![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 18, 15979-15984, May 3, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the
Received for publication, December 18, 2001, and in revised form, February 7, 2002
p58/ERGIC-53 is an animal
calcium-dependent lectin that cycles between the
endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and the Golgi complex and appears to act as
a cargo receptor for a subset of soluble glycoproteins exported from
the ER. We have determined the crystal structure of the carbohydrate
recognition domain (CRD) of p58, the rat homologue of human ERGIC-53,
to 1.46 Å resolution. The fold and ligand binding site are most
similar to those of leguminous lectins. The structure also resembles
that of the CRD of the ER folding chaperone calnexin and the neurexins,
a family of non-lectin proteins expressed on neurons. The CRD comprises
one concave and one convex Secretory and membrane proteins undergo a quality control process
that assures their proper folding, oligomerization, and maturation
before exit from the endoplasmic reticulum
(ER)1 (1). This is followed
by the critical step of selection of cargo proteins to be exported from
the ER to the Golgi complex via the ERGIC (ER-Golgi intermediate
compartment). Export is then mediated by COPII vesicles (2). Although
many proteins may become incorporated into COPII vesicles by default
(bulk-flow transport), it is now generally believed that export is an
active regulated process, whereby cargo molecules are first localized to ER exit sites and then selectively incorporated into COPII vesicles
by one of several mechanisms (2, 3). Selective export of soluble
proteins may occur by interaction with export receptors harboring
motifs recognized by COPII coatomers.
The p58 and ERGIC-53/MR60 proteins are the most commonly used
markers for the ERGIC (4, 5). p58 (4) and ERGIC-53 (5)
were originally identified as proteins reacting with antibodies prepared against Golgi membrane fractions, whereas MR60 was identified as a mannose-binding protein (6). Subsequent cDNA cloning showed that ERGIC-53 (7) and MR60 (8) were identical to each other and
represented the human homologue of the rat p58 protein (9).
p58/ERGIC-53/MR60 is a type I transmembrane, nonglycosylated protein
with a lumenal domain, a transmembrane domain, and a short cytoplasmic
domain. In cells, it is present as dimers and hexamers (9, 10). The
lumenal domain can be divided into two subdomains, an N-terminal
carbohydrate recognition domain (CRD) (residues 31-285) and a
membrane-proximal The identification of MR60 as a mannose-binding protein (8) and
mutagenesis studies of ERGIC-53, in which the
calcium-dependent binding of mannose to this protein was
abolished (13), support the suggestion that p58/ERGIC-53 serves as a
mammalian intracellular lectin (14). This proposition was also based on
the similarity between ERGIC-53 and VIP-36, a membrane protein isolated
from Madin-Darby canine kidney cells (15), shown to bind mannose, and
localized in the early secretory pathway (16, 17). It was proposed that
p58/ERGIC-53 and VIP-36 constituted a new class of animal lectins (14).
Blocking the export of ERGIC-53 from the ER impaired but did not block
export of the lysosomal enzyme cathepsin C and cathepsin Z-related
protein (18). Furthermore, ERGIC-53 could be cross-linked to a
cathepsin Z-related protein. The glycan structure binding to ERGIC-53
in the ER was suggested to be a nine-mannose form (Man9),
i.e. the asparagine-linked core glycan from which three
terminal glucose residues have been trimmed (19). Efficient secretion
of coagulation factors V and VIII requires a functional ERGIC-53 (20),
and mutations in the gene coding for ERGIC-53 cause a rare hereditary
bleeding disorder, a combined deficiency of factors V and VIII (21).
Taken together, these data strongly suggest that p58/ERGIC-53/MR60
functions as a lectin-like receptor involved in facilitating export
from the ER of a subset of secretory glycoproteins (22).
As a first step toward a better understanding of how glycans on cargo
molecules interact with the lectin receptor, we have determined the
crystal structure of the CRD of p58. The structure reveals a link
between leguminous and animal lectins and defines a new class of animal
calcium-dependent lectins that function in the secretory pathway.
Protein Production--
The CRD of rat p58/ERGIC-53 (residues
31-285) was defined by a combination of sequence alignment, secondary
structure prediction, and limited proteolysis. The CRD (including the
N-terminal signal sequence comprising residues 1-30 and a 6xHis tag)
was produced in insect cells using a baculovirus vector and purified as
described elsewhere (23). The region encompassing residues 286-478,
which is not present in the construct whose structure is described
here, is the oligomerization domain of p58/ERGIC-53 and is required for
dimerization and formation of hexamers (10). Therefore, the CRD
is monomeric in solution as assayed by native gel electrophoresis and
gel filtration chromatography (data not shown).
Crystallization--
Crystals were grown by vapor diffusion from
hanging drops containing equal volumes of a 10 mg/ml protein solution
in 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 1 mM
CaCl2, and well solution. The drops were equilibrated
against 1 ml of well solution that consisted of 100 mM
Na-HEPES, pH 7.25, 1.6 M Li2SO4,
and 10 mM EDTA, as described previously (23). The crystals
belong to the orthorhombic space group I222, with cell dimensions
a = 49.6 Å, b = 86.1 Å, and
c = 128.1 Å, and they have one monomer in the
asymmetric unit (23).
Data Collection--
X-ray data used for the structure
determination were collected on a MAR 300mm Image plate detector
mounted on a Rigaku R200 x-ray generator, operating at 50 kV and 90 mA
at 110 K. Crystals were transferred to a solution containing 1.2 M Li2SO4, 0.1 M Na-HEPES, pH 7.25, and 20% PEG400, allowed to equilibrate for a
few seconds, and frozen in a stream of nitrogen. The high-resolution data set used for refinement was collected at beamline 711 at the MAX
Laboratory (Lund, Sweden) synchrotron radiation source. The
crystal was transferred to mother liquor containing 20% ethylene glycol before freezing. All data were processed with DENZO and SCALEPACK (24).
Structure Determination and Refinement--
The structure was
solved by multiple isomorphous replacement based on five heavy metal
derivatives (Table I). Location of metal binding sites and phase
calculations were performed using SOLVE (25) with a native data set
collected at the home source as a reference. The initial electron
density map calculated at 2.7 Å was of sufficient quality to allow
automated model building of most residues in the structure and phase
extension to 1.46 Å using wARP (26). This procedure was
followed by multiple cycles of refinement in crystallography NMR
software (CNS) (27) using a maximum likelihood target and bulk solvent
correction and using model building in O (28). The final cycles
of refinement were performed using Refmac5 (29) because it led to
faster convergence and lower R factor and Rfree
values. Crystallographic data have been deposited at the PDB (accession
code 1GV9 for the coordinate entry and accession code R1GV9SF for the
structure factors).
Structure Determination of p58--
The crystal structure of the
CRD of p58 was solved by multiple isomorphous replacement (Table
I). The initial electron density map was
of sufficient quality to allow tracing of most residues in the
structure. The model was subsequently refined to
Rwork/Rfree values of 19.1 and 21.1%,
respectively. All data collection, phasing, and refinement statistics
are summarized in Table I.
The final model contains residues 50-277 of p58, 197 water molecules
and 2 sulfate ions. The region corresponding to residues 1-30
constitutes the signal sequence, which is cleaved upon secretion of the
protein into the medium and is therefore not present in the mature form
of the protein. Residues 31-49 and the 6xHis tag inserted between
residues 34 and 35 (23) are not visible in the electron density maps.
There is also no density for the final 8 residues of the construct and
for residues 165-169 of the p58 sequence, which presumably are part of
a flexible loop.
Overall Fold--
The CRD domain of p58 has an overall globular
shape and is composed of 15
The two
Based on their weak homology to plant lectins, it has been
proposed (14) that ERGIC-53 and VIP-36 define a new class of animal
lectins in the secretory pathway. It is thought that these proteins
function as sorting receptors for glycoproteins exiting the ER (22).
Orthologues of this gene have been found in several organisms.
Moreover, two other genes named ERGIC-53-like (ERGL) and GP36b have
recently been identified as displaying significant homology to
p58/ERGIC-53 (30),2
suggesting that their products might also act as cargo receptors for
glycoproteins. The fold observed here is most likely conserved in all
ERGIC-53-like proteins recognized thus far because they share
significant sequence identity (25-35%) and align very well in the
region spanning the CRD (Fig. 2).
Structural Similarity of p58 to Other Lectins--
Comparisons of
the structure described here against the PDB data base using the DALI
server (32) and the program TOP (33) revealed that the CRD of p58 is
structurally most similar to the leguminous lectins (Table
II). Most leguminous lectins have
a core structure composed of a
Similarity is also found between p58 and other animal proteins,
including lectins such as calnexin and galectin-3, as well as the
ligand-binding domain of neurexin 1 Evolutionary Conservation of p58/ERGIC-53-like
Domains--
Alignment of p58/ERGIC-53 and related sequences from
different organisms within the animal kingdom reveals a high degree of sequence identity (Fig. 2). The sequence conservation is well distributed throughout the polypeptide chain. Highly conserved residues
include: (i) tryptophans (Trp51, Trp78,
Trp110, and Trp128) forming a hydrophobic
ladder that runs through the hydrophobic core of the protein, (ii)
glycines in loops between the Putative Ligand Binding Site--
The oligomeric form of
p58/ERGIC-53 binds to mannose-substituted (Man1) resins,
although mannose monosaccharide is probably not the ligand of p58
in vivo (19). Rather, it is thought that p58/ERGIC-53
recognizes Man9 on glycoproteins (6, 22). Mutagenesis studies have implicated 2 residues, Asp129 and
Asn164, to be required for binding of ERGIC-53 to
mannose-substituted resins (13). Due to the presence of EDTA in the
crystallization conditions, no Ca2+ ions are observed in
the putative ligand binding site of the p58 structure when compared
with those of leguminous lectins. However, similarities are observed
between these binding site structures (Fig.
4): residues Asp129 and
Asp160 in p58 are in positions similar to those of the
equivalent Asp81 and Asp121 from the
Lathyrus ochrus and pea lectin structures in complex with
mannose (PDB codes 1RIN and 1LOB, respectively; hereafter, we refer to
these two proteins by their PDB codes) (37, 38). Both these residues
coordinate the Ca2+ ion, and Asp81 also binds
mannose in these complexes. The peptide bond between residues
Ala128 and Asp129 is in the
cis-conformation in p58, as in the leguminous lectins. This
is essential for the correct geometry of the Ca2+ binding
site and for sugar binding in these lectins (37).
Major differences observed between the binding sites from p58, 1LOB,
and 1RIN include: (i) a different conformation of Asn170 in
p58 as compared with the equivalent Asp129 in 1RIN and
1LOB, due mostly to a disordered region between residues 165 and 169 of
p58 (Fig. 1), (ii) positioning of the side chain of Asn164
~12.0 Å away from the equivalent Asn125 in 1RIN and 1LOB
(Fig. 4), and (iii) substitution of residues Glu119 and
His136, which are involved in Mn2+ coordination
in leguminous lectins, by Phe158 and Ala172 in
p58, which probably renders it unable to bind Mn2+ ions. Of
the other residues of 1LOB and 1RIN that interact with mannose,
Ala210 and Glu211 superimpose well on the
equivalent residues Gly259 and Gly260 from p58,
whereas the third residue is part of a loop and is located around 6 Å from its counterpart in 1LOB and 1RIN.
Functional Implications for Cargo Recognition--
Recent data
indicate that ERGIC-53 acts as a cargo receptor for a subset of
glycoproteins through recognition of mannose residues in their sugar
moieties (19, 22). Because this is a selective process, and all
glycoproteins have identical sugar structures while still in the ER,
specific recognition of a small subset of glycoproteins is most likely
also dependent in part on characteristics intrinsic to the recognized
proteins other than their sugar structure. Electrostatic surface charge
calculations show a marked charge polarity on the surface of p58. A
deep, negatively charged pocket is situated adjacent to the residues
that are thought to be involved in calcium coordination and
mannose binding (Fig. 3A). The presence of a
Ca2+ ion would reduce the negative charge in this pocket,
but electrostatic calculations suggest that it would still have a
predominantly negative character (data not shown). The sequence
conservation in the vicinity as well as inside of the negatively
charged pocket is quite strong (Fig. 3B), suggesting that
this region and its intrinsic electrostatic character are important for
protein-protein interactions.
On the side of p58 opposite to the ligand binding site, there is a
surface patch made up of residues conserved only in p58/ERGIC-53 orthologues (Fig. 3D). It maps to the convex
In summary, we have demonstrated that the CRD of p58/ERGIC-53 is an
example of the utilization of the plant lectin fold within the quality
control system in the ER. The fold of the structure reported here is a
versatile scaffold for carbohydrate-mediated ligand-receptor
interactions. The structural conservation between the CRD domain of p58
and calnexin highlights the importance of quality control mechanisms
for the proper maturation of proteins in the ER. It is therefore likely
that this domain was present in evolution before the separation of the
plant and animal kingdoms. The structure presented here, together with
functional data on p58/ERGIC-53, suggests that the leguminous lectin
fold is also used for Ca2+-dependent
recognition of carbohydrate structures in animals, reinforcing the
proposition that these proteins constitute a new class of animal
calcium-dependent lectins.
We acknowledge access to synchrotron
radiation at the MAX Laboratory, beamline 711. We thank Tatyana
Sandalova for help with data collection and refinement and Cristofer
Enroth for help with wARP.
*
This work was supported by grants from the Swedish Research
Council.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The atomic coordinates and the structure factors (code 1GV9 and R1GV9SF) have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank, Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ (http://www.rcsb.org/).
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: ylva@
alfa.mbb.ki.se.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, February 15, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M112098200
2
E. Hartmann, B. Reimann, D. Goerlich, T. A. Rapoport, and S. Prehn, unpublished results, GenBankTM
accession number U10362.
The abbreviations used are:
ER, endoplasmic
reticulum;
CRD, carbohydrate recognition domain;
PDB, Protein Data
Bank.
Crystal Structure of the Carbohydrate Recognition Domain of
p58/ERGIC-53, a Protein Involved in Glycoprotein Export from the
Endoplasmic Reticulum*
,
,
¶
Division of Molecular Structural
Biology, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics,
Karolinska Institutet, Tomtebodavägen 6, S-17177 Stockholm,
Sweden and § Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Stockholm
Branch, Karolinska Institutet, Box 240, S-17177 Stockholm, Sweden
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-sheet packed into a
-sandwich. The
ligand binding site resides in a negatively charged cleft formed by
conserved residues. A large surface patch of conserved residues with a
putative role in protein-protein interactions and oligomerization lies on the opposite side of the ligand binding site. Together with previous functional data, the structure defines a new and expanding class of calcium-dependent animal lectins and provides a
starting point for the understanding of glycoprotein sorting between
the ER and the Golgi.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-helical coiled domain (residues 290-460) (10).
The cytoplasmic tail contains a KKFF sequence at its extreme C terminus
that is essential for both ER exit and Golgi retrieval (11), meaning
that p58/ERGIC-53/MR60 cycles between the ER and Golgi compartment
(12).
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
Summary of the data collection, phasing, and refinement statistics
-strands, a small
helix, and one
turn of 310 helix (Fig. 1).
Two major twisted antiparallel
-sheets, one seven-stranded (major)
-sheet, and one six-stranded (minor)
sheet pack against each
other, forming a
-sandwich, in a variation of the jelly roll fold.
The N terminus starts with two short
-strands (
1a and
1b)
separated by a turn of 310 helix. This structural motif is
replaced by a single and longer strand in other lectin structures; therefore, we refer to it as
1 in p58. This is the first strand of
the minor
-sheet. It is followed by a long loop and the first strand
(
2) of the major
-sheet. A
-hairpin (strands
3 and
4) is
inserted between
2 and the second strand of the major
-sheet
(
5). From here, the chain makes an excursion into the opposite
(minor)
-sheet, contributing one strand (
6) before returning to the major
-sheet and forming four antiparallel
strands (
7
10). A loop followed by an
helix of two turns is
inserted between
9 and
10. The chain then crosses over to the
minor
-sheet, contributing three antiparallel strands
(
11
13). The last pair of strands is split between the two
sheets, with
14 in the major
-sheet and
15 in the minor
-sheet. The N and C termini of the polypeptide chain are close to
each other in space.

View larger version (33K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Overall structure of p58. Ribbon
diagram of p58 monomer shown (A) perpendicular to the
-sheets and (B) rotated 90° around a vertical axis.
Secondary structure elements were assigned using PROCHECK (43) and are
labeled in A. Positions of the N and C termini are
indicated. The arrow in A indicates the position
of the disordered loop.
-Strands belonging to the concave and convex
-sheets are shown in red and dark blue,
respectively. Strands that do not take part in the
-sheets and are
variable when compared with leguminous lectin structures are shown in
light blue. Loops and helices are shown in gray
and green, respectively. The arrow in
B indicates the position of the ligand binding site. This
figure and Figs. 4 and 5 were prepared using Bobscript (44) and
Raster3D (45).
-sheets are curved, giving rise to a concave surface of the
molecule on the side of the major
-sheet and a convex surface on the
side of the minor
-sheet. A cleft is formed by a 15-residue-long
loop between strands
7 and
8 of the major
-sheet, by the
helix and the loop preceding it. Residues Cys198 (strand
-10, major
-sheet) and Cys238 (strand
13, minor
-sheet) form a disulfide bond. Two peptide bonds are
observed in cis-conformation: one between
residues Ala128 and Asp129 at the entrance of
strand 9, and the other between Gly62 and Pro63
at the beginning of the loop joining strands
1b and
2.

View larger version (74K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Sequence alignment of p58/ERGIC-53- and
VIP-36-like CRD. The CRDs of p58/ERGIC-53 and VIP-36 sequences
from different organisms were aligned. Secondary structure elements are
shown as arrows and rectangles, representing
-strands and
or 310 helices in p58. The disordered
region is shown as a dashed line. The alignment is
restricted to the region of the sequences for which electron density
was observed in p58. Splicing sites are indicated by blue
arrowheads. Residues that are invariable in all sequences are
shown in red, and residues invariable only in p58/ERGIC-53
sequences are shown in green. The accession codes for the
sequences from GenBankTM are as follows: human ERGIC-53, U09716;
monkey, AAF13155; rat p58, U44129; mouse, BAB27655;
Drosophila, AF223385; C. elegans, 1729626; dog
VIP-36, X76392; human hVIP-36, NP_110432; and human ERGL, NM_021819.
The alignment was made using CLUSTAL W (46).
-sandwich with a concave face
comprising seven
-strands and a convex face comprising six
-strands (Table II). Despite the fact that the sequence identities
between p58/ERGIC-53 and leguminous lectins are generally <20%, the
core of these structures shares the same basic architecture, and the
secondary structure elements of p58 superimpose quite well with those
of the leguminous lectins. The sugar binding sites in these lectins are
all located on the concave
-sheet, with most of the residues that
participate in ligand binding coming from the loops between strands at
the top of the sheet.
Structural homologues to p58a
(Table II). Calnexin is also a
calcium-dependent lectin that resides in the ER and is
involved in quality control mechanisms (34). When compared, p58 and
calnexin have a CRD where the
-sheets have similar arrangements and
show helical insertions in the same region. Despite the low sequence
identity between the two proteins (Table II), 2 aspartate residues,
which coordinate Ca2+ in the leguminous lectin structures,
are conserved and occupy similar positions in both animal lectin
structures. Galectin-3 belongs to a family of calcium-independent
animal lectins that are predominantly cytoplasmic (35). Compared with
p58, the
-sheets and loops of galectin-3 are smaller, despite their
similar arrangement. Neurexin 1
belongs to a family of proteins
expressed in hundreds of isoforms in neuronal tissues and thought to
function as cell recognition molecules. Although ligands for these
molecules have still not been identified, it has been proposed that
they use the same binding fold and surface as the leguminous lectins to interact with cell surface molecules (36). However, p58 and neurexin
1
superimpose poorly in the region of the putative ligand binding
site, and there is no similarity between residues thought to be
involved in ligand binding in p58/ERGIC-53 and the corresponding residues of neurexin 1
.
-strands, (iii) the two
disulfide-bonded cysteines, and (iv) the proline observed in
cis-conformation in p58/ERGIC-53 and conserved in all
sequences of this domain family. It is therefore likely that the
overall structure observed here is conserved in other p58/ERGIC-53-like domains. Two patches of conserved residues on opposite sides of the
molecule are evident, indicating that conserved residues are not
confined to the hydrophobic core of the protein (Fig.
3).

View larger version (55K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Surface features of p58. A
and C, electrostatic surface potential of p58. The two views
are related by ~180° rotation around a vertical axis in the plane
of the paper and show the concave (A) and convex
(C) faces of the molecule. Negative potential is denoted by
red, and positive potential is denoted by blue.
An arrow indicates the position of the putative ligand
binding site. The maps are contoured at the 10kT level. B
and D, sequence conservation projected onto the accessible
surface of p58. Colors for the sequence conservation are as described
in the Fig. 2 legend. Residues Asp129 and
Asn164, for which mutagenesis studies have been carried
out, are shown in orange and dark blue,
respectively. The orientations are as described in A and
C. This figure was prepared using GRASP (31).

View larger version (29K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Stereo picture showing a comparison of the
ligand binding sites of p58, pea lectin (1RIN), and isolectin-1 (1LOB)
mannose complexes. Residues participating in mannose binding and
Ca2+/Mn2+ coordination in 1RIN and 1LOB are
shown with the carbon backbone in magenta and
green, respectively. The corresponding residues in p58 are
shown with the carbon backbone in light blue. Nitrogen and
oxygen atoms are shown in dark blue and red,
respectively, in all three structures. The residue numbers refer to
p58. The Ca2+ ion and mannose molecule from the isolectin-1
structure are shown in orange. See "Results and
Discussion" for numbering of the corresponding residues in pea lectin
and isolectin-1.
-sheet in
p58 and has well-balanced charge distribution (Fig. 3C). Due
to its conservation only in p58/ERGIC-53 orthologues, it may be
involved in protein-protein interactions that are unique to
p58/ERGIC-53, such as receptor-cargo binding or contacting neighboring
molecules in the formation of oligomers. Cargo proteins might use two
different and opposing faces of the p58
-sandwich for complex
formation. Whereas the carbohydrate moiety interacts with the
negatively charged pocket on one side of p58/ERGIC-53, another region,
conferring specificity for the cargo protein, could bind to the
conserved surface patch on the other side of p58/ERGIC-53. This would
be reminiscent of the interactions between calnexin and its substrates
using both its arm and lectin domains (34). p58/ERGIC-53 oligomerizes
into dimers and hexamers in contrast to other members of this family, which are monomeric. Therefore, involvement of this surface patch in
oligomerization would also explain its conservation only in p58/ERGIC-53 orthologues.
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Ellgaard, L.,
Molinari, M.,
and Helenius, A.
(1999)
Science
286,
1882-1888 2.
Klumperman, J.
(2000)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
12,
445-449[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 3.
Balch, W. E.,
McCaffery, J. M.,
Plutner, H.,
and Farquhar, M. G.
(1994)
Cell
76,
841-852[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 4.
Saraste, J.,
Palade, G. E.,
and Farquhar, M. G.
(1987)
J. Cell Biol.
105,
2021-2029 5.
Schweizer, A.,
Fransen, J. A. M.,
Bächi, T.,
Ginsel, L.,
and Hauri, H. P.
(1988)
J. Cell Biol.
107,
1643-1653 6.
Pimpaneau, V.,
Midoux, P.,
Monsigny, M.,
and Roche, A. C.
(1991)
Carbohydr. Res.
213,
95-108[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 7.
Schindler, R.,
Itin, C.,
Zerial, M.,
Lottspeich, F.,
and Hauri, H.-P.
(1993)
Eur. J. Cell Biol.
61,
1-9[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 8.
Arar, C.,
Carpentier, V., Le,
Caer, J.-P.,
Monsigny, M.,
Legrand, A.,
and Roche, A.-C.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
3551-3553 9.
Lahtinen, U.,
Hellman, U.,
Wernstedt, C.,
Saraste, J.,
and Pettersson, R.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
4031-4037 10.
Lahtinen, U.,
Svensson, K.,
and Pettersson, R. F.
(1999)
Eur. J. Biochem.
260,
392-397[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 11.
Kappeler, F.,
Klopfenstein, D. R. Ch.,
Foguet, M.,
Paccaud, J.-P.,
and Hauri, H.-P.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
31802-31808 12.
Klumperman, J.,
Schweizer, A.,
Clausen, H.,
Tang, B. L.,
Hong, W.,
Oorschot, V.,
and Hauri, H.-P.
(1998)
J. Cell Sci.
111,
3411-3425[Abstract] 13.
Itin, C.,
Roche, A.-C.,
Monsigny, M.,
and Hauri, H.-P.
(1996)
Mol. Biol. Cell
7,
483-493[Abstract] 14.
Fiedler, K.,
and Simons, K.
(1994)
Cell
77,
625-626[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 15.
Fiedler, K.,
Parton, R. G.,
Kellner, R.,
Etzold, T.,
and Simons, K.
(1994)
EMBO J.
13,
1729-1740[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 16.
Fullerkrug, J.,
Scheiffele, P.,
and Simons, K.
(1999)
J. Cell Sci.
112,
2813-2821[Abstract] 17.
Hara-Kuge, S.,
Ohkura, T.,
Seko, A.,
and Yamashita, K.
(1999)
Glycobiology
9,
833-839 18.
Vollenweider, F.,
Kappeler, F.,
Itin, C.,
and Hauri, H.-P.
(1998)
J. Cell Biol.
142,
377-389 19.
Appenzeller, C.,
Andersson, H.,
Kappeler, F.,
and Hauri, H.-P.
(1999)
Nat. Cell Biol.
1,
330-334[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 20.
Moussalli, M.,
Pipe, S. W.,
Hauri, H.-P.,
Nichols, W. C.,
Ginsburg, D.,
and Kaufman, R. J.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
32539-32542 21.
Nichols, W. C.,
Seligsohn, U.,
Zivelin, A.,
Terry, V. H.,
Hertel, C. E.,
Weatley, M. A.,
Moussalli, M.,
Hauri, H. P.,
Ciavarella, N.,
Kaufman, R. J.,
and Ginsburg, D.
(1998)
Cell
93,
61-70[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 22.
Hauri, H.-P.,
Kappeler, F.,
Andersson, H.,
and Appenzeller, C.
(2000)
J. Cell Sci.
113,
587-596[Abstract] 23.
Velloso, L. M.,
Svensson, K.,
Lahtinen, U.,
Schneider, G.,
Pettersson, R. F.,
and Linqvist, Y.
(2002)
Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr.
58,
536-538[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 24.
Otwinowski, Z.
(1993)
Data Collection and Processing
, pp. 56-62, SERC Daresbury Laboratory, Warrington, United Kingdom
25.
Terwilliger, T. C.,
and Berendzen, J.
(1999)
Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr.
55,
849-861[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 26.
Perakis, A.,
Morris, R.,
and Lamzin, V. S.
(1999)
Nat. Struct. Biol.
6,
458-464[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 27.
Brünger, A. T.,
Adams, P. D.,
Clore, G. M.,
DeLano, W. L.,
Gros, P.,
Grosse-Kunstleve, R. W.,
Jiang, J.-S.,
Kuszewski, J.,
Nilges, M.,
Pannu, N. S.,
Read, R. J.,
Rice, L. M.,
Simonson, T.,
and Warren, G. L.
(1999)
Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr.
54,
905-921 28.
Jones, T. A.,
Zou, J.-Y.,
Cowman, S. W.,
and Kjeldgaard, M.
(1991)
Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A Found. Crystallogr.
47,
110-119[CrossRef] 29.
Murshudov, G. N.,
Lebedev, A.,
Vagin, A. A.,
Wilson, K. S.,
and Dodson, E. J.
(1999)
Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr.
55,
247-255[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 30.
Yerushalmi, N.,
Keppler-Hafkemeyer, A.,
Vasmatzis, G.,
Liu, X. F.,
Olsson, P.,
Bera, T. K.,
Duray, P.,
Lee, B.,
and Pastan, I.
(2001)
Gene (Amst.)
265,
55-60[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 31.
Nicholls, A.,
Sharp, K. A.,
and Honig, B.
(1991)
Proteins
11,
281-296[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 32.
Holm, L.,
and Sander, C.
(1993)
J. Mol. Biol.
233,
123-138[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 33.
Lu, G.
(2000)
J. Appl. Crystallogr.
33,
176-183[CrossRef]
34.
Schrag, J. D.,
Bergeron, J. J. M., Li, Y.,
Borisova, S.,
Hahn, M.,
Thomas, D. Y.,
and Cygler, M.
(2001)
Mol. Cell
8,
633-644[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 35.
Seetharaman, J.,
Kanigsberg, A.,
Slaaby, R.,
Leffler, H.,
Barondes, S.,
and Rini, J. M.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
13047-13052 36.
Rudenko, G.,
Nguyen, T.,
Chelliah, Y.,
Sudhof, T. C.,
and Deisenhofer, J.
(1999)
Cell
99,
93-101[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 37.
Bourne, Y.,
Roussel, A.,
Frey, M.,
Rouge, P.,
Fontecilla-Camps, J. C.,
and Cambillau, C.
(1990)
Proteins
8,
365-376[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 38.
Rini, J. M.,
Hardman, K. D.,
Einspahr, H.,
Suddath, F. L.,
and Carver, J. P.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
10126-10132 39.
Casset, F.,
Hamelryck, T.,
Loris, R.,
Brisson, J. R.,
Tellier, C.,
Dao-Thi, M. H.,
Wyns, L.,
Poortmans, F.,
Perez, S.,
and Imberty, A.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
25619-25628 40.
Naismith, J. H.,
Emmerich, C.,
Habash, J.,
Harrop, S. J.,
Helliwell, J. R.,
Hunter, W. N.,
Raftery, J.,
Kalb, A. J.,
and Yariv, J.
(1994)
Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr.
50,
847-858[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 41.
Delbaere, L. T. J.,
Vandoselaar, M.,
Prasas, M. L.,
Quail, J. W.,
Wilson, K. S.,
and Dauter, Z.
(1993)
J. Mol. Biol.
230,
950-965[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 42.
Michel, G.,
Chantalat, L.,
Duee, E.,
Barbeyron, T.,
Henrissat, B.,
Kloareg, B.,
and Dideberg, O.
(2001)
Structure
9,
513-525[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 43.
Laskowski, R. A.,
MacArthur, M. W.,
Moss, D. S.,
and Thorton, J. M.
(1993)
J. Appl. Crystallogr.
26,
283-291[CrossRef]
44.
Esnouf, R. M.
(1999)
Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr.
55,
938-940[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 45.
Merritt, E. A.,
and Bacon, D. J.
(1997)
Methods Enzymol.
277,
505-524[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 46.
Thompson, J. D.,
Higgins, D. G.,
and Gibson, T. J.
(1994)
Nucleic Acids Res.
22,
4673-4680
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Ravaud, G. Stjepanovic, K. Wild, and I. Sinning The Crystal Structure of the Periplasmic Domain of the Escherichia coli Membrane Protein Insertase YidC Contains a Substrate Binding Cleft J. Biol. Chem., April 4, 2008; 283(14): 9350 - 9358. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Adams, A. A. Bentley, M. Kvansakul, D. Hatherley, and E. Hohenester Extracellular matrix retention of thrombospondin 1 is controlled by its conserved C-terminal region J. Cell Sci., March 15, 2008; 121(6): 784 - 795. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Kawasaki, Y. Ichikawa, I. Matsuo, K. Totani, N. Matsumoto, Y. Ito, and K. Yamamoto The sugar-binding ability of ERGIC-53 is enhanced by its interaction with MCFD2 Blood, February 15, 2008; 111(4): 1972 - 1979. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Kato and Y. Kamiya Structural views of glycoprotein-fate determination in cells Glycobiology, October 1, 2007; 17(10): 1031 - 1044. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Satoh, N. P. Cowieson, W. Hakamata, H. Ideo, K. Fukushima, M. Kurihara, R. Kato, K. Yamashita, and S. Wakatsuki Structural Basis for Recognition of High Mannose Type Glycoproteins by Mammalian Transport Lectin VIP36 J. Biol. Chem., September 21, 2007; 282(38): 28246 - 28255. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Banerjee, P. Vishwanath, J. Cui, D. J. Kelleher, R. Gilmore, P. W. Robbins, and J. Samuelson The evolution of N-glycan-dependent endoplasmic reticulum quality control factors for glycoprotein folding and degradation PNAS, July 10, 2007; 104(28): 11676 - 11681. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Sharon Lectins: Carbohydrate-specific Reagents and Biological Recognition Molecules J. Biol. Chem., February 2, 2007; 282(5): 2753 - 2764. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Satoh, K. Sato, A. Kanoh, K. Yamashita, Y. Yamada, N. Igarashi, R. Kato, A. Nakano, and S. Wakatsuki Structures of the Carbohydrate Recognition Domain of Ca2+-independent Cargo Receptors Emp46p and Emp47p J. Biol. Chem., April 14, 2006; 281(15): 10410 - 10419. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Kamiya, Y. Yamaguchi, N. Takahashi, Y. Arata, K.-i. Kasai, Y. Ihara, I. Matsuo, Y. Ito, K. Yamamoto, and K. Kato Sugar-binding Properties of VIP36, an Intracellular Animal Lectin Operating as a Cargo Receptor J. Biol. Chem., November 4, 2005; 280(44): 37178 - 37182. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Pretzer, J. Snel, D. Molenaar, A. Wiersma, P. A. Bron, J. Lambert, W. M. de Vos, R. van der Meer, M. A. Smits, and M. Kleerebezem Biodiversity-Based Identification and Functional Characterization of the Mannose-Specific Adhesin of Lactobacillus plantarum J. Bacteriol., September 1, 2005; 187(17): 6128 - 6136. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Sharon and H. Lis History of lectins: from hemagglutinins to biological recognition molecules Glycobiology, November 1, 2004; 14(11): 53R - 62R. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Z. Miao, N. Sirachainan, L. Palmer, P. Kucab, M. A. Cunningham, R. J. Kaufman, and S. W. Pipe Bioengineering of coagulation factor VIII for improved secretion Blood, May 1, 2004; 103(9): 3412 - 3419. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Appenzeller-Herzog, A.-C. Roche, O. Nufer, and H.-P. Hauri pH-induced Conversion of the Transport Lectin ERGIC-53 Triggers Glycoprotein Release J. Biol. Chem., March 26, 2004; 279(13): 12943 - 12950. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. S. Trombetta The contribution of N-glycans and their processing in the endoplasmic reticulum to glycoprotein biosynthesis Glycobiology, September 1, 2003; 13(9): 77R - 91R. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |