![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 16, 14211-14215, April 19, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Department of Physiological Chemistry, Graduate School of
Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto
606-8501, Japan and the Department of Physiological Chemistry, Graduate
School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku,
Kyoto 606-8501, Japan
Received for publication, January 23, 2002, and in revised form, February 1, 2002
Histamine synthesis in male reproductive tissues
remains largely unknown. The interaction between stem cell factor and
its receptor, c-Kit, has been found to be essential for the
maturation of male germ cells and peripheral mast cells. Based on this
analogy, we investigated the expression of histidine decarboxylase
(HDC), the rate-limiting enzyme of histamine synthesis, in mouse male germ cells. Immunohistochemical analyses revealed that HDC is localized
in the acrosomes of spermatids and spermatozoa. In the testis,
epididymis, and spermatozoa, a significant amount of histamine and HDC
activity were detected. W/WV mice, known to lack most
of their germ cells in the seminiferous tubules, were found to lack HDC
protein expression as well as HDC activity in the testis. An in
vitro acrosome reaction induced by a calcium ionophore, A23187,
caused the release of histamine from epididymal spermatozoa. Our
observations indicate that histamine is produced in and released from
the acrosomes.
L-Histidine decarboxylase
(HDC1; EC 4.1.1.22) catalyzes
the decarboxylation of L-histidine to form histamine. It is
the only enzyme that synthesizes histamine in mammals. Histamine is
well known to act as an important physiological modulator. Histamine is
produced by a variety of cell types such as mast cells, basophils, enterochromaffin-like cells, and neurons (1-3). Among these cells, histamine production in mast cells has been best characterized. We
previously demonstrated that the 74-kDa precursor form of HDC is a
short lived protein and is degraded via the ubiquitin-proteasome system
in the cytosol of a rat basophilic/mast cell line (4). We also revealed
that the 74-kDa form is processed post-translationally into its mature
53-kDa form and that histamine is produced in two distinct
compartments, the cytosol and the granules of mast cells (5).
The maturation of mast cells in peripheral tissues such as the skin is
known to be largely dependent on the presence of fibroblasts (6). The
interaction between c-Kit (SCF receptor) of mast cells and the
membrane-bound SCF of fibroblasts is required for the maturation of
mast cell progenitors in vitro (6). The interaction between
SCF and c-Kit has also been found to induce histamine synthesis in
cultured mast cells (7). Such an interaction between SCF and c-Kit has
also been found to occur during spermatogenesis (8, 9).
W/WV mice, which possess a point mutation in the kinase
domain of c-Kit, are known to lack peripheral mast cells and a large
proportion of their male germ cells (10-12). Spermatozoa are known to
contain a granule-like organelle, the acrosome. Fertilizing spermatozoa are believed to undergo an acrosome reaction, the release of a variety
of hydrolytic enzymes from the acrosome onto the surface of the zona
pellucida before penetrating it (13). The acrosome reaction has been
reported to require a massive influx of extracellular calcium (14),
which is also known to be essential for the degranulation of mast cells.
We investigated the expression of HDC mRNA in various mouse tissues
and found a large amount of mRNA in the testis. This observation led us to the hypothesis that the maturation of male germ cells may be
accompanied by histamine synthesis. In this study, we demonstrate the
expression of HDC in mouse male germ cells, which may be responsible for histamine production in the acrosomes.
Animals--
Adult male ICR mice (9-12 weeks of age),
WBB6F1-W/WV (W/WV), and
WBB6F1-W/W+ (W/W+) mice (8 weeks of
age) were obtained from the Shizuoka Agricultural Cooperative
Association for Laboratory Animals (Hamamatsu, Japan).
RT-PCR--
Various male reproductive tissues and stomach were
collected from ICR mice, immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and
stored at Northern Blot Analysis--
Total RNAs (15 µg) from testis,
epididymis, and stomach were separated by electrophoresis on a
1.5% agarose gel and transferred onto a nylon membrane
(Biodyne-A, Pall, Port Washington, NY). Hybridization was
performed with a 32P-labeled cDNA fragment specific for
mouse HDC (PvuII-digested fragment) at 65 °C in 6× SSC
(1× SSC is composed of 0.15 M NaCl and 0.015 M
sodium citrate), 0.5% SDS, and 5× Denhardt's solution. After
hybridization, filters were washed at 68 °C in 2× SSC, 1% SDS, and
the hybridized bands were detected by autoradiography. The filters were
then rehybridized with a 32P-labeled cDNA fragment
specific for glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase
(CLONTECH, Palo Alto, CA).
In Situ Hybridization--
In situ hybridization was
performed as described previously (15). Testes collected from ICR mice
were immediately frozen. Sections (10 µm in thickness) were cut on a
Jung Frigocut 3000E cryostat and thaw-mounted onto
poly-L-lysine-coated glass slides. Antisense riboprobes
were synthesized by transcription with T3 RNA polymerase (Stratagene,
La Jolla, CA) in the presence of [ Immunohistochemistry--
Testes were collected and treated with
Bouin's fixative (Muto Pure Chemicals, Tokyo, Japan) for 24 h at
4 °C. Sections (10 µm in thickness) were cut on a Jung Frigocut
3000E cryostat. The sections were incubated with a rabbit polyclonal
antibody raised against glutathione S-transferase fusion HDC
(16) (1:200) for 1 day at 4 °C. After incubation with biotinylated
secondary antibody against rabbit IgG (1:2000, Vector, Burlingame, CA)
for 2 h, the antibodies were detected with the
avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex (diluted 1:2000; Vector, Burlingame,
CA). Development was performed by incubation with 50 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, containing 0.02% 3,3'-diaminobenzidine, 0.0045%
H2O2, and 0.6% nickel ammonium sulfate for 3 min to obtain brown stained products. The sections were counterstained
with methyl green for nuclear staining. For the immunofluorescence study, a rhodamine-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG antibody (1:200) was used
as a secondary antibody. The nuclear staining was performed using a
SYBR green dye (Molecular Probes, Inc., Eugene, OR). All of the
immunoreactive signals obtained using the anti-HDC antibody were
undetectable in the presence of an excess amount (10 µg/ml) of the
antigen, glutathione S-transferase fusion HDC.
Histidine Decarboxylase Assay--
Testes, epididymides, and
spermatozoa were collected and homogenated in 50 mM
HEPES-NaOH, pH 7.3, containing 0.2 mM dithiothreitol, 0.01 mM pyridoxal 5'-phosphate, 0.2 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 0.1 mM benzamidine, 10 µg/ml E-64, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 1 µg/ml
pepstatin A, and 1% Triton X-100. The homogenates were centrifuged at
13,000 × g for 15 min at 4 °C, and the resulting supernatants were assayed for histidine decarboxylase activity as
described previously (5). The assay mixture (1 ml) was composed of 0.8 µmol L-histidine, 0.2 µmol of dithiothreitol, 0.01 µmol of pyridoxal 5'-phosphate, 10 mg of polyethylene glycol 300, 100 µmol of potassium phosphate, pH 6.8, and the crude extracts. The reaction was performed at 37 °C for 4 h and was terminated by adding 0.04 ml of 60% perchloric acid. The histamine formed was extracted and separated on a cation exchange column, WCX-1 (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) by high pressure liquid chromatography and then measured
by the o-phtalaldehyde method (17).
Protein Assay--
Protein concentrations were determined by the
method of Bradford (18) using bovine serum albumin for the standards.
Immunoblot Analysis--
Testes, epididymides, and epididymal
spermatozoa were homogenized in 99.2 mM NaCl containing
2.68 mM KCl, 0.36 mM
NaH2PO4, 0.5% Triton X-100, and 0.2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and crude extracts were
prepared by centrifugation at 13,000 × g for 10 min at
4 °C. Aliquots were separated by SDS-PAGE (10% slab gel) and
electrophoretically transferred onto a polyvinylidene difluoride
membrane (Millipore, Tokyo, Japan). Immunoblot analysis was performed
as previously described (5). An anti-HDC antibody (1:500) was used as
the primary antibody, and a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG antibody (1:3000; Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) was used as
the secondary antibody. The membrane was stained using the ECL kit
(Amersham Biosciences) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Partially purified HDC (53 kDa) was prepared from a mouse mastocytoma
cell line, P-815, as described previously (19). Sf9 cells
expressing recombinant 74-kDa HDC were prepared using a
baculovirus-insect cell expression system as described previously
(20).
Acrosome Reaction--
Spermatozoa were collected from the cauda
epididymis in modified fertilization medium reported by Whittingham
(21) after 1 h of "swim up" at 37 °C in a fully humidified
atmosphere with 5% CO2 to allow capacitation. Motile
spermatozoa (3.5 × 106 cells/ml) were carefully
collected and incubated for 1 h at 37 °C in the medium in the
presence or absence of 10 µM A23187. The acrosome
reaction was confirmed by the loss of Coomassie Brilliant Blue
R-250-positive spermatozoa. In our experimental conditions, only a
small proportion of spermatozoa underwent acrosome reactions spontaneously (4.80 ± 0.374%, n = 5), whereas a
large proportion of spermatozoa did so in the presence of A23187
(86.4 ± 1.81%, n = 5).
Expression of HDC mRNA in Mouse Male Reproductive
Tissues--
The expression of HDC mRNA in various male
reproductive organs of ICR mice was investigated. HDC mRNA
expression was detected in the testis and epididymis by RT-PCR
analyses. The 2.7-kb transcripts of HDC could only be detected in the
testis upon Northern blot analyses (Fig.
1A). The amount of HDC
mRNA accumulation in the testis was comparable with that in the
stomach, which has been reported to exhibit significant levels of HDC
activity (22). HDC mRNAs were found to be expressed mainly in the
cells inside the seminiferous tubules by in situ
hybridization (Fig. 1B).
Immunohistochemical Analyses with an Anti-HDC
Antibody--
Immunohistochemical analyses with an anti-HDC antibody
also demonstrated that the immunoreactive cells were localized in the seminiferous tubules (Fig. 2,
A and B). A majority of immunoreactive signals
demonstrated a characteristic shape of the acrosomal cap of elongating
spermatids. Small signals were also detected in the round spermatids.
Confocal microscopic analysis demonstrated that the immunoreactive
signals were localized mainly in the cells that possessed an elongating
nucleus (Fig. 3). No immunofluorescence was detected in the cells distributed near the basement membranes of
the seminiferous tubules. In the epididymis, the luminal spermatozoa and epithelial cells were also immunoreactive to the anti-HDC antibody
(Fig. 2, C and D).
Enzymatic Activity of HDC and Tissue Histamine Content in the
Testis, Epididymis, and Spermatozoa--
The enzymatic activity of HDC
and tissue histamine content in the testis, epididymis, and spermatozoa
obtained form the cauda epididymis were determined. Significant amounts
of enzymatic activity and tissue histamine were detected in these
tissues and cells, although the levels were much lower than that in the
stomach (Table I). Similar levels of
specific activity of HDC were detected in the testis and epididymal
spermatozoa, but a higher histamine content (more than 10-fold) was
observed in the spermatozoa.
Immunoblot Analyses in the Testis, Epididymis, and
Spermatozoa--
The molecular species of HDC detected in the mouse
male reproductive system was different from those observed in a rat
mast cell line. Three immunoreactive bands (69, 45, and 39 kDa) were detected in the testis by immunoblot analyses using an anti-HDC antibody (Fig. 4). In the epididymis, 69- and 39-kDa forms were detected, whereas 39- and 35-kDa forms were
detected in the epididymal spermatozoa. None of these bands were
detected in the presence of an excess amount of the antigen,
glutathione S-transferase fusion HDC (data not shown).
Absence of HDC in the Seminiferous Tubules of W/WV
Mice--
W/WV mice, which are genetically defective in
c-Kit (stem cell factor receptor) function, have been reported to lack
a significant proportion of their male germ cells. No immunoreactive
cells were observed in the seminiferous tubules of W/WV
mice when immunostained with an anti-HDC antibody. On the other hand, a
similar staining pattern to that of ICR mice was observed in the testis
of W/W+ mice (Fig. 5).
Neither HDC activity nor histamine was detectable in the testis of
W/WV mice. In the epididymis, W/WV mice showed
a much lower HDC activity and histamine content than the
W/W+ mice (Table II).
Histamine Release Induced by an in Vitro Acrosome
Reaction--
In vitro acrosome reactions were performed
using a calcium ionophore, A23187. Spermatozoa obtained from the cauda
epididymis of ICR mice underwent acrosome reactions upon the addition
of A23187. Intracellular histamine was completely lost during the
reaction for 1 h and about 25% of the histamine was recovered in
the medium (Table III). The addition of a
diamine oxidase inhibitor, aminoguanidine, had no effect on the
recovery of histamine (data not shown).
The abundant expression of HDC mRNA was demonstrated in the
mouse testis by Northern blot analysis. Since the function of histamine
in the male reproductive system remains to be clarified, our current
studies were performed to analyze the possible functions. HDC mRNA
and protein were detected in the cells inside the seminiferous tubules.
The most intense immunoreactive signals were found in the acrosomes of
elongating spermatids. Since immature acrosomes of the round spermatids
were also immunoreactive to the anti-HDC antibody, HDC protein
expression in the seminiferous tubules may be synchronized with
acrosome development. HDC mRNA was also detected by in
situ hybridization in the cells located near the basement membranes of the seminiferous tubules, which were not immunoreactive to
the anti-HDC antibody. Although we were unable to identify which types
of cells near the basement membrane were positive upon in
situ hybridization, these observations suggest that the expression
of HDC in these cells may be regulated at the post-transcriptional level.
W/WV mice, which possess a point mutation in the kinase
domain of c-Kit (SCF receptor), are known to be sterile and to lack a
significant portion of their germ cells in the seminiferous tubules
(10). Studies with a monoclonal antibody, ACK-2, which blocks binding
of SCF to c-Kit, have indicated that the SCF/c-Kit interaction is
essential for the proliferation of type A spermatogonia in a normal
genetic background (23, 24). W/WV mice are known to lack
spermatocytes, spermatids, and spermatozoa. The absence of the HDC
protein in the seminiferous tubules and the lack of enzymatic activity
in the testis of W/WV mice is consistent with the
observation that HDC is selectively expressed in the spermatids and
spermatozoa. The relationship between membrane-bound SCF expression in
Sertoli cells and c-Kit expression in male germ cells (spermatogonia
and spermatids) is analogous to that between SCF in fibroblasts and
c-Kit in immature mast cells. W/WV mice are also known to
lack peripheral mature mast cells, indicating that the SCF/c-Kit
signaling is also essential for the development of peripheral mast
cells (10). The treatment of interleukin-3-dependent bone
marrow-derived mast cells with SCF has been reported to enhance the
synthesis of histamine in these cells (7). The acrosome is believed to
be analogous to the lysosome (25) and contains a large array of
hydrolyzing enzymes such as acrosin and hyaluronidase (26). We
previously demonstrated that HDC is localized in the granular fraction
of a rat mast cell line, RBL-2H3 (5). Male germ cells and mast cells
may share a common mechanism, a SCF/c-Kit signaling pathway, that may
induce the expression and determine the intracellular localization of
HDC.
We previously reported that HDC is translated as a 74-kDa precursor and
processed into a mature 53-kDa form in a mast cell line (5). The
reported molecular mass of purified enzymes from various
mammalian tissues has all been 53-55-kDa (19, 20, 27) while the mouse
HDC cDNA codes a protein with a predicted molecular mass of 74 kDa
(28). Immunoblot analyses demonstrated that different forms of HDC (69, 45, 39, and 35 kDa) are expressed in the male reproductive tissues. We
recently generated a mouse strain, genetically lacking the
pyridoxal-binding site of HDC, and exhibiting no HDC activity (29, 30).
In this strain, no immunoreactive bands were observed in the testis,
epididymis, and epididymal spermatozoa (data not shown). Since no
splice variants of HDC were detected in the testis by RT-PCR (data not
shown), these multiple forms of HDC may be generated by
post-translational processing. It is possible that sperm-specific forms
of HDC may be produced by a different processing pathway from that in
mast cells, since acrosomes are known to contain various specific
proteases. A previous study has suggested the existence of a
testis-specific form of the c-Kit protein (31). In rat stomach, the
existence of multiple forms of HDC have also been reported, where small forms of HDC (40 and 36 kDa) were found to be increased upon the refeeding of fasted rats (32, 33). Since the specific activity of these
forms remains to be determined both in the rat stomach and in our
study, it is unclear whether these small forms of HDC possess the
enzymatic activity. However, since Engel et al. (34) have
reported that the deletion of the amino-terminal 68 residues and the
carboxyl-terminal 20-kDa region has no effect on the
Km value and enzymatic activity of rat HDC, it is
possible that the small forms of HDC (39 and 35 kDa) in spermatozoa
exhibit enzymatic activity.
In this study, we demonstrated the release of histamine from
spermatozoa by an in vitro acrosome reaction induced by a
calcium ionophore, A23187. Accumulating evidence suggests that
fertilizing spermatozoa do not initiate the acrosome reaction in
vivo until they come into contact with the zona pellucida (14).
Although the acrosome reaction induced by a calcium ionophore may be
quite different from the zona-induced reaction, it is generally
believed that the differences most probably occur during the initial
steps of the reaction and not in the downstream cascade of events that occur.
Although a function for histamine in fertilization has not been
reported, our results suggest that histamine release may have some
function in the fertilization process. We have observed normal fertility in the HDC-deficient mice (29), indicating that histamine production may not be essential in fertility. We are now investigating of male germ cell function and morphology using this mutant mouse strain. To clarify the mechanism as to how histamine modulates the
process of fertilization, further experiments, such as in vitro fertilization, are surely required.
The recovery of released histamine was quite low in our in
vitro acrosome reactions. Since the addition of a diamine oxidase inhibitor, aminoguanidine, did not increase the recovery of histamine, the other histamine-metabolizing enzyme, histamine
N-methyltransferase, may be involved in the degradation of
histamine. We have not been able to perform further studies on this
point, since we could not obtain a specific inhibitor of histamine
N-methyltransferase. The expression of diamine oxidase and
histamine N-methyltransferase in spermatozoa remains unknown.
In summary, we have demonstrated for the first time that there is
significant expression of HDC in the spermatids and spermatozoa of male
mice and that the release of histamine from spermatozoa can be induced
by an in vitro acrosome reaction. Our results raise the
possibility that histamine may play a role in the mouse reproductive system.
*
This work was supported by grants-in-aid for Scientific
Research from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, and Culture, Japan.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, February 4, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M200702200
The abbreviations used are:
HDC, L-histidine decarboxylase;
RT, reverse transcriptase;
SCF, stem cell factor.
Expression of L-Histidine Decarboxylase in Mouse Male
Germ Cells*
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
80 °C until use. Total RNAs were extracted with ISOGEN
(Nippon Gene, Tokyo, Japan) according to the manufacturer's
instructions. The reverse transcription reaction was performed using
Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase (New England
Biolabs, Beverly, MA) in the presence of random hexamers. The PCR was
performed with Taq DNA polymerase (TOYOBO, Tokyo, Japan)
using the first strand as a template. The primer pair used for
amplification of HDC transcripts were as follows: HDC (forward), 5'-CGC
TCC ATT AAG CTG TGG TTT GTG ATT CGG-3'; HDC (reverse), 5'-AGA CTG GCT CCT GGC TGC TTG ATG ATC TTC-3'.
-35S]CTP. The
sections were fixed with 4% formalin and acetylated with 0.25% acetic
anhydride. Hybridization was carried out in a buffer containing 50%
formamide, 2× SSC, 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 1× Denhardt's
solution, 10% dextran sulfate, 0.2% SDS, 100 mM
dithiothreitol, 500 µg/ml sheared single-stranded salmon sperm DNA,
and 250 µg/ml yeast tRNA. The 35S-labeled riboprobes were
added to the hybridization mixture at 1.5 × 105
cpm/µl. After incubation at 60 °C for 5 h, the slides were
washed for 1 h in 2 × SSC. The sections were treated with 20 µg/ml ribonuclease A, followed by an additional wash in 0.1× SSC at
60 °C for 1 h. The slides were then dipped in nuclear track
emulsion (NTB3; Eastman Kodak Co.). After exposure for 5 weeks at
4 °C, the dipped slides were developed, fixed, and counterstained
with hematoxylin and eosin. The specificity of the signals for each
probe was verified by its disappearance when an excess amount of
unlabeled probe was added (data not shown).
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (54K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Expression of HDC in mouse male reproductive
tissues. A, various male reproductive tissues and
stomach were collected from ICR mice (10 weeks of age). The RT-PCR was
performed as described under "Experimental Procedures." Lane
M, 100-bp DNA ladder marker; lane 1, testis;
lane 2, epididymis; lane 3,
vas deferens; lane 4, penis; lane
5, seminal vesicle; lane 6, prostate;
lane 7, musculus bulbospongiosus; lane
8, stomach. The arrow indicates the amplified
transcripts of HDC (505 bp). B, total RNAs (15 µg/lane)
were loaded on a 1.5% agarose gel, and Northern blot analysis was
performed using 32P-labeled probes (HDC and
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH)) as
described under "Experimental Procedures." Lane
1, testis; lane 2, epididymis;
lane 3, stomach. C, the testis of an
ICR mouse was collected, and cryostat sections (10 µm in thickness)
were prepared. In situ hybridization was performed using a
35S-labeled antisense riboprobe as described under
"Experimental Procedures." Bar, 100 µm.

View larger version (129K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Immunohistochemical analysis with an anti-HDC
antibody in the testis and epididymis of ICR mice. Testis
(A and B) and epididymis (caput (C)
and cauda (D)) were collected from ICR mice (10 weeks
of age), and cryostat sections (10 µm in thickness) were prepared.
The sections were incubated with an anti-HDC antibody (1:200) and
stained as described under "Experimental Procedures." The sections
were counterstained with methyl green for nuclear staining.
Bar, 100 µm.

View larger version (12K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Immunofluorescent study using an anti-HDC
antibody in the testis of ICR mice. The preparations of the
sections of the testis were performed as described in the legend to
Fig. 2. The sections were incubated with an anti-HDC antibody (1:200)
and stained with a rhodamine-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG antibody. The
nuclear staining was performed with a SYBR green dye. The fluorescent
images were obtained using confocal microscopy (MRC-1024; Bio-Rad).
Bar, 10 µm.
Enzymatic activity of HDC and histamine content in the testis,
epididymis, epididymal spermatozoa, and stomach

View larger version (55K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Immunoblot analysis using an anti-HDC
antibody in the testis, epididymis, and spermatozoa. Crude protein
extracts were prepared from the testis (lane 1,
50 µg of protein), epididymis (lane 2, 50 µg), and spermatozoa (lane 3, 100 µg) of ICR
mice and subjected to SDS-PAGE (10% slab gel). Immunoblot analysis was
performed using an anti-HDC antibody (1:500) as described under
"Experimental Procedures." Partially purified 53-kDa HDC
(lane 4, 30 ng of protein) from a mouse
mastocytoma cell line, P-815, and the crude extracts of SF9 cells
expressing mouse full-length HDC cDNA (lane
5, 1 µg of protein) were loaded for comparison. The
arrows indicate 53- and 74-kDa HDC, and the
arrowheads indicate the multiple forms of HDC.

View larger version (76K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Immunohistochemical analysis with an anti-HDC
antibody in the testis of W/W+ and W/WV
mice. The testes of W/W+ and W/WV mice
(9-10 weeks of age) were collected, and immunohistochemical analysis
was performed with an anti-HDC antibody (1:200) as described in
the legend to Fig. 2. Bar, 100 µm.
HDC activity and histamine content in the testis and epididymis of
W/W+ and W/Wv mice
Histamine release by the acrosome reaction induced by A23187
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
FOOTNOTES
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 81-75-753-4527;
Fax: 81-75-753-4557; E-mail: aichikaw@pharm.kyoto-u.ac.jp.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Beaven, M. A.
(1978)
Histamine: Its Role in Physiological and Pathological Processes
, pp. 1-113, Karger, Basel
2.
Code, C. F.
(1965)
Fed. Proc.
24,
1311-1321[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 3.
Schwartz, J. C.,
Pollard, H.,
and Quach, T. T.
(1980)
J. Neurochem.
35,
26-33[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 4.
Tanaka, S.,
Nemoto, K.,
Yamamura, E.,
Ohmura, S.,
and Ichikawa, A.
(1997)
FEBS Lett.
471,
203-207 5.
Tanaka, S.,
Nemoto, K.,
Yamamura, E.,
and Ichikawa, A.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
8177-8182 6.
Metcalfe, D. D.,
Baram, D.,
and Mekori, Y. A.
(1997)
Physiol. Rev.
77,
1033-1079 7.
Lukacs, N. W.,
Kunkel, S. L.,
Strieter, R. M.,
Evanoff, H. L.,
Kunkel, G.,
Key, M. L.,
and Taub, D. D.
(1996)
Blood
87,
2262-2268 8.
Loveland, K. L.,
and Schlatt, S.
(1997)
J. Endocrinol.
153,
337-344 9.
Kissel, H.,
Timokhina, I.,
Hardy, M. P.,
Rothschild, G.,
Tajima, Y.,
Soares, V.,
Angeles, M.,
Whitlow, S. R.,
Manova, K.,
and Besmer, P.
(2000)
EMBO J.
19,
1312-1326[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 10.
Russell, E. S.
(1979)
Adv. Genet.
20,
357-459[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 11.
Reith, A. D.,
and Bernstein, A.
(1991)
Genome Analysis
, Vol. 3
, pp. 105-131, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
12.
Yarden, Y.,
Kuang, W. J.,
Yang-Feng, T.,
Coussens, L.,
Munemistu, S.,
Dull, T. J.,
Chen, E.,
Schlessinger, J.,
Francke, U.,
and Ullrich, A.
(1987)
EMBO J.
6,
3341-3351[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 13.
Breil, J. D.
(1991)
in
Elements of Mammalian Fertilization
(Wassarman, P. M., ed), Vol. 1
, pp. 133-151, CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL
14.
Yanagimachi, R.
(1994)
in
The Physiology of Reproduction
(Knobil, E.
, and Neil, J. D., eds)
, pp. 189-317, Raven, New York
15.
Sugimoto, Y.,
Namba, T.,
Shigemoto, R.,
Negishi, M.,
Ichikawa, A.,
and Narumiya, S.
(1994)
Am. J. Physiol.
266,
F823-F828[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 16.
Asahara, M.,
Mushiake, S.,
Shimada, S.,
Fukui, H.,
Kinoshita, Y.,
Kawanami, C.,
Watanabe, T.,
Tanaka, S.,
Ichikawa, A.,
Uchiyama, Y.,
Narushima, Y.,
Takasawa, S.,
Okamato, H.,
Tohyama, M.,
and Chiba, T.
(1996)
Gastroenterology
111,
45-55[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 17.
Shore, P. A.,
Burkhalter, A.,
and Cohn, V. H.
(1959)
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.
127,
182-186 18.
Bradford, M. M.
(1974)
Anal. Biochem.
72,
248-254[CrossRef] 19.
Ohmori, E.,
Fukui, T.,
Imanishi, N.,
Yatsunami, K.,
and Ichikawa, A.
(1990)
J. Biochem. (Tokyo)
107,
834-839 20.
Yamamoto, J.,
Fukui, T.,
Suzuki, K.,
Tanaka, S.,
Yatsunami, K.,
and Ichikawa, A.
(1993)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1216,
431-440[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 21.
Whittingham, D. G.
(1968)
Nature
220,
592-593[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 22.
Watanabe, T.,
and Wada, H.
(1983)
in
Methods in Biogenic Amine Research
(Parvez, S.
, Nagatsu, T.
, Nagatsu, I.
, and Parvez, H., eds)
, pp. 690-720, Elsevier Science Publications B.V., Amsterdam
23.
Yoshinaga, K.,
Nishikawa, S.,
Ogawa, M.,
Hayashi, S.,
Kunisada, T.,
Fujimoto, T.,
and Nishikawa, S.
(1991)
Development
113,
689-699[Abstract] 24.
Tajima, Y.,
Sawada, K.,
Morimoto, T.,
and Nishimune, Y.
(1994)
J. Reprod. Fertil.
102,
117-122 25.
Allison, A. C.,
and Hartree, E. F.
(1970)
J. Reprod. Fertil.
21,
501-515 26.
Zaneveld, L. J. D.,
and De Jonge, C. J.
(1991)
in
A Comparative Overview of Mammalian Fertilization
(Dunbar, B. S.
, and O'Rand, M. G., eds)
, pp. 63-79, Plenum Press, New York
27.
Watabe, A.,
Fukui, T.,
Ohmori, E.,
and Ichikawa, A.
(1992)
Biochem. Pharmacol.
43,
587-593[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 28.
Yamamoto, J.,
Yatsunami, K.,
Ohmori, E.,
Sugimoto, Y.,
Fukui, T.,
Katayama, T.,
and Ichikawa, A.
(1990)
FEBS Lett.
276,
214-218[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 29.
Ohtsu, H.,
Tanaka, S.,
Terui, T.,
Hori, Y.,
Makabe-Kobayashi, Y.,
Pejler, G.,
Tchougounova, E.,
Hellman, L.,
Gertsenstein, M.,
Hirasawa, N.,
Sakurai, E.,
Buzas, E.,
Kovacs, P.,
Csaba, G.,
Kittel, A.,
Okada, M.,
Hara, M.,
Mar, L.,
Numayama-Tsuruta, K.,
Ishigaki-Suzuki, S.,
Ohuchi, K.,
Ichikawa, A.,
Falus, A.,
Watanabe, T.,
and Nagy, A.
(2001)
FEBS Lett.
502,
53-56[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 30.
Tanaka, S.,
Hamada, K.,
Yamada, N.,
Sugita, Y.,
Tonai, S.,
Hunyady, B.,
Palkovits, M.,
Falus, A.,
Watanabe, T.,
Okabe, S.,
Ohtsu, H.,
Ichikawa, A.,
and Nagy, A.
(2002)
Gastroenterology
122,
145-155[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 31.
Sandlow, J. I.,
Feng, H.,
and Sandra, A.
(1997)
Urology
49,
494-500[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 32.
Dartsch, C.,
Chen, D.,
and Persson, L.
(1998)
Regul. Pept.
77,
33-41[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 33.
Fleming, J. V.,
and Wang, T. C.
(2000)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20,
4932-4947 34.
Engel, N.,
Olno, M. T.,
Coleman, C. S.,
Medina, M. A.,
Pegg, A. E.,
and Sánchez-Jiménez, F.
(1996)
Biochem. J.
320,
365-368[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. H. Abel, P. J. Baker, H. M. Charlton, A. Monteiro, G. Verhoeven, K. De Gendt, F. Guillou, and P. J. O'Shaughnessy Spermatogenesis and Sertoli Cell Activity in Mice Lacking Sertoli Cell Receptors for Follicle-Stimulating Hormone and Androgen Endocrinology, July 1, 2008; 149(7): 3279 - 3285. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Furuta, K. Nakayama, Y. Sugimoto, A. Ichikawa, and S. Tanaka Activation of Histidine Decarboxylase through Post-translational Cleavage by Caspase-9 in a Mouse Mastocytoma P-815 J. Biol. Chem., May 4, 2007; 282(18): 13438 - 13446. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Liu, K. Furuta, R. Teshima, N. Shirata, Y. Sugimoto, A. Ichikawa, and S. Tanaka Critical Role of Protein Kinase C {beta}II in Activation of Mast Cells by Monomeric IgE J. Biol. Chem., November 25, 2005; 280(47): 38976 - 38981. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Mondillo, Z. Patrignani, C. Reche, E. Rivera, and O. Pignataro Dual Role of Histamine in Modulation of Leydig Cell Steroidogenesis via HRH1 and HRH2 Receptor Subtypes Biol Reprod, November 1, 2005; 73(5): 899 - 907. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Cianchi, C. Cortesini, N. Schiavone, F. Perna, L. Magnelli, E. Fanti, D. Bani, L. Messerini, V. Fabbroni, G. Perigli, et al. The Role of Cyclooxygenase-2 in Mediating the Effects of Histamine on Cell Proliferation and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Production in Colorectal Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2005; 11(19): 6807 - 6815. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. V. Fleming and T. C. Wang The Production of 53-55-kDa Isoforms Is Not Required for Rat L-Histidine Decarboxylase Activity J. Biol. Chem., January 3, 2003; 278(1): 686 - 694. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |