![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 16, 14321-14328, April 19, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the
Received for publication, December 27, 2001
Recombination-dependent replication
is an essential housekeeping function in prokaryotes and eukaryotes,
serving, for example, to restart DNA replication after the repair of a
double-strand break. Little is known about the interplay between the
recombination and replication machinery when recombination
intermediates are used as substrates for DNA replication. We show here
that recombination intermediates formed between linear duplex and
supercoiled plasmid DNAs are substrates for a generalized strand
displacement DNA synthesis reaction in which the 3'-OH of the invading
strand in the recombination intermediate is used as a primer. DNA
synthesis is driven by negative superhelicity and is inhibited if
disassembly of the RecA filament is prevented. Thus, assembly and
disassembly of RecA filaments in the same direction facilitates
filament clearance from the 3'-end of the invading strand,
allowing DNA synthesis to occur from recombination intermediates.
Maintenance of genomic integrity is dependent on the intersection
of DNA replication and recombination (1-3). Many forms of
recombinational repair of DNA damage involve limited DNA synthesis and,
as has become clear over the past few years, the rescue of stalled
replication forks requires the action of the recombination proteins.
This latter point is best illustrated in bacteria, in which the
replication forks that form at the origin of replication are generally
not the ones that complete replication of the chromosome (4). Instead,
with high frequency, either they run into frozen proteins or template
DNA damage such as thymidine dimers, abasic lesions, or other bulky
adducts that cause the replication fork to stall, or they encounter
template nicks that cause the replication fork to collapse completely,
generating a double-strand break in one of the sister chromosomes. Both
types of events require that the template damage be repaired and that
DNA replication be restarted.
The role of the recombination proteins in replication restart varies.
In some instances, such as daughter strand gap repair, it is thought
that DNA strand exchange acts to provide a template strand for repair
of the lesion and that subsequent replication restart takes place at a
replication fork that is regenerated by the combined action of proteins
such as the branch migration enzymes RuvAB and RecG, the Holliday
junction resolvase RuvC, and DNA helicases such as RecQ (5-7). On the
other hand, during double-strand break repair in bacteria, replication
restart proceeds directly from a recombination intermediate (8). This
intermediate is most likely a D loop that has been formed between the
broken and intact sister chromosome arms by the action of RecA and
RecBCD. Replication restart is effected by the assembly of the
replication restart primosome, which is directed by the action of PriA
(9). PriA recognizes the D loop specifically (10, 11), and subsequent primosome assembly leads to the deposition of DnaB, the replication fork DNA helicase, on the lagging-strand template, allowing replisome assembly.
Inactivation of priA leads to the generation of spontaneous
suppressor mutations that map in dnaC (12), another restart primosomal protein (13) that forms a complex with DnaB in solution (14)
and is involved in its transfer to DNA (15). We have reconstituted
PriA-directed replisome assembly on a nicked, double-stranded DNA
template that was engineered to contain a D loop (16). Using this
system, we showed that DnaC810, which is encoded by the
priA Genetic studies have demonstrated multiple pathways of replication
restart (17, 18), the use of which might reflect the different types of
substrates for replication restart generated by the recombination
proteins. To understand how the enzymatic pathway for processing of
recombination intermediates is chosen, we have initiated an effort to
reconstitute concerted recombination and replication reactions in
vitro. We demonstrate here a generalized DNA polymerase-catalyzed
strand displacement synthesis reaction that utilizes as a primer the
3'-OH end of the invading strand in a D loop generated by the action of
RecA and RecBCD. The nascent strand synthesis reaction does not require
a DNA helicase and is driven by negative supercoiling. We also show
that the availability of the 3'-end of the invading strand is dictated
by the nature of the RecA filament that is formed during strand
exchange. If the filament is static, the 3'-end is buried within and
cannot be accessed by a DNA polymerase, whereas if the filament is
dynamic, any DNA polymerase can bind to the 3'-end and extend it.
DNAs and Proteins--
RecA (19) and RecBCD (20) were prepared
as described. single-stranded DNA-binding protein
(SSB),1 DNA gyrase,
topoisomerase IV, and the DNA polymerase III holoenzyme (Pol III HE, as
Pol III* and DNA Synthesis from Joint Molecules--
Standard
reaction mixtures (20 µl) containing 50 mM
HEPES-KOH (pH 8.0), 16 mM MgOAc, 10 mM
dithiothreitol, 100 µg/ml bovine serum albumin, 2 mM ATP,
40 µM dNTPs, 7.5 mM creatine phosphate, 62 ng/ml creatine kinase, 12.5 nM 5'-32P-labeled
800-mer, 1.1 nM pBR Two-dimensional Gel Electrophoresis--
Two DNA elongation
reaction mixtures were mixed together and then applied equally to two
adjacent lanes of a neutral agarose gel as described above. After
electrophoresis, the two lanes were excised from the gel. One lane was
dried to serve as a reference. The other lane was soaked in 50 mM NaOH, 1 mM EDTA and then inserted into a
0.5% horizontal alkaline agarose gel. Electrophoresis was at 1.5 V/cm
for 15 h using 30 mM NaOH, 1 mM EDTA as
the electrophoresis buffer. The gel was neutralized by soaking in 5%
trichloroacetic acid, dried, and autoradiographed.
Isolation of Joint Molecules--
Joint molecules were formed as
described above in a standard reaction mixture increased 5-fold in a
volume that contained only RecA, RecBCD, and SSB. After treatment with
proteinase K, joint molecules were isolated by gel filtration
through a Bio-Gel A-5m column (2.5 ml) formed in a 2-ml Falcon pipette
using 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0 at 4 °C), 1 mM
EDTA as the column buffer. The excluded volume was identified by
determining the Cerenkov radiation present in the column fractions and
pooled. Typically, 12 or 13 µl of this pool were used in subsequent reactions.
Assay for RecA Filament Stability--
An oligonucleotide
substrate was prepared by annealing a 65-nt-long top strand of
the sequence
5'-ACCGCAATACGGAAGCTGGCTGAGCACGCCGACGAACATTCAGTACGCCAGACCACGTATCGGAA-3' with a 40-nt-long bottom strand of the sequence
5'-TTCCGATACGTGGTCTGGCGTACTGAATGTTCGTCGGCGT-3' to give a duplex region
of 40 bp containing a centrally located RsaI site with a
25-nt-long 5'-single-stranded tail. The top strand was
5'-32P-labeled. Reaction mixtures (80 µl) containing 50 mM HEPES-KOH (pH 8.0), 16 mM MgOAc, 10 mM dithiothreitol, 100 µg/ml bovine serum albumin, either
2 mM ATP or dATP, 7.5 mM creatine phosphate, 62 ng/ml creatine kinase, 1.2 nM 32P-tailed duplex
oligonucleotide, and either 3.5 µM wild-type or K72R RecA
were incubated for 15 min at 37 °C. An aliquot (10 µl) was
withdrawn to represent the 0 time point of the digestion reaction, RsaI (2.5 units) was added, and the incubation was
continued. Aliquots (10 µl) were withdrawn at the indicated times.
Reactions were terminated by the addition of EDTA to 25 mM
followed by extraction with phenol-chloroform and recovery of the DNA
by ethanol precipitation. Samples were analyzed by electrophoresis
through an 8% polyacrylamide gel (30:1, acrylamide to bisacrylamide)
using 100 mM Tris borate (pH 8.3), 2 mM EDTA as
the electrophoresis buffer. The gel was fixed by soaking in 10%
methanol, 7% HOAc, 5% glycerol and then dried.
DNA Synthesis from a Recombination Intermediate--
DNA strand
exchange during double-strand break-repair is initiated in
Escherichia coli by RecBCD locating the double-strand end of
the broken chromosome arm and digesting it. Initially, the 3'-ended
strand is digested from the break until a properly oriented
Incubation of a linear duplex DNA (the 800-mer) with a plasmid DNA
(pBR
Inclusion of gyrase and the Pol III HE in the reaction mixture resulted
in the appearance of a new band (Fig. 1B, lane 3) that is a consequence of the invading strand in the joint molecule having been extended all the way around the plasmid DNA template by the
DNA polymerase (Fig. 2). The formation of this product required RecA,
RecBCD, SSB, gyrase, and the Pol III HE (Fig. 1B). Two
additional products were apparent when the HE was omitted from the
reaction mixture (Fig. 1B, lane 2). The
electrophoretic mobility of these products corresponded to that of the
plasmid DNA (Fig. 1B, form I-D loop) and to a
band that ran faster than the plasmid DNA (Fig. 1B, form X).
The presence of SSB inhibited the formation of form X (Fig.
1B, compare lanes 2 and 4). The nature
of the [32P]DNA in these products was investigated by
two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (Fig. 2).
A lane excised from a native agarose gel displaying the products of a
reaction mixture containing the 5'-32P-labeled 800-mer,
pBR
Neither of the other two products of the reaction contained elongated
DNA. Form I-D loop contained a mixture of full-length and digested
800-mer. This was consistent with our assignment in that both
The band that we labeled form X contained primarily 800-mer. The
mobility of form X on native agarose gels (Fig. 1B)
indicated that it had a superhelical density that was considerably
greater than that of the input plasmid DNA. The enzymatic requirements for the generation of form X were therefore investigated (Fig. 3). The formation of form X required only
RecA and gyrase. These requirements and the highly supercoiled nature
of the plasmid DNA indicated that the generation of form X occurred via
the reaction pathway observed by Shibata and colleagues (25) during
their studies of the D loop cycle catalyzed by RecA. Using small
oligonucleotides as the invading strand in the presence of RecA and
various topoisomerases, these investigators observed the appearance of
highly supercoiled form X DNA. In their case, the invading strand was
no longer present in the form X product. It is present in the product
reported here because the greater length of the invading strand used
stabilizes the D loop. Shibata and colleagues (25) hypothesized that
extensive RecA filament formation extending from the D loop into the
duplex portion of the plasmid caused unwinding of the plasmid DNA.
Extensive unwinding generates compensatory positive supercoils that DNA gyrase will convert directly to negative supercoils. Following removal
of the proteins from the DNA, it will assume the hyper-supercoiled form
reported here (form X).
Thus, either joint molecules or form X could be the substrate for the
observed DNA synthesis reaction. We therefore investigated this issue.
Reactions were executed in two stages (Fig.
4). During the first stage, either joint
molecules were first generated in the presence of RecA, RecBCD, and SSB
(Fig. 4, lanes 1-3) or form X was first generated in the
presence of RecA, RecBCD, and gyrase (Fig. 4, lanes 4-6).
In the second stage, the reaction mixtures were supplemented with
either the HE and gyrase (Fig. 4, lanes 1-3) or the HE and
SSB (Fig. 4, lanes 4-6). Only in the case where joint
molecules were formed in the first stage could elongated product be
observed in the second stage. Although there was a small amount of
elongated product present in the reaction in which form X was formed
first and then HE was added (Fig. 4, lane 6), it most likely
arose from the equivalent amount of The Elongation Reaction Represents Strand Displacement
Synthesis--
Because form X could be generated in the reaction, we
considered the possibility that RecA might, in some manner, be acting as a DNA helicase to allow the elongation of the invading strand, perhaps as a result of treadmilling of the filament. To address this
question, joint molecules were formed in the presence of RecA, RecBCD,
and SSB, and the proteins were then removed by digestion with
proteinase K in the presence of SDS followed by isolation of the joint
molecules by gel filtration through a Bio-Gel A-5m column. Elongation
of the invading strand in these isolated joint molecules required only
the HE, gyrase, and SSB (Fig. 5). Some partially elongated material could be observed in the absence of SSB
(Fig. 5, lane 3). In addition, in the presence of HE,
gyrase, and SSB, elongated product with a lower mobility than the
full-length product could be observed. Two-dimensional gel analysis has
shown that this elongated product corresponds to DNA that is greater than unit template length (data not shown), presumably produced by
rolling circle-type replication.
Thus, the requirement for RecA observed with the concerted reaction in
Fig. 1B related only to the requirement that joint molecules
must be made before any polymerase-catalyzed elongation of the invading
strand could take place and not to the involvement of RecA in the
elongation process itself. How, then, was DNA unwinding being driven
given that no DNA helicase was involved in the replication reaction?
The most likely possibility was that we were observing a slow strand
displacement reaction in which the DNA was being unwound by a
combination of the DNA being kept negatively supercoiled by the action
of DNA gyrase, which will favor unwinding, and SSB binding to the
displaced single-stranded DNA that is generated as the polymerase
slowly pushes forward. We would expect that in such a reaction, there
would not be any specificity for the DNA polymerase, that elongation
would be slow, and that other topoisomerases that could relax the
positive supercoils generated by the unwinding would not be able to
support the elongation reaction because they could not supercoil the
DNA template. These predictions were tested directly.
Both Sequenase (Fig. 6A), a
version of the bacteriophage T7 DNA polymerase, as well as E. coli DNA polymerase I (data not shown) could substitute for the HE
in the reaction. Thus, it was unlikely that elongation of the invading
strand in the joint molecule required any specific interaction between
the DNA polymerase and either RecA, RecBCD, or SSB.
To measure the speed of the elongation reaction, aliquots were removed
from the reaction mixture starting from the beginning of the reaction,
and the products were analyzed on denaturing alkaline agarose gels
(Fig. 6B). The trailing edge of the smear present in the
lanes in Fig. 6B represents the longest elongated invading
strands at that time point; thus the speed of elongation can be
assessed by observing the change in the size of the largest products as
a function of time. It required about 90 s to produce full-length
material, giving an elongation speed of about 70 nt/s. This is far
slower than the 700-1000 nt/s that we have measured for bona
fide replication forks in vitro (26) and is therefore consistent with the progress of a strand displacement reaction.
Elongation of the invading strand in the joint molecule all the way
around the circular template creates positive linkages as a result of
the unwinding of the parental duplex DNA. If a DNA helicase were
driving the elongation reaction, the production of full-length product
DNA would require only that the excess positive linkages be removed by
a topoisomerase such as topoisomerase IV, which can relax both
negatively and positively supercoiled DNA but cannot supercoil DNA
(21). We have shown, for example, that this enzyme is capable of
supporting oriC replication in vitro (27).
However, topoisomerase IV was unable to replace gyrase in elongation
reactions using isolated joint molecules (Fig.
7). This test had to be performed in this
manner because in the concerted reaction, topoisomerase IV would relax
the pBR Polymerase Access to the Terminus of the Invading Strand in Joint
Molecules Requires Clearance by the RecA Filament--
In the presence
of ATP, RecA filaments assemble and disassemble in the same direction
(28, 29), indicating that the filament grows at one end and
disassembles at the other. Structural analysis of RecA bound to DNA
suggests that access to the terminus of the invading strand is likely
to be restricted sterically (30). Thus, clearance of the RecA filament
from the region of the template DNA containing the terminus of the
invading strand might be required in order for a DNA polymerase to find
the 3'-end of the invading strand. To examine this possibility, we used
conditions known to stabilize the RecA filament and assessed their
effect on the ability to generate elongated product (Fig.
8).
RecA K72R is a mutant RecA protein that can only utilize dATP to
support strand exchange, and evidence indicates that a filament formed
by the mutant protein is more stable than one formed by the wild-type
protein in the presence of ATP (31, 32). Similarly, dATP stabilizes the
filament formed by the wild-type protein (33, 34). As expected, RecA
K72R could only form joint molecules in the presence of dATP (Fig. 8,
compare lanes 4 and 10), whereas the wild-type
protein worked in the presence of either ATP or dATP (Fig. 8, compare
lanes 1 and 7). The wild-type protein could only
support the formation of elongated product in the presence of ATP (Fig.
8, compare lanes 3 and 9). The mutant protein was unable to support the formation of elongated product in the presence of
dATP (Fig. 8, lane 12). Although there are other
ATP-utilizing enzymes present in the reaction, the failure to observe
elongated product in the presence of dATP could be attributed directly
to an altered property of RecA. Initiation complex formation by the HE
proceeds equally well in the presence of either ATP or dATP (35), and
supercoiling by DNA gyrase is supported about a third as well by dATP
as by ATP (36). To compensate for this latter deficiency, the
concentration of gyrase in the reaction was increased 5-fold.
Thus, it appeared that if the RecA filament was stabilized, the HE
could not access the 3'-end of the invading strand in the joint
molecules. To confirm that it was the stability of the RecA filament
that was the variable under these reaction conditions, we developed an
assay to test access to DNA coated with a RecA filament. An
oligonucleotide substrate was designed that was a 40-nt duplex with an
RsaI site in the middle of the duplex and that had a
5'-single-stranded tail of 25 nt. Thus, the RecA filament assembly will
nucleate on the single strand and spread onto the duplex portion of the
oligonucleotide. We assessed inhibition of digestion by RsaI
of the duplex portion of the oligonucleotide under the various
conditions used in the experiment described in the legend for
Fig. 8. After allowing filament formation to reach an equilibrium,
RsaI was added, and digestion of the oligonucleotide was
followed over time (Fig. 9).
In the absence of RecA, cleavage of the oligonucleotide was rapid, and
the reaction was complete 2-3 min after addition of RsaI.
Filament formation by wild-type RecA in the presence of ATP slowed the
rate of cleavage by RsaI but, notably, it did not prevent
it. On the other hand, filament formation by either the wild-type or
the K72R protein in the presence of dATP prevented cleavage by the
restriction enzyme. These findings are consistent with the data
presented in Fig. 8. Thus, a dynamic RecA filament permits access to
DNA that it is nominally bound to, presumably, in the case of the
experiment shown in Fig. 9, because the cycles of assembly and
disassembly that describe the equilibrium position leave the
RsaI site uncoated for a certain fraction of time. In the
elongation reaction from joint molecules, the equivalent action would
result in clearance of the RecA filament from the terminus of the
invading strand in the D loop and allow the 3'-OH to be detected and
elongated by a DNA polymerase.
The intersection between the recombination and replication
machinery is now well established in prokaryotes and is being revealed in eukaryotes. During recombinational repair of stalled replication forks in bacteria, recombination proteins often act to generate substrates for replication restart. The situation therefore arises in
which a recombination intermediate is poised to proceed along a pathway
of maturation and resolution that is dictated by the enzymatic
specificities of either recombination or replication proteins. Thus, a
D loop formed, for example, between the broken and intact sister arms
of a replicating circular bacterial chromosome could yield extensive
strand exchange by the continued action of RecA and by the additional
action of the branch migration DNA helicase RuvAB. On the other hand,
the same D loop could become a substrate for replisome assembly
directed by the restart primosome. We report here a third possibility,
that the invading strand in the joint molecule can be used as a primer
by a DNA polymerase in a strand displacement reaction that is driven by
negative supercoiling.
The DNA replication reaction that we observed uses joint molecules
formed by the action of RecA and RecBCD as a template. The reaction
drew our attention initially because, in the absence of a DNA helicase,
full-length DNA was being synthesized by the Pol III HE, which is
nominally incapable of strand displacement synthesis (37). Using
various oligonucleotide substrates where a primer was annealed upstream
to a duplex region, we confirmed that the HE was, indeed, incapable of
strand displacement synthesis (data not shown). These observations
implied that during the extension of the invading strand in the joint
molecules, the unwinding of the template duplex was achieved by novel means.
The fact that a highly unwound form of the plasmid DNA, form X, could
also be generated in the reaction raised the possibility that the same
driving force for form X production, the unwinding of the DNA by the
RecA filament (38), might also be capable of sustaining the DNA
replication reaction. However, although it was clear that RecA was
required initially in the reaction to catalyze the formation of joint
molecules, we found that it could be eliminated from the elongation
reaction without effect. This observation left us to consider that
superhelicity was driving the unwinding needed for elongation.
Elongation of the invading strand in the joint molecules creates
positive windings in the template DNA that compensate for the unwinding
of the parental duplex strands. Accrual of excess positive windings
will prevent additional template unwinding and stall DNA replication.
Topoisomerases are responsible for sustaining DNA replication on
topologically constrained templates by relaxing the positive windings.
Both DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV are capable of relaxing positive
supercoils, but only DNA gyrase was capable of supporting the
elongation reaction. We have to attribute this difference to the fact
that gyrase, but not topoisomerase IV, can also supercoil DNA. In fact,
during the elongation reaction, gyrase will convert the positive
supercoils directly into negative ones. Therefore, with gyrase present,
the template DNA will retain a net negative supercoiling. Supercoiled
DNA prefers to exist in the relaxed state, in which there are no
supercoils. Thus, negative supercoils favor the unwinding of the duplex
turns in the DNA molecule. This tendency likely acts as a driving force for the unwinding of the duplex template DNA during the elongation reaction. However, it clearly does not provide sufficient energy for
the process because SSB is also required. In the absence of SSB, only
partial elongation was observed. We presume that the energy of SSB
binding cooperatively to single-stranded DNA at the fork contributes to
the unwinding reaction.
Although the requirement for RecA in the concerted
elongation reaction derives from the need to first make a joint
molecule, it is clear, because form X can be produced in the same
reaction, that an extensive RecA filament can form on the duplex
template DNA. At first glance, it would seem that the RecA filament
would actually represent an impediment to any DNA replication reaction seeking to utilize the joint molecule as a substrate, suggesting that
the tendency would be for the joint molecule to continue on a pathway
dictated by the recombination proteins. However, it is clear that the
joint molecules can be directed into a replication pathway as well. We
investigated the role that RecA plays in this pathway choice. We could
demonstrate that, in fact, if the RecA filament was formed under
conditions in which it was stabilized, the extension of the invading
strand in the joint molecule was prevented. Thus, the dynamic nature of
the RecA filament allows it to clear from the region of heteroduplex in
a joint molecule. This clearance, in turn, allows subsequent reactions
to occur on the joint molecules, permitting a choice of enzymatic
pathway for resolution. It is particularly interesting that because
RecA filaments assemble and disassemble in the same direction, 5' Does the reaction described here play a role in the cell? This issue is
difficult to assess. Any form of extensive replication from
recombination intermediates, be it the result of bona fide replisome assembly or strand displacement synthesis, within the context
of double-strand break repair between sister chromosomes is genetically
silent. Detection requires the creation of specifically marked
chromosome arms and the use of physical analysis. It is, however,
interesting to point out that in one of the few cases in which
recombination-directed replication has been studied carefully, a
reaction similar to the one described here may be operative.
Haber and his colleagues (39) have carefully analyzed break-induced
replication (BIR) in yeast originating at the mating type locus as a
result of HO endonuclease-catalyzed cleavage of the DNA.
Normally, BIR is limited, probably because of the formation of a second
Holliday junction that acts to capture the replication fork, to a small
region about the site of cleavage. However, rare events can be observed
in which BIR is quite extensive (hundreds of kilobases long). Two
genetic pathways have been delineated that differ by their dependence
on Rad51. However, in each case, although it can be demonstrated that
many of the proteins present at the replication fork, such as
pol *
This work was supported by Grant GM34557 from the National
Institutes of Health.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.:
212-639-5890; Fax: 212-717-3627; E-mail:
k-marians@ski.mskcc.org.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, February 6, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M112418200
The abbreviations used are:
SSB, single-stranded DNA-binding protein;
HE, holoenzyme;
Pol III, polymerase III;
BIR, break-induced replication.
A Dynamic RecA Filament Permits DNA Polymerase-catalyzed
Extension of the Invading Strand in Recombination Intermediates*
and
§¶
Graduate Program in Biochemistry and
Structural Biology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences of the Weill
College of Medicine of Cornell University and § Molecular
Biology Program, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center,
New York, New York 10021
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
suppressor allele dnaC810
(12), had gained the ability to bypass PriA function and load DnaB
directly to the D loop. This observation underscores that replication
restart is an essential function.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
) were prepared as described previously (21). RecA K72R
was the kind gift of Michael Cox (University of Wisconsin). pBR
-1
DNA was purified after alkaline lysis by buoyant density CsCl
centrifugation and velocity sedimentation in sucrose gradients
containing 1 M NaCl. The 800-mer was prepared by PCR
using a forward primer with the sequence 5'-TGATTCTTCTCGCTTCCGGC-3' corresponding to nucleotide coordinates 1724-1743 of pBR
-1 DNA and
a reverse primer with the sequence 5'-ATGCCCGGTTACTGGAACGT-3' corresponding to nucleotide coordinates 2549'-2530' of pBR
-1 DNA.
The DNA fragment was gel-purified before use.
-1 DNA, 3.5 µM
RecA, 1 nM RecBCD, 0.8 µM SSB, 16 nM DNA gyrase, 20 nM Pol III*, and 20 nM
-subunit of the HE were incubated at 37 °C for 5 min for joint molecule formation or 20 min for form X formation and DNA
elongation. Reactions were terminated by the addition of EDTA, SDS, and
proteinase K to 25 mM, 1%, and 100 µg/ml, respectively,
followed by incubation at 37 °C for 30 min. The samples were
analyzed by electrophoresis through vertical 1% agarose gels at 1.5 V/cm for 15 h using 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3 at
23 °C), 40 mM NaOAc, 1 mM EDTA as the
electrophoresis buffer. Gels were dried and autoradiographed.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-site is encountered. Nuclease activity then switches to the
5'-ended strand from the break, resulting in the generation of a
recombinogenic 3'-single-stranded tail that becomes coated with RecA as
a result of the RecA-loading enhancing function of RecBCD (22). Strand
invasion into the sister chromosome results initially in the formation
of a D loop. This key intermediate is a substrate for both the
continued action of recombination proteins and the assembly of a
replisome. To study these reactions, we utilized a plasmid template,
pBR
-1, a modified pBR322 DNA into which we had inserted a
-site
at the XcmI site, and an 800-nt-long double-stranded DNA
fragment representing the broken chromosome arm that was produced by
PCR from the region on pBR
-1 that included the
-site (Fig.
1A). Our initial
reconstitution efforts included RecA, RecBCD, the SSB, the
restart primosomal proteins, the DNA Pol III HE, and DNA gyrase, along
with the 800-mer and pBR
-1. As we developed this system, we found
that although we could observe bona fide replisome assembly,
which will be described elsewhere, we could also observe a replication
reaction that was not dependent on DnaB, the replication fork helicase.
This reaction is described here.

View larger version (21K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Helicase-independent elongation
reaction of the invading strand in joint molecules. A,
the template DNA pBR
-1. A
-site was introduced into the
XcmI site of pBROTB I-535 DNA (40). This is a pBR322 plasmid
that also carries E. coli oriC and two Ter sites
oriented to block replication forks coming from oriC. The
region of the plasmid amplified by PCR to give the 800-mer is indicated
by the opposing arrows. B, requirements for the
elongation reaction. Standard reaction mixtures containing the
indicated assortment of proteins were incubated and analyzed as
described under "Experimental Procedures." Both an autoradiogram
(top) and a photograph of the ethidium bromide-stained gel
(bottom) are shown. Lane 0 is the form I plasmid
DNA. EP, elongated product; Gyr, gyrase;
-indep JM,
-independent joint molecules;
-dep
JM,
-dependent joint molecules; FI-DL,
form I D loop DNA; FX, form X DNA; FII, form II
DNA; JM, joint molecules; FI, form I DNA.
-1) containing complementary sequences in the presence of RecA,
RecBCD, SSB, and ATP results in the generation of joint molecules (Fig.
1B, lane 1). In this and all other experiments described herein, 32P label is present only on the 5'-ends
of the 800-mer. We observed the formation of both
-dependent and
-independent joint molecules. Because
the
-independent joint molecules incorporate all of the 800-mer,
whereas in the
-dependent joint molecules, the 800-mer has been digested by RecBCD to the
-site (see Fig.
2), which is roughly in the center of the
800-mer, the
-independent joint molecules have a reduced mobility as
compared with the
-dependent joint molecules on the
native agarose gels used for analysis of the reaction products.

View larger version (41K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
The invading strand is elongated to full
template length. The DNA products of a standard reaction were
analyzed by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis as described under
"Experimental Procedures." An autoradiogram of the dried gel is
shown. At the top of the figure for reference is an
autoradiogram of the products after electrophoresis through the native
agarose gel. DNA size markers were 5'-32P-labeled
HindIII fragments of bacteriophage
. EP,
elongated product; FI-DL, form I D loop DNA; FX,
form X DNA.
-1, RecA, RecBCD, SSB, gyrase, and the HE was soaked in 50 mM NaOH to denature the DNA products and inserted into a
second, alkaline agarose gel (Fig. 2). For reference, another lane from
the initial native agarose gel that displayed the products of the
reaction is shown at the top of Fig. 2. pBR
-1 DNA is 6.5 kb in length. Thus, as is clear from Fig. 2, the majority of the elongated product corresponded to full-length DNA, indicating that the
joint molecules consisted of D loops incorporating all of the invading
strand and that the HE was able to use the invading strand as a primer
and extend it all the way around the template DNA. Note that this
full-length product could not be the consequence of replication of
pBR
-1 DNA that had initiated at either of the two origins of
replication on the plasmid. Initiation from the pBR322 origin requires
RNA polymerase (23), whereas initiation from E. coli oriC
requires DnaA (24), neither of which were included in the reactions.
-dependent and
-independent joint molecules could form during the reaction. Because gyrase is present in the reaction mixture, although the formation of the D loop itself will relax the
plasmid DNA (because the pBR
-1 DNA is unwound), the plasmid DNA in
the joint molecules can become negatively supercoiled. This will also
tend to stabilize the D loop present on the plasmid DNA. Also visible
on the two-dimensional gel was 800-mer that had neither been digested
nor incorporated into joint molecules.

View larger version (22K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Requirements for form X (FX)
formation. Standard reaction mixtures containing the indicated
assortment of proteins were incubated and analyzed as described under
"Experimental Procedures." Both an autoradiogram (top)
and a photograph of the ethidium bromide-stained gel
(bottom) are shown. Lane 0 is the form I
(FI) plasmid DNA. Gyr, gyrase;
-indep
JM,
-independent joint molecules;
-dep JM,
-dependent joint molecules; FX, form X DNA;
FII, form II DNA; JM, joint molecules.
-independent joint molecules
that accumulated during form X formation (Fig. 4, lane 4).
Thus, we conclude that the substrate for HE-catalyzed elongation was a
joint molecule formed by the action of RecA and RecBCD and not a highly
supercoiled DNA that contained a D loop.

View larger version (38K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Joint molecules, not form X
(FX), are the substrate for the elongation
reaction. Reactions were executed in two stages. In stage 1, either joint molecules (JM) were formed using RecA, RecBCD,
and SSB (lanes 1-3) or form X was formed using RecA,
RecBCD, and gyrase (lanes 4-6). In stage 2, HE and gyrase
were added to the reactions shown in lanes 1-3, and HE and
SSB were added to the reactions shown in lanes 4-6.
Reactions were processed and analyzed as described under
"Experimental Procedures." An autoradiogram of the dried gel is
shown. EP, elongated product;
-indep JM,
-independent joint molecules;
-dep JM,
-dependent joint molecules.

View larger version (52K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
RecA is not required for elongation of the
invading strand in joint molecules (JM). Joint
molecules were isolated by gel filtration as described under
"Experimental Procedures." Standard reaction mixtures contained 13 µl of the isolated pool of joint molecules. The complete
reaction (Comp) also contained Pol III HE, SSB, and gyrase
(gyr). Reactions were processed and analyzed as described
under "Experimental Procedures." An autoradiogram of the dried gel
is shown. EP, elongated product; FI-DL, form I D
loop DNA.

View larger version (33K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Characterization of the elongation
reaction. There is no DNA polymerase specificity in the elongation
reaction (A). Standard reactions contained either Sequenase
(Seq, 5 units) or the Pol III HE, as indicated. Reactions
were processed and analyzed as described under "Experimental
Procedures." An autoradiogram of the dried gel is shown.
EP, elongated product; JM, joint molecules;
FI-DL, form I D loop DNA; FX, form X DNA. The
elongation reaction is slow (B). A standard reaction was
increased in volume 5-fold. Aliquots (15 µl) were withdrawn at the
indicated times after the start of the incubation, and EDTA was added
to 25 mM to terminate the reaction. NaOH was then added to
50 mM, and the DNA products were analyzed by
electrophoresis through a horizontal 0.7% alkaline agarose gel at 1.3 V/cm for 20 h using 30 mM NaOH, 1 mM EDTA
as the electrophoresis buffer. DNA size markers were
5'-32P-labeled HindIII fragments of
bacteriophage
. An autoradiogram of the dried gel is shown.
-1 DNA and inhibit joint molecule formation. Thus, we
conclude that the observed elongation reaction represents a generalized
strand displacement DNA synthesis reaction that utilizes the invading strand in the joint molecules as a primer and is driven by negative supercoiling.

View larger version (38K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Negative supercoiling is required for the
elongation reaction. Joint molecules (JM) were formed
in a standard reaction increased in volume 5-fold. The reaction was
then split into five equal portions. One portion was mixed
immediately with EDTA (JM). The other portions received the
indicated proteins, and the incubation was continued for 20 min.
Reactions were processed and analyzed as described under
"Experimental Procedures." Both an autoradiogram (top)
and a photograph of the ethidium bromide-stained gel
(bottom) are shown. The slowly moving band in lane
4 is multigenome-length product produced by rolling circle DNA
synthesis. We have only observed this reaction when purified
recombination intermediates are used as template DNA. G, DNA
gyrase; T4, topoisomerase IV; EP, elongated
product; JM, joint molecules; FII, form II DNA;
FI, form I DNA; FX, form X DNA.

View larger version (73K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 8.
ATP is required to observe elongation of the
invading strand in joint molecules. Standard reactions for either
joint molecule formation (JM), form X formation
(FX), or invading strand elongation (El) with
either wild-type (WT) or K72R RecA and containing either the
standard concentration of ATP and all other nucleotides (ATP) or
lacking ATP and containing 2 mM dATP and the standard
concentration of all other nucleotides (dATP), as indicated, were
incubated, processed, and analyzed as described under "Experimental
Procedures." Both an autoradiogram (top) and a photograph
of the ethidium bromide-stained gel (bottom) are shown.
EP, elongated product; FII, form II DNA;
FI, form I DNA.

View larger version (33K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 9.
RecA filaments are dynamic in the presence of
ATP, but not dATP. Filaments of either wild-type (WT)
or K72R RecA were formed in the presence of either ATP or dATP as
indicated on a 40-bp duplex oligonucleotide (oligo) with a
centrally located RsaI site and a 25-nt 5'-single-stranded
tail (schematically diagrammed at the top of the figure).
RsaI was then added, and digestion of the oligonucleotide
was assessed as a function of time as described under "Experimental
Procedures." DNA products were analyzed by electrophoresis through
8% polyacrylamide gels. Autoradiograms of the dried gels and
quantitation of the digestion are shown. Only about 60% of the input
oligonucleotide could be digested with RsaI. We suspect that
this was because of incomplete deprotection during synthesis.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
3', clearance occurs in a manner that specifically encourages subsequent DNA replication that uses the 3'-end of the invading strand
as a primer for leading-strand synthesis.
/primase, pol
, proliferating cell nuclear antigen, and
replication protein A, are required for BIR, there is no indication
that a helicase is required for the reaction. These observations are
consistent with the type of strand displacement synthesis described here.
![]()
FOOTNOTES
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Haber, J. E.
(1999)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
24,
271-275[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 2.
Kuzminov, A.
(1995)
Mol. Microbiol.
16,
373-384[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 3.
Rothstein, R.,
Michel, B.,
and Gangloff, S.
(2000)
Genes Dev.
14,
1-10 4.
Cox, M. M.,
Goodman, M. F.,
Kreuzer, K. N.,
Sherratt, D. J.,
Sandler, S. J.,
and Marians, K. J.
(2000)
Nature
404,
37-41[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 5.
Kowalczykowski, S. C.
(2000)
Trends. Biochem. Sci.
25,
156-165[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 6.
Kuzminov, A.
(1999)
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
63,
751-813 7.
Michel, B.,
Flores, M.-J.,
Viguera, E.,
Grompone, G.,
Seigneur, M.,
and Bidnenko, V.
(2001)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
98,
8181-8188 8.
Kogoma, T.
(1997)
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
61,
212-238[Abstract] 9.
Marians, K. J.
(2000)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
25,
185-189[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 10.
McGlynn, P., Al-,
Deib, A. A.,
Liu, J.,
Marians, K. J.,
and Lloyd, R. G.
(1997)
J. Mol. Biol.
270,
212-221[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 11.
Nurse, P.,
Liu, J.,
and Marians, K. J.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
25026-25032 12.
Sandler, S. J.,
Sawra, H. S.,
and Clark, A. J.
(1996)
Genetics
145,
5-13[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 13.
Sandler, S. J.,
and Marians, K. J.
(2000)
J. Bacteriol.
182,
9-13 14.
Wickner, S.,
and Hurwitz, J.
(1975)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
72,
921-925 15.
Learn, B. A., Um, S. J.,
Huang, L.,
and McMacken, R.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
1154-1159 16.
Liu, J., Xu, L.,
Sandler, S. J.,
and Marians, K. J.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
3552-3555 17.
Sandler, S. J.,
Marians, K. J.,
Zavitz, K. H.,
Coutu, J.,
Parent, M. A.,
and Clark, A. J.
(1999)
Mol. Microbiol.
34,
91-101[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 18.
Sandler, S. J.,
McCool, J. D., Do, T. T.,
and Johansen, R. U.
(2001)
Mol. Microbiol.
41,
697-704[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 19.
Griffith, J.,
and Shores, C. G.
(1985)
Biochemistry
24,
158-162[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 20.
Roman, L. J.,
and Kowalczykowski, S. C.
(1989)
Biochemistry
28,
2863-2873[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 21.
Hiasa, H.,
and Marians, K. J.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
21529-21535 22.
Anderson, D. G.,
and Kowalczykowski, S. C.
(1997)
Cell
90,
77-86[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 23.
Itoh, T.,
and Tomizawa, J.
(1980)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
77,
2450-2454 24.
Kaguni, J. M.,
and Kornberg, A.
(1984)
Cell
38,
183-190[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 25.
Iwabuchi, M.,
Shibata, T.,
Ohtani, T.,
Natori, M.,
and Ando, T.
(1983)
J. Biol. Chem.
258,
12394-12404 26.
Mok, M.,
and Marians, K. J.
(1987)
J. Biol. Chem.
262,
16644-16654 27.
Hiasa, H.,
and Marians, K. J.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
16371-16375 28.
Lindsley, J. E.,
and Cox, M. M.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
9043-9054 29.
Bork, J. M.,
Cox, M. M.,
and Inman, R. B.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
45740-45743 30.
Egelman, E. H.,
and Yu, X.
(1989)
Science
245,
404-407 31.
Rehrauer, W. M.,
and Kowalczykowski, S. C.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
1292-1297 32.
Shan, Q.,
Cox, M. M.,
and Inman, R. B.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
5712-5724 33.
Menetski, J. P.,
and Kowalczykowski, S. C.
(1989)
Biochemistry
28,
5871-5881[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 34.
Shan, Q.,
Bork, J. M.,
Webb, B. L.,
Inman, R. B.,
and Cox, M. M.
(1997)
J. Mol. Biol.
265,
519-540[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 35.
Burgers, P. M. J.,
and Kornberg, A.
(1982)
J. Biol. Chem.
257,
11468-11473 36.
Gellert, M.,
Mizuuchi, K.,
O'Dea, M. H.,
and Nash, H. A.
(1976)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
73,
3872-3876 37.
O'Donnell, M. E.,
and Kornberg, A.
(1985)
J. Biol. Chem.
260,
12884-12889 38.
Ohtani, T.,
Shibata, T.,
Iwabuchi, M.,
Watabe, H.,
Iino, T.,
and Ando, T.
(1982)
Nature
299,
86-89[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 39.
Kraus, E.,
Leung, W. Y.,
and Haber, J. E.
(2001)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
98,
8255-8262 40.
Hiasa, H.,
and Marians, K. J.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
26959-26968
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. S. Dillingham and S. C. Kowalczykowski RecBCD Enzyme and the Repair of Double-Stranded DNA Breaks Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., December 1, 2008; 72(4): 642 - 671. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. S. Symington and W.-D. Heyer Some disassembly required: role of DNA translocases in the disruption of recombination intermediates and dead-end complexes Genes & Dev., September 15, 2006; 20(18): 2479 - 2486. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W.-D. Heyer, X. Li, M. Rolfsmeier, and X.-P. Zhang Rad54: the Swiss Army knife of homologous recombination? Nucleic Acids Res., September 10, 2006; 34(15): 4115 - 4125. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Ristic, M. Modesti, T. van der Heijden, J. van Noort, C. Dekker, R. Kanaar, and C. Wyman Human Rad51 filaments on double- and single-stranded DNA: correlating regular and irregular forms with recombination function Nucleic Acids Res., June 8, 2005; 33(10): 3292 - 3302. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Fulconis, A. Bancaud, J.-F. Allemand, V. Croquette, M. Dutreix, and J.-L. Viovy Twisting and Untwisting a Single DNA Molecule Covered by RecA Protein Biophys. J., October 1, 2004; 87(4): 2552 - 2563. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. V. Nimonkar and P. E. Boehmer Role of Protein-Protein Interactions during Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Recombination-dependent Replication J. Biol. Chem., May 21, 2004; 279(21): 21957 - 21965. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. V. Nimonkar and P. E. Boehmer Reconstitution of recombination-dependent DNA synthesis in h |