![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 17, 14629-14634, April 26, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the
Received for publication, January 5, 2002, and in revised form, January 30, 2002
Mutations in the X-linked retinitis pigmentosa
2 gene cause progressive degeneration of photoreceptor cells.
The retinitis pigmentosa 2 protein (RP2) is similar in sequence to the
tubulin-specific chaperone cofactor C. Together with cofactors D and E,
cofactor C stimulates the GTPase activity of native tubulin, a reaction regulated by ADP-ribosylation factor-like 2 protein. Here we show that
in the presence of cofactor D, RP2 protein also stimulates the GTPase
activity of tubulin. We find that this function is abolished by
mutation in an arginine residue that is conserved in both cofactor C
and RP2. Notably, mutations that alter this arginine codon cause
familial retinitis pigmentosa. Our data imply that this residue acts as
an "arginine finger" to trigger the tubulin GTPase activity and
suggest that loss of this function in RP2 contributes to retinal
degeneration. We also show that in Saccharomyces
cerevisiae, both cofactor C and RP2 partially complement the
microtubule phenotype resulting from deletion of the cofactor C
homolog, demonstrating their functional overlap in vivo.
Finally, we find that RP2 interacts with GTP-bound ADP ribosylation
factor-like 3 protein, providing a link between RP2 and several
retinal-specific proteins, mutations in which also cause retinitis pigmentosa.
Retinitis pigmentosa is a degenerative disease and the major cause
of heritable blindness (1). It is caused by mutations in a dizzying
variety of genes; some are structural proteins of photoreceptors, many
are involved in photoreception and transduction, and a few are
seemingly unrelated ubiquitously expressed proteins (see RetNet,
www.sph.uth.tmc.edu/retnet/). Most (80-90%) cases of X-linked
retinitis pigmentosa are caused by mutations in two genes,
XRP2 and XRP3 (2). These were isolated by
positional cloning and shown to encode, respectively, the
RP21 protein (3) and the
retinitis pigmentosa GTPase regulator (RP3) (4, 5). The function
of RP2 is unknown, and the gene is expressed at a low level in all
tissues examined; it is targeted to the plasma membrane by
myristoylation and palmitoylation of its amino terminus
(6).
RP2 has amino acid sequence similarity over half of its length to the
tubulin-specific chaperone protein cofactor C (3). It has been shown
that cofactor C acts in a pathway together with four other
tubulin-specific chaperone proteins (cofactors A, B, D, and E) to
chaperone quasi-native The mammalian Arl (ADP ribosylation factor (ARF)-like) proteins
constitute a family of Ras-related small GTP-binding proteins with at
least eight members (15-18). They share 40-60% amino acid sequence
identity with ARF proteins but do not act as cofactors in the cholera
toxin-induced ADP-ribosylation of G Plasmid Construction--
DNA fragments encoding human RP2,
cofactor C, BART (binder of Arl2) and carboxyl-terminally
His6-tagged Arl2, Arl3 and Arl4 were generated by PCR using
reverse transcribed human testis RNA (CLONTECH,
Inc., Palo Alto, CA) as template. These were inserted into the pET23b
vector (Novagen, Inc., Madison, WI). From these plasmids, mutated
cDNAs (encoding RP2-R118H, RP2- Expression and Purification of Proteins--
Bovine brain
tubulin (27) was obtained free from associated proteins by passage
through phosphocellulose (28). The cytosolic chaperonin CCT and
cofactors B, D, and E were purified as described previously (8, 9, 29).
Full-length, untagged wild type and mutant cofactor C were expressed in
Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) cells using the expression
plasmids described above. Harvested cells were lysed using a French
press and clarified by centrifugation, and the recombinant proteins
were purified through two dimensions as follows: 1) a cation exchange
column of SP-Sepharose (Amersham Biosciences), developed with a linear
gradient of 10-250 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 6.8)
containing 1 mM each DTT, MgCl2, and EGTA and
2) an anion exchange column (Q15; Amersham Biosciences), also developed
using a phosphate buffer gradient (10-400 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.3). The recombinant proteins were monitored by
SDS-PAGE analysis of fractions emerging from the columns. Wild type and
mutant RP2 proteins were expressed from pET23b recombinant plasmids
harbored in E. coli BL21(DE3). Cell lysates were cleared by
centrifugation at 100,000 × g and applied to a Q15
anion exchange column developed with a linear gradient of NaCl
(0.01-0.7 M NaCl in 10 mM phosphate buffer, pH
7.4, 0.5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EGTA, and 1 mM DTT). The purified material from this dimension was
loaded on a column of hydroxyapatite (Pentax, American
International Chemical Co., Inc., Natick, MA) in 0.5 mM
MgCl2, 50 µM CaCl2, and 1 mM DTT. Elution was performed in the same buffer using a linear gradient of 0-0.25 M sodium phosphate buffer, pH
6.7. Fractions enriched in RP2 were further purified by application to
a MonoQ anion exchange column (Amersham Biosciences) and eluted in 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8, and 1 mM DTT via a 0.0-0.5
M gradient of MgCl2. Following each dimension
of purification, aliquots of fractions emerging from the column were
analyzed by Western blotting using a polyclonal anti-RP2 antibody for
the detection of immunoreactive material. His6-tagged Arl2,
Arl3, Arl4, and GST-tagged RP2 were affinity-purified on cobalt resin
(CLONTECH, Inc., Palo Alto, CA) and agarose-coupled
glutathione (Amersham Biosciences), respectively, according to the
manufacturer's recommended protocols.
Generation of Antisera to Cofactor C, RP2, and
Arl3--
Purified recombinant proteins were used as antigens for the
production of antisera in rabbits (Arl3, cofactor C) or guinea pigs
(RP2) (Cocalico Biologicals Inc., Reamstown, PA). For this purpose,
Arl3 was first coupled to keyhole limpet hemocyanin. The
resulting sera were tested for their titer and specificity by Western
blotting against both their respective antigens and whole cell lysates.
In Vitro Tubulin Folding Reactions--
In vitro
tubulin refolding assays (10 µl) were performed in folding buffer (20 mM Mes, pH 6.8, 20 mM KCl, and 1 mM
each DTT, MgCl2, and EGTA), containing 10 µM
[ Tubulin-GAP Assays--
Purified bovine brain tubulin (1 µM) was incubated at 37 °C in the presence of 25 µM [ Complementation Assay in S. cerevisiae--
A CIN2
deletion strain (413.4B:MAT Translation in Vitro and Binding Assays--
cDNAs encoding
RP2, cofactor C, and BART were transcribed and translated in
vitro using TnT rabbit reticulocyte lysate (Promega, Inc.,
Madison, WI) in the presence of [35S]methionine (0.8 mCi/ml) at 30 °C for 1 h. Samples were cleared of ribosomes by
centrifugation at 200,000 × g for 20 min and
preincubated with uncoupled Talon cobalt affinity beads
(CLONTECH, Inc.) to remove nonspecifically bound
translated protein. Transcription/translation reactions were diluted
20-fold in reaction buffer (0.3 M NaCl, 50 mM
phosphate, pH. 7.2, 1 mM MgCl2) and incubated
for 1 h at room temperature with cobalt affinity beads preloaded
with about 25 µg of bound His6-Arl2, 3, or 4 or (in a
control reaction) without bound protein. The resin-bound complexes were
extensively washed with reaction buffer containing 0.05% Nonidet P-40
and eluted in SDS gel loading buffer. Some of the in vitro
transcription/translation reactions were done by addition of ethanol
alone or 0.6 mM DL- Functional Comparison of RP2 and Cofactor C--
Human RP2 and
human cofactor C share 53% similarity and 29% identity over a domain
of ~200 amino acids. The untagged, bacterially expressed proteins
were purified to homogeneity through several dimensions of ion exchange
chromatography. Using these purified recombinant proteins, together
with the cytosolic chaperonin CCT and the other tubulin-specific
chaperone proteins required for tubulin heterodimer formation
(i.e. cofactors B, D, and E) (9), we performed in
vitro Mutation of the Arginine Conserved in RP2 and Cofactor C--
It
has been proposed that GTPase activators share a common active site
consisting of an arginine finger (32). Arg-118 in RP2 and
Arg-262 in cofactor C constitute the only pair of conserved arginines
found in these two proteins (Fig.
2A). Therefore, using site-directed mutagenesis, we engineered plasmid constructs expressing either cofactor C or RP2 mutated at this position, i.e.
cofactor C-R262A and RP2-R118H. In the latter case, mutation of
arginine to histidine was chosen because this mutation has been shown
to cause X-linked retinitis pigmentosa in some families (3, 33). We
also made a plasmid expressing another disease mutant RP2 protein, RP2- Complementation Assay in S. cerevisiae--
Cofactor C and RP2 are
distantly related in sequence to the yeast protein CIN2 (11, 12,
40). CIN1, CIN2, CIN4, and
PAC2 (putative homologs of cofactor D, cofactor C, Arl2, and
cofactor E, respectively) act together in a pathway affecting
microtubule stability. Yeast harboring mutations in these genes show
supersensitvity to cold and to benomyl, both of which destabilize
microtubules. To test whether human cofactor C or RP2 can compensate
for the loss of CIN2 in yeast, we transformed plasmids expressing wild type and mutant versions of these proteins into a CIN2
deletion strain. We assayed the resulting strains for their benomyl
resistance in the cold (26 °C) where benomyl supersensitivity of the
parental strain is enhanced. The positive control was
CIN2-cloned into the same vector, and the negative control
was the vector itself. As shown in Fig.
3, only wild type RP2 or cofactor C but
not RP2-R118H, cofactor C-R262A, or vector alone could complement for
the loss of CIN2. Neither RP2 nor cofactor C complemented as
well as CIN2 itself, and cofactor C was more effective than
RP2 in restoring benomyl resistance.
Binding of RP2 to ADP Ribosylation Factor-like Protein 3 (Arl3)--
The tubulin-GAP activity of cofactors C and D is modulated
by the small G protein Arl2 (ARF-like protein 2) (22). We therefore examined the possibility that one or more members of the Arl family of
proteins might bind to RP2. To do this, we generated constructs for the
expression in E. coli of Arl2, Arl3, and Arl4, each
His6-tagged at their carboxyl termini. The Arl2- and
Arl3-binding protein BART (34, 35) was used as a positive control.
Agarose-bound nickel beads loaded with each of the
His6-tagged proteins were incubated with either
35S-labeled RP2, BART, or cofactor C generated by
translation in vitro. Analysis of the bound products by
SDS-PAGE showed that Arl3 bound to in vitro translated RP2
but only in the presence of the slowly hydrolyzable GTP analogue,
GTP-
We also made two mutant forms of Arl3, Arl3-Q71L and Arl3-T30N, based
on mutant proteins used for the study of the well characterized and
quite similar Ras family of G-proteins (36, 37). These mutations
correspond to Q61L and T17N in Ras. The former mutation results in a
defect in GTP hydrolysis, leading to GTP-bound mutant protein, whereas
the latter is defective in GTP binding, resulting in nucleotide-free or
GDP-bound protein. We found that the putative GTPase-defective mutant
Arl3 binds most strongly to RP2, reinforcing our conclusion that it is
GTP-Arl3 that binds to RP2 (Fig. 4B). The interaction
between RP2 and Arl3 was also found using purified tagged proteins
(data not shown), demonstrating that the interaction is direct and not
mediated by some third protein.
To confirm the binding of RP2 to GTP-Arl3 in tissue extracts, we
expressed RP2 as a GST fusion protein, immobilized it on agarose-bound
glutathione beads, and examined the ability of these beads to
specifically bind proteins contained in an unfractionated tissue
extract. These experiments were done in the presence of GTP, GDP,
GTP-
We have shown that Arl2 inhibits the tubulin-GAP activity of the
tubulin-specific chaperones known as cofactors C and D (22). However,
we found that neither wild type nor mutant His6-tagged Arl3
modulated the tubulin-GAP activity of RP2 and cofactor D, nor did RP2
behave as a GTPase activator of Arl3 (data not shown). However, these
negative results could result from using bacterially synthesized Arl3
protein that is both tagged and unmodified, as well as recombinant RP2,
which is not acylated.
Because our data established that RP2 binds to GTP-Arl3, we decided to
see whether there was differential binding among the RP2 mutant
proteins that we used in the GAP experiment shown in Fig. 2. We found
that in vitro translated RP2-R118H binds to the GTPase-defective form of Arl3 more weakly than wild type RP2, whereas
RP2- Retinitis pigmentosa 2 protein, RP2, is similar in sequence over
half its length to the tubulin-specific chaperone cofactor C. We
investigated the functional similarities and differences between the
two proteins. We demonstrate here that the two proteins have
overlapping but not identical functions. Both stimulate the GTPase
activity of native tubulin, in both cases only with the cooperation of
cofactor D. However, only cofactor C participates in the
heterodimerization of newly folded tubulin subunits. Whereas the
ADP-ribosylation factor-like 2 protein (Arl2) regulates the tubulin-GAP
activity of cofactors C and D (22), the related protein Arl3, to which
RP2 binds specifically (see below), does not affect the tubulin-GAP
activity of RP2 and cofactor D. The fact that RP2 and cofactor C are
not functionally identical is not surprising given that they only share
one of two putative domains and that the former is largely a
membrane-associated protein, whereas the latter is cytosolic.
Remarkably, we found that mutation of the only conserved arginine
residue present in both RP2 and cofactor C (R118H in RP2 and R262A in
cofactor C) causes a total loss of tubulin-GAP activity in each
protein. The mutation R118H in RP2 is one that has been shown to cause
familial retinitis pigmentosa (3). This mutation does not, however,
lead to the mislocalization or destabilization of the RP2 protein (2,
6). When expressed in cultured cells (either tagged or untagged),
RP2-R118H is expressed at high levels and is targeted to the plasma
membrane in a manner indistinguishable from wild type RP2. Combining
these genetic studies with the biochemical data presented here, we
conclude that the loss of tubulin-GAP activity itself may cause
retinitis pigmentosa in families harboring this mutation.
The active site of many different GAPs is hypothesized to contain an
arginine finger (32). It is likely that the arginine residue we have
mutated plays this role in cofactor C and RP2 for two reasons. First,
it is the only arginine that is invariant in all sequenced RP2 and
cofactor C proteins (2). Second, mutation of this arginine leads to a
total loss of GAP activity, while leaving the stability and
chromatographic properties of both proteins unchanged. From the latter
fact we conclude that mutation of the conserved arginine does not lead
to a global rearrangement or misfolding of the proteins. If structural
analysis confirms our inference that cofactor C and RP2 act as
tubulin-GAPs through an arginine finger, this would be very striking
given the fact that tubulin has a very different GTP binding pocket
than the small GTP-binding proteins (39).
CIN2, the putative homolog of cofactor C in yeast, acts
together with CIN1, CIN4, and PAC2
(the putative homologs of cofactor D, Arl2, and cofactor E,
respectively) in a pathway affecting microtubule stability (11, 12,
40). We have shown here that cofactor C and RP2 can partially
complement a deletion in CIN2. However, when mutated at the
conserved arginine residue, neither protein can restore benomyl
resistance to the CIN2 deletion strain. These findings
suggest that tubulin-GAP activity is essential for restoring normal
microtubule function in vivo. There was a gradient in the
effectiveness of these proteins in conferring benomyl resistance:
CIN2 > cofactor C > RP2. This result is readily explained
by the degree of sequence similarity among the three proteins. We infer
that cofactor C is the human homolog of CIN2 and that RP2
(which is similar in sequence over only half its length to cofactor C
and CIN2) shares some but not all functions of the latter
two proteins.
As tubulin-GAPs, RP2 and cofactor C convert GTP-tubulin to GDP-tubulin.
Since it is only the former species that is competent to polymerize
into microtubules, these GAP activities could regulate microtubule
polymerization in vivo. Microtubules are stabilized against
catastrophic depolymerization by a dynamic cap of GTP-tubulin formed
because, although hydrolysis of bound GTP by tubulin is coupled to its
polymerization, this reaction lags slightly behind the polymerization
reaction (41, 42). If the GAP activity of either RP2 or cofactor C
causes the destruction of this GTP cap, these proteins would be
powerful regulators of microtubule dynamics. Since RP2 is plasma
membrane-bound, it is possible that it plays a role in maintaining the
plasticity of microtubules near the periphery. The fact that RP2 is
membrane-bound in vivo means that in the cell, it is
effectively concentrated in two dimensions. This may explain the
somewhat higher concentrations of RP2 required for GAP activity in the
in vitro reaction compared with those of cofactor C, which
is a cytosolic protein. In addition, the myristoylation and
palmitoylation of RP2 may enhance its GAP activity (we used
recombinant, unmodified RP2 in our in vitro GAP assays).
There are several reasons to believe that the GAP activity of RP2 is
tubulin specific. 1) This activity is totally dependent on the action
of a third protein (cofactor D). 2) RP2 displays no GAP activity
toward, for example, recombinant ADP ribosylation factor-like proteins.
3) GAP proteins are usually extremely specific (36), sometimes
selectively recognizing specific isoforms of G proteins.
Biochemical and genetic data have previously shown that Arl2, a member
of the ARF-like (Arl) subfamily of small G proteins, regulates
tubulin-specific chaperones (22, 23). Here we show that RP2 binds to
the related protein Arl3. The interaction of Arl3 and RP2 is very
likely to be physiologically significant, because 1) it occurs in whole
cell extracts and 2) it is GTP-dependent, as is typically
the case for interactions of G proteins with their effectors.
Interestingly, we find that while RP2-R118H shows a weak affinity to
Arl3, RP2- The interaction of RP2 and Arl3 is particularly interesting since Arl3
has recently been shown to bind to PDE *
This work was supported by a grant from the National
Institutes of Health.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, February 14, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M200128200
The abbreviations used are:
RP2, retinitis
pigmentosa 2;
CCT, cytosolic chaperonin containing TCP-1;
GAP, GTPase activator;
ARF, ADP ribosylation factor;
GST, glutathione
S-transferase;
DTT, dithiothreitol;
BART, binder of Arl2.
Functional Overlap between Retinitis Pigmentosa 2 Protein and the
Tubulin-specific Chaperone Cofactor C*
,
,
, and
Department of Biochemistry, New York
University Medical Center, New York, New York 10016, § Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Cellular
and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California,
San Francisco, California 94143, and ¶ Aventis Pharma
Deutschland, DG Metabolic Diseases Industriepark Höchst,
Gebäude H 825, Labor 439, 65926 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
- and
-tubulin subunits released from the
cytosolic chaperonin CCT and assemble the
/
-tubulin heterodimer.
Each step in this pathway has been deduced from in vitro
reconstitution experiments using purified components (7-9). The
pathway hinges on the formation of a supercomplex containing 
and
-tubulin and cofactors C, D, and E. The hydrolysis of GTP by
tubulin, stimulated by cofactors C and D, is part of the heterodimer
assembly reaction; the stimulated hydrolysis of GTP by
-tubulin acts
as a switch for the release from the supercomplex of native, newly made
tubulin heterodimers (10). Cofactor C and D in combination have also
been shown to be a GTPase activator (GAP) for native tubulin; cofactor
E enhances this tubulin-GAP activity (10). These biochemical data are
consistent with the wealth of genetic evidence on cofactor homologs in
the yeasts Saccharomyces cerevisiae and
Schizosaccharomyces pombe (11-14). In S. cerevisiae, these genes were first identified in screens for
chromosomal loss and supersensitivity to microtubule poisons. CIN1, CIN2, CIN4, and PAC2
are the putative homologs of cofactor D, cofactor C, Arl2 (see below),
and cofactor E, respectively.
S nor do they possess
the other biochemical activities that characterize ARF proteins
(19-21). Arl2 modulates the tubulin-GAP activity of cofactors C and D
(22), and mutations in its putative yeast homologs affect microtubule
stability (11, 12, 23). Mutations in Arl2 in Arabidopsis
thaliana also result in the loss of microtubules (24, 25). Given
the sequence similarity between cofactor C and RP2 and the interaction
of Arl2 with tubulin-folding cofactors, we decided to compare the
functional and biochemical properties of RP2 and cofactor C and to
investigate the possibility that RP2 might interact with one or more
Arl proteins. Our data show that RP2 acts as a GAP for tubulin in
concert with cofactor D, but unlike cofactor C, it does not catalyze
tubulin heterodimerization. We also show that both cofactor C and RP2
partially complement CIN2 deletion in S. cerevisiae and that RP2 binds to Arl3 in a nucleotide and
myristoylation-dependent manner.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
S6, cofactor C-R262A,
Arl3-T30N, and Arl3-Q70L) were generated by PCR, using the recombinant
pET23b plasmids as template, with specific mismatched primers and the
QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene Inc., La Jolla,
CA). For the expression of glutathione S-transferase-RP2 (GST-RP2), a fragment encoding human RP2 was generated and subcloned into the pGEX-4T-1 vector (Stratagene Inc., La Jolla, CA) in frame with
the GST-coding region. For expression in yeast, human RP2 and
RP2-R118H, human cofactor C wild type, and R262A were subcloned from
pET23b into pRS413-GPD carrying the HIS3 gene and the 2µ ori (26). CIN2 was cloned into the same vector by
PCR from a yeast genomic library. All constructs were verified by DNA sequencing.
-32P]GTP (2.5 µCi), purified bovine brain tubulin
(3 µM), the cytosolic chaperonin CCT (1.5 µM) and various combinations of cofactors B, D, E (6 µg/ml each), and C (6 µg/ml) or RP2 (6-300 µg/ml). Reactions
were incubated at 30 °C for 1.25 h and analyzed by native gel
electrophoresis (30) followed by autoradiography to assess the
incorporation of non-exchangeable radiolabeled GTP into refolded tubulin dimers.
-32P]GTP (10 µCi) in folding
buffer in the presence of various combinations of tubulin-folding
cofactors and RP2 (see Fig. 1 legend). Release of radiolabeled
inorganic phosphate was measured at 1 min intervals as described
(10).
ade2 his3 leu2 lys2 ura3
cin2::LEU2) (11) was transformed according to
the lithium acetate method with either pRS413 alone or pRS413 carrying
the wild type or mutant versions of RP2 or cofactor C. CIN2-pRS413 was used as a positive control. Transformants
were selected on synthetic medium. Single colonies were picked and
grown at 30 °C overnight in liquid medium lacking the appropriate
amino acids. Transformants were resuspended in sterile water at the
same optical density, and growth on plates was tested at 26 °C by
spotting serial dilutions of cell suspensions onto yeast
extract/peptone/dextrose plates containing 0, 1, or 5 µg/ml of benomyl.
-hydroxymyristic acid
(HMA, Sigma) dissolved in ethanol (the maximum that the system could
tolerate). GST-RP2 binding assays were carried out by incubating 0.5 mg
of GST-RP2 bound to glutathione-conjugated-Sepharose 4B beads (Amersham
Biosciences). For binding to immobilized RP2-GST, unfractionated
soluble protein from a bovine testis lysate (9) was transferred into
PBS by passage over Sephadex G25. 0.6 ml of this material (containing
20 mg/ml total protein) was used for each binding reaction. Incubations
were performed at room temperature in the presence of various
nucleotides each at a concentration of 1 mM. The beads were
washed with PBS containing that nucleotide and 0.05% Tween 20. Protein
was eluted with 15 mM glutathione in 50 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 8, fractionated on SDS-PAGE and analyzed by Western
blotting using rabbit anti-Arl3 antisera or a mouse monoclonal
anti-
-actin antibody (Sigma).
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-tubulin refolding reactions in the presence of
radiolabeled GTP. In these reactions, tubulin is cycled through the
folding (CCT-driven) and heterodimerization (tubulin-folding cofactors)
machinery, in the process incorporating non-exchangeable GTP bound to
-tubulin in the
/
heterodimer (10, 31). The products were
analyzed by non-denaturing gel electrophoresis (Fig. 1A). We found that despite its
sequence similarity, RP2 was unable to substitute for cofactor C in
these in vitro folding reactions and hence cannot
participate in the heterodimerization of tubulin under these
experimental conditions. Increasing the concentration of RP2 in these
reactions had no effect (data not shown). However, reactions containing
RP2, cofactors D, or D and E, and native tubulin showed tubulin-GAP
activity (Fig. 1B). No GTP hydrolysis was observed in
control reactions containing either RP2 alone or RP2 plus tubulin. We
conclude that RP2, like cofactor C, acts in concert with cofactor D as
a tubulin-GAP. As is the case with cofactor C, cofactor E enhances this
tubulin-GAP activity but is not essential to it (Fig. 1B). A
higher concentration of RP2 relative to cofactor C is needed to elicit
comparable tubulin-GAP activity; possible reasons for this difference
are discussed below.

View larger version (21K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Functional comparison of RP2 and cofactor C
in vitro. A, RP2 does not substitute
for cofactor C in tubulin folding. Tubulin refolding reactions (see
"Materials and Methods") were done in the presence of
[
-32P]GTP and chaperonin (CCT), cofactors
B, D, and E and either cofactor C (lane 1), no addition
(lane 2), or RP2 (lane 3). Reaction products were
resolved by native gel electrophoresis followed by autoradiography to
visualize those products that non-exchangeably bound radiolabeled GTP.
Only in lane 1 is native heterodimeric tubulin regenerated.
B, RP2 has tubulin-GAP (GTPase-activator protein) activity.
Tubulin (1.0 µM) was incubated with cofactors C (80 µg/ml), D, and E (30 µg/ml each) (open squares);
cofactors D and E (30 µg/ml each) and RP2 (250 µg/ml)
(asterisks); cofactor D (30 µg/ml) and RP2 (250 µg/ml)
(crosses); cofactors D and E (30 µg/ml each) and RP2 (80 µg/ml) (open triangles); and RP2 (250 µg/ml)
(closed diamonds). The experiment marked with closed circles
represents incubation of RP2 without added tubulin. The release of
inorganic phosphate from [
-32P]GTP by hydrolysis was
measured at 1-min intervals.
S6. This mutation is known to prevent myristoylation of the protein, a defect leading to intracellular misrouting (2, 6). The three
mutant proteins were expressed in E. coli and purified using
precisely the same chromatographic dimensions used to purify the wild
type protein. The mutant proteins behaved indistinguishably from their
wild type counterpart on all dimensions (see "Materials and
Methods"). We conclude that these mutations do not result in any
global changes in the structures of the respective proteins. We tested
each mutant protein in tubulin-GAP reactions; the results are shown in
Fig. 2. Mutation of the invariant arginine common to both RP2 and
cofactor C completely abolished their tubulin-GAP activity (Fig. 2,
B and C). However, deletion of serine 6 in RP2 had no effect on its GAP activity (Fig. 2C). Given the
structural integrity of the mutant proteins, it seems likely that the
invariant arginine is critical for tubulin-GAP activity and suggests
that it is indeed part of an arginine finger.

View larger version (15K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Mutation of a conserved arginine in RP2 and
cofactor C abolishes tubulin-GAP activity. A, sequence
comparison between the conserved domains in human RP2 and human
cofactor C with a consensus sequence shown below. The sole conserved
arginine is boxed. B, mutation of Arg-262 in
cofactor C abolishes its tubulin-GAP activity. Tubulin-GAP reactions
were performed as in Fig. 1 and contained tubulin, cofactors D and E,
and either wild type cofactor C (open diamonds) or cofactor
C-R262A (open squares). C, mutation of Arg-118
(but not Ser-6) in RP2 abolishes its tubulin-GAP activity. Three
tubulin-GAP assays were performed as described in the legend to Fig. 1;
they contained tubulin and cofactors D and E and either RP2
(closed diamonds); RP2-
S6 (open triangles) or
RP2-R118H (asterisks). Control reactions were performed with
RP2 (crosses) or RP2 plus tubulin (open
squares).

View larger version (41K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Cofactor C and RP2, but neither cofactor
C-R262A or RP2-R118H, complement a CIN2 deletion
phenotype in yeast. CIN2, cofactor C (wild type and
R262A), RP2 (wild type and R118H), and vector alone were each
transformed into a CIN2 deletion strain. Individual
transformants were grown in selective medium overnight and spotted in
serial dilutions onto yeast extract/peptone/dextrose plates containing
0, 1.0, or 5.0 µg/ml benomyl to assess growth under these conditions.
Incubation was at 26 °C to enhance benomyl sensitivity.
Cc, cofactor C.
-S (Fig. 4A). This suggested a specific binding between RP2 and GTP-Arl3. As a positive control, both Arl2 and Arl3 bound to BART, while none of the three Arl
proteins tested bound to cofactor C (Fig. 4A).

View larger version (41K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
RP2 binds to GTP-Arl3 (ADP-ribosylation
factor-like protein 3). A, His6-tagged Arl2
(lane A2) Arl3 (lane A3),
or Arl4 (lane A4) bound to cobalt affinity beads
or beads alone (lane C) were incubated in the presence of
35S-radiolabeled BART, RP2, or cofactor C either in the
presence or absence of GTP-
-S. Eluted products were analyzed by
SDS-PAGE. I, input translated BART, RP2, or Cofactor C
corresponding to 40% of the amount used in the other lanes.
B, interaction between RP2 and either wild type or mutant
forms of His6-tagged Arl3. Wild type and
His6-tagged mutant (Q71L and T30N) forms of purified
recombinant Arl3 were incubated with 35S-radiolabeled RP2
and analyzed as described in A. C, GST-RP2 binds
to Arl3 in a whole tissue extract. Immobilized GST-RP2 or GST alone was
incubated with a total soluble protein extract from bovine testis.
Bound and eluted material was analyzed by Western blotting with either
an anti-Arl3 or anti-
-actin antibody. Left-hand panel,
Western blot of input bovine testis soluble extract (I)
corresponding to the amount used in the lanes shown in the center
panel. Center panel, Western blot of material binding
to beads (lane C) or to GST alone.
L and
+L, material binding to GST-RP2 in the absence or presence,
respectively, of bovine testis lysate. Right-hand panel,
Western blot of (I) tissue extract corresponding to the
amount used in the adjacent binding experiments; GTP, GDP, GTP-
-S,
, material bound to GST-RP2 in the presence of GTP, GDP, GTP-
-S
(all at 1 mM) or no nucleotide.
-S, or no nucleotide. In each case, the bound proteins were
eluted, resolved by SDS-PAGE and detected by Western blotting with an
anti-Arl3 antiserum. These experiments showed that binding of Arl3 is
strongest in the presence of GTP-
-S (Fig. 4C), supporting a specific interaction between RP2 and GTP-Arl3 in the context of whole cells.
S6 bound much more strongly to this form of Arl3 and to wild
type Arl3 (Fig. 5A). Since
deletion of serine 6 in RP2 is known to prevent its myristoylation (6),
we tested whether the enhanced binding of RP2-
S6 might be a
result of its inability to acquire this posttranslational modification.
To do this, we included an inhibitor of myristoylation
(DL-
-hydroxymyristic acid) (38) in in vitro
translation reactions and showed that a greater proportion of wild type
RP2 is bound to Arl3 when myristoylation is inhibited (Fig.
5B). We conclude that myristoylation of RP2 indeed weakens
its binding to Arl3 while increasing the nucleotide dependence of that
interaction.

View larger version (25K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Differential binding of RP2 and RP2 mutants
to Arl3 and the effect of myristoylation on binding of wild type RP2 to
Arl3. A, RP2-
S6 binds more strongly than wild
type RP2 or RP2-R118H to both wild type Arl3 and Arl3-Q71L.
Left-hand panel, input RP2 wild type and mutant translation
products. Center and right-hand panels, binding
of wild type Arl3 (center panel) or Arl3-Q71L (right
panel) to radiolabeled wild type or mutant RP2. B,
effect of an inhibitor (HMA) of myristoyl-CoA:protein
N-myristoyltransferase on binding of wild type RP2 to
Arl3-Q71L. Wild type RP2 was translated in the absence
(control) or in the presence of HMA, and the reaction
products were incubated in the presence of His6-tagged
Arl3-Q71L conjugated to cobalt beads. Recovered complexes were eluted
and analyzed by SDS-PAGE along with an equivalent amount of
input-translated RP2. The bands corresponding to bound and input RP2
were quantitated by phosphorimaging. The ratio of these two numbers,
expressed as a percentage and averaged from three independent
experiments, is shown in the figure.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
S6 binds more strongly to it than its wild type
counterpart as does unmyristoylated RP2. Our data imply that the
absence of myristoylation causes the stronger binding of RP2-
S6. It
is possible that in vivo Arl3 binds to unmodified RP2 and
participates in its targeting.
, the
subunit of
rod-specific cyclic GMP phosphodiesterase (43), a molecule involved in
phototransduction. PDE
also interacts with the retinitis pigmentosa
GTPase regulator (44); mutations in the gene (XRP3) encoding this
protein are the major cause of X-linked retinitis pigmentosa. Thus, it
is tempting to speculate that Arl3 links RP2 with RGPR and PDE
in a
common pathway necessary for the maintenance of rod photoreceptor cells.
![]()
FOOTNOTES
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of
Biochemistry, New York University Medical Center, 550 First Ave., New York, NY 10016. Tel.: 212-263-3141; Fax: 212-263-8166; E-mail: sally.lewis@med.nyu.edu.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Boughman, J. A.,
Conneally, P. M.,
and Nance, W. E.
(1980)
Am. J. Hum. Genet.
32,
223-235[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 2.
Schwahn, U.,
Paland, N.,
Techritz, S.,
Lenzner, S.,
and Berger, W.
(2001)
Hum. Mol. Genet.
10,
1177-1183 3.
Schwahn, U.,
Lenzner, S.,
Dong, J.,
Feil, S.,
Hinzmann, B.,
van Duijnhoven, G.,
Kirschner, R.,
Hemberger, M.,
Bergen, A. A.,
Rosenberg, T.,
Pinckers, A. J.,
Fundele, R.,
Rosenthal, A.,
Cremers, F. P.,
Ropers, H. H.,
and Berger, W.
(1998)
Nat. Genet.
19,
327-332[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 4.
Meindl, A.,
Dry, K.,
Herrmann, K.,
Manson, F.,
Ciccodicola, A.,
Edgar, A.,
Carvalho, M. R.,
Achatz, H.,
Hellebrand, H.,
Lennon, A.,
Migliaccio, C.,
Porter, K.,
Zrenner, E.,
Bird, A.,
Jay, M.,
Lorenz, B.,
Wittwer, B.,
D'Urso, M.,
Meitinger, T.,
and Wright, A.
(1996)
Nat. Genet.
13,
35-42[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 5.
Roepman, R.,
van Duijnhoven, G.,
Rosenberg, T.,
Pinckers, A. J.,
Bleeker-Wagemakers, L. M.,
Bergen, A. A.,
Post, J.,
Beck, A.,
Reinhardt, R.,
Ropers, H. H.,
Cremers, F. P.,
and Berger, W.
(1996)
Hum. Mol. Genet.
5,
1035-1041 6.
Chapple, J. P.,
Hardcastle, A. J.,
Grayson, C.,
Spackman, L. A.,
Willison, K. R.,
and Cheetham, M. E.
(2000)
Hum. Mol. Genet.
9,
1919-1926 7.
Tian, G.,
Vainberg, I. E.,
Tap, W. D.,
Lewis, S. A.,
and Cowan, N. J.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
23910-23913 8.
Tian, G.,
Lewis, S. A.,
Feierbach, B.,
Stearns, T.,
Rommelaere, H.,
Ampe, C.,
and Cowan, N. J.
(1997)
J. Cell Biol.
138,
821-832 9.
Tian, G.,
Huang, Y.,
Rommelaere, H.,
Vandekerckhove, J.,
Ampe, C.,
and Cowan, N. J.
(1996)
Cell
86,
287-296[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 10.
Tian, G.,
Bhamidipati, A.,
Cowan, N. J.,
and Lewis, S. A.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
24054-24058 11.
Stearns, T.,
Hoyt, M. A.,
and Botstein, D.
(1990)
Genetics
124,
251-262[Abstract] 12.
Hoyt, M. A.,
Stearns, T.,
and Botstein, D.
(1990)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
10,
223-234 13.
Fleming, J. A.,
Vega, L. R.,
and Solomon, F.
(2000)
Genetics
156,
69-80 14.
Radcliffe, P. A.,
Garcia, M. A.,
and Toda, T.
(2000)
Genetics
156,
93-103 15.
Clark, J.,
Moore, L.,
Krasinskas, A.,
Way, J.,
Battey, J.,
Tamkun, J.,
and Kahn, R. A.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
8952-8956 16.
Jacobs, S.,
Schilf, C.,
Fliegert, F.,
Koling, S.,
Weber, Y.,
Schurmann, A.,
and Joost, H. G.
(1999)
FEBS Lett.
456,
384-388[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 17.
Cavenagh, M. M.,
Breiner, M.,
Schurmann, A.,
Rosenwald, A. G.,
Terui, T.,
Zhang, C.,
Randazzo, P. A.,
Adams, M.,
Joost, H. G.,
and Kahn, R. A.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
18937-18942 18.
Hong, J. X.,
Lee, F. J.,
Patton, W. A.,
Lin, C. Y.,
Moss, J.,
and Vaughan, M.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
15872-15876 19.
Vaughan, M.,
and Moss, J.
(1997)
Adv. Exp. Med. Biol.
419,
315-320[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 20.
Amor, J. C.,
Horton, J. R.,
Zhu, X.,
Wang, Y.,
Sullards, C.,
Ringe, D.,
Cheng, X.,
and Kahn, R. A.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
42477-42484 21.
Tamkun, J. W.,
Kahn, R. A.,
Kissinger, M.,
Brizuela, B. J.,
Rulka, C.,
Scott, M. P.,
and Kennison, J. A.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
3120-3124 22.
Bhamidipati, A.,
Lewis, S. A.,
and Cowan, N. J.
(2000)
J. Cell Biol.
149,
1087-1096 23.
Radcliffe, P. A.,
Vardy, L.,
and Toda, T.
(2000)
FEBS Lett.
468,
84-88[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 24.
McElver, J.,
Patton, D.,
Rumbaugh, M.,
Liu, C.,
Yang, L. J.,
and Meinke, D.
(2000)
Plant Cell
12,
1379-1392 25.
Mayer, U.,
Herzog, U.,
Berger, F.,
Inze, D.,
and Jurgens, G.
(1999)
Eur. J. Cell Biol.
78,
100-108[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 26.
Mumberg, D.,
Muller, R.,
and Funk, M.
(1995)
Gene
156,
119-122[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 27.
Shelanski, M. L.,
Gaskin, F.,
and Cantor, C. R.
(1973)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
70,
765-768 28.
Goode, B. L.,
and Feinstein, S. C.
(1994)
J. Cell Biol.
124,
769-782 29.
Gao, Y.,
Thomas, J. O.,
Chow, R. L.,
Lee, G. H.,
and Cowan, N. J.
(1992)
Cell
69,
1043-1050[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 30.
Zabala, J. C.,
and Cowan, N. J.
(1992)
Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton
23,
222-230[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 31.
Lewis, S. A.,
Tian, G.,
and Cowan, N. J.
(1997)
Trends Cell Biol.
7,
479-485[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 32.
Sceffzek, K.,
Ahmadian, M. R.,
and Wittinghofer, A.
(1998)
Trends Biochem.
23,
257-262[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 33.
Sharon, D.,
Bruns, G. A.,
McGee, T. L.,
Sandberg, M. A.,
Berson, E. L.,
and Dryja, T. P.
(2000)
Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.
41,
2712-2721 34.
Sharer, J. D.,
and Kahn, R. A.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
27553-27561 35.
Van Valkenburgh, H.,
Shern, J. F.,
Sharer, J. D.,
Zhu, X.,
and Kahn, R. A.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
22826-22837 36.
Boguski, M. S.,
and McCormick, F.
(1993)
Nature
366,
643-654[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 37.
Bourne, H. R.,
Sanders, D. A.,
and McCormick, F.
(1990)
Nature
348,
125-132[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 38.
Nadler, M. J.,
Harrison, M. L.,
Ashendel, C. L.,
Cassady, J. M.,
and Geahlen, R. L.
(1993)
Biochemistry
32,
9250-9255[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 39.
Nogales, E.,
Downing, K. H.,
Amos, L. A.,
and Lowe, J.
(1998)
Nat. Struct. Biol.
5,
451-458[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 40.
Hoyt, M. A.,
Macke, J. P.,
Roberts, B. T.,
and Geiser, J. R.
(1997)
Genetics
146,
849-857[Abstract] 41.
Mitchison, T. J.,
and Kirschner, M. W.
(1986)
Cell
45,
329-342[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 42.
Carlier, M. F.
(1992)
Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond-Biol. Sci.
336,
93-97[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 43.
Linari, M.,
Hanzal-Bayer, M.,
and Becker, J.
(1999)
FEBS Lett.
458,
55-59[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 44.
Linari, M.,
Ueffing, M.,
Manson, F.,
Wright, A.,
Meitinger, T.,
and Becker, J.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
1315-1320
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Prokisch, M. Hartig, R. Hellinger, T. Meitinger, and T. Rosenberg A Population-Based Epidemiological and Genetic Study of X-Linked Retinitis Pigmentosa Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., September 1, 2007; 48(9): 4012 - 4018. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Zhou, L. Cunningham, A. I. Marcus, Y. Li, and R. A. Kahn Arl2 and Arl3 Regulate Different Microtubule-dependent Processes Mol. Biol. Cell, May 1, 2006; 17(5): 2476 - 2487. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Bartolini, G. Tian, M. Piehl, L. Cassimeris, S. A. Lewis, and N. J. Cowan Identification of a novel tubulin-destabilizing protein related to the chaperone cofactor E J. Cell Sci., March 15, 2005; 118(6): 1197 - 1207. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S S Dandekar, N D Ebenezer, C Grayson, J P Chapple, C A Egan, G E Holder, S A Jenkins, F W Fitzke, M E Cheetham, A R Webster, et al. An atypical phenotype of macular and peripapillary retinal atrophy caused by a mutation in the RP2 gene Br. J. Ophthalmol., April 1, 2004; 88(4): 528 - 532. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. F. Shern, J. D. Sharer, D. C. Pallas, F. Bartolini, N. J. Cowan, M. S. Reed, J. Pohl, and R. A. Kahn Cytosolic Arl2 Is Complexed with Cofactor D and Protein Phosphatase 2A J. Biol. Chem., October 17, 2003; 278(42): 40829 - 40836. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Goswami, N. L. Sheets, J. Zavadil, B. K. Chauhan, E. P. Bottinger, V. N. Reddy, M. Kantorow, and A. Cvekl Spectrum and Range of Oxidative Stress Responses of Human Lens Epithelial Cells to H2O2 Insult Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., May 1, 2003; 44(5): 2084 - 2093. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Grayson, F. Bartolini, J. P. Chapple, K. R. Willison, A. Bhamidipati, S. A. Lewis, P. J. Luthert, A. J. Hardcastle, N. J. Cowan, and M. E. Cheetham Localization in the human retina of the X-linked retinitis pigmentosa protein RP2, its homologue cofactor C and the RP2 interacting protein Arl3 Hum. Mol. Genet., November 15, 2002; 11(24): 3065 - 3074. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||