![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 18, 15426-15431, May 3, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the
Received for publication, November 26, 2001, and in revised form, February 14, 2002
The proline-rich tyrosine kinase 2 (Pyk2) was
first identified as a key kinase linked to the MAP kinase and JNK
signaling pathways that play important roles in cell growth and
adhesion. The linkage between Pyk2 and the androgen receptor (AR), an
important transcription factor in prostate cancer progression, however, remains unclear. Here we report that using the full-length androgen receptor-associated protein, ARA55, coregulator as bait, we were able
to isolate an ARA55-interacting protein, Pyk2, and demonstrated that
Pyk2 could repress AR transactivation via inactivation of ARA55. This
inactivation may result from the direct phosphorylation of ARA55 by
Pyk2 at tyrosine 43, impairing the coactivator activity of ARA55 and/or
sequestering ARA55 to reduce its interaction with AR. Our finding that
Pyk2 can indirectly modulate AR function via interaction and/or
phosphorylation of ARA55 not only expands the role of Pyk2 in
AR-mediated prostate cancer growth but also strengthens the role of
ARA55 as an AR coregulator.
The androgen receptor
(AR),1 a transcription
factor, requires coregulators to exert its optimal or proper
function in the control of cell growth and death (1-4). Several
AR coregulators including ARA24, ARA55, ARA70, ARA160, and ARA267 were
isolated in our previous studies (5-9). Transactivation assays
indicated that ARA55 can function as a coactivator to enhance AR
function in a ligand-dependent manner in several prostate
cancer cells (6). Thereafter, Yang et al. (10) found that
Hic-5, a mouse homolog of human ARA55, could also function as a
coregulator to increase the transactivation of AR or
glucocorticoid receptor and induce cell senescence in fibroblasts (11).
Tissue distribution studies suggest that ARA55 may be differentially
expressed during various stages of prostate cancer (12). The detailed
physiological role of ARA55 and its potential regulation of prostate
cancer progression, however, remain unclear.
Early studies showed that various kinase signaling pathways could
modulate AR transactivation via phosphorylation of AR at various amino
acids (13-15). For example, the HER2/Neu-mitogen-activated protein
(MAP) kinase pathway can phosphorylate AR, increasing its ability to
recruit coregulators and enhancing AR transactivation (14). In
contrast, the PI3K/Akt pathway can phosphorylate AR, reducing its
ability to recruit coregulators and decreasing AR transactivation (15).
Similar results indicating cross-talk between kinase signaling pathways
and other nuclear receptors (NR) to increase NR recruitment of
coregulators have been reported including estrogen receptor (16) and
steroidogenic factor 1 (SF-1) (17). Furthermore, several kinases have
been reported to phosphorylate NR coregulators resulting in increased
NR transactivation including SRC-1 and SRC-3 (18, 19). These findings
lead us to hypothesize that some kinases may be able to modulate AR
function via phosphorylation of AR coregulators. Using full-length
ARA55 as bait in a yeast two-hybrid assay we found that proline-rich tyrosine kinase 2 (Pyk2) can interact with ARA55. We subsequently investigated if Pyk2 could modulate AR function via
interaction/phosphorylation of ARA55.
Pyk2, a member of the focal adhesion kinase (FAK) family, is a mediator
of G-protein-coupled receptors and may be involved in the regulation of
the MAP kinase and JNK signal pathways (20-23). Early studies
suggested that some upstream regulators such as integrins,
platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), stress signals, or interleukin-2
could induce Pyk2 activity by modulating the phosphorylation of Pyk2
(24-28). Pyk2 is detected in many cells such as neurons, bone marrow,
smooth muscle, and prostate cells (29, 30). Tissue staining also
indicates that Pyk2 expression is decreased with increasing malignancy
of prostate cancer (30). The significance of Pyk2
interaction/phosphorylation of ARA55 in prostate cancer
progression is currently unclear.
Here we demonstrate that Pyk2 is an ARA55-interacting protein that
represses AR transactivation via phosphorylation of ARA55. This new
signal pathway from Pyk2-ARA55-AR may represent a novel mechanism to
modulate AR function in prostate cancer.
Materials and Plasmids--
5 Cell Culture--
DU145, PC-3, H1299, and MCF-7 human cancer
cells, as well as COS-1 monkey kidney cells were maintained in
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) containing penicillin (25 units/ml), streptomycin (25 µg/ml), and 10% fetal calf serum (FCS).
PC-3(AR)2 human cancer cells were maintained in RPMI enzyme 1640 containing penicillin (25 units/ml), streptomycin (25 µg/ml), and
10% charcoal-stripped FCS. LNCaP human prostate cells were maintained
in RPMI 1640 containing penicillin (25 units/ml), streptomycin (25 µg/ml), and 10% FCS.
Screening of Human Prostate cDNA Library by Yeast Two-hybrid
Assay--
A CytoTrap yeast two-hybrid system (Stratagene) and pMyr
plasmid library (Stratagene) consisting of a DNA sequence encoding a
myristylation membrane localization signal fused with human prostate
and testis cDNAs were used for yeast two-hybrid screening. The pSos
vector containing the hSos gene fused with the
full-length ARA55 cDNA using the BamHI cloning site
served as bait. Expression of the myristylation sequence-tagged target
protein is induced by galactose but not glucose and is anchored to the
cell membrane. The library was screened by co-transformation of the
pSos-ARA55 bait construct into a temperature-sensitive cdc25H yeast
strain that cannot grow at 37 °C. Once the bait protein physically
interacts with the target protein, the hSos protein is recruited to the membrane activating the Ras signaling pathway and allowing the temperature-sensitive mutant yeast strain to grow at 37 °C.
Phosphorylation Site-directed Mutagenesis of Wild Type
ARA55--
The potential tyrosine kinase target site on wild type
ARA55 was mutated by site-directed mutagenesis using two primers
5'-GGACCACCTGTTCAGCACGGTATG-3' and 5'-CATACCGTGCTGAACAGGTGGTCC-3',
substituting phenylalanine for tyrosine at amino acid 43 (Y43F). The
mutant ARA55 PCR product was constructed into the pcDNA4A
expression vector for the AR transactivation assay and constructed into
the GAL4 and VP16 expression vectors for mammalian two-hybrid assay.
Stable Transfection of DU145 Cells--
DU145 cells, an
ARA55-negative human prostate cancer cell line, was transfected with
pBig or pBig-ARA55 for 24 h using SuperFect (Qiagen, Chatsworth,
CA). The cells were then selected using 100 µg/ml hygromycin B (32).
A single colony was chosen, amplified, and confirmed by reporter gene
and Western blotting assay.
Transfection and Report Gene Assay--
DU145, H1299, MCF-7,
LNCaP, PC-3(AR2), and COS-1 cells were grown in appropriate medium.
Transfection was performed by modified calcium phosphate precipitation
as previously described (33) or by using SuperFect according to the
manufacturer's procedure. After incubation for 24 h with
charcoal-stripped medium, the medium was changed, and cells were
treated with ethanol or DHT for another 24 h and then harvested
for the luciferase assay. The MMTV-LUC or PSA-LUC plasmids were used as
the reporter genes, and SV40-pRL (Promega) was used as an internal
control. The Dual-luciferase reporter 1000 assay system (Promega) was
employed to measure LUC activity.
Mammalian Two-hybrid Assay--
Transfections in DU145, H1299,
or COS-1 cells were performed using the calcium phosphate precipitation
method. The cells were transiently co-transfected with the pG5-LUC
reporter plasmid and 3.5 µg of both the GAL4 and pVP16-hybrid
expression plasmids. The SV40-pRL plasmid was used as an internal
control. For the interaction between ARA55 and AR the cells were
treated with 10 nM DHT for another 24 h and then
harvested for luciferase assays as previously described.
Co-immunoprecipitation and Western Blotting--
H1299 cells
were co-transfected with Pyk2 and His-ARA55 expression plasmids by
SuperFect. Cells were lysed using radioimmune precipitation buffer
(RIPA) following the protocol from Santa Cruz Biotechnology and
supplemented with protease inhibitor mixture tablet (Roche Molecular
Biochemicals) and 1 mM phenylmethlsulfonyl fluoride.
Anti-His probe antibody (Santa Cruz) was used to immunoprecipitate the
complex from the whole cell lysate. The complex was then
resolved on a 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel. The separated proteins were
transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane and then blotted
with anti-Pyk2. The Pyk2 bands were resolved by an alkaline phosphatase detection kit (Bio-Rad). In the PC-3 whole cell lysate, an anti-Hic-5 antibody was used to immunoprecipitate the endogenous ARA55 and Pyk2
complex followed by the previously described procedure. After transfection with various combinations of pcDNA4A-ARA55, pSG5AR, Pyk2, and PKM by SuperFect, H1299 cells were treated with l0
nM DHT for another 24 h and then starved in DMEM with
0.1% FCS and 10 nM DHT for 16 h. The cells were
treated with 1.5 nM PDGF-BB and then harvested. His probe
was used to precipitate the His-ARA55 and AR complex that was resolved
by Western blotting using anti-AR NH27 and anti-Hic-5 antibodies,
respectively. For the ARA55 phosphorylation experiment, RIPA was
supplemented with 1 mM pyrophosphate, 50 mM
sodium fluoride, and 2 mM sodium vanadate. The anti-Hic-5
antibody was used to immunoprecipitate ARA55, and then the
anti-phosphotyrosine antibody was applied for Western blotting.
ARA55 Interacts with Pyk2 in Yeast and Mammalian
Cells--
Full-length ARA55 was used as bait to screen prostate and
testis libraries using the CytoTrap yeast two-hybrid system. The Pyk2
C-terminal sequence (amino acids 675-1009) was isolated, and its
interaction with ARA55 was reconfirmed in a yeast growth assay. When we
co-transfected the pSos-ARA55 and pMyr-Pyk2 C terminus plasmids into
the temperature-sensitive mutant yeast, cell colonies appeared on both
SD/glucose (-UL) agar and SD/galactose (-UL) agar plates at 25 °C
and also on SD/(-UL)/galactose agar plates at 37 °C (Fig.
1A). Glucose represses the
expression of target proteins, preventing yeast growth at 37 °C.
Then we constructed ARA55 and the Pyk2 C terminus into both the GAL4
and VP16 vectors and tested their interaction via the mammalian
two-hybrid system in various human cell lines. As shown in Fig.
1B, GAL4-ARA55 and VP16-Pyk2 C terminus (left
panel) and GAL4-Pyk2 C terminus and VP16-ARA55 (right
panel) can interact strongly in H1299, DU145, and COS-1 cells.
ARA55 also interacts with Pyk2 in vivo by
co-immunoprecipitation. As shown in Fig.
2A, exogenous Pyk2 can be
co-immunoprecipitated with His-ARA55 from H1299 whole cell extracts
using an anti-His antibody. In addition, endogenous ARA55 and Pyk2 can
be co-immunoprecipitated in PC-3 cells using an anti-Hic-5 antibody,
confirming the in vivo interaction of the two proteins (Fig.
2B). Together, results from Figs. 1 and 2 demonstrate that
ARA55 can interact with Pyk2 using various in vitro and
in vivo systems in several yeast and mammalian cells.
Interestingly, whereas Pyk2 can interact with ARA55, an AR-interacting
protein, Pyk2 cannot interact with AR in the same mammalian two-hybrid
assay (Fig. 3) or co-immunoprecipitation assays (data not shown) suggesting that any effect of Pyk2 on AR
activity may require interaction with ARA55.
Expression of Pyk2 and ARA55 in Various Cell Lines--
50 µg of
whole cell lysate of each cell line were separated on a SDS-PAGE gel
and blotted by anti-Pyk2 and anti-ARA55 antibodies. Pyk2 is almost
ubiquitously expressed among these cell lines with the exception of
H1299 (Fig. 4). In contrast, ARA55 was
only expressed in PC-3, PC-3(AR2), and COS-1 cells (Fig. 4). H1299
cells were then used for further study because of relatively lower
expression of both Pyk2 and ARA55. Results from Fig. 4 also
offered us the opportunity to study Pyk2 function in
ARA55-positive versus -negative cells.
Suppression of ARA55-induced AR Transactivation by Pyk2--
To
study the potential influence of Pyk2 on AR function via interaction
with ARA55, we compared the effect of Pyk2 on AR transactivation in
ARA55-negative versus ARA55-positive cells. As shown in Fig. 5, whereas Pyk2 can significantly repress
AR transactivation in ARA55-positive PC-3(AR)2 cells, Pyk2 has only a
marginal effect in LNCaP, MCF-7, and DU145 cells that lack endogenous
ARA55. These results further suggest that Pyk2 may suppress AR
transactivation through the interaction with ARA55.
We then used PC-3(AR2), an ARA55-positive cell line stably transfected
with AR to further characterize the effect of Pyk2 on AR
transactivation. As shown in Fig. 6, Pyk2
can suppress AR transactivation in a dose-dependent manner
using the PSA or MMTV promoters linked to the LUC (Fig. 6A)
or chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) reporter systems (data not
shown). In contrast, PKM with a lysine to alanine substitution at amino
acid 475 of Pyk2 (20) only slightly affected AR transactivation (Fig.
6A).
To verify that ARA55 is required for Pyk2 to suppress AR activity, we
then stably transfected DU145 with ARA55 using a doxycycline-inducible system. As with PC-3(AR2), transfection of Pyk2, ARA55, and AR into
parent ARA55-negative DU145 cells resulted in suppression of AR
transactivation in a dose-dependent manner (data not
shown). Treatment of the stably transfected pBIG-ARA55 DU145 cells with doxycycline to induce ARA55 expression resulted in enhanced AR transactivation that could be suppressed by the exogenous Pyk2. In
contrast, DU145 cells stably transfected with the pBIG vector demonstrated no increased AR activity upon doxycycline treatment and
were unaffected by exogenous Pyk2. (Fig. 6B). These results support the essential role of ARA55 in suppression of AR
transactivation by Pyk2.
Molecular Mechanisms of Pyk2 Suppression of ARA55-induced AR
Transactivation--
Since PKM, a kinase-negative Pyk2 mutant (20),
failed to repress AR transactivation, we suspected that Pyk2 may need
to phosphorylate ARA55 to suppress AR function. Sequence analysis revealed a potential Pyk2 tyrosine kinase phosphorylation site, HLYST, on ARA55 at amino acids 41-45. We therefore mutated
this potential Pyk2 target site to HLFST and tested its
effect on the AR transactivation. Results in Fig.
7A demonstrate that
PDGF-induced Pyk2 can enhance the tyrosine phosphorylation of ARA55
(lane 3 versus lane 2) in vivo. In
contrast, PDGF-induced Pyk2 only marginally increased the
phosphorylation of mutant ARA55 (lane 4 versus
lane 3). As shown in Fig. 7B wild type ARA55
alone, but not Pyk2, enhances AR transactivation (lanes 4 versus 2 and lanes 3 versus
2, respectively), but addition of Pyk2 suppresses the
ARA55-enhanced AR transactivation (lane 5 versus
lane 4). Interestingly, the mutant ARA55, like wild type
ARA55, enhances AR transactivation (lane 6 versus
lane 2), but addition of Pyk2 only marginally suppresses
mutant ARA55-induced AR transactivation (lane 6 versus lane 7). The data from Fig. 7,
A and B demonstrate that Pyk2 enhances the
phosphorylation of ARA55 at residue 43 to suppress AR
transactivation.
Pyk2 may also inhibit ARA55-induced AR transactivation by blocking the
interaction between AR and ARA55 or by sequestering ARA55 away from AR.
Results from the mammalian two-hybrid assay in H1299 cells show that
wild type Pyk2, but not kinase-negative PKM, can block the interaction
between AR and ARA55 (Fig.
8A). Interestingly, the
interaction between AR and the Y43F ARA55 mutant can only be partially
blocked by either Pyk2 or PKM.
We then used co-immunoprecipitation to verify the ability of Pyk2 to
block the interaction between AR and ARA55 in H1299 cells. As shown in
Fig. 8B, anti-His antibody precipitates the complex containing AR and wild type or mutated ARA55. Addition of Pyk2 in the
presence of PDGF, a growth factor that activates Pyk2, can then block
the interaction between AR and wild type ARA55 but not the interaction
between AR and mutated ARA55 (lanes 3 and 4 versus lanes 7 and 8). PKM only slightly blocks
the interaction between AR and ARA55 (lanes 5 and
6). Results from both the mammalian two-hybrid and
co-immunoprecipitation assays demonstrate that Pyk2, but not
kinase-negative PKM, can block the interaction between AR and wild type ARA55.
Cross-talk between various kinase signals and the androgen/AR
pathway has been well documented. The phosphorylation of AR co-regulators to modulate AR transactivation, however, is currently unclear. Pyk2 is an important tyrosine kinase that can be induced by
various extracellular stimuli (24-28) resulting in the activation of
the MAPK and JNK kinase pathways (20, 23). The linkage from the Pyk2
pathway to NR transactivation, however, remains largely unknown. Here
we provide evidence demonstrating that Pyk2 can interact with and
phosphorylate ARA55 to suppress AR transactivation. This finding may
represent a new mechanism to modulate AR function and supports the role
of ARA55 as an AR co-regulator (6).
Tissue distribution analysis indicates that ARA55 is differentially
expressed in various stages of prostate cancer (6, 12). Stanzione
et al. (30) also reported that Pyk2 expression declines with
increasing prostate cancer grade. These findings, in addition to our
data showing that ARA55 and Pyk2 modulate AR function, suggest that the
regulation of AR function may be altered in prostate cancer by changes
in Pyk2 and ARA55 expression. The significance of these alterations in
the progression of prostate cancer from androgen dependence to androgen
independence, however, has yet to be determined.
Results from Figs. 5 and 6 clearly demonstrate that Pyk2 needs ARA55 to
suppress AR function. Pyk2, a tyrosine kinase linked to the MAPK and
JNK signaling pathways and thereby the regulation of cell growth and
adhesion, may also utilize non-ARA55-mediated pathways to exert its
physiological functions. The discovery of new pathways that cross-talk
with Pyk2 The inability of PKM to suppress AR function via wild type ARA55 and
the inability of Pyk2 to suppress AR function via mutated ARA55
suggests that the Pyk2 phosphorylation of ARA55 at residue 43 is
critical in the suppression of AR function. Since this phosphorylation site is not located in the AR interaction domain of ARA55, amino acids
(251-444) (6), it is possible that other mechanisms may also be
involved in the suppression of AR function by Pyk2-ARA55. Nevertheless,
our mammalian two-hybrid and co-immunoprecipitation assays indicate
that Pyk2 blocks the interaction between AR and ARA55. Therefore, it is
possible that Pyk2 may have multiple ways to communicate with ARA55 to
suppress AR transactivation.
In summary, Pyk2 can dramatically repress AR transactivation by
inhibiting the coregulatory activity of ARA55. This interruption may
entail both the direct phosphorylation of ARA55 to impair its
coregulatory activity and/or sequestering ARA55 to reduce its
interaction with AR. Our findings not only expand the role of Pyk2 in
AR-mediated prostate cancer growth but also support the importance of
ARA55 in the control of AR function.
We thank Drs. Jun-Lin Guan, Aknori Takaoka,
and Joseph Schlessinger for valuable plasmids and Dr. T. J. Brown for
the PC-3(AR2) cell line. We also thank Karen Wolf for manuscript preparation.
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grant CA71570.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
Both authors contributed equally to this work.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, February 20, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M111218200
The abbreviations used are:
AR, androgen
receptor;
JNK, c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase;
NR, nuclear
receptors;
DHT, 5
Suppression of Androgen Receptor Transactivation by Pyk2 via
Interaction and Phosphorylation of the ARA55 Coregulator*
§¶,
¶,
§,
,
,
,
,
,
George Whipple Laboratory for Cancer
Research, Departments of Urology, Pathology, Radiation Oncology and the
Cancer Center, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14642 and the § First Hospital of Peking University,
Beijing, 100034 China
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-dihydrotestosterone (DHT) and
doxycycline were obtained from Sigma. PDGF-B-chain homodimer
(PDGF-BB) and hygromycin B were purchased from Invitrogen. The
anti-AR polyclonal antibody, NH27, was produced as described (31). A
monoclonal antibody for ARA55 (anti-Hic-5) was purchased from
Transduction Laboratories. Antibodies for Pyk2 (anti-Pyk2) and
phosphotyrosine (anti-Tyr(P)) were purchased from Upstate
Biotechnology. His probe (H-3) was purchased from Santa Cruz
Biotechnology. The pKH3Pyk2 expression plasmid was kindly provided by
Dr. Jun-Lin Guan, Cancer Biology Laboratory, Dept. of Molecular
Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University. The
pEF-PKM expression plasmid (kinase-negative Pyk2) was kindly provided
by Dr. Aknori Takaoka, Dept. of Immunology, University of Tokyo, Japan
and Dr. Joseph Schlessinger, Dept. of Pharmacology, New York University
Medical Center. The PKM cDNA was subcloned into the
EcoRI site of the pcDNA4A expression vector. The
PC-3(AR)2 cell line was provided by T. J. Brown, University of
Toronto, Ontario, Canada. We also constructed ARA55 into the pcDNA4-His, GAL4, and VP16 vectors using the BamHI
enzyme. The Pyk2 C terminus (675-1009) that was isolated from the
yeast library was constructed into the GAL4 and VP16 vectors.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (33K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
ARA55 interacts with Pyk2 in yeast and
mammalian cells. A, the interaction between ARA55 and
Pyk2 C terminus in yeast. 0.3 µg of pSos-ARA55 and pMyr-Pyk2C
plasmids was co-transformed into cdc25H yeast cells. The entire
transformation reaction was plated onto a 100 mm SD/glucose (-UL) agar
plate that was then incubated at 25 °C until colonies appeared.
Colonies were transferred to two SD/galactose (-UL) and two SD/glucose
(-UL) agar plates that were then cultured at 25 °C (upper
panel) and 37 °C (lower panel). At the selective
temperature of 37 °C colonies only appeared on SD/(-UL)/galactose
agar plate because glucose represses the expression of target proteins.
B, ARA55 interacts with the Pyk2 C terminus in the mammalian
two-hybrid assay. DU145, COS-1, and H1299 cells cultured in 60-mm
dishes were transiently transfected with 3 µg of the pG5-LUC reporter
plasmid and 10 ng of the SV40-pRL internal control plasmid as well as
3.5 µg of GAL4DBD, VPl6, GAL4DBD-ARA55, VP16-ARA55, GAL4DBD-Pyk2 C
terminus, or VP16-Pyk2 C terminus as indicated. LUC assay was performed
24 h after transfection. The LUC activity of the interaction
between GAL4DBD and VPI6 was set as 1-fold. All values represent the
mean ± S.D. of three independent experiments.

View larger version (32K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
In vivo co-immunoprecipitation of ARA55
and Pyk2. A, 5 µg of pcDNA4A-His, or
pcDNA4A-His-ARA55, and 5 µg of pKH3-Pyk2 were co-transfected into
H1299 cells for 24 h as indicated. Anti-His antibody was added to
500 µg of protein lysate for 2 h to immunoprecipitate the
His-ARA55 and Pyk2 complex. After SDS-PAGE, the protein complexes were
transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane that was Western
blotted with anti-Pyk2 and anti-His antibodies (A,
panel 1). The relative expression of Pyk2 and His-ARA55 in
the protein lysate was shown by Western blotting (A,
panel 2). B, normal IgG (lane 1) and
anti-Hic-5 (lane 2) for ARA55 were added to PC-3 whole cell
lysates for 2 h to immunoprecipitate the ARA55 and Pyk2 complex.
The samples were then separated as described above and Western blotted
with anti-Pyk2 and anti-Hic-5 antibodies. PC-3 lysate input was loaded
to show the relative expression of Pyk2 and ARA55 (lane
3).

View larger version (28K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Pyk2 interacts with ARA55 but not AR in the
mammalian two-hybrid assay. COS-1 and H1299 cells were transiently
co-transfected with 3 µg of pG5-LUC reporter plasmid, 10 ng of
SV40-pRL internal control plasmid, as well as 3.5 µg of GAL4DBD,
VPl6, GAL4-ARA55, GAL4-Pyk2C terminus, or VP16-AR as indicated. 24 h after transfection the cells were treated with 10 nM DHT
for another 24 h. The LUC activity of the sample transfected with
GAL4DBD and VPI6 was set as 1-fold. All values represent the mean ± S.D. of three independent experiments.

View larger version (22K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
The expression of ARA55 and Pyk2 in various
cell lines. LNCaP, PC-3, PC-3(AR2), DU145, MCF-7, COS-1, and H1299
cells were cultured and then harvested for Western blotting. 50 µg of
whole cell lysate from each cell line were loaded and separated on a
10% SDS-PAGE gel. Anti-Pyk2 and anti-Hic-5 (ARA55) antibodies were
used to Western blot the polyvinylidene difluoride membrane to detect
the expression of Pyk2 and ARA55, respectively. Anti-
-actin antibody
was used to detect
-actin expression as a loading control.

View larger version (49K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
The effect of Pyk2 on AR transactivation in
ARA55-positive and -negative cells. PC-3(AR)2, LNCaP, and MCF-7
cells were seeded in 35-mm dishes. Cells were transiently
co-transfected with 0.75 µg of MMTV-LUC or PSA-LUC reporter plasmids,
5 ng of SV40-pRL internal control plasmid, as well as 1.25 µg of Pyk2
using the SuperFect reagent. DU145 cells were seeded in 60-mm
dishes and co-transfected with 3 µg of each reporter plasmid, 10 ng
of SV40-pRL internal control plasmid, 0.5 µg of AR, and 3 µg of
Pyk2 using calcium phosphate precipitation. The total amount of DNA in
all experiments was adjusted by addition of the backbone vectors. Cells
were treated with ethanol or 10 nM DHT for 24 h after
transfection as indicated. The LUC activity of AR with ethanol
treatment was set as 1-fold. All values represent the mean ± S.D.
of three independent experiments.

View larger version (27K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Pyk2 suppresses AR transactivation in
ARA55-positive PC-3(AR2) and ARA55 stably transfected DU145 cells.
A, PC-3(AR)2 cells were transiently co-transfected with 3 µg of PSA-LUC or MMTV-LUC reporter plasmids, 10 ng of SV40-pRL
internal control plasmid, increasing amounts of full-length Pyk2, and 3 µg of PKM for 16 h as indicated. The total amount of DNA in each
transfection was adjusted by addition of backbone vectors. Cells were
treated with ethanol or 10 nM DHT for 24 h and then
harvested for the LUC assay. B, DU145(pBIGARA55) and
DU145(pBIG) stably transfected cells were transiently co-transfected
with 1 µg of MMTV-LUC reporter plasmid, 5 ng of SV40-pRL internal
control plasmid, and 0.5 µg of AR and Pyk2 expression plasmids using
SuperFect for 16 h as indicated. The cells were then treated with
ethanol or 10 nM DHT and 2 µg/ml doxycycline for another
24 h as indicated. The total amount of DNA in each transfection
was adjusted by addition of backbone vectors. The LUC activity of AR
with ethanol treatment was set as 1-fold. All values represent the
mean ± S.D. of three independent experiments.

View larger version (32K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Pyk2 suppresses AR transactivation by
phosphorylation of ARA55. A, H1299 cells
were transfected with Pyk2 and ARA55 or mutant ARA55-Y43F for 24 h
and then starved in 0.1% serum medium for another 16 h. Before
harvesting, Pyk2 activity was induced by 1.5 nM PDGF for 10 min. The phosphorylation of ARA55 was analyzed by immunoprecipitation
with anti-Hic-5(ARA55) antibody and Western blotting with
anti-phosphotyrosine antibody (Anti-Tyr). Anti-Hic-5
antibody was also used to monitor the expression of ARA55. Pyk2
expression was detected by Western blotting with anti-Pyk2.
B, H1299 cells were transiently co-transfected with 3 µg
of MMTV-LUC reporter plasmid, AR, ARA55, mtARA55-Y43F, or Pyk2
expression plasmids, as indicated for 16 h. The total amount of
DNA in each transfection was adjusted by addition of backbone vectors.
Cells were treated with 10 nM DHT for another 24 h as
indicated, and then the LUC assay was performed. The LUC activity of AR
with ethanol treatment was set as 1-fold. All values represent the
mean ± S.D. of three independent experiments.

View larger version (36K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 8.
Pyk2 blocks the interaction between ARA55 and
AR. A, H1299 cells were transiently co-transfected with
3 µg of pG5-LUC reporter plasmid, 3 µg of GAL4-ARA55, GAL4-mtARA55
Y43F, VP16-AR, Pyk2, or PKM as indicated. The total amount of DNA in
each transfection was adjusted by addition of backbone vectors. Cells
were treated with 10 nM DHT for another 24 h, and then
the LUC assay was performed. The LUC activity of the sample transfected
with GAL4DBD and VPI6 was set as 1-fold. All values represent the
mean ± S.D. of three independent experiments. B, 3.5 µg of His-ARA55, His-mtARA55-Y43F, AR, Pyk2, or PKM in various
combinations were transfected into H1299 cells using SuperFect. Cells
were treated with 10 nM DHT for 24 h and then starved
in 0.1% serum medium containing 10 nM DHT for another
16 h. Before harvesting, Pyk2 activity was further induced with
1.5 nM PDGF as indicated. Anti-His antibody was added to
immunoprecipitate the His-ARA55 or His-mtARA55-Y43F and AR complex.
10% SDS-PAGE was used to separate the complexes. NH27 and anti-His
probe antibodies were used to detect AR and ARA55 or mtARA55,
respectively (B, upper). The expression of AR in
the cell lysate was determined by Western blotting with NH27
(B, lower).
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
ARA55
AR signaling may therefore expand the importance of
Pyk2 in the control of prostate cancer growth.
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail:
chang@URMC.rochester.edu.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
-dihydrotestosterone;
Pyk2, proline-rich tyrosine
kinase 2;
PKM, kinase-negative Pyk2;
ARA, androgen
receptor-associated protein;
DBD, DNA-binding domain;
LUC, luciferase;
MMTV, mouse mammary tumor virus;
RL, Renilla luciferase;
PSA, prostate-specific antigen;
PDGF, platelet-derived growth factor;
PI3K, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase;
MAP, mitogen-activated protein;
FCS, fetal calf serum;
-UL, minus uronolactone..
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Chang, C.,
Kokontis, J.,
and Liao, S. T.
(1988)
Science
240,
324-326 2.
Chang, C.,
Saltzman, A.,
Yeh, S.,
Young, W.,
Keller, E.,
Lee, H. J.,
Wang, C.,
and Mizokami, A.
(1995)
Crit. Rev. Eukaryotic Gene Expression
5,
97-125[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 3.
Sampson, E. R.,
Yeh, S. Y.,
Chang, H. C.,
Tsai, M. Y.,
Wang, X.,
Ting, H. J.,
and Chang, C.
(2001)
J. Biol. Regul. Homeost. Agents
15,
123-129[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 4.
McKenna, N. J.,
Lanz, R. B.,
and O'Malley, B. W.
(1999)
Endocr. Rev.
20,
321-344 5.
Hsiao, P. W,
Lin, D. L,
Nakao, R.,
and Chang, C.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
20229-20234 6.
Fujimoto, N.,
Yeh, S.,
Kang, H. Y.,
Inui, S.,
Chang, H. C.,
Mizokami, A.,
and Chang, C.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
8316-8321 7.
Yeh, S.,
and Chang, C.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
5517-5521 8.
Hsiao, P. W.,
and Chang, C.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
22373-22379 9.
Wang, X.,
Yeh, S., Wu, G.,
Hsu, C. L.,
Wang, L.,
Chiang, T.,
Yang, Y.,
Guo, Y.,
and Chang, C.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
40417-40423 10.
Yang, L.,
Guerrero, J.,
Hong, H.,
DeFranco, D. B.,
and Stallcup, M. R.
(2000)
Mol. Biol. Cell
11,
2007-2018 11.
Shibanuma, M.,
Mashimo, J.,
Kuroki, T.,
and Nose, K.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
26767-26774 12.
Fujimoto, N.,
Mizokami, A.,
Harada, S.,
and Matsumoto, T.
(2001)
Urology
58,
289-294[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 13.
Nazareth, L. V.,
and Weigel, N. L.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
19900-19907 14.
Yeh, S.,
Lin, H. K.,
Kang, H. Y.,
Thin, T. H.,
Lin, M. F.,
and Chang, C.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
5458-5463 15.
Lin, H. K.,
Yeh, S.,
Kang, H. Y.,
and Chang, C.
(2001)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
98,
7200-7205 16.
Tremblay, A.,
Tremblay, G. B.,
Labrie, F.,
and Giguere, V.
(1999)
Mol. Cell
3,
513-519[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 17.
Hammer, G. D.,
Krylova, I.,
Zhang, Y.,
Darimont, B. D.,
Simpson, K.,
Weigel, N. L.,
and Ingraham, H. A.
(1999)
Mol. Cell
3,
521-526[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 18.
Rowan, B. G.,
Weigel, N. L.,
and O'Malley, B. W.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
4475-4483 19.
Font de Mora, J.,
and Brown, M.
(2000)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20,
5041-5047 20.
Lev, S.,
Moreno, H.,
Martinez, R.,
Canoll, P.,
Peles, E.,
Musacchio, J. M.,
Plowman, G. D.,
Rudy, B.,
and Schlessinger, J.
(1995)
Nature
376,
737-745[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 21.
Dikic, I.,
Tokiwa, G.,
Lev, S.,
Courtneidge, S. A.,
and Schlessinger, J.
(1996)
Nature
383,
547-550[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 22.
Takaoka, A.,
Tanaka, N.,
Mitani, Y.,
Miyazaki, T.,
Fujii, H.,
Sato, M.,
Kovarik, P.,
Decker, T.,
Schlessinger, J.,
and Taniguchi, T.
(1999)
EMBO J.
18,
2480-2488[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 23.
Tokiwa, G.,
Dikic, I.,
Lev, S.,
and Schlessinger, J.
(1996)
Science
273,
792-794[Abstract] 24.
Li, J.,
Avraham, H.,
Rogers, R. A.,
Raja, S.,
and Avraham, S.
(1996)
Blood
88,
417-428 25.
Hiregowdara, D.,
Avraham, H., Fu, Y.,
London, R.,
and Avraham, S.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
10804-10810 26.
Brinson, A. E.,
Harding, T.,
Diliberto, P. A., He, Y., Li, X.,
Hunter, D.,
Herman, B.,
Earp, H. S.,
and Graves, L. M.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
1711-1718 27.
Zheng, C.,
Xing, Z.,
Bian, Z. C.,
Guo, C.,
Akbay, A.,
Warner, L.,
and Guan, J. L.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
2384-2389 28.
Miyazaki, T.,
Takaoka, A.,
Nogueira, L.,
Dikic, I.,
Fujii, H.,
Tsujino, S.,
Mitani, Y.,
Maeda, M.,
Schlessinger, J.,
and Taniguchi, T.
(1998)
Genes Dev.
12,
770-775 29.
Avraham, H.,
Park, S. Y.,
Schinkmann, K.,
and Avraham, S.
(2000)
Cell. Signal.
12,
123-133[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 30.
Stanzione, R.,
Picascia, A.,
Chieffi, P.,
Imbimbo, C.,
Palmieri, A.,
Mirone, V.,
Staibano, S.,
Franco, R., De,
Rosa, G.,
Schlessinger, J.,
and Tramontano, D.
(2001)
Lab. Invest.
81,
51-59[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 31.
Yeh, S., Hu, Y. C.,
Rahman, M.,
Lin, H. K.,
Hsu, C. L.,
Ting, H. J.,
Kang, H. Y.,
and Chang, C.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
97,
11256-11261 32.
Strathdee, C. A.,
McLeod, M. R.,
and Hall, J. R.
(1999)
Gene
229,
21-29[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 33.
Mizokami, A.,
Yeh, S. Y.,
and Chang, C.
(1994)
Mol. Endocrinol.
8,
77-88[Abstract]
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Kaulfuss, M. Grzmil, B. Hemmerlein, P. Thelen, S. Schweyer, J. Neesen, L. Bubendorf, A. G. Glass, H. Jarry, B. Auber, et al. Leupaxin, a Novel Coactivator of the Androgen Receptor, Is Expressed in Prostate Cancer and Plays a Role in Adhesion and Invasion of Prostate Carcinoma Cells Mol. Endocrinol., July 1, 2008; 22(7): 1606 - 1621. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. V. Heemers and D. J. Tindall Androgen Receptor (AR) Coregulators: A Diversity of Functions Converging on and Regulating the AR Transcriptional Complex Endocr. Rev., December 1, 2007; 28(7): 778 - 808. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. N. Sahu, S. Nunez, G. Bai, and A. Gupta Interaction of Pyk2 and PTP-PEST with leupaxin in prostate cancer cells Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, June 1, 2007; 292(6): C2288 - C2296. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Yang, Y.-J. Chang, H. Miyamoto, S. Yeh, J. L. Yao, P. A. di Sant'Agnese, M.-Y. Tsai, and C. Chang Suppression of Androgen Receptor Transactivation and Prostate Cancer Cell Growth by Heterogeneous Nuclear Ribonucleoprotein A1 via Interaction with Androgen Receptor Coregulator ARA54 Endocrinology, March 1, 2007; 148(3): 1340 - 1349. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J Burd, L. M Morey, and K. E Knudsen Androgen receptor corepressors and prostate cancer Endocr. Relat. Cancer, December 1, 2006; 13(4): 979 - 994. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. P. Saelzler, C. C. Spackman, Y. Liu, L. C. Martinez, J. P. Harris, and M. K. Abe ERK8 Down-regulates Transactivation of the Glucocorticoid Receptor through Hic-5 J. Biol. Chem., June 16, 2006; 281(24): 16821 - 16832. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Yi, R.-C. Wu, J. Sandquist, J. Wong, S. Y. Tsai, M.-J. Tsai, A. R. Means, and B. W. O'Malley Peptidyl-Prolyl Isomerase 1 (Pin1) Serves as a Coactivator of Steroid Receptor by Regulating the Activity of Phosphorylated Steroid Receptor Coactivator 3 (SRC-3/AIB1) Mol. Cell. Biol., November 1, 2005; 25(21): 9687 - 9699. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Wang, K. Song, T. L. Sponseller, and D. Danielpour Novel Function of Androgen Receptor-associated Protein 55/Hic-5 as a Negative Regulator of Smad3 Signaling J. Biol. Chem., February 18, 2005; 280(7): 5154 - 5162. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. Brown and C. E. Turner Paxillin: Adapting to Change Physiol Rev, October 1, 2004; 84(4): 1315 - 1339. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Heinlein and C. Chang Androgen Receptor in Prostate Cancer Endocr. Rev., April 1, 2004; 25(2): 276 - 308. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Rahman, H. Miyamoto, and C. Chang Androgen Receptor Coregulators in Prostate Cancer: Mechanisms and Clinical Implications Clin. Cancer Res., April 1, 2004; 10(7): 2208 - 2219. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. L. Smith and B. W. O'Malley Coregulator Function: A Key to Understanding Tissue Specificity of Selective Receptor Modulators Endocr. Rev., February 1, 2004; 25(1): 45 - 71. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Schrantz, J. d. S. Correia, B. Fowler, Q. Ge, Z. Sun, and G. M. Bokoch Mechanism of p21-activated Kinase 6-mediated Inhibition of Androgen Receptor Signaling J. Biol. Chem., January 16, 2004; 279(3): 1922 - 1931. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. C. Rigas, D. M. Ozanne, D. E. Neal, and C. N. Robson The Scaffolding Protein RACK1 Interacts with Androgen Receptor and Promotes Cross-talk through a Protein Kinase C Signaling Pathway J. Biol. Chem., November 14, 2003; 278(46): 46087 - 46093. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-L. Hsu, Y.-L. Chen, S. Yeh, H.-J. Ting, Y.-C. Hu, H. Lin, X. Wang, and C. Chang The Use of Phage Display Technique for the Isolation of Androgen Receptor Interacting Peptides with (F/W)XXL(F/W) and FXXLY New Signature Motifs J. Biol. Chem., June 20, 2003; 278(26): 23691 - 23698. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Rahman, H. Miyamoto, H. Lardy, and C. Chang Inactivation of androgen receptor coregulator ARA55 inhibits androgen receptor activity and agonist effect of antiandrogens in prostate cancer cells PNAS, April 29, 2003; 100(9): 5124 - 5129. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||