![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 18, 15721-15728, May 3, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
§¶,
¶,
,
,
, and
**
From the
Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia
Sinica, Taipei 115, § Department of Life Sciences, Chung
Shan Medical University, Taichung 402, and the
Institute
of Neuroscience, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei 112, Taiwan,
Republic of China
Received for publication, December 4, 2001, and in revised form, January 28, 2002
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We previously showed that phosphorylation of
Ser10 of the N terminus domain of the type VI
adenylyl cyclase (ACVI) partly mediated protein kinase C (PKC)-induced
inhibition of ACVI. We now report that phosphorylation of the other two
cytosolic domains (C1 and C2), which form the catalytic core complex of
ACVI, also contributes to PKC-mediated inhibition. In vitro
phosphorylation by PKC of the recombinant C1a and C2 domains, and of
the synthetic peptides representing potential PKC phosphorylation
sites, suggests that Ser568 and Ser674 of the
C1 domain and Thr931 of the C2 domain might act as
substrates for PKC. We next created several full-length ACVI mutants in
which one or more of the four likely PKC phosphorylation sites
(Ser10, Ser568, Ser674, and
Thr931) were mutated to alanine. Simultaneous mutation of
at least two of the three likely residues located in the N and C1
domains (Ser10, Ser568, and Ser674)
was required to render ACVI variants completely insensitive to PKC
treatment. In contrast, a single mutation of Thr931 was
sufficient to create a functional ACVI mutant that exhibited no
detectable PKC-mediated inhibition, demonstrating the essentiality of
Thr931 to PKC-mediated regulation. Based on these results,
we propose that the three cytosolic domains of ACVI might form a
regulatory complex. Phosphorylation of this regulatory complex at
different sites might induce a fine-tuning of the catalytic core
complex and subsequently lead to alternation in the catalytic activity of ACVI.
Genes of nine mammalian membrane-bound adenylyl cyclases
(ACs)1 have been isolated and
characterized (1-3). All of these ACs contain two hydrophobic spans,
composed of six transmembrane helices, and three large cytoplasmic
domains (N, C1a/b, and C2, see Fig. 1A). The crystal
structure of the catalytic domains of AC has been resolved and analyzed
in detail (4, 5). It was clearly demonstrated that two cytoplasmic
domains (C1a and C2) of ACs form the catalytic core. In
addition, G We have previously reported that prolonged activation of the
A2A adenosine receptor (A2A-R) in PC12 cells
significantly inhibits the activity of type VI adenylyl cyclase (ACVI),
which in turn causes a lower response to subsequent stimulation by
A2A-R (12, 13). In addition, stimulation by
A2A-R activates the calcium-independent protein kinase C
(PKC) that phosphorylates and inhibits ACVI. Suppression of ACVI by
protein phosphorylation thus produces a lower response of ACVI to
subsequent stimulation by A2A-R in PC12 cells (14). Further
biochemical analyses reveal that the apparent maximal forskolin-
and G In the present study, we have sought to further elucidate the molecular
mechanism underlying the inhibitory effect of PKC on ACVI. Detailed
mutational characterization suggests that PKC phosphorylates at least
four residues (Ser10, Ser568,
Ser674, and Thr931) located in the three large
cytosolic domains (N, C1, and C2) of ACVI and subsequently exerts an
inhibitory effect on the catalytic activity of ACVI. Moreover,
phosphorylation of ACVI at multiple sites located in different
cytosolic domains is required to achieve the maximal inhibitory effect
of PKC, indicating that the three large cytosolic domains might
interact with each other to acquire an active conformation, which is
subject to phosphorylation-driven regulation by PKC.
Expression of Adenylyl Cyclases in Sf21 Cells--
The
cDNA of rat ACVI was kindly provided by Dr. Iyengar (Department of
Pharmacology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, NY) (16). Expressions of
wild-type and mutant ACVI were carried out in a recombinant
baculovirus-driven Sf21 cell system following the manufacturer's protocol (BD PharMingen, San Diego, CA). Membrane fractions were collected from Sf21 cells infected with the
indicated virus carrying the desired ACVI variant 68-72 h after infection.
Adenylyl Cyclase Assay--
AC activity was assayed as described
previously (13). Briefly, cells were resuspended in lysis buffer (0.4 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 25 mM Tris-HCl,
250 mM sucrose, 0.1 mM leupeptin, and 40 µM PMSF, pH 7.4), and sonicated using a W-380 sonicator
(Ultrasonics, Farmingdale, NY) at a setting of 20% output power for a
total of 45 s. The homogenate was centrifuged at 50,000 × g for 30 min to collect the P1 membrane fractions. The AC
activity assay was performed at 37 °C for 10 min in a 400-µl
reaction mixture containing 1 mM ATP, 100 mM
NaCl, 50 mM Hepes, 0.5 mM
3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine, 6 mM MgCl2, 1 µM GTP, and 20 µg of membrane protein. Reactions were
stopped by addition of 0.6 ml of 10% trichloroacetic acid. The cAMP
formed was isolated by Dowex chromatography (Sigma) and assayed as
described previously (13). The ACVI activity was determined as the
difference between cyclase activities measured in membrane fractions
collected from Sf21 cells infected with the ACVI virus and with
the control Autographa californica multicapsid nuclear
polyhedrosis virus. Endogenous cyclase activities in Sf21 cells represented ~20% of the total activity. The enzyme activity was linear for up to 30 min with up to 40 µg of membrane proteins.
Site-directed Mutagenesis--
Potential PKC phosphorylation
sites of rat ACVI were identified using the Genetics Computer Group
program (Madison, WI). Site-directed mutagenesis of Ser10,
Ser325, Ser568, Ser674, and
Thr931 of ACVI was carried out using the Altered Sites II
in vitro Mutagenesis Systems (Promega) following the
manufacturer's protocol. Mutations were confirmed by DNA sequencing.
Mutant cDNAs were cloned into a baculovirus transfer vector
(pVL1392) and expressed in Sf21 cells as described above.
Recombinant G Polymerase Chain Reaction--
DNA fragments encoding the C1a,
C2S, and C2L domains of ACVI were produced using the PCR technique. DNA
amplification was carried out in a solution containing 10 mM Tris-HCl, 50 mM KCl, 1.5 mM
MgCl2, 0.001% (w/v) gelatin, 0.2 mg of the desired
primers, 0.2 mM of each deoxynucleoside triphosphate
(dNTP), a DNA template, and 2 units of DynaZyme thermostable DNA
polymerase (Finnzymes, Espoo, Finland) per 50 µl of reaction
solution. Primers for ACVI (16) were as follows: for the C1a domain
(amino acids 356-599), 5'-GCATATGTCGGTGTTGCCCCAGCAT-3' and
5'-GGATCCGTCAGGAACCCAGCGGGG-3'; and for the C2S domain (amino acids
946-1173), 5'-CATATGAAGGAGGAGATGGAGGAG-3' and
5'-GAGATGACCACCTACTTCTAGGGATCCTAT-3'. The reactions proceeded for 40 PCR cycles (95 °C, 1 min; 68 °C, 1 min; 72 °C, 4 min). Primers
for the C2L domain (amino acids 925-1180) were
5'-CATATGCAACAGGTGGAATCT-3' and 5'-GGATCCCTAACTGCTGGGGCCCCCATT-3'. The
reactions proceeded for 40 PCR cycles (95 °C, 1 min; 55 °C, 1 min; 72 °C, 4 min). The amplified DNA fragments were ligated to the
C terminus of a hexahistidine tag, confirmed by DNA sequencing, and
subcloned into pET11d (Novagen) for expression in E. coli.
Because the expression levels of the recombinant C1a and C2S domains
were very low in E. coli, the DNA fragment encoding C1a or
C2S was subcloned into pVL1393 for expression in Sf21 cells.
Expressions of these domain proteins were carried out in a recombinant
baculovirus-driven Sf21 cell system following the
manufacturer's protocol (BD PharMingen).
SDS-PAGE and Western Blotting--
We determined protein
concentrations by a simple colorimetric assay based on the Bradford
dye-binding procedure (18) using the Bio-Rad Protein Assay Dye Reagent
Concentrate (Bio-Rad). For SDS-PAGE, membrane fractions were combined
with 2× sample buffer containing 125 mM Tris-HCl (pH 6.8),
20% glycerol, 1% SDS, 15% 2-mercaptoethanol, and 0.01% bromphenol
blue, boiled for 5 min, centrifuged to remove the insoluble material,
and then separated on 8% separating gels according to the method of
Laemmli (19). Following electrophoresis, the gel was transferred to a
polyvinylidene difluoride membrane, blocked with 5% skim milk in PBS,
then incubated with an anti-ACVI antibody (AC6D, 1:5000 dilution (14))
at 4 °C overnight. After three washes of 5 min each in PBS, the
membranes were incubated with peroxidase-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit
IgG (Amersham Biosciences, Inc., Buckinghamshire, UK) at a 1:5000 dilution for 1 h at room temperature. The membranes were washed three times with PBS, and the immunoreactive bands were stained using a
light-emitting non-radioactive method (ECL, Amersham Biosciences, Inc.). The polyclonal AC6D was raised against the recombinant C2 domain
(amino acids 987~1180) of ACVI (14). Because the C1a and C2 domains
of ACVI are highly homologous (44% similarity), AC6D recognized both
the C1a and C2 domains of ACVI.
Immunoprecipitation and in Vitro Phosphorylation--
To carry
out the protein phosphorylation study, ACVI variants expressed in
Sf21 cells were purified by immunoprecipitation using AC6D. In
brief, 0.25 mg of P1 membrane fractions collected from Sf21
cells infected with the indicated virus were solubilized in 0.25 ml of
ice-cold radioimmune precipitation buffer (150 mM NaCl, 1%
Nonidet P-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, 0.1 mM
leupeptin, 40 µM PMSF, and 50 mM Tris, pH 8)
at 4 °C for 30 min. Immunoprecipitation was initiated by addition of
AC6D (1:50 dilution). The reaction mixture was incubated with gentle
agitation at 4 °C for 90 min. Immunocomplexes were purified using
Sephadex-conjugated protein A (Sigma) and then washed three times with
ice-cold radioimmune precipitation buffer. Phosphorylation by PKC was
carried out in a final volume of 0.1 ml of a reaction mixture
containing 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM
CaCl2, 0.25% bovine serum albumin, 12 µM
N-[2-(p-bromocinnamylamino)ethyl]-5-isoquinoline sulfonamide (H89), 12 µM ATP, 50 µCi of
[ Peptide Phosphorylation--
Peptides were synthesized and
purchased from Genosys (Woodlands, TX). The composition and amount of
each peptide were confirmed by amino acid analysis (Analytical
Biotechnology Services, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan).
Names and sequences of the peptides are shown in Table I.
Phosphorylation of each peptide was carried in a final volume of 50 µl of a reaction mixture containing 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH
7.5), 10 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM
CaCl2, 0.1 mg/ml phosphatidylserine, 20 µg/ml diolein
(Sigma), 0.25 mM [ In addition to phosphorylation of the highly variable N domain at
Ser10, our previous study (10) suggests that PKC might
phosphorylate other cytosolic domains (C1a/b and C2, Fig.
1A). Because the C1 and C2
domains form the catalytic core complex (5), we examined whether the
activation state of the catalytic core complex affects the ability of
ACVI to be regulated by PKC. Activation of ACVI was first achieved by
pretreating ACVI with activated G
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
s and/or forskolin increase the
affinity between C1a and C2 and activate cyclase by changing the
relative orientation of the C1 and C2 domains to an active conformation
(4, 5). The functional roles of the C1b domain of ACs are relatively
more variable. For ACII and ACVII, the C1b domain suppresses the
catalytic activity by holding ACs in their basal non-stimulated state
(6). Moreover, the C1b domain modulates calmodulin-elicited activation
of ACI- and PKA-evoked inhibition of ACVI (7, 8). The N terminus
domains of ACs are highly variable among ACs and have been demonstrated
to play a regulatory role (9, 10). The twelve transmembrane segments
are responsible for linking together the two catalytic domains (C1a and
C2) to achieve a proper functional conformation and are important for membrane targeting of ACs (4, 11).
s-stimulated activities of PKC-treated ACVI are
significantly lower than those of the non-treated enzyme. However,
treatment with PKC does not alter the Km of the
substrate, nor does it markedly affect the EC50 values of forskolin or G
s (10). Interestingly, the glycosylation
state of ACVI affects the ability of ACVI to be inhibited by PKC (15), further suggesting that post-translational modification of ACVI is
important for its activity. Analysis of the amino acid sequence of rat
ACVI (16) using the Genetics Computer Group program (Madison, WI)
reveals that there are 11 potential PKC phosphorylation sites that lie
within the three predicted large intracellular cytoplasmic domains (N,
C1a/b, and C2; see Fig. 1A). We earlier reported that PKC
phosphorylates the highly variable N terminus domain of ACVI at
Ser10. The N terminus domain therefore appears to mediate,
at least partly, the inhibition and phosphorylation of ACVI by PKC
(10). Notably, the ACVI mutant lacking amino acids 1-86 or
Ser10 can still be phosphorylated by PKC (10), suggesting
that PKC also phosphorylates residues located in the C1 or C2 domain of ACVI.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
SProtein
Expression--
The expression construct (pQE60/H6-G
s)
of G
s protein was a generous gift from Dr. W.-J. Tang
(University of Chicago, Chicago, IL). The hexahistidine-tagged
G
s protein was expressed in Escherichia coli
and purified using the His·Bind metal chelation resin (Novagen, Madison, WI) as described elsewhere (17). To stimulate AC activity, the
indicated concentration of G
s protein was activated by
GTP
S (20 µM) in a 100-µl reaction mixture containing
10 mM MgCl2, 20 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA, and 1 mM dithiothreitol for 20 min at
20 °C.
-32P]ATP (6000 Ci/mmol, 1 Ci = 37 GBq, Amersham
Biosciences, Inc., Piscataway, NJ), 0.1 mM leupeptin, 40 µM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), 30 nM okadaic acid, 0.2 mM sodium vanadate, and 20 mM Tris (pH 7.5). The phosphorylation reaction was
initiated by addition of PKC (0.1 milliunit (mU)) purified from rat
brain (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) for 30 min at 4 °C and was
terminated by the addition of 2× SDS sample treatment buffer. Samples
were then boiled for 5 min then analyzed by SDS-PAGE (8%) and Western blotting using AC6D. To visualize the phosphorylation of ACVI by PKC,
immunoblots were rinsed twice with PBS, air-dried, and autoradiographed.
