Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M112293200 on February 14, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 17, 14925-14932, April 26, 2002
A Novel Cyclophilin from Parasitic and Free-living
Nematodes with a Unique Substrate- and Drug-binding Domain*
Dong
Ma,
Laura S.
Nelson
,
Krystel
LeCoz,
Catherine
Poole, and
Clotilde K. S.
Carlow§
From New England Biolabs, Beverly, Massachusetts 01915
Received for publication, December 21, 2001, and in revised form, February 12, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
A highly diversified member of the cyclophilin
family of peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerases has been
isolated from the human parasite Onchocerca volvulus
(OvCYP-16). This 25-kDa cyclophilin shares 43-46%
similarity to other filarial cyclophilins but does not belong to any of
the groups previously defined in invertebrates or vertebrates. A
homolog was also isolated from Caenorhabditis elegans
(CeCYP-16). Both recombinant O. volvulus and C. elegans cyclophilins were found to
possess an enzyme activity with similar substrate preference and
insensitivity to cyclosporin A. They represent novel cyclophilins with
important differences in the composition of the drug-binding site in
particular, namely, a Glu124 (C. elegans) or
Asp123 (O. volvulus) residue present in a
critical position. Site-directed mutagenesis studies and kinetic
characterization demonstrated that the single residue dictates the
degree of binding to substrate and cyclosporin A. CeCYP-16::GFP-expressing lines were generated with expression in the anterior and posterior distal portions of the
intestine, in all larval stages and adults. An exception was found in
the dauer stage, where fluorescence was observed in both the cell
bodies and processes of the ventral chord motor neurons but was absent
from the intestine. These studies highlight the extensive
diversification of cyclophilins in an important human parasite and a
closely related model organism.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Cyclophilins belong to a large family of proteins that have been
found in most organisms including parasites. It is thought that
cyclophilins play an important role in protein folding because of their
peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase
(PPIase)1 activity, which can
be measured in vivo (1, 2) and in vitro (3, 4).
Most cyclophilins bind the immunosuppressive drug cyclosporin A (CsA),
resulting in specific inhibition of their PPIase activity (5, 6).
Therefore, CsA may interfere with the correct folding of
proline-containing proteins that are the natural substrates for
cyclophilins. It remains to be determined whether this is the mechanism
by which CsA and its nonimmunosuppressive derivatives exert lethal
structural damage on a number of important parasites. For example,
subimmunosuppressive levels of CsA cause gross herniation in the gut
and blistering of the tegumental surface of Schistosoma
mansoni (7). In the case of Litomosoides carinii microfilariae, the drug causes shrinkage of the parasite and stiffening of the surrounding sheath (8).
Most parasite cyclophilins published to date possess a high degree of
similarity to human cyclophilin A (CypA) (5), an 18-kDa cytoplasmic
protein that is abundantly expressed in all mammalian tissues (9). Like
human CypA, the PPIases described from S. mansoni (10-12),
Toxoplasma gondii (13, 14), and Plasmodium falciparum (15) increase the rate of isomerization of a standard proline-containing peptide substrate
(N-succinyl-Ala-Ala-Pro-Phe-p-nitroanilide) in vitro, and their PPIase activity is easily inhibited by
nanomolar concentrations of CsA (9, 16-18). Thus far, only CypA
homologs have been found in parasites, with the exception of the
filarial worms. In addition to this highly conserved form, designated
CYP-2 in filarial parasites, Brugia malayi, Onchocerca
volvulus, and Dirofilaria immitis express two divergent
cyclophilins that are more related to human nuclear-specific
cyclophilin (CYP-3/4) and natural killer cell cyclophilin
(CYP-1). These cyclophilins are considerably larger than human CypA,
prefer other synthetic substrates, and display a reduced sensitivity to
CsA (19-21).
We report here the cloning, expression, and characterization of a new
class of cyclophilin from the important human parasite O. volvulus (OvCYP-16) and the model organism
Caenorhabditis elegans (CeCYP-16). These
cyclophilins are distinct from the other cyclophilins present in the
data base from C. elegans (designated CeCYP-1
through CeCYP-15, and CeCYP-17) or
O. volvulus (designated OvCYP-1,
OvCYP-2, OvCYP-4, OvCYP-5, and
OvCYP-10). The CYP-16 cyclophilins represent novel, highly
diversified cyclophilins with respect to the composition of the
drug-binding site and are particularly interesting because, unlike
other parasite cyclophilins described thus far, they are apparently not
found in mammals. We present molecular and biochemical studies on these
new enzymes and use transgenic methodologies in C. elegans
to analyze developmental and spatial expression of CeCYP-16
to gain insight into the potential natural substrate(s) for these enzymes.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Isolation of OvCYP-16 and CeCYP-16--
All reagents, kits, and
bacterial strains used in cloning, expression, and sequencing
(described below) were obtained from New England Biolabs (Beverly, MA)
and used as described by the manufacturer, unless otherwise specified.
A partial cDNA clone (552 bp) encoding a putative cyclophilin was
isolated from an O. volvulus L3 stage Lambda Uni-ZAP XR cDNA library kindly provided by Dr. Steven Williams. The library was screened by hybridization (22) with a 1300-bp genomic fragment of
O. volvulus furin (a gift from Dr. Jingmin Jin). The
fragment was radiolabeled with [
-32P]dATP by
oligonucleotide random priming using the NEBlot kit. Plaque lifts
(23) were hybridized in 6× SSC at 60 °C overnight with the
32P-labeled probe (1 × 106 cpm/ml
hybridization solution). After hybridization, the plaque lifts were
washed twice at room temperature and once at 60 °C for 30 min each
in 2× SSC containing 0.1% SDS. After plaque purification of nine
clones, the Bluescript phagemids were excised from Lambda ZAP
(Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). After sequencing, the phagemid clone with
the smallest insert (552 bp; fragment B) was identified as a fragment
of a putative O. volvulus cyclophilin (OvCYP-16) by using the National Center for Biotechnology Information BLAST program. This clone was isolated due to significant homology in a short
stretch of sequence (39 nucleotides) encoding part of the
catalytic domain of each enzyme (data not shown).
To obtain a full-length cDNA of OvCYP-16, two primers,
5'-gcgagtggacattcctttgacc-3' (antisense) and 5'-ccattcaatgatattgttcc-3' (sense), were designed using the sequence derived from the 5' and 3'
ends of the partial cDNA. Two PCR products, designated fragment A
(241 bp) and fragment C (322 bp), were obtained by performing thermal
cycling on the O. volvulus L3 cDNA library with the
following primer pairs: antisense primer/T3 primer,
5'-aattaaccctcactaaaggg-3'; and sense primer/T7 primer,
5'-gtaatacgctcactatagggc-3'. Typical PCR reactions contained 2 µl of
O. volvulus L3 cDNA library stock boiled for 10 min
before use, 2 units of Vent polymerase, 1× thermal polymerase buffer,
6 mM MgSO4, 0.2 mM deoxynucleotide
triphosphate, and 250 nM of each primer. The reactions were
heated at 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 20 cycles of 95 °C for 1 min, 55 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 1 min. PCR products were
purified with the QIAquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen) and then
subcloned into the pGEM-T vector (Promega, Madison, WI) for DNA
sequence analysis. Fragments A and C were digested separately with
EcoRI/ClaI and BtgI/Xhol,
respectively. The 459-bp partial OvCYP-16 cDNA (fragment B) was
released from the Bluescript phagemid with ClaI and
BtgI. These three fragments (fragments A, B, and C) were
ligated into pUC19 digested with EcoRI and SalI.
The ligation was performed at 16 °C overnight. Deduced amino acid
sequences were aligned and compared using the Clustal method
(24), and searches for homologies to other cyclophilins were
performed using the National Center for Biotechnology Information BLAST program.
A genomic DNA sequence encoding the putative homolog of
OvCYP-16 was identified in the C. elegans cosmid
Y17G7B using the C. elegans BLAST program (Sanger
Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom). This genomic
DNA sequence was used to search the C. elegans
expressed sequence tag data base, and a clone (yk648d4) was found
that likely represented a full-length cDNA (CeCYP-16) homolog of OvCYP-16.
Preparation and Purification of Recombinant O. volvulus CYP-16
and C. elegans CYP-16--
Thermal cycling primers were designed to
enable cloning of OvCYP-16 into plasmid pMAL-c2X to generate
a fusion with maltose-binding protein (MBP). The forward primer
corresponded to the open reading frame of OvCYP-16 and had
the sequence 5'-atgtcaaacgttattatcgaattcggc-3', generating a 5' blunt
end. The reverse primer, 5'-cccaagcttctattcaactttattgaagaccgc-3', corresponded to the 3' end of the gene including a downstream termination codon and a HindIII recognition site. 50-µl
PCR reactions were carried out using 0.1 µg of the
pUC19-OvCYP-16 construct as template, 2 units of Vent DNA
polymerase, 5 µl of 10× thermal polymerase buffer, 5 mM
MgSO4, 0.2 mM deoxynucleotide triphosphate, and
250 nM of each primer. The thermal cycling conditions used were 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 25 cycles of 95 °C for 1 min, 60 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 1 min. The reaction product
was purified and digested with HindIII before ligation into
pMAL-c2X digested with XmnI and HindIII. Plasmid
DNA was isolated, and the insert was sequenced in both directions using
the CircumVent thermal cycle dideoxy DNA sequencing kit. Production and
purification of the MBP fusion protein were as described by the manufacturer.
The cDNA clone yk648d4 (GenBankTM accession number
AV195981) was obtained from Dr. Yuji Kohara, and two thermal cycling
primers were designed to subclone CeCYP-16 into pMAL-c2X for
protein expression. The forward primer
(5'-atgagtaatcaatatatcaacgagccg-3') corresponded to the open reading
frame of CeCYP-16 preceded by an ATG codon. The reverse
primer (5'-cccaagcttctaaaccttattaaaaacggcc-3') corresponded to the 3'
end of the gene and included a downstream termination codon and a
HindIII recognition site. PCR reactions (50 µl) were performed as described above using 3 µl of yk648d4 Lambda DNA stock
as template. PCR products were purified and digested with HindIII before ligation into pMAL-c2X digested with
XmnI and HindIII. The recombinant plasmid DNA was
isolated, and the insert was sequenced in both directions to ensure
authenticity. Production and purification of the MBP fusion protein
were as described by the manufacturer.
Production of Active Site Mutants of Filarial
Cyclophilin--
Site-directed mutagenesis of the PPIase domain of the
previously described B. malayi BmCYP-1 (19) was accomplished
by the method of Kunkel (25). The histidine residue (132) of
BmCYP-1 was substituted with aspartic acid using the
following mutagenic primer:
5'-attactacaacacctgcgccagatctcaatatatccatgtggtatttgg-3'. The bases encoding the mutated amino acid are underlined.
Mutagenesis of BmCYP-1 was verified using the CircumVent
thermal cycle dideoxy DNA sequencing kit. The protocol used for the
production and purification of BmCYP-1 (H132D) was as
described previously (26).
Preparation and Purification of BmCYP-1, BmCYP-2, and
DiCYP-3--
The various filarial PPIases were prepared and purified
as described previously (19, 21, 27).
Sequencing Analysis--
DNA sequences were analyzed using the
Genetics Computer Group (Madison, WI) software. Pairwise identity
comparisons of OvCYP-16 and CeCYP-16 to other
cyclophilins were performed using the program GAP. Alignment of the
derived amino acid sequence of the enzyme domains of
OvCYP-16, CeCYP-16, and other cyclophilins was
made using the program PILEUP (gap weight = 3.0, gap length
weight = 0.1). Phylogenetic tree analysis was performed using the
Clustal method (24) with the PAM250 residue weight table in the
Magalign program in DNA star.
Determination of Peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans Isomerase Activity and
CsA Inhibition Assays--
The PPIase activity of OvCYP-16
and CeCYP-16 fusion proteins was determined by measuring the
cis-trans conversion of 13 available synthetic peptide
substrates of the general structure
N-succinyl-Ala-Xaa-Pro-Phe-p-nitroanilide (Bachem), where Xaa is any of the 12 amino acids listed in Table I.
Reactions were performed at 10 °C and monitored at 0.3-s intervals at 400 nm using a Beckman DU 640 spectrophotometer. Pseudo-first-order rate kinetics were calculated using the following formula:
kobs = (kcat/Km)[E].
To determine inhibition of enzyme activity by CsA (Sigma), recombinant
enzyme (30 nM to 10 µM) was preincubated for
1 h at 4 °C with CsA (1 nM to 5 µM),
and the assay was performed as described above. Data were fitted into
the following equation: kobs = kobs*/(1 + [CsA]/IC50), where
kobs* is kobs in the
absence of CsA (19).
Nematode Culture--
Wild-type C. elegans were
obtained from the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center (St. Paul, MN). Worms
were maintained on nematode growth medium agar plates with
Escherichia coli (OP50) as a food source (28).
Transformation of C. elegans--
A CYP-16::GFP
expression construct (pIP10) was generated as follows: A 1213-bp region
upstream of the CYP-16 start site was PCR-amplified from C. elegans genomic DNA using the following primers:
5'-aaggcgtctagacgccggctgaaatattcac-3' and
5'-cagtcgccaagcttctcctgaaatagtcgtttcg-3'.
Amplification products were subcloned using the TOPO TA® Dual
Promotor Cloning Kit (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Restriction sites near the 5' ends of the primers (XbaI and HindIII) were then used to excise the
insert and clone it into a multicloning site upstream of GFP in the
pPD95.75 vector (29).
50-75 ng/µl pIP10 was microinjected into the gonad of
adult wild-type worms along with 100 ng/µl pRF-4 plasmid containing the dominant marker, rol-6 (su1006). Two independent worm lines demonstrating the rolling marker phenotype were isolated and designated IP102: nbEx3[rol-6(su1006)CYP-16::GFP] and
IP103: nbEx4[rol-6(su1006)CYP-16::GFP]. Rolling worms of all stages were observed by fluorescence microscopy to
determine where GFP was expressed.
 |
RESULTS |
Sequence Analysis of OvCYP-16 and CeCYP-16--
The complete
cDNA of OvCYP-16 encoding an O. volvulus
cyclophilin is 823-bp long and possesses an open reading frame of 669 bp, with a putative initiation codon at position 41 (GenBankTM accession number AF017738). The conserved
nematode-specific 22-nucleotide spliced leader sequence (30) is located
at the 5' end, 27 nucleotides upstream of the putative start codon. The 3'-untranslated region is 114-bp long with a putative polyadenylation signal (AATAAA) at position 784. The translated protein (223 amino acids) has a predicted molecular mass of 25.2 kDa with a pI of 6.75 and
contains a PPIase domain (Figs. 1 and
3).

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
A schematic representation of filarial and
C. elegans cyclophilins. The amino acid present
(aspartic acid (D), glutamic acid (E), histidine
(H), tryptophan (W), or tyrosine (Y))
in the critical position in the drug-binding site is shown.
|
|
The CeCYP-16 cDNA is 669 bp in length
(GenBankTM accession number AF393636) and codes for a
223-amino acid protein with a predicted molecular mass of 25.2 kDa with
a pI of 7.44 and contains a PPIase domain (Figs. 1 and 3).
The derived amino acid sequence (Figs. 1 and 3) and phylogenetic tree
analyses (Fig. 2) indicate that
OvCYP-16 and CeCYP-16 are novel cyclophilins and
homologs. The proteins are the same size (223 amino acids), possess a
short tail that is KR-rich, and share 75% similarity and 64%
identity. OvCYP-16 possesses only 48%, 43%, and 46%
similarity, respectively, to the previously described cyclophilins
OvCYP-1 (20), OvCYP-2 (27), and
OvCYP-4 (31) from O. volvulus. CeCYP-16 is a
novel C. elegans cyclophilin and shares 35-56%
similarity to the 17 documented cyclophilins in the C. elegans genome. It does not belong to any of the previously characterized groups defined by Page et al. (32). A data
base search revealed an absence of mammalian homologs of the
OvCYP-16 and CeCYP-16 cyclophilins (Figs. 2 and
3). In contrast, homologs of the filarial
CYP-1, CYP-2, and CYP-3/4 proteins are present in humans (Figs. 2 and
3).

View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Phylogenetic tree of members of the
cyclophilin family. The Clustal method was used with the PAM250
residue weight table to construct a phylogenetic tree of the sequence
block corresponding to OvCYP-16. Nomenclature for the
sequences is described in the Fig. 3 legend.
|
|

View larger version (83K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Alignment of the deduced amino acid sequences
of various cyclophilins. The amino acid sequences of various
cyclophilins are denoted as follows (GenBankTM
accession numbers are indicated in parentheses): D. immitis,
DiCYP-1 (U70884), DiCYP-2 (U47813),
DiCYP-3 (AF000668); B. malayi, BmCYP-1 (L37292),
BmCYP-2 (U47811), and BmCYP-4 (AJ000916);
O. volvulus, OvCYP-1 (U70827), OvCYP-2
(U47812), OvCYP-4 (AJ000917), and OvCYP-16
(AF017738); human nuclear-specific cyclophilin, HuCYP60 (U37219); human
cyclophilin A, HuCYPA (X52851); human natural killer cell cyclophilin,
HuCYPNK (L04288); and C. elegans, CeCYP-4
(U36187), CeCYP-7 (U27559), CeCYP-8 (U31078), and
CeCYP-16 (AF393636). C-terminal asterisks indicate
translational terminations. In the CYP-1 and CYP-3 sequences, the
additional C-terminal residues of CYP-1 and the additional N- and
C-terminal residues of CYP-3 are not shown. Dashes indicate
residues identical to the corresponding residue in OvCYP-16.
Dots denote gaps. The residues important in CsA binding (33)
are indicated with a #.
|
|
There are 13 residues that constitute the CsA-binding site of human
cyclophilin A (33) (Fig. 3, #), and one of these residues (tryptophan
121) is essential for drug binding (34). In the OvCYP-16 and
CeCYP-16 cyclophilins, 9 and 11, respectively, of the 13 residues are conserved. However, unlike any other cyclophilins described to date, the tryptophan residue is substituted with a
Glu124 (C. elegans) or Asp123
(O. volvulus) amino acid (Fig. 3).
Characterization of PPIase Activity and Inhibition Studies Using
CsA--
The characteristics of recombinant OvCYP-16- and
CeCYP-16-MBP fusion proteins were examined using 13 different synthetic peptides of the general structure
N-succinyl-Ala-Xaa-cis-Pro-Phe-p-nitroanilide, where Xaa is any of the 12 amino acids listed in Table
I. The tripeptide substrate
Suc-Phe-Pro-Phe-pNA was also evaluated. Mutant BmCYP-1 (H132D) and the previously characterized filarial
cyclophilins BmCYP-1, BmCYP-2, and
DiCYP-3 were included for comparison as MBP fusion proteins.
BmCYP-1, BmCYP-2, and DiCYP-3 are
active PPIases, both as a MBP fusion protein and in a purified (minus MBP) form (19, 21, 27).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Substrate specificity of nematode cyclophilins toward various peptide
substrates
Xaa is shown in the first column (Nle is the artificial amino acid
norleucine). Asterisk denotes the tripeptide substrate Suc-F-P-F-pNA.
First-order rate kinetics were calculated using the formula:
kobs = (kcat/Km)[E]. All enzymes are
fusion proteins with MBP.
|
|
The catalytic efficiency
(kcat/Km) of the substrates
varied, and a distinct profile was obtained for each filarial and
C. elegans cyclophilin (Table I). Both OvCYP-16
and CeCYP-16 proteins were found to possess a low level of
PPIase activity that was only detectable using relatively large amounts
of protein (namely, 9.7 µM OvCYP-16 and 4 µM CeCYP-16, respectively) in the presence of
specific substrates (Fig. 4). The highest
level of PPIase activity
(kcat/Km) for
OvCYP-16 and CeCYP-16 was 5.2 × 102 (Ala-Leu-Pro-Phe or Ala-Nle-Pro-Phe) and 2 × 103 (Ala-Val-Pro-Phe), respectively. The profile observed
for the mutant PPIase (5 µM BmCYP-1, H132D)
was more similar to OvCYP-16 and CeCYP-16 and was
dramatically reduced (2.7 × 103 Ala-Leu-Pro-Phe)
compared with wild-type (6.9 × 105) (Table I).

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Progress curves for the PPIase activity of
O. volvulus CYP-16 and C. elegans
CYP-16 using the synthetic substrate
N-succinyl-Ala-Leu-Pro-Phe-p-nitroanilide.
a, nonenzymatic thermal isomerization; b, 10 µM MBP alone; c, 10 µM
recombinant O. volvulus CYP-16 fusion with MBP;
d, 10 µM recombinant C. elegans
CYP-16 fusion with MBP.
|
|
To determine the sensitivity of OvCYP-16,
CeCYP-16, and mutant BmCYP-1 (H132D) PPIases to
CsA, recombinant enzyme (10 µM) was preincubated with
varying concentrations of CsA (10 nM to 5 µM)
at 4 °C for 1 h before the assays were performed as described above. The previously characterized filarial PPIases,
BmCYP-1, BmCYP-2, and DiCYP-3, were
included for comparison. Appropriate synthetic substrates were used in
the assays, namely,
N-succinyl-Ala-Leu-Pro-Phe-p-nitroanilide for
OvCYP-16 and CeCYP-16 and
N-succinyl-Ala-Ala-Pro-Phe-p-nitroanilide for
BmCYP-1, BmCYP-1 (H132D), BmCYP-2, and
DiCYP-3, respectively. No inhibition of the PPIase
activities of DiCYP-3, OvCYP-16, CeCYP-16, or
mutant BmCYP-1 (H132D) was observed, even at CsA
concentrations as high as 5 µM (Fig.
5). In contrast, nanomolar concentrations of CsA are sufficient to inhibit 50% of the activities of
BmCYP-1 and BmCYP-2.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Inhibition of the PPIase activity of
BmCYP-1, BmCYP-2,
DiCYP-3, OvCYP-16,
CeCYP-16, and mutant BmCYP-1 (H132D)
with cyclosporin A. Appropriate synthetic substrates were used in
the assays, namely,
N-succinyl-Ala-Leu-Pro-Phe-p-nitroanilide for
OvCYP-16 and CeCYP-16 and
N-succinyl-Ala-Ala-Pro-Phe-p-nitroanilide for
BmCYP-1, BmCYP-1 (H132D), BmCYP-2, and
DiCYP-3, respectively.
|
|
Expression Pattern of CYP-16 in C. elegans--
Transgenic lines
IP102 and IP103 were obtained after coinjection of pIP10 and pRF-4 into
the gonad of adult worms. Consistent GFP expression patterns were
observed in these lines throughout the intestine, with particularly
strong fluorescence in the anterior and posterior ends, in all the
larval stages and adults (Fig. 6). An
exception was found in the dauer stage, where fluorescence was observed
in both the cell bodies and processes of the ventral chord motor
neurons but was absent from the intestine (Fig. 6).

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Expression pattern of
cyp-16::GFP. A,
cyp-16::GFP expression in the adult
hermaphrodite is seen throughout the intestine, with particularly
strong expression in the anterior and posterior ends. Similar
expression is seen in all detectable larval stages except the dauer
stage. B, cyp-16::GFP expression in the
dauer larva is seen in neuron cell bodies and processes along the
length of the body, consistent with identification as the ventral chord
motor neurons. Expression in the gut is absent in this stage.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Cyclophilins appear to have undergone proliferation and extensive
diversification in filarial worms. In contrast to other parasites that
appear to only express homologs of human CypA, the filariae possess, in
addition, highly distinctive cyclophilins. The three filarial PPIases
(CYP-1, CYP-2, and CYP-3) analyzed in detail thus far differ in size
and display unique substrate preferences and a range of sensitivity to
inhibition with CsA (21, 27, 32). The other cyclophilins (designated
CYP-4, CYP-5, and CYP-10) identified from O. volvulus as
potential vaccine and drug target candidates after immunoscreening of
cDNA libraries and expressed sequence tag analysis (35) belong to
previously defined groups (19, 21, 27, 32). Structure/function studies in the human and filarial parasite systems have given some insight into
the reasons for the apparent differences in the enzymes. There are 13 residues that form the CsA-binding site of human CypA (33), and 1 of
these residues (tryptophan 121) is essential for drug binding (34).
These amino acids are highly conserved in all parasite cyclophilins
described, with the exception of the filarial CYP-1 (19) and CYP-3/4
(21, 32) enzymes that have a histidine or tyrosine residue instead of
tryptophan, respectively. X-ray crystallography analysis (36-38) and
site-directed mutagenesis studies (26) on B. malayi CYP-1
have demonstrated that the single H132W difference correlates with
increased sensitivity to CsA.
Diversification of cyclophilins may be a feature of nematodes because
the free-living nematode C. elegans possesses many different cyclophilins, including homologs of the filarial cyclophilins described
above (31, 32, 39). This is also the case with the novel
OvCYP-16 cyclophilin from O. volvulus and
CeCYP-16 from C. elegans. The CYP-16 proteins
possess a PPIase domain and an additional C-terminal domain that is
rich in lysine and arginine. However, a distinctive feature of these
cyclophilins is that they belong to an independent group and, based on
a data base search, do not appear to be present in mammals.
In the OvCYP-16 and CeCYP-16 cyclophilins, 9 and
11 of the 13 residues are conserved, and, unlike any other cyclophilin
published to date, a Glu124 (C. elegans) or
Asp123 (O. volvulus) residue is present at the
critical position (tryptophan) in the drug-binding site. Because
previous studies have shown that filarial parasites possess
CsA-insensitive (CYP-1 and CYP-3) (19, 21) and CsA-sensitive (CYP-2)
cyclophilins (27), similar experiments were performed using
OvCYP-16 and CeCYP-16 fusion proteins. At the
highest concentrations of CsA tested, we were unable to detect any
inhibition of enzyme activity. These enzymes are therefore considerably
more resistant to CsA inhibition than CYP-1 or CYP-2 and are more
similar to the more recently described filarial CYP-3 enzymes (21).
It has been suggested that the various isoforms of filarial
cyclophilins may be involved in the folding of different proteins in vivo (40). Therefore, we compared the ability of
OvCYP-16 and CeCYP-16 to catalyze the
isomerization to the trans form of 13 different synthetic
peptides of the general structure
N-succinyl-Ala-Xaa-cis-Pro-Phe-p-nitroanilide. The previously characterized filarial enzymes CYP-1, CYP-2, and CYP-3
were also included. The catalytic efficiency
(kcat/Km) of the substrates
varied, and a distinct profile emerged for each cyclophilin. CYP-1,
CYP-2, and CYP-3 favored peptides containing the short chain residues
alanine (found in the standard substrate) and glycine. In contrast,
OvCYP-16 and CeCYP-16 did not demonstrate any
activity with these particular substrates but instead were found to
prefer hydrophobic, acidic, or amide amino acids. These results support
the notion that the various members of the cyclophilin family could
have distinct natural substrates. Amazingly, a single amino acid
substitution in the mutated BmCYP-1 (H132D) resulted in an
enzyme with the characteristics of OvCYP-16 and
CeCYP-16 with regard to substrate preference, enzyme
activity (decreased ~40-fold compared with wild-type), and drug
sensitivity. This emphasizes how a single amino acid in this position
dictates the behavior of the enzyme. We have also found that mutation
of CeCYP-16 (E124W) significantly increased the activity of the enzyme
fused to MBP (data not shown). This result indicates that the low
activity associated with the CYP-16 enzymes is probably not due to the presence of MBP. Consistent with this is the fact that a mixture containing MBP cleaved from the fusion protein and CeCYP-16
also has a low enzyme activity (data not shown).
It is known from the extensive work done on mammalian cyclophilins that
the various isoforms can vary in their expression pattern (41). To gain
information on the function of filarial CYP-16, properties of its
homolog were studied in the genetic model C. elegans.
Developmental and spatial expression patterns of
CeCYP-16 were determined using a GFP reporter
system. It was found that GFP expression under the control of the
CeCYP-16 promoter was strong in the distal
portions of the intestine. This pattern was seen throughout
development, with the exception of the dauer larva, in which expression
was seen only in the ventral chord motor neurons. Therefore,
CeCYP-16 would seem to be functioning in distinct
cell types during regular development as compared with the dauer stage.
During the dauer stage, the intestine is closed off to the environment,
and the animal does not feed (42). Therefore, perhaps a protein
functioning in the intestine would no longer be needed during this
stage, resulting in a loss of expression in the gut. Of greater
interest is the apparent recruitment of this protein in completely
unrelated cells during the dauer stage. Because dauer animals undergo
less movement compared with other developmental stages, one might
speculate that a dauer-specific function for
CeCYP-16 in the motor neurons might be of an
inhibitory nature. It would be interesting to determine whether a
parallel expression pattern is seen in filarial parasites, where the
dauer stage is represented by the infective stage larva that remains in
the insect vector until transmitted to the mammalian host.
The expression pattern of CeCYP-16 resembles that of
CeCYP-8, another cyclophilin with a homolog in filarial
parasites (BmCYP-1). CeCYP-8 was found
specifically in gut cells in various stages (39). However, this study
did not include the dauer stage, so it remains to be seen whether there
is complete overlap in the expression patterns of these two proteins. A
completely different pattern was observed for CeCYP-4, a
muscle-specific cyclophilin that has been shown to be essential for
normal muscle development in early larvae. RNA interference experiments
of the CeCYP-4 resulted in progeny with a lumpy appearance
(31). Similar experiments performed using CeCYP-8 (39) or
CeCYP-16 (data not shown) did not show any obvious
phenotype, perhaps indicating that they perform the same function in
the gut, although this is unlikely due to the distinct substrate
preference profile observed for CeCYP-16 and
BmCYP-1 (a homolog of CeCYP-8). It is also
noteworthy that RNA interference is ineffective against neuronal
expressed products (43), so other approaches would be necessary to
address the importance of CeCYP-16 in this tissue.
Additional studies on both conserved and divergent cyclophilins in
nematodes may give insight into the function of the various PPIases and
reveal potential drug targets for antifilarial chemotherapy.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We gratefully acknowledge the encouragement
of Dr. Donald Comb (New England Biolabs). We thank Drs. Larry
McReynolds and Jeremy Foster for critical reading of the manuscript,
Drs. Fran Perler and Maurice Southworth for assistance with digital
art, and Dr. Reginaldo Prioli for assistance with fluorescence
microscopy. We also thank Dr. Yuji Kohara for supplying cDNA clone
yk648d4 and Dr. Chris Li for generously providing strains, reagents,
technical advice, and assistance.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by Dr. Donald Comb, New England
Biolabs.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EBI Data Bank with accession number(s) AF017738 and AF393636.
Present address: Proteome, Inc., Beverly, MA 01915.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: New England Biolabs, 32 Tozer Rd., Beverly, MA 01915. Tel.: 978-927-5054, Ext. 263; Fax:
978-921-1350; E-mail: carlow@neb.com.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, February 14, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M112293200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
PPIase, peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase;
CypA, human cyclophilin
A;
CsA, cyclosporin A;
MBP, maltose-binding protein;
GFP, green
fluorescent protein.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Stamnes, M. A.,
Shieh, B. H.,
Chuman, L.,
Harris, G. L.,
and Zuker, C. S.
(1991)
Cell
65,
219-227[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Galat, A.
(1993)
Eur. J. Biochem.
216,
689-707[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Lang, K.,
Schmid, F. X.,
and Fischer, G.
(1987)
Nature
329,
268-270[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Takahashi, N.,
Hayano, T.,
and Suzuki, M.
(1989)
Nature
337,
473-475[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Handschumacher, R. E.,
Harding, M. W.,
Rice, J.,
Drugge, R. J.,
and Speicher, D. W.
(1984)
Science
226,
544-547[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Fischer, G.,
Wittmann-Liebold, B.,
Lang, K.,
Kiefhaber, T.,
and Schmid, F. X.
(1989)
Nature
337,
476-478[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Munro, G. H.,
and McLaren, D. J.
(1990)
Parasitology
100, Pt 1,
19-28
|
| 8.
|
Zahner, H.,
and Schultheiss, K.
(1987)
J. Helminthol.
61,
282-290[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Koletsky, A. J.,
Harding, M. W.,
and Handschumacher, R. E.
(1986)
J. Immunol.
137,
1054-1059[Abstract]
|
| 10.
|
Bueding, E.,
Hawkins, J.,
and Cha, Y. N.
(1981)
Agents Actions
11,
380-383[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Chappell, L. H.,
Liu, J. F.,
and Penlington, M. C.
(1993)
J. Cell. Biochem.
17C (suppl.),
114
|
| 12.
|
Munro, G. H.,
and McLaren, D. J.
(1990)
Parasitology
100, Pt 1,
29-34
|
| 13.
|
Mack, D. G.,
and McLeod, R.
(1984)
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
26,
26-30[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
McCabe, R. E.,
Luft, B. J.,
and Remington, J. S.
(1986)
Transplantation
41,
611-615[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Thommen-Scott, K.
(1981)
Agents Actions
11,
770-773[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
High, K. P.,
Joiner, K. A.,
and Handschumacher, R. E.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
9105-9112[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Bell, A.,
Wernli, B.,
and Franklin, R. M.
(1994)
Biochem. Pharmacol.
48,
495-503[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Reddy, G. R.
(1995)
Mol. Biochem. Parasitol.
73,
111-121[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Page, A. P.,
Landry, D.,
Wilson, G. G.,
and Carlow, C. K.
(1995)
Biochemistry
34,
11545-11550[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Hong, X., Ma, D.,
Page, A. P.,
Kumar, S.,
and Carlow, C. K.
(1998)
Exp. Parasitol.
88,
246-251[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Hong, X., Ma, D.,
and Carlow, C. K. S.
(1998)
Mol. Biochem. Parasitol.
91,
353-358[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Grandea, A. G. d.,
Tuyen, L. K.,
Asikin, N.,
Davis, T. B.,
Philipp, M.,
Cohen, C.,
and McReynolds, L. A.
(1989)
Mol. Biochem. Parasitol.
35,
31-41[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Sambrook, J.,
Fritsch, E. F.,
and Maniatis, T.
(1989)
Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual
, 2nd Ed.
, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
|
| 24.
|
Thompson, J. D.,
Higgins, D. G.,
and Gibson, T. J.
(1994)
Nucleic Acids Res.
22,
4673-4680[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Kunkel, T. A.
(1985)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
82,
488-492[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Ma, D.,
and Carlow, C. K.
(1998)
Mol. Biochem. Parasitol.
92,
361-365[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Ma, D.,
Hong, X.,
Raghavan, N.,
Scott, A. L.,
McCarthy, J. S.,
Nutman, T. B.,
Williams, S. A.,
and Carlow, C. K.
(1996)
Mol. Biochem. Parasitol.
79,
235-241[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Brenner, S.
(1974)
Genetics
77,
71-94[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Fire, A.,
Harrison, S. W.,
and Dixon, D.
(1990)
Gene (Amst.)
93,
189-198[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Takacs, A. M.,
Denker, J. A.,
Perrine, K. G.,
Maroney, P. A.,
and Nilsen, T. W.
(1988)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
85,
7932-7936[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Page, A. P.,
and Winter, A. D.
(1998)
Mol. Biochem. Parasitol.
95,
215-227[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Page, A. P.,
MacNiven, K.,
and Hengartner, M. O.
(1996)
Biochem. J.
317,
179-185
|
| 33.
|
Pflugl, G.,
Kallen, J.,
Schirmer, T.,
Jansonius, J. N.,
Zurini, M. G.,
and Walkinshaw, M. D.
(1993)
Nature
361,
91-94[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Liu, J.,
Chen, C. M.,
and Walsh, C. T.
(1991)
Biochemistry
30,
2306-2310[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Lizotte-Waniewski, M.,
Tawe, W.,
Guiliano, D. B., Lu, W.,
Liu, J.,
Williams, S. A.,
and Lustigman, S.
(2000)
Infect. Immun.
68,
3491-3501[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Mikol, V., Ma, D.,
and Carlow, C. K.
(1998)
Protein Sci.
7,
1310-1316[Abstract]
|
| 37.
|
Ellis, P. J.,
Carlow, C. K., Ma, D.,
and Kuhn, P.
(2000)
Biochemistry
39,
592-598[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 38.
|
Taylor, P.,
Page, A. P.,
Kontopidis, G.,
Husi, H.,
and Walkinshaw, M. D.
(1998)
FEBS Lett.
425,
361-366[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Page, A. P.,
and Winter, A. D.
(1999)
Mol. Biochem. Parasitol.
99,
301-306[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 40.
|
Kieffer, L. J.,
Seng, T. W., Li, W.,
Osterman, D. G.,
Handschumacher, R. E.,
and Bayney, R. M.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
12303-12310[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 41.
|
Walsh, C. T.,
Zydowsky, L. D.,
and McKeon, F. D.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
13115-13118[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 42.
|
Wood, W. B.
(1988)
The Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans
, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
|
| 43.
|
Tavernarakis, N.,
Wang, S. L.,
Dorovkov, M.,
Ryazanov, A.,
and Driscoll, M.
(2000)
Nat. Genet.
24,
180-183[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Belfiore, P. Pugnale, Z. Saudan, and A. Puoti
Roles of the C. elegans cyclophilin-like protein MOG-6 in MEP-1 binding and germline fates
Development,
June 15, 2004;
131(12):
2935 - 2945.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Dubourg, T. Kamphausen, M. Weiwad, G. Jahreis, J. Feunteun, G. Fischer, and N. Modjtahedi
The Human Nuclear SRcyp Is a Cell Cycle-regulated Cyclophilin
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 21, 2004;
279(21):
22322 - 22330.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Cavarec, T. Kamphausen, B. Dubourg, I. Callebaut, F. Lemeunier, D. Metivier, J. Feunteun, G. Fischer, and N. Modjtahedi
Identification and Characterization of Moca-cyp. A DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER NUCLEAR CYCLOPHILIN
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 18, 2002;
277(43):
41171 - 41182.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|