HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 17, 14539-14546, April 26, 2002

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 277/17/14539    most recent M111224200v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by van den Bemd, G.-J. C. M. Articles by van Leeuwen, J. P. T. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by van den Bemd, G.-J. C. M. Articles by van Leeuwen, J. P. T. M. Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

A Central Dinucleotide within Vitamin D Response Elements Modulates DNA Binding and Transactivation by the Vitamin D Receptor in Cellular Response to Natural and Synthetic Ligands^*

Gert-Jan C. M. van den Bemd^§, Mila Jhamai^§, Ada Staal^¶, André J. van Wijnen^¶, Jane B. Lian^¶, Gary S. Stein^¶, Huibert A. P. Pols, and Johannes P. T. M. van Leeuwen

From the  Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands and the ^¶ Department of Cell Biology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts 01655

Received for publication, November 26, 2001, and in revised form, February 6, 2002

	ABSTRACT

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

There is considerable divergence in the sequences of steroid receptor response elements, including the vitamin D response elements (VDREs). Two major VDRE-containing and thus 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D₃ (1,25-(OH)₂D₃)-regulated genes are the two non-collagenous, osteoblast-derived bone matrix proteins osteocalcin and osteopontin. We observed a stronger induction of osteopontin than osteocalcin mRNA expression by 1,25-(OH)₂D₃. Subsequently, we have shown that vitamin D receptor/retinoid X receptor  (VDR/RXR) heterodimers bind more tightly to the osteopontin VDRE than to the osteocalcin VDRE. Studies using point mutants revealed that the internal dinucleotide at positions 3 and 4 of the proximal steroid half-element are most important for modulating the strength of receptor binding. In addition, studies with VDRE-driven luciferase reporter gene constructs revealed that the central dinucleotide influences the transactivation potential of VDR/RXR with the same order of magnitude as that observed in the DNA binding studies. The synthetic vitamin D analog KH1060 is a more potent stimulator of transcription and inducer of VDRE binding of VDR/RXR in the presence of nuclear factors isolated from ROS 17/2.8 osteoblast-like cells than the natural ligand 1,25-(OH)₂D₃. Interestingly, however, KH1060 is comparable or even less potent than 1,25-(OH)₂D₃ in stimulating VDRE binding of in vitro synthesized VDR/RXR. Thus, the extent of 1,25-(OH)₂D₃- and KH1060-dependent binding of VDR/RXR is specified by a central dinucleotide in the VDRE, and the ligand-induced effects on DNA binding are in part controlled by the cellular context of nuclear proteins.

	INTRODUCTION

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

The classic role of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D₃ (1,25-(OH)₂D₃)¹ includes regulating the expression of genes involved in calcium and bone metabolism (1). In addition, the hormone is an important mediator of cell growth and differentiation (2, 3). In a large number of 1,25-(OH)₂D₃-dependent target genes, distinct vitamin D response elements (VDREs) have been identified that are composed of two hexameric half-sites separated by three base pairs (DR3-type VDRE). The vitamin D receptor (VDR)/retinoid X receptor (RXR) complex binds with defined polarity to these VDREs with the RXR occupying the distal half-site and the VDR the proximal half-site (4-7).

The spacing of the half-sites plays an important role in specifying the type of receptor pair that interacts with hormone response elements (7). There is considerable divergence in the nucleotide sequence of the distal and proximal half-site, which is attributable at least in part to redundancy in the consensus recognition motifs of the VDR and the RXR (8). The sequences of steroid hormone half-elements also influence the relative affinities for different steroid hormone receptors and thus may support receptor-specific gene activation by discriminating between different receptors (7). In addition, specific nucleotides in the VDRE appear to influence the conformation of bound VDR/RXR heterodimers, reflected by a VDRE-specific alteration in epitope accessibility (6). Furthermore, minor changes in the nucleotide sequence of half-elements can change a negative VDRE that suppresses transcription into a positive VDRE, which transactivates in a 1,25-(OH)₂D₃-dependent manner (9). The impact of minor changes in nucleotide sequences on receptor DNA binding is not restricted to VDR/VDRE interactions, as evidenced by half-element point mutations that have been shown to alter the affinity (10) or identity of the cognate receptor (11).

Two major 1,25-(OH)₂D₃-regulated genes are the two non-collagenous, osteoblast-derived bone matrix proteins osteocalcin and osteopontin. These genes have sequence variations in their VDREs (Refs. 12-14 and Table I). To gain insight into the biological relevance of nucleotide variation in naturally occurring VDREs for the action of 1,25-(OH)₂D₃ and its potent analog KH1060 (15-18), we examined the binding and activity of the osteocalcin and osteopontin VDREs. The main finding of our study is that nucleotide differences between osteopontin and osteocalcin VDREs affect DNA binding and transactivation in response to 1,25-(OH)₂D₃ and its potent analog, KH1060. Our findings show that the primary sequence of VDREs may influence the biological activities of natural and synthetic ligands that bind to the VDR. Finally, the strong biological potency of the analog KH1060 is only reflected by DNA binding of VDR/RXR heterodimers in the environment of nuclear proteins and not by the binding of in vitro synthesized VDR and RXR, underscoring the importance of a cellular context for ligand-induced DNA binding.

	EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

Reagents-- 1,25-(OH)₂D₃ and KH1060 were a gift from L. Binderup, Leo Pharmaceuticals, Ballerup, Denmark. -Minimal essential medium was from Sigma. VDRE-encoding oligonucleotides, fetal bovine serum, penicillin, streptomycin, and L-glutamine were purchased from Invitrogen. The coupled in vitro transcription and translation rabbit reticulocyte lysate system (TNT lysate assay), NheI, BglII, Tfx-50, the pGL3 control and promoter plasmids, and the luciferase assay reagent were from Promega, Madison, WI. The rat osteocalcin and osteopontin cDNA probes were generously provided by Dr. M. Noda (West Point, PA).

Cells-- The osteoblast-like osteosarcoma cell line ROS 17/2.8 was cultured in -minimal essential medium supplemented with 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 units/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, 0.1% D-glucose, and 10% fetal bovine serum. When the cells reached subconfluence, the medium was replaced by -minimal essential medium containing 2% charcoal-treated fetal bovine serum. After 24 h of culture, ligand incubations or transfections were performed for the indicated period of time.

RNA Extraction and Northern Blot Analyses-- ROS 17/2.8 cells were cultured as described above, and 24 h after the addition of 1,25-(OH)₂D₃, RNA was isolated. RNA isolation was performed according to the method of Chomczynski and Sacchi (19). Electrophoresis of total RNA (30 µg) through a formaldehyde gel and Northern blotting (GeneScreen filters) were performed according to the method described by Davis et al. (20). The cDNA probes included a 0.52-kb rat osteocalcin fragment, a 1.3-kb rat osteopontin fragment, and a 0.8-kb human glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase fragment.

In Vitro Synthesis of VDR and RXR and Preparation of Nuclear Extracts-- Human recombinant VDR and RXR were in vitro synthesized with the Promega TNT lysate assay according to the instructions of the manufacturer using cDNA encoding for human VDR (in pGem4; a gift from M. R. Haussler, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ) and RXR (in pSG5; a gift from P. Chambon, INSERM, Strasbourg, France). For the preparation of nuclear extracts, ROS 17/2.8 rat osteoblast-like cells were incubated for 1 h with 1,25-(OH)₂D₃ or KH1060. Next, nuclear extracts were prepared in 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 420 mM KCl, 25% glycerol, and 0.2 mM EDTA according to the method described previously (6).

Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay-- Electrophoretic mobility shift assays were performed as described earlier (6). In brief, 10 µl of a mixture of in vitro synthesized VDR and RXR was treated for 15 min at 37 °C with a ligand (1,25-(OH)₂D₃ or KH1060), or 10 µl of diluted nuclear extract (5 µg of protein) was incubated for 15 min at room temperature with 10 µl of ³²P-labeled oligonucleotides (10 fmol). The oligonucleotides used in this study are presented in Table I. The protein-DNA complexes formed were separated on a 5% polyacrylamide gel (acrylamide/bisacrylamide, 80:1) in 0.5× TBE buffer (1 × TBE is 50 mM Tris, 50 mM boric acid, and 1 mM EDTA). In the competition experiments, ³²P-labeled oligonucleotides and different concentrations of unlabeled oligonucleotides were mixed and subsequently incubated with nuclear extract. The VDR ligand-responsive complex was visualized by exposure to Fuji RX medical x-ray film. All electrophoretic mobility shift assays were performed with excess probe, but for reasons of clarity in most figures only the shifted bands are shown.

Transactivation Assay-- Oligonucleotides with BglII- and NheI-compatible ends containing the rat osteocalcin (5'-CTAGCTGCACTGGGTGAatgAGGACATTACTGA-3') or the OC/OP VDRE (5'-CTAGCTGCACTGGGTGAatgGGTTCATTACTGA-3'; VDREs are shown in bold; the underlined nucleotides are distinct from the corresponding nucleotides within the proximal rat osteocalcin VDRE half-site) were cloned into the multiple cloning site of the pGL3 promoter vector containing luciferase cDNA as the reporter gene. Sequences were confirmed by dideoxy sequencing using a 310 genetic analyzer (PerkinElmer Life Sciences). Cells (ROS 17/2.8 rat osteoblast-like cell line, MG-63 human osteoblast-like cell line, ECC-1 human endometrium carcinoma cell line, and MCF-7 human breast cancer cell line) cultured in 10 cm² dishes were transfected with 5 µg of reporter plasmid/well using Tfx-50 reagent. The pGL3 control plasmid was used as a normalization vector. Cells recovered for 4 h and were then treated with vehicle (0.1% ethanol) or 10⁸ M 1,25-(OH)₂D₃ or KH1060. Luciferase activity was measured after 24 h of ligand incubation using a luciferase assay reagent and the Lumac Biocounter M2500.

	RESULTS

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

Vitamin D-regulated Expression of Osteocalcin and Osteopontin mRNA-- Incubation for 24 h of ROS 17/2.8 osteoblasts with 1,25-(OH)₂D₃ resulted in a dose-dependent induction of both osteocalcin and osteopontin mRNA expression (Fig. 1). Fig. 1 clearly demonstrates that 1,25-(OH)₂D₃ more potently induces osteopontin mRNA than osteocalcin mRNA expression in ROS 17/2.8 osteoblast-like cells.

View larger version (68K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 1.   Dose-dependent induction of osteocalcin and osteopontin mRNA expression. RNA from ROS17/2.8 cells was isolated and processed as described under "Experimental Procedures." RNA was subsequently hybridized with osteocalcin (A), osteopontin (B), and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) (C) cDNA probes. The Northern blots presented in panels A-C were quantitated by densitometric scanning, and the absorbance ratios of osteocalcin mRNA or osteopontin mRNA to that of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase mRNA are expressed (D).

Ligand-dependent Binding of the VDR/RXR Heterodimer-- Electrophoretic mobility shift assays revealed that the binding of in vitro synthesized VDR/RXR to the VDREs (Table I) was 1,25-(OH)₂D₃ concentration-dependent. In the absence of 1,25-(OH)₂D₃ only minor VDR/RXR binding was observed, and 1,25-(OH)₂D₃ enhanced the binding of in vitro synthesized recombinant VDR/RXR to the human and rat osteocalcin VDREs and the mouse osteopontin VDRE in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 2). The importance of Fig. 2 is that the VDR/RXR heterodimer preferentially interacts with the osteopontin VDRE, exhibits intermediate binding to the human osteocalcin VDRE, and binds less strongly to the rat osteocalcin VDRE. The electrophoretic mobility shift assays were also performed with nuclear extracts of ROS 17/2.8 osteoblast-like cells, for which we have previously demonstrated with monoclonal antibodies that 1,25-(OH)₂D₃ induces VDR/RXR complexes (6). Also here, the intensity of the shifted complex was strongest for the osteopontin VDRE and lowest for the rat osteocalcin VDRE (Fig. 3A).

View larger version (73K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 2.   Binding of in vitro synthesized VDR and RXR to rat osteocalcin, human osteocalcin, or mouse osteopontin VDREs. A, in vitro synthesized VDR and RXR were incubated for 10 min with vehicle (0.1% ethanol) or increasing amounts of 1,25-(OH)2D3 or KH1060 (1010-107 M) and subsequently incubated with 10 fmol of 32P-labeled ROC, human osteocalcin (HOC), or mouse osteopontin (MOP) VDREs, and protein-DNA complexes were separated by gel electrophoresis. The DNA-bound VDR/RXR heterodimers are indicated by the arrowheads. B, a computerized optical density scan of the shifted complex is shown. The absorbance value of the shifted ROC VDRE VDR/RXR complex at 108 M 1,25-(OH)2D3 was set to 1. Data represent the means of four independent experiments ± S.E.

View larger version (35K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 3.   Binding of nuclear proteins of ROS 17/2.8 osteoblast-like cells to hybrid rat osteocalcin and mouse osteopontin (MOP) VDREs. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays were performed with nuclear extracts from 1,25-(OH)2D3- or KH1060-treated (1010 or 108 M, 1 h) ROS 17/2.8 osteoblast-like cells. Nuclear extracts were incubated with 10 fmol of 32P-labeled oligonucleotides encoding for wild-type (A) and substitution mutation VDREs (B) (see Table I for VDRE sequences). The arrowheads indicate shifted complexes. In panel C, a computerized optical density scan of the shifted complex is shown. The absorbance value of the shifted ROC VDRE-VDR/RXR complex at 108 M 1,25-(OH)2D3 was set to 1. Data represent the means of four independent experiments ± S.E.

Ligand Specificity for Binding Requires a Cellular Context-- In comparison with 1,25-(OH)₂D₃ we also investigated the effect of the biologically very active 1,25-(OH)₂D₃ analog KH1060 (15-18) on VDR/RXR VDRE binding. Using in vitro synthesized VDR/RXR and the mouse osteopontin VDRE, KH1060 was only slightly more potent than 1,25-(OH)₂D₃. Unexpectedly, in view of its potent induction of osteocalcin production (15), KH1060 and 1,25-(OH)₂D₃ had a comparable stimulatory effect on VDR/RXR binding to the human osteocalcin VDRE, and the potency of KH1060 to induce VDR/RXR binding to the rat osteocalcin VDRE was even lower than that of 1,25-(OH)₂D₃ (Fig. 2). Interestingly, however, when nuclear extracts of 1,25-(OH)₂D₃- or KH1060-treated ROS 17/2.8 osteoblast-like cells were used, KH1060 induced DNA binding more strongly than 1,25-(OH)₂D₃ not only to the human osteocalcin VDRE (data not shown) and osteopontin but also to the rat osteocalcin VDRE (Fig. 3A). Thus, bone cell nuclear proteins are required for VDR/RXR binding to reflect physiological responsiveness to the hormone.

The VDR Binding Site of the Mouse Osteopontin Gene Confers High Affinity DNA Binding-- To study in more detail the contribution of the various hexamer motifs in this differential preference for DNA binding, we introduced substitution mutations, replacing rat osteocalcin VDRE half-sites with osteopontin VDRE half-sites (Table I). With both nuclear extracts (Fig. 3B) and in vitro synthesized VDR and RXR (Fig. 4), replacement of the distal rat osteocalcin VDRE half-element with the corresponding osteopontin VDRE half-site (OP/OC) only slightly increased the intensity of the 1,25-(OH)₂D₃- and KH1060-induced shifted band. In contrast, substitution of the proximal half-site alone (OC/OP) or in combination with the distal half-site (OP/OP) led to a strong increase in DNA binding to levels comparable with that of the intact osteopontin VDRE. This was observed with both in vitro synthesized VDR/RXR and nuclear extracts and with 1,25-(OH)₂D₃ as well as KH1060 (Figs. 3 and 4). These findings clearly show that the proximal VDRE half-site, i.e. the VDR-binding site, has the largest impact on the extent of VDR/RXR binding to DNA.

View larger version (33K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 4.   Binding of in vitro synthesized VDR and RXR to hybrid rat osteocalcin and mouse osteopontin (MOP) VDREs. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays were performed with in vitro synthesized VDR and RXR incubated with vehicle (0.1% ethanol) or increasing amounts of 1,25-(OH)2D3 or KH1060 (109 M, lane 9; 108 M, lane 8; 107 M, lane 7) and subsequently with 32P-labeled oligonucleotides encoding for wild-type (A) and substitution mutation VDREs (B) as presented in Table I. In panel C, a computerized optical density scan of the shifted complex is shown. The absorbance value of the shifted ROC VDRE-VDR/RXR complex at 108 M 1,25-(OH)2D3 was set to 1. Data represent the means of two independent experiments ± S.E.

Both Position and Sequencing of the VDRE Half-sites Are Critical Components-- Using single substitution mutations, we further investigated which nucleotide(s) in the proximal half-site is/are significant in determining the observed differences in VDRE binding. The significance of the 3T and 4T nucleotides in the proximal half-site of the osteopontin VDRE was already noted (6, 21). Here, we show that the introduction of one (PM 3T, PM 4T) or both of these nucleotides (PM 3T4T) strongly enhanced 1,25-(OH)₂D₃-induced VDR/RXR VDRE binding. Additional substitution of 1G (PM 1G3T and PM 1G4T) had no clear supplementary effect (Fig. 5).

View larger version (39K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 5.   Binding of nuclear proteins of ROS 17/2.8 osteoblast-like cells to rat osteocalcin VDREs containing specific point mutations. A, electrophoretic mobility shift assays were performed with nuclear extracts from 1,25-(OH)2D3-treated (1012 M, lane 12; 1010 M, lane 10; 108 M, lane 8; 1 h) ROS 17/2.8 osteoblast-like cells and 32P-labeled oligonucleotides encoding for wild-type and point mutated VDREs as presented in Table I. B, a computerized optical density scan of the shifted complex is shown. The absorbance value of the shifted ROC VDRE-VDR/RXR complex at 108 M 1,25-(OH)2D3 was set to 1. Data represent the means of two independent experiments ± S.E. MOP, mouse OP.

Sequence Variations within VDRE Half-sites Determine VDR/RXR Affinity for DNA Binding-- We also studied whether the differences in binding to VDREs are reflected by the differences in affinity for these VDREs. Competition analysis using ³²P-labeled rat osteocalcin VDRE and increasing amounts (10-1,000 fmol) of unlabeled competitor oligonucleotides (rat osteocalcin or mouse osteopontin VDRE) showed that in vitro synthesized VDR/RXR displayed an increased affinity for mouse osteopontin VDRE (Fig. 6). We further investigated the impact of differences in nucleotide sequences on the affinity of nuclear extracts for the wild-type rat osteocalcin VDRE and the OC/OP VDRE. Competition assays revealed that nuclear proteins of ROS 17/2.8 osteoblast-like cells displayed an increased binding affinity for OC/OP VDRE (Fig. 7).

View larger version (42K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 6.   Competition electrophoretic mobility shift analysis with in vitro synthesized VDR/RXR and rat osteocalcin VDRE. A, in vitro synthesized VDR/RXR incubated with 1,25-(OH)2D3 (108 M, 10 min) was incubated with a mixture of 10 fmol of 32P-labeled rat osteocalcin VDRE-containing oligonucleotides and increasing amounts of unlabeled ROC or mouse OP (MOP) competitor oligonucleotides (10-1,000 fmol). B, a computerized optical density scan of the shifted complex is shown. The absorbance value of the shifted complex in the absence of competitor was set to 1. Data represent the means of two independent experiments ± S.D.

View larger version (40K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 7.   Competition electrophoretic mobility shift analysis with nuclear extracts of ROS 17/2.8 osteoblast-like cells and OC/OP VDRE. A, a nuclear extract of ROS 17/2.8 osteoblast-like cells incubated with 1,25-(OH)2D3 (108 M, 1 h) was incubated with a mixture of 10 fmol of 32P-labeled OC/OP VDRE-containing oligonucleotides and increasing amounts of unlabeled competitor ROC or OC/OP oligonucleotides (10-1000 fmol). B, a computerized optical density scan of the shifted complex is shown. The absorbance value of the shifted complex in the absence of competitor was set to 1. Data represent the means of three independent experiments ± S.D.

Strength of VDR/RXR Binding to VDREs Determines Ligand-dependent Transactivation-- Finally, to establish the functional consequences of differences in VDRE binding strength, we monitored ligand-dependent transactivation by the VDR using VDRE-driven luciferase reporter gene constructs that were transfected into ROS 17/2.8 osteoblast-like cells. ROS 17/2.8 osteoblast-like cells were transfected with a pGL3 luciferase reporter vector containing rat osteocalcin or OC/OP VDRE sequences. As shown in Table I, these VDREs differ only by 3 nucleotides in the proximal half-site. We found that the transactivation activity of 1,25-(OH)₂D₃ and KH1060 was enhanced 2-fold when the first, third, and fourth nucleotides of the proximal half-site of the rat osteocalcin VDRE were replaced by the corresponding nucleotides of the mouse osteopontin VDRE (Fig. 8). Similar findings were observed using other cell lines, i.e. MG-63 osteoblast-like cells, MCF-7 breast cancer cells, and ECC-1 endometrium cancer cells (data not shown). These data corroborate our initial observations on the more potent induction of osteopontin than of osteocalcin mRNA expression by 1,25-(OH)₂D₃.

View larger version (14K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 8.   Transactivation assay with ROS 17/2.8 osteoblast-like cells transiently transfected with a luciferase reporter gene driven by either the rat osteocalcin VDRE or OC/OP hybrid VDRE. The rat osteocalcin VDRE (open bars) and OC/OP VDRE (solid bars) were transiently transfected into ROS 17/2.8 osteoblast-like cells as described under "Experimental Procedures." Luciferase activity was measured after 24 h of ligand incubation. The luciferase activity measured in the vehicle-treated ROS 17/2.8 osteoblast-like cells transfected with the wild-type rat osteocalcin VDRE was set to 1. Data represent the means of three independent experiments ± S.D.

	DISCUSSION

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

In this study, we have shown that the biological activity of osteocalcin and osteopontin enhancer VDREs depends on specific nucleotides in the proximal half-sites, providing a mechanism to explain the differences in mRNA expression of these genes in osteoblastic cells. The key mutations we have tested that demonstrate increased VDR/RXR binding and vitamin D-dependent gene activation are identical to those we have previously shown affect receptor conformation (6) and are analogous to those studied by Koszewski et al. (9), which are involved in receptor-dependent repression. An important observation in the present study is the difference in intensity in the DNA-bound complexes between the three naturally occurring VDRE types tested. We show that the ligand-induced binding of VDR/RXR complexes to the rat osteocalcin VDRE was less pronounced compared with the binding to human osteocalcin and mouse osteopontin VDREs. This is in line with the previously described differences between these VDREs (22-25). We also show that the intensity of ligand-induced VDR/RXR binding to functional VDREs can mainly be attributed to the VDR half-site, in particular to the 3T and/or 4T. The impact on the extent of VDR/RXR DNA binding by minor changes in nucleotide sequences is also illustrated by the work of others (9, 26, 27). Ozono et al. (27) showed that a non-VDR binding accessory element within the rat 24-hydroxylase gene was converted to a VDR-binding site when the fourth nucleotide within its proximal half-site was substituted by adenine or thymidine. Koszewski et al. (9) demonstrated that two mutations in the proximal half-site of the avian parathyroid hormone (PTH) VDRE converted the negative activity of this VDRE into a positive one. The large impact of only small changes in nucleotide sequences on receptor-DNA binding is not restricted to VDR-VDRE interaction. For instance, within estrogen response elements a change of 1 base pair in the proximal half-site (the vitellogenin A2 estrogen response element versus the human pS2 estrogen response element) resulted in a 3-fold lower estrogen receptor affinity (10), and the introduction of two mutations converted the vitellogenin A2 estrogen response element into a glucocorticoid responsive element (11). These reports and the present study demonstrate that only minor changes in the nucleotide sequences of nuclear hormone response elements can affect receptor-DNA binding and receptor conformation. This will, in its turn, have an impact on the recruitment of cofactors to the receptor-DNA complex. Altogether, nucleotide variations within response elements can have a major influence on the transcriptional activation of the target gene.

In addition, the present paper shows that the increased biological potency of the vitamin D analog KH1060 (15-18) is not reflected by an increased binding of in vitro synthesized VDR and RXR to various VDREs. KH1060-induced binding of in vitro synthesized VDR/RXR to the mouse osteopontin VDRE was slightly increased, whereas binding to human osteocalcin and rat osteocalcin VDREs was comparable with or even less than 1,25-(OH)₂D₃. Studies by Imai et al. (28) with RO 24-2637 and RO 23-7553 also demonstrated a lack of parallelism between the potency of these analogs to induce the binding of recombinant human VDR and RXR to the human osteocalcin VDRE and the ability of these analogs to activate a human osteocalcin VDRE-driven reporter gene. However, when we performed electrophoretic mobility shift assays with nuclear extracts of ROS 17/2.8 osteoblast-like cells, the biological potency of KH1060 was paralleled by an increased binding of nuclear factors to the different VDREs studied. These observations underline the absolute importance of the cellular context, i.e. the absence or presence of (nuclear) cofactors for the interaction between VDR/RXR and VDRE and the observation that KH1060 induced VDR/RXR-DNA binding that reflects its biological potency. Also Zhao et al. (29) showed that the ability of KH1060 and other 1,25-(OH)₂D₃ analogs (RO 24-5531, MC903, ED-71) to enhance the binding of VDR expressed in COS-7 cells and RXR from yeast extract to the human osteocalcin VDRE correlated with their potency to transactivate a human osteocalcin VDRE-driven reporter gene. The importance of a nuclear/cellular context is also illustrated by cell type-dependent repression of gene transcription via the human PTH VDRE. In bovine parathyroids and rat pituitary GH4C1 cells but not in ROS 17/2.8 osteoblast-like cells, the human PTH VDRE mediates transcriptional repression (25). This cell type-specific difference was paralleled by distinct protein-DNA binding; in the extracts of bovine parathyroids and GH4C1 cells, VDR homodimer binding to the human PTH VDRE was observed, whereas the complex formed with extracts of ROS 17/2.8 osteoblast-like cells contained VDR/RXR heterodimers. Transcriptional repression of the human PTH gene seems, therefore, dependent on the ability of the cell (i.e. dependent on the presence or absence of certain cofactors) to induce VDR-VDRE binding without interference of RXR (25).

Several processes might be involved in the increased potency of KH1060 to induce VDR/RXR DNA binding. The incubation of ROS 17/2.8 osteoblast-like cells with KH1060 might have a different effect than 1,25-(OH)₂D₃ on the amount and/or distribution of VDR, RXR, and/or cofactors in the nucleus, leading to the changed formation and/or affinity of DNA binding complexes. Although the ligand incubation period used was relatively short (1 h), it is not unlikely that de novo synthesis of receptors or cofactors has taken place (30). In addition, during the incubation period the migration of receptors/cofactors from the cytoplasm to the nucleus might occur. It was, for instance, shown that the VDR migrates from the cytoplasm to the nucleus within several minutes after the addition of 1,25-(OH)₂D₃ (31). In addition, compared with 1,25-(OH)₂D₃ KH1060 might induce the formation of a more stable VDR/RXR DNA complex. Cheskis et al. (32) demonstrated, by using surface plasmon resonance, that certain analogs with stronger transcriptional activation activity than 1,25-(OH)₂D₃ induced increased stability of the VDR/RXR-mouse osteopontin VDRE complex.

In summary, the observed nucleotide sequence-dependent differences in VDRE binding and activity might underlie the observed differences in osteocalcin and osteopontin mRNA expression in ROS 17/2.8 cells. In addition, we have demonstrated that for the 1,25-(OH)₂D₃ analog KH1060 a cellular/nuclear context (i.e. the absence or presence of nuclear cofactors) is crucial for observing the ligand-induced VDR-VDRE binding that reflects its increased biological potency (15-18). Thereby, this study implicates the significance of these nuclear cofactors for determining the extent of transcriptional activity. An important issue for following this is the identification of ligand-specific cofactors. In general, our findings are consistent with the concept that the dinucleotide motif may alter the conformation of VDR/RXR heterodimers, their affinity for DNA, and the intrinsic transactivation potential, which provides a framework for understanding the different biological responses of cells to 1,25-(OH)₂D₃ and its analogs.

	FOOTNOTES

^* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

^§ Present address: Dept. of Endocrinology and Reproduction, Erasmus Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Internal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Tel.: 31-10-4633405; Fax: 31-10-4633639; E-mail: vanleeuwen@inw3.fgg.eur.nl.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, February 7, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M111224200

	ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: 1, 25-(OH)₂D₃, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D₃; VDRE, vitamin D response element; VDR, vitamin D receptor; RXR, retinoid X receptor; KH1060, 20-epi-22-oxa-24a,26a,27a-tri-homo-1,25-(OH)₂vitamin D₃; PM, proximal; OC, osteocalcin; OP, osteopontin; ROC, rat OC; PTH, parathyroid hormone.

	REFERENCES

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

CiteULike

Complore

Connotea

Del.icio.us

Digg

Reddit

Technorati

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. Du, G. S. Daftary, S. I. Lalwani, and H. S. Taylor Direct Regulation of HOXA10 by 1,25-(OH)2D3 in Human Myelomonocytic Cells and Human Endometrial Stromal Cells Mol. Endocrinol., September 1, 2005; 19(9): 2222 - 2233. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. J. Kaiser, K. Tavassoli, G.-J. Van den Bemd, G. T.G. Chang, B. Horsthemke, T. Moroy, and H.-J. Ludecke Nuclear interaction of the dynein light chain LC8a with the TRPS1 transcription factor suppresses the transcriptional repression activity of TRPS1 Hum. Mol. Genet., June 1, 2003; 12(11): 1349 - 1358. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 277/17/14539    most recent M111224200v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by van den Bemd, G.-J. C. M. Articles by van Leeuwen, J. P. T. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by van den Bemd, G.-J. C. M. Articles by van Leeuwen, J. P. T. M. Social Bookmarking                      What's this?