Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M100766200 on January 23, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 17, 14747-14756, April 26, 2002
A Domain of the Manganese-stabilizing Protein from
Synechococcus elongatus Involved in Functional Binding to
Photosystem II*
Akihiro
Motoki
§,
Mina
Usui
,
Tsuneo
Shimazu
,
Masahiko
Hirano
, and
Sakae
Katoh¶
From the
Biological Sciences Department, Toray
Research Center Inc., Kamakura 248-8555, Japan and the
¶ Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Toho University,
Funabashi 274-8510, Japan
Received for publication, January 26, 2001, and in revised form, January 22, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
Site-directed mutagenesis was performed to
investigate whether the two protease-sensitive sequences
Phe156-Gly163 and
Arg184-Ser191, of the manganese-stabilizing
protein (MSP) from a thermophilic cyanobacterium, Synechococcus
elongatus (Motoki, A., Shimazu, T., Hirano, M., and Katoh, S. (1998) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1365, 492-502), are involved
in functional interaction with photosystem II (PSII). The ability of
MSP to bind to its functional site on the PSII complex and to
reactivate oxygen evolution was dramatically reduced by the
substitution of Arg152, Asp158,
Lys160, or Arg162 with uncharged residues, by
insertion of a single residue between Phe156 and
Leu157, or by deletion of Leu157. Substitution
of each of the four charged residues with an identically charged
residue showed that the charges at Asp158, and possibly
Lys160, are important for the electrostatic interaction
with PSII. The reactivating ability was also strongly affected by the
alteration of Phe156 to Leu. Replacement of
Lys188, the only strictly conserved charged residue in the
Arg184-Ser191 sequence, by Gln had only a
marginal effect on the function of MSP. High affinity binding of MSP to
PSII was also affected significantly by mutation at Arg152,
which is located in a region (Val148-Arg152)
strictly conserved among the 14 sequences so far reported. These results imply that the Val148-Gly163 sequence,
which is well conserved among MSPs from cyanobacteria to higher plants,
is a domain of MSP for functional interaction with PSII.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Photosynthetic oxygen evolution is mediated by
PSII,1 a multiprotein complex
carrying chlorophylls, carotenoids, and a variety of redox cofactors
(for reviews see Refs. 1 and 2). Among the protein components of PSII,
the extrinsic 33-kDa protein is also called the
manganese-stabilizing protein (MSP) and is associated with the
lumenal surface of the PSII complex together with two or three other
extrinsic proteins, i.e. the 23-kDa and 17-kDa proteins in
higher plants and green algae (3), cytochrome
c550 and a 12-kDa protein in
cyanobacteria (4), and cytochrome c550, the
12-kDa protein, and a 20-kDa protein in red algae (5). MSP stabilizes
the manganese cluster, which catalyzes oxidation of water to molecular
oxygen. Dissociation of the protein by washing with 1 M
CaCl2 or MgCl2 (6) or 2.6 M urea
plus 0.2 M NaCl (7) leads to a gradual release of two of
four Mn2+ ions present in the cluster. Oxygen
evolution is strongly suppressed by the release of MSP, but the lost
activity can be restored by rebinding of the protein (8, 9). Because no
cofactor is associated with MSP, it is considered that binding of the
protein itself is responsible for optimal activity of oxygen evolution.
Cross-linking experiments with various bifunctional reagents have shown
that MSP is associated with or in close proximity to essentially all of
the major intrinsic proteins of the PSII complex (10-15). Various
attempts have been made to locate binding sites for PSII or identify
amino acid residues on MSP that are involved in binding to its
functional site on the PSII complex. The N-terminal sequence of spinach
MSP was suggested to have a binding site to PSII because removal of 16 or 18 amino acid residues from its N terminus by protease digestion
resulted in total loss of the protein binding (16). Recently, evidence
was presented indicating that the N-terminal sequence is necessary for
maintaining the binding ability of the protein to PSII but might not be
involved in the intermolecular binding itself (17). It was also
suggested that Asp9, the only conserved, charged residue in
the N-terminal 18-amino acid sequence, might engage in both intra- and
intermolecular interactions (18). Cross-linking with EDC, which
covalently links amino and carboxyl groups in van der Waals contact,
indicated that MSP is bound directly to CP47, an intrinsic
chlorophyll-carrying protein of the PSII complex through electrostatic
interaction (10-12). Analysis of EDC-cross-linked products showed that
a charge-pair interaction exists between a charged residue in the
Asp1-Lys76 sequence of the spinach MSP and an
oppositely charged residue in the
Phe364-Asp440 sequence of CP47 (13).
Chemical modification with specific reagents showed that six conserved
lysyl residues distributed over the entire sequence of spinach MSP are
accessible to at least one of the reagents when the protein is free in
solution but not when the protein is associated with PSII membranes
(19, 20). This suggests that these lysyl residues are located in
domains of the protein that are in contact with the PSII complex and
might participate in intermolecular interaction. Cross-linking of the
Lys159-Lys236 domain of spinach MSP to CP47
with a reagent that cross-links lysyl residues within a 1.2-nm radius
has been reported (21). Four arginyl residues of the spinach protein
may also be involved in the binding to PSII because they were modified
with a specific reagent only when the protein was free in solution
(20).
Involvement of negatively charged amino acid residues on MSP in binding
to PSII was also suggested by EPR studies with a free radical-relaxing
agent dysprosium, which showed that the binding site for MSP on the
PSII complex is positively charged (22). Cross-linking experiments in
which carboxyl groups of spinach MSP were activated for cross-linking
prior to reconstitution with PSII membranes or vice versa, showed that
all carboxyl groups involved in intermolecular cross-linking with EDC
are located on MSP (23). The binding affinity of spinach MSP was
strongly reduced by chemical modification of carboxyl groups of
aspartyl and glutamyl residues with glycine methyl ester when it was
free in solution but not when it was bound to PSII membrane (24). The
reduced binding affinity was related to modification of two or three
acidic amino acid residues located in domains
Asp157-Asp168 and
Glu212-Gln247, because these residues were
modified only when the protein was free in solution. Mutation of
Asp159 to other residues in Synechocystis MSP
affected oxygen evolution significantly (25). On the other hand, in
another study, chemical modification of carboxyl groups with glycine
methyl ester failed to affect the ability of the spinach protein to
reactivate oxygen evolution upon reconstitution at a high protein/PSII
ratio (20). Site-directed mutagenesis of completely or partially
conserved aspartyl and glutamyl residues on spinach MSP was performed,
but none of the mutations had a dramatic effect (26, 27). All of the
mutant proteins were able to bind to PSII membranes, and the ability of
the protein to reactivate oxygen evolution was only marginally affected
by alteration of several residues. Thus, amino acid residues on MSP
that are involved in functional interaction with PSII still remain to
be identified.
We showed previously that cleavage of MSP from the thermophilic
cyanobacterium Synechococcus elongatus at a single site
between Phe156 and Gly163, or between
Agr184 and Ser191, by trypsin, chymotrypsin, or
lysylendopeptidase resulted in total loss of the ability of the protein
to bind to PSII and to restore the oxygen-evolving activity (28).
Introduction of a nick between Phe156 and
Leu157, a cleavage site specific to chymotrypsin, by
site-directed mutagenesis also led to loss of the binding and
reactivating ability of MSP. The cause of the inactivation of MSP may,
however, not be related to a local change at the protease-cleavage
site, because the mutation was accompanied by a significant change in
the secondary conformation of the protein. Insertion of a methionyl
residue between Phe156 and Leu157 abolished
functional binding of MSP and unexpectedly created an appreciable
binding affinity for nonspecific sites of the PSII complex. Because the
protein conformation was little affected by insertion of the residue,
the observed changes in the protein binding were ascribed to a small
structural change(s) in the mutated polypeptide. Based on these
observations, we proposed that the two protease-sensitive regions,
Phe156-Gly163 and
Arg184-Ser191, are possible candidates for
interaction with the PSII complex.
In the present study, site-directed mutagenesis was performed to
identify the amino acid residues involved in effective binding of
Synechococcus MSP to PSII. Conserved, charged residues in
the first protease-sensitive sequences were substituted with an
uncharged residue, and the ability of the mutant proteins to bind to
urea/NaCl-washed PSII and to restore the oxygen evolution was
determined. Charge-preserving substitution with an identically charged
residue was also performed to examine whether the residues are involved
in electrostatic interaction. For comparison, conserved, uncharged
residues in and near the first protease-sensitive sequence
Phe156-Gly163 and conserved, charged residues
in other domains of the protein were altered. The results obtained
indicate that Arg152, Phe156,
Asp158, Lys160, and Arg162 located
in or near the first protease-sensitive sequence are essential for
binding of MSP to its functional site. Mutant proteins were also
constructed by inserting a residue with a side group smaller than that
of Met between Phe156 and Leu157 or by deleting
Leu157, in order to elucidate the structural configuration
of MSP around Phe156 and Leu157, which are
required for the functional binding of MSP.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Site-directed Mutagenesis of the psbO Gene--
Site-directed
mutagenesis was performed by the method described previously (28). The
pET8c expression vector, which contains the wild-type psbO
gene of S. elongatus, was constructed as described (29). The
XbaI/BamHI fragment of the vector containing the
whole psbO gene was cloned into the multiple cloning site of
pBluescriptII phagemid vector (Stratagene) and subcloned into
SacI/HindIII site of the M13mp18 phagemid vector.
The SculptureTM in vitro mutagenesis system
(Amersham Biosciences) was used to introduce a desired mutagenesis into
a M13mp18 template (30-32). The synthesized, mutagenic
oligonucleotides employed are shown in Table
I. The mutation was checked by sequencing
the single-stranded DNA of each mutated psbO gene.
The mutated psbO genes were expressed in Escherichia
coli cells, and the mutant MSPs were purified by the same method
employed for isolation of the wild-type MSP (29). The yields of
purified protein were 5-10 mg of protein/liter of culture medium.
Preparation of Oxygen-evolving PSII
Complexes--
Oxygen-evolving PSII complexes were isolated from
S. elongatus as described by Ichimura et al.
(33). Thylakoid membranes suspended in solution A (50 mM
MES/NaOH (pH 6.0), 10 mM NaCl, 5 mM
MgCl2) containing 1 M sucrose (1 mg of
chlorophyll/ml) were treated with 0.20-0.25% sucrose monolaurate for
1 h at 20 °C in the dark. After the addition of an equal volume
of solution A to reduce the sucrose concentration to 0.5 M,
2 volumes of the suspension was placed on 1 volume of solution A
containing 1 M sucrose and centrifuged at 300,000 × g for 1 h. A green band that appeared at the interface
between 0.5 and 1 M sucrose contained PSII complexes. The
complexes were collected by centrifugation at 370,000 × g for 40 min and suspended in solution A containing 25% glycerol.
Binding of MSP--
PSII complexes were treated with 2.6 M urea and 0.2 M NaCl for 30 min at 0 °C to
extract the three extrinsic proteins, precipitated by centrifugation,
and suspended in solution A containing 25% glycerol. Washed PSII
complexes were incubated with each mutant protein in 20 mM
MES/NaOH (pH 6.0), 10 mM CaCl2, and 10%
glycerol at 0 °C at an indicated protein/PSII ratio. A stoichiometry
of 45 chlorophylls/PSII was assumed for the PSII complexes (33). After incubation for 1 h, the PSII complexes were precipitated by
centrifugation at 370,000 × g for 40 min and then
washed once with and resuspended in 50 mM MES/NaOH (pH
6.0), 10 mM MgCl2, and 25% glycerol.
Wild-type and mutant MSPs bound to PSII were analyzed by
SDS-PAGE. Samples were denatured with 5% SDS and 60 mM
dithiothreitol for 30 min, then applied to polyacrylamide gels. The
acrylamide concentration was 4.5% for the stacking gel and 12.5% for
the resolving gel, and both gels contained 0.1% SDS and 6 M urea. After electrophoresis, gels were stained with
Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250 and scanned at 560 nm with an ATTO
AE-6900 densitometer. Amounts of MSPs bound to PSII were estimated by measuring the peak area of the protein with that of CP47 as reference.
Determination of Oxygen Evolution--
Oxygen evolution was
determined with a Clark-type oxygen electrode at 40 °C as described
(33). White light of a saturating intensity was provided from a halogen
lamp (Watanabe Shoko R&D Corp). The reaction medium contained 50 mM MES/NaOH (pH 6.0), 10 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 10 mM CaCl2,
1 M sucrose, and 0.4 mM
2,6-dichloro-p-benzoquinone.
Circular Dichroism Spectrometry--
Far-UV and near-UV CD
spectra were determined with a JASCO J-820 spectrometer. Data were
collected every 0.1 nm with a bandwidth of 1 or 2 nm and a 0.5-s time
constant. For determination of the far-UV CD spectra, proteins were
dissolved in 20 mM potassium phosphate (pH 6.5) at a
protein concentration of 80 µg/ml, which was determined by amino acid
analysis. Eight repetitive scans were collected and averaged; the
secondary structure elements were analyzed with the program VARSLC (34,
35). Near-UV CD spectra were determined with proteins dissolved in 20 mM MES/NaOH (pH 6.5). Measurement was repeated 6-16 times
depending on the protein concentrations (see Fig. 4), and the signals
obtained were averaged.
 |
RESULTS |
Substitution of Charged Amino Acid Residues--
There are several
lines of evidence indicating that binding of MSP to its functional site
involves electrostatic interactions between charged amino acid residues
on the protein and oppositely charged residues on intrinsic proteins of
PSII (6, 7, 36, 37). Single-amino acid substitution experiments were,
therefore, performed for conserved, charged residues located in the two
protease-sensitive sequences. The first protease-sensitive sequence,
Phe156-Gly163, contains two positively charged
amino acid residues, Lys160 and Arg162, and a
negatively charged residue, Asp158, which are completely
conserved among 14 sequences of MSPs from cyanobacteria, algae, and
higher plants (Fig. 1). Mutant proteins were constructed by replacing Lys160 and Arg162
with Gln (K160Q,R162Q), and by replacing Asp158 with Asn
(D158N). Binding affinities of the mutant proteins to PSII were
determined by measuring the amount of each mutant protein bound to
urea/NaCl-washed PSII at different protein/PSII ratios. Reconstituted
PSII complexes were washed once to remove loosely bound MSP. As shown
in Fig. 2, binding of wild-type MSP was
saturated at a protein/PSII ratio of two. A further increase in the
protein/PSII ratio led to only a small increase in the amount of the
protein bound, reflecting the ability of the protein to bind
specifically and stoichiometrically to its functional site on the PSII
complex. On the other hand, binding of the protein to PSII complexes
was dramatically altered by the mutations introduced. The binding curves of the K160Q and R162Q mutant proteins were sigmoidal, and the
amounts of the two mutant proteins bound to PSII at low protein/PSII
ratios were much lower than that of the wild-type protein, indicating
that alteration of Lys160 and Arg162 leads to a
large decrease in the binding affinity for the functional site. At
protein/PSII ratios above four, the amount of mutant proteins bound
increased linearly with an increase in protein concentration; this
increase is apparently steeper than that of the wild-type protein. This
is a feature of nonspecific binding that has been described first for
mutant proteins with Met inserted between Phe156 and
Leu157 and with Leu157 replaced by Met (28).
Nonspecific binding was particularly enhanced upon substitution of
Asp158 with Asn so that the amount of the D158N mutant
protein bound to PSII far exceeded that of the wild-type protein at a
protein/PSII ratio of six. Nevertheless, the high-affinity binding of
the protein to PSII was appreciably reduced by the mutation. The
results show that all three of the conserved, charged residues located
in the Phe156-Gly163 sequence are required for
high affinity binding of the protein to PSII, consistent with the
notion that the first protease-sensitive sequence is a domain for
interaction with PSII. The high affinity binding, however, was also
severely affected by alteration of Arg152 to Gln, which is
located three residues upstream of the first protease-sensitive
sequence. This indicates that the binding domain is larger than the
Phe156-Gly163 sequence and possibly involves
the Val148-Arg152 sequence, which is strictly
conserved in all the sequences of MSP shown in Fig. 1.

View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Alignment of amino acid sequences of MSP from
14 oxygenic photosynthetic organisms. Amino acid residues
substituted or deleted by site-directed mutagenesis in the present
study are indicated by triangles. Dashes indicate amino acid
residues identical to those in S. elongatus; dots indicate vacant position in
the sequence; stars indicate residues completely conserved
in the 14 sequences. The two protease-sensitive sequences are
boxed. 1, Synechococcus elongatus;
2, Anacystis nidulans R2; 3,
Synechocystis sp. PCC6803; 4, Anabaena
sp. PCC7120; 5, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii;
6, Euglena gracilis Z; 7, garden pea;
8, Arabidopsis thaliana; 9, wheat;
10, potato; 11, tomato; 12, tobacco;
13, rice; 14, spinach.
|
|

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Effects of substitution of
Arg152, Asp158, Lys160, and
Arg162 with an uncharged residue on the binding affinity of
MSP to PSII. Urea/NaCl-washed PSII complexes were reconstituted
with each mutant protein at the indicated protein/PSII ratios. The
amount of wild-type protein bound to PSII at the protein/PSII ratio of
three was taken as 100%. , wild-type MSP; , D158N; , R152Q;
, K160Q; ×, R162Q.
|
|
The effects of the substitution mutations on the ability of MSP to
restore the oxygen-evolving activity were also investigated. As shown
in Table II, oxygen evolution was
strongly suppressed by urea/NaCl washing, but the activity was
partially restored by the addition of wild-type MSP. This reflects the
normal function of the protein because the small magnitude of
reactivation (about 30% of activity in untreated PSII complexes) can
be ascribed to the following two reasons. First, the full activity of
oxygen evolution of cyanobacterial or red algal PSII requires three or four extrinsic proteins (38-40); MSP only partially supports the activity. Second, the smaller reactivating effect of MSP may be because
a larger proportion of PSII preparations had been irreversibly damaged
during protein extraction. This, however, will in principle not affect
our reconstitution results as far as the comparison of the relative
effects of wild-type and mutant MSPs is concerned. The mutations that
strongly affected the high affinity binding of the protein had a severe
impact on the reactivation ability of MSP. The levels of oxygen
evolution restored by the mutant MSPs were only less than 20% of that
restored by wild-type protein even at a protein/PSII ratio of five. The
results confirm that the four charged residues are essential for
functional interaction with PSII and that the nonspecific binding to
PSII is nonfunctional. Table II also shows that not all of the strictly
conserved, charged residues are required for the function of MSP.
Substitution of Lys188, the only strictly conserved,
charged residue in the second protease-sensitive sequence,
Arg184-Ser191 with Gln, had only a marginal
effect on the reactivation ability of MSP. This casts a doubt on the
notion that the second protease-sensitive sequence is a region for
interaction with PSII. The alteration of Lys59,
Arg73, Lys123, and Lys234 to Gln
had no effect on the function of MSP. Thus, inactivation of MSP is
specific to the substitution of a charged residue in the
Val148-Gly163 sequence. The present study,
however, does not exclude the existence of a binding site for PSII in
other regions of the protein because there are still eight strictly
conserved, charged residues that remain to be investigated (see Fig.
1).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table II
Effects of substitution of a charged amino-acid residue with an
uncharged residue on the ability of MSP to restore oxygen-evolving
activity
Urea/NaCl-washed PSII complexes were reconstituted with each mutant
protein at a protein/PSII ratio of five.
|
|
CD spectroscopy was performed to investigate the effect of the
substitution mutations on the secondary and tertiary conformations of
MSP. The secondary conformation of the protein has previously been
estimated from the UV CD spectrum in the 197-250 nm region as
well as Fourier-transform infrared spectrum (41). Because CD data
provide more accurate estimates of the proportions of secondary
structure elements when the CD spectrum is extended to shorter
wavelengths (35), the CD spectra of wild-type and mutant proteins were
determined from 181 to 260 nm. The far-UV CD spectrum of wild-type
protein showed a strong positive band at 197 nm, a broad negative band
between 205 and 225 nm, and a zero-line crossover point at 192 nm (Fig.
3). Substitution of Arg152,
Asp158, Lys160, and Arg162 had no
significant effect on the spectrum (Fig. 3 and data not presented). The
relative abundance of secondary structure elements estimated from the
far-UV CD data is shown in Table III. The
wild-type protein contains
-sheet severalfold more abundantly than
-helix. The values are similar to those of spinach MSP (42-44) but
different from the previous estimate from the CD spectrum in the
197-250 nm region, which predicted a higher proportion of
-helix
and a lower proportion of
-sheet than those shown in Table
III (41). Although not shown here, Fourier-transform infrared
spectroscopy with an improved precision also indicated a larger
abundance of
-sheets than shown previously (41). The mutations that
significantly decreased the binding and reactivating abilities of MSP
had no significant effect on the secondary conformation of the protein; small variations in the proportion of the secondary structure elements
observed are in the range of experimental error. Thus, loss of the
functional binding to PSII is not a result of distortion of the
secondary conformation of the protein.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Far-UV CD spectra of wild-type and mutant
MSPs with Arg152 replaced by Gln and Asp158
replaced by Asn. Thick line, wild-type MSP; thin
line, R152Q; dotted line, D158N.
|
|
The near-UV CD spectra were determined to examine whether tertiary
structure of the protein is affected by the substitution mutations. The
near-UV CD spectrum of spinach MSP shows two prominent bands, a
tryptophan band at 294 nm and a tyrosine band at 285 nm. These bands
disappeared when the tertiary structure that contributes to the
local environment of the aromatic amino acids was altered by cleavage
of the sulfhydryl bond (45), acidification (43), or heat treatment (44)
of the protein. Synechococcus MSP lacks tryptophan, and
accordingly no band at 294 nm was observed (Fig. 4). Moreover, and unexpectedly, no
conspicuous tyrosine band was observed at 285 nm. A simple explanation
would be that the 285 nm band originates from one (or more) of the
three tyrosine residues that are present in the spinach protein but not
in the Synechococcus protein (see Fig. 1). Fig. 4, however,
shows four positive bands at 261, 266, 274, and 282 nm, which can be
ascribed to the fine-structure bands of phenylalanine and tyrosine
(46). A more likely explanation, therefore, is that a peak at 290 nm
corresponds to a tyrosine band that is overlapped with a sharp negative
band at shorter wavelengths. In any case, these spectral features
remained essentially unaltered upon substitution of any of the four
charged residues, indicating that inactivation of the mutant MSPs was
not associated with a significant change in the tertiary structure of
the protein, either (Fig. 4 and data not presented).

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Near-UV CD spectra of wild-type and mutant
MSPs with Arg152 or Arg162 replaced by
Gln. Solid line, wild-type MSP (985 µg/ml);
dashed line, R152Q (827 µg/ml); dotted line,
R162Q (1760 µg/ml).
|
|
If the four charged residues contribute to the effective binding of MSP
through electrostatic interaction with oppositely charged residues on
the PSII complex, substitution of each residue with an identically
charged residue might have little impact on the function of the
protein. This was found to be the case with Asp158.
Alteration of the aspartyl residue to a glutamyl residue had no effect
on the binding of the protein to PSII (Fig.
5). The D158E mutant protein was able to
reconstitute oxygen evolution activity as effectively as wild-type
protein (Table IV). Thus, a negative
charge at Asp158 is critically important for the functional
binding of MSP. In contrast, charge-preserving alteration of
Arg152 to Lys, Lys160 to Arg, or
Arg162 to Lys resulted in a significant decrease in the
high affinity binding and an increase in nonspecific binding to PSII
(Fig. 5). The amounts of the R152K, K160R, and R162K mutant proteins
bound to PSII at low protein/PSII ratios appear to be larger than those of the corresponding charge-deleted mutant proteins. The difference should be ascribed to the difference in nonspecific binding, because the charge-preserving mutations affected the ability of the protein to
reconstitute oxygen evolution as severely as the corresponding charge-deleting mutations. Only the K160R mutant protein restored oxygen evolution somewhat more effectively than the K160Q mutant protein, suggesting participation of this residue in electrostatic interaction (Table IV).

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Effects of substitution of
Arg152, Asp158, Lys160, and
Arg162 with an identically charged residue on the binding
affinity of MSP to PSII. Experimental conditions were the same as
in Fig. 2. , wild-type MSP; , D158E; , R152K; , K160R; ×,
R162K.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table IV
Effects of substitution of a charged amino acid residue with an
identically charged residue on the ability of MSP to restore
oxygen-evolving activity
Experimental conditions are the same as in Table II.
|
|
Substitution of Uncharged Residues--
Five uncharged residues,
Phe156, Leu157, Pro159,
Gly161, and Gly163, which are located in the
Phe156-Gly163 sequence, are strictly conserved
among MSPs from cyanobacteria to higher plants, except for
Gly161, which is conservatively replaced by Ala in two
cyanobacteria (see Fig. 1). Substitution of Phe156 with Leu
resulted in a nearly total loss of the reactivating ability of MSP
(Table V). Thus, Phe156 is
required for effective binding of the protein, although the effects of
the mutation on binding of the protein to its functional site could not
be determined accurately because of an extremely strong affinity the
mutant protein exhibited for nonspecific sites (not shown). Alteration
of Phe156 to Tyr had no effect on the function of the
protein. This indicates that the structure of the side group is crucial
for effective interaction with PSII. Substitution of Gly161
or Gly163 with Gln led to a small decline in the
reactivating ability of MSP, whereas alteration of Pro159
to Ala had no effect.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table V
Effects of substitution of an uncharged amino acid residue on the
ability of MSP to restore oxygen-evolving activity
Urea/NaCl-washed PSII complexes were reconstituted with each mutant
protein at the protein/PSII ratios of five except that the ratio of
four was used for of G163Q and G167Q.
|
|
The Thr153-Asn155 and
Leu164-Ser166 sequences, which are located
adjacent to the first protease-sensitive sequence, are not conserved even in cyanobacterial MSPs. Replacement of a single residue in these
two sequences or the entire three-amino acid sequences had no effect on
the ability of MSP to restore the oxygen-evolving activity (not shown).
Although Arg152 is required for the functional binding of
MSP, Val148, Pro149, and Tyr151,
located in the conserved Val148-Arg152
sequence, could be replaced by Thr, Ala, and Phe, respectively, without
affecting the reactivating ability of MSP. No attempt was made to alter
Ser150. Gly167 and Tyr168 are also
completely conserved in the 14 sequences of MSP. The reactivating
ability of MSP was moderately affected by substitution of
Tyr168 with Phe, whereas replacement of Gly167
by Gln had no influence on the function of MSP.
Insertion of a Residue between Phe156 and
Leu157 and deletion of Leu157--
We showed
previously (28) that MSP becomes unable to bind to its functional site
and reactivate oxygen evolution when a methionyl residue is inserted
between Phe156 and Leu157. The mutant protein,
however, showed a strong affinity for nonspecific binding. Extension of
this experiment provided important information on both effective and
nonspecific interaction of MSP with PSII. Because the protein
conformation was little affected by the insertion of Met, loss of the
functional binding of the protein is ascribed to a small structural
change in the protease-sensitive sequence. If this interpretation was
correct, the inactivation of MSP can be ascribed to an effect of either
the side group of the methionyl residue inserted or a small increase in
the polypeptide length between Phe156 and
Leu157. To examine the effect of the side group, mutant
MSPs were constructed by inserting an amino acid residue that has a
side group smaller than that of Met between Phe156 and
Leu157. The three mutant MSPs, which were constructed by
inserting Gly, Ala, and Val, are called 156+G+157, 156+A+157 and
156+V+157, respectively. Leu157 is not essential for the
functional binding of MSP to PSII because the residue could be
substituted with Met without affecting the reactivating ability of the
protein (28). In the fourth mutant protein (
157L), therefore,
Leu157 was deleted to examine whether the protein binding
is affected by a change in the polypeptide length. As shown in Table
VI, the protein became totally
ineffective in reactivation of oxygen evolution when Val, Ala, or even
Gly, which has no side chain, was inserted between Phe156
and Leu157, indicating that inactivation of the protein is
independent of the size and structure of side chain of the residue
inserted. Deletion of Leu157 also led to a large decline in
the reactivating ability of the protein. None of the four mutant
proteins bound to PSII to an appreciable amount at the protein/PSII
ratio of five, indicating that the mutations abolished high affinity
binding without enhancing nonspecific binding of the protein to PSII
(data not shown). These results indicate that binding of MSP to its
functional site is extremely sensitive to a small change in the
polypeptide length in the region between Phe156 and
Leu157. The observation that nonspecific binding appeared
upon insertion of Met but not upon insertion of Gly, Ala, or Val
implies that the structural factor that confers an affinity for
nonfunctional sites on the protein is the side group of Met inserted.
This is consistent with the previous observation that nonfunctional
binding became appreciable upon replacement of Leu157 by
Met (28).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table VI
Effects of insertion of Gly, Ala, or Val between Phe156 and
Leu157 and deletion of Leu157 on the ability of MSP to
restore the oxygen-evolving activity
Experimental conditions are the same as in Table II.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
We have constructed more than 30 variants of
Synechococcus MSP by substituting, inserting, or deleting an
amino acid residue to investigate whether the protease-sensitive
Phe156-Gly163 and
Arg184-Ser191 sequences are regions for
functional binding to PSII. The cyanobacterial MSP served as an
excellent tool for investigation of the protein binding by means of
site-directed mutagenesis and in vitro reconstitution, allowing us to identify several charged and uncharged amino acid residues that are essential for binding of MSP to its functional site.
The mutations that effectively altered the ability of MSP to reactivate
oxygen evolution are illustrated in Fig.
6.

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Mutations that affected the function of
MSP. The large and small upward arrows
indicate mutations that affected the ability of
Synechococcus MSP to reactivate oxygen evolution strongly
and weakly, respectively. Downward arrows indicate mutations
that had no effect on the reactivating ability of the protein. The
first protease-sensitive sequence is boxed. Asterisks
indicate residues completely conserved in the 14 sequences of
MSP.
|
|
The first protease-sensitive sequence contains a highly conserved
acidic residue, Asp158. Substitution of this residue with
Asn resulted in a large decrease in the ability of MSP to bind to
functional site and to restore the oxygen-evolving activity, whereas
its charge-preserving replacement by Glu had no inhibitory effect,
indicating that the negative charge at Asp158 is required
for the protein binding. Thus, Asp158 is involved either in
charge-pair interaction with an oppositely charged residue on an
intrinsic protein of PSII or in intramolecular charge-pair interaction
necessary for maintenance of a functional structure of MSP. Far- and
near-UV CD spectroscopy demonstrated that inactivation of MSP by
mutation of Asp158 to Asn was not accompanied by a
significant change in the secondary and tertiary conformation of the
protein, respectively. Substitution of the corresponding aspartyl
residue (Asp157) in spinach MSP was also shown to have no
influence on intramolecular salt bridges formed upon cross-linking with
EDC (17). In addition, carboxyl groups in the domain
Asp157-Asp168 of the spinach protein were
shown to participate in the binding of spinach MSP to PSII (24). These
observations favor the involvement of Asp158 in an
intermolecular charge-pair interaction between MSP and PSII.
Substitution of the corresponding aspartyl residue on MSPs from other
photosynthetic organisms had weaker effects, a 5-15% decline in the
reactivating ability of spinach MSP (27) and a 35-40% reduction in
the rate of oxygen evolution in Synechocystis cells (25).
These differences may be related to differences in protein binding
between higher plants and cyanobacteria or in the flexibility of
proteins between mesophiles and thermophiles.
Six conserved lysyl residues, Lys66, Lys76,
Lys130, Lys159, Lys186, and
Lys236, of spinach MSP were suggested to be located in
regions of the protein in contact with PSII because they were modified
with amino group-specific reagents when MSP was free in solution but
not when the protein was bound to PSII membranes (19, 20). The present
study shows that not all of the conserved lysyl residues are required
for functional binding to PSII. Substitution of Lys59,
Lys123, Lys188, and Lys234 of
Synechococcus MSP (which correspond to Lys66,
Lys130, Lys190, and Lys236 of the
spinach protein, respectively) with Gln had no influence on the
function of the protein. Alteration of Lys160 (which
corresponds to Lys159 of the spinach protein) to Gln had,
however, a severe impact on the ability of the protein to effectively
bind to PSII. Loss of protein binding is not related to a change in the
secondary or tertiary structure of the protein. The effect of the
charge-preserving substitution of Lys160 with Arg on the
reactivating ability of the protein was somewhat less than that of the
charge-deleting substitution of the residue with Gln. This can be
explained by assuming that Lys160 participates in the
electrostatic interaction essential for the function of the protein and
that Arg acts only imperfectly for Lys160 due to the
difference in the side group. The corresponding lysyl residue
(Lys159) on spinach MSP was unable to participate in an
intramolecular charge-pair interaction because the residue was
accessible to amino group modifiers when the protein was free in
solution (20). It is highly likely, therefore, that Lys160
contributes to binding of MSP to its functional site by
electrostatically interacting with a negatively charged residue on an
intrinsic protein of the PSII complex.
The contribution of arginyl residues to binding of spinach MSP has been
suggested by chemical modification of the guanidino group of arginyl
residues with 2,3-butanedione (20). None of the six arginyl residues
present in MSP reacted with the reagent when the protein was bound to
PSII membranes, whereas treatment of the protein in solution led to
modification of four arginyl residues, which was accompanied by loss of
the ability of the protein to bind to PSII and to reactivate oxygen
evolution. Modified residues have not been identified yet because of
the instability of the modified products (20). Site-directed
mutagenesis allowed us to successfully identify arginyl residues that
are essential for the protein binding and also provided important
information as to a domain of the protein for effective binding to
PSII. There are three arginyl residues, Arg73,
Arg152, and Arg162, which are completely
conserved among MSPs from cyanobacteria, algae, and higher plants (Fig.
1). Arg73 is not essential because the residue could be
substituted with Gln without affecting the function of the protein.
Mutations at either Arg152 or Arg162 affected
the function of MSP significantly. Because these mutations did not
induce any significant changes in the protein conformation, the results
indicate that the two arginyl residues directly participate in
effective interaction with PSII. No direct evidence was obtained indicating that Arg152 and Arg162 are involved
in charge-pair interaction; the reactivating ability of MSP was nearly
equally suppressed by charge-deleting and charge-preserving substitutions of each residue. A possibility remains, however, that the
two residues participate in charge-pair interaction but that a positive
charge each residue carries becomes incapable of interacting with a
negative charge on the partner residue when Arg is altered to Lys.
Because Arg152 is located three residues apart from the
first protease-sensitive sequence, the result also shows that the
binding domain of MSP is larger than suggested by the proteolytic
experiments (28) and may involve the well conserved
Val148-Arg152 sequence.
Substitution of uncharged residue in the first protease-sensitive
sequence also affected the function of MSP. Substitution of
Phe156 with Leu resulted in an almost complete loss of the
ability of the protein to restore the oxygen-evolving activity, whereas
replacement of the same residue by Tyr had no effect on the function of
MSP. Thus, the aromatic side group of Phe156 is required
for the functional binding of the protein. The reactivating ability of
MSP was moderately affected by substitution of either Gly161 or Gly163 with Gln. This suggests that
the side chain of Gln, which replaced Gly sterically, interferes with
the protein-protein interaction. Alternatively, because Gly has no side
chain, it may confer a greater conformational flexibility, possibly
required in the first protease-sensitive region for the effective
association of the protein with its functional site. The protein
binding, however, was not appreciably affected by substitution of
Pro159 with Ala; this may give another constraint on the
polypeptide conformation.
Conserved, uncharged residues located near the
Phe156-Gly163 sequence were also examined. As
stated above, Arg152 is located in the completely conserved
five-amino acid sequence. Although substitution of three uncharged
residues, Val148, Pro149, and
Tyr151, in the sequence failed to affect the function of
MSP, the result should be interpreted with caution because
Val148 and Tyr151 were replaced by residues
with relatively small differences in the structure of the side chain.
In particular, because Tyr151 was substituted with Phe, a
possibility remains that an aromatic group at position 151 plays
a role in the functional binding of the protein, which will be
addressed in future studies. Furthermore, amino acid residues in the
Gly167-Asp169 sequence, which is located three
residues after the first protease-sensitive sequence, are either
strictly conserved or conservatively replaced. Possible contribution of
this sequence to the protein binding cannot be excluded because
substitution of Tyr168 with Phe weakly affected the
function of MSP, and single amino acid substitution has not been
performed yet for Asp169.
Extension of the previous experiments with the mutant protein having
Met inserted (28) between Phe156 and Leu157
showed that binding of MSP to its functional site is extremely sensitive to a small change in the polypeptide length caused by insertion of an amino acid residue between Phe156 and
Leu157 or deletion of Leu157. This is
consistent with the above described results that residues in or near
the first protease-sensitive region participate in the interaction of
MSP with PSII and further suggests that the relative location of these
residues is critical for effective binding to PSII. We suggest that
binding of MSP to its functional site involves multiple charged
residues in the Val148-Gly163 region, which
interact electrostatically with oppositely charged residues on
intrinsic proteins of the PSII complex, although contribution of other
interactions cannot be excluded. Such a protein-complex interaction is
possible only when the charged residues on the surface of MSP are
arranged spatially so as to become in van der Waals contact with
respective partner residues on the PSII complex. As such, the protein
binding will be weakened or abolished by insertion or deletion of a
residue, which alters the location of the charged residues in
the Val148-Gly163 domain.
The Val148-Gly163 domain becomes a region for
nonfunctional binding to PSII upon modification. Replacement of a
single essential residue in the domain conferred on the protein the
ability to nonspecifically bind to the PSII complex. A comparison of
the insertion mutants constructed in the present and previous
experiments (28) showed that the structure of the side chain of an
inserted residue is critical for the nonspecific binding of the
protein. It is concluded, therefore, that the conserved amino acid
residues in the Val148-Gly163 domain are also
important for the protein to minimize nonspecific interactions with
PSII. Several mutant proteins exhibited an extremely strong affinity
for nonspecific binding. This implies caution in using binding of MSP
to PSII as an index of the functional integrity of the protein when
reconstitution is performed at a low protein/PSII protein ratio.
In contrast to the first protease-sensitive sequence where all the
eight residues are completely conserved except for Gly161,
which is conservatively replaced, the second protease-sensitive Arg184-Ser191 sequence has only two strictly
conserved residues, Asn186 and Lys188. No
evidence was obtained to support the proposition that a binding site for PSII is located in the Arg184-Ser191
sequence. Substitution of Lys188, the sole strictly
conserved charged residue in the sequence, with Gln had only a marginal
effect on the reactivating ability of MSP. This is consistent with the
results with spinach MSP, where the corresponding lysyl residue
(Lys190) was accessible to the water-soluble reagents even
when the protein was bound to PSII membranes (19, 20). There is another
charged residue, Arg184, in the second protease-sensitive
sequence, which is conserved in two other cyanobacteria and
conservatively replaced by Lys in other photosynthetic organisms.
Because the lysyl residue (Lys186) of spinach MSP was
modified with specific reagents only when the protein was free in
solution (19, 20), a possibility remains that Arg184
participates in the functional binding of Synechococcus
MSP.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We are grateful to Dr. T. Takakuwa, Nihon
Bunko Co., for measurement and analysis of CD spectra. We thank Dr.
Jian-Ren Shen of the Institute of Physical and Chemical Research
(Riken) for reading the manuscript.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was performed under the management of the Research
Association for Biotechnology as a part of the R&D Project of Basic
Technology for Future Industries, supported by the New Energy and
Industrial Technology Development Organization.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Biological Sciences
Dept., Toray Research Center Inc., Kamakura 248-8555, Japan. Tel.:
81-467-32-9963; Fax: 81-467-32-0414; E-mail:
akihiro_motoki@trc. toray.co.jp.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, January 23, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M100766200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
PSII, photosystem
II;
MSP, extrinsic 33-kDa manganese-stabilizing protein;
EDC, 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-carbodiimide;
MES, 2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Seidler, A.
(1996)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1277,
35-60[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Bricker, T. M.,
and Frankel, L. K.
(1998)
Photosynth. Res.
56,
157-173[CrossRef]
|
| 3.
|
Murata, N.,
and Miyao, M.
(1985)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
10,
122-124[CrossRef]
|
| 4.
|
Shen, J.-R.,
Ikeuchi, M.,
and Inoue, Y.
(1992)
FEBS Lett.
301,
145-149[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Enami, I.,
Murayama, H.,
Ohta, H.,
Kamo, M.,
Nakazato, K.,
and Shen, J.-R.
(1995)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1232,
208-216[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Ono, T.,
and Inoue, Y.
(1984)
FEBS Lett.
166,
381-384[CrossRef]
|
| 7.
|
Miyao, M.,
and Murata, N.
(1984)
FEBS Lett.
170,
350-354[CrossRef]
|
| 8.
|
Kuwabara, T.,
Miyao, M.,
Murata, T.,
and Murata, N.
(1985)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
806,
283-289[CrossRef]
|
| 9.
|
Ono, T.,
and Inoue, Y.
(1986)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
850,
380-389[CrossRef]
|
| 10.
|
Enami, I.,
Satoh, K.,
and Katoh, S.
(1987)
FEBS Lett.
226,
161-165[CrossRef]
|
| 11.
|
Bricker, T. M.,
Odam, W. R.,
and Queirolo, C. B.
(1988)
FEBS Lett.
231,
111-117[CrossRef]
|
| 12.
|
Enami, I.,
Kaneko, M.,
Kitamura, N.,
Koike, H.,
Sonoike, K.,
Inoue, Y.,
and Katoh, S.
(1991)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1060,
224-232
|
| 13.
|
Odom, W. R.,
and Bricker, T. M.
(1992)
Biochemistry
31,
5616-5620[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Mei, R.,
Green, J. P.,
Sayer, R. T.,
and Frash, W. D.
(1989)
Biochemistry
28,
5560-5567[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Enami, I.,
Ohta, S.,
Mitsuishi, S.,
Takahashi, S.,
Ikeuchi, M.,
and Katoh, S.
(1992)
Plant Cell Physiol.
33,
291-297[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Eaton-Rye, J. J.,
and Murata, N.
(1989)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
977,
219-226[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Seidler, A.,
Rutherford, A. W,
and Michel, H.
(1996)
Plant Mol. Biol.
31,
183-188[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Qian, M., Al-,
Khaldi, S. F.,
Putnam-Evans, C.,
Bricker, T. M.,
and Burnap, R. L.
(1997)
Biochemistry
36,
15244-15252[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Frankel, L. K.,
and Bricker, T. M.
(1995)
Biochemistry
34,
7492-7497[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Miura, T.,
Shen, J.-R.,
Takahashi, S.,
Kamo, M.,
Nakamura, E.,
Ohta, H.,
Kamei, A.,
Inoue, Y.,
Domae, N.,
Takio, K.,
Nakazato, K.,
Inoue, Y.,
and Enami, I.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
3788-3798[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Queirola, C. B.
(1992)
Doctoral dissertation
, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge
|
| 22.
|
Isogai, Y.,
Nishimura, M.,
and Itoh, S.
(1987)
Plant Cell Physiol.
28,
1493-1499[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Seidler, A.
(1996)
Eur. J. Biochem.
242,
485-490[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Frankel, L. K.,
Cruz, J. A.,
and Bricker, T. M.
(1999)
Biochemistry
38,
14271-14278[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Burnap, R. L.,
Qian, M.,
Shen, J.-R.,
Inoue, Y.,
and Sherman, L. A.
(1994)
Biochemistry
33,
13712-13718[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Seidler, A.,
Röll, K.,
and Michel, H.
(1992)
in
Current Research in Photosynthesis
(Murata, N., ed), Vol. II
, pp. 409-412, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
|
| 27.
|
Seidler, A.,
Michel, H.,
and Rutherford, A. W.
(1995)
in
Photosynthesis: From Light to Biosphere
(Mathis, P., ed), Vol. II
, pp. 259-262, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
|
| 28.
|
Motoki, A.,
Shimazu, T.,
Hirano, M.,
and Katoh, S.
(1998)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1365,
492-502[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Motoki, A.,
Shimazu, T.,
Hirano, M.,
and Katoh, S.
(1995)
in
Photosynthesis: from Light to Biosphere
(Mathis, P., ed), Vol. II
, pp. 487-490, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
|
| 30.
|
Taylor, J. W.,
Ott, J.,
and Eckstein, F.
(1985)
Nucleic Acids Res.
13,
8765-8785[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Nakamae, K. L.,
and Eckstein, F.
(1986)
Nucleic Acids Res.
14,
9679-9698[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Sayers, J. R.,
Krekel, C.,
and Eckstein, F.
(1992)
BioTechniques
13,
592-596[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Ichimura, T.,
Miyairi, S.,
Satoh, K.,
and Katoh, S.
(1992)
Plat Cell Physiol.
33,
299-305
|
| 34.
|
Manavalan, P.,
and Johnson, W. C., Jr.
(1987)
Anal. Biochem.
167,
76-85[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Johnson, W. C., Jr.
(1990)
Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet.
7,
205-214[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Enami, I.,
Tomo, T.,
Kitamura, M.,
and Katoh, S.
(1994)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1185,
75-80[CrossRef]
|
| 37.
|
Enami, I.,
Kitamura, M.,
Tomo, T.,
Isokawa, Y.,
Ohta, H.,
and Katoh, S.
(1994)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1186,
52-58[CrossRef]
|
| 38.
|
Shen, J.-R.,
and Inoe, Y.
(1993)
Biochemistry
32,
1825-1832[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Enami, I.,
Kikuchi, S.,
Fukuda, T.,
Ohta, H.,
and Shen, J.-R.
(1998)
Biochemistry
37,
2787-2793[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 40.
|
Enami, I.,
Yoshihara, S.,
Tori, A,
Okamura, A.,
Ohta, H.,
and Shen, J.-R.
(2000)
Plant cell Physiol.
41,
1354-1364[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 41.
|
Sonoyama, M.,
Motoki, M.,
Okamoto, G.,
Hirano, M.,
Ishida, H.,
and Katoh, S.
(1996)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1297,
167-170[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 42.
|
Xu, Q.,
Nelson, J.,
and Bricker, T. M.
(1994)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1188,
427-431[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 43.
|
Shutova, T.,
Irrgang, K.-D.,
Shubin, V.,
Klimov, V.,
and Renger, G.
(1997)
Biochemistry
36,
6350-6358[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 44.
|
Lydakis-Simantris, N.,
Hutchinson, R. S.,
Betts, H. S.,
Barry, B. A.,
and Yocum, C. F.
(1999)
Biochemistry
38,
404-414[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 45.
|
Tanaka, S.,
and Wada, K.
(1988)
Photosynth. Res.
17,
255-266[CrossRef]
|
| 46.
|
Strickland, E. H.
(1976)
in
Handbook of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
(Fasman, G. D., ed), Vol. III
, pp. 141-147, CRC Press, Cleveland, OH
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
R