-32P]ATP (500 cpm/pmol),
1 mM peptide (MBP4-14, Sigma), and 0.01 mU of PKC. After a
30-min incubation at 30 °C, the reaction was terminated by boiling
for 5 min. The phosphorylated peptides were segregated from
[
-32P]ATP by 20% acrylamide SDS-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis as described elsewhere (20). Gels were fixed with two
changes of 30% (v/v) methanol followed by two changes of 10% (v/v)
acetic acid after which they were exposed to the film at
80 °C.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
s proteins (240 nM), which enhanced the activity of ACVI by ~5 fold (Fig. 2). As shown in Fig. 2, ACVI in both the
basal/non-stimulated and G
s-activated states could be
inhibited by PKC treatment to a similar extent.

View larger version (21K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Schematic representation of rat ACVI (amino
acid sequence derived from M96160.Gb_Ro). A, 11 potential PKC phosphorylation sites located on the three large
intracellular domains are indicated as open circles.
B, schematic representation of the C1a, C2S, and C2L
domains. Amino acid residues that define these domains are shown.

View larger version (17K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Inhibition of ACVI by PKC is independent of
the activation status of ACVI. Membrane fractions of Sf21
cells infected with ACVI baculoviruses were collected. Activation of
ACVI by G
s was carried out by treating the desired
membrane fractions with G
s (240 nM)/GTP
S
(5 µM) for 10 min at 20 °C as described under
"Experimental Procedures." Activated G
s proteins
were then removed by centrifugation, followed by PKC treatment of the
membrane fractions as indicated. Activity of ACVI was then stimulated
by forskolin (5 µM). Values represent the means ± S.E. of three determinations. The standard deviations are too small to
be visible in the figure. The results are from one representative
example of four independent experiments performed. Statistical
significance was evaluated by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA).
Specific comparisons between the PKC-treated and the control group of
each activation status were performed using the Dunnett method (33). *,
p < 0.05.
Based on the available crystallographic structure of VC1a/IIC2 (5), we
built a computer model of the catalytic core composed of the C1a and C2
domains of ACVI (Fig. 3). According to
the model, two potential PKC phosphorylation sites, Ser489
and Ser1126, are located in the catalytic core of the
C1a·C2 complex of ACVI. Ser489 and
Ser1126 are very conserved among eight other AC isoforms,
and lie close to the forskolin and ATP binding sites, respectively
(Fig. 3). Because these two residues are most likely buried inside the
core catalytic complex at all times (basal or activated), they are less
likely to be accessible to PKC-mediated phosphorylation.
|
We next determined whether the other putative PKC phosphorylation residues located in the C1 (Ser325, Thr372, Ser568, Ser619, and Ser674) and C2 (Thr931) domains of ACVI could be phosphorylated by PKC. Because synthetic peptides have been used to assess the most likely phosphorylation sites (21, 22), peptides (Table I) representing the potential PKC phosphorylation sites of the C1 domain were treated with PKC to screen for the most likely PKC phosphorylation sites in the C1 domain. As shown in Fig. 4A, peptides containing Ser325, Ser568, or Ser674, but not the others, were phosphorylated by PKC. In addition, the recombinant C1a domain (amino acids 356-599) could be effectively phosphorylated by PKC (Fig. 4B). PKC, therefore, might phosphorylate the C1 domain of ACVI, and the likely phosphorylated residues of the C1 domain by PKC are Ser325, Ser568, and Ser674.
|
|
We next proceeded to individually mutate the three most likely phosphorylation sites (Ser325, Ser568, or Ser674) of the C1 domain into alanine and then expressed the resultant ACVI mutants in insect cells using a baculovirus-driven system. As shown in Fig. 4C, each ACVI mutant carrying a single point mutation exhibited similar molecular weights as that of the wild-type ACVI. In addition, mutation of Ser568 or Ser674 led to a statistically significant reduction in the phosphorylation levels of ACVI by PKC (Fig. 4D). Because multiple residues of ACVI might be phosphorylated by PKC, it is not surprising to find that PKC was able to cause a substantial level of phosphorylation in both ACVI-S568A and ACVI-674. In contrast, mutation of Ser325 did not diminish the PKC-mediated phosphorylation levels. In some of the experiments performed, we even observed a slight increase in PKC-mediated phosphorylation of ACVI-S325A compared with that of the wild-type (WT, Fig. 4C). However, the difference in the PKC-mediated phosphorylation levels between the WT and the ACVI-S325A mutant was not statistically significant (Fig. 4D). Collectively, at least two residues (Ser568 and Ser674) located in the C1 domain of ACVI might be phosphorylated by PKC.
To assess the functional relevance of Ser568 and Ser674 in PKC-mediated inhibition of ACVI, we next examined the effect of PKC treatment on the activities of ACVI-S568A and ACVI-S674A. As shown in Table II, mutation of Ser568 or Ser674 diminished PKC-mediated inhibition when relative activities of the PKC-treated WT and PKC-treated ACVI-mutant groups were compared. Reduced PKC-evoked inhibition of both ACVI mutants correlated well with the decreased phosphorylation levels of ACVI-S568A and S674A. Ser568 and Ser674, therefore, might be critical for PKC-mediated inhibition of ACVI activity. It is interesting to note that individual mutations of these two residues only partially relieved PKC-mediated inhibition, further supporting our hypothesis that multiple residues contribute to the phosphorylation and suppression of ACVI by PKC.
|
We have previously reported that mutation of Ser10 located
in the N terminus domain of ACVI into alanine partially relieved PKC-evoked inhibition of ACVI (10). We next simultaneously mutated two
of the three residues (Ser10, Ser568, and
Ser674) located in the N and C1 domains to analyze their
contributions to PKC-mediated phosphorylation and inhibition. As shown
in Fig. 5A, phosphorylation
levels of the ACVI mutants carrying mutations of two residues were
significantly reduced. Most importantly, activities of these ACVI
mutants containing double mutations could not be inhibited by PKC
treatment (Table II). Simultaneous phosphorylation of at least two of
these three residues of the C1 and N domains therefore appears to be
important for PKC-mediated inhibition of ACVI activity. Likewise, as
expected, activity of the ACVI mutant
(ACVI-S10A/S568A/S674A) that contained mutations of all three
residues was not sensitive to PKC-mediated inhibition (Table II),
although, at very low levels, ACVI-S10A/S568A/S674A could still be
phosphorylated by PKC (Fig. 5B, Table II). Other residues, likely to be those located in the C2 domain, thus might also contribute to PKC-mediated phosphorylation and inhibition of ACVI. Note that each
of these residues contributes to only a small portion of the overall
PKC-induced phosphorylation level of ACVI, and inevitably, there are
slight variations among independent experiments. Although phosphorylation levels of single ACVI mutants appear to be higher than
those of ACVI variants with multiple mutations, the differences are not
statistically significant (Table II). Quantitation of phosphorylation
levels therefore only allows us to conclude that PKC-mediated
phosphorylation levels of all mutants examined are lower than that of
the wild-type.
|
The C2 domain of ACVI contains two potential PKC phosphorylation sites
(Thr931 and Ser1126; Fig. 1A).
Ser1126 is located inside the catalytic core of ACVI (Fig.
3) and is therefore less likely to be accessible by PKC. To investigate this conjecture, two recombinant C2 domain proteins (C2L, amino acids
925-1180; C2S, amino acids 946-1173; Fig. 1B) of ACVI were prepared and used to determine whether PKC phosphorylates these two
domains. As shown in Fig. 6, PKC
effectively phosphorylated the recombinant C2L protein, which contains
Thr931 and Ser1126, but not the recombinant C2S
domain containing only Ser1126 (Fig. 6, A and
B). We then substituted Thr931 with alanine to
examine the involvement of Thr931 in PKC-elicited
inhibition of ACVI. PKC-evoked phosphorylation levels of the resultant
ACVI mutant (ACVI-T931A) were reduced when compared with those of the
wild-type ACVI (Fig. 6C). Moreover, mutation of
Thr931 resulted in a functional ACVI mutant that exhibited
no PKC-mediated inhibition. Thr931 thus appears to play a
critical role in PKC-mediated inhibition of ACVI.
|
Except for Ser489 and Ser1126, all other
potential PKC phosphorylation sites are located outside of the
catalytic core of ACVI as defined by the computer model (Fig. 3). As
expected, mutation of the potential PKC phosphorylation sites examined
in the present study did not markedly alter the general enzymatic
properties or protein expression levels of ACVI (data not shown). The
variation observed in the apparent maximal AC activity evoked by
forskolin (Vm', Table II) was likely to have been caused by the passages and ages of Sf21 cells employed for expression as
previously observed in Sf9 cells (23). To determine the effect
of PKC, AC activities of the indicated ACVI variant were measured in
the absence or presence of PKC in the same experiment using the same preparation of plasma membranes. The observed variation in the Vm' values resulting from different batches of plasma membranes
therefore did not interfere with our analysis of the effect of PKC.
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the present study, we demonstrate that PKC suppresses the
activity of ACVI in both the basal/non-stimulated and
G
s-stimulated states. Phosphorylation studies and
mutational analyses reveal that at least four amino acids
(Ser10, Ser568, Ser674, and
Thr931) located in the regulatory N domain and two
catalytic domains (C1 and C2) of ACVI might contribute to PKC-evoked
inhibition and phosphorylation. Such a conclusion is based on several
lines of evidence (Ref. 10 and this report). First, synthetic peptides encoding the potential phosphorylation sites of Ser10,
Ser568, and Ser674 are substrates of PKC.
Second, the recombinant N domain (containing Ser10), C1a
domain (containing Ser568), and C2L domain (containing
Thr931) were all effectively phosphorylated by PKC. Last
and most importantly, both single and multiple mutations of these four
residues reduced the ability of ACVI to be phosphorylated and regulated
by PKC. The goal of the present study was neither to identify all
phosphorylated residues of ACVI by PKC nor to exclude the involvement
of residues other than the four identified above. Instead, results
presented herein attribute the PKC-mediated inhibition of ACVI to
phosphorylation of the three large cytosolic domains and further
underscore the importance of domains outside the catalytic core in
determining the activity of ACVI. Because phosphorylation of all
cytosolic domains is required to achieve maximal inhibition of ACVI by
PKC, a delicate fine-tuning by intramolecular interactions among the three large cytosolic domains must play a critical role in the regulation of ACVI.
Phosphorylation is one of the most important regulatory mechanisms of
the superfamily of ACs. Except for ACVI, residues of ACs phosphorylated
by various kinases reported so far are located in only one cytosolic
domain (either C1b or C2 (8, 24-26)). The one or more mechanisms
underlying the modulation of different ACs by various kinases are
distinct. For example, phosphorylation of the C1b domain of ACI at
Ser545 and Ser552 by
Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent kinase II affects
calmodulin-induced activation of ACI without altering basal catalytic
activity (24), whereas phosphorylation of multiple residues of ACVI by
PKC reduces forskolin-induced catalytic activity (Ref. 10 and this
report). Regulation of ACVI by phosphorylation is intriguing, because
this AC isozyme can be regulated by at least three different kinases,
including PKA, PKC, and a tyrosine kinase (8, 10, 27). We note with particular interest that PKC phosphorylates the C1b domain of ACVI at
Ser674, which is the same residue phosphorylated by PKA
(8). Phosphorylation of ACVI by PKA reduces the low affinity
stimulation by G
s protein (8), while phosphorylation of
ACVI by PKC causes a reduction in its catalytic activity without
changing its affinities toward stimuli (i.e. forskolin and
G
s (10)). This difference in the effects of PKC- and
PKA-mediated phosphorylation on enzymatic properties of ACVI might be
due to PKC phosphorylating at least three more residues in addition to
Ser674, which is the only site phosphorylated by PKA.
Because ACVI is mostly expressed in neurons (28), regulation of ACVI by
different kinases might provide an important mechanism to render
neurons capable of detecting simultaneous stimulation by multiple neurotransmitters.
The importance of phosphorylation of the highly variable N terminus domain of ACVI at Ser10 has been thoroughly discussed elsewhere (10). In the C1 domain, Ser568 and Ser674 are located in relatively conserved regions. Structural information on Ser568 in the C1a domain is currently unavailable, because it is located at the crystallographically disordered C terminus of the C1a domain (Fig. 3). Ser 674 is located in a short and conserved region of the C1b domain, which interacts with the C1a and C2 domains (6). We were surprised to find that, although single mutations of Ser10, Ser568, or Ser674 caused only partial relief of PKC-mediated inhibition of ACVI, simultaneous mutation of two or all three of these residues gave rise to ACVI mutants insensitive to PKC treatment (Table II). The present study therefore supports and extends our previous findings (10) and suggests that intramolecular interactions between the N domain and the catalytic core complex are important for the activity of ACVI. Regulation mediated by phosphorylation of multiple residues, each with a small but significant contribution, has other precedent examples (29).
Another residue contributing significantly to PKC-mediated inhibition of ACVI is Thr931. Thr931 is located in a relatively conserved region at the beginning of the C2 domain of ACVI (Fig. 1A), and, therefore, is in an ideal position to influence the dynamic conformation of the catalytic core complex. In contrast to what was observed for other single mutants of ACVI (ACVI-S10A, ACVI-S568A, and ACVI-S674A), substitution of Thr931 with alanine resulted in a functional ACVI insensitive to PKC-mediated inhibition. Phosphorylation of the C2 domain at Thr931 thus is essential for regulation of ACVI by PKC. This result is in agreement with the observation that the catalytic cleft of ACs is mainly constructed by the C2 moiety (30). In addition, given the positions of Ser674 and Thr931 (Fig. 1A), our finding is consistent with the concept that regions linking transmembrane domains and cytosolic loops are important for the regulation of ACs (31). In the equivalent position of Thr931, four other AC isozymes (ACV, ACVI, ACVIII, and ACIX) also possess a potential PKC phosphorylation site. Note that ACV is phosphorylated and stimulated by PKC (32). Whether the Thr931-equivalent site of ACV is phosphorylated by PKC is currently unknown. It will be of interest to examine whether ACVIII and ACIX can be regulated by PKC.
Because the catalytic core complexes of ACV and ACVI are highly homologous, the fact that PKC has an opposite effect on ACV than it does on ACVI is intriguing. There are totally 12 potential PKC phosphorylation sites in the three intracellular cytosolic domains of ACV (Genetics Computer Group program, Madison, WI). At least two different PKC isozymes can phosphorylate ACV (probably at multiple sites) and markedly enhance its catalytic activity (32). Among these potential PKC phosphorylation sites, five are in the same equivalent positions as those of ACVI (Ser145, Ser325, Ser489, Ser568, and Thr931). At least two major PKC phosphorylation sites (Ser10 and Ser674) of ACVI are missing in ACV. The importance of Ser674 is obvious, because it can be phosphorylated by both PKC and PKA in ACVI (Ref. 8 and this report) and is conserved as the only potential PKA phosphorylation site in ACV which can be inhibited by PKA-mediated phosphorylation (34). Negative charges caused by phosphorylation at Ser674 of ACVI and its equivalent site of ACV therefore might suppress the catalytic core activity. The absence of PKC-mediated phosphorylation at the Ser674-equivalent site of ACV might partially contribute to the lack of a negative effect of PKC on ACV. Importantly, unlike the catalytic core, the N terminus domains of ACV and ACVI show little sequence homology. For ACVI, we have reported that PKC phosphorylates its N domain at Ser10, a PKC site missing in ACV, and that the N domain might interact with its catalytic core to confer an active conformation sensitive to PKC-mediated phosphorylation (Ref. 10 and this report). Given the regulatory roles of the N domain that have been elucidated for two AC isozymes (9, 10), it is tempting to speculate that the N domain of ACV, which contains six potential PKC phosphorylation sites, might be phosphorylated by PKC and that it plays a role in the PKC-evoked enhancing effect on the catalytic activity of ACV.
Together with our previous study on the N terminus (10), we have
demonstrated that PKC phosphorylates at least four residues distributed
in the three large cytosolic domains, and phosphorylation of these
resides all contributes to PKC-mediated inhibition. The complexity of
the regulation led us to hypothesize that the three cytosolic domains
of ACVI might form a regulatory complex that can, through
phosphorylation at multiple sites, fine-tune the relative orientations
of the C1 and C2 domains to modulate the enzyme's catalytic activity.
Based on the boundaries defined by the structural model of the
catalytic core (Fig. 3) and the likely spatial location of
Ser568 and Ser674, it also seems reasonable to
hypothesize that PKC phosphorylates the C1 domain at a region opposite
to the G
s binding site (Figs. 3 and 5), perhaps by
interfering with the G
i binding site (23). In this
context, it is of interest to note that deglycosylation of ACVI elicits
a similar neutralizing effect, although to different extents, on the
inhibition of the enzyme mediated by a G
i
protein-coupled receptor or PKC (15).
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Te-Hsun Yang for creating mutant ACVI-S674A and Ya-Wen Lin for her effort in maintaining the Sf21 cell culture. We are also grateful to Yi-Sheng Cheng and Yuh-Shin Jiang for generating the computer model and Fig. 3.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by grants from the National Science Council (NSC89-2320-B001-011; NSC90-2320-B001-009) and from Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶ Both authors contributed equally to this work.
** To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 886-2-2652-3913; Fax: 886-2-2782-9143; E-mail: bmychern@ibms.sinica.edu.tw.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, February 27, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M111537200
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are:
AC(s), adenylyl cyclase(s);
ACVI, type VI adenylyl cyclase;
A2A adenosine
receptor, A2A-R;
PKA, protein kinase A;
PKC, protein kinase
C;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
PMSF, phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride;
GTP
S, guanosine 5'-3-O-(thio)triphosphate;
WT, wild-type.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Taussig, R.,
and Gilman, A. G.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
1-4 |
| 2. |
Paterson, J. M.,
Smith, S. M.,
Harmar, A. J.,
and Antoni, F. A.
(1995)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
214,
1000-1008[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 3. |
Chern, Y.
(2000)
Cell. Signal.
12,
195-204[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 4. |
Yan, S.-Z.,
Hahn, D.,
Huang, Z.-H.,
and Tang, W.-J.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
10941-10945 |
| 5. |
Tesmer, J. J. G.,
Sunahara, R. K.,
Gilman, A. G.,
and Sprang, S. R.
(1997)
Science
278,
1907-1916 |
| 6. |
Yan, S.-Z.,
Beeler, J. A.,
Chen, Y.,
Shelton, R. K.,
and Tang, W.-J.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
8500-8506 |
| 7. |
Levin, L. R.,
and Reed, R. R.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
7573-7579 |
| 8. |
Chen, Y.,
Harry, A., Li, J.,
Smit, M. J.,
Bai, X.,
Magnusson, R.,
Pieroni, J. P.,
Weng, G.,
and Iyengar, R.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
14100-14104 |
| 9. |
Gu, C.,
and Cooper, D. M. F.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
8012-8021 |
| 10. |
Lai, H.-L.,
Lin, T.-H.,
Kao, Y.-Y.,
Lin, W.-J.,
Hwang, M.-J.,
and Chern, Y.
(1999)
Mol. Pharmacol.
56,
644-650 |
| 11. |
Gu, C.,
Sorkin, A.,
and Cooper, D. M. F.
(2001)
Curr. Biol.
11,
185-190[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 12. |
Chern, Y.,
Lai, H.-L.,
Fong, J. C.,
and Liang, Y.
(1993)
Mol. Pharmacol.
44,
950-958[Abstract] |
| 13. |
Chern, Y.,
Chiou, J.-Y.,
Lai, H.-L.,
and Tsai, M.-H.
(1995)
Mol. Pharmacol.
48,
1-8[Abstract] |
| 14. |
Lai, H. L.,
Yang, T.-H.,
Messing, R. O.,
Ching, Y.-H.,
Lin, S.-C.,
and Chern, Y.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
4970-4977 |
| 15. |
Wu, G.-C.,
Lai, H.-L.,
Lin, Y.-W.,
Chu, Y.-T.,
and Chern, Y.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
35450-35457 |
| 16. |
Premont, R. T.,
Chen, J., Ma, H. W.,
Ponnapalli, M.,
and Iyengar, R.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
9809-9813 |
| 17. |
Yan, S.-Z.,
Huang, Z.-H.,
Andrews, R. K.,
and Tang, W.-J.
(1998)
Mol Pharmacol.
53,
182-187 |
| 18. |
Bradford, M.
(1976)
Anal. Biochem.
72,
248-254[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 19. |
Laemmli, U. K.
(1970)
Nature (Lond.)
227,
680-685[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 20. |
Honegger, A.,
Dull, T. J.,
Szapary, R.,
Komoriya, A.,
Kris, R.,
Ullrich, A.,
and Schlessinger, J.
(1988)
EMBO J.
7,
3053-3060[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 21. |
Luscher, B.,
Christenson, E.,
Litchfield, D. W,
Krebs, E. G.,
and Eisenman, R. N.
(1990)
Nature
344,
517-522[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 22. |
Graff, J. M.,
Young, T. N.,
Johnson, J. D.,
and Blackshear, P. J.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
2818-2823 |
| 23. |
Dessauer, C. W.,
Tesmer, J. J.,
Sprang, S. R.,
and Gilman, A. G.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
25831-25839 |
| 24. |
Wayman, G. A.,
Wei, J.,
Wong, S.,
and Storm, D. R.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
6075-6082[Abstract] |
| 25. |
Wei, J.,
Waymann, G.,
and Storm, D. R.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
24231-24235 |
| 26. |
Bol, G. F.,
Gros, C.,
Hulster, A.,
Bosel, A.,
and Pfeuffer, T.
(1997)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
237,
251-256[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 27. |
Tan, C. M.,
Kelvin, D. J.,
Litchfield, D. W.,
Ferguson, S. S.,
and Feldman, R. D.
(2001)
Biochemistry
40,
1702-1709[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 28. | Liu, F.-C., Wu, G.-C., Hsieh, S.-T., Lai, H.-L., Wang, H.-F., Wang, T.-W., and Chern, Y. FEBS Lett. 436, 92-98 |
| 29. |
Miyakawa, Y.,
Drachman, J. G.,
Gallis, B.,
Kaushansky, A.,
and Kaushansky, K.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
32214-32219 |
| 30. |
Weitmann, S.,
Myrsig, N.,
Navarro, J. M.,
and Kleuss, C.
(1999)
Biochemistry
38,
3409-3413[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 31. |
Parent, C. A.,
Borleis, J.,
and Devreotes, P. N.
(2002)
J. Biol. Chem.
277,
1354-1360 |
| 32. |
Kawabe, J.,
Iwami, G.,
Ebina, T.,
Ohno, S.,
Katada, T.,
Ueda, Y.,
Homcy, C. J.,
and Ishikawa, Y.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
16554-16558 |
| 33. | Glantz, S. A. (1997) Primer of Biostatistic , 4th Ed. , pp. 99-103, McGraw-Hill, New York |
| 34. |
Iwami, G.,
Kawabe, J.,
Ebina, T.,
Cannon, P. J.,
Homcy, C. J.,
and Ishikawa, Y.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
12481-12484 |
| 35. | Kraulis, P. J. (1991) J. Appl. Crystallog. 24, 946-950[CrossRef] |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Willoughby and D. M. F. Cooper Organization and Ca2+ Regulation of Adenylyl Cyclases in cAMP Microdomains Physiol Rev, July 1, 2007; 87(3): 965 - 1010. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z Cheng, E L Sheldrick, E Marshall, D C Wathes, D R E Abayasekara, and A P F Flint Control of cyclic AMP concentration in bovine endometrial stromal cells by arachidonic acid Reproduction, May 1, 2007; 133(5): 1017 - 1026. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Fischmeister, L. R.V. Castro, A. Abi-Gerges, F. Rochais, J. Jurevicius, J. Leroy, and G. Vandecasteele Compartmentation of Cyclic Nucleotide Signaling in the Heart: The Role of Cyclic Nucleotide Phosphodiesterases Circ. Res., October 13, 2006; 99(8): 816 - 828. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. C. L. Martin and D. M. F. Cooper Capacitative and 1-Oleyl-2-acetyl-sn-glycerol-Activated Ca2+ Entry Distinguished Using Adenylyl Cyclase Type 8 Mol. Pharmacol., August 1, 2006; 70(2): 769 - 777. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Beazely, J. K. Alan, and V. J. Watts Protein Kinase C and Epidermal Growth Factor Stimulation of Raf1 Potentiates Adenylyl Cyclase Type 6 Activation in Intact Cells Mol. Pharmacol., January 1, 2005; 67(1): 250 - 259. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-l. Chou, C.-L. Huang, H.-L. Lai, A. C. Hung, C.-L. Chien, Y.-Y. Kao, and Y. Chern Regulation of Type VI Adenylyl Cyclase by Snapin, a SNAP25-binding Protein J. Biol. Chem., October 29, 2004; 279(44): 46271 - 46279. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |