Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M112399200 on January 30, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 16, 14020-14030, April 19, 2002
Role of Tyrosine Kinase Jak2 in Prolactin-induced Differentiation
and Growth of Mammary Epithelial Cells*
Jianwu
Xie,
Matthew J.
LeBaron,
Marja T.
Nevalainen, and
Hallgeir
Rui
From the United States Military Cancer Institute and
Department of Pathology, Uniformed Services University of the
Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland 20814
Received for publication, December 27, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
Genetic studies in mice have established a
critical role for prolactin receptors and transcription factor Stat5 in
mammary gland differentiation. However, the enzymatic coupling between prolactin receptors and Stat5 in this process has not been established. In addition to Jak2, several other tyrosine kinases reportedly also are
associated with prolactin receptors and may phosphorylate Stat5.
Because Jak2 null mice die in utero, we
targeted Jak2 in an ex vivo model of
prolactin-induced mammary epithelial cell differentiation to determine
the role of Jak2 in regulation of cell differentiation and growth. Two
independent targeting strategies were used to suppress Jak2 in
immortalized HC11 mouse mammary epithelial cells: 1) stable expression
of a specific Jak2 antisense construct and 2) adenoviral
delivery of a dominant-negative Jak2 gene. We now
demonstrate that Jak2 is essential for prolactin-induced differentiation and activation of Stat5 in normal mouse mammary epithelial cells. Furthermore, suppression of Jak2 in HC11 cells was
associated with constitutive activation of oncoprotein Stat3 and a
hyperproliferative phenotype characterized by increased mitotic rate,
reduced apoptosis, and reduced contact inhibition. Collectively, our
data suggest that Jak2 is differentiation-inducing and
growth-inhibitory in normal mammary epithelial cells, observations that
may shed new light on the role of the Jak2-Stat5 pathway in breast cancer.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Prolactin is a principal differentiation factor for human and
mouse mammary epithelial cells and is required for milk production (1).
However, prolactin may also stimulate mammary epithelial cell growth
and act as a mammary tumor promoter (1, 2). Identifying the roles of
individual signaling molecules and pathways activated by prolactin in
normal mammary epithelial cells is therefore needed to better
understand the role of prolactin in breast cancer.
Prolactin activates tyrosine kinase
Jak21 (3) and transcription
factor Stat5 (4) in target cells, including Nb2 lymphocytes, ovarian
cells, and mammary cells. Specifically, the Jak2-Stat5 pathway is
expected to mediate prolactin-induced mammary epithelial cell
differentiation (5). Although genetic studies have established a
critical role for Stat5 in mouse mammary gland differentiation (6, 7),
corresponding genetic evidence is not yet available for Jak2, because
Jak2 null mice die in utero (8, 9) and conditional Jak2 null mice have not been established.
Although Jak2 has been regarded as the principal tyrosine kinase
activated by prolactin (3), the picture has been complicated by
evidence that prolactin also can activate other tyrosine kinases,
including Src family kinases (10, 11), focal adhesion kinase (12), Tec kinase (13), and the ErbB-2 receptor tyrosine kinase
(14). Experimental testing of the importance of Jak2 for
prolactin-induced differentiation of mammary epithelial cells is
therefore warranted. Furthermore, because Jak2 is oncogenic in
hematopoietic cells (15), it is also critical to establish the role of
Jak2 in regulating growth of normal mammary epithelial cells.
In this study, we targeted Jak2 in an ex vivo
model of prolactin-induced mammary epithelial cell differentiation to
determine the role of Jak2 in cell differentiation and growth. Two
distinct targeting strategies were used to suppress Jak2 in
immortalized HC11 mouse mammary epithelial cells. First, an effective
Jak2 antisense construct was generated and stably introduced
into HC11 cells. Second, a functional dominant-negative Jak2
mutant was generated and introduced into HC11 cells by adenoviral
delivery. We now report that Jak2 is essential for prolactin-induced
differentiation and activation of transcription factor Stat5 in normal
HC11 mouse mammary epithelial cells. Importantly, suppression of Jak2
in HC11 cells was associated with a hyperproliferative phenotype characterized by increased mitotic rate, reduced apoptosis, and reduced
contact inhibition. In addition, constitutive activation of Stat3 was
associated with suppression of Jak2 in HC11 cells. Collectively, our
data suggest that Jak2 mediates growth-suppressive and
differentiation-inducing effects on normal mouse mammary epithelial cells. These observations may provide important new insight into the
role of the prolactin-activated Jak2-Stat5 pathway in breast cancer.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Hormones and Antibodies--
Ovine prolactin (NIDDK-oPRL-19,
AFP-9221A) and human prolactin (NIDDK-hPRL-SIAFP-B2, AFP-2969A) were
kindly provided by Dr. A. F. Parlow under the sponsorship of the
National Hormone and Pituitary Program, NIDDK (National Institutes of
Health), the NICHD (NIH), and the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Human
epidermal growth factor (EGF) was purchased from Upstate Biotechnology
(Lake Placid, NY). Dexamethasone and insulin were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO). Monoclonal anti-phosphotyrosine antibody
4G10 was purchased from Upstate Biotechnology. Monoclonal anti-phosphotyrosine-Stat5 antibody and polyclonal rabbit antisera to
Jak1, Jak2, Jak3, Tyk2, Stat1, Stat3, and Stat5 were obtained from
Advantex BioReagents (Conroe, TX).
HC11 Cell ex Vivo Model of Mammary Epithelial Cell
Differentiation--
The mouse mammary epithelial cell line HC11 (16)
was grown to confluence in RPMI 1640 medium (Biofluids, Rockville, MD) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum (Atlanta Biologicals, Norcross, GA), insulin (5 µg/ml), and EGF (10 ng/ml). Prior to hormone treatment, HC11 cells were starved for 48 h in medium lacking EGF and containing only 2% fetal calf serum. For studies of prolactin-induced differentiation, HC11 cells were then
incubated with RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf
serum, dexamethasone (0.1 µM), and insulin (5 µg/ml) in
the presence or absence of ovine prolactin (10 nM) as indicated.
Expression Vectors--
Expression vector for murine
Stat5a (pXM-Stat5a) was kindly provided by Xiuwen
Liu and Lothar Hennighausen (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda,
MD). Plasmid p3PRLR contains a 2.7-kb human prolactin receptor cDNA
(kindly provided by Dr. Paul A. Kelly, INSERM, Paris, France) and
subsequently cloned into the EcoRI site of pcDNA3
expression vector (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) as described previously
(17). Rat Jak2 cDNA was originally cloned from an Nb2-SP
cell cDNA library (18), and a 3.7-kb open reading frame cDNA
fragment was subcloned into the NotI and ApaI
sites of pcDNA3 for expression studies.
Construction of V5/His Epitope-tagged Wild-type (Wt) and
Dominant-negative (Dn) Jak2 Expression Vectors--
To generate
expression constructs encoding Wt-Jak2 and a kinase-deleted
Dn-Jak2 with C-terminal V5/His epitope tags that could be
further subcloned into an adenoviral vector with limited selection of
cloning sites, a two-step strategy was used. First, a
Wt-Jak2 cDNA was cloned into the pcDNA3.1/V5-His
vector (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) 5' to the V5/His sequence. Second,
irrelevant intervening sequence, including Jak2 untranslated
repeat was deleted to generate Wt-Jak2-V5-His, and further
deletion of the entire JH1 kinase domain was carried out to generate
Dn-Jak2-V5-His. Specifically, rat Jak2 cDNA
containing the open reading frame was released from the pBK cloning
vector (18) by digestion with ApaI and NotI. This
fragment was subcloned into the ApaI and NotI
sites of the pcDNA3.1/V5-His vector. To remove intervening sequence
to generate V5-His-tagged Wt-Jak2, and in the case of
Dn-Jak2 also to remove the JH1 domain, a modified pCR2.1
vector (Invitrogen) was used from which we had removed the
KpnI site. The KpnI site in pCR2.1 vector was
deleted by KpnI digestion, blunt-ending by T4 DNA
polymerase, relegation with T4 DNA Ligase, and confirmation by
KpnI re-digestion. The Jak2-V5-His pcDNA3.1
construct was digested with NotI and PmeI, and
the resulting fragment was subcloned into the
NotI-PmeI site of the modified pCR2.1 vector.
High fidelity PCR was used to 1) generate a short fragment A spanning
from upstream of the AvrII site within the JH1 domain and
containing a 3' SacII restriction site after the last
Jak2 codon and 2) generate a second short fragment B
spanning from upstream of the KpnI site within the JH2
domain to introduce a 3' SacII restriction site within the
hinge region located between the JH1 and the JH2 domains. To generate a
contiguous Wt-Jak2-V5-His construct, irrelevant sequence was
released from the original Jak2-pcDNA 3.1/V5-His vector
by AvrII and SacII digestion and replaced by
correspondingly digested high fidelity PCR fragment A. For the Dn-Jak2
construct, the original Jak2-pcDNA 3.1/V5-His vector was
digested with KpnI and SacII, and the released
fragment was replaced by the high fidelity PCR fragment B. Finally, the Wt-Jak2-V5-His and the Dn-Jak2-V5-His genes were
released by NotI and SpeI digestion, blunted by
T4 DNA polymerase, and cloned into blunt-ended NotI and
XbaI restriction sites of the pcDNA3 vector. All cloning
was verified by DNA sequencing.
Antisense Jak2 Construct and Generation of Stably
Expressing HC11 Clones--
After testing several alternatives, an
effective and specific Jak2 antisense oligonucleotide was
determined as
5'-TGTCTTCAAAAGCACCAGAAAATCCTAGGGCACCTATTCTCATGTTGGGTA-3'. This
targeting sequence was verified to be unique to Jak2 by
searching the NCBI GenBankTM data base. The sequence
targets a region of Jak2 mRNA encoding the amino acid
sequence PNMRIGALGFSGAFEDR within the hinge region between the JH1 and
JH2 domains (18). The sense control nucleotide sequence is
5'-TACCCAACATGAGAATAGGTGCCCTAGGATTTTCTGGTGCTTTTGAAGACA-3'. Both the
antisense and sense Jak2 DNA were generated by PCR, and a 5'
EcoR V flanking site was introduced for orientation
identification and subsequent cloning into pCR2.1. The sense and
antisense Jak2 DNA were released by
HindIII and NotI digestion and were
subcloned into the pcDNA3 vector at the multiple cloning site. The
purified antisense and sense Jak2 cDNA-pcDNA3
constructs were transfected into HC11 cells using LipofectAMINE 2000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), and stable clones were isolated after 10 days of treatment with 300 µg/ml G418 (Invitrogen). The clones were
validated with neomycin resistance gene PCR product analysis.
Cell Culture and Transient Transfections--
Construct
expression and functional tests were performed by transient
transfection of COS-7 cells (ATCC, Manassas, VA). COS-7 cells were
grown in RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% fetal calf serum, 2 mM L-glutamine, and penicillin-streptomycin (50 IU/ml and 50 µg/ml, respectively) at 37 °C with 5%
CO2. Sub-confluent COS-7 cells in 6-well plates were
transfected using LipofectAMINE 2000 according the manufacturer's
protocol and were kept without fetal calf serum for 24-48 h followed
by stimulation of 10 nM prolactin for 30 min. The harvested
cell pellets were frozen on dry ice and stored at
80 °C.
Protein Solubilization, Immunoblotting, and
Immunoprecipitation--
For protein solubilization, the cell pellets
were solubilized in lysis buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 5 mM EDTA, 50 mM NaCl, 30 mM sodium
pyrophosphate, 50 mM sodium fluoride, 1 mM
sodium orthovanadate, 1% Triton X-100, 1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 5 µg/ml aprotinin, 1 µg/ml pepstatin
A, and 2 µg/ml leupeptin). Cell lysates were rotated end-over-end at
4 °C for 60 min, and insoluble material was pelleted at 12,000 × g for 30 min at 4 °C. For immunoprecipitations, the
protein concentrations of clarified tissue lysates were determined by
simplified Bradford method (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA).
Clarified lysates corresponding to 3.5 mg of total protein were
immunoprecipitated by rotation for 2 h at 4 °C with the
appropriate antibodies. Antibodies were captured by incubation for 60 min with protein A-Sepharose beads (Amersham Biosciences, Inc.,
Piscataway, NJ), and washed three times in 1 ml of lysis buffer.
Immunoprecipitated proteins were dissolved in 1.1× loading buffer
containing reducing agent. The proteins were analyzed by
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and immunoblotting as described
previously using polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Millipore,
Bedford, MA) and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies
in conjunction with enhanced chemiluminescence substrate mixture
(Amersham Biosciences, Inc.) and exposed to x-ray film.
Dominant-negative Jak2 Recombinant Adenovirus--
A
replication-defective human adenovirus (Ad5) carrying
Dn-Jak2 was generated using the AdEasy Vector system
(Qbigene, Carlsbad, CA). Briefly, the sequence-verified and
expression-confirmed Dn-Jak2-V5/His expression cassette was
released by ApaI and NotI digestion. Before NotI digestion, the ApaI digested ends were
blunt-ended by T4 DNA polymerase. The fragment was then subcloned into
the NotI and EcoRV sites of Adv-shuttle vector.
After creating a recombinant Dn-Jak2-V5/His Adv gene using
pAdEasy, the virus was packaged in QBI-293A cells and subsequent
plaques were isolated. Expression of Dn-Jak2 was verified by Western
blotting using anti-V5 and anti-Jak2 antibodies. The selected
recombinant virus was expanded, purified, and titered in QBI-293A cells
as per the manufacturer's recommendation. Two additional recombinant
adenoviruses were used as controls: Adv-LacZ, which specifies a
nuclear-localized form of
-galactosidase, and Adv-Control, which
does not express a protein.
Flow Cytometry--
HC11 cells were washed once in PBS,
trypsinized, pelleted at 1000 × g, and washed once in
5 ml of cold PBS. After a second centrifugation, cells were resuspended
in 0.5 ml of cold PBS and fixed by dropwise addition of 1.5 ml of cold
100% ethanol, while slowly vortexing the cell suspension. After having
been fixed for 1 h at 4 °C, cells were stained with 100 µg/ml
propidium iodide (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Indianapolis, IN) and
treated with 100 ng/ml RNase A (Invitrogen) for 30 min at 37 °C. The
cells were measured for DNA content by flow cytometry using a Coulter EPICS XL cell analyzer (Beckman-Coulter, Brea, CA).
TUNEL Assay--
In situ detection of apoptotic cells
was performed using terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP
nick end labeling (TUNEL). Cells were air-dried on glass slides and
fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 min at room temperature and
permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 and 0.1% sodium citrate for 1 min on ice. The slides were rinsed with PBS several times, and the
samples were then processed for TUNEL labeling using the
fluorescein-based In Situ Cell Death Detection kit (Roche
Molecular Biochemicals, Indianapolis, IN) according to the
manufacturer's instructions. Samples were rinsed three times with PBS,
mounted, and analyzed under a fluorescence microscope.
Anchorage-independent Survival Analysis--
Confluent HC11
cells were trypsinized into a single cell suspension. A total of
700,000 cells per group were plated in 150-mm culture dishes that had
previously been coated with 0.8% agarose. Cells were collected at
various time points and washed in PBS, and cell aggregates were
dispersed by trypsinization. Parallel samples were analyzed for
apoptosis by TUNEL staining and flow cytometry for hypodiploid cells.
Anti-phosphotyrosine-Stat5 Immunocytochemistry--
HC11 cells
were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde-PBS at room temperature for 20 min.
The cells were gently detached by a cell scraper in PBS. The detached
cells were stretched into monolayer sheets in warm PBS and adhered to
poly-lysine pretreated glass slides. Before immunocytochemical
staining, sample slides were pretreated with an antigen-unmasking
procedure by boiling in an antigen-retrieval solution for 10 min. The
slides were incubated at 4 °C overnight by using a 1:2000 dilution
of the primary anti-phosphoTyr-Stat5 monoclonal antibody AX1 (Advantex
Bioreagents, Conroe, TX). For secondary detection the Histomouse kit
(Zymed Laboratories Inc., South San Francisco, CA) was
used, and active Stat5 was visualized with aminoethyl carbazole and
counterstaining with hematoxylin. The prolactin-treated COS-7 cells
cotransfected with Stat5a and prolactin receptor expression constructs
were used as positive control, and subtype-specific mouse IgG and PBS
were used for negative controls (not shown).
 |
RESULTS |
Prolactin-induced Differentiation of HC11 Mouse Mammary Epithelial
Cells Correlates with Activation of Tyrosine Kinase
Jak2--
Confluent, growth-arrested HC11 mouse mammary epithelial
cells can be induced to differentiate in vitro by prolactin
in medium supplemented with glucocorticoids and insulin (16). This
differentiation process leads to formation of mammospheres, which are
acinar-like structures that have been shown to express milk proteins
(19). HC11 cells have been widely used as an ex vivo model
of mammary gland epithelial cell differentiation (20, 21). We took
advantage of this model to determine whether Jak2 was critical for
prolactin-induced differentiation.
The time-dependent differentiation of HC11 cells induced by
prolactin as measured by the appearance of mammospheres is presented in
Fig. 1A. Mammospheres were
detectable within 1 day of prolactin treatment, and additional
mammospheres continued to form over a period of 4 to 5 days of culture,
reaching a plateau at a density of ~15 mammospheres per
cm2. Although glucocorticoids and insulin are required
supplements in the differentiation medium, mammosphere formation
critically requires prolactin as demonstrated by a
concentration-dependent effect of prolactin ranging from 0 to 20 nM (Fig. 1B).

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Prolactin-induced differentiation of HC11
mammary epithelial cells correlates with activation of Jak2, and not
other Jaks. A, time-dependent stimulation
of HC11 cell differentiation by prolactin (Prl). HC11 cells
were stimulated with prolactin (10 nM) for up to 7 days,
and density of mammospheres was recorded by manual counting under
phase-contrast microscopy. Data presented represent three independent
experiments carried out in duplicate (error bars represent
S.E.). See "Materials and Methods" for detailed culture conditions.
B, concentration-dependent stimulation of HC11
cell differentiation by prolactin. HC11 cells were incubated with
concentrations of prolactin ranging from 0 to 20 nM for 4 days, and density of mammospheres was recorded. Data represent three
independent experiments carried out in duplicate (error bars
represent S.E.). C, prolactin selectively activated tyrosine
kinase Jak2, and not other Jaks, in HC11 cells. HC11 cells at day 0 of
differentiation treatment were exposed to prolactin (10 nM)
for 30 min. Jak1, Jak2, Jak3, and Tyk2 were individually
immunoprecipitated (IP) with specific antibodies and first
subjected collectively to anti-pTyr immunoblotting and subsequently
reprobed individually for corresponding Jak protein levels.
|
|
To determine expression and activation patterns of Jak tyrosine kinases
at the initiation of differentiation treatment, HC11 cells were treated
with or without prolactin for 30 min and harvested. Individual Jak
kinases were immunoprecipitated from cell lysates and immunoblotted for
phosphotyrosine and reprobed for Jak protein levels. These analyzes
showed that prolactin treatment of HC11 cells correlated with selective
activation of Jak2 and not of other members of the Jak tyrosine kinase
family (Fig. 1C). Specifically, phosphotyrosine
immunoblotting of immunoprecipitated Jak proteins established that only
Jak2 became detectably tyrosine-phosphorylated in response to
prolactin. Furthermore, of the four Jak kinases, Jak2 was the only Jak
family member expressed at significant levels in HC11 cells. Control
experiments verified that the antibodies used for immunoprecipitation
and immunoblotting of the various Jak tyrosine kinases were effective
against mouse isoforms (data not shown). We therefore conclude that
prolactin-induced differentiation of HC11 mammary epithelial cells
correlated with selective activation of Jak2 tyrosine kinase.
Jak2 Antisense Blocks Prolactin-induced Differentiation of Stably
Transfected HC11 Clones--
As one strategy to suppress Jak2 function
and test the importance of Jak2 in prolactin-induced differentiation of
HC11 cells, we generated an antisense construct to inhibit Jak2 protein
expression. The genetic engineering of this Jak2 antisense
construct, which targets a region of 51 bp unique to the
Jak2 transcript, is described in detail under "Materials
and Methods." This region is located within the hinge region between
the JH2 pseudokinase and JH1 kinase domains of Jak2.
Functional testing of the antisense construct was first carried out
using COS-7 cells and cotransfection experiments with a V5-His tagged
Wt-Jak2 construct. We determined that the Jak2
antisense construct effectively blocked Wt-Jak2 expression in a
dose-dependent manner under conditions where total amounts of DNA transfected were kept constant (Fig.
2A). Equivalent amounts of
cell lysates in the various lanes were verified by parallel blotting
for
-actin. Furthermore, the control sense construct did not affect
Jak2 levels in parallel experiments (data not shown).

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Antisense Jak2 blocks prolactin-induced
differentiation of stably transfected HC11 clones. A,
validation of efficiency of Jak2 antisense construct by transient
cotransfection in COS-7 cells. COS-7 cells were cotransfected with a
constant amount of plasmid encoding V5-epitope-tagged Jak2 and an
increasing amount of plasmid encoding a 51-nucleotide antisense
mRNA specific to Jak2 mRNA. In each case, total
levels of transfected DNA were kept constant by compensating with empty
pcDNA3 vector as indicated. Levels of Jak2 protein were monitored
in cell lysates by anti-V5 immunoblotting in the presence of increasing
amounts of antisense-Jak2. Parallel immunoblotting for
-actin was used to verify equal loading of cell lysates.
B, validation of efficiency of Jak2 antisense construct in
stably transfected HC11 clones. HC11 cells were transfected with vector
sense control plasmid or Jak2 antisense plasmid using
LipofectAMINE 2000. A vector sense (Vs) control clone and
two antisense clones (A and B) were selected, and
clones were incubated with or without prolactin (10 nM) for
30 min. Jak2 was immunoprecipitated from whole cell lysates and tested
for levels of tyrosine phosphorylated Jak2 and levels of Jak2 protein
by immunoblotting. C, prolactin-induced HC11 cell
differentiation is disrupted in Jak2 antisense expressing
clones. Parental HC11 cells, Vs-control clone, and Jak2
antisense-expressing clones A and B were incubated with prolactin for 4 days. Phase contrast images of representative fields show failure of
mammosphere formation in Jak2 antisense-expressing clones.
D, quantification of differentiation-suppressive effect of
Jak2 antisense in stable HC11 clones. The effect of stable
expression of Jak2 antisense on prolactin-induced HC11 cell
differentiation was documented by counting of mammospheres after 4 days
of treatment. Data are expressed as density of mammospheres in the
cultures, and represent mean values (±S.E.) of three independent
experiments. ND, not detected.
|
|
To directly test whether Jak2 is required for prolactin-induced mammary
epithelial cell differentiation, we then generated stable HC11 clones
expressing the Jak2 antisense construct. A vector
sense-control clone (HC11-Vs) was also selected for use as a second
control cell line in addition to the parental line. Stable clones A and
B were selected for further study from several positive clones, and
showed markedly reduced Jak2 protein levels by immunoprecipitation and
Western blot analysis (Fig. 2B, lower panel).
Correspondingly, basal and prolactin-induced Jak2 tyrosine phosphorylation was lost in clones A and B (Fig. 2B,
upper panel). When examined in differentiation assays,
suppression of Jak2 levels in clones A and B was associated with
complete disruption of prolactin-induced mammosphere differentiation,
as illustrated by representative images of cultures on day 4 of
treatment (Fig. 2C). In contrast, mammosphere formation
remained intact in parental HC11 and vector-sense control cells.
Mammosphere formation was quantified by counting, and the data from
three independent experiments were expressed as number of mammospheres
per cm2 of culture surface (Fig. 2D). The
inhibitory effect of Jak2 suppression on cell differentiation was
equally pronounced after extended treatment with prolactin for up to 7 days (data not shown). We therefore conclude that suppression of Jak2
levels by stable expression of a Jak2 antisense construct
blocked prolactin-induced differentiation of HC11 cells.
Construction and Functional Testing of a Dominant-negative Jak2
Mutant--
To further test by an independent strategy whether Jak2
was essential for prolactin-induced mammary differentiation, we
generated a dominant-negative Jak2 protein by deletion of the
C-terminal kinase domain as described under "Materials and
Methods." As a functional test of this construct, transient
transfection assays in COS-7 cells were used to examine the ability of
this kinase-deleted mutant Jak2 to block prolactin-induced activation
of Stat5 by Wt-Jak2. COS-7 cells were cotransfected with plasmids
encoding PrlR, Stat5a, and Jak2 forms as indicated and stimulated with or without prolactin for 30 min (Fig.
3A). In whole cell lysates of
mock transfected, negative control cells, immunoblotting revealed no
detectable endogenous Stat5, and therefore no response to prolactin stimulation (Fig. 3A, lanes a and b).
When Stat5a and prolactin receptor were
cotransfected into COS-7 cells, modest but detectable prolactin-stimulated Stat5a phosphorylation was observed, presumably mediated by low levels of endogenous Jak2 (Fig. 3A,
lanes c and d).

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Dominant-negative (Dn) Jak2
inhibits prolactin-induced HC11 cell differentiation.
A, validation of efficiency of Dn-Jak2 construct by
transient cotransfection in COS-7 cells. COS-7 cells were cotransfected
with plasmids encoding prolactin receptor, Stat5a, Wt-Jak2, and/or
Dn-Jak2 as indicated. Total amounts of DNA transfected were maintained
constant by compensating with empty pcDNA3 vector. Parallel
cultures were incubated in the presence (+) or absence ( ) of
prolactin (10 nM) for 30 min, and whole cell lysates were
examined for tyrosine phosphorylated Stat5 (upper panel),
Stat5a protein levels (middle panel), or V5-epitope tagged
Wt-Jak2 or Dn-Jak2 (lower panel). B, validation
of efficiency of adenoviral delivery of Dn-Jak2 to inhibit Jak2
activation in HC11 cells. HC11 cells were either mock infected (no
adenovirus), or infected with either Adv-Control (no insert; m.o.i.
25), or with two increasing doses of Adv-Dn-Jak2 (m.o.i. 5 and 25). Twenty-four h after infection, cells were incubated with (+)
or without ( ) prolactin (10 nM) for 30 min. Jak2 was
immunoprecipitated from whole cell lysates and basal and
prolactin-induced Jak2 phosphotyrosine levels were determined by
anti-pTyr immunoblotting (upper panel), and levels of V5
epitope-tagged Dn-Jak2 protein were determined in parallel samples by
anti-V5 immunoblotting (lower panel). C,
adenoviral delivery of Dn-Jak2 blocks prolactin-induced HC11
cell differentiation. HC11 cells were either mock infected or infected
with either Adv-Control (m.o.i. 25) or with two increasing doses of
Adv-Dn-Jak2 (m.o.i. 5 and 25) on Day 0 of a four-day prolactin-induced
differentiation treatment. Phase contrast images of representative
fields show failure of mammosphere formation in HC11 cells expressing
Dn-Jak2. D, adenoviral delivery of Dn-Jak2 blocks
prolactin-induced HC11 cell differentiation in a
dose-dependent manner. The effect of Dn-Jak2 on
prolactin-induced HC11 cell differentiation was documented by counting of mammospheres after 4 days of adenoviral gene
delivery. Data are expressed as density of mammospheres in the
cultures, and represent mean values (±S.E.) of three independent
experiments. ND, not detected.
|
|
This inducible Stat5a activation was inhibited by cotransfection with
Dn-Jak2, which migrated with the expected size of 90 kDa in
SDS-PAGE (Fig. 3, lanes e and f; top
and bottom panels, respectively). Cotransfection of
Wt-Jak2 with Stat5a led to basal tyrosine
phosphorylation of Stat5a that was markedly enhanced by prolactin
treatment (lanes g and h). However, further
cotransfection of Dn-Jak2 with Wt-Jak2 showed
complete inhibition of both basal and prolactin-induced Stat5a
activation (lanes i and j). This effect was not
due to reduced levels of Stat5 or Wt-Jak2 as demonstrated by reprobing
with anti-Stat5 or anti-V5 antibodies, respectively (Fig.
3A, middle and lower panels).
Furthermore, these and other immunoblotting experiments showed that
Dn-Jak2 effectively inhibited Wt-Jak2 function at equivalent protein
levels, providing direct evidence for dominant rather than a simple
competitive inhibitory effect of the kinase-deleted Jak2 mutant. Thus,
we conclude that the engineered Dn-Jak2 functioned as predicted.
Adenoviral Delivery of Dn-Jak2 into HC11 Cells Blocks
Prolactin-induced Differentiation--
As the second approach to
effectively inhibit the Jak2 tyrosine kinase in HC11 cells, we then
generated a replication-defective adenovirus for high efficiency gene
delivery of Dn-Jak2 into HC11 cells. Detailed description of
this construct is presented under "Materials and Methods."
Functional testing of Adv-Dn-Jak2 was first carried out in
HC11 cells using prolactin-stimulated Jak2 tyrosine phosphorylation as
a readout. Cells were mock infected or infected with virus carrying no
insert (Adv-control), or Adv-Dn-Jak2 at increasing
multiplicity of infection (m.o.i.). Twenty-four hours later, cells were
incubated with or without prolactin for 30 min, and Jak2
phosphotyrosine levels were examined. In HC11 cells, both basal and
prolactin-activated Jak2 tyrosine phosphorylation was inhibited by
Dn-Jak2 at m.o.i. values of 5 and 25, whereas infection with control
virus had no effect. Reblotting of samples for V5-tagged Dn-Jak2
protein verified specific and dose-dependent expression of
Dn-Jak2 in HC11 cells (Fig. 3B) and that
Adv-Dn-Jak2 was functional.
To determine whether Dn-Jak2 would block prolactin-induced
differentiation of HC11 cells, cells were infected with or without Adv-DN-Jak2 as described and mammosphere formation in
response to prolactin treatment was monitored. While prolactin-induced differentiation remained intact in mock and Adv-control infected cells,
Dn-Jak2 effectively disrupted prolactin-induced mammosphere formation
in HC11 mammary cells (Fig. 3C). The effect of Dn-Jak2 was
dose-dependent and could not be attributed to general
protein overexpression, because infection with Adv-LacZ did
not disrupt mammosphere formation (Fig. 3D). Therefore,
based on two independent approaches that involved either Dn-Jak2 or
antisense to inactivate Jak2, we conclude that Jak2 is required for
terminal differentiation of mammary epithelial cells. To our knowledge,
these data provide the first direct evidence that Jak2 tyrosine kinase
activity is critical for prolactin-induced differentiation of mammary
epithelial cells.
Disruption of Jak2 Activity Is Associated with Inhibition of Stat5a
Tyrosine Phosphorylation in HC11 Cells--
Transcription factor Stat5
is critical for terminal differentiation of mammary cells and for
lactogenesis as determined from genetic studies in mice (6, 7).
Furthermore, Stat5 is recognized to be a substrate of Jak2 in the
context of the prolactin receptor complex (22). To experimentally
determine whether inhibition of Jak2 would block prolactin-induced
Stat5 activation in HC11 cells, we tested the effect of
Adv-Dn-Jak2 on prolactin-induced Stat5 tyrosine
phosphorylation. Stat5 activation was measured by protein
immunoblotting of samples from whole cell lysates using a monoclonal
anti-phosphotyrosine-Stat5 antibody (Fig.
4A). Whereas prolactin-induced
Stat5 activation was readily detectable in mock-infected cells or cells
infected with Adv-control (lanes a-d), prolactin-induced Stat5 activation was inhibited in a dose-dependent manner
in cells infected with Adv-Dn-Jak2 (Fig. 4A,
lanes e-h, upper panel). Furthermore, inhibition
of Stat5 activation correlated with Dn-Jak2 levels as detected by
anti-V5 immunoblotting and was not due to reduction in Stat5 protein
levels (Fig. 4A, middle and bottom
panels, respectively).

View larger version (80K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Dominant-negative Jak2 inhibits
prolactin-induced Stat5 activation in HC11 cells. A,
adenoviral delivery of Dn-Jak2 inhibits
prolactin-induced Stat5 tyrosine phosphorylation in HC11 cells by
anti-phosphotyrosine-Stat5 immunoblotting. HC11 cells were either mock
infected or infected with either Adv-Control (no insert; m.o.i. 25), or
with two increasing doses of Adv-Dn-Jak2 (m.o.i. 5 and 25).
Twenty-four h after infection, cells were incubated with (+) or without
( ) prolactin (10 nM) for 30 min. Whole cell lysates were
examined for tyrosine phosphorylated Stat5 (upper panel),
V5-epitope tagged Dn-Jak2 (middle panel), or Stat5 protein
levels (lower panel). B, adenoviral delivery of
Dn-Jak2 inhibits prolactin-induced Stat5 tyrosine
phosphorylation in HC11 cells by immunocytochemistry. Parental HC11
cells or HC11 clone A, which stably expresses antisense
Jak2, were infected with either Adv-Control (m.o.i. 25;
first and third panels, respectively) or
Adv-Dn-Jak2 (m.o.i. 25; second and fourth
panels, respectively). Twenty-four hours later all cells were
exposed to prolactin for 30 min, followed by fixation and
immunocytochemistry for activated Stat5 using anti-Stat5 pTyr
antibodies.
|
|
Inhibition of prolactin-induced Stat5 tyrosine phosphorylation by Jak2
suppression was verified at the subcellular level by anti-phosphoTyr-Stat5 immunocytochemistry. HC11 cells infected with
Adv-control and treated with prolactin showed marked nuclear tyrosine
phosphorylation of Stat5, whereas infection of cells with
Adv-Dn-Jak2 markedly inhibited Stat5 phosphorylation (Fig. 4B, panels 1 and 2). Likewise, HC11
cell clones stably expressing antisense-Jak2 displayed only
minor levels of prolactin-stimulated Stat5 phosphorylation as detected
by anti-phosphoTyr-Stat5 immunocytochemistry (Fig. 4B,
panel 3; only clone A shown). Finally, infection of clone A
with Adv-Dn-Jak2 led to an even more pronounced inhibition of prolactin-induced Stat5 tyrosine phosphorylation (Fig. 4,
panel 4). Therefore, both molecular approaches to inhibit
Jak2 activity also inhibited prolactin-induced Stat5
activation. Collectively, these observations support the concept that
the Jak2-Stat5 pathway is a differentiation-inducing axis in mammary
epithelial cells.
Targeted Inactivation of Jak2 in HC11 Cells Resulted in a
Hyperproliferative Phenotype--
Terminal differentiation of cells is
associated with exit from the cell cycle and inhibition of cell
proliferation. To determine the effect of Jak2 on growth
characteristics of HC11 cells, we compared the growth rates of HC11
clones A and B to those of parental HC11 cells and the sense-control
clone. As shown in Fig. 5A,
HC11 clones A and B exhibited significantly higher growth rates than parental HC11 or the sense-control clone. In fact, the growth rates of
clones A and B stably expressing Jak2 antisense were approximately
double that of parental or sense-control HC11 cells.

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Suppression of Jak2 tyrosine kinase in
Jak2 antisense expressing HC11 cell clones is
associated with a hyperproliferative phenotype. A,
increased growth rate in Jak2 antisense expressing HC11
clones A and B. The growth rates of parental HC11 cells, vector-sense
(Vs) control expressing control clone, and Jak2
antisense-expressing clones A and B were compared by plating cells at
the same low density and following cell numbers over 72 h. Cell
numbers were counted manually in a hemacytometer, and the data
represent means of three independent experiments (S.E. indicated by
bars). B, increased growth rate in
Jak2-suppressed HC11 cells was associated with increased number of
mitotic figures. Exponentially growing cultures of parental HC11 cells,
vector-sense (Vs) control expressing control clone, and
Jak2 antisense expressing clones A and B were stained with
propidium iodide to better visualize dividing cells (indicated by
arrows). C, increased growth rate in
Jak2-suppressed HC11 cells was associated with increased number of
cycling cells by flow cytometry. Exponentially growing cultures of
parental HC11 cells, vector-sense (Vs) control expressing
control clone, and Jak2 antisense-expressing clones A and B
were stained with propidium iodide and analyzed by flow cytometry to
determine fraction of cells in the various stages of cell cycle.
|
|
The increased growth rates of Jak2-suppressed clones A and B were also
correlated with increased rates of mitosis during exponential growth,
as visualized by propidium iodide staining of cells (Fig. 5B). Flow cytometry of cells during exponential growth
verified a markedly increased proportion of cycling cells with a
corresponding reduction in cells in the G0/G1
phase in clones A and B when compared with control cells (Fig.
5C). Specifically, whereas almost 50% of parental or
vector-sense control cells were in G0/G1, less than 25% of clones A and B were in G0/G1. For
these cell cycle experiments, cells were harvested and measured at
~50% confluency. The data suggest that suppression of Jak2 is
associated with increased cycling of HC11 cells and higher growth rate
during exponential growth.
We then examined the cell cycle characteristics of superconfluent
cultures. Intriguingly, Jak2-deficient clones A and B consistently grew
to a density nearly 3-fold greater than that of parental or vector
sense-control HC11 cells (Fig.
6A). Furthermore, during superconfluency, Jak2-deficient clones displayed reduced growth suppression and retained a markedly elevated S phase population compared with parental HC11 cells and vector sense-control cells (Fig.
6B). Specifically, 15-21% of parental or vector
sense-control cells were in S-phase during superconfluent conditions,
whereas ~30% of antisense Jak2 clones A and B remained in
S-phase.

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Suppression of Jak2 in stable Jak2
antisense expressing clones of HC11 cells is associated with
reduced contact inhibition. A, increased saturation
density of HC11 clones A and B. Superconfluent cultures of parental
HC11 cells, vector-sense (Vs) control expressing control
clone, and Jak2 antisense-expressing clones A and B were
counted to determine cell saturation density. Cell numbers were counted
in duplicate in three independent experiments. Values represent mean
cell number/cm2, and bars represent S.E.
B, increased fraction of cycling cells in superconfluent
cultures of HC11 clones A and B. Superconfluent cultures of parental
HC11 cells, vector-sense (Vs) control expressing control
clone, and Jak2 antisense-expressing clones A and B were
stained with propidium iodide and analyzed by flow cytometry.
C, dose-dependent increase in cycling cells in
superconfluent cultures of HC11 cells exposed to
Adv-Dn-Jak2. Superconfluent cultures of parental HC11 cells
were mock infected, or infected with either Adv-Control (no insert;
m.o.i. 25), or with two increasing doses of Adv-Dn-Jak2
(m.o.i. 5 and 25). Forty-eight h after infection and maintenance under
serum-free conditions, cells were stained with propidium iodide and
analyzed by flow cytometry.
|
|
We also introduced Dn-Jak2 into HC11 cells by adenoviral
gene transfer and assessed its effect on cell cycling. Superconfluent cells that had been serum-deprived for 48 h were cycling only to a
very low extent (<4% in S or G2/M) in mock infected or
control virus-infected cells (Fig. 6C, left two
panels). However, a dose-dependent increase in the
fraction of cycling cells was observed in superconfluent, serum-deprived cells overexpressing Dn-Jak2 (Fig. 6B,
right two panels). These observations are consistent with a
general growth-suppressive effect of the Jak2-Stat5 pathway in HC11
cells. The data are also consistent with reduced contact inhibition
following suppression of Jak2.
Inhibition of Jak2 Suppresses Apoptosis of HC11 Cells Induced by
Anchorage-independent Culture Conditions--
The HC11 cell is a
nontransformed mammary epithelial cell line that does not survive under
anchorage-independent conditions. To investigate whether inhibition of
Jak2 would affect the rate of apoptosis induced by culture under
anchorage-independent culture conditions, we first examined apoptosis
rates in HC11 cells stably expressing antisense Jak2.
Parental HC11 cells, Vs-control cells, and clones A and B were cultured
on 0.8% agar in normal growth medium, collected after 12 and 36 h, and assayed for apoptosis by flow cytometry.
The hypodiploid fraction of HC11 cells at 12 h was markedly lower
in Jak2-suppressed clones A and B than in parental or vector control
cells (Fig. 7A), and although
the number of apoptotic cells increased in both control cells and
Jak2-suppressed cells over the next 24 h, Jak2-suppressed cells
showed consistently reduced rates of apoptosis. Examination of
apoptosis in parallel samples using TUNEL staining of fragmented
DNA at 12 h verified reduced number of apoptotic cells in
Jak2-suppressed clones, whereas phase-contrast and DAPI staining
verified equal cell numbers in the selected fields (Fig.
7B). However, extended cultures revealed that suppression of
Jak2 levels in HC11 cells did not confer long term survival under
anchorage-independent culture conditions (data not shown).

View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Suppression of Jak2 in HC11 cells is
associated with reduced rate of apoptosis. A, reduced
rate of apoptosis in HC11 clones A and B under anchorage-independent
culture conditions. Parental HC11 cells, vector-sense (Vs)
control expressing control clone, and Jak2
antisense-expressing clones A and B were cultured on soft agar. After
12 h (open bars) or 36 h (filled bars),
cells were harvested, stained with propidium iodide, and analyzed for
hypodiploid, apoptotic cells by flow cytometry. A representative data
set from two independent experiments is presented. B,
reduced rate of apoptosis in HC11 clones A and B as visualized by TUNEL
staining. Reduced apoptosis rates in HC11 clones A and B under
anchorage-independent culture conditions for 36 h were verified by
TUNEL staining of cells for DNA fragmentation (middle
panel). Phase contrast (upper panel) and DAPI staining
of DNA (lower panel) verified comparable number of cells in
each representative field. C, reduced rates of apoptosis in
superconfluent HC11 cells infected with Adv-Dn-Jak2.
Superconfluent cultures of parental HC11 cells cultured on plastic were
infected with either Adv-Control (m.o.i. 25) or with
Adv-Dn-Jak2 (m.o.i. 25). Forty-eight h after infection,
cells were TUNEL stained for DNA fragmentation (middle
panels) and stained with DAPI (right panels). The
left panels show phase contrast micrographs of the same
fields.
|
|
Parallel studies of HC11 cells grown under
anchorage-dependent conditions also provided evidence for
reduced apoptosis following delivery of Dn-Jak2 into
confluent cultures, as demonstrated by TUNEL staining of cells
undergoing DNA fragmentation (Fig. 7C). Representative
fields from cell cultures presented by phase-contrast, TUNEL, and DAPI
staining, showed that a larger number of HC11 cells undergo
apoptosis when infected with Adv-control compared with
Adv-Dn-Jak2 (Fig. 7C). We conclude from these
experiments that suppression of Jak2 in HC11 cells inhibits cellular
apoptosis under several culture conditions. Thus, the
hyperproliferative phenotype of HC11 cells associated with suppression
of Jak2 also involved anti-apoptotic elements.
The Hyperproliferative Phenotype Resulting from Jak2 Suppression in
HC11 Cells Is Associated with Constitutive Activation of
Stat3--
The observed hyperproliferative and undifferentiated
phenotype of HC11 mammary epithelial cells with disrupted Jak2-Stat5 signaling is intriguing in light of the general loss of differentiation associated with progressing breast cancer cells. Because Stat3 has been
shown to be an oncogene (23) and to be constitutively activated in
human breast cancer (24), we examined the effect of Jak2 suppression on
basal Stat3 activation in HC11 cells. Interestingly, Western blot
analysis of whole cell lysates from subconfluent HC11 cells indicated
that Stat3 was constitutively active in hyperproliferative clones A and
B, as determined by increased Stat3 phosphotyrosine levels in the
absence of increased Stat3 levels (Fig.
8A).

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Suppression of Jak2 in HC11 cells is
associated with constitutive activation of Stat3. A,
constitutive activation of Stat3 in HC11 clones A and B. Parental HC11
cells, Vs-control clone, and Jak2 antisense-expressing clones A and B
were cultured under exponential growth conditions. Levels of
tyrosine-phosphorylated Stat3 were determined in whole cell lysates by
immunoblotting with anti-pTyr-Stat3 antibodies (upper
panel). Samples were reprobed for Stat3 protein levels to verify
equal loading (lower panel). B,
dose-dependent induction of constitutive Stat3
phosphotyrosine levels in HC11 cells infected with
Adv-Dn-Jak2. HC11 cells were either mock infected or
infected with either Adv-Control (m.o.i. 25) or with two increasing
doses of Adv-Dn-Jak2 (m.o.i. 5 and 25). Twenty-four h after
infection, whole cell lysates were analyzed for Stat3 tyrosine
phosphorylation (upper panel) and reprobed for Stat3 protein
levels (lower panel).
|
|
Similar results were obtained with introduction of
Dn-Jak2 into HC11 cells by adenoviral transfer. Dn-Jak2 also
led to constitutive activation of Stat3 as measured by Stat3
phosphotyrosine and Stat3 protein immunoblotting (Fig. 8B).
The effect was dose-dependent and was not induced by
infection with control adenovirus. Based on two independent molecular
approaches, we conclude that the hyperproliferative phenotype of
Jak2-suppressed HC11 cells correlated with constitutive activation of
Stat3. Thus, the possibility exists that constitutive activation of
Stat3 is involved in the hyperproliferative phenotype of the cells
associated with Jak2 suppression. Further investigations into the role
of Stat3 in proliferation of HC11 cells, and the relationship between
Stat3 activation and suppression of the Jak2-Stat5 pathway, are underway.
 |
DISCUSSION |
The present study used adenoviral delivery of
dominant-negative Jak2 and stable expression of
Jak2 antisense mRNA to identify Jak2 as a critical
mediator of prolactin-induced differentiation of nontransformed HC11
mammary epithelial cells. The associated disruption of
prolactin-induced Stat5 activation most likely represents the key
molecular mechanism responsible for disrupting prolactin-induced differentiation. Furthermore, targeted suppression of Jak2 in HC11
cells led to a hyperproliferative phenotype, suggesting that Jak2
exerts a growth-inhibitory influence on normal mammary epithelial cells. Whereas suppression of Jak2 did not lead to transformation of
HC11 cells, Jak2 suppression did, however, reduce contact inhibition and extend cell survival under anchorage-independent growth conditions. Stat3 was constitutively activated in hyperproliferative,
Jak2-suppressed HC11 mammary epithelial cells, and this activation of
Stat3, a known oncogene (23), may contribute to the hyperproliferative phenotype.
Jak2 as a Mediator of Prolactin-induced Differentiation--
We
originally identified Jak2 as the prolactin-associated tyrosine kinase
in Nb2 lymphoma cells (3, 25). Although other Jak tyrosine kinases
reportedly are not activated by prolactin receptors, numerous studies
indicate that prolactin may activate other, non-Jak tyrosine kinases.
These include tyrosine kinases Fyn (10), Src (11), Tec (13), and
focal adhesion kinase (12). In most cases, temporal activation profiles
suggest that prolactin activates Jak2 upstream of the non-Jak tyrosine
kinases, but at least one report indicated that prolactin can activate Src independent of Jak2 (26). Consequently, the notion that all
prolactin-induced effects are mediated by Jak2 may not be correct.
Therefore, it was of particular importance to determine whether Jak2
mediates prolactin-induced differentiation of mammary epithelial cells.
The present study now provides direct evidence that Jak2, in fact, is
critical for mammary epithelial cell differentiation. After
establishing that prolactin activated Jak2, and not other Jaks, in HC11
cells, and that concentration-dependent induction of cell
differentiation by prolactin correlated with Jak2 activation, two
independent strategies were used in vitro for targeted
suppression of Jak2. These included construction of two sets of novel
reagents, a vector for stable or transient expression of a novel and
specific Jak2 antisense-mRNA, and a
replication-defective adenovirus for efficient gene delivery of
Dn-Jak2. Both sets of molecular tools were validated and
determined to be effective in independent experiments, and both
strategies independently demonstrated that Jak2 is critical for
prolactin-induced differentiation by selectively disrupting mammosphere
formation. Disruption of prolactin-induced differentiation was not
associated with any general cytotoxic effects, because suppression of
Jak2 by either strategy led to increased proliferation rates and
reduced cellular apoptosis. Furthermore, the described molecular tools
may be applied to determine whether Jak2 is critical for biological
effects of other cytokine receptors in a variety of cell types.
Evidence That Jak2 Phosphorylates and Activates Stat5
in HC11 Cells--
Transcription factor Stat5, and especially the
Stat5a isoform, is critical for mammary gland differentiation (6).
Stat5 is phosphorylated on a single tyrosine residue following
prolactin receptor activation, and this modification causes Stat5 to
dimerize, which in turn is needed for DNA binding and transcriptional
regulation (4). Jak2 is presumed to mediate prolactin-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of Stat5 (22), although Stat5 can also be
phosphorylated by the Src tyrosine kinase (27). In the present study,
we determined that suppression of Jak2 activity blocked
prolactin-stimulated Stat5 tyrosine phosphorylation in HC11 cells, both
by immunoblotting and by immunocytochemistry using an
anti-phosphotyrosine-Stat5 antibody. Specifically, in Jak2-suppressed
HC11 clones, Stat5 activation was significantly down-regulated.
Furthermore, Stat5 activation was inhibited in a
dose-dependent manner by Dn-Jak2 delivered by
adenoviral infection. These findings support a view of the Jak2-Stat5
pathway as a differentiation-inducing axis in mammary epithelial cells.
Targeted Inactivation of Jak2 Resulted in Hyperproliferative
Phenotype of HC11 Cells--
The Jak2-deficient HC11 clones showed
significantly increased growth rates, loss of contact inhibition, and
prolonged survival under anchorage-independent culture conditions.
Although suppression of Jak2 in HC11 cells was associated with loss of
Stat5 activation, Stat3 became constitutively tyrosine-phosphorylated.
Constitutive activation of Stat3 was observed both in HC11 clones
stably expressing the Jak2 antisense construct and in cells
overexpressing Dn-Jak2 by adenoviral delivery, raising the possibility
that the Jak2-Stat5 pathway normally inhibits Stat3 activation in HC11
cells. Interestingly, a similar mutual exclusion of Stat5 activation
and Stat3 activation has been observed in mammary epithelial cells
within the physiological setting of mammary gland involution (28).
Weaning, or artificially induced milk stasis, rapidly shuts off Stat5
activation in lactating mammary epithelial cells, and Stat3 becomes
activated instead (29). Although the importance of Stat3 activation in
hyperproliferative HC11 cells remains to be determined, this
observation is particularly intriguing in light of the established
tumor-promoting role of Stat3 (23).
In summary, the present work demonstrated that Jak2 is
critical for prolactin-induced differentiation of HC11 mouse mammary epithelial cells. Equally important, the data are also consistent with
an overall growth-inhibitory role of the Jak2-Stat5 pathway in mammary
epithelial cells. This notion is of direct relevance to mammary
tumorigenesis, because the data suggest a tumor-suppressive role of the
Jak2-Stat5 pathway in the mammary gland. In general, cancer cells are
characterized by enhanced growth and reduced levels of differentiation.
Future work will address the possibility that progression of mammary
and breast tumors involve a gradual loss of Jak2-Stat5 signaling, with
a consequent increase in Stat3 activation.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grants RO1 DK52013 and RO1 CA83813, and Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences Grant RO74JW.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Georgetown University,
Lombardi Cancer Center, E504A, Research Building, 3970 Reservoir Rd.,
NW, Washington, DC 20007. E-mail: ruih@georgetown.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, January 30, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M112399200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
Jak, Janus kinase;
Stat, signal transducer and activator of transcription;
Prl, prolactin;
PrlR, prolactin receptor;
Adv, adenovirus;
m.o.i.: multiplicity of
infection, Wt, wild type;
Dn, dominant-negative;
EGF, epidermal growth
factor;
mAb, monoclonal antibody;
pAb, polyclonal antibody;
DAPI, 4',6-diamidino-2-phenyl-indole;
TUNEL, terminal deoxynucleotidyl
transferase-mediated dUTP nick end labeling;
PBS, phosphate-buffered
saline.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Horseman, N. D.,
Zhao, W.,
Montecino-Rodriguez, E.,
Tanaka, M.,
Nakashima, K.,
Engle, S. J.,
Smith, F.,
Markoff, E.,
and Dorshkind, K.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
6926-6935[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Wennbo, H.,
Gebre-Medhin, M.,
Gritli-Linde, A.,
Ohlsson, C.,
Isaksson, O. G.,
and Tornell, J.
(1997)
J. Clin. Invest.
100,
2744-2751[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Rui, H.,
Kirken, R. A.,
and Farrar, W. L.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
5364-5368[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 4.
|
Wakao, H.,
Gouilleux, F.,
and Groner, B.
(1994)
EMBO J.
13,
2182-2191[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Hennighausen, L.,
Robinson, G. W.,
Wagner, K. U.,
and Liu, W.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
7567-7569[Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Liu, X.,
Robinson, G. W.,
Wagner, K. U.,
Garrett, L.,
Wynshaw-Boris, A.,
and Hennighausen, L.
(1997)
Genes Dev.
11,
179-186[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Teglund, S.,
McKay, C.,
Schuetz, E.,
van Deursen, J. M.,
Stravopodis, D.,
Wang, D.,
Brown, M.,
Bodner, S.,
Grosveld, G.,
and Ihle, J. N.
(1998)
Cell
93,
841-850[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Neubauer, H.,
Cumano, A.,
Muller, M., Wu, H.,
Huffstadt, U.,
and Pfeffer, K.
(1998)
Cell
93,
397-409[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Parganas, E.,
Wang, D.,
Stravopodis, D.,
Topham, D. J.,
Marine, J. C.,
Teglund, S.,
Vanin, E. F.,
Bodner, S.,
Colamonici, O. R.,
van Deursen, J. M.,
Grosveld, G.,
and Ihle, J. N.
(1998)
Cell
93,
385-395[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Clevenger, C. V.,
and Medaglia, M. V.
(1994)
Mol. Endocrinol.
8,
674-681[Abstract]
|
| 11.
|
Berlanga, J. J.,
Fresno Vara, J. A.,
Martin-Perez, J.,
and Garcia-Ruiz, J. P.
(1995)
Mol. Endocrinol.
9,
1461-1467[Abstract]
|
| 12.
|
Canbay, E.,
Norman, M.,
Kilic, E.,
Goffin, V.,
and Zachary, I.
(1997)
Biochem. J.
324,
231-236[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Kline, J. B.,
Moore, D. J.,
and Clevenger, C. V.
(2001)
Mol. Endocrinol.
15,
832-841[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Yamauchi, T.,
Yamauchi, N.,
Ueki, K.,
Sugiyama, T.,
Waki, H.,
Miki, H.,
Tobe, K.,
Matsuda, S.,
Tsushima, T.,
Yamamoto, T.,
Fujita, T.,
Taketani, Y.,
Fukayama, M.,
Kimura, S.,
Yazaki, Y.,
Nagai, R.,
and Kadowaki, T.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
33937-33944[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Lacronique, V.,
Boureux, A.,
Monni, R.,
Dumon, S.,
Mauchauffe, M.,
Mayeux, P.,
Gouilleux, F.,
Berger, R.,
Gisselbrecht, S.,
Ghysdael, J.,
and Bernard, O. A.
(2000)
Blood
95,
2076-2083[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Ball, R. K.,
Friis, R. R.,
Schoenenberger, C. A.,
Doppler, W.,
and Groner, B.
(1988)
EMBO J.
7,
2089-2095[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Yamashita, H., Xu, J.,
Erwin, R. A.,
Farrar, W. L.,
Kirken, R. A.,
and Rui, H.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
30218-30224[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Duhe, R. J.,
Rui, H.,
Greenwood, J. D.,
Garvey, K.,
and Farrar, W. L.
(1995)
Gene
158,
281-285[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Blatchford, D. R.,
Hendry, K. A.,
Turner, M. D.,
Burgoyne, R. D.,
and Wilde, C. J.
(1995)
Epithelial Cell Biol.
4,
8-16[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Hynes, N. E.,
Taverna, D.,
Harwerth, I. M.,
Ciardiello, F.,
Salomon, D. S.,
Yamamoto, T.,
and Groner, B.
(1990)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
10,
4027-4034[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Humphreys, R. C.,
and Rosen, J. M.
(1997)
Cell Growth Differ.
8,
839-849[Abstract]
|
| 22.
|
Gouilleux, F.,
Wakao, H.,
Mundt, M.,
and Groner, B.
(1994)
EMBO J.
13,
4361-4369[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Bromberg, J. F.,
Wrzeszczynska, M. H.,
Devgan, G.,
Zhao, Y.,
Pestell, R. G.,
Albanese, C.,
and Darnell, J. E., Jr.
(1999)
Cell
98,
295-303[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Garcia, R.,
Bowman, T. L.,
Niu, G., Yu, H.,
Minton, S.,
Muro-Cacho, C. A.,
Cox, C. E.,
Falcone, R.,
Fairclough, R.,
Parsons, S.,
Laudano, A.,
Gazit, A.,
Levitzki, A.,
Kraker, A.,
and Jove, R.
(2001)
Oncogene
20,
2499-2513[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Rui, H.,
Djeu, J. Y.,
Evans, G. A.,
Kelly, P. A.,
and Farrar, W. L.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
24076-24081[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Fresno Vara, J. A.,
Carretero, M. V.,
Geronimo, H.,
Ballmer-Hofer, K.,
and Martin-Perez, J.
(2000)
Biochem. J.
345,
17-24[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Kazansky, A. V.,
Kabotyanski, E. B.,
Wyszomierski, S. L.,
Mancini, M. A.,
and Rosen, J. M.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
22484-22492[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Groner, B.,
and Hennighausen, L.
(2000)
Breast Cancer Res.
2,
149-153[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Li, M.,
Liu, X.,
Robinson, G.,
Bar-Peled, U.,
Wagner, K. U.,
Young, W. S.,
Hennighausen, L.,
and Furth, P. A.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
3425-3430[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S.-H. Tan and M. T Nevalainen
Signal transducer and activator of transcription 5A/B in prostate and breast cancers
Endocr. Relat. Cancer,
June 1, 2008;
15(2):
367 - 390.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|