JBC Focus on PI3-Kinase with Echelon

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M112098200 on February 15, 2002

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 18, 15979-15984, May 3, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/18/15979    most recent
M112098200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Velloso, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Lindqvist, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Velloso, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Lindqvist, Y.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Crystal Structure of the Carbohydrate Recognition Domain of p58/ERGIC-53, a Protein Involved in Glycoprotein Export from the Endoplasmic Reticulum*

Lucas M. VellosoDagger , Kerstin Svensson§, Gunter SchneiderDagger , Ralf F. Pettersson§, and Ylva LindqvistDagger

From the Dagger  Division of Molecular Structural Biology, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Karolinska Institutet, Tomtebodavägen 6, S-17177 Stockholm, Sweden and § Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Stockholm Branch, Karolinska Institutet, Box 240, S-17177 Stockholm, Sweden

Received for publication, December 18, 2001, and in revised form, February 7, 2002

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

p58/ERGIC-53 is an animal calcium-dependent lectin that cycles between the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and the Golgi complex and appears to act as a cargo receptor for a subset of soluble glycoproteins exported from the ER. We have determined the crystal structure of the carbohydrate recognition domain (CRD) of p58, the rat homologue of human ERGIC-53, to 1.46 Å resolution. The fold and ligand binding site are most similar to those of leguminous lectins. The structure also resembles that of the CRD of the ER folding chaperone calnexin and the neurexins, a family of non-lectin proteins expressed on neurons. The CRD comprises one concave and one convex beta -sheet packed into a beta -sandwich. The ligand binding site resides in a negatively charged cleft formed by conserved residues. A large surface patch of conserved residues with a putative role in protein-protein interactions and oligomerization lies on the opposite side of the ligand binding site. Together with previous functional data, the structure defines a new and expanding class of calcium-dependent animal lectins and provides a starting point for the understanding of glycoprotein sorting between the ER and the Golgi.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Secretory and membrane proteins undergo a quality control process that assures their proper folding, oligomerization, and maturation before exit from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER)1 (1). This is followed by the critical step of selection of cargo proteins to be exported from the ER to the Golgi complex via the ERGIC (ER-Golgi intermediate compartment). Export is then mediated by COPII vesicles (2). Although many proteins may become incorporated into COPII vesicles by default (bulk-flow transport), it is now generally believed that export is an active regulated process, whereby cargo molecules are first localized to ER exit sites and then selectively incorporated into COPII vesicles by one of several mechanisms (2, 3). Selective export of soluble proteins may occur by interaction with export receptors harboring motifs recognized by COPII coatomers.

The p58 and ERGIC-53/MR60 proteins are the most commonly used markers for the ERGIC (4, 5). p58 (4) and ERGIC-53 (5) were originally identified as proteins reacting with antibodies prepared against Golgi membrane fractions, whereas MR60 was identified as a mannose-binding protein (6). Subsequent cDNA cloning showed that ERGIC-53 (7) and MR60 (8) were identical to each other and represented the human homologue of the rat p58 protein (9).

p58/ERGIC-53/MR60 is a type I transmembrane, nonglycosylated protein with a lumenal domain, a transmembrane domain, and a short cytoplasmic domain. In cells, it is present as dimers and hexamers (9, 10). The lumenal domain can be divided into two subdomains, an N-terminal carbohydrate recognition domain (CRD) (residues 31-285) and a membrane-proximal alpha -helical coiled domain (residues 290-460) (10). The cytoplasmic tail contains a KKFF sequence at its extreme C terminus that is essential for both ER exit and Golgi retrieval (11), meaning that p58/ERGIC-53/MR60 cycles between the ER and Golgi compartment (12).

The identification of MR60 as a mannose-binding protein (8) and mutagenesis studies of ERGIC-53, in which the calcium-dependent binding of mannose to this protein was abolished (13), support the suggestion that p58/ERGIC-53 serves as a mammalian intracellular lectin (14). This proposition was also based on the similarity between ERGIC-53 and VIP-36, a membrane protein isolated from Madin-Darby canine kidney cells (15), shown to bind mannose, and localized in the early secretory pathway (16, 17). It was proposed that p58/ERGIC-53 and VIP-36 constituted a new class of animal lectins (14). Blocking the export of ERGIC-53 from the ER impaired but did not block export of the lysosomal enzyme cathepsin C and cathepsin Z-related protein (18). Furthermore, ERGIC-53 could be cross-linked to a cathepsin Z-related protein. The glycan structure binding to ERGIC-53 in the ER was suggested to be a nine-mannose form (Man9), i.e. the asparagine-linked core glycan from which three terminal glucose residues have been trimmed (19). Efficient secretion of coagulation factors V and VIII requires a functional ERGIC-53 (20), and mutations in the gene coding for ERGIC-53 cause a rare hereditary bleeding disorder, a combined deficiency of factors V and VIII (21). Taken together, these data strongly suggest that p58/ERGIC-53/MR60 functions as a lectin-like receptor involved in facilitating export from the ER of a subset of secretory glycoproteins (22).

As a first step toward a better understanding of how glycans on cargo molecules interact with the lectin receptor, we have determined the crystal structure of the CRD of p58. The structure reveals a link between leguminous and animal lectins and defines a new class of animal calcium-dependent lectins that function in the secretory pathway.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Protein Production-- The CRD of rat p58/ERGIC-53 (residues 31-285) was defined by a combination of sequence alignment, secondary structure prediction, and limited proteolysis. The CRD (including the N-terminal signal sequence comprising residues 1-30 and a 6xHis tag) was produced in insect cells using a baculovirus vector and purified as described elsewhere (23). The region encompassing residues 286-478, which is not present in the construct whose structure is described here, is the oligomerization domain of p58/ERGIC-53 and is required for dimerization and formation of hexamers (10). Therefore, the CRD is monomeric in solution as assayed by native gel electrophoresis and gel filtration chromatography (data not shown).

Crystallization-- Crystals were grown by vapor diffusion from hanging drops containing equal volumes of a 10 mg/ml protein solution in 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 1 mM CaCl2, and well solution. The drops were equilibrated against 1 ml of well solution that consisted of 100 mM Na-HEPES, pH 7.25, 1.6 M Li2SO4, and 10 mM EDTA, as described previously (23). The crystals belong to the orthorhombic space group I222, with cell dimensions a = 49.6 Å, b = 86.1 Å, and c = 128.1 Å, and they have one monomer in the asymmetric unit (23).

Data Collection-- X-ray data used for the structure determination were collected on a MAR 300mm Image plate detector mounted on a Rigaku R200 x-ray generator, operating at 50 kV and 90 mA at 110 K. Crystals were transferred to a solution containing 1.2 M Li2SO4, 0.1 M Na-HEPES, pH 7.25, and 20% PEG400, allowed to equilibrate for a few seconds, and frozen in a stream of nitrogen. The high-resolution data set used for refinement was collected at beamline 711 at the MAX Laboratory (Lund, Sweden) synchrotron radiation source. The crystal was transferred to mother liquor containing 20% ethylene glycol before freezing. All data were processed with DENZO and SCALEPACK (24).

Structure Determination and Refinement-- The structure was solved by multiple isomorphous replacement based on five heavy metal derivatives (Table I). Location of metal binding sites and phase calculations were performed using SOLVE (25) with a native data set collected at the home source as a reference. The initial electron density map calculated at 2.7 Å was of sufficient quality to allow automated model building of most residues in the structure and phase extension to 1.46 Å using wARP (26). This procedure was followed by multiple cycles of refinement in crystallography NMR software (CNS) (27) using a maximum likelihood target and bulk solvent correction and using model building in O (28). The final cycles of refinement were performed using Refmac5 (29) because it led to faster convergence and lower R factor and Rfree values. Crystallographic data have been deposited at the PDB (accession code 1GV9 for the coordinate entry and accession code R1GV9SF for the structure factors).

    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Structure Determination of p58-- The crystal structure of the CRD of p58 was solved by multiple isomorphous replacement (Table I). The initial electron density map was of sufficient quality to allow tracing of most residues in the structure. The model was subsequently refined to Rwork/Rfree values of 19.1 and 21.1%, respectively. All data collection, phasing, and refinement statistics are summarized in Table I.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Summary of the data collection, phasing, and refinement statistics

The final model contains residues 50-277 of p58, 197 water molecules and 2 sulfate ions. The region corresponding to residues 1-30 constitutes the signal sequence, which is cleaved upon secretion of the protein into the medium and is therefore not present in the mature form of the protein. Residues 31-49 and the 6xHis tag inserted between residues 34 and 35 (23) are not visible in the electron density maps. There is also no density for the final 8 residues of the construct and for residues 165-169 of the p58 sequence, which presumably are part of a flexible loop.

Overall Fold-- The CRD domain of p58 has an overall globular shape and is composed of 15 beta -strands, a small alpha  helix, and one turn of 310 helix (Fig. 1). Two major twisted antiparallel beta -sheets, one seven-stranded (major) beta -sheet, and one six-stranded (minor) beta  sheet pack against each other, forming a beta -sandwich, in a variation of the jelly roll fold. The N terminus starts with two short beta -strands (beta 1a and beta 1b) separated by a turn of 310 helix. This structural motif is replaced by a single and longer strand in other lectin structures; therefore, we refer to it as beta 1 in p58. This is the first strand of the minor beta -sheet. It is followed by a long loop and the first strand (beta 2) of the major beta -sheet. A beta -hairpin (strands beta 3 and beta 4) is inserted between beta 2 and the second strand of the major beta -sheet (beta 5). From here, the chain makes an excursion into the opposite (minor) beta -sheet, contributing one strand (beta 6) before returning to the major beta -sheet and forming four antiparallel strands (beta 7-beta 10). A loop followed by an alpha  helix of two turns is inserted between beta 9 and beta 10. The chain then crosses over to the minor beta -sheet, contributing three antiparallel strands (beta 11-beta 13). The last pair of strands is split between the two sheets, with beta 14 in the major beta -sheet and beta 15 in the minor beta -sheet. The N and C termini of the polypeptide chain are close to each other in space.


View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Overall structure of p58. Ribbon diagram of p58 monomer shown (A) perpendicular to the beta -sheets and (B) rotated 90° around a vertical axis. Secondary structure elements were assigned using PROCHECK (43) and are labeled in A. Positions of the N and C termini are indicated. The arrow in A indicates the position of the disordered loop. beta -Strands belonging to the concave and convex beta -sheets are shown in red and dark blue, respectively. Strands that do not take part in the beta -sheets and are variable when compared with leguminous lectin structures are shown in light blue. Loops and helices are shown in gray and green, respectively. The arrow in B indicates the position of the ligand binding site. This figure and Figs. 4 and 5 were prepared using Bobscript (44) and Raster3D (45).

The two beta -sheets are curved, giving rise to a concave surface of the molecule on the side of the major beta -sheet and a convex surface on the side of the minor beta -sheet. A cleft is formed by a 15-residue-long loop between strands beta 7 and beta 8 of the major beta -sheet, by the alpha  helix and the loop preceding it. Residues Cys198 (strand beta -10, major beta -sheet) and Cys238 (strand beta 13, minor beta -sheet) form a disulfide bond. Two peptide bonds are observed in cis-conformation: one between residues Ala128 and Asp129 at the entrance of strand 9, and the other between Gly62 and Pro63 at the beginning of the loop joining strands beta 1b and beta 2.

Based on their weak homology to plant lectins, it has been proposed (14) that ERGIC-53 and VIP-36 define a new class of animal lectins in the secretory pathway. It is thought that these proteins function as sorting receptors for glycoproteins exiting the ER (22). Orthologues of this gene have been found in several organisms. Moreover, two other genes named ERGIC-53-like (ERGL) and GP36b have recently been identified as displaying significant homology to p58/ERGIC-53 (30),2 suggesting that their products might also act as cargo receptors for glycoproteins. The fold observed here is most likely conserved in all ERGIC-53-like proteins recognized thus far because they share significant sequence identity (25-35%) and align very well in the region spanning the CRD (Fig. 2).


View larger version (74K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Sequence alignment of p58/ERGIC-53- and VIP-36-like CRD. The CRDs of p58/ERGIC-53 and VIP-36 sequences from different organisms were aligned. Secondary structure elements are shown as arrows and rectangles, representing beta -strands and alpha  or 310 helices in p58. The disordered region is shown as a dashed line. The alignment is restricted to the region of the sequences for which electron density was observed in p58. Splicing sites are indicated by blue arrowheads. Residues that are invariable in all sequences are shown in red, and residues invariable only in p58/ERGIC-53 sequences are shown in green. The accession codes for the sequences from GenBankTM are as follows: human ERGIC-53, U09716; monkey, AAF13155; rat p58, U44129; mouse, BAB27655; Drosophila, AF223385; C. elegans, 1729626; dog VIP-36, X76392; human hVIP-36, NP_110432; and human ERGL, NM_021819. The alignment was made using CLUSTAL W (46).

Structural Similarity of p58 to Other Lectins-- Comparisons of the structure described here against the PDB data base using the DALI server (32) and the program TOP (33) revealed that the CRD of p58 is structurally most similar to the leguminous lectins (Table II). Most leguminous lectins have a core structure composed of a beta -sandwich with a concave face comprising seven beta -strands and a convex face comprising six beta -strands (Table II). Despite the fact that the sequence identities between p58/ERGIC-53 and leguminous lectins are generally <20%, the core of these structures shares the same basic architecture, and the secondary structure elements of p58 superimpose quite well with those of the leguminous lectins. The sugar binding sites in these lectins are all located on the concave beta -sheet, with most of the residues that participate in ligand binding coming from the loops between strands at the top of the sheet.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II
Structural homologues to p58a

Similarity is also found between p58 and other animal proteins, including lectins such as calnexin and galectin-3, as well as the ligand-binding domain of neurexin 1beta (Table II). Calnexin is also a calcium-dependent lectin that resides in the ER and is involved in quality control mechanisms (34). When compared, p58 and calnexin have a CRD where the beta -sheets have similar arrangements and show helical insertions in the same region. Despite the low sequence identity between the two proteins (Table II), 2 aspartate residues, which coordinate Ca2+ in the leguminous lectin structures, are conserved and occupy similar positions in both animal lectin structures. Galectin-3 belongs to a family of calcium-independent animal lectins that are predominantly cytoplasmic (35). Compared with p58, the beta -sheets and loops of galectin-3 are smaller, despite their similar arrangement. Neurexin 1beta belongs to a family of proteins expressed in hundreds of isoforms in neuronal tissues and thought to function as cell recognition molecules. Although ligands for these molecules have still not been identified, it has been proposed that they use the same binding fold and surface as the leguminous lectins to interact with cell surface molecules (36). However, p58 and neurexin 1beta superimpose poorly in the region of the putative ligand binding site, and there is no similarity between residues thought to be involved in ligand binding in p58/ERGIC-53 and the corresponding residues of neurexin 1beta .

Evolutionary Conservation of p58/ERGIC-53-like Domains-- Alignment of p58/ERGIC-53 and related sequences from different organisms within the animal kingdom reveals a high degree of sequence identity (Fig. 2). The sequence conservation is well distributed throughout the polypeptide chain. Highly conserved residues include: (i) tryptophans (Trp51, Trp78, Trp110, and Trp128) forming a hydrophobic ladder that runs through the hydrophobic core of the protein, (ii) glycines in loops between the beta -strands, (iii) the two disulfide-bonded cysteines, and (iv) the proline observed in cis-conformation in p58/ERGIC-53 and conserved in all sequences of this domain family. It is therefore likely that the overall structure observed here is conserved in other p58/ERGIC-53-like domains. Two patches of conserved residues on opposite sides of the molecule are evident, indicating that conserved residues are not confined to the hydrophobic core of the protein (Fig. 3).


View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Surface features of p58. A and C, electrostatic surface potential of p58. The two views are related by ~180° rotation around a vertical axis in the plane of the paper and show the concave (A) and convex (C) faces of the molecule. Negative potential is denoted by red, and positive potential is denoted by blue. An arrow indicates the position of the putative ligand binding site. The maps are contoured at the 10kT level. B and D, sequence conservation projected onto the accessible surface of p58. Colors for the sequence conservation are as described in the Fig. 2 legend. Residues Asp129 and Asn164, for which mutagenesis studies have been carried out, are shown in orange and dark blue, respectively. The orientations are as described in A and C. This figure was prepared using GRASP (31).

Putative Ligand Binding Site-- The oligomeric form of p58/ERGIC-53 binds to mannose-substituted (Man1) resins, although mannose monosaccharide is probably not the ligand of p58 in vivo (19). Rather, it is thought that p58/ERGIC-53 recognizes Man9 on glycoproteins (6, 22). Mutagenesis studies have implicated 2 residues, Asp129 and Asn164, to be required for binding of ERGIC-53 to mannose-substituted resins (13). Due to the presence of EDTA in the crystallization conditions, no Ca2+ ions are observed in the putative ligand binding site of the p58 structure when compared with those of leguminous lectins. However, similarities are observed between these binding site structures (Fig. 4): residues Asp129 and Asp160 in p58 are in positions similar to those of the equivalent Asp81 and Asp121 from the Lathyrus ochrus and pea lectin structures in complex with mannose (PDB codes 1RIN and 1LOB, respectively; hereafter, we refer to these two proteins by their PDB codes) (37, 38). Both these residues coordinate the Ca2+ ion, and Asp81 also binds mannose in these complexes. The peptide bond between residues Ala128 and Asp129 is in the cis-conformation in p58, as in the leguminous lectins. This is essential for the correct geometry of the Ca2+ binding site and for sugar binding in these lectins (37).


View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Stereo picture showing a comparison of the ligand binding sites of p58, pea lectin (1RIN), and isolectin-1 (1LOB) mannose complexes. Residues participating in mannose binding and Ca2+/Mn2+ coordination in 1RIN and 1LOB are shown with the carbon backbone in magenta and green, respectively. The corresponding residues in p58 are shown with the carbon backbone in light blue. Nitrogen and oxygen atoms are shown in dark blue and red, respectively, in all three structures. The residue numbers refer to p58. The Ca2+ ion and mannose molecule from the isolectin-1 structure are shown in orange. See "Results and Discussion" for numbering of the corresponding residues in pea lectin and isolectin-1.

Major differences observed between the binding sites from p58, 1LOB, and 1RIN include: (i) a different conformation of Asn170 in p58 as compared with the equivalent Asp129 in 1RIN and 1LOB, due mostly to a disordered region between residues 165 and 169 of p58 (Fig. 1), (ii) positioning of the side chain of Asn164 ~12.0 Å away from the equivalent Asn125 in 1RIN and 1LOB (Fig. 4), and (iii) substitution of residues Glu119 and His136, which are involved in Mn2+ coordination in leguminous lectins, by Phe158 and Ala172 in p58, which probably renders it unable to bind Mn2+ ions. Of the other residues of 1LOB and 1RIN that interact with mannose, Ala210 and Glu211 superimpose well on the equivalent residues Gly259 and Gly260 from p58, whereas the third residue is part of a loop and is located around 6 Å from its counterpart in 1LOB and 1RIN.

Functional Implications for Cargo Recognition-- Recent data indicate that ERGIC-53 acts as a cargo receptor for a subset of glycoproteins through recognition of mannose residues in their sugar moieties (19, 22). Because this is a selective process, and all glycoproteins have identical sugar structures while still in the ER, specific recognition of a small subset of glycoproteins is most likely also dependent in part on characteristics intrinsic to the recognized proteins other than their sugar structure. Electrostatic surface charge calculations show a marked charge polarity on the surface of p58. A deep, negatively charged pocket is situated adjacent to the residues that are thought to be involved in calcium coordination and mannose binding (Fig. 3A). The presence of a Ca2+ ion would reduce the negative charge in this pocket, but electrostatic calculations suggest that it would still have a predominantly negative character (data not shown). The sequence conservation in the vicinity as well as inside of the negatively charged pocket is quite strong (Fig. 3B), suggesting that this region and its intrinsic electrostatic character are important for protein-protein interactions.

On the side of p58 opposite to the ligand binding site, there is a surface patch made up of residues conserved only in p58/ERGIC-53 orthologues (Fig. 3D). It maps to the convex beta -sheet in p58 and has well-balanced charge distribution (Fig. 3C). Due to its conservation only in p58/ERGIC-53 orthologues, it may be involved in protein-protein interactions that are unique to p58/ERGIC-53, such as receptor-cargo binding or contacting neighboring molecules in the formation of oligomers. Cargo proteins might use two different and opposing faces of the p58 beta -sandwich for complex formation. Whereas the carbohydrate moiety interacts with the negatively charged pocket on one side of p58/ERGIC-53, another region, conferring specificity for the cargo protein, could bind to the conserved surface patch on the other side of p58/ERGIC-53. This would be reminiscent of the interactions between calnexin and its substrates using both its arm and lectin domains (34). p58/ERGIC-53 oligomerizes into dimers and hexamers in contrast to other members of this family, which are monomeric. Therefore, involvement of this surface patch in oligomerization would also explain its conservation only in p58/ERGIC-53 orthologues.

In summary, we have demonstrated that the CRD of p58/ERGIC-53 is an example of the utilization of the plant lectin fold within the quality control system in the ER. The fold of the structure reported here is a versatile scaffold for carbohydrate-mediated ligand-receptor interactions. The structural conservation between the CRD domain of p58 and calnexin highlights the importance of quality control mechanisms for the proper maturation of proteins in the ER. It is therefore likely that this domain was present in evolution before the separation of the plant and animal kingdoms. The structure presented here, together with functional data on p58/ERGIC-53, suggests that the leguminous lectin fold is also used for Ca2+-dependent recognition of carbohydrate structures in animals, reinforcing the proposition that these proteins constitute a new class of animal calcium-dependent lectins.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We acknowledge access to synchrotron radiation at the MAX Laboratory, beamline 711. We thank Tatyana Sandalova for help with data collection and refinement and Cristofer Enroth for help with wARP.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by grants from the Swedish Research Council.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

The atomic coordinates and the structure factors (code 1GV9 and R1GV9SF) have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank, Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ (http://www.rcsb.org/).

To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: ylva@ alfa.mbb.ki.se.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, February 15, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M112098200

2 E. Hartmann, B. Reimann, D. Goerlich, T. A. Rapoport, and S. Prehn, unpublished results, GenBankTM accession number U10362.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: ER, endoplasmic reticulum; CRD, carbohydrate recognition domain; PDB, Protein Data Bank.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Ellgaard, L., Molinari, M., and Helenius, A. (1999) Science 286, 1882-1888[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2. Klumperman, J. (2000) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 12, 445-449[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Balch, W. E., McCaffery, J. M., Plutner, H., and Farquhar, M. G. (1994) Cell 76, 841-852[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Saraste, J., Palade, G. E., and Farquhar, M. G. (1987) J. Cell Biol. 105, 2021-2029[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. Schweizer, A., Fransen, J. A. M., Bächi, T., Ginsel, L., and Hauri, H. P. (1988) J. Cell Biol. 107, 1643-1653[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Pimpaneau, V., Midoux, P., Monsigny, M., and Roche, A. C. (1991) Carbohydr. Res. 213, 95-108[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Schindler, R., Itin, C., Zerial, M., Lottspeich, F., and Hauri, H.-P. (1993) Eur. J. Cell Biol. 61, 1-9[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Arar, C., Carpentier, V., Le, Caer, J.-P., Monsigny, M., Legrand, A., and Roche, A.-C. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 3551-3553[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Lahtinen, U., Hellman, U., Wernstedt, C., Saraste, J., and Pettersson, R. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 4031-4037[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Lahtinen, U., Svensson, K., and Pettersson, R. F. (1999) Eur. J. Biochem. 260, 392-397[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Kappeler, F., Klopfenstein, D. R. Ch., Foguet, M., Paccaud, J.-P., and Hauri, H.-P. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 31802-31808
12. Klumperman, J., Schweizer, A., Clausen, H., Tang, B. L., Hong, W., Oorschot, V., and Hauri, H.-P. (1998) J. Cell Sci. 111, 3411-3425[Abstract]
13. Itin, C., Roche, A.-C., Monsigny, M., and Hauri, H.-P. (1996) Mol. Biol. Cell 7, 483-493[Abstract]
14. Fiedler, K., and Simons, K. (1994) Cell 77, 625-626[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Fiedler, K., Parton, R. G., Kellner, R., Etzold, T., and Simons, K. (1994) EMBO J. 13, 1729-1740[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Fullerkrug, J., Scheiffele, P., and Simons, K. (1999) J. Cell Sci. 112, 2813-2821[Abstract]
17. Hara-Kuge, S., Ohkura, T., Seko, A., and Yamashita, K. (1999) Glycobiology 9, 833-839[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Vollenweider, F., Kappeler, F., Itin, C., and Hauri, H.-P. (1998) J. Cell Biol. 142, 377-389[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Appenzeller, C., Andersson, H., Kappeler, F., and Hauri, H.-P. (1999) Nat. Cell Biol. 1, 330-334[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Moussalli, M., Pipe, S. W., Hauri, H.-P., Nichols, W. C., Ginsburg, D., and Kaufman, R. J. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 32539-32542[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Nichols, W. C., Seligsohn, U., Zivelin, A., Terry, V. H., Hertel, C. E., Weatley, M. A., Moussalli, M., Hauri, H. P., Ciavarella, N., Kaufman, R. J., and Ginsburg, D. (1998) Cell 93, 61-70[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Hauri, H.-P., Kappeler, F., Andersson, H., and Appenzeller, C. (2000) J. Cell Sci. 113, 587-596[Abstract]
23. Velloso, L. M., Svensson, K., Lahtinen, U., Schneider, G., Pettersson, R. F., and Linqvist, Y. (2002) Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 58, 536-538[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Otwinowski, Z. (1993) Data Collection and Processing , pp. 56-62, SERC Daresbury Laboratory, Warrington, United Kingdom
25. Terwilliger, T. C., and Berendzen, J. (1999) Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 55, 849-861[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Perakis, A., Morris, R., and Lamzin, V. S. (1999) Nat. Struct. Biol. 6, 458-464[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Brünger, A. T., Adams, P. D., Clore, G. M., DeLano, W. L., Gros, P., Grosse-Kunstleve, R. W., Jiang, J.-S., Kuszewski, J., Nilges, M., Pannu, N. S., Read, R. J., Rice, L. M., Simonson, T., and Warren, G. L. (1999) Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 54, 905-921
28. Jones, T. A., Zou, J.-Y., Cowman, S. W., and Kjeldgaard, M. (1991) Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A Found. Crystallogr. 47, 110-119[CrossRef]
29. Murshudov, G. N., Lebedev, A., Vagin, A. A., Wilson, K. S., and Dodson, E. J. (1999) Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 55, 247-255[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Yerushalmi, N., Keppler-Hafkemeyer, A., Vasmatzis, G., Liu, X. F., Olsson, P., Bera, T. K., Duray, P., Lee, B., and Pastan, I. (2001) Gene (Amst.) 265, 55-60[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Nicholls, A., Sharp, K. A., and Honig, B. (1991) Proteins 11, 281-296[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Holm, L., and Sander, C. (1993) J. Mol. Biol. 233, 123-138[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Lu, G. (2000) J. Appl. Crystallogr. 33, 176-183[CrossRef]
34. Schrag, J. D., Bergeron, J. J. M., Li, Y., Borisova, S., Hahn, M., Thomas, D. Y., and Cygler, M. (2001) Mol. Cell 8, 633-644[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Seetharaman, J., Kanigsberg, A., Slaaby, R., Leffler, H., Barondes, S., and Rini, J. M. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 13047-13052[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36. Rudenko, G., Nguyen, T., Chelliah, Y., Sudhof, T. C., and Deisenhofer, J. (1999) Cell 99, 93-101[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Bourne, Y., Roussel, A., Frey, M., Rouge, P., Fontecilla-Camps, J. C., and Cambillau, C. (1990) Proteins 8, 365-376[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Rini, J. M., Hardman, K. D., Einspahr, H., Suddath, F. L., and Carver, J. P. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 10126-10132[Abstract/Free Full Text]
39. Casset, F., Hamelryck, T., Loris, R., Brisson, J. R., Tellier, C., Dao-Thi, M. H., Wyns, L., Poortmans, F., Perez, S., and Imberty, A. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 25619-25628[Abstract/Free Full Text]
40. Naismith, J. H., Emmerich, C., Habash, J., Harrop, S. J., Helliwell, J. R., Hunter, W. N., Raftery, J., Kalb, A. J., and Yariv, J. (1994) Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 50, 847-858[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
41. Delbaere, L. T. J., Vandoselaar, M., Prasas, M. L., Quail, J. W., Wilson, K. S., and Dauter, Z. (1993) J. Mol. Biol. 230, 950-965[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
42. Michel, G., Chantalat, L., Duee, E., Barbeyron, T., Henrissat, B., Kloareg, B., and Dideberg, O. (2001) Structure 9, 513-525[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
43. Laskowski, R. A., MacArthur, M. W., Moss, D. S., and Thorton, J. M. (1993) J. Appl. Crystallogr. 26, 283-291[CrossRef]
44. Esnouf, R. M. (1999) Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 55, 938-940[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
45. Merritt, E. A., and Bacon, D. J. (1997) Methods Enzymol. 277, 505-524[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
46. Thompson, J. D., Higgins, D. G., and Gibson, T. J. (1994) Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 4673-4680[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Ravaud, G. Stjepanovic, K. Wild, and I. Sinning
The Crystal Structure of the Periplasmic Domain of the Escherichia coli Membrane Protein Insertase YidC Contains a Substrate Binding Cleft
J. Biol. Chem., April 4, 2008; 283(14): 9350 - 9358.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
J. C. Adams, A. A. Bentley, M. Kvansakul, D. Hatherley, and E. Hohenester
Extracellular matrix retention of thrombospondin 1 is controlled by its conserved C-terminal region
J. Cell Sci., March 15, 2008; 121(6): 784 - 795.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
N. Kawasaki, Y. Ichikawa, I. Matsuo, K. Totani, N. Matsumoto, Y. Ito, and K. Yamamoto
The sugar-binding ability of ERGIC-53 is enhanced by its interaction with MCFD2
Blood, February 15, 2008; 111(4): 1972 - 1979.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GlycobiologyHome page
K. Kato and Y. Kamiya
Structural views of glycoprotein-fate determination in cells
Glycobiology, October 1, 2007; 17(10): 1031 - 1044.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
T. Satoh, N. P. Cowieson, W. Hakamata, H. Ideo, K. Fukushima, M. Kurihara, R. Kato, K. Yamashita, and S. Wakatsuki
Structural Basis for Recognition of High Mannose Type Glycoproteins by Mammalian Transport Lectin VIP36
J. Biol. Chem., September 21, 2007; 282(38): 28246 - 28255.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
S. Banerjee, P. Vishwanath, J. Cui, D. J. Kelleher, R. Gilmore, P. W. Robbins, and J. Samuelson
The evolution of N-glycan-dependent endoplasmic reticulum quality control factors for glycoprotein folding and degradation
PNAS, July 10, 2007; 104(28): 11676 - 11681.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
N. Sharon
Lectins: Carbohydrate-specific Reagents and Biological Recognition Molecules
J. Biol. Chem., February 2, 2007; 282(5): 2753 - 2764.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
T. Satoh, K. Sato, A. Kanoh, K. Yamashita, Y. Yamada, N. Igarashi, R. Kato, A. Nakano, and S. Wakatsuki
Structures of the Carbohydrate Recognition Domain of Ca2+-independent Cargo Receptors Emp46p and Emp47p
J. Biol. Chem., April 14, 2006; 281(15): 10410 - 10419.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y. Kamiya, Y. Yamaguchi, N. Takahashi, Y. Arata, K.-i. Kasai, Y. Ihara, I. Matsuo, Y. Ito, K. Yamamoto, and K. Kato
Sugar-binding Properties of VIP36, an Intracellular Animal Lectin Operating as a Cargo Receptor
J. Biol. Chem., November 4, 2005; 280(44): 37178 - 37182.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Bacteriol.Home page
G. Pretzer, J. Snel, D. Molenaar, A. Wiersma, P. A. Bron, J. Lambert, W. M. de Vos, R. van der Meer, M. A. Smits, and M. Kleerebezem
Biodiversity-Based Identification and Functional Characterization of the Mannose-Specific Adhesin of Lactobacillus plantarum
J. Bacteriol., September 1, 2005; 187(17): 6128 - 6136.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GlycobiologyHome page
N. Sharon and H. Lis
History of lectins: from hemagglutinins to biological recognition molecules
Glycobiology, November 1, 2004; 14(11): 53R - 62R.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
H. Z. Miao, N. Sirachainan, L. Palmer, P. Kucab, M. A. Cunningham, R. J. Kaufman, and S. W. Pipe
Bioengineering of coagulation factor VIII for improved secretion
Blood, May 1, 2004; 103(9): 3412 - 3419.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C. Appenzeller-Herzog, A.-C. Roche, O. Nufer, and H.-P. Hauri
pH-induced Conversion of the Transport Lectin ERGIC-53 Triggers Glycoprotein Release
J. Biol. Chem., March 26, 2004; 279(13): 12943 - 12950.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GlycobiologyHome page
E. S. Trombetta
The contribution of N-glycans and their processing in the endoplasmic reticulum to glycoprotein biosynthesis
Glycobiology, September 1, 2003; 13(9): 77R - 91R.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page