Effects of a Guanine-derived Formamidopyrimidine Lesion
on DNA Replication
TRANSLESION DNA SYNTHESIS, NUCLEOTIDE INSERTION, AND EXTENSION
KINETICS*
Kenjiro
Asagoshi,
Hiroaki
Terato,
Yoshihiko
Ohyama, and
Hiroshi
Ide
From the Department of Mathematical and Life Sciences, Graduate
School of Science, Hiroshima University,
Higashi-Hiroshima 739-8526, Japan
Received for publication, January 11, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
2,6-Diamino-4-hydroxy-5-formamidopyrimidine
derived from guanine (FapyG) is a major DNA lesion formed by
reactive oxygen species. In this study, a defined oligonucleotide
template containing a 5-N-methylated analog of FapyG
(mFapyG) was prepared, and its effect on DNA replication was
quantitatively assessed in vitro. The results were further
compared with those obtained for 7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine and an
apurinic/apyrimidinic site embedded in the same sequence context.
mFapyG constituted a fairly strong but not absolute block to DNA
synthesis catalyzed by Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I
Klenow fragment with and without an associated 3'-5' exonuclease activity, thereby permitting translesion synthesis with a limited efficiency. The efficiency of translesion synthesis was G > 7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine > mFapyG > apurinic/apyrimidinic
site. Analysis of the nucleotide insertion
(fins = Vmax/Km for insertion) and
extension (fext = Vmax/Km for extension)
efficiencies for mFapyG revealed that the extension step constituted a
major kinetic barrier to DNA synthesis. When mFapyG was bypassed, dCMP,
a cognate nucleotide, was preferentially inserted opposite the lesion
(dCMP (relative fins = 1)
dTMP (2.4 × 10
4)
dAMP (8.1 × 10
5) > dGMP (4.5 × 10
7)), and
the primer terminus containing a mFapyG:C pair was most efficiently
extended (mFapyG:C (relative fext = 1) > mFapyG:T (4.6 × 10
3)
mFapyG:A and mFapyG:G
(extension not observed)). Thus, mFapyG is a potentially lethal but not
premutagenic lesion.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Reactive oxygen species formed by aerobic metabolism, phagocytic
blood cells upon inflammation, ionizing radiation, and photosensitized reactions generate structurally diverse oxidative damage to DNA that
stores vital genetic information of cells (1-3). Base lesions thus
formed are generally restored by the base excision repair pathway
involving multiple enzymes such as
N-glycosylase/AP1
lyase, AP endonuclease, DNA polymerase, and DNA ligase (4, 5). However,
if left unrepaired, they result in mutations and/or cell death. It has
also been implied that oxidative DNA damage is involved in
carcinogenesis and various degenerative diseases (6, 7).
7,8-Dihydro-8-oxoguanine (8-oxoG) and
2,6-diamino-4-hydroxy-5-formamidopyrimidine derived from guanine
(FapyG) have been identified as major products in the reaction of DNA
with reactive oxygen species (Fig.
1A) (1, 2). When formed in
DNA, 8-oxoG in a template directs incorporation of non-cognate dAMP as
well as cognate dCMP during translesion synthesis by DNA polymerases, thereby inducing GC-to-TA transversions (8, 9). Similarly, when formed
in a cellular nucleotide pool, a 2'-deoxyribonucleotide form of 8-oxoG
can be incorporated opposite adenine as well as cytosine in a DNA
template, inducing AT-to-CG transversions (10-12). Mispair formation
between 8-oxoG and adenine leading to mutation involves an unusual
syn-conformer of 8-oxoG that can form two hydrogen bonds
between O-6 and N-7-H in 8-oxoG and N-6-H and N-1 in adenine without
introducing significant distortions in DNA (13, 14). Accordingly, the
molecular basis of the mechanism of 8-oxoG-induced mutagenesis has been
well established.

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Reaction schemes of formation of FapyG and
mFapyG. A, formation of 8-oxoG and FapyG from G by the
reaction with reactive oxygen species (ROS); B,
formation of mFapyG from 7-MeG (7mG) by the reaction with
base.
|
|
The amount of FapyG in DNA exposed to oxidizing agents is comparable to
that of 8-oxoG (15-17). Despite this fact, the genotoxic effect of
FapyG lesions has been less clarified than that of 8-oxoG. The effects
of FapyG on DNA synthesis have been previously assessed by in
vitro DNA polymerase reactions and transfection studies using DNA
containing a 5-N-methylated analog of FapyG
(2,6-diamino-4-hydroxy-5-N-methylformamidopyrimidine (mFapyG)) (Fig. 1B) (18-20). In these experiments,
single-stranded M13mp18 DNA was methylated by dimethyl sulfate (DMS)
and then treated with 0.2 M NaOH to rupture the imidazole
ring of 7-methylguanine (7-MeG), thereby introducing mFapyG as a major
lesion (59%) together with 1-methyladenine (21%), 3-methyladenine
(6%), and others (14%) as minor lesions. When the DMS/NaOH-treated
DNA template was replicated by DNA polymerase I Klenow fragment (pol I
Kf) or T4 DNA polymerase in vitro, DNA synthesis stalled 1 base prior to putative mFapyG sites as well as other adenine and
cytosine lesions. Consistent with this, the transfection efficiency of
DMS/NaOH-treated M13mp18 DNA decreased significantly relative to that
of DMS-treated DNA. Interestingly, the most frequent mutation in
progeny phage was observed at adenine sites (A-to-G transitions) rather
than guanine sites (putative mFapyG sites). Aside from the contribution
of coexisting base lesions, these results strongly suggest that mFapyG is a potentially lethal lesion due to its capacity to block DNA synthesis, but not a premutagenic lesion, although the mechanism involved is not clear. Possible mechanisms may involve (i) preferential insertion of cognate dCMP opposite mFapyG during translesion synthesis; (ii) very inefficient extension of primer termini containing mFapyG:A, mFapyG:G, and mFapyG:T pairs formed by insertion of non-cognate nucleotides; and (iii) complete arrest of DNA synthesis by mFapyG (no
translesion synthesis).
Recently, we developed a novel method to introduce mFapyG into DNA as a
unique lesion without using DMS treatment (21). In this method, 7-MeG,
a precursor of mFapyG, is site-specifically incorporated into
oligonucleotides by a DNA polymerase reaction using the
2'-deoxyribonucleoside triphosphate of 7-MeG as a substrate, and then
7-MeG is quantitatively converted to mFapyG by mild alkaline treatment
at pH 11.4. The oligonucleotides containing site-specific mFapyG have
been successfully used to quantitatively characterize the activities of
Escherichia coli formamidopyrimidine glycosylase (Fpg) and
its human functional homolog (hOGG1) (21). More recently, we also
demonstrated that endonuclease (Endo) III and Endo VIII from E. coli and a mammalian Endo III homolog (NTH1), which have been
thought to be pyrimidine-specific enzymes, recognize mFapyG in a paired
base-dependent manner (22).
Availability of the defined DNA containing mFapyG prompted us to
further investigate the mechanistic and kinetic aspects of the effect
of mFapyG on DNA synthesis. We report here that mFapyG is a fairly
strong but not absolute block to DNA synthesis catalyzed by pol I Kf
and that dCMP is preferentially incorporated opposite mFapyG when
bypassed. Moreover, the reaction parameters reveal that extension of a
mFapyG:C primer terminus rather than preceding insertion of dCMP
opposite mFapyG constitutes a dominant kinetic barrier to DNA
synthesis. The kinetic data and the thermal stability of the duplexes
containing mFapyG are further compared with those of 8-oxoG and an AP
site embedded in the same site of the templates.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials--
T4 polynucleotide kinase and 7-methyl-2'-dGTP
were purchased from Toyobo and Sigma, respectively.
[
-32P]ATP (110 TBq/mmol) and ultrapure dNTPs were
obtained from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech. Pol I Kf and pol I Kf
deficient in 3'-5' exonuclease (pol I Kf(exo
)) were
obtained from New England Biolabs Inc.
Oligonucleotides--
The oligonucleotides used in this study
are listed in Table I. The templates
containing G (34G), 8-oxoG (34OG), and a tetrahydrofuran-type AP site
(34AP) at the same position were synthesized by the standard phosphoramidite method and purified by 16% denaturing PAGE. Other oligonucleotides (except 34FP) were also synthesized and purified in a
similar manner. The template containing mFapyG (34FP) was prepared by
alkaline hydrolysis of a 7-MeG residue that was site-specifically introduced by a DNA polymerase reaction (21). Briefly, the primer 11OLG
was 5'-end-labeled with [
-32P]ATP and T4
polynucleotide kinase, purified, and mixed with a 9-fold excess of
11OLGp bearing a nonradioactive 5'-phosphate group. 11OLGp was annealed
to the template 44OLG (2-fold molar excess) in buffer A (10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) and 25 mM NaCl). The
template-primer (44OLG-11OLGp, 125 nM) was incubated with pol I Kf (25 units) in the presence of 200 µM
7-methyl-2'-dGTP and 20 µM each dATP, dCTP, and dTTP in
buffer B (66 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 5 mM
mercaptoethanol, 50 µg/ml bovine serum albumin, and 6.6 mM MgCl2; total of 200 µl) at 25 °C for 40 min. A single 7-MeG residue was incorporated immediately after the
original primer terminus (i.e. opposite cytosine in the
template) under these conditions. After incubation, the reaction
mixture was dialyzed against alkaline buffer (10 mM sodium
phosphate (pH 11.4) and 2 mM EDTA) at 25 °C for 20 h to rupture the imidazole ring, followed by 10 mM Tris-HCl
(pH 7.5) and 1 mM EDTA at 4 °C for 6 h (twice). The
strand containing mFapyG (34FP) was separated from the template (44OLG)
by 16% denaturing PAGE, extracted from the gel, and purified on a
Waters Sep-Pak cartridge (23). Our previous study has shown that
oligonucleotides prepared in this manner contain mFapyG exclusively (96%) at the lesion site (21).
Analysis of Translesion DNA Synthesis--
The reactions to
assay translesion synthesis were performed under running-start
conditions using templates (34FP, 34OG, 34AP, and 34G) and a
32P-5'-end-labeled primer (11PRM) whose terminus was three
nucleotides shorter than the lesion site. The template and primer were
annealed in buffer A by briefly heating at 70 °C and cooling to room
temperature. The template-primer (15 nM) was incubated with
pol I Kf or pol I Kf(exo
) (both at 0.1 unit) and 4 dNTPs
(50 µM each) in buffer B (5 µl) at 25 °C for 0.5-60
min. The reaction was terminated by adding gel loading buffer (0.05%
xylene cyanol, 0.05% bromphenol blue, 20 mM EDTA, and 98%
formamide). Products were separated by 16% denaturing PAGE, and the
radioactivity in the gel was analyzed on a Fuji BAS 2000 phosphorimage
analyzer. Alternatively, the gel was autoradiographed at
80 °C.
Analysis of Nucleotides Inserted Opposite Lesions--
The
nucleotides inserted opposite the lesions were analyzed by two methods.
In the first method, a template (34FP, 34OG, or 34G) was primed by
11PRM and replicated by pol I Kf for 60 min as described above. The
products were subjected to single-strand conformation polymorphism
(SSCP) analysis. The SSCP analysis was performed following the reported
method (24) with slight modifications. The upper phase (5 cm) of a 20%
polyacrylamide gel contained 8 M urea, and the lower phase
(35 cm) contained no urea (native gel). The sample was electrophoresed
at 4 °C for 30 h. The applied voltage was 600 V for the initial
24 h and was then shifted to 1200 V for the remaining 6 h.
5'-End-labeled oligonucleotides (26COM-N, where N is A, G, C, or T)
were electrophoresed side by side as standard markers. In the second
method, a single nucleotide incorporation opposite the lesion was
analyzed by a primer extension assay under standing-start conditions. A
template (34FP, 34OG, 34AP, or 34G) was primed by 5'-end-labeled 14PRM
(15 nM as template-primer) and incubated with pol I Kf or
pol I Kf(exo
) (both at 0.1 unit) and a single dNTP (100 µM) in buffer B (5 µl) at 25 °C for 5 min. The
reaction was terminated by adding gel loading buffer, and products were
analyzed by 16% denaturing PAGE.
Kinetic Parameters for Nucleotide Insertion and
Extension--
The parameters for nucleotide insertion and extension
were determined by the gel fidelity assay (25). For the insertion parameter, a primer (5'-end-labeled 14PRM) annealed to a template (34FP, 34OG, 34AP, or 34G) was extended by pol I Kf (0.01-1.5 units)
in the presence of a single dNTP (0.01-500 µM) for 5-30 min as described above (see "Analysis of Nucleotides Inserted Opposite Lesions"). Based on the results of preliminary experiments, the amount of pol I Kf, the concentration range of dNTP, and the reaction time were appropriately adjusted so that the extent of primer
elongation was <30% in the actual measurement of the initial velocity. For the parameter of primer extension past the lesion, a
primer (5'-end-labeled 15PRM-N, where N is A, G, C, or T) annealed to a
template (34FP, 34OG, 34AP, or 34G) was extended by pol I Kf in an
essentially similar manner, except that the amount of pol I Kf was
0.01-0.3 units and only dATP (complementary to template T next to the
lesion) was added to the reaction mixture. The amounts of the original
and extended primers were quantified by measuring the radioactivity of
the corresponding bands on the Fuji BAS 2000 analyzer. The parameters
(Vmax and Km) were evaluated from the plot of the initial velocity versus the dNTP
concentration using a hyperbolic curve-fitting program. Data are the
average of two independent experiments, and all
Vmax values were standardized as nM
extended primer/min/unit of pol I Kf.
Analysis of Melting Temperatures--
The melting temperature
(Tm) of duplexes containing a lesion was measured by
temperature gradient gel electrophoresis (TGGE) (26-30). Duplexes (5 nM) comprising a 5'-end-labeled lesion strand (34FP, 34OG,
or 34G) and a complementary strand (34COM-N, where N is A, G, C, or T)
in TGGE loading buffer (0.25% xylene cyanol, 0.25% bromophenol blue,
50% glycerol, 5 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.0), and 0.5 mM EDTA; total of 52.5 µl) were loaded along the top of a
20% polyacrylamide gel (12 × 12 cm) containing 5 M
formamide and TBE buffer (90 mM Tris, 90 mM
sodium borate, and 2 mM EDTA). Formamide was included to
adjust the Tm in a measurable temperature range of
the present TGGE setup. Using a standard vertical gel electrophoresis
apparatus, the sample was briefly electrophoresed at 250 V for ~5 min
at 4 °C, allowing the sample to run onto the gel. The gel was
transferred to a TGGE apparatus Thermogradient TG (TAITEC), and
electrophoresis was carried out at 250 V for 3.5 h in a
perpendicular TGGE mode (i.e. a temperature gradient was
perpendicular to the electric field) using a linear temperature
gradient between 20 and 60 °C. After electrophoresis, a digital
image of the migrated radioactive DNA was acquired on the Fuji BAS 2000 analyzer. The amounts of the duplex and dissociated DNA were quantified
every 0.15-mm slice (corresponding to a 0.05 °C temperature
difference) along the temperature axis using the Science Lab 99 Image
Gauge Version 3.4 software of the Fuji BAS 2000 analyzer. The
Tm value was determined from the melting curve (a
plot of the fraction of duplex DNA (
) versus temperature) as a midpoint where the amounts of the duplex and dissociated DNA were equal.
 |
RESULTS |
Translesion DNA Synthesis on Templates Containing mFapyG and
Other Lesions--
To elucidate the effect of mFapyG on DNA synthesis,
a template (34FP) containing this lesion at the defined site was primed by 11PRM and replicated by pol I Kf or pol I Kf(exo
) for
up to 60 min. For comparison, similar experiments were performed using
the templates containing G (34G), 8-oxoG (34OG), and an AP site (34AP)
at the same site. Primer extension catalyzed by pol I Kf (Fig.
2A) and pol I
Kf(exo
) (Fig. 2B) was strongly arrested by
mFapyG (lanes 7-11), 8-oxoG (lanes 13-17), and
the AP site (lanes 19-23). The primary termination site of
DNA synthesis was at the mFapyG and 8-oxoG sites for both pol I Kf and
pol I Kf(exo
). With the AP site, the primary site was one
nucleotide prior to the lesion for pol I Kf, whereas it was one
nucleotide prior to and at the lesion for pol I Kf(exo
).
The arrested bands were observed after 60 min of incubation for all
lesions. In contrast, primer elongation on the intact template
containing G (lanes 3-5) was rather rapid, although DNA synthesis was considerably distributive. Thus, almost fully extended products were observed after 3-10 min of incubation. With the templates containing mFapyG and 8-oxoG, products resulting from translesion synthesis (bands at the top of the gel) gradually accumulated with incubation time. This was also the case for the AP
site, but the products accumulated very slowly. Note that the fully extended product on the AP template (lane 23) was one
nucleotide shorter than the 34AP template (34-mer). Probably, a single
nucleotide deletion occurred at the AP site by the misinsertion strand
slippage mechanism (31-35). In the present case, incorporation of dAMP
opposite the AP site (see below) was followed by misalignment of the
primer terminus to 5'-T in the template (3'-TXT-5', where
X is the AP site) and extension of the misaligned terminus.
To compare the efficiency of translesion synthesis, the amount of
bypassed products was quantified and plotted against incubation time
(Fig. 3). The order of the efficiency of
translesion synthesis was G > 8-oxoG > mFapyG > AP
site, and the efficiencies were slightly higher for pol I
Kf(exo
) (Fig. 3B) than for pol I Kf (Fig.
3A) with all lesions.

View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
PAGE analysis of translesion synthesis on
templates containing mFapyG, 8-oxoG, and an AP site. A,
translesion synthesis by pol I Kf. Templates containing G (34G), mFapyG
(34FP), 8-oxoG (34OG), and an AP site (34AP) were primed with
5'-end-labeled 11PRM, and the template-primer (75 fmol) was incubated
with pol I Kf (0.1 unit) in the presence of four dNTPs (50 µM each) at 25 °C. The lesion present in the template
and the incubation time are indicated at the top of the gel. Products
were analyzed by 16% denaturing PAGE. Part of the sequence of the
template (where X is G, mFapyG, 8-oxoG, or AP) and the
primer is shown on the right. Lane 1 shows a maker
(5'-end-labeled 14PRM) indicating the position 1 base prior to the
lesions. B, translesion synthesis by pol I
Kf(exo ). The reactions and analysis were carried out as
described for A using pol I Kf(exo ).
|
|

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Time courses of translesion synthesis on
templates containing mFapyG, 8-oxoG, and an AP site. A,
time courses of translesion synthesis by pol I Kf. The fraction of
bypassed products formed by pol I Kf was determined by quantifying the
products elongated up to the lesion (U) and those elongated beyond the
lesion (B) in Fig. 2A. The fraction of bypassed products for
each lesion (100 × (B/(U + B))) was plotted against incubation
time. B, time courses of translesion synthesis by pol I
Kf(exo ). The fraction of bypassed products formed by pol
I Kf(exo ) was determined as described for A
using the data from Fig. 2B. , G; , 8-oxoG; ,
mFapyG; , AP.
|
|
Nucleotides Incorporated Opposite mFapyG and Other
Lesions--
To analyze the nucleotide incorporated opposite
mFapyG during translesion synthesis, the template 34FP was
primed by 11PRM and replicated by pol I Kf for 60 min. The products,
together with those obtained for 8-oxoG (34OG) and G (34G), were
subjected to SSCP analysis, which can resolve a single nucleotide
difference at the same site (34). Fig.
4A shows the results of SSCP
analysis of the bypassed products. Comparison of the gel mobility of
the product formed on the mFapyG template (lane 6)
with those of standard markers (lanes 1-4) revealed that
dCMP was exclusively incorporated opposite mFapyG during translesion
synthesis. Incorporation of other nucleotides was below the detection
limit under these conditions. Consistent with previous reports (8, 9),
both dCMP and dAMP were incorporated opposite 8-oxoG, with a preference
for dCMP (lane 5). To confirm the SSCP data, the nucleotide
incorporated opposite the lesion was also analyzed by a primer
extension assay in the presence of a single dNTP using 14PRM as the
primer. The results obtained for pol I Kf and pol I
Kf(exo
) are shown in Fig. 4 (B and
C, respectively). Essentially similar results were obtained
for both enzymes. Stepping of the primer band (i.e.
incorporation of the added nucleotide) was observed with dCTP for
mFapyG (lane 9) and with dCTP and dATP (incorporation of two
consecutive As due to T on the 3'-side of 8-oxoG) for 8-oxoG (lanes 14 and 12, respectively). These results
agree well with those obtained by SSCP analysis. For the AP template,
dAMP was most efficiently incorporated (lane 17), consistent
with previously studies (36-39).

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Analysis of nucleotides inserted opposite
mFapyG and other lesions. A, SSCP analysis. Templates
containing mFapyG (34FP), 8-oxoG (34OG), and G (34G) were primed and
replicated by pol I Kf for 60 min as described in the legend to Fig. 2.
After incubation, the products were separated on a two-phase
polyacrylamide gel comprising a 20% denaturing gel (top 5 cm) and a
20% native gel (bottom 35 cm). Electrophoresis was carried out at
4 °C for 30 h. Lanes 1-4, 5'-end-labeled standard
markers showing the mobility of products formed by incorporation of T
(26COM-T), G (26COM-G), A (26COM-A), and C (26COM-C) at the lesion
site; lanes 5-7, products formed on the templates
containing 8-oxoG, mFapyG, and G, respectively. B, pol I
Kf-catalyzed primer extension assays in the presence of a single dNTP.
Templates containing G (34G), mFapyG (34FP), 8-oxoG (34OG), and an AP
site (34AP) were primed by 5'-end-labeled 14PRM. The primer (75 fmol as
template-primer) was extended by pol I Kf (0.1 unit) at 25 °C for 5 min. Products were analyzed by 16% denaturing PAGE. The lesion present
in the template and the dNTP added to the reaction mixture are
indicated at the top of the gel. Part of the sequence of the
template-primer is shown on the right. C, pol I
Kf(exo )-catalyzed primer extension assays in the presence
of a single dNTP. The reactions and analysis were carried out as
described for B using pol I Kf(exo ).
|
|
Parameters for Nucleotide Insertion and Extension--
To
elucidate the quantitative aspect of nucleotide insertion opposite
mFapyG and to compare the data with those for other lesions, parameters
for nucleotide insertion (Vmax and
Km) were measured using pol I Kf. Using these data,
the insertion efficiency of individual nucleotides
(fins = Vmax/Km) was calculated
(Table II). To better understand
the data in Table II, log fins was plotted
against the nucleotide inserted opposite the lesion (Fig.
5A). As shown in Fig.
5A, dCTP was the much favored nucleotide for
insertion opposite mFapyG (dCTP
dTTP
dATP > dGTP). The -fold decrease in fins relative to
that of dCTP was 4.2 × 103 for dTTP, 1.2 × 104 for dATP, and 2.2 × 106 for dGTP. The
discrimination between dCTP and other nucleotides originated from both
a reduction in Vmax (33-790-fold) and an increase in Km (47-2900-fold) (Table II). When the
fins values of the cognate nucleotide (dCTP) for
template G and mFapyG were compared, insertion opposite mFapyG was
65-fold less efficient than that opposite G (3.1 × 102 versus 2.0 × 104), showing
that mFapyG constituted a moderate barrier to DNA synthesis in the
insertion step. Also note that fins of dCTP for
mFapyG (3.1 × 102) was comparable to that for 8-oxoG
(2.5 × 102), but was roughly an order of magnitude
greater than that of dATP for 8-oxoG (1.9 × 10). The
fins value of dATP for the AP site was much
lower (280-fold) than that of dCTP for mFapyG. Thus, the order of
fins of dNTPs preferentially inserted opposite
the lesions and G was G:dCTP > mFapyG:dCTP
8-oxoG:dCTP > 8-oxoG:dATP > AP site:dATP (Fig.
5A).

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Comparison of nucleotide insertion,
extension, and bypass efficiencies for the templates containing mFapyG,
8-oxoG, an AP site, and G. A, comparison of the
nucleotide insertion efficiencies. The log fins
values were calculated from the data (fins) in
Table II and plotted against the inserted dNTP. B,
comparison of the extension efficiencies. The log
fext values were calculated from the data
(fext) in Table II and plotted against the
primer terminus nucleotide (N). C, comparison of
the bypass efficiencies. The values of log(fins × fext) were calculated from the data
(fins × fext) in Table
II and plotted against the inserted dNTP during translesion
synthesis.
|
|
The parameters of primer extension past the lesion
(Vmax and Km)
were also measured using pol I Kf, and the extension efficiency of
individual termini (fext = Vmax/Km) was calculated
(Table II). The data were plotted in a manner similar to those for the
insertion reaction (Fig. 5B). As shown in Fig. 5B, a mFapyG:C terminus was extended most efficiently in
four possible primer termini (mFapyG:N, where N is A, G, C, or T). The
second preferred terminus was a mFapyG:T pair, but the
fext value was 220-fold lower than that of a
mFapyG:C pair. The discrimination between the two termini (mFapyG:C and
mFapyG:T) originated mostly from a reduction in
Vmax (Table II). Extension of mFapyG:A and mFapyG:G termini was below the detection limit of these experiments and
therefore was not observed. Accordingly, the order of
fext for mFapyG:N termini was C > T
A and G (both not detectable) with respect to the paired base
(N). When the fext values for G:C and mFapyG:C
termini were compared, the extension of a mFapyG:C terminus was
9200-fold less efficient than that of a G:C terminus (1.1 × 104 versus 1.2), thus constituting the second
barrier to DNA synthesis. Considering the reduction factors of
fins and fext associated with conversion of G to mFapyG (Table
III), the dominant kinetic barrier to
DNA synthesis was attributable to extension of the mFapyG:C
terminus (9200-fold reduction) rather than preceding insertion of dCTP
opposite mFapyG (65-fold reduction). The order of
fext of the preferentially formed primer termini
was G (template):C (primer terminus)
8-oxoG:A
8-oxoG:C > mFapyG:C
AP site:A (Fig. 5B).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table III
Reduction factors of insertion and extension efficiencies relative to
those for a G (template):C (dNTP) pair
|
|
Stability of Duplexes Containing mFapyG and 8-oxoG--
To gain
insight into the physicochemical mechanism for nucleotide selection and
primer extension at the mFapyG site, the Tm of
34-mer duplexes containing a mFapyG:N pair (where N is A, G, C, or T)
was measured by the TGGE method (26-30). Fig.
6A shows an autoradiogram of a
typical temperature gradient gel for the duplex 34FP/34COM-C containing
a mFapyG:C pair. The gel displayed the temperature-induced mobility
transition of intact double-stranded DNA (the slow migrating band) to
the denatured state (the fast migrating band) at ~38 °C. The
amounts of double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) and single-stranded DNA (ssDNA)
were quantified every 0.05 °C slice along the temperature
axis, and the fraction of double-stranded DNA (
= dsDNA/(dsDNA + ssDNA)) was plotted against temperature (Fig. 6B).
Tm was evaluated as a midpoint of the melting curve
where
= 0.5 in Fig. 6B. The TGGE experiments were
performed for the duplexes containing mFapyG:N, 8-oxoG:N, and G:N pairs
(where N is A, G, C, or T) in the same sequence context, and the
Tm values (average of two experiments) are
summarized in Table IV. Replacing a G:C
pair with a mFapyG:C pair resulted in a moderate decrease in the
thermal stability of the duplex (Tm = 41.7 °C for
G:C and 37.8 °C for mFapyG:C). The extent of the helix
destabilization by introduction of a mFapyG:C pair (
3.9 °C) was
comparable to that obtained with an 8-oxoG:C pair (
3.5 °C). The
duplex containing a mFapyG:C pair was most stable among those
containing four possible mFapyG base pairs (mFapyG:C > mFapyG:A > mFapyG:G > mFapyG:T), although the
Tm difference between the most stable and the least
stable base pairs was considerably small (
Tm = 2 °C). Similar to mFapyG, the duplex containing an 8-oxoG:C pair
exhibited the highest thermal stability among those containing four
possible 8-oxoG base pairs (8-oxoG:C > 8-oxoG:G
8-oxoG:A > 8-oxoG:T). Thus, it follows that common to G, mFapyG,
and 8-oxoG, the base pair containing C that exhibited the highest
stability in the respective groups was preferentially formed and
extended by pol I Kf (Fig. 5, A and B). However,
for the rest of base pairs (i.e. those containing A, G, and
T), there were poor correlations between the order of stability and
that of preference for insertion or extension.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Typical TGGE data for
Tm measurement. A, a
temperature gradient gel of a duplex containing a mFapyG:C pair
(5'-end-labeled 34FP/34COM-C). Electrophoresis was carried out on
a 20% polyacrylamide gel containing 5 M formamide and TBE
buffer at 250 V for 3.5 h in a perpendicular mode (i.e.
a temperature gradient was perpendicular to the electric field). The
directions of the temperature gradient (20-60 °C) and DNA migration
(shown as mobility) are indicated by arrows.
B, a melting curve of 34FP/34COM-C. The fraction of
34FP/34COM-C in a duplex state ( ) was determined every 0.05 °C
slice along the temperature axis using the TGGE profile (A)
and plotted against temperature.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table IV
Melting temperatures of duplexes containing G, mFapyG, and 8-oxoG
base pairs
Tm values were determined by TGGE using duplexes
34G/34COM-N, 34FP/34COM-N, and 34OG/34COM-N (where N is A, G, C, or T)
as described under "Experimental Procedures."
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
In this study, it has been shown that mFapyG site-specifically
incorporated into template DNA constitutes a block to DNA synthesis catalyzed by pol I Kf and pol I Kf(exo
). The block was
fairly strong but not absolute, thus permitting translesion DNA
synthesis with a limited efficiency (Fig. 2). This was not clear in
previous studies (18-20). Quantitation of the bypassed product
indicated that the efficiency of translesion synthesis for mFapyG was
interposed between those of 8-oxoG and an AP site (Fig. 3). More
detailed analysis of the insertion (fins) and
extension (fext) parameters for individual dNTPs
and primer termini revealed that the overall bypass efficiency
(fins × fext) was
G:C > 8-oxoG:C > mFapyG:C > 8-oxoG:A > AP site:A (Fig. 5 and Table II),
where the underlined C and A were nucleotides preferentially inserted
during translesion synthesis. The primary kinetic barrier to DNA
synthesis by mFapyG originated from the extension step after dCMP was
inserted opposite the lesion, as was demonstrated by the reduction
factors of fins (65-fold) and
fext (9200-fold) relative to those of the G:C
pair (Table III). This is consistent with the observation that the
major termination band of DNA synthesis appeared at the mFapyG site
(Fig. 2, A and B), but is in contrast to the
previous observation that pol I Kf and T4 DNA polymerase stalled 1 base
prior to the putative mFapyG sites when DMS/NaOH-treated M13 DNA was
replicated in vitro (18). The dominant kinetic barrier to
DNA synthesis by 8-oxoG also arose from the extension step, but the
contribution of this step was less significant compared with mFapyG,
particularly for the 8-oxoG:A pair (Table III).
When mFapyG was bypassed, dCMP was preferentially inserted opposite the
lesion, which was also first demonstrated in this study. The second and
third preferred nucleotides were dTMP and dAMP, respectively; but the
fins values for these nucleotides were 4200- and
12,000-fold lower than for dCMP, respectively (Table II). In addition,
the fext of a mFapyG:T terminus was 220-fold lower than that of a mFapyG:C terminus, and that of a mFapyG:A terminus
was below the detection limit (i.e. practically not
extendable) (Table II). Thus, replication errors at mFapyG sites
emerging in fully replicated DNA will be suppressed to a very low level of ~1/106 replicated mFapyG lesions based on the ratio of
fins × fext for insertion of C (3.7 × 102) versus T
(4.0 × 10
4). This provides a reasonable model and
explanation for the lack of (or very low) mutagenicity of mFapyG
lesions found in the transfection assays of DMS/NaOH-treated M13 DNA
(19, 20), although the DNA polymerase involved in vivo is
different from the present study (polymerase III holoenzyme in
uninduced E. coli cells and possibly polymerase II, IV, or V
in SOS-induced cells) (40, 41). Conversely, the replication error
frequency at 8-oxoG sites emerging in fully replicated DNA is high
(~1/10 replicated 8-oxoG lesions according to the ratio of
fins × fext for
insertion of C (9.5 × 102) versus A
(8.9 × 10)), which has been substantiated by a number of in
vivo studies (9, 11, 42-44). Combining the present and previous
data (18-20), the biological consequence of mFapyG is quite different
from that of 8-oxoG and rather resembles thymine glycol, a major
thymine lesion formed by reactive oxygen species. Like mFapyG, thymine
glycol constitutes a fairy strong replication block in vitro
and is lethal in vivo when introduced into transfecting M13
DNA (45-48). Moreover, DNA polymerase stalls at a thymine glycol lesion after inserting a cognate nucleotide dAMP (49). Thus, thymine
glycol does not elicit mutations when bypassed in SOS-induced E. coli cells (48).
In this study, we attempted to delineate the physicochemical mechanism
underlying selection of incoming dNTP at the mFapyG site and
differential extension of the subsequently formed primer terminus. For
this purpose, the Tm of the duplexes containing four
possible mFapyG base pairs was measured by a TGGE method (Table IV),
assuming that Tm changes in the duplexes reflect the
local stability of mFapyG base pairs. The mFapyG:C pair showing the
highest thermal stability was preferentially formed and extended by pol
I Kf (Fig. 5). This was also the case for G:C and 8-oxoG:C pairs,
suggesting a common base pairing scheme involving three canonical
hydrogen bonds for mFapyG:C, G:C, and 8-oxoG:C base pairs (Fig.
7). However, as inferred from the
moderate decrease in Tm relative to G:C, a mFapyG:C
pair seems less stable than a G:C pair. Plausible causes are weakened
stacking interactions and increased conformational flexibility due to
rupture of the imidazole ring. Thus, it is likely that a similar
destabilization effect on incoming dCTP slows down the formation of a
new phosphodiester bond at the mFapyG site. Judging from the very low
value of fext (1.2) relative to
fins (3.1 × 102), the
destabilized mFapyG:C pair exerts a more pronounced effect in the
subsequent extension reaction. Conversely, in the mFapyG base pairs
containing A, G, and T that showed lower stabilities compared with a
mFapyG:C pair, there was no obvious correlation between their thermal
stability and the insertion/extension efficiencies (fins and fext) (Fig. 5
and Table IV), although the difference in stability
(
Tm) was considerably small. This was also the
case for G and 8-oxoG base pairs containing A, G, and T (Fig. 5 and
Table IV). It is possible that steric exclusion (or geometric recognition) in the polymerase active site rather than the thermal stability of base pairs plays a crucial role in the insertion and
extension steps (reviewed in Refs. 50 and 51) particularly when
canonical hydrogen bonding and/or stacking interactions are absent.
Such a mechanism has been implied for AP sites and thymine glycol on
the basis of the lack of apparent correlations between the preference
of insertion or proofreading excision of nucleotides and the
Tm of oligonucleotides containing these lesions (52,
53). The mechanism involving steric exclusion also seems consistent
with the observation that Endo III recognizes mFapyG paired with
purines more efficiently than that paired with pyrimidines (activity
with respect to the paired base: A
G > T > C)
(22). Similar to other base lesions (54), steric crash between mFapyG and bulky purines in a helix promotes base flipping into the
active-site pocket of Endo III. Thus, the order of
fins (C
T
A > G) and fext (C > T
A and G) for mFapyG can
be interpreted as the combined outcome of hydrogen bonding specific for
incoming dCTP and steric exclusion in the polymerase active site.

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Base pairing schemes for G:C, 8-oxoG:C, and
mFapyG:C pairs. Hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed
lines, and those for a mFapyG:C pair are tentative.
|
|
Toward the end of this study, the chemical synthesis of
oligonucleotides containing FapyG (a form of mFapyG without the
5-N-methyl group) and 4,6-diamino-5-formamidopyrimidine
derived from adenine (FapyA) was reported (55, 56). The reports
have shown that the N-glycosidic bond of FapyG and FapyA in
monomeric and single-stranded DNA substrates is stable, with half-lives
of 108 days (FapyG, calculated from the deglycosylation rate at
55 °C) and 4.3 days (FapyA) at 37 °C. More interestingly, the
nucleotide forms of FapyG and FapyA epimerize in solution, giving rise
to a mixture of
- and
-anomers with respect to the orientation of
the N-glycosidic bond around sugar C-1'. We have previously
shown that the
-anomer of 2'-deoxyadenosine (
dA)
site-specifically introduced into oligonucleotide templates or M13
vectors constitutes moderate to fairly strong replication blocks
in vitro and in vivo (57, 58), exhibiting an
effect similar to that of mFapyG. However, there are several differences between
dA and mFapyG concerning the responses to DNA
polymerase and repair enzyme. With
dA, the primary termination site
of in vitro DNA synthesis catalyzed by pol I Kf was 1 base prior to the lesion site, indicating a high barrier to DNA synthesis in
the insertion step rather than the extension step. In addition,
dA
directed insertion of four nucleotides (T > C > A
G),
although the efficiency was limited. The order of the insertion
efficiency was inversely correlated with that of structural
perturbations induced by
dA base pairs (59). Concerning the
recognition by repair enzyme, it has been shown that Endo IV, an
E. coli AP endonuclease, recognizes
dA (60) and the
-anomer of
2'-deoxythymidine,2 incising
the phosphodiester bond 5' to the lesions. A rational mechanism of the
activity for the
-anomer has been also proposed based on the high
resolution structure of an Endo IV·DNA binary complex (61). However,
the duplex oligonucleotide containing mFapyG is not a substrate of Endo
IV (21). Thus, as far as termination and insertion specificities of pol
I Kf and recognition by Endo IV are concerned, there is no strong
evidence that supports the presence of the
-anomer of mFapyG in the
DNA used in this study. However, it will be necessary in future studies
to determine the exact ratio of the two anomers of mFapyG and FapyG in
actual DNA substrates and to clarify the distinctive responses, if any,
of DNA polymerases to the anomers.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by grants-in-aid from the Ministry
of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan (to
H. I.) and by a research fellowship for young scientists from the
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (to K. A.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel. and Fax:
81-824-24-7457; E-mail: ideh@hiroshima-u.ac.jp.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, February 11, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M200316200
2
A. Masaoka, H. Terato, Y. Ohyama, and H. Ide,
unpublished data.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
AP, apurinic/apyrimidinic;
8-oxoG, 7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine;
FapyG, 2,6-diamino-4-hydroxy-5-formamidopyrimidine derived from guanine;
mFapyG, 2,6-diamino-4-hydroxy-5-N-methylformamidopyrimidine
derived from guanine;
FapyA, 4,6-diamino-5-formamidopyrimidine derived
from adenine;
DMS, dimethyl sulfate;
7-MeG, 7-methylguanine;
pol I Kf, E. coli DNA polymerase I Klenow fragment;
pol I
Kf(exo
), pol I Kf deficient in 3'-5' exonuclease;
Endo, endonuclease;
SSCP, single-strand conformation polymorphism;
Tm, melting temperature;
TGGE, temperature gradient
gel electrophoresis;
dA,
-anomer of 2'-deoxyadenosine.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
von Sonntag, C.
(1987)
Chemical Basis of Radiation Biology
, Taylor & Francis, New York
|
| 2.
|
Breen, A. P.,
and Murphy, J. A.
(1995)
Free Radic. Biol. Med.
18,
1033-1077[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Wink, D. A.,
Vodovotz, Y.,
Laval, J.,
Laval, F.,
Dewhirst, M. W.,
and Mitchell, J. B.
(1998)
Carcinogenesis
19,
711-721[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 4.
|
Friedberg, E. C.,
Walker, G. C.,
and Siede, W.
(1995)
DNA Repair and Mutagenesis
, American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
|
| 5.
|
Dogliotti, E.,
Fortini, P.,
Pascucci, B.,
and Parlanti, E.
(2001)
Prog. Nucleic Acid Res. Mol. Biol.
68,
3-27[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Ames, B. N.
(1983)
Science
221,
1256-1264[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Halliwell, B.,
and Gutteridge, J. M. C.
(1990)
Methods Enzymol.
186,
1-85[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Shibutani, S.,
Takeshita, M.,
and Grollman, A. P.
(1991)
Nature
349,
431-434[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Wood, M. L.,
Esteve, A.,
Morningstar, M. L.,
Kuziemko, G. M.,
and Essigmann, J. M.
(1992)
Nucleic Acids Res.
20,
6023-6032[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Maki, H.,
and Sekiguchi, M.
(1992)
Nature
355,
273-275[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Cheng, K. C.,
Cahill, D. S.,
Kasai, H.,
Nishimura, S.,
and Loeb, L. A.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
166-172[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Pavlov, Y. I.,
Minnick, D. T.,
Izuta, S.,
and Kunkel, T. A.
(1994)
Biochemistry
33,
4695-4701[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Kouchakdjian, M.,
Bodepudi, V.,
Shibutani, S.,
Eisenberg, M.,
Johnson, F.,
Grollman, A. P.,
and Patel, D. J.
(1991)
Biochemistry
30,
1403-1412[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
McAuley-Hecht, K. E.,
Leonard, G. A.,
Gibson, N. J.,
Thomson, J. B.,
Watson, W. P.,
Hunter, W. N.,
and Brown, T.
(1994)
Biochemistry
33,
10266-10270[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Dizdaroglu, M.,
Nackerdien, Z.,
Chao, B.-C.,
Gajewski, E.,
and Rao, G.
(1991)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
285,
388-390[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Boiteux, S.,
Gajewski, E.,
Laval, J.,
and Dizdaroglu, M.
(1992)
Biochemistry
31,
106-110[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Graziewicz, M. A.,
Zastawny, T. H.,
Olinski, R.,
Speina, E.,
Siedlecki, J.,
and Tudek, B.
(2000)
Free Radic. Biol. Med.
28,
75-83[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
O'Connor, T. R.,
Boiteux, S.,
and Laval, J.
(1988)
Nucleic Acids Res.
16,
5879-5894[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Tudek, B.,
Boiteux, S.,
and Laval, J.
(1992)
Nucleic Acids Res.
20,
3079-3084[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Tudek, B.,
Graziewicz, M.,
Kazanova, O.,
Zastawny, T. H.,
Obtulowicz, T.,
and Laval, J.
(1999)
Acta Biochim. Pol.
46,
785-799[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Asagoshi, K.,
Yamada, T.,
Terato, H.,
Ohyama, Y.,
Monden, Y.,
Arai, T.,
Nishimura, S.,
Aburatani, H.,
Lindahl, T.,
and Ide, H.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
4956-4964[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Asagoshi, K.,
Yamada, T.,
Okada, Y.,
Terato, H.,
Ohyama, Y.,
Seki, S.,
and Ide, H.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
24781-24786[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Ide, H.,
Okagami, M.,
Murayama, H.,
Kimura, Y.,
and Makino, K.
(1993)
Biochem. Mol. Biol. Int.
31,
485-491[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Shibutani, S.
(1993)
Chem. Res. Toxicol.
6,
625-629[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Creighton, S.,
Bloom, L. B.,
and Goodman, M. F.
(1995)
Methods Enzymol.
262,
232-256[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Nishigaki, K.,
Tsubota, M.,
Miura, T.,
Chonan, Y.,
and Husimi, Y.
(1992)
J. Biochem. (Tokyo)
111,
144-150[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Nishigaki, K.,
Miura, T.,
Tsubota, M.,
Sutoh, A.,
Amano, N.,
and Husimi, Y.
(1992)
J. Biochem. (Tokyo)
111,
151-156[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Ke, S.-H.,
and Wartell, R. M.
(1993)
Nucleic Acids Res.
21,
5137-5143[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Ke, S.-H.,
and Wartell, R. M.
(1995)
Biochemistry
34,
4593-4600[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Ke, S.-H.,
and Wartell, R. M.
(1996)
Nucleic Acids Res.
24,
707-712[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Shibutani, S.,
and Grollman, A. P.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
11703-11710[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Cai, H.,
Bloom, L. B.,
Eritja, R.,
and Goodman, M. F.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
23567-23572[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Bebenek, K.,
and Kunkel, T. A.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
4946-4950[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Kunkel, T. A.
(1990)
Biochemistry
29,
8003-8011[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Schaaper, R. M.,
Koffel-Schwartz, N.,
and Fuchs, R. P. P.
(1990)
Carcinogenesis
11,
1087-1095[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Boiteux, S.,
and Laval, J.
(1982)
Biochemistry
21,
6746-6751[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Schaaper, R. M.,
Kunkel, T. A.,
and Loeb, L. A.
(1983)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
80,
487-491[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Randall, S. K.,
Eritja, R.,
Kaplan, B. E.,
Petruska, J.,
and Goodman, M. F.
(1987)
J. Biol. Chem.
262,
6864-6870[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 39.
|
Takeshita, M.,
Chang, C.-N.,
Johnson, F.,
Will, S.,
and Grollman, A. P.
(1987)
J. Biol. Chem.
262,
10171-10179[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Pham, P.,
Rangarajan, S.,
Woodgate, R.,
and Goodman, M. F.
(2001)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
98,
8350-8354[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 41.
|
Wang, Z.
(2001)
Mutat. Res.
486,
59-70[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 42.
|
Moriya, M.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
1122-1126[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 43.
|
Kamiya, H.,
Murata-Kamiya, N.,
Koizume, S.,
Inoue, H.,
Nishimura, S.,
and Ohtsuka, E.
(1995)
Carcinogenesis
16,
883-889[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 44.
|
Lowe, L. G.,
and Guengerich, F. P.
(1996)
Biochemistry
35,
9840-9849[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 45.
|
Ide, H.,
Kow, Y. W.,
and Wallace, S. S.
(1985)
Nucleic Acids Res.
13,
8035-8052[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 46.
|
Ide, H.,
Petrullo, L. A.,
Hatahet, Z.,
and Wallace, S. S.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
1469-1477[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 47.
|
Evans, J.,
Maccabee, M.,
Hatahet, Z.,
Courcelle, J.,
Bockrath, R.,
Ide, H.,
and Wallace, S. S.
(1993)
Mutat. Res.
299,
147-156[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 48.
|
Hayes, R. C.,
Petrullo, L. A.,
Huang, H. M.,
Wallace, S. S.,
and LeClerc, J. E.
(1988)
J. Mol. Biol.
201,
239-246[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 49.
|
Clark, J. M.,
and Beardsley, G. P.
(1987)
Biochemistry
26,
5398-5403[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 50.
|
Echols, H.,
and Goodman, M. F.
(1991)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
60,
477-511[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 51.
|
Kool, E. T.
(2001)
Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct.
30,
1-22[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 52.
|
Ide, H.,
Murayama, H.,
Sakamoto, S.,
Makino, K.,
Honda, K.,
Nakamuta, H.,
Sasaki, M.,
and Sugimoto, N.
(1995)
Nucleic Acids Res.
23,
123-129[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 53.
|
Iwai, S.
(2001)
Chem. Eur. J.
7,
4343-4351
|
| 54.
|
Asagoshi, K.,
Odawara, H.,
Nakano, H.,
Miyano, T.,
Terato, H.,
Ohyama, Y.,
Seki, S.,
and Ide, H.
(2000)
Biochemistry
39,
11389-11398[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 55.
|
Haraguchi, K.,
and Greenberg, M. M.
(2001)
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
123,
8636-8637[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 56.
|