JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M111911200 on February 14, 2002

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 17, 14666-14673, April 26, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/17/14666    most recent
M111911200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kesavan, K. P.
Right arrow Articles by Harrison, M. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kesavan, K. P.
Right arrow Articles by Harrison, M. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Characterization of the in Vivo Sites of Serine Phosphorylation on Lck Identifying Serine 59 as a Site of Mitotic Phosphorylation*

Kamala P. KesavanDagger §, Christina C. Isaacson, Curtis L. Ashendel, Robert L. Geahlen, and Marietta L. Harrison||

From the Dagger  Department of Biological Sciences and the  Department of Medicinal Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907

Received for publication, December 14, 2001, and in revised form, February 10, 2002

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The lymphocyte-specific protein-tyrosine kinase Lck plays a critical role in T cell activation. In response to T cell antigen receptor binding Lck undergoes phosphorylation on serine residues that include serines 59 and 194. Serine 59 is phosphorylated by ERK mitogen-activated protein kinase. Recently, we showed that in mitotic T cells Lck becomes hyper-phosphorylated on serine residues. In this report, using one-dimensional phosphopeptide mapping analysis, we identify serine 59 as a site of in vivo mitotic phosphorylation in Lck. The mitotic phosphorylation of serine 59 did not require either the catalytic activity or functional SH2 or SH3 domains of Lck. In addition, the presence of ZAP-70 also was dispensable for the phosphorylation of serine 59. Although previous studies demonstrated that serine 59 is a substrate for the ERK MAPK pathway, inhibitors of this pathway did not block the mitotic phosphorylation of serine 59. These results identify serine 59 as a site of mitotic phosphorylation in Lck and suggest that a pathway distinct from that induced by antigen receptor signaling is responsible for its phosphorylation. Thus, the phosphorylation of serine 59 is the result of two distinct signaling pathways, differentially activated in response to the physiological state of the T cell.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Lck is a member of the Src family of non-receptor protein kinases. It primarily is expressed in T lymphocytes and natural killer cells and plays a critical role in T cell development and activation (1-6). The structure of Lck is typical of Src family kinases with an amino-terminal membrane-targeting Src homology (SH)1 4 domain, followed by a unique domain, an SH3 domain, an SH2 domain, and the catalytic domain (7). The extreme carboxyl terminus contains a conserved tyrosine residue that upon phosphorylation negatively regulates the catalytic activity of Lck. The SH4 domain of Lck consists of an amino-terminal myristoylation site and two sites of palmitoylation (8), and Lck is both myristoylated (9) and reversibly palmitoylated (10, 11). Recently, it was shown that the palmitoylation of Lck is essential for its signaling function in T cells (12). In addition to palmitoylation, the kinase activity and the SH2 and SH3 domains of Lck play critical roles in T cell activation.

Lck is phosphorylated on several sites in vivo, two of which, tyrosines 394 and 505, directly regulate catalytic activity. In addition to these two major tyrosine phosphorylation sites, Lck also is phosphorylated on serine residues. In response to T cell stimulation by the ligation of either the T cell antigen receptor (TCR) (13-18), the interleukin-2 receptor (19), or treatment with phorbol esters (17, 20, 21), Lck undergoes phosphorylation on amino-terminal serine residues. In all these cases, the phosphorylation on serine residues is accompanied by a decrease in the electrophoretic mobility of Lck on SDS-polyacrylamide gels. Mutational analysis revealed that the phorbol ester, PMA, induced the phosphorylation of serines 42 and 59 in the unique domain of Lck (22), and stimulation with anti-CD3 antibodies resulted in the in vivo phosphorylation of serine 59 that in turn resulted in the decreased electrophoretic mobility of Lck (18). The ERK MAP kinase was identified as the kinase responsible for the phosphorylation of serine 59 both in cells (23) and in vitro (18, 22), whereas protein kinase A and protein kinase C were both implicated in the phosphorylation of serine 42 (18, 22). Biochemical studies also revealed that serine 158 present within the SH2 domain of Lck was phosphorylated upon treatment of Jurkat T cells with PMA (17) and that anti-CD3 stimulation of Jurkat T cells resulted in the phosphorylation of tyrosine 192 (17, 24) and serine 194 (17) in cells. Several studies have reported that serine phosphorylation of Lck inhibits its enzymatic activity (13, 14, 16, 18, 25). Phosphorylation of serine 59 in particular has been reported to inhibit Lck activity and to regulate the binding specificity of the Lck SH2 domain (26, 27).

We demonstrated previously (28) that during mitosis Lck became phosphorylated on serine residues and that this phosphorylation was mimicked by the in vitro phosphorylation of Lck by Cdc2. Src itself is known to be phosphorylated at mitosis by Cdc2, and this results in the activation of Src and association with its mitotic substrate Sam68 (29, 30). Studies over the past several years have implicated Src family kinases in the progression of the cell cycle (31-37). Recently it was reported that in mature T lymphocytes, Lck was required for progression through the G2-M transition (32) and that cells treated with a Src family selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor were blocked in mitosis (35).

Using a mutagenesis approach we identified serine 59 as an in vivo site of mitotic phosphorylation in Lck. Neither the kinase activity nor a functioning SH3 or SH2 domain of Lck was required for the mitotic phosphorylation of serine 59. In addition, the presence of ZAP-70 also was dispensable for the phosphorylation of serine 59 at mitosis suggesting that a pathway distinct from that induced by antigen receptor stimulation is involved in the mitotic phosphorylation of serine 59. Indeed our results demonstrated that although two potent and specific inhibitors of the ERK MAP kinase pathway inhibited the phosphorylation of serine 59 induced by PMA, neither inhibited the mitotic phosphorylation of serine 59. These results suggest that two distinct proline-directed serine/threonine kinases are utilized by T cells to phosphorylate serine 59 in a context-specific manner.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Cells and Antibodies-- The human leukemia T cell line Jurkat (clone E6-1, from American Type Culture Collection), the Lck-deficient Jurkat derivative (JCaM1.6, from American Type Culture Collection), and LSTRA cells, which naturally overexpress Lck due to retroviral promoter insertion of the Moloney murine leukemia virus (38, 39), were grown and maintained in log phase growth as described previously (28). Cells remained in log phase growth for the duration of all experiments. Polyclonal antipeptide antibodies to residues 476-509 of Lck were described previously (28). Monoclonal antibodies to Lck (3A5) were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology.

Expression of Lck in JCaM1 Cells-- The murine Lck cDNA was obtained from Dr. A. Shaw, Washington University, St. Louis. The S59A, S59A/S194A, and the SH2 (R154K) and kinase-inactive (K273R) mutants were generated using the unique site elimination method (40). The S59D and the SH3 (W97A) mutants were generated using the transformer site-directed mutagenesis kit (CLONTECH). All mutations were confirmed by DNA sequencing. The wild type and mutant cDNAs were then subcloned into the EcoRI site of the pCAGGS expression vector. JCaM1 cells (1 × 107) maintained in log phase (2 × 105 cells/ml) were transiently transfected with 15 µg of the various Lck DNA-containing plasmids by electroporation (Invitrogen, gene pulsar, pulsed at 800 microfarads, 250 V). Where specified, JCaM1 cells were transiently cotransfected with 15 µg each of Lck DNA-containing plasmid and pBabepuro empty vector to allow selection in puromycin ((0.5 µg/ml) 24 h after transfection) of cells expressing Lck.

Cell Treatments and Analysis-- At 36 h post-transfection cells in log phase growth were incubated with nocodazole (Sigma, 1 µg/ml) for 12 h to obtain mitotic cells as described previously (28). For inhibitor assays, the inhibitor was added during the last 4 h of the nocodazole treatment. U0126 (Promega) and SB 203580 (Sigma) were used at 20 µM. Equivalent numbers of untreated cycling cells and mitotic cells were lysed in ice-cold lysis buffer (25 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1% Nonidet P-40, 1 mM sodium vanadate and 20 µg/ml each of leupeptin and aprotinin) for 15 min on ice. After incubation on ice, nuclei and unbroken cells were removed by centrifugation at 15,000 × g for 5 min at 4 °C. Lck was immunoprecipitated with anti-Lck polyclonal antibodies coupled to protein A-Sepharose (Sigma). For immunoblotting, the proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE on 8% acrylamide gels, transferred to Immobilon-P membranes, blocked in TBST (15 mM Tris, pH 7.2, 150 mM NaCl, 0.05% Tween) containing 5% goat serum for 1 h, and then incubated with the appropriate primary antibody. After extensive washes the blots were incubated with goat anti-mouse peroxidase-conjugated antibodies for 1 h, washed, and analyzed using the ECL detection system. Lck was detected by immunoblotting analysis with anti-Lck monoclonal antibodies.

Metabolic Labeling and Phosphopeptide Mapping-- Untreated cycling cells and mitotic cells (treated with nocodazole, 1 µg/ml for 8 h) were incubated in 10 ml of phosphate-free RPMI 1640 for 1 h and then incubated for an additional 3-3.75 h in the presence of [32P]orthophosphate (PerkinElmer Life Sciences). In case of the mitotic cells, the incubation in phosphate-free RPMI 1640 and the subsequent labeling was done in the presence of nocodazole (1 µg/ml). Cells were collected, washed, and lysed in ice-cold RIPA buffer (10 mM Tris-Cl, pH 7.2, 150 mM NaCl, 1% sodium deoxycholate, 1% Triton X-100, 0.1% SDS) containing 5 mM EDTA, 1 mM sodium vanadate, and 40 µg/ml each of leupeptin and aprotinin. Lysates were centrifuged at 15,000 × g for 15 min at 4 °C. The supernatants were precleared by incubation with protein A-Sepharose for 1 h at 4 °C. Lck was immunoprecipitated from precleared lysates using polyclonal anti-Lck antibodies previously incubated with protein A-Sepharose. The immune complexes were washed 3 times with RIPA buffer, dissociated in SDS sample buffer, separated by SDS-PAGE, and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. Labeled proteins were detected by autoradiography.

To obtain in vitro autophosphorylated Lck, lysates from equivalent numbers of untreated cycling and mitotic Jurkat cells were immunoprecipitated with anti-Lck polyclonal antibodies. The immune complexes were washed in lysis buffer followed by washes in 25 mM HEPES, pH 7.5. The immune complexes were incubated for 3 min at 30 °C in 25 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 10 mM MnCl2, 5 mM p-nitrophenyl phosphate, 5 µM ATP, and 20 µCi of [gamma -32P]ATP, and the reactions were stopped by adding SDS sample buffer. Phosphorylated proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose, and detected by autoradiography.

Phosphoproteins were excised from nitrocellulose membranes and digested with trypsin as described previously (41). Briefly, membranes were incubated in polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP-10, Sigma), 100 mM acetic acid for 30 min at 37 °C. After extensive washes in H2O, membranes were incubated for 2 h at 37 °C with 10 µg of N-tosyl-L-phenylalanine chloromethyl ketone-treated trypsin in 50 mM NH4HCO3 and then for an additional 2 h with 10 µg of fresh trypsin. Supernatants were lyophilized and resuspended in alkaline PAGE sample buffer containing 0.125 M Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 6 M urea, and bromphenol blue. The tryptic phosphopeptides were separated by 40% alkaline-acrylamide gels (42) until the blue tracking dye had migrated to Rf = 0.5. The phosphopeptides were detected by autoradiography.

Phosphoamino Acid Analysis-- Phosphopeptide bands were excised from alkaline 40% gels and extracted in 1 ml of distilled water overnight at 37 °C with constant shaking. The extract was concentrated using a speed-vac concentrator, and the resulting pellet was resuspended in 3 µl of distilled water. Samples were spotted on wet Immobilon CD that was presoaked in methanol, and the membrane was allowed to air dry. The dried membrane was washed in 1 ml of distilled water to removed acrylamide and allowed to air dry. The membrane was cut into small pieces and hydrolyzed at 110 °C for 1 h in 50 µl of 5.7 N HCl containing phosphoamino acid standards. Hydrolysates were concentrated, and the resulting pellet was washed twice in 200 µl of distilled water and finally resuspended in 3 µl and applied to a Whatman cellulose thin layer plate. Phosphoamino acids were separated by electrophoresis at 1100 V for 45 min. Standards were visualized by ninhydrin staining, and radioactive samples were analyzed using a Storm 860 PhosphorImager.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Lck Is Serine-phosphorylated during Mitosis in Jurkat T Cells-- Jurkat T cells and the Lck-deficient Jurkat variant JCaM1 cells were chosen to study the mitotic serine phosphorylation of Lck. As we reported previously (28), Jurkat cells arrested at mitosis by treatment with the microtubule inhibitor nocodazole contained an additional Lck band which migrated with slower electrophoretic mobility on SDS-polyacrylamide gels (Fig. 1A, lane 2). As mentioned previously, this shifted, slower mobility form of Lck is associated with increased serine phosphorylation. Although not visible in Fig. 1A, similar immunoblot analyses frequently showed the presence of a faint Lck band of decreased mobility in lysates from cycling, non-nocodazole-treated Jurkat cells (e.g. Fig. 1, B and C, and Figs. 4 and 6). The presence of the decreased mobility (shifted) form of Lck in cycling cells correlated with flow cytometric analysis, which indicated the presence of ~20% mitotic cells in the cycling population (data not shown). The slower mobility form of Lck present in the cycling cell population likely represents the small fraction of mitotic cells that are present in the dividing cultures. As expected, the lysates from Lck-deficient JCaM1 cells contained a truncated form of Lck (Delta -Lck, Fig. 1A, lanes 3 and 4) that previously was reported to be catalytically inactive (2).


View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Mitosis-specific shift in the electrophoretic mobility of Lck. A, anti-Lck immunoblot analysis of detergent lysates from untreated cycling (U, lanes 1 and 3) and mitotic (M, lanes 2 and 4) Jurkat (lanes 1 and 2) and control JCaM1 (lanes 3 and 4) cells. B, anti-Lck immunoblot of detergent lysates from Jurkat cells that were either left untreated (lane 1) or were treated with nocodazole (1 µg/ml) for 15 min (lane 2), 30 min (lane 3), 1 h (lane 4), or 2 h (lane 5). Frozen lysates from nocodazole-treated (lane 6) and PMA-treated (lane 7) Jurkat cells were included as markers for the migration of the two forms of Lck. C, anti-Lck immunoblot of detergent lysates from Jurkat cells that were either left untreated (lane 1) or were treated with nocodazole (1 µg/ml) for 30 min (lane 2), 1 h (lane 3), 2 h (lane 4), 4 h (lane 5), 8 h (lane 6), and 12 h (lane 7).

As nocodazole itself recently was demonstrated to inhibit the activity of Lck (43), we sought to confirm that the shift in the electrophoretic mobility of Lck was a mitosis-specific event, rather than a nocodazole-induced effect. To determine the effect of the drug on the mobility of Lck, a time course of nocodazole treatment of Jurkat cells was performed. The results revealed that treatment of Jurkat cells with nocodazole for 15 min did indeed induce the hyper-phosphorylated, shifted form of Lck (Fig. 1B). The generation of the shifted form of Lck reached a maximum at 30 min following the addition of nocodazole, after which its abundance appeared to decrease with time. To confirm this decrease, a longer time course was performed (Fig. 1C), which confirmed that after 2 h of treatment with nocodazole the presence of the shifted form of Lck had declined relative to its level after 30 min of treatment. However, an increase in the amount of shifted Lck was seen after 8 h of nocodazole treatment, which correlated with an increase in the number of cells blocked in mitosis. This increase was sustained for 12 h when ~60-70% of the cells were blocked in mitosis. These results support the conclusion that the hyper-serine-phosphorylated, shifted form of Lck induced after 12 h of nocodazole treatment of Jurkat cells reflected a mitosis-specific phosphorylation rather than a drug-induced phosphorylation. This was later confirmed by phosphopeptide mapping analysis, which demonstrated that the shifted form of Lck from those mitotic cells naturally present in the cycling cell population mapped identically to the shifted form of Lck from cells artificially blocked in mitosis by nocodazole (Fig. 6).

It should be noted that initial autophosphorylation assays of Lck revealed no consistent change in Lck activity in cells treated with nocodazole for 12 h. However, it should be emphasized that our antibodies to Lck cannot distinguish the two forms of Lck, and thus we were not able to measure directly the activity of the shifted form of Lck in the absence of unshifted Lck. Others have reported a decrease in the activity of the hyper-serine-phosphorylated, slower mobility form of Lck induced after antigen receptor stimulation (13) or generated in vitro (18, 25). The phosphopeptide mapping analysis of Lck labeled in vivo with 32P described here (Figs. 6 and 7) consistently showed a decrease in the phosphorylation of tyrosine 394 (the autophosphorylation site) in the decreased mobility, shifted form of Lck.

Potential Sites of Mitotic Serine Phosphorylation in Lck-- As stated above, a shift in the mobility of Lck on SDS-polyacrylamide gels is diagnostic of increased serine phosphorylation. We reported previously (28) that in vitro phosphorylation of Lck by the mitotic cyclin-dependent kinase, Cdc2, induced the shifted form of Lck. This result suggested that the mitotic phosphorylation site contained either a serine or threonine residue followed by a proline residue. Four such serine or threonine residues, serines 59, 194, and 281 and threonine 330, are present in the Lck sequence. Of these four residues, only two, serine 59 and serine 194, have been reported to be phosphorylated in vivo (17, 18). Hence, our initial studies to identify the mitotic site of phosphorylation focused on these two serine residues. As illustrated in Fig. 2, the sequence surrounding serine 59 resembles the consensus sequence for phosphorylation by MAP kinases, and the sequence surrounding serine 194 is similar to the consensus phosphorylation site for Cdc2. As mentioned earlier, ERK MAP kinases phosphorylate serine 59 in vitro (18, 22) and in cells (23), and a synthetic peptide containing the serine 194 site was reported to be phosphorylated by Cdc2 (17).


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Potential sites of mitotic serine phosphorylation in the Lck sequence. The proline-directed sites of phosphorylation include serine 59 in the unique domain and serine 194 in the SH2 domain of Lck. Serine 59 is a consensus site for ERK MAP kinase, whereas serine 194 resembles a consensus site for Cdc2.

Lck Lacking Serine 59 Fails to Shift Its Electrophoretic Mobility on SDS-Polyacrylamide Gels-- To determine whether serines 59 or 194 were phosphorylated at mitosis, alanine substitution mutants were made to generate the S59A, S194A single mutants and the S59A/S194A double mutant. The wild type and mutant forms of Lck transiently were expressed in the Lck-deficient JCaM1 cells, and Lck was immunoprecipitated from cycling and mitotic cells. Lysates from both cycling and mitotic Jurkat cells were included as markers for the migration of the two mobility forms of Lck. As shown in Fig. 3A, the S194A mutant showed a decrease in electrophoretic mobility at mitosis similar to wild type Lck, indicating that the phosphorylation of serine 194 was not necessary for the mitotic induced shift in the mobility of Lck. However, the additional mutation of serine 59 to alanine blocked the mitotic shift (Fig. 3B, lane 4). This result suggested that serine 59 was phosphorylated at mitosis either causing or contributing to the formation of the decreased mobility form of Lck. The mobility of the S59A mutant could not be determined, as its expression level was too low to permit analysis.


View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Serine 59 is phosphorylated at mitosis. A, detergent lysates (lanes 1 and 2) and Lck immunoprecipitates (lanes 3-9) from mitotic (M) and cycling (U) Jurkat (lanes 1 and 2 and 8 and 9) and JCaM1 cells expressing wild type Lck (lanes 3 and 4), S194A Lck (lanes 5 and 6), or pCAGGS vector only (lane 7) were immunoblotted with anti-Lck monoclonal antibodies. B, detergent lysates (lane 1) and Lck immunoprecipitates (lanes 2-6) from mitotic (M) and cycling (U) Jurkat (lane 1) and JCaM1 cells expressing wild type Lck (lanes 2 and 3), S59A/S194A double mutant Lck (lanes 4 and 5), or pCAGGS vector (lane 6) were immunoblotted with anti-Lck monoclonal antibodies. C, detergent lysates (lane 1) and Lck immunoprecipitates (lanes 2-7) from mitotic (M) and cycling (U) Jurkat (lane 1) and JCaM1 cells expressing wild type Lck (lanes 2 and 3), S59D Lck (lanes 4 and 5), or pCAGGS vector (lanes 6 and 7) were immunoblotted with anti-Lck monoclonal antibodies.

To investigate whether phosphorylation of serine 59 is sufficient to change the electrophoretic mobility of Lck, an aspartic acid residue was substituted for serine 59 to position a negatively charged residue at this site. Wild type and S59D Lck were expressed in JCaM1 cells, and the electrophoretic mobilities of Lck from cycling and mitotic cells were compared. As shown in Fig. 3C, the S59D mutant from both cycling and mitotic cells demonstrated a decreased electrophoretic mobility. This result indicated that positioning a negatively charged residue at position 59 in the Lck sequence was sufficient to generate the shifted mobility form of Lck and supported the conclusion that serine 59 is specifically phosphorylated at mitosis.

Phosphorylation of Serine 59 Is Independent of the Catalytic Activity and Intact SH3 or SH2 Domains of Lck and the Presence of ZAP-70-- Results presented above suggested that serine 59 was a site of mitotic phosphorylation in Lck. In the case of antigen receptor signaling, it was suggested that phosphorylation of serine 59 by ERK MAP kinase is the result of a negative feedback pathway designed to inhibit activated Lck (18, 25). To assess the requirement for the catalytic activity of Lck for the mitotic phosphorylation of serine 59, a point mutant (K273R) that disrupts the ATP binding capacity and hence the catalytic activity of Lck was generated and expressed in JCaM1 cells. Western blotting analysis of cycling and mitotic cells expressing either wild type or the K273R mutant Lck indicated that the catalytic activity of Lck was not required for the phosphorylation of serine 59 at mitosis (Fig. 4A, lane 5). Furthermore, anti-Lck immunoblot analysis of lysates from cycling and mitotic P116 cells (ZAP-70 deficient Jurkat cells) revealed that the downstream target of Lck, the tyrosine kinase ZAP-70, also was dispensable for the mitotic phosphorylation of serine 59 (Fig. 4B, lane 5). The functional requirement of the SH2 and SH3 domains for the mitotic serine phosphorylation of Lck was assessed using single and double point mutants that disrupt ligand binding to either or both domains. Previous reports (29, 44) demonstrated that mutation of a conserved arginine residue at amino acid 154 to a lysine residue (R154K) and mutation of tryptophan 97 to an alanine residue (W97A) abrogated binding to the SH2 and SH3 domains of Lck, respectively. The SH3 (W97A) and SH2 (R154K) single mutants and the W97A/R154K double mutant were expressed in JCaM1 cells, and the electrophoretic mobility of each mutant at mitosis was determined by immunoblot analysis of anti-Lck immunoprecipitates from cycling and mitotic cells. The results indicated that neither the SH2 (Fig. 4C, lanes 4 and 10) nor the SH3 (Fig. 4C, lanes 9 and 10) domains of Lck were required for the mitotic phosphorylation at serine 59. 


View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Mitotic phosphorylation of Ser59 is independent of the early components of the TCR signaling pathway. A, detergent lysates (lanes 1 and 2) and Lck immunoprecipitates (lanes 3-7) from mitotic (M) and cycling (U) Jurkat (lanes 1 and 2) and JCaM1 cells expressing wild type Lck (lanes 3 and 4), K273R Lck (lanes 5 and 6), or pCAGGS vector (lane 7) were immunoblotted with anti-Lck monoclonal antibodies. B, detergent lysates from mitotic (M) and cycling (U) Jurkat (lanes 1 and 2), JCaM1 (lanes 3 and 4), and ZAP-70 deficient P116 (lanes 5 and 6) cells were immunoblotted with anti-Lck antibodies. C, detergent lysates (lanes 1 and 13) and Lck immunoprecipitates (lanes 2-12) from mitotic (M) and cycling (U) Jurkat (lanes 1 and 13) and JCaM1 cells expressing wild type Lck (lanes 2 and 3 and 6 and 7), R154K Lck (lanes 4 and 5), W97A Lck (lanes 8 and 9), W97A/R154K Lck (lanes 10 and 11), or pCAGGS vector (lanes 12) were immunoblotted with anti-Lck monoclonal antibodies.

Phosphorylation of Serine 59 at Mitosis Is Independent of ERK1/2 MAP Kinase Pathway and p38-- The ERK MAP kinase was reported to phosphorylate serine 59 in Lck in vitro (18, 22) and in cells in response to TCR ligation (23) and to associate with the SH3 domain of Lck (45). However, the data from the catalytically inactive Lck mutant and the ZAP70-deficient P116 cells presented above suggested that a pathway distinct from that induced by antigen receptor stimulation resulted in the mitotic phosphorylation of serine 59. To test whether ERK MAP kinase was responsible for the mitotic phosphorylation of serine 59, cycling and nocodazole-arrested mitotic Jurkat cells were treated with the MEK1/2 inhibitor (U0126) and immunoblotted with anti-Lck antibodies. As a positive control, Jurkat cells that were either untreated or were pre-treated with U0126 were stimulated with PMA, and the lysates were included on the same gel. The phorbol ester PMA is a potent activator of the serine/threonine kinase protein kinase C, and treatment of T cells with PMA both activates the ERK MAP kinase pathway and generates the shifted form of Lck. As shown in Fig. 5A, the MEK1/2 inhibitor was unable to block the kinase responsible for the mitotic phosphorylation of serine 59 but was able to block a significant fraction of the PMA-induced phosphorylation of this site. Similar treatment with another MEK1 inhibitor (PD98059) yielded identical results (data not shown). Consistent with these results, we find that ERK MAP kinase is not active in nocodazole-arrested Jurkat cells.2 Another member of the MAP kinase superfamily, p38, has been reported to be activated in nocodazole-arrested mitotic cells (46). To determine whether p38 phosphorylated serine 59 at mitosis, the p38 inhibitor SB 203580 was used to treat cycling and mitotic Jurkat cells. Similar to the results seen with the ERK MAP kinase pathway-specific inhibitors, the p38 inhibitor had no effect on the mitotic phosphorylation of serine 59 (Fig. 5B).


View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Mitotic phosphorylation of serine 59 is independent of p38 and ERK MAP kinase pathways. A, anti-Lck immunoblot of detergent lysates from cycling (U), mitotic (M), and phorbol ester (PMA)-treated Jurkat cells that were either pre-treated with Me2SO (DMSO) (lanes 1-3) or the U0126 MEK1 inhibitor in Me2SO (lanes 4-6). B, anti-Lck immunoblot of detergent lysates from cycling (lanes 1 and 3) and mitotic (lanes 2 and 4) Jurkat cells that were either pre-treated with Me2SO (lanes 1 and 2) or the SB 203580 p38 inhibitor in Me2SO (lanes 3 and 4).

Lck Phosphorylation Sites Determined by One-dimensional Phosphopeptide Mapping Analysis-- Although the above results strongly suggested that serine 59 was a mitotic site of phosphorylation in Lck, they did not directly demonstrate phosphorylation at this site, nor did they address whether additional mitotic sites existed. To accomplish this, a one-dimensional phosphopeptide mapping strategy using 40% alkaline-polyacrylamide gels (42) was used. This phosphopeptide mapping technique recently was used successfully for mapping the sites of in vivo phosphorylation on the protein-tyrosine kinase Syk (41). This technique preferentially allows negatively charged peptides to enter the gel and separates peptides on the basis of their charge to mass ratio. The high percentage of acrylamide allows peptides as small as 4 amino acids to be resolved (41) and permits the direct comparison of different samples on the same gel.

Lck from cycling and mitotic cells labeled in vivo with [32P]orthophosphate was immunoprecipitated with anti-Lck antibodies, and the lower (unshifted) and upper (shifted) mobility forms were separated by SDS-PAGE (Fig. 6A). Both 32P-Lck bands were excised from the gels and thoroughly digested with trypsin. Tryptic phosphopeptides were resolved on 40% alkaline-polyacrylamide gels. Fig. 6 shows the results of such an analysis of Lck labeled in vivo with [32P]orthophosphate (Fig. 6B) and in vitro in an autokinase assay utilizing [gamma -32P]ATP (Fig. 6C). It is immediately obvious that the lower (L) and upper (U) mobility forms of Lck displayed distinct phosphopeptide mapping patterns consistent with their differential phosphorylation. The lower mobility forms of in vivo labeled Lck from cycling and mitotic cells generated identical phosphopeptide maps (Fig. 6B, left panel, lanes 1 and 2) indicating that the in vivo sites of phosphorylation in the unshifted form of Lck are unchanged at mitosis, at least within the limits of the resolution of this analysis. As indicated previously and illustrated in Fig. 6A (lane 1), a faint but distinct upper mobility form of Lck (U1) is present in unsynchronized cycling Jurkat cells, which represents the small percentage of cells in this population that are undergoing mitosis. Importantly, both the upper mobility, shifted forms of Lck, one generated from a cycling, non-nocodazole-treated cell population (Fig. 6B, left panel, lane 3 (U1), and Fig. 6B, right panel, lane 4 (U1)) and the other generated from a nocodazole-arrested mitotic population (Fig. 6B, right panel, lane 5 (U2)) generated identical phosphopeptide maps. This indicated that the increased in vivo phosphorylation of Lck seen at mitosis is a mitosis-specific event rather than a direct effect of nocodazole on Lck. The two panels in Fig. 6B are from two separate experiments. The bands shown in Fig. 6A were used to generate the data in Fig. 6B, right panel, whereas the bands used to generate the data in Fig. 6B, left panel, are not shown. In addition to the two experiments illustrated in Fig. 6B, two other experiments yielded identical results when the phosphopeptide maps of the upper forms of Lck from cycling and nocodazole-arrested cells were compared (data not shown).


View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   One-dimensional phosphopeptide mapping analysis of Lck. A, cycling (U) and mitotic (M) Jurkat cells (3 × 106) were metabolically labeled with [32P]orthophosphate (2.25 mCi), and Lck immunoprecipitates were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose, and labeled Lck was detected by autoradiography. B, the shifted upper (U) and unshifted lower (L) bands of Lck from cycling (L1, lanes 2 and 6, and U1, lanes 3 and 4) and nocodazole-arrested mitotic cells (L2, U2, lanes 1 and 5) were excised, exhaustively digested with trypsin, and separated on 40% alkaline-acrylamide gels. The phosphopeptides were detected by autoradiography. C, Lck was immunoprecipitated from mitotic Jurkat cells and phosphorylated in vitro in an immune complex kinase assay in the presence of [gamma -32P]ATP. The phosphorylated Lck bands were resolved by SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose. The lower (L, lane 1) and the shifted upper (U, lane 2) bands of Lck were excised, exhaustively digested with trypsin, and separated on 40% alkaline-acrylamide gels, and the phosphopeptides were detected by autoradiography. The numbered arrows identify the major phosphopeptide bands and designate their migration on the gels.

Examination of the phosphopeptides generated from the lower, unshifted form of Lck labeled in vivo revealed the presence of seven phosphopeptides (phosphopeptides 1-3 and 6-9; Fig. 6B, lanes 1, 2, and 6). This pattern was consistent throughout this study where 10 separate in vivo labeling experiments and subsequent phosphopeptide mapping analyses were performed. The pattern was altered, however, in the upper, shifted, mitotic form of Lck, where phosphopeptides 1 and 2 showed a faster mobility, resulting in a shift in their migration distance (phosphopeptides 1a and 2a, Fig. 6B, lanes 3-5). The increased mobility of phosphopeptides 1a and 2a is consistent with increased phosphorylation of these peptides, as the addition of a phosphate with its two negative charges would increase peptide mobility in this alkaline gel system. In addition, a new phosphopeptide, phosphopeptide 4, was evident in the mitotic form of Lck (Fig. 6B, lanes 3-5).

Phosphopeptide mapping analysis of both the lower and upper mobility forms of Lck labeled in an in vitro autokinase assay showed a similar but not identical pattern (Fig. 6C). Phosphopeptide 9 in particular showed a dramatic increase in phosphorylation suggesting that this band represented the tryptic peptide containing tyrosine 394, the autophosphorylation site. By using phosphopeptides with known molecular weights and charge, it is possible to construct a standard curve and predict where various Lck phosphopeptides will migrate (47). Such an analysis using phosphopeptides generated from the tyrosine kinase Syk as standards revealed that phosphopeptide 9 migrates at a position that is predicted for the tryptic peptide containing phosphorylated tyrosine 394 (data not shown). Additionally, phosphoamino acid analysis of peptide 9 revealed that the only phosphorylated amino acid in this peptide was phosphotyrosine (Fig. 8B). Therefore, phosphopeptide 9 is the tryptic fragment, LIEDNEpYTAR, (amino acids 388-397; where pY is phosphotyrosine) containing the autophosphorylation site at tyrosine 394. As was seen in Lck labeled in vivo, the pattern of phosphopeptides generated from the lower and upper mobility forms of Lck differed (Fig. 6C) consistent with the differential phosphorylation of these two forms of Lck. In particular, phosphopeptides with mobilities similar to the serine 59-containing peptide (see next section) were present in in vitro phosphorylated Lck. Also, a mitotic specific phosphopeptide similar to band 4 (Fig. 6B) appeared directly above band 5 in the upper mobility form of Lck (Fig. 6C, lane 2).

The phosphopeptides of immediate interest in Fig. 6 were those migrating near the top of the gel, where phosphopeptides derived from the upper mobility mitotic form of Lck (phosphopeptides 1a and 2a) were altered in their migration relative to those derived from the lower mobility, non-mitotic form of Lck (phosphopeptides 1 and 2). Based on the results in Fig. 3, which suggested that serine 59 was a target for the mitotic phosphorylation of Lck, it seemed likely that these phosphopeptides contained serine 59.

The nonphosphorylated form of the tryptic peptide containing serine 59 has a molecular mass of 4166 Da and contains one threonine, four serine, and two tyrosine residues. By using a standard curve constructed from the migration of known phosphopeptides derived from the tyrosine kinase Syk, phosphopeptides 1 and 2 migrate at positions predicted for the serine 59 tryptic peptide containing one (phosphopeptide 1) or two (phosphopeptide 2) phosphates. We therefore suspected that phosphopeptides 1 and 2 represented singly and doubly phosphorylated versions of the serine 59 tryptic peptide. If this were the case, then the additional phosphorylation of serine 59 induced at mitosis would be predicted to increase the mobility of the more acidic phosphoserine 59-containing peptides. Assuming that phosphopeptide 1 (Figs. 6B and 7) represents a singly phosphorylated form of the serine 59-containing peptide, then phosphopeptide 1a (Fig. 6B and 7) would represent this same peptide additionally phosphorylated on serine 59 due to the activation of a serine 59 kinase at mitosis. Therefore, phosphopeptide 2 (Figs. 6B and 7) is a doubly phosphorylated version of the same peptide, where the additional phosphorylation of serine 59 generates phosphopeptide 2a.

To verify the identity of phosphopeptides 1, 1a, 2, and 2a, we took a mutational approach where serine 59 was mutated to aspartic acid (S59D) to partially mimic the negative charge generated by the mitotic phosphorylation of serine 59. We chose to analyze these mutants in the Lck-deficient JCaM1 cells. We initially determined that the phosphorylation patterns of both the upper and lower mobility forms of wild type Lck transiently expressed in JCaM cells were similar to those seen in endogenous Lck from Jurkat cells (data not shown). By using this expression system the S59D mutant of Lck was transiently expressed in JCaM1 cells that were either allowed to cycle or were arrested in mitosis. Cycling and mitotic Jurkat cells and S59D-expressing JCaM1 cells were metabolically labeled with [32P]orthophosphate. Lck was immunoprecipitated, and the two mobility forms were resolved by SDS-PAGE. As was seen previously in Fig. 3C, the S59D Lck mutant migrated with a single mobility from both cycling and mitotic cells, and this mobility corresponded to the mobility of the upper mitotic form of Lck (data not shown). The upper and lower mobility forms of endogenous Lck from mitotic Jurkat cells and the single S59D mobility form from cycling and mitotic JCaM1 cells were excised and subjected to phosphopeptide mapping analysis. As seen in Fig. 7, the phosphorylation pattern of Lck that contained an acidic residue at amino acid 59 (lanes 3 and 4) was similar to the phosphorylation pattern of the mitotic, upper mobility form of Lck. In particular, the aspartic acid containing versions of the serine 59 tryptic peptides displayed migrations that were identical to the migration of phosphopeptides 1a and 2a in the upper mobility form of Lck. We interpret these data as follows: phosphopeptides 1a and 2a from the S59D mutant are singly (phosphopeptide 1a) and doubly (phosphopeptide 2a) phosphorylated versions of the serine 59-containing phosphopeptide. Neither can be phosphorylated on serine 59 because aspartic acid was substituted for serine. The additional charge introduced by the aspartic acid residue caused the phosphopeptides to migrate with mobilities similar to the singly (phosphopeptide 1) and doubly (phosphopeptide 2) phosphorylated serine 59-containing phosphopeptides additionally phosphorylated on serine 59 in the mitotic form of Lck (phosphopeptides 1a and 2a, lane 1, Fig. 7). These data confirm that phosphopeptides 1 and 2 represent different phosphorylation states of the serine 59-containing peptide and that this residue is a site of mitotic phosphorylation of Lck.


View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   One-dimensional phosphopeptide mapping analysis of S59DLck confirms the mitotic phosphorylation of serine 59. Mitotic Jurkat (3 × 106) and cycling and mitotic S59DLck-expressing JCaM1 cells (7.5 × 106) were incubated with [32P]orthophosphate (2.3-5.6 mCi), and cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with antibodies to Lck. The immunoprecipitates were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose, and the labeled Lck bands were detected by autoradiography. The migration patterns of Lck and S59DLck were similar to those detected by immunoblotting in Fig. 3C. The upper and lower Lck bands from mitotic Jurkat cells and the single band from mitotic and cycling S59DLck-expressing JCaM1 cells were excised and exhaustively digested with trypsin. The phosphopeptides generated from the upper (U, lane 1) and lower (L, lane 2) bands of Lck from mitotic Jurkat cells and those generated from the single S59DLck band from mitotic (M, lane 4) and cycling (C, lane 3) transfected JCaM1 cells were separated by 40% alkaline-acrylamide gels. The phosphopeptides were detected by autoradiography. The numbered arrows identify the major phosphopeptide bands and designate their migration on the gel.

The fact that phosphopeptides 1a and 2a containing a non-phosphorylatable residue at serine 59 (Fig. 7, lanes 3 and 4) were labeled in vivo with 32P indicates the presence of additional phosphorylation sites in the serine 59-containing tryptic peptide. Phosphoamino acid analysis of in vivo labeled phosphopeptides 1 and 2 revealed the presence of only phosphoserine (Fig. 8B, samples 1 and 2). This indicated that the novel phosphorylation sites in the serine 59-containing tryptic peptide are additional serine residues.


View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Phosphoamino acid analysis of the phosphopeptides generated from in vivo labeled Lck. Cycling LSTRA cells (2 × 106) were metabolically labeled in duplicate with [32P]orthophosphate (7.5 mCi), and the immunoprecipitated Lck was resolved by SDS-PAGE. The lower Lck bands (only faint upper bands were visible) were excised and subjected to trypsin digestion. The digests from each lower band were combined. The phosphopeptides were analyzed on alkaline 40% polyacrylamide gels (A), and the numbered bands correspond to the phosphopeptides in Fig. 6. B, the indicated phosphopeptides were excised from the gel in A and subjected to phosphoamino acid analysis. The numbers under the lanes in B correspond to the bands in A. The migration of inorganic phosphate (Pi) and the phosphoserine (pSer), phosphothreonine (pThr), and phosphotyrosine (pTyr) standards are indicated. C, Lck was immunoprecipitated from mitotic Jurkat cells and subjected to an immune complex kinase assay in the presence of [gamma -32P]ATP. The sample was resolved by SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose, and the radioactive bands were detected by autoradiography. The upper and lower bands were excised, combined, and digested with trypsin. The digest was subjected to immunoprecipitation using antibodies that recognize amino acids 476-509 in the Lck sequence. The immunoprecipitation (lane 3) and aliquots of the digests (1×, lane 1, and 0.5×, lane 2) before immunoprecipitation were analysis on alkaline 40% acrylamide gels, and the radioactive bands were detected by autoradiography.

In addition to containing increased phosphorylated peptide 9, in vitro phosphorylated Lck contained a new phosphorylated peptide, phosphopeptide 5 (Fig. 6C and Fig. 8C). This phosphopeptide migrates at a position predicted for the tryptic peptide-containing phosphorylated tyrosine 505 using a standard curve constructed from the migration of known phosphopeptides derived from the tyrosine kinase Syk. Although phosphopeptide 5 is only faintly visible in in vivo labeled Lck from Jurkat cells (Fig. 6B), it is prominent in in vivo labeled Lck from LSTRA cells (Fig. 8A), which naturally overexpress Lck due to insertional mutagenesis of the Moloney leukemia virus upstream of the Lck promoter (38, 39). Phosphoamino acid analysis of phosphopeptide 5 from in vivo labeled LSTRA cells showed that phosphopeptide 5 contained only phosphotyrosine (Fig. 8B, sample 5). Moreover, when a mixture of the labeled tryptic phosphopeptides from Lck labeled in vitro was immunoprecipitated with an antibody raised against a synthetic Lck peptide containing amino acids 476-509, the antibodies specifically recognized phosphopeptide 5 (Fig. 8C, lane 3). Therefore, phosphopeptide 5 is the tryptic fragment, SVLEDFFTATEGQpYQPQP, containing phosphorylated tyrosine 505.

We were unable to identify unequivocally phosphopeptides 4 and 6-8, although phosphoamino acid analysis revealed the presence of only phosphoserine in phosphopeptides 6 and 7 derived from the unshifted, lower form of Lck labeled in vivo in LSTRA cells (Fig. 8B, samples 6 and 7). Phosphopeptide 4 is especially intriguing because it appears to be a site of mitotic phosphorylation in Lck. Phosphopeptide 4 was intensely labeled with 32P in vivo in the shifted form of Lck that resulted from treatment of Jurkat cells with the phorbol ester, PMA (data not shown). Additionally, phosphopeptide 4 migrates with a mobility predicted for the serine 158-containing tryptic peptide (data not shown).

    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Stimulation of T cells through antigen receptor cross-linking or by treatment with phorbol esters is associated with an increase in the serine phosphorylation of Lck and a concomitant decrease in its electrophoretic mobility on SDS-polyacrylamide gels (13-18, 20, 21). A similar increase in the serine phosphorylation of Lck is seen at mitosis (28). Here we identify serine 59 in the unique region of Lck as a site of mitotic phosphorylation. Previously, serine 59 was shown to be a site of TCR-induced phosphorylation, and the kinase responsible for its phosphorylation was identified as ERK MAP kinase (18, 23). However, we conclude that ERK MAP kinase is not responsible for the phosphorylation of serine 59 at mitosis based on the following observations: (i) tyrosine kinase activities and binding domains that are necessary for the activation of the ERK MAP kinase pathway (e.g. Lck, ZAP-70, SH2 and SH3 domains of Lck) were not required for the mitotic phosphorylation of serine 59; and (ii) inhibitors of the ERK MAP kinase pathway failed to inhibit the mitotic phosphorylation of serine 59. Thus a proline-directed serine/threonine kinase distinct from ERK MAP kinase phosphorylates Lck on serine 59 at mitosis.

The mitotic serine phosphorylation of Lck is reminiscent of the mitotic phosphorylation of Src by Cdc2 (48). The phosphorylation of Lck and Src at mitosis occurs in the unique domains of both kinases, but at non-conserved residues (Ref. 48 and this report). Purified Cdc2 can phosphorylate Lck in vitro, and this phosphorylation results in a shift in the electrophoretic mobility of Lck (28). Two other proteins are phosphorylated at mitosis at sites identical to (49) or nearly identical to (50) serine 59 in Lck. BCL-2 is phosphorylated on an identical site by ASK1/Jun amino-terminal protein kinase (49), and the protein-tyrosine phosphatase PTP-1B (where the glutamine in Lck is an asparagine in PTP-1B) is phosphorylated by an unknown mitotic kinase that is not Cdc2 (50). However, purified JNK1 fails to phosphorylate Lck in vitro2 making it an unlikely candidate for the mitotic serine 59 kinase. Regardless of which serine/threonine kinase is responsible for the mitotic phosphorylation of Lck, the fact that it is not ERK MAP kinase reveals that two distinct signaling pathways phosphorylate serine 59 depending on the physiological state of the cell.

Like Src, the function of Lck at mitosis is not known, although both kinases associate with and phosphorylate Sam68 (10, 42).3 However, unlike Src, it isn't clear that the activity of Lck is activated at mitosis. In fact, it seems likely that just the opposite is true. Several studies (13, 14, 16, 18, 25) have reported that the activity of the slower mobility form of Lck is decreased, and we have observed a decrease in the phosphorylation of tyrosine 394 (the autophosphorylation site) in the mitotic, slower mobility form of Lck (Figs. 6 and 7). Phosphorylation of tyrosine 394 is known to activate Lck (51). However, some basal activity of Lck is present in mitotic cells based on the finding that in vitro kinase assays of Lck from mitotic cells result in both Lck autophosphorylation and the phosphorylation of co-immunoprecipitating Sam683 and Raf-1 (52). It is also possible that the phosphorylation of serine 59 alters the binding of Lck to cellular partners or its submembrane localization.

The peptide mapping studies revealed the existence of several additional phosphorylation sites on Lck. The in vivo labeling of the S59D mutant with 32P indicated that at least two serine residues in the serine 59-containing tryptic peptide were basally phosphorylated in cycling cells. Although we identified the serine 59-containing peptide as well as the tyrosine 394- and tyrosine 505-containing peptides, the identities of three additional in vivo labeled phosphoserine-containing peptides (4, 6, 7) are still under investigation. The identity of phosphopeptide 4 is especially important because it appears specifically in the shifted form of Lck, generated both at mitosis and by treatment of cells with the phorbol ester, PMA. Phosphopeptide 4 migrates with a mobility that is predicted for the serine 158-containing tryptic phosphopeptide, and it was reported that serine 158 is a major site of in vivo phosphorylation following PMA treatment of Jurkat T cells (17). Therefore we think it likely that serine 158 is a second site of mitotic phosphorylation in Lck.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Andrey Shaw for providing the Lck cDNA and Robert Abraham for providing the P116 cells.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant GM48099 (to M. L. H.) and a Purdue Research fellowship from the Purdue Cancer Center (to K. P. K.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§ Present address: University of Colorado, Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO 80262.

|| To whom correspondence should be addressed: Life Sciences Research Bldg., Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907. Tel.: 765-494-1442; Fax: 765-494-9193, E-mail: harrison@pharmacy.purdue.edu.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, February 14, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M111911200

2 Z. Yu, R. L. Geahlen, and M. L. Harrison, manuscript in preparation.

3 N. Pathan, K. Kesavan, R. L. Geahlen, and M. L. Harrison, manuscript in preparation.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: SH, Src homology; TCR, T cell antigen receptor; MAP, mitogen-activated protein; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase; PMA, phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate..

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Molina, T. J., Kishihara, K., Siderovski, D. P., van Ewijk, W., Narendran, A., Timms, E., Wakeham, A., Paige, C. J., Hartmann, K. U., Veillette, A., Davidson, D., and Mak, T. W. (1992) Nature 357, 161-164[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Straus, D. B., and Weiss, A. (1992) Cell 70, 585-593[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Kane, L. P., Lin, J., and Weiss, A. (2000) Curr. Opin. Immunol. 12, 242-249[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Zhang, W., and Samelson, L. E. (2000) Semin. Immunol. 12, 35-41[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Janes, P. W., Ley, S. C., Magee, A. I., and Kabouridis, P. S. (2000) Semin. Immunol. 12, 23-34[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Norian, L. A., and Koretzky, G. A. (2000) Semin. Immunol. 12, 43-54[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Thomas, S. M., and Brugge, J. S. (1997) Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 13, 513-609[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Resh, M. D. (1994) Cell 67, 411-413
9. Marchildon, G. A., Casnellie, J. E., Walsh, K. A., and Krebs, E. G. (1984) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 81, 7679-7682[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Paige, L. A., Nadler, M. J. S., Harrison, M. L., Cassady, J. M., and Geahlen, R. L. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 8669-8674[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Shenoy-Scaria, A. M., Timson, G., Kwong, J., Shaw, A. S., and Lublin, D. M. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 6385-6392[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Kabouridis, P. S., Magee, A. I., and Ley, S. C. (1997) EMBO J. 16, 4983-4998[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Lee, J. E., Cossoy, M. B., Chau, L. A., Singh, B., and Madrenas, J. (1997) J. Immunol. 159, 61-69[Abstract]
14. Veillette, A., Horak, I. D., Horak, E. M., Bookman, M. A., and Bolen, J. B. (1988) Mol. Cell. Biol. 8, 4353-4361[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Marth, J. D., Lewis, D. B., Cooke, M. P., Mellins, E. D., Gearn, M. E., Samelson, L. E., Wilson, C. B., Miller, A. D., and Perlmutter, R. M. (1989) J. Immunol. 142, 2430-2437[Abstract]
16. Danielian, S., Fagard, R., Alcover, A., Acuto, O., and Fischer, S. (1989) J. Immunol. 19, 2183-2189
17. Soula, M., Rothhut, B., Camoin, L., Guillaume, J., Strosberg, D., Vorherr, T., Burn, P., Meggio, F., Fischer, S., and Fagard, R. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 27420-27427[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Watts, J. D., Sanghera, J. S., Pelech, S. L., and Abersold, R. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 23275-23282[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Horak, I. D., Gress, R. E., Lucas, P. J., Horak, E. M., Waldmann, T. A., and Bolen, J. B. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88, 1996-2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Galron, D., Ansotegui, I. J., and Isakov, N. (1997) Cell. Immunol. 178, 141-151[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Lou, K., and Sefton, B. M. (1990) Oncogene 5, 803-808[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Winkler, D. G., Park, I., Kim, T., Payne, N. S., Walsh, C. T., Strominger, J. L., and Shin, J. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 5176-5180[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Schröder, A. J., Quehl, P., Müller, J., and Samstag, Y. (2000) Eur. J. Immunol. 30, 635-643[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Couture, C., Songyang, Z., Jascur, T., Williams, S., Tailor, P., Cantley, L. C., and Mustelin, T. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 241, 24880-24884
25. Gold, M. R., Chiu, R., Ingham, R. J., Saxton, T. M., van Oostveen, I., Watts, J. D., Affolter, M., and Abersold, R. (1994) J. Immunol. 153, 2369-2380[Abstract]
26. Joung, I., Kim, T., Stolz, L. A., Payne, G., Winkler, D. G., Walsh, C. T., Strominger, J. L., and Shin, J. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 5778-5782[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Park, I., Chung, J., Walsh, C. T., Yun, Y., Strominger, J. L., and Shin, J. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 12338-12342[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Pathan, N. I., Geahlen, R. L., and Harrison, M. L. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 27517-27523[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. Taylor, S. J., and Shalloway, D. (1994) Nature 368, 867-871[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Fumagalli, S., Totty, N. F., Hsuan, J. J., and Courtneidge, S. A. (1994) Nature 368, 871-874[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Chang, B. Y., Conroy, K. B., Machleder, E. M., and Cartwright, C. A. (1998) Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 3245-3256[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. AL-Ramadi, B. K., Zhang, H., and Bothwell, A. L. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 12498-12503[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33. Roche, S., Fumagalli, S., and Courtneidge, S. A. (1996) Science 269, 1567-1569
34. Yasunaga, M., Yagi, T., Hanzawa, N., Yasuda, M., Yamanashi, Y., Yamamoto, T., Aizawa, S., Miyauchi, Y., and Nishikawa, S.-I. (1996) J. Cell Biol. 132, 91-99[Abstract/Free Full Text]
35. Moasser, M. M., Srethapakdi, M., Sachar, K. S., Kraker, A. J., and Rosen, N. (1999) Cancer Res. 59, 6145-6152[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36. Erpel, T., Alonso, G., Roche, S., and Courtneidge, S. A. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 16807-16812[Abstract/Free Full Text]
37. Broome, M. A., and Hunter, T. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 16798-16806[Abstract/Free Full Text]
38. Marth, J. D., Peet, R., Krebs, E. G., and Perlmutter, R. M. (1985) Cell 43, 393-404[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39. Voronova, A. F., and Sefton, B. M. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 257, 10738-10742
40. Deng, W. P., and Nickoloff, J. A. (1992) Anal. Biochem. 1, 81-88
41. Keshvara, L. M., Isaacson, C. I., Yankee, T. M., Sarac, R., Harrison, M. L., and Geahlen, R. L. (1998) J. Immunol. 161, 5276-5283[Abstract/Free Full Text]
42. Dadd, C. A., Cook, R. G., and Allis, C. D. (1993) BioTechniques 14, 266-273[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
43. Huby, R. D., Weiss, A., and Ley, S. C. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 12024-12031[Abstract/Free Full Text]
44. Straus, D. B., Chan, A. C., Patai, B., and Weiss, A. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 9976-9981[Abstract/Free Full Text]
45. August, A., and Dupont, B. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 10045-10059
46. Takenaka, K. T., Moriguchi, T., and Nishida, E. (1998) Science 280, 599-602[Abstract/Free Full Text]
47. West, M. H. P., Wu, R. S., and Bonner, W. M. (1984) Electrophoresis 5, 133-138
48. Shenoy, S., Choi, J.-K., Bagrodia, S., Copeland, T. D., Maller, J. L., and Shalloway, D. (1989) Cell 57, 763-774[CrossRef]