Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M112451200 on February 11, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 17, 15021-15027, April 26, 2002
Nitric Oxide (NO) Induces Nitration of Protein Kinase
C
(PKC
), Facilitating PKC
Translocation via Enhanced
PKC
-RACK2 Interactions
A NOVEL MECHANISM OF NO-TRIGGERED ACTIVATION OF PKC
*
Zarema
Balafanova
§,
Roberto
Bolli
§,
Jun
Zhang
§,
Yuting
Zheng
,
Jason M.
Pass
§,
Aruni
Bhatnagar§,
Xian-Liang
Tang§,
Ouli
Wang
,
Ernest
Cardwell§, and
Peipei
Ping
§¶
From the
Department of Physiology and Biophysics,
University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky 40202 and the
§ Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology,
Louisville, Kentucky 40202
Received for publication, December 28, 2001, and in revised form, February 4, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
Activation of protein kinase C (PKC)
by
nitric oxide (NO) has been implicated in the development of
cardioprotection. However, the cellular mechanisms underlying
the activation of PKC
by NO remain largely unknown. Nitration of
protein tyrosine residues has been shown to alter functions of a
variety of proteins, and NO-derived peroxynitrite is known as a strong
nitrating agent. In this investigation, we demonstrate that NO
donors promote translocation and activation of PKC
in an NO- and
peroxynitrite-dependent fashion. NO induces
peroxynitrite-mediated tyrosine nitration of PKC
in rabbit
cardiomyocytes in vitro, and nitrotyrosine residues were also detected on PKC
in vivo in the rabbit myocardium
preconditioned with NO donors. Furthermore, coimmunoprecipitation of
PKC
and its receptor for activated
C kinase, RACK2, illustrated a
peroxynitrite-dependent increase in PKC
-RACK2
interactions in NO donor-treated cardiomyocytes. Moreover, using an
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay-based protein-protein interaction
assay, PKC
proteins treated with the peroxynitrite donor SIN-1
exhibited enhanced binding to RACK2 in an acellular environment. Our
data demonstrate that post-translational modification of PKC
by NO
donors, namely nitration of PKC
, facilitates its interaction with
RACK2 and promotes translocation and activation of PKC
. These
findings offer a plausible novel mechanism by which NO activates the
PKC signaling pathway.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Protein kinase C (PKC)1
is a family of serine-threonine kinases that participate in numerous
biological processes (1, 2). In the heart, activation of PKC reduces
the myocardial ischemic injury, whereas inhibition of PKC abolishes
ischemic preconditioning (3-5). Recently, it has been shown that this
cardioprotective effect can be fully mimicked by modulating the
activity of a single isozyme of this family, the
isoform of PKC
(6-9). Multiple molecular events have been shown to have an activating
effect on this enzyme, among which, of particular interest, is nitric oxide (NO). Although the effects of NO on PKC depend on its biological functions and on the cell types (10-14), NO-induced activation of PKC
is well documented in the heart (15, 16). Several investigations have
demonstrated that at doses that produce a cardioprotective effect,
exogenous NO (released by NO donors) activates PKC
in an
isoform-specific manner (17-20). Furthermore, activation of this
isozyme has been demonstrated to play an essential role in orchestrating the signal transduction events during NO-induced cardioprotection against ischemic injury (15, 21). However, the exact
molecular mechanism(s) whereby NO activates PKC
in the heart remain
largely unknown.
As a relatively stable hydrophobic free radical gas, NO can readily
diffuse through cell membranes (22). Within cells, NO itself and
NO-derived reactive nitrogen species are capable of reacting
with various molecular targets that include complex biological molecules, such as proteins, lipids, and DNA, as well as low molecular weight compounds (23). One of the important molecular targets of NO are
protein tyrosine residues, which can be modified to fairly stable
3-nitrotyrosines upon reacting with nitrating species. Protein
nitration is believed to be a selective process with respect to both
the proteins and the specific protein tyrosine residues that can
undergo this posttranslational modification (24). Nitration of protein
tyrosine residues has been shown to alter the functions of a variety of
proteins under physiological and pathophysiological conditions both
in vitro and in vivo (23, 25). Posttranslational modification of tyrosine residues has been shown to play an important role in modulating the activity of several PKC isozymes (26-28), and
analysis of the molecular sequence of PKC
reveals that it harbors
multiple tyrosine residues. Therefore, we hypothesized that nitration
of PKC
on tyrosine residues may contribute to NO-induced activation
of PKC
.
Peroxynitrite (ONOO
) is a well characterized nitrating
species that is produced under physiological conditions when NO reacts with superoxide anion (O
) (29). Because the reaction of NO
with O
to form ONOO
occurs at a near
diffusion-limited rate, generation of ONOO
will
predominate in any setting where NO and O
are released
concomitantly. Considering the fact that that cardiac myocytes have
several potential sources of O
, which among others include
mitochondria and NADPH oxidase (30), it stands to reason that
ONOO
can play a role as a mediator of NO donor-induced
nitration of PKC
.
Translocation and subcellular redistribution of PKC
have been
recognized as important molecular events for the activation of this
isozyme (1, 2, 31). The particulate translocation of PKC
is known to
be facilitated by its interaction with a specific anchoring protein
termed receptor for activated C
kinase 2, or RACK2 (32). Importantly, the interaction of
PKC
with RACK2 is crucial for mediating PKC
activation and
function (6, 8, 33). Accordingly, we postulated that tyrosine nitration
may serve to promote the interaction between PKC
and its RACK2,
thereby leading to enhanced expression and activity of PKC
in the
particulate fraction.
In the present study, we investigated whether NO induces PKC
activation and translocation in adult cardiac myocytes and elucidated the cellular mechanisms of this event. Cardiomyocytes were treated with the NO donor
S-nitroso-N-acetyl-DL-penicillamine
(SNAP), which was previously shown to induce PKC
activation and
cardiac protection in vivo (15). The translocation and
activation of PKC
, as well as the posttranslational modification of
this isozyme such as tyrosine nitration, were characterized both in
cultured cardiac cells in vitro and in a rabbit model of NO
preconditioning in vivo. We found that NO induces
activation, translocation, and nitration of PKC
. Furthermore,
nitration of PKC
enhances PKC
-RACK2 interactions and facilitates
PKC
translocation.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
The present study was performed in accordance with guidelines of
the Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Louisville School of Medicine and with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (Department of Health and Human Services,
publication [NIH] 86-23).
Materials and Reagents--
M199 medium, fetal calf serum,
penicillin, and streptomycin were obtained from Invitrogen. Type
II collagenase was from Worthington. SNAP, SIN-1, and Ebselen were from
Calbiochem. Mouse monoclonal antibody against PKC
and horseradish
peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse secondary antibody were obtained
from Transduction Laboratories (Lexington, KY). Mouse monoclonal
anti-nitrotyrosine antibody and nitrotyrosine immunoblotting control
were from Upstate Biotechnology (Lake Placid, NY). Rat monoclonal
anti-TCP-1
(anti-RACK2) and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated rabbit
anti-rat IgG were obtained from StressGen Biotechnologies Corp.
(Victoria, British Columbia, Canada). Protein A/G PLUS-agarose beads
were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). Enhanced
chemiluminescence (ECL)-detecting reagents were obtained from Amersham
Biosciences. Reagents for SDS-PAGE were from Bio-Rad Laboratories. All
other reagents were from Sigma.
Isolation of Adult Rabbit Cardiac Myocytes--
Adult rabbit
cardiac myocytes were isolated using a modification of the method of
Haddad et al. (34) using collagenase type II digestion. This
method yielded 80-85% rod-shaped cardiac myocytes, generating an
average total of 4-6 × 107 cells per rabbit heart.
This method has been employed previously to study PKC
-induced
activation of mitogen-activated protein kinases in rabbit
cardiomyocytes (35). In brief, isolated myocytes were plated onto
laminin-coated 100-mm dishes at subconfluence (2 × 106 cells/dish) and cultured overnight at 37 °C in M199
medium with 2% fetal bovine serum, penicillin, and streptomycin. The
medium was replaced with serum-free M199 medium supplemented with
taurine (5 mM), creatine (5 mM), and carnitine
(5 mM), and the cells were cultured under the serum-starved
conditions for 3 h prior to performing the treatments with a
nitric oxide donor.
Experimental Protocol--
Cardiomyocytes obtained from the same
rabbit were divided into the following groups: a control group, in
which only the vehicle (Me2SO) was added to the medium;
three groups in which the cells were incubated for 40 min with
different concentrations of the NO donor SNAP obtained by diluting the
stock solution of SNAP in the culture medium (2, 20, or 100 µM final concentrations of SNAP); a group in which the
cells were pretreated for 10 min with the NO scavenger oxyhemoglobin at
a 50 µM concentration before the treatment with 20 µM SNAP; and a group in which the peroxynitrite scavenger
Ebselen was added at a concentration of 2 µM 10 min prior
to the treatment with 20 µM SNAP. The SNAP stock solution was prepared freshly by dissolving it in Me2SO prior to
each experiment. After the treatment, the medium was removed, the cells
were rinsed twice with ice-cold PBS, scraped off the bottoms of the
dishes, and frozen at
80 °C.
Cell Sample Preparation--
The cell samples were processed for
the assessment of protein expression and phosphorylation activity of
PKC
. The myocytes were resuspended and homogenized by glass-glass
homogenization in sample buffer containing 20 mM Tris·HCl
(pH 7.5), 10 mM EGTA, 2 mM EDTA, 50 µg/ml
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and a mixture of protease inhibitors (10 µg/ml aprotinin, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, and 10 µg/ml pepstatin A).
The total cellular proteins in the homogenates were subjected to
centrifugation at 45,000 × g for 40 min; the
supernatants were removed (cytosolic fractions), and the pellets were
resuspended in the above sample buffer (particulate fractions). The
protein concentrations in the cytosolic and particulate fractions of
the samples were determined using the method of Bradford.
Western Immunoblotting Analysis--
The subcellular
distribution and translocation of PKC
were assessed by standard
Western immunoblotting techniques as previously described (15).
Briefly, 100 µg of proteins from the cytosolic and the particulate
fraction of each cell sample were subjected to SDS-PAGE on a 10%
denaturing gel and were electroblotted onto nitrocellulose membrane.
Gel transfer efficiency and equal loading of protein were monitored by
Ponceau staining of the nitrocellulose membranes. Background blocking
was performed by incubating the membranes with 5% nonfat milk in
Tris-buffered saline. Monoclonal antibodies against PKC isoform
were used to assess its subcellular distribution and translocation.
Monoclonal anti-nitrotyrosine antibodies were used to detect protein
tyrosine nitration. Monoclonal anti-TCP-1
antibodies were used to
determine RACK2 protein expression. The protein signal was visualized
using standard ECL methods.
Immunoprecipitations--
To carry out immunoprecipitations, 5 µg of anti-PKC
antibodies were incubated with 50 µl of protein
A/G-agarose beads for 40 min at 4 °C as described previously (36).
The anti-PKC
antibodies were substituted with IgG in controls. The
protein A/G-agarose-anti-PKC
complex was washed three times with
phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.1% Triton X-100 and incubated
with 1000 µg of proteins from the particulate fractions of the cell
samples overnight at 4 °C, after which the beads were washed three
times with PBS containing 0.1% Triton X-100. The immunoprecipitates
were subsequently subjected to Western immunoblotting using either
anti-nitrotyrosine antibodies (to detect tyrosine nitration of PKC
protein), anti-RACK2 antibodies (to assess its co-immunoprecipitation
with PKC
), or anti-PKC
antibodies.
Measurement of PKC
Isoform-selective Phosphorylation
Activity--
The phosphorylation activity of PKC
was determined
using a previously employed method (15, 21). Briefly, 50 µg of
proteins from the particulate fraction were immunoprecipitated
overnight with PKC
monoclonal antibodies. Subsequently, the
immunoprecipitates were subjected to a phosphorylation assay using a
PKC
-selective peptide substrate (ERMRPRKRQGSVRRRV).
ELISA for the Assessment of PKC
-RACK
Interactions--
Recombinant PKC
and RACK2 proteins were generated
as described previously (36, 37), and the interactions of PKC
and RACK2 were determined. For the PKC
-RACK2 in vitro binding
assay, 96-well flat-bottomed ELISA plates were coated with either 10, 100, 500, 5, 10, or 50 ng of recombinant purified RACK2 dissolved in
PBS (50 µl/well) and incubated overnight at 4 °C. The wells were
washed three times with PBS and blocked with 200 µl of 4% bovine
serum albumin (w/v) blocking buffer for 2 h at 37 °C to minimize any nonspecific binding. After washing the ELISA plates three
times with PBS, 40 ng of recombinant purified PKC
was added to each
well and incubated for 2 h at 37 °C (final volume, 50 µl per
well). PKC
protein had either been left untreated (control), pretreated with 2 µM concentration of the
ONOO
donor SIN-1 in 15 mM HEPES buffer (pH
7.4) for 30 min (SIN-1-treated), or pretreated with 60 µg/ml
phosphatidylserine and 100 nM phorbol myristate acetate (PS
plus PMA-treated) for 30 min at room temperature. After allowing
binding of PKC
to RACK2, the wells were washed three times with PBS,
and 50 µl of anti-PKC
primary antibody (1:400 in bovine serum
albumin blocking buffer) were added to each well and incubated for
1 h at 37 °C. PBS containing 0.05% Tween 20 (PBST) was used to
wash the plates three times to remove any weakly, nonspecifically bound
proteins, after which 50 µl of horseradish peroxidase-conjugated
anti-mouse antibodies (1:3500) were added to each well. The plates were
again incubated for 1 h at 37 °C and then washed 3 times with
PBST. The bound antibodies were detected by incubating the reaction
wells with TMB detection reagent for 30 min at room temperature
and, for a greater sensitivity, subsequent acidifying using 50 µl of
2 M H2SO4. The optical density was
measured on an ELISA plate reader at a single wavelength of 450 nm.
In Vivo Rabbit Model of NO-induced Cardioprotection--
To
explore the functional significance of PKC
nitration, we used a well
established conscious rabbit model of NO-induced cardioprotection as
described previously (15, 38, 39). Briefly, male New Zealand White
rabbits (Myrtle's Rabbitry Inc., Thompson Station, TN; 2.0-2.5 kg,
age 3-4 months) were given the NO donor diethylenetriamine/NO
(DETA/NO, 0.1 mg/kg intravenously every 25 min for 75 min; total dose
of 0.4 mg/kg). This dose of DETA/NO has been shown to trigger rapid
activation of PKC
and to induce protection against myocardial
infarction and stunning 24 h later (15, 38, 39). Cardiac tissue
samples were taken at 30 min after the last dose of DETA/NO, a time
point when marked PKC
activation by DETA/NO was previously
demonstrated (15, 21).
Statistical Analysis--
All data are reported as means ± S.E. Differences between groups were analyzed using Student's
t test for unpaired data. A p value of <0.05 was
considered significant.
 |
RESULTS |
Effect of the NO Donor SNAP on the Subcellular Distribution of
PKC
--
We have previously reported that NO released by NO donors
induces preconditioning in rabbit hearts by activating PKC
in an isozyme-specific manner (15, 21). To assess the effects of NO donors on
PKC
in isolated adult rabbit cardiac myocytes, we treated the cells
with SNAP, an NO donor that has been shown to afford cardioprotection
in rabbits (15, 38, 39). Cardiac myocytes were incubated with one of
the three increasing concentrations of SNAP (2, 20, and 100 µM) for 40 min, and the changes in the PKC
expression
in the particulate fraction were subsequently determined. SNAP
treatment induced a significant, concentration-dependent, translocation of PKC
from the cytosolic to the particulate fraction of the cells (Fig. 1). This effect of
SNAP was similar to that induced by PMA (data not shown). Pretreatment
of the cells with the NO scavenger oxyhemoglobin at a concentration of
50 µM prevented the SNAP-induced translocation of PKC
,
demonstrating that this effect of SNAP was due to NO release.
Similarly, pretreatment of the cells with the peroxynitrite scavenger
Ebselen at a concentration of 2 µM for 10 min prior to
SNAP application attenuated the translocation of
protein,
implicating a role of a secondary peroxynitrite formation in mediating
the effects of SNAP on PKC
.

View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Changes in the subcellular distribution of
PKC in isolated adult rabbit myocytes,
detected by Western immunoblotting. A, cells treated
with the NO donor SNAP for 40 min exhibited a
dose-dependent translocation of PKC protein from the
cytosolic (lanes 2-4) to the particulate fraction
(lanes 8-10) when compared with the vehicle-treated
controls (lanes 1 and 7). This translocation was
abrogated when the cells were pretreated with the NO scavenger OxyHb
(lanes 5 and 11) or the ONOO
scavenger Ebselen (lanes 6 and 12) prior to the
application of SNAP. B, histogram representing the changes
in the subcellular distribution of PKC as percent of total PKC
protein expression.
|
|
Effects of SNAP on PKC
Isoform-selective Phosphorylation
Activity--
We next examined whether SNAP treatment of
cardiomyocytes led to changes in the kinase activity of particulate
PKC
parallel to the changes in its subcellular distribution. The
ability of PKC
to phosphorylate its specific peptide substrate was
measured in the particulate fractions of samples treated with different concentrations of SNAP. The results were compared with PKC
activity in Me2SO-treated control samples and samples that were
pretreated with oxyhemoglobin or Ebselen. We found that SNAP induced a
dose-dependent increase in the phosphorylation activity of
PKC
in the particulate fraction (Fig.
2). Pretreating cardiac myocytes with
either oxyhemoglobin or Ebselen before treating them with 20 µM SNAP attenuated the SNAP-induced activation of PKC
,
suggesting that this effect was dependent on the release of NO and on
the secondary formation of ONOO
.

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
PKC phosphorylation
activity in the particulate fraction. SNAP treatment of cardiac
myocytes caused a significant increase in the isoform-selective
phosphorylation activity of the particulate PKC in a
dose-dependent fashion when compared with vehicle-treated
controls. Scavenging of either NO or ONOO with
oxyhemoglobin or Ebselen, respectively, prevented the increase in
PKC activity.
|
|
SNAP-induced Tyrosine Nitration of PKC
in Cardiac
Myocytes--
We then proceeded to test whether NO produced during
SNAP treatment of myocytes induced a posttranslational modification of PKC
on tyrosine residues. We postulated that the activation of PKC
by SNAP, as manifested by both increased particulate PKC
expression and increased PKC
phosphorylation activity, might be
associated with the secondary production of ONOO
, which
has been shown to induce nitration of tyrosine residues on proteins
(23, 25). Therefore, formation of 3-nitrotyrosines on PKC
in
response to treatment with SNAP was evaluated by immunoprecipitating PKC
from the particulate fractions and then immunoblotting the precipitates with anti-nitrotyrosine monoclonal antibodies. A 20 µM concentration of SNAP, which significantly activated
PKC
(Fig. 2), induced a greater than 3.3-fold increase in the amount of tyrosine nitration on this PKC isoform compared with controls (Fig.
3). Scavenging of NO by oxyhemoglobin or
ONOO
by Ebselen markedly attenuated the effect of SNAP.
These data support the concept that SNAP-induced nitration of PKC
on
its tyrosine residues was mediated by release of NO and secondary formation of ONOO
.

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Nitration of PKC in
cardiac myocytes treated with SNAP in vitro.
A, upper panel shows Western blot analysis of
PKC immunoprecipitated from the particulate fractions of cells that
were treated with SNAP only (lane 3), pretreated with
oxyhemoglobin (lane 4), or pretreated with Ebselen
(lane 5) prior to incubation with SNAP. Anti-nitrotyrosine
monoclonal antibodies were used to detect the amount of
3-nitrotyrosines formed on PKC protein. Lower panel shows
the same blot but reprobed using anti-PKC antibody. B,
histogram of the respective changes in the amounts of nitrotyrosine
expressed as percent of vehicle-treated control.
|
|
SNAP-induced Tyrosine Nitration of PKC
in the Rabbit Model of
NO-induced Cardioprotection in Vivo--
To determine whether NO
induces tyrosine nitration of PKC
in vivo, we examined
tissue samples from hearts treated with DETA/NO and control hearts
treated with the vehicle. The dose of DETA/NO was previously documented
to induce activation of PKC
and protection against myocardial
infarction (15, 39). 1000 µg of proteins from the particulate
fractions were used to carry out immunoprecipitations utilizing
anti-PKC
antibodies. We observed a significant increase in the
amount of tyrosine nitration on PKC
in hearts treated with DETA/NO
when compared with the controls (Fig. 4).
These data demonstrate that tyrosine nitration of PKC
occurs
in vivo after administration of NO donors at doses that had
been shown previously to induce preconditioning by activating
PKC
.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Nitration of PKC in
the hearts of rabbits treated with DETA/NO in
vivo. A, upper panel shows
Western immunoblotting with anti-nitrotyrosine antibodies of PKC
immunoprecipitated from cardiac samples of rabbits that underwent NO
donor treatment. The amount of 3-nitrotyrosine formation on PKC
increased significantly 30 min after NO donor administration
(lanes 4 and 5) when compared with
vehicle-treated controls (lanes 2 and 3).
Lower panel shows the same blot but reprobed using
anti-PKC antibody. B, histogram of the change in the
amount of nitrotyrosines formed on PKC in vivo upon NO
donor treatment expressed as percent of control.
|
|
SNAP Enhances PKC
-RACK2 Interactions--
The goal of the next
set of experiments was to assess whether SNAP modulated the ability of
PKC
to interact with its selective anchoring protein,
'-COP
(RACK2). When cardiac myocytes were incubated with 20 µM
SNAP, the amount of RACK2 that co-immunoprecipitated with
PKC
-specific antibodies increased significantly (Fig.
5). This indicates that binding of PKC
to its selective RACK increased upon treatment with exogenous NO. To
investigate whether the increase in PKC
-RACK2 interactions occurred
via secondary ONOO
formation, we pretreated the cells
with 2 µM Ebselen prior to the application of SNAP.
Scavenging this strong nitrating agent prevented the increase in the
binding of PKC
to RACK2 (Fig. 5).

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Co-immunoprecipitation of RACK2 and
PKC . A, PKC -RACK2
interactions were assessed by immunoprecipitating PKC and subsequent
probing of the precipitates with anti-RACK2 antibody, as described
under "Experimental Procedures." Cardiac myocytes treated with SNAP
exhibited enhanced PKC -RACK2 protein-protein interactions in the
particulate fraction (lane 3) when compared with control
(lane 2). Pretreatment with the ONOO scavenger
Ebselen prevented this effect of SNAP (lane 4). No
significant changes in the amount of PKC in the immunoprecipitates
were detected. B, histogram depicting the amount of RACK2
bound to PKC as percent of control.
|
|
Lack of Effect of SNAP on RACK2--
When cardiomyocytes were
incubated with increasing concentrations of the NO donor SNAP, no
change was observed in the subcellular distribution of RACK2 when
compared with untreated controls. In control samples, 79 ± 3% of
total RACK2 was present in the particulate fraction. In cardiomyocytes
treated with 2, 20, and 100 µM SNAP, the amounts of RACK2
in the particulate fractions were 81 ± 1, 77 ± 4, and
80 ± 3% of total RACK2 expression, respectively. Furthermore, we
did not detect nitrotyrosine signals on RACK2 in NO donor-treated cells (data not shown).
Assessment of PKC
-RACK2 Interactions by ELISA--
To
investigate the physical interactions between PKC
and RACK2, we
generated recombinant PKC
protein using a baculovirus expression
system (37) and recombinant RACK2 protein using an expression vector (a
gift from Dr. Daria Mochly-Rosen). The interaction between PKC
and
RACK2 was characterized using an ELISA assay. 96-well ELISA plates were
precoated with increasing amounts of RACK2 protein (10, 100, 500, 5, 10, or 50 ng). PKC
recombinant protein was either untreated
(control), pretreated with 2 µM ONOO
donor
SIN-1 (SIN-1-treated) for 30 min, or preincubated with phosphatidylserine, at a concentration 60 µg/ml, and phorbol
myristate acetate, at 100 nM concentration ((PS plus
PMA)-treated) for 30 min. 40 ng of either untreated, SIN-1-, or (PS
plus PMA)-treated PKC
was added to each well (total volume, 50 µl). The plates were incubated for 2 h, allowing sufficient
binding between PKC
and RACK2 recombinant proteins.
As shown in Fig. 6, the amount of PKC
bound to RACK2 increased with RACK2 in a dose-dependent
fashion. Pretreating the recombinant PKC
proteins with the
ONOO
donor SIN-1 significantly enhanced PKC
interactions with RACK2, shifting the dose-response curve to the left
at the higher concentrations (
10 ng). SIN-1-treated PKC
also
exhibited increased maximal binding to RACK2 (Fig. 6). This latter
effect of the ONOO
donor was comparable with that of the
known activators of PKC, PS, and PMA (Fig. 6). These data demonstrate
that ONOO
activates PKC
directly, that is, in the
absence of other molecules that are present in the cellular
environment.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Effect of the ONOO donor SIN-1
on PKC affinity for RACK2, as assessed by
ELISA. The wells of ELISA plates were precoated with
increasing amounts of recombinant RACK2 protein (10-200 ng).
Pretreatment of recombinant purified PKC with SIN-1 promoted
PKC -RACK2 interactions in vitro in a manner similar to PS
(60 µg/ml) and PMA (100 nM) pretreatment when compared
with the untreated control PKC . The amount of PKC bound to RACK2
is expressed as optical density.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Although NO-induced activation of PKC
has been well documented,
the cellular and molecular mechanisms mediating this event remain
virtually unknown. We hereby present evidence to demonstrate that NO
may activate PKC
via post-translational modification (nitration of
tyrosine residues) of this isozyme, a phenomenon observed both in
isolated cardiac cells in vitro and in a model of NO-induced
cardiac protection in vivo. We also show that nitration of
PKC
enhances its interaction with the selective anchoring protein
RACK2, an event that is critical for PKC
translocation and
activation. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study
delineating a direct molecular modification of PKC by NO in the heart.
Given the ubiquitous role of NO and PKC in the regulation of cardiac
function, these findings may have significant implications for a
variety of NO- and PKC-mediated biological processes in the
cardiovascular system.
Cardiac Signaling Mechanisms Underlying NO-induced Activation of
PKC--
The effect of NO on the activity of PKC isozymes is
controversial. The specific effects of NO on its biological molecular targets appear to be dependent upon the species, model, cell types, and
the concentration of NO achieved (22). In the heart, NO donors given at
doses that produce a cardiac protective effect have been shown to
activate the
isozyme of PKC (15, 21). However, the mechanisms of
this event have not been characterized. Covalent posttranslational
modification, namely phosphorylation, of PKC along with binding of PKC
to the lipid second messenger diacylglycerol are recognized as the two
equally important mechanisms that regulate PKC activity (1, 40). The
recently discovered 3-phosphoinositide-dependent kinase
(PDK)-1 has been demonstrated to induce phosphorylation of the
activation loop in conventional, novel, and atypical PKCs (41-43).
Moreover, posttranslational modification of tyrosine residues by
phosphorylation has emerged as an important mechanism modulating PKC
activity (26-28).
Our study shows that NO released by the NO donor SNAP activates PKC
in cultured myocytes in a dose-dependent fashion. PKC
activation was manifested by both translocation of this isozyme from
the cytosolic to the particulate fraction and by its increased phosphorylation activity in the particulate fraction. These in vitro results complement previous in vivo findings in
which the NO donors SNAP and DETA/NO induced activation of PKC
in
conscious rabbits (15, 21) at doses that had been previously shown to mimic the protective effects of the late phase of ischemic
preconditioning (39). The activating effect of SNAP on PKC
was due
to NO production because scavenging of NO with oxyhemoglobin prevented
PKC
activation. In addition to the release of NO by SNAP, secondary
production of ONOO
was shown to be important because
Ebselen, an ONOO
scavenger, attenuated the activation of
protein by SNAP.
Nitration as a Mechanism for NO-dependent Modulation of
Protein Function--
Both exogenously and endogenously produced NO
have been shown to nitrate tyrosine residues on a number of proteins
(25). Such covalent posttranslational modification modulates protein functions. NO· is a relatively stable free radical molecule that
is characterized by high membrane diffusibility and ability to react
with biological molecules, which confers to NO an important role in
cell signaling. Various physiological and pathophysiological actions of
NO or NO-generated species depend on the NO concentration and local redox state and include reactions with heme-containing proteins, iron-sulfur clusters, lipids, DNA bases, oxygen, superoxide, water, and
nitrosation of thiols and amines (44). One of the characteristic and
more irreversible reactions of NO is nitration of DNA nucleotides, lipids, and aromatic amino acids. The aromatic amino acid tyrosine seems to be especially susceptible to nitration. Consequently, formation of 3-nitrotyrosines as a result of the covalent modification of tyrosines by either endogenous or exogenous NO and NO-derived species, ONOO
in particular, has received much attention.
Nitration of tyrosine residues is considered to be a stable (or even
irreversible) posttranslational modification of proteins as opposed to
another cellular mechanism of NO action, S-nitrosylation of
protein cysteine residues. Tyrosine nitration of proteins is also a
selective process with respect to both specific proteins and specific
tyrosine residues that can undergo such modification (24). Importantly,
tyrosine nitration has been demonstrated to be capable of altering
protein functions both in vivo and in vitro,
thus modulating protein functions. For example, nitration of manganese
superoxide dismutase leads to its enzymatic inactivation in human renal
allografts (45). ONOO
-dependent formation of
3-nitrotyrosines on surfactant protein A decreases the ability of this
protein to aggregate lipids (46). Likewise, the p85 regulatory subunit
of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3-kinase) in macrophages has been
found to be nitrated on tyrosine residues by both ONOO
and NO donors, and this nitration has been implicated in abrogating the
interaction of different subunits of PI3-kinase (47).
ONOO
has been reported to induce tyrosine nitration and
differential activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinases p38,
JNK1/2, and ERK1/2 (48) and Src tyrosine kinases (49, 50).
In this study, we present evidence that nitration of PKC
contributes
to the activating effect of NO on PKC
. Treatment of cardiac myocytes
with NO donors resulted in the detection of nitrotyrosine residues on
myocardial PKC
concomitant with its activation. The nitration effect
appeared to be selective, as the tyrosine-bearing protein RACK2 did not
exhibit any detectable nitrotyrosine signal. Both formation of
nitrotyrosines on PKC
and the activation of the enzyme could be
prevented by pretreating the cells with Ebselen, supporting the role of
ONOO
as a major nitrating agent. These data indicate that
generation of ONOO
secondary to SNAP treatment and
subsequent nitration of tyrosine residues on PKC
may play a pivotal
role in mediating the activation of this novel PKC isoform by exogenous
NO.
Activation and Translocation of PKC
via Its Interaction with
RACK--
Isozyme-specific subcellular localization of each individual
PKC isoform is important for the specific activity and, therefore, functions of each member of the PKC family of enzymes. A plausible theory has been put forth stating that isozyme-selective anchoring proteins, or receptor proteins, target activated PKC isoforms to their
specific subcellular locations in close proximity to their
corresponding substrates, thus allowing substrate phosphorylation to
occur (51). Specifically, RACK2 was identified as a selective anchoring
protein for activated PKC
(52). Disruption of RACK2 interactions
with PKC
inhibits norepinephrine- or PMA-induced negative
chronotropic effects (33) and abrogates PKC
-mediated protection
against ischemic injury in several species (6, 8, 9). These findings
stress the importance of PKC
-RACK2 protein-protein interactions for
mediating various cardiac functions that involve the
isoform of
PKC.
We found that SNAP treatment resulted in increased binding of the
activated PKC
to its selective anchoring protein RACK2 in the
particulate fraction of cardiomyocytes. The increase in PKC
-RACK2
interaction was mediated by generation of ONOO
because it
was attenuated by Ebselen. Because SNAP treatment did not result in
increased expression of RACK2 in the particulate fraction, the
enhancement of PKC
-RACK2 binding cannot be ascribed to increased
availability of the anchoring protein for PKC
. Importantly, SIN-1
promoted the interaction of isolated recombinant PKC
and SIN-1,
demonstrating that ONOO
can activate PKC
directly, in
the absence of other cellular components. Taken together, these results
support our hypothesis that exogenous NO induces nitration of PKC
via the production of ONOO
and that this event plays an
important role in mediating the increase in active PKC
-RACK2 binding.
Conclusions--
Regulation of kinase activity via
posttranslational modification has been recently recognized as an
important means for facilitating signal transduction in a variety of
biological systems. Consistent with this concept, our results show that
nitration of PKC
protein by NO donors modulates its interaction with
the receptor binding protein RACK2, thereby promoting particulate
translocation of PKC
and activating the PKC
signaling pathway.
The findings reported herein delineate a novel signaling mechanism by
which NO activates PKC isozymes and illustrate an example of how a
cascade of molecular reactions in signal transduction can be initiated
by chemical modifications of an individual element.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by NHLBI, National
Institutes of Health Grants HL-63901 and HL-65431 (to P. P.) and
HL-43151, HL-55757, and HL-68088 (to R. B.), American Heart
Association National Center Grant-in-aid 9750721N (to P. P.), by the
Commonwealth of Kentucky Research Challenge Trust Fund, and by the
Jewish Hospital Research Foundation, Louisville, Kentucky.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed: 570 South Preston
St., Baxter Building, Suite 122, Cardiology Research, Louisville, KY
40202. Tel.: 502-852-8431; Fax: 502-852-8421; E-mail:
ping@ntr.net.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, February 11, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M112451200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
PKC, protein kinase
C;
NO, nitric oxide;
SNAP, S-nitroso-N-acetyl-DL-penicillamine;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent
assay;
PS, phosphatidylserine;
PMA, phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate;
DETA, diethylenetriamine;
JNK, c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase;
ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Newton, A. C.
(1997)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
9,
161-167[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Ron, D.,
and Kazanietz, M. G.
(1999)
FASEB J.
13,
1658-1676[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 3.
|
Ytrehus, K.,
Liu, Y.,
and Downey, J. M.
(1994)
Am. J. Physiol.
266,
H1145-H1152[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Cohen, M. V.,
and Downey, J. M.
(1995)
Cardiol. Rev.
3,
137-149
|
| 5.
|
Ping, P.,
Song, C.,
Zhang, J.,
Guo, Y.,
Cao, X., Li, R., Wu, W.,
Vondriska, T. M.,
Pass, J. M.,
Tang, X. L.,
Pierce, W. M.,
and Bolli, R.
(2002)
J. Clin. Invest.
109,
499-507[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Gray, M. O.,
Karliner, J. S.,
and Mochly-Rosen, D.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
30945-30951[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Ping, P.,
Zhang, J.,
Cao, X., Li, R. C.,
Kong, D.,
Tang, X. L.,
Qiu, Y.,
Manchikalapudi, S.,
Auchampach, J. A.,
Black, R. G.,
and Bolli, R.
(1999)
Am. J. Physiol.
276,
H1468-H1481[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Liu, G. S.,
Cohen, M. V.,
Mochley-Rosen, D.,
and Downey, J. M.
(1999)
J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol.
31,
1937-1948[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Dorn, G. W., II,
Souroujon, M. C.,
Liron, T.,
Chen, C. H.,
Gray, M. O.,
Zhou, H. Z.,
Csukai, M., Wu, G.,
Lorenz, J. N.,
and Mochly-Rosen, D.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
12798-12803[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Gopalakrishna, R.,
Chen, Z. H.,
and Gundimeda, U.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
27180-27185[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Shizukuda, Y.,
Tang, S.,
Yokota, R.,
and Ware, J. A.
(1999)
Circ. Res.
85,
247-256[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Yoshida, K.,
Mizukami, Y.,
and Kitakaze, M.
(1999)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1453,
230-238[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Tepperman, B. L.,
Chang, Q.,
and Soper, B. D.
(1999)
Br. J. Pharmacol.
128,
1268-1274[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Nishio, E.,
and Watanabe, Y.
(1997)
Eur. J. Pharmacol.
339,
245-251[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Ping, P.,
Takano, H.,
Zhang, J.,
Tang, X. L.,
Qui, Y., Li, R. C. X.,
Banergee, S.,
Dawn, B.,
Balafanova, Z.,
and Bolli, R.
(1999)
Circ. Res.
84,
587-604[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Liu, H.,
McPherson, B. C.,
Zhu, X., Da,
Costa, M. L.,
Jeevanandam, V.,
and Yao, Z.
(2001)
Am. J. Physiol.
281,
H191-H197
|
| 17.
|
Bolli, R.
(2001)
J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol.
33,
1897-1918[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Nandagopal, K.,
Dawson, T. M.,
and Dawson, V. L.
(2001)
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.
297,
474-478[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Cohen, M. V.,
Baines, C. P.,
and Downey, J. M.
(2000)
Annu. Rev. Physiol.
62,
79-109[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Xi, L.,
and Kukreja, R. C.
(2000)
Toxicology
155,
37-44[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Vondriska, T. M.,
Zhang, J.,
Song, C.,
Tang, X, L.,
Cao, X.,
Baines, C. P.,
Pass, J. M.,
Wang, S.,
Bolli, R.,
and Ping, P.
(2001)
Circ. Res.
88,
1306-1313[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Lane, P.,
and Gross, S. S.
(1999)
Semin. Nephrol.
19,
215-229[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Davis, K. L.,
Martin, E.,
Turko, I. V.,
and Murad, F.
(2001)
Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol.
41,
203-236[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Souza, J. M.,
Daikhin, E.,
Yudkoff, M.,
Raman, C. S.,
and Ischiropoulos, H.
(1999)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
371,
169-178[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Ischiropoulos, H.
(1998)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
356,
1-11[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Blass, M.,
Kronfeld, I.,
Kazimirsky, G.,
Blumberg, P. M.,
and Brodie, C.
(2002)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
22,
182-195[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Wooten, M. W.,
Vandenplas, M. L.,
Seibenhener, M. L.,
Geetha, T.,
and Diaz-Meco, M. T.
(2001)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
21,
8414-8427[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Konishi, H.,
Tanaka, M.,
Takemura, Y.,
Matsuzaki, H.,
Ono, Y.,
Kikkawa, U.,
and Nishizuka, Y.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
11233-11237[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Reiter, C. D.,
Teng, R. J.,
and Beckman, J. S.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
32460-32466[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Griendling, K. K.,
Sorescu, D.,
and Ushio-Fukai, M.
(2000)
Circ. Res.
86,
494-501[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Mochly-Rosen, D.
(1995)
Science
268,
247-251[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Mackay, K.,
and Mochly-Rosen, D.
(2001)
J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol.
33,
1301-1307[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Johnson, J. A.,
Gray, M. O.,
Chen, C.,
and Mochly-Rosen, D.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
24962-24966[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Haddad, J.,
Decker, M. L.,
Hsieh, L. C.,
Lesch, M.,
Samarel, A. M.,
and Decker, R. S.
(1988)
Am. J. Physiol.
255,
C19-C27[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Li, R. C. X.,
Ping, P.,
Zhang, J.,
Wead, W. B.,
Cao, X.,
Gao, J.,
Zheng, Y.,
Huang, S.,
Han, J.,
and Bolli, R.
(2000)
Am. J. Physiol.
279,
H1679-H1689
|
| 36.
|
Pass, J. M.,
Zheng, Y. T.,
Wead, W. B.,
Zhang, J., Li, R. C. X.,
Bolli, R.,
and Ping, P.
(2001)
Am. J. Physiol.
280,
H946-H955
|
| 37.
|
Ping, P.,
Zhang, J.,
Pierce, W. M., Jr.,
and Bolli, R.
(2001)
Circ. Res.
88,
59-62[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Shinmura, K.,
Tang, X. L.,
Takano, H.,
Hill, M.,
and Bolli, R.
(1999)
Am. J. Physiol.
277,
H2495-H2503[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Takano, H.,
Tang, X. L.,
Qiu, Y.,
Guo, Y.,
French, B. A.,
and Bolli, R.
(1998)
Circ. Res.
83,
73-84[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Dempsey, E. C.,
Newton, A. C.,
Mochly-Rosen, D.,
Fields, A. P.,
Reyland, M. E.,
Insel, P. A.,
and Messing, R. O.
(2000)
Am. J. Physiol.
279,
L429-L438
|
| 41.
|
Chou, M. M.,
Hou, W.,
Johnson, J.,
Graham, L. K.,
Lee, M. H.,
Chen, C. S.,
Newton, A. C.,
Schaffhausen, B. S.,
and Toker, A.
(1998)
Curr. Biol.
8,
1069-1077[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 42.
|
Dutil, E. M.,
Toker, A.,
and Newton, A. C.
(1998)
Curr. Biol.
8,
1366-1375[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 43.
|
Le Good, J. A.,
Ziegler, W. H.,
Parekh, D. B.,
Alessi, D. R.,
Cohen, P.,
and Parker, P. J.
(1998)
Science
281,
2042-2045[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 44.
|
Kelly, R. A.,
Balligand, J-L.,
and Smith, T. W.
(1996)
Circ. Res.
79,
363-380[Free Full Text]
|
| 45.
|
MacMillan-Crow, L. A.,
Crow, J. P.,
Kerby, J. D.,
Beckman, J. S.,
and Thompson, J. A.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
11853-11858[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 46.
|
Zhu, S.,
Basiounu, K. F.,
Crow, J. P.,
and Matalon, S.
(2000)
Am. J. Physiol.
278,
L1025-L1031
|
| 47.
|
Hellberg, C. B.,
Boggs, S. E.,
and Lapetina, E. G.
(1998)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
252,
313-317[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 48.
|
Schieke, S. M.,
Briviba, K.,
Klotz, L. O.,
and Sies, H.
(1999)
FEBS Lett.
448,
301-303[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 49.
|
Di Stasi, A. M.,
Mallozzi, C.,
Macchida, G.,
Petrucci, T. C.,
and Minetti, M.
(1999)
J. Neurochem.
73,
727-735[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 50.
|
MacMillan-Crow, L. A.,
Greendorfer, J. S.,
Vickers, S. M.,
and Thompson, J. A.
(2000)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
7,
350-356
|
| 51.
|
Mochly-Rosen, D.,
Khaner, H.,
and Lopez, J.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
3997-4000[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 52.
|
Csukai, M.,
Chen, C. H., De,
Matteis, M. A.,
and Mochly-Rosen, D.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
29200-29206[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike