Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M200101200 on February 19, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 18, 15465-15471, May 3, 2002
Modulation of Dimer Stability in Yeast Pyrophosphatase by
Mutations at the Subunit Interface and Ligand Binding to the Active
Site*
Anu
Salminen
§,
Alexey N.
Parfenyev§¶,
Krista
Salli
,
Irina S.
Efimova¶,
Natalia N.
Magretova¶,
Adrian
Goldman
,
Alexander A.
Baykov¶**, and
Reijo
Lahti

From the
Department of Biochemistry, University of
Turku, FIN-20500 Turku, Finland, ¶ A. N.Belozersky
Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology and School of Chemistry, Moscow
State University, Moscow 119899, Russia, and
Institute of
Biotechnology, University of Helsinki, P. O. Box 56, FIN-00014
Helsinki, Finland
Received for publication, January 4, 2002, and in revised form, February 15, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
Yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae)
pyrophosphatase (Y-PPase) is a tight homodimer with two active
sites separated in space from the subunit interface. The present study
addresses the effects of mutation of four amino acid residues at the
subunit interface on dimer stability and catalytic activity. The W52S
variant of Y-PPase is monomeric up to an enzyme concentration of 300 µM, whereas R51S, H87T, and W279S variants produce
monomer only in dilute solutions at pH
8.5, as revealed by
sedimentation, gel electrophoresis, and activity measurements.
Monomeric Y-PPase is considerably more sensitive to the SH reagents
N-ethylmaleimide and
p-hydroxymercurobenzosulfonate than the dimeric protein.
Additionally, replacement of a single cysteine residue
(Cys83), which is not part of the subunit interface or
active site, with Ser resulted in insensitivity of the monomer to SH
reagents and stabilization against spontaneous inactivation during
storage. Active site ligands (Mg2+ cofactor, Pi
product, and the PPi analog imidodiphosphate) stabilized the W279S dimer versus monomer predominantly by decreasing
the rate of dimer to monomer conversion. The monomeric protein
exhibited a markedly increased (5-9-fold) Michaelis constant, whereas
kcat remained virtually unchanged, compared
with dimer. These results indicate that dimerization of Y-PPase
improves its substrate binding performance and, conversely, that active
site adjustment through cofactor, product, or substrate binding
strengthens intersubunit interactions. Both effects appear to be
mediated by a conformational change involving the C-terminal segment
that generally shields the Cys83 residue in the dimer.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Inorganic pyrophosphatase (EC 3.6.1.1;
PPase)1 is an essential
enzyme that catalyzes the interchange between pyrophosphate and
phosphate (1, 2). Due to its relatively simple structure and high
catalytic efficiency (kcat/Km = ~109 M
1 s
1),
PPase has become a paradigm for mechanistic and structural studies of
enzymatic phosphoryl transfer from phosphoric acid anhydrides to water
(3, 4). Two nonhomologous families of soluble PPase have been
identified to date. Yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) PPase
(Y-PPase) is a member of family I, which is fairly widespread in all
types of organisms (5). Family I PPases are homohexamers of ~20-kDa
subunits in prokaryotes and homodimers of ~32-kDa subunits in
eukaryotes with highly conserved active sites and mechanisms of action
(3, 4). Family II PPases have been discovered more recently (6, 7). All
the established and putative members of this family belong to bacteria
but are homodimers of ~33-kDa subunits (8), in contrast to bacterial PPases of family I. Although family II members have yet to be characterized in detail, available data suggest that the active sites
of family I and family II PPases are quite similar, presenting a
remarkable example of convergent enzyme evolution (9, 10).
The extensively studied Y-PPase enzyme exists as a very tight dimer in
a wide range of conditions. The active site and subunit interface are
separated by about 5 Å (11-13) and do not share common amino acid
residues. All intersubunit interactions involve side chain atoms (Fig.
1). Core intersubunit contact is formed
by a three-layer stacking of the aromatic rings of Trp52,
His87, His87', and Trp52', with
His87 and His87' forming the central layer (' represents residues of the second subunit). Trp279 and
Trp279' pack perpendicular and on the outside of this
three-layer stack. Polar contacts between subunits include hydrogen
bonds His87
His87', Arg51 side
chain
Asp277' main chain oxygen, and a symmetrical
Arg51'
Asp277 interaction. The interface is
essentially conserved in other fungal and animal PPases, except for a
His87 to Lys replacement in four of the nine known
sequences (5). Active monomeric Y-PPase was previously obtained upon
covalent immobilization on Sepharose beads, followed by denaturation
with guanidine hydrochloride and renaturation of the protein (14).

