JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M200916200 on February 20, 2002

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 18, 16002-16010, May 3, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/18/16002    most recent
M200916200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Makagiansar, I. T.
Right arrow Articles by Siahaan, T. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Makagiansar, I. T.
Right arrow Articles by Siahaan, T. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Disulfide Bond Formation Promotes the cis- and trans-Dimerization of the E-cadherin-derived First Repeat*

Irwan T. MakagiansarDagger , Phuong D. NguyenDagger , Atsutoshi IkesueDagger §, Krzysztof Kuczera, William Dentler, Jeffrey L. Urbauer, Nadezhda Galeva||, Michail Alterman||, and Teruna J. SiahaanDagger **

From the Departments of Dagger  Pharmaceutical Chemistry and  Molecular Biosciences and the || Biochemical Research Laboratory, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66047

Received for publication, January 28, 2002, and in revised form, February 19, 2002

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Cadherin is a cell adhesion molecule crucial for epithelial and endothelial cell monolayer integrity. The previously solved x-ray crystallographic structure of the E-CAD12 cis-dimer displayed an unpaired Cys9, which protruded away from the Cys9 on the other protomer. To investigate the possible biological function of Cys9 within the first repeat (the E-cadherin-derived N-terminal repeat), E-CAD1 was overexpressed and secreted into the periplasmic space of Escherichia coli cells. Recombinant E-CAD1 produced a mixed monomer and dimer in an equilibrium fashion. The dimer was linked by a disulfide through Cys9 pairing. Analysis by high pressure liquid chromatography and electron microscopy suggested the existence of oligomeric complexes. Mutation at Trp2 appears to indicate that these oligomeric complexes trans-dimerize. Interestingly, mutation of Cys9 affected not only the cis-dimerization, but also the trans-oligomerization of E-CAD1. Accordingly, it is plausible that, under oxidative stress, the homophilic interactions of E-cadherin through E-CAD1 may be promoted and stabilized by this disulfide bond.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

E-cadherin, a Ca2+-dependent member of the cadherin family of cell adhesion molecules, is crucial in providing cell polarity, tightness, and integrity of the intercellular junctions (1, 2). In most cancerous tissues, nonfunctional E-cadherin leads to the disturbance of the integrity of the intercellular junctions and consequentially promotes higher mobility and invasiveness of the cancer cells (3-5).

In recent years, considerable information has been gathered on the adhesion mechanism of classical cadherins from both structural and functional studies. The modular architecture of classical cadherins is characterized by the five repeats in the extracellular domain (6). The N-terminal of the extracellular domain is believed to be critical for homophilic cadherin interactions. The structure of the N-terminal fragment derived from the first repeat of the neuronal N-cadherin (N-CAD1) (7) and the epithelial E-cadherin (E-CAD1) (8) displays a resemblance to the structural fold of immunoglobulin.

Biochemical analysis of the first extracellular repeat E-CAD1 revealed only the presence of monomers (8). The solution structure of this monomer form was indeed determined by nuclear magnetic resonance (9, 10). This is in contrast with the crystal lattice structure of N-CAD1 (7), which contains a unique mixture of two different populations. One population consists of monomers interacting closely to form cis-dimers (parallel), which are stabilized by the exchange between the N-terminal beta A-strand and the intercalation of Trp2 into the partnering hydrophobic core. The other population reveals the pairing between antiparallel-oriented cis-dimers, designated as trans-dimers to reflect the possible head-to-head contacts between two cadherin molecules of the apposing cells. Alternating the cis- and trans-interactions forms a zipper-like structure (7). Crystallographic analysis of E-CAD12 also showed cis-dimers linked together by calcium ions with no evidence for adhesive trans-contact (11). Intriguingly, neither cis- nor trans-dimers were observed in the crystal structure of the extended form of N-CAD12, irrespective of the presence of Ca2+ (12). Thus, the interactions of the molecular repeats of E-CAD and N-CAD remain controversial. Nevertheless, it is basically agreed from in vitro and in vivo studies that lateral cis-dimerization of cadherin molecules is a prerequisite step for the trans-adhesive activity (13-15). Further mutational studies of the E-cadherin ectodomain fused with the pentamerization domain of cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (E-CADCOMP) seem to indicate that Trp2 docks into an intramolecular hydrophobic pocket, and this process appears to be critical for the trans-interaction event (16, 17).

At present, no studies have been performed to determine the role of the conserved Cys9 found in the first repeat of the E-cadherin sequence. Intriguingly, this particular cysteine residue is missing in other classical cadherins. As an initial effort toward understanding the contributory role of Cys9 in the homophilic mechanism of E-cadherin and in contrast to previously published works (8, 11), we have overexpressed and secreted the recombinant E-CAD1 fragment into the oxidizing environment of the periplasmic space of Escherichia coli cells. Our study shows that E-CAD1 is capable of forming disulfide-bonded cis-dimers, followed by their presumably trans-dimerization. These findings have important implications for the proposed mechanism for homophilic trans-interactions occurring at the first repeat of E-cadherin (16, 18-20).

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Construction of E-cadherin-derived Regions-- Full-length cDNA for human E-cadherin cloned in pCEP4 was kindly provided by Dr. David Rimm (Department of Pathology, Yale University). The boundary for E-CAD1 is defined as Asp151-Asp289 (GenBankTM/EBI Data Bank accession number AAA61259). The following oligonucleotide primer pairs, containing a BsaI restriction site at each end and an artificial stop codon (TAG) after the triple base pairs coding for Asp289, were used for PCR-generating an E-cadherin-derived E-CAD1 DNA fragment: 5'-acgtatggtctcagcgcgactgggttattcctcccatc-3' (forward) and 5'-acgtatggtctcatatcacacatcatcgtccgcgtctg-3' (reverse). The amplified product was digested with BsaI and ligated to BsaI-cleaved pASK-IBA6 (Sigma) downstream of the DNA sequence encoding the ompA signal peptide (cleaved by the endogenous signal peptidase upon secretion into the periplasmic space), the 8-amino acid streptavidin tag (WSHPQFEK), and the Factor Xa site. The recombinant plasmid DNA (designated as pASKcadEC1) was transformed into competent E. coli BL21 cells. The putative correct clones were screened by PCR using the ompA primer (5'-agtggcactggctggctggtttcg-3', forward) and the above reverse primer, and the correct sequence was confirmed by DNA sequencing.

Single point mutations were obtained using the QuikChange mutagenesis kit (Stratagene). pASKcadEC1 (20 ng) was used as a template with the following mutated (boldface) primer sets: C9A, 5'-gttattcctcccatcagcgcaccagaaaatgaaaaaggccc-3' (forward) and 5'-gggcctttttcattttctggtgcgctgatgggaggaataac-3' (reverse); and W2A, 5'-cgaaaaaatcgaagggcgcgacgcagttattcctcccatcagc-3' (forward) and 5'-gctgatgggaggaataactgcgtcgcgcccttcgattttttcg-3' (reverse). For all mutations, the following PCR parameters were used: 16 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s; 55 °C for 45 s; and 70 °C for 7 min, 50 s. After digestion with 10 units of DpnI (Stratagene) at 37 °C for 1 h, 1 µl of the DpnI-treated DNA was used to transform competent BL21 cells. DNA sequencing identified plasmids containing the desired mutation.

Overexpression of E-CAD1-- Cells harboring the plasmids coding for E-CAD1 or E-CAD1 mutants were grown at 37 °C in M9 minimal medium (20% D-glucose, 1.3% Na2HPO4·7H2O, 0.3% KH2PO4, 0.05% NaCl, 0.1% NH4Cl, 2 mM MgSO4·7H2O, and 0.5 mM CaCl2·2H2O, pH 7.4) supplemented with 1 × 10-3 mM thiamine, 1 × 10-3 mM FeSO4·7H2O, and 100 µg/ml ampicillin. When an A600 of 0.5-0.6 was reached, 2 mg/ml anhydrotetracycline (Sigma) was added to induce protein expression. After 3 h of induction, the cells were harvested by centrifugation at 5000 × g for 15 min at 4 °C.

Purification-- The pelleted cells were resuspended in 1 ml of pre-cooled periplasmic extraction buffer (100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 500 mM sucrose, 1 mM EDTA, and 0.02% (w/v) NaN3) and incubated on ice for 30 min. To remove spheroplasts, the suspension was centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 15 min at 4 °C. The supernatant, which contained the periplasmic extract, was carefully transferred into a clean 1.5-ml Eppendorf tube. The supernatant was then loaded onto a StrepTactin-Sepharose® affinity column (5.0 × 0.6 cm); washed with 5 × 1 ml of 100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 1 mM EDTA, and 0.02% (w/v) NaN3; and eluted with 6 × 0.5 ml of standard buffer containing 2.5 mM desthiobiotin. E-CAD1 was collected manually into six 0.5-ml fractions, and the purity of the protein-containing fractions was assessed using 4-12% SDS-polyacrylamide gels. The protein was identified by excising the gel band representing the monomer and subjecting the protein in the band to N-terminal sequencing and amino acid analysis (Commonwealth Biotechnologies, Inc.). Protein concentrations were determined by UV using a molar absorption coefficient of 19,580 M-1 cm-1 as calculated from the composition of tryptophan and tyrosine residues (21). For storage, small aliquots of the preparation were frozen in liquid nitrogen and kept at -70 °C.

Mass Spectrometry-- MALDI-TOF1 mass spectra were obtained with a Voyager DE-STR mass spectrometer (PerSeptive Biosystems) equipped with a nitrogen laser (337 nm, 3-ns pulse). For tryptic peptide analysis, the accelerating voltage in the ion source was 20 kV; the grid voltage was 75%; the mirror voltage ratio was 1.12; the guide wire was 0.002%; and the extraction delay time was 180 ns. The matrix used was 10 mg/ml alpha -cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid dissolved in water/acetonitrile (1:1, v/v) to give a saturated solution at room temperature. The peptide mixtures (5-10 pmol) were desalted using ZipTips C18 (Millipore Corp.) and eluted with the matrix solution directly into a stainless steel sample plate. The acquisition mass range was 700-3000 Da. Internal mass calibration was performed using trypsin autolysis peaks (MH+ 842.5021 and 2211.0968). The program software PAW Version 4.01 (ProteoMetrics, Inc.) was used to simulate the masses of all possible peptides. For protein analysis, spectra were acquired in positive linear mode with an acceleration voltage of 25,000 V and an extraction delayed time of 750 ns. The guide wire and grid voltage were 0.1-0.3 and 90-93%, respectively. Sinapinic acid in 30% acetonitrile and 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid was used as a matrix. For protein-protein studies, 6-aza-2-thiothymine in 0.5 M ammonium citrate or 50% ethanol was used to prevent the protein complexes from dissociating (22, 23).

Chemical Cross-linking-- An aliquot from each respective peak in 10 mM HEPES, pH 8.0, was cross-linked with 1 mM dimethyl pimelimidate dihydrochloride (Pierce) and incubated at room temperature for 45 min. Analysis of the cross-linked proteins was performed immediately by 4-12% SDS-PAGE.

HPLC/Laser Light Scattering-- HPLC/laser light scattering studies were carried out using three detectors (light scattering, UV absorbance, and refractive index) that were connected in series to an HPLC gel-filtration column. An eluted fraction from each peak was directly analyzed on a DAWN®-DSP laser light scattering photometer (Wyatt Technology Corp.) at 18 different angles. Thus, 450 µl of a 33 µM sample of E-cadherin monomer (E-CAD1m) and dimer (E-CAD1dm) was fractionated on a Superose 6 gel-filtration column (1 × 30 cm, flow rate of 0.3 ml/min; Amersham Biosciences) using buffer containing 20 mM HEPES and 150 mM NaCl with or without 1 mM DTT, pH 8.0. The scattering intensity and refractive index signal of the eluting peaks were monitored. The refractive index signal was used to calculate the protein concentration, using an assumed refractive index increment (dn/dc) value of 0.188. For each slice across the peak, a Debye plot of RTheta /K*c versus sin2(Theta /2) was constructed using ASTRA software to determine the reciprocal molecular mass. The apparent average molecular mass across the whole peak was calculated from all the individual peaks. The system was calibrated using standard proteins ranging from 12.4 to 476 kDa.

Dissociation Constant of Oligomeric Complexes-- A time-dependent study of oligomeric complexes (derived from peak 1) was performed after dilution from 9 to 3.0 µM and incubation at different time intervals during a total period of 24 h. At a given time, 1 ml of the diluted sample was reinjected onto the size-exclusion column. The integrated peak area (PA) of the oligomeric complex (E-CAD1oc) was used to calculate the percentage decrease in the oligomeric complexes using Equation 1.


%=(1−((<UP>PA<SUB>0</SUB></UP>−<UP>PA</UP><SUB>t</SUB>)/<UP>PA</UP><SUB>0</SUB>))×100 (Eq. 1)
A plot of ln[E-CAD1oc]0/[E-CAD1oc]t versus t was then established (where t = dissociation time in seconds, [E-CAD1oc]0 = concentration of E-CAD1oc at time 0, and [E-CAD1oc]t = concentration of E-CAD1oc at a given time). The dissociation rate constant (kd) was determined from the slope of this plot (slope = 1/kd).

Electron Microscopy-- Following their purification, E-CAD1m/E-CAD1dm and E-CAD1oc were analyzed immediately by electron microscopy within a 24-48-h period. Electron microscopy solutions containing the protein (0.5 mg/ml) in 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, were absorbed to a glow-discharged Formvar-over-carbon support film on a copper grid; the protein was negatively stained with freshly prepared and filtered 1% aqueous uranyl acetate. Images were photographed at magnification ×100,000 using a Joel 12000 EXII transmission electron microscope and were digitized using Adobe Photoshop 5. The mean length and width for each observed structure were determined from 9-12 related particles.

Molecular Dynamics Simulation-- The structure of E-CAD12 (mouse E-cadherin, Protein Data Bank code 1FF5) was used in an umbrella sampling simulation employing the stochastic boundary molecular dynamics (SBMD) approach. Hydrogen atoms and missing termini were built in with the CHARMM modeling package. A 20-Å sphere was defined, centered at the midpoint between the two sulfur atoms. This sphere contained 85 residues of chain A and 86 residues of chain B. Empty spaces in this sphere were solvated by overlay of a 20-Å sphere of TIP3 water molecules (24). After SBMD conditions were set up, a brief energy minimization was performed, followed by a 20-ps molecular dynamics simulation of the water only to relax the solvation shell. A second overlay of water was performed to fill any empty spaces in the solvent, followed by another 20-ps equilibration of the solvent and a 50-ps equilibration of the whole system. The final simulation system contained 2719 fixed atoms and 3904 moving atoms, the latter consisting of the 171 amino acid residues listed above, six calcium ions, and 395 water molecules.

The umbrella sampling simulation was started from the equilibrated SBMD system coordinates. A harmonic constraint potential Uc(x) = f*(x - x0)2 was introduced to restrain the disulfide bond distance coordinate x to a limited region, using a force constant f = 20 kcal/(mol A2). Initially, the reference value x0 was set at 14.5 Å, close to the 14.76 Å found in the 1FF5 crystal structure. A 100-ps equilibration and a 100-ps data collection simulation were performed. Next, 19 additional simulation windows were generated, each consisting of 50 ps of equilibration and 100 ps of data collection with x0 = 14.5, 14.0, 13.5 down to 5.0. Within each window, the biased distribution P (x) of the disulfide bond distance coordinate x was calculated and converted to a potential of mean force w(x) according to Equation 2 (25),
w(x)=<UP>−</UP>kT <UP>ln</UP> P(x)−U<SUB>c</SUB>(x)+C (Eq. 2)
where k is the Boltzmann constant, T is the temperature, Uc is the constraint potential, and C is an arbitrary constant. The values of the constants were chosen so that w(x) values from neighboring windows coincided in the region of overlap. The SBMD simulation corresponds approximately to constant pressure and temperature conditions; thus, the differences in w(x) along the path correspond approximately to the Gibbs free energy changes. The simulations used the molecular simulation program CHARMM Version 28 and the CHARMM19 polar atom topology and parameters (26). In this model, only the polar hydrogen atoms are treated explicitly, whereas nonpolar hydrogens are subsumed into the heavy atoms. In all energy evaluations, an atom-based 7.5-Å non-bonded cutoff distance was employed, with a shifting function applied between 6.5 and 7.5 Å for van der Waals and electrostatic terms to eliminate discontinuities due to the cutoff. In molecular dynamics simulations, the Verlet algorithm was used with a 2-fs time step and SHAKE constraints applied to all bonds involving hydrogen atoms. Calculations were performed on an SGI Octane workstation and on the SGI ORIGIN 2400 supercomputer at the Center for Advanced Scientific Computing at the University of Kansas. The umbrella sampling simulation took ~1 week of central processing unit time on a single processor of the ORIGIN 2400.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Expression and Purification-- E-CAD1 was expressed in the cytoplasm as a fusion fragment with both the streptavidin-derived sequence and the ompA signaling peptide. When secreted into the periplasmic space of E. coli cells, the signaling peptide was cleaved proteolytically by the host cell. Thus, the resulting recombinant E-CAD1 protein incorporated only an N-terminal streptavidin tag fusion sequence (WSHPQFEK).

Following its purification by one-step column chromatography on immobilized StrepTactin, the purity of E-CAD1 was assessed by SDS-PAGE. With the exception of fraction 5, the purified fractions gave rise to a single band with an apparent molecular mass of 18 kDa under nonreducing conditions (Fig. 1A). MALDI-TOF spectrometry of an aliquot of this protein revealed a mass at m/z 16,884, the value of which is in close agreement with the predicted size of the fused E-CAD1 (16,897 Da). However, fraction 5 also contained a higher molecular mass band of similar intensity. The apparent molecular mass of the protein in this band was 36 kDa (double that of the lower band). Treatment with the reducing agent beta -mercaptoethanol led to the concurrent disappearance of the 36-kDa band and an increase in intensity of the 18-kDa band (Fig. 1B). This upper band therefore appears to represent the dimer form of E-CAD1.


View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Monomer/dimer observation by SDS-PAGE. A, fractions (fractions 1-6) of E-CAD1 (EC1) eluted by one-step column chromatography on immobilized StrepTactin. Fraction 5 contained two bands instead of one. B, MALDI-TOF analysis of an aliquot derived from a fraction containing the single band showed a mass at m/z 16,884. C, when fraction 5 was reduced with 5 mM beta -mercaptoethanol, the higher molecular mass band was converted into the lower molecular mass band, which implies the existence of a dimer. NR, nonreducing; R, reducing.

Evidence of a Disulfide-linked Dimer-- In-gel trypsinization of this E-CAD1 dimer and MALDI-TOF spectrometry were performed to demonstrate further that dimerization was mediated by a disulfide bond. The trypsin cleavage point of the N-terminal cysteine-containing sequence is shown in Fig. 2A. The tryptic mass spectrum of the nonreduced dimer displayed molecular masses at m/z 3776 and 4303, which correspond to the calculated masses of the disulfide-linked fragments, respectively (Fig. 2B). In contrast, when the putative dimer was reduced and alkylated with iodoacetamide, the two high molecular masses disappeared and gave rise to molecular masses at m/z 1683 and 2210, which correspond to the predicted masses of the cysteine-alkylated fragments (Fig. 2C).


View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   MALDI-TOF mass spectrometric analysis of in-gel trypsin-digested E-CAD1 dimer. A, shown is the first N-terminal 44-amino acid sequence of fused E-CAD1 along with the predicted trypsin cleavage points of arginine or lysine at the C terminus (arrows). The cysteine residue is italic. B, shown is a mass spectrum of the nonreduced tryptic sample showing the presence of peptides disulfide-linked via Cys9. C, following reduction and alkylation with iodoacetamide, the disulfide-linked peptides were released as single peptide fragments. The indicated masses (asterisks) correspond to fragments derived solely from the E-CAD1 sequence.

To explore further the feasibility of an intermolecular disulfide bond in E-cadherin, molecular dynamics simulations were performed based on the coordinates derived from the previously solved x-ray crystallography of the E-CAD12 dimer. A 20-Å sphere centered at the midpoint of the two sulfur atoms was defined. The protein atoms in the sphere were solvated and allowed to move according to the CHARMM molecular mechanics force field, whereas atoms outside the sphere remained fixed. A harmonic umbrella potential was applied to the S-S distance coordinate, centered at progressively decreasing distances. As a result, the potential of mean force for changing the S-S distance was generated in the range between 15.0 and 5.0 Å. Interestingly, changing the distance from 14.8 Å (found in the E-CAD12 dimer crystal structure) to 5.0 Å produced an increase in the Gibbs free energy of only 1.3 kcal/mol. The simulation stopped when the region of non-bonded repulsion between the sulfurs was reached.

Subsequent modeling of this structure with the Insight package showed that a simple rotation of the chi 1 dihedrals is sufficient to bring the sulfur atoms to a configuration consistent with a disulfide bond at a distance of 2.1 Å (Fig. 3). Thus, the formation of the S-S bond is thermodynamically and structurally feasible. Based on all these observations, the recombinant protein monomer was designated as E-CAD1m and the dimer as E-CAD1dm.


View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Molecular dynamics simulations of intermolecular disulfide in E-CAD1. The simulations were performed based on the coordinates of the E-CAD12 dimer crystal structure. The space-filling model represents the disulfide bond between 2 Cys9 residues from E-CAD12. Green, carbon; white, hydrogen; dark blue, nitrogen; yellow, sulfur; red, oxygen.

HPLC of the Monomer/Dimer Fraction-- Pooled E-CAD1m/E-CAD1dm was fractionated by size-exclusion gel chromatography. UV tracing of the eluted fractions revealed three distinct peaks rather than the expected two peaks (Fig. 4A). Neither addition of 1 mM calcium in the eluting buffer nor cleavage by Factor Xa of the tagged streptavidin sequence affected the elution profile (data not shown). SDS-PAGE analysis of fractions from both peaks 1 and 2 under nonreducing conditions revealed prominent dimer bands (E-CAD1dm). On the other hand, fractions from peak 3 contained only the monomer band (E-CAD1m) (Fig. 4B). This pattern indicates that the proteins in all three eluted peaks were derived from E-CAD1 and excludes the possibility that peak 1 was due to a contaminating protein.


View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Separation of E-CAD1 monomer and dimer. A, an aliquot of 33 µM E-CAD1m/E-CAD1dm was resolved further through a Superose 6 size-exclusion column. B, fractions eluted from each peak were analyzed by 4-12% SDS-PAGE under nonreducing conditions. C, when an aliquot from each respective peak was cross-linked with 1 mM dimethyl pimelimidate dihydrochloride, only peak 1 produced a higher molecular mass smeared band. Lanes 1-3 correspond to peaks 1-3. MM, molecular mass markers.

Oligomeric State of E-CAD1-- When an aliquot derived from peak 1, 2, or 3 was cross-linked with dimethyl pimelimidate dihydrochloride, only peak 1 revealed a high molecular mass smeared band of 180-210 kDa by SDS-PAGE (Fig. 4C). The cross-linked sample from either peak 2 or 3 did not increase in molecular size and therefore remained as a dimer and monomer, respectively. These data suggest that the oligomeric complexes in peak 1 must be derived from the self-association of dimers. At this stage, the oligomeric complexes in peak 1 were designated as E-CAD1oc. Furthermore, MALDI-TOF analysis of E-CAD1m/E-CAD1dm using the less acidic matrix 6-aza-2-thiothymine for noncovalent protein-protein studies (22, 23) showed two conspicuous high molecular masses at m/z 66,585 and 133,257 (Fig. 5). This observation also supports the existence of oligomeric complex molecules.


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Oligomeric state of E-CAD1. MALDI-TOF spectrometry of E-CAD1m/E-CAD1dm using the less acidic matrix 6-aza-2-thiothymine revealed, in addition to the m/z 16,901 monomer and m/z 33,800 dimer, higher masses at m/z 66,585 and 133,208.

HPLC/Dynamic Light Scattering of the Monomer/Dimer Fraction-- To confirm further the presence of the oligomeric complex, the fractions eluted across the size-exclusion column were also detected and analyzed by direct on-line dynamic light scattering. The light scattering trace showed a broadened peak 1 (Fig. 6A). From the calculated Debye plot (Fig. 6B) the molar mass across peak 1 was not constant, as the molecular mass varied from 140 to 300 kDa (Table I). This polydisperse distribution strongly indicates that peak 1 contained oligomeric molecules. Thus, it would be fairly speculative to assign a given oligomeric state for the molecules that eluted in peak 1. In contrast, the distribution of molar mass across peak 2 or 3 was constant, indicating a monodisperse distribution (i.e. a homogeneous molecule) for each peak with molecular masses of 36.1 kDa (E-CAD1dm) and 17.6 kDa (E-CAD1m), respectively.


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   HPLC/dynamic light scattering of the monomer/dimer fraction. A, E-CAD1m/E-CAD1dm fractionation by direct on-line dynamic light scattering detected three peaks. The distribution of molecular mass (as shown by thick lines) across each peak was determined based on the Debye plot. Molecular masses across peak 1 revealed a non-constant distribution. B, shown is an example of a Debye plot derived from peak 1 at a volume of 12.8 ml.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Molecular mass determination of eluted E-CAD1m/E-CAD1dm by Superose 6 HPLC/light scattering
For reducing conditions, E-CAD1 was treated with 1 mM DTT for 20 min before sample loading and resolved in standard buffer containing 1 mM DTT. Values in parentheses represent the peak area percentage.

Importance of the Disulfide Bond-- Repeating the same HPLC/light scattering experiment but with 1 mM DTT in the elution buffer resulted in the elimination of both peaks 1 and 2 (Fig. 7A and Table I). Thus, DTT affected the dimerization (peak 2) and oligomerization (peak 1) of E-CAD1. To assess further the importance of the disulfide bond, Cys9 was substituted with alanine to yield a recombinant E-CAD1C9A fragment. Following its expression and purification, E-CAD1C9A was subjected to size-exclusion gel chromatography. As expected, the elution profile of the single peak is identical (data not shown) to the chromatographic profile obtained with E-CAD1 under reducing conditions. SDS-PAGE of the eluted peak fractions showed a single band corresponding to the monomer form (Fig. 7B). This observation implies the importance of the disulfide not only in promoting dimer formation, but also, at the same time, in stabilizing formation of the oligomeric complex.


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Disulfide bond involvement in dimerization and oligomerization. A, when 33 µM E-CAD1m/E-CAD1dm was further resolved across a Superose 6 column in buffer containing the reducing agent DTT, both peaks 1 and 2 disappeared, leaving the monomer as the only eluted peak (peak 3). B, analysis by SDS-PAGE of eluted E-CAD1C9A showed a sole monomer band. MW, molecular weight.

Dissociation Rate Constant of E-CAD1oc-- A time-dependent study of E-CAD1oc stability by gel filtration showed a rapid decrease in E-CAD1oc and the appearance of E-CAD1dm. An equilibrium between the oligomeric complex and dimer forms was reached after 12 h at 22 °C (Fig. 8A). The E-CAD1oc dissociation rate constant (kd) was calculated to be 23 × 10-4 s-1 at 22 °C (Fig. 8B).


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Determination of dissociation rate constant. A, a 9 µM sample of E-CAD1oc was diluted to 3.0 µM and incubated at room temperature. At different time intervals, diluted E-CAD1oc was reinjected onto a size-exclusion column. The percentage decrease in E-CAD1oc was determined from its peak area at a given time (see "Experimental Procedures"). B, from this kinetic study, the dissociation rate constant (kd) was determined from a plot of ln[E-CAD1oc]0/[E-CAD1oc]t versus time.

Electron Microscopy-- The electron micrographs of negatively stained E-CAD1m/E-CAD1dm showed particles of heterogeneous sizes (Fig. 9A). Many prominent small particles revealed one or two bead-like particles with average sizes of 80 ± 0.6 × 102 ± 1.0 Å (Fig. 9B, row 1) or 254 ± 2.3 × 118 ± 1.2 Å (row 2), respectively. Much longer particles of different lengths were also observed when the sample from peak 1 (E-CAD1oc) was negatively stained (Fig. 9B, row 3). Because these particles appeared as nonlinear bead-like particles, their size could not be measured accurately. Electron microscopy of samples from both peaks 2 and 3 revealed no particles (data not shown), probably because they were too minute for detection.


View larger version (89K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9.   Electron micrographs of negatively stained E-CAD1. A, heterogeneous structures derived from an aliquot of the E-CAD1m/E-CAD1dm fraction. B, a gallery of selected molecules. The determined size of negatively stained E-CAD1oc was dominantly tetrameric (row 1) or dodecameric (row 2). Longer bead-like structures were also observed (row 3). Bar = 40 