Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M200386200 on February 26, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 18, 15690-15696, May 3, 2002
Functional Studies on Recombinant Domains of Mac-2-binding
Protein*
Simon
Hellstern
,
Takako
Sasaki§,
Charlotte
Fauser
,
Ariel
Lustig
,
Rupert
Timpl§, and
Jürgen
Engel
¶
From the
Department of Biophysical Chemistry,
Biozentrum, University of Basel, Klingelbergstrasse 70, CH-4056 Basel,
Switzerland and the § Max-Planck-Institut für
Biochemie, D-82152 Martinsried, Germany
Received for publication, January 14, 2002, and in revised form, February 22, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
Mac-2-binding protein (M2BP) is a secreted
glycoprotein suggested to have a role in host defense. It forms linear
and ring-shaped oligomers, with each ring segment being composed of two
monomers. We have produced recombinant human M2BP fragments comprising
domains 1 and 2 (M2BP-1,2) and domains 3 and 4 (M2BP-3,4) in 293 human kidney cells to characterize structural and functional properties of
M2BP. Both fragments were obtained in a native and glycosylated form,
as analyzed by CD spectroscopy, trypsin susceptibility, and enzymatic
deglycosylation. These results strongly suggest that both fragments are
autonomous folding units. All three potential N-glycosylation sites in M2BP-1,2 and all four in M2BP-3,4
were found to be occupied. M2BP-1,2 expressed in tunicamycin-treated cells contained no glycosyl residues, indicating that
O-glycosylation is not occurring. Ultracentrifugation
revealed that M2BP-1,2 is homogeneously dimeric in the nanomolar range
reflecting the properties of intact M2BP. Domain 2 (BTB/POZ
domain) is thus identified as the dimerization domain of M2BP,
because it has been formerly shown that recombinant domain 1 is
monomeric. M2BP-3,4 showed a concentration-dependent
self-association, and aggregates of different size and shape were shown
by electron microscopy. In contrast to this irregular aggregation of
M2BP-3,4, it has been formerly shown that a fragment comprising domains
2-4 still has the ability to form ring-like structures, although the
rings are protein-filled, and thus domain 2 appears to be indispensable for ring formation. Solid phase assays showed that M2BP-3,4 contains binding sites for galectin-3, nidogen, and collagens V and VI, whereas
M2BP-1,2 is inactive in binding. Both fragments showed no cell adhesive
activity in contrast to native M2BP, suggesting that a concerted
binding action and/or multivalent interactions of rings are necessary
for cell attachment.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Mac-2-binding protein
(M2BP)1 is a secreted
glycoprotein present in the extracellular matrix of several tissues (1)
and in extracellular fluids such as serum and milk (2). Elevated levels
are observed in some tumors and viral infections (3, 4). In
vitro, human M2BP induces production of interleukin-1, interleukin-6, and other cytokines by blood monocytes and stimulates natural killer cell and lymphokine-activated killer cell activity (5,
6). Mouse cyclophilin C-associated protein is 69% identical to
M2BP, and it seems likely that the two proteins are functional homologues. Gene-targeted cyclophilin C-associated protein-deficient mice are viable but show an up-regulation of the endotoxin and proinflammatory response (7).
M2BP is extensively glycosylated and interacts with galectin-3 (former
name Mac-2), and it also interacts with other extracellular proteins
such as collagens IV, V, and VI, fibronectin, and nidogen (1, 2, 8, 9).
M2BP binds to galectin-3 on the cell surface and induces homotypic cell
aggregation (10).
1-Integrin-mediated cell adhesion to
M2BP was also demonstrated (1).
Tissue extracted and recombinant M2BP form linear and ring-shaped
oligomers. Investigation by scanning transmission electron microscopy
showed that the ring oligomers are comprised of ~14-nm-long segments
composed of two 92-kDa M2BP monomers (11). Although the rings vary in
size, decamers predominate. The various linear oligomers and
dimers are probably ring precursors. It is hypothesized that the
multivalency of M2BP provided by its assembly to ring-like structures
is of decisive importance for the linkage of different components and
for an increase in binding activity.
M2BP consists of 567 residues after cleavage of the signal peptide (2,
5). Four putative domains could be distinguished in its cDNA
sequence (11). Domain 1 at the N terminus is a member of the scavenger
receptor cysteine-rich domain family (2, 5), and its crystal structure
has recently been solved (12). Domains 2 and 3 are putative members of
the BTB (broad complex, tramtrack, and
bric-a-brac)/POZ (poxvirus and zinc
finger) and IVR domain family, respectively. In several proteins,
BTB/POZ domains have been shown to mediate homodimerization or
multimerization (see Ref. 13 for review). No convincing similarity with
other proteins was detected for the C-terminal putative domain 4. Recombinant domain 1 (M2BP-1) is monomeric and is inactive in binding
to extracellular matrix ligands and in cell attachment. A fragment
consisting of putative domains 2-4 (M2BP-2,3,4) aggregates to
heterogeneous, protein-filled ring-like structures and retains the
potential for binding to extracellular matrix ligands and for cell
adhesion (11).
In the present study we have produced recombinant M2BP fragments
consisting of domains 1 and 2 (M2BP-1,2) and domains 3 and 4 (M2BP-3,4)
to further characterize the function of the different domains. Both
fragments were obtained in native and glycosylated forms, suggesting
that they are autonomous folding units. All putative
N-glycosylation sites are occupied, but there are some modifications in the glycan moieties compared with the parent protein.
We show that domain 2 (BTB/POZ domain) is the dimerization domain of
M2BP. M2BP-3,4 shows self-association but cannot form ring structures
in the absence of domain 2. Binding studies in vitro
demonstrated binding sites for extracellular matrix ligands in
M2BP-3,4, in contrast to M2BP-1,2. Both fragments are inactive in cell
attachment, suggesting that concerted action of several binding sites
in both fragments and/or multivalent interactions of rings is necessary
for cell adhesion.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Expression and Purification of Recombinant M2BP
Fragments--
The full-length human M2BP cDNA sequence in the
pCEP-Pu vector (1) was used as a PCR template to generate the cDNA
constructs encoding human M2BP-1,2 and M2BP-3,4. Oligonucleotide
primers corresponding to the domain borders 19 and 254 for M2BP-1,2 and 250 and 585 for M2BP-3,4 were used. Primers were constructed to code
for a N-terminal His6 tag and a thrombin cleavage site.
Primers used for the M2BP-1,2 protein were
GATCGCTAGCTCACCACCATCATCACCACCTGGTTCCGCGTGGTTCTGTGAACGATGGTGACATGCGG and GATCGGATCCTTAGTCCTGGGGGAGGAGGATGG for the 5' and 3' ends, respectively. Primers used for the M2BP-3,4 protein were
GATCGCTAGCTCACCACCATCATCACCACCTGGTTCCGCGTGGTTCTCTCCTCCCCCAGGACCCCTC and
GATCGGATCCTTAGTCCACACCTGAGGAGTTGGTC for the 5' and 3' ends, respectively. Sequences were verified by dye terminator cycle sequencing. They were inserted into the episomal expression vector pCEP-Pu (14) in frame to the BM-40 signal peptide and used for the
episomal transfection of human embryonic kidney cells that express the
EBNA-1 protein of Epstein-Barr virus (EBNA-293 cells). Transfectants were selected with 2-10 µg/ml puromycin.
Serum-free medium collected from cultures was centrifuged at
2500 × g for 10 min and stored at
20 °C. To the
harvested medium Tris-HCl, pH 7.9 (final concentration, 20 mM), and a mixture of protease inhibitors (1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 µg/ml aprotinin, 1 µg/ml
leupeptin, 1 µg/ml pepstatin, 5 mM EDTA (final
concentrations)) were added, and the medium was passed through a
0.45-µm cellulose acetate filter. The solution was dialyzed against
20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.9, 1 mM EDTA and passed
over a column of DEAE-Sephacel (Amersham Biosciences). The protein was
eluted with 500 mM NaCl and dialyzed against 20 mM Tris-HCl, 500 mM NaCl, 5 mM
imidazole, pH 7.9. The proteins were further purified by
nickel-Sepharose affinity chromatography (Amersham Biosciences) and
dialyzed against 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, or 20 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.2. Removal of the
His6 tag by treatment with thrombin was not successful. In
the case of M2BP-1,2, which is stable to limited trypsin digestion, the
His6 tag was cleaved with trypsin (5 units/µmol of
recombinant protein) for 30 min at room temperature. Trypsin and the
cleaved His6 tag fragments were removed by passing the
solution over a column of aprotinin-Sepharose (Sigma) and
nickel-Sepharose, respectively.
Inhibition of Glycosylation--
Transfected cells were
incubated in serum-free medium containing 0.1-10 µg of
tunicamycin/ml of medium at 37 °C for 36 h before analysis of
the expressed recombinant proteins. For protein purification, the cells
were incubated in the presence of 3.3 µg of tunicamycin/ml of
serum-free medium, and cell supernatants were selected every second day
for 6 days.
Trypsin Digestion--
The protein samples (2-40
µM) were incubated with 5 units of trypsin/µmol of
protein at 22 °C in 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, in the
presence or absence of 150 mM NaCl. The reactions were
stopped after 1 h by incubating the sample in SDS buffer for 5 min
at 95 °C. The reaction products were analyzed by Tricine-SDS-PAGE (15) and silver staining.
Circular Dichroism Spectroscopy--
An Aviv 62DS circular
dichroism spectropolarimeter was used with thermostated 1-mm quartz
cuvettes. Each spectrum was the average of four scans and was corrected
for the buffer contribution. The buffers used were 20 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl (Tris-buffered saline) and 20 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.2, 100 mM NaCl
(phosphate-buffered saline). The molar ellipticity (in degrees × cm2/dmol) was calculated on the basis of a mean residue
molecular mass of 110 Da.
Analytical Ultracentrifugation--
A Beckman model XLA
analytical ultracentrifuge equipped with absorption optics was
employed. Sedimentation velocity runs were performed in 12-mm double
sector cells at 54,000 rpm for M2BP-1,2 and 44,000 rpm for M2BP-3,4.
Sedimentation equilibrium runs were performed using the same cells but
at a filling height of 1.5-3 mm only. Rotor speeds were adapted to the
different molecular masses: 16,000-17,000 rpm for M2BP-1,2 and 5,200 rpm for M2BP-3,4. The measurements were performed at 20 °C. The
molecular masses were calculated from sedimentation equilibrium runs
using a floating base-line computer program that adjusts the base-line
absorbance to obtain the best linear fit of ln A
versus r2 (A = absorbance, r = distance from the rotor axis). Partial
specific volumes of 0.73 cm3/g for nonglycosylated M2BP-1,2
and 0.70 cm3/g for glycosylated M2BP-1,2 and M2BP-3,4 were
used for the calculations. The latter value is calculated for proteins
with 30% weight glycosylation (16). The Sedimentation coefficients
were corrected to standard conditions (water at 20 °C).
Electron Microscopy--
Electron microscopy by the rotary
shadowing technique was performed as described (17). Protein (20-30
µg/ml) in 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, or 20 mM
sodium phosphate, pH 7.5, was mixed with an equal volume of glycerol
and sprayed onto freshly cleaved mica discs. These were dried in high
vacuum, rotary shadowed with platinum/carbon at an angle of 9 °, and replicated.
Protein Binding and Cell Adhesion Assays--
A solid phase
assay with plastic-immobilized ligands and soluble M2BP proteins was
performed as described (1). The concentration of the polyclonal
anti-M2BP antiserum (1:300) used in the solid phase assays was adjusted
to result in a similar binding activity to the same protein amounts of
M2BP-1,2, M2BP-3,4, and full-length M2BP. Full-length M2BP for the
solid phase assays was recombinantly expressed in EBNA-293 cells and
purified as described (1). The cell adhesion assay as well as the cell
lines used have been described previously (1).
Enzymatic Modification--
Treatment of 10 µg of native
M2BP-1,2 or M2BP-3,4 with 4-10 milliunits of neuraminidase or with a
mixture of 2-10 milliunits of neuraminidase, 10-60 milliunits of
endoglycosidase F, and 0.3-5.5 units of N-glycosidase F
(Roche Molecular Biochemicals) was done at 37 °C for 1-5 days in
20-100 mM sodium or potassium phosphate, pH 7.2. In the
case of the longer incubation times, the enzymes were renewed two times
during the incubation period. Treatment of 10 µg of denatured
M2BP-1,2 or M2BP-3,4 with 2 milliunits of neuraminidase, 2.5 milliunits
of O-glycosidase, or 4 units of N-glycosidase F
(Roche Molecular Biochemicals) was done at 37 °C for 20 h in 20 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.2, containing 0.5% octylglucoside and 0.1% SDS. The denaturation before the incubation with the enzymes was done by heating at 97 °C for 5 min in the presence of 1% SDS and 1% 2-mercaptoethanol.
Analytical Methods--
The samples were hydrolyzed with 3 M HCl (110 °C, 16 h) for the determination of
hexosamine compositions on a LC 3000 analyzer (Biotronik). Mass
spectral data were acquired between 200 and 2000 Da on a Finnigan
TSQ7000 mass spectrometer (Finnigan, San José, CA) set at single
unit resolution; the molecular masses of the proteins were calculated
from the raw spectrum with the biochemistry applications
software provided by the manufacturer. Protein concentrations of
M2BP-1,2 and M2BP-3,4 were determined spectroscopically by absorbance
at 280 nm, using molar extinction coefficients of 30,075 and 80,580 M
1 cm
1 predicted from the amino
acid sequences (18). The proteins were analyzed by SDS-PAGE according
to Laemmli (19) or by Tricine-SDS-PAGE according to Schagger and von
Jagow (15). The proteins in SDS gels were silver-stained as described
(20). For Western blotting, the proteins were chromatographed on
SDS-polyacrylamide gels, transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (BA85,
Schleicher & Schüll), and probed with 1:10,000 diluted anti-M2BP
antiserum (1) using the ECL chemiluminescence detection system
(Amersham Biosciences) to visualize bound secondary antibody on x-ray films.
 |
RESULTS |
M2BP-1,2 and M2BP-3,4: Expression and Investigation of the
Oligosaccharide Moieties--
Fragments consisting of domains 1 and 2 (M2BP-1,2; residues 19-254) and of domains 3 and 4 (M2BP-3,4; residues
250-585) were prepared according to the predicted domain boundaries
for human M2BP (11). cDNAs were produced by PCR amplification to
code for a N-terminal His6 tag. Episomal expression vectors
containing the BM-40 signal peptide sequence were constructed to
express the recombinant proteins in EBNA-293 kidney cells. Both
fragments were secreted and detectable by SDS-PAGE (Fig.
1A). A polyclonal antiserum
against recombinant full-length M2BP (1) specifically recognized both
M2BP fragments in crude culture medium (Fig. 1B). Column
chromatography on DEAE-Sephacel and nickel-Sepharose resulted in
homogeneous proteins (Fig. 1C) with yields of 10-30 µg/ml
of culture medium. The apparent molecular mass of the proteins in SDS-polyacrylamide gels (Fig. 1) was larger than the one calculated from the protein sequence (35-42 kDa as compared with 27.4 kDa for
M2BP-1,2 and 50-60 kDa as compared with 40.0 kDa for M2BP-3,4), indicating glycosylation. In addition, the proteins appeared as diffuse
bands rather than as sharp bands in the gels, indicating heterogeneity
in the oligosaccharide moieties. Hexosamine analyses demonstrated on
average 12 residues of glucosamine per M2BP-1,2 monomer and 19 residues
of glucosamine and 1 residue of galactosamine per M2BP-3,4 monomer.
Fig. 2A shows that treatment
of the purified proteins in their denatured form with neuraminidase
resulted in small decreases of apparent molar mass (Fig. 2A,
lanes 2). By treatment with N-glycosidase F
shifts were much larger, and sharp protein bands were obtained,
indicating apparent molecular masses close to the calculated ones (Fig.
2A, lanes 3). No further shift in mobility was
observed after including O-glycosidase in the digestion mix
(data not shown).

View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Expression of M2BP-1,2 and M2BP-3,4 in
EBNA-293 cells and purification of the recombinant proteins.
A and B, aliquots of serum-free culture medium of
the cells were chromatographed on 12.5% SDS-polyacrylamide gels.
Either the gels were silver-stained (A), or proteins from
the gels were blotted onto nitrocellulose and probed with antibodies
against recombinant M2BP (B). Lane 1, secreted
proteins from medium of nontransfected cells (negative control);
lane 2, medium of cells transfected with cDNA encoding
full-length M2BP (positive control); lane 3, medium of cells
transfected with cDNA encoding M2BP-1,2; lane 4, medium
of cells transfected with cDNA encoding M2BP-3,4. C,
recombinant His6-tagged M2BP fragments from serum-free
medium were isolated by DEAE-Sephacel chromatography and
nickel-Sepharose chromatography. 1 µg of M2BP-1,2 (lane 1)
or M2BP-3,4 (lane 2) were analyzed by electrophoresis on
12.5% SDS-polyacrylamide gels and with silver staining.
|
|

View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Susceptibility of M2BP-1,2 and M2BP-3,4 to
neuraminidase and N-glycosidase F and inhibition of
glycosylation of M2BP-1,2 by tunicamycin. A, purified
M2BP-1,2 or M2BP-3,4 were denatured and then treated with either buffer
only (control incubation, lane 1), neuraminidase (lane
2), or N-glycosidase F (lane 3) at 37 °C
for 20 h. The samples (1 µg of protein) were analyzed by 12.5%
SDS-PAGE, and the bands were visualized by silver staining.
B, transfected EBNA-293 cells that express M2BP-1,2 were
incubated with serum-free culture medium in the presence of 0.1%
(CH3)2SO (control incubation, lane
1) or with 0.1 µg/ml (lane 2), 1 µg/ml (lane
3), or 10 µg/ml (lane 4) tunicamycin at 37 °C for
36 h. Secreted proteins from the medium were analyzed by 12.5%
SDS-PAGE, and the bands were visualized by silver staining.
|
|
Treatment of M2BP-1,2 expressing EBNA-293 cells with tunicamycin, which
inhibits N-glycosylation, resulted in a size reduction of
the secreted M2BP-1,2 (Fig. 2B) very similar to that of the purified protein after digestion with N-glycosidase F (Fig.
2A, left lane 3). 0.1 µg/ml of tunicamycin
resulted in a partial inhibition of N-glycosylation (Fig.
2B, lane 2), whereas 1 µg/ml or higher concentrations of tunicamycin inhibited N-glycosylation
completely (Fig. 2B, lanes 3 and 4).
Application of this method to M2BP-3,4 was not successful, and addition
of tunicamycin stopped expression (data not shown), probably because of
misfolding and degradation.
M2BP-1,2 and M2BP-3,4 contain three and four potential
N-glycosylation sites, respectively (2, 5). To investigate
whether all of these sites are glycosylated, native M2BP fragments were partially deglycosylated with a glycosidase mixture containing neuraminidase, N-glycosidase F, and endoglycosidase F (Fig.
3). This experiment resulted in two and
three intermediate protein bands for M2BP-1,2 and M2BP-3,4,
respectively (Fig. 3, lanes 3), in contrast to treatment
with neuraminidase only (Fig. 3, lanes 2) and with
quantitative cleavage of all N-linked glycans by
deglycosylation of the proteins in their denatured form (Fig. 3,
lanes 4). The stepwise removal of N-glycans
suggests that all three potential N-glycosylation sites in
M2BP-1,2 and all four sites in M2BP-3,4 are occupied.

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Partial removal of N-linked
glycan moieties from M2BP-1,2 and M2BP-3,4. Purified M2BP-1,2
(A) or M2BP-3,4 (B) were treated in their native
form with either buffer only (control incubation, lanes 1),
neuraminidase (lanes 2), or a mixture of neuraminidase,
endoglycosidase F, and N-glycosidase F (lanes 3)
at 37 °C for 1-5 days. In a control experiment the
N-glycans were removed completely by denaturation of
M2BP-1,2 (A) and M2BP-3,4 (B) followed by
treatment with N-glycosidase F at 37 °C for 20 h
(lanes 4). The samples (1 µg of protein) were analyzed by
12.5% (A) or 10% (B) SDS-PAGE, and the bands
were visualized by silver staining.
|
|
Stability and Secondary Structure of M2BP-1,2 and
M2BP-3,4--
Resistance to protease digestion of correctly folded
domains is a common probe for proper folding of recombinant fragments (21, 22). After trypsin incubation (5 units of trypsin/µmol of
recombinant protein), M2BP-1,2 undergoes only a very slight reduction
of its molecular size in SDS-PAGE (data not shown), which is due to the
cleavage of the N-terminal His6 tag at the thrombin
cleavage site that was introduced between the His6 tag and the
M2BP-1,2 protein sequence (removal of the tag by treatment with
thrombin turned out to be unsuccessful). Microsequencing showed that
the cleaved protein started with the N-terminal sequence GSVND, with
the GS being derived from the foreign thrombin cleavage region.
M2BP-1,2 from tunicamycin-treated EBNA-293 cells, which contain no
N-glycans, was also stable to trypsin digestion, but 10-fold
less trypsin was required for cleavage of the His6 tag. Stability to limited proteolysis of the latter protein indicates that
the structural organization in M2BP-1,2 is responsible for this
property rather than a protection effect by the glycan moieties. This
protein was analyzed by electrospray ionization-mass spectroscopy. The
molecular mass before cleavage of the His tag was 27,412.0 Da
(calculated mass of the nonreduced protein, 27,416.8 Da) and after
cleavage of the His tag was 25,769.0 Da (calculated mass of the
nonreduced protein, 25,775.9 Da). The agreement between measured and
calculated molar masses shows that the protein does not contain any
glycosyl residues. The result also proves that the protein is not
O-glycosylated in EBNA-293 cells nor does it contain any
other posttranslational modification.
Treatment of M2BP-3,4 with trypsin completely converted the protein
into two bands of 27 and 35 kDa in SDS-PAGE (data not shown).
N-terminal sequencing revealed the two sequences APLAH and GSLLP for
the 35-kDa band and the sequence YSSDY for the 27-kDa band. The 35-kDa
band thus consists of the N-terminal domain 3 with and without
His6 tag, whereas the 27-kDa band consists of the
C-terminal domain 4 starting at position 442 of native M2BP. This
result is consistent with the finding of several protease cleavage
sites within the putative linker region between domains 3 and 4, which
have been demonstrated with plasmin and a not identified endogenous
protease from human breast carcinoma cells SK-BR-3 (1, 2). Plasmin has
been shown to cleave full-length M2BP from EBNA-293 cells into a 67-kDa
N-terminal fragment and the 26-kDa C-terminal domain 4 starting at
positions 442 and 455 (1). The former N terminus is the same as the one
of domain 4 released from M2BP-3,4 by trypsin. Full-length M2BP from
SK-BR-3 cells has been shown to be cleaved by an endogenous protease
into a 70-kDa N-terminal fragment and the 27 kDa C-terminal domain 4 starting at position 437 (2).
The conformational state of M2BP-1,2 and M2BP-3,4 was analyzed by
circular dichroism (Fig. 4). The CD
spectrum of M2BP-1,2 shows a dichroic minimum at 209 nm. A nearly
identical spectrum was obtained for unglycosylated M2BP-1,2 from
tunicamycin-treated cells (data not shown). M2BP-3,4 showed dichroic
minima at 209 and 222 nm. The CD spectra demonstrate the presence of
-helical and
-structures in both proteins but with a higher
-helical content in M2BP-3,4. The spectra thus indicate that the
proteins are in a native state. An analysis of different proportions of secondary structure appeared to be of little use because both proteins
may consist of two rather different domains.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
CD spectra of M2BP-1,2 and M2BP-3,4. The
spectra were recorded at 25 °C. M2BP-1,2 ( ) in Tris-buffered
saline and M2BP-3,4 ( ) in phosphate-buffered saline were used at
protein concentrations of 15 and 6 µM,
respectively.
|
|
Oligomeric Structures of M2BP-1,2 and M2BP-3,4--
Analytical
ultracentrifugation was used for the analysis of the oligomeric state
of the recombinant proteins (Table I).
M2BP-1,2 sedimented with a single sharp profile and a sedimentation
coefficient of 4.3 S, and sedimentation equilibrium yielded a molecular
mass of 70 kDa. The data indicate a dimeric state of glycosylated
M2BP-1,2, which runs on SDS gels with a molecular mass of 35-42 kDa in
the monomeric form (Fig. 1C). The frictional ratio
f/f0 = 1.2 suggests a globular shape
of the dimer, which can be approximated by an ellipsoid of revolution
with an axial ratio of 2. Sedimentation equilibrium experiments were
performed in a broad range of protein concentrations (3-15
µM), but even at the lowest concentrations near the
meniscus of the cells (1 µM) no indication for
dissociation of dimers into monomers was detectable. The dissociation
equilibrium constant may therefore be estimated to be lower than 100 nM. Strong dimer formation of M2BP-1,2 was confirmed for
the unglycosylated form from tunicamycin-treated cells. The
sedimentation coefficient was 3.3 S, and equilibrium experiments at 10, 20, and 40 µM yielded a molar mass of 57 kDa. The
calculated molar mass of the unglycosylated monomer is 25.8 kDa.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Sedimentation coefficients (s20, w) and average molecular
masses of M2BP-1,2 and M2BP-3,4 as determined by analytical
ultracentrifugation
M2BP-1,2 and M2BP-3,4 were analyzed in 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH
7.5, 150 mM NaCl, and 20 mM potassium phosphate, pH 7.2, respectively.
|
|
In contrast to M2BP-1,2, M2BP-3,4 forms a heterogeneous distribution of
aggregates (Table I). At a concentration of 0.9 mg/ml (23 µM) in 20 mM potassium phosphate, pH 7.2, several sedimentation coefficients between 6 and 11 S were observed.
The molecular mass was in the range between 200 and 400 kDa, indicating
about 3-8 monomers/aggregate (glycosylated M2BP-3,4 runs on SDS gels
with a molecular mass of 50-60 kDa (Fig. 1C)). The
aggregation of M2BP-3,4 was found to increase with increasing protein
and salt concentration (Fig. 5).

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Self-association of M2BP-3,4 monitored by
sedimentation equilibrium experiments at different ionic strength.
The change of the molecular masses in dependence of the total monomer
concentration is shown. M2BP-3,4 was measured in 20 mM
potassium phosphate, pH 7.2, with ( ) or without ( ) 120 mM NaCl. The position of the monomer is indicated.
|
|
We also investigated the aggregation state of trypsin-digested
M2BP-3,4, which consists of the single domains 3 and 4 to possibly separate and characterize the two domains. However, analytical ultracentrifugation experiments revealed that the trypsin digest is
still aggregated (data not shown).
The nature of both proteins was also investigated by electron
microscopy (Fig. 6). Rotary shadowing of
M2BP-1,2 and unglycosylated M2BP-1,2 revealed particles of a
homogeneous size (Fig. 6, A and B). Adsorption to
the mica surface occurred from an about 1 µM protein
solution, at which, according to ultracentrifugal analysis, only dimers
are present. The size and shape of the dimers is in agreement with this
prediction. Horseshoe-like shapes can sometimes be identified (Fig.
6A). The open ends of this structure may be formed by the
noninteracting domains 1 according to the ring model of M2BP (11).
M2BP-3,4 shows particles of variable sizes and thus a tendency for
aggregation (Fig. 6C), as expected from the ultracentrifugal
results.

View larger version (198K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Visualization of glycosylated M2BP-1,2
(A), nonglycosylated M2BP-1,2 (B),
and glycosylated M2BP-3,4 (C) by electron microscopy
after rotary shadowing. The bar indicates 100 nm and
applies to all images.
|
|
Binding of M2BP-1,2 and M2BP-3,4 to Extracellular Matrix
Ligands--
A solid phase assay was used to examine the binding
potential of various plastic-immobilized extracellular matrix proteins to soluble M2BP-1,2 and M2BP-3,4 in comparison with native M2BP (Fig.
7). All matrix proteins that were tested
showed no or only weak binding to M2BP-1,2. Galectin-3 was the
strongest ligand for M2BP-3,4, with half-maximal binding achieved at
~2.5 µg/ml (~60 nM). The binding to native M2BP was
even stronger, with half-maximal binding at ~0.1 µg/ml (~1.5
nM). No substantial binding of fibronectin to M2BP-3,4 was
observed, whereas half-maximal binding to native M2BP was at ~1
µg/ml (~15 nM). The basement membrane protein nidogen showed half-maximal binding to M2BP-3,4 at ~40 µg/ml (~1
µM) and to native M2BP at ~6 µg/ml (~95
nM). The binding activity of collagens V and VI to M2BP-3,4
was distinctly lower than to native M2BP. Half-maximal binding to the
latter was at ~1.5 µg/ml (~25 nM) in case of both
collagens. When used as a plastic-immobilized substrate, both M2BP-1,2
and M2BP-3,4 showed no cell adhesive activity for human HBL-100 and rat
Rugli glioma cells (data not shown), in contrast to native M2BP and
M2BP-2,3,4 as shown previously (1, 11).

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Binding of soluble M2BP-1,2 and M2BP-3,4 to
immobilized extracellular matrix ligands in solid phase binding
assays. M2BP-1,2 ( ) and M2BP-3,4 ( ) were compared with
native M2BP ( ).
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
For a mapping of functional sites in multidomain proteins,
expression of individual domains or domain pairs is a very fruitful approach that was applied to laminin, fibronectin, and many other extracellular matrix proteins. For M2BP, domain 1 and a fragment comprising domains 2-4 were already investigated (1, 11), but a more
complete picture was only obtained with domain pair 1 and 2 and domain
pair 3 and 4 in the present study. With the exception of domain
2, we were not successful in expressing other single domains (domains 3 and 4) or domain combinations (M2BP-2,3 and M2BP-1,2,3), probably
because of misfolding in the ER and subsequent degradation. In all of
the unsuccessful cases one of the two domain boundaries selected for
cloning was between domains 3 and 4, where a putative linker region has
been identified (11). M2BP-2 could only be expressed in low amounts and
as a mixture of proteins that differed in their N termini and
glycosylation status. Electron microscopy showed that this protein
mixture had a high aggregation potential, and it was therefore not
characterized further.
Recombinant M2BP-1,2 and M2BP-3,4 were obtained as autonomously folding
proteins as shown by CD spectroscopy and protease resistance. This
result suggests that a connection between domains 2 and 3 is not
necessary for correct folding of M2BP. It also demonstrates that the
domain boundary between domains 2 and 3 was predicted correctly (11).
Trypsin susceptibility experiments with M2BP-3,4 revealed a trypsin
cleavage site within the putative linker region, where cleavage sites
for plasmin and an endogenous protease of SK-BR-3 cells have already
been localized (1, 2). Trypsin cleaved M2BP-3,4 into domains 3 and 4, which were stable to limited proteolysis. It is not yet clear why
expression of M2BP constructs with a domain boundary in this region was
not successful. A possible explanation is that both domains are needed for proper folding with each becoming stable against proteolysis.
We showed that folding of M2BP-1,2 is not prevented in the absence of
glycosylation. Treatment of M2BP-1,2 expressing EBNA-293 cells with
tunicamycin resulted in the production and secretion of unglycosylated
M2BP-1,2 in high amounts similar to the glycosylated one. The CD
spectra and the resistance to trypsin were very similar for both
proteins. In contrast, M2BP-3,4 was not secreted in the presence of
tunicamycin, probably because of misfolding.
M2BP-1,2 and M2BP-3,4 were substituted with ~12 and ~20
hexosamines, respectively. This suggested occupation of all three and
four N-linked oligosaccharide acceptor sites, respectively. By partial removal of the N-linked glycan moieties we have
shown that this is indeed the case. This result proved the previous suggestion that in recombinant full-length M2BP, all seven
N-linked oligosaccharide acceptor sites are occupied (1).
The almost complete absence of galactosamine residues in both M2BP-1,2
and M2BP-3,4 suggests that O-glycosylation plays a minor
role. This result is consistent with our finding that after treatment
with N-glycosidase F the molecular mass of both fragments is
reduced to values that are very close to the predicted mass of the
nonglycosylated fragments. Mass analysis of M2BP-1,2 from
tunicamycin-treated cells indeed showed that the protein is completely
unglycosylated, i.e. there is no O-glycosylation
occurring at all. The demonstration of terminal neuraminic acid
residues in the oligosaccharide chains by a small increase of
electrophoretic mobility in SDS-PAGE of both M2BP-1,2 and M2BP-3,4
after treatment with neuraminidase points to the presence of
N-linked oligosaccharide chains of the complex type.
Analytical ultracentrifugation showed that M2BP-1,2 forms dimers
already in the nanomolar range. The dimers were the only species
detectable by ultracentrifugation, and the homogeneity was confirmed by
electron microscopy. Dimerization is very strong (KD<100 nM), and dissociation into
monomers could experimentally not been achieved. Dimerization of
M2BP-1,2 points to domain 2 (BTB/POZ domain) as the dimerization domain
of M2BP, because it has been previously shown that recombinantly
expressed domain 1 (M2BP-1) is monomeric (11). The observation of dimer
formation by M2BP-1,2 is in complete agreement with the strong
dimerization tendency of many other proteins containing BTB/POZ domains
(reviewed by Aravind and Koonin (13)). The crystal structure of the
BTB/POZ domain from the promyelocytic leukemia zinc finger protein
revealed a dimer stabilized by an extensive hydrophobic interface (23, 24), a feature typical of obligate dimers. In agreement with this
structural evidence, unfolding studies and mutagenesis studies showed
that dimerization of the BTB/POZ domain is essential for proper folding
(25, 26). Native M2BP exists only in dimeric form because of the
putative obligate dimerization of domain 2. This prediction is
consistent with mass determinations by scanning transmission electron
microscopy, which have shown that the ring segments of recombinant M2BP
consist of dimers and that most of the linear oligomers exhibit masses
of an even number of monomers (11). Monomers are apparently only
present under strongly denaturing conditions (1).
Unglycosylated M2BP-1,2 from tunicamycin-treated cells was also
homogeneously dimeric. Thus the N-linked oligosaccharide
structures of M2BP-1,2 are necessary neither for proper folding nor for
proper oligomerization.
We have made attempts to crystallize M2BP-1,2 to get a crystal
structure of an extracellular BTB/POZ domain. However,
N-glycosylated M2BP-1,2 did not form crystals, obviously
because of the high oligosaccharide content of this protein. Therefore
we now try to crystallize unglycosylated M2BP-1,2 from
tunicamycin-treated cells because it has a secondary structure and an
oligomeric state indistinguishable from the glycosylated protein.
Analytical ultracentrifugation experiments showed that M2BP-3,4
self-associates in dependence of the protein concentration. No specific
oligomeric state was reached within the concentration range used (3-23
µM). Self-association was also dependent on the salt
concentration of the buffer. A mixture of aggregates with different
sizes and shapes was shown by electron microscopy. It has been
previously shown that a M2BP fragment comprising domains 2-4
(M2BP-2,3,4) still has the ability to form rings, although its
association is less specific, and the rings were found to be filled
with protein (11). Because M2BP-3,4 is not forming ring-like
structures, we conclude that domain 2 is indispensable for ring
formation. This is in agreement with a previously published model of
the rings in which each ring unit must be a dimer (11).
Dimers are formed by the interactions between BTB/POZ domains 2. The
scavenger receptor cysteine-rich domain 1 does not directly participate
in ring formation, and dimers interact end-to-end via domains 2 and 4. We were not able to show an interaction of M2BP-1,2 with M2BP-3,4 in
solid phase and surface plasmon resonance assays (data not shown),
which would be expected according to the model. However, this result
can be explained by the irregular aggregation of M2BP-3,4.
Previous studies showed that native M2BP and M2BP-2,3,4 bind to several
collagen types, fibronectin, and nidogen as well as to galectin-3. The
binding activity of the parent protein and the fragment are similar,
and consistently domain 1 was inactive (1, 11). We now have further
restricted the binding activities to domains 3 and 4. The binding
activity of intact M2BP and M2BP-3,4 was most similar in the case of
binding to nidogen. M2BP-3,4, which was used as soluble ligand in the
solid phase assays, reached half-maximal binding at a ~7-fold higher
protein concentration compared with intact M2BP. In the case of binding
to galectin-3, the difference in protein concentration to reach
half-maximal binding was ~25-fold, and in the case of binding to
collagens V and VI, it was even higher. M2BP-3,4 showed almost no
binding activity to fibronectin, whereas M2BP achieved half-maximal
binding at ~15 nM. The differences in the binding
activity to galectin-3 may be explained by different oligosaccharide
modification within domains 2-4 in M2BP-1,2 and M2BP-3,4 on one hand
and M2BP and M2BP-2,3,4 on the other hand. The specificity of
galectin-3, a
-galactoside-binding lectin, to galactose residues in
the sugar moiety of M2BP has already been described (8). Differences in
the sugar moieties of M2BP-1,2 and M2BP-3,4 compared with native M2BP
are also suggested by their hexosamine content. M2BP-1,2 and M2BP-3,4
contain altogether ~31 glucosamine residues and ~1 galactosamine
residue, whereas it has been shown that native M2BP produced
recombinantly in the same cells contains ~44 glucosamine and ~16
galactosamine residues (1). The reason for the different oligosaccharide modification in EBNA-293 cells is not yet clear.
The differences in binding activity of M2BP-2,3,4 and M2BP-3,4 to
nidogen, fibronectin, and the collagens point to a supporting role of
domain 2. Because domain 2 itself shows no detectable binding to these
matrix proteins, its influence appears to be indirect. A putative
mechanism for this phenomenon is the prevention of the irregular
aggregation of domains 3 and 4 by the presence of domain 2. In
conclusion the binding activity of aggregated M2BP-3,4 was lower than
that of native M2BP, but the fact that dimeric M2BP-1,2 was inactive in
binding strongly suggests that the binding sites are localized within
domains 3 and 4.
Both M2BP-1,2 and M2BP-3,4 showed no cell adhesive activity. In former
studies it has been shown that M2BP as well as M2BP-2,3,4 strongly
promoted adhesion of human HBL-100 and rat Rugli glioma cells, whereas
M2BP-1 was inactive (11). It has also been shown that cell adhesion to
M2BP is mediated by
1-integrins and is independent of
galectin-3 (1). Clearly M2BP-1,2 and M2BP-3,4 do not replace the intact
protein in cell adhesion perhaps because of the lack of a concerted
action of sites located in different regions or more likely because of
the lack of ring-like assembly. For a deeper understanding of the
functional advantage of the unusual ring-like structure of M2BP,
further studies are required, particularly at the level of the
interaction with its ligands.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We gratefully acknowledge the help of Dr.
Olivier Pertz on the cell culture experiments. We thank Dr. Paul
Jenö for N-terminal protein sequencing and the electrospray
ionization-mass spectroscopy experiments.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by Swiss National Science Foundation
Grant 31-49281.96 (to J. E.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.:
41-61-2672250; Fax: 41-61-2672189; E-mail:
Juergen.Engel@unibas.ch.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, February 26, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M200386200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
M2BP, Mac-2-binding
protein;
M2BP-1, domain 1 of M2BP;
M2BP-1, 2, N-terminal fragment of
M2BP comprising domains 1 and 2;
M2BP-3, 4, C-terminal fragment of M2BP
comprising domains 3 and 4;
M2BP-2, 3,4, M2BP with domain 1 deleted;
Tricine, N-[2-hydroxy-1,1-bis(hydroxymethyl)ethyl]glycine.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Sasaki, T.,
Brakebusch, C.,
Engel, J.,
and Timpl, R.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
1606-1613[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Koths, K.,
Taylor, E.,
Halenbeck, R.,
Casipit, C.,
and Wang, A.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
14245-14249[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 3.
|
Iacobelli, S.,
Arno, E.,
Sismondi, P.,
Natoli, C.,
Gentiloni, N.,
Scambia, G.,
Giai, M.,
Cortese, P.,
Panici, P. B.,
and Mancuso, S.
(1988)
Breast Cancer Res. Treat.
11,
19-30[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Longo, G.,
Natoli, C.,
Rafanelli, D.,
Tinari, N.,
Morfini, M.,
Rossi-Ferrini, P.,
D'Ostilio, N.,
and Iacobelli, S.
(1993)
Br. J. Haematol.
85,
207-209[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Ullrich, A.,
Sures, I.,
D'Egidio, M.,
Jallal, B.,
Powell, T. J.,
Herbst, R.,
Dreps, A.,
Azam, M.,
Rubinstein, M.,
Natoli, C.,
Shawver, L. K.,
Schlessinger, J.,
and Iacobelli, S.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
18401-18407[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Powell, T. J.,
Schreck, R.,
McCall, M.,
Hui, T.,
Rice, A.,
App, H.,
Azam, M.,
Ullrich, A.,
and Shawver, L. K.
(1995)
J. Immunother. Emphasis Tumor Immunol.
17,
209-221[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Trahey, M.,
and Weissman, I. L.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
3006-3011[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Rosenberg, I.,
Cherayil, B. J.,
Isselbacher, K. J.,
and Pillai, S.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
18731-18736[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Inohara, H.,
and Raz, A.
(1994)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
201,
1366-1375[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Inohara, H.,
Akahani, S.,
Koths, K.,
and Raz, A.
(1996)
Cancer Res.
56,
4530-4534[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Muller, S. A.,
Sasaki, T.,
Bork, P.,
Wolpensinger, B.,
Schulthess, T.,
Timpl, R.,
Engel, A.,
and Engel, J.
(1999)
J. Mol. Biol.
291,
801-813[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Hohenester, E.,
Sasaki, T.,
and Timpl, R.
(1999)
Nat. Struct. Biol.
6,
228-232[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Aravind, L.,
and Koonin, E. V.
(1999)
J. Mol. Biol.
285,
1353-1361[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Kohfeldt, E.,
Maurer, P.,
Vannahme, C.,
and Timpl, R.
(1997)
FEBS Lett.
414,
557-561[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Schagger, H.,
and von Jagow, G.
(1987)
Anal. Biochem.
166,
368-379[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Ralston, G.
(1993)
Introduction to Analytical Ultracentrifugation
, Beckman Instruments, Fullerston, CA
|
| 17.
|
Engel, J.
(1994)
Methods Enzymol.
245,
469-488[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Pace, C. N.,
Vajdos, F.,
Fee, L.,
Grimsley, G.,
and Gray, T.
(1995)
Protein Sci.
4,
2411-2423[Abstract]
|
| 19.
|
Laemmli, U. K.
(1970)
Nature
227,
680-685[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Heukeshoven, J.,
and Dernick, R.
(1988)
Electrophoresis
9,
28-32[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Specks, U.,
Mayer, U.,
Nischt, R.,
Spissinger, T.,
Mann, K.,
Timpl, R.,
Engel, J.,
and Chu, M. L.
(1992)
EMBO J.
11,
4281-4290[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Pokutta, S.,
Herrenknecht, K.,
Kemler, R.,
and Engel, J.
(1994)
Eur. J. Biochem.
223,
1019-1026[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Ahmad, K. F.,
Engel, C. K.,
and Prive, G. G.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
12123-12128[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Li, X.,
Peng, H.,
Schultz, D. C.,
Lopez-Guisa, J. M.,
Rauscher, F. J., III,
and Marmorstein, R.
(1999)
Cancer Res.
59,
5275-5282[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Li, X.,
Lopez-Guisa, J. M.,
Ninan, N.,
Weiner, E. J.,
Rauscher, F. J., III,
and Marmorstein, R.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
27324-27329[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Melnick, A.,
Ahmad, K. F.,
Arai, S.,
Polinger, A.,
Ball, H.,
Borden, K. L.,
Carlile, G. W.,
Prive, G. G.,
and Licht, J. D.
(2000)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20,
6550-6567[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Becker, M. C. Lenter, T. Vollkommer, A. M. Boos, D. Pfaff, H. G. Augustin, and S. Christian
Tumor stroma marker endosialin (Tem1) is a binding partner of metastasis-related protein Mac-2 BP/90K
FASEB J,
August 1, 2008;
22(8):
3059 - 3067.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|