JBC Avanti Polar Lipids

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.C200074200 on March 12, 2002

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 17, 14367-14369, April 26, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/17/14367    most recent
C200074200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clayton, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Browning, M. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Clayton, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Browning, M. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

ACCELERATED PUBLICATION
Aging and Surface Expression of Hippocampal NMDA Receptors*

Daniel A. ClaytonDagger §, David R. GrosshansDagger , and Michael D. Browning§||

From the Dagger  Medical Scientist Training Program, the § Neuroscience Program, and the  Department of Pharmacology, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado 80262

Received for publication, February 6, 2002, and in revised form, March 11, 2002

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Aging is known to alter many physiological processes within the brain including synaptic responses, long-term potentiation, learning, and memory. Aging has also been shown to alter the expression and distribution of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors in many different brain regions, including the hippocampus. Additionally, we have recently reported that young adult rats show an activity-dependent increase in the surface expression of NMDA receptors. We have extended these observations in the present study in aged animals and have found that aged Fischer 344 rats fail to show activity-dependent changes in the surface distribution of NMDA receptors. In conjunction with this observation we have also noted that aged rats show an expression deficit in the C2 splice variant of the NR1 subunit. This subunit is preferentially shifted to the surface following stimulation in young adult animals. As the NMDA receptor is thought to play an important role in neuronal signaling, these observations suggest possible new areas of dysfunction in this receptor that might underlie age-related deficits in neuronal physiology.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Aging has long been known to have detrimental effects upon the function of the nervous system, but the precise molecular mechanisms involved have not been elucidated. Multiple signaling pathways involved in inflammation, antioxidant defenses, developmental gene regulation, and cellular signaling have been implicated as playing a role in the age-related deterioration (1-9). The N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA)1 receptor is thought to play an important role in neuronal signaling because of its ability to flux calcium. This occurs in response to glutamate and concomitant depolarization, thus allowing the NMDA receptor to function as a "coincidence detector." This capability has led some to suggest that the NMDA receptor could be involved in "Hebbian" synaptic plasticity. We and others (5, 9-14) have noted that as part of the aging process, a specific decrease in the expression and function of the NMDA receptor occurs in multiple areas of the brain. Moreover, we have recently demonstrated a correlation between the amount of NR2B subunit of the NMDA receptor in the hippocampus and spatial learning task performance in aged rats (15).

Long-term potentiation (LTP) is a long lasting increase in synaptic efficacy, which can be produced by repeated stimulation of neurons in many regions of the brain including the hippocampus. We have recently reported that LTP stimulation produces a redistribution of NMDA receptors from an intracellular pool to the surface of hippocampal neurons from young adult rats (16). To extend these studies, we have examined the effect of LTP stimulation upon the surface distribution of NMDA receptors in Fischer 344 rats at 4, 16, and 24 months to examine the effect of aging upon this activity-dependent redistribution of receptor. Additionally, in young adult rats, there is a preferential redistribution of the C2 cassette-containing NR1 splice variant subunits to the surface. We therefore also examined the expression of NR1 splice variants in aged animals.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Animals-- Fisher 344 rats were obtained from the National Institute of Aging breeding colony at Harlan Sprague-Dawley at 6, 16, and 24 months of age. After sacrifice the brains were removed and the hippocampi dissected out. 400-µm slices were prepared on a McIlwain tissue slicer and allowed to recover at 32 °C in a perfusion chamber containing ACSF (124 mM NaCl, 4 mM KCl, 1 mM MgSO4, 2.5 mM CaCl2, 10 mM dextrose, 1 mM KH2PO4, 25.7 mM NaHCO3) at a rate of 4 ml/min for 90 min. For surface expression experiments, CA1 mini-slices were prepared directly from isolated CA1 as described previously (16).

Semiquantitative Western Blotting-- Tissue samples for protein expression were sonicated into Tris-buffered SDS (10 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 2 mM EDTA, 1% SDS). Protein concentrations were determined using a modified BCA assay (Pierce). Samples were loaded onto 7.5% SDS-PAGE along with a five-point standard curve for comparative analysis. Whole rat brain homogenate was used as the standard with aliquots from the same batch freshly prepared before each set of gels was run. Gels were transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membrane using a submarine transfer apparatus (Owl Scientific). Following transfer, blots were dried and blocked with 5% milk or 3% BSA in TTBS (10 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.4, 100 mM NaCl, 0.1% Tween 20). Primary antibody was applied for 16 h at 4 C in 1% milk or 1% BSA in TTBS. Secondary antibody was applied for 2 h at 25° in 1% milk or 1% BSA in TTBS. Gels were developed using SuperSignal (Pierce) and were imaged and analyzed using an Alpha Imager (Alpha Innotech). Quantitation was performed using Excel (Microsoft), and statistics were performed using StatView (SAS Institute). Antibodies to NR2A, NR2B, the NR1 splice variants (N-terminal cassette, C1 cassette, C2 cassette, C2' alternate reading frame), and synapsin were produced in our laboratory and have been described previously (16). Antibodies were obtained commercially, NR1 from PharMingen and GluR2 from Chemicon.

Electrophysiology-- Field EPSPs were obtained by the usual protocols. In brief, the Schaeffer collateral pathway was stimulated using a bipolar nichrome electrode, and recordings were made from the dendritic layer of CA1 using a silver electrode contained in a finely drawn glass capillary tube containing ACSF. These field EPSPs were considered as representing mainly AMPA receptor responses. To obtain NMDA receptor responses, AMPA EPSPs were blocked by the administration of 2-µm NBQX. For electrophysiological studies, 1 train of 1-s 100-Hz stimulation was delivered at 50% of the maximal NMDA receptor response. For biochemical studies, LTP was induced in the slice using a multi-rake electrode, which we have described previously. In short, 16 rake electrodes were fixed to a rigid support in a 4 × 4 matrix arrangement allowing for the stimulation of 4 slices at 4 rake positions each (16 stimulation points/mini-slice). Columns of 4 rake electrodes on the same slice were oriented parallel to each other and separated by 500 µm. Adjacent columns were separated by 2.5 mm. LTP was induced by the sequential delivery of four 1-s trains of 100-Hz stimulation per rake electrode separated by 30 s. Rake positions were stimulated in turn across the slice so that only one rake/slice was stimulating at any given time.

Cross-linking for Surface Expression Analysis-- To assay basal and stimulation-dependent surface expression, we employed the membrane impermeable cross-linker, bis(sulfosuccinimidyl)suberate (BS3, Pierce) as described previously (16). For determination of basal surface expression values, slices were allowed to recover for a minimum of 90 min and transferred to either ACSF or ACSF containing 1 mg/ml BS3 for 45 min at 4 °C. To assay stimulation-dependent changes in surface expression, slices were harvested at 30 min post-LTP, and both stimulated and matched control slices were treated with cross-linker. A minimum of three slices per control or treatment groups was included for each animal. To terminate the reaction and quench remaining BS3, slices were washed three times in cold ACSF containing 20 mM Tris, pH 7.6. Surface expression was determined following semiquantitative Western blot analysis and a comparison of cross-linked samples to nontreated controls.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

We have previously reported that aging is associated with a selective decrease in the expression of the NR1 and NR2B subunits of the NMDA receptor with no change in the expression of the NR2A subunit of the NMDA receptor or in the expression of the GluR2 subunit of the AMPA receptor (10). Other groups have found similar results, although age-related decreases in the expression of the NR2A subunit have also been reported (9, 11, 12, 14). In this report we have extended our previous studies by analyzing the surface expression of NMDA receptors in the CA1 region of the hippocampus across the life span of the Fischer 344 rat. We saw no significant differences in basal surface expression in any of the examined targets in rats at 6, 16, and 24 months of age (data not shown). Thus, in marked contrast to the expression of NMDA receptors in aged animals, which is down-regulated, the percentage of the receptor pool that is basally expressed at the surface remains relatively constant with age.

We next sought to examine the effect of aging upon LTP-related changes in surface expression of glutamate receptors in Fischer 344 rats at 6, 16, and 24 months using a multiple "rake" stimulation device (Fig. 1). Surface expression changes following HFS were measured by cross-linking of both stimulated and nonstimulated matched control slices 30 min post-LTP. Samples were then used for semiquantitative Western blotting; as the cross-linker (BS3) is membrane-impermeable, only surface expressed molecules are cross-linked, rendering them unable to enter polyacrylamide gels. The internal pool of receptor, which is not cross-linked, is measured directly. Equal amounts of total protein are loaded, so that changes in surface expression with treatment are reflected in alterations in the levels of intracellular proteins. As previously described, LTP stimulation led to an increase in surface expression of NR2A, 2B, and NR1 in young adult animals (16 months). However, no LTP-related changes were seen in the surface expression of NR1, 2A, or 2B subunits in the 24-month group (Fig. 2). An intermediate effect was seen in the 16-month group. In this group, NR2A shows a trend toward an increase in surface expression with LTP (p = 0.11) (Fig. 2). NR2B was not significantly effected (p = 0.39), nor was NR1 (p = 0.52). There were no LTP-related effects on GluR2 in any age group (Fig. 2).


View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Multi-rake electrode stimulation. Hippocampal CA1 slices were stimulated with a multi-rake electrode to saturate the amount of LTP within slices. This saturation is intended to produce sufficient tissue for biochemical analysis and reduce the amount of unstimulated tissue included in the biochemical analyses. A description of the multi-rake electrode is found under "Experimental Procedures."


View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Surface expression changes with LTP. Surface expression was assayed with the use of a membrane-impermeable cross-linking agent (BS3), which only cross-links proteins on the surface of cells. The cross-linked product is unable to enter polyacrylamide gels, so that only the intracellular pool is resolved by Western blotting. Changes in surface expression are detected by observing changes in this directly detected intracellular pool. A, no significant changes were seen in the surface expression of NR1 (mean % change = 3.34 ± 7.26%), 2A (mean % change = 2.38 ± 6.94%), 2B (mean % change = -3.96 ± 7.61%), or GluR2 (mean % change = -7.26 ± 8.20%) in the 24-month group (n = 7, all p values > 0.9). In the 16-month group, NR2A shows a trend toward a significant change indicating an increase in surface expression with LTP (mean % change = 26.58 ± 6.86%, n = 7, p = 0.11). NR2B was not significantly effected (mean % change = 14.58 ± 16.64%, n = 7, p = 0.39) nor was NR1 (mean % change = 9.61 ± 6.02%, n = 7, p = 0.52) or GluR2 (p = 1). Six-month-old animals showed a significant increase in the surface expression of NR1 (mean % change = 24.37 ± 6.72%, n = 6, p < 0.05) and NR2A (mean % change = 21.23 ± 1.68%, n = 6, p < 0.05) and no change in the surface expression of NR2B (mean % change = 14.76 ± 9.31, n = 6, p = 0.34) or GluR2 (mean % change = 3.69 ± 7.28%, n = 6, p = 0.88). Statistical analyses were performed by ANOVA with Fisher's PLSD post-hoc test. B, representative immunoblots.

As shown previously, the LTP-related increase in surface expression of the NMDA receptor is accompanied by an increase in the function of the NMDA receptor in the CA1 region of the hippocampus. We have replicated this result in young adult animals, as delivery of a single train of 100-Hz stimulation leads to a potentiation of NMDA receptor current of 28% (p < 0.05) (Fig. 3). In 16-month-old animals, stimulation results in a trend toward an increase in NMDA receptor-mediated current (20%, p = 0.14) (Fig. 3). However, in aged animals (24 months), no increase in NMDA receptor current is seen (Fig. 3). All NMDA receptor responses were blocked by the addition of APV (2-amino-5-phosphopentanoic acid).


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   NMDA receptor response with LTP stimulation. Young adult animals show a potentiation of the NMDA receptor response with the delivery of 1 s of 100-Hz stimulation via a bipolar electrode in the presence of NBQX to block AMPA receptor responses (mean % change = 28.4% ± 9.3%, n = 6, p = 0.005). Measurement of the NMDA receptor response in slices from 16-month-old Fisher 344 rats before and after a single train of HFS shows a trend toward an increase after HFS, but the change is not significant (mean % change = 24.2 ± 11.5%, n = 4, p = 0.14 paired t test). Measurement of the NMDA receptor response in slices from 24-month-old Fisher 344 rats before and after a single train of HFS (delivered at arrow) fails to show any changes (mean % change = 3.2 ± 9.2%, n = 4, p = 0.99 by paired t test).

We have also shown that the increase in NR1 surface expression seen with activity in young adult rats is specific for the C2 cassette containing splice variants (16). Thus, as the NR1 subunit is not redistributed in aged animals, we sought to measure the total expression level of the NR1 subunit splice variants in aging. We find that there is a significant decrease in the total expression of the C2 splice variant in aged animals (Fig. 4). Interestingly, the total expression of subunits containing the N1, C1, and C2' cassettes is not altered with age.


View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   NR1 splice variant total expression in young and aged animals. Total expression of NR1 splice variants was measured using semiquantitative Western blotting. N1 cassette containing splice variants: there is no significant difference between 2-month (mean = 2.92 ± 0.52, n = 8) and 22-month animals (mean = 3.06 ± 0.22, n = 24, p = 0.87). C1 cassette containing splice variants: no difference is seen between 2-month (mean = 3.19 ± 0.67, n = 8) and 22-month animals (mean = 3.10 ± 0.39, n = 24, p = 0.99). C2 cassette containing splice variants: a significant difference is seen between 2-month (mean = 3.45 ± 0.54, n = 8) and 22-month (mean 2.03 ± 0.21, n = 24) animals (p = 0.02). C2' cassette containing splice variants: no significant difference is seen between 2-month (mean = 4.84 ± 0.75, n = 8) and 22-month (mean 4.32 ± 0.24, n = 24, p = 0.52) animals. All units are standardized to aliquots of the same batch of rat brain homogenate. All statistics performed across splice variants and across age by ANOVA with Fisher's PLSD post-hoc test. All 2-month sets contain 8 animals and all 22 month sets contain 24 animals.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

NMDA receptor dysfunction in the hippocampus of aged animals has been demonstrated by multiple groups using a variety of techniques (5, 13). We and others have also demonstrated age-related reductions in the expression of the NMDA receptor. In this report we extend those findings by examining the surface expression of the NMDA receptor subunits in the CA1 region of the hippocampus in 6-, 16-, and 24-month-old Fischer 344 rats. We have found that aging does not affect the basal surface expression of NMDA receptors. Although aged animals express less of the receptors, the percentage of total cellular receptor on the surface does not change.

We have recently documented activity-dependent changes in the surface expression of NMDA receptors (16). Extending those findings, we find that aged animals are deficient in the ability to increase the quantity of NMDA receptor at the surface of the neuron in response to activity. Young animals show a significant increase in the amount of NR1 and NR2A subunits at the surface of the neuron (NR2B increases are seen but are not significant), which is not seen in aged animals. Similarly, aged animals fail to show an increase in NMDA receptor-mediated current post-LTP stimulation as is seen in young animals. These findings, in combination, are suggestive of a plasticity deficit in the function of aged neurons, whereby aged animals are unable to increase the amount of NMDA receptor at the surface in response to stimulation. If NMDA receptors are important for forming a "synaptic tag" for synapse formation or enlargement, as has been suggested previously, aged animals should be compromised in their ability to increase synaptic contacts in this fashion. Thus, this described defect in activity-dependent regulation may indicate a mechanism for decreased plasticity in aging mediated by a decrease in the formation or enlargement of synapses with activity. Cycling of receptors and other proteins into membranes occurs both constitutively and with activation of various signaling cascades. Our data suggest that constitutive cycling of NMDA and AMPA receptors is not altered with age. In contrast, activity-dependent cycling of NMDA receptors appears to be altered profoundly as a function of age. The mechanism of this selective deficit in receptor trafficking is unknown; however, one clue may be found in our previous observation that the increase in surface expression of the NR1 subunit is preferential for NR1 subunit splice variants containing the C2 cassette. In examining the expression of NR1 splice variant proteins in aged animals, we find that there is a specific deficit in the expression of the C2 cassette containing subunits. It has been suggested that the cellular quantity of the NR1 subunit protein is determined in part by assembly with other subunits and that the differential assembly of subunits may determine the intracellular distribution of receptor (17-19). Thus, the age-related reduction in the amount of C2 splice variant NR1 subunit may impair the activity-dependent cycling of NMDA receptors. Age-related decreases in the expression of NR2 subunits could also contribute to this scenario, reducing the amount of total functional receptor that could be assembled.

These findings extend our understanding of the cellular distribution of NMDA receptors in aged animals and describe a new deficit in the activity-dependent regulation of the cellular distribution of these receptors in aged animals. Further studies are needed to elucidate the importance of activity-dependent alterations in the surface expression of NMDA in synaptic plasticity in aged animals.

    FOOTNOTES

* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

|| To whom correspondence should be addressed: University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Box C236, 4200 E. Ninth Ave., Denver, CO 80262. Tel: 303-315-6936; Fax: 303-315-0137; E-mail: Michael.Browning@uchsc.edu.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, March 12, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.C200074200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: NMDA, N-methyl-D-aspartic acid; LTP, long-term potentiation; BSA, bovine serum albumin; AMPA, aminomethyl phosphonic acid; ANOVA, analysis of variance; EPSP, excitatory post-synaptic potential; PLSD, predicted least-square distance determination; HFS, high-frequency stimulation; GluR2, glutamate receptor subunit-2; NBQX, 2-3-dihydroxy-6-nitro-7-sulfamoylbenzo(f)quinoxaline.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Lynch, M. A. (1998) Prog. Neurobiol. 56, 571-589[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. deToledo-Morrell, L., Geinisman, Y., and Morrell, F. (1988) Neurobiol. Aging 9, 581-590[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Herman, J. P., Chen, K. C., Booze, R., and Landfield, P. W. (1998) Neurobiol. Aging 19, 581-587[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Bach, M. E., Barad, M., Son, H., Zhuo, M., Lu, Y. F., Shih, R., Mansuy, I., Hawkins, R. D., and Kandel, E. R. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 5280-5285[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. Eckles-Smith, K., Clayton, D., Bickford, P., and Browning, M. D. (2000) Brain Res. Mol. Brain Res. 78, 154-162[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. McGahon, B. M., Martin, D. S., Horrobin, D. F., and Lynch, M. A. (1999) Neurobiol. Aging 20, 655-664[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Joseph, J. A., Shukitt-Hale, B., Denisova, N. A., Bielinski, D., Martin, A., McEwen, J. J., and Bickford, P. C. (1999) J. Neurosci. 19, 8114-8121[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Desjardins, S., Mayo, W., Vallee, M., Hancock, D., Le, Moal, M., Simon, H., and Abrous, D. N. (1997) Neurobiol. Aging 18, 37-44[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Sonntag, W. E., Bennett, S. A., Khan, A. S., Thornton, P. L., Xu, X., Ingram, R. L., and Brunso-Bechtold, J. K. (2000) Brain Res. Bull. 51, 331-338[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Clayton, D. A., and Browning, M. D. (2001) Neurobiol. Aging 22, 165-168[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Magnusson, K. R. (2000) J. Neurosci. 20, 1666-1674[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Kuehl-Kovarik, M. C., Magnusson, K. R., Premkumar, L. S., and Partin, K. M. (2000) Mech. Ageing Dev. 115, 39-59[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Barnes, C. A., Rao, G., and Shen, J. (1997) Neurobiol. Aging 18, 445-452[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Wenk, G. L., and Barnes, C. A. (2000) Brain Res. 885, 1-5[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Clayton, D. A. M. M., Alvarez, E., Bickford, P. C., Browning, M. D. (2002) J. Neurosci., in press
16. Grosshans, D. R., Clayton, D. A., Coultrap, S. J., and Browning, M. D. (2001) Nat. Neurosci. 5, 27-33
17. Huh, K. H., and Wenthold, R. J. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 151-157[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Winkler, A., Mahal, B., Kiianmaa, K., Zieglgansberger, W., and Spanagel, R. (1999) Brain Res. Mol. Brain Res. 72, 166-175[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Okabe, S., Miwa, A., and Okado, H. (1999) J. Neurosci. 19, 7781-7792[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
C. M. Norris, E. M. Blalock, O. Thibault, L. D. Brewer, G. V. Clodfelter, N. M. Porter, and P. W. Landfield
Electrophysiological Mechanisms of Delayed Excitotoxicity: Positive Feedback Loop Between NMDA Receptor Current and Depolarization-Mediated Glutamate Release
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2006; 96(5): 2488 - 2500.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
A.-M. Samuelsson, E. Jennische, H.-A. Hansson, and A. Holmang
Prenatal exposure to interleukin-6 results in inflammatory neurodegeneration in hippocampus with NMDA/GABAA dysregulation and impaired spatial learning
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, May 1, 2006; 290(5): R1345 - R1356.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
A. C. Boudreau and M. E. Wolf
Behavioral Sensitization to Cocaine Is Associated with Increased AMPA Receptor Surface Expression in the Nucleus Accumbens
J. Neurosci., October 5, 2005; 25(40): 9144 - 9151.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
Y.-X. Tao, G. Rumbaugh, G.-D. Wang, R. S. Petralia, C. Zhao, F. W. Kauer, F. Tao, M. Zhuo, R. J. Wenthold, S. N. Raja, et al.
Impaired NMDA Receptor-Mediated Postsynaptic Function and Blunted NMDA Receptor-Dependent Persistent Pain in Mice Lacking Postsynaptic Density-93 Protein
J. Neurosci., July 30, 2003; 23(17): 6703 - 6712.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/17/14367    most recent
C200074200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clayton, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Browning, M. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Clayton, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Browning, M. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.