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Stereo view of the intersubunit contact in
Y-PPase (13). One subunit is drawn in dark gray and the
other is drawn in light gray. The hydrogen bond is
represented by the dashed line. The Cys83
residues shown are outside the contact region.
|
|
Here we describe the effects of Arg51, Trp52,
His87, and Trp279 substitutions on the
quaternary structure and activity of Y-PPase. Our results indicate that
mutation of Trp52 has the most significant effect on
dimerization and that active site ligands enhance dimer stability.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Enzymes--
The production and purification of wild-type and
variant Y-PPase from overproducing Escherichia coli
XL2blueb strains transformed with suitable plasmids were
performed as described by Heikinheimo et al. (15), except
that the Stratagene QuikChange mutagenesis kit was used. Enzyme
concentration was calculated on the basis of the subunit molecular mass
of 32.0 kDa (16) and the specific absorbance
A
equal to 14.5 for
wild-type PPase (17). Substitution of each Trp residue with Ser
decreased A
by 1.7 (18).
Methods--
The initial rates of PPi hydrolysis
were measured using a continuous Pi assay (19). The assay
medium contained 6 µM PPi, 20 mM
Mg2+, 0.15 M Tris/HCl, pH 7.2, and 40 µM EGTA, except where specified. The reaction was
initiated by adding enzyme and continued for 3-4 min at 25 °C.
Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis under nondenaturing conditions was
done with a 12.5% gel in a Sigma-Aldrich vertical electrophoresis
unit. The gel buffer and the running buffer were 25 mM
Tris-glycine, pH 9.3, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol (20).
Electrophoresis in the presence of 0.55% dodecyl sulfate was performed
with a 8-25% gradient gel, using the Phast System (Amersham
Biosciences). Analytical ultracentrifugation was carried out in
a Spinco E instrument (Beckman-Spinco), with scanning at 280 nm.
Sedimentation velocity was measured at 48,000 rpm, and the
sedimentation coefficient, s20,w, was calculated
using standard procedures (21). A partial specific volume of 0.730 cm3/g at 25 °C was calculated from the amino acid composition.
The following pH buffers were used for enzyme incubations:
(a) 0.1 M citric acid/NaOH and 50 µM EGTA (pH 4.5); (b) 0.083 M TES/KOH, 0.017 M KCl, and 50 µM EGTA (pH
7.2); (c) 0.09 M TAPS/KOH and 5 µM
EGTA (pH 8.5); and (d) 0.052 M TAPS/KOH and
0.048 M CAPS/KOH (pH 9.3). All measurements were performed
at 25 °C.
Data Analysis--
Eqs. 1 and 2 (derived from Scheme
I) describe time-courses of
activity (A) resulting from dimer (D) conversion into
monomer (M) and the reverse reaction, as well as the equilibrium
activity (at t =
and
d
D/dt = 0) as a function of enzyme
concentration (22). AD and
AM are the specific activities of the dimer and monomer, respectively;
D is the fraction of the dimer at
time t; [E]t is total enzyme subunit
concentration; ka and kd are the
apparent rate constants for association and dissociation, respectively.
Eqs. 1 and 2 were simultaneously fit to data with the SCIENTIST program
(MicroMath).
|
(Eq. 1)
|
|
(Eq. 2)
|
Monomer-dimer
equilibrium.
Scheme I.
|
|
 |
RESULTS |
Production of Y-PPase Variants--
The primary goal of this work
was to redesign the subunit interface to yield nonassociating and
stable monomer. Low probability substitutions (23) of dimer-forming
residues were specifically selected (W/S, H/T, and R/S) to induce
structural changes within this region of the protein. Three single
variants (W52S, H87T, and W279S) and one double variant (H87T/W279S)
were expressed and isolated in amounts ranging from 90 to 200 mg/liter
culture medium. However, the R51S variant, as well as the R51G and R51L variants, could not be expressed, possibly as a consequence of replacing the buried and charged Arg51 side chain with
uncharged side chains. A more conservative R51K replacement preserving
the positive charge on the side chain resulted in yield improvement.
Another major problem was the low stability of the W52S variant during
short-term incubations in solution or long-term storage as a frozen
solution, which ultimately resulted in a large scatter in data for this
variant. This behavior was dithiothreitol-dependent,
suggesting the involvement of SH groups. The problem was solved by
replacement of the single Cys residue in Y-PPase (Cys83)
with Ser.
All preparations of the variant proteins used in this study were >95%
homogeneous, as observed by SDS-PAGE analysis.
Effect of Substitutions on Quaternary Structure--
The first
indication of altered quaternary structure in Y-PPase interface
variants was evident upon native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis,
which revealed that they migrated faster than the wild-type enzyme and
the noninterface variant, C83S (Fig. 2).

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of
wild-type (WT) and variant Y-PPases. Protein
samples were preincubated as described for Table I, except that
the protein concentration was 10 µM, and the
preincubation buffer used was 0.01 M Tris-glycine, pH 9.3. The gel was stained with Bio-Safe Coomassie (Bio-Rad).
|
|
Direct evidence for changes in the quaternary structure was
additionally provided by sedimentation data (Table
I). The W52S variant exhibited a lower
s20,w value (2.4 S) than wild-type PPase (4.0 S)
at both pH 7.2 and pH 9.3, indicating monomeric protein as a result of
the mutation. The other single-amino acid-substituted variants were
dimers at pH 7.2 and mixtures of monomer and dimer at pH 9.3 and 5 µM enzyme, as indicated by the
s20,w values. The W52S substitution had the the
most significant effect on the quaternary structure of the protein. A
combination of two substitutions (H87T and W279S), each inadequate in
yielding monomers at pH 7.2, also resulted in monomeric protein at both
pH values.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Sedimentation coefficients
Samples contained 5 µM enzyme, 1 mM
MgCl2, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol, and appropriate
buffers. Before each run, the samples were preincubated for 1-3 h at
25 °C. The s20,w values are accurate to ±0.2 S.
|
|
Wild-type PPase remained dimeric at pH values as low as 4.5, in both
the absence and presence of Mg2+, as indicated by the
unchanged s20,w value (4.0 S).
Effects of Active Site Ligands on the Equilibrium and Rates of the
Dimer-Monomer Interconversion in W279S-PPase--
Dimer-monomer
interconversion was conveniently monitored by activity measurements
because activities of the dimer and monomer were different, and they
converted into each other slowly on the time scale of the enzyme assay.
This approach was used previously in studies on E. coli
PPase variants with weakened quaternary structure (22, 24, 25,
27); here, we use it to characterize the W279S variant, which exists as
either a dimer or a monomer, depending on specific conditions (Table
I). In accordance with the sedimentation data, the specific activity of
W279S-PPase (measured with 6 µM substrate) increased with
enzyme concentration in a stock solution preincubated at pH 9.3 (Fig.
3), as expected for a slow equilibrium
between dimer and less active monomer. No such inactivation of
W279S-PPase at low enzyme concentrations was observed upon
preincubation at pH 7.2. In contrast, the specific activity of
wild-type Y-PPase and its W52S/C83S variant remained constant (240 ± 15 and 29 ± 2 s
1, respectively) on preincubation
with 1 mM Mg2+ at both pH 7.2 and pH 9.3 at the
same range of enzyme concentrations (data not shown). The inactivation
of the W279S variant observed at pH 9.3 was completely reversed by
decreasing the pH to 7.2 (Fig. 4).

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Specific activity of W279S-PPase preincubated
with active site ligands as a function of enzyme concentration.
Preincubation was performed for 2-5 h at pH 9.3 in the presence of 0.5 mM dithiothreitol and 1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin. After
preincubation, enzyme activity was assayed with 6 µM
PPi, as described under "Experimental Procedures."
Curve labels indicate the ligands present during
preincubation (PNP, imidodiphosphate). The lines
were obtained with Eqs. 1 and 2 (with
d D/dt = 0) using parameter values
specified in Table II. Monomer activity, AM, was
fixed at 43 s 1, as determined from the curves measured in
the presence of Mg2+ only.
|
|

View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Reversibility of W279S-PPase inactivation at
pH 9.3. Enzyme solution (16 nM) was pre-equilibrated
at pH 9.3 in the presence of 1 mM Mg2+ as
described in the Fig. 3 legend, and the pH was lowered to 7.2 with 0.5 M TES at a specific time (indicated by the
arrow). Aliquots were withdrawn as a function of time, and
PPase activity was assayed at pH 7.2. The line was obtained
with Eqs. 1 and 2 using ka value specified in
Table II.
|
|
The shift in the activity versus enzyme concentration
profile to the left caused by the active site ligands Mg2+,
Pi, and imidodiphosphate (a PPi analog
containing N instead of O at the bridge position) (Fig. 3) indicated
that the ligands stabilize the dimer rather than the monomer.
The value of the equilibrium dissociation constant for dimer
(Kd = kd/ka) derived from these
profiles with Eqs. 1 and 2 decreased by 4 orders of magnitude in the
presence of Mg2+ and imidodiphosphate. The effects of the
active site ligands on the rate of W279S-PPase dissociation (Fig.
5) paralleled their effects on
Kd (Table II). Because
imidodiphosphate is a tightly bound (Km < 1 µM) and slowly converted (kcat = 0.01 s
1) substrate for Y-PPases (28), enzyme
concentration was limited to 0.6 µM in the experiments
illustrated in Figs. 3 and 5 to ensure that at least 50% of
imidodiphosphate remained intact at the end of the incubation.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Effects of ligands on W279S-PPase
dissociation into monomers at pH 9.3. Stock enzyme solution (22 µM) pre-equilibrated at pH 7.2 to convert essentially all
enzyme into dimeric form was diluted to 0.2 µM with the
pH 9.3 buffer containing the indicated ligands, 0.5 mM
dithiothreitol, and 1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin. Aliquots were
withdrawn as a function of time, and PPase activity was assayed at pH
7.2. The lines represent a reversible first-order reaction
with the kd and ka values
specified in Table II.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table II
Parameters for dimer-monomer equilibrium in W279S-PPase
Values of Kd and kd were
estimated with Eqns. 1 and 2 from the dependencies shown in Figs. 3 and
5, respectively, and similar dependencies measured at pH 7.2 and pH
8.5; ka values at pH 7.2 were estimated from Fig. 4;
ka values at pH 8.5 and pH 9.3 were calculated as
kd/Kd.
|
|
Fitting Eqs. 1 and 2 with ka = kd/Kd (Kd
values specified in Table II) to the time-courses shown in Fig. 5
allowed the estimation of kd. The value of
ka at pH 7.2 was obtained by fitting Eqs. 1 and 2 to
the time-course of the association reaction (Fig. 4), which was
essentially irreversible (i.e. kd could
be set to 0) because the enzyme was predominantly monomeric at the
start of the reaction and dimeric at the end of the reaction.
A similar analysis was performed for W279S-PPase at a wide range
of Mg2+ concentrations for yielding kd
and ka dependences, as shown in Fig.
6. The dependence of
kd may be described by Scheme
II, which implies an effect of two metal
ions bound sequentially with dissociation constants of
K
and
K
. The shape of the profile indicates that kd2 is the lowest of the three
individual dissociation rate constants shown in Scheme II. Fitting the
data of Fig. 6 to Eq. 3 allowed the evaluation of all parameters in Scheme II: K
= 19 ± 8 µM, K
> 20,000 µM, kd1 = 2.1 ± 0.3 min
1, kd2 = 0.12 ± 0.08 min
1, and kd3 > 1 min
1.
|
(Eq. 3)
|
The less significant effect of [Mg2+] on
ka (Fig. 6) is described by Eq. 4, which indicates
one metal binding site/subunit. The corresponding dissociation
constant, KMX, and the values of the rate constants
ka1 for free monomer and ka2 for
its magnesium complex were found to be 1600 ± 600 µM, 4.1 ± 0.1 µM
1
min
1, and 6.9 ± 0.2 µM
1
min
1, respectively.
|
(Eq. 4)
|

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Rate constants for W279S-PPase dissociation
into monomers at pH 9.3 ( ) and reassociation into dimers at pH 7.2 ( ) as a function of Mg2+ concentration. Experiments
were performed as described in the Fig. 4 legend. Lines were
obtained with Eqs. 3 and 4, using the parameter values specified under
"Results."
|
|
Dissociation of dimeric W279S-PPase in the
presence of metal ions.
Scheme II.
|
|
Sensitivity to SH Reagents--
Additional evidence for the
different quaternary structures of the W279S and W52S variants at pH
7.2 was obtained by comparing the effects of SH reagents on different
enzyme forms. In dimeric Y-PPase, the single Cys residue/subunit,
located at ~5 Å from the subunit interface, is shielded by
C-terminal residues 280-284 (13), which protect the residue from
modification by bulky reagents (29). Consistent with this structure,
N-ethylmaleimide had a minimal effect on the activity of
wild-type Y-PPase and its dimeric W279S variant at pH 7.2, as confirmed
by the s20,w values, but inactivated the
monomeric W52S variant (Fig. 7).
p-HMBS, a more reactive SH reagent, inactivated the dimeric
PPases appreciably, but again, the effect on the monomeric W52S variant
was much more significant. The Cys residue was not appreciably modified
by N-ethylmaleimide in the dimeric PPases but was nearly
completely modified in monomeric W52S-PPase at pH 7.2, as confirmed by
a greater inactivating effect of p-HMBS on the
N-ethylmaleimide-treated wild-type PPase and W279S-PPase
compared with W52S-PPase (Fig. 7). The monomeric double variant
(W52S/C83S) lacking Cys was not inactivated by
N-ethylmaleimide.

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Sensitivity of wild-type and variant PPases
to inactivation by SH reagents at pH 7.2 and pH 9.3. Enzymes were
incubated for 20-30 min without SH reagents ( ) or with 0.1 mM p-HMBS ( ), 1 mM
N-ethylmaleimide ( ), or N-ethylmaleimide
followed by p-HMBS ( ) and assayed for activity as
described under "Experimental Procedures." Incubation conditions: 5 µM enzyme, 1 mM Mg2+. Where
available, values of s20,w are presented
above the bars.
|
|
At pH 9.3, both p-HMBS and N-ethylmaleimide
modified wild-type PPase significantly, causing partial dissociation
into monomers, as indicated by the decrease in
s20,w (Fig. 7). Again, the W279S variant that is
predominantly monomeric at this pH value displayed significantly
greater reactivity to these reagents and decreased s20,w values upon the modification.
Michaelis-Menten Parameters for Dimer and Monomer--
Only minor
changes in kcat and Km values
were observed in the dimeric variant PPases, compared with wild-type
protein (Table III), indicating no
significant alterations in the active site. The monomeric forms of all
variant PPases exhibited markedly increased Km
values, whereas kcat values decreased
significantly in only two variants (W52S and W279S).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table III
Michaelis-Menten parameters for dimeric and monomeric PPases
Monomeric R51K, H87T, and W279S variants were obtained by preincubation
at pH 9.3 in the absence of Mg2+ at 0.003, 0.015, and 0.06 µM enzyme, respectively. In all other cases, the
preincubation was performed at pH 7.2 in the presence of 1 mM Mg2+, using 0.015 µM (R51K), 0.06 µM (W52S, W52S/C83S, and W279S), or 0.6 µM
(wild type, H87T) enzyme. Km values are calculated
in terms of total PPi concentration. Assay conditions: pH 7.2 (0.15 M Tris/HCl or 83 mM TES/KOH + 17 mM KCl), 1-1000 µM PPi,
20mM Mg2+, and 40 µM EGTA.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Contribution of Different Residues to Dimerization--
X-ray
crystallography has led to the identification of four critical residues
at the subunit interface of Y-PPase, specifically Arg51,
Trp52, His87, and Trp279 (Fig. 1).
Sedimentation, gel electrophoresis, and activity measurements reveal
that the W52S substitution has a greater effect on dimer stability than
the R51K, H87T, and W279S substitutions. Among other factors, the
nature of a substitution largely influences the extent of the effects
on protein structure and function. With this in mind, one can conclude
that Trp52 contributes more to dimer formation than
Trp279 (identical substitution) and perhaps
His87 (drastic substitution), whereas the role of
Arg51 may be underestimated (charge-preserving
substitution). The importance of Trp52 may be explained by
its participation in the three-layer stacking of aromatic rings with
His87', His87, and Trp52' (Fig. 1).
Our inability to express the R51S, R51G, and R51L variants suggests
that the Arg51 residue, whose side chain is charged and
buried, is important not only in dimer formation but also in
maintaining overall structure.
Factors Affecting Dimer Stability--
Whereas wild-type Y-PPase
exists as dimer in a wide range of conditions, the W279S variant is a
mixture of dimer and monomer, facilitating analyses of the effects of
various stimuli on the dimer
monomer equilibrium. The results of
these analyses indicated that substrate (imidodiphosphate), product
(Pi), and Mg2+ stimulate dimerization (Figs. 3
and 6), whereas modification of Cys83 and increasing pH
have an opposite effect (Fig. 7).
The effects of Mg2+ on dimer stability are mainly a result
of its effect on kd (however, it should be taken
into account that the kd and ka
values were obtained at different pH conditions) and are reversed at
high Mg2+ concentrations (Fig. 6). Four metal binding
sites/subunit have been identified in the phosphate complex of dimeric
wild-type Y-PPase by x-ray crystallography (11). Three of them bind
Mg2+ in the absence of phosphate (30, 31), with
dissociation constants of 2.3, 15, and >5000 µM at pH
9.3 (31). A comparison of these values with
K
of 19 ± 8 µM and K
of > 20,000 µM in Scheme II indicates that the
decrease in kd and reversal of this effect with
increasing Mg2+ concentrations (Fig. 6) are associated with
the binding of the second and third Mg2+ ions,
respectively. It should be noted that the destabilizing effect of
Mg2+ on the dimer is insignificant at physiological
concentrations of the ion (~1 mM). The Mg2+
concentration dependence of ka in Fig. 6 yielded an Mg2+ binding constant of 1600 ± 600 µM
for monomeric Y-PPase at pH 7.2. Our recent kinetic analysis of the
activating effect of Mg2+ on monomeric
W279S-PPase2 suggests that
this constant refers to binding of the second Mg2+ ion and
thus implies an 80-fold decrease in affinity for monomer, compared with
dimer. Accordingly, Mg2+ stimulates dimer formation via
tighter binding. Because the active site and subunit interface are
separated in space, the effect of Mg2+ implies a
conformational difference between monomer and dimer and between dimers
with vacant and occupied M2 sites. The same considerations apply to
imidodiphosphate and Pi binding.
In addition to confirming that the W52S variant is monomeric,
Cys83 modification helped to identify the conformational
differences between dimer and monomer. The increased reactivity of
Cys83 in monomer clearly indicates that the C-terminal
segment that normally shields Cys83 in dimer (Fig.
8) becomes more mobile or possibly adopts
a completely different conformation, making the SH group accessible to
modifying agents. This displacement is not a specific effect of the
W279S substitution because (a) the SH group is inaccessible
to N-ethylmaleimide in both dimeric wild-type PPase and
dimeric W279S-PPase at pH 7.2 (Fig. 7), and (b) two
different mutations (W279S and W52S) similarly increase the reactivity
of the SH group in monomer (Fig. 7). At pH 9.3, the reactivity of dimer
to the SH reagents is increased, which may mean that the dimer
represents an equilibrium mixture of several conformations (32), with
the more reactive conformations becoming more populated at increasing
pH values or in variants with weakened subunit interactions.

View larger version (109K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Arrangement of Cys83, the
C-terminal segment (residues 280-284), and subunit interface residues
in wild-type Y-PPase (13).
|
|
The effect of pH on dimer stability (Table II) may be associated with
His87. In dimeric Y-PPase, two His87 residues
of the different subunits are linked by a hydrogen bond, implying that
one of them is protonated. Loss of this proton at a high pH value
should destabilize subunit interactions (see Table II for details).
Role of the Quaternary Structure in Catalysis--
The
conformational change resulting from monomer to dimer conversion is
accompanied by an alteration in the Michaelis-Menten parameters (Table
III). In three variants (R51K, H87T, and W279S) that exist as both
dimers and monomers, dimerization only slightly increases
kcat (by a factor of 1.05-1.4) but markedly
decreases Km (by a factor of 5-9). The data
measured for wild-type Y-PPase and its other variants that exist in
only one oligomeric form are in accordance with this trend. The
difference in the Km values between dimer and
monomer explains the major effect of enzyme concentration on the
specific activity of W279S-PPase measured at low (6 µM)
substrate concentration (Fig. 3). Consistent with this explanation, a
much lower inactivation was observed at low concentrations of
W279S-PPase, when activity was assayed with 1000 µM
substrate (data not shown).
Thus, dimerization fine-tunes the active site of Y-PPase, allowing
tighter binding of the metal cofactor and substrate (as verified by the
Michaelis constant). Conversely, intersubunit interactions increase in
strength upon active site adjustment caused by metal cofactor, product,
or substrate analog. MgPPi binding is sufficient for
complete active site organization, as indicated by similar
kcat values for dimer and monomer. In this respect, the family I member, Y-PPase, principally differs from family
II PPases with similar subunit size and quaternary structure, which
exhibit an ~40-fold increase in kcat upon
dimerization (8). This may be a consequence of the two-domain structure
of family II PPases with active site location at the domain interface
(9, 10). In this case, dissociation into monomers may cause domain flexibility that cannot be overcome by substrate binding. In contrast, Y-PPase is a one-domain protein, like all family I PPases.
Another interesting comparison may be made with E. coli
PPase, which, like Y-PPase, belongs to family I. The active sites of
the two PPases are nearly identical, but the subunit size is much
smaller for E. coli PPase (20 versus 32 kDa).
Accordingly, the E. coli enzyme is inactive as a monomer but
fully functional as a hexamer, similar to other prokaryotic PPases of
family I (27). For E. coli PPase,
kcat values are similar in dimer, trimer, and
hexamer, whereas Km values decrease progressively (104-fold) from dimer to hexamer (22, 27). This comparison
suggests that the critical mass required to form a well-ordered active site in homo-oligomeric PPases is inversely proportional to monomer mass, i.e. larger monomers lead to smaller homo-oligomers.
This information is crucial in the design of other polypeptides with enzymatic activity de novo.
The structure of the subunit interface is highly conserved in other
fungal and animal family I PPases (5) but is significantly different in
prokaryotic PPases of both families (5, 9, 10, 26). This allows the
design of selective inhibitors of PPases of families I and II that
would interfere with oligomerization in pathogenic prokaryotes. In this
context, it is important to note that subunit contacts are weaker in
prokaryotic than in eukaryotic PPases.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank P. V. Kalmykov, K. Mikalahti,
and T. Vehmas for technical help.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by Russian Foundation for Basic
Research Grants 00-04-48310, 00-15-97907, and 01-04-06111 and Academy of Finland Grants 35736 and 47513.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
Both authors contributed equally to this work.
**
To whom correspondence may be addressed. Tel.: 7-095-939-5541; Fax:
7-095-939-3181; E-mail: baykov@genebee.msu.su.

To whom correspondence may be addressed. Tel.: 358-2-333-6845;
Fax: 358-2-333-6860; E-mail: reijo.lahti@utu.fi.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, February 19, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M200101200
2
A. N. Parfenyev, unpublished data.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
PPase, pyrophosphatase;
CAPS, 3-(cyclohexylamino)propanesulfonic acid;
p-HMBS, p-hydroxymercurobenzosulfonate;
Y-PPase, yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) pyrophosphatase;
TAPS, 3-{[2-hydroxy-1,1-bis(hydroxymethyl)ethyl]amino}-1-propanesulfonic
acid;
TES, 2-{[2-hydroxy-1,1-bis(hydroxymethyl)ethyl]amino}ethanesulfonic
acid.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Chen, J.,
Brevet, A.,
Formant, M.,
Leveque, F.,
Schmitter, J.-M.,
Blanquet, S.,
and Plateau, P.
(1990)
J. Bacteriol.
172,
5686-5689[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 2.
|
Lundin, M.,
Baltscheffsky, H.,
and Ronne, H.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
12168-12172[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 3.
|
Cooperman, B. S.,
Baykov, A. A.,
and Lahti, R.
(1992)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
17,
262-266[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Baykov, A. A.,
Cooperman, B. S.,
Goldman, A.,
and Lahti, R.
(1999)
Progr. Mol. Subcell. Biol.
23,
127-150[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Sivula, T.,
Salminen, A.,
Parfenyev, A. N.,
Pohjanjoki, P.,
Goldman, A.,
Cooperman, B. S.,
Baykov, A. A.,
and Lahti, R.
(1999)
FEBS Lett.
454,
75-80[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Young, T. W.,
Kuhn, N. J.,
Wadeson, A.,
Ward, S.,
Burges, D.,
and Cooke, G. D.
(1998)
Microbiology
144,
2563-2571[Abstract]
|
| 7.
|
Shintani, T.,
Uchiumi, T.,
Yonezawa, T.,
Salminen, A.,
Baykov, A. A.,
Lahti, R.,
and Hachimori, A.
(1998)
FEBS Lett.
439,
263-266[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Parfenyev, A. N.,
Salminen, A.,
Halonen, P.,
Hachimori, A.,
Baykov, A. A.,
and Lahti, R.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
24511-24518[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Merckel, M. C.,
Fabrichniy, I. P.,
Salminen, A.,
Kalkkinen, N.,
Baykov, A. A.,
Lahti, R.,
and Goldman, A.
(2001)
Structure
9,
289-297[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Ahn, S.,
Milner, A. J.,
Futterer, K.,
Konopka, M.,
Ilias, M.,
Young, T. W.,
and White, S. A.
(2001)
J. Mol. Biol.
313,
797-811[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Heikinheimo, P.,
Lehtonen, J.,
Baykov, A.,
Lahti, R.,
Cooperman, B.,
and Goldman, A.
(1996)
Structure
4,
1491-1508[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Harutyunyan, E. H.,
Kuranova, I. P.,
Vainshtein, B. K.,
Höhne, W. E.,
Lamzin, V. S.,
Dauter, Z.,
Teplyakov, A. V.,
and Wilson, K. S.
(1996)
Eur. J. Biochem.
239,
220-228[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Heikinheimo, P.,
Tuominen, V.,
Ahonen, A.-K.,
Teplyakov, A.,
Cooperman, B. S.,
Baykov, A. A.,
Lahti, R.,
and Goldman, A.
(2001)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
98,
3121-3126[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Plaksina, E. A.,
Sergienko, O. V.,
Sklyankina, V. A.,
and Avaeva, S. M.
(1981)
Bioorg. Khim.
7,
357-363
|
| 15.
|
Heikinheimo, P.,
Pohjanjoki, P.,
Helminen, A.,
Tasanen, M.,
Cooperman, B. S.,
Goldman, A.,
Baykov, A.,
and Lahti, R.
(1996)
Eur. J. Biochem.
239,
138-143[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Kolakowski, L. F.,
Schlösser, M.,
and Cooperman, B. S.
(1988)
Nucleic Acids Res.
16,
10441-10452[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Kunitz, M.
(1952)
J. Gen. Physiol.
35,
423-450[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Gill, S. C.,
and von Hippel, P. H.
(1989)
Anal. Biochem.
182,
319-326[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Baykov, A. A.,
and Avaeva, S. M.
(1981)
Anal. Biochem.
116,
1-4[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Hames, B. D.,
and Rickwood, D.
(1990)
Electrophoresis of Proteins: A Practical Approach
, p. 32, Oxford University Press, New York
|
| 21.
|
Chervenka, C. H.
(1972)
Methods for the Analytical Ultracentrifuge
, pp. 23-33, Spinco Division of Beckman Instruments, Inc., Palo Alto, CA
|
| 22.
|
Velichko, I. S.,
Mikalahti, K.,
Kasho, V. N.,
Dudarenkov, V. Y.,
Hyytiä, T.,
Goldman, A.,
Cooperman, B. S.,
Lahti, R.,
and Baykov, A. A.
(1998)
Biochemistry
37,
734-740[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Overington, J.,
Donnelly, D.,
Johnson, M. S.,
Sali, A.,
and Blundell, T. J.
(1992)
Protein Sci.
1,
216-226[Abstract]
|
| 24.
|
Baykov, A. A.,
Dudarenkov, V. Y.,
Käpylä, J.,
Salminen, T.,
Hyytiä, T.,
Kasho, V. N.,
Husgafvel, S.,
Cooperman, B. S.,
Goldman, A.,
and Lahti, R.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
30804-30812[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Fabrichniy, I. P.,
Kasho, V. N.,
Hyytiä, T.,
Salminen, T.,
Halonen, P.,
Dudarenkov, V. Y.,
Heikinheimo, P.,
Chernyak, V. Y.,
Goldman, A.,
Lahti, R.,
Cooperman, B. S.,
and Baykov, A. A.
(1997)
Biochemistry
36,
7746-7753[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Aoki, M.,
Uchiumi, T.,
Tsuji, E.,
and Hachimori, A.
(1998)
Biochem. J.
331,
143-148
|
| 27.
|
Salminen, A.,
Efimova, I. S.,
Parfenyev, A. N.,
Magretova, N. N.,
Mikalahti, K.,
Goldman, A.,
Baykov, A. A.,
and Lahti, R.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
33898-33904[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Smirnova, I. N.,
Baykov, A. A.,
and Avaeva, S. M.
(1986)
FEBS Lett.
206,
121-124[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Baykov, A. A.,
Krasnova, V. I.,
and Avaeva, S. M.
(1982)
Bioorg. Khim.
8,
195-199
|
| 30.
|
Baykov, A. A.,
and Shestakov, A. S.
(1992)
Eur. J. Biochem.
206,
463-470[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Belogurov, G. A.,
Fabrichniy, I. P.,
Pohjanjoki, P.,
Kasho, V. N.,
Lehtihuhta, E.,
Turkina, V.,
Cooperman, B. S.,
Goldman, A.,
Baykov, A. A.,
and Lahti, R.
(2000)
Biochemistry
39,
13931-13938[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Tsai, C.-J., Ma, B.,
and Nussinoff, R.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
9970-9972[Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?