JBC Focus on PI3-Kinase with Echelon

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M102777200 on February 4, 2002

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 18, 15962-15970, May 3, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/18/15962    most recent
M102777200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kong, M.
Right arrow Articles by Donoghue, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kong, M.
Right arrow Articles by Donoghue, D. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Interaction of Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 3 and the Adapter Protein SH2-B

A ROLE IN STAT5 ACTIVATION*

Monica KongDagger, Ching S. WangDagger, and Daniel J. Donoghue§

From the Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Center for Molecular Genetics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093-0367

Received for publication, March 29, 2001, and in revised form, January 17, 2002

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) influences a diverse array of biological processes, including cell growth, differentiation, and migration. Activating mutations in FGFR3 are associated with multiple myeloma, cervical carcinoma, and bladder cancer. To identify proteins that interact with FGFR3 and which may mediate FGFR3-dependent signaling, a yeast two-hybrid screen was employed using the cytoplasmic kinase domain of FGFR3 as bait. We identified the adapter protein SH2-B as an FGFR3-interacting protein. Coimmunoprecipitation experiments demonstrate binding of the SH2-Bbeta isoform to FGFR3 in 293T cells. Tyrosine phosphorylation of SH2-Bbeta was observed when coexpressed with activated FGFR3 mutants such as the weakly activated mutant N540K or the strongly activated mutant K650E, both associated with human developmental syndromes. The extent of tyrosine phosphorylation of SH2-Bbeta correlates with receptor activation, suggesting that FGFR3 activation mediates tyrosine phosphorylation of SH2-Bbeta . Furthermore, two tyrosine phosphorylation sites of FGFR3, Tyr-724 and Tyr-760, are required for optimal binding of the Src homology-2 (SH2) domain of SH2-Bbeta . We also demonstrate the phosphorylation and nuclear translocation of Stat5 by activated FGFR3, which increases in response to overexpression of SH2-Bbeta . Taken together, our results identify SH2-Bbeta as a novel FGFR3 binding partner that mediates signal transduction.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFRs)1 are receptor tyrosine kinases that integrate many different intercellular signals affecting cell growth, differentiation, migration, wound healing, and angiogenesis, depending on the target cell type and developmental stage (1, 2). The FGFR family comprises of four structurally related members, FGFR1, FGFR2, FGFR3, and FGFR4, exhibiting three extracellular immunoglobulin-like (Ig) domains, a single transmembrane domain, and a split intracellular tyrosine kinase domain (3-5). Mutations in FGFRs, which may be either familial or spontaneous in origin, are responsible for a large number of human developmental disorders including skeletal dwarfism and craniosynostosis syndromes (6-8). Translocations and mutations affecting members of the FGFR family are also importantly associated with several human cancers (6, 9-12).

FGFR3 plays a particularly important role in skeletal development (13-15). Disruption of murine FGFR3 produces severe and progressive bone dysplasia with enhanced endochondral bone growth, suggesting that FGFR3 mediates the negative regulation of bone growth (16, 17). Mutations in FGFR3 are directly responsible for human dwarfism syndromes, including hypochondroplasia, achondroplasia, and thanatophoric dysplasia (TD) (6). Several of the mutations that cause these syndromes reside within the FGFR3 kinase domain and result in varying degrees of constitutive receptor activation. The N540K substitution, located proximal to the split tyrosine kinase domain, underlies the mild skeletal dwarfism hypochondroplasia and confers weak constitutive activation (15, 18). At the other end of the spectrum, the K650E substitution located within the activation loop of the kinase domain relieves the normal requirement for regulatory phosphorylation at Tyr-647 and Tyr-648 and leads to profound constitutive kinase activation in comparison to wild-type FGFR3 (19). This mutation causes thanatophoric dysplasia type II (TDII), a neonatal lethal dwarfism syndrome (6, 19). Recently, a different activating substitution at this same position, K650M, has been associated with the syndrome SADDAN (or severe achondroplasia with delayed development and acanthosis nigricans) (12).

Abnormal activation of FGFR3 as a result of somatic mutation has been reported in conjunction with several human cancers, including multiple myeloma, cervical carcinoma, and bladder carcinoma (7, 8, 20). The specific FGFR3 mutations involved include K650E and K650M in the kinase domain or R248C, S249C, G370C, and Y373C in the extracellular domain. All of these mutations identified in human neoplasia have been previously described as activating mutations associated with TDI, TDII, or SADDAN (6, 19, 21, 22).

In the presence of heparin sulfate proteoglycan, fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) bind to FGFRs, causing receptor dimerization and autophosphorylation of tyrosine residues (23-25). These phosphotyrosine residues provide specific binding sites for signaling proteins containing Src homology 2 (SH2) domains or phosphotyrosine binding domains (26, 27). For example, Tyr-766 in FGFR1 has been shown to interact with phospholipase C-gamma (PLC-gamma ) (28). The adapter protein fibroblast growth factor receptor substrate 2 (FRS2) has also been shown to associate with FGFR1 (29-31). Activation of FGFR1 leads to tyrosine phosphorylation of FRS2 at several sites, leading to recruitment of growth factor receptor-bound 2 (Grb2) (32). Besides PLC-gamma and FRS2, little is known about substrates of FGFRs that lead to mitogenesis and differentiation.

Given the importance of understanding FGFR3-mediated signaling, both for human developmental syndromes and also for those human cancers where FGFR3 activation has been observed, we wished to identify novel FGFR3-interacting proteins that may represent important substrates for downstream signaling. Toward this end, we employed a yeast two-hybrid screen in which the bait was the kinase domain from either wild-type FGFR3 or from an activated mutant. Using the weakly activated N540K mutant as bait, we were able to identify four candidate binding proteins that interact with FGFR3, one of which is the adapter protein SH2-B.

SH2-B contains several protein-protein interaction motifs, including a pleckstrin homology domain, an SH2 domain, and multiple proline-rich regions (33, 34). At least three splice variants of SH2-B (alpha , beta , and gamma ) have been identified that have identical N-terminal and SH2 domains but differ in their C-terminal domains (33, 35, 36). SH2-B has previously been shown to interact with other receptor tyrosine kinases including platelet-derived growth factor receptor, insulin receptor, and tropomyosin receptor kinase A (TrkA) receptor as well as the non-receptor tyrosine kinase Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) (33-35, 37-44). Because SH2-Bbeta has been the most studied isoform of SH2-B, we used SH2-Bbeta to further characterize the interaction with FGFR3 described here. In PC12 cells, tyrosine-phosphorylated SH2-Bbeta binds to growth factor receptor-bound 2 (Grb2) and is sufficient to mediate nerve growth factor induction of Ras and mitogen-activated protein kinase (38, 45, 46). SH2-Bbeta has also been demonstrated to bind to JAK2, to stimulate the kinase activity of JAK2, and to increase tyrosine phosphorylation of Stat3 and Stat5B when coexpressed with JAK2 (35, 37).

In this study, we have identified and characterized SH2-B as an FGFR3 binding partner. We also demonstrate that activated FGFR3 can directly phosphorylate SH2-Bbeta . In addition, we show that expression of SH2-Bbeta together with activated FGFR3 increases Stat5B phosphorylation in 293T cells. Stat5B was also observed to relocalize exclusively to the nucleus upon FGFR3-mediated signaling through SH2-Bbeta . Our data thus suggest that the adapter protein SH2-Bbeta may represent an important signaling molecule that mediates downstream biological effects of FGFR3 activation.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Plasmid Construction-- Full-length Myc epitope-tagged SH2-Bbeta and GFP-Stat5B were generous gifts from C. Carter-Su (35, 47). FGFR3-wild type (R3-WT), FGFR3-K650E (R3-K650E), and myristoylated FGFR3-K650E (myr-R3-K650E) clones were described previously (19, 22, 48). The FGFR3-N540K (R3-N540K) mutant was constructed from R3-WT by using QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis (Stratagene). LexA-R3-WT, LexA-R3-N540K, and LexA-R3-K650E were constructed through the insertion of the cytoplasmic domain of R3-WT, R3-N540K, and R3-K650E, respectively, into the LexA fusion vector pBTM116, which was constructed by P. Bartel and S. Fields. To construct the Myc epitope-tagged SH2 domain of SH2-B (Myc-SH2), pVP16-SH2-B isolated from the yeast two-hybrid screen was digested at flanking BamHI and EcoRI sites, and the resulting restriction fragment was subcloned into BglII/EcoRI-digested pCS3+MT vector. GST-SH2 was generated by subcloning Myc-SH2 into the vector pGEX-KG (Amersham Biosciences). The Tyr to Phe mutants were constructed as described previously (49) and subcloned into pBTM116. The Myc-SH2-Bbeta (R555E) was made as described previously (37).

Yeast Two-hybrid Screen-- A yeast two-hybrid screen was performed according to previously published protocols (50, 51). The two-hybrid plasmids pBTM116, pVP16, and LexA-lamin were kindly provided by S. Hollenberg and J. A. Cooper (Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center). LexA-R3-WT, LexA-R3-N540K, or LexA-R3-K650E constructs were cotransformed with a 9.5-day-post-coitum mouse embryonic cDNA library fused to pVP16 into the L40 strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Transformants were selected on His- medium for 3-4 days at 30 °C. The resulting colonies were subjected to the filter-lift color assay and tested for beta -galactosidase activity (50). Potential positive clones were selected, and prey plasmids containing library cDNA inserts were isolated and shuttled into Escherichia coli HB101 cells. Positives were further confirmed by testing pVP16-cDNA against LexA-lamin and sequenced by the Center for AIDS Research Molecular Biology Core, University of California San Diego. The NCBI BLAST program was used to determine the identity of positive clones.

Immunoprecipitation and Immunoblot-- 293T cells were grown in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and incubated at 37 °C in 10% CO2. Sub-confluent cells were transfected with 10 µg of DNA by calcium phosphate precipitation (52). Two days after transfection cells were harvested and lysed in 0.5% Nonidet P-40 lysis buffer {20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 150 mM NaCl, 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 1 mM Na3VO4, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, and 10 µg/ml leupeptin. Lysates were pre-cleared with 40 µl of 50% protein A-Sepharose beads and then incubated with 2 µg of polyclonal FGFR3 (C-15) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) antibody or monoclonal Myc (9E10) antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) overnight at 4 °C. Protein A-Sepharose beads were then added over a 2-h period, and the immunoprecipitated samples were washed 3 times with lysis buffer, boiled 3 min in sample buffer, and analyzed by 10% SDS-PAGE. For experiments not requiring immunoprecipitation, lysates were analyzed by 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred to Immobilon-P membranes (Millipore). Membranes were immunoblotted with FGFR3 (C-15) antibody, Myc (9E10) antibody, and phosphotyrosine (4G10) antibody (Upstate Biotechnology) followed by enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) (Amersham Biosciences). To reprobe with other antibodies, membranes were stripped of bound antibodies in stripping buffer (100 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 2% SDS, 62.5 mM Tris-HCl (pH 6.8)) and incubated for 30 min at 60 °C with rotation.

For endogenous SH2-Bbeta association with FGFR3, NIH3T3 cells were transfected with 15 µg of pcDNA3 or R3-K650E. Two days post-transfection, cells were harvested and lysed with 0.1% Nonidet P-40 lysis buffer, and 1.5 mg of pre-cleared protein were immunoprecipitated with SH2-Bbeta antibody generously provided by Dr. Carter-Su (35) at 4 °C overnight. Protein A-Sepharose beads were then added for at least 2 h, and the immunoprecipitated samples were washed 3 times with lysis buffer, boiled 3 min in sample buffer, and analyzed by 10% SDS-PAGE. Proteins were then transferred to Immobilon-P membranes and probed with FGFR3 (C-15) antibody. The membrane was then stripped and probed with SH2-Bbeta antibody followed by ECL.

For Stat5 phosphorylation experiments, 5 µg of the indicated constructs were transfected into 293T cells. Cells were lysed in 1% Nonidet P-40 lysis buffer, and 40 µg of lysate was analyzed by 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred to Immobilon-P membranes. The membrane was then probed with phospho-Stat5 antibody (Cell Signaling) and proteins were detected by ECL. The membrane was then stripped and reprobed with Stat5 (C-17, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), FGFR3 (C-15), and Myc (9E10) antisera to ensure equal levels of protein expression.

Glutathione S-Transferase (GST) Fusion Proteins-- Bacteria transformed with GST-SH2 or GST plasmid were grown overnight and induced with isopropyl-beta -D-thiogalactopyranoside the next day. Bacterial pellets were resuspended in 20 ml of NETN (100 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 0.5% v/v Nonidet P-40 with 2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 15 µg/ml aprotinin, 20 µg/ml leupeptin, and 20 µg/ml pepstatin A). Cell suspensions were then sonicated followed by centrifugation at 20 krpm for 30 min. Supernatants were added to GST beads and rotated at 4 °C overnight. Beads then were washed five times with NETN and boiled in sample buffer.

Baculovirus Expression of R3-K650E-- The kinase domain isolated from full-length R3-K650E (amino acids 457-827) was subcloned into pFASTBAC Htc (Invitrogen), which contains a histidine tag and elements necessary for cloning and subsequent transfer to the baculovirus genome. Purification was as previously described (53).

In Vitro Kinase Assay-- 15 µl of GST fusion proteins were washed once in kinase buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 10 mM MnCl2, 5 mM MgCl2) and subsequently incubated with or without 15 µl of baculovirus-expressed R3-K650E in 30 µl of kinase buffer plus 20 µCi of [gamma -32P]ATP at 37 °C for 20 min. Samples were then washed with NETN five times, boiled in sample buffer, resolved by 7.5% SDS-PAGE, transferred to membrane, and visualized by autoradiography. The membrane was then immunoblotted with GST (Z-5) antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and detected by ECL.

Liquid Culture beta -Galactosidase Assay-- Yeast were cotransformed with the indicated plasmids and grown on His- plates for 3-4 days at 30 °C. Liquid culture beta -galactosidase assays were then performed according to the protocol provided by CLONTECH using o-nitrophenyl beta -D-galactopyranoside (Sigma). Each reaction was carried out at 30 °C until the sample became yellow. Samples that did not develop a yellow color were stopped at the end of the fourth hour. The absorbance of each sample was measured at 420 nm, and beta -galactosidase activity was calculated using the formula, beta -galactosidase units = 1000 × A420/(t × V × A600), where t is elapsed time (min) of incubation, V is 0.1 ml × concentration factor, and A600 is the absorbance of 1 ml if culture at 600 nm. The data obtained were the results of five independent experiments.

Immunofluorescence-- 2C4 cells were cultured in 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum containing 80 µg/ml G418 in 5% CO2. Cells were plated onto 60-mm plates containing glass coverslips at a density of 5 × 105. The next day, the cells were transfected with a total of 2.1 µg of DNA of the indicated constructs using Effectene (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's directions. DNA ratios for the triple transfection were 0.1 µg of GFP-Stat5B, 0.5 µg of FGFR3, and 1.5 µg of Myc-SH2-Bbeta . pcDNA3 was added to make up the difference in the single and double transfections. Twenty-four h post-transfection, the coverslips were fixed with 3% paraformaldehyde. To visualize protein localization, the cells were permeabilized with 0.5% Triton-X, rinsed with phosphate-buffered saline, and blocked with 3% bovine serum albumin for 30 min. The cells were incubated with FGFR3 antibody (1:500) for 1 h, washed, then incubated with 1:500 rhodamine-conjugated anti-rabbit secondary antibody for 45 min. After washing with phosphate-buffered saline, the coverslips were mounted onto glass slides with 90% glycerol in 0.1 M Tris-HCl (pH 8.5) plus phenylenediamine to prevent fading. Cells were photographed using a Nikon Microphot-FXA microscope with a Hamamatsu C5810 camera.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Identification of an FGFR3-interacting Protein-- A yeast two-hybrid screen was employed to identify potential substrates of FGFR3. To construct the bait for the two-hybrid screen, the entire intracellular domain of FGFR3 was fused to the LexA DNA binding domain. Three different bait constructs were utilized that differed in the extent of constitutive FGFR3 kinase activation (Fig. 1A): (i) LexA-R3-WT, (ii) LexA-R3-N540K, incorporating the weakly activated N540K mutation that causes hypochondroplasia (15, 18), and (iii) LexA-R3-K650E, incorporating the strongly activated K650E mutation that causes TDII (19).


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   FGFR3 interacts with SH2-B in a two-hybrid screen. A, schematic representation of the LexA-FGFR3 baits. TM (shaded) represents the transmembrane domain, and Ig represents an immunoglobulin-like domain. The black region represents the LexA DNA binding domain. B, the SH2 domain of SH2-B was isolated from the two-hybrid screen. Full-length rat SH2-Bbeta is 670 amino acids (aa) long containing 9 tyrosine residues. The black regions represent proline-rich regions, PH represents the pleckstrin homology domain, and SH2 represents the Src homology 2 domain. The expanded region shown, isolated from the yeast two-hybrid screen, is mouse SH2-B (GenBankTM accession number AF036355).

These constructs were used as two-hybrid baits and screened against a 9.5-day-post-coitum mouse embryonic cDNA library. Cotransformed yeast were plated on His- plates, and the activation of the HIS3 reporter gene was used to select for protein-protein interactions. The LexA-R3-WT bait resulted in ~50 positives, but none yielded identifiable clones. The LexA-R3-K650E bait appeared toxic to the yeast in the large scale transformation, and no positives resulted from the screen. Only one of the bait proteins, LexA-R3-N540K, yielded significant positive clones in the screen. Approximately 150 potential positive clones were isolated, and of these, 50 clones scored positive on the filter-lift beta -galactosidase assay. False positives were further eliminated by testing against LexA-lamin, and 25 clones remained positive. One of the positive clones identified was SH2-B.

The cDNA insert of the SH2-B plasmid identified is 342 bp in length and corresponds to residues 518-631. The region includes the entire SH2 domain plus a small portion of flanking sequences as shown in Fig. 1B. We also wished to determine whether the LexA-R3-WT and LexA-R3-K650E constructs would interact with the SH2-B clone and performed a small scale yeast transformation. Both LexA-R3-WT and LexA-R3-K650E were found to interact with the SH2 domain of SH2-B (Table I). PLC-gamma , which was also isolated from the screen, was used as a positive control since it has been shown to bind to Y766 of FGFR1, which corresponds to Tyr-760 in FGFR3 (28). This yeast two-hybrid interaction demonstrates for the first time a direct interaction between FGFR3 and PLC-gamma . The empty pVP16 vector was used as an additional negative control. Thus, we demonstrate a novel interaction between the SH2 domain of SH2-B and FGFR3.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Summary of yeast two-hybrid interactions
The LexA-R3-N540K bait isolated SH2-B from the two-hybrid screen. SH2-B was then tested against LexA-R3-WT and LexA-R3-K 650E. As a positive control, PLC-gamma was tested against each bait. As negative controls, the baits were tested against the Vp16 vector alone, and the isolated clones were tested against LexA-lamin. Transformed yeast were grown at 30 °C for 3-4 days on His- plates.

The SH2 Domain of SH2-Bbeta Mediates Interaction with FGFR3 in Vivo-- To confirm that the SH2 domain alone can interact with FGFR3 in mammalian cells, an Myc epitope-tagged derivative of SH2-Bbeta was constructed containing only the SH2 domain. This derivative, designated Myc-SH2, was transfected into 293T cells in the absence or presence of full-length FGFR3-wild type (R3-WT), FGFR3-N540K (R3-N540K), or FGFR3-K650E (R3-K650E). Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with FGFR3 antibody, resolved by 10% SDS-PAGE, and immunoblotted with Myc antisera. The results indicate that the SH2 domain alone is sufficient to bind to activated FGFR3 (Fig. 2, lanes 3 and 4). Significant association was observed between Myc-SH2 and the strongly activated mutant, R3-K650E (Fig. 2, lane 4), whereas little or no R3-WT was recovered in association with Myc-SH2 (Fig. 2, lane 2). In comparison, intermediate association was seen between R3-N540K and Myc-SH2. These results suggest that the binding of the SH2 domain to FGFR3 may be dependent on the extent of receptor activation. Immunoblotting with FGFR3 antibody shows the expression of the FGFR3 derivatives immunoprecipitated from transfected cell lysates (Fig. 2, middle panel), and equivalent expression of Myc-SH2 was confirmed by analyzing lysate alone (Fig. 2, bottom panel).


View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   The SH2 domain of SH2-B interacts with FGFR3 in vivo. 293T cells were transfected with the indicated constructs, where Mock is pcDNA3 vector alone. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated (IP) with FGFR3 antibody, analyzed by 10% SDS-PAGE, and immunoblotted (IB) with Myc antibody (top panel). The middle panel shows the presence of FGFR3 using FGFR3 antibody. Equal expression of the Myc-SH2 domain of SH2-B was confirmed by resolving lysate on a 10% SDS-PAGE followed by immunoblotting with Myc antibody (bottom panel).

Endogenous SH2-Bbeta Interacts with Activated FGFR3-- We next wished to determine whether endogenous mouse SH2-Bbeta would interact with transfected FGFR3 in NIH3T3 cells. Cells were transfected with either mock or R3-K650E, lysed, and immunoprecipitated with SH2-Bbeta antisera. Lysates and immunoprecipitated samples were then analyzed by 10% SDS-PAGE, followed by immunoblotting with FGFR3 or SH2-Bbeta antisera. The top panel of Fig. 3 demonstrates the presence of activated FGFR3 in the SH2-Bbeta -immunoprecipitated sample (lane 4). Activated FGFR3 does not bind to protein A-Sepharose beads alone, as demonstrated in lane 6 of the top panel. The bottom panel of Fig. 3 confirms the presence of endogenous mouse SH2-Bbeta in the lysate and SH2-Bbeta -immunoprecipitated lanes (lanes 1-4) but not in the protein A-Sepharose plus lysate lanes (lanes 5 and 6).


View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   FGFR3 interacts with endogenous SH2-B. NIH3T3 cells were transfected with the indicated constructs, lysed, and immunoprecipitated (IP) with SH2-Bbeta antibody (lanes 3 and 4) or protein A (Pro A)-Sepharose beads alone (lanes 5 and 6). Samples were then analyzed by 10% SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted (IB) with FGFR3 antibody (top panel). The membrane was then stripped and reprobed with SH2-Bbeta antibody to confirm the presence of SH2-Bbeta (bottom panel).

Full-length SH2-Bbeta Interacts with FGFR3-- Myc epitope-tagged full-length SH2-Bbeta (Myc-SH2-Bbeta ) (35) was examined for its ability to bind to FGFR3 derivatives in mammalian cells. 293T cells were transfected with empty pcDNA3 vector or with Myc-SH2-Bbeta in the absence or presence of full-length R3-WT, R3-N540K, or R3-K650E. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with Myc antibody, resolved by 10% SDS-PAGE, and immunoblotted with FGFR3 antisera. All three of the FGFR3 derivatives bound to Myc-SH2-Bbeta , as demonstrated by the recovery of FGFR3 proteins in the Myc-SH2-Bbeta immunoprecipitates (Fig. 4). The extent of FGFR3 recovery correlated generally with the magnitude of receptor activation. The strongly activated R3-K650E mutant exhibited the strongest association (Fig. 4, lane 6, top panel), and the weakly activated R3-N540K mutant was recovered to a lesser extent (Fig. 4, lane 5, top panel), whereas R3-WT showed the lowest association (Fig. 4, lane 4, top panel). The membrane was stripped and reprobed with Myc antibody to confirm the expression of Myc-SH2-Bbeta (Fig. 4, middle panel). Equivalent expression of FGFR3 was also confirmed by analyzing lysate alone (Fig. 4, bottom panel). These results demonstrate that SH2-Bbeta forms a complex with FGFR3 in vivo that can be recovered by immunoprecipitation and that the extent of SH2-Bbeta ·FGFR3 complex formation correlates with the level of FGFR3 activation.


View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Full-length SH2-Bbeta interacts with FGFR3 in vivo. 293T cells were transfected with the indicated constructs. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated (IP) with Myc antibody, analyzed by 10% SDS-PAGE, and immunoblotted (IB) with FGFR3 antibody (top panel). The membrane was stripped and reprobed with Myc antibody to confirm the presence of Myc-SH2-Bbeta (middle panel). Equal expression of FGFR3 was confirmed by resolving lysate on a 10% SDS-PAGE followed by immunoblotting with FGFR3 antibody.

FGFR3 Activation Promotes Tyrosine Phosphorylation of SH2-Bbeta -- SH2-Bbeta has been shown previously to be tyrosine-phosphorylated in response to growth hormone, nerve growth factor, and platelet-derived growth factor (33, 34, 37-40). To determine whether FGFR3 activation promotes tyrosine phosphorylation of SH2-Bbeta , 293T cells were transfected with empty pcDNA3 vector or with Myc-SH2-Bbeta in the absence or presence of R3-WT, R3-N540K, or R3-K650E. Lysates were immunoprecipitated with Myc antibody and resolved by 10% SDS-PAGE. Immunoblotting with 4G10 phosphotyrosine antisera revealed that the tyrosine-phosphorylated form of SH2-Bbeta specifically associated with activated FGFR3 (Fig. 5A, lanes 5 and 6 of the top panel). Tyrosine-phosphorylated SH2-Bbeta associated strongly with R3-K650E (Fig. 5A, lane 6, top panel) but much less so with R3-N540K (Fig. 5A, lane 5, top panel). R3-WT was unable to stimulate the tyrosine phosphorylation on SH2-Bbeta (Fig. 5A, lane 4, top panel). The presence of SH2-Bbeta was confirmed by reprobing the stripped membrane with Myc antibody (Fig. 5A, middle panel). Equivalent FGFR3 expression was confirmed by immunoblotting the lysates with FGFR3 antibody (Fig. 5A, bottom panel).


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Activated FGFR3 tyrosine phosphorylates SH2-Bbeta . A, 293T cells were transfected with the indicated constructs. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated (IP) with Myc antibody, analyzed on a 10% SDS-PAGE, and immunoblotted (IB) with phosphotyrosine (4G10) antibody (top panel). The membrane was stripped and reprobed with Myc antibody to confirm the presence of Myc-SH2-Bbeta (middle panel). Equal expression of FGFR3 was confirmed by resolving lysate on 10% SDS-PAGE followed by immunoblotting with FGFR3 antibody (bottom panel). B, 293T cells were transfected with the indicated constructs, where myr represents the myristoylated derivative of R3. Lysates were immunoprecipitated with Myc antibody followed by immunoblotting with 4G10 antibody (top panel). The membrane was stripped and reprobed with Myc antibody to confirm the expression of Myc-SH2-Bbeta . P, phosphorylated.

Because both FGFR3 and SH2-Bbeta migrate between 116 and 97.5 kDa on 10% SDS-PAGE, we wanted to rule out the possibility that the bands shown in the top panel of Fig. 5A were tyrosine-phosphorylated FGFR3. To accomplish this, we utilized a truncated R3-K650E construct that contained only the intracellular domain and a myristoylation signal at the N terminus (Myr-R3-K650E) to properly localize the protein to the plasma membrane and which we have extensively characterized in previous studies (22, 48). This construct runs at ~50 kDa. 293T cells were transfected with empty pcDNA3 vector or with Myc-SH2-Bbeta in the absence or presence of Myr-R3-K650E. The samples were then lysed and immunoprecipitated with Myc antibody. Immunoblotting with 4G10 phosphotyrosine antibody showed that SH2-Bbeta is indeed tyrosine-phosphorylated (Fig. 5B, lane 4, top panel), which confirmed that activated FGFR3 stimulates tyrosine phosphorylation of SH2-Bbeta . The bottom panel of Fig. 5B shows that Myc-SH2-Bbeta was expressed in the appropriate samples (lanes 2 and 4).

Activated FGFR3 Phosphorylates the SH2 Domain of SH2-B-- We then examined whether the kinase domain of activated FGFR3 directly phosphorylated SH2-B by performing in vitro kinase assays. A GST fusion protein containing the SH2 region isolated from the yeast two-hybrid screen (GST-SH2) was constructed. We prepared baculovirus-expressed R3-K650E and added it to immobilized GST or GST-SH2 in the presence of [gamma -32P]ATP. Samples were resolved by 7.5% SDS-PAGE, transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane, and followed by autoradiography. A high level of GST-SH2 phosphorylation was detected only when the activated kinase domain was present (Fig. 6, lane 4 of the left panel), demonstrating that the SH2 domain of SH2-B can be directly phosphorylated by the kinase domain of FGFR3. To confirm that the phosphorylated protein was GST-SH2, the membrane was probed with GST antibody (Fig. 6, right panel). These data suggest that activated FGFR3 can phosphorylate the SH2 domain of SH2-B, although we cannot completely exclude the possibility that another kinase may have copurified with the baculovirus-expressed R3-K650E protein.


View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Activated FGFR3 phosphorylates the SH2 domain of SH2-B in vitro. GST or GST-SH2 was incubated with or without the baculovirus-expressed kinase domain of R3-K650E in the presence of 20 32 µCi of [gamma -32P]ATP. Samples were resolved on a 7.5% SDS-PAGE and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. The left panel shows a 20-min autoradiography. The membrane was then immunoblotted (IB) with GST antibody to confirm the expression of GST and GST-SH2 (right panel).

Identification of SH2-B Binding Sites in FGFR3-- Seven autophosphorylation sites in FGFR1 have been described previously (23, 28). Based on the sequence alignment with FGFR1, the potential autophosphorylation sites (Tyr-577, Tyr-647, Tyr-648, Tyr-724, and Tyr-760) in FGFR3 were identified. In addition, Tyr-770 in FGFR3 is conserved throughout FGFRs, suggesting that it may be a potential autophosphorylation site as well. A schematic diagram of the intracellular domain of FGFR3 with six potential autophosphorylation sites is shown in Fig. 7A. Tyr-647 and Tyr-648 are located in the activation loop, and their phosphorylation is involved in the conformational changes that accompany receptor activation (49). Previously we showed that substitution of all non-activation loop Tyr residues with Phe caused FGFR3 to be inactive (49). We therefore focused on residues Tyr-724, Tyr-760, and Tyr-770. To determine the tyrosine residue(s) of FGFR3 required for SH2-B binding, we generated a series of LexA-R3-N540K mutants containing phosphorylation site mutations in which the tyrosine residues were mutated to phenylalanine. LexA-R3-N540K was used as the template for these mutants (Fig. 7B), since this derivative was used as bait in the initial yeast two-hybrid screen.


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Representation of FGFR3 mutants. A, a schematic diagram of the intracellular domain of FGFR3 with six potential tyrosine phosphorylation sites (Tyr-577, Tyr-647, Tyr-648, Tyr-724, Tyr-760, and Tyr-770). Tyr-647 and Tyr-648 are crucial for kinase activity. TM, transmembrane domain. B, table of FGFR3 tyrosine mutants used to determine SH2-B binding sites. Mutations were made starting with the LexA-R3-N540K construct, where Tyr-724, Tyr-760, and/or Tyr-770 were mutated from Tyr to Phe.

Each mutant was tested against the SH2-B region isolated from the screen by beta -galactosidase liquid assay (Table II). PLC-gamma was used as a positive control due to its previously characterized interaction with FGFR1 (28). Among the mutants, LexA-770F exhibited the strongest interaction with SH2-B (Table II). This mutant lacks Tyr-770 but retains Tyr-724 and Tyr-760. This suggests that one or the other or both of these residues is important for the interaction with SH2-B. The LexA-724F mutant, which retains Tyr-760 and Tyr-770 but lacks Tyr-724, showed a decrease in binding. In addition, the LexA-760F mutant, which retains Tyr-724 and Tyr-770 but lacks Tyr-760, also exhibited a significantly decreased interaction. These data indicate that Tyr-724 and Tyr-760 are important for SH2-B binding.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II
beta -Galactosidase assay for SH2-B binding sites in FGFR3
Mutants were constructed by mutation of tyrosine to phenylalanine in the intracellular domain of FGFR3-N540K followed by subcloning into the LexA yeast vector pBTM116. Yeast were cotransformed with the indicated plasmids and grown under His- medium at 30 °C for 3-4 days before beta -galactosidase assay. One unit of beta -galactosidase is defined as the amount that hydrolyzes 1 mmol of o-nitrophenyl beta -D-galactopyranoside/min/cell. Results shown are the mean ±S.D. of 5 independent experiments.

The results presented in Table II also demonstrate that LexA-R3-N540K exhibits significant interaction with PLC-gamma . Interestingly, when Tyr-770 was removed by mutation, the resulting mutant LexA-770F exhibited increased interaction with PLC-gamma and to a lesser extent with SH2-B. This observation could suggest that Tyr-770 plays a negative regulatory role in FGFR3 signaling, at least with regard to signaling through the effector proteins SH2-B and PLC-gamma .

Activated FGFR3 and SH2-Bbeta Increase Stat5 Phosphorylation and Activation-- A previous study has shown that growth hormone-induced binding of SH2-B and JAK2 results in enhanced tyrosine phosphorylation of cellular proteins, including Stats (37). Thus, we next examined whether SH2-Bbeta and activated FGFR3 affected Stat signaling. 293T cells were transfected with empty pcDNA3 vector, R3-WT, R3-K650E, R3-K650E plus Myc-SH2-Bbeta , or R3-K650E plus SH2-Bbeta (R555E). The SH2-Bbeta (R555E) mutant contains a mutation within the SH2 domain of SH2-Bbeta to prevent binding by SH2 domain binding substrates (37). Lysates were then analyzed by 10% SDS-PAGE, transferred to a membrane, and immunoblotted with phospho-Stat5 antisera. As demonstrated in Fig. 8A, activated FGFR3 alone induces a small amount of endogenous Stat5 phosphorylation (lane 3). When SH2-Bbeta is coexpressed with activated FGFR3, there is a significant increase in Stat5 phosphorylation (Fig. 8A, lane 4). In contrast, coexpression of the SH2-Bbeta mutant containing a defective SH2 domain with activated FGFR3 resulted in a decrease in endogenous Stat5 phosphorylation (Fig. 8A, lane 5). The membrane was then stripped and reprobed with Stat5 (Fig. 8B) to demonstrate equivalent levels of protein in each sample. The membrane was further stripped and reprobed with Myc antibody to show expression of transfected Myc-SH2-Bbeta (Fig. 8C) and then with FGFR3 antibody to show expression of transfected FGFR3 (Fig. 8D).


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Stat5 activation by FGFR3 and SH2-Bbeta . A, 293T cells were transfected with the indicated constructs. Lysates were analyzed by 10% SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted (IB) for phospho-Stat5. B, the membrane was stripped and reprobed with Stat5 antiserum. C, immunoblotting with Myc antibody of the stripped membrane indicated the presence of transfected Myc-SH2-Bbeta . D, the membrane was stripped once more and probed with FGFR3 antibody to confirm the presence of FGFR3.

After tyrosine phosphorylation at the C terminus, Stat proteins undergo dimerization and relocalization from the cytoplasm to the nucleus (54, 55). We examined whether Stat5 localization was dependent upon expression of SH2-Bbeta and activated FGFR3. We utilized a human fibroblast cell line, 2C4, for transfection with the indicated constructs. To ensure that each transfected cell contained all the indicated constructs, 0.1 µg of GFP-Stat5B was cotransfected with 0.5 µg of FGFR3-K650E or 0.5 µg each of FGFR3-K650E and Myc-SH2-Bbeta (wild type or R555E mutant). Each GFP-Stat5B-positive cell examined should then contain FGFR3-K650E and, in the case of the triple transfection, both FGFR3-K650E and Myc-SH2-Bbeta (wild type or R555E mutant). Thus, in some cases, cells not exhibiting GFP-Stat5B staining could contain FGFR3-K650E as shown in Fig. 9, panel j.


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9.   Stat5 relocalizes to the nucleus upon FGFR3-mediated signaling. 2C4 cells were transfected with the indicated constructs. Panel e demonstrates the cytoplasmic localization of GFP-Stat5B in the presence of R3-WT. When activated R3-K650E is cotransfected with GFP-Stat5B, Stat5B is both cytoplasmic and nuclear, as shown in panel h. Upon cotransfection of SH2-Bbeta with R3-K650E and GFP-Stat5B, GFP-Stat5B is exclusively nuclear (panel k). When SH2-Bbeta (R555E) is coexpressed with R3-K650E and GFP-Stat5B, GFP-Stat5B becomes cytoplasmic. Panels a, d, g, j, and m confirm expression of FGFR3. Panels c, f, i, l, and o represent the nuclei visualized by Hoechst 33342.

When GFP-Stat5B (47) was cotransfected with wild-type FGFR3, Stat5B was predominantly cytoplasmic (Fig. 9, panel e). Cotransfection of GFP-Stat5B with the activating mutant, R3-K650E, resulted in an increase in nuclear localization of Stat5B (Fig. 9, panel h). When SH2-Bbeta was also transfected with R3-K650E and GFP-Stat5B, Stat5B relocalized completely into the nucleus (Fig. 9, panel k). In the presence of the mutant SH2-Bbeta (R555E), R3-K650E, and GFP-Stat5B, however, Stat5B was localized to the cytoplasm (Fig. 9, panel n). These data correlate with the increase in phosphorylation observed in Fig. 8 upon coexpression of activated FGFR3 and SH2-Bbeta and a decrease in phosphorylation upon coexpression of activated FGFR3 and SH2-Bbeta (R555E).

    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Numerous skeletal and developmental disorders have been shown to result from mutations in FGFRs (6, 56, 57). Mutations in FGFR3 result in many human disorders, including TDI, TDII, SADDAN, and dwarfism (6, 21). More recently, FGFR3 has been linked to cancers such as multiple myeloma and bladder and cervical carcinoma (7, 8). Unlike other receptor tyrosine kinases, few of the immediate downstream signals of FGFR3 have been identified. In this study, we have identified SH2-B as an FGFR3-binding protein using the yeast two-hybrid screen. Coimmunoprecipitation experiments in 293T cells between FGFR3 and SH2-B confirmed this interaction. We have also found by beta -galactosidase liquid assay that Tyr-724 and Tyr-760 in FGFR3 interact with the SH2 domain of SH2-B. In addition, activated FGFR3 promotes binding to SH2-Bbeta and stimulates tyrosine phosphorylation of SH2-Bbeta . Furthermore, the kinase domain of FGFR3-K650E can directly phosphorylate SH2-B in vitro. These results suggest that SH2-B is a direct substrate of FGFR3.

Previously, PLC-gamma represented the only SH2 domain-containing binding partner for FGFRs (28). The SH2-B clone isolated from the yeast two-hybrid screen primarily contains the SH2 domain (Fig. 1B), demonstrating that SH2-B binds to FGFR3 via its SH2 domain. Consistent with this, the SH2 domain alone was sufficient to bind to activated FGFR3 in mammalian cells. Because SH2 domains have been found to bind to phosphotyrosine residues (58), it is likely that SH2-B interacts with the phosphotyrosine residue(s) of FGFR3. Coimmunoprecipitation experiments demonstrated that binding of the SH2-Bbeta isoform to FGFR3 correlated with receptor activation, which further supports the premise that the interaction is phosphotyrosine-dependent. This also corresponds to the fact that a N540K mutation leads to a milder form of activated FGFR3 than a K650E mutation. Interestingly, our data indicate that full-length SH2-Bbeta can also weakly associate with wild-type FGFR3 (Fig. 4). One possible explanation for this observation is the existence of an additional low affinity binding site(s) in SH2-B for FGFR3. In fact, SH2-Bbeta has been shown to bind to tyrosine-phosphorylated JAK2 not only via its SH2 domain but also by its N-terminal region (amino acids 1 to 555); however, this binding is not phosphotyrosine-dependent (59).

We also show that both Tyr-724 and Tyr-760 of FGFR3 are required for interaction with the SH2 domain of SH2-B. Mutating these residues to phenylalanine impairs the association between FGFR3 and the SH2 domain. Previous studies from our laboratory show that a derivative of FGFR3 containing all conserved tyrosine residues stimulated transformation, Stat activation, and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase activation (49). Substitution of all non-activation loop tyrosine residues with phenylalanine rendered the FGFR3 derivative inactive; however, the addition of Tyr-724 restored its ability to stimulate the above signaling pathways (49). Data from our two-hybrid screen also indicate that the SH2 domain of the p85 regulatory subunit of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase interacts with FGFR3 (data not shown). It is possible that the SH2 domains of p85 and SH2-B compete for binding of Tyr-724 in FGFR3, resulting in the activation of different signaling pathways. We have also previously shown that both Tyr-724 and Tyr-760 were required for maximal Stat activation (49). Similarly, both tyrosine residues may be necessary to mediate the signaling events carried out by SH2-B in response to FGFR3 activation. Nonetheless, the possibility that the SH2 domain interacts with only Tyr-724 or Tyr-760 should not be excluded.

We also demonstrate by an in vitro kinase assay that the SH2 domain of SH2-Bbeta can be directly phosphorylated by activated FGFR3. Because SH2-Bbeta has nine tyrosine residues, some of these residues may be directly phosphorylated by FGFR3, whereas others may be phosphorylated by non-receptor tyrosine kinases such as JAK2 (35). Among these residues, Tyr-439, Tyr-494, and Tyr-624 were predicted to be potential tyrosine phosphorylation sites (33). The Tyr-624 residue in particular is located within a YVPS motif, which is a putative phosphorylation site by platelet-derived growth factor receptor (33). Because the SH2-B clone isolated from the screen contains the entire SH2 domain as well as the Tyr-624 residue, it would be interesting to determine whether FGFR3 specifically phosphorylates Tyr-624. There are two other tyrosine residues, Tyr-525 and Tyr-564, in the SH2 domain of SH2-Bbeta that may also serve as phosphorylation sites. Future studies will determine which residue(s) is specifically phosphorylated by FGFR3. Identification of the tyrosine residues phosphorylated by FGFR3 will be important in studying the signaling pathway(s) mediated by SH2-Bbeta because they will suggest molecular mechanisms of recruitment of signaling proteins by FGFR3 activation via specific tyrosine phosphorylation.

In this study, we have characterized a novel interaction between FGFR3 and SH2-Bbeta , and we have demonstrated that FGFR3 activation results in the tyrosine phosphorylation of SH2-Bbeta . We also demonstrate one mechanism by which FGFR3 mediates downstream signaling. In 293T cells, we observe phosphorylation of Stat5 in cells transfected with activated FGFR3. This phosphorylation increases in response to expression of SH2-Bbeta . We also demonstrate the nuclear translocalization of Stat5B when both activated FGFR3 and SH2-Bbeta are coexpressed. When the mutant SH2-Bbeta (R555E) was coexpressed with activated FGFR3, Stat5B becomes inactivated and is predominantly cytoplasmic. SH2-B therefore appears to represent a novel and biologically relevant substrate of FGFR3.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank C. Carter-Su for generously providing Myc epitope-tagged SH2-B, SH2-Bbeta antisera, and GFP-Stat5B. We also thank S. C. Robertson, M.Y. Kanemitsu, and K. C. Hart for helpful discussions and technical assistance, R. W. Dellinger, A. N. Meyer, and other members of the Donoghue lab for critical reviews of the manuscript, and L. J. Castrejon for editorial assistance.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant 1R01 DE12581.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger These authors contributed equally to this work.

§ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Center for Molecular Genetics, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0367. Tel.: 858-534-2167; Fax: 858-534-7481; E-mail: ddonoghue@ucsd.edu.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, February 4, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M102777200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: FGFR, fibroblast growth factor (FGF) receptor; SH2, Src homology 2; JAK2, Janus kinase 2; Stat, signal transducer and activator of transcription; PLC-gamma , phospholipase Cgamma ; TD, thanatophoric dysplasia; FRS2, fibroblast growth factor receptor substrate 2; SADDAN, severe achondroplasia with delayed development and acanthosis nigricans; GST, glutathione S-transferase; GFP, green fluorescent protein; myr, myristoylated; WT, wild type.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Basilico, C., and Moscatelli, D. (1992) Adv. Cancer Res. 59, 115-1652[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Mason, I. J. (1994) Cell 78, 547-552[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Miyamoto, M., Naruo, K.-I., Seko, C., Matsumoto, S., Kondo, T., and Kurokawa, T. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 4251-4259[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Johnson, D. E., and Williams, L. T. (1993) Adv. Cancer Res. 60, 1-41[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Partanen, J., Vainikka, S., and Alitalo, K. (1993) Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 340, 297-303[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Webster, M. K., and Donoghue, D. J. (1997) Trends Genet. 13, 178-182[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Chesi, M., Nardini, E., Brents, L. A., Schrock, E., Ried, T., Kuehl, W. M., and Bergsagel, P. L. (1997) Nat. Genet. 16, 260-264[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Cappellen, D., De, Oliverira, C., Ricol, D., de Medina, S. G. D., Bourdin, J., Sastre-Garau, X., Chopin, D., Thiery, J. P., and Radvanyi, F. (1999) Nat. Genet. 23, 18-20[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Hattori, Y., Odagiri, H., Katoh, O., Sakamoto, H., Morita, T., Shimotohno, K., Tobinai, K., Sugimura, T., and Terada, M. (1992) Cancer Res. 52, 3367-3371[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Popovici, C., Adelaide, J., Ollendorf, V., Chaffanet, C., Guasch, G., Jacrot, M., Leroux, D., Birnbaum, D., and Pebusque, M. J. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 5712-5717[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Reiter, A., Sohal, J., Kulkarni, S., Chase, A., MacDonald, D. H., Aguiar, R. C., Goncalves, C., Hernandez, J. M., Jennings, B. A., Goldman, J. M., and Cross, N. C. P. (1998) Blood 92, 1735-1742[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Tavormina, P. L., Bellus, G. A., Webster, M. K., Bamshad, M. J., Fraley, A. E., McIntosh, I., Szabo, J, Jiang, W., Jabs, E. W., Wilcox, W. R., Wasmuth, J. J., Donoghue, D. J., Thompson, L. M., and Francomano, C. A. (1999) Am. J. Hum. Genet. 64, 722-731[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Peters, K. G., Werner, S., Chen, G., and Williams, L. T. (1992) Development 114, 233-243[Abstract]
14. Bellus, G. A., Hefferon, T. W., Ortiz de Luna, R. I., Hecht, J. T., Horton, W. A., Machado, M., Kaitila, I., McIntosh, I., and Francomano, C. A. (1995) Am. J. Hum. Genet. 56, 368-373[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Bellus, G. A., McIntosh, I., Smith, E. A., Aylsworth, A. S., Kaitila, I., Horton, W. A., Greenhaw, G. A., Hecht, J. T., and Francomano, C. A. (1995) Nat. Genet. 10, 357-359[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Deng, C., Wynshaw-Boris, A., Zhou, F., Kuo, A., and Leder, P. (1996) Cell 84, 911-921[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Colvin, J. S., Bohne, B. A., Harding, G. W., McEwen, D. G., and Ornitz, D. M. (1996) Nat. Genet. 12, 390-397[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Bellus, G. A., Spector, E. B., Speiser, P. W., Weaver, C. A., Garber, A. T., Bryke, C. R., Israel, J., Rosengren, S. S., Webster, M. K., Donoghue, D. J., and Francomano, C. A. (2000) Am. J. Hum. Genet. 67, 1411-1421[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Webster, M. K., and Donoghue, D. J. (1996) EMBO J. 15, 520-527[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Richelda, R., Ronchetti, D., Baldini, L, Cro, L., Viggiano, L., Marzella, R., Rocchi, M., Otsuki, T., Lombardi, L., Maiolo, A. T., and Neri, A. (1997) Blood 90, 4062-4070[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Tavormina, P. L., Shiang, R., Thompson, L. M., Zhu, Y. Z., Wilkin, D. J., Lachman, R. S., Wilcox, W. R., Rimoin, D. L., Cohn, D. H., and Wasmuth, J. J. (1995) Nat. Genet. 9, 321-328[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Webster, M. K., d'Avis, P. Y., Robertson, S. C., and Donoghue, D. J. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 4081-4087[Abstract]
23. Mohammadi, M., Dikic, I., Sorokin, A., Burgess, W. H., Jaye, M., and Schlessinger, J. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 977-989[Abstract]
24. Ullrich, A., and Shlessinger, J. (1990) Cell 61, 203-212[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Spivak-Kroizman, T., Lemmon, M. A., Dikic, I., Ladbury, J. E., Pinchasi, D., Huang, J., Jaye, M., Crumley, G., Schlessinger, J., and Lax, I. (1994) Cell 79, 1015-1024[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Fantl, W. J., Escobedo, J. A., Martin, G. A., Turck, C. W., del Rosario, M., McCormick, F., and Wiliams, L. T. (1992) Cell 69, 413-423[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Fantl, W. J., Johnson, D. E., and Williams, L. T. (1993) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 62, 453-481[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Mohammadi, M., Honegger, A. M., Rotin, D., Fischer, R., Bellot, F., Li, W., Dionne, C. A., Jaye, M., Rubinstein, M., and Schlessinger, J. (1991) Mol. Cell. Biol. 11, 5068-5078[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. Ong, S. H., Guy, G. R., Hadari, Y. R., Laks, S., Gotoh, N., Schelessinger, J., and Lax, I. (2000) Mol. Cell. Biol. 20, 979-989[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Ong, S. H., Lim, Y. P., Low, B. C., and Guy, G. R. (1997) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 238, 261-266[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Xu, H., Lee, K. W., and Goldfarb, M. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 17987-17990[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Kouhara, H., Hadari, Y. R., Spivak-Kroizman, T., Schilling, J., Bar-Sagi, D., Lax, I., and Schelssinger, J. (1997) Cell 89, 693-702[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Riedel, H., Wang, J., Hansen, H., and Yousaf, N. (1997) J. Biochem. 122, 1105-1113[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. Rui, L., and Carter-Su, C. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 21239-21245[Abstract/Free Full Text]
35. Rui, L., Mathews, L. S., Hotta, K., Gustafson, T. A., and Carter-Su, C. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 6633-6644[Abstract]
36. Osborne, M. A., Dalton, S., and Kochan, J. P. (1995) BioTechnology 13, 1474-1478[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Rui, L., and Carter-Su, C. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 7172-7177[Abstract/Free Full Text]
38. Qian, X., Riccio, A., Zhang, Y., and Ginty, D. D. (1998) Neuron 21, 1017-1029[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]