![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 18, 15354-15362, May 3, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
§,
,
**,
,
,

,
¶¶,

From the
Medical Research Council
Immunochemistry Unit,
Department of Biochemistry, University of
Oxford, South Parks Rd., Oxford OX1 3QU, United Kingdom, the
¶ Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford,
Oxford OX3 9DS, United Kingdom, and the
§§ Department of Medical Biochemistry and
Microbiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala S-751 23, Sweden
Received for publication, November 9, 2001, and in revised form, January 24, 2002
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Tumor necrosis factor-stimulated gene-6
(TSG-6) encodes a 35-kDa protein, which is comprised of
contiguous Link and CUB modules. TSG-6 protein has been detected in the
articular joints of osteoarthritis (OA) patients, with little or no
constitutive expression in normal adult tissues. It interacts with
components of cartilage matrix (e.g. hyaluronan and
aggrecan) and thus may be involved in extracellular remodeling during
joint disease. In addition, TSG-6 has been found to have
anti-inflammatory properties in models of acute and chronic inflammation. Here we have mapped the human TSG-6 gene to
2q23.3, a region of chromosome 2 linked with OA. A single nucleotide
polymorphism was identified that involves a non-synonymous G Tumor necrosis factor-stimulated gene-6
(TSG-6)1 encodes
an ~35-kDa secreted protein (1) that is likely to have roles in extracellular matrix remodeling and leukocyte migration (2, 3). The
production of TSG-6 is tightly controlled, with little or no
constitutive expression in adult tissues, and is induced during inflammatory disease (e.g. arthritis; see
below) as well as in normal "inflammation-like" processes
(e.g. cumulus-oocyte complex expansion prior to
ovulation (4, 5) and cervical ripening (6)).
TSG-6 protein has been found in the synovial fluids of patients with
different forms of arthritis, including osteoarthritis (OA) and
rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but is not detectable in individuals without
known joint disease (7); the highest levels of protein have been seen
in RA, but similar levels were detected in some patients with OA (7,
8). TSG-6 has been immunolocalized to both cartilage and synovium in OA
and RA but was not detected in normal samples, making it likely that
the source of this protein is the joint tissues themselves (3). For
example, in OA cartilage, the majority of chondrocytes expressed TSG-6,
usually with extensive staining in the surrounding matrix. In addition,
TSG-6 has been detected in cartilage of the STR/ort mouse that develops
a natural form of OA (9). Interestingly, TSG-6 protein was detectable in the chondrocyte pericellular matrix before OA lesions developed, with an up-regulation of TSG-6 mRNA as the disease progressed.
In vitro studies have shown that TSG-6 is secreted from a
variety of cell types found in articular joints (including
chondrocytes, synoviocytes, and vascular smooth muscle cells) in
response to inflammatory mediators and growth factors (reviewed in
Refs. 2, 3). For example, TSG-6 expression (mRNA and protein) is
induced in human chondrocytes, from macroscopically normal cartilage, by interleukin-1 The mature human TSG-6 protein is 260 residues in length and is
comprised of an N-terminal sequence of 19 amino acids followed by
contiguous Link and CUB modules (residues 37-128 and 129-250, respectively, in the preprotein (1)) and a 27-amino acid C-terminal sequence. The Link module of human TSG-6, for which a tertiary structure has been determined (12), has been shown to interact with
components of cartilage extracellular matrix, i.e.
hyaluronan (HA), chondroitin-4-sulfate, and aggrecan (13, 14); the
position of the HA-binding site on the Link module has been localized
recently by NMR spectroscopy (15) and site-directed mutagenesis (16). At present, the ligand binding specificity of the TSG-6 CUB module is
unknown; in other proteins the CUB module (defined as
Complement subcomponents C1r/C1s, Uegf,
Bmp1 (17)) has been implicated in protein·protein (18)
and protein·carbohydrate interactions (19).
Full-length human TSG-6 (expressed in insect cells) has been shown to
be a potent inhibitor of neutrophil migration in a mouse air-pouch
model of acute inflammation (20). Recombinant TSG-6 was also found to
ameliorate collagen-induced arthritis in mice, where there was a large
reduction in pannus formation and cartilage erosion (21), and to have a
chondroprotective effect in a proteoglycan-induced model of arthritis
(22). In vitro, TSG-6 can form a stable (probably covalent)
~120-kDa complex with inter- The TSG-6 gene has been mapped to human chromosome 2 but was
not assigned to the p or q arms (24). Previously, as part of a
genome-wide screen for OA susceptibility loci (25, 26), we obtained
evidence for a linkage across a broad region of chromosome 2q ranging
from 2q14.1 through to 2q31, with a maximum multipoint LOD score
of 1.22, which increased to 2.19 in families that were concordant for
hip-only disease. Therefore, it was thought possible that
TSG-6 could represent a susceptibility gene for OA,
especially given its up-regulation in OA and its biological activities
in vivo (described above).
Here we have mapped the TSG-6 gene to 2q23.3 by radiation
hybrid mapping and subsequently typed a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), involving a non-synonymous G Radiation Hybrid Mapping of TSG-6--
The Stanford TNG
Human/Hamster RH panel (Research Genetic Inc.) was used to map the
TSG-6 gene with two amplimers; one amplifying a 214-bp
fragment of the TSG-6 5'-flanking region (nucleotides Cloning and Sequencing of Human TSG-6--
First-strand
cDNA was reverse-transcribed from human primary osteoblast total
RNA (kindly provided by Dr. Bev Fermor) and used to amplify full-length
TSG-6 (nucleotides 1-831 in Ref. 1) for 30 cycles of 94 °C,
57 °C, and 72 °C (1 min each) with Tli polymerase
(Promega). The forward and reverse primers used,
5'-TATGGTACCATGATCATCTTAATTTACTTATTTCTC-3' and
5'-ATATCTAGATTATTATAAGTGGCTAAATCTTCCAGC-3', introduced
KpnI and XbaI restriction sites (underlined),
respectively, allowing the product to be cloned into
KpnI/XbaI-cut pAcCL29-1 vector (27). Two
internal sequence primers were used (5'-GCCTATTGCTACAACCC-3' and
5'-GCCAGTAGCAGATTTGG-3'), in addition to the PCR primers, to generate
contiguous sequence data on both strands of the insert from three
separate clones; sequencing was performed on an Applied Biosystems 377 DNA analyzer.
Amplification-Refractory Mutation System--
ARMS
analysis, a PCR-based method for detecting single base changes (see
Ref. 28), was carried out on genomic DNA from 38 HLA homozygous
Epstein-Barr virus-transformed B lymphoblastoid cell lines (10th
International Histocompatibility Workshop). Each DNA sample was
analyzed in two (allele-specific) reactions, both of which contained
control primers A and B (29), which amplify a 360-bp region of the
human Sequencing of PCR Products--
A 229-bp PCR product was
amplified from three genomic DNA samples (identified as either
heterozygous GA, homozygous AA, or homozygous GG from ARMS analysis)
using primers (forward: 5'-CAAAGGAGTGTGGTGGCGTCTTTAC-3'; reverse:
5'-CTTCCCACAAAGCCATGGACATCAT-3') that flank nucleotide position 431 of
TSG-6. The products were purified on agarose gels and sequenced using
the reverse primer.
The 5'-flanking region (nucleotides Homology Modeling--
The CUB module from human TSG-6 (amino
acids 129-250 in Ref. 1 with an Arg at position 144) was modeled using
the program Modeler4 (30) on the basis of the co-ordinates of three
spermadhesins (boar PSP-I and PSP-II (31) and bovine aSFP (32)) and a
multiple sequence alignment generated with Multalign (AMPS package
(33)), to which minor adjustments were made by eye. One hundred
independent models were generated, and Procheck (34) and WhatCheck (35) were used to analyze the six models with the lowest molecular probability density functions. The model with the best overall stereochemistry and energies was chosen for refinement. XPLOR version
3.8 (36) was used to add hydrogen atoms and disulfide bonds and to
carry out energy minimization and molecular dynamic simulations with
the CHARMm22 force field (37) as described previously (16).
Association Analysis of a TSG-6 Single Nucleotide Polymorphism
(SNP) with Severe OA--
Association analysis was performed on a
proband/spouse case-control cohort; all cases (probands) were
ascertained through the Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre in Oxford. Cases
had undergone total joint replacement of the hip and/or the knee for
primary OA. Patients who underwent total joint replacement secondary to other factors, such as fracture or RA, were excluded. The primary status was supported by clinical, radiological, operative, and histological findings and has been described in detail elsewhere (25).
Four hundred cases were studied (Tables I
and II). Controls (spouses) had not
undergone any joint-replacement surgery or required clinical treatment
for OA. During ascertainment, if a spouse had any evidence of
symptomatic OA, then that spouse and their affected partner (the case)
were excluded from the study. In this way, we identified a case group
of severely affected individuals and an age-matched control group in
which clinical OA had a very low frequency. All cases and controls were
of Caucasian origin and informed consent was obtained from all
subjects.
The SNP (at nucleotide 431) does not affect a restriction site. Thus,
to create a restriction site we designed a PCR forward primer that
spanned nucleotides 396-430 of human TSG-6 (1) in which a change from
A to C was introduced at position 428. Therefore, the PCR product from
the G431 allele contains a BstUI site (CGCG)
whereas the product from the A431 allele does not, which
allows the SNP to be typed by BstUI restriction analysis;
there are no native BstUI sites in this region of the TSG-6 sequence. The sequence of the forward primer is
5'-ACGATAAAGGAGTGTGGTGGCGTCTTTACAGATCCAACGC-3'; the engineered change is indicated in boldface, whereas the
underlined portion represents a sequence that was added to balance the
number of AT to CG nucleotides. The reverse primer is the same as that used in the ARMS analysis. PCR amplification was performed as described
above for the radiation hybrid analysis except that a final
concentration of 2 mM MgCl2 and an annealing
temperature of 58 °C were used. The amplified product was digested
with BstUI (New England BioLabs), using the manufacturer's
recommended conditions, and analyzed by gel electrophoresis on a 3%
(w/v) agarose gel. A heterozygous individual was always included in
each set of samples to verify that the restriction enzyme was active.
Allele and genotype distributions between cases and controls were
compared by Expression of TSG-6 R and Q Allotypes in Schneider 2 Cells--
The full-length coding sequence of human TSG-6
(A431 allele encoding Gln at amino acid 144), including the
signal sequence and stop codon, was excised from the pAcCL29-1 vector
by digestion with KpnI/XbaI and cloned into the
corresponding sites in the Drosophila Expression System
(DES) vector pMT/V5-His B (Invitrogen). This plasmid (designated
pDES_TSG6_Q; verified as having the expected DNA sequence) was used to
generate a second DES vector, representing the G431 allele
(encoding Arg at residue 144), by mutagenesis using the Transformer
site-directed mutagenesis kit (CLONTECH) according to the manufacturer's instructions (see Refs. 16, 38). The mutation primer (5'-AGATCCAAAGCGAATTTTTAAATCTC-3'; mutated residue in boldface) and selection primer
(5'-AGAGGGCCCTAGGTTCGAAGG-3'), which changes a unique
SacII site in the polylinker of the DES vector to
AvrII (underlined), were both synthesized with 5'-phosphate groups. A DES plasmid containing the desired mutation and no other changes was identified by DNA sequencing and denoted pDES_TSG6_R.
Stable transfectants were generated for each of the two DES plasmids by
cotransfection of Schneider 2 cells (a cell line derived from
Drosophila melanogaster (39)) with a vector carrying the hygromycin B resistance gene (pCoHygro) and hygromycin B-resistant cells were selected as a stable polyclonal population following the
manufacturer's instructions. Heterologous protein expression was
induced by adding CuSO4 to a final concentration of 500 µM ~5 h after cells had been transferred into
serum-free medium. Culture supernatants (900 ml) were harvested after
66 h and clarified by centrifugation. To these 20 ml of 50% (v/v)
SP-Sepharose (Amersham Biosciences) in 300 mM sodium
acetate, pH 4.0, were added and incubated for 20 min, then washed twice
with the acetate buffer. The SP-Sepharose (in a sintered column) was
washed with 50 ml of acetate buffer, and the recombinant protein was
eluted with 5 × 10 ml of 20 mM MES·HCl, pH 6.5, 500 mM NaCl. Fractions 2 and 3 were combined and then loaded
onto a Phenomenex 250 × 10-mm Jupiter C5 column (300 Å, 5 µm)
equilibrated in 20% (v/v) solvent B (80% (v/v) acetonitrile, 0.09%
(v/v) trifluoroacetic acid) in solvent A (0.1% (v/v) trifluoroacetic
acid) at a flow rate of 3 ml/min. Initial conditions were maintained
for 10 min, and then the protein was eluted by linear gradients of
20-55, 55-80, 80-95% B (in A) over 10, 20, and 5 min, respectively.
The absorbance at 277 nm was monitored continuously, and TSG-6 was
collected manually. The TSG-6 allotypes were then lyophilized,
resuspended in water (at 1 mg/ml), and stored at Analysis of HA Binding--
The HA-binding activities of the
purified recombinant TSG-6 allotypes (human TSG-6R and TSG-6Q) were
compared using a colorimetric assay that measures the binding of
biotinylated-HA (12.5 ng/well) to protein-coated microtiter plates
(0.25-32 pmol/well) at pH 6.0, as described previously (16); the
interaction between TSG-6 and HA is maximal at pH 6.0 (14).2 All absorbance
measurements (405 nm) were corrected by subtracting values from
uncoated control wells.
Formation of TSG-6·I Radiation Hybrid Mapping of Human TSG-6--
The TSG-6
gene was mapped to the Stanford Human Genome Center marker SHGC-32178
with the 5' amplimer and to marker SHGS-5621 with the 3' PCR product.
This places the TSG-6 gene between the microsatellite loci
D2S2275 and D2S2236 and at 2q23.3. Mouse TSG-6 has been
mapped previously to the 28.4-31.6-centimorgan region of chromosome 2 (4), which is equivalent to 2q24.1-2q24.2 in humans (42). Therefore,
it can be seen that TSG-6 in the mouse and human are at
similar but not identical chromosomal locations. In humans, the
TSG-6 gene is within the 2q12-q35 region of
chromosome 2 that we, and others, have found evidence for harboring an
OA susceptibility locus (26, 43).
Identification of an SNP in Human TSG-6--
Sequencing of TSG-6
inserts, derived from human osteoblast mRNA and cloned into the
pAcCL29-1 vector, revealed a single nucleotide difference from the
published sequence (1); with an A at position 431 rather than a G,
leading to a Arg to Gln substitution at amino acid 144 in the sequence
of the preprotein. ARMS analysis was then performed on 38 genomic DNA
samples to investigate whether this sequence difference represented a
genuine SNP or a PCR artifact. As shown in Fig.
1A, the ARMS assay can
distinguish both G and A nucleotides at position 431. In this panel of
samples, 37 out of 38 gave a product with the A-specific primer (1 GG,
11 GA, and 26 AA); direct sequencing of PCR products amplified from
three samples (determined to be AA, GA, or GG) confirmed the accuracy of the ARMS typing (Fig. 1B). Therefore, it can be concluded
that the sequence identified here (A431) represents an
allelic variant of the TSG-6 gene; this sequence has been
deposited at the EMBL data base (accession code AJ419936). It should be
noted that data bank searching has revealed that the sequences AF086484
and XM_002762 also contain an A at this position, and these are
identical to the sequence determined here, in the regions where they
overlap (e.g. in XM_002762 this is the entire coding
sequence).
PCR products amplified from the 5'-flanking regions of GG and AA
homozygotes were found to have identical sequences (between Modeling of the TSG-6 CUB Module--
A model of the CUB module
from human TSG-6 was constructed to estimate the structural location of
residue 144 (Arg and Gln in the G and A alleles, respectively).
Modeling was performed on the basis of the co-ordinates from three
spermadhesins, each comprised of a single CUB module that has a
structure related to the jellyroll fold (31, 32), and the alignment in
Fig. 2. In the alignment there are a
number of insertions in the TSG-6 sequence (relative to the
spermadhesins), but none of these occur in regions corresponding to
secondary structural elements (31). The model that was chosen for
energy minimization (from the 100 generated) had only 2.9% of residues
in disallowed areas of the Ramachandran plot. In the final model the
total energy and van der Waals terms were
From Fig. 2 it can be seen that the guanidinium group of
Arg144 is predicted to be on the surface of the CUB module;
analysis with the program
Naccess4 indicates that
~18% of the Arg side chain in the model structure is
solvent-accessible. The Arg/Gln substitution at this position could
influence the biological activities of TSG-6, because Arg side chains
are longer than those of Gln and have a different charge state. In the
model, Arg144 is in close spatial proximity to the
N-terminal amino acid of the CUB module (i.e.
Asn129; C Genotyping of OA Cases and Controls using BstUI Restriction
Mapping--
Initial analysis of 14 DNA samples genotyped using the
ARMS assay (including AA, GA, and GG haplotypes) determined that
BstUI restriction mapping (where an engineered primer
generates a BstUI site in the PCR product from the G but not
the A allele; see Fig. 1C) produced identical results. The
BstUI method is more suitable than ARMS for typing a large
number of individuals, because only one set of primers and one gel lane
is required per sample. We typed 400 OA patients and 400 controls for
the TSG-6 SNP (Table III). The
results from the control group showed that A431 (identified
here) is the major TSG-6 allele found in the Caucasian population with over 75% of individuals typed being homozygotes. Only
1.8% of the controls were homozygous for the G431 sequence
(identified previously (1)) indicating that this allele is relatively
rare.
There was no significant difference (p Expression and Functional Analysis of the TSG-6R and TSG-6Q
Allotypes--
Preliminary experiments to express full-length TSG-6Q
using a baculovirus system, with the pAcCL29-1 vector and the insect cell line Sf21, indicated that the protein was produced at low levels (~0.5 mg/liter, data not shown). Therefore, the entire coding
sequence of TSG-6Q (i.e. including the signal sequence and
stop codon) was subcloned into pMT/V5-His B (a DES vector), which was
then used to generate a vector encoding the TSG-6R allotype by
site-directed mutagenesis. Transient transfection of Schneider 2 cells
indicated that both the TSG-6R and TSG-6Q proteins were secreted into
the culture supernatant following induction with CuSO4 (as
determined by Western blot analysis; data not shown). Stable
transfectants of these allotypes were then established, and the
recombinant proteins were expressed, as described under "Experimental
Procedures." The proteins were initially purified from the culture
supernatants using SP-Sepharose, in a similar way to that described by
Wisniewski and colleagues (46) for baculovirus-expressed TSG-6R;
SDS-PAGE analysis indicated that the majority of TSG-6R and TSG-6Q were
each eluted in fractions 2 and 3 (data not shown). These fractions were
then combined and run on reverse-phase high performance liquid
chromatography. This second purification step led to TSG-6 proteins of
high purity (Fig. 3), which were free of
salt. Amino acid sequencing of the two allotypes expressed here
revealed that they both had the same N terminus (i.e.
WGFKDGIFHN) as that reported previously for protein produced in the
baculovirus system (46). In addition, both the recombinant proteins
have an apparent molecular mass of ~33 kDa, which is very similar to
that reported for the native protein (7, 46); matrix-assisted
laser-desorption/ionization time of flight mass spectrometry on TSG-6Q
indicates a mass of ~30.1 kDa (data not shown), and this value was
used to determine protein concentrations in the functional assays. From
Fig. 3 it can be seen that TSG-6Q and TSG-6R have the same apparent
mass on SDS-PAGE, which indicates that there are no major differences
in the glycosylation of the two allotypes. This is not surprising
considering that neither of the two potential N-linked sites
in TSG-6 is located in the CUB module (one is in the Link module and
the other is in the C-terminal sequence). The recombinant TSG-6
allotypes described here are of high purity (estimated to be >98%
pure) and were both expressed at about the same level (~3 mg/liter;
determined on the basis of amino acid analysis).
To see if the TSG-6 allotypes have any significant functional
differences, their HA-binding functions and abilities to form stable
complexes with I
Previously, it has been demonstrated that TSG-6 forms a stable,
probably covalent, complex of ~120 kDa with the serine protease inhibitor I Here we have identified an SNP in the human TSG-6 gene
(involving a non-synonymous G to A transition at nucleotide 431 of the
published TSG-6 cDNA sequence (1)) that results in a coding change
of amino acid 144 (Arg to Gln), located within the CUB module.
Furthermore, we have shown that the sequence encoding Gln144 represents the major allele in Caucasians. We have
mapped TSG-6 to human 2q23.3 by radiation hybrid mapping,
consistent with the assignment of TSG-6 to human chromosome
2 using somatic cell hybrids (24). This is within a region of
chromosome 2q for which we have reported suggestive evidence for
linkage to OA, i.e. 2q14.1 through 2q31 (25, 47); other
studies have found linkage to 2q12-q21 (48) and 2q23-q35 (43). Thus,
TSG-6 could be considered a possible candidate for OA
susceptibility, especially given that the expression of TSG-6 protein
is up-regulated in cartilage of patients with OA (3). However,
genotyping of a panel of 400 unrelated cases and 400 controls showed no
evidence for an association between OA and the TSG-6 alleles
when the data was analyzed either unstratified, or stratified according
to sex, or the site of joint replacement (i.e. hip or knee).
Therefore, the TSG-6 SNP identified here is not a marker for
OA susceptibility in the patients that we have studied. This does not
exclude the possibility that other, as yet unknown, common variants
within the TSG-6 gene may account for at least some of the
OA susceptibility that appears to reside in this part of the human genome.
It remains to be investigated whether the TSG-6
A431 and G431 alleles are associated with other
disease processes. This would seem more likely, if the resulting TSG-6R
and TSG-6Q allotypes exhibit either functional differences or if they
are expressed at differential levels in response to particular stimuli.
In regard to the latter possibility, characterization of a segment of
the 5'-flanking regions (corresponding to nucleotides Three-dimensional homology modeling of the TSG-6 CUB module, described
in this study, predicts that the side chain of Arg144 is at
least partly solvent accessible. Although no function, or
ligand-binding activity, has yet been ascribed to the TSG-6 CUB module,
this result suggests that replacement of Arg144 with a
glutamine could lead to differences in functions described for the Link
module or the full-length protein. To test this possibility, we
expressed full-length TSG-6 proteins, corresponding to each of the
allotypes (i.e. TSG-6R and TSG-6Q) in a eukaryotic
expression system; the Drosophila system used directed
expression into the culture supernatant by utilizing the native signal
sequence of TSG-6. Both allotypes were expressed and secreted by the
Schneider 2 cells at equivalent levels, and they could be purified to
near homogeneity by a combination of ion exchange and reverse-phase high performance liquid chromatography. HA binding to TSG-6R and TSG-6Q
was compared as was their ability to form a stable ~120-kDa complex
with I It is not particularly surprising that a mutation within the CUB module
has no effect on HA binding to TSG-6 as the functionally important
amino acids, which we have identified previously (16), are clustered on
the opposite face of the Link module from where the CUB module is
attached. Moreover, the individually expressed Link module has been
found to be capable of supporting high affinity HA binding (15, 16).
However, it remains to be established whether full-length TSG-6 has the
same affinity for HA as the recombinant Link module.
The formation of complexes between TSG-6 and I I TSG-6 has also been found to potentiate the anti-plasmin activity of
I Here we have found that human TSG-6 protein with a Gln at position 144 is the major form in Caucasians (the corresponding A431
allele has a frequency of 87.0%). Interestingly, TSG-6 from mouse (4),
rabbit (50), cow,7 and pig
(accession codes: BI342110 and BI467634) all have an Arg at this
sequence position, as is found in the rare human allotype (with a G at
nucleotide 431). The prevalence of the TSG-6Q allotype identified in
this study may suggest that the A431 allele results in an,
as yet, uncharacterized functional change that confers a selective
advantage, in the Caucasian population at least. Further comparative
studies on the TSG-6R and TSG-6Q allotypes, and typing of different
ethnic groups, should clarify this possibility.
A
transition at nucleotide 431 of the TSG-6 coding sequence, resulting in
an Arg to Gln alteration in the CUB module (at residue 144 in the preprotein). Molecular modeling of the CUB domain indicated that this
amino acid change might lead to functional differences. Typing of 400 OA cases and 400 controls revealed that the A431 variant
identified here is the major TSG-6 allele in Caucasians (with over 75% being A431 homozygotes) but that this
polymorphism is not a marker for OA susceptibility in the patients we
have studied. Expression of the Arg144 and
Gln144 allotypes in Drosophila Schneider 2 cells, and functional characterization, showed that there were no
significant differences in the ability of these full-length proteins to
bind hyaluronan or form a stable complex with
inter-
-inhibitor.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
(IL-1
), tumor necrosis factor, and transforming growth factor-
1 (10). An mRNA fingerprinting technique
identified TSG-6 as one of the major species to be up-regulated
(~6-fold) in response to IL-1
in chondrocytes obtained from OA
patients undergoing joint surgery (11).
-inhibitor (I
I); TSG-6·I
I complexes of this size have been detected in vivo
(e.g. in RA synovial fluids (7) and in expanded
cumulus-oocyte complexes (5, 23)), where they are likely to be involved
in stabilizing extracellular matrices rich in HA. In addition, TSG-6 is
able to potentiate the anti-plasmin activity of I
I (20), although it
is not clear whether formation of the TSG-6·I
I complex is necessary for this activity. It has been hypothesized that the inhibition of neutrophil migration by TSG-6 is due to its effect on the
plasmin network (2, 20), but this remains to be established.
A transition (that results in
an Arg to Gln change in the CUB module), in a panel of 400 OA cases and
400 controls. The effect of this coding change on TSG-6 function was
investigated by the expression of the full-length allotypes in insect
cells and analysis of their relative abilities to bind HA and form a
stable complex with I
I.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1040 to
800
in (24), the forward and reverse primers were 5'-GGAGGGACTAAGAAAGCATG-3' and 5'-TATCCCAAACTTTCCTCTTCC-3',
respectively), and the other a 208-bp fragment of the 3'-untranslated
region (nucleotides 978-1185 in Ref. 1, the forward and reverse
primers were 5'-AGGAAACTTTAAACGAGAAAATG-3' and
5'-TTCATAAAGTTCAAGATTTAAAAA-3', respectively). PCR was performed with
TaqGold Polymerase (Applied Biosystems), 100 ng of genomic DNA, 3 mM MgCl2 (final concentration) and the
following cycle conditions: 94 °C for 15 min followed by 35 cycles
of 94 °C for 30 s, 62 °C for 1 min (5' amplimer)/55 °C
for 1 min (3' amplimer) and 72 °C for 30 s. The amplified
products were purified on 3% (w/v) agarose.
-1-antitrypsin gene, and a common TSG-6 reverse primer
(5'-TCTCCACAGTATCTTCCCACAAAGCCATGG-3'). In addition, one reaction
included the "g-primer"
(5'-GGAGTGTGGTGGCGTCTTTACAGATCCAAAGAG-3') and the other the
"a-primer" (5'-GGAGTGTGGTGGCGTCTTTACAGATCCAAAGAA-3'), which can each amplify a product of 236 bp, in combination with the
reverse primer, if the appropriate sequence
(G431 or A431,
respectively) is present. All reactions contained 1 µg of DNA, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 120 µM each dNTP, 1.25 mM reverse primer, 1.25 mM g-primer or
a-primer, 0.12 mM control primers, and 1 unit of
Taq Polymerase in a 50-µl reaction. Cycling conditions
were: 94 °C for 5 min, followed by 30 cycles of 1 min each at
94 °C, 61 °C and 72 °C, followed by 10 min at 72 °C.
Reaction mixtures were analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis.
1342 to +94 in Ref. 24) of
the TSG-6 gene was amplified from two genomic DNA samples (identified by ARMS analysis as being homozygous AA or homozygous GG,
respectively, at position 431) using 5'-CTCTTTTGCAACAAACTTAAATTCAC-3' and 5'-GTAAATTAAGATGATCATATCGTCAG-3' forward and reverse primers. These
products were sequenced using both amplification oligonucleotides and
four internal primers, two on each strand (sense:
5'-GGAAGCAATTTGAGACCAAAAGTAG-3' and 5'-AAAGCAGGCAGAGAATAAGGAAGTC-3';
antisense: 5'-TGTCTTCAAATATCCCAAACTTTCC-3' and
5'-TTTGCAGTGTCAATTATGGGATATG-3').
Details of cases and controls used in genotyping
Average age of cases and controls used in genotyping
2 using standard contingency table analysis.
For each stratification analysis, female cases were compared with
female controls and male cases with male controls.
20 °C; the
protein concentrations were determined by amino acid analysis as
described previously (16). The purified proteins were analyzed on 10%
(w/v) Tris-Tricine SDS-PAGE (40) following reduction and alkylation
with dithiothreitol and iodoacetamide, respectively.
I Complex--
Purified TSG-6R and
TSG-6Q (at 80 µg/ml final concentration, 2.7 µM) were
each incubated in 20 mM HEPES·HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2 (final
concentrations) with I
I (320 µg/ml final concentration, 1.3 µM), purified from human serum (41), at 37 °C in a
final volume of 50 µl; these conditions give maximum conversion of
free TSG-6 into complex using purified
I
I.3 At various time
points (ranging from 30 s to 1 h) 2.5 µl of the TSG-6·I
I reaction mixtures was removed, treated immediately with gel sample buffer, and then analyzed by Western blotting; TSG-6 and
I
I were incubated (for 60 min) individually under identical conditions as controls. Briefly, the samples were run under reducing conditions on 10% (w/v) Tris-Tricine SDS-PAGE and electroblotted onto
Hybond-P membranes (Amersham Biosciences). Washes were performed in
phosphate-buffered saline, containing 0.1% (v/v) Tween 20, after each
stage of the Western blotting procedure, all of which were carried out
at room temperature. The membranes were blocked overnight in
phosphate-buffered saline containing 10% (w/v) milk powder, 0.1%
(v/v) Tween 20, 0.02% (w/v) bovine serum albumin and washed
thoroughly. They were then incubated with a 1:20,000 dilution of a
rabbit anti-human antiserum (that recognizes the C-terminal 16 amino
acids of human TSG-6 (6)) and, following washing, with a 1:5000
dilution of a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit IgG
for 1 h each in 10% (v/v) blocking solution without bovine serum
albumin. After a final wash, antibody binding was visualized by the
enhanced chemiluminescence system, according to the instructions of the
supplier (Amersham Biosciences).
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (43K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Identification of SNP in TSG-6
gene. In A, ARMS PCR products from three genomic
DNA samples (I, II, and III) are
shown. Each sample was analyzed in two separate reactions (g
and a), one of which contained a primer that only amplifies
G431 (g-primer) whereas the other contained an
A341-specific oligonucleotide (a-primer). The band at 360 bp is derived from the
-1-antitrypsin (ATT) gene and is included in
each reaction as a PCR control. The 236-bp band is sequence-specific
and indicates the presence of the G431 and/or
A431 nucleotide in the TSG-6 sequence. In
B, sequencing data (from the antisense strand) are shown for
AA homozygous DNA (top panel), GA heterozygous DNA
(middle), and GG homozygous DNA (bottom). The
position of nucleotide 431 is indicated with an arrow. In
C, BstUI restriction mapping is shown for three
genomic DNA samples: PCR products that are refractory to digestion (245 bp) are derived from the A allele, whereas those that cut with this
enzyme (206 bp) indicate a G allele.
1316 to
+68; numbered as in Ref. 24), indicating that there are no promoter
polymorphisms in linkage disequilibrium with either of the 431 alleles;
these sequences have been deposited at EMBL with accession codes of
AJ413948 and AJ413949, respectively. There were some differences in the
sequences determined here from that published previously by Lee
et al. (24), with insertions of A, G, C, T, A, C, and
TG between nucleotides
1292 and
1291,
867 and
866,
681 and
680,
678 and
677,
631 and
630,
472 and
471, and
53 and
52, respectively. However, none of these insertions are in regions
that have been determined experimentally to be transcription
factor-binding sites (44, 45).
1033 and
6 kJ/mol,
respectively, indicating that the model was of good quality, with
acceptable packing and backbone conformation.

View larger version (72K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Modeling of the CUB module from human
TSG-6. In A, the TSG-6 CUB module (CUB_TSG6: residues
129-250 with an Arg at position 144) is aligned with bovine aSFP
(residues 1-111), boar PSP-I (residues 1-108), and PSP-II (residues
3-113). Regions of
-sheet (b) secondary structure
(SS) in the spermadhesins (31) are indicated below the
alignment. Black and gray boxes with amino acids
highlighted in white indicate sequence positions
with identities or conservative replacements, respectively, in the four
sequences. Gray boxes (with black text) denote
sequence identities between TSG-6 and one or more of the spermadhesins.
The position of residue 144 in TSG-6 is shown in white on a
black circle. In B, the CUB_TSG6 model is shown
in a Molscript (51) representation, where the right-hand
molecule is rotated 90° relative to that on the left.
The
strands, identified with DSSP (52), are numbered
1-9. The first
strand in CUB_TSG6 corresponds to strand
2 in the spermadhesins; residues 130-132 of TSG-6 are
predicted to be a
-strand only when C
geometry is
used as the basis of defining the secondary structure. The N and C
termini, which emerge from the same face of the molecule, are denoted
by N and C, respectively. Arg144
(R144; depicted in ball-and-stick mode) is the
second residue of
strand 2 of CUB_TSG6. In C,
the CUB_TSG6 model is shown in a space-filling representation, in the
same orientations as the structures in B.
-C
distance of 5.1 Å), and thus to the C terminus of the preceding Link module (defined
on the basis of the three-dimensional structure as residues 37-128
(12)). Therefore, it is possible that amino acid 144 could make
contacts with amino acids on the Link module and modulate its
functional activity. In this regard, we have shown previously that the
binding of an HA octasaccharide to Link_TSG6 causes an alteration in
side-chain dynamics of Asn129 (15), although this residue
is on the opposite face of the protein from the HA-binding surface
(16). Residue 144 is also fairly close in space to two VXXDP
motifs (residues 138-142 and 245-249; the C
of
Arg144 is 11.8 Å and 6.6 Å from the C
carbons of Val138 and Val245, respectively). It
has been suggested previously that such motif sequences may be involved
in the formation of the stable 120-kDa complex between TSG-6 and I
I
(see Ref. 46). Therefore, the TSG-6R and TSG-6Q allotypes could show
differences in HA binding and complex formation with I
I.
Allele and genotype frequencies of TSG-6 SNP
0.05) in the
frequency of GG, GA, or AA genotypes between OA cases and controls. When we stratified the data (Table IV),
there were no significant differences in the genotype or allele
frequencies between female and male cases, between female and male
controls, between female cases and female controls, or between male
cases and male controls. There was an increase in the frequency of the
AA genotype in knee cases (79.6%, versus 74.0% in hip
cases and 74.0% in unstratified controls), and this was reflected by
an increase in the frequency of the A431 allele in the knee
cases (89.4%, versus 86.1% in hip cases and 86.1% in
unstratified controls), however, this was not significant (p = 0.27 for knee cases versus hip cases,
and p = 0.25 for knee cases versus
controls).
Allele and genotype frequencies of TSG-6 SNP stratified according to
sex, hip, and knee replacement

View larger version (30K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
SDS-PAGE of recombinant TSG-6 allotypes.
TSG-6Q (Q) and TSG-6R (R) allotypes (2 µg of
each) were analyzed by SDS-PAGE. The positions of the molecular
mass standards are shown on the left-hand side of the
figure.
I were analyzed. TSG-6R and TSG-6Q were found to
exhibit similar HA-binding activities over a wide range of
concentrations in a microtiter plate assay (Fig.
4). This assay has been used extensively
to characterize the interaction of HA with the TSG-6 Link module (see
Ref. 16). The binding of the biotinylated-HA was found to be greatly
reduced by the presence of competing unlabeled HA (200-fold molar
excess), indicating that the interactions are specific (data not
shown). From Fig. 4 it can be seen that maximum binding is achieved in
the assay when there is ~8 pmol of TSG-6/well. It should be noted
that identical assays on the recombinant Link module of TSG-6 have
shown that, in this case, maximum binding is seen with ~25 pmol/well
(data not shown; see also Ref. 16). This might indicate that
full-length TSG-6 has a higher affinity for HA than the isolated Link
module, but further experiments will be required to test this
possibility.

View larger version (12K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Comparison of the HA binding activities of
TSG-6Q and TSG-6R. The binding of biotinylated-HA to proteins
coated onto microtiter wells was determined using a colorimetric assay.
The proteins were coated at a range of concentrations: 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, 8.0, 16.0, 25.0, and 32.0 pmol/well (shown on a log scale).
Values are plotted as mean absorbance (n = 8) at 405 nm
after 10-min development time ± the S.E.
I (46). As can be seen from Fig.
5, incubation of TSG-6R or TSG-6Q with
purified I
I gave rise to a species of ~120 kDa that is recognized
by an anti-TSG-6 antibody. Similar levels of the ~120-kDa species
were formed by both allotypes over a wide range of incubation times
(from 30 s to 1 h); SDS-PAGE analysis of identical assays
confirmed that there are no detectable differences in complex formation
exhibited by the TSG-6Q and TSG-6R proteins (data not shown). In
addition, assays conducted with different TSG-6 to I
I ratios
indicate that these allotypes have identical complex-forming properties
(data not shown). The experiment in Fig. 5 shows that, under the assay
conditions (i.e. pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 37 °C),
which are similar to physiological, the two TSG-6 allotypes are both
able to form a TSG-6·I
I complex very rapidly, and this process is
essentially complete within 30 s.

View larger version (14K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
TSG-6Q and TSG-6R form stable complexes of
~120 kDa with I
I. A Western blot of
TSG-6Q (top panel) and TSG-6R (bottom panel)
proteins following their incubation in the absence (
) or presence (+)
of human I
I (for the times indicated) probed with an anti-TSG-6
antiserum. A band of ~120 kDa is seen in samples containing both
TSG-6 and I
I (open arrows), but this is not detected in
the samples containing I
I or TSG-6 alone. The free TSG-6Q and TSG-6R
proteins are denoted by Q and R, respectively.
This blot is representative of three separate experiments.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1324 to +68 in
Ref. 24) amplified from homozygous genomic DNA samples showed that
these sequences are the same in the two alleles, indicating that there are unlikely to be any differences in their levels of expression. A
sequence identical to the ones described here (spanning nucleotides
1301 to
20 numbered as in Ref. 24) has also been isolated from
human cervical muscle cell genomic DNA (6), suggesting that the
differences in the 5'-flanking sequence derived from human peripheral
blood (24) are more likely to be due to sequencing errors rather than
representing polymorphic variants.
I; these unrelated properties of TSG-6 were thought most
likely to be affected by the Arg to Gln substitution (see above) and
were reasonably straightforward to investigate. Neither the HA-binding
activity nor TSG-6·I
I complex formation was significantly different in the two allotypes.
I may have an
important role in the stabilization of tissues rich in HA by cross-linking of the polysaccharide chains (4). TSG-6·I
I complexes of ~120 kDa have been identified in the synovial fluids of arthritis patients (including OA) (7) and in the extracellular matrix of mouse
cumulus cell oocyte complexes that expand prior to ovulation (5, 23);
it is becoming apparent that a number of TSG-6·I
I complexes of
different composition and structure may exist (23). The ~120-kDa
complex that we produced here, by incubation of recombinant TSG-6 and
purified I
I in vitro, is not affected by the substitution in the CUB module. These experiments indicate that formation of this
TSG-6·I
I complex is likely to be very rapid under physiological conditions.
I is comprised of three protein chains (bikunin, heavy chain 1 (HC1), and heavy chain 2 (HC2)) that are held together by an unusual
protein·glycosaminoglycan·protein linkage (49). The heavy chains
are synthesized as pro-forms that each contain a VXXDP
motif. During their secretory transport, the Asp-Pro bond is cleaved,
which is necessary to reveal the
-carboxylic acid group of the Asp
residues that can then form ester bonds to internal N-acetylgalactosamine residues of the chondroitin 4-sulfate
chain (see Ref. 46). Wisniewski et al. (46) noted that TSG-6
contains such a motif near the C terminus of the CUB module
(i.e. residues 245-249) and speculated that this could be
involved in formation of the complex with I
I, in an analogous manner
to the assembly of I
I; TSG-6 also has another VXXDP
sequence at amino acids 138-142. However, it seems unlikely that
either of these motifs (both of which are reasonably close to the site
of the allelic difference; see above) are involved in the formation of
the TSG-6·I
I complex produced here, as cleavage after their
aspartic acid residues would release the C-terminal portion of TSG-6,
which is recognized by our anti-TSG-6 antibody, i.e. such a
complex would not be detected by this antiserum. However, this does not
exclude the involvement of such motifs in the formation of other
TSG-6·I
I complexes.
I (20). It has been assumed that formation of the stable ~120-kDa
complex is required for this activity. However, work in our
laboratories has shown that complex formation is not necessary for
TSG-6 to modulate the function of I
I in this
way.5 In this regard, the
TSG-6R and TSG-6Q allotypes have identical abilities to potentiate
I
I anti-plasmin activity.6
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Valerie Cooper for synthesis of oligonucleotides, Tony Willis for protein sequencing and amino acid analysis, and Dr. Neil Oldham for mass spectrometry. We are very grateful to Drs. Antonio Romero and Juan J. Calvete for providing the spermadhesin coordinates and to Dr. Jane Worthington and Stephen H. Kennedy for providing genomic DNA samples that were not included in this study. We thank Professor Andrew Carr, Dr. Jai Chitnavis, and Kim Clipsham who organized the collection of the case and control samples used here; that collection was partly funded by The Wishbone Trust. We also acknowledge the continued interest and support of Professor Iain D. Campbell.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by the Arthritis Research Campaign (ARC) Grants D0540, D0562, L0538, L0537, M0522, M0534, and M0625 and the Medical Research Council.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EBI Data Bank with accession number(s) AJ419936, AJ413948, and AJ413949.
§ A recipient of a Wellcome Trust prize studentship.
** Funded by a Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council studentship.
¶¶ ARC Research Fellows.

To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.:
44-1865-275-349; Fax: 44-1865-275-729; E-mail:
tony.day@bioch.ox.ac.uk.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, February 19, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M110765200
2 D. J. Mahoney and A. J. Day, unpublished data.
3 M. S. Rugg, E. Fries, and A. J. Day, unpublished data.
4 S. J. Hubbard and J. M. Thornton (1993). Naccess, Computer Program, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University College of London.
5 S. J. Getting, D. J. Mahoney, T. Cao, M. S. Rugg, E. Fries, C. M. Milner, M. Perretti and A. J. Day, manuscript in preparation.
6 D. J. Mahoney, C. M. Milner, E. Fries, and A. J. Day, unpublished data.
7 M. R. Cordell and A. J. Day, unpublished data.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are:
TSG-6, tumor
necrosis factor-stimulated gene-6;
DES, Drosophila
expression system;
HA, hyaluronan;
I
I, inter-
-inhibitor;
OA, osteoarthritis;
RA, rheumatoid arthritis;
SNP, single nucleotide
polymorphism;
IL-1
, interleukin-1
;
ARMS, amplification-refractory
mutation system;
Tricine, N-[2-hydroxy-1,1-bis(hydroxymethyl)ethyl]glycine;
HC1, -2,
heavy chains 1 and 2;
MES, 4-morpholineethanesulfonic acid.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Lee, T. H.,
Wisniewski, H. G.,
and Vilcek, J.
(1992)
J. Cell Biol.
116,
545-557 |
| 2. |
Wisniewski, H. G.,
and Vilcek, J.
(1997)
Cytokine Growth Factor Rev.
8,
143-156[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 3. |
Bayliss, M. T.,
Howat, S. L.,
Dudhia, J.,
Murphy, J. M.,
Barry, F. P.,
Edwards, J. C.,
and Day, A. J.
(2001)
Osteoarthritis Cartilage
9,
42-48[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 4. |
Fülöp, C.,
Kamath, R. V., Li, Y.,
Otto, J. M.,
Salustri, A.,
Olsen, B. R.,
Glant, T. T.,
and Hascall, V. C.
(1997)
Gene
202,
95-102[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 5. |
Carrette, O.,
Nemade, R. V.,
Day, A. J.,
Brickner, A.,
and Larsen, W. J.
(2001)
Biol. Reprod.
65,
301-308 |
| 6. |
Fujimoto, T.,
Savani, R. C.,
Watari, M.,
Day, A. J.,
and Strauss, J. F.
(2002)
Am. J. Pathol.
160,
1485-1492 |
| 7. |
Wisniewski, H. G.,
Maier, R.,
Lotz, M.,
Lee, S.,
Klampfer, L.,
Lee, T. H.,
and Vilcek, J.
(1993)
J. Immunol.
151,
6593-6601[Abstract] |
| 8. | Goldberg, R. L., Doughty, J., Spirito, S., Klien, M., Peppard, J., Crowl, R. M., and Hu, S.-I. (1998) Trans. Orthop. Res. 23, 215 |
| 9. | Flannelly, J. K., Dudhia, J., Day, A. J., Mason, R. M., and Bayliss, M. T. (2001) Trans. Orthop. Res. 26, 228 |
| 10. |
Maier, R.,
Wisniewski, H. G.,
Vilcek, J.,
and Lotz, M.
(1996)
Arthritis Rheum.
39,
552-559[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 11. |
Margerie, D.,
Flechtenmacher, J.,
Buttner, F. H.,
Karbowski, A.,
Puhl, W.,
Schleyerbach, R.,
and Bartnik, E.
(1997)
Osteoarthritis Cartilage
5,
129-138[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 12. |
Kohda, D.,
Morton, C. J.,
Parkar, A. A.,
Hatanaka, H.,
Inagaki, F. M.,
Campbell, I. D.,
and Day, A. J.
(1996)
Cell
86,
767-775[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 13. |
Parkar, A. A.,
and Day, A. J.
(1997)
FEBS Lett.
410,
413-417[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 14. |
Parkar, A. A.,
Kahmann, J. D.,
Howat, S. L. T.,
Bayliss, M. T.,
and Day, A. J.
(1998)
FEBS Lett.
428,
171-176[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 15. |
Kahmann, J. D.,
O'Brien, R.,
Werner, J. M.,
Heinegard, D.,
Ladbury, J. E.,
Campbell, I. D.,
and Day, A. J.
(2000)
Structure
8,
763-774[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 16. |
Mahoney, D. J.,
Blundell, C. D.,
and Day, A. J.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
22764-22771 |
| 17. |
Bork, P.,
and Beckmann, G.
(1993)
J. Mol. Biol.
231,
539-545[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 18. |
Sieron, A. L.,
Tretiakova, A.,
Jameson, B. A.,
Segall, M. L.,
Lund-Katz, S.,
Khan, M. T., Li, S.,
and Stocker, W.
(2000)
Biochemistry
39,
3231-3239[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 19. |
Solis, D.,
Romero, A.,
Jimenez, M.,
Diaz-Maurino, T.,
and Calvete, J. J.
(1998)
FEBS Lett.
431,
273-278[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 20. |
Wisniewski, H. G.,
Hua, J. C.,
Poppers, D. M.,
Naime, D.,
Vilcek, J.,
and Cronstein, B. N.
(1996)
J. Immunol.
156,
1609-1615[Abstract] |
| 21. |
Mindrescu, C.,
Thorbecke, G. J.,
Klein, M. J.,
Vilcek, J.,
and Wisniewski, H. G.
(2000)
Arthritis Rheum.
43,
2668-2677[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 22. |
Bardos, T.,
Kamath, R. V.,
Mikecz, K.,
and Glant, T. T.
(2001)
Am. J. Pathol.
159,
1711-1721 |
| 23. |
Mukhopadhyay, D.,
Hascall, V. C.,
Day, A. J.,
Salustri, A.,
and Fulop, C.
(2001)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
394,
173-181[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 24. |
Lee, T. H.,
Klampfer, L.,
Shows, T. B.,
and Vilcek, J.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
6154-6160 |
| 25. |
Chapman, K.,
Mustafa, Z.,
Irven, C.,
Carr, A. J.,
Clipsham, K.,
Smith, A.,
Chitnavis, J.,
Sinsheimer, J. S.,
Bloomfield, V. A.,
McCartney, M.,
Cox, O.,
Cardon, L. R.,
Sykes, B.,
and Loughlin, J.
(1999)
Am. J. Hum. Genet.
65,
167-174[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 26. |
Mustafa, Z.,
Chapman, K.,
Irven, C.,
Carr, A. J.,
Clipsham, K.,
Chitnavis, J.,
Sinsheimer, J. S.,
Bloomfield, V. A.,
McCartney, M.,
Cox, O.,
Sykes, B.,
and Loughlin, J.
(2000)
Rheumatology (Oxford)
39,
299-306 |
| 27. |
Livingstone, C.,
and Jones, I.
(1989)
Nucleic Acids Res.
17,
2366 |
| 28. | Dracopoli, N. C., Haines, J. L., Korf, B. R., Moir, D. T., Morton, C. C., Seidman, C. E., Seidman, J. G., and Smith, D. R. (1995) in Current Protocols in Human Genetics (Boyle, A. L., ed) Vol. 2, Unit 9.8, pp. 1-12, John Wiley and Sons, New York |
| 29. |
Jenkins, S. C.,
March, R. E.,
Campbell, R. D.,
and Milner, C. M.
(2000)
Tissue Antigens
56,
38-44[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 30. |
Sali, A.,
and Blundell, T. L.
(1993)
J. Mol. Biol.
234,
779-815[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 31. |
Varela, P. F.,
Romero, A.,
Sanz, L.,
Romao, M. J.,
Topfer-Petersen, E.,
and Calvete, J. J.
(1997)
J. Mol. Biol.
274,
635-649[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 32. |
Romao, M. J.,
Kolln, I.,
Dias, J. M.,
Carvalho, A. L.,
Romero, A.,
Varela, P. F.,
Sanz, L.,
Topfer-Petersen, E.,
and Calvete, J. J.
(1997)
J. Mol. Biol.
274,
650-660[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 33. |