Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M102777200 on February 4, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 18, 15962-15970, May 3, 2002
Interaction of Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 3 and the
Adapter Protein SH2-B
A ROLE IN STAT5 ACTIVATION*
Monica
Kong
,
Ching S.
Wang
, and
Daniel J.
Donoghue§
From the Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Center for
Molecular Genetics, University of California San Diego,
La Jolla, California 92093-0367
Received for publication, March 29, 2001, and in revised form, January 17, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
Fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3)
influences a diverse array of biological processes, including cell
growth, differentiation, and migration. Activating mutations in FGFR3
are associated with multiple myeloma, cervical carcinoma, and bladder
cancer. To identify proteins that interact with FGFR3 and which may
mediate FGFR3-dependent signaling, a yeast two-hybrid
screen was employed using the cytoplasmic kinase domain of FGFR3 as
bait. We identified the adapter protein SH2-B as an FGFR3-interacting
protein. Coimmunoprecipitation experiments demonstrate binding of the
SH2-B
isoform to FGFR3 in 293T cells. Tyrosine phosphorylation of
SH2-B
was observed when coexpressed with activated FGFR3 mutants
such as the weakly activated mutant N540K or the strongly activated
mutant K650E, both associated with human developmental syndromes. The
extent of tyrosine phosphorylation of SH2-B
correlates with receptor
activation, suggesting that FGFR3 activation mediates tyrosine
phosphorylation of SH2-B
. Furthermore, two tyrosine phosphorylation
sites of FGFR3, Tyr-724 and Tyr-760, are required for optimal binding
of the Src homology-2 (SH2) domain of SH2-B
. We also demonstrate the
phosphorylation and nuclear translocation of Stat5 by activated FGFR3,
which increases in response to overexpression of SH2-B
. Taken
together, our results identify SH2-B
as a novel FGFR3 binding
partner that mediates signal transduction.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Fibroblast growth factor receptors
(FGFRs)1 are receptor
tyrosine kinases that integrate many different intercellular signals affecting cell growth, differentiation, migration, wound healing, and
angiogenesis, depending on the target cell type and developmental stage
(1, 2). The FGFR family comprises of four structurally related members,
FGFR1, FGFR2, FGFR3, and FGFR4, exhibiting three extracellular
immunoglobulin-like (Ig) domains, a single transmembrane domain, and a
split intracellular tyrosine kinase domain (3-5). Mutations in
FGFRs, which may be either familial or spontaneous in origin, are
responsible for a large number of human developmental disorders
including skeletal dwarfism and craniosynostosis syndromes (6-8).
Translocations and mutations affecting members of the FGFR family are
also importantly associated with several human cancers (6, 9-12).
FGFR3 plays a particularly important role in skeletal development
(13-15). Disruption of murine FGFR3 produces severe and progressive bone dysplasia with enhanced endochondral bone growth, suggesting that
FGFR3 mediates the negative regulation of bone growth (16, 17).
Mutations in FGFR3 are directly responsible for human dwarfism syndromes, including hypochondroplasia, achondroplasia, and
thanatophoric dysplasia (TD) (6). Several of the mutations that cause
these syndromes reside within the FGFR3 kinase domain and result in varying degrees of constitutive receptor activation. The N540K substitution, located proximal to the split tyrosine kinase domain, underlies the mild skeletal dwarfism hypochondroplasia and confers weak
constitutive activation (15, 18). At the other end of the spectrum, the
K650E substitution located within the activation loop of the kinase
domain relieves the normal requirement for regulatory phosphorylation
at Tyr-647 and Tyr-648 and leads to profound constitutive kinase
activation in comparison to wild-type FGFR3 (19). This mutation causes
thanatophoric dysplasia type II (TDII), a neonatal lethal dwarfism
syndrome (6, 19). Recently, a different activating substitution at this
same position, K650M, has been associated with the syndrome SADDAN (or
severe achondroplasia with delayed development and acanthosis
nigricans) (12).
Abnormal activation of FGFR3 as a result of somatic mutation has been
reported in conjunction with several human cancers, including multiple
myeloma, cervical carcinoma, and bladder carcinoma (7, 8, 20). The
specific FGFR3 mutations involved include K650E and K650M in the kinase
domain or R248C, S249C, G370C, and Y373C in the extracellular domain.
All of these mutations identified in human neoplasia have been
previously described as activating mutations associated with TDI, TDII,
or SADDAN (6, 19, 21, 22).
In the presence of heparin sulfate proteoglycan, fibroblast growth
factors (FGFs) bind to FGFRs, causing receptor dimerization and
autophosphorylation of tyrosine residues (23-25). These
phosphotyrosine residues provide specific binding sites for signaling
proteins containing Src homology 2 (SH2) domains or phosphotyrosine
binding domains (26, 27). For example, Tyr-766 in FGFR1 has been shown to interact with phospholipase C-
(PLC-
) (28). The adapter protein fibroblast growth factor receptor substrate 2 (FRS2) has also
been shown to associate with FGFR1 (29-31). Activation of FGFR1 leads
to tyrosine phosphorylation of FRS2 at several sites, leading to
recruitment of growth factor receptor-bound 2 (Grb2) (32). Besides
PLC-
and FRS2, little is known about substrates of FGFRs that lead
to mitogenesis and differentiation.
Given the importance of understanding FGFR3-mediated signaling, both
for human developmental syndromes and also for those human cancers
where FGFR3 activation has been observed, we wished to identify novel
FGFR3-interacting proteins that may represent important substrates for
downstream signaling. Toward this end, we employed a yeast two-hybrid
screen in which the bait was the kinase domain from either wild-type
FGFR3 or from an activated mutant. Using the weakly activated N540K
mutant as bait, we were able to identify four candidate binding
proteins that interact with FGFR3, one of which is the adapter protein
SH2-B.
SH2-B contains several protein-protein interaction motifs, including a
pleckstrin homology domain, an SH2 domain, and multiple proline-rich
regions (33, 34). At least three splice variants of SH2-B (
,
,
and
) have been identified that have identical N-terminal and SH2
domains but differ in their C-terminal domains (33, 35, 36). SH2-B has
previously been shown to interact with other receptor tyrosine kinases
including platelet-derived growth factor receptor, insulin receptor,
and tropomyosin receptor kinase A (TrkA) receptor as well as the
non-receptor tyrosine kinase Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) (33-35, 37-44).
Because SH2-B
has been the most studied isoform of SH2-B, we used
SH2-B
to further characterize the interaction with FGFR3 described
here. In PC12 cells, tyrosine-phosphorylated SH2-B
binds to growth
factor receptor-bound 2 (Grb2) and is sufficient to mediate nerve
growth factor induction of Ras and mitogen-activated protein kinase
(38, 45, 46). SH2-B
has also been demonstrated to bind to JAK2, to
stimulate the kinase activity of JAK2, and to increase tyrosine
phosphorylation of Stat3 and Stat5B when coexpressed with JAK2 (35,
37).
In this study, we have identified and characterized SH2-B as an FGFR3
binding partner. We also demonstrate that activated FGFR3 can directly
phosphorylate SH2-B
. In addition, we show that expression of
SH2-B
together with activated FGFR3 increases Stat5B phosphorylation
in 293T cells. Stat5B was also observed to relocalize exclusively to
the nucleus upon FGFR3-mediated signaling through SH2-B
. Our data
thus suggest that the adapter protein SH2-B
may represent an
important signaling molecule that mediates downstream biological
effects of FGFR3 activation.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Plasmid Construction--
Full-length Myc epitope-tagged
SH2-B
and GFP-Stat5B were generous gifts from C. Carter-Su (35, 47).
FGFR3-wild type (R3-WT), FGFR3-K650E (R3-K650E), and myristoylated
FGFR3-K650E (myr-R3-K650E) clones were described previously (19, 22,
48). The FGFR3-N540K (R3-N540K) mutant was constructed from R3-WT by
using QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis (Stratagene). LexA-R3-WT,
LexA-R3-N540K, and LexA-R3-K650E were constructed through the insertion
of the cytoplasmic domain of R3-WT, R3-N540K, and R3-K650E,
respectively, into the LexA fusion vector pBTM116, which was
constructed by P. Bartel and S. Fields. To construct the Myc
epitope-tagged SH2 domain of SH2-B (Myc-SH2), pVP16-SH2-B isolated from
the yeast two-hybrid screen was digested at flanking BamHI
and EcoRI sites, and the resulting restriction fragment was
subcloned into BglII/EcoRI-digested pCS3+MT
vector. GST-SH2 was generated by subcloning Myc-SH2 into the vector
pGEX-KG (Amersham Biosciences). The Tyr to Phe mutants were constructed
as described previously (49) and subcloned into pBTM116. The
Myc-SH2-B
(R555E) was made as described previously (37).
Yeast Two-hybrid Screen--
A yeast two-hybrid screen was
performed according to previously published protocols (50, 51). The
two-hybrid plasmids pBTM116, pVP16, and LexA-lamin were kindly provided
by S. Hollenberg and J. A. Cooper (Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research
Center). LexA-R3-WT, LexA-R3-N540K, or LexA-R3-K650E constructs were
cotransformed with a 9.5-day-post-coitum mouse embryonic cDNA
library fused to pVP16 into the L40 strain of Saccharomyces
cerevisiae. Transformants were selected on
His
medium for 3-4 days at 30 °C. The
resulting colonies were subjected to the filter-lift color assay and
tested for
-galactosidase activity (50). Potential positive clones
were selected, and prey plasmids containing library cDNA inserts
were isolated and shuttled into Escherichia coli HB101
cells. Positives were further confirmed by testing pVP16-cDNA
against LexA-lamin and sequenced by the Center for AIDS Research
Molecular Biology Core, University of California San Diego. The NCBI
BLAST program was used to determine the identity of positive clones.
Immunoprecipitation and Immunoblot--
293T cells were grown in
Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium supplemented with 10% fetal
bovine serum and incubated at 37 °C in 10% CO2.
Sub-confluent cells were transfected with 10 µg of DNA by calcium
phosphate precipitation (52). Two days after transfection cells were
harvested and lysed in 0.5% Nonidet P-40 lysis buffer {20
mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 150 mM NaCl, 0.5%
Nonidet P-40, 1 mM Na3VO4, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 mM
dithiothreitol, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, and 10 µg/ml leupeptin. Lysates
were pre-cleared with 40 µl of 50% protein A-Sepharose beads and
then incubated with 2 µg of polyclonal FGFR3 (C-15) (Santa Cruz
Biotechnology) antibody or monoclonal Myc (9E10) antibody (Santa Cruz
Biotechnology) overnight at 4 °C. Protein A-Sepharose beads were
then added over a 2-h period, and the immunoprecipitated samples
were washed 3 times with lysis buffer, boiled 3 min in sample buffer,
and analyzed by 10% SDS-PAGE. For experiments not requiring
immunoprecipitation, lysates were analyzed by 10% SDS-PAGE and
transferred to Immobilon-P membranes (Millipore). Membranes were
immunoblotted with FGFR3 (C-15) antibody, Myc (9E10) antibody, and
phosphotyrosine (4G10) antibody (Upstate Biotechnology) followed by
enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) (Amersham Biosciences). To
reprobe with other antibodies, membranes were stripped of bound
antibodies in stripping buffer (100 mM 2-mercaptoethanol,
2% SDS, 62.5 mM Tris-HCl (pH 6.8)) and incubated for 30 min at 60 °C with rotation.
For endogenous SH2-B
association with FGFR3, NIH3T3 cells were
transfected with 15 µg of pcDNA3 or R3-K650E. Two days
post-transfection, cells were harvested and lysed with 0.1% Nonidet
P-40 lysis buffer, and 1.5 mg of pre-cleared protein were
immunoprecipitated with SH2-B
antibody generously provided by Dr.
Carter-Su (35) at 4 °C overnight. Protein A-Sepharose beads were
then added for at least 2 h, and the immunoprecipitated samples
were washed 3 times with lysis buffer, boiled 3 min in sample buffer,
and analyzed by 10% SDS-PAGE. Proteins were then transferred to
Immobilon-P membranes and probed with FGFR3 (C-15) antibody. The
membrane was then stripped and probed with SH2-B
antibody followed
by ECL.
For Stat5 phosphorylation experiments, 5 µg of the indicated
constructs were transfected into 293T cells. Cells were lysed in 1%
Nonidet P-40 lysis buffer, and 40 µg of lysate was analyzed by 10%
SDS-PAGE and transferred to Immobilon-P membranes. The membrane was
then probed with phospho-Stat5 antibody (Cell Signaling) and proteins
were detected by ECL. The membrane was then stripped and reprobed with
Stat5 (C-17, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), FGFR3 (C-15), and Myc (9E10)
antisera to ensure equal levels of protein expression.
Glutathione S-Transferase (GST) Fusion Proteins--
Bacteria
transformed with GST-SH2 or GST plasmid were grown overnight and
induced with isopropyl-
-D-thiogalactopyranoside the next
day. Bacterial pellets were resuspended in 20 ml of NETN (100 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 0.5% v/v
Nonidet P-40 with 2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl
fluoride, 15 µg/ml aprotinin, 20 µg/ml leupeptin, and 20 µg/ml
pepstatin A). Cell suspensions were then sonicated followed by
centrifugation at 20 krpm for 30 min. Supernatants were added to GST
beads and rotated at 4 °C overnight. Beads then were washed five
times with NETN and boiled in sample buffer.
Baculovirus Expression of R3-K650E--
The kinase domain
isolated from full-length R3-K650E (amino acids 457-827) was subcloned
into pFASTBAC Htc (Invitrogen), which contains a histidine tag and
elements necessary for cloning and subsequent transfer to the
baculovirus genome. Purification was as previously described (53).
In Vitro Kinase Assay--
15 µl of GST fusion proteins were
washed once in kinase buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 10 mM MnCl2, 5 mM MgCl2)
and subsequently incubated with or without 15 µl of
baculovirus-expressed R3-K650E in 30 µl of kinase buffer plus 20 µCi of [
-32P]ATP at 37 °C for 20 min. Samples
were then washed with NETN five times, boiled in sample buffer,
resolved by 7.5% SDS-PAGE, transferred to membrane, and visualized by
autoradiography. The membrane was then immunoblotted with GST (Z-5)
antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and detected by ECL.
Liquid Culture
-Galactosidase Assay--
Yeast were
cotransformed with the indicated plasmids and grown on
His
plates for 3-4 days at 30 °C. Liquid culture
-galactosidase assays were then performed according to the protocol
provided by CLONTECH using o-nitrophenyl
-D-galactopyranoside (Sigma). Each reaction was carried
out at 30 °C until the sample became yellow. Samples that did not
develop a yellow color were stopped at the end of the fourth hour. The
absorbance of each sample was measured at 420 nm, and
-galactosidase
activity was calculated using the formula,
-galactosidase units = 1000 × A420/(t × V × A600), where
t is elapsed time (min) of incubation, V is 0.1 ml × concentration factor, and A600 is the
absorbance of 1 ml if culture at 600 nm. The data obtained were the
results of five independent experiments.
Immunofluorescence--
2C4 cells were cultured in 10%
heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum containing 80 µg/ml G418 in 5%
CO2. Cells were plated onto 60-mm plates containing glass
coverslips at a density of 5 × 105. The next day, the
cells were transfected with a total of 2.1 µg of DNA of the indicated
constructs using Effectene (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's
directions. DNA ratios for the triple transfection were 0.1 µg of
GFP-Stat5B, 0.5 µg of FGFR3, and 1.5 µg of Myc-SH2-B
. pcDNA3
was added to make up the difference in the single and double
transfections. Twenty-four h post-transfection, the coverslips were
fixed with 3% paraformaldehyde. To visualize protein localization, the
cells were permeabilized with 0.5% Triton-X, rinsed with
phosphate-buffered saline, and blocked with 3% bovine serum albumin
for 30 min. The cells were incubated with FGFR3 antibody (1:500) for
1 h, washed, then incubated with 1:500 rhodamine-conjugated anti-rabbit secondary antibody for 45 min. After washing with phosphate-buffered saline, the coverslips were mounted onto glass slides with 90% glycerol in 0.1 M Tris-HCl (pH 8.5) plus
phenylenediamine to prevent fading. Cells were photographed using a
Nikon Microphot-FXA microscope with a Hamamatsu C5810 camera.
 |
RESULTS |
Identification of an FGFR3-interacting Protein--
A yeast
two-hybrid screen was employed to identify potential substrates of
FGFR3. To construct the bait for the two-hybrid screen, the entire
intracellular domain of FGFR3 was fused to the LexA DNA binding domain.
Three different bait constructs were utilized that differed in the
extent of constitutive FGFR3 kinase activation (Fig.
1A): (i) LexA-R3-WT, (ii)
LexA-R3-N540K, incorporating the weakly activated N540K mutation that
causes hypochondroplasia (15, 18), and (iii) LexA-R3-K650E,
incorporating the strongly activated K650E mutation that causes TDII
(19).

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
FGFR3 interacts with SH2-B in a two-hybrid
screen. A, schematic representation of the LexA-FGFR3
baits. TM (shaded) represents the transmembrane
domain, and Ig represents an immunoglobulin-like domain. The
black region represents the LexA DNA binding domain.
B, the SH2 domain of SH2-B was isolated from the two-hybrid
screen. Full-length rat SH2-B is 670 amino acids (aa)
long containing 9 tyrosine residues. The black regions
represent proline-rich regions, PH represents the pleckstrin
homology domain, and SH2 represents the Src homology 2 domain. The expanded region shown, isolated from the yeast two-hybrid
screen, is mouse SH2-B (GenBankTM accession number
AF036355).
|
|
These constructs were used as two-hybrid baits and screened against a
9.5-day-post-coitum mouse embryonic cDNA library. Cotransformed yeast were plated on His
plates, and the activation of
the HIS3 reporter gene was used to select for protein-protein
interactions. The LexA-R3-WT bait resulted in ~50 positives, but none
yielded identifiable clones. The LexA-R3-K650E bait appeared toxic to
the yeast in the large scale transformation, and no positives resulted
from the screen. Only one of the bait proteins, LexA-R3-N540K, yielded
significant positive clones in the screen. Approximately 150 potential
positive clones were isolated, and of these, 50 clones scored positive on the filter-lift
-galactosidase assay. False positives were further eliminated by testing against LexA-lamin, and 25 clones remained positive. One of the positive clones identified was SH2-B.
The cDNA insert of the SH2-B plasmid identified is 342 bp in length
and corresponds to residues 518-631. The region includes the entire
SH2 domain plus a small portion of flanking sequences as shown in Fig.
1B. We also wished to determine whether the LexA-R3-WT and
LexA-R3-K650E constructs would interact with the SH2-B clone and
performed a small scale yeast transformation. Both LexA-R3-WT and
LexA-R3-K650E were found to interact with the SH2 domain of SH2-B
(Table I). PLC-
, which was also
isolated from the screen, was used as a positive control since it has
been shown to bind to Y766 of FGFR1, which corresponds to Tyr-760 in
FGFR3 (28). This yeast two-hybrid interaction demonstrates for the
first time a direct interaction between FGFR3 and PLC-
. The empty
pVP16 vector was used as an additional negative control. Thus, we
demonstrate a novel interaction between the SH2 domain of SH2-B and
FGFR3.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Summary of yeast two-hybrid interactions
The LexA-R3-N540K bait isolated SH2-B from the two-hybrid screen. SH2-B
was then tested against LexA-R3-WT and LexA-R3-K 650E. As a positive
control, PLC- was tested against each bait. As negative controls,
the baits were tested against the Vp16 vector alone, and the isolated
clones were tested against LexA-lamin. Transformed yeast were grown at
30 °C for 3-4 days on His plates.
|
|
The SH2 Domain of SH2-B
Mediates Interaction with FGFR3 in
Vivo--
To confirm that the SH2 domain alone can interact with FGFR3
in mammalian cells, an Myc epitope-tagged derivative of SH2-B
was
constructed containing only the SH2 domain. This derivative, designated
Myc-SH2, was transfected into 293T cells in the absence or presence of
full-length FGFR3-wild type (R3-WT), FGFR3-N540K (R3-N540K), or
FGFR3-K650E (R3-K650E). Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with FGFR3
antibody, resolved by 10% SDS-PAGE, and immunoblotted with Myc
antisera. The results indicate that the SH2 domain alone is sufficient
to bind to activated FGFR3 (Fig. 2,
lanes 3 and 4). Significant association was
observed between Myc-SH2 and the strongly activated mutant, R3-K650E
(Fig. 2, lane 4), whereas little or no R3-WT was recovered
in association with Myc-SH2 (Fig. 2, lane 2). In comparison,
intermediate association was seen between R3-N540K and Myc-SH2. These
results suggest that the binding of the SH2 domain to FGFR3 may be
dependent on the extent of receptor activation. Immunoblotting with
FGFR3 antibody shows the expression of the FGFR3 derivatives
immunoprecipitated from transfected cell lysates (Fig. 2, middle
panel), and equivalent expression of Myc-SH2 was confirmed by
analyzing lysate alone (Fig. 2, bottom panel).

View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
The SH2 domain of SH2-B interacts with FGFR3
in vivo. 293T cells were transfected with the indicated
constructs, where Mock is pcDNA3 vector alone. Cell
lysates were immunoprecipitated (IP) with FGFR3 antibody,
analyzed by 10% SDS-PAGE, and immunoblotted (IB) with Myc
antibody (top panel). The middle panel shows the
presence of FGFR3 using FGFR3 antibody. Equal expression of the Myc-SH2
domain of SH2-B was confirmed by resolving lysate on a 10% SDS-PAGE
followed by immunoblotting with Myc antibody (bottom
panel).
|
|
Endogenous SH2-B
Interacts with Activated FGFR3--
We next
wished to determine whether endogenous mouse SH2-B
would interact
with transfected FGFR3 in NIH3T3 cells. Cells were transfected with
either mock or R3-K650E, lysed, and immunoprecipitated with SH2-B
antisera. Lysates and immunoprecipitated samples were then analyzed by
10% SDS-PAGE, followed by immunoblotting with FGFR3 or SH2-B
antisera. The top panel of Fig.
3 demonstrates the presence of activated
FGFR3 in the SH2-B
-immunoprecipitated sample (lane 4).
Activated FGFR3 does not bind to protein A-Sepharose beads alone, as
demonstrated in lane 6 of the top panel. The
bottom panel of Fig. 3 confirms the presence of endogenous
mouse SH2-B
in the lysate and SH2-B
-immunoprecipitated lanes
(lanes 1-4) but not in the protein A-Sepharose plus lysate
lanes (lanes 5 and 6).

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
FGFR3 interacts with endogenous SH2-B.
NIH3T3 cells were transfected with the indicated constructs, lysed, and
immunoprecipitated (IP) with SH2-B antibody (lanes
3 and 4) or protein A (Pro A)-Sepharose
beads alone (lanes 5 and 6). Samples were then
analyzed by 10% SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted (IB) with FGFR3
antibody (top panel). The membrane was then stripped and
reprobed with SH2-B antibody to confirm the presence of SH2-B
(bottom panel).
|
|
Full-length SH2-B
Interacts with FGFR3--
Myc epitope-tagged
full-length SH2-B
(Myc-SH2-B
) (35) was examined for its ability
to bind to FGFR3 derivatives in mammalian cells. 293T cells were
transfected with empty pcDNA3 vector or with Myc-SH2-B
in the
absence or presence of full-length R3-WT, R3-N540K, or R3-K650E. Cell
lysates were immunoprecipitated with Myc antibody, resolved by 10%
SDS-PAGE, and immunoblotted with FGFR3 antisera. All three of the FGFR3
derivatives bound to Myc-SH2-B
, as demonstrated by the recovery of
FGFR3 proteins in the Myc-SH2-B
immunoprecipitates (Fig.
4). The extent of FGFR3 recovery
correlated generally with the magnitude of receptor activation. The
strongly activated R3-K650E mutant exhibited the strongest association (Fig. 4, lane 6, top panel), and the weakly
activated R3-N540K mutant was recovered to a lesser extent (Fig. 4,
lane 5, top panel), whereas R3-WT showed the
lowest association (Fig. 4, lane 4, top panel).
The membrane was stripped and reprobed with Myc antibody to confirm the
expression of Myc-SH2-B
(Fig. 4, middle panel). Equivalent expression of FGFR3 was also confirmed by analyzing lysate
alone (Fig. 4, bottom panel). These results demonstrate that
SH2-B
forms a complex with FGFR3 in vivo that can be
recovered by immunoprecipitation and that the extent of
SH2-B
·FGFR3 complex formation correlates with the level of FGFR3
activation.

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Full-length SH2-B
interacts with FGFR3 in vivo. 293T cells were
transfected with the indicated constructs. Cell lysates were
immunoprecipitated (IP) with Myc antibody, analyzed by 10%
SDS-PAGE, and immunoblotted (IB) with FGFR3 antibody
(top panel). The membrane was stripped and reprobed with Myc
antibody to confirm the presence of Myc-SH2-B (middle
panel). Equal expression of FGFR3 was confirmed by resolving
lysate on a 10% SDS-PAGE followed by immunoblotting with FGFR3
antibody.
|
|
FGFR3 Activation Promotes Tyrosine Phosphorylation of
SH2-B
--
SH2-B
has been shown previously to be
tyrosine-phosphorylated in response to growth hormone, nerve growth
factor, and platelet-derived growth factor (33, 34, 37-40). To
determine whether FGFR3 activation promotes tyrosine phosphorylation of
SH2-B
, 293T cells were transfected with empty pcDNA3 vector or
with Myc-SH2-B
in the absence or presence of R3-WT, R3-N540K, or
R3-K650E. Lysates were immunoprecipitated with Myc antibody and
resolved by 10% SDS-PAGE. Immunoblotting with 4G10 phosphotyrosine
antisera revealed that the tyrosine-phosphorylated form of SH2-B
specifically associated with activated FGFR3 (Fig. 5A, lanes 5 and
6 of the top panel). Tyrosine-phosphorylated
SH2-B
associated strongly with R3-K650E (Fig. 5A,
lane 6, top panel) but much less so with R3-N540K
(Fig. 5A, lane 5, top panel). R3-WT was unable to
stimulate the tyrosine phosphorylation on SH2-B
(Fig. 5A,
lane 4, top panel). The presence of SH2-B
was
confirmed by reprobing the stripped membrane with Myc antibody (Fig.
5A, middle panel). Equivalent FGFR3 expression
was confirmed by immunoblotting the lysates with FGFR3 antibody (Fig.
5A, bottom panel).

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Activated FGFR3 tyrosine phosphorylates
SH2-B . A, 293T cells were
transfected with the indicated constructs. Cell lysates were
immunoprecipitated (IP) with Myc antibody, analyzed on a
10% SDS-PAGE, and immunoblotted (IB) with phosphotyrosine
(4G10) antibody (top panel). The membrane was stripped and
reprobed with Myc antibody to confirm the presence of Myc-SH2-B
(middle panel). Equal expression of FGFR3 was confirmed by
resolving lysate on 10% SDS-PAGE followed by immunoblotting with FGFR3
antibody (bottom panel). B, 293T cells were
transfected with the indicated constructs, where myr
represents the myristoylated derivative of R3. Lysates were
immunoprecipitated with Myc antibody followed by immunoblotting with
4G10 antibody (top panel). The membrane was stripped and
reprobed with Myc antibody to confirm the expression of Myc-SH2-B .
P, phosphorylated.
|
|
Because both FGFR3 and SH2-B
migrate between 116 and 97.5 kDa on
10% SDS-PAGE, we wanted to rule out the possibility that the bands
shown in the top panel of Fig. 5A were
tyrosine-phosphorylated FGFR3. To accomplish this, we utilized a
truncated R3-K650E construct that contained only the intracellular
domain and a myristoylation signal at the N terminus
(Myr-R3-K650E) to properly localize the protein to the plasma membrane
and which we have extensively characterized in previous studies (22,
48). This construct runs at ~50 kDa. 293T cells were transfected with
empty pcDNA3 vector or with Myc-SH2-B
in the absence or presence
of Myr-R3-K650E. The samples were then lysed and immunoprecipitated
with Myc antibody. Immunoblotting with 4G10 phosphotyrosine antibody
showed that SH2-B
is indeed tyrosine-phosphorylated (Fig.
5B, lane 4, top panel), which
confirmed that activated FGFR3 stimulates tyrosine phosphorylation of
SH2-B
. The bottom panel of Fig. 5B shows that
Myc-SH2-B
was expressed in the appropriate samples (lanes
2 and 4).
Activated FGFR3 Phosphorylates the SH2 Domain of SH2-B--
We
then examined whether the kinase domain of activated FGFR3 directly
phosphorylated SH2-B by performing in vitro kinase assays. A
GST fusion protein containing the SH2 region isolated from the yeast
two-hybrid screen (GST-SH2) was constructed. We prepared
baculovirus-expressed R3-K650E and added it to immobilized GST or
GST-SH2 in the presence of [
-32P]ATP. Samples were
resolved by 7.5% SDS-PAGE, transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane,
and followed by autoradiography. A high level of GST-SH2
phosphorylation was detected only when the activated kinase domain was
present (Fig. 6, lane 4 of the
left panel), demonstrating that the SH2 domain of SH2-B can
be directly phosphorylated by the kinase domain of FGFR3. To confirm
that the phosphorylated protein was GST-SH2, the membrane was probed with GST antibody (Fig. 6, right panel). These data suggest
that activated FGFR3 can phosphorylate the SH2 domain of SH2-B,
although we cannot completely exclude the possibility that another
kinase may have copurified with the baculovirus-expressed R3-K650E
protein.

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Activated FGFR3 phosphorylates the SH2 domain
of SH2-B in vitro. GST or GST-SH2 was incubated
with or without the baculovirus-expressed kinase domain of R3-K650E in
the presence of 20 32 µCi of [ -32P]ATP. Samples were
resolved on a 7.5% SDS-PAGE and transferred to a nitrocellulose
membrane. The left panel shows a 20-min autoradiography. The
membrane was then immunoblotted (IB) with GST antibody to
confirm the expression of GST and GST-SH2 (right
panel).
|
|
Identification of SH2-B Binding Sites in FGFR3--
Seven
autophosphorylation sites in FGFR1 have been described previously (23,
28). Based on the sequence alignment with FGFR1, the potential
autophosphorylation sites (Tyr-577, Tyr-647, Tyr-648, Tyr-724, and
Tyr-760) in FGFR3 were identified. In addition, Tyr-770 in FGFR3 is
conserved throughout FGFRs, suggesting that it may be a potential
autophosphorylation site as well. A schematic diagram of the
intracellular domain of FGFR3 with six potential autophosphorylation
sites is shown in Fig. 7A.
Tyr-647 and Tyr-648 are located in the activation loop, and their
phosphorylation is involved in the conformational changes that
accompany receptor activation (49). Previously we showed that
substitution of all non-activation loop Tyr residues with Phe caused
FGFR3 to be inactive (49). We therefore focused on residues Tyr-724,
Tyr-760, and Tyr-770. To determine the tyrosine residue(s) of FGFR3
required for SH2-B binding, we generated a series of LexA-R3-N540K
mutants containing phosphorylation site mutations in which the tyrosine residues were mutated to phenylalanine. LexA-R3-N540K was used as the
template for these mutants (Fig. 7B), since this derivative was used as bait in the initial yeast two-hybrid screen.

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Representation of FGFR3 mutants.
A, a schematic diagram of the intracellular domain of FGFR3
with six potential tyrosine phosphorylation sites (Tyr-577, Tyr-647,
Tyr-648, Tyr-724, Tyr-760, and Tyr-770). Tyr-647 and Tyr-648 are
crucial for kinase activity. TM, transmembrane domain.
B, table of FGFR3 tyrosine mutants used to determine SH2-B
binding sites. Mutations were made starting with the LexA-R3-N540K
construct, where Tyr-724, Tyr-760, and/or Tyr-770 were mutated from Tyr
to Phe.
|
|
Each mutant was tested against the SH2-B region isolated from the
screen by
-galactosidase liquid assay (Table
II). PLC-
was used as a positive
control due to its previously characterized interaction with FGFR1
(28). Among the mutants, LexA-770F exhibited the strongest interaction
with SH2-B (Table II). This mutant lacks Tyr-770 but retains Tyr-724
and Tyr-760. This suggests that one or the other or both of these
residues is important for the interaction with SH2-B. The LexA-724F
mutant, which retains Tyr-760 and Tyr-770 but lacks Tyr-724, showed a
decrease in binding. In addition, the LexA-760F mutant, which retains
Tyr-724 and Tyr-770 but lacks Tyr-760, also exhibited a significantly
decreased interaction. These data indicate that Tyr-724 and Tyr-760 are
important for SH2-B binding.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table II
-Galactosidase assay for SH2-B binding sites in FGFR3
Mutants were constructed by mutation of tyrosine to phenylalanine in
the intracellular domain of FGFR3-N540K followed by subcloning into the
LexA yeast vector pBTM116. Yeast were cotransformed with the indicated
plasmids and grown under His medium at 30 °C for 3-4 days
before -galactosidase assay. One unit of -galactosidase is
defined as the amount that hydrolyzes 1 mmol of
o-nitrophenyl -D-galactopyranoside/min/cell.
Results shown are the mean ±S.D. of 5 independent experiments.
|
|
The results presented in Table II also demonstrate that LexA-R3-N540K
exhibits significant interaction with PLC-
. Interestingly, when
Tyr-770 was removed by mutation, the resulting mutant LexA-770F exhibited increased interaction with PLC-
and to a lesser extent with SH2-B. This observation could suggest that Tyr-770 plays a
negative regulatory role in FGFR3 signaling, at least with regard to
signaling through the effector proteins SH2-B and PLC-
.
Activated FGFR3 and SH2-B
Increase Stat5 Phosphorylation and
Activation--
A previous study has shown that growth
hormone-induced binding of SH2-B and JAK2 results in enhanced tyrosine
phosphorylation of cellular proteins, including Stats (37). Thus, we
next examined whether SH2-B
and activated FGFR3 affected Stat
signaling. 293T cells were transfected with empty pcDNA3 vector,
R3-WT, R3-K650E, R3-K650E plus Myc-SH2-B
, or R3-K650E plus
SH2-B
(R555E). The SH2-B
(R555E) mutant contains a mutation within
the SH2 domain of SH2-B
to prevent binding by SH2 domain binding
substrates (37). Lysates were then analyzed by 10% SDS-PAGE,
transferred to a membrane, and immunoblotted with phospho-Stat5
antisera. As demonstrated in Fig.
8A, activated FGFR3 alone
induces a small amount of endogenous Stat5 phosphorylation (lane
3). When SH2-B
is coexpressed with activated FGFR3, there is a
significant increase in Stat5 phosphorylation (Fig. 8A,
lane 4). In contrast, coexpression of the SH2-B
mutant
containing a defective SH2 domain with activated FGFR3 resulted in a
decrease in endogenous Stat5 phosphorylation (Fig. 8A,
lane 5). The membrane was then stripped and reprobed with
Stat5 (Fig. 8B) to demonstrate equivalent levels
of protein in each sample. The membrane was further stripped and
reprobed with Myc antibody to show expression of transfected
Myc-SH2-B
(Fig. 8C) and then with FGFR3 antibody to show
expression of transfected FGFR3 (Fig. 8D).

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Stat5 activation by FGFR3 and
SH2-B . A, 293T cells were
transfected with the indicated constructs. Lysates were analyzed by
10% SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted (IB) for phospho-Stat5.
B, the membrane was stripped and reprobed with Stat5
antiserum. C, immunoblotting with Myc antibody of the
stripped membrane indicated the presence of transfected Myc-SH2-B .
D, the membrane was stripped once more and probed with FGFR3
antibody to confirm the presence of FGFR3.
|
|
After tyrosine phosphorylation at the C terminus, Stat proteins undergo
dimerization and relocalization from the cytoplasm to the nucleus (54,
55). We examined whether Stat5 localization was dependent upon
expression of SH2-B
and activated FGFR3. We utilized a human
fibroblast cell line, 2C4, for transfection with the indicated
constructs. To ensure that each transfected cell contained all the
indicated constructs, 0.1 µg of GFP-Stat5B was cotransfected with 0.5 µg of FGFR3-K650E or 0.5 µg each of FGFR3-K650E and Myc-SH2-B
(wild type or R555E mutant). Each GFP-Stat5B-positive cell examined
should then contain FGFR3-K650E and, in the case of the triple
transfection, both FGFR3-K650E and Myc-SH2-B
(wild type or R555E
mutant). Thus, in some cases, cells not exhibiting GFP-Stat5B staining
could contain FGFR3-K650E as shown in Fig. 9, panel j.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Stat5 relocalizes to the nucleus upon
FGFR3-mediated signaling. 2C4 cells were transfected with the
indicated constructs. Panel e demonstrates the cytoplasmic
localization of GFP-Stat5B in the presence of R3-WT. When activated
R3-K650E is cotransfected with GFP-Stat5B, Stat5B is both cytoplasmic
and nuclear, as shown in panel h. Upon cotransfection of
SH2-B with R3-K650E and GFP-Stat5B, GFP-Stat5B is exclusively
nuclear (panel k). When SH2-B (R555E) is coexpressed with
R3-K650E and GFP-Stat5B, GFP-Stat5B becomes cytoplasmic. Panels
a, d, g, j, and m
confirm expression of FGFR3. Panels c, f,
i, l, and o represent the nuclei
visualized by Hoechst 33342.
|
|
When GFP-Stat5B (47) was cotransfected with wild-type FGFR3, Stat5B was
predominantly cytoplasmic (Fig. 9, panel e). Cotransfection of GFP-Stat5B with the activating mutant, R3-K650E, resulted in an
increase in nuclear localization of Stat5B (Fig. 9, panel
h). When SH2-B
was also transfected with R3-K650E and
GFP-Stat5B, Stat5B relocalized completely into the nucleus (Fig. 9,
panel k). In the presence of the mutant SH2-B
(R555E),
R3-K650E, and GFP-Stat5B, however, Stat5B was localized to the
cytoplasm (Fig. 9, panel n). These data correlate with the
increase in phosphorylation observed in Fig. 8 upon coexpression of
activated FGFR3 and SH2-B
and a decrease in phosphorylation upon
coexpression of activated FGFR3 and SH2-B
(R555E).
 |
DISCUSSION |
Numerous skeletal and developmental disorders have been shown to
result from mutations in FGFRs (6, 56, 57). Mutations in FGFR3 result
in many human disorders, including TDI, TDII, SADDAN, and dwarfism (6,
21). More recently, FGFR3 has been linked to cancers such as multiple
myeloma and bladder and cervical carcinoma (7, 8). Unlike other
receptor tyrosine kinases, few of the immediate downstream signals of
FGFR3 have been identified. In this study, we have identified SH2-B as
an FGFR3-binding protein using the yeast two-hybrid screen.
Coimmunoprecipitation experiments in 293T cells between FGFR3 and SH2-B
confirmed this interaction. We have also found by
-galactosidase
liquid assay that Tyr-724 and Tyr-760 in FGFR3 interact with the SH2
domain of SH2-B. In addition, activated FGFR3 promotes binding to
SH2-B
and stimulates tyrosine phosphorylation of SH2-B
.
Furthermore, the kinase domain of FGFR3-K650E can directly
phosphorylate SH2-B in vitro. These results suggest that
SH2-B is a direct substrate of FGFR3.
Previously, PLC-
represented the only SH2 domain-containing binding
partner for FGFRs (28). The SH2-B clone isolated from the yeast
two-hybrid screen primarily contains the SH2 domain (Fig.
1B), demonstrating that SH2-B binds to FGFR3 via its SH2 domain. Consistent with this, the SH2 domain alone was sufficient to
bind to activated FGFR3 in mammalian cells. Because SH2 domains have
been found to bind to phosphotyrosine residues (58), it is likely that
SH2-B interacts with the phosphotyrosine residue(s) of FGFR3.
Coimmunoprecipitation experiments demonstrated that binding of the
SH2-B
isoform to FGFR3 correlated with receptor activation, which
further supports the premise that the interaction is
phosphotyrosine-dependent. This also corresponds to the
fact that a N540K mutation leads to a milder form of activated FGFR3 than a K650E mutation. Interestingly, our data indicate that
full-length SH2-B
can also weakly associate with wild-type FGFR3
(Fig. 4). One possible explanation for this observation is
the existence of an additional low affinity binding site(s) in SH2-B
for FGFR3. In fact, SH2-B
has been shown to bind to
tyrosine-phosphorylated JAK2 not only via its SH2 domain but also by
its N-terminal region (amino acids 1 to 555); however, this binding is
not phosphotyrosine-dependent (59).
We also show that both Tyr-724 and Tyr-760 of FGFR3 are required for
interaction with the SH2 domain of SH2-B. Mutating these residues to
phenylalanine impairs the association between FGFR3 and the SH2 domain.
Previous studies from our laboratory show that a derivative of FGFR3
containing all conserved tyrosine residues stimulated transformation,
Stat activation, and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase activation (49).
Substitution of all non-activation loop tyrosine residues with
phenylalanine rendered the FGFR3 derivative inactive; however, the
addition of Tyr-724 restored its ability to stimulate the above
signaling pathways (49). Data from our two-hybrid screen also indicate
that the SH2 domain of the p85 regulatory subunit of
phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase interacts with FGFR3 (data not shown). It
is possible that the SH2 domains of p85 and SH2-
B compete for
binding of Tyr-724 in FGFR3, resulting in the activation of different
signaling pathways. We have also previously shown that both Tyr-724 and
Tyr-760 were required for maximal Stat activation (49). Similarly, both
tyrosine residues may be necessary to mediate the signaling events
carried out by SH2-B in response to FGFR3 activation. Nonetheless, the
possibility that the SH2 domain interacts with only Tyr-724 or Tyr-760
should not be excluded.
We also demonstrate by an in vitro kinase assay that the SH2
domain of SH2-B
can be directly phosphorylated by activated FGFR3.
Because SH2-B
has nine tyrosine residues, some of these residues may
be directly phosphorylated by FGFR3, whereas others may be
phosphorylated by non-receptor tyrosine kinases such as JAK2 (35).
Among these residues, Tyr-439, Tyr-494, and Tyr-624 were predicted to
be potential tyrosine phosphorylation sites (33). The Tyr-624 residue
in particular is located within a YVPS motif, which is a putative
phosphorylation site by platelet-derived growth factor receptor (33).
Because the SH2-B clone isolated from the screen contains the entire
SH2 domain as well as the Tyr-624 residue, it would be interesting to
determine whether FGFR3 specifically phosphorylates Tyr-624. There are
two other tyrosine residues, Tyr-525 and Tyr-564, in the SH2 domain of
SH2-B
that may also serve as phosphorylation sites. Future studies
will determine which residue(s) is specifically phosphorylated by
FGFR3. Identification of the tyrosine residues phosphorylated by FGFR3 will be important in studying the signaling pathway(s) mediated by
SH2-B
because they will suggest molecular mechanisms of recruitment of signaling proteins by FGFR3 activation via specific tyrosine phosphorylation.
In this study, we have characterized a novel interaction between FGFR3
and SH2-B
, and we have demonstrated that FGFR3 activation results in
the tyrosine phosphorylation of SH2-B
. We also demonstrate one
mechanism by which FGFR3 mediates downstream signaling. In 293T cells,
we observe phosphorylation of Stat5 in cells transfected with activated
FGFR3. This phosphorylation increases in response to expression of
SH2-B
. We also demonstrate the nuclear translocalization of Stat5B
when both activated FGFR3 and SH2-B
are coexpressed. When the mutant
SH2-B
(R555E) was coexpressed with activated FGFR3, Stat5B becomes
inactivated and is predominantly cytoplasmic. SH2-B therefore appears
to represent a novel and biologically relevant substrate of FGFR3.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank C. Carter-Su for generously
providing Myc epitope-tagged SH2-B, SH2-B
antisera, and GFP-Stat5B.
We also thank S. C. Robertson, M.Y. Kanemitsu, and K. C. Hart
for helpful discussions and technical assistance, R. W. Dellinger,
A. N. Meyer, and other members of the Donoghue lab for critical
reviews of the manuscript, and L. J. Castrejon for editorial assistance.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grant 1R01 DE12581.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Chemistry and
Biochemistry, Center for Molecular Genetics, University of California
at San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0367. Tel.: 858-534-2167; Fax:
858-534-7481; E-mail: ddonoghue@ucsd.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, February 4, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M102777200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
FGFR, fibroblast
growth factor (FGF) receptor;
SH2, Src homology 2;
JAK2, Janus kinase
2;
Stat, signal transducer and activator of transcription;
PLC-
, phospholipase C
;
TD, thanatophoric dysplasia;
FRS2, fibroblast
growth factor receptor substrate 2;
SADDAN, severe achondroplasia with
delayed development and acanthosis nigricans;
GST, glutathione
S-transferase;
GFP, green fluorescent protein;
myr, myristoylated;
WT, wild type.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Basilico, C.,
and Moscatelli, D.
(1992)
Adv. Cancer Res.
59,
115-1652[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Mason, I. J.
(1994)
Cell
78,
547-552[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Miyamoto, M.,
Naruo, K.-I.,
Seko, C.,
Matsumoto, S.,
Kondo, T.,
and Kurokawa, T.
(1993)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13,
4251-4259[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 4.
|
Johnson, D. E.,
and Williams, L. T.
(1993)
Adv. Cancer Res.
60,
1-41[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Partanen, J.,
Vainikka, S.,
and Alitalo, K.
(1993)
Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci.
340,
297-303[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Webster, M. K.,
and Donoghue, D. J.
(1997)
Trends Genet.
13,
178-182[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Chesi, M.,
Nardini, E.,
Brents, L. A.,
Schrock, E.,
Ried, T.,
Kuehl, W. M.,
and Bergsagel, P. L.
(1997)
Nat. Genet.
16,
260-264[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Cappellen, D., De,
Oliverira, C.,
Ricol, D.,
de Medina, S. G. D.,
Bourdin, J.,
Sastre-Garau, X.,
Chopin, D.,
Thiery, J. P.,
and Radvanyi, F.
(1999)
Nat. Genet.
23,
18-20[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Hattori, Y.,
Odagiri, H.,
Katoh, O.,
Sakamoto, H.,
Morita, T.,
Shimotohno, K.,
Tobinai, K.,
Sugimura, T.,
and Terada, M.
(1992)
Cancer Res.
52,
3367-3371[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Popovici, C.,
Adelaide, J.,
Ollendorf, V.,
Chaffanet, C.,
Guasch, G.,
Jacrot, M.,
Leroux, D.,
Birnbaum, D.,
and Pebusque, M. J.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
5712-5717[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Reiter, A.,
Sohal, J.,
Kulkarni, S.,
Chase, A.,
MacDonald, D. H.,
Aguiar, R. C.,
Goncalves, C.,
Hernandez, J. M.,
Jennings, B. A.,
Goldman, J. M.,
and Cross, N. C. P.
(1998)
Blood
92,
1735-1742[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Tavormina, P. L.,
Bellus, G. A.,
Webster, M. K.,
Bamshad, M. J.,
Fraley, A. E.,
McIntosh, I.,
Szabo, J,
Jiang, W.,
Jabs, E. W.,
Wilcox, W. R.,
Wasmuth, J. J.,
Donoghue, D. J.,
Thompson, L. M.,
and Francomano, C. A.
(1999)
Am. J. Hum. Genet.
64,
722-731[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Peters, K. G.,
Werner, S.,
Chen, G.,
and Williams, L. T.
(1992)
Development
114,
233-243[Abstract]
|
| 14.
|
Bellus, G. A.,
Hefferon, T. W.,
Ortiz de Luna, R. I.,
Hecht, J. T.,
Horton, W. A.,
Machado, M.,
Kaitila, I.,
McIntosh, I.,
and Francomano, C. A.
(1995)
Am. J. Hum. Genet.
56,
368-373[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Bellus, G. A.,
McIntosh, I.,
Smith, E. A.,
Aylsworth, A. S.,
Kaitila, I.,
Horton, W. A.,
Greenhaw, G. A.,
Hecht, J. T.,
and Francomano, C. A.
(1995)
Nat. Genet.
10,
357-359[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Deng, C.,
Wynshaw-Boris, A.,
Zhou, F.,
Kuo, A.,
and Leder, P.
(1996)
Cell
84,
911-921[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Colvin, J. S.,
Bohne, B. A.,
Harding, G. W.,
McEwen, D. G.,
and Ornitz, D. M.
(1996)
Nat. Genet.
12,
390-397[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Bellus, G. A.,
Spector, E. B.,
Speiser, P. W.,
Weaver, C. A.,
Garber, A. T.,
Bryke, C. R.,
Israel, J.,
Rosengren, S. S.,
Webster, M. K.,
Donoghue, D. J.,
and Francomano, C. A.
(2000)
Am. J. Hum. Genet.
67,
1411-1421[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Webster, M. K.,
and Donoghue, D. J.
(1996)
EMBO J.
15,
520-527[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Richelda, R.,
Ronchetti, D.,
Baldini, L,
Cro, L.,
Viggiano, L.,
Marzella, R.,
Rocchi, M.,
Otsuki, T.,
Lombardi, L.,
Maiolo, A. T.,
and Neri, A.
(1997)
Blood
90,
4062-4070[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Tavormina, P. L.,
Shiang, R.,
Thompson, L. M.,
Zhu, Y. Z.,
Wilkin, D. J.,
Lachman, R. S.,
Wilcox, W. R.,
Rimoin, D. L.,
Cohn, D. H.,
and Wasmuth, J. J.
(1995)
Nat. Genet.
9,
321-328[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Webster, M. K.,
d'Avis, P. Y.,
Robertson, S. C.,
and Donoghue, D. J.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
4081-4087[Abstract]
|
| 23.
|
Mohammadi, M.,
Dikic, I.,
Sorokin, A.,
Burgess, W. H.,
Jaye, M.,
and Schlessinger, J.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
977-989[Abstract]
|
| 24.
|
Ullrich, A.,
and Shlessinger, J.
(1990)
Cell
61,
203-212[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Spivak-Kroizman, T.,
Lemmon, M. A.,
Dikic, I.,
Ladbury, J. E.,
Pinchasi, D.,
Huang, J.,
Jaye, M.,
Crumley, G.,
Schlessinger, J.,
and Lax, I.
(1994)
Cell
79,
1015-1024[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Fantl, W. J.,
Escobedo, J. A.,
Martin, G. A.,
Turck, C. W.,
del Rosario, M.,
McCormick, F.,
and Wiliams, L. T.
(1992)
Cell
69,
413-423[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Fantl, W. J.,
Johnson, D. E.,
and Williams, L. T.
(1993)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
62,
453-481[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Mohammadi, M.,
Honegger, A. M.,
Rotin, D.,
Fischer, R.,
Bellot, F., Li, W.,
Dionne, C. A.,
Jaye, M.,
Rubinstein, M.,
and Schlessinger, J.
(1991)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
11,
5068-5078[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Ong, S. H.,
Guy, G. R.,
Hadari, Y. R.,
Laks, S.,
Gotoh, N.,
Schelessinger, J.,
and Lax, I.
(2000)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20,
979-989[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Ong, S. H.,
Lim, Y. P.,
Low, B. C.,
and Guy, G. R.
(1997)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
238,
261-266[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Xu, H.,
Lee, K. W.,
and Goldfarb, M.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
17987-17990[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Kouhara, H.,
Hadari, Y. R.,
Spivak-Kroizman, T.,
Schilling, J.,
Bar-Sagi, D.,
Lax, I.,
and Schelssinger, J.
(1997)
Cell
89,
693-702[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Riedel, H.,
Wang, J.,
Hansen, H.,
and Yousaf, N.
(1997)
J. Biochem.
122,
1105-1113[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Rui, L.,
and Carter-Su, C.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
21239-21245[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Rui, L.,
Mathews, L. S.,
Hotta, K.,
Gustafson, T. A.,
and Carter-Su, C.
(1997)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17,
6633-6644[Abstract]
|
| 36.
|
Osborne, M. A.,
Dalton, S.,
and Kochan, J. P.
(1995)
BioTechnology
13,
1474-1478[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Rui, L.,
and Carter-Su, C.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
7172-7177[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Qian, X.,
Riccio, A.,
Zhang, Y.,
and Ginty, D. D.
(1998)
Neuron
21,
1017-1029[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
|