JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M201453200 on February 21, 2002

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 16, 14238-14245, April 19, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/16/14238    most recent
M201453200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bewley, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Clore, G. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bewley, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Clore, G. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Design of a Novel Peptide Inhibitor of HIV Fusion That Disrupts the Internal Trimeric Coiled-coil of gp41*

Carole A. BewleyDagger, John M. Louis, Rodolfo Ghirlando, and G. Marius Clore§

From the Laboratories of Bioorganic Chemistry, Chemical Physics, and Molecular Biology, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892

Received for publication, February 12, 2002

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The pre-hairpin intermediate of gp41 from the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is the target for two classes of fusion inhibitors that bind to the C-terminal region or the trimeric coiled-coil of N-terminal helices, thereby preventing formation of the fusogenic trimer of hairpins. Using rational design, two 36-residue peptides, N36Mut(e,g) and N36Mut(a,d), were derived from the parent N36 peptide comprising the N-terminal helix of the gp41 ectodomain (residues 546-581 of HIV-1 envelope), characterized by analytical ultracentrifugation and CD, and assessed for their ability to inhibit HIV fusion using a quantitative vaccinia virus-based fusion assay. N36Mut(e,g) contains nine amino acid substitutions designed to disrupt interactions with the C-terminal region of gp41 while preserving contacts governing the formation of the trimeric coiled-coil. N36Mut(a,d) contains nine substitutions designed to block formation of the trimeric coiled-coil but retains residues that interact with the C-terminal region of gp41. N36Mut(a,d) is monomeric, is largely random coil, does not interact with the C34 peptide derived from the C-terminal region of gp41 (residues 628-661), and does not inhibit fusion. The trimeric coiled-coil structure is therefore a prerequisite for interaction with the C-terminal region of gp41. N36Mut(e,g) forms a monodisperse, helical trimer in solution, does not interact with C34, and yet inhibits fusion about 50-fold more effectively than the parent N36 peptide (IC50 ~ 308 nM versus ~16 µM). These results indicate that N36Mut(e,g) acts by disrupting the homotrimeric coiled-coil of N-terminal helices in the pre-hairpin intermediate to form heterotrimers. Thus N36Mut(e,g) represents a novel third class of gp41-targeted HIV fusion inhibitor. A quantitative model describing the interaction of N36Mut(e,g) with the pre-hairpin intermediate is presented.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Virus-cell and cell-cell fusion mediated by the viral envelope glycoproteins (Env)1 (1) gp41 and gp120 constitute the first step of infection and dissemination, respectively, of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hence represent a promising target for the development of antiviral therapeutics (2). Following binding of gp120 to CD4 and a chemokine receptor, a conformational change occurs in the gp120/gp41 oligomer that leads to insertion of the fusion peptide of gp41 into the target membrane and ultimately membrane fusion (2, 3). The structure of the ectodomain of both HIV and simian immunodeficiency virus gp41 in its fusogenic/postfusogenic state has been solved by NMR (4) and crystallography (5-8) and shown to consist of a trimer of hairpins. Each subunit comprises long N- and C-terminal helices connected by a 25-30-residue loop. The N-helices form a parallel, trimeric coiled-coil in the interior of the complex surrounded by the C-terminal helices oriented antiparallel to the N-terminal helices (Fig. 1a, bottom). Peptides derived from the C- and N-helices inhibit Env-mediated fusion at nanomolar and micromolar concentrations, respectively (9-12). These peptides do not bind the fusion-active or postfusogenic state of gp41 as represented by the ectodomain of gp41 free in solution and are thought to interact with a pre-hairpin intermediate (2, 13, 14) in which the N- and C-helices are not associated and the trimeric coiled-coil of N-helices is exposed (Fig. 1a, top left). Peptides derived from the C-terminal helix, such as C34 (residues 628-661 of HIV-1 Env) and T20 (residues 638-673 of HIV-1 Env; currently in phase III clinical trials (15, 16)) target the exposed face of the trimeric coiled-coil of N-helices (11, 13, 14, 17, 18). Engineered constructs such as the chimeric protein NCCG-gp41 (19), which features an exposed, stable, disulfide-linked, trimeric coiled-coil of N-helices grafted onto the minimal, thermostable ectodomain of gp41; peptides in which the trimeric coiled-coil of N-helices is stabilized by fusion to the GCN4 trimeric coiled-coil (12); and the protein 5-helix (20), in which the internal trimeric coiled-coil of N-helices is surrounded by only two C-helices, specifically target the C-region in the pre-hairpin intermediate state (Fig. 1a, top left). In both instances, packing of the C-region onto the trimeric coiled-coil of N-helices is blocked, and hairpin formation is inhibited. Although the ectodomain of gp41 in free solution is highly thermostable (with a Tm in excess of 100 °C) (21), it has been shown to exist as a monomer-trimer equilibrium (21, 22). In the context of the fusion process, the trimeric coiled-coil of N-helices in the pre-hairpin intermediate state may also exist as a monomer-trimer equilibrium (4, 22, 23). If this is indeed the case, blocking the formation of the fusion-competent, homotrimeric coiled-coil of N-helices may provide another molecular target for inhibiting HIV cell fusion. In this article, we present the design and characterization of a peptide, derived from the N-helix of gp41, in which the sites of interaction with the C-helices have been mutated, but the sites of intermolecular contacts between the N-helices have been preserved. This peptide, which we term N36Mut(e,g), is about 50-fold more effective in inhibiting HIV Env-mediated cell fusion than the N36 peptide (residues 546-581 of HIV-1 Env) of gp41 from which it was derived. These data strongly suggest that the homotrimeric coiled-coil of N-helices in the pre-hairpin state can be disrupted.


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Schematic model illustrating the site of action of different HIV fusion inhibitors that target the ectodomain of gp41. a, the fusogenic state of gp41 (bottom) consists of a trimer of hairpins comprising an internal trimeric, helical coiled-coil of the N-region (red) surrounded by helices derived from the C-region (blue) (4-8). The inhibitors target a pre-hairpin intermediate state (top) in which the N- (red) and C- (blue) regions of gp41 are not yet associated (2). In the pre-hairpin intermediate state, the N-region (red) is thought to consist of a trimeric, parallel helical coiled-coil; the fusion peptide (green) located at the N terminus of the ectodomain of gp41 is inserted into the target cell membrane; the C-region (blue) of gp41 is anchored to the viral membrane by a transmembrane segment (purple). Peptides derived from the C-region, such as C34 (11), bind to the N-region in its trimeric coiled-coil state; the proteins NCCG-gp41 (19) and 5-helix (20), which expose either the complete or a portion of the N-region trimeric coil-coil in a stable form, bind to the C-region. N36Mut(e,g), the subject of the present article, has been designed to remove the interaction surface between the N- and C-regions and therefore can only interact with the N-region in a monomeric form, thereby disrupting the homotrimeric coiled-coil N-region and resulting in the formation of heterotrimers. In all three instances, the fusion inhibitors block the formation of the trimer of hairpins, thereby preventing apposition of the viral and target cell membranes. b, as a consequence of the existence of a monomer-trimer equilibrium for the trimeric coiled-coil of N-helices, the interaction of homotrimeric N36Mut(e,g) (yellow) with the fusion-competent homotrimeric pre-hairpin intermediate (N-helices in red) results in subunit exchange and the formation of fusion-incompetent heterotrimers.


    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Peptides-- All peptides (Fig. 2b), purchased from Commonwealth Biotechnologies (Richmond, VA), were synthesized on a solid phase support, purified by reverse phase high pressure liquid chromatography, and verified for purity by mass spectrometry and amino acid composition. All peptides bear an acetyl group at the N terminus and an amide group at the C terminus. Concentrations of peptides were determined spectrophotometrically: the calculated A280 values (1-cm path length) for a concentration of 1 mg/ml N36, N36Mut(e,g), N36Mut(a,d), and C34 are 1.35, 1.31, 1.34, and 2.90, respectively. The corresponding molecular masses are 4160, 4293, 4182, and 4286 Da, respectively.


View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Design of a peptide that disrupts the internal N-region trimeric coiled-coil in the pre-hairpin intermediate state of gp41. a, helical wheel representation illustrating the interaction between the N- and C-regions of gp41 in the trimer of hairpins as observed in the solution (4) and crystal (5-8) structures of the fusogenic/postfusogenic state of the ectodomain of gp41. The intermolecular contacts between the N-helices occur between positions a and d of the helical wheel. Contacts between the N- and C-helices (intra- and intermolecular) involves residues at positions e and g of the N-helices and positions a and d of the C-helices. b, peptide sequences. The N36 peptide comprises residues 546-581 of the N-region of HIV-1 gp41, and the C34 peptide comprises residues 628-661 of the C-region of HIV-1 gp41. N36 and C34 associate to form a six-helix bundle whose structure has been solved crystallographically (5). In the N36Mut(e,g) mutant, the residues at positions e and g of N36 have been substituted by residues at positions e and g, respectively, of C34; this effectively removes the interaction surface with C34 but preserves the contacts necessary to form a trimeric coiled-coil of N-helices. In the N36Mut(a,d) mutant, the residues at positions a and d of N36 have been substituted by residues at positions f and c, respectively, of C34; this removes the contacts necessary to form the trimeric coil-coil of N-helices but preserves the interaction sites with C34.

Circular Dichroism-- CD spectra of peptides (at a concentration corresponding to 0.7-0.8 A280) were recorded at 25 °C on a JASCO J-720 spectropolarimeter using a 0.05-cm path length cell. Quantitative evaluation of secondary structure from the CD spectrum was carried out using the program CDNN (www.bioinformatik.biochemtech.uni-halle.de/cd_spect/index.html; Ref. 24).

Sedimentation Equilibrium-- Sedimentation equilibrium experiments were conducted at 20.0 °C and three different rotor speeds (16,000, 20,000, and 24,000) on a Beckman Optima XL-A analytical ultracentrifuge. Peptide samples were prepared in 50 mM sodium formate buffer (pH = 3) and loaded into the ultracentrifuge cells at nominal loading concentrations of ~0.2 and 0.7-0.8 A280. Data were analyzed in terms of a single ideal solute to obtain the buoyant molecular mass, M(1 - vrho ), using the Optima XL-A data analysis software (Beckman). The value for the experimental molecular mass M was determined using calculated values for the density rho  (determined at 20 °C using standard tables) and partial specific volume v (calculated on the basis of amino acid composition (25)).

Cell Fusion Assay-- Inhibition of HIV Env-mediated cell fusion by peptides was carried out as described previously (19) using a modification (26) of the vaccinia virus-based reporter gene assay (using soluble CD4 at a final concentration of 200 nM). B-SC-1 cells were used for both target and effector cell populations. Target cells were co-infected with vCB21R-LacZ and vCBYF1-fusin (CXCR4), and effector cells were co-infected with vCB41 (Env) and vP11T7gene1 at a multiplicity of infection of 10. For inhibition studies, peptides were added to an appropriate volume of Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (2.5%) and phosphate-buffered saline to yield identical buffer compositions (100 µl) followed by addition of 1 × 105 effector cells (in 50 µl of medium) per well. After incubation for 15 min, 1 × 105 target cells (in 50 µl) and soluble CD4 were added to each well. Following 2.5 h of incubation, beta -galactosidase activity of cell lysates was measured (A570; Molecular Devices 96-well spectrophotometer) upon addition of chlorophenol red-beta -D-galactopyranoside (Roche Molecular Biochemicals). The curves for %fusion versus peptide inhibitor concentration were fit by nonlinear least-squares optimization using the program FACSIMILE (27, 28).

    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Design of Peptide Inhibitors-- The helical wheel diagram in Fig. 2a illustrates the interactions between the N-helices and between the N- and C-helices as observed in both the NMR (4) and x-ray (5-8) structures of the fusogenic/postfusogenic state of the ectodomain of gp41. Internal contacts between the N-helices involve positions a and d of the helical wheel (5). Each C-helix interacts with two N-helices (one intra- and the other intersubunit): these contacts involve positions e and g of the N-helices and positions a and d of the C-helix (5). The first crystal structure of the HIV-1 gp41 ectodomain core consisted of a complex of N36 and C34 peptides comprising residues 546-581 and 628-661, respectively, of HIV-1 Env (5). Using the N36 and C34 peptides as starting points, we designed two peptides: N36Mut(e,g), which can only undergo self-association but cannot interact with C34, and N36Mut(a,d), which can no longer self-associate but could potentially still interact with C34 (Fig. 2b). In the case of N36Mut(e,g), the residues at positions e and g of N36 have been replaced by residues at positions e and g of C34. Since the latter residues are located on the external surface of C34 in the context of the ectodomain gp41 core (4-8) and since C34 on its own is monomeric (29),2 this set of substitutions will prevent any interaction between N36Mut(e,g) and the C-region of gp41 in its pre-hairpin intermediate state while preserving the intermolecular contacts required to form the trimeric coiled-coil of N-helices. In the case of N36Mut(a,d), the residues at positions a and d of N36 have been substituted by residues at positions f and c of C34, which are located on the solvent-exposed face of the ectodomain core of gp41 (4-8), thereby removing the intermolecular contacts required to form the trimeric coiled-coil of N-helices.

Biophysical Characterization of N36Mut(e,g) and N36Mut(a,d)-- The results of analytical ultracentrifugation on N36Mut(e,g) and N36Mut(a,d) are presented in Fig. 3a. N36Mut(e,g) behaves as a single monodisperse species at concentrations of ~36 µM (in monomer; A280 ~ 0.2) and ~124 µM (in monomer; A280 ~ 0.7) with a molecular mass of ~12,000-12,500 Da, corresponding to a trimer. In this context it is worth noting that N36 on its own aggregates and does not form a well defined trimer (12),2 presumably due to further self-association involving the predominantly hydrophobic residues at positions e and g, which have been substituted by predominantly hydrophilic residues in N36Mut(e,g) (Fig. 2b). N36Mut(a,d) also behaves as a single monodisperse species at a concentration of ~140 µM (A280 ~ 0.8), but its molecular mass is only ~3700 Da, corresponding to a monomer.


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Characterization of N36Mut(e,g) (red) and N36Mut(a,d) (blue). a, results of analytical ultracentrifugation on N36Mut(e,g) and N36Mut(a,d). Sedimentation equilibrium profiles, plotted in terms of ln(A280) versus the square of the radius (r2) (bottom panel), are shown; also shown in the top two panels is the distribution of residuals between calculated and experimental data for best fits to a monomer of N36Mut(a,d) and a trimer of N36Mut(e,g). The concentrations (in monomer) of N36Mut(a,d) and N36Mut(e,g) are ~140 µM (A280 ~ 0.8) and 124 µM (A280 ~ 0.7), respectively. The calculated molecular masses are 3660 ± 80 Da for N36Mut(a,d), which corresponds to a monomer, and 12,040 ± 200 Da for N36Mut(e,g), which corresponds to a trimer. An independent run for N36Mut(e,g) at a concentration of 36 µM in monomer (A280 ~ 0.2) yielded a molecular mass of 12,500 ± 180 Da. b, CD spectrum of N36Mut(e,g) and N36Mut(a,d). The calculated helical content is ~80% for N36Mut(e,g) and ~20% for N36Mut(a,d). deg, degrees.

CD spectra of N36Mut(e,g) and N36Mut(a,d) are shown in Fig. 3b. N36Mut(e,g) displays a double minimum at 208 and 222 nm, characteristic of an alpha -helix; and quantification of the CD data (24) indicates a helical content of ~80%. N36Mut(a,d), on the other hand, is largely random coil (characterized by a minimum around 200 nm) with a small amount of alpha -helix (~20%).

We were unable to detect any evidence of interaction between either N36Mut(e,g) or N36Mut(a,d) and C34 by either analytical ultracentrifugation or CD. The absence of interaction between N36Mut(e,g) and C34 is exactly as predicted from the design since the points of contact with C34 have been mutated (cf. Fig. 2). The absence of interaction between N36Mut(a,d) and C34 was initially somewhat surprising since the residues that contact C34 in the context of the fusogenic/postfusogenic state of the gp41 ectodomain were preserved. This result therefore indicates that C34 can only form a complex with a stable trimeric coiled-coil of N-helices. From a structural standpoint, this is readily understood since each C-helix contacts two N-helices of the trimeric coiled-coil (one intramolecular and the other intersubunit; cf. Fig. 2a), and the buried surface area for each of the two interactions is comparable.

To exclude the remote possibility that N36Mut(e,g) could behave in a manner analogous to C34 and bind to the surface of the trimeric coiled-coil of N-helices in the pre-hairpin intermediate of gp41, we also examined the interaction of N36Mut(e,g) with the engineered protein NCCG-gp41. NCCG-gp41 is a chimeric protein that features an exposed trimeric coiled-coil of N-helices that is stabilized both by fusion to a minimal thermostable ectodomain of gp41 and by engineered intersubunit disulfide bonds (19). The exposed trimeric coiled-coil of N-helices in NCCG-gp41 mimics that of the pre-hairpin intermediate of gp41, but in contrast to native gp41, the N-helices cannot dissociate since they are covalently tethered by disulfide bonds. Analytical ultracentrifugation on various mixtures of N36Mut(e,g) and NCCG-gp41 in ratios of 4.5:1 and 11.7:1 (24 µM N36Mut(e,g) plus 5.3 µM NCCG-gp41 and 51 µM N36Mut(e,g) plus 4.4 µM NCCG-gp41, respectively, with concentrations expressed in trimer) provided no evidence of any interactions between these two molecules, and the data were readily accounted for by a mixture of two ideal species.

Inhibition of HIV Env-mediated Cell Fusion-- The results of a quantitative vaccinia virus-based reporter gene assay (26) for HIV Env-mediated cell fusion are shown in Fig. 4. N36 inhibits fusion with an IC50 of 16 ± 2 µM in agreement with previous results (19). N36Mut(e,g) inhibits fusion with an IC50 308 ± 22 nM. Thus N36Mut(e,g) is ~50-fold more active in inhibiting fusion than N36. N36Mut(a,d), on the other hand, fails to inhibit fusion even at concentrations as high as 0.1 mM. The lack of any fusion-inhibitory activity for N36Mut(a,d) is exactly as predicted from the biophysical data since N36Mut(a,d) does not self-associate and does not interact with C34.


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Inhibition of HIV Env-mediated cell fusion by N36Mut(e,g), N36Mut(a,d), and N36. Red solid circles, N36Mut(e,g); blue solid squares, N36Mut(a,d); black open circles, N36.The solid lines represent best fits to the data using the simple activity relationship: %fusion = 100/(1+[I]/IC50) where [I] is the inhibitor concentration. The IC50 values for N36Mut(e,g) and N36 are 308 ± 22 nM and 16 ± 2 µM, respectively. N36Mut(a,d) displays no inhibitory activity at the concentrations tested.

Since N36Mut(e,g) forms a well defined trimeric species that does not interact with either C34 or the chimeric protein NCCG-gp41 (in which the N-helices of the solvent-exposed trimeric coil-coil are covalently linked by interhelical disulfide bonds), it must target the N-region of the pre-hairpin intermediate by forming fusion-incompetent heterotrimers (Fig. 1b). Analytical ultracentrifugation on the ectodomain of gp41 indicates the presence of only monomer and trimer species in equilibrium (21, 22); that is, assembly of the trimer is a highly cooperative process. The fusion-inhibitory activity of N36Mut(e,g) therefore indicates the presence of a dynamic equilibrium between monomeric and trimeric forms of membrane-bound gp41 that allows subunit exchange to take place in the pre-hairpin intermediate state. The rate of exchange between these species must be sufficiently fast to permit efficient heterotrimer formation within the lifetime (~15 min) of the pre-hairpin intermediate (13, 30, 31).

Modeling Inhibition of HIV Env-mediated Cell Fusion by N36Mut(e,g)-- The inhibition curve for N36Mut(e,g) is well fit by a simple Langmuir isotherm given by %fusion = 100/(1 + [N36Mut(e,g)]/IC50) (Fig. 4). Yet, mechanistically, the interaction of N36Mut(e,g) with the pre-hairpin intermediate of gp41 is far more complex, involving multiple species in different homo- and hetero-oligomerization states. The simplest scheme describing the situation is presented in Fig. 5a. L and M represent N36Mut(e,g) and the pre-hairpin intermediate of gp41 in their monomeric forms, respectively; LL and MM are homodimers; ML is a heterodimer; LLL and MMM are homotrimers; and MML and MLL are heterodimers. We assume that only the homotrimer MMM is fusion-active, and the fraction fusion activity is given by the ratio of [MMM]LT/[MMM]LT = 0. The interactions between ligand (in its various oligomerization states) and membrane-bound protein (in its various homo- and hetero-oligomeric states) are described by their respective bulk solution concentrations. The interactions involving only membrane-bound species, however, are dependent on their concentrations in the two-dimensional membrane (i.e. number of molecules per unit area) that are much higher than their concentrations in bulk solvent. In terms of thermodynamics, all equilibria in Fig. 5a can be related to the species concentrations in bulk solvent by multiplying the relevant equilibrium constants by a factor lambda  to yield appropriate apparent equilibrium constants (Fig. 5a, middle panel).


View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Modeling the inhibition of HIV Env-mediated cell fusion by N36Mut(e,g). a, mechanistic scheme. L, LL, and LLL are the monomeric, homodimeric, and homotrimeric forms, respectively, of the ligand N36Mut(eg,); M, MM, and MMM are the monomeric, homodimeric, and homotrimeric forms, respectively, of the prefusion intermediate of gp41 bound on the surface of the cell; ML is the heterodimeric species formed by the interaction of M and L; MML and MLL are the heterotrimeric species. K<UP><SUB>ref</SUB><SUP>trimer</SUP></UP> is the experimentally measured equilibrium association constant for the monomer-trimer equilibrium of the ectodomain of gp41 in free solution (4.8 × 1011 M-2; Ref. 21) given by the product of K1 and K2 with K2 K1 (since trimer formation is highly cooperative, and only monomer and trimer species can be detected by analytical ultracentrifugation). (K1 was arbitrarily set to 104 M-1, yielding a value of 4.8 × 107 M-1 for K2.) The factors alpha , beta , and lambda  relate the equilibrium association constants for homotrimerization of L (K<UP><SUB>homo,L</SUB><SUP>trimer</SUP></UP>), heterotrimerization of M and L (K<UP><SUB>hetero,ML</SUB><SUP>trimer</SUP></UP>), and homodimerization of M (K<UP><SUB>homo,M</SUB><SUP>trimer,app</SUP></UP>) to K<UP><SUB>ref</SUB><SUP>trimer</SUP></UP>. The factor lambda  serves to convert the concentrations of species in the membrane to their bulk solution concentrations and, in addition, subsumes any energetic differences between trimerization of the pre-hairpin intermediate of gp41 in the membrane and trimerization of the ectodomain of gp41 measured in free solution. The various numerical factors in front of the equilibrium constants are statistical factors related to symmetry considerations involved in the formation of homo- and hetero-oligomeric species. b, variation in the optimized values of alpha  and beta  derived by nonlinear least-squares optimization as a function of lambda MT, where MT is the total concentration of protein (monomer units) in bulk solution. The vertical bars represent the error in the fitted parameters. c, comparison of the experimental fusion data (solid red circles) with the best fit theoretical curves calculated for lambda MT = 1.5 × 10-5 M (solid line) and 1.5 × 10-4 M (dashed line). (For a value of 10 pM for MT, the corresponding values of lambda  are 1.5 × 106-1.5 × 107, respectively). The percentage of fusion activity is given by 100[MMM]LT/[MMM]LT = 0. Note that the two theoretical curves are essentially indistinguishable not only from each other but also from a simple Langmuir isotherm. Calculated fractional concentrations of various species as a function of total protein concentration, MT (d), and total ligand concentration, LT (e). The fraction of dimeric species (i.e. 2[MM]/MT, [ML]/MT, and 2[LL]/LT) is less than 1% for all values of LT. The curves obtained for lambda MT = 1.5 × 10-5 M and 1.5 × 10-4 M are shown as solid and dashed lines, respectively.

The measured equilibrium association constant K<UP><SUB>ref</SUB><SUP>trimer</SUP></UP> for the ectodomain of HIV-1 gp41 in free solution (i.e. the trimer of hairpins) is 4.8 × 1011 M-2 and is given by the product of the equilibrium association constants K1 (monomer-dimer equilibrium) and K2 (dimer-trimer equilibrium) (Fig. 5a, bottom panel). Since trimerization of the gp41 ectodomain is highly cooperative (21, 22), K2 K1. Taking K<UP><SUB>ref</SUB><SUP>trimer</SUP></UP> as a reference point, the overall equilibrium association constant between monomeric and homotrimeric species of L is given by alpha K<UP><SUB>ref</SUB><SUP>trimer</SUP></UP>, between monomeric and homotrimeric species of M by lambda K<UP><SUB>ref</SUB><SUP>trimer</SUP></UP> (note that lambda  also subsumes any difference in the energetics of trimerization between the pre-hairpin intermediate in the membrane and the ectodomain of gp41 in free solution), and between monomeric species of L and M and heterotrimeric species of M and L by 3beta K<UP><SUB>ref</SUB><SUP>trimer</SUP></UP> (where the factor 3 is a statistical factor). The scheme in Fig. 5a has three unknowns: alpha , beta , and lambda MT, where MT is the total protein concentration (in monomer units). The data, however, are insufficient to determine all three parameters independently. Nonlinear least-squares fitting to the experimental data, optimizing the values of alpha  and beta , was carried out for values of lambda MT ranging from 1.5 × 10-7 to 1.5 × 10-3 M (which corresponds to values of lambda  of 1.5 × 104-1.5 × 108 for MT = 10 pM, the probable concentration of protein in bulk solution, estimated on the basis of a concentration of 5 × 103 cells/µl and ~5000 gp41 trimers/cell). (Note that the concentrations of the various species in the scheme shown in Fig. 5a as a function of total ligand concentration, LT, were calculated numerically by integration of the differential equations describing the reactions to essentially infinite time.) The optimized values of alpha  and beta  depend on the product lambda MT, and the results are therefore equally valid for a wide range of MT concentrations. The data can be equally well fitted for values of lambda MT ranging from 10-7 to 10-3 M with alpha  varying from ~10 to 0.1 and beta  varying from 1 to 10 (Fig. 5b). Best fits to the experimental fusion inhibition data for lambda MT = 1.5 × 10-5 and 1.5 × 10-4 M are shown in Fig. 5c; the optimized values of alpha  are 1.07 and 0.34 (with error estimates of ~40%), respectively, and of beta  are 2.97 and 5.76 (with error estimates of 10%), respectively. The resulting curves are essentially indistinguishable from each other as well as from that obtained with a Langmuir isotherm. The occupancy of the various species relative to MT and LT are shown in Fig. 5, d and e, respectively. For this set of parameters, the fraction M in the trimeric state in the absence of ligand is ~86% for lambda MT = 1.5 × 10-5 M and ~97% for lambda MT = 1.5 × 10-4 M; the value of LT at which 50% of L is monomeric is ~2 × 10-6 and 5 × 10-6 M, respectively. The occupancy of homodimeric ligand is less than 1% of LT; likewise the occupancy of homodimeric (MM) and heterodimeric (LM) protein is less than 1% of MT for all values of LT. Both MML and MLL heterotrimers are formed with the MML heterotrimer peaking at concentrations of LT slightly less than that at which 50% of the ligand is monomeric.

The above calculations reveal two important findings. First, despite the complexities introduced by multiple homo- and hetero-oligomerization states, which might lead one to predict a complex relationship between fusion and total ligand concentration, a scheme such as that depicted in Fig. 5a can still yield rather simple inhibition data that is readily characterized by a Langmuir isotherm. Second, the values for the various equilibrium constants for trimerization required to best fit the experimental fusion data are entirely compatible with the experimentally measured value for the equilibrium constant for trimerization of the ectodomain of HIV-1 gp41 in solution.

In the best fit calculations described above and depicted in Fig. 5, only the homotrimeric form of the pre-hairpin intermediate of gp41, MMM, is considered to be fusion-active. If the calculations are repeated assuming that the heterotrimer, MML, containing only one molecule of N36Mut(e,g), is also fusion-active, the resulting theoretical curves do not reproduce the experimental data. One can therefore conclude that the energetics of formation of a five-helix bundle comprising a heterotrimeric internal coiled-coil consisting of two N-helices of gp41 and one N36Mut(e,g) helix surrounded by two C-helices of gp41 is not sufficiently favorable to bring the target and viral membranes into sufficiently close proximity for fusion to take place.

Concluding Remarks-- Using rational design, we have engineered two peptides derived from the N-helix of the ectodomain of gp41. The parent peptide, N36, corresponds to residues 546-581 of HIV-1 Env and encompasses the N-terminal helix of gp41. The N36Mut(a,d) peptide was designed to remove interactions leading to self-association and the formation of a trimeric coiled-coil of N-helices while preserving those residues that interact with the C-helix of the ectodomain of gp41. The absence of any fusion-inhibitory activity of N36Mut(a,d) leads us to conclude that the C-region of gp41 can only interact with a trimeric coiled-coil of N-helices. The N36Mut(e,g) peptide was designed to preserve the interactions leading to self-association while replacing those residues that interact with the C-region. N36Mut(e,g) forms a monodisperse trimer in solution that does not interact with the C-region of gp41 and yet still inhibits fusion about 50-fold more effectively than the native gp41 sequence (i.e. N36) from which it was derived. These results can only be explained by the existence of a dynamic equilibrium between monomeric and trimeric coiled-coil forms of the N-region of gp41 in the pre-hairpin intermediate on a time scale sufficiently fast to permit subunit exchange and the consequent formation of heterotrimers of the N-helices of gp41 and N36Mut(e,g). Thus, N36Mut(e,g) disrupts the homotrimeric coiled-coil of N-helices in the pre-hairpin intermediate state of gp41 and represents a novel third class of gp41-targeted fusion inhibitor. The other two classes of inhibitors bind to either the homotrimeric coiled-coil of N-helices (e.g. C34 and T20) or to the exposed C-region (e.g. NCCG-gp41 and 5-helix) of gp41 in the pre-hairpin intermediate state. Since C34 (and presumably T20) also binds to NCCG-gp41 and 5-helix (19, 20), these two classes of inhibitors antagonize each other. In contrast, one would predict that the N36Mut(e,g) class of inhibitors should act either additively or synergistically with either of the other two classes. Therefore, N36Mut(e,g) may represent a promising lead for the design of clinically effective, novel fusion inhibitors.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank A. Szabo for stimulating discussions, I. Nesheiwat and L.C. Chang for technical assistance, E. Berger for soluble CD4, and L. Pannell for mass spectrometry.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by the Intramural AIDS Targeted Antiviral Program of the Office of the Director of the National Institutes of Health (to G. M. C. and C. A. B.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger To whom correspondence may be addressed: Laboratory of Bioorganic Chemistry, Bldg. 8, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-0820. Tel.: 301-594-5187; E-mail: caroleb@intra.niddk.nih.gov.

§ To whom correspondence may be addressed: Laboratory of Chemical Physics, Bldg. 5, Rm. B1-30I, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-0510. Tel.: 301-496-0782; Fax: 301-496-0825; E-mail: clore@speck.niddk.nih.gov.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, February 21, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M201453200

2 C. A. Bewley, J. M. Louis, R. Ghirlando, and G. M. Clore, unpublished data.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: Env, viral envelope glycoprotein(s); HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; gp120, surface envelope glycoprotein of HIV; gp41, transmembrane subunit of HIV envelope; N36 and C34, peptides encompassing residues 546-581 and 628-661 of HIV-1 Env, respectively; N36Mut(e, g), peptide derived from N36 that contains nine substitutions at positions e and g of the helical wheel (defined in the context of the gp41 trimer of hairpins structure) corresponding to residues 549, 551, 556, 558, 563, 565, 570, 572, and 577 of HIV-1 Env; N36Mut(a, d), peptide derived from N36 that contains nine substitutions at positions a and d of the helical wheel (defined in the context of the gp41 trimer of hairpins structure) corresponding to residues 552, 555, 559, 562, 566, 569, 573, 576, and 580 of HIV-1 Env.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Freed, E. O., and Martin, M. A. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 23883-23886[Free Full Text]
2. Eckert, D. M., and Kim, P. S. (2001) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 70, 777-810[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Moore, J. P., Trkola, A., and Dragic, T. (1997) Curr. Opin. Immunol. 9, 551-562[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Caffrey, M., Cai, M., Kaufman, J., Stahl, S. J., Wingfield, P. T., Covell, D. G., Gronenborn, A. M., and Clore, G. M. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 4572-4584[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Chan, D. C., Fass, D., Berger, J. M., and Kim, P. S. (1997) Cell 89, 263-273[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Weissenhorn, W., Dessen, A., Harrison, S. C., Skehel, J. J., and Wiley, D. C. (1997) Nature 387, 426-430[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Tan, K. J., Liu, J., Wang, S., Shen, S., and Lu, M. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 12303-12308[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Malashkevich, V. N., Chan, D. C., Chutkowski, C. T., and Kim, P. S. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 9134-9139[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Wild, C. T., Oas, T., McDanal, C. B., Bolognesi, D., and Matthews, T. J. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 10537-10541[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Wild, C. T., Shugars, D. C., Greenwell, T. K., McDanal, C. B., and Matthews, T. J. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 9770-9774[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Chan, D. C., Chutkowski, C. T., and Kim, P. S. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 15613-15617[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Eckert, D. M., and Kim, P. S. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98, 11187-11192[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Furuta, R. A., Wild, C. T., Weng, Y., and Weiss, C. D. (1998) Nat. Struct. Biol. 5, 276-279[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Chan, D. C., and Kim, P. S. (1998) Cell 93, 681-684[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Kilby, J. M., Hopkins, S., Venetta, T. M., DiMassimo, B., Cloud, G. A., Lee, J. Y., Alldredge, L., Hunter, E., Lambert, D., Bolognesi, D., Matthews, T., Johnson, M. R., Nowak, M. A., Shaw, G. M., and Saag, M. S. (1998) Nat. Med. 4, 1302-1307[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Pozniak, A. (2001) J. HIV Res. 6, 92-94
17. Weissenhorn, W., Dessen, A., Calder, L. J., Harrison, S. C., Skehel, J. J., and Wiley, D. C. (199) Mol. Membr. Biol. 16, 3-9
18. Kliger, Y., and Shai, Y. (2000) J. Mol. Biol. 295, 163-168[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Louis, J. M., Bewley, C. A., and Clore, G. M. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 29485-29489[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Root, M. J., Kay, M. S., and Kim, P. S. (2001) Science 291, 884-888[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Wingfield, P. T., Stahl, S. J., Kaufman, J., Zlotnick, A., Hyde, C. C., Gronenborn, A. M., and Clore, G. M. (1997) Protein Sci. 6, 1653-1660[Abstract]
22. Caffrey, M., Kaufman, J., Stahl, S. J., Wingfield, P. T., Gronenborn, A. M., and Clore, G. M. (1999) Protein Sci. 8, 1904-1907[Abstract]
23. Peisajovich, S. G., and Shai, Y. (2001) J. Mol. Biol. 311, 249-254[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Bohm, G., Muhr, R., and Jaenicke, R. (1992) Protein Eng. 5, 191-195[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Perkins, S. J. (1986) Eur. J. Biochem. 157, 169-180[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Salzwedel, K., Smith, E., Dey, B., and Berger, E. J. (2000) J. Virol. 74, 326-333[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Chance, E. M., Curtis, A. R., Jones, I. P., and Kirby, C. R. (1979) FACSIMILE, Atomic Energy Research Establishment Report R8775 , Harwell, H. M. Stationary Office, London, UK
28. Clore, G. M. (1983) in Computing in Biological Science (Geisow, M. J. , and Barrett, A. N., eds) , pp. 313-348, Elsevier/North-Holland, New York
29. Lu, M., Blacklow, S. C., and Kim, P. S. (1995) Nat. Struct. Biol. 2, 1075-1082[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Jones, P. L., Korte, T., and Blumenthal, R. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 404-409[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31. Muñoz-Barroso, I., Durell, S., Sakaguchi, K., Appella, E., and Blumenthal, R. (1998) J. Cell Biol. 140, 315-323[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
E. Gustchina, C. A Bewley, and G. M. Clore
Sequestering of the Prehairpin Intermediate of gp41 by Peptide N36Mut(e,g) Potentiates the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Neutralizing Activity of Monoclonal Antibodies Directed against the N-Terminal Helical Repeat of gp41
J. Virol., October 15, 2008; 82(20): 10032 - 10041.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
M. Fromer and C. Yanover
A computational framework to empower probabilistic protein design
Bioinformatics, July 1, 2008; 24(13): i214 - i222.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y. He, Y. Xiao, H. Song, Q. Liang, D. Ju, X. Chen, H. Lu, W. Jing, S. Jiang, and L. Zhang
Design and Evaluation of Sifuvirtide, a Novel HIV-1 Fusion Inhibitor
J. Biol. Chem., April 25, 2008; 283(17): 11126 - 11134.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Protein Sci.Home page
J. J. Dwyer, K. L. Wilson, K. Martin, J. E. Seedorff, A. Hasan, R. J. Medinas, D. K. Davison, M. D. Feese, H.-T. Richter, H. Kim, et al.
Design of an engineered N-terminal HIV-1 gp41 trimer with enhanced stability and potency
Protein Sci., April 1, 2008; 17(4): 633 - 643.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
E. Gustchina, J. M. Louis, S. N. Lam, C. A. Bewley, and G. M. Clore
A Monoclonal Fab Derived from a Human Nonimmune Phage Library Reveals a New Epitope on gp41 and Neutralizes Diverse Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Strains
J. Virol., December 1, 2007; 81(23): 12946 - 12953.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. Jacobs, O. Quraishi, X. Huang, N. Bousquet-Gagnon, G. Nault, N. Francella, W. G. Alvord, N. Pham, C. Soucy, M. Robitaille, et al.
A Covalent Inhibitor Targeting an Intermediate Conformation of the Fusogenic Subunit of the HIV-1 Envelope Complex
J. Biol. Chem., November 2, 2007; 282(44): 32406 - 32413.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y. He, S. Liu, W. Jing, H. Lu, D. Cai, D. J. Chin, A. K. Debnath, F. Kirchhoff, and S. Jiang
Conserved Residue Lys574 in the Cavity of HIV-1 Gp41 Coiled-coil Domain Is Critical for Six-helix Bundle Stability and Virus Entry
J. Biol. Chem., August 31, 2007; 282(35): 25631 - 25639.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
M. Wallin, M. Ekstrom, and H. Garoff
Receptor-Triggered but Alkylation-Arrested Env of Murine Leukemia Virus Reveals the Transmembrane Subunit in a Prehairpin Conformation
J. Virol., October 1, 2006; 80(19): 9921 - 9925.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. Sackett, Y. Wexler-Cohen, and Y. Shai
Characterization of the HIV N-terminal Fusion Peptide-containing Region in Context of Key gp41 Fusion Conformations
J. Biol. Chem., August 4, 2006; 281(31): 21755 - 21762.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. A. Gallo, W. Wang, S. S. Rawat, G. Jung, A. J. Waring, A. M. Cole, H. Lu, X. Yan, N. L. Daly, D. J. Craik, et al.
{theta}-Defensins Prevent HIV-1 Env-mediated Fusion by Binding gp41 and Blocking 6-Helix Bundle Formation
J. Biol. Chem., July 7, 2006; 281(27): 18787 - 18792.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
P. L. Moore, E. T. Crooks, L. Porter, P. Zhu, C. S. Cayanan, H. Grise, P. Corcoran, M. B. Zwick, M. Franti, L. Morris, et al.
Nature of Nonfunctional Envelope Proteins on the Surface of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1
J. Virol., March 1, 2006; 80(5): 2515 - 2528.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Leukoc. Biol.Home page
H. Garg and R. Blumenthal
HIV gp41-induced apoptosis is mediated by caspase-3-dependent mitochondrial depolarization, which is inhibited by HIV protease inhibitor nelfinavir
J. Leukoc. Biol., February 1, 2006; 79(2): 351 - 362.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
E. Bianchi, M. Finotto, P. Ingallinella, R. Hrin, A. V. Carella, X. S. Hou, W. A. Schleif, M. D. Miller, R. Geleziunas, and A. Pessi
Covalent stabilization of coiled coils of the HIV gp41 N region yields extremely potent and broad inhibitors of viral infection
PNAS, September 6, 2005; 102(36): 12903 - 12908.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]