycling of receptor-mediated endocytic tracers (transferrin) is affected in CF lung epithelial cells.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Cells and Tissue Culture-- CFT1 (19, 20) is a cell line derived from the tracheal epithelium of a CF patient homozygous for the most common CFTR Delta F508 mutation. Stably transfected derivatives of CFT1were the following: CFT1-LCFSN, expressing the wild-type CFTR gene; CFT1-Delta 508, transfected with Delta F508 mutant CFTR gene; and CFT1-LC3, the vector-transfected control cells. CFT1 and derivative cells were grown in F12 media (Invitrogen) supplemented with 10 µg/ml insulin, 1 µM hydrocortisone, 1 nM triiodothyronine, 10 ng/ml cholera toxin (Sigma), 3.75 µg/ml endothelial cell growth supplement, 25 ng/ml epidermal growth factor, and 5 µg/ml transferrin (Collaborative Research Inc., Bedford, MA) (19). IB3-1 is a human bronchial epithelial cell line derived from a CF patient with a Delta F508/W1282X CFTR mutant genotype (21). C38 and S9 are derivatives of IB3-1 cells and are stably transfected with a functional CFTR corrected for chloride conductance (22). The physiological levels of expression of CFTR and its functionality have been established previously for C38 cells (22). The cells were maintained in LHC-8 media (BIOSOURCE Int., Rockville, MD), 10% fetal bovine serum, and 50 units/ml penicillin-streptomycin (Invitrogen). All cells were grown in a humidified incubator at 37 °C under 5% CO2.

Transfections-- Cellubrevin-pHluorin GFP and glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-pHluorin GFP DNA constructs were from J. Rothman (18). IB3-1 cells and its derivatives were seeded at 105 cells/ml on 25-mm coverslips in 6-well plates. Cells were transfected with 1 µg/ml DNA using Lipofectin (Invitrogen) for 6 h at 37 °C, 5% CO2. CFT1 cells and their derivatives were seeded at 105 cells/ml on 25-mm coverslips in 6-well plates and grown in the medium without cholera toxin. Cells were transfected with GenePorter (Gene Therapy Systems, San Diego, CA) with 2.5 µg/ml DNA for 4 h at 37 °C, 5% CO2. Transfected cells were mounted in a perfusion chamber after 48 h of expression (Harvard Instruments, Holliston, MA) set at 37 °C for live microscopy or otherwise processed for colocalization studies.

Fluorescence Microscopy and pH Measurements-- Fluorescence microscopy was carried out using an Olympus IX-70 microscope and Olympix KAF1400 CCD camera (LSR, Olympus, Melville, NY). The ratio of emission at 508 nm upon excitation at 410 versus 470 nm was obtained using the previously described (18) filter sets (Chroma Technology Corp., Brattleboro, VT) mounted in a Sutter filter wheel (Sutter Instruments, Novato, CA) and controlled by the Merlin program (version 1.89, LSR, Olympus, Melville, NY). For the pH standard curve, two types of calibrations were carried out. (i) Cells transfected with GPI-pHluorin GFP were mounted in a perfusion chamber and incubated in buffer A (25 mM HEPES (pH changing from 7.4 to 5.5), 119 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM KCl, 2 mM CaCl2, 2 mM MgCl2, 30 mM glucose) at 37 °C. Fluorescence images were taken upon excitation at 410 and 470 nm (six consecutive exposures). Three regions of interest were selected, and the standard curve was plotted as averaged 410/470 ratio values for a given buffer pH. (ii) At the end of experiments, the pH gradient was collapsed by incubating cells in 10 µM monensin and 10 µM nigericin for 30 min at 37 °C in buffer A at pH 7.4 or 5.5, and ratios were recorded for internal standards. Sample pH was determined the same way as for the external standard curve.

Ratiometric Measurements with 8-Hydroxypyrene-1,3,6-trisulfonic Acid-- IB3-1 and derivative cells were seeded onto glass coverslips in 6-well plates at the density described above. After 72 h cells were washed and incubated with the water-soluble, membrane-impermeant, pH-sensitive ratiometric probe 8-hydroxypyrene-1,3,6-trisulfonic acid 5 mM (HPTS, Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) at 37 °C. Cells were washed after 10 and 60 min, and the ratio of fluorescence emission at 508 nm was determined upon altered excitation at 410 and 470 nm.

Inhibition Studies-- For H+-ATPase inhibition, cells were incubated with 100 nM bafilomycin A (Sigma) in buffer A at pH 7.4 for 2.5 h at 37 °C. For inhibition of sodium channels, 100 µM amiloride (Sigma) was added in buffer A at pH 7.4 for 60 or 120 min at 37 °C. For Na+/K+-ATPase inhibition, cells were incubated with 10 µM acetylstrophanthidin in buffer A for 60 min, and pH was measured as above.

Organellar pH in CF Cells with Rescued CFTR via Temperature or Chemically Enhanced CFTR Trafficking-- In experiments where CFTR folding and trafficking were rescued (23) by low temperature, mutant IB3-1 cells were grown at 26 °C, 5% CO2 for 40 h on glass coverslips. Organellar pH was determined using ratiometric GFP-pHluorin as described in sections above. 4-Phenylbutyric acid (4-PBA; gift from Triple Crown America Inc., Perkasie, PA) was used as an agent that promotes CFTR trafficking and rescue of its function (24, 25). IB3-1 cells were grown in the presence of 2.5 mM 4-PBA at 37 °C, 5% CO2 for 40 h. Cells were then subjected to ratiometric determination of organellar pH as described above.

Normalization of Organellar pH in CF Cells with Ammonia-- Cells were grown for 48 h in complete LHC-8 media in the presence of 0.1-1.0 mM NH4Cl (from Sigma) at 37 °C in 5% CO2, and pH measurements were carried out as describe above.

Fluorescence Microscopy Localization Studies-- For localization studies with fluorescently labeled transferrin, IB3-1 cells and derivatives grown on glass slides were transfected with cellubrevin-pHluorin GFP as described above. After 48 h of expression, cells were incubated for 30 min in DMEM (BioWhittaker, Walkersville, MD), 0.2% BSA (Sigma) at 37 °C followed by a change of medium and incubation at 4 °C for 30 min. 20 µg/ml human transferrin conjugated to Texas Red (Molecular Probes) in DMEM, 0.2% BSA was added for 30 min at 4 °C followed by three washes and incubation with DMEM, 0.2% BSA at 37 °C for 15 and 120 min. When indicated, cells were treated with 20 µg/ml nocodazole (Sigma) in DMEM, 0.2% BSA for 60 min following a 120-min treatment with transferrin. Samples were fixed with 3.7% paraformaldehyde, 5% sucrose for 10 min at room temperature, mounted with PermaFluor (Shandon, Pittsburgh, PA), and examined by fluorescence microscopy using a 570/20 excitation filter and a dichroic mirror/emitter cube set 8300 (Chroma Technology Corp.). For localization studies with CFTR-GFP and transferrin, IB3-1 cells and derivatives were transfected with CFTR-GFP. Transfection and transferrin incubation were as described above. For localization studies with alpha 2,6-sialyltransferase, cells were co-transfected with 0.5 µg of cellubrevin-pHluorin GFP and Myc-tagged alpha 2,6-sialyltransferase DNA using 10 µl of Lipofectin. After 48 h of expression, cells were fixed with 3.7% paraformaldehyde and permeabilized with 0.2% saponin for 5 min. Mouse monoclonal antibody (9E10) against c-myc (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) was followed by goat anti-mouse secondary antibody conjugated to Alexa 568 (Molecular Probes). Glass slides were mounted using PermaFluor and analyzed by fluorescence microscopy using a 570/20 excitation filter and a dichroic mirror/emitter cube set 8300. For localization studies with dextran-Texas Red, cellubrevin-pHluorin-transfected IB3-1 cells and IB3-1 derivatives were incubated with 10 µg/ml dextran-Texas Red followed by three washes. Cells were either fixed or live sequences were recorded immediately after removal of dextran-Texas Red every 30 s for 30 min using a monochromator excitation light source and emission filter sets on a microscope and camera controlled by TILLvisTRAC, version 3.3 (T.I.L.L. Vision Photonics, GMBH). For localization studies of cellubrevin-pHluorin GFP and EEA-1, IB3-1 and derivative cells were transfected with cellubrevin-pHluorin GFP. EEA1 was visualized using primary human anti-EEA1 antibody (Transduction Laboratories, Lexington, KY) and secondary Alexa 568-conjugated antibody.

Transferrin Recycling-- Transferrin recycling was carried out as described previously (16). IB3-1 cells and their derivatives were incubated with 125I-labeled transferrin for 45 min in DMEM, 0.2% BSA at 37 °C. Cells were then washed three times with ice-cold DMEM, 0.2% BSA. The last wash was taken as 0 time point. Cells were then incubated for 15 min at 37 °C, and medium was collected and replaced with fresh DMEM, 0.2% BSA for a further 45 min. Medium was collected, and cells were lysed to establish 100% of counts. Samples were counted in a gamma -counter (Beckman, Brae, CA) and expressed as % transferrin recycled at a given time point.

Horseradish Peroxidase (HRP) Uptake and Fluid Phase Endocytosis-- The assay was carried out according to Li and co-workers (26, 27). Cells were seeded in 6-well plates at 5 × 105/well at 24 h prior to assay. After being washed in serum-free DMEM, cells were incubated for 15 min at 37 °C with either DMEM or 100 ng/ml wortmannin in DMEM. After washing, cells were incubated with 5 mg/ml HRP in DMEM, 0.2% BSA for 60 min at 37 °C. Uptake was stopped by washing with 4 °C phosphate-buffered saline, 0.2% BSA. Cells were lysed in phosphate-buffered saline, 0.1% Triton X-100. Lysate was added to O-phenylenediamine solution (HRP substrate) in a 96-well plate and incubated at room temperature for 5 min. Reaction was stopped by adding 1 M H2SO4, and A490 was measured using a spectrophotometer (Shimadzu UV-1601, Shimadzu, Columbia, MD). Protein concentration of the lysate was determined by BCA reaction (Pierce), and uptake was expressed as A490/mg protein.

Statistics-- All statistical analyses were carried out using Fisher's Protected LSD post hoc test (analysis of variance) (SuperANOVA v1.11, Abacus Concepts, Inc., Berkeley, CA).

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Expression and Localization of Cellubrevin- and GPI-pHluorin GFP Chimeras in CF and CFTR-corrected Bronchial Epithelial Cells-- In this study, we employed the recently developed pH-sensitive GFP (pHluorin GFP) system for ratiometric determination of the lumenal pH in intracellular organelles (18). Two pHluorin GFP fusion constructs were used (Fig. 1, a-h), one with GPI-pHluorin GFP and another with (endosomal v-SNARE) cellubrevin (18). GPI-pHluorin GFP is expected to result in the exposure of pHluorin GFP on the plasma membrane to the extracellular fluid. The cellubrevin-pHluorin GFP fusion has GFP exposed luminally in the intracellular compartments containing cellubrevin. The endosomal (cellubrevin) and plasma membrane (GPI)-targeted pHluorin GFP probes were transfected into well characterized human bronchial epithelial cells (21, 22): IB3-1 (from a compound heterozygote CFTR Delta F508/W1282X CF patient), C38 (IB3-1 cells corrected with a functional CFTR lacking the first ecto-loop), and S9 (IB3-1 cells corrected with a full size functional CFTR cDNA). These cells have been used as standard cell lines to model the effects of CFTR (6, 21, 22, 24, 28).


View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Fluorescence images of live human CFTR-mutant and CFTR-corrected bronchial epithelial cells expressing GPI- and cellubrevin-pHluorin GFP. Cells were excited at 410 or 470 nm as indicated above each column of panels, and fluorescence emission at 508 nm was captured. a-d, IB3-1 cells transfected with GPI-pHluorin GFP at the indicated pH of buffer A applied externally. e-h, cellubrevin-pHluorin GFP-transfected IB3-1 (e and f) and C38 (g and h). Color insets, pH-values according to the color look-up table in panel i. i, pH calibration curve obtained with GPI-pHluorin GFP; red, internal standards obtained with cellubrevin-pHluorin GFP in cells treated with monensin and nigericin, normalized to match the pH 7.4 ratio obtained using GPI-pHluorin GFP as external standard. Inset, the dots are a representative individual calibration data set.

The plasma membrane localization of GPI-pHluorin GFP was demonstrated by responsiveness of GFP fluorescence to pH changes of the external buffer. Fig. 1, a-d, displays the fluorescence appearance of GPI-pHluorin GFP at pH 7.4 and 5.5. The cells expressing GPI-pHluorin GFP were used to generate a standard curve (Fig. 1i). All cells showed identical dependence of the GPI-pHluorin GFP fluorescence on pH of the external buffer. In addition to the plasma membrane labeling, as evidenced in Fig. 1, a-d, all cells transfected with GPI-pHluorin GFP showed a perinuclear fluorescence corresponding to a lipid raft recycling compartment, recently described by Lippincott-Schwartz and colleagues (29). Based on our observations, this compartment responds to external buffer pH (Fig. 1, a-d), most likely because of the previously described rapid cycling of these membranes in constant communication with plasma membrane (29). GPI-pHluorin GFP fluorescence was not dependent on changes in concentration of other ions in the medium (e.g. sodium; data not shown). There were no differences in fluorescence ratios obtained with GPI-pHluorin GFP in IB3-1, C38, and S9 cells.

Localization of cellubrevin-pHluorin GFP was examined in both CF and CFTR-corrected cells by fluorescence microscopy using EEA1 antibodies, Texas Red-conjugated endocytic tracers. First, the cells were allowed to endocytose fluorescent transferrin, which was followed by chasing this marker of receptor-mediated endocytosis into the pericentriolar/paranuclear recycling compartment. This resulted in a significant colocalization of transferrin with cellubrevin-pHluorin GFP fluorescence in the transfected cells as evidenced by a similar overall organellar distribution (Fig. 2, a-c, IB3-1 cells; d-f, CFTR-corrected S-9 cells). Both the CF and CFTR-corrected cells showed similar overall organellar distribution. The colocalization of cellubrevin-pHluorin GFP and transferrin was not absolute in either cell line, as some of the cellubrevin- and transferrin-labeled profiles did not fully overlap, consistent with previous observations of strong but incomplete colocalization between transferrin and cellubrevin labeled vesicles (30). The most complete overlap was seen in the pericentriolar recycling endosomal compartment, strongly labeled by fluorescent transferrin, which was also the site of the majority of cellubrevin-pHluorin GFP labeled intracellular organelles. In further support of the overlap between cellubrevin and the recycling endosomal compartment, the treatment of cells with nocodazole, which causes depolymerization of microtubules and dispersion of the recycling endosome, resulted in redistribution of both transferrin and cellubrevin-pHluorin GFP fluorescence with a preservation of the significant overlap between the two markers (Fig. 2, g-i). These observations suggest that cellubrevin-pHluorin GFP is localized in human bronchial epithelial cells with similar distribution in both CF and CFTR-corrected cells in the endosomal recycling compartment equivalent to what has been observed in several model cell lines (30-33). Importantly, CFTR partially overlapped with the recycling endosome in bronchial epithelial cells (Fig. 2, j-l). The colocalization of CFTR-GFP and transferrin was similar to the one observed with cellubrevin-pHluorin GFP and transferrin (Fig. 2, a-f).


View larger version (133K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Colocalization of cellubrevin-pHluorin GFP and transferrin-labeled endosomes in human bronchial epithelial cells by fluorescence microscopy. Cells were transfected with cellubrevin-pHluorin GFP and incubated with transferrin conjugated to Texas Red for 30 min at 4 °C; unbound transferrin was washed and endocytosis allowed to proceed for 2 h at 37 °C. a-c, CFTR mutant cells IB3-1: a, GFP fluorescence (cellubrevin-pHluorin GFP); b, Texas Red fluorescence (transferrin); c, merged images a and b. d-f, CFTR corrected S9 cells: d, GFP fluorescence as in a; e, Texas Red fluorescence as in b; f, merged images d and e. g-i, IB3-1 as described in a-c upon treatment with 20 µg/ml nocodazole for 1 h: g, GFP fluorescence; h, conjugated Texas Red (transferrin); i, merged images g and h. j-l, colocalization of CFTR-GFP and transferrin labeled endosomes in human bronchial epithelial cells (C38) by fluorescence microscopy: j, GFP fluorescence (CFTR GFP); k, Texas Red fluorescence (transferrin); l, merged images j and k.

The cellubrevin-pHluorin GFP probe did not colocalize with the early endosomal marker EEA1, although the large EEA1-positive profiles and the cellubrevin recycling endosome appeared to be closely apposed (Fig. 3, a-c). Treatment of cells with nocodazole confirmed that cellubrevin-pHluorin GFP and EEA1 were in distinct compartments (Fig. 3, d-f). The organellar distribution of EEA1 and cellubrevin compartments was similar in CFTR-corrected (Fig. 3, a-c) and CF cells (Fig. 3, insets in a-c). Cellubrevin-pHluorin GFP did not colocalize with peripheral endocytic organelles labeled with the fluid phase tracer dextran-Texas Red in fixed cells (data not shown) and in live cells monitored by time lapse microscopy (Fig. 3, g-l). Cellubrevin-pHluorin GFP was also tightly apposed to the alpha 2,6-sialyltransferase, as revealed by immunofluorescence (Fig. 4), but remained localized distinctly from the TGN marker. There were no differences in localization of cellubrevin-pHluorin GFP in the CFTR mutant cells and CFTR-corrected cells (Fig. 4, a-d, CFTR-corrected cells; insets in b-d, CF cells). Collectively, these observations indicate that cellubrevin-pHluorin GFP probe was in the identical compartments in CFTR-corrected and CF cells and that the pH probe was in the recycling endosome.


View larger version (121K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Fluorescence microscopy analysis of cellubrevin-pHluorin GFP and EEA1 localization. IB3-1 and derivative cells were transfected with cellubrevin-pHluorin GFP. EEA1 was visualized using primary human anti-EEA1 antibody and secondary Alexa 568-conjugated antibody. a-c, CFTR-corrected C38 cell (insets, CF cells IB3-1): a, GFP fluorescence; b, EEA1 immunofluorescence; c, merged images a and b. d-f, C38 cells as described in a-c upon treatment with nocodazole: d, GFP fluorescence; e, EEA1 visualization; f, merged images a and b. g-l, time lapse recording of cellubrevin-pHluorin GFP labeled and dextran-Texas Red-containing vesicles. Shown is a portion of a live IB3-1 cell transfected with cellubrevin GFP (green) following endocytosis of the fluid phase endocytic tracer dextran-Texas Red. 1, dextran-Texas Red-labeled vesicle; 2, cellubrevin-pHluorin GFP vesicle.


View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Close apposition of cellubrevin-pHluorin GFP recycling endosomes and TGN in human bronchial epithelial cells. TGN was revealed by Myc-tagged alpha 2,6-sialyltransferase Sttyr. IB3-1 and S9 cells were co-transfected with cellubrevin-pHluorin GFP and myc tagged alpha 2,6-sialyltransferase Sttyr expressing constructs. a-d, main panels, S9 (CFTR-corrected cell). b-d, insets, IB3-1 (mutant CFTR cell): a, phase contrast; b, GFP fluorescence; c, immunofluorescent visualization of Myc-tagged alpha 2,6-sialyltransferase, Sttyr, using anti-Myc antibody and secondary Alexa 568-conjugated antibody (red fluorescence); d, merged images b and c.

Cellubrevin Endosomal Compartment Is Hyperacidified in CF Lung Epithelial Cells-- IB3-1 (CF), C38 (CFTR-corrected IB3-1), and S9 cells (full size CFTR-corrected IB3-1), transfected with cellubrevin-pHluorin GFP (18) were used to determine the pH of cellubrevin-containing endosomal compartments. Fig. 1, e-h, illustrates the difference in fluorescence between cellubrevin-pHluorin GFP-transfected IB3-1 and C38 cells upon illumination at 410 versus 470 nm. The apparent pH of cellubrevin-containing endosomes was 6.7 ± 0.1 (mean ± S.E., n = 15) for the CFTR-corrected C38 and 6.7 ± 0.1 (mean ± S.E., n = 32) for S9 cells compared with the apparent pH of IB3-1 CFTR mutant cells, which was 6.2 ± 0.1 (mean ± S.E., n = 19) (Table I). Thus, cellubrevin-labeled compartments in CF mutant cells show hyperacidification of 0.5 pH unit (p = 0.0001). The pH of the cellubrevin-labeled compartments remained unaltered regardless of whether the cells were subconfluent or confluent, retaining the difference in pH between CF and CFTR-corrected cells (n = 66).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Hyperacidification of TGN38 and cellubrevin-labeled compartments in CF respiratory epithelial cells

The observation that cellubrevin-labeled endosomes are hyperacidified in CF cells was confirmed using another well characterized CF cell line, CFT1 (19, 20), derived from the tracheal epithelium of a CF patient homozygous for the Delta F508 CFTR mutation. CFT1, and its stably transfected derivatives, CFT1-LCFSN (expressing the wild-type CFTR gene), CFT1-Delta F508 (expressing the Delta F508 mutant CFTR gene), and CFT1-LC3 (vector control), were transiently transfected with cellubrevin-pHluorin GFP constructs. The cellubrevin-pHluorin GFP-labeled compartment in the CFTR-corrected variant CFT1-LCFSN had an apparent pH of 6.6 ± 0.03 compared with pH 6.1 ± 0.1 in CFT1, pH 6.2 ± 0.1 in CFT1-Delta F508, and pH 6.0 ± 0.1 in CFT1-LC3 cells (Table I). Thus CF tracheal epithelial cells, similar to bronchial epithelial cells, had hyperacidified cellubrevin endosomal compartments. As in the case of IB3-1, C38, and S9 cells, the differences in cellubrevin endosomal pH between CFT1, CFT1-Delta F508, CFT1-LC3, and CFT1-LCFSN (CFTR-corrected) cells remained unaltered whether cells were confluent or not (n = 63).

Additional experiments were also carried out to confirm these findings. Hyperacidification of cellubrevin containing endosomes in CF cells was corrected by the addition of low concentrations of the weak base NH4Cl (0.1 mM) bringing pH to the values matching those observed in CFTR-corrected cells (Fig. 5a). Based on these experiments, we conclude that cellubrevin-labeled compartments are hyperacidified by 0.5 pH units in CF lung epithelial cells. This phenomenon was due to defective CFTR function and trafficking, as expression of a functional CFTR, but not that of Delta F508 CFTR, restored the normal pH in CFT1 cells (Table I). To confirm this notion, we treated mutant CFTR IB3-1 cells by growing them at a permissive temperature (26 °C), which allows CFTR folding and trafficking (23), or by adding the chemical chaperone 4-PBA, which restores trafficking and CFTR function (24, 25), followed by pH determination using cellubrevin-pHluorin GFP-transfected cells. The results of these experiments are shown in Fig. 6. As both treatments (low temperature and chemical chaperone) restored normal pH of the cellubrevin-endosome in CFTR-mutant cells, it is possible to conclude that defective CFTR causes aberrantly low pH in this organelle.


View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Analysis of the mechanism of hyperacidification of cellubrevin endosomes in CF. Changes in pH (Delta pH) in IB3-1 (open circle ), C38 (triangle ), and S9 () cells expressing cellubrevin-pHluorin GFP were determined in five distinct cells for each treatment as indicated (bar, mean value). a, IB3-1, C38, and S9 were either not treated (Control, open symbols) or treated with 0.1 mM NH4Cl (filled symbols) for 48 h. IB3-1, p = 0.0057; C38, p = 0.8805; S9, p = 0.2982. b, untreated cells (Control, open symbols) and bafilomycin A1-treated cells (filled symbols). IB3-1, p < 0.0001; C38, p = 0.0028; S9, p = 0.0500. c, IB3-1 cells treated with amiloride for the indicated period of time: 60 min, p = 0.0085; 120 min, p < 0.0001. d, untreated cells (Control, open symbols) and 10 µM acetylstrophanthidin-treated cells (filled symbols) for 60 min. IB3-1, p = 0.4528; C38, p < 0.0001.


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Temperature shift-induced and 4-PBA treatment-dependent rescue of CFTR function normalize the pH of cellubrevin-endosomal compartments in CF cells. IB3-1 were grown at 37 °C (open circle ) or 26 °C () or in the presence of 2.5 mM 4-PBA at 37 °C () for 40 h. C38 cells (triangle ) were grown at 37 °C for 40 h. The pH values for the cells were: IB3-1, pH 6.3 ± 0.1; IB3-1 26 °C, pH 6.7 ± 0.1; IB3-1 4-PBA, pH 6.8 ± 0.1; and C38, pH 6.7 ± 0.1 (n = 5, ±S.E.). IB3-1 37 °C versus IB3-1 26 °C, p = 0.0044; IB3-1 37 °C versus IB3-1 4-PBA, p = 0.0008; IB3-1 37 °C versus C38, 37 °C p = 0.0019.

To examine the pH of other parts of the endocytic pathway, IB3-1, C38, and S9 cells were allowed to endocytose 5 mM HTPS, a fluid phase pH-sensitive ratiometric dye, for 5 min. The ratio of fluorescence was measured after 10 and 60 min (n = 5). After 10 min IB3-3 CFTR mutant cells (ratio 3.26 ± S.E. 0.42) were significantly more acidic than C38 (ratio 2.40 ± S.E. 0.21) and S9 (ratio 2.54 ± S.E. 0.18) (both corrected) cells (p = 0.0149 IB3-1 versus C38, p = 0.038, IB3-1 versus S9). However, after 60 min there was no significant difference in the ratios between IB3-3 CFTR mutant cells (ratio 3.02 ± S.E. 0.159) and C38 (ratio 2.88 ± S.E. 0.15) or S9 (ratio 2.84 ± S.E. 0.14) cells (p = 0.6732 IB3-1 versus C38, p = 0.5881, IB3-1 versus S9). HTPS probe responsiveness was linear over a pH range from 7.4 to 5.5. These results indicate that an early endosomal compartment accessible to the exogenously added fluid phase probe is hyperacidified in CF bronchial epithelial cells but that the late, degradative endocytic organelles are not affected.

Hyperacidification of Cellubrevin Endosomal Compartments in CF Epithelial Cells Is a Sodium-dependent Process-- How might the absence of CFTR affect endosomal pH? It has previously been suggested that chloride channel activity of CFTR may affect organellar acidification in nasal polyp epithelial cells from CF (11). Such proposals are consistent with the role that Cl- anions are believed to play in dissipating membrane potential generated by proton pumping into the lumen, which otherwise inhibits H+-ATPase activity (34). However, this model would predict organellar alkalization in CF and could not explain hyperacidification observed in our experiments. Instead, we considered an alternative hypothesis, in which Na+ efflux from the organelles could play a role in determining lumenal pH. It is known that in CF bronchial epithelial cells, the epithelial sodium channel, ENaC, is under negative regulation by CFTR (3-5, 35-37). In the absence of CFTR, as is the case in CF, ENaC is relieved from CFTR inhibition in lung epithelial cells, leading to an increase in Na+ transport. To test for the possibility that altered sodium transport could play a role in affecting organellar acidification in CF, we first established whether H+-ATPase played a role in hyperacidification of the cellubrevin endosomes in CF cells. Treatment with bafilomycin A1 abrogated hyperacidification of cellubrevin-labeled compartments in CF cells (Fig. 5b). Next, a role for sodium transport in hyperacidification was tested. The addition of amiloride, a sodium channel inhibitor, led to an increase in pH of 1 unit in cellubrevin labeled endosomes of IB3-1 CFTR mutant cells after 2 h of incubation (Fig. 5c). This observation is consistent with sodium transport, (i.e. sodium efflux from the organelles) playing a role in determining the pH of the cellubrevin endosomal compartment. Additional experiments (Fig. 5d) with acetylstrophanthidin, an Na+/K+-ATPase inhibitor, and ion substitution studies (data not shown) confirmed the role of Na+ conductance in organellar hyperacidification in CF.

Recycling of Transferrin Is Affected in CF Cells-- Previous studies have indicated that altering endosomal pH can affect the function of the recycling endosome (38, 39). To assess the functionality of cellubrevin recycling endosome in CF, we examined recycling of transferrin in CF and CFTR-corrected cells. IB3-1 cells and their CFTR-corrected derivatives, C38 and S9, were allowed to take up 125I-labeled transferrin. The kinetics of transferrin recycling is shown in Fig. 6. There was no difference in recycling after 15 min. However, after 60 min, recycling of transferrin in IB3-1 (CFTR mutant) cells was reduced by 21% (p = 0.0244) compared with the CFTR-corrected C38 cells and by and 16% (p = 0.0054) relative to S9 cells. In contrast, endocytosis of transferrin or fluid phase endocytosis (Fig. 7, inset) was not different in CF and CFTR-corrected cells and was equally sensitive to the inhibitor of bulk endocytosis, wortmannin (27) These results indicate that endosomal recycling is impaired in CF bronchial epithelial cells.


View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Defective endosomal recycling in CF respiratory epithelial cells. CF IB3-1 cells (open circle ) and CFTR-corrected C38 (black-square) and S9 (black-triangle) cells were allowed to endocytose 125I-labeled transferrin for 45 min at 37 °C, excess transferrin was removed by washing at 4 °C, and recycling was measured after 15 and 60 min at 37 °C. Shown are mean values ± S.E. (n = 3). After 60 min, recycling was reduced in IB3-1 (CFTR mutant) cells by 21% (p = 0.0244) compared with the CFTR-corrected C38 cells and by 16% (p = 0.0054) relative to S9 cells. Inset, fluid phase endocytosis (measured by HRP uptake) is not affected in CF cells (IB3-1 versus C38, p = 0.4966) and is equally sensitive to wortmannin (WM) in both CF and normal cells, IB3-1 versus C38, p = 0.7954; C38 versus wortmannin C38, p = 0.0001; IB3-1 versus wortmannin IB3-1, p = 0.0001.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The studies reported here were inspired by previous models (11, 12) in which altered pH in intracellular organelles was predicted in CF. However, our observations that the recycling endosomal compartment is hyperacidified in mutant CFTR IB3-1 and CFT1 cells is at variance with the previously published values for CF nasal polyp cells reporting slight alkalinization of the endosome (pH 6.8 in CF versus pH 6.3 in CFTR corrected cells) (11). Others have observed no differences in endosomal acidification of Swiss 3T3 fibroblasts (15), CFPAC-1 (17), or Chinese hamster ovary cells (13) transfected with either functional or nonfunctional CFTR. The discrepancies between these studies and our findings can be explained by the different cell types investigated, as in our work human bronchial and tracheal epithelial cells derived from CF patients were tested. It is know that, depending upon the cell type, CFTR may have either positive (4, 37) or negative (40) regulatory effects on sodium channels, and so the cell type selection for testing is critical.

It is important to note that our data cannot be easily explained by the previously proposed action of CFTR as a chloride channel in the context of organellar acidification (11). Instead, regulatory functions of CFTR must be invoked, such as the CFTR-dependent inhibition of the sodium conductance in human respiratory epithelial cells (3, 4, 35-37, 40). In this model, excess positive charge, caused by the accumulation of H+ in the lumen of the organelles, may be compensated by Na+ efflux into the cytosol, thus dissipating the electrogenic charge differential (41) and allowing the H+-ATPase to develop a greater transmembrane pH gradient. In the context of charge gain or loss, the impact of Na+ exit is equivalent to the influx of Cl- with the net effect of relieving the proton pump from the inhibition associated with the build up of membrane potential. In normal cells, inactive sodium channels, and most likely active Na+/K+-ATPase along with potassium channels, increase the interior positive membrane potential and thus counteract acidification. In CF cells, in the absence of CFTR-dependent inhibition (3-5, 35-37), the probability for open state of the sodium channel increases and Na+-efflux compensates for the H+-associated positive charge build-up, thus neutralizing the membrane potential and facilitating H+-ATPase action and vesicle acidification. Independent studies show that the TGN, another compartment through which CFTR and sodium channel ENaC traffic in normal cells, is also hyperacidified in CF (42).

Because, as shown here, the function of the recycling endosome is affected in CF, this defect may have repercussions on endocytic and plasma membrane trafficking processes in this disease. For example regulation of plasma membrane signaling events by endocytosis, the availability of receptors and the duration of signals may be altered in CF. This may potentially contribute to the well recognized deficiencies in pro- and anti-inflammatory signaling in CF (28). In addition, the endosomal pathway may affect the interactions of respiratory epithelial cells with the bacterial pathogens responsible for recurring respiratory infections in CF (1, 43). Of particular interest in CF may be the repercussions of altered pH in the recycling endosome on membrane flow to the points of bacterial entry into epithelial cells, because recycling is reduced in CF lung epithelial cells. For example, phagocytosis is inhibited when delivery of membrane from the recycling endosome to the nascent phagosome is obstructed (44, 45). Thus, the dysfunction of the recycling endosome in CF could affect the uptake of microorganisms by cells and explain the reduced bacterial phagocytosis reported for CF epithelia (46). In addition, hyperacidification of the recycling endosome, and potentially that of other compartments, may have effects on other fundamental cellular functions including the transcytosis of biologically active molecules and the pH homeostasis of both intracellular and extracellular environments. The phenomena described here suggest the existence of new physiological links between the CFTR defect, via organellar hyperacidification, and pathogenesis in CF.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank J. Rothman for pHluorin GFP constructs, P. Zeitlin for IB3-1, C38, and S9 cells, and J. R. Yankaskas for CTF1 cells and derivatives.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by Grant AI31139 from the National Institutes of Health and Grant 9680 from the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

A Cystic Fibrosis Foundation fellow.

|| Present address: Harvard Medical School, Bldg. D1, Rm. 411, 200 Longwood Ave., Boston, MA 02115.

§§ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Health Science Center, University of New Mexico, 915 Camino de Salud, N. E., Albuquerque, NM 87131. Tel.: 505-272-0291; Fax: 734-272-5309; vderetic@salud.unm.edu.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, January 24, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M105441200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: CFTR, cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator; CF, cystic fibrosis; ENaC, epithelial sodium channel; GFP, green fluorescent protein; GPI, glycosylphosphatidylinositol; 4-PBA, 4-phenylbutyric acid; DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium; BSA, bovine serum albumin; HRP, horseradish peroxidase; TGN, trans-Golgi network.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Welsh, M. J., Tsui, L.-C., Boat, T. F., and Beaudet, A. L. (1995) in Cystic Fibrosis (Scriver, C. R. , Beaudet, A. L. , Sly, W. S. , and Valle, D., eds), Vol. III , pp. 3799-3876, McGraw-Hill Inc., New York
2. Schwiebert, E. M., Benos, D. J., Egan, M. E., Stutts, M. J., and Guggino, W. B. (1999) Physiol. Rev. 79, S145-66
3. Bradbury, N. A. (1999) Physiol. Rev. 79, S175-91
4. Stutts, M. J., Canessa, C. M., Olsen, J. C., Hamrick, M., Cohn, J. A., Rossier, B. C., and Boucher, R. C. (1995) Science 269, 847-850
5. Schreiber, R., Hopf, A., Mall, M., Greger, R., and Kunzelmann, K. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 5310-5315
6. Schwiebert, E. M., Egan, M. E., Hwang, T. H., Fulmer, S. B., Allen, S. S., Cutting, G. R., and Guggino, W. B. (1995) Cell 81, 1063-1073
7. Schwiebert, E. M., Cid-Soto, L. P., Stafford, D., Carter, M., Blaisdell, C. J., Zeitlin, P. L., Guggino, W. B., and Cutting, G. R. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 3879-3884
8. Wang, S., Raab, R. W., Schatz, P. J., Guggino, W. B., and Li, M. (1998) FEBS Lett. 427, 103-108
9. Illek, B., Yankaskas, J. R., and Machen, T. E. (1997) Am. J. Physiol. 272, L752-L761
10. Lee, M. G., Choi, J. Y., Luo, X., Strickland, E., Thomas, P. J., and Muallem, S. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 14670-14677
11. Barasch, J., Kiss, B., Prince, A., Saiman, L., Gruenert, D., and al-Awqati, Q. (1991) Nature 352, 70-73
12. Barasch, J., and al-Awqati, Q. (1993) J. Cell Sci. 17, 229-233
13. Lukacs, G. L., Chang, X. B., Kartner, N., Rotstein, O. D., Riordan, J. R., and Grinstein, S. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 14568-14572
14. Seksek, O., Biwersi, J., and Verkman, A. S. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 15542-15548
15. Biwersi, J., and Verkman, A. S. (1994) Am. J. Physiol. 266, C149-156
16. Gibson, G. A., Hill, W. G., and Weisz, O. A. (2000) Am. J. Physiol. 279, C1088-C1099
17. Dunn, K. W., Park, J., Semrad, C. E., Gelman, D. L., Shevell, T., and McGraw, T. E. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 5336-5345
18. Miesenbock, G., De, Angelis, D. A., and Rothman, J. E. (1998) Nature 394, 192-195
19. Olsen, J. C., Johnson, L. G., Stutts, M. J., Sarkadi, B., Yankaskas, J. R., Swanstrom, R., and Boucher, R. C. (1992) Hum. Gene Ther. 3, 253-266
20. Lee, A., Chow, D., Haus, B., Tseng, W., Evans, D., Fleiszig, S., Chandy, G., and Machen, T. (1999) Am. J. Physiol. 277, L204-L217
21. Zeitlin, P. L., Lu, L., Rhim, J., Cutting, G., Stetten, G., Kieffer, K. A., Craig, R., and Guggino, W. B. (1991) Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 4, 313-319
22. Egan, M., Flotte, T., Afione, S., Solow, R., Zeitlin, P. L., Carter, B. J., and Guggino, W. B. (1992) Nature 358, 581-584
23. Egan, M. E., Schwiebert, E. M., and Guggino, W. B. (1995) Am. J. Physiol. 268, C243-C251
24. Rubenstein, R. C., and Zeitlin, P. L. (2000) Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol 278, C259-C267
25. Zeitlin, P. L. (1999) J. Clin. Invest. 103, 447-452
26. Li, G., and Stahl, P. D. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 24475-24480
27. Li, G., D'Souza-Schorey, C., Barbieri, M. A., Roberts, R. L., Klippel, A., Williams, L. T., and Stahl, P. D. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 10207-10211
28. DiMango, E., Ratner, A. J., Bryan, R., Tabibi, S., and Prince, A. (1998) J. Clin. Invest. 101, 2598-2605
29. Nichols, B. J., Kenworthy, A. K., Polishchuk, R. S., Lodge, R., Roberts, T. H., Hirschberg, K., Phair, R. D., and Lippincott-Schwartz, J. (2001) J. Cell Biol. 153, 529-541
30. Teter, K., Chandy, G., Quinones, B., Pereyra, K., Machen, T., and Moore, H. P. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 19625-19633
31. Yamashiro, D. J., Tycko, B., Fluss, S. R., and Maxfield, F. R. (1984) Cell 37, 789-800
32. Hopkins, C. R., Gibson, A., Shipman, M., Strickland, D. K., and Trowbridge, I. S. (1994) J. Cell Biol. 125, 1265-1274
33. Marsh, E. W., Leopold, P. L., Jones, N. L., and Maxfield, F. R. (1995) J. Cell Biol. 129, 1509-1522
34. Van Dyke, R. W. (1996) in Biology of the Lysosome (Manson, L. A., ed), Vol. 27 , pp. 331-361, Plenum Press, New York
35. Ismailov, I. I., Awayda, M. S., Jovov, B., Berdiev, B. K., Fuller, C. M., Dedman, J. R., Kaetzel, M., and Benos, D. J. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 4725-4732
36. Stutts, M. J., Rossier, B. C., and Boucher, R. C. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 14037-14040
37. Kunzelmann, K., and Schreiber, R. (1999) J. Membr. Biol. 168, 1-8
38. Presley, J. F., Mayor, S., McGraw, T. E., Dunn, K. W., and Maxfield, F. R. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 13929-13936
39. van Weert, A. W., Dunn, K. W., Gueze, H. J., Maxfield, F. R., and Stoorvogel, W. (1995) J. Cell Biol. 130, 821-834
40. Reddy, M. M., Light, M. J., and Quinton, P. M. (1999) Nature 402, 301-304
41. Zen, K., Biwersi, J., Periasamy, N., and Verkman, A. S. (1992) J. Cell Biol. 119, 99-110
42. Poschet, J. F., Boucher, J. C., Tatterson, L., Skidmore, J., Van Dyke, R. W., and Deretic, V. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98, 13972-13977
43. Deretic, V. (2000) in Persistent Bacterial Infections (Nataro, J. P. , Blaser, M. J. , and Cunningham-Runddles, S., eds) , pp. 305-326, ASM Press, Washington, D. C.
44. Cox, D., Lee, D. J., Dale, B. M., Calafat, J., and Greenberg, S. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97, 680-685
45. Hackam, D. J., Rotstein, O. D., Sjolin, C., Schreiber, A. D., Trimble, W. S., and Grinstein, S. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 11691-11696
46. Pier, G. B., Grout, M., Zaidi, T. S., Olsen, J. C., Johnson, L. G., Yankaskas, J. R., and Goldberg, J. B. (1996) Science 271, 64-67


Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
H. Barriere, M. Bagdany, F. Bossard, T. Okiyoneda, G. Wojewodka, D. Gruenert, D. Radzioch, and G. L. Lukacs
Revisiting the Role of Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator and Counterion Permeability in the pH Regulation of Endocytic Organelles
Mol. Biol. Cell, July 1, 2009; 20(13): 3125 - 3141.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.Home page
P. M. Haggie and A. S. Verkman
Defective organellar acidification as a cause of cystic fibrosis lung disease: reexamination of a recurring hypothesis
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, June 1, 2009; 296(6): L859 - L867.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
P. M. Haggie and A. S. Verkman
Unimpaired Lysosomal Acidification in Respiratory Epithelial Cells in Cystic Fibrosis
J. Biol. Chem., March 20, 2009; 284(12): 7681 - 7686.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
P. M. Haggie and A. S. Verkman
Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator-independent Phagosomal Acidification in Macrophages
J. Biol. Chem., October 26, 2007; 282(43): 31422 - 31428.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.Home page
J. F. Poschet, G. S. Timmins, J. L. Taylor-Cousar, W. Ornatowski, J. Fazio, E. Perkett, K. R. Wilson, H. D. Yu, H. R. de Jonge, and V. Deretic
Pharmacological modulation of cGMP levels by phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors as a therapeutic strategy for treatment of respiratory pathology in cystic fibrosis
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, September 1, 2007; 293(3): L712 - L719.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
F. Jouret, A. Bernard, C. Hermans, G. Dom, S. Terryn, T. Leal, P. Lebecque, J.-J. Cassiman, B. J. Scholte, H. R. de Jonge, et al.
Cystic Fibrosis Is Associated with a Defect in Apical Receptor-Mediated Endocytosis in Mouse and Human Kidney
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., March 1, 2007; 18(3): 707 - 718.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.Home page
N. M. White, D. Jiang, J. D. Burgess, I. R. Bederman, S. F. Previs, and T. J. Kelley
Altered cholesterol homeostasis in cultured and in vivo models of cystic fibrosis
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, February 1, 2007; 292(2): L476 - L486.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
M. A. Delgado, J. F. Poschet, and V. Deretic
Nonclassical Pathway of Pseudomonas aeruginosa DNA-Induced Interleukin-8 Secretion in Cystic Fibrosis Airway Epithelial Cells.
Infect. Immun., May 1, 2006; 74(5): 2975 - 2984.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. Swiatecka-Urban, A. Brown, S. Moreau-Marquis, J. Renuka, B. Coutermarsh, R. Barnaby, K. H. Karlson, T. R. Flotte, M. Fukuda, G. M. Langford, et al.
The Short Apical Membrane Half-life of Rescued {Delta}F508-Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator (CFTR) Results from Accelerated Endocytosis of {Delta}F508-CFTR in Polarized Human Airway Epithelial Cells
J. Biol. Chem., November 4, 2005; 280(44): 36762 - 36772.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Bio.Home page
N. M. White, D. A. Corey, and T. J. Kelley
Mechanistic Similarities between Cultured Cell Models of Cystic Fibrosis and Niemann-Pick Type C
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., November 1, 2004; 31(5): 538 - 543.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. Swiatecka-Urban, C. Boyd, B. Coutermarsh, K. H. Karlson, R. Barnaby, L. Aschenbrenner, G. M. Langford, T. Hasson, and B. A. Stanton
Myosin VI Regulates Endocytosis of the Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator
J. Biol. Chem., September 3, 2004; 279(36): 38025 - 38031.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
F. Bilan, V. Thoreau, M. Nacfer, R. Derand, C. Norez, A. Cantereau, M. Garcia, F. Becq, and A. Kitzis
Syntaxin 8 impairs trafficking of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) and inhibits its channel activity
J. Cell Sci., April 15, 2004; 117(10): 1923 - 1935.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y. Xu, J. C. Clark, B. J. Aronow, C. R. Dey, C. Liu, J. L. Wooldridge, and J. A. Whitsett
Transcriptional Adaptation to Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator Deficiency
J. Biol. Chem., February 21, 2003; 278(9): 7674 - 7682.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
O. Devuyst and W. B. Guggino
Chloride channels in the kidney: lessons learned from knockout animals
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, December 1, 2002; 283(6): F1176 - F1191.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/16/13959    most recent
M105441200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Poschet, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Deretic, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Poschet, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Deretic, V.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement