Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M111911200 on February 14, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 17, 14666-14673, April 26, 2002
Characterization of the in Vivo Sites of Serine
Phosphorylation on Lck Identifying Serine 59 as a Site of Mitotic
Phosphorylation*
Kamala P.
Kesavan
§,
Christina C.
Isaacson¶,
Curtis L.
Ashendel¶,
Robert L.
Geahlen¶, and
Marietta L.
Harrison¶
From the
Department of Biological Sciences and the
¶ Department of Medicinal Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology,
Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907
Received for publication, December 14, 2001, and in revised form, February 10, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
The lymphocyte-specific protein-tyrosine kinase
Lck plays a critical role in T cell activation. In response to T cell
antigen receptor binding Lck undergoes phosphorylation on serine
residues that include serines 59 and 194. Serine 59 is phosphorylated
by ERK mitogen-activated protein kinase. Recently, we showed that in
mitotic T cells Lck becomes hyper-phosphorylated on serine residues. In
this report, using one-dimensional phosphopeptide mapping analysis, we
identify serine 59 as a site of in vivo mitotic phosphorylation in Lck. The mitotic phosphorylation of serine 59 did
not require either the catalytic activity or functional SH2 or SH3
domains of Lck. In addition, the presence of ZAP-70 also was
dispensable for the phosphorylation of serine 59. Although previous
studies demonstrated that serine 59 is a substrate for the ERK MAPK
pathway, inhibitors of this pathway did not block the mitotic
phosphorylation of serine 59. These results identify serine 59 as a
site of mitotic phosphorylation in Lck and suggest that a pathway
distinct from that induced by antigen receptor signaling is responsible
for its phosphorylation. Thus, the phosphorylation of serine 59 is the
result of two distinct signaling pathways, differentially activated in
response to the physiological state of the T cell.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Lck is a member of the Src family of non-receptor protein kinases.
It primarily is expressed in T lymphocytes and natural killer cells and
plays a critical role in T cell development and activation (1-6). The
structure of Lck is typical of Src family kinases with an
amino-terminal membrane-targeting Src homology (SH)1 4 domain, followed by a
unique domain, an SH3 domain, an SH2 domain, and the catalytic domain
(7). The extreme carboxyl terminus contains a conserved tyrosine
residue that upon phosphorylation negatively regulates the catalytic
activity of Lck. The SH4 domain of Lck consists of an amino-terminal
myristoylation site and two sites of palmitoylation (8), and Lck is
both myristoylated (9) and reversibly palmitoylated (10, 11). Recently,
it was shown that the palmitoylation of Lck is essential for its signaling function in T cells (12). In addition to palmitoylation, the
kinase activity and the SH2 and SH3 domains of Lck play critical roles
in T cell activation.
Lck is phosphorylated on several sites in vivo, two of
which, tyrosines 394 and 505, directly regulate catalytic activity. In
addition to these two major tyrosine phosphorylation sites, Lck also is
phosphorylated on serine residues. In response to T cell stimulation by
the ligation of either the T cell antigen receptor (TCR) (13-18), the
interleukin-2 receptor (19), or treatment with phorbol esters (17, 20,
21), Lck undergoes phosphorylation on amino-terminal serine residues.
In all these cases, the phosphorylation on serine residues is
accompanied by a decrease in the electrophoretic mobility of Lck on
SDS-polyacrylamide gels. Mutational analysis revealed that the phorbol
ester, PMA, induced the phosphorylation of serines 42 and 59 in the
unique domain of Lck (22), and stimulation with anti-CD3 antibodies
resulted in the in vivo phosphorylation of serine 59 that in
turn resulted in the decreased electrophoretic mobility of Lck (18).
The ERK MAP kinase was identified as the kinase responsible for the
phosphorylation of serine 59 both in cells (23) and in vitro
(18, 22), whereas protein kinase A and protein kinase C were both
implicated in the phosphorylation of serine 42 (18, 22). Biochemical
studies also revealed that serine 158 present within the SH2 domain of
Lck was phosphorylated upon treatment of Jurkat T cells with PMA (17)
and that anti-CD3 stimulation of Jurkat T cells resulted in the
phosphorylation of tyrosine 192 (17, 24) and serine 194 (17) in cells.
Several studies have reported that serine phosphorylation of Lck
inhibits its enzymatic activity (13, 14, 16, 18, 25). Phosphorylation of serine 59 in particular has been reported to inhibit Lck activity and to regulate the binding specificity of the Lck SH2 domain (26,
27).
We demonstrated previously (28) that during mitosis Lck became
phosphorylated on serine residues and that this phosphorylation was
mimicked by the in vitro phosphorylation of Lck by Cdc2. Src itself is known to be phosphorylated at mitosis by Cdc2, and this results in the activation of Src and association with its mitotic substrate Sam68 (29, 30). Studies over the past several years have
implicated Src family kinases in the progression of the cell cycle
(31-37). Recently it was reported that in mature T lymphocytes, Lck
was required for progression through the G2-M transition
(32) and that cells treated with a Src family selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor were blocked in mitosis (35).
Using a mutagenesis approach we identified serine 59 as an in
vivo site of mitotic phosphorylation in Lck. Neither the kinase activity nor a functioning SH3 or SH2 domain of Lck was required for
the mitotic phosphorylation of serine 59. In addition, the presence of
ZAP-70 also was dispensable for the phosphorylation of serine 59 at
mitosis suggesting that a pathway distinct from that induced by antigen
receptor stimulation is involved in the mitotic phosphorylation of
serine 59. Indeed our results demonstrated that although two potent and
specific inhibitors of the ERK MAP kinase pathway inhibited the
phosphorylation of serine 59 induced by PMA, neither inhibited the
mitotic phosphorylation of serine 59. These results suggest that two
distinct proline-directed serine/threonine kinases are utilized by T
cells to phosphorylate serine 59 in a context-specific manner.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Cells and Antibodies--
The human leukemia T cell line Jurkat
(clone E6-1, from American Type Culture Collection), the Lck-deficient
Jurkat derivative (JCaM1.6, from American Type Culture Collection), and
LSTRA cells, which naturally overexpress Lck due to retroviral promoter
insertion of the Moloney murine leukemia virus (38, 39), were grown and
maintained in log phase growth as described previously (28). Cells
remained in log phase growth for the duration of all experiments. Polyclonal antipeptide antibodies to residues 476-509 of Lck were described previously (28). Monoclonal antibodies to Lck (3A5) were
purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology.
Expression of Lck in JCaM1 Cells--
The murine Lck cDNA
was obtained from Dr. A. Shaw, Washington University, St. Louis. The
S59A, S59A/S194A, and the SH2 (R154K) and kinase-inactive (K273R)
mutants were generated using the unique site elimination method (40).
The S59D and the SH3 (W97A) mutants were generated using the
transformer site-directed mutagenesis kit
(CLONTECH). All mutations were confirmed by DNA
sequencing. The wild type and mutant cDNAs were then subcloned into
the EcoRI site of the pCAGGS expression vector. JCaM1 cells
(1 × 107) maintained in log phase (2 × 105 cells/ml) were transiently transfected with 15 µg of
the various Lck DNA-containing plasmids by electroporation (Invitrogen,
gene pulsar, pulsed at 800 microfarads, 250 V). Where specified, JCaM1 cells were transiently cotransfected with 15 µg each of Lck
DNA-containing plasmid and pBabepuro empty vector to allow selection in
puromycin ((0.5 µg/ml) 24 h after transfection) of cells
expressing Lck.
Cell Treatments and Analysis--
At 36 h post-transfection
cells in log phase growth were incubated with nocodazole (Sigma, 1 µg/ml) for 12 h to obtain mitotic cells as described previously
(28). For inhibitor assays, the inhibitor was added during the last
4 h of the nocodazole treatment. U0126 (Promega) and SB 203580 (Sigma) were used at 20 µM. Equivalent numbers of
untreated cycling cells and mitotic cells were lysed in ice-cold lysis
buffer (25 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1% Nonidet P-40, 1 mM sodium vanadate
and 20 µg/ml each of leupeptin and aprotinin) for 15 min on ice.
After incubation on ice, nuclei and unbroken cells were removed by
centrifugation at 15,000 × g for 5 min at 4 °C. Lck
was immunoprecipitated with anti-Lck polyclonal antibodies coupled to
protein A-Sepharose (Sigma). For immunoblotting, the proteins were
separated by SDS-PAGE on 8% acrylamide gels, transferred to
Immobilon-P membranes, blocked in TBST (15 mM Tris, pH 7.2, 150 mM NaCl, 0.05% Tween) containing 5% goat serum for
1 h, and then incubated with the appropriate primary antibody.
After extensive washes the blots were incubated with goat anti-mouse
peroxidase-conjugated antibodies for 1 h, washed, and analyzed
using the ECL detection system. Lck was detected by immunoblotting
analysis with anti-Lck monoclonal antibodies.
Metabolic Labeling and Phosphopeptide Mapping--
Untreated
cycling cells and mitotic cells (treated with nocodazole, 1 µg/ml for
8 h) were incubated in 10 ml of phosphate-free RPMI 1640 for
1 h and then incubated for an additional 3-3.75 h in the presence
of [32P]orthophosphate (PerkinElmer Life Sciences). In
case of the mitotic cells, the incubation in phosphate-free RPMI 1640 and the subsequent labeling was done in the presence of nocodazole (1 µg/ml). Cells were collected, washed, and lysed in ice-cold RIPA
buffer (10 mM Tris-Cl, pH 7.2, 150 mM NaCl, 1%
sodium deoxycholate, 1% Triton X-100, 0.1% SDS) containing 5 mM EDTA, 1 mM sodium vanadate, and 40 µg/ml
each of leupeptin and aprotinin. Lysates were centrifuged at
15,000 × g for 15 min at 4 °C. The supernatants
were precleared by incubation with protein A-Sepharose for 1 h at
4 °C. Lck was immunoprecipitated from precleared lysates using
polyclonal anti-Lck antibodies previously incubated with protein
A-Sepharose. The immune complexes were washed 3 times with RIPA buffer,
dissociated in SDS sample buffer, separated by SDS-PAGE, and
transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. Labeled proteins were detected
by autoradiography.
To obtain in vitro autophosphorylated Lck, lysates from
equivalent numbers of untreated cycling and mitotic Jurkat cells were immunoprecipitated with anti-Lck polyclonal antibodies. The immune complexes were washed in lysis buffer followed by washes in 25 mM HEPES, pH 7.5. The immune complexes were incubated for 3 min at 30 °C in 25 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 10 mM
MnCl2, 5 mM p-nitrophenyl phosphate,
5 µM ATP, and 20 µCi of [
-32P]ATP, and
the reactions were stopped by adding SDS sample buffer. Phosphorylated
proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose, and
detected by autoradiography.
Phosphoproteins were excised from nitrocellulose membranes and digested
with trypsin as described previously (41). Briefly, membranes were
incubated in polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP-10, Sigma), 100 mM
acetic acid for 30 min at 37 °C. After extensive washes in
H2O, membranes were incubated for 2 h at 37 °C with
10 µg of N-tosyl-L-phenylalanine chloromethyl
ketone-treated trypsin in 50 mM
NH4HCO3 and then for an additional 2 h
with 10 µg of fresh trypsin. Supernatants were lyophilized and
resuspended in alkaline PAGE sample buffer containing 0.125 M Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 6 M urea, and bromphenol
blue. The tryptic phosphopeptides were separated by 40%
alkaline-acrylamide gels (42) until the blue tracking dye had migrated
to Rf = 0.5. The phosphopeptides were detected by autoradiography.
Phosphoamino Acid Analysis--
Phosphopeptide bands were
excised from alkaline 40% gels and extracted in 1 ml of distilled
water overnight at 37 °C with constant shaking. The extract was
concentrated using a speed-vac concentrator, and the resulting pellet
was resuspended in 3 µl of distilled water. Samples were spotted on
wet Immobilon CD that was presoaked in methanol, and the membrane was
allowed to air dry. The dried membrane was washed in 1 ml of distilled
water to removed acrylamide and allowed to air dry. The membrane was cut into small pieces and hydrolyzed at 110 °C for 1 h in 50 µl of 5.7 N HCl containing phosphoamino acid standards.
Hydrolysates were concentrated, and the resulting pellet was washed
twice in 200 µl of distilled water and finally resuspended in 3 µl
and applied to a Whatman cellulose thin layer plate. Phosphoamino acids
were separated by electrophoresis at 1100 V for 45 min. Standards were
visualized by ninhydrin staining, and radioactive samples were analyzed
using a Storm 860 PhosphorImager.
 |
RESULTS |
Lck Is Serine-phosphorylated during Mitosis in Jurkat T
Cells--
Jurkat T cells and the Lck-deficient Jurkat variant JCaM1
cells were chosen to study the mitotic serine phosphorylation of Lck.
As we reported previously (28), Jurkat cells arrested at mitosis by
treatment with the microtubule inhibitor nocodazole contained an
additional Lck band which migrated with slower electrophoretic mobility
on SDS-polyacrylamide gels (Fig.
1A, lane 2). As
mentioned previously, this shifted, slower mobility form of Lck is
associated with increased serine phosphorylation. Although not visible
in Fig. 1A, similar immunoblot analyses frequently showed
the presence of a faint Lck band of decreased mobility in lysates from
cycling, non-nocodazole-treated Jurkat cells (e.g. Fig. 1,
B and C, and Figs. 4 and 6). The presence of the
decreased mobility (shifted) form of Lck in cycling cells correlated
with flow cytometric analysis, which indicated the presence of ~20%
mitotic cells in the cycling population (data not shown). The slower
mobility form of Lck present in the cycling cell population likely
represents the small fraction of mitotic cells that are present in the
dividing cultures. As expected, the lysates from Lck-deficient JCaM1
cells contained a truncated form of Lck (
-Lck, Fig. 1A,
lanes 3 and 4) that previously was reported to be
catalytically inactive (2).

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Mitosis-specific shift in the electrophoretic
mobility of Lck. A, anti-Lck immunoblot analysis of
detergent lysates from untreated cycling (U,
lanes 1 and 3) and mitotic (M, lanes
2 and 4) Jurkat (lanes 1 and 2)
and control JCaM1 (lanes 3 and 4) cells.
B, anti-Lck immunoblot of detergent lysates from Jurkat
cells that were either left untreated (lane 1) or were
treated with nocodazole (1 µg/ml) for 15 min (lane 2), 30 min (lane 3), 1 h (lane 4), or 2 h
(lane 5). Frozen lysates from nocodazole-treated (lane
6) and PMA-treated (lane 7) Jurkat cells were included
as markers for the migration of the two forms of Lck. C,
anti-Lck immunoblot of detergent lysates from Jurkat cells that were
either left untreated (lane 1) or were treated with
nocodazole (1 µg/ml) for 30 min (lane 2), 1 h
(lane 3), 2 h (lane 4), 4 h (lane
5), 8 h (lane 6), and 12 h (lane
7).
|
|
As nocodazole itself recently was demonstrated to inhibit the activity
of Lck (43), we sought to confirm that the shift in the electrophoretic
mobility of Lck was a mitosis-specific event, rather than a
nocodazole-induced effect. To determine the effect of the drug on the
mobility of Lck, a time course of nocodazole treatment of Jurkat cells
was performed. The results revealed that treatment of Jurkat cells with
nocodazole for 15 min did indeed induce the hyper-phosphorylated,
shifted form of Lck (Fig. 1B). The generation of the shifted
form of Lck reached a maximum at 30 min following the addition of
nocodazole, after which its abundance appeared to decrease with time.
To confirm this decrease, a longer time course was performed (Fig.
1C), which confirmed that after 2 h of treatment with
nocodazole the presence of the shifted form of Lck had declined
relative to its level after 30 min of treatment. However, an increase
in the amount of shifted Lck was seen after 8 h of nocodazole
treatment, which correlated with an increase in the number of cells
blocked in mitosis. This increase was sustained for 12 h when
~60-70% of the cells were blocked in mitosis. These results support
the conclusion that the hyper-serine-phosphorylated, shifted form of
Lck induced after 12 h of nocodazole treatment of Jurkat cells
reflected a mitosis-specific phosphorylation rather than a drug-induced
phosphorylation. This was later confirmed by phosphopeptide mapping
analysis, which demonstrated that the shifted form of Lck from those
mitotic cells naturally present in the cycling cell population mapped
identically to the shifted form of Lck from cells artificially blocked
in mitosis by nocodazole (Fig. 6).
It should be noted that initial autophosphorylation assays of Lck
revealed no consistent change in Lck activity in cells treated with
nocodazole for 12 h. However, it should be emphasized that our
antibodies to Lck cannot distinguish the two forms of Lck, and thus we
were not able to measure directly the activity of the shifted form of
Lck in the absence of unshifted Lck. Others have reported a decrease in
the activity of the hyper-serine-phosphorylated, slower mobility form
of Lck induced after antigen receptor stimulation (13) or generated
in vitro (18, 25). The phosphopeptide mapping analysis of
Lck labeled in vivo with 32P described here
(Figs. 6 and 7) consistently showed a decrease in the phosphorylation
of tyrosine 394 (the autophosphorylation site) in the decreased
mobility, shifted form of Lck.
Potential Sites of Mitotic Serine Phosphorylation in Lck--
As
stated above, a shift in the mobility of Lck on SDS-polyacrylamide gels
is diagnostic of increased serine phosphorylation. We reported
previously (28) that in vitro phosphorylation of Lck by the
mitotic cyclin-dependent kinase, Cdc2, induced the shifted
form of Lck. This result suggested that the mitotic phosphorylation site contained either a serine or threonine residue followed by a
proline residue. Four such serine or threonine residues, serines 59, 194, and 281 and threonine 330, are present in the Lck sequence. Of
these four residues, only two, serine 59 and serine 194, have been
reported to be phosphorylated in vivo (17, 18). Hence, our
initial studies to identify the mitotic site of phosphorylation focused
on these two serine residues. As illustrated in Fig.
2, the sequence surrounding serine 59 resembles the consensus sequence for phosphorylation by MAP kinases,
and the sequence surrounding serine 194 is similar to the consensus
phosphorylation site for Cdc2. As mentioned earlier, ERK MAP kinases
phosphorylate serine 59 in vitro (18, 22) and in cells (23),
and a synthetic peptide containing the serine 194 site was reported to
be phosphorylated by Cdc2 (17).

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Potential sites of mitotic serine
phosphorylation in the Lck sequence. The proline-directed sites of
phosphorylation include serine 59 in the unique domain and serine 194 in the SH2 domain of Lck. Serine 59 is a consensus site for ERK MAP
kinase, whereas serine 194 resembles a consensus site for Cdc2.
|
|
Lck Lacking Serine 59 Fails to Shift Its Electrophoretic Mobility
on SDS-Polyacrylamide Gels--
To determine whether serines 59 or 194 were phosphorylated at mitosis, alanine substitution mutants were made
to generate the S59A, S194A single mutants and the S59A/S194A double
mutant. The wild type and mutant forms of Lck transiently were
expressed in the Lck-deficient JCaM1 cells, and Lck was
immunoprecipitated from cycling and mitotic cells. Lysates from both
cycling and mitotic Jurkat cells were included as markers for the
migration of the two mobility forms of Lck. As shown in Fig.
3A, the S194A mutant showed a
decrease in electrophoretic mobility at mitosis similar to wild type
Lck, indicating that the phosphorylation of serine 194 was not
necessary for the mitotic induced shift in the mobility of Lck.
However, the additional mutation of serine 59 to alanine blocked the
mitotic shift (Fig. 3B, lane 4). This result
suggested that serine 59 was phosphorylated at mitosis either causing
or contributing to the formation of the decreased mobility form of Lck.
The mobility of the S59A mutant could not be determined, as its
expression level was too low to permit analysis.

View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Serine 59 is phosphorylated at mitosis.
A, detergent lysates (lanes 1 and 2)
and Lck immunoprecipitates (lanes 3-9) from mitotic
(M) and cycling (U) Jurkat (lanes 1 and 2 and 8 and 9) and JCaM1 cells
expressing wild type Lck (lanes 3 and 4), S194A
Lck (lanes 5 and 6), or pCAGGS vector only
(lane 7) were immunoblotted with anti-Lck monoclonal
antibodies. B, detergent lysates (lane 1) and Lck
immunoprecipitates (lanes 2-6) from mitotic (M)
and cycling (U) Jurkat (lane 1) and JCaM1 cells
expressing wild type Lck (lanes 2 and 3),
S59A/S194A double mutant Lck (lanes 4 and 5), or
pCAGGS vector (lane 6) were immunoblotted with anti-Lck
monoclonal antibodies. C, detergent lysates (lane
1) and Lck immunoprecipitates (lanes 2-7) from mitotic
(M) and cycling (U) Jurkat (lane 1)
and JCaM1 cells expressing wild type Lck (lanes 2 and
3), S59D Lck (lanes 4 and 5), or
pCAGGS vector (lanes 6 and 7) were immunoblotted
with anti-Lck monoclonal antibodies.
|
|
To investigate whether phosphorylation of serine 59 is sufficient to
change the electrophoretic mobility of Lck, an aspartic acid residue
was substituted for serine 59 to position a negatively charged residue
at this site. Wild type and S59D Lck were expressed in JCaM1 cells, and
the electrophoretic mobilities of Lck from cycling and mitotic cells
were compared. As shown in Fig. 3C, the S59D mutant from
both cycling and mitotic cells demonstrated a decreased electrophoretic
mobility. This result indicated that positioning a negatively charged
residue at position 59 in the Lck sequence was sufficient to generate
the shifted mobility form of Lck and supported the conclusion that
serine 59 is specifically phosphorylated at mitosis.
Phosphorylation of Serine 59 Is Independent of the Catalytic
Activity and Intact SH3 or SH2 Domains of Lck and the Presence of
ZAP-70--
Results presented above suggested that serine 59 was a
site of mitotic phosphorylation in Lck. In the case of antigen receptor signaling, it was suggested that phosphorylation of serine 59 by ERK
MAP kinase is the result of a negative feedback pathway designed to
inhibit activated Lck (18, 25). To assess the requirement for the
catalytic activity of Lck for the mitotic phosphorylation of serine 59, a point mutant (K273R) that disrupts the ATP binding capacity and hence
the catalytic activity of Lck was generated and expressed in JCaM1
cells. Western blotting analysis of cycling and mitotic cells
expressing either wild type or the K273R mutant Lck indicated that the
catalytic activity of Lck was not required for the phosphorylation of
serine 59 at mitosis (Fig. 4A, lane
5). Furthermore, anti-Lck immunoblot analysis of lysates from
cycling and mitotic P116 cells (ZAP-70 deficient Jurkat cells) revealed
that the downstream target of Lck, the tyrosine kinase ZAP-70, also was
dispensable for the mitotic phosphorylation of serine 59 (Fig.
4B, lane 5). The functional requirement of the SH2 and SH3
domains for the mitotic serine phosphorylation of Lck was assessed
using single and double point mutants that disrupt ligand binding to
either or both domains. Previous reports (29, 44) demonstrated that
mutation of a conserved arginine residue at amino acid 154 to a lysine
residue (R154K) and mutation of tryptophan 97 to an alanine residue
(W97A) abrogated binding to the SH2 and SH3 domains of Lck,
respectively. The SH3 (W97A) and SH2 (R154K) single mutants and the
W97A/R154K double mutant were expressed in JCaM1 cells, and the
electrophoretic mobility of each mutant at mitosis was determined by
immunoblot analysis of anti-Lck immunoprecipitates from cycling and
mitotic cells. The results indicated that neither the SH2 (Fig.
4C, lanes 4 and 10) nor the SH3 (Fig. 4C,
lanes 9 and 10) domains of Lck were required for the
mitotic phosphorylation at serine 59.

View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Mitotic phosphorylation of Ser59 is
independent of the early components of the TCR signaling pathway.
A, detergent lysates (lanes 1 and 2)
and Lck immunoprecipitates (lanes 3-7) from mitotic
(M) and cycling (U) Jurkat (lanes 1 and 2) and JCaM1 cells expressing wild type Lck (lanes
3 and 4), K273R Lck (lanes 5 and
6), or pCAGGS vector (lane 7) were immunoblotted
with anti-Lck monoclonal antibodies. B, detergent lysates
from mitotic (M) and cycling (U) Jurkat
(lanes 1 and 2), JCaM1 (lanes 3 and
4), and ZAP-70 deficient P116 (lanes 5 and
6) cells were immunoblotted with anti-Lck antibodies.
C, detergent lysates (lanes 1 and 13)
and Lck immunoprecipitates (lanes 2-12) from mitotic
(M) and cycling (U) Jurkat (lanes
1 and 13) and JCaM1 cells expressing wild type
Lck (lanes 2 and 3 and 6 and
7), R154K Lck (lanes 4 and 5), W97A
Lck (lanes 8 and 9), W97A/R154K Lck (lanes
10 and 11), or pCAGGS vector (lanes 12) were
immunoblotted with anti-Lck monoclonal antibodies.
|
|
Phosphorylation of Serine 59 at Mitosis Is Independent of
ERK1/2 MAP Kinase Pathway and p38--
The ERK MAP
kinase was reported to phosphorylate serine 59 in Lck in
vitro (18, 22) and in cells in response to TCR ligation (23) and
to associate with the SH3 domain of Lck (45). However, the data from
the catalytically inactive Lck mutant and the ZAP70-deficient P116
cells presented above suggested that a pathway distinct from that
induced by antigen receptor stimulation resulted in the mitotic phosphorylation of serine 59. To test whether ERK MAP kinase was responsible for the mitotic phosphorylation of serine 59, cycling and
nocodazole-arrested mitotic Jurkat cells were treated with the MEK1/2
inhibitor (U0126) and immunoblotted with anti-Lck antibodies. As a
positive control, Jurkat cells that were either untreated or were
pre-treated with U0126 were stimulated with PMA, and the lysates were
included on the same gel. The phorbol ester PMA is a potent activator
of the serine/threonine kinase protein kinase C, and treatment of T
cells with PMA both activates the ERK MAP kinase pathway and generates
the shifted form of Lck. As shown in Fig.
5A, the MEK1/2 inhibitor was
unable to block the kinase responsible for the mitotic phosphorylation
of serine 59 but was able to block a significant fraction of the
PMA-induced phosphorylation of this site. Similar treatment with
another MEK1 inhibitor (PD98059) yielded identical results (data not
shown). Consistent with these results, we find that ERK MAP kinase is
not active in nocodazole-arrested Jurkat
cells.2 Another member of the
MAP kinase superfamily, p38, has been reported to be activated in
nocodazole-arrested mitotic cells (46). To determine whether p38
phosphorylated serine 59 at mitosis, the p38 inhibitor SB 203580 was
used to treat cycling and mitotic Jurkat cells. Similar to the results
seen with the ERK MAP kinase pathway-specific inhibitors, the p38
inhibitor had no effect on the mitotic phosphorylation of serine
59 (Fig. 5B).

View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Mitotic phosphorylation of serine 59 is
independent of p38 and ERK MAP kinase pathways. A, anti-Lck
immunoblot of detergent lysates from cycling (U), mitotic
(M), and phorbol ester (PMA)-treated Jurkat cells that were
either pre-treated with Me2SO (DMSO)
(lanes 1-3) or the U0126 MEK1 inhibitor in
Me2SO (lanes 4-6). B, anti-Lck
immunoblot of detergent lysates from cycling (lanes 1 and
3) and mitotic (lanes 2 and 4) Jurkat
cells that were either pre-treated with Me2SO (lanes
1 and 2) or the SB 203580 p38 inhibitor in
Me2SO (lanes 3 and 4).
|
|
Lck Phosphorylation Sites Determined by One-dimensional
Phosphopeptide Mapping Analysis--
Although the above results
strongly suggested that serine 59 was a mitotic site of phosphorylation
in Lck, they did not directly demonstrate phosphorylation at this site,
nor did they address whether additional mitotic sites existed. To
accomplish this, a one-dimensional phosphopeptide mapping strategy
using 40% alkaline-polyacrylamide gels (42) was used. This
phosphopeptide mapping technique recently was used successfully for
mapping the sites of in vivo phosphorylation on the
protein-tyrosine kinase Syk (41). This technique preferentially allows
negatively charged peptides to enter the gel and separates peptides on
the basis of their charge to mass ratio. The high percentage of
acrylamide allows peptides as small as 4 amino acids to be resolved
(41) and permits the direct comparison of different samples on the same gel.
Lck from cycling and mitotic cells labeled in vivo with
[32P]orthophosphate was immunoprecipitated with anti-Lck
antibodies, and the lower (unshifted) and upper (shifted) mobility
forms were separated by SDS-PAGE (Fig.
6A). Both 32P-Lck
bands were excised from the gels and thoroughly digested with trypsin.
Tryptic phosphopeptides were resolved on 40% alkaline-polyacrylamide gels. Fig. 6 shows the results of such an analysis of Lck labeled in vivo with [32P]orthophosphate (Fig.
6B) and in vitro in an autokinase assay utilizing
[
-32P]ATP (Fig. 6C). It is immediately
obvious that the lower (L) and upper (U) mobility
forms of Lck displayed distinct phosphopeptide mapping patterns
consistent with their differential phosphorylation. The lower mobility
forms of in vivo labeled Lck from cycling and mitotic cells
generated identical phosphopeptide maps (Fig. 6B, left
panel, lanes 1 and 2) indicating that the
in vivo sites of phosphorylation in the unshifted form of
Lck are unchanged at mitosis, at least within the limits of the
resolution of this analysis. As indicated previously and illustrated in
Fig. 6A (lane 1), a faint but distinct upper
mobility form of Lck (U1) is present in unsynchronized
cycling Jurkat cells, which represents the small percentage of cells in
this population that are undergoing mitosis. Importantly, both the
upper mobility, shifted forms of Lck, one generated from a cycling,
non-nocodazole-treated cell population (Fig. 6B, left
panel, lane 3 (U1), and Fig.
6B, right panel, lane 4 (U1)) and the other generated from a nocodazole-arrested
mitotic population (Fig. 6B, right panel,
lane 5 (U2)) generated identical phosphopeptide maps.
This indicated that the increased in vivo phosphorylation of
Lck seen at mitosis is a mitosis-specific event rather than a direct
effect of nocodazole on Lck. The two panels in Fig.
6B are from two separate experiments. The bands shown in
Fig. 6A were used to generate the data in Fig.
6B, right panel, whereas the bands used to
generate the data in Fig. 6B, left panel, are not
shown. In addition to the two experiments illustrated in Fig.
6B, two other experiments yielded identical results when the
phosphopeptide maps of the upper forms of Lck from cycling and
nocodazole-arrested cells were compared (data not shown).

View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
One-dimensional phosphopeptide mapping
analysis of Lck. A, cycling (U) and mitotic
(M) Jurkat cells (3 × 106) were
metabolically labeled with [32P]orthophosphate (2.25 mCi), and Lck immunoprecipitates were separated by SDS-PAGE and
transferred to nitrocellulose, and labeled Lck was detected by
autoradiography. B, the shifted upper
(U) and unshifted lower (L) bands of
Lck from cycling (L1, lanes 2 and 6,
and U1, lanes 3 and 4) and
nocodazole-arrested mitotic cells (L2, U2, lanes 1 and
5) were excised, exhaustively digested with trypsin, and
separated on 40% alkaline-acrylamide gels. The phosphopeptides were
detected by autoradiography. C, Lck was immunoprecipitated
from mitotic Jurkat cells and phosphorylated in vitro in an
immune complex kinase assay in the presence of
[ -32P]ATP. The phosphorylated Lck bands were resolved
by SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose. The lower
(L, lane 1) and the shifted upper
(U, lane 2) bands of Lck were excised,
exhaustively digested with trypsin, and separated on 40%
alkaline-acrylamide gels, and the phosphopeptides were detected by
autoradiography. The numbered arrows identify the major
phosphopeptide bands and designate their migration on the gels.
|
|
Examination of the phosphopeptides generated from the lower, unshifted
form of Lck labeled in vivo revealed the presence of seven
phosphopeptides (phosphopeptides 1-3 and 6-9; Fig.
6B, lanes 1, 2, and 6).
This pattern was consistent throughout this study where 10 separate
in vivo labeling experiments and subsequent phosphopeptide
mapping analyses were performed. The pattern was altered, however, in
the upper, shifted, mitotic form of Lck, where phosphopeptides 1 and 2 showed a faster mobility, resulting in a shift in their migration
distance (phosphopeptides 1a and 2a, Fig.
6B, lanes 3-5). The increased mobility of
phosphopeptides 1a and 2a is consistent with increased phosphorylation
of these peptides, as the addition of a phosphate with its two negative charges would increase peptide mobility in this alkaline gel system. In
addition, a new phosphopeptide, phosphopeptide 4, was evident in the
mitotic form of Lck (Fig. 6B, lanes 3-5).
Phosphopeptide mapping analysis of both the lower and upper mobility
forms of Lck labeled in an in vitro autokinase assay showed
a similar but not identical pattern (Fig. 6C).
Phosphopeptide 9 in particular showed a dramatic increase in
phosphorylation suggesting that this band represented the tryptic
peptide containing tyrosine 394, the autophosphorylation site. By using
phosphopeptides with known molecular weights and charge, it is possible
to construct a standard curve and predict where various Lck
phosphopeptides will migrate (47). Such an analysis using
phosphopeptides generated from the tyrosine kinase Syk as standards
revealed that phosphopeptide 9 migrates at a position that is predicted
for the tryptic peptide containing phosphorylated tyrosine 394 (data
not shown). Additionally, phosphoamino acid analysis of peptide 9 revealed that the only phosphorylated amino acid in this peptide was
phosphotyrosine (Fig. 8B). Therefore, phosphopeptide 9 is
the tryptic fragment, LIEDNEpYTAR, (amino acids 388-397; where
pY is phosphotyrosine) containing the autophosphorylation site at
tyrosine 394. As was seen in Lck labeled in vivo, the
pattern of phosphopeptides generated from the lower and upper mobility
forms of Lck differed (Fig. 6C) consistent with the
differential phosphorylation of these two forms of Lck. In particular,
phosphopeptides with mobilities similar to the serine 59-containing
peptide (see next section) were present in in vitro
phosphorylated Lck. Also, a mitotic specific phosphopeptide similar to
band 4 (Fig. 6B) appeared directly above band 5 in the upper
mobility form of Lck (Fig. 6C, lane 2).
The phosphopeptides of immediate interest in Fig. 6 were those
migrating near the top of the gel, where phosphopeptides derived from
the upper mobility mitotic form of Lck (phosphopeptides 1a and 2a) were
altered in their migration relative to those derived from the lower
mobility, non-mitotic form of Lck (phosphopeptides 1 and 2). Based on
the results in Fig. 3, which suggested that serine 59 was a target for
the mitotic phosphorylation of Lck, it seemed likely that these
phosphopeptides contained serine 59.
The nonphosphorylated form of the tryptic peptide containing serine 59 has a molecular mass of 4166 Da and contains one threonine, four
serine, and two tyrosine residues. By using a standard curve constructed from the migration of known phosphopeptides derived from
the tyrosine kinase Syk, phosphopeptides 1 and 2 migrate at positions
predicted for the serine 59 tryptic peptide containing one
(phosphopeptide 1) or two (phosphopeptide 2) phosphates. We therefore
suspected that phosphopeptides 1 and 2 represented singly and doubly
phosphorylated versions of the serine 59 tryptic peptide. If this were
the case, then the additional phosphorylation of serine 59 induced at
mitosis would be predicted to increase the mobility of the more acidic
phosphoserine 59-containing peptides. Assuming that phosphopeptide 1 (Figs. 6B and 7) represents a singly phosphorylated form of
the serine 59-containing peptide, then phosphopeptide 1a (Fig.
6B and 7) would represent this same peptide additionally
phosphorylated on serine 59 due to the activation of a serine 59 kinase
at mitosis. Therefore, phosphopeptide 2 (Figs. 6B and 7) is
a doubly phosphorylated version of the same peptide, where the
additional phosphorylation of serine 59 generates phosphopeptide 2a.
To verify the identity of phosphopeptides 1, 1a, 2, and 2a, we took a
mutational approach where serine 59 was mutated to aspartic acid (S59D)
to partially mimic the negative charge generated by the mitotic
phosphorylation of serine 59. We chose to analyze these mutants in the
Lck-deficient JCaM1 cells. We initially determined that the
phosphorylation patterns of both the upper and lower mobility forms of
wild type Lck transiently expressed in JCaM cells were similar to those
seen in endogenous Lck from Jurkat cells (data not shown). By using
this expression system the S59D mutant of Lck was transiently expressed
in JCaM1 cells that were either allowed to cycle or were arrested in
mitosis. Cycling and mitotic Jurkat cells and S59D-expressing JCaM1
cells were metabolically labeled with
[32P]orthophosphate. Lck was immunoprecipitated, and the
two mobility forms were resolved by SDS-PAGE. As was seen previously in
Fig. 3C, the S59D Lck mutant migrated with a single mobility
from both cycling and mitotic cells, and this mobility corresponded to
the mobility of the upper mitotic form of Lck (data not shown). The upper and lower mobility forms of endogenous Lck from mitotic Jurkat
cells and the single S59D mobility form from cycling and mitotic JCaM1
cells were excised and subjected to phosphopeptide mapping analysis. As
seen in Fig. 7, the phosphorylation
pattern of Lck that contained an acidic residue at amino acid 59 (lanes 3 and 4) was similar to the
phosphorylation pattern of the mitotic, upper mobility form of Lck. In
particular, the aspartic acid containing versions of the serine 59 tryptic peptides displayed migrations that were identical to the
migration of phosphopeptides 1a and 2a in the upper mobility form of
Lck. We interpret these data as follows: phosphopeptides 1a and 2a from
the S59D mutant are singly (phosphopeptide 1a) and doubly
(phosphopeptide 2a) phosphorylated versions of the serine 59-containing
phosphopeptide. Neither can be phosphorylated on serine 59 because
aspartic acid was substituted for serine. The additional charge
introduced by the aspartic acid residue caused the phosphopeptides to
migrate with mobilities similar to the singly (phosphopeptide 1) and
doubly (phosphopeptide 2) phosphorylated serine 59-containing
phosphopeptides additionally phosphorylated on serine 59 in the mitotic
form of Lck (phosphopeptides 1a and 2a,
lane 1, Fig. 7). These data confirm that phosphopeptides 1 and 2 represent different phosphorylation states of the serine 59-containing peptide and that this residue is a site of mitotic phosphorylation of Lck.

View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
One-dimensional phosphopeptide mapping
analysis of S59DLck confirms the mitotic phosphorylation of serine
59. Mitotic Jurkat (3 × 106) and cycling and
mitotic S59DLck-expressing JCaM1 cells (7.5 × 106)
were incubated with [32P]orthophosphate (2.3-5.6 mCi),
and cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with antibodies to Lck. The
immunoprecipitates were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to
nitrocellulose, and the labeled Lck bands were detected by
autoradiography. The migration patterns of Lck and S59DLck were similar
to those detected by immunoblotting in Fig. 3C. The
upper and lower Lck bands from mitotic Jurkat
cells and the single band from mitotic and cycling S59DLck-expressing
JCaM1 cells were excised and exhaustively digested with trypsin. The
phosphopeptides generated from the upper (U, lane
1) and lower (L, lane 2) bands of Lck from
mitotic Jurkat cells and those generated from the single S59DLck band
from mitotic (M, lane 4) and cycling
(C, lane 3) transfected JCaM1 cells were
separated by 40% alkaline-acrylamide gels. The phosphopeptides were
detected by autoradiography. The numbered arrows identify
the major phosphopeptide bands and designate their migration on the
gel.
|
|
The fact that phosphopeptides 1a and 2a containing a
non-phosphorylatable residue at serine 59 (Fig. 7, lanes 3 and 4) were labeled in vivo with 32P
indicates the presence of additional phosphorylation sites in the
serine 59-containing tryptic peptide. Phosphoamino acid analysis of
in vivo labeled phosphopeptides 1 and 2 revealed the
presence of only phosphoserine (Fig.
8B, samples 1 and
2). This indicated that the novel phosphorylation sites in
the serine 59-containing tryptic peptide are additional serine
residues.

View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Phosphoamino acid analysis of the
phosphopeptides generated from in vivo labeled
Lck. Cycling LSTRA cells (2 × 106) were
metabolically labeled in duplicate with
[32P]orthophosphate (7.5 mCi), and the immunoprecipitated
Lck was resolved by SDS-PAGE. The lower Lck bands (only faint upper
bands were visible) were excised and subjected to trypsin digestion.
The digests from each lower band were combined. The phosphopeptides
were analyzed on alkaline 40% polyacrylamide gels (A), and
the numbered bands correspond to the phosphopeptides in Fig. 6.
B, the indicated phosphopeptides were excised from the gel
in A and subjected to phosphoamino acid analysis. The
numbers under the lanes in B
correspond to the bands in A. The migration of inorganic
phosphate (Pi) and the phosphoserine (pSer),
phosphothreonine (pThr), and phosphotyrosine
(pTyr) standards are indicated. C, Lck was
immunoprecipitated from mitotic Jurkat cells and subjected to an immune
complex kinase assay in the presence of [ -32P]ATP. The
sample was resolved by SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose, and
the radioactive bands were detected by autoradiography. The
upper and lower bands were excised, combined, and
digested with trypsin. The digest was subjected to immunoprecipitation
using antibodies that recognize amino acids 476-509 in the Lck
sequence. The immunoprecipitation (lane 3) and aliquots of
the digests (1×, lane 1, and 0.5×, lane 2)
before immunoprecipitation were analysis on alkaline 40% acrylamide
gels, and the radioactive bands were detected by autoradiography.
|
|
In addition to containing increased phosphorylated peptide 9, in
vitro phosphorylated Lck contained a new phosphorylated peptide, phosphopeptide 5 (Fig. 6C and Fig. 8C). This
phosphopeptide migrates at a position predicted for the tryptic
peptide-containing phosphorylated tyrosine 505 using a standard curve
constructed from the migration of known phosphopeptides derived from
the tyrosine kinase Syk. Although phosphopeptide 5 is only faintly
visible in in vivo labeled Lck from Jurkat cells (Fig.
6B), it is prominent in in vivo labeled Lck from
LSTRA cells (Fig. 8A), which naturally overexpress Lck due
to insertional mutagenesis of the Moloney leukemia virus upstream of
the Lck promoter (38, 39). Phosphoamino acid analysis of phosphopeptide
5 from in vivo labeled LSTRA cells showed that phosphopeptide 5 contained only phosphotyrosine (Fig.
8B, sample 5). Moreover, when a mixture of the
labeled tryptic phosphopeptides from Lck labeled in vitro
was immunoprecipitated with an antibody raised against a synthetic Lck
peptide containing amino acids 476-509, the antibodies specifically
recognized phosphopeptide 5 (Fig. 8C, lane 3).
Therefore, phosphopeptide 5 is the tryptic fragment,
SVLEDFFTATEGQpYQPQP, containing phosphorylated tyrosine 505.
We were unable to identify unequivocally phosphopeptides 4 and 6-8,
although phosphoamino acid analysis revealed the presence of only
phosphoserine in phosphopeptides 6 and 7 derived from the unshifted,
lower form of Lck labeled in vivo in LSTRA cells (Fig.
8B, samples 6 and 7). Phosphopeptide 4 is
especially intriguing because it appears to be a site of mitotic
phosphorylation in Lck. Phosphopeptide 4 was intensely labeled with
32P in vivo in the shifted form of Lck that
resulted from treatment of Jurkat cells with the phorbol ester, PMA
(data not shown). Additionally, phosphopeptide 4 migrates with a
mobility predicted for the serine 158-containing tryptic peptide (data
not shown).
 |
DISCUSSION |
Stimulation of T cells through antigen receptor cross-linking or
by treatment with phorbol esters is associated with an increase in the
serine phosphorylation of Lck and a concomitant decrease in its
electrophoretic mobility on SDS-polyacrylamide gels (13-18, 20, 21). A
similar increase in the serine phosphorylation of Lck is seen at
mitosis (28). Here we identify serine 59 in the unique region of Lck as
a site of mitotic phosphorylation. Previously, serine 59 was shown to
be a site of TCR-induced phosphorylation, and the kinase responsible
for its phosphorylation was identified as ERK MAP kinase (18, 23).
However, we conclude that ERK MAP kinase is not responsible for the
phosphorylation of serine 59 at mitosis based on the following
observations: (i) tyrosine kinase activities and binding domains that
are necessary for the activation of the ERK MAP kinase pathway
(e.g. Lck, ZAP-70, SH2 and SH3 domains of Lck) were not
required for the mitotic phosphorylation of serine 59; and (ii)
inhibitors of the ERK MAP kinase pathway failed to inhibit the mitotic
phosphorylation of serine 59. Thus a proline-directed serine/threonine
kinase distinct from ERK MAP kinase phosphorylates Lck on serine 59 at mitosis.
The mitotic serine phosphorylation of Lck is reminiscent of the mitotic
phosphorylation of Src by Cdc2 (48). The phosphorylation of Lck and Src
at mitosis occurs in the unique domains of both kinases, but at
non-conserved residues (Ref. 48 and this report). Purified Cdc2 can
phosphorylate Lck in vitro, and this phosphorylation results
in a shift in the electrophoretic mobility of Lck (28). Two other
proteins are phosphorylated at mitosis at sites identical to (49) or
nearly identical to (50) serine 59 in Lck. BCL-2 is phosphorylated on
an identical site by ASK1/Jun amino-terminal protein kinase (49), and
the protein-tyrosine phosphatase PTP-1B (where the glutamine in Lck is
an asparagine in PTP-1B) is phosphorylated by an unknown mitotic kinase
that is not Cdc2 (50). However, purified JNK1 fails to phosphorylate
Lck in vitro2 making it an unlikely candidate
for the mitotic serine 59 kinase. Regardless of which serine/threonine
kinase is responsible for the mitotic phosphorylation of Lck, the fact
that it is not ERK MAP kinase reveals that two distinct signaling
pathways phosphorylate serine 59 depending on the physiological state
of the cell.
Like Src, the function of Lck at mitosis is not known, although both
kinases associate with and phosphorylate Sam68 (10, 42).3 However, unlike Src, it
isn't clear that the activity of Lck is activated at mitosis. In fact,
it seems likely that just the opposite is true. Several studies (13,
14, 16, 18, 25) have reported that the activity of the slower mobility
form of Lck is decreased, and we have observed a decrease in the
phosphorylation of tyrosine 394 (the autophosphorylation site) in the
mitotic, slower mobility form of Lck (Figs. 6 and 7). Phosphorylation
of tyrosine 394 is known to activate Lck (51). However, some basal activity of Lck is present in mitotic cells based on the finding that
in vitro kinase assays of Lck from mitotic cells result in both Lck autophosphorylation and the phosphorylation of
co-immunoprecipitating Sam683 and Raf-1 (52). It is also
possible that the phosphorylation of serine 59 alters the binding of
Lck to cellular partners or its submembrane localization.
The peptide mapping studies revealed the existence of several
additional phosphorylation sites on Lck. The in vivo
labeling of the S59D mutant with 32P indicated that at
least two serine residues in the serine 59-containing tryptic peptide
were basally phosphorylated in cycling cells. Although we identified
the serine 59-containing peptide as well as the tyrosine 394- and
tyrosine 505-containing peptides, the identities of three additional
in vivo labeled phosphoserine-containing peptides (4, 6, 7)
are still under investigation. The identity of phosphopeptide 4 is
especially important because it appears specifically in the shifted
form of Lck, generated both at mitosis and by treatment of cells with
the phorbol ester, PMA. Phosphopeptide 4 migrates with a mobility that
is predicted for the serine 158-containing tryptic phosphopeptide, and
it was reported that serine 158 is a major site of in vivo
phosphorylation following PMA treatment of Jurkat T cells (17).
Therefore we think it likely that serine 158 is a second site of
mitotic phosphorylation in Lck.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Andrey Shaw for providing the Lck
cDNA and Robert Abraham for providing the P116 cells.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grant GM48099 (to M. L. H.) and a Purdue Research fellowship from the
Purdue Cancer Center (to K. P. K.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
Present address: University of Colorado, Health Sciences
Center, Denver, CO 80262.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Life Sciences
Research Bldg., Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907. Tel.: 765-494-1442; Fax: 765-494-9193, E-mail:
harrison@pharmacy.purdue.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, February 14, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M111911200
2
Z. Yu, R. L. Geahlen, and M. L. Harrison, manuscript in preparation.
3
N. Pathan, K. Kesavan, R. L. Geahlen, and
M. L. Harrison, manuscript in preparation.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
SH, Src homology;
TCR, T cell antigen receptor;
MAP, mitogen-activated protein;
ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase;
PMA, phorbol 12-myristate
13-acetate..
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Molina, T. J.,
Kishihara, K.,
Siderovski, D. P.,
van Ewijk, W.,
Narendran, A.,
Timms, E.,
Wakeham, A.,
Paige, C. J.,
Hartmann, K. U.,
Veillette, A.,
Davidson, D.,
and Mak, T. W.
(1992)
Nature
357,
161-164[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Straus, D. B.,
and Weiss, A.
(1992)
Cell
70,
585-593[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Kane, L. P.,
Lin, J.,
and Weiss, A.
(2000)
Curr. Opin. Immunol.
12,
242-249[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Zhang, W.,
and Samelson, L. E.
(2000)
Semin. Immunol.
12,
35-41[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Janes, P. W.,
Ley, S. C.,
Magee, A. I.,
and Kabouridis, P. S.
(2000)
Semin. Immunol.
12,
23-34[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Norian, L. A.,
and Koretzky, G. A.
(2000)
Semin. Immunol.
12,
43-54[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Thomas, S. M.,
and Brugge, J. S.
(1997)
Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol.
13,
513-609[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Resh, M. D.
(1994)
Cell
67,
411-413
|
| 9.
|
Marchildon, G. A.,
Casnellie, J. E.,
Walsh, K. A.,
and Krebs, E. G.
(1984)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
81,
7679-7682[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Paige, L. A.,
Nadler, M. J. S.,
Harrison, M. L.,
Cassady, J. M.,
and Geahlen, R. L.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
8669-8674[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Shenoy-Scaria, A. M.,
Timson, G.,
Kwong, J.,
Shaw, A. S.,
and Lublin, D. M.
(1993)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13,
6385-6392[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Kabouridis, P. S.,
Magee, A. I.,
and Ley, S. C.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
4983-4998[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Lee, J. E.,
Cossoy, M. B.,
Chau, L. A.,
Singh, B.,
and Madrenas, J.
(1997)
J. Immunol.
159,
61-69[Abstract]
|
| 14.
|
Veillette, A.,
Horak, I. D.,
Horak, E. M.,
Bookman, M. A.,
and Bolen, J. B.
(1988)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
8,
4353-4361[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Marth, J. D.,
Lewis, D. B.,
Cooke, M. P.,
Mellins, E. D.,
Gearn, M. E.,
Samelson, L. E.,
Wilson, C. B.,
Miller, A. D.,
and Perlmutter, R. M.
(1989)
J. Immunol.
142,
2430-2437[Abstract]
|
| 16.
|
Danielian, S.,
Fagard, R.,
Alcover, A.,
Acuto, O.,
and Fischer, S.
(1989)
J. Immunol.
19,
2183-2189
|
| 17.
|
Soula, M.,
Rothhut, B.,
Camoin, L.,
Guillaume, J.,
Strosberg, D.,
Vorherr, T.,
Burn, P.,
Meggio, F.,
Fischer, S.,
and Fagard, R.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
27420-27427[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Watts, J. D.,
Sanghera, J. S.,
Pelech, S. L.,
and Abersold, R.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
23275-23282[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Horak, I. D.,
Gress, R. E.,
Lucas, P. J.,
Horak, E. M.,
Waldmann, T. A.,
and Bolen, J. B.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
1996-2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Galron, D.,
Ansotegui, I. J.,
and Isakov, N.
(1997)
Cell. Immunol.
178,
141-151[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Lou, K.,
and Sefton, B. M.
(1990)
Oncogene
5,
803-808[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Winkler, D. G.,
Park, I.,
Kim, T.,
Payne, N. S.,
Walsh, C. T.,
Strominger, J. L.,
and Shin, J.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
5176-5180[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Schröder, A. J.,
Quehl, P.,
Müller, J.,
and Samstag, Y.
(2000)
Eur. J. Immunol.
30,
635-643[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Couture, C.,
Songyang, Z.,
Jascur, T.,
Williams, S.,
Tailor, P.,
Cantley, L. C.,
and Mustelin, T.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
241,
24880-24884
|
| 25.
|
Gold, M. R.,
Chiu, R.,
Ingham, R. J.,
Saxton, T. M.,
van Oostveen, I.,
Watts, J. D.,
Affolter, M.,
and Abersold, R.
(1994)
J. Immunol.
153,
2369-2380[Abstract]
|
| 26.
|
Joung, I.,
Kim, T.,
Stolz, L. A.,
Payne, G.,
Winkler, D. G.,
Walsh, C. T.,
Strominger, J. L.,
and Shin, J.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
5778-5782[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Park, I.,
Chung, J.,
Walsh, C. T.,
Yun, Y.,
Strominger, J. L.,
and Shin, J.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
12338-12342[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Pathan, N. I.,
Geahlen, R. L.,
and Harrison, M. L.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
27517-27523[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Taylor, S. J.,
and Shalloway, D.
(1994)
Nature
368,
867-871[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Fumagalli, S.,
Totty, N. F.,
Hsuan, J. J.,
and Courtneidge, S. A.
(1994)
Nature
368,
871-874[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Chang, B. Y.,
Conroy, K. B.,
Machleder, E. M.,
and Cartwright, C. A.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
3245-3256[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
AL-Ramadi, B. K.,
Zhang, H.,
and Bothwell, A. L.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
12498-12503[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Roche, S.,
Fumagalli, S.,
and Courtneidge, S. A.
(1996)
Science
269,
1567-1569
|
| 34.
|
Yasunaga, M.,
Yagi, T.,
Hanzawa, N.,
Yasuda, M.,
Yamanashi, Y.,
Yamamoto, T.,
Aizawa, S.,
Miyauchi, Y.,
and Nishikawa, S.-I.
(1996)
J. Cell Biol.
132,
91-99[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Moasser, M. M.,
Srethapakdi, M.,
Sachar, K. S.,
Kraker, A. J.,
and Rosen, N.
(1999)
Cancer Res.
59,
6145-6152[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Erpel, T.,
Alonso, G.,
Roche, S.,
and Courtneidge, S. A.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
16807-16812[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
|
Broome, M. A.,
and Hunter, T.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
16798-16806[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Marth, J. D.,
Peet, R.,
Krebs, E. G.,
and Perlmutter, R. M.
(1985)
Cell
43,
393-404[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Voronova, A. F.,
and Sefton, B. M.
(1986)
J. Biol. Chem.
257,
10738-10742
|
| 40.
|
Deng, W. P.,
and Nickoloff, J. A.
(1992)
Anal. Biochem.
1,
81-88
|
| 41.
|
Keshvara, L. M.,
Isaacson, C. I.,
Yankee, T. M.,
Sarac, R.,
Harrison, M. L.,
and Geahlen, R. L.
(1998)
J. Immunol.
161,
5276-5283[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 42.
|
Dadd, C. A.,
Cook, R. G.,
and Allis, C. D.
(1993)
BioTechniques
14,
266-273[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 43.
|
Huby, R. D.,
Weiss, A.,
and Ley, S. C.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
12024-12031[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 44.
|
Straus, D. B.,
Chan, A. C.,
Patai, B.,
and Weiss, A.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
9976-9981[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 45.
|
August, A.,
and Dupont, B.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
10045-10059
|
| 46.
|
Takenaka, K. T.,
Moriguchi, T.,
and Nishida, E.
(1998)
Science
280,
599-602[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 47.
|
West, M. H. P., Wu, R. S.,
and Bonner, W. M.
(1984)
Electrophoresis
5,
133-138
|
| 48.
|
Shenoy, S.,
Choi, J.-K.,
Bagrodia, S.,
Copeland, T. D.,
Maller, J. L.,
and Shalloway, D.
(1989)
Cell
57,
763-774[CrossRef] |