![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 17, 14635-14640, April 26, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Institut für Biochemie, OE 4310, Medizinische
Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, D-30623 Hannover, Germany
Received for publication, September 24, 2001, and in revised form, February 4, 2002
The receptor for the macrophage
colony-stimulating factor (CSF-1, also termed M-CSF), the tyrosine
kinase c-Fms, was originally determined to be the oncogene product of
the McDonough strain of feline sarcoma virus, v-Fms. The structural
difference between c-Fms and v-Fms amounts to only five point mutations
in the extracellular domain, two mutations in the cytoplasmic domain,
and the replacement of 50 amino acids by 14 unrelated amino acids at
the C-terminal tail. Here, we have identified c-Cbl as the direct
binding partner for c-Fms. c-Cbl binds to phosphotyrosine residue 977 at the C-terminal end of feline c-Fms, which is absent in v-Fms. The
replacement of the C-terminal end of v-Fms by the corresponding part of
c-Fms (vc-Fms) restored the binding potential. As a result, vc-Fms
reduced the transforming potency of v-Fms. The overexpression of Cbl
did not influence the v-Fms-transformed phenotype, although c-Cbl forms
a complex with v-Fms indirectly. In contrast, the expression of Cbl
drastically reduced the vc-Fms-transformed phenotype and the activation
of Erk and enhanced Fms ubiquitination via phosphotyrosine residue 977. Furthermore, the replacement of tyrosine 977 into phenylalanine in
feline c-Fms and vc-Fms reduced the Cbl-dependent ubiquitination. These data suggest that an indirect association of
c-Cbl via multimeric complex induced a different signaling pathway from
the pathway induced by c-Cbl direct interaction.
Retroviral oncogenes have been intensively investigated to further
understanding of neoplastic conversion and tumor development in animals
(1). A number of receptor tyrosine kinases were originally identified
as retroviral oncogene products, including v-Fms, v-erbB, or v-Kit of
which the cellular counterparts are receptors for macrophage
colony-stimulating factor
(CSF-11 or M-CSF), epidermal
growth factor, or stem cell factor, respectively. In normal
cells, the life span and enzymatical activity of protooncogene-products are tightly regulated. Through mutation and/or deletion of the receptor
tyrosine kinase, they escaped from cellular regulatory mechanisms and
activated constitutively without ligand binding.
In the normal state, binding of growth factors causes dimerization of
the receptors and activation of their inherent receptor tyrosine
kinases leading to autophosphorylation of the cytoplasmic domains at
multiple tyrosine residues. The newly formed phosphotyrosines constitute binding sites for Src homology 2 (SH2) domain- or
phosphotyrosine binding (PTB) domain-containing cytoplasmic proteins,
which are thought to participate in the control of mitogenic or
differentiation pathways, cell metabolism, and/or cell morphology.
After triggering the signal transduction pathways, the receptors are
internalized and either recycled again to the cell surface or degraded.
The receptor for the CSF-1, the tyrosine kinase c-Fms, was originally
determined to be the oncogene product of the McDonough strain of feline
sarcoma virus, v-Fms. The Fms tyrosine kinase was reported to interact
with several SH2 domain-containing proteins, including the growth
factor receptor bound protein 2 (Grb2; Refs. 2, 3), STAT1 (4), the p85
subunit of phosphatidylinositol (PI) 3-kinase (5), the p120RasGTPase
activating protein (6), phospholipase C- Expression of the viral fms gene in mammalian
fibroblasts leads to cell transformation and to formation of
fibrosarcoma in vivo. The structural difference between
c-Fms and v-Fms consists of only five point mutations in the
extracellular domain, two mutations in the cytoplasmic domain, and the
replacement of 50 amino acids by 14 unrelated amino acids at the
C-terminal tail (12). Roussel et al., (13) showed that a
single point mutation at position 301 was solely responsible for a
conversion of the human c-fms gene product into a
transforming protein. However, Woolford et al. (12) showed
that in addition a second mutation involving residue 374 and the
exchange of the C-terminal domain were required for an effective
transforming potency. The mutation of residues 301 and 374 in the
extracellular domain leads to receptor dimerization without a ligand.
There is only one tyrosine residue, tyrosine 977, in the feline
c-Fms-specific C-terminal tail. Mutation of tyrosine residue 969 of
human c-Fms (corresponding to tyrosine 977 of feline c-Fms) slightly
enhanced the transforming potency in fibroblasts (14) or gained
cytokine independence for growth in the
interleukin-3-dependent murine hematopoietic cell
line, FDC-P1 (15). Interestingly, the same point mutation has been detected in a number of hematological disorders. The C-terminal mutation has also been observed in children suffering from secondary acute myeloblastic leukemia (AML) or myelodysplasia (16, 17). However,
the role of the C-terminal at the molecular level was poorly
understood. To elucidate the molecular principles underlying the
up-regulation of oncogenic potency via mutation of the C-terminal tail,
we employed a yeast two-hybrid screening protocol based on the
tyrosine-phosphorylated cytoplasmic domain of c-Fms and v-Fms as baits.
We identified c-Cbl as a binding partner of c-Fms. c-Cbl binds to c-Fms
specifically at tyrosine 977, which is absent in v-Fms. Using cells
expressing a chimera receptor of v-Fms and c-Fms, we show that the
overexpression of c-Cbl suppressed the transforming potential of
chimera Fms by the enhancement of the receptor ubiquitination but not
that of v-Fms. Furthermore, the replacement of tyrosine residue 977 into phenylalanine avoided the quick ubiquitination of Fms molecules.
These data indicate that the observed negative regulatory function of
the C-terminal tail is mediated by a Cbl binding site.
Plasmid Constructions, Transfection, and Yeast Two-hybrid
Screening--
The construction of LexA fusion genes encoding the
cytoplasmic domains of c-Fms, v-Fms, and vc-Fms downstream of LexA
using BTM116 vector, the expression in Saccharomyces
cerevisiae strain YRN974, and the qualitative and quantitative
evaluations of various two-hybrid protein/protein interactions were
described previously (3, 10). GST-Cbl-(amino acids 1-350) and
Fms-fusion proteins were generated in the pGex system (Amersham
Biosciences). For expression in mammalian cells, the feline
c-fms, v-fms, and its chimera
vc-fms-cDNA were cloned into pcDNA3 (Invitrogen,
Carlsbad, CA).
Cells and Antibodies--
NIH3T3 and HEK293 cells expressing the
v-fms, c-fms, or vc-fms genes were
grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10%
fetal calf serum. CSF-1 (Sigma) was added at a concentration of 2000 units/ml. Rat sera against feline c-Fms and v-Fms were used as
described previously (22). Monoclonal antibodies against phosphotyrosine (4G10) and against c-Cbl, ubiquitin, Grb2, and PI
3-kinase were from Upstate Biotechnology Incorporated (Lake Placid, NY)
or from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). Rabbit antibodies
against ubiquitin and Fms were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, and
Erk1/2 and phospho-Erk1/2 antibodies were from Promega (Madison, WI).
Tyrosine Kinase Assays, Immunoprecipitation, and
Immunoblotting--
For tyrosine kinase assays, Fms-specific immune
complexes were incubated for 20 min at room temperature with 3 µCi of
Binding of Cellular Proteins to GST-Cbl and Fms Fusion
Proteins--
Strain TKX-1 (TKX, Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) was used
for the isolation of phosphorylated GST-Fms fusion proteins.
Phosphorylated GST fusion proteins were produced as recommended by the
manufacturer. The corresponding nonphosphorylated molecular species
were isolated from E. coli strain DH5 Detection of c-Cbl As a c-Fms-specific Direct Binding
Partner--
Using a yeast two-hybrid technique, we have isolated
cDNA encoding several signaling proteins such as PI 3-kinase, Grb2,
Grb10, phospholipase C- c-Fms Binds to c-Cbl Directly, but v-Fms Is Associated with c-Cbl
Only via a Multiprotein Complex--
To demonstrate the
protein/protein interaction between c-Cbl and c-Fms in different
systems, we first performed a Cbl-specific co-immunoprecipitation
study. v-Fms, c-Fms, and vc-Fms were expressed in HEK293 cells, and
cell extracts were supplied for an in vitro kinase reaction
of Fms-specific immune complexes. Autophosphorylated v-Fms, c-Fms, and
vc-Fms polypeptides were liberated from these complexes by a low pH
shock treatment (Fig. 2A). The
same counts of radiolabeled individual Fms molecules were incubated
with HEK293 cell lysates, and were immunoprecipitated with anti
Cbl antibody. In this assay, all three, v-, c-, and vc-Fms, were
co-immunoprecipitated with c-Cbl molecules (Fig. 2B). In
addition, c-Cbl was co-precipitated by anti-Fms antibody with all three
autophosphorylated Fms polypeptides. After incubation of
autophosphorylated Fms molecules with alkaline phosphatase, the
interaction of c-Cbl with Fms was completely abolished (Fig.
2B). Thus, in the presence of cellular proteins, both c- and
v-Fms associate with c-Cbl. This is not surprising because it has been
well documented that CSF-1 stimulation induces the formation of a
multiprotein complex including c-Fms, c-Cbl, CrkII, PI 3-kinase, and
Grb2 (19). Here, both Grb2 and PI 3-kinase bind to v-Fms as well. In
addition, c-Cbl forms a stable complex via its proline-rich sequence
with the SH3 domain of PI 3-kinase and Grb2 (20, 21). Therefore, we
utilized the GST fusion protein binding assay using GST-Cbl (amino acid
residues 1-350), which is lacking the proline-rich domain. In
agreement with data obtained from the yeast two-hybrid assay, both
32P-labeled autophosphorylated c-Fms and vc-Fms bound
to the GST-Cbl, but v-Fms did not (Fig.
3), suggesting that c-Cbl associates
directly with the C-terminal of the c-Fms molecule. However, in
addition, c-Cbl binds to v-Fms indirectly through multiprotein complex
formation.
The Unique Tyrosine Residue 977 of c-Fms at the C-terminal Tail
Provides a Binding Site for c-Cbl--
To study whether the
c-Cbl/c-Fms interaction relied on the presence of particular
phosphotyrosine residues of Fms, we employed a set of GST-Fms fusion
proteins including GST-CT-v-Fms (amino acids 904-944), and
GST-CT-c-Fms (amino acids 904-980) (Fig.
4A). The recombinant
tyrosine-phosphorylated GST-Fms polypeptides were isolated from
E. coli strain TKX that expresses an active Elk tyrosine
kinase (11). As demonstrated by Western blotting using anti-phosphotyrosine, these proteins were indeed phosphorylated on
tyrosine (Fig. 4B, anti-Try (anti-pY)). GST Fms
fusion proteins were incubated with HEK293 cell extracts, and bound
proteins were analyzed by c-Cbl- and Grb2-specific immunoblotting. In
agreement with previous data (3), Grb2 bound to both GST-CT-c-Fms and GST-CT-v-Fms that contain the Grb2 binding site, phosphotyrosine 921, while c-Cbl bound to GST-CT-c-Fms exclusively. GST-CT-c-Fms contains
two tyrosine residues, tyrosine 921 and tyrosine 977, while
GST-CT-v-Fms contains only phosphotyrosine 921 (Fig. 4A). Therefore, we have replaced the unique tyrosine residue in c-Fms, tyrosine 977, by phenylalanine (GST-CT-c-Fms977F). This GST fusion protein was still able to bind to Grb2; however, c-Cbl was almost undetectable (Fig. 4B). Furthermore, no binding of c-Cbl and
Grb2 to unphosphorylated GST fusion proteins were observed (Fig. 4). These data indicate that phosphotyrosine 977 indeed provides the binding site for c-Cbl.
Replacement of the C-terminal of v-Fms by the c-Fms Tail Reduced
the Transforming Potency of v-Fms--
One important characteristic
which distinguishes normal cells from transformed cells is the ability
of the latter to form colonies in soft agar. To determine whether the
replacement of the C-terminal tail influences the transforming potency
of v-Fms, 5 × 105 NIH3T3 cells were transfected with
10 µg of pcDNA3 containing feline c-Fms, v-Fms, and chimera
vc-Fms. Fig. 5 shows that v-Fms transfectants formed colonies in 0.5% soft agar, but c-Fms
transfectants were not able to form colonies. In agreement with
previous data (12), vc-Fms transfectants formed colonies; however,
sizes of colonies were drastically reduced.
Overexpression of c-Cbl Abolished the Transforming Potential of
vc-Fms but Not v-Fms--
To determine whether the observed reduction
of v-Fms-transforming potency by the C-terminal replacement is due to a
direct interaction with c-Cbl, we introduced the exogenous c-Cbl at
different concentrations into vc-Fms- and v-Fms-transformed cells. For
this experiment, we further established cell lines that express vc-Fms or v-Fms. Established cell lines were transfected with 1 and 9 µg of
pcDNA3 containing c-Cbl cDNA and tested again for formation of
colonies in soft agar. In the absence of exogenous c-Cbl,
v-Fms-transformed cells formed colonies with an average size of 60 µm
in diameter, while vc-Fms-transformed cells formed colonies with an
average size of 35 µm in diameter within 6 days (Fig.
6). Sizes of colonies of vc-Fms
expressing cells were drastically reduced by overexpression of
exogenous c-Cbl after transfection even with 1 µg of pcDNA3 containing c-Cbl cDNA. In contrast, c-Cbl expression (Fig.
6A, 1 µg) did not change, if rather enhanced, the size of
colonies after the same treatment of v-Fms-transformed cells. These
results indicate that the direct interaction with c-Cbl to the Fms
molecule may down-modulate the Fms signal. In addition, although
wild-type v-Fms interacts with c-Cbl indirectly via other signaling
molecules such as PI 3-kinase and Grb2, c-Cbl did not affect
transforming potency of v-Fms, suggesting an indirect association of
c-Cbl via a multimeric complex that induced a different signaling
pathway from the pathway induced by c-Cbl direct interaction.
c-Fms and vc-Fms Were Ubiquitinated in the Tyrosine Residue
977 and c-Cbl-dependent Manner--
Since it has been well
documented that c-Cbl plays a role in protein ubiquitination, the
question arises as to whether the reduced transforming potency of
vc-Fms is a result of enhanced ubiquitination. Therefore, we compared
first the ubiquitination of v-Fms and vc-Fms upon stimulation with
CSF-1. Sister cultures of 1 × 106 cells each derived
from v- or vc-Fms-transformed 3T3 cell lines were labeled with
[3H]leucin for 16 h and were stimulated with CSF-1
for 3, 10, or 30 min. Cell extracts from each preparation were supplied
for Fms-specific immunoprecipitation. In agreement with previous data (22), about 10% of v-Fms molecules were detected as a mature glycoprotein, gp140v-Fms that is expressed at the cell
surface. Although similar amounts of immature glycoprotein
gp120v-Fms and gp130vc-Fms were detected from
both cell lines, less of the mature glycoprotein of vc-Fms,
gp150vc-Fms, was detected than gp140v-Fms (Fig.
7A). The same aliquots of
Fms-specific immunoprecipitates were analyzed by ubiquitin-specific
immunoblot. vc-Fms was ubiquitinated about 2-fold more than v-Fms;
however, no significant difference was observed in the presence or
absence of CSF-1. It is noteworthy that vc-Fms was dimerized and
activated constitutively without CSF-1 via mutations in the
extracellular domain (12, 13) and might be ubiquitinated constantly to
some extent. As control, cell extracts from the same preparation were
analyzed by Western blot using anti-Erk and activated Erk antibodies.
In both cell lines, Erk1/2was activated slightly without ligand;
however, CSF-1 stimulation induced an activation of Erk within 3 min in
both cell lines, whereby the level of phosphorylation decreased within 10 min. To determine whether c-Cbl molecules indeed influenced ubiquitination via phospho-Tyr-977, we generated the mutant vc-Fms whose tyrosine 977 was replaced by phenylalanine (vc-Y977F-Fms). Five µg of each vc-Fms and vc-Y977F-Fms cDNA were transfected into 2 × 105 HEK293 cells with and without c-Cbl
cDNA. After serum starvation for 16 h, cells were stimulated
with CSF-1 for 3 or 30 min at 37 °C. Aliquots of cell extracts were
immunoprecipitated by Fms-specific antibodies and were analyzed by Fms-
or ubiquitin-specific immunoblotting. The following results were
obtained. Firstly, c-Cbl over-expression down-modulated Erk activation
induced by CSF-1 in vc-Fms-transformed cells. Secondly, c-Cbl
over-expression up-regulated the vc-Fms ubiquitination. Thirdly, the
mutation of tyrosine 977 in vc-Fms enhanced the CSF-1-mediated Erk
activation. Fourthly, over-expression of c-Cbl in vc-Y977F-Fms cells
has a lesser effect on the activation of Erk than in vc-Fms cells, and
no effect on vc-Y977F-Fms ubiquitination. We then examined the
c-Cbl-dependent ubiquitination of their cellular counterpart, the feline c-Fms, the kinase of which is inactive in the
absence of CSF-1. Furthermore, we replaced tyrosine 977 in feline c-Fms
by phenylalanine (c-Y977F-Fms). Five µg of c-Fms and c-Y977F-Fms
cDNA were transfected into HEK293 cells with and without c-Cbl
cDNA. After serum starvation for 16 h, cells were stimulated
with CSF-1 for 3 or 30 min for 37 °C, and cell extracts were then
immunoprecipitated using a Fms-specific antibody. In agreement with the
previous data using the mouse c-Fms-expressing cells (23), the feline
c-Fms was ubiquitinated in the presence of the exogenous c-Cbl (Fig.
8); however, this ubiquitination is
drastically reduced by replacement of tyrosine 977 into
phenylalanine in feline c-Fms molecules, indicating that tyrosine
977, our newly found c-Cbl binding site, plays a key role for the
c-Cbl-mediated ubiquitination.
Employing a yeast two-hybrid technique, we detected c-Cbl as a
direct interacting partner of c-Fms tyrosine kinase. We show here c-Cbl
binds to phosphotyrosine 977 at the C-terminal tail of feline c-Fms,
which is absent in the v-Fms molecule. Oncogenic v-Fms, which was
reconstituted the Cbl binding site, did not transform cells in the
presence of the high level of c-Cbl, indicating that the direct binding
of c-Cbl plays a key role in Fms tyrosine kinase-mediated cell
transformation. Furthermore, the exogenous c-Cbl expression in
vc-Y977F-Fms cells did not influence Fms ubiquitination of and Erk
activation mediated by CSF-1. Interestingly, v-Fms formed a complex
with c-Cbl indirectly; however, expression of c-Cbl did not alter
transforming potency of v-Fms, indicating that c-Cbl may mediate two
different signaling pathways dependent upon distinct multimeric complexes.
The protooncogne c-cbl product is the 120-kDa protein
containing an unconventional PTB domain, a ring finger, a proline
rich-domain, and a leucine zipper-like domain. This molecule was
originally identified as a retroviral oncogene product, v-Cbl (24),
that contains only the PTB domain of c-Cbl. Recently, it was
demonstrated that the protooncogene product c-Cbl acts as a ubiquitin
ligase, E3 ubiquitin conjugate enzyme, (25-27) and leads to the
increased rate of ubiquitination and degradation of several receptor
tyrosine kinases, including the receptor for epidermal growth factor,
platelet-derived growth factor, and CSF-1 (23, 26-29).
We show here for the first time that c-Fms binds to c-Cbl directly via
phosphotyrosine 977. It has been suggested that Cbl is associated with
phosphotyrosine 723 in human c-Fms (corresponding to the tyrosine
residue 720 in v-Fms and feline c-Fms). Since this tyrosine residue was
identified as a PI 3-kinase binding site, this interaction may be via
PI 3-kinase (18). The authors showed that c-Cbl molecules were less
immunoprecipitated by a mutant human c-Fms in which tyrosine 723 was
changed to phenylalanine. In agreement with this work, we observed that
the phosphorylated v-Fms formed a complex with c-Cbl in the presence of
other signaling molecules, indicating that c-Cbl binds also indirectly
via a multiprotein complex. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that
PI 3-kinse or Grb2 forms a complex with c-Cbl upon stimulation with
CSF-1 (30). Taken together these data suggest that the Fms/c-Cbl
interaction may mediate two different signaling pathways dependent upon
distinct multimeric complexes; direct c-Cbl/Fms association leads to
the down-modulation of receptor signaling, whereas the indirect
association via a multiprotein complex leads instead to the
up-regulation of receptor signaling. Along these same lines, Grishin
et al. (31) reported that the mutation of the PI 3-kinase
binding site, tyrosine 731, in the Cbl molecule down-regulated
Lyn tyrosine kinase-mediated thymidine incorporation, suggesting
that the association of Cbl with PI 3-kinase plays a key role in
proliferative signaling pathways. It has also been shown that the
interaction of PI 3-kinase with c-Cbl enhanced PI 3-kinase activity
(32), suggesting that c-Cbl may act as positive regulator for signaling
by the activation of receptor tyrosine kinase. In addition, c-Cbl also
up-regulates Fc receptor-mediated platelet activation (33) or
CD16-mediated signaling (34) via distinct multiprotein complexes. On
the other hand, it is clear that the direct binding of c-Cbl to
phosphotyrosine 977 of Fms leads to the down-modulation of Fms and its
downstream signal cascades. Interestingly, the ubiquitination of
platelet-derived growth factor In addition to the Cbl binding site, the C-terminal tail of c-Fms
contains a PEST-like domain of 33 amino acids (amino acid residues 925-957 of feline c-Fms) with 18 serine residues, five glutamate residues, two proline residues, and one threonine residue. Hence, Oberg et al. (38) reported that Notch 1 is
ubiquitinated by mSel-10 and that ubiquitination requires the presence
of the Notch 1 C-terminal domain, including the PEST domain. The role of this PEST-like domain of c-Fms, however, still remains to be studied.
It is noteworthy that mutation of the human c-fms gene at
codon 969 (corresponding to the feline 977 tyrosine residue) has been
detected in a number of hematological disorders, AML, B-cell lymphoma
and children suffering from secondary AML or myelodysplasia (16, 17).
These observations taken together, indicate that this mutation may
represent a general mechanism by which oncogenic potential is achieved
by escaping the c-Cbl, negative regulation of tyrosine kinase signaling.
We thank Karsten Heidrich for
fluorescenceactivated cell sorter analyses, Bruce. C. Boschek for
critically reading the manuscript, Wallace Longdon for providing c-Cbl
cDNA, and Morag Park for helpful discussion.
*
This research was supported by the Sonderforschungsbereich
566-B2, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft-Ta-111/8-1, and
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover-HiLF program (to A. M.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, February 14, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M109214200
The abbreviations used are:
CSF, colony-stimulating factor;
SH, Src homology;
PTB, phosphotyrosine
binding;
PI, phosphatidylinositol;
AML, acute myeloblastic leukemia;
GST, glutathione S-transferase.
c-Cbl Associates Directly with the C-terminal Tail of the
Receptor for the Macrophage Colony-stimulating Factor, c-Fms, and
Down-modulates This Receptor but Not the Viral Oncogene v-Fms*
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
(7), c-Src (8), Mona (9),
Fms-interacting protein (10), and p55, a polypeptide of yet unknown
function (11).
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-[32P]ATP (Amersham Biosciences) in the
presence of 10 mM MnCl2, and were analyzed by
SDS-PAGE. For co-immunoprecipitation studies, 5 × 106
cells were lysed with the lysis buffer (50 mM HEPES, pH
7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 1% Triton X-100, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EGTA, 1% trasylol,
100 µg/ml leupeptin, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride,
200 µM sodium orthovanadate, 10 mM sodium
pyrophosphate, and 100 mM sodium fluoride). For
identification by immunoblotting, proteins were transferred onto
Polablot polyvinylidene difluoride membrane or nitrocellulose membrane
(Macherey-Nagel) by a semi-dry blotting technique. Bound
antibody was visualized by incubation of blots in 3 ml of 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, containing 137 mM NaCl and
2 µCi of 125I-labeled anti-species-specific
immunoglobulin G (Amersham Biosciences) or horseradish
peroxidase-conjugated immunoglobulin G (Santa Cruz) followed by
applying with BM chemiluminescence detection kit (Roche Diagnostics). Bound radioactivity was quantified using a model BAS1500
bioimaging analyzer (Fuji Photo Film Co., Kanagawa, Japan).
. Purified GST
fusion proteins were bound for 1 h at 4 °C to
glutathione-agarose beads (40 µl of slurry; Amersham Biosciences)
suspended in the lysis buffer. Precharged beads were incubated
overnight at 4 °C with 32P-labeled Fms, as generated by
in vitro autophosphorylation or obtained from Fms-expressing
HEK293 cell lysates in a total volume of 2 ml of binding buffer. Beads
were washed five times with binding buffer, and pellets were analyzed
by SDS-PAGE.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
, c-Src, c-Abl, Crk, Fms-interacting protein, and c-Cbl, which specifically interact with the cytoplasmic domain of
c-Fms (10). To determine whether one of these associates with c-Fms or
v-Fms specifically, we again employed the yeast two-hybrid system using
green fluorescent protein as a reporter gene product (3). All of the
proteins bound to both v-Fms and c-Fms equally well except the PTB
domain of c-Cbl (amino acid residues 1-350). c-Cbl bound to c-Fms but
not to v-Fms in this assay system (Fig.
1A). Since the major
difference of the cytoplasmic domains of v-Fms and c-Fms is the
C-terminal tail, we replaced the last 14 amino acids of v-Fms by 50 amino acids derived from the C-terminal tail of c-Fms (vc-Fms) (Fig.
1B). As shown in Fig. 1, the resultant vc-Fms was indeed
able to bind to c-Cbl. As expected, the kinase-negative vc-Fms mutant
(vc-FmsK613M) did not associate with c-Cbl, indicating this association
is tyrosine phosphorylation-dependent. Furthermore,
mutation of tyrosine 720, which was previously suggested as a direct or
indirect binding site of c-Cbl (18), did not influence the Fms
interaction with c-Cbl in this assay system, indicating that
Tyr-720 is not a direct binding site for c-Cbl.

View larger version (28K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
c-Cbl binds to c-Fms and chimera Fms
(vc-Fms), but not to v-Fms by the yeast two-hybrid assay.
A, identifying the c-Fms-specific binding partner by the
yeast two-hybrid assay. LexA/c-Fms, v-Fms, vc-Fms (14 amino acids of
v-Fms C-terminal tail was replaced by 50 amino acids of c-Fms
C-terminal tail), 613M-vc-Fms (a kinase-negative vc-Fms mutant lacking
the ATP-binding site), and 720F-vc-Fms (PI 3-kinase binding site,
tyrosine 720, was mutated) (numbers refer to amino acid
residues) fusion proteins were co-expressed together with the VP16, the
SH2 domain of PI 3-kinase (PI3'K), and the PTB domain of
c-Cbl (Cbl-PTB) fusion protein in YRN974 (3). Ten thousand
cells of four independent transformants were analyzed for fluorescence
intensity using a Becton Dickinson FACScan flow cytometer. Values
represent the mean values of four independent experiments.
B, schematic drawing of the Fms and Fms mutants.
JX, juxtamembrane domain; K1, kinase domain 1;
KI, kinase insert domain; K2, kinase domain 2;
CT, C-terminal domain.

View larger version (36K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Both v-Fms and c-Fms were immunoprecipitated
with c-Cbl in the presence of other signaling molecules.
A, v-Fms, c-Fms, and vc-Fms were expressed in HEK293 cells,
and cell extracts were used for an in vitro kinase reaction
in the presence or absence of
-[32P]ATP.
Aliquots of 32P-labeled materials were analyzed by SDS-PAGE
and autography. B, 32P-labeled or non-labeled
autophosphorylated v-Fms, c-Fms, and vc-Fms were incubated with
and without alkaline phosphatase (AP) and were then added to
cell lysates from normal HEK293 cells. After incubation, mixtures
containing 32P-labeled materials were used for
immunoprecipitation with anti-Cbl antibody (IP:c-Cbl)
followed by SDS-PAGE and autography, while nonlabeled mixtures were
precipitated using anti-Fms antibody (IP:Fms) and analyzed
by c-Cbl-specific immunoblot (WB:anti-Cbl).

View larger version (33K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
c-Cbl interacts with c-Fms and chimera
vc-Fms, but not v-Fms in the GST-Cbl-binding assay. GST-Cbl-PTB
(amino acids 1-350) or GST alone, were produced in bacterial strains
DH5
. v-Fms, c-Fms, and vc-Fms genes were expressed in HEK293 cells,
and cell extracts were supplied for in vitro kinase reaction
in the presence of
-[32P]ATP. GST-fusion
protein or GST (5 µg each) were bound to GT-agarose beads and
incubated with 32P-labeled v-Fms, c-Fms, and vc-Fms.
Binding materials were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography. As a
control, aliquots were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and staining with Coomassie
Brilliant Blue.

View larger version (51K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Phosphotyrosine 977 at the C-terminal end of
c-Fms provides the binding site for c-Cbl. A, schematic
drawing of the GST-Fms fusion proteins: GST, v-CT,
GST-CT-v-Fms (amino acids 904-944); c-CT, GST-CT-c-Fms (amino
acids 904-980); and 977F/c-CT, GST-CT-c-FmsY977F (amino acids
904-980). B, GST and GST-Fms fusion proteins were produced
in bacterial strains DH5
(DH) or TKX (TK) to
generate either nonphosphorylated or phosphorylated Fms species,
respectively. GST fusion protein or GST (5 µg each) were bound to
GT-agarose beads and incubated with HEK293 cell extracts. Binding
materials were analyzed by SDS-PAGE followed by immunoblotting
(WB) using anti-Cbl or -Grb2 antibodies. As a positive
control, HEK293 cell extract was immunoprecipitated by anti-Cbl or
-Grb2 (IP). To demonstrate tyrosine phosphorylation of
GST-Fms fusion proteins from strain TKX, aliquots of the same samples
were analyzed by immunoblotting using an anti-phosphotyrosine antibody
(WB: anti-pTyr (anti-pY). As a control, aliquots
were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and staining with Coomassie Brilliant
Blue.

View larger version (51K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
The replacement of 14 amino acids of the
C-terminal tail of v-Fms by 50 amino acids of c-Fms reduced the
transforming potency of v-Fms. Ten µg of pcDNA3 containing
v-Fms, c-Fms, or vc-Fms cDNA were transfected into 1 × 105 of NIH3T3. After 2 days of transfection, cells were
incubated in the 0.5% soft agar. All photographs were taken after 7 days at identical magnification. Bar represents 100 µm.

View larger version (40K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
c-Cbl expression inhibited the transforming
potential of vc-Fms-transformed cells but not v-Fms transformed
cells. Aliquots of 1 × 10 6 cells from v-Fms-
(3T3/v-Fms) and vc-Fms- (3T3/vc-Fms #7)
expressing cell lines were transfected with 1 or 9 µg of
c-Cbl-cDNA and were grown in 0.5% soft agar. A,
diameters of 100 individual colonies were measured and divided into
four groups: <30, 30-60, 60-100, and >100 µm.
B, all photographs were taken after 6 days at identical
magnification. The bar represents 100 µm.

View larger version (49K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
The over-expression of c-Cbl in
vc-Fms-suppressed Erk activation and enhanced vc-Fms ubiquitination via
a direct c-Cbl binding site, tyrosine 977. A, 1 × 106 cells of v-Fms- and vc-Fms-expressing NIH3T3 cell lines
were labeled with [3H]leucine for 16 h and then
stimulated with CSF-1 for 10 or 30 min. Cell extracts were
immunoprecipitated with anti-v-Fms rat antibody. Precipitates were
analyzed by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography. Same sister cultures were
stimulated with CSF-1 for 3, 10, or 30 min. Cell extracts were
divided into two aliquots: one was precipitated by anti-v-Fms rat
antibody (IP:Fms) followed by ubiquitin-specific immunoblot
(WB:anti-Ub) and the other cell lysates (WCL)
were analyzed by phosphoErk or Erk-specific immunoblot (WB).
B, five µg of pcDNA3 containing vc-Fms or vc-Y977F-Fms
cDNA were transfected into 2 × 105 of HEK293
together with or without 5 µg of c-Cbl cDNA. After 36 h of
transfection, cells were serum-starved for 16 h and then
stimulated with CSF-1 for 3 or 30 min at 37 °C. Cell extracts were
divided into two aliquots and precipitated by anti-Fms rat antibody
(IP:Fms) followed by ubiquitin (WB: anti-Ub) or
Fms-specific immunoblot (WB: anti-Fms), or cell
lysates (WCL) were analyzed by c-Cbl, phosphoErk,
or Erk-specific immunoblot (WB).

View larger version (53K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 8.
The replacement of tyrosine residue 977 by
phenylalanine in the feline c-Fms reduced the ubiquitination. Five
µg of pcDNA3 containing c-Fms or c-Y977F-Fms cDNA were
transfected into 2 × 105 of HEK293 together with or
without 5 µg of c-Cbl cDNA. After 36 h of transfection,
cells were serum-starved for 16 h and were then stimulated with
CSF-1 for 3 or 30 min at 37 °C. Cell extracts were divided into two
aliquots and precipitated by anti-Fms rat antibody (IP:Fms)
followed by ubiquitin (WB:anti-Ub) or Fms-specific
immunoblot (WB:anti-Fms), or cell lysates (WCL)
were analyzed by c-Cbl, phosphoErk, or Erk-specific immunoblot
(WB).
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
receptor, which is closely related
to Fms tyrosine kinase, was drastically reduced via deletion of 98 amino acids at the C-terminal end or replacement of tyrosine residues
1009 and 1021 by phenylalanine at the C-terminal domain. Furthermore, the ubiquitination-deficient receptors possessed an amplified mitogenic
activity (35). The C-terminal tail of Neu receptor tyrosine
kinase is also required for c-Cbl-mediated ubiquitination (36) and
mutations that impair the property of c-Cbl to induce the
ubiquitination of the epidermal growth factor receptor has oncogenic
properties (25), suggesting that C-terminal tail has a function as a
regulatory domain for many receptor tyrosine kinases. These data also
reveal that receptor ubiquitination is one of the important control
mechanisms for anti-cell transformation. Interestingly, impairing the
function of TSG101/Vsp23, a protein that contains an inactive E2
ubiquitin-conjugase domain, perturbs endosomal trafficking and induces
cell transformation (37).
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.:
0049-511- 532-2857; Fax: 0049-511-532-2827; E-mail:
Tamura.Teruko@MH-Hannover.de.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Bishop, J. M.
(1991)
Cell
64,
235-248[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 2.
van der Geer, P.,
and Hunter, T.
(1993)
EMBO J.
12,
5161-5172[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 3.
Mancini, A.,
Niedenthal, R.,
Joos, H.,
Koch, A.,
Trouliaris, S.,
Niemann, H.,
and Tamura, T.
(1997)
Oncogene
15,
1565-1572[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 4.
Novak, U.,
Nice, E.,
Hamilton, J. A.,
and Paradiso, L.
(1996)
Oncogene
13,
2607-2613[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 5.
Reedijk, M.,
Liu, X.,
van der Geer, P.,
Letwin, K.,
Waterfield, M. D.,
Hunter, T.,
and Pawson, T.
(1992)
EMBO J.
11,
1365-1372[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 6.
Trouliaris, S.,
Smola, U.,
Chang, J.-H.,
Parsons, S. J.,
Niemann, H.,
and Tamura, T.
(1995)
J. Virol.
69,
6010-6020[Abstract] 7.
Bourette, R. B.,
Myles, G. M.,
Choi, J.-L.,
and Rohrschneider, R.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
5880-5893[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 8.
Courtneidge, S. A.,
Dhand, R.,
Pilat, D.,
Twamley, G. M.,
Waterfield, M. D.,
and Roussel, M. F.
(1993)
EMBO J.
12,
943-950[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 9.
Bourette, R. P.,
Arnaud, S.,
Myles, G. M.,
Blanchet, J-P.,
Rohrschneider, L. R.,
and Mouchiroud, G.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
7273-7281[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 10.
Tamura, T.,
Mancini, A.,
Joos, H.,
Koch, A.,
Hakim, C.,
Dumanski, J.,
Weidner, K. M.,
and Niemann, H.
(1999)
Oncogene
18,
6488-6495[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 11.
Joos, H.,
Trouliaris, S.,
Helftenbein, G.,
Niemann, H.,
and Tamura, T.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
24476-24481 12.
Woolford, J.,
McAuliffe, A.,
and Rohrschneider, L. R.
(1988)
Cell
55,
965-977[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 13.
Roussel, M. F.,
Downing, J. R.,
Rettenmier, C. W.,
and Sherr, C. J.
(1988)
Cell
55,
979-988[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 14.
Roussel, M. F.,
Shurtleff, S. A.,
Downing, J. R.,
and Sherr, C. J.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
6738-6742 15.
McGlynn, H.,
Baker, A. H.,
and Padua, R. A.
(1998)
Leuk. Res.
22,
365-372[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 16.
Ridge, S. A.,
Worwood, M.,
Oscier, D.,
Jacobs, A.,
and Padua, R. A.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
1377-1380 17.
Baker, A. H.,
Ball, S.,
McGynn, H.,
Whittaker, J. A.,
Burnett, A. K.,
and Padua, R. A.
(1995)
Leukemia
9,
155-158[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 18.
Ota, J.,
Sato, K.,
Kimura, F.,
Wakimoto, N.,
Nakamura, Y.,
Nagata, N.,
Suzu, S.,
Yamada, M.,
Shimamura, S.,
and Motoyoshi, K.
(2000)
FEBS Letters
466,
96-100[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 19.
Husson, H.,
Mograbi, B.,
Schmid-Antomarchi, H.,
Fischer, S.,
and Rossi, B.
(1997)
Oncogene
14,
2331-2338[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 20.
Sattler, M.,
Salgia, R.,
Okuda, K.,
Uemura, N.,
Durstin, M. A.,
Pisick, E., Xu, G., Li, J. L.,
Prasad, K. V.,
and Griffin, J. D.
(1996)
Oncogene
12,
839-846[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 21.
Odai, H.,
Sasaki, K.,
Iwamatsu, A.,
Hanazono, Y.,
Tanaka, T.,
Mitani, K.,
Yazaki, Y.,
and Hirai, H.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
10800-10805 22.
Tamura, T.,
Simon, E.,
Niemann, H.,
Snoek, G. T.,
and Bauer, H.
(1986)
Mol. Cell. Biol
6,
4745-4748 23.
Lee, P. S. W.,
Wang, Y.,
Dominguez, M. G.,
Yeung, Y-G.,
Murphy, M. A.,
Bowtell, D. D.,
and Stanley, E. R.
(1999)
EMBO J.
13,
3616-3628[CrossRef] 24.
Blake, T. J.,
Shapiro, M.,
Moese III, H. C.,
and Langdon, W. Y.
(1991)
Oncogene
6,
653-657[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 25.
Joazeiro, C. A.,
Wing, S. S.,
Huang, H.,
Leverson, J. D.,
Hunter, T.,
and Liu, Y.-C.
(1999)
Science
286,
309-312 26.
Levkowitz, G.,
Waterman, H.,
Zamir, E.,
Kam, Z.,
Oved, S.,
Langdon, W. Y.,
Beguinot, L.,
Geigr, B.,
and Yarden, Y.
(1998)
Genes Dev.
12,
3663-3674 27.
Levkowitz, G.,
Waterman, H.,
Ettenberg, S. A.,
Katz, M.,
Tsygankov, A. Y.,
Alroy, I.,
Lavi, S.,
Iwai, K.,
Reiss, Y.,
Ciechanover, A.,
Lipkowitz, S.,
and Yarden, Y.
(1999)
Mol. Cell.
4,
1029-1040[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 28.
Miyake, S.,
Lupher, M. L.,
Druker, B.,
and Band, H.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
7927-7932 29.
Miyake, S.,
Mullane-Robinson, K. P.,
Lill, N. L.,
Douillard, P.,
and Band, H.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
16619-16628 30.
Wang, Y.,
Yeung, Y.-G.,
and Stanley, E. R.
(1999)
J. Cell. Biochem.
72,
119-134[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 31.
Grishin, A.,
Sinha, S.,
Roginskaya, V.,
Boyer, M. J.,
Gomez-Cambronero, J.,
Zup, S.,
Kurosaki, T.,
Romero, G.,
and Corey, S. J.
(2000)
Oncogene
19,
97-105[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 32.
Ueno, H.,
Sasaki, K.,
Honda, H.,
Nakamoto, T.,
Yamagata, T.,
Miyagiwa, K.,
Mitani, K.,
Yazaki, Y.,
and Hirai, H.
(1998)
Blood
91,
46-53 33.
Saci, A.,
Pain, S.,
Rendu, F.,
and Bachelot-Loza, C.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
1898-1904 34.
Cerboni, C.,
Gismondi, A.,
Palmieri, G.,
Piccoli, M.,
Frati, L.,
and Santoni, A.
(1998)
Eur. J. Immunol.
28,
1005-1015[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 35.
Mori, S.,
Heldin, C-H.,
and Claesson-Welsh, L.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
577-583 36.
Levkowitz, G.,
Oved, S.,
Klapper, L. N.,
Harari, D.,
Lavi, S.,
Sela, M.,
and Yarden, Y.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
35532-35539 37.
Babst, M.,
Odorizzi, G.,
Estepa, E. J.,
and Emr, S. D.
(2000)
Traffic
1,
248-258[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 38.
Oberg, C., Li., J.,
Pauley, A.,
Wolf, E.,
Gurney, M.,
and Lendahl, U.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
35847-35853
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Takeshita, R. Faccio, J. Chappel, L. Zheng, X. Feng, J. D. Weber, S. L. Teitelbaum, and F. P. Ross c-Fms Tyrosine 559 Is a Major Mediator of M-CSF-induced Proliferation of Primary Macrophages J. Biol. Chem., June 29, 2007; 282(26): 18980 - 18990. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Pakuts, C. Debonneville, L. M. Liontos, M. P. Loreto, and C. J. McGlade The Src-like Adaptor Protein 2 Regulates Colony-stimulating Factor-1 Receptor Signaling and Down-regulation J. Biol. Chem., June 22, 2007; 282(25): 17953 - 17963. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Schalk-Hihi, H.-C. Ma, G. T. Struble, S. Bayoumy, R. Williams, E. Devine, I. P. Petrounia, T. Mezzasalma, L. Zeng, C. Schubert, et al. Protein Engineering of the Colony-stimulating Factor-1 Receptor Kinase Domain for Structural Studies J. Biol. Chem., February 9, 2007; 282(6): 4085 - 4093. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Staub and D. Rotin Role of Ubiquitylation in Cellular Membrane Transport Physiol Rev, April 1, 2006; 86(2): 669 - 707. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Rohde, J. Schrum, and A. W.-M. Lee A Juxtamembrane Tyrosine in the Colony Stimulating Factor-1 Receptor Regulates Ligand-induced Src Association, Receptor Kinase Function, and Down-regulation J. Biol. Chem., October 15, 2004; 279(42): 43448 - 43461. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Wilhelmsen, J. Copp, G. Glenn, R. C. Hoffman, P. Tucker, and P. van der Geer Purification and Identification of Protein-Tyrosine Kinase-binding Proteins Using Synthetic Phosphopeptides as Affinity Reagents Mol. Cell. Proteomics, September 1, 2004; 3(9): 887 - 895. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. K. Ghosh, A. L. Reddi, N. L. Rao, L. Duan, V. Band, and H. Band Biochemical Basis for the Requirement of Kinase Activity for Cbl-dependent Ubiquitinylation and Degradation of a Target Tyrosine Kinase J. Biol. Chem., August 20, 2004; 279(34): 36132 - 36141. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Peschard, N. Ishiyama, T. Lin, S. Lipkowitz, and M. Park A Conserved DpYR Motif in the Juxtamembrane Domain of the Met Receptor Family Forms an Atypical c-Cbl/Cbl-b Tyrosine Kinase Binding Domain Binding Site Required for Suppression of Oncogenic Activation J. Biol. Chem., July 9, 2004; 279(28): 29565 - 29571. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||