![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 18, 15600-15606, May 3, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Section on Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Clinical
Endocrinology Branch, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health,
Bethesda, Maryland 20892-1758
Received for publication, November 20, 2001, and in revised form, February 2, 2002
In many tissues, the insulin-like growth factor I
(IGF-I) receptor (IGF-IR) is known to functionally oppose apoptosis.
Recently, we demonstrated a direct role for the IGF-IR in the rescue of DNA-damaged fibroblasts by activating a DNA repair pathway
(Héron-Milhavet, L., Karas, M., Goldsmith, C. M., Baum, B. J.,
and LeRoith, D. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 18185-18192). p53 is a nuclear transcription factor that can
block progression of the cell cycle, modulate DNA repair, and trigger
apoptosis. In this work, we tested the effect of IGF-I on the
regulation of the p53 signaling cascade. The DNA-damaging agent
4-nitroquinoline 1-oxide was applied to NIH-3T3 cells overexpressing
normal IGF-IRs (NWTb3 cells). We showed that after 4-nitroquinoline
1-oxide-induced DNA damage, IGF-I induced exclusion of the p53 protein
from the nucleus and led to its degradation in the cytoplasm, whereas
p53 mRNA was unaffected. Degradation of the p53 protein was
associated with an increase in MDM2, an upstream modulator of the
half-life and activity of the p53 protein. p53 degradation was also
associated with down-regulation of p21. We further showed that the
effects of IGF-I on mdm2 transcription and on
MDM2/p19 ARF association were mediated by the p38 MAPK pathway.
In conclusion, we describe a novel role for IGF-I in the regulation of
the MDM2/p53/p21 signaling pathway during DNA damage.
The insulin-like growth factor I
(IGF-I)1 receptor (IGF-IR) is
a membrane-bound heterotetramer with ligand-induced tyrosine kinase
activity (1). The IGF-IR is expressed by many tumors and, upon
activation by IGFs, plays an important role in cell growth by inducing
mitogenesis and transformation and by protecting cells from apoptosis
(2). IGF-I can protect fibroblasts from apoptosis induced by UVB light
via activation of the Akt protein kinase signaling pathway (3). It has
also recently been demonstrated that activation of the IGF-IR can
rescue 4-nitroquinoline 1-oxide (4-NQO)-damaged cells by activating a
DNA repair pathway predominantly mediated by signaling through the
stress-activated protein kinase p38 (4).
p53 is a tumor suppressor gene that is one of the most commonly mutated
genes in human cancers. The role of p53 in tumor suppression was
demonstrated in p53 One crucial regulator of p53 is the cellular protein MDM2 (13). MDM2
can both inhibit the function of p53 and target p53 for degradation in
the cytoplasm (see Ref. 14 for review). The MDM2 protein is a RING
finger ubiquitin ligase that can induce destabilization and subsequent
ubiquitin-mediated proteasomal degradation of p53 (15).
Previous studies have established a relationship between IGF-I, cell
growth, and p53. For example, it has been shown that the anti-apoptotic
effect of IGF-I in myocytes is mediated by its ability to depress p53
transcriptional activity (16). Moreover, IGF-I-induced growth
stimulation in MCF-7 cells is accompanied by tyrosine phosphorylation
and nuclear exclusion of p53 (17). Recently, we demonstrated a role for
IGF-IR activation in DNA repair in response to 4-NQO-induced damage in
NIH-3T3 fibroblast cells (4). Thus, it was of particular interest to
determine whether, in our experimental system, stimulation of the
IGF-IR exerts its effects through the modulation of p53 and its network of transcriptional events and effects.
Materials--
4-NQO was purchased from Sigma, and recombinant
human IGF-I was a gift of Genentech (San Francisco, CA). Anti-p53
(Pab240) and anti-p21 (M19) antibodies used for Western blotting were
obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA). The
mouse anti-MDM2 antibody was a gift from Dr. G. Lozano (M. D. Anderson Cancer Institute, Houston, TX), and the mouse
anti-p19ARF antibody was obtained from Novus Biologicals
(Littleton, CO). Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary
antibodies, including anti-mouse and anti-rabbit IgG, were obtained
from Amersham Biosciences. The anti-HA antibody was obtained from
Covance (Vienna, VA), and the fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated
secondary antibody was obtained from Jackson ImmunoResearch
Laboratories, Inc. (West Grove, PA). Specific protein kinase inhibitors
(LY294002, SB202190, and U0126) were from Calbiochem. The mouse RNA
probe templates for mdm2, p53, and 18 S RNA used for
Northern blots were purchased from Ambion Inc. (Austin, TX). The RNA
probe templates for p19ARF were kindly provided by Drs. T. Ouchi (Mt. Sinai Medical School, New York, NY) and C. Sherr (St.
Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN).
Cell Culture--
The NWTb3 cell line established in this
laboratory expresses wild-type human IGF-IRs at a level of ~4 × 105 receptors/cell (18). This cell line was routinely
cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10%
heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, 100 units/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, 300 µg/ml L-glutamine, and 0.5 g/liter G418 in a humidified atmosphere of 95% air and 5%
CO2 at 37 °C.
Transient Transfection--
NWTb3 cells were seeded the day
prior to transfection. The cells were then transiently transfected
using the FuGENE 6 transfection reagent (Roche Molecular Biochemicals)
according to the manufacturer's instructions. For immunofluorescence,
cells were transfected with the pcDNA3-HAp53 construct (human p53),
kindly provided by Dr. W. G. Kaelin, Jr. (Dana Farber
Cancer Research Institute, Boston, MA). After transfection, the cells
were subjected to immunofluorescence microscopy and immunoblotting to
assess the efficiency of the transient transfection. The transfection
efficiency in NWTb3 cells was determined in our previous study
using FuGENE 6 transfection reagent (4).
NWTb3 cells were also transfected with a dominant-negative p38
construct (pCMV5-p38AGF) with the FuGENE 6 transfection reagent as
previously described (4). The cells were then treated with 4-NQO in the
absence or presence of IGF-I. Total RNA was extracted, and
mdm2 Northern blotting was performed as described below.
4-NQO and UV Light Cell Treatment, Immunoprecipitation, and
Immunoblotting--
NWTb3 cells were cultured in 100-mm dishes (1 × 106 cells/dish) as described above. One day after
plating, the cells were starved overnight in serum-free medium. The
UV-mimetic drug 4-NQO was dissolved in 100% ethanol at a concentration
of 2 mM. A 100 µM stock solution was prepared
by diluting the concentrated solution in serum-free medium and stored
in aliquots at Immunofluorescence Microscopy--
Immunofluorescence was
performed on NWTb3 cells transiently transfected with HA-tagged human
p53 as described above. Briefly, cells were seeded on Nunc chamber
slides and then washed and fixed in 2% formaldehyde solution. The
samples were blocked for 15 min with Dulbecco's PBS and 10%
fetal bovine serum and incubated with the mouse anti-HA primary
antibody for 1 h at room temperature in Dulbecco's PBS and 10%
fetal bovine serum. Samples were then incubated with the fluorescein
isothiocyanate-conjugated anti-mouse secondary antibody for 30 min at
room temperature in the same buffer. Slides were mounted with mounting
medium and sealed. Samples were viewed using an inverted fluorescence
microscope equipped with a fluorescein isothiocyanate filter
(Axiovert 100S, Zeiss) at a magnification of ×64.
Northern Blotting--
Cells were homogenized in Trizol reagent
(Invitrogen), and total RNA was isolated as recommended by the
manufacturer. Total RNA (20 µg) was loaded onto a 1.25% agarose gel
containing formaldehyde. Ethidium bromide staining was utilized to
assess the integrity of the RNA and to estimate loading efficiencies.
After electrophoresis, RNA was transferred onto Nytran nylon membrane
(Schleicher & Schüll) by capillary action and fixed by UV
cross-linking. mRNA levels were determined by hybridizing Northern
blots with 32P-labeled riboprobes specific for
mdm2, p53, and 18 S mRNA or with DNA probes for
p19ARF and excision repair
cross-complementing 1
(ercc-1). Quantification of the specific message according
to the 1.8-kb 18 S message was performed using Image Reader software
and Image Gauge software together with a Fuji 1800II instrument.
IGF-I Induces a Time- and Dose-dependent Decrease in
p53 Protein Levels in Response to DNA Damage--
Our study was
performed in NWTb3 cells overexpressing normal human IGF-IRs (18).
Recent studies in our laboratory have shown that the IGF-IR plays a
role in rescuing these cells from DNA damage (4). Given the importance
of the tumor suppressor gene p53 in the regulation of apoptosis and
because IGF-I signaling plays a role in DNA repair, we examined the
effect of IGF-IR activation on p53 protein levels in response to DNA
damage. As described above, the cells were treated with 4-NQO
(2.5 µM) and stimulated with a physiological
concentration of IGF-I (50 nM). p53 protein levels were
determined by Western blotting samples treated with 4-NQO alone, IGF-I
alone, or 4-NQO followed by IGF-I. No significant changes in p53 levels
were observed in cells treated with 4-NQO alone (Fig.
1A). Both the time course
(0-6 h) and the dose dependence (0-100 nM) of IGF-I
effects were evaluated (Fig. 1, A and B,
respectively). After induction of DNA damage with 4-NQO, IGF-I
treatment resulted in a 50% decrease in the level of p53 after 6 h of stimulation (Fig. 1A). A slight decrease in p53 protein
levels was observed when the cells were stimulated with IGF-I alone for
6 h, but this effect did not exhibit dose dependence (Fig.
1B). On the other hand, a marked dose-dependent
reduction in the expression of p53 was observed in samples that were
treated with IGF-I for 6 h after 4-NQO exposure (Fig.
1B). These data suggest that IGF-IR activation plays a role
in the regulation of p53 protein levels in NWTb3 cells and that this
effect is most pronounced after cellular DNA damage has already
occurred.
IGF-I Induces Intracellular Localization Shuttling of p53 from the
Nucleus to the Cytoplasm--
To determine the cellular localization
of p53, NWTb3 cells were transiently transfected with HA-tagged human
p53. Western blotting with a specific antibody against human p53
confirmed that the human p53 protein was expressed (data not shown).
Using a fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated antibody against the HA epitope tag, immunofluorescence microscopy was used to localize p53
under various conditions (4-NQO only, IGF-I only, or 4-NQO + IGF-I). In
a control experiment, cells were transfected with p53, but did not
receive any treatment. As shown in Fig.
2A, p53 was present in the
nucleus and more specifically in the nucleoplasm under these
conditions. No fluorescence was detected in the non-transfected NWTb3
cells (data not shown). When cells were treated with IGF-I for 2 h
(Fig. 2B) or for 5 h (Fig. 2C), no
differences were observed in p53 localization. Similarly, no
differences in the cellular localization of p53 were observed in cells
exposed to 4-NQO alone for 2 or 5 h (Fig. 2, D and
E, respectively). In striking contrast, when 4-NQO-treated
cells were subsequently exposed to IGF-I, p53 localization was
partially shifted from the nucleoplasm to the cytoplasm of NWTb3 cells
in a time-dependent manner (Fig. 2, F and
G). Thus, in response to 4-NQO-induced DNA damage,
stimulation with IGF-I promotes the shuttling of p53 from the nucleus
to the cytoplasm.
IGF-I Effect on mdm2 and p53 mRNA Levels--
MDM2 is a
proto-oncoprotein that is known to negatively regulate p53 (21). Thus,
we also studied the effects of 4-NQO and IGF-I on MDM2 and investigated
whether MDM2 plays a role in the reduction of p53 protein levels.
First, we focused on the decrease observed in p53 protein levels after
DNA damage and subsequent IGF-I treatment. Northern blot analysis was
used to assess mdm2 and p53 mRNA levels. As shown in
Fig. 3A, p53 mRNA levels
stayed relatively constant after IGF-I, 4-NQO, or 4-NQO + IGF-I
treatment, suggesting that the decrease in p53 protein levels shown in
Fig. 1 was due to a post-translational effect. A 2-h incubation with IGF-I increased mdm2 mRNA levels by ~2-fold, whereas
4-NQO exposure followed by IGF-I treatment increased mdm2
mRNA levels by ~4-fold. This effect appeared to plateau at the
2-h time point. These results were confirmed by measuring
mdm2 mRNA levels in an RNase protection assay (data not
shown). Moreover, the MDM2 protein was also slightly increased in
response to 4-NQO exposure followed by IGF-I treatment, although to a
lesser degree than the mRNA (~2-fold), as shown in Fig.
3B. Because MDM2 is a negative regulator of the p53 protein, the results presented may suggest that IGF-I stimulation occurring after DNA damage plays a role in the degradation of the p53 protein via
induction of MDM2.
IGF-I Decreases p53 Target Gene Expression--
To determine the
functional consequences of changes in p53 protein levels, we studied
the expression of p21WAF1, a downstream target of
p53 that acts as a cell cycle checkpoint (22). As expected, no
difference was observed in p21 protein levels when cells were treated
with 4-NQO alone (data not shown) and/or IGF-I alone (Fig.
4). On the other hand, p21 protein levels were progressively decreased in a time-dependent manner
when cells were treated with IGF-I after 4-NQO exposure.
Regulation of MDM2-dependent p53 Degradation--
To
further characterize MDM2-induced p53 degradation, we investigated the
effects of DNA damage and subsequent IGF-I treatment on
p19ARF, which is known to inhibit MDM2 and to indirectly
stabilize p53. Western blot analysis was used to determine
p19ARF protein levels in response to the various
treatments. As shown in Fig. 5,
p19ARF protein levels did not vary significantly in
response to exposure to 4-NQO, IGF-I, or 4-NQO + IGF-I.
p19ARF mRNA levels were also determined by Northern
blot analysis. p19ARF mRNA levels are relatively low in
NIH-3T3 cells (23). Nevertheless, no changes were observed in
p19ARF mRNA levels (data not shown), in agreement with
the lack of effect of the p19ARF protein. These results
suggest that p19ARF may not be directly involved as an
upstream component in the MDM2/p53 signaling pathway targeted by IGF-I
in response to DNA damage.
IGF-I Prevents Association of MDM2 with ARF after 4-NQO
Treatment--
One factor that regulates p53 stabilization involves
the interaction between p19ARF and MDM2, which inhibits
MDM2 ubiquitin-protein isopeptide ligase (E3) activity and
consequently stabilizes p53. Thus, we studied the effect of IGF-I on
the association between the two proteins. Fig.
6 shows a representative experiment in
which ARF was immunoprecipitated from NWTb3 cell lysates, and the
resulting samples were immunoblotted with the anti-MDM2 antibody. In
the absence of DNA damage, the association between ARF and MDM2, which
is known to stabilize the p53 protein, reached a maximum 2 h after
IGF-I treatment (in the absence of 4-NQO-induced DNA damage), as shown
in Fig. 6. To investigate whether the effect seen with 4-NQO and IGF-I
may be 4-NQO-specific, we used UV light (254 nm) to irradiate NWTb3 cells, and we treated the cells with IGF-I (50 nM) for 0, 2, 6, and 24 h. Two different doses of UV light were used: a low
and a high dose of UV radiation, previously described to increase p53
protein levels (24). Fig. 7 shows a
typical experiment in which p19ARF was immunoprecipitated
from NWTb3 cell lysates. Immunoblotting was then performed with the
anti-MDM2 antibody. In the presence of either a low or a high UV dose
and IGF-I post-treatment, no association between ARF and MDM2 could be
detected. The association did occur when the cells were stimulated with
IGF-I alone (data not shown).
Thus, in the presence of UV- or UV-mimetic-induced DNA damage, IGF-I
treatment failed to promote the association between ARF and MDM2 and
therefore would not be expected to suppress MDM2 E3 activity. Thus,
these findings suggest that treatment with IGF-I after UV-induced DNA
damage may promote degradation of the p53 protein, which is consistent
with the data shown in Fig. 1.
p38 MAPK Is Implicated in the Regulation of MDM2 and MDM2/ARF
Association by IGF-I after DNA Damage--
In a previous study, we
showed that NWTb3 cells can be rescued from 4-NQO-induced cell
proliferation inhibition by activation of the IGF-IR and that this
effect is mediated primarily through the p38 MAPK pathway (4). To
determine whether the p38 MAPK pathway plays a role in the regulation
of mdm2 gene expression, we treated the NWTb3 cells with
4-NQO and IGF-I in the presence or absence of compounds that inhibit
various protein kinases. The increase in mdm2 mRNA
induced by treatment with 4-NQO + IGF-I was completely blocked in cells
pretreated with the p38 MAPK inhibitor SB202190, but not in cells
pretreated with a phosphatidylinositol 3'-kinase inhibitor or an ERK1/2
MAPK inhibitor (data not shown). Moreover, we investigated whether p38
MAPK is involved in the regulation of MDM2/ARF association. When the
cells were treated with SB202190 (after 4-NQO exposure and before IGF-I
stimulation), the association between the two proteins could be
restored, as shown in Fig. 8. This result
indicates that in addition to a slight regulation of the MDM2 protein
levels, p38 MAPK seems to be involved more specifically in the
modulation of MDM2/ARF association to promote degradation of the p53
protein.
We have investigated the role of the IGF-IR in the regulation of
the p53 network and its relationship to DNA repair in response to
UV-mimetic (4-NQO)-induced DNA damage. Previously, IGF-I has been
clearly implicated both in the protection of cells from apoptosis and
in DNA repair. In this report, we now provide evidence that p53, MDM2,
and p19ARF are part of the pathway used by IGF-I to promote
DNA repair in damaged cells.
In the context of 4-NQO-induced DNA damage, subsequent IGF-I treatment
induced an increase in mdm2 mRNA levels with concomitant decreases in p53 protein levels and p53 functional activity (as shown
by reduced levels of the p21 protein). In UV-mimetic-treated cells,
IGF-I failed to induce an association between p19ARF and
MDM2. The lack of association between p19ARF and MDM2
(association that appears to be p38 MAPK-dependent) thereby
enables activation of MDM2 and facilitates MDM2-induced degradation of
p53. Moreover, IGF-I promoted the nuclear export of p53 in
4-NQO-treated cells, thus further promoting its degradation through
MDM2 (a negative regulator of p53).
Three competing models have been described to explain the nuclear
export of p53 (14). The first model proposes that MDM2 binds to p53 in
the nucleus and shuttles p53 to the cytoplasm (25). The second model
suggests that p53 itself contains a nuclear export signal capable of
mediating its own nuclear export (26). Finally, the third model
proposes that MDM2 ubiquitinates p53 in the nucleus and that this
ubiquitination promotes its nuclear export and subsequent cytoplasmic
degradation (27). Although all three models suggest that nuclear
transport is necessary for the degradation of p53, none explain why p53
must transfer to the cytoplasm to be degraded by the proteasome. No
regulation of ARF mRNA or protein could be detected when the cells
were treated with IGF-I after 4-NQO-induced DNA damage. However, IGF-I
was shown to regulate MDM2 activity by inhibiting the association between ARF and MDM2 in a p38 MAPK-dependent manner. ARF
also plays an important role in stabilizing p53 by inhibiting
MDM2-mediated p53 degradation, at least in part by blocking the nuclear
export of p53 and MDM2. The function of mouse p19ARF (or
human p14ARF) (23) may involve direct binding to MDM2,
thereby leading to the stabilization of p53 (21). The MDM2/ARF
interaction stabilizes p53 by a mechanism that involves inhibition of
the intrinsic E3 activity of MDM2, which is required for p53
degradation (28). Inhibition of MDM2-induced shuttling of p53 from the
nucleus to the cytoplasm, where it is degraded by the proteasome, may
also represent a mechanism by which the MDM2/ARF interaction stabilizes p53 (29). ARF is found predominantly in the nucleolus, whereas MDM2 and
p53 are usually nucleoplasmic and shuttle in and out of the nucleus to
deliver ubiquitinated p53 to the cytoplasmic proteasome (29). It has
been proposed that nucleolar localization is not essential for the
function of ARF, but that it may enhance the availability of ARF to
inhibit MDM2 (21).
Thus, when IGF-I was used to rescue NWTb3 cells from UV-mimetic-induced
DNA damage, the p53 protein was degraded through the MDM2/ARF-mediated
pathway. Our data are consistent with a secondary down-regulation of
p21 in response to a decrease in p53 when cells are sequentially
exposed to 4-NQO and then to IGF-I. This may occur as a mechanism of
rescuing NWTb3 cells from DNA damage through the degradation of p53.
Nucleotide excision repair is considered to be the major repair system
that cells use to eliminate a large range of DNA lesions. The
identification of DNA lesions is a complex process whereby lesions are
localized, a stretch of nucleotides containing the damage is excised,
and a repair patch is synthesized (for a review on DNA repair, see Ref.
30). Nucleotide excision repair genes, including ERCC-1 and
XPB/ERCC-3, are thought to determine cellular sensitivity to a variety of DNA lesions (31). The human
ERCC-1 gene is a DNA repair gene (32). The ERCC-1
protein has been shown to play a crucial role in the early excision
step of damaged DNA by virtue of its intrinsic structure-specific
nuclease activity. In a previous study, it has been shown that
overexpression of the IGF-IR induces an increase in ERCC-1
gene expression in Chinese hamster ovary cells (33). A correlation
between ERCC-1 levels and protection from UV-induced cell death
was also established (33). Supraphysiological concentrations of insulin
have also been shown to increase ERCC-1 mRNA levels in
serum-deprived cells overexpressing insulin receptors (34). We found
that IGF-I induced a time-dependent 2-fold increase in
ERCC-1 mRNA levels in the absence or presence of 4-NQO
(data not shown). Furthermore, this IGF-I-induced increase in
ERCC-1 gene expression was p38-dependent (data
not shown).
We propose a model for the mode of action of IGF-I in response to
UV-mimetic-induced DNA damage (Fig. 9).
Under basal conditions, IGF-I facilitates the association of
p19ARF with MDM2. However, after UV-induced DNA damage,
IGF-I treatment cannot promote this association. Thus, MDM2 remains
active (i.e. not inhibited by p19ARF) and can
ubiquitinate p53, thereby targeting it to the cytoplasm for proteasomal
degradation. As a consequence, there is a decrease in p53 activity, as
evidenced by down-regulation of p21.
In summary, this study demonstrates that p38 MAPK mediates IGF-I
regulation of both induction of DNA repair and modulation of the
MDM2/ARF/p53 network. Thus, we have identified a signaling cascade
involving p53 as a target for IGF-IR activation. This complements our
previous work showing that IGF-I promotes DNA repair in damaged cells
through p38 MAPK (4). This work may lead to new areas of
research regarding the role of p38 MAPK in cell growth and protection pathways.
We thank Drs. C. Sherr and T. Ouchi for
providing the p19ARF constructs and Drs. C. Deng for useful
advice. We also thank Drs. G. Lozano for providing the anti-MDM2
antibody as well as Drs. M. Oren, F. Rauscher, W. G. Kaelin, and
H. Werner for the p53 constructs and technical help. We are grateful to
Drs. P. Pennisi and A. Jacobs for technical support with fluorescence
microscopy. Finally, we thank Drs. S. Yakar and O. Milhavet for
pertinent advice about this study as well as Drs. L. Scavo and M. Quon
for critically reading this manuscript.
*
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, February 27, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M111142200
The abbreviations used are:
IGF-I, insulin-like
growth factor I;
IGF-IR, insulin-like growth factor I receptor;
4-NQO, 4-nitroquinoline 1-oxide;
ARF, p19 alternate reading frame;
HA, hemagglutinin;
E3, ubiquitin-protein isopeptide ligase;
MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase;
ERK, extracellular signal-regulated
kinase.
Insulin-like Growth Factor I Induces MDM2-dependent
Degradation of p53 via the p38 MAPK Pathway in Response to DNA
Damage*
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
/
(knockout) mice, which are highly
prone to developing a variety of different cancers (5). The specific
biological roles attributed to p53 are very complex, but p53
essentially protects the genome from mutations and genetic
alterations. Structural analyses have shown that p53 is a transcription
factor with a sequence-specific DNA-binding domain in its central
region and a transcription activation domain at its N terminus (6).
Under basal conditions, cellular p53 protein levels are relatively low.
However, in response to DNA damage and/or various stresses, the p53
protein is stabilized, and its ability to bind specific DNA sequences
is activated. Both stabilization and DNA binding are modulated by
post-translational modifications of the p53 protein, including
phosphorylation and acetylation (7, 8). The upstream regulatory
interactions and downstream events involved in stabilization of p53 are
part of a complex network of signaling pathways that lead to either cell cycle arrest or apoptosis (6). A number of genes have been
identified as primary targets of p53 (6, 9). In response to DNA damage,
stabilization of p53 blocks the cell cycle by binding directly to
genomic p53 response elements and stimulating the expression of
p21waf1/cip1, an inhibitor of
cyclin-dependent kinases (10). It has been reported that
p21waf1 is mainly responsible for
p53-induced G1 arrest (11). GADD45 is another target of p53
and may participate in the coupling between chromatin assembly and
DNA repair (9). Zhao et al. (12) demonstrated that these two
p53 targets, p21 and GADD45, act upon different signaling pathways that
suppress cell growth.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
20 °C for use throughout the study. All 4-NQO
exposures were performed at a final concentration of 2.5 µM in serum-free medium for 30 min at 37 °C in a
humidified CO2 incubator. Following the drug treatment, cells were rinsed twice with prewarmed (37 °C) serum-free medium. The cells were then incubated for 1 h at 37 °C in the absence or presence of specific protein kinase inhibitors at the appropriate concentrations. Two different doses of UV treatment were used: a low
dose of 6 J/m2 and a high dose of 24 J/m2 (19),
known to increase p53 protein levels (20). The cells were rinsed twice
with serum-free medium, and both 4-NQO- and UV-treated cells were then
incubated in the presence or absence of IGF-I for various times and at
various concentrations as indicated on the figures. The cells were
washed with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline, and total cell lysates
were prepared exactly as described previously (4). For
immunoprecipitation experiments, aliquots of lysates containing 400 µg of protein were incubated with 40 µl of the
anti-p19ARF antibody (0.1 µg/µl) at 4 °C overnight,
and protein G-Sepharose beads were added to the lysate. Supernatants
were subjected to SDS-PAGE on a 4-20% gradient gel and immunoblotted
with the anti-MDM2 antibody. All antibodies used (anti-p53, anti-actin,
and anti-p21) were diluted in Tris-buffered saline and 0.1% Tween 20 supplemented with 5% bovine serum albumin according to the
manufacturers' recommended conditions, except for the anti-ARF
antibody, which was diluted in Tris-buffered saline and 0.1% Tween 20, and the anti-MDM2 antibody, which was diluted in 0.1% Tween 20 supplemented with 5% nonfat dry milk.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (31K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Time- and dose-dependent effects
of 4-NQO and IGF-I on p53 protein levels. A, NWTb3
cells were plated in 100-mm dishes (1 × 106
cells/dish) as described under "Experimental Procedures."
Serum-starved cells were incubated in the presence or absence of the
DNA-damaging chemical agent 4-NQO (2.5 µM) for 30 min.
The cells were then washed and incubated with IGF-I (50 nM)
for various times as indicated. At each time point, total cell lysates
were prepared as described under "Experimental Procedures." p53
protein levels were determined by subjecting samples to immunoblotting
with anti-p53 antibody Pab240. Membranes were stripped and reblotted
with the anti-actin antibody to confirm that protein was loaded equally
across the various samples. The lower panel shows
quantitation of immunoreactivity levels. The data shown are
representative of three similar experiments. B, NWTb3 cells
were incubated in the presence or absence of the DNA-damaging chemical
agent 4-NQO (2.5 µM) for 30 min. The cells were then
washed and incubated with various concentrations of IGF-I for 6 h
as indicated. p53 protein levels were determined as described for
A. The blot shown is representative of three similar
experiments. The lower panel shows quantitation of
immunoreactivity levels.

View larger version (59K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
IGF-I induces translocation of p53 from the
nucleus to the cytoplasm in response to DNA damage. NWTb3 cells
were plated on chamber slides and transiently transfected with a human
p53 construct tagged with a HA epitope as described under
"Experimental Procedures." After overnight serum deprivation, cells
were incubated in the presence or absence of 4-NQO (2.5 µM), followed by either IGF-I (50 nM) or
vehicle as indicated. The cells were then immunostained with the
anti-HA monoclonal antibody. A, control cells; B,
cells treated with IGF-I for 2 h; C, cells treated with
IGF-I for 5 h; D, cells treated with 4-NQO for
2 h; E, cells treated with 4-NQO for 5 h;
F, cells treated with both 4-NQO and IGF-I for 2 h;
G, cells treated with both 4-NQO and IGF-I for 5 h. The
images shown are representative of results obtained in two separate
experiments (magnification (Magn) ×64).

View larger version (35K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
A, regulation of mdm2 and p53
mRNA expression by IGF-I after DNA damage. NWTb3 cells were
incubated in the presence or absence of 4-NQO (2.5 µM) for 30 min, followed by vehicle or 50 nM
IGF-I for various times as indicated. Samples containing 20 µg of RNA
were subjected to Northern blot analysis for mdm2,
p53, or 18 S mRNA as indicated. The lower panel
shows quantitative RNA levels as determined with a Fuji
PhosphorImager. The data are expressed as percent change from
control and are representative of data obtained in four similar
experiments. B, effects of both 4-NQO and IGF-I on MDM2
protein levels. NWTb3 cells were incubated in the presence or absence
of 4-NQO (2.5 µM) for 30 min, followed by vehicle or 50 nM IGF-I for various times as indicated. MDM2 protein
levels were determined by immunoblotting. Membranes were stripped and
reblotted with the anti-actin antibody to confirm that protein was
equally loaded across the various samples. The blot shown is
representative of data obtained in two similar experiments. The
lower panel shows quantitation of immunoreactivity levels.
No dose-response effect could be detected with the anti-MDM2 antibody
when the cells were treated with 4-NQO alone.

View larger version (56K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Effects of IGF-I and 4-NQO on
p21, a target of p53. NWTb3 cells were incubated in the presence
or absence of 4-NQO (2.5 µM) for 30 min, followed by
vehicle or 50 nM IGF-I for various times as indicated. At
each time point, total cell lysates were prepared as described under
"Experimental Procedures." p21 protein levels were determined by
immunoblotting with anti-p21 antibody M19. The membranes were then
reblotted with the anti-actin antibody to assess equal protein loading.
The blots shown are representative of two similar experiments. The
lower panel shows quantitation of immunoreactivity
levels.

View larger version (47K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Effects of 4-NQO and IGF-I on
p19ARF protein levels. NWTb3 cells were
incubated in the presence or absence of 4-NQO (2.5 µM)
for 30 min, followed by vehicle or 50 nM IGF-I for various
times as indicated. At each time point, total cell lysates were
prepared and subjected to immunoblotting with the
anti-p19ARF antibody. The membranes were then reblotted
with the anti-actin antibody to assess equal protein loading. The
immunoblot is representative of data obtained in two similar
experiments. The lower panel shows quantitation of
immunoreactivity levels.

View larger version (14K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Effects of IGF-I and 4-NQO on the association
between p19ARF and MDM2 proteins. NWTb3
cells were incubated in the presence or absence of 4-NQO (2.5 µM) for 30 min, followed by vehicle or 50 nM
IGF-I for various times; and the cells were harvested at the indicated
times after IGF-I treatment. Aliquots of cell lysates containing a
total of 400 µg of protein were incubated with the
anti-p19ARF antibody as described under "Experimental
Procedures." The immunoprecipitated samples were loaded onto a
4-20% SDS-polyacrylamide gel. Western blotting (WB) was
performed using the anti-MDM2 antibody diluted in 5% nonfat dry milk.
The membrane was reblotted with the anti-p19ARF antibody to
determine whether equal amounts of p19ARF protein had been
immunoprecipitated (IP). The data shown are representative
of two similar experiments, although in one other experiment, the
maximal interaction was observed after 3 h of IGF-I
treatment.

View larger version (18K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Effects of IGF-I and UV light on the
association between MDM2 and p19ARF. NWTb3 cells were
treated with UV light at two different doses: 6 J/m2 (low dose) and 24 J/m2 (high dose). The cells were then harvested at the indicated times
after IGF-I treatment, and protein lysates were prepared.
Immunoprecipitation (IP) was performed as described in the
legend to Fig. 6. WB, Western blotting.

View larger version (17K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 8.
The p38 MAPK pathway plays a role in the
regulation of MDM2/ARF association. NWTb3 cells were treated with
4-NQO (2.5 µM) for 30 min and incubated for 1 h with
50 µM SB202190 (inhibitor of p38 MAPK). The cells were
then incubated in the presence of 50 nM IGF-I for various
times. The cells were harvested at the indicated time points after
IGF-I treatment. 400 µg of protein were incubated with the
anti-p19ARF antibody. The immunoprecipitated
(IP) samples were loaded onto a 4-20% SDS-polyacrylamide
gel. Western blotting (WB) was performed using the anti-MDM2
antibody. The membrane was reblotted with the anti-p19ARF
antibody. The data shown are representative of two similar
experiments.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (22K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 9.
Model for IGF-I action after 4-NQO-induced
DNA damage. Shown is a schematic illustration of the proposed
mechanism of MDM2-mediated p53 degradation following IGF-I treatment of
fibroblasts containing 4-NQO-damaged DNA. See "Discussion"
for detailed comments. p53RE, p53 response element.
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
To whom correspondence should be addressed: CEB, NIDDK, NIH, Bldg.
10, Rm. 8D12, Bethesda, MD 20892-1758. Tel.: 301-496-8090; Fax:
301-480-4386; E-mail: Derek@helix.nih.gov.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
LeRoith, D.,
Werner, H.,
Beitner-Johnson, D.,
and Roberts, C. T., Jr.
(1995)
Endocr. Rev.
16,
143-163[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 2.
Baserga, R.,
Hongo, A.,
Rubini, M.,
Prisco, M.,
and Valentinis, B.
(1997)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1332,
F105-F126[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 3.
Kulik, G.,
Klippel, A.,
and Weber, M. J.
(1997)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17,
1595-1606[Abstract] 4.
Héron-Milhavet, L.,
Karas, M.,
Goldsmith, C. M.,
Baum, B. J.,
and LeRoith, D.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
18185-18192 5.
Donehower, L. A.,
Harvey, M.,
Slagle, B. L.,
McArthur, M. J.,
Montgomery, C. A., Jr.,
Butel, J. S.,
and Bradley, A.
(1992)
Nature
356,
215-221[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 6.
Ko, L. J.,
and Prives, C.
(1996)
Genes Dev.
10,
1054-1072 7.
Buschmann, T.,
Potapova, O.,
Bar-Shira, A.,
Ivanov, V. N.,
Fuchs, S. Y.,
Henderson, S.,
Fried, V. A.,
Minamoto, T.,
Alarcon-Vargas, D.,
Pincus, M. R.,
Gaarde, W. A.,
Holbrook, N. J.,
Shiloh, Y.,
and Ronai, Z.
(2001)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
21,
2743-2754 8.
Sakaguchi, K.,
Herrera, J. E.,
Saito, S.,
Miki, T.,
Bustin, M.,
Vassilev, A.,
Anderson, C. W.,
and Appella, E.
(1998)
Genes Dev.
12,
2831-2841 9.
Smith, M. L.,
Ford, J. M.,
Hollander, M. C.,
Bortnick, R. A.,
Amundson, S. A.,
Seo, Y. R.,
Deng, C. X.,
Hanawalt, P. C.,
and Fornace, A. J., Jr.
(2000)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20,
3705-3714 10.
Takimoto, R.,
and El-Deiry, W. S.
(2001)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
98,
781-783 11.
Dulic, V.,
Kaufmann, W. K.,
Wilson, S. J.,
Tlsty, T. D.,
Lees, E.,
Harper, J. W.,
Elledge, S. J.,
and Reed, S. I.
(1994)
Cell
76,
1013-1023[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 12.
Zhao, H.,
Jin, S.,
Antinore, M. J.,
Lung, F. D.,
Fan, F.,
Blanck, P.,
Roller, P.,
Fornace, A. J., Jr.,
and Zhan, Q.
(2000)
Exp. Cell Res.
258,
92-100[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 13.
Momand, J.,
Zambetti, G. P.,
Olson, D. C.,
George, D.,
and Levine, A. J.
(1992)
Cell
69,
1237-1245[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 14.
Zhang, Y.,
and Xiong, Y.
(2001)
Cell Growth Differ.
12,
175-186 15.
Maki, C. G.,
Huibregtse, J. M.,
and Howley, P. M.
(1996)
Cancer Res.
56,
2649-2654 16.
Leri, A.,
Liu, Y.,
Claudio, P. P.,
Kajstura, J.,
Wang, X.,
Wang, S.,
Kang, P.,
Malhotra, A.,
and Anversa, P.
(1999)
Am. J. Pathol.
154,
567-580 17.
Takahashi, K.,
and Suzuki, K.
(1993)
Int. J. Cancer
55,
453-458[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 18.
Kato, H.,
Faria, T. N.,
Stannard, B.,
Roberts, C. T., Jr.,
and LeRoith, D.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
2655-2661 19.
Wu, L.,
and Levine, A. J.
(1997)
Mol. Med.
3,
441-451[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 20.
Zhu, Q.,
Wani, M. A., El-,
Mahdy, M.,
Wani, G.,
and Wani, A. A.
(2000)
Mol. Carcinog.
28,
215-224[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 21.
Llanos, S.,
Clark, P. A.,
Rowe, J.,
and Peters, G.
(2001)
Nat. Cell Biol.
3,
445-452[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 22.
Kannan, K.,
Amariglio, N.,
Rechavi, G.,
Jakob-Hirsch, J.,
Kela, I.,
Kaminski, N.,
Getz, G.,
Domany, E.,
and Givol, D.
(2001)
Oncogene
20,
2225-2234[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 23.
Hirai, H.,
Roussel, M. F.,
Kato, J. Y.,
Ashmun, R. A.,
and Sherr, C. J.
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15,
2672-2681[Abstract] 24.
Latonen, L.,
Taya, Y.,
and Laiho, M.
(2001)
Oncogene
20,
6784-6793[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 25.
Roth, J.,
Dobbelstein, M.,
Freedman, D. A.,
Shenk, T.,
and Levine, A. J.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
554-564[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 26.
Stommel, J. M.,
Marchenko, N. D.,
Jimenez, G. S.,
Moll, U. M.,
Hope, T. J.,
and Wahl, G. M.
(1999)
EMBO J.
18,
1660-1672[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 27.
Boyd, S. D.,
Tsai, K. Y.,
and Jacks, T.
(2000)
Nat. Cell Biol.
2,
563-568[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 28.
Honda, R.,
and Yasuda, H.
(1999)
EMBO J.
18,
22-27[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 29.
Tao, W.,
and Levine, A. J.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
6937-6941 30.
Thoma, F.
(1999)
EMBO J.
18,
6585-6598[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 31.
Lee-Kwon, W.,
Park, D.,
and Bernier, M.
(1998)
Exp. Cell Res.
241,
458-466[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 32.
van Duin, M.,
de Wit, J.,
Odijk, H.,
Westerveld, A.,
Yasui, A.,
Koken, H. M.,
Hoeijmakers, J. H.,
and Bootsma, D.
(1986)
Cell
44,
913-923[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 33.
Perfetti, R.,
Lee-Kwon, W.,
Montrose-Rafizadeh, C.,
and Bernier, M.
(1997)
Endocrinology
138,
1829-1835 34.
Lee-Kwon, W.,
Park, D.,
and Bernier, M.
(1998)
Biochem. J.
331,
591-597[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
I. Bentov, G. Narla, H. Schayek, K. Akita, S. R. Plymate, D. LeRoith, S. L. Friedman, and H. Werner Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I Regulates Kruppel-Like Factor-6 Gene Expression in a p53-Dependent Manner Endocrinology, April 1, 2008; 149(4): 1890 - 1897. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Gilkes, Y. Pan, D. Coppola, T. Yeatman, G. W. Reuther, and J. Chen Regulation of MDMX Expression by Mitogenic Signaling Mol. Cell. Biol., March 15, 2008; 28(6): 1999 - 2010. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Xiong, F. Kou, Y. Yang, and J. Wu A novel role for IGF-1R in p53-mediated apoptosis through translational modulation of the p53-Mdm2 feedback loop J. Cell Biol., September 7, 2007; 178(6): 995 - 1007. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R J. Barnard Prostate cancer prevention by nutritional means to alleviate metabolic syndrome Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, September 1, 2007; 86(3): 889S - 893S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A. Samani, S. Yakar, D. LeRoith, and P. Brodt The Role of the IGF System in Cancer Growth and Metastasis: Overview and Recent Insights Endocr. Rev., February 1, 2007; 28(1): 20 - 47. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Heron-Milhavet, C. Franckhauser, V. Rana, C. Berthenet, D. Fisher, B. A. Hemmings, A. Fernandez, and N. J. C. Lamb Only Akt1 Is Required for Proliferation, while Akt2 Promotes Cell Cycle Exit through p21 Binding Mol. Cell. Biol., November 15, 2006; 26(22): 8267 - 8280. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Tanno, C. Mancini, R. Vitali, M. Mancuso, H. P. McDowell, C. Dominici, and G. Raschella Down-Regulation of Insulin-Like Growth Factor I Receptor Activity by NVP-AEW541 Has an Antitumor Effect on Neuroblastoma Cells In vitro and In vivo. Clin. Cancer Res., November 15, 2006; 12(22): 6772 - 6780. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. W. Jackson, L. E. Patt, G. A. LaRusch, D. B. Donner, G. R. Stark, and L. D. Mayo Hdm2 Nuclear Export, Regulated by Insulin-like Growth Factor-I/MAPK/p90Rsk Signaling, Mediates the Transformation of Human Cells J. Biol. Chem., June 16, 2006; 281(24): 16814 - 16820. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Zhang, M. Karas, H. Zhao, S. Yakar, and D. LeRoith 14-3-3{sigma} Mediation of Cell Cycle Progression Is p53-independent in Response to Insulin-like Growth Factor-I Receptor Activation J. Biol. Chem., August 13, 2004; 279(33): 34353 - 34360. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P.-S. Leung, W. J. Aronson, T. H. Ngo, L. A. Golding, and R. J. Barnard Exercise alters the IGF axis in vivo and increases p53 protein in prostate tumor cells in vitro J Appl Physiol, February 1, 2004; 96(2): 450 - 454. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Porras, S. Zuluaga, E. Black, A. Valladares, A. M. Alvarez, C. Ambrosino, M. Benito, and A. R. Nebreda p38{alpha} Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase Sensitizes Cells to Apoptosis Induced by Different Stimuli Mol. Biol. Cell, February 1, 2004; 15(2): 922 - 933. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |