JBC Oz Biosciences

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M112378200 on February 8, 2002

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 17, 15093-15098, April 26, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/17/15093    most recent
M112378200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Papinutto, E.
Right arrow Articles by Zanotti, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Papinutto, E.
Right arrow Articles by Zanotti, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Structure of Two Iron-binding Proteins from Bacillus anthracis*

Elena PapinuttoDagger §, William G. Dundon§, Nea PitulisDagger , Roberto BattistuttaDagger , Cesare Montecucco, and Giuseppe ZanottiDagger ||

From the Dagger  Dipartimento di Chimica Organica e Centro CNR Biopolimeri, Università di Padova, Via Marzolo 1, 35131 Padova, Italy and the  Centro CNR Biomembrane e Dipartmento di Scienze Biomediche, Università di Padova, Via G. Colombo 3, 35121 Padova, Italy

Received for publication, December 26, 2001, and in revised form, February 6, 2002

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Bacillus anthracis is currently under intense investigation due to its primary importance as a human pathogen. Particularly important is the development of novel anti-anthrax vaccines, devoid of the current side effects. A novel class of immunogenic bacterial proteins consists of dodecamers homologous to the DNA-binding protein of Escherichia coli (Dps). Two Dps homologous genes are present in the B. anthracis genome. The crystal structures of these two proteins (Dlp-1 and Dlp-2) have been determined and are presented here. They are sphere-like proteins with an internal cavity. We also show that they act as ferritins and are thus involved in iron uptake and regulation, a fundamental function during bacterial growth.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

A novel class of bacterial proteins with architecture and properties similar to ferritins has been recently described (1, 2). They consist of 12 identical subunits, each of them with a four-helix bundle folding similar to that of ferritins. These dodecamers form a shell with a large central cavity. Despite this structural similarity and the fact that some of these proteins are capable of incorporating iron in vitro, their function in vivo is still unclear. The family members expressed by Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis bind and protect DNA from oxidative damage (Dps, DNA protecting protein under starved conditions) (3-5), whereas the Listeria innocua protein (Flp) is a true dodecameric ferritin functioning in iron storage (6). For other members of the family, completely different functions have been hypothesized; Flp from Listeria monocytogenes is believed to be a cold shock protein (7), and FtpA from Hemophilus ducreyi is a structural protein of fine tangled pili (8).

One of the most interesting members of the Dps-like family, termed HP-NAP, has been discovered in Helicobacter pylori. It is a molecule that activates different human inflammatory cells (9, 10). HP-NAP is also a major antigen in the human immune response to this bacterium and, as such, it is a component of an anti-H. pylori vaccine currently under trial (11). In addition, the homologous proteins from Treponema pallidum and Borrelia burgdorferi are also highly immunogenic (12, 13).

Bacillus anthracis, the causative agent of the various forms of the anthrax disease, possesses two different genes encoding for proteins (Dlp-1 and Dlp-2) with amino acid sequences similar to those of the other members of this family (www.tigr.org). In consideration of the high immunogenicity of some of the proteins of the Dps family and of the side effects associated with the presently available anti-anthrax vaccine (14, 15), we have cloned, expressed, and purified Dlp-1 and Dlp-2. Here, we report on their crystal structure, and we show that they have properties compatible with ferritin activity.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Bioinformatics-- A TBLASTN search of the unfinished B. anthracis genome available from the Institute for Genome Research (TIGR) at www.tigr.org was performed using the complete amino acid sequence of HP-NAP (HP0243) (16). Theoretical molecular weights and isolectric point values of the proteins were calculated using the ProtParam tool available at www.expasy.ch.

Cloning of the dlp Gene from B. anthracis into the Expression Vector pSM214G-- Both dlp-1 and dlp-2 were amplified by PCR from B. anthracis 9131 template DNA using primers BA1 (5'-cccgagctcaggagattgatcataatg-3') and BA2 (5'-cgcaagcttttattgattcaagaacgc-3') for dlp-1 and BA3 (5'-cccgagctcagaggagtggattgtatg-3') and BA4 (5'-cgcaagcttttattttaagaacgcact-3') for dlp-2, respectively. The restriction sites for SacI and HindIII are underlined. Each PCR was carried out using standard methods, and the thermal cycling parameters were as follows: 1 cycle of 94 °C (5 min) followed by 30 cycles of 94 °C (1 min), 55 °C (1 min), 72 °C (2 min), and with a final elongation step at 72 °C (10 min). The amplified fragments (474 bp for dlp-1 and 477 bp for dlp-2) were cloned into pCR2.1® using the TA cloning kit (Invitrogen) resulting in plasmid pCR2.1-Dlp1 and pCR2.1-Dlp-2, respectively. The cloned fragments were then excised from both pCR2.1-Dlp1 and pCR2.1-Dlp2 by digestion with SacI and HindIII and ligated into the SacI and HindIII sites of the expression vector pSM214G resulting in plasmid pSM214G-Dlp1 and pSM214G-Dlp2. pSM214G contains an artificial constitutive promoter, a chloramphenicol resistance cassette, and two origins of replication that allow expression of cloned genes both in E. coli and B. subtilis (17). Both plasmids were sequenced to confirm the presence of the correct gene. The sequences have been deposited with GenBankTM under accession numbers AF374268 and AF374269 for dlp-1 and dlp-2, respectively.

Purification of Dlp-1 and Dlp-2-- E. coli strain XL1-blue (supE44 hsdR17 recA1 endA1 gyrA46 thi relA1 lac F'[proAB+ lacIq lacZDelta M15 Tn10 (Tetr)]) (Stratagene) containing the appropriate plasmid, i.e. either pSM214G-Dlp1 or pSM214G-Dlp2 was grown for 16 h in YT (15 g/liter yeast extract, 16 g/liter bactotryptone, 5 g/liter NaCl medium) with 20 µg/ml chloramphenicol. After three passages through a French press and removal of bacterial debris by centrifugation at 32,000 × g, ammonium sulfate was added to the supernatant (60% (w/v) for Dlp-1 and 65% (w/v) for Dlp-2). At these percentages of ammonium sulfate both proteins remained in solution. The resulting supernatant was dialyzed overnight in buffer A (Tris-HCl 30 mM, pH 7.8, NaCl, 0.1 M) and then loaded onto a Mono Q FPLC column (Amersham Biosciences) equilibrated with buffer A. The proteins were eluted by high performance liquid chromatography with a linear gradient of 0.1-1.0 M NaCl in buffer A. The fractions containing proteins were pooled and dialyzed overnight in phosphate-buffered saline. At this point Dlp-1 was considered pure by Coomassie Blue staining of SDS-PAGE gels and stored at -80 °C. Dlp-2 was further purified by gel filtration chromotography on a Superdex 200 HR 10/30 column (Amersham Biosciences) with phosphate-buffered saline and stored at -80 °C after checking for purity as described above.

Protein Crystallization-- Crystals were obtained at 20 °C with the vapor diffusion technique from a solution of 0.2 M ammonium acetate, 0.1 M citrate buffer, pH 5.6, 30% MPD1 (Dlp-1) and 20% MPD (Dlp-2). Because of the presence of MPD, crystals were frozen at 100 K before data collection without the need of any particular cryoprotectant solution. Both Dlp-1 and Dlp-2 crystals belong to space group R3, with a = b = 89.22 Å and c = 210.16 Å and with a = b = 87.68 Å and c = 214.65 Å, respectively. These data correspond to a tetramer in the asymmetric unit, with a VM of 2.46 and 2.38 Å3/Da and a solvent content of about 50 and 48% for Dlp-1 and Dlp-2, respectively.

Data Collection and Processing-- For Dlp-1, one data set at 2.5 Å resolution was measured at the ELETTRA synchrotron in Trieste, Italy. Eighty-six rotations of 1° each (wavelength 1.2 Å, crystal to detector distance of 140 mm, MAR-CCD detector) gave a full data set.

For Dlp-2, data were measured at the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility synchrotron source in Grenoble (France), at beamline ID14-3. An entire data set at 1.46-Å resolution was measured from one frozen crystal, using a wavelength of 0.9 Å and a MAR-CCD detector. One-hundred and twenty rotations of 0.8° with a crystal to detector distance of 110 mm and 30 oscillations of 3° with a crystal to detector distance of 350 mm were performed.

All data sets were processed with the MOSFLM software (18) and reduced with SCALA (19). Statistics are reported in Table I.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Data collection and refinement statistics
Numbers in parentheses refer to the last resolution shell. Rfree was calculated using 7 and 10% of the data for Dlp-1 and Dlp-2, respectively.

Structure Determination and Refinement-- The structure of Dlp-2 and Dlp-1 were solved with the AMoRe software (20) using the HP-NAP model as a template (Protein Data Bank code 1JI4).2 Model visualization and rebuilding was performed with QUANTA software (21). The 3-fold molecular axis is coincident with a crystallographic axis of the R3 space group, and the content of the asymmetric unit corresponds to one-third of the molecule, i.e. four monomers. A perfect hemihedral twinning was revealed by the analysis of the intensity distribution of Dlp-2 data, the twinning operator being (h,-h-k,-l). Consequently, refinement was performed using the twinning procedure of the CNS package (22). Initial refinement was carried out using one single monomer and imposing a strict noncrystallographic symmetry. The four monomers were refined independently only in the final stages of refinement, but imposing noncrystallographic symmetry restraints. One metal site per monomer was visible. The final model of Dlp-2, composed of 4656 protein atoms, four cations, and 324 solvent molecules, presents a crystallographic twinned R factor of 0.186 (Rfree = 0.205) and an R factor of 0.191 (Rfree = 0.208) after detwinning of the data (23). In Dlp-1, an electron density accounting for an MPD molecule was visible in the difference-Fourier map in proximity of a hydrophobic pocket, and it was introduced and refined. In the final model it is close to hydrophobic residues (Phe-20 of two different subunits and Ile-53) and makes two hydrogen bonds with OG1 of Thr-21 and O of Ser-17 of the same monomer.

The quality of the models was tested with the PROCHECK software (24). Both final models present an overall G-factor of 0.3 and a good stereochemistry. The presence of a "perfect" twinning for Dlp-2 did not hinder the refinement process, allowing a smooth convergence. The Dlp-1 model is less accurate than the Dlp-2 one not only because the crystals diffracted to a lower resolution (2.5 Å), but also due to the large diffuse scattering present in the spectrum.

Staining of Iron-binding Proteins-- The iron binding ability of Dlp-1 and Dlp-2 was determined by resolving the E. coli-expressed recombinant Dlp-1 and Dlp-2 on nondenaturing (native) polyacrylamide gels and staining according to Ref. 25. The bacteria were grown in LB medium overnight at 37 °C in the presence or absence of 1.0 mM FeCl2. Total protein extracts were than prepared by resuspending pelleted bacteria in phosphate-buffered saline, freeze/thawing (liquid N2/37 °C) three times, and then centrifuging for 10 min at 16,000 × g. The total protein content of the resulting supernatants was quantified using the Bradford assay and bovine serum albumin as standard. Polyacrylamide gels (8%) were prepared without the addition of SDS, and the samples (in 10% w/v sucrose) were electrophoresed at 15 mA until the bromphenol blue tracking dye (bromphenol blue in 10% w/v sucrose) reached a position 1-2 cm from the bottom of the gel. The gels were then stained with potassium ferricyanide solution (100 mM K3[Fe(CN)6] in 50 mM Tris-HCl, 100 mM NaCl, pH 7.5) for 10 min in the dark and destained with a 10% trichloroacetic acid/methanol solution until clearing of the background. An image of the stained gel was recorded using a digital scanner (Epson), and the gel was then subjected to Coomassie staining using standard techniques. Horse ferritin (Sigma) and bovine serum albumin were used as positive and negative controls, respectively.

Coordinates-- Coordinates have been deposited at the Protein Data Bank (accession codes 1JI5 and 1JIG for Dlp-1 and Dlp-2, respectively).

    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Using the amino acid sequence of HP-NAP (HP0243) (16), a search of the available genome sequence of B. anthracis (www.tigr.org) revealed the presence of two Dps-like genes designated dlp-1 and dlp-2 that encode for Dlp-1 (146 amino acids) and Dlp-2 (147 amino acids), respectively (Fig. 1). The pI and Mr, respectively, of each, predicted using the ProtParam program, are 4.76 and 16910 Da for Dlp-1 and 4.79 and 16649 Da for Dlp-2.


View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Primary sequence alignment of Dlp-1 and Dlp-2 with HP-NAP, Flp, and Dps. Identical residues are shown on a black background and conserved residues on a gray background. Residues involved in metal binding are indicated by an asterisk.

Oligonucleotides were designed based on the available nucleotide sequence data, and the dlp genes were amplified by PCR, cloned into the expression vector pSM214G, and transformed into E. coli XL1-blue. The proteins were purified to homogeneity using a two-step purification protocol for Dlp-1 and a three-step purification protocol for Dlp-2, as described under "Experimental Procedures."

Structure of the Dlp Monomer-- Dlp-1 and Dlp-2 are dodecamers of 12 identical subunits, folded in a four-helix bundle. Helices A and B are connected to helices C and D via a 25-residue-long segment. This fold is similar to that of Dps and Flp (1, 2). The major difference with respect to ferritins (26) is the lack of the C-terminal helix E and the presence of a short helix in the middle of the BC connecting segment. This short helix appears to play an important structural role, as it is involved in the hydrophobic subunit-subunit interaction, related by a 2-fold symmetry axis, and mediated by two Leu and two Met residues (Fig. 2A). Dlp-1 and Dlp-2 present a sequence identity of 58% between themselves and of 39 and 41%, respectively, with Flp (Fig. 1). The superposition of the equivalent Calpha 's of the monomers yields a root mean square (r.m.s.) deviation of 0.5 Å (Dlp-1 - Dlp-2), of 0.9 Å (Dlp-1 - Flp), and of 0.8 Å (Dlp-2 - Flp) (Fig. 2B). At variance, the sequence identity between Dlp-1 and Dlp-2 and Dps decreases to 18 and 21%, respectively, and the superposition of the models yields a r.m.s. deviation of 1.5 and 1.4 Å, respectively. These data support the possibility that Dlp-1, Dlp-2, and Flp are mini-ferritins, whereas Dps has diverged to fulfill a different biological function. In fact, Dps lacks the specific entry portal of the cation into the cavity (see below), and it protects bacterial DNA from oxidative damage (3).


View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   A, stereo view of two monomers of Dlp-2 related by a molecular 2-fold axis. Hydrophobic residues at the interface of the dimer (Leu-77 and Met-73) are drawn in ball and sticks. Red spheres represent metal ions. B, stereo view of the superposition of a Calpha chain trace of Dlp-1 (green), Dlp-2 (light blue), Dps (red), and Flp (violet). Dps is 22 amino acids longer than Dlp-2 at the N-terminal, while Flp extends 5 amino acids at the C-terminal. The most significant conformational difference is located in the region from 85 to 100.

Structure of the Dodecamer-- The arrangement of the 12 monomers generates a nearly spherical shell, with 32 symmetry (Fig. 3). In both cases, one of the 3-fold axes of the molecule is coincident with a crystallographic axis. The internal cavity, where iron is likely to be stored, is about 45 Å in diameter. It should be noted that in the two structures presented here no iron was observed in the internal cavity, which is probably filled with unordered solvent molecules. This absence does not necessarily reflect the in vivo situation, but may result from the heterologous expression and/or the biochemical operations to which the proteins were submitted during extraction, purification, and crystallization. In fact, the proteins expressed in B. subtilis do contain iron (not shown). These macromolecules possess four 3-fold axes, each of them passing through the shell in two different 3-fold environments, organized as pores. One of the two 3-fold pores corresponds to the postulated iron entry channel of Flp (2). This channel in Flp has a negatively charged environment, with positive charges lining the pore surface. In Dlp-1, the negatively charged environment is contributed by residues Asp-124 and Glu-120, pointing their carboxylates into the interior of the cavity, and by Glu-112 and Asp-118 located around the pore. At variance, in Dlp-2, Glu-114, Glu-118, and Asp-126 form the negatively charged environment of the iron entry pore, and only one positively charged residue is present on the external surface of the pore (Lys-109 in Dlp-1, Lys-110 in Dlp-2).


View larger version (99K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Ribbon view of Dlp-2 dodecameric assembly, as seen down a 3-fold axis. Monomers are in different colors; red spheres indicate the cations bound to each monomer.

The second of the 3-fold pores is the smaller of the two, in both Dlp-1 and Dlp-2. Moreover, it is closed by the side chains of Thr-37 and Gln-34 in Dlp-1 and of Thr-39 and His-36 in Dlp-2.

The quaternary structures of Dlp-1 and Dlp-2 are very stable and as much as 6 molar guanidinium chloride is necessary to denature them (not shown). Such stability is mainly due to the large number of intersubunit interactions. Each monomer of both proteins in engaged in 19-20 hydrogen bond interactions with the surrounding subunits. In addition, metal coordination contributes to the oligomer stability, since each cation binding site is formed by two contiguous monomers.

Metal Binding Site-- The iron binding sites of Dlp-1 and Dlp-2 are illustrated in Fig. 4. The cation environment is quite similar in the two proteins and corresponds to a tetrahedral coordination. It is made up of two oxygen atoms (from an aspartate and a glutamate), one nitrogen of a histidine, and an oxygen atom of a water molecule, as identified by its thermal parameter and interatomic distance. The two acidic residues and the His belong to two different monomers. In Dlp-1, the solvent molecule filling the fourth coordination position is kept in place by Glu-43 and by a second solvent molecule, which is also hydrogen-bonded to His-39. In Dlp-2 the solvent molecule coordinated to the metal ion forms a hydrogen bond only with another water molecule, which is also hydrogen-bonded to His-41. At variance, the conserved Glu-45 residue of Dlp-2 is positioned further away, and as such it does not interact with the ligand site.


View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Stereo view of the putative Fe(II) coordination site of Dlp-1 (A) and Dlp-2 (B). The ion has a tetrahedral coordination; ligands and distances among atoms are: Fe-O(H2O) = 1.95 Å; Fe-O(H2O) = 2.06 Å; Fe-NE1(His-26) = 2.05 Å; Fe-NE2(His-29) = 2.10 Å; Fe-OD2(Asp-53) = 1.99 Å; Fe-OD2(Asp-56) = 2.00 Å; Fe-OE1(Glu-57) = 2.44 Å; Fe-OE1(Glu-60) = 1.97 Å.

Dlp-1 and Dlp-2 Act as Ferritins-- Dlp-1 and Dlp-2 do not activate human neutrophils and do not bind to bacterial DNA (not shown). To determine whether these proteins are capable of binding iron, both purified proteins and total protein extracts of E. coli strains expressing Dlp-1 and Dlp-2 grown in the presence and absence of 1.0 mM FeCl2 were stained for iron binding by the potassium ferricyanide method. Potassium ferricyanide reacts with protein-bound iron atoms to form royal blue complexes, and it is believed that the intensity of the staining is dependent in part on the number of iron atoms present per molecule of protein (25). No iron was detected in the purified proteins or in the bacterial extracts grown in the absence of iron. On the contrary, when iron was included in the culture medium, both Dpl-1 and Dpl-2 were stained (Fig. 5, A and B), clearly revealing that Dlp-1 and Dlp-2 bind iron. To study the role of this property in vivo, the ability of both proteins to confer resistance to iron overload when overexpressed in E. coli was investigated as previously done for HP-NAP and Pfr (27).


View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Iron binding of Dlp-1 and Dlp-2. A, native acrylamide gels (8%) were stained with potassium ferricyanide as described under "Experimental Procedures" and then subjected to Coomassie staining. B, lane 1, horse ferritin (10 µg); lane 2, Dlp-1 purified from E. coli (10 µg); lane 3, Dlp-2 purified from E. coli (10 µg); lane 4, total protein extract (75 µg) from E. coli expressing Dlp-1; lane 5, total protein extract (75 µg) from E. coli expressing Dlp-2; lane 6, total protein extract (75 µg) from E. coli expressing Dlp-1 grown overnight in the presence of 1.0 mM FeCl2; lane 7, total protein extract (75 µg) from E. coli expressing Dlp-2 grown overnight in the presence of 1.0 mM FeCl2; lane 8, bovine serum albumin (10 µg). C, iron resistance in E. coli XL1-blue. The growth of E. coli XL1-blue in the presence () or absence of iron (5.5 mM FeCl2) (black-diamond ), and of the recombinant strains expressing Dlp-1 (black-triangle) and Dlp-2 (black-square) in the presence of iron, was monitored in triplicate for 8 h. Error bars represent S.D. values.

The E. coli recombinants expressing Dlp-1 and Dlp-2 and the parental XL1-blue strain were grown in triplicate in LB medium supplemented with 5.5 mM FeCl2, a concentration previously determined to be toxic for E. coli XL1-blue (27). The growth of each strain was monitored over an 8-h period. As it can be seen from Fig. 5C, the recombinants expressing Dlp-1 and Dlp-2 grew under iron overload conditions, while the parental strain did not grow. Therefore both Dlp-1 and Dlp-2 are capable of binding and sequestering free iron, allowing for bacterial growth under iron overload conditions by reducing the amount of free iron in the growth medium. Altogether these data indicate that Dlp-1 and Dlp-2 act as ferritins in B. anthracis. Their value as antigens remains to be studied, but the present work provides the structural basis for mapping the surface epitopes of these proteins.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Dr. Michele Mock, Institut Pasteur, Paris for B. anthracis genomic DNA and the staff of beamline ID14-3 of European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (Grenoble, France) for technical assistance during data measurements of Dlp-2 and that of the ELETTRA synchrotron (Trieste, Italy) for Dlp-1.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by the Italian Ministero per l'Istruzione, Università e Ricerca Scientifica (MIUR), by the Italian National Research Council, Rome, and by the Armenise-Harvard Medical School Foundation.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EBI Data Bank with accession number(s) AF374268 and AF374269.

The atomic coordinates and the structure factors (code 1JI5 and 1JIG) have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank, Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ (http://www.rcsb.org/).

§ These two authors contributed equally to this work.

|| To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. Organic Chemistry, University of Padova, Via Marzolo 1, 35131 Padova, Italy. Tel.: 39-49-8275245; Fax: 39-49-8275239; E-mail: giuseppe.zanotti@unipd.it.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, February 8, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M112378200

2 G. Zanotti, E. Papinutto, W. G. Dundon, R. Battistutta, M. Seveso, G. Del Giudice, R. Rappuoli, and C. Montecucco, manuscript in preparation.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: MPD, (±)-2-methyl-2,4-pentanediol; r.m.s., root mean square.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Grant, R. A., Filman, D. J., Finkel, S. E., Kolter, R., and Hogle, J. M. (1998) Nat. Struct. Biol. 5, 294-303[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Ilari, A., Stefanini, S., Chiancone, E., and Tsernoglou, D. (2000) Nat. Struct. Biol. 7, 38-43[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Almiron, M., Link, A. J., Furlong, D., and Kolter, R. (1992) Genes Dev. 6, 2646-2654[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Chen, L., and Helmann, J. D. (1995) Mol. Microbiol. 18, 295-300[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Antelmann, H., Engelmann, S., Schmid, R., Sorokin, A., Lapidus, A., and Hecker, M. (1997) J. Bacteriol. 179, 7251-7256[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Bozzi, M., Mignogna, G., Stefanini, S., Barra, D., Longhi, C., Valenti, P., and Chiancone, E. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 3259-3265[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Hébraud, M., and Guzzo, J. (2000) FEMS Microbiol. Letts. 190, 29-34[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Brentjens, R. J., Ketterer, M., Apicella, M. A., and Spinola, S. M. (1996) J. Bacteriol. 178, 808-816[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Evans, D. J., Evans, D. G., Takemura, T., Lampert, H. C., and Nakano, H. (1995) Gene (Amst.) 153, 123-127[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Satin, B., Del Guidice, G., Della Biance, V., Dusi, S., Laudanna, C., Tonello, F., Kelleher, D., Rappuoli, R., Montecucco, C., and Rossi, F. (2000) J. Exp. Med. 191, 1467-1476[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Del Giudice, G., Covacci, A., Telford, J. L., Montecucco, C., and Rappuoli, R. (2001) Annu. Rev. Immunol. 19, 523-563[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Noordhoek, G. T., Hermans, P. W., Paul, A. N., Schouls, L. M., van der Sluis, J. J., and van Embden, J. D. (1989) Microb. Pathog. 6, 29-42[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Luft, B. J., Jiang, W., Munoz, P., Dattwyler, R. J., and Gorevic, P. D. (1989) Infect. Immun. 57, 3637-3645[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Hayes, S. C., and World, M. J. (2000) J. R. Army Med. Corps. 146, 191-195[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Swanson-Biearman, B., and Krenzelok, E. P. (2001) J. Toxicol. Clin. Toxicol. 39, 81-84[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Tomb, J. F., White, O., Kerlavage, A. R., Clayton, R. A., Sutton, G. G., Fleischmann, R. D., Ketchum, K. A., Klenk, H. P., Gill, S., Dougherty, B. A., Nelson, K., Quackenbush, J., Zhou, L., Kirkness, E. F., Peterson, S., Loftus, B., Richardson, D., Dodson, R., Khalak, H. G., Glodek, A., McKenney, K., Fitzegerald, L. M., Lee, N., Adams, M. D., Venter, J. C., et al.. (1997) Nature 388, 539-547[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Bellini, A. V., Galli, G., Fascetti, E., Frascotti, G., Branduzzi, P., Lucchese, G., and Grandi, G. (1991) J. Biotechnol. 18, 177-192[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Leslie, A. G. W. (1991) in Crystallographic Computing V (Moras, D. , Podjarny, A. D. , and Thierry, J. P., eds) , pp. 27-38, Oxford University Press, Oxford
19. Collaborative Computational Project 4: The CCP4 Suite. (1994) Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr 50, 760-763[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Navaza, J. (1994) Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A 50, 157-163[CrossRef]
21. Molecular Simulation Inc., Quanta Release 2000, San Diego, CA
22. Brünger, A. T., Adams, P. D., Clore, G. M., Delano, W. L., Gros, P., Gross-Kunstleve, R. W., Jiang, J.-S., Kuszewski, J., Nilges, M., Pannu, N. S., Read, R. J., Rice, L. M., Simonson, T., and Warren, G. L. (1998) Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr 54, 905-921[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Redinbo, M. R., and Yeates, T. O. (1993) Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr 49, 375-380[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Laskowski, R. A., McArthur, M. W., Moss, D. S., and Thornton, J. (1993) J. Appl. Crystallogr. 26, 283-291[CrossRef]
25. Leong, L. M., Tan, B. H., and Ho, K. K. (1992) Anal. Biochem. 207, 317-320[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Harrison, P. M., and Arosio, P. (1996) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1275, 161-203[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Dundon, W. G., Polenghi, A., Del. Giudice, G., Rappuoli, R., and Montecucco, C. (2001) FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 199, 143-149[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
G. Bhattacharyya and A. Grove
The N-terminal Extensions of Deinococcus radiodurans Dps-1 Mediate DNA Major Groove Interactions as well as Assembly of the Dodecamer
J. Biol. Chem., April 20, 2007; 282(16): 11921 - 11930.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
P. Ceci, L. Mangiarotti, C. Rivetti, and E. Chiancone
The neutrophil-activating Dps protein of Helicobacter pylori, HP-NAP, adopts a mechanism different from Escherichia coli Dps to bind and condense DNA
Nucleic Acids Res., April 1, 2007; 35(7): 2247 - 2256.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Bacteriol.Home page
A. W. Maresso, T. J. Chapa, and O. Schneewind
Surface Protein IsdC and Sortase B Are Required for Heme-Iron Scavenging of Bacillus anthracis
J. Bacteriol., December 1, 2006; 188(23): 8145 - 8152.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Protein Sci.Home page
A. Hindupur, D. Liu, Y. Zhao, H. D. Bellamy, M. A. White, and R. O. Fox
The crystal structure of the E. coli stress protein YciF
Protein Sci., November 1, 2006; 15(11): 2605 - 2611.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
X. Liu, K. Kim, T. Leighton, and E. C. Theil
Paired Bacillus anthracis Dps (Mini-ferritin) Have Different Reactivities with Peroxide
J. Biol. Chem., September 22, 2006; 281(38): 27827 - 27835.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
M. Castruita, M. Saito, P. C. Schottel, L. A. Elmegreen, S. Myneni, E. I. Stiefel, and F. M. M. Morel
Overexpression and Characterization of an Iron Storage and DNA-Binding Dps Protein from Trichodesmium erythraeum
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., April 1, 2006; 72(4): 2918 - 2924.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
P. Ceci, A. Ilari, E. Falvo, L. Giangiacomo, and E. Chiancone
Reassessment of Protein Stability, DNA Binding, and Protection of Mycobacterium smegmatis Dps
J. Biol. Chem., October 14, 2005; 280(41): 34776 - 34785.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MicrobiologyHome page
K. N. Olsen, M. H. Larsen, C. G. M. Gahan, B. Kallipolitis, X. A. Wolf, R. Rea, C. Hill, and H. Ingmer
The Dps-like protein Fri of Listeria monocytogenes promotes stress tolerance and intracellular multiplication in macrophage-like cells
Microbiology, March 1, 2005; 151(3): 925 - 933.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
P. Ceci, S. Cellai, E. Falvo, C. Rivetti, G. L. Rossi, and E. Chiancone
DNA condensation and self-aggregation of Escherichia coli Dps are coupled phenomena related to the properties of the N-terminus
Nucleic Acids Res., November 8, 2004; 32(19): 5935 - 5944.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
K. Zeth, S. Offermann, L.-O. Essen, and D. Oesterhelt
Iron-oxo clusters biomineralizing on protein surfaces: Structural analysis of Halobacterium salinarum DpsA in its low- and high-iron states
PNAS, September 21, 2004; 101(38): 13780 - 13785.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
P. Ceci, A. Ilari, E. Falvo, and E. Chiancone
The Dps Protein of Agrobacterium tumefaciens Does Not Bind to DNA but Protects It toward Oxidative Cleavage: X-RAY CRYSTAL STRUCTURE, IRON BINDING, AND HYDROXYL-RADICAL SCAVENGING PROPERTIES
J. Biol. Chem., May 23, 2003; 278(22): 20319 - 20326.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. T. Pulliainen, S. Haataja, S. Kahkonen, and J. Finne
Molecular Basis of H2O2 Resistance Mediated by Streptococcal Dpr. DEMONSTRATION OF THE FUNCTIONAL INVOLVEMENT OF THE PUTATIVE FERROXIDASE CENTER BY SITE-DIRECTED MUTAGENESIS IN STREPTOCOCCUS SUIS
J. Biol. Chem., February 28, 2003; 278(10): 7996 - 8005.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Gupta and D. Chatterji
Bimodal Protection of DNA by Mycobacterium smegmatis DNA-binding Protein from Stationary Phase Cells
J. Biol. Chem., February 7, 2003; 278(7): 5235 - 5241.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Bacteriol.Home page
T. Ishikawa, Y. Mizunoe, S.-i. Kawabata, A. Takade, M. Harada, S. N. Wai, and S.-i. Yoshida
The Iron-Binding Protein Dps Confers Hydrogen Peroxide Stress Resistance to Campylobacter jejuni
J. Bacteriol., February 1, 2003; 185(3): 1010 - 1017.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/17/15093    most recent
M112378200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Papinutto, E.
Right arrow Articles by Zanotti, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Papinutto, E.
Right arrow Articles by Zanotti, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.