![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 16, 14238-14245, April 19, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Laboratories of Bioorganic Chemistry, Chemical
Physics, and Molecular Biology, NIDDK, National Institutes of
Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892
Received for publication, February 12, 2002
The pre-hairpin intermediate of gp41 from
the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is the target for two classes of
fusion inhibitors that bind to the C-terminal region or the trimeric
coiled-coil of N-terminal helices, thereby preventing formation of the
fusogenic trimer of hairpins. Using rational design, two 36-residue
peptides, N36Mut(e,g) and N36Mut(a,d),
were derived from the parent N36 peptide comprising the
N-terminal helix of the gp41 ectodomain (residues 546-581 of HIV-1
envelope), characterized by analytical ultracentrifugation and CD, and
assessed for their ability to inhibit HIV fusion using a quantitative
vaccinia virus-based fusion assay. N36Mut(e,g) contains
nine amino acid substitutions designed to disrupt interactions with the
C-terminal region of gp41 while preserving contacts governing the
formation of the trimeric coiled-coil. N36Mut(a,d) contains
nine substitutions designed to block formation of the trimeric
coiled-coil but retains residues that interact with the C-terminal
region of gp41. N36Mut(a,d) is monomeric, is largely random
coil, does not interact with the C34 peptide derived from the
C-terminal region of gp41 (residues 628-661), and does not inhibit
fusion. The trimeric coiled-coil structure is therefore a prerequisite
for interaction with the C-terminal region of gp41.
N36Mut(e,g) forms a monodisperse, helical trimer in
solution, does not interact with C34, and yet inhibits fusion about
50-fold more effectively than the parent N36 peptide (IC50 ~ 308 nM versus ~16 µM).
These results indicate that N36Mut(e,g) acts by disrupting
the homotrimeric coiled-coil of N-terminal helices in the pre-hairpin
intermediate to form heterotrimers. Thus N36Mut(e,g)
represents a novel third class of gp41-targeted HIV fusion inhibitor. A
quantitative model describing the interaction of
N36Mut(e,g) with the pre-hairpin intermediate is presented.
Virus-cell and cell-cell fusion mediated by the viral
envelope glycoproteins
(Env)1 (1) gp41 and gp120
constitute the first step of infection and dissemination, respectively,
of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hence represent a
promising target for the development of antiviral therapeutics (2).
Following binding of gp120 to CD4 and a chemokine receptor, a
conformational change occurs in the gp120/gp41 oligomer that leads to
insertion of the fusion peptide of gp41 into the target membrane and
ultimately membrane fusion (2, 3). The structure of the
ectodomain of both HIV and simian immunodeficiency virus gp41 in its
fusogenic/postfusogenic state has been solved by NMR (4) and
crystallography (5-8) and shown to consist of a trimer of hairpins.
Each subunit comprises long N- and C-terminal helices connected by a
25-30-residue loop. The N-helices form a parallel, trimeric
coiled-coil in the interior of the complex surrounded by the C-terminal
helices oriented antiparallel to the N-terminal helices (Fig.
1a, bottom). Peptides derived from the C- and
N-helices inhibit Env-mediated fusion at nanomolar and micromolar
concentrations, respectively (9-12). These peptides do not bind the
fusion-active or postfusogenic state of gp41 as represented by the
ectodomain of gp41 free in solution and are thought to interact with a
pre-hairpin intermediate (2, 13, 14) in which the N- and C-helices are
not associated and the trimeric coiled-coil of N-helices is exposed
(Fig. 1a, top left). Peptides derived from the
C-terminal helix, such as C34 (residues 628-661 of HIV-1 Env) and T20
(residues 638-673 of HIV-1 Env; currently in phase III clinical trials
(15, 16)) target the exposed face of the trimeric coiled-coil of
N-helices (11, 13, 14, 17, 18). Engineered constructs such as the
chimeric protein NCCG-gp41 (19), which features an exposed,
stable, disulfide-linked, trimeric coiled-coil of N-helices grafted
onto the minimal, thermostable ectodomain of gp41; peptides in which
the trimeric coiled-coil of N-helices is stabilized by fusion to the
GCN4 trimeric coiled-coil (12); and the protein 5-helix (20), in which
the internal trimeric coiled-coil of N-helices is surrounded by only
two C-helices, specifically target the C-region in the pre-hairpin
intermediate state (Fig. 1a,
top left). In both instances, packing of the C-region onto
the trimeric coiled-coil of N-helices is blocked, and hairpin formation
is inhibited. Although the ectodomain of gp41 in free solution is
highly thermostable (with a Tm in excess of
100 °C) (21), it has been shown to exist as a monomer-trimer equilibrium (21, 22). In the context of the fusion process, the
trimeric coiled-coil of N-helices in the pre-hairpin intermediate state
may also exist as a monomer-trimer equilibrium (4, 22, 23). If this is
indeed the case, blocking the formation of the fusion-competent,
homotrimeric coiled-coil of N-helices may provide another molecular
target for inhibiting HIV cell fusion. In this article, we present the
design and characterization of a peptide, derived from the N-helix of
gp41, in which the sites of interaction with the C-helices
have been mutated, but the sites of intermolecular contacts
between the N-helices have been preserved. This peptide, which
we term N36Mut(e,g), is about 50-fold more
effective in inhibiting HIV Env-mediated cell fusion than the
N36 peptide (residues 546-581 of HIV-1 Env) of gp41 from
which it was derived. These data strongly suggest that the
homotrimeric coiled-coil of N-helices in the pre-hairpin state
can be disrupted.
Peptides--
All peptides (Fig.
2b), purchased from
Commonwealth Biotechnologies (Richmond, VA), were synthesized on a
solid phase support, purified by reverse phase high pressure liquid
chromatography, and verified for purity by mass spectrometry and amino
acid composition. All peptides bear an acetyl group at the N terminus
and an amide group at the C terminus. Concentrations of peptides were
determined spectrophotometrically: the calculated
A280 values (1-cm path length) for a
concentration of 1 mg/ml N36, N36Mut(e,g),
N36Mut(a,d), and C34 are 1.35, 1.31, 1.34, and 2.90, respectively. The corresponding molecular masses are 4160, 4293, 4182, and 4286 Da, respectively.
Circular Dichroism--
CD spectra of peptides (at a
concentration corresponding to 0.7-0.8 A280)
were recorded at 25 °C on a JASCO J-720 spectropolarimeter using a
0.05-cm path length cell. Quantitative evaluation of secondary structure from the CD spectrum was carried out using the program CDNN
(www.bioinformatik.biochemtech.uni-halle.de/cd_spect/index.html; Ref. 24).
Sedimentation Equilibrium--
Sedimentation equilibrium
experiments were conducted at 20.0 °C and three different rotor
speeds (16,000, 20,000, and 24,000) on a Beckman Optima XL-A analytical
ultracentrifuge. Peptide samples were prepared in 50 mM
sodium formate buffer (pH = 3) and loaded into the ultracentrifuge
cells at nominal loading concentrations of ~0.2 and 0.7-0.8
A280. Data were analyzed in terms of a single ideal solute to obtain the buoyant molecular mass, M(1 Cell Fusion Assay--
Inhibition of HIV Env-mediated cell
fusion by peptides was carried out as described previously (19) using a
modification (26) of the vaccinia virus-based reporter gene assay
(using soluble CD4 at a final concentration of 200 nM).
B-SC-1 cells were used for both target and effector cell populations.
Target cells were co-infected with vCB21R-LacZ and vCBYF1-fusin
(CXCR4), and effector cells were co-infected with vCB41 (Env) and
vP11T7gene1 at a multiplicity of infection of 10. For inhibition
studies, peptides were added to an appropriate volume of Dulbecco's
modified Eagle's medium (2.5%) and phosphate-buffered saline to yield
identical buffer compositions (100 µl) followed by addition of 1 × 105 effector cells (in 50 µl of medium) per
well. After incubation for 15 min, 1 × 105 target
cells (in 50 µl) and soluble CD4 were added to each well. Following
2.5 h of incubation, Design of Peptide Inhibitors--
The helical wheel diagram in
Fig. 2a illustrates the interactions between the N-helices
and between the N- and C-helices as observed in both the NMR (4) and
x-ray (5-8) structures of the fusogenic/postfusogenic state of the
ectodomain of gp41. Internal contacts between the N-helices involve
positions a and d of the helical wheel (5). Each
C-helix interacts with two N-helices (one intra- and the other
intersubunit): these contacts involve positions e and
g of the N-helices and positions a and
d of the C-helix (5). The first crystal structure of the
HIV-1 gp41 ectodomain core consisted of a complex of N36 and C34
peptides comprising residues 546-581 and 628-661, respectively, of
HIV-1 Env (5). Using the N36 and C34 peptides as starting points, we
designed two peptides: N36Mut(e,g), which can only undergo
self-association but cannot interact with C34, and
N36Mut(a,d), which can no longer self-associate but could
potentially still interact with C34 (Fig. 2b). In the case
of N36Mut(e,g), the residues at positions e and
g of N36 have been replaced by residues at positions
e and g of C34. Since the latter residues are
located on the external surface of C34 in the context of the ectodomain
gp41 core (4-8) and since C34 on its own is monomeric (29),2 this set of
substitutions will prevent any interaction between N36Mut(e,g) and the C-region of gp41 in its pre-hairpin
intermediate state while preserving the intermolecular contacts
required to form the trimeric coiled-coil of N-helices. In the case of
N36Mut(a,d), the residues at positions a and
d of N36 have been substituted by residues at positions
f and c of C34, which are located on the
solvent-exposed face of the ectodomain core of gp41 (4-8), thereby
removing the intermolecular contacts required to form the trimeric
coiled-coil of N-helices.
Biophysical Characterization of N36Mut(e,g) and
N36Mut(a,d)--
The results of analytical
ultracentrifugation on N36Mut(e,g) and
N36Mut(a,d) are presented in Fig.
3a. N36Mut(e,g)
behaves as a single monodisperse species at concentrations of ~36
µM (in monomer; A280 ~ 0.2) and
~124 µM (in monomer; A280 ~ 0.7) with a molecular mass of ~12,000-12,500 Da, corresponding to a
trimer. In this context it is worth noting that N36 on its own
aggregates and does not form a well defined trimer (12),2
presumably due to further self-association involving the
predominantly hydrophobic residues at positions e and
g, which have been substituted by predominantly hydrophilic
residues in N36Mut(e,g) (Fig. 2b).
N36Mut(a,d) also behaves as a single monodisperse species
at a concentration of ~140 µM
(A280 ~ 0.8), but its molecular mass is only
~3700 Da, corresponding to a monomer.
CD spectra of N36Mut(e,g) and N36Mut(a,d) are
shown in Fig. 3b. N36Mut(e,g) displays a double
minimum at 208 and 222 nm, characteristic of an
We were unable to detect any evidence of interaction between either
N36Mut(e,g) or N36Mut(a,d) and C34 by either
analytical ultracentrifugation or CD. The absence of interaction
between N36Mut(e,g) and C34 is exactly as predicted from
the design since the points of contact with C34 have been mutated
(cf. Fig. 2). The absence of interaction between
N36Mut(a,d) and C34 was initially somewhat surprising since
the residues that contact C34 in the context of the
fusogenic/postfusogenic state of the gp41 ectodomain were preserved.
This result therefore indicates that C34 can only form a complex with a
stable trimeric coiled-coil of N-helices. From a structural standpoint,
this is readily understood since each C-helix contacts two N-helices of the trimeric coiled-coil (one intramolecular and the other
intersubunit; cf. Fig. 2a), and the buried
surface area for each of the two interactions is comparable.
To exclude the remote possibility that N36Mut(e,g) could
behave in a manner analogous to C34 and bind to the surface of the
trimeric coiled-coil of N-helices in the pre-hairpin intermediate of
gp41, we also examined the interaction of N36Mut(e,g) with
the engineered protein NCCG-gp41. NCCG-gp41 is
a chimeric protein that features an exposed trimeric coiled-coil of
N-helices that is stabilized both by fusion to a minimal thermostable
ectodomain of gp41 and by engineered intersubunit disulfide bonds (19). The exposed trimeric coiled-coil of N-helices in NCCG-gp41
mimics that of the pre-hairpin intermediate of gp41, but in contrast to
native gp41, the N-helices cannot dissociate since they are covalently tethered by disulfide bonds. Analytical ultracentrifugation on various mixtures of N36Mut(e,g) and
NCCG-gp41 in ratios of 4.5:1 and 11.7:1 (24 µM N36Mut(e,g) plus 5.3 µM
NCCG-gp41 and 51 µM N36Mut(e,g)
plus 4.4 µM NCCG-gp41, respectively, with
concentrations expressed in trimer) provided no evidence of any
interactions between these two molecules, and the data were readily
accounted for by a mixture of two ideal species.
Inhibition of HIV Env-mediated Cell Fusion--
The results of a
quantitative vaccinia virus-based reporter gene assay (26) for HIV
Env-mediated cell fusion are shown in Fig.
4. N36 inhibits fusion with an
IC50 of 16 ± 2 µM in agreement with
previous results (19). N36Mut(e,g) inhibits fusion with an
IC50 308 ± 22 nM. Thus
N36Mut(e,g) is ~50-fold more active in inhibiting fusion
than N36. N36Mut(a,d), on the other hand, fails to inhibit
fusion even at concentrations as high as 0.1 mM. The lack
of any fusion-inhibitory activity for N36Mut(a,d) is
exactly as predicted from the biophysical data since
N36Mut(a,d) does not self-associate and does not interact
with C34.
Since N36Mut(e,g) forms a well defined trimeric species
that does not interact with either C34 or the chimeric protein
NCCG-gp41 (in which the N-helices of the solvent-exposed
trimeric coil-coil are covalently linked by interhelical disulfide
bonds), it must target the N-region of the pre-hairpin intermediate by
forming fusion-incompetent heterotrimers (Fig. 1b).
Analytical ultracentrifugation on the ectodomain of gp41 indicates the
presence of only monomer and trimer species in equilibrium (21, 22);
that is, assembly of the trimer is a highly cooperative process. The
fusion-inhibitory activity of N36Mut(e,g) therefore
indicates the presence of a dynamic equilibrium between monomeric and
trimeric forms of membrane-bound gp41 that allows subunit exchange to
take place in the pre-hairpin intermediate state. The rate of exchange
between these species must be sufficiently fast to permit efficient
heterotrimer formation within the lifetime (~15 min) of the
pre-hairpin intermediate (13, 30, 31).
Modeling Inhibition of HIV Env-mediated Cell Fusion by
N36Mut(e,g)--
The inhibition curve for
N36Mut(e,g) is well fit by a simple Langmuir isotherm given
by %fusion = 100/(1 + [N36Mut(e,g)]/IC50) (Fig. 4). Yet,
mechanistically, the interaction of N36Mut(e,g) with the
pre-hairpin intermediate of gp41 is far more complex, involving
multiple species in different homo- and hetero-oligomerization states.
The simplest scheme describing the situation is presented in Fig.
5a. L and M represent
N36Mut(e,g) and the pre-hairpin intermediate of gp41 in
their monomeric forms, respectively; LL and MM are homodimers;
ML is a heterodimer; LLL and MMM are homotrimers; and MML and MLL are
heterodimers. We assume that only the homotrimer MMM is fusion-active,
and the fraction fusion activity is given by the ratio of
[MMM]LT/[MMM]LT = 0. The interactions between ligand (in its various oligomerization states)
and membrane-bound protein (in its various homo- and hetero-oligomeric states) are described by their respective bulk solution concentrations. The interactions involving only membrane-bound species, however, are
dependent on their concentrations in the two-dimensional membrane (i.e. number of molecules per unit area) that are much
higher than their concentrations in bulk solvent. In terms of
thermodynamics, all equilibria in Fig. 5a can be related to
the species concentrations in bulk solvent by multiplying the relevant
equilibrium constants by a factor
The measured equilibrium association constant
K
The above calculations reveal two important findings. First, despite
the complexities introduced by multiple homo- and
hetero-oligomerization states, which might lead one to predict a
complex relationship between fusion and total ligand concentration, a
scheme such as that depicted in Fig. 5a can still yield
rather simple inhibition data that is readily characterized by a
Langmuir isotherm. Second, the values for the various equilibrium
constants for trimerization required to best fit the experimental
fusion data are entirely compatible with the experimentally measured
value for the equilibrium constant for trimerization of the ectodomain
of HIV-1 gp41 in solution.
In the best fit calculations described above and depicted in Fig. 5,
only the homotrimeric form of the pre-hairpin intermediate of gp41,
MMM, is considered to be fusion-active. If the calculations are
repeated assuming that the heterotrimer, MML, containing only one
molecule of N36Mut(e,g), is also fusion-active, the
resulting theoretical curves do not reproduce the experimental data.
One can therefore conclude that the energetics of formation of a
five-helix bundle comprising a heterotrimeric internal coiled-coil
consisting of two N-helices of gp41 and one N36Mut(e,g)
helix surrounded by two C-helices of gp41 is not sufficiently favorable
to bring the target and viral membranes into sufficiently close
proximity for fusion to take place.
Concluding Remarks--
Using rational design, we have engineered
two peptides derived from the N-helix of the ectodomain of gp41. The
parent peptide, N36, corresponds to residues 546-581 of HIV-1 Env and
encompasses the N-terminal helix of gp41. The N36Mut(a,d)
peptide was designed to remove interactions leading to self-association and the formation of a trimeric coiled-coil of N-helices while preserving those residues that interact with the C-helix of the ectodomain of gp41. The absence of any fusion-inhibitory activity of
N36Mut(a,d) leads us to conclude that the C-region of gp41
can only interact with a trimeric coiled-coil of N-helices. The
N36Mut(e,g) peptide was designed to preserve the
interactions leading to self-association while replacing those residues
that interact with the C-region. N36Mut(e,g) forms a
monodisperse trimer in solution that does not interact with the
C-region of gp41 and yet still inhibits fusion about 50-fold more
effectively than the native gp41 sequence (i.e. N36) from
which it was derived. These results can only be explained by the
existence of a dynamic equilibrium between monomeric and trimeric
coiled-coil forms of the N-region of gp41 in the pre-hairpin intermediate on a time scale sufficiently fast to permit subunit exchange and the consequent formation of heterotrimers of the N-helices
of gp41 and N36Mut(e,g). Thus, N36Mut(e,g)
disrupts the homotrimeric coiled-coil of N-helices in the pre-hairpin intermediate state of gp41 and represents a novel third class of
gp41-targeted fusion inhibitor. The other two classes of inhibitors bind to either the homotrimeric coiled-coil of N-helices
(e.g. C34 and T20) or to the exposed C-region
(e.g. NCCG-gp41 and 5-helix) of gp41 in the
pre-hairpin intermediate state. Since C34 (and presumably T20) also
binds to NCCG-gp41 and 5-helix (19, 20), these two classes
of inhibitors antagonize each other. In contrast, one would predict
that the N36Mut(e,g) class of inhibitors should act either
additively or synergistically with either of the other two classes.
Therefore, N36Mut(e,g) may represent a promising lead for
the design of clinically effective, novel fusion inhibitors.
We thank A. Szabo for stimulating
discussions, I. Nesheiwat and L.C. Chang for technical assistance, E. Berger for soluble CD4, and L. Pannell for mass spectrometry.
*
This work was supported by the Intramural AIDS Targeted
Antiviral Program of the Office of the Director of the National
Institutes of Health (to G. M. C. and C. A. B.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
To whom correspondence may be addressed: Laboratory of Chemical
Physics, Bldg. 5, Rm. B1-30I, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health,
Bethesda, MD 20892-0510. Tel.: 301-496-0782; Fax: 301-496-0825; E-mail: clore@speck.niddk.nih.gov.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, February 21, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M201453200
2
C. A. Bewley, J. M. Louis, R. Ghirlando, and G. M. Clore, unpublished data.
The abbreviations used are:
Env, viral envelope glycoprotein(s);
HIV, human immunodeficiency virus;
gp120, surface
envelope glycoprotein of HIV;
gp41, transmembrane subunit of HIV
envelope;
N36 and C34, peptides encompassing residues 546-581 and
628-661 of HIV-1 Env, respectively;
N36Mut(e, g), peptide
derived from N36 that contains nine substitutions at positions
e and g of the helical wheel (defined in
the context of the gp41 trimer of hairpins structure) corresponding to
residues 549, 551, 556, 558, 563, 565, 570, 572, and 577 of HIV-1 Env;
N36Mut(a, d), peptide derived from N36 that contains nine
substitutions at positions a and d of the helical
wheel (defined in the context of the gp41 trimer of hairpins structure)
corresponding to residues 552, 555, 559, 562, 566, 569, 573, 576, and
580 of HIV-1 Env.
Design of a Novel Peptide Inhibitor of HIV Fusion That Disrupts
the Internal Trimeric Coiled-coil of gp41*
,
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (20K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Schematic model illustrating the site of
action of different HIV fusion inhibitors that target the ectodomain of
gp41. a, the fusogenic state of gp41
(bottom) consists of a trimer of hairpins comprising an
internal trimeric, helical coiled-coil of the N-region
(red) surrounded by helices derived from the C-region
(blue) (4-8). The inhibitors target a pre-hairpin
intermediate state (top) in which the N- (red)
and C- (blue) regions of gp41 are not yet associated (2). In
the pre-hairpin intermediate state, the N-region (red) is
thought to consist of a trimeric, parallel helical coiled-coil; the
fusion peptide (green) located at the N terminus of the
ectodomain of gp41 is inserted into the target cell membrane; the
C-region (blue) of gp41 is anchored to the viral membrane by
a transmembrane segment (purple). Peptides derived from the
C-region, such as C34 (11), bind to the N-region in its trimeric
coiled-coil state; the proteins NCCG-gp41 (19) and 5-helix
(20), which expose either the complete or a portion of the N-region
trimeric coil-coil in a stable form, bind to the C-region.
N36Mut(e,g), the subject of the present article, has been
designed to remove the interaction surface between the N- and C-regions
and therefore can only interact with the N-region in a monomeric form,
thereby disrupting the homotrimeric coiled-coil N-region and resulting
in the formation of heterotrimers. In all three instances, the fusion
inhibitors block the formation of the trimer of hairpins, thereby
preventing apposition of the viral and target cell membranes.
b, as a consequence of the existence of a monomer-trimer
equilibrium for the trimeric coiled-coil of N-helices, the interaction
of homotrimeric N36Mut(e,g) (yellow) with the
fusion-competent homotrimeric pre-hairpin intermediate (N-helices in
red) results in subunit exchange and the formation of
fusion-incompetent heterotrimers.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (34K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Design of a peptide that disrupts the
internal N-region trimeric coiled-coil in the pre-hairpin intermediate
state of gp41. a, helical wheel representation
illustrating the interaction between the N- and C-regions of gp41 in
the trimer of hairpins as observed in the solution (4) and crystal
(5-8) structures of the fusogenic/postfusogenic state of the
ectodomain of gp41. The intermolecular contacts between the N-helices
occur between positions a and d of the
helical wheel. Contacts between the N- and C-helices (intra- and
intermolecular) involves residues at positions e
and g of the N-helices and positions a
and d of the C-helices. b, peptide sequences. The
N36 peptide comprises residues 546-581 of the N-region of HIV-1 gp41,
and the C34 peptide comprises residues 628-661 of the C-region of
HIV-1 gp41. N36 and C34 associate to form a six-helix bundle whose
structure has been solved crystallographically (5). In the
N36Mut(e,g) mutant, the residues at positions e
and g of N36 have been substituted by residues at
positions e and g, respectively, of C34;
this effectively removes the interaction surface with C34 but preserves
the contacts necessary to form a trimeric coiled-coil of N-helices. In
the N36Mut(a,d) mutant, the residues at positions
a and d of N36 have been substituted by residues at
positions f and c, respectively, of C34; this
removes the contacts necessary to form the trimeric coil-coil of
N-helices but preserves the interaction sites with C34.
v
), using the Optima XL-A data analysis software
(Beckman). The value for the experimental molecular mass M
was determined using calculated values for the density
(determined
at 20 °C using standard tables) and partial specific volume
v (calculated on the basis of amino acid composition
(25)).
-galactosidase activity of cell lysates
was measured (A570; Molecular Devices 96-well
spectrophotometer) upon addition of chlorophenol
red-
-D-galactopyranoside (Roche Molecular Biochemicals).
The curves for %fusion versus peptide inhibitor
concentration were fit by nonlinear least-squares optimization using
the program FACSIMILE (27, 28).
![]()
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (19K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Characterization of N36Mut(e,g)
(red) and N36Mut(a,d)
(blue). a, results of analytical
ultracentrifugation on N36Mut(e,g) and
N36Mut(a,d). Sedimentation equilibrium profiles, plotted in
terms of ln(A280) versus the square
of the radius (r2) (bottom panel),
are shown; also shown in the top two panels is the
distribution of residuals between calculated and experimental data for
best fits to a monomer of N36Mut(a,d) and a trimer of
N36Mut(e,g). The concentrations (in monomer) of
N36Mut(a,d) and N36Mut(e,g) are ~140
µM (A280 ~ 0.8) and 124 µM (A280 ~ 0.7), respectively.
The calculated molecular masses are 3660 ± 80 Da for
N36Mut(a,d), which corresponds to a monomer, and
12,040 ± 200 Da for N36Mut(e,g), which corresponds to
a trimer. An independent run for N36Mut(e,g) at a
concentration of 36 µM in monomer
(A280 ~ 0.2) yielded a molecular mass of
12,500 ± 180 Da. b, CD spectrum of
N36Mut(e,g) and N36Mut(a,d). The calculated
helical content is ~80% for N36Mut(e,g) and ~20% for
N36Mut(a,d). deg, degrees.
-helix; and
quantification of the CD data (24) indicates a helical content of
~80%. N36Mut(a,d), on the other hand, is largely random
coil (characterized by a minimum around 200 nm) with a small amount of
-helix (~20%).

View larger version (17K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Inhibition of HIV Env-mediated cell fusion by
N36Mut(e,g), N36Mut(a,d), and N36.
Red solid circles, N36Mut(e,g); blue solid
squares, N36Mut(a,d); black open circles,
N36.The solid lines represent best fits to the data using
the simple activity relationship: %fusion = 100/(1+[I]/IC50) where [I] is the inhibitor
concentration. The IC50 values for N36Mut(e,g)
and N36 are 308 ± 22 nM and 16 ± 2 µM, respectively. N36Mut(a,d) displays no
inhibitory activity at the concentrations tested.
to yield appropriate apparent
equilibrium constants (Fig. 5a, middle
panel).

View larger version (33K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Modeling the inhibition of HIV Env-mediated
cell fusion by N36Mut(e,g). a, mechanistic
scheme. L, LL, and LLL are the monomeric, homodimeric, and homotrimeric
forms, respectively, of the ligand N36Mut(eg,); M, MM, and
MMM are the monomeric, homodimeric, and homotrimeric forms,
respectively, of the prefusion intermediate of gp41 bound on the
surface of the cell; ML is the heterodimeric species formed by the
interaction of M and L; MML and MLL are the heterotrimeric species.
K 
2; Ref. 21) given by the
product of K1 and K2 with
K2
K1 (since trimer
formation is highly cooperative, and only monomer and trimer species
can be detected by analytical ultracentrifugation).
(K1 was arbitrarily set to 104
M
1, yielding a value of 4.8 × 107 M
1 for
K2.) The factors
,
, and
relate the
equilibrium association constants for homotrimerization of L
(K



serves
to convert the concentrations of species in the membrane to their bulk
solution concentrations and, in addition, subsumes any energetic
differences between trimerization of the pre-hairpin intermediate of
gp41 in the membrane and trimerization of the ectodomain of gp41
measured in free solution. The various numerical factors in front of
the equilibrium constants are statistical factors related to symmetry
considerations involved in the formation of homo- and hetero-oligomeric
species. b, variation in the optimized values of
and
derived by nonlinear least-squares optimization as a function of
MT, where MT is the total concentration of
protein (monomer units) in bulk solution. The vertical bars
represent the error in the fitted parameters. c, comparison
of the experimental fusion data (solid red circles) with the
best fit theoretical curves calculated for
MT = 1.5 × 10
5 M (solid line) and 1.5 × 10
4 M (dashed line). (For a
value of 10 pM for MT, the corresponding values
of
are 1.5 × 106-1.5 × 107,
respectively). The percentage of fusion activity is given by
100[MMM]LT/[MMM]LT = 0.
Note that the two theoretical curves are essentially indistinguishable
not only from each other but also from a simple Langmuir isotherm.
Calculated fractional concentrations of various species as a function
of total protein concentration, MT (d), and
total ligand concentration, LT (e). The fraction
of dimeric species (i.e. 2[MM]/MT,
[ML]/MT, and 2[LL]/LT) is less than 1% for
all values of LT. The curves obtained for
MT = 1.5 × 10
5 M and 1.5 × 10
4 M are shown as solid and
dashed lines, respectively.

2 and is given
by the product of the equilibrium association constants K1 (monomer-dimer equilibrium) and
K2 (dimer-trimer equilibrium) (Fig.
5a, bottom panel). Since trimerization of the
gp41 ectodomain is highly cooperative (21, 22),
K2
K1. Taking
K
K
K
also
subsumes any difference in the energetics of trimerization between the
pre-hairpin intermediate in the membrane and the ectodomain of gp41 in
free solution), and between monomeric species of L and M and
heterotrimeric species of M and L by
3
K
,
, and
MT, where MT is the
total protein concentration (in monomer units). The data, however, are
insufficient to determine all three parameters independently. Nonlinear
least-squares fitting to the experimental data, optimizing the values
of
and
, was carried out for values of
MT ranging
from 1.5 × 10
7 to 1.5 × 10
3
M (which corresponds to values of
of 1.5 × 104-1.5 × 108 for MT = 10 pM, the probable concentration of protein in bulk solution,
estimated on the basis of a concentration of 5 × 103
cells/µl and ~5000 gp41 trimers/cell). (Note that the
concentrations of the various species in the scheme shown in Fig.
5a as a function of total ligand concentration,
LT, were calculated numerically by integration of the
differential equations describing the reactions to essentially infinite
time.) The optimized values of
and
depend on the product
MT, and the results are therefore equally valid for a
wide range of MT concentrations. The data can be equally well fitted for values of
MT ranging from
10
7 to 10
3 M with
varying
from ~10 to 0.1 and
varying from 1 to 10 (Fig. 5b).
Best fits to the experimental fusion inhibition data for
MT = 1.5 × 10
5 and 1.5 × 10
4 M are shown in Fig. 5c; the
optimized values of
are 1.07 and 0.34 (with error estimates of
~40%), respectively, and of
are 2.97 and 5.76 (with error
estimates of 10%), respectively. The resulting curves are essentially
indistinguishable from each other as well as from that obtained with a
Langmuir isotherm. The occupancy of the various species relative to
MT and LT are shown in Fig. 5, d and
e, respectively. For this set of parameters, the fraction M
in the trimeric state in the absence of ligand is ~86% for
MT = 1.5 × 10
5 M and
~97% for
MT = 1.5 × 10
4
M; the value of LT at which 50% of L is
monomeric is ~2 × 10
6 and 5 × 10
6 M, respectively. The occupancy of
homodimeric ligand is less than 1% of LT; likewise the
occupancy of homodimeric (MM) and heterodimeric (LM) protein is less
than 1% of MT for all values of LT. Both MML
and MLL heterotrimers are formed with the MML heterotrimer peaking at
concentrations of LT slightly less than that at which 50%
of the ligand is monomeric.
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
To whom correspondence may be addressed: Laboratory of Bioorganic
Chemistry, Bldg. 8, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-0820. Tel.: 301-594-5187; E-mail:
caroleb@intra.niddk.nih.gov.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Freed, E. O.,
and Martin, M. A.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
23883-23886 2.
Eckert, D. M.,
and Kim, P. S.
(2001)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
70,
777-810[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 3.
Moore, J. P.,
Trkola, A.,
and Dragic, T.
(1997)
Curr. Opin. Immunol.
9,
551-562[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 4.
Caffrey, M.,
Cai, M.,
Kaufman, J.,
Stahl, S. J.,
Wingfield, P. T.,
Covell, D. G.,
Gronenborn, A. M.,
and Clore, G. M.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
4572-4584[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 5.
Chan, D. C.,
Fass, D.,
Berger, J. M.,
and Kim, P. S.
(1997)
Cell
89,
263-273[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 6.
Weissenhorn, W.,
Dessen, A.,
Harrison, S. C.,
Skehel, J. J.,
and Wiley, D. C.
(1997)
Nature
387,
426-430[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 7.
Tan, K. J.,
Liu, J.,
Wang, S.,
Shen, S.,
and Lu, M.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
12303-12308 8.
Malashkevich, V. N.,
Chan, D. C.,
Chutkowski, C. T.,
and Kim, P. S.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
9134-9139 9.
Wild, C. T.,
Oas, T.,
McDanal, C. B.,
Bolognesi, D.,
and Matthews, T. J.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
10537-10541 10.
Wild, C. T.,
Shugars, D. C.,
Greenwell, T. K.,
McDanal, C. B.,
and Matthews, T. J.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
9770-9774 11.
Chan, D. C.,
Chutkowski, C. T.,
and Kim, P. S.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
15613-15617 12.
Eckert, D. M.,
and Kim, P. S.
(2001)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
98,
11187-11192 13.
Furuta, R. A.,
Wild, C. T.,
Weng, Y.,
and Weiss, C. D.
(1998)
Nat. Struct. Biol.
5,
276-279[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 14.
Chan, D. C.,
and Kim, P. S.
(1998)
Cell
93,
681-684[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 15.
Kilby, J. M.,
Hopkins, S.,
Venetta, T. M.,
DiMassimo, B.,
Cloud, G. A.,
Lee, J. Y.,
Alldredge, L.,
Hunter, E.,
Lambert, D.,
Bolognesi, D.,
Matthews, T.,
Johnson, M. R.,
Nowak, M. A.,
Shaw, G. M.,
and Saag, M. S.
(1998)
Nat. Med.
4,
1302-1307[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 16.
Pozniak, A.
(2001)
J. HIV Res.
6,
92-94
17.
Weissenhorn, W.,
Dessen, A.,
Calder, L. J.,
Harrison, S. C.,
Skehel, J. J.,
and Wiley, D. C.
(199)
Mol. Membr. Biol.
16,
3-9 18.
Kliger, Y.,
and Shai, Y.
(2000)
J. Mol. Biol.
295,
163-168[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 19.
Louis, J. M.,
Bewley, C. A.,
and Clore, G. M.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
29485-29489 20.
Root, M. J.,
Kay, M. S.,
and Kim, P. S.
(2001)
Science
291,
884-888[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 21.
Wingfield, P. T.,
Stahl, S. J.,
Kaufman, J.,
Zlotnick, A.,
Hyde, C. C.,
Gronenborn, A. M.,
and Clore, G. M.
(1997)
Protein Sci.
6,
1653-1660[Abstract] 22.
Caffrey, M.,
Kaufman, J.,
Stahl, S. J.,
Wingfield, P. T.,
Gronenborn, A. M.,
and Clore, G. M.
(1999)
Protein Sci.
8,
1904-1907[Abstract] 23.
Peisajovich, S. G.,
and Shai, Y.
(2001)
J. Mol. Biol.
311,
249-254[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 24.
Bohm, G.,
Muhr, R.,
and Jaenicke, R.
(1992)
Protein Eng.
5,
191-195 25.
Perkins, S. J.
(1986)
Eur. J. Biochem.
157,
169-180[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 26.
Salzwedel, K.,
Smith, E.,
Dey, B.,
and Berger, E. J.
(2000)
J. Virol.
74,
326-333 27.
Chance, E. M.,
Curtis, A. R.,
Jones, I. P.,
and Kirby, C. R.
(1979)
FACSIMILE, Atomic Energy Research Establishment Report R8775
, Harwell, H. M. Stationary Office, London, UK
28.
Clore, G. M.
(1983)
in
Computing in Biological Science
(Geisow, M. J.
, and Barrett, A. N., eds)
, pp. 313-348, Elsevier/North-Holland, New York
29.
Lu, M.,
Blacklow, S. C.,
and Kim, P. S.
(1995)
Nat. Struct. Biol.
2,
1075-1082[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 30.
Jones, P. L.,
Korte, T.,
and Blumenthal, R.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
404-409 31.
Muñoz-Barroso, I.,
Durell, S.,
Sakaguchi, K.,
Appella, E.,
and Blumenthal, R.
(1998)
J. Cell Biol.
140,
315-323
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Gustchina, C. A Bewley, and G. M. Clore Sequestering of the Prehairpin Intermediate of gp41 by Peptide N36Mut(e,g) Potentiates the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Neutralizing Activity of Monoclonal Antibodies Directed against the N-Terminal Helical Repeat of gp41 J. Virol., October 15, 2008; 82(20): 10032 - 10041. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Fromer and C. Yanover A computational framework to empower probabilistic protein design Bioinformatics, July 1, 2008; 24(13): i214 - i222. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. He, Y. Xiao, H. Song, Q. Liang, D. Ju, X. Chen, H. Lu, W. Jing, S. Jiang, and L. Zhang Design and Evaluation of Sifuvirtide, a Novel HIV-1 Fusion Inhibitor J. Biol. Chem., April 25, 2008; 283(17): 11126 - 11134. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Dwyer, K. L. Wilson, K. Martin, J. E. Seedorff, A. Hasan, R. J. Medinas, D. K. Davison, M. D. Feese, H.-T. Richter, H. Kim, et al. Design of an engineered N-terminal HIV-1 gp41 trimer with enhanced stability and potency Protein Sci., April 1, 2008; 17(4): 633 - 643. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Gustchina, J. M. Louis, S. N. Lam, C. A. Bewley, and G. M. Clore A Monoclonal Fab Derived from a Human Nonimmune Phage Library Reveals a New Epitope on gp41 and Neutralizes Diverse Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Strains J. Virol., December 1, 2007; 81(23): 12946 - 12953. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Jacobs, O. Quraishi, X. Huang, N. Bousquet-Gagnon, G. Nault, N. Francella, W. G. Alvord, N. Pham, C. Soucy, M. Robitaille, et al. A Covalent Inhibitor Targeting an Intermediate Conformation of the Fusogenic Subunit of the HIV-1 Envelope Complex J. Biol. Chem., November 2, 2007; 282(44): 32406 - 32413. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. He, S. Liu, W. Jing, H. Lu, D. Cai, D. J. Chin, A. K. Debnath, F. Kirchhoff, and S. Jiang Conserved Residue Lys574 in the Cavity of HIV-1 Gp41 Coiled-coil Domain Is Critical for Six-helix Bundle Stability and Virus Entry J. Biol. Chem., August 31, 2007; 282(35): 25631 - 25639. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Wallin, M. Ekstrom, and H. Garoff Receptor-Triggered but Alkylation-Arrested Env of Murine Leukemia Virus Reveals the Transmembrane Subunit in a Prehairpin Conformation J. Virol., October 1, 2006; 80(19): 9921 - 9925. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Sackett, Y. Wexler-Cohen, and Y. Shai Characterization of the HIV N-terminal Fusion Peptide-containing Region in Context of Key gp41 Fusion Conformations J. Biol. Chem., August 4, 2006; 281(31): 21755 - 21762. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Gallo, W. Wang, S. S. Rawat, G. Jung, A. J. Waring, A. M. Cole, H. Lu, X. Yan, N. L. Daly, D. J. Craik, et al. {theta}-Defensins Prevent HIV-1 Env-mediated Fusion by Binding gp41 and Blocking 6-Helix Bundle Formation J. Biol. Chem., July 7, 2006; 281(27): 18787 - 18792. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. L. Moore, E. T. Crooks, L. Porter, P. Zhu, C. S. Cayanan, H. Grise, P. Corcoran, M. B. Zwick, M. Franti, L. Morris, et al. Nature of Nonfunctional Envelope Proteins on the Surface of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 J. Virol., March 1, 2006; 80(5): 2515 - 2528. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Garg and R. Blumenthal HIV gp41-induced apoptosis is mediated by caspase-3-dependent mitochondrial depolarization, which is inhibited by HIV protease inhibitor nelfinavir J. Leukoc. Biol., February 1, 2006; 79(2): 351 - 362. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Bianchi, M. Finotto, P. Ingallinella, R. Hrin, A. V. Carella, X. S. Hou, W. A. Schleif, M. D. Miller, R. Geleziunas, and A. Pessi Covalent stabilization of coiled coils of the HIV gp41 N region yields extremely potent and broad inhibitors of viral infection PNAS, September 6, 2005; 102(36): 12903 - 12908. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||