Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M107776200 on January 31, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 17, 14844-14852, April 26, 2002
Identification of Novel Point Mutations in ERK2 That Selectively
Disrupt Binding to MEK1*
Fred L.
Robinson
,
Angelique W.
Whitehurst
,
Malavika
Raman
, and
Melanie H.
Cobb§
From the Department of Pharmacology, The University of Texas
Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75390-9041
Received for publication, August 13, 2001, and in revised form, January 24, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
Extracellular signal-regulated
kinases 1 and 2 (ERK1 and ERK2) are essential components of pathways
through which signals received at membrane receptors are converted into
specific changes in protein function and gene expression. As with other
members of the mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase family, ERK1 and ERK2 are activated by phosphorylations catalyzed by dual-specificity protein kinases known as MAP/ERK kinases (MEKs). MEKs exhibit stringent
specificity for individual MAP kinases. Indeed, MEK1 and MEK2 are the
only known activators of ERK1 and ERK2. ERK2·MEK1/2 complexes
can be detected in vitro and in vivo. The
biochemical nature of such complexes and their role in MAP kinase
signaling are under investigation. This report describes the use of a
yeast two-hybrid screen to identify point mutations in ERK2 that impair its interaction with MEK1/2, yet do not alter its interactions with
other proteins. ERK2 residues identified in this screen are on the
surface of the C-terminal domain of the kinase, either within or
immediately preceding
-helix G, or within the MAP kinase insert.
Some mutations identified in this manner impaired the two-hybrid
interaction of ERK2 with both MEK1 and MEK2, whereas others had a
predominant effect on the interaction with either MEK1 or MEK2. Mutant
ERK2 proteins displayed reduced activation in HEK293 cells following
epidermal growth factor treatment, consistent with their
impaired interaction with MEK1/2. However, ERK2 proteins containing
MEK-specific mutations retained kinase activity, and were similar to
wild type ERK2 in their activation following overexpression of
constitutively active MEK1. Unlike wild type ERK2, proteins containing
MEK-specific point mutations were constitutively localized in the
nucleus, even in the presence of overexpressed MEK1. These data suggest
an essential role for the MAP kinase insert and residues within or just
preceding
-helix G in the interaction of ERK2 with
MEK1/2.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1 and 2 (ERK11 and ERK2) are
serine/threonine protein kinases activated by numerous stimuli
including growth factors, cytokines, serum, certain stresses, and
ligands for G-protein-coupled receptors (1, 2). Through the
phosphorylation of substrates, ERK1/2 signaling plays an important role
in numerous biological processes, notably those involving differentiation and growth control. The activation of ERK1/2 requires phosphorylation of both a threonine and tyrosine residue located within
a flexible surface loop adjacent to the enzyme active site (3, 4). Both
of these phosphorylations are catalyzed by the dual-specificity protein
kinases MAP/ERK kinase 1 and 2 (MEK1/2; also called MKK1/2) (5-8).
MEK1 and MEK2 are activated via phosphorylation by Raf family kinases
(9, 10). Raf, MEK1/2, and ERK1/2 thus constitute a three-tier kinase
cascade. Such MAP kinase modules are conserved in all eukaryotes. In
mammals, four distinct MAP kinase modules have been well defined
experimentally and all appear to employ a three-kinase cascade (1,
2).
ERK1 and ERK2 are the only known substrates of MEK1/2 (1, 5). Indeed,
MEK level kinases appear to be dedicated activators of specific MAP
kinases. For example, in vitro experiments have shown that
MEK1 and MEK2 do not phosphorylate other MAP kinases such as the
stress-activated p38 MAP kinases or ERK5 (11, 12). Conversely, MEK3/6
and MEK4, which activate p38 MAP kinases and c-Jun N-terminal
kinases, respectively, do not phosphorylate ERK1 and ERK2
in vitro (11). Overexpression studies in transfected mammalian cells have shown a similar theme. MEK3 and MEK6 activate specific p38 MAP kinase isoforms to varying degrees, suggesting that
exacting specificities may be intrinsic to MAP kinase signaling modules
(13). How this tight biochemical coupling between MAP kinases and their
specific upstream activators (MEKs) is achieved is beginning to be elucidated.
The search for the structural elements within MAP kinases that
determine their specificity for upstream MEKs was begun by Brunet and
Pouysségur (14), who reported that elements within the N-terminal
domains of MAP kinases dictate which upstream signals lead to their
activation in cells. Their findings using p38-ERK1 chimeras implicated
-helix C,
-strand 4, and the first part of
-strand 5 as
determinants of specificity for MEK recognition. In vitro
experiments using ERK2 mutants and several sets of MAP kinase chimeras
suggested that multiple elements in both domains participate in the
MEK-MAP kinase interaction. These included the extreme N terminus of
ERK2,
-helix C,
-strands 4 and 5, and the L16 segment from the
N-terminal domain, and the activation loop and MAP kinase insert from
the C-terminal domain (11-13, 15-19). How these various MAP kinase
structural elements contribute to MEK binding and phosphoryl-transfer
is unclear.
Specific residues in the C-terminal L16 segment have been proposed to
play a key role in the docking of MAP kinases to substrates and
phosphatases, as well as to MEKs (20-22). These residues, which include Asp316 and Asp319 in rat ERK2, are
thought to bind to a conserved peptide motif known as a docking (D)
domain, which is found in many MAP kinase-binding proteins (13,
21-29). The acidic residues of the L16 segment, which are part of the
putative D domain-binding site, are located on the opposite surface of
ERK2 from the activation loop. This site has been termed the common
docking (CD) domain (21). Hydrophobic amino acids, on the surface of
ERK2 and immediately adjacent to Asp316, also play a role
in MEK1-ERK2 docking (22).
The CD domain plays an important role in the binding of D
domain-containing proteins to MAP kinases. However, additional protein elements within ERK2 play essential roles in binding to MEK1. Here we
used a two-hybrid screen of an ERK2 mutant library to identify residues
specifically involved in the interaction with MEK1/2.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Plasmid DNA Constructs: Construction of pGAD-ERK2--
The wild
type rat ERK2 cDNA was PCR amplified using oligonucleotides
FRO-5 (GGCCGGATCCCATCATGGCGGCGGCGGCGGCG) and FRO-9
(CCGGGGCTCGAGTCAAGATCTGTATCCTGGCTGGAATCG) and the resulting DNA
fragment was digested with BamHI and XhoI and
ligated into pGAD-GH (30) which had been cut with the same enzymes. The
resulting construct encodes full-length ERK2 fused to the C terminus of
the Gal4 transcriptional activation domain (GAD). Two-hybrid vectors
encoding LexA fusion proteins were generated by PCR amplifying specific
cDNAs with 5' and 3' primers that introduced BamHI (5')
and XhoI (3') sites flanking the various coding sequences. The resulting DNA fragments were digested with BamHI and
XhoI and ligated into pVJL11 (31) that had been digested
with BamHI and SalI. The resulting constructs
encode the various proteins fused to the C terminus of the LexA
DNA-binding domain. Mammalian expression vectors encoding triple FLAG
epitope-tagged ERK2 and ERK2 mutants were constructed by digesting
pGAD-ERK2 with BamHI and XhoI and ligating the
resulting DNA fragment into p3XFLAG-CMV7.1 (Sigma number E4026), which
had been digested with BglII and SalI. All
plasmid constructs were sequenced to confirm that spurious mutations
were not introduced.
Yeast Two-hybrid Experiments--
Pairwise interaction tests
were carried out as follows. The yeast strain L40 (32) was
co-transformed with pGAD-ERK2 (or ERK2 mutants) and either the empty
pVJL11 (LexA) vector or pVJL11-based constructs encoding LexA fusions
with various sequences from human MEK1, human MEK2, human MNK1, rat
MKP3, or chicken RSK. Co-transformants were selected by plating cells
on complete supplemental medium (CSM) (BIO 101, Inc., number 4530-522)
lacking Leu and Trp. Protein-protein interactions were tested by
streaking co-transformed isolates on CSM lacking His, Leu, and Trp and
observing for growth. The expression of all LexA and GAD fusion
proteins in yeast cells was confirmed by immunoblotting with antibodies
specific for either LexA or ERK1/2.
Semi-quantitative Yeast Two-hybrid Interaction Assays--
For
each combination of LexA and GAD plasmids to be tested, five
independent yeast colonies were simultaneously used to inoculate 10 ml
of liquid CSM-Leu-Trp medium. Such cultures were incubated overnight at
30 °C. Yeast cells equivalent to 1.5 ml of a 1.5 A600 broth culture were collected by
microcentrifugation, washed once with 1 ml of LacZ buffer
(100 mM Na-phosphate, pH 7.0, 10 mM KCl, 1 mM MgSO4), and re-suspended in 350 µl of
LacZ buffer. This mixture was frozen using liquid nitrogen,
thawed, and split into three 100-µl aliquots. To each aliquot, 681 µl of LacZ buffer and 19 µl of
-mercaptoethanol were
added. Reactions were initiated by the addition of 160 µl of
o-nitrophenyl
-D-galactopyranoside substrate
(a 4 mg/ml solution in LacZ buffer), incubated for 15 min at
37 °C and terminated with the addition of 400 µl of 1 M Na2CO3. Insoluble material was
removed by microcentrifugation and the amount of reaction product was
quantified by measuring the absorbance of the supernatant at 420 nm.
Under these assay conditions, 420-nm absorbance was linear with respect
to
-galactosidase activity over a range of
A420 values from <0.065 to 2.27 (data not shown).
Construction of a Mutant ERK2 Two-hybrid Library--
The
full-length ERK2 cDNA was mutagenized by low-fidelity PCR using
Taq DNA polymerase (33). Specifically, pGAD-ERK2 was amplified using primers FRO-30 (GAGATCCTAGAACTAGTGGATCCC) and FRO-31 (GGGTACCGGGCCCCCCCTCGAG), which flank the ERK2 coding sequence at its 5' and 3' ends, respectively. The resulting mixture of mutagenized ERK2 cDNAs was digested with BamHI and
XhoI and ligated into pGAD-GH that had been digested with
BamHI and XhoI and the ligation products were
used to transform Escherichia coli. The resulting mutant
library contained 2 × 106 potentially unique ERK2
cDNAs and its predicted mutation rate was such that 65% of the
cDNAs should have contained a single mutation.
Yeast Two-hybrid Screen for Mutant ERK2 Proteins Losing
Interaction with MEK1--
Similar screens have been used to identify
target-specific mutations in the p21 Ras GTPase (34). The pGAD-ERK2
mutant library was transformed into the yeast strain L40
(MATa) and plated on CSM-Leu agar at a density of about
103 colonies per 150-mm plate. These arrayed mutant clones
were duplicated by replica plating, and subsequently mated to lawns of
the yeast strain AMR70 (MAT
) (32) that had been
transformed with either pLexA-MEK1-K97M or pLexA-MNK1. Diploids were
selected by replica plating onto CSM-Leu-Trp plates. Protein-protein
interactions were then tested by replica plating diploids onto
CSM-His-Leu-Trp plates and observing colonies for growth. MEK1-specific
ERK2 mutants were identified as those which failed to grow on
CSM-His-Leu-Trp medium when co-transformed with pLexA-MEK1-K97M, but
grew normally when co-transformed with pLexA-MNK1. Approximately
104 yeast colonies were screened in this manner. Yeast
colonies having a MEK1-specific mutant interaction profile were
isolated from the original CSM-Leu library plates and their mutant
pGAD-ERK2 plasmids were isolated and used to transform E. coli. Plasmid DNA was then prepared and mutated ERK2 cDNAs
were sequenced.
Cell Culture, Transfection, Cell Lysis, and
Immunoblotting--
Human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells were
maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 10%
fetal bovine serum. Cells were transfected at 60-80% confluence in
60-mm dishes by adding 0.45 ml of a calcium phosphate precipitate,
containing 1.4 µg of each plasmid DNA, to the 5 ml of culture medium.
Transfection efficiency was between 30 and 50%. After 16 h of
incubation, the precipitate-containing medium was removed and replaced
with serum-free Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium. 24 h later,
cells were treated with epidermal growth factor (EGF) (50 ng/ml) for 5 min. The culture medium was then removed and the cells were lysed in
0.4 ml of lysis buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 7.6, 0.15 M NaCl, 0.5% Triton X-100, 0.1 M NaF, 1 µg/ml pepstatin A, 1 µg/ml leupeptin, 1 mM
Na-orthovanadate, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10.5 µg/ml aprotinin) and microcentrifuged for 5 min. 5-12 µl of the
resulting cleared lysate was resolved by SDS-PAGE (10% gels) and
transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. Antibodies specific for
phospho-ERK1/2 (BIOSOURCE Int. number 44-680),
total ERK1/2 (Y691 serum) (35) or MEK1 (Santa Cruz number SC-219) were
used for immunoblotting as described in Ref. 36.
Immunoprecipitation and Protein Kinase Assays--
Four µg of
anti-FLAG M2 antibody (Sigma number F3165) was added to 0.2 ml of cell
lysate and incubated at 4 °C for 1 h. 30 µl of a 50% slurry
of Protein A-Sepharose CL-4B (Amersham Bioscience number 17-0963-03) in
lysis buffer was added and this mixture was incubated at 4 °C for
1 h. Immune complexes were washed 3 times with 1 ml of 1 M NaCl, 20 mM Tris (pH 7.4) followed by once in
10 mM Hepes (pH 8.0), 10 mM MgCl2.
The drained beads were resuspended in a 30-µl kinase reaction mixture
(10 mM Hepes, pH 8.0, 10 mM MgCl2,
50 µM ATP, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM benzamidine) that contained 10 µCi of
[
-32P]ATP and 5 µg of GST-Myc (Myc residues 1-103).
Kinase reaction tubes were incubated for 30 min at 30 °C, placed on
ice, and terminated by adding 7.5 µl of 5 × SDS-PAGE sample
buffer and boiling for 3 min. Twenty µl of this mixture was resolved
by SDS-PAGE (10% gels). Gels were fixed, Coomassie-stained, dried, and
used for autoradiography. Gel bands corresponding to the GST-Myc
substrate were excised and their radioactivity determined by
scintillation counting. MEK1 and MEK2 immunoprecipitations were
performed as above except that antibodies A2227 (MEK1-specific) and
A2228 (MEK2-specific) (37) were used. MEK1/2 kinase assays were carried
out as those described for ERK2 except that 5 µg of GST-ERK2-K52R
protein was used as substrate.
Kinetic Analysis of Mutant ERK2
Proteins--
His6-tagged ERK2 and ERK2 mutants were
expressed in E. coli using the NpT75-His6-ERK2
construct (38) and purified by nickel affinity chromatography.
Phosphorylation reactions (50 µl) contained 3 µM
(unphosphorylated) ERK2, 20 mM MOPS (pH 7.4), 50 mM KCl, 0.1 mM EDTA, 1 mM
dithiothreitol, 10 MgCl2, 3 mM ATP containing 100 cpm/pmol [
-32P]ATP, and 10-200 µM
myelin basic protein (MBP, Sigma number M-1891) (39). Reactions were
initiated by the addition of the ATP mixture, incubated at room
temperature for 45 min, placed on ice, and immediately terminated by
adding 13 µl of 5 × SDS-PAGE sample buffer and boiling for 3 min. Reaction products were separated by SDS-PAGE and visualized by
autoradiography. MBP bands were excised from gels and their radioactivity was quantified by scintillation counting. Kinetic constants were determined by graphing and fitting the data to the
equation: y = Vmax*x/(Km + x),
where y is the reaction velocity and x is the MBP
concentration using SigmaPlot 5.0 software.
Immunofluorescence--
HEK293 cells were cultured on
collagen-coated coverslips placed in 60-mm dishes until reaching 50%
confluence. One ml of a calcium phosphate precipitate containing 4 µg
of each plasmid DNA was added to the 5 ml of culture medium.
Transfection efficiency was 20-30%. After an overnight incubation,
cells were deprived of serum for 24 h, fixed in phosphate-buffered
saline (PBS) containing 3.7% formaldehyde and made permeable by
incubating in PBS containing 0.5% Triton X-100. Cells were incubated
for 1 h at room temperature in PBS containing 1% bovine serum
albumin and 40 µg/ml anti-FLAG M2 antibody (Sigma number F3165).
Cells were then washed and incubated for 30 min in PBS-bovine serum
albumin containing a goat anti-mouse secondary antibody (Molecular
Probes, Alexa 488) that was diluted 1:3000. Cells were mounted using
Polymount and visualized using a Zeiss Axiocam Microscope with Open Lab Software.
 |
RESULTS |
ERK2-MEK1/2 Interactions Examined Using the Yeast
Two-hybrid System--
To analyze the nature of the ERK2-MEK1/2
interaction detected in two-hybrid tests, we examined the interaction
of ERK2 with wild type MEK1 and MEK2, as well as with several mutant
forms of these MEKs. A fusion of ERK2 to the LexA DNA-binding domain independently activated transcription of the HIS3 auxotrophy
reporter gene borne by the yeast strain L40 (data not shown). For this reason, a fusion of ERK2 to the Gal4 transcriptional activation domain
(GAD-ERK2) was used in all two-hybrid experiments. Although wild type
MEK1 interacted only weakly with ERK2, the catalytically defective
mutant MEK1-K97M interacted robustly with ERK2 in two-hybrid assays
(Fig. 1). In contrast to MEK1, MEK2
interacted well with ERK2 in both the wild type and catalytically
inactive forms (MEK2-K101A) (Fig. 1).

View larger version (77K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
The interactions of ERK2 with MEK1, MEK2,
various MEK1 and MEK2 mutants, and an ERK1/2 docking site from chicken
RSK (most similar to human RSK1) examined using the yeast two-hybrid
system. The yeast strain L40 was co-transformed with pGAD-ERK2 and
empty pLexA vector, pLexA-MEK1, or plasmids encoding LexA fusions to
the indicated proteins. Interactions were tested by streaking
co-transformed yeast isolates on a medium lacking His, Leu, and Trp and
observing streaks for growth. A representative plate from one of three
experiments is shown. Multiple independent yeast transformants were
streaked for each interaction tested. The expression of all GAD and
LexA fusion proteins in yeast was confirmed by immunoblotting (data not
shown).
|
|
To determine whether the MEK1 D domain (residues 3-11) is required for
interaction with ERK2 in two-hybrid assays, we examined the interaction
of ERK2 with a MEK1 mutant lacking the N-terminal 32 amino acids
(MEK1-(33-393)) (16, 21, 40). ERK2 did not interact with
MEK1-(33-393), but did interact with the catalytically inactive mutant
MEK1-(33-393)-K97M (Fig. 1), indicating that the MEK1 D domain is not
required for a two-hybrid interaction with ERK2.
Interactions between ERK2 and several isolated D domain sequences were
also examined. ERK2 did not interact with the D domain-containing fragment of MEK1 (residues 1-32, Fig. 1). This result is consistent with our finding that the MEK1 D domain is not required for the two-hybrid interaction of ERK2 and MEK1-K97M. However, ERK2 did associate with a previously characterized 64-residue docking site from
the C terminus of ribosomal S6 kinase (RSK-(689-752), Fig. 1), which
contains a D domain at its extreme C terminus (41, 42). In keeping with
previous findings, deletion of the D domain sequence from this
construct (RSK-(689-738)) eliminated the interaction with ERK2 (Fig.
1) (41). These two-hybrid tests suggest significant differences in the
affinity of ERK2 for various D domain sequences.
To assess the importance of the activation state of MEK to the MEK-ERK
interaction, we examined the two-hybrid interaction of ERK2 with
constitutively active MEKs. ERK2 failed to interact with the
constitutively active MEK mutants MEK1-R4F and MEK2-R4F (40) (Fig. 1).
This result was expected based on suggestions in the literature that
stable MEK·ERK complexes are not formed when ERK2 is phosphorylated
on Tyr185 (17).
These data indicate that the MEK1 D domain is not required for a
two-hybrid interaction between ERK2 and MEK1-K97M. In addition, they
suggest that the strength of the ERK2-MEK1 interaction is increased
when MEK1 is catalytically inactive, perhaps due to a lack of
phosphorylation of ERK2 on Tyr185 (17).
Identification of ERK2 Mutants That Fail to Bind MEK1, but Retain
Other Interactions--
Several regions of MAP kinases have been
implicated in interactions with MEKs (11-14, 16, 18-22). The CD
domain appears to function as a general docking element, and may be
utilized by the many D domain-containing proteins that interact with
MAP kinases. To identify novel elements involved in ERK2-MEK1 binding,
we performed an unbiased mutagenesis and two-hybrid screening protocol
that identifies point mutations in ERK2 that selectively impair the interaction with MEK1.
An ERK2 mutant two-hybrid library was screened to identify mutants that
had lost the ability to interact with MEK1-K97M, yet retained the
ability to interact with MAP kinase-interacting kinase 1 (MNK1), an
ERK2 substrate (see "Experimental Procedures" for details of
library and screen). Further analysis was performed on ERK2 mutants
containing a single amino acid change that was not expected to have
adverse effects on ERK2 kinase activity.
Based on their reduced activation in HEK293 cells (see below), four
ERK2 mutants were analyzed in detail: H230R, N236K, Y261N, and S264P.
The two-hybrid interactions of these mutants with MEK1-K97M, MEK2,
MNK1, RSK-(689-752), and MAP kinase phosphatase 3 (MKP3) were tested
to determine whether interactions with proteins other than MEK1 were
affected. The mutant H230R failed to interact with MEK1-K97M, but
retained the ability to interact with MEK2 in a weakened fashion (Fig.
2 and Table
I). ERK2-H230R interacted with MNK1 in a
manner indistinguishable from that of wild type ERK2, but displayed
somewhat weakened interactions with MKP3 and RSK-(689-752) (Fig. 2 and
Table I). The mutant N236K, upon re-testing, was found to have only a
modest defect in its interaction with MEK1-K97M (not apparent in Fig.
2), but exhibited a dramatically impaired interaction with MEK2 (Fig. 2
and Table I). This result was surprising as N236K was isolated from our
screen as a mutant that had lost binding to MEK1-K97M. This discrepancy
may result from the fact that while the two-hybrid assays of the screen
procedure were performed in diploid yeast, the two-hybrid tests shown
in Fig. 2 were carried out in haploid yeast. ERK2-N236K interacted with
MNK1 in a manner indistinguishable from that of wild type ERK2, and
displayed only slightly weakened interactions with MKP3 and
RSK-(689-752) (Fig. 2 and Table I). The mutants Y261N and S264P failed
to interact with both MEK1-K97M and MEK2, but displayed nearly wild
type interactions with MNK1, MKP3 and RSK-(689-752) (Fig. 2 and Table
I).

View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
MEK1/2-specific mutations in ERK2. The
interactions of ERK2 and ERK2 mutant proteins with MEK1-K97M, MEK2,
MNK1, MKP3, and an ERK1/2 docking site from the C terminus of RSK were
examined using the yeast two-hybrid system. The yeast strain L40 was
co-transformed with pGAD-ERK2 and either empty pLexA vector,
pLexA-MEK1-K97M, or plasmids encoding LexA fusions to the indicated
proteins. Positive interactions were identified by streaking
co-transformed isolates on a medium lacking His, Leu, and Trp and
observing streaks for growth. A representative plate from one of three
experiments is shown. Multiple independent yeast transformants were
streaked for each interaction tested. The expression of all GAD and
LexA fusion proteins in yeast was confirmed by immunoblotting (data not
shown).
|
|
The Locations of MEK1/2-specific Mutations within
the ERK2 Structure--
We examined the positions of the mutated
residues within the three-dimensional structure of unphosphorylated
ERK2 (44) and found they are clustered on the surface of the C-terminal
domain near the ERK2 activation loop, either in a turn immediately
preceding
-helix G (H230R), within
-helix G (N236K), or within
the MAP kinase insert (Y261N and S264P) (Fig.
3, B-D). Possible
implications of the locations of these residues within the ERK2
structure are discussed below.

View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
The locations of MEK1/2-specific point
mutations within the three-dimensional structure of unphosphorylated
ERK2 (44). A, a schematic representation of ERK2
drawn using drawn using Molscript 2.1.2 (45). -Helices are colored
green and -strands are colored blue. The
activation loop (residues 173-187) is colored red and the
MAP kinase insert (residues 243-273) is colored magenta.
The proposed D domain-binding site (CD domain (21)) is indicated with
an arrowhead and the text "CD." A dashed line
square indicates the portion of the figure magnified in B.
The -carbon and side chain atoms of residues His230,
Asn236, Tyr261, and Ser264 are
drawn as ball-and-stick. B, a magnification of the indicated
portion of A. The -carbon and side chain atoms of
residues His230, Asn236, Tyr261,
and Ser264 are drawn as ball-and-stick with the following
color scheme: carbon (black), nitrogen (blue),
and oxygen (red). C, a space-filling model of a
portion of ERK2 rendered using Insight II 2000 software (Molecular
Simulations). Activation loop residues are colored red. The
color scheme for the individual atoms of residues His230,
Asn236, Tyr261, and Ser264 is as in
B except that carbon atoms are colored green.
D, the sequence of residues 222 to 292 of rat ERK2 with
secondary structural elements indicated as in (44) and colored as in
A. Individual residues highlighted with red
(His230, Asn236, Tyr261, and
Ser264) are those mutated in ERK2 mutants with selective
loss of interaction with MEK1/2.
|
|
We examined the roles of the ERK2 CD domain (residues 316-319) and MAP
kinase insert sequences in the two-hybrid interactions under
investigation. The ERK2 double mutant D316A/D319A failed to
interact with MNK1, MKP3, and RSK-(689-752). However, ERK2-D316A/D319A retained the ability to interact with both MEK1-K97M and MEK2, albeit
in a weakened fashion (Fig. 2 and Table I). These findings are
consistent with previous work indicating that Asp316 and
Asp319 play important roles in the interaction of ERK2 with
a number of proteins that contain D domain sequences. Deletion of the
MAP kinase insert from ERK2 (ERK2-
242-271) yielded a protein that did not interact detectably with MEK1-K97M or MEK2 (Fig. 2 and Table
I). ERK2-
242-271 displayed an apparently wild type interaction with
MNK1, but reduced interactions with MKP3 and RSK-(689-752) (Fig. 2 and
Table I). These data suggest that the MAP kinase insert sequence plays
a critical role in the association of ERK2 with both of its activators
(MEK1 and MEK2). On the other hand, stable associations between ERK2
and the substrates MNK1 and RSK-(689-752) and the phosphatase MKP3 do
not require the presence of the insert sequence.
Mutant ERK2 Proteins Impaired in MEK1 Binding Are Inefficiently
Activated by MEK1/2 in Mammalian Cells--
We
investigated whether the described ERK2 mutant proteins, which were
defective in their interactions with MEKs in two-hybrid experiments,
were activated by endogenous MEKs in cells. To test this, mutant ERK2
cDNAs were subcloned into a mammalian expression vector and
expressed in HEK293 cells. Three copies of the FLAG epitope were
inserted at the N terminus of ERK2, yielding a protein that
migrates with a molecular weight of 46,000 by SDS-PAGE (Fig. 4A). Following a period of
serum starvation, transfected cells were treated with EGF, lysed, and
the resulting protein extracts were analyzed by immunoblotting with
antibodies specific for doubly phosphorylated (active) ERK1/2. ERK2
mutants H230R and Y261N exhibited dramatically reduced levels of dual
phosphorylation following EGF treatment, indicative of a defect in
their activation (Fig. 4A). Mutants N236K and S264P
consistently displayed modestly reduced levels of dual phosphorylation
in response to EGF treatment (Fig. 4A), indicating a less
severe defect in activation. ERK2 proteins containing MEK1/2-specific
mutations also showed reduced levels of kinase activity following EGF
stimulation, confirming that the lower levels of dual phosphorylation
reflected reduced activity (Fig. 4A, bottom
panel). As expected from the above blots, mutants H230R and Y261N
displayed the lowest activities (Fig. 4A, bottom panel). These data, together with the two-hybrid results above, suggest that the mutated ERK2 proteins have impaired interactions with
MEK1/2, and that this property inhibits their activation in HEK293
cells following EGF stimulation.

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
A, activation of ERK2 mutants containing
MEK1/2-specific point mutations in response to EGF treatment of HEK293
cells. Cells were transfected either with the empty p3XFLAG-CMV vector,
p3XFLAG-CMV-ERK2, or the indicated ERK2 mutants. Cells were deprived of
serum for 24 h, treated with EGF (50 ng/ml) for 5 min, and
subsequently lysed. The resulting lysates were analyzed by
immunoblotting (IB) with antibodies specific for
phospho-ERK1/2 (upper panel) or total ERK1/2 (middle
panel) or were used for immunoprecipitation (IP) kinase
assays using GST-Myc-(1-103) as a substrate (bottom
panel). Bands corresponding to the GST-Myc-(1-103) substrate were
excised from SDS-PAGE gels and their radioactivity was determined by
scintillation counting. Representative data from one of three
experiments is shown. The average activation relative to that of wild
type ERK2 is presented below the bottom panel. *, the
activation of the S264P mutant in response to EGF treatment was lower
in the two other replicate experiments that were included in the
calculation of the average activation (data not shown). Thus, while the
average activation presented for S264P (14.2%) does not appear to
correlate well with the size of the band on the autoradiogram
(bottom panel), this number does reflect the average
activation of this mutant. B and C, activation of
endogenous MEK1 and MEK2 in HEK293 cells following EGF treatment.
Subconfluent HEK293 cells were deprived of serum for 24 h, treated
with EGF (50 ng/ml) for 5 min, and subsequently lysed. MEK1 and MEK2
were selectively immunoprecipitated from the resulting lysates using
antibodies A2227 (MEK1-specific) and A2228 (MEK2-specific) and assayed
using enzymatically defective GST-ERK2-K52R as a substrate. Kinase
reaction mixtures were resolved by SDS-PAGE. Gels were fixed, stained
with Coomassie Blue, dried, and autoradiographed. Bands corresponding
to the GST-ERK2-K52R substrate were excised from gels and their
radioactivity determined by scintillation counting.
|
|
MEK1 and MEK2 Are Activated to Similar Extents by EGF Treatment of
HEK293 Cells--
We compared the activation of endogenous MEK1 and
MEK2 by EGF in HEK293 cells. MEK1 and MEK2 were immunoprecipitated from EGF-treated HEK293 cell lysates and their activities were examined in
immune complex kinase assays. Antibodies selective for MEK1 and MEK2
have been described (37) and are directed against non-conserved sequences in the MEK1/2 proline-rich insert. As seen in Fig. 4, B and C, EGF treatment stimulated MEK1 and MEK2
activity to a similar extent. This finding suggests that the varying
degrees of EGF-stimulated activation of the ERK2 mutants described
above is unlikely to result from different degrees of activation of MEK1 and MEK2.
Defects in Activation of ERK2 Mutants Are Overcome if
Constitutively Active MEK1 Is Overexpressed--
Impaired activation
of the ERK2 mutants (Fig. 4A) might result from a reduced
ERK2 affinity for MEK1/2. If so, a significant increase in the
intracellular abundance of MEK1/2 might overcome this defect. To test
this hypothesis, HEK293 cells were transiently co-transfected with
constitutively active MEK1-R4F and either wild type ERK2 or the various
ERK2 mutants. In response to co-expression of MEK1-R4F, all four ERK2
mutants showed levels of dual-phosphorylation comparable with that of
wild type ERK2 (Fig. 5). When the
MEK1-R4F-stimulated kinase activities of the mutant proteins were
examined, ERK2 mutants H230R and N236K were found to have activities
similar to that of wild type ERK2 (Fig. 5). ERK2 mutants Y261N and
S264P, although activated, showed somewhat reduced activities toward
substrate (Fig. 5). These data indicate that the overexpression of
constitutively active MEK1 largely overcomes the defects in the
activation of the ERK2 mutants that were observed following EGF
treatment. Therefore, once activated in mammalian cells, these mutant
proteins are similar to wild type ERK2 in their kinase activity,
indicating that structural changes caused by the mutations are not
significantly altering their function.

View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Activation of ERK2 mutants containing
MEK1/2-specific point mutations in response to the co-expression of
constitutively active MEK1-R4F in HEK293 cells. A,
cells were transfected with pCMV5-MEK1-R4F and either the empty
p3XFLAG-CMV vector, p3XFLAG-CMV-ERK2, or the indicated ERK2 mutants.
Cells were deprived of serum for 24 h, treated with EGF (50 ng/ml)
(where indicated) and subsequently lysed. The resulting lysates were
analyzed by immunoblotting (IB) with antibodies specific for
phospho-ERK1/2 (top panel), total ERK1/2 (second
panel from top) or MEK1 (third panel from
top), and immunoprecipitation (IP) kinase assays
using GST-Myc-(1-103) as a substrate (bottom panel).
Representative data from one of two experiments is shown. The average
fold activation relative to that of wild type ERK2 is presented
below the bottom panel. The components of
immunoprecipitation kinase assay reactions were resolved by SDS-PAGE,
stained with Coomassie Blue, dried, and used for autoradiography. Bands
corresponding to the GST-Myc substrate were excised from gels and their
radioactivity was determined by scintillation counting.
|
|
Kinetic Analysis of ERK2 Proteins Containing
MEK1/2-specific Mutations--
To assess
quantitatively the impact of the mutations H230R, N236K, Y261N, and
S264P on ERK2 function, we performed in vitro kinase assays
using recombinant proteins. These mutant proteins, as well as wild type
ERK2 and catalytically defective ERK2-K52R were expressed in E. coli and purified to near homogeneity (Fig. 6). The basal activity of these
recombinant proteins toward the model substrate MBP was examined. The
concentration of MBP was varied from 10 to 200 µM and
steady state kinetic constants were determined (Table
II). The apparent Km
(MBP) (11.7 ± 2.4 µm) and kcat
(0.0251 ± 0.0009 min
1) values determined for wild
type, unphosphorylated ERK2 were similar to those reported by Prowse
and Lew (39) (Km = 50 ± 10 µm;
kcat = 0.012 ± 0.009 min
1).
The H230R and Y261N mutant proteins, which were the most dramatically altered, both showed an ~3.5-fold increase in the apparent
Km for MBP (Table II) and displayed decreases in the
apparent kcat of 3.4- and 1.9-fold, respectively
(Table II). The kinetic behaviors of the mutants N236K and S264P were
very similar to that of wild type ERK2 (Table II). Under the assay
conditions used, kinase activity associated with the ERK2-K52R protein
was not detected.

View larger version (92K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Purified, recombinant ERK2 proteins.
His6-tagged ERK2 proteins were expressed in E. coli and purified by nickel affinity chromatography. Between 3 and
8 µg of each protein was analyzed by SDS-PAGE followed by Coomassie
staining.
|
|
ERK2 Proteins Containing MEK1/2-specific Mutations
Are Localized to the Nuclei of Transfected Cells--
Transient
overexpression of ERK2 results in a predominantly nuclear localization
of the transfected protein (20, 22). If exogenous MEK1 is co-expressed,
the transfected ERK2 protein is largely localized to the cytoplasm of
serum-starved cells. MEK1 contains a nuclear export sequence (47), and
is thought to form a complex with unphosphorylated ERK2 and promote its
nuclear export. The ERK2 mutants described here, being specifically
impaired in their ability to interact with MEK1/2, might be insensitive to MEK1-mediated cytoplasmic localization. To test this, HEK293 cells
were transfected with MEK1 and FLAG-tagged versions of either wild type
ERK2 or the various ERK2 mutants. Following serum starvation, cells
were fixed, immunostained for the FLAG epitope, and stained with
diamidino-2-phenylindole dihydrochloride to identify nuclei. As seen in
Fig. 7, the co-expression of MEK1
resulted in a largely cytoplasmic or perinuclear localization of
transfected wild type ERK2. However, in the presence of co-transfected
MEK1, ERK2 mutants H230R, N236K, Y261N, and S264P consistently showed a
predominantly nuclear staining pattern that was similar to that of ERK2
expressed without MEK1 (Fig. 7). The mutants Y261N and S264P were
consistently more dramatically localized to the nucleus than were the
mutants H230R and N236K. We conclude that these ERK2 mutants interact poorly with MEK1 in HEK293 cells, resulting in their having a predominantly nuclear staining profile even in the presence of overexpressed MEK1.

View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
ERK2 proteins deficient in MEK1/2 binding are
localized to the nucleus in the presence of co-expressed MEK1.
HEK293 cells were grown to 50% confluence on collagen-coated
coverslips and transfected with pCMV-3XFLAG-ERK2 (or ERK2 mutants) and
pCMV5-MEK1-Myc (where indicated). After an overnight incubation, cells
were deprived of serum for 24 h, fixed in 3.7% formaldehyde, and
made permeable with 0.5% Triton X-100. ERK2 protein was visualized by
immunofluorescence using an anti-FLAG antibody and nuclei were
identified by 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) staining. A
representative cell from one of two experiments is shown.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Fidelity in signal transduction often results from the intrinsic
specificities of pathway components for one another (48). This may be
the case for the activation of MAP kinases by MEKs, as the MEK-MAP
kinase specificity observed in vitro largely mirrors that
observed in vivo. The molecular details of MEK-MAP kinase specificity are being pursued experimentally. However, because crystal
structures of MEKs and MEK-MAP kinase complexes are not available,
their interactions have been studied by mutagenesis. Investigators have
created chimeras and other variants that lose interaction or have
altered specificities. The results of many such studies have suggested
that multiple structural elements of ERK2, including the N terminus,
-helix C, the activation loop, the MAP kinase insert, and the
C-terminal L16 segment, are important for interaction with MEKs.
In this study, we identified ERK2 point mutants that fail to interact
with MEK1 in a two-hybrid screen and subsequently examined their
properties in mammalian cells. In two-hybrid experiments, these mutant
ERK2 proteins retain the ability to interact with MNK1, MKP3, and a
docking site from RSK. Because the latter three proteins bind to ERK2
through D domains (21, 41, 42), the novel mutations we describe here
are unlikely to impair ERK2 binding to D domains. Consistent with this
notion, the MEK1/2-specific mutations we describe occur in ERK2
residues well removed from the putative D domain-binding site (CD
domain) (see Fig. 3A). Thus, these mutations appear to
interfere selectively with the binding of ERK2 to MEK1/2. Although the
MEK1/2-specific mutations described here are located on the same
surface of ERK2 as the active site, they have little or no adverse
effect on protein kinase activity. This was true both when these
proteins were immunoprecipitated from mammalian cells expressing
constitutively active MEK1 (Fig. 5) and when their kinetic behavior was
examined in vitro (Table II). Interestingly, the residue
comparable with His230 was mutated in a dominant
gain-of-function allele of the MAP kinase Fus3p (D227N) (49).
The analysis of these mutants in mammalian cells is complicated by the
fact that other proteins may influence the association of ERK2 with
MEK1/2. Scaffolds such as yeast Ste5p promote the formation of cascade
complexes that may control accessibility and localization of cascade
components. However, since the mutants described here were not exported
from the nucleus in the presence of MEK1 (Fig. 7), their association
with MEK1 appears to be weak despite scaffolding or other
protein-protein interactions that may take place.
The three-dimensional structures of both inactive and active ERK2 have
been determined by x-ray crystallography (44, 50). As with all protein
kinases, ERK2 consists of a small N-terminal domain, made up largely of
-strands, and a larger, primarily
-helical C-terminal domain (see
Fig. 3A). The active site is formed at the interface of the
folding domains. In the crystal structure of unphosphorylated ERK2, the
activation loop extends from the active site and folds down upon the
C-terminal domain, making contacts with residues from both the N
terminus of
-helix G and the MAP kinase insert (44) (see Fig. 3,
B and C). Upon phosphorylation, this loop
refolds, losing earlier interactions and forming new contacts with both
domains (50). Structural features unique to MAP kinases are the above
mentioned insert of about 30 residues between kinase subdomains X and
XI and a 45-residue C-terminal extension referred to as loop 16 (L16)
(44). In MAP kinases, the C-terminal L16 extension winds back over the N-terminal domain such that the N and C termini are close together (44)
(see Fig. 3A). Insertions into the kinase core between subdomains X and XI are found only in MAP kinases,
cyclin-dependent kinases, and glycogen-synthase kinase 3 (GSK3). However, in cyclin-dependent kinases 2 and 6 this
segment adopts a conformation distinct from the two
-helices
observed in MAP kinases (51-53).
Two of the mutations identified in this screen (Y261N and S264P) occur
at residues within the MAP kinase insert, which forms contacts with the
activation loop in unphosphorylated ERK2 (44) (see Fig. 3). The other
two residues, His230 and Asn236, precede or are
in
-helix G, which is in close contact with the insert. Biochemical
or biological functions of the MAP kinase insert have not previously
been determined. Our results implicate this insert in recognition of
ERK2 by MEKs.
As crystal structures of MEK·MAP kinase complexes are not available,
it is difficult to predict how the mutations described here might
impair MEK1·ERK2 complex formation. One or more of the residues
His230, Asn236, Tyr261, or
Ser264 might directly contact MEK1 in a MEK1·ERK2
complex. Alternatively, the described mutations might act indirectly,
by altering the conformations of other ERK2 residues critical for MEK1
binding. MEK1 usually phosphorylates ERK2 on Tyr185 prior
to phosphorylating Thr183 (43, 54). Because the side chain
of Tyr185 is buried in unphosphorylated ERK2 (44), a
conformational change in the activation loop is required for the
hydroxyl of Tyr185 to enter the active site of MEK1. The
binding of MEK1 to unphosphorylated ERK2 may drive this conformational
change. The close proximity of the mutated residues His230
and Tyr261 to residues making contacts with the activation
loop (Tyr231, Leu232, and Ala258)
raises the possibility that the mutations H230R and Y261N might indirectly alter the behavior of the flexible activation loop in
unphosphorylated ERK2 (see Fig. 3, B and C).
Alterations in the conformation or flexibility of this loop might
result in impaired MEK1 binding. Wolf et al. (19) have
demonstrated that mutations in the ERK2 activation loop (residues
176-178 to Ala) impair association with MEK1 in vivo.
Consistent with this finding, the ERK2 double mutant T183E/Y185E, which
has a disordered activation loop in crystals (46), exhibits an impaired
interaction with MEK1-K97M in two-hybrid
experiments.2 Hopefully,
high-resolution crystal structures of MEK·MAP kinase complexes will
be obtained in the future. Such structures should provide substantial
insight into how MEK-MAP kinase signaling specificity is achieved and
may better explain how specific mutations disrupt MEK-MAP kinase recognition.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Natalie Ahn (human MEK1, MEK1-R4F,
and MEK2-R4F), Kun-Liang Guan (human MEK2 and rat MKP3), Tony Hunter
(human MNK1), and John Blenis (chicken RSK) for providing cDNAs. We
thank Bing-e Xu for critically reviewing the manuscript, Elizabeth
Goldsmith, Michael White, Gregory Tall, Bruce Horazdovsky, and Lori
Jackson for helpful discussions, Radha Akella for help with Molscript, and Dionne Ware for administrative assistance.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grant DK34128 and Robert A. Welch Foundation Grant I1243.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Ph.D. degree.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 214-648-3627;
Fax: 214-648-3811; E-mail: mcobb@mednet.swmed.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, January 31, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M107776200
2
F. L. Robinson and M. H. Cobb,
unpublished observation.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinases;
MEK, MAP kinase kinase/ERK
kinase;
MAP, mitogen-activated protein;
GAD, Gal4 transcriptional
activation domain;
RSK, ribosomal S6 kinase;
CSM, complete supplemental
medium;
HEK, human embryonic kidney;
EGF, epidermal growth factor;
GST, glutathione S-transferase;
MBP, myelin basic protein;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
MOPS, 4-morpholinepropanesulfonic
acid.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Lewis, T. S.,
Shapiro, P. S.,
and Ahn, N. G.
(1998)
Adv. Cancer Res.
74,
49-139[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Pearson, G.,
Robinson, F.,
Beers, G. T., Xu, B. E.,
Karandikar, M.,
Berman, K.,
and Cobb, M. H.
(2001)
Endocr. Rev.
22,
153-183[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 3.
|
Payne, D. M.,
Rossomando, A. J.,
Martino, P.,
Erickson, A. K.,
Her, J.-H.,
Shananowitz, J.,
Hunt, D. F.,
Weber, M. J.,
and Sturgill, T. W.
(1991)
EMBO J.
10,
885-892[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Robbins, D. J.,
Zhen, E.,
Owaki, H.,
Vanderbilt, C. A.,
Ebert, D.,
Geppert, T. D.,
and Cobb, M. H.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
5097-5106[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Seger, R.,
Ahn, N. G.,
Posada, J.,
Munar, E. S.,
Jensen, A. M.,
Cooper, J. A.,
Cobb, M. H.,
and Krebs, E. G.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
14373-14381[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Ahn, N. G.,
Robbins, D. J.,
Haycock, J. W.,
Seger, R.,
Cobb, M. H.,
and Krebs, E. G.
(1992)
J. Neurochem.
59,
147-156[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Gotoh, Y.,
Nishida, E.,
and Sakai, H.
(1990)
Eur. J. Biochem.
193,
671-674[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Crews, C.,
Alessandrini, A.,
and Erikson, R.
(1992)
Science
258,
478-480[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Kyriakis, J. M.,
App, H.,
Zhang, X.-F.,
Banerjee, P.,
Brautigan, D. L.,
Rapp, U. R.,
and Avruch, J.
(1992)
Nature
358,
417-421[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Dent, P.,
Haser, W.,
Haystead, T. A. J.,
Vincent, L. A.,
Roberts, T. M.,
and Sturgill, T. W.
(1992)
Science
257,
1404-1407[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Wilsbacher, J. L.,
Goldsmith, E. J.,
and Cobb, M. H.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
16988-16994[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
English, J. M.,
Pearson, G.,
Baer, R.,
and Cobb, M. H.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
3854-3860[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Enslen, H.,
Brancho, D. M.,
and Davis, R. J.
(2000)
EMBO J.
19,
1301-1311[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Brunet, A.,
and Pouysségur, J.
(1996)
Science
272,
1653-1655
|
| 15.
|
Robinson, M. J.,
Cheng, M.,
Khokhlatchev, A.,
Ebert, D.,
Ahn, N.,
Guan, K. L.,
Stein, B.,
Goldsmith, E.,
and Cobb, M. H.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
29734-29739[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Xu, B.,
Wilsbacher, J. L.,
Collisson, T.,
and Cobb, M. H.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
34029-34035[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Adachi, M.,
Fukuda, M.,
and Nishida, E.
(1999)
EMBO J.
18,
5347-5358[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Eblen, S. T.,
Catling, A. D.,
Assanah, M. C.,
and Weber, M. J.
(2001)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
21,
249-259[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Wolf, I.,
Rubinfeld, H.,
Yoon, S.,
Marmor, G.,
Hanoch, T.,
and Seger, R.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
24490-24497[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Rubinfeld, H.,
Hanoch, T.,
and Seger, R.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
30349-30352[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Tanoue, T.,
Adachi, M.,
Moriguchi, T.,
and Nishida, E.
(2000)
Nat. Cell Biol.
2,
110-116[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Xu, B.,
Stippec, S.,
Robinson, F. L.,
and Cobb, M. H.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
26509-26515[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Hibi, M.,
Lin, A.,
Smeal, T.,
Minden, A.,
and Karin, M.
(1993)
Genes Dev.
7,
2135-2148[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Dai, T.,
Rubie, E.,
Franklin, C. C.,
Kraft, A.,
Gillespie, D. A.,
Avruch, J.,
Kyriakis, J. M.,
and Woodgett, J. R.
(1995)
Oncogene
10,
849-855[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Bardwell, L.,
and Thorner, J.
(1996)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
21,
373-374[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Yang, S. H.,
Yates, P. R.,
Whitmarsh, A. J.,
Davis, R. J.,
and Sharrocks, A. D.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
710-720[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Pulido, R.,
Zuniga, A.,
and Ullrich, A.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
7337-7350[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Holland, P. M.,
and Cooper, J. A.
(1999)
Curr. Biol.
9,
R329-R331[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Sharrocks, A. D.,
Yang, S. H.,
and Galanis, A.
(2000)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
25,
448-453[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Van Aelst, L.,
Barr, M.,
Marcus, S.,
Polverino, A.,
and Wigler, M.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
6213-6217[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Jullien-Flores, V.,
Dorseuil, O.,
Romero, F.,
Letourneur, F.,
Saragosti, S.,
Berger, R.,
Tavitian, A.,
Gacon, G.,
and Camonis, J. H.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
22473-22477[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Vojtek, A. B.,
Hollenberg, S. M.,
and Cooper, J. A.
(1993)
Cell
74,
205-214[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Zhou, Y. H.,
Zhang, X. P.,
and Ebright, R. H.
(1991)
Nucleic Acids Res.
19,
6052[Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Kaur, K. J.,
and White, M. A.
(2001)
Methods Enzymol.
332,
270-277[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Boulton, T. G.,
and Cobb, M. H.
(1991)
Cell Regul.
2,
357-371[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Harlow, E.,
and Lane, D.
(1988)
Antibodies: A Laboratory Manual
, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
|
| 37.
|
Xu, S.,
Robbins, D.,
Frost, J.,
Dang, A.,
Lange-Carter, C.,
and Cobb, M. H.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
6808-6812[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Zhang, F.,
Robbins, D. J.,
Cobb, M. H.,
and Goldsmith, E. J.
(1993)
J. Mol. Biol.
233,
550-552[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Prowse, C. N.,
and Lew, J.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
99-103[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Mansour, S. J.,
Candia, J. M.,
Matsuura, J. E.,
Manning, M. C.,
and Ahn, N. G.
(1996)
Biochemistry
35,
15529-15536[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 41.
|
Smith, J. A.,
Poteet-Smith, C. E.,
Malarkey, K.,
and Sturgill, T. W.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
2893-2898[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 42.
|
Gavin, A. C.,
and Nebreda, A. R.
(1999)
Curr. Biol.
9,
281-284[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 43.
|
Ferrell, J. E.,
and Bhatt, R. R.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
19008-19016[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 44.
|
Zhang, F.,
Strand, A.,
Robbins, D.,
Cobb, M. H.,
and Goldsmith, E. J.
(1994)
Nature
367,
704-711[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 45.
|
Kraulis, P. J.
(1991)
J. Appl. Crystallogr.
24,
946-950[CrossRef]
|
| 46.
|
Zhang, J.,
Zhang, F.,
Ebert, D.,
Cobb, M. H.,
and Goldsmith, E. J.
(1995)
Structure
3,
299-307[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 47.
|
Fukuda, M.,
Gotoh, I.,
Gotoh, Y.,
and Nishida, E.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
20024-20028[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 48.
|
Pawson, T.,
and Nash, P.
(2000)
Genes Dev.
14,
1027-1047[Free Full Text]
|
| 49.
|
Brill, J. A.,
Elion, E. A.,
and Fink, G. R.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
5,
297-312
|
| 50.
|
Canagarajah, B. J.,
Khokhlatchev, A.,
Cobb, M. H.,
and Goldsmith, E. J.
(1997)
Cell
90,
859-869[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 51.
|
DeBondt, H. L.,
Rosenblatt, J.,
Jancarik, J.,
Jones, H. D.,
Morgan, D. O.,
and Kim, S.-H.
(1993)
Nature
363,
595-602[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 52.
|
Brotherton, D. H.,
Dhanaraj, V.,
Wick, S.,
Brizuela, L.,
Domaille, P. J.,
Volyanik, E., Xu, X.,
Parisini, E.,
Smith, B. O.,
Archer, S. J.,
Serrano, M.,
Brenner, S. L.,
Blundell, T. L.,
and Laue, E. D.
(1998)
Nature
395,
244-250[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 53.
|
Russo, A. A.,
Tong, L.,
Lee, J. O.,
Jeffrey, P. D.,
and Pavletich, N. P.
(1998)
Nature
395,
237-243[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 54.
|
Robbins, D. J.,
and Cobb, M. H.
(1992)
Mol. Biol. Cell
3,
299-308[Abstract]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore