|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M112066200 on February 11, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 17, 14458-14466, April 26, 2002
2-Macroglobulin Exposure Reduces Calcium Responses
to N-Methyl-D-Aspartate via Low Density
Lipoprotein Receptor-related Protein in Cultured Hippocampal
Neurons*
Zhihua
Qiu §,
Dudley K.
Strickland¶,
Bradley T.
Hyman , and
G. William
Rebeck
From the Department of Neurology, Massachusetts
General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts
02129 and ¶ Holland Laboratory, American Red Cross,
Rockville, Maryland 20855
Received for publication, December 18, 2001, and in revised form, February 5, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
There is increasing evidence that the low-density
lipoprotein receptor-related protein (LRP) can function as a signaling
link in the central nervous system. To investigate the
pathophysiological role of LRP in the central nervous system, we
examined the effects of activated 2-macroglobulin
( 2M*), a ligand of LRP, on intracellular calcium signaling in
cultured rat hippocampal neurons. Neuronal effects of 2M* (50 nM) were assessed by a comparison of calcium signals
produced in control and 2M*-pretreated neurons by
N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) and
-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid. 2M*
pretreatment significantly decreased the calcium signals to NMDA,
whereas little change was observed for the signals to -amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid. Native 2M,
which is not a ligand for LRP, did not affect signals to NMDA. The
receptor-associated protein prevented 2M*-induced decrease of
calcium responses to NMDA, suggesting that 2M* exerted its effects
through an LRP-mediated pathway. Experiments changing calcium sources
demonstrated that 2M* pretreatment altered calcium responses to NMDA
by primarily changing extracellular calcium influx and subsequently
affecting calcium release from intracellular calcium stores. Immunoblot
analysis demonstrated that 2M* caused a reduction in the levels of
the NMDA receptor subunit, NMDAR1. These results suggest that 2M*
can alter the neuronal response to excitatory neurotransmitters and
that 2M* pretreatment selectively reduced the calcium responses to
NMDA by down-regulating the NMDA receptor.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
LRP1 is a 600-kDa
multifunctional cell surface receptor containing multiple ligand
binding sites and a high affinity Ca2+-binding site, which
is important for receptor conformation and ligand recognition (1). LRP
directs ligands, including apolipoprotein E (2) and activated
2-macroglobulin ( 2M*) (1), to degradation. LRP is
expressed in the CNS (3) and also in primary neurons (4) and is
involved in numerous neurotrophic processes, including 2M*-induced
neurite outgrowth (5), up-regulation of LRP expression (6), neuronal
migration (7, 8), and neuronal protection (9, 10).
Among the diverse ligands for LRP, 2M* is of particular interest
because of its robust association with cytokines (11, 12) and
neurodegeneration (13). 2M* is a large tetrameric protein that has
established roles as a pan-proteinase inhibitor and in binding and
clearance of a variety of small molecules, including cytokines (14),
growth factors (15), and endogenous soluble -amyloid peptide (16,
17). When 2M has been "activated" by protease or chemical
modification, it becomes a competent ligand for binding and clearance
by LRP. Although 2M* can be a neurotrophic factor, little is known
about the neuronal function of 2M* on intracellular calcium
signaling. To assess 2M* potential in the CNS, we examined the
chronic and acute effects of 2M* exposure on an important neuronal
function in hippocampus of the brain: calcium signaling in response to
stimulation of glutamate receptors. Calcium plays an important role in
both physiological and pathological processes. Physiologically, calcium
is an important intracellular second messenger and controls a variety
of neuronal functions. However, excessive intracellular calcium is
associated with neurotoxicity (18-21). 2M*-induced changes in
calcium signaling could profoundly affect neuronal function in the
CNS.
Here, the effects of 2M* were examined in cultured hippocampal
neurons, which were grown in relative isolation from other cell types.
The hippocampal neurons express
N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA),
-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid (AMPA)
and kainate subtypes of glutamate receptors. Glutamate is the
main excitatory transmitter in the CNS and is known to play an
important role in neuronal degeneration (18, 22, 23). Calcium signaling
elicited by activation of NMDA and AMPA receptors were assessed using
selective agonists. 2M* pretreatment substantially decreased the
calcium signals produced by NMDA stimulation but not by AMPA
stimulation or K+ depolarization. The decline of calcium
signals was due primarily to a reduction in the influx of extracellular
calcium. The effects of 2M* were mediated by LRP and were associated
with reduced levels of NMDAR1. These results suggest that the elevated
levels of 2M*, for example around plaques in the Alzheimer's
disease (AD) brain, could significantly influence NMDA
receptor-mediated processes and neuronal function in the CNS.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Cell Culture--
Hippocampal neurons from 19-day-old embryonic
Sprague-Dawley rats were isolated by a standard enzyme treatment
protocol (24). Briefly, hippocampi were dissociated in calcium-free
saline and plated on poly-D-lysine (Sigma)-coated tissue
culture dishes at the density of 1.5 × 106 cell/ml.
The neurons were grown in minimum Eagle's medium plus 10% horse serum
and 10% fetal bovine serum supplemented with 30 mM glucose
and 25 µM penicillin-streptomycin. Medium with 10% horse
serum was replaced every 3 days. Treatment with
5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine (20 µg/ml) on the third day after plating
minimized non-neuronal cell proliferation. The cultures survive for
about 20 days in a standard CO2 incubator.
Pretreatment with 2M*--
50 nM 2M* was added
to primary neuronal cultures 6 or 8 days after plating, in which half
the culture media was replaced with medium containing 2% horse serum
during 2M* pretreatment. Control cultures (sister cultures) were not
pretreated with 2M* or other LRP ligands. The neurons were observed
throughout the first 10 days in culture. The 2M*-containing medium
was replaced by physiological saline before calcium measurements were
made. The composition of the physiological saline was 140 mM NaCl, 3.5 mM KCl, 0.4 mM
KH2PO4, 0.33 mM
Na2HPO4, 2 mM MgSO4,
2.2 mM CaCl2, 10 mM glucose, and 10 mM HEPES-NaOH, pH 7.3. Similar pretreatment protocol was
applied to compounds native 2M (50 nM), lactoferrin (500 nM), and receptor-associated protein (RAP) (500 nM).
Intracellular Calcium Measurement--
Intracellular calcium was
determined for individual cells using standard microscopic fluo-3
digital imaging (25, 26). In this study, hippocampal neurons were
loaded with 1 µM fluo-3/acetoxymethyl for 30 min and
incubated in dye-free saline solution for an additional 45 min at room
temperature to allow cleavage of acetoxymethyl ester. The culture dish
was then mounted on the stage of an inverted microscope equipped for
fluo-3 video imaging. Live video imagines of selected microscopic
fields were recorded with photomultiplier (Hamamatsu Photonics,
Hamamatsu City, Japan) and digitized by computer. Images were formed by
a pixel-by-pixel of the 488-nm wavelength-excited imaging. Real time
digitized display, image acquisition, and calcium measurements are made
with Bio-Rad imaging time course software (Imaging Research Inc.). The
somata of ~5-10 cells in each microscopic field were individually
measured. Intracellular calcium levels were estimated by converting
fluorescent intensity to intracellular calcium concentration using the
following formula: [Ca2+]i = Kd(F Fmin)/(Fmax F), where F = measured signal,
Fmax = measured signal for a saturated calcium
solution, and Fmin = measured signal for a
calcium free solution. Calibration was done in vitro using
fluo-3 salt (100 µM) in solutions of known calcium
concentration (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR). Calibration of the fluo-3
signal in neurons required making measurements under saturating calcium
concentrations and was facilitated by introducing extracellular calcium
into cells with the calcium ionophore A23187 (Molecular Probes). The
calcium calibration in vivo was consistent with calcium
calibration in vitro. To avoid photo-bleaching and cell
damages of fluo-3, 1 s of optical recording was followed by a 3-s
break. Analysis of base-line data indicated that little or no bleaching
of fluo-3 fluorescence occurred. The calcium calibration in
vivo was applied to all pilot experiments that showed the
alteration of calcium levels in order to demonstrate that the change of
calcium signals was not the consequence of a change in fluo-3 loading. All experiments were performed at room temperature (~23 °C).
Drug Application--
Cells were stimulated with micropressure
application of either NMDA (100 µM) or AMPA (50 µM), selective agonists for the NMDA and AMPA subtypes of
glutamate receptors, respectively. The agonists were dissolved in bath
saline and applied by a brief (1 s) micropressure pulse from drug
pipettes (1-3-µm tip) placed under visual control near target
neurons. 150 mM K+ (K+ substituted
for Na+ in physiological saline), which causes membrane
depolarization, was applied in the same manner. A dye was included in
the treatment solutions to monitor neuronal exposure, demonstrating
that the agonist or K+ was rapidly distributed over an area
sufficient to expose the target neurons. For NMDA stimulation the cell
bath and agonist solutions were magnesium-free physiological saline
containing 5 µM glycine. For the stimulation of AMPA and
K+ depolarization, the bath contained normal physiological
saline. In some experiments the neurons were exposed to antagonists or other drugs by bath exchange. These drugs included
D( )-2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoic acid (APV), nimodipine,
EGTA, caffeine, and ifenprodil.
NMDA Receptor Analysis--
For analysis of the NMDA receptor
subunits, cell lysates were prepared from the primary rat hippocampal
neuronal cultures. Cells were lysed in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH
8.0, containing 0.5 M NaCl, 4 µM leupeptin, 2 µM pepstatin, 1.5 µM aprotinin, 400 µM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 0.3% Triton-X. The
total cell lysates were centrifuged at 2000 rpm for 30 s, and the
supernatant was analyzed by immunoblot as described (17, 27). Briefly,
equal amounts of protein (~5 µg) were separate by SDS-PAGE (Novex)
and transferred to nitrocellulose membrane. The monoclonal antibody for
NMDA receptor subunit, NMDAR1, was a generous gift from Dr. Anthone
Dunah, Massachusetts General Hospital. The concentration of antibody
NMDAR1 used for immunoblot in this study was 1 µg/ml. From the same
blots, actin was detected by specific monoclonal antibody (AC-40;
Sigma) to assure that equal protein was present in each lane.
Immunoreactivity was detected using horseradish peroxidase-linked
anti-mouse IgG developed with chemiluminescent reagent and exposed to
film. Film were scanned with a Bio-Rad GS-700 imaging densitometer, and
relative levels of NMDAR1 were determined for 2M*-pretreated and
untreated cultures.
Chemicals--
Human recombinant 2M (Sigma) was activated in
methylamine (100 mM) at 1 mg/ml as stock solution and
stored at 20 °C for no more than 2-3 weeks. NMDA and AMPA were
obtained from Tocris Neuramin, and stored as stock solutions at
concentrations of 50 and 1 mM, respectively. APV (Sigma)
was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (Me2SO) at a
concentration of 10 mM as stock solution. Stock solutions
of nimodipine (20 mM; Sigma) were also prepared in
Me2SO. The final concentration of Me2SO was not
more than 0.05% in cell bath solution. In control experiments 0.05%
Me2SO alone had no effects on calcium levels. EGTA
(Sigma) was applied at a concentration of 1 mM to titrate
the extracellular calcium. Caffeine, ifenprodil, and lactoferrin were
purchased from Sigma. Human recombinant RAP was prepared from a
glutathione S-transferase fusion protein as described
(28).
Data Analysis--
Intracellular calcium signals were quantified
by measurement of peak amplitude. The decay phase of intracellular
calcium signaling, Ca30, was also analyzed in some experiments. Resting
calcium level was subtracted from all peak amplitude values and Ca30
amplitude values on an individual cell basis. Each protocol consists of two or three culture sets of hippocampal neurons in which 5-15 neuronal somata in each field were measured. Data from several cultures
were pooled for statistical analyses. Values are expressed as the
means ± S.E. One-way analysis of variance followed by the Fisher
post-hoc test for multiple comparisons determined
statistical significance. p < 0.05 was considered
indicative of a statistically significant difference.
 |
RESULTS |
NMDA-induced Intracellular Calcium Signals--
Glutamate
receptor-mediated calcium influx has been suggested to be an important
factor in neurodegenerative processes, with the NMDA receptor as the
subtype primarily associated (18, 21). In this study, we examined
whether 2M* could alter calcium signaling after stimulation with
NMDA. Fig. 1A shows typical
intracellular calcium recordings from the hippocampal neurons in
control cultures and in cultures chronically exposed to 2M* (50 nM) for 48 h. In both control and 2M*-pretreated
neurons, the calcium response evoked by NMDA was characterized by a
rapid initial peak and a slower recovery phase. The amplitudes of the
calcium signals were significantly smaller in 2M*-pretreated neurons
compared with controls. Mean values for the populations of neurons
studied are shown in Fig. 1B. 2M* pretreatment
substantially decreased the peak calcium amplitudes to NMDA stimulation
by 56% in the cultured hippocampal neurons. In addition to its effects
on the NMDA response, 2M* also decreased resting calcium levels by
17% (Fig. 1, A and B).

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
2M* decreases the calcium
responses to NMDA in hippocampal neurons. Results show
representative recordings of intracellular calcium signals evoked by a
brief (1 s) application of NMDA (at the arrow) from a
micropipette in both control and 2M*-pretreated neurons. Estimates
intracellular calcium are plotted versus time for
representative cells under control condition (open circles
in panels A and C) and either 2M* or native
2M-pretreated conditions (filled circles in panels
A and C). Mean values (mean ± S.E.) for the
population of neurons studied for control neurons (open
bars) and either 2M* or 2M-pretreated neurons (filled
bars) are shown in panels B and D. Averaged
data include resting calcium levels and peak calcium amplitude, in
which the resting levels have been subtracted. Results are pooled from
two to three sets of cultures, and each culture includes two or three
fields containing 7-12 cells/field. *, p < 0.05. The
effects of APV on intracellular calcium signaling were shown in control
(panel E) or 2M*-pretreated neurons (panel F)
in the absence of APV, (open circles) and in the presence of
APV (filled circles).
|
|
To control for nonspecific effects of 2M*, we examined the influence
of native 2M (which is not an LRP ligand) on the calcium responses
to NMDA. In contrast to activated 2M, native 2M did not influence
the calcium response to NMDA (Fig. 1, C and D). This result indicates that 2M must be activated to decrease the calcium response to NMDA.
The effect of APV, an NMDA receptor competitive antagonist, was tested
to determine whether the intracellular calcium responses to NMDA in
both control and 2M*-pretreated neurons were entirely induced by
activation of NMDA receptors. After the neurons were incubated in
saline containing APV (10 µM) for 15 min, NMDA did not
induce a visible increase of the intracellular calcium in either
control (Fig. 1E) or 2M*-pretreated neurons (Fig.
1F). These results indicate that the intracellular calcium
changes produced by NMDA stimulation were specifically induced by NMDA receptor activation in both control and 2M*-pretreated neurons.
The Acute Effects of 2M* Treatment on Cultured Hippocampal
Neurons--
To test whether an acute treatment with 2M* produced
effects similar to the chronic pretreatment, 2M* was applied by
micropressure or bath application at a standard dose (50 nM) and a larger dose (500 nM) to neurons in
hippocampal cultures. In addition, the response to NMDA stimulation was
monitored during acute bath addition of 2M* (Fig.
2). There was no visible intracellular
calcium response to 2M* stimulation when applied by micropressure
pulse at the concentration of 50 nM (Fig. 2A).
Panels C and D in Fig. 2 are representative
recordings of intracellular calcium signals to NMDA stimulation in the
absence (panel C) and in the presence (panel D)
of 50 nM 2M*; panel E shows averaged data of
both resting levels and peak calcium amplitude. Acute 2M* treatment
at the concentration of 50 nM also did not reduce the
calcium responses to NMDA as seen for chronic 2M* pretreatment.

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Acute effects of 2M*
treatment on calcium signaling. Acute 2M* was applied by
micropressure or bath application of a standard dose of 2M* (50 nM) and a larger dose of 2M* (500 nM) to
neurons in hippocampal culture. Neurons were acutely treated with
2M* (at the arrow) at the concentrations 50 nM (panels A) and 500 nM
(panel B). The responses to NMDA stimulation was monitored
during acute bath pretreatment (5-10 min) of 2M* at the
concentrations 50 nM (panels C-E) and 500 nM (panels F-H). The representative recordings
are shown in the absence of 2M* (panels C and
F) and in the presence of 2M* at the concentrations of 50 nM (panel D) and 500 nM (panel
H). The average data (mean ± S.E.) in panels E
and H show the intracellular calcium response to NMDA
stimulation in the absence (open bars) and in the presence
(filled bars) of 2M* at the concentration of 50 nM (panel E) or 500 nM (panel
H) when acutely applied by addition into the bath. In these
figures, the average data include resting calcium levels and peak
calcium amplitude, in which the resting levels have been subtracted. *,
p < 0.05.
|
|
However, at the higher concentration (500 nM), 2M*
dramatically reduced the amplitude of spontaneous intracellular calcium oscillations in hippocampal neurons when applied by micropressure pulse
(Fig. 2B). The spontaneous intracellular calcium
oscillations in neurons were characterized with synchronization of the
calcium oscillations across neurons in a given field. Panel
F and G in Fig. 2 are representative recordings of
intracellular calcium responses to NMDA stimulation in the absence
(panel F) and in the presence (panel G) of 500 nM 2M*. Besides its dramatic reduction of the amplitude
of spontaneous intracellular calcium oscillations, acute application of
2M* at 500 nM significantly decreased the intracellular
calcium responses to NMDA (by 33%) and resting calcium levels (by
14%) (Fig. 2H). The levels of resting calcium in both control and chronic 2M*-treated neurons were determined by averaging the mean of intracellular calcium within the individual oscillations from the same field. These data indicate that a high concentration of
2M* produced acute effects on neuronal calcium signaling that were
not seen at lower concentrations.
2M* Alters Calcium Responses to NMDA via LRP--
RAP is a
protein that facilitates the proper folding and trafficking of LRP
within the early secretory pathway (29). RAP antagonizes the binding of
all known LRP ligands to this receptor in vitro (30). To
test if the tremendous decline in calcium responses to NMDA by 2M*
was due to an LRP-mediated pathway, we co-incubated cultures with RAP
(500 nM) to block the interactions between LRP and 2M*.
Fig. 3A shows a representative
recording and the averaged data of the effects of RAP on the
2M*-induced alteration of the calcium responses to NMDA. 2M*
substantially decreased the calcium responses to NMDA, and this change
was eliminated by co-culture with RAP. RAP alone caused no change in
the neuronal calcium responses to NMDA (Fig. 3B).

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
2M* alters the calcium
responses to NMDA via LRP. Neurons were co-incubated 2M* with
RAP at the concentration of 500 nM for 48 h.
Panel A shows the representative recording and averaged data
(mean ± S.E.) of the effects of RAP on 2M*-induced alteration
of the calcium responses to NMDA. 2M* substantially decreased the
calcium responses to NMDA, and this change was eliminated by co-culture
with RAP. Panel B shows the representative recordings and
averaged data (mean ± S.E.) of the effects of RAP. RAP alone did
not alter the calcium responses to NMDA in both resting and peak
levels. Panel C shows the representative recordings and
average data (mean ± S.E.) of the effects of lactoferrin.
LF in panel C represents lactoferrin. In these
figures, the average data include resting calcium levels (panels
B and C) and peak calcium amplitude (panels
A-C), in which the resting levels have been subtracted. *,
p < 0.05.
|
|
Although 2M* and RAP both bind LRP, only 2M* affected calcium
responses to NMDA. We therefore tested another LRP ligand, lactoferrin,
which is of particular interest due to its association with calcium
signals in blood monocytes (31). Fig. 3C, with the
representative recordings and averaged data, shows that lactoferrin pretreatment substantially decreased calcium responses to NMDA. Averaged data shows a 17% decline in resting levels and 67% decline in peak amplitude, which is similar to the 2M*-induced reduction in
calcium signals. To test if the reduced calcium signaling by lactoferrin was due to enhanced LRP-mediated pathway, we co-incubated cultures with 500 nM RAP. RAP treatment abolished the
effects of lactoferrin on calcium responses to NMDA (Fig.
3C). This result suggests that lactoferrin and 2M* share
the common pathway, LRP, for altering the calcium responses to
NMDA.
Although RAP inhibited the effects of chronic treatment with 50 nM 2M* (Fig. 2), it had no effects on the intracellular
calcium signaling produced by acute treatment with 500 nM
2M* (data not shown). Thus, LRP is involved in the chronic, but not
acute, effects of 2M* under these conditions.
Effects of 2M* on Calcium Responses to AMPA and
KCl--
Hippocampal neurons express multiple subtypes of glutamate
receptors. Therefore, it was of interest to know if the response evoked
by another glutamate receptor agonist was affected by the chronic
2M* pretreatment. We examined the effects of 2M* on the
intracellular calcium responses to AMPA, shown in Fig.
4 A, B
(representative recordings), and C (mean values). Similar to NMDA, AMPA increased intracellular calcium, which was characterized by
an initial peak but quick recovery phase in both control and 2M*-pretreated neurons. However, 2M* pretreatment did not change the calcium signaling of neurons to AMPA. This result indicates that
2M* alters the intracellular calcium responses to NMDA but not to
AMPA.

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Effects of 2M* on
the calcium responses to AMPA and KCl. Representative recording in
panels A and B and mean values (mean ± S.E.) in panel C are shown the effects of 2M* on the
intracellular calcium responses to AMPA. Representative recordings in
panels D and E and mean values (mean ± S.E.) in panel F show the effect of 2M* pretreatment on
calcium signals produced by K+ depolarization in
hippocampal neurons. In these figures, the averaged data include
resting calcium levels and peak calcium amplitude (panels C
and F), in which the resting levels have been subtracted. *,
p < 0.05.
|
|
Activation of NMDA receptors can cause a membrane depolarization that
activates voltage-sensitive calcium channels, resulting in an enhanced
calcium signal. An alteration of this signal by 2M* pretreatment
could contribute to the reduced calcium response to NMDA in the
2M*-pretreated neurons. To test this possibility, the effect of
2M* pretreatment on calcium signals produced by K+
depolarization in hippocampal neurons was investigated. Representative recordings are shown in Fig. 4, D and E, and mean
values are shown in Fig. 4F. Similar to AMPA, both control
and 2M*-pretreated neurons show an initial peak and quick recovery
phase in the intracellular calcium signaling in response to
K+ depolarization. 2M* pretreatment had no effect on the
K+-evoked calcium signaling, suggesting that activation of
only voltage-sensitive calcium channels did not contribute to the
altered intracellular calcium responses to NMDA in 2M*-pretreated
neurons. The results summarized in Fig. 4 demonstrate that 2M* did
not affect calcium entry after stimulation of AMPA receptors or
voltage-sensitive calcium channels.
Influence of Extracellular Calcium Influx on NMDA-induced
Intracellular Calcium Signaling--
LRP has a binding site for
calcium, which may allow LRP to act as a sensor of extracellular
calcium levels (32). We hypothesized that extracellular calcium levels
may alter the calcium binding to LRP and subsequently affect calcium
influx through NMDA-gated calcium channels. Therefore, we examined the
effect of lowering physiological extracellular calcium levels on the
response to NMDA by EGTA titration. Results are summarized in Fig.
5. Lowering extracellular calcium from
2.2 to 0.22 mM reduced the response to NMDA in both control
and 2M*-pretreated neurons. Similar effects were observed in the
calcium response to NMDA (Fig. 5, A and B) in
both control and 2M*-pretreated neurons. The peak calcium amplitude
was decreased by 79% in control and by 85% in 2M*-pretreated neurons (Fig. 5C). Similar reductions were observed in the
decay phase, such as 30 s after stimulation (Ca30), in both
control and 2M*-pretreated neurons (75 versus 85%) (Fig.
5D). These results indicate that extracellular calcium is an
important component of the NMDA response, and the effects of 2M* on
the calcium responses to NMDA depend on the activation of NMDA
receptors (Figs. 1, E and F) rather than on the
concentration of extracellular calcium. However, we found no indication
that altered extracellular calcium levels reduced the calcium signaling
of neurons to 2M* pretreatment, which suggested that the binding
site for calcium of LRP may not play an important role in the different
calcium responses to NMDA induced by 2M*.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Influence of extracellular calcium influx on
the NMDA-induced intracellular calcium signaling of hippocampal neurons
in control and 2M*-pretreated neurons.
Lowering extracellular calcium from 2.2 (filled circles in
panels A and B) to 0.22 mM
(open circles in panels A and B)
reduced the response to NMDA in both control (panel A) and
2M*-pretreated neurons (panel B). The average data
(mean ± S.E.) shows similar reduced effects were observed in the
calcium responses to NMDA in both control (open bars in
panels C and D) and 2M*-pretreated neurons
(filled bars in panels C and D). The
effect of 2M* on L-type VSCC calcium channels was examined by
treating the neurons with the L-type VSCC calcium channel blocker,
nimodipine (Nim; 5 µM). Averaged data
(mean ± S.E.) of peak amplitude (panel E) and Ca30
(panel F) show the effects of 2M* (filled
bars) on L-type VSCC compared with controls (open
bars). Averaged data include peak calcium amplitude and the
amplitude of 30 s after stimulation (Ca30) in both control and
2M*-pretreated neurons (panels C and D) after
the resting calcium levels have been subtracted. *, p < 0.05.
|
|
2M* did not affect the calcium response to KCl (Fig. 4), indicating
that calcium signals from only voltage-sensitive calcium channels did
not contribute to the altered intracellular calcium responses to NMDA
in 2M*-pretreated neurons. However, activation of NMDA receptors can
cause a membrane depolarization that activates voltage-sensitive
calcium channels, contributing to the calcium signal. To determine
whether 2M* affected calcium influx through voltage-sensitive
calcium channels subsequent to the activation of NMDA receptor, we used
an L-type voltage-sensitive calcium channel blocker, nimodipine (5 µM), in control and 2M*-pretreated neurons. Similar
reductions were observed in average peak calcium amplitude in control
and 2M*-pretreated neurons (48 versus 49%, p > 0.05), whereas the difference between control and
2M*-pretreated neurons was eliminated by nimodipine in Ca30 calcium
amplitude (88 versus 57%, p < 0.05) (Fig.
5, E and F). These results suggested that the
L-type voltage-sensitive calcium channels contribute not only to the
intracellular calcium responses to NMDA in both groups but also partly
to the reduced intracellular calcium response to NMDA in the neurons
chronically treated with 2M*.
Involvement of Intracellular Calcium Stores in NMDA-induced
Intracellular Calcium Signaling--
Calcium release from
intracellular calcium stores could also contribute to NMDA-induced
intracellular calcium response in hippocampal neurons. Such release
could be trigged by extracellular calcium influx via either NMDA
receptor-gated calcium channels or voltage-sensitive calcium channels
activated by membrane depolarization. This release is called
calcium-induced calcium release and is controlled by the ryanodine
receptor located on the endoplasmic reticulum. To examine the role of
these stores in NMDA-induced intracellular calcium signaling, both
control and 2M*-pretreated rat hippocampal neurons were tested 1) in
the presence of 20 mM caffeine, which depletes
intracellular calcium stores (33, 34), and 2) in the presence of 10 µM dantrolene, an antagonist of the ryanodine receptor
that blocks calcium-induced calcium release (33-35).
Panels A-C in Fig. 6 show the
effect of caffeine on NMDA-induced intracellular calcium responses of
hippocampal neurons in control and 2M*-treated neurons. 20 mM caffeine treatment reduced the response to NMDA in both
control and 2M*-pretreated neurons (Fig. 6, A and
B). There was an 80% reduction of peak calcium amplitude in
control neurons and a 63% reduction in 2M*-pretreated neurons (Fig.
6C). The difference between control and 2M*-pretreated neurons was greatly reduced by caffeine but not abolished.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Influence of caffeine on the NMDA-induced
intracellular calcium signaling of hippocampal neurons in control
and 2M*-pretreated neurons. The effect of
2M* on intracellular calcium stores was examined by treating the
neurons with 20 mM caffeine (panels A-C) and 10 µM dantrolene (panels D-F). Panels
A and B are representative recordings of control
(panel A) and 2M*-pretreated neurons (panel B)
in the absence of caffeine (filled circles) and in the
presence of caffeine (open circles). Panels D and
E are representative recordings of control (panel
D) and 2M*-pretreated neurons (panel E) in the
absence of dantrolene (filled circles) and in the presence
of dantrolene (open circles). Averaged data (Mean ± S.E.) of peak amplitude (panels C and F) show the
effects of 2M*-pretreatment (filled bars) on
intracellular calcium stores compared with control conditions
(open bars), in which the resting levels have been
subtracted. *, p < 0.05.
|
|
Caffeine treatment at 20 mM also altered resting calcium
levels. Mean resting calcium levels were increased by caffeine in both
control and 2M*-pretreated neurons from 41.6 ± 2.0 to
50.9 ± 3.8 nM (n = 40) in control
neurons and from 28.3 ± 2.1 to 49.5 ± 4.1 nM
(n = 51) in 2M*-pretreated neurons. These results
indicate that only calcium release from intracellular calcium stores
did not contribute to the effects of 2M* on calcium responses to NMDA.
The effects of dantrolene on NMDA-induced intracellular calcium
responses in control and 2M*-pretreated neurons are shown in Fig. 6,
D-F. Dantrolene reduced the calcium responses to NMDA stimulation in both control and 2M*-pretreated neurons (by 54% in
controls and 43% in 2M*-pretreated neurons). These results show
that the control neurons were more sensitive to dantrolene. In
addition, the ryanodine receptor immunoreactivity (relative to
immunostaining in control neurons) was similar in control and 2M*-pretreated neurons (data not shown), which further demonstrated that the 2M* effects on the calcium response to NMDA are not primarily due to the alterations in intracellular calcium stores.
Together, Figs. 5 and 6 demonstrate that 2M* pretreatment altered
calcium responses to NMDA by primarily changing extracellular calcium
influx and, subsequently, affecting calcium release from intracellular
calcium stores. Thus, we hypothesize that extracellular calcium influx
through NMDA receptors plays an important role in the 2M*-induced
alteration of intracellular calcium signaling to NMDA.
2M Alters NMDA Receptor Subunit Function and
Immunoreactivity--
NMDA receptors in rat hippocampal neurons are
comprised of two distinct types of subunits, NMDAR1 and NMDAR2. NMDAR1
is the key subunit that possesses all properties characteristic of the NMDA receptor. NMDAR2 subunits modulate the properties of NMDAR1. The
native receptor in hippocampal neurons is formed by a combination of
NMDAR1 with at least one of four NMDAR2 subunits (referred to as
NMDAR2A, -B, -C, and -D) (36-38). The intricacy of NMDA receptor subunits is due to the variety of combinations of NMDAR1 with the
physiological and pharmacological regulatory subunits, NMDAR2 (38).
Therefore, in this study we only focused on the chronic effects of
2M* on 1) the intracellular calcium responses to NMDA in the
presence of 0.5 µM ifenprodil, an antagonist of NMDAR2B, and 2) the expression of NMDAR1.
NMDA receptors show differential pharmacological and functional
properties depending on their subunit composition (39). Low micromolar
concentrations of ifenprodil acts selectively to block receptors
containing the NMDA2B subunit (40, 41). We examined the effects of
ifenprodil on the calcium responses to NMDA to determine whether
receptor properties were affected by 2M* treatment (Fig.
7, A-C). 0.5 µM
ifenprodil reduced the amplitude of the calcium responses to NMDA in
control neurons, whereas no significant effects were observed in
2M*-pretreated neurons (Fig. 7C). Ifenprodil eliminated
the difference of calcium responses to NMDA between control and
2M*-pretreated groups. Thus, the effects of 2M* on NMDA
receptor-gated calcium channels is limited to the NMDA receptor subtype
NMDAR2B. In addition, we examined the effects of 2M* on the
expression of NMDAR1 using immunohistochemical techniques. Fig.
7D shows that NMDAR1 immunoreactivity in 2M*-pretreated neurons declined by 38% relative to control neurons (n = 7) (62.3 ± 12.1 versus 100.5 ± 1.7, p < 0.02). There were no visible changes in the levels
of control protein, actin, when the same blots were probed with
monoclonal antibody against actin. These data suggest that the reduced
calcium responses to NMDA by 2M* pretreatment is due to a reduced
NMDA receptor number and that a smaller proportion of NMDA receptors in
the 2M*-pretreated neurons contain the combination of NMDAR1 with
NMDAR2B subunits than that in control neurons.

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Effects of 2M* on
NMDA receptor subunit function and immunoreactivity. The chronic
effects of 2M* were examined on 1) the intracellular calcium
responses to NMDA in the presence of 0.5 µM ifenprodil,
an antagonist of NMDAR2B (panels A-C), and 2) the
expression of NMDAR1 (panel D). Representative recordings of
control (panel A) and 2M*-pretreated neurons (panel
B) are shown in the absence of ifenprodil (filled
circles) and in the presence of ifenprodil (open
circles). Averaged data (mean ± S.E.) of peak amplitude
(panels C) show the neuronal sensitivity to ifenprodil in
control (open bars) and 2M* pretreatment neurons
(filled bars) on the intracellular calcium responses to
NMDA, in which the resting levels have been subtracted. Ifen
in panels A and B represents
ifenprodil. *, p < 0.05. The effects of
2M* on the expression of NMDA receptor subunit was also examined
using immunohistochemical techniques in control and 2M*-pretreated
neurons. Panel D shows a representative immunoblot of NMDA
receptor subunit, NMDAR1, from cell lysates in both control
(column 1) and 2M*-pretreated neurons (column
2). The concentration of monoclonal antibody for NMDA receptor
subunit, NMDAR1, used for immunoblot in this study was 1 µg/ml. From
the same blots, actin was detected by specific monoclonal antibody. We
found that NMDAR1 immunoreactivity in 2M*-pretreated neurons
(n = 7) declined by 38% relative to control neurons
(n = 7) (62.3 ± 12.1 versus 100.5 ± 1.7, p < 0.02), whereas no detectable changes in
the levels of actin were observed.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
In this study, we found that exposure of cultured rat hippocampal
neurons to 2M* alters the physiological characteristics of these
neurons by decreasing the resting intracellular calcium levels and the
calcium responses to NMDA. This effect of 2M* appears to be
selective for the NMDA receptor since the response to AMPA and
K+ depolarization were not altered. In addition, we found
that an acute treatment of 2M* did not affect either the resting
calcium level or the NMDA response in control neurons. However, acute application of a higher concentration of 2M* did affect the calcium response to NMDA and dramatically reduced the amplitude of spontaneous intracellular calcium oscillations. RAP prevented the 2M*-induced decrease of responses to NMDA, and another LRP ligand, lactoferrin, showed a similar declined response to NMDA as 2M*, suggesting that
2M* altered calcium signals to NMDA via an LRP-mediated pathway.
Calcium release through intracellular calcium stores subsequent to the
NMDA receptor activation contributed to the decreased intracellular
calcium responses to NMDA in 2M*-pretreated neurons. Initial
analysis of the molecular mechanism for these effects showed that the
reduction of calcium signaling was limited to the NMDAR2B-contaning
receptor, and the NMDAR1 levels were significantly reduced by 2M*
pretreatment. These results suggest that exposure of hippocampal
neurons to 2M* can alter neuronal function by selectively decreasing
the calcium response to NMDA.
The effects of 50 nM 2M* on resting calcium levels and
the calcium response to NMDA required chronic exposure, and were not reproduced during acute treatment. Thus, 50 nM 2M*
appears to exert its effects through a slow regulatory process, such as
receptor expression, rather than by fast effects such as changes in
enzyme activities. However, 500 nM 2M* had acute
effects, reducing both the spontaneous intracellular calcium
oscillations in hippocampal neurons and the calcium response to NMDA
(Fig. 2, F-H). The synchronized calcium oscillations across
neurons in a microscopic field depend on NMDA receptor activation, as
indicated by their reduction by APV (Fig. 1, E and
F) and depend on calcium release from intracellular calcium
stores (data not shown). Neither the alteration in synchronized calcium
oscillations nor the decreased intracellular calcium responses to NMDA
and resting calcium levels were observed when neurons were co-cultured
with 2M* (500 nM) and RAP. Thus, 500 nM
2M* appears to exert several effects on NMDA receptors through a
fast regulatory process independent of LRP. The alterations of 2M* in calcium signaling are consistent with its reported neuronal trophic (4, 6, 42), protective (10), and electrophysiological effects (43, 44).
The current result that chronic 2M* induces a reduced intracellular
calcium response to NMDA complements the results previously reported by
Bacskai et al. (45), in which the intracellular calcium signaling mediated by LRP was associated with NMDA receptor activation. However, in that study, an elevation of resting calcium levels through NMDA receptor was produced by acute 2M* stimulation (45); in this study we reported that 2M* produced a chronic reduction in resting calcium levels. After side-by-side comparisons of
the experiments were performed, we found that different primary neuronal culture conditions account for these differences (data not
shown). These comparisons revealed that the cultured neurons in the
current study had lower intracellular resting calcium levels (by 27%,
p < 0.0002) and were significant smaller in size (by 179% p < 0.0001) than those in the studies of
Bacskai et al. (45). Furthermore, monomeric LRP
ligands, such as lactoferrin, had no effect on that system, suggesting
that the formation of LRP-LRP dimers was necessary for the calcium
response. In the present system, lactoferrin behaved similarly to the
tetrameric 2M* molecules. These differences raise interesting
questions with respect to the influence of the culture condition of
neurons on the sensitivity and response to 2M* pretreatment and
suggest that neuronal responses in vivo may be
heterogeneous, particularly in neurodegeneration.
Activation of NMDA receptors increases intracellular calcium via
several pathways: (a) calcium influx through receptor-gated channels, (b) calcium influx through voltage-sensitive
calcium channels activated by membrane depolarization, and
(c) release of calcium from intracellular calcium stores.
Therefore, 2M* pretreatment could decrease the response to NMDA by
altering one or more of these pathways. Extracellular calcium influx
depends not only on the calcium gradient across the cell membrane but also on the activity of calcium channels on the cell membrane. 2M*
did not alter the responses to AMPA and K+ depolarization
(Fig. 3), although L-type voltage-sensitive calcium channels to some
extent were involved in the calcium responses to NMDA (Fig. 5,
E and F). It is unlikely that the effects of 2M* on the NMDA response are primarily due to a change in calcium influx via voltage-sensitive calcium channels. Studies with depletion of intracellular calcium stores showed that calcium release from intracellular stores plays a prominent role in the reduced calcium response to NMDA in the 2M*-pretreated neurons (Fig. 6). 2M* pretreatment also influenced the NMDA receptor subunit composition, as
evidenced by sensitivity of the calcium responses to NMDAR2B subunit
antagonist ifenprodil and NMDAR1 expression (Fig. 7). With the 2M*
pretreatment, neurons exhibit a relatively smaller proportion of NMDA
receptors containing the NMDAR2B and NMDAR1 subunit than control
neurons. We conclude that 2M* alters the initial influx of calcium
through NMDA receptor-gated channels and, thus, alters all subsequent
effects on intracellular calcium levels. The subunit composition of the
NMDA receptors in hippocampal neurons is known to be deregulated in
neurodegeneration (46) and could be influenced by 2M* pretreatment.
Our cell culture data support the hypothesis that the effects of 2M*
on calcium signaling are through binding to LRP rather than directly
interacting with NMDA receptor. Calcium responses to NMDA can be
blocked by magnesium and APV (Fig. 1, E and F) and potentiated by 5 µM glycine in our study,
demonstrating that the effects of 2M* on calcium signaling are NMDA
receptor-specific. Our data support the model of 2M* directly
binding to LRP and indirectly affecting the activation of NMDA receptor
by modifying the receptor levels (panel D in Fig. 7) then
altering intracellular calcium homeostasis. First, native 2M, which
does not interact with LRP, had no effects on calcium responses to NMDA
(Fig. 1, C and D). Second, another LRP ligand,
lactoferrin, had similar effects as 2M* (Fig. 3C).
Finally, the LRP blocker, RAP, blocked the effects of 2M* (Fig.
3A). The mechanism connecting LRP to the NMDA receptor
remains unknown. In vitro experiments demonstrate binding of
several cytoplasm proteins to LRP, including the Disabled-1 and the
scaffold protein, postsynaptic density 95 (47, 48). In particular,
postsynaptic density 95 is of interest because of its binding to the
NMDA receptor. These proteins may help in signaling transduction from
LRP to the NMDA receptor (49, 50). Other studies found that cytoplasmic
residues of LRP can be phosphorylated (51), potentially affecting the
association of LRP with those cytoplasmic proteins. The molecular
connection between LRP and NMDA receptors will be pursued in the future.
NMDA receptors are known to play an important role in development (52),
synaptic plasticity (53), and the generation of long term potentiation
(54). They also may be involved in the pathological processes
accompanying some neurological diseases. For example, in AD, the
excessive calcium influx via NMDA-gated calcium channels and
voltage-sensitive calcium channels might contribute to neuronal injury.
NMDA receptors have been proposed to be involved in neurotoxicity
caused by -amyloid peptide, in which the neurotoxicity could be
prevented by co-treatment with antagonists to NMDA (21) or calcium
channel blockers (55). The current demonstration of the reduction of
the intracellular calcium signaling in response to NMDA stimulation in
2M*-pretreated neurons, thus, could have important functional
implications under conditions of elevated 2M* around plaques in AD
brain. The functional alterations at the cellular level in AD brain
could lead to reduced calcium toxicity or excitotoxicity, which could
be a contributing factor in the neuronal damage observed in
vivo.
LRP is associated with late-onset AD from several perspectives. Genetic
studies have implicated two ligands of LRP as risk factors in AD; they
are apolipoprotein E (56) and, more recently, 2-macroglobulin ( 2M) (57). Immunohistochemical
studies have found 2M* prominently associated with plaques (13). We
focused on the chronic effects of 2M* because the presence of 2M*
on plaques in the AD brain could expose surrounding neurons to
plaque-associated protein for the life of the plaque. Our studies of
cultured hippocampal neurons examining the relationship between the
NMDA receptor and LRP in neuronal degeneration demonstrate the
potential for LRP to alter important aspects of neuronal function in
the AD brain. Our study provides a context to interpret the genetic
associations of apoE, 2M*, and LRP with AD. A deficiency of
LRP-mediated calcium responses to NMDA in the central nervous system
may predispose toward AD by causing a relative increase in neuronal
degeneration caused by intracellular calcium overload. Further evidence
of how each of these genetic factors alters neuronal function may elucidate a common mechanism underlying disruption of intracellular calcium homeostasis in AD. Moreover, enhancing LRP-mediated calcium signaling or LRP-mediated neurotrophic effects may be a pharmacological approach to decreasing calcium response to NMDA and its associated pathological changes in vivo.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
We thank Dr. David G. Standaert for advice
about the analysis of NMDA receptor subunits.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by Grants from the National
Institutes of Health AG14473 (to G. W. R.) and AG12406 (to
B. T. H.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of
Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 114 16th St., Charlestown, MA 02129. Tel.: 617-724-2433; Fax: 617-724-1480; E-mail:
qiu@helix.mgh.harvard.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, February 11, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M112066200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
LRP, low density
lipoprotein receptor-related protein;
AD, Alzheimer's disease;
2M, 2-macroglobulin;
NMDA, N-methyl-D-aspartate;
NMDAR1, NMDA receptor 1;
APV, D( )-2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoic acid;
AMPA, -amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid;
RAP, receptor-associated protein;
CNS, central nervous system.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Strickland, D. S.,
Ashcom, J. D.,
Williams, S.,
Battey, F.,
Behre, E.,
McTigue, K.,
Battey, J. F.,
and Argraves, W. S.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
13364-13369[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 2.
|
Williams, K.,
Saunders, A. M.,
Roses, A. D.,
and Armati, P.
(1998)
Neurobiol. Dis.
5,
271-279[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Rebeck, G. W.,
Reiter, J. S.,
Strickland, D. K.,
and Hyman, B. T.
(1993)
Neuron
11,
575-580[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Holtzman, D. M.,
Pitas, R. E.,
Kilbridge, J.,
Nathan, B.,
Mahley, R. W., Bu, G.,
and Schwartz, A. L.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (U. S. A.)
92,
9480-9484[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Narita, M., Bu, G.,
Holtzman, D. M.,
and Schwartz, A. L.
(1997)
J. Neurochem.
68,
587-595[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Qiu, Z.,
Strickland, D. K.,
Hyman, B. T.,
and Rebeck, G. W.
(2001)
J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol.
60,
430-440[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Yamamoto, M.,
Ikeda, K.,
Ohshima, K.,
Tsugu, H.,
Kimura, H.,
and Tomonaga, M.
(1998)
Brain Tumor Pathol.
15,
23-30[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Webb, D. J.,
Nguyen, D. H.,
and Gonias, S. L.
(2000)
J. Cell Sci.
113,
123-134[Abstract]
|
| 9.
|
Du, Y.,
Bales, K. R.,
Dodel, R. C.,
Liu, X.,
Glinn, M. A.,
Horn, J. W.,
Little, S. P.,
and Paul, S. M.
(1998)
J. Neurochem.
70,
1182-1188[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Hashimoto, Y.,
Jiang, H.,
Niikura, T.,
Ito, Y.,
Hagiwara, A.,
Umezawa, K.,
Abe, Y.,
Murayama, Y.,
and Nishimoto, I.
(2000)
J. Neurosci.
20,
8401-8409[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Thal, D. R.,
Schober, R.,
and Birkenmeier, G.
(1997)
Brain Res.
777,
223-227[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Yoo, J. Y.,
Wang, W.,
Desiderio, S.,
and Nathans, D.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
26421-26429[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Rebeck, G. W.,
Harr, S. D.,
Strickland, D. K.,
and Hyman, B. T.
(1995)
Ann. Neurol.
37,
211-217[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
LaMarre, J.,
Hayes, M. A.,
Wollenberg, G. K.,
Hussaini, I.,
Hall, S. W.,
and Gonias, S. L.
(1991)
J. Clin. Invest.
87,
39-44[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Crookston, K. P.,
Webb, D. J.,
Lamarre, J.,
and Gonias, S. L.
(1993)
Biochem. J.
293,
443-450[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Narita, M.,
Holtzman, D. M.,
Schwartz, A. L.,
and Bu, G.
(1997)
J. Neurochem.
69,
1904-1911[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Qiu, Z.,
Strickland, D. K.,
Hyman, B. T.,
and Rebeck, G. W.
(1999)
J. Neurochem.
73,
1393-1398[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Choi, D. W.
(1992)
J. Neurobiol.
23,
1261-1276[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Gibbons, S. J.,
Brorson, J. R.,
Bleakman, D.,
Chard, P. S.,
and Miller, R. J.
(1993)
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.
679,
22-23[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Lipton, S. A.,
and Rosenberg, P. A.
(1994)
N. Engl. J. Med.
330,
613-622[Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Mattson, M. P.,
LaFerla, F. M.,
Chan, S. L.,
Leissring, M. A.,
Shepel, P. N.,
and Geiger, J. D.
(2000)
Trends Neurosci.
23,
222-229[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Mattson, M. P.,
Rydel, R. E.,
Lieberburg, I.,
and Smith-Swintosky, V. L.
(1993)
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.
679,
1-21[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Olney, J. W.,
Wozniak, D. F.,
and Farber, N. B.
(1997)
Arch. Neurol.
54,
1234-1240[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Qiu, Z.,
Parsons, K. L.,
and Gruol, D. L.
(1995)
J. Neurosci.
15,
6688-6699[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Minta, A.,
Kao, J. P. Y.,
and Tsien, R. Y.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
8171-8178[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Qiu, Z.,
Sweeney, D. D.,
Netzeband, J. G.,
and Gruol, D.
(1998)
J. Neurosci.
18,
10445-10456[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Luo, J.,
Wang, Y.,
Yasuda, R. P.,
Dunah, A. W.,
and Wolfe, B. B.
(1997)
Mol. Pharmacol.
51,
79-86[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Williams, S. E.,
Ashcom, J. D.,
Argraves, W. S.,
and Strickland, D. K.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
9035-9040[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Zheng, G.,
Bachinsky, D. R.,
Stamenkovic, I.,
Strickland, D. K.,
Brown, D.,
Andres, G.,
and McCluskey, R. T.
(1994)
J. Histochem. Cytochem.
42,
531-542[Abstract]
|
| 30.
|
Battey, F. D.,
Gafvels, M. E.,
FitzGerald, D. J.,
Argraves, W. S.,
Chappell, D. A.,
Strauss, J. F., III,
and Strickland, D. K.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
23268-23273[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Misra, U. K.,
Gawdi, G.,
and Pizzo, S. V.
(1999)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
372,
238-247[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Herz, J.,
Hamann, U.,
Rogne, S.,
Myklebost, O.,
Gausepohl, H.,
and Stanley, K. K.
(1988)
EMBO J.
7,
4119-4127[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Tsien, R. W.,
and Tsien, R. Y.
(1990)
Annu. Rev. Cell Biol.
6,
715-760[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Miller, R. J.
(1991)
Prog. Neurobiol.
37,
255-285[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Charles, A. C.,
Dirksen, E. R.,
Merrill, J. E.,
and Sanderson, M. J.
(1993)
Glia
7,
134-145[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Monyer, H.,
Sprengel, R.,
Schoepfer, R.,
Herb, A.,
Higuchi, M.,
Lomeli, H.,
Burnashev, N.,
Sakmann, B.,
and Seeburg, P. H.
(1992)
Science
256,
1217-1221[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
|
Monyer, H.,
Burnashev, N.,
Laurie, D. J.,
Sakmann, B.,
and Seeburg, P. H.
(1994)
Neuron
12,
529-540[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 38.
|
Hollmann, M.,
and Heinemann, S.
(1994)
Annu. Rev. Neurosci.
17,
31-108[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
McBain, C. J.,
and Mayer, M. L.
(1994)
Physiol. Rev.
74,
723-760[Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Priestley, T.,
Laughton, P.,
Myers, J., Le,
Bourdelles, B.,
Kerby, J.,
and Whiting, P. J.
(1995)
Mol. Pharmacol.
48,
841-848[Abstract]
|
| 41.
|
Williams, K.
(1993)
Mol. Pharmacol.
44,
851-859[Abstract]
|
| 42.
|
Ishii, M.,
Osada, T.,
Gliemann, J.,
and Ikai, A.
(1996)
Brain Res.
737,
269-274[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 43.
|
Qian, Z.,
Gilbert, M. E.,
Colicos, M. A.,
Kandel, E. R.,
and Kuhl, D.
(1993)
Nature
361,
453-457[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 44.
|
Zhuo, M.,
Holtzman, D. M., Li, Y.,
Osaka, H.,
DeMaro, J.,
Jacquin, M.,
and Bu, G.
(2000)
J. Neurosci.
20,
542-549[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 45.
|
Bacskai, B. J.,
Xia, M. Q.,
Strickland, D. K.,
Rebeck, G. W.,
and Hyman, B. T.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (U. S. A.)
97,
11551-11556[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 46.
|
Sze, C., Bi, H.,
Kleinschmidt-DeMasters, B. K.,
Filley, C. M.,
and Martin, L. J.
(2001)
J. Neurol. Sci.
182,
151-159[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 47.
|
Sheng, M.
(1997)
Nature
386,
221-223[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 48.
|
Gotthardt, M.,
Trommsdorff, M.,
Nevitt, M. F.,
Shelton, J.,
Richardson, J. A.,
Stockinger, W.,
Nimpf, J.,
and Herz, J.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
25616-25624[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 49.
|
Christopherson, K. S.,
Hillier, B. J.,
Lim, W. A.,
and Bredt, D. S.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
27467-27473[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 50.
|
Lei, S.,
Czerwinska, E., W, C.,
Walsh, M. P.,
and MacDonald, J. F.
(2001)
J. Neurosci.
21,
8464-8472[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 51.
|
Bu, G.,
Maksymovitch, E. A.,
Nerbonne, J. M.,
and Schwartz, A. L.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
18521-18528[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 52.
|
Cull-Candy, S.,
Brickley, S.,
and Farrant, M.
(2001)
Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.
11,
327-335[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 53.
|
Horn, G.
(1998)
Trends Neurosci.
21,
300-305[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 54.
|
Bliss, T. V. P.,
and Collingridge, G. L.
(1993)
Nature
361,
31-39[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 55.
|
Kanowski, S.
(1998)
J. Neural Transm. Suppl.
54,
195-200[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 56.
|
Strittmatter, W.,
and Roses, A.
(1996)
Ann. Rev. Neurosci.
19,
53-77[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 57.
|
Blacker, D.,
Wilcox, M. A.,
Laird, N. M.,
Rodes, L.,
Horvath, S. M., Go, R. C. P.,
Perry, R.,
Watson, B.,
Bassett, S. S.,
McInnis, M. G.,
Albert, M. S.,
Hyman, B. T.,
and Tanzi, R. E.
(1998)
Nat. Genet.
19,
357-360[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. K. Jensen, K. Dolmer, and P. G. W. Gettins
Specificity of Binding of the Low Density Lipoprotein Receptor-related Protein to Different Conformational States of the Clade E Serpins Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 and Proteinase Nexin-1
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 3, 2009;
284(27):
17989 - 17997.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H.-S. Hoe, K. J. Lee, R. S. E. Carney, J. Lee, A. Markova, J.-Y. Lee, B. W. Howell, B. T. Hyman, D. T. S. Pak, G. Bu, et al.
Interaction of Reelin with Amyloid Precursor Protein Promotes Neurite Outgrowth
J. Neurosci.,
June 10, 2009;
29(23):
7459 - 7473.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. P. Morrison, T.-V. Ton, J. B. Collins, R. C. Switzer, P. B. Little, D. L. Morgan, and R. C. Sills
Gene Expression Studies Reveal That DNA Damage, Vascular Perturbation, and Inflammation Contribute to the Pathogenesis of Carbonyl Sulfide Neurotoxicity
Toxicol Pathol,
June 1, 2009;
37(4):
502 - 511.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Z. Shi, M. Rudzinski, K. Meerovitch, F. Lebrun-Julien, E. Birman, A. Di Polo, and H. U. Saragovi
{alpha}2-Macroglobulin Is a Mediator of Retinal Ganglion Cell Death in Glaucoma
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 24, 2008;
283(43):
29156 - 29165.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H.-S. Hoe, M. J. Cooper, M. P. Burns, P. A. Lewis, M. van der Brug, G. Chakraborty, C. M. Cartagena, D. T. S. Pak, M. R. Cookson, and G. W. Rebeck
The Metalloprotease Inhibitor TIMP-3 Regulates Amyloid Precursor Protein and Apolipoprotein E Receptor Proteolysis
J. Neurosci.,
October 3, 2007;
27(40):
10895 - 10905.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H.-S. Hoe, A. Pocivavsek, G. Chakraborty, Z. Fu, S. Vicini, M. D. Ehlers, and G. W. Rebeck
Apolipoprotein E Receptor 2 Interactions with the N-Methyl-D-aspartate Receptor
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 10, 2006;
281(6):
3425 - 3431.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H.-S. Hoe, D. Wessner, U. Beffert, A. G. Becker, Y. Matsuoka, and G. W. Rebeck
F-Spondin Interaction with the Apolipoprotein E Receptor ApoEr2 Affects Processing of Amyloid Precursor Protein
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
November 1, 2005;
25(21):
9259 - 9268.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Gveric, B. M. Herrera, and M. L. Cuzner
tPA Receptors and the Fibrinolytic Response in Multiple Sclerosis Lesions
Am. J. Pathol.,
April 1, 2005;
166(4):
1143 - 1151.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Kvajo, H. Albrecht, M. Meins, U. Hengst, E. Troncoso, S. Lefort, J. Z. Kiss, C. C. H. Petersen, and D. Monard
Regulation of Brain Proteolytic Activity Is Necessary for the In Vivo Function of NMDA Receptors
J. Neurosci.,
October 27, 2004;
24(43):
9734 - 9743.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. May, A. Rohlmann, H. H. Bock, K. Zurhove, J. D. Marth, E. D. Schomburg, J. L. Noebels, U. Beffert, J. D. Sweatt, E. J. Weeber, et al.
Neuronal LRP1 Functionally Associates with Postsynaptic Proteins and Is Required for Normal Motor Function in Mice
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
October 15, 2004;
24(20):
8872 - 8883.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T.-Y. Ling, C.-L. Chen, Y.-H. Huang, I-H. Liu, S. S. Huang, and J. S. Huang
Identification and Characterization of the Acidic pH Binding Sites for Growth Regulatory Ligands of Low Density Lipoprotein Receptor-related Protein-1
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 10, 2004;
279(37):
38736 - 38748.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Z. Qiu, B. T. Hyman, and G. W. Rebeck
Apolipoprotein E Receptors Mediate Neurite Outgrowth through Activation of p44/42 Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase in Primary Neurons
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 13, 2004;
279(33):
34948 - 34956.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Kinoshita, T. Shah, M. M. Tangredi, D. K. Strickland, and B. T. Hyman
The Intracellular Domain of the Low Density Lipoprotein Receptor-related Protein Modulates Transactivation Mediated by Amyloid Precursor Protein and Fe65
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 17, 2003;
278(42):
41182 - 41188.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
U. K. Misra, M. Gonzalez-Gronow, G. Gawdi, J. P. Hart, C. E. Johnson, and S. V. Pizzo
The Role of Grp 78 in alpha 2-Macroglobulin-induced Signal Transduction. EVIDENCE FROM RNA INTERFERENCE THAT THE LOW DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN RECEPTOR-RELATED PROTEIN IS ASSOCIATED WITH, BUT NOT NECESSARY FOR, GRP 78-MEDIATED SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 25, 2002;
277(44):
42082 - 42087.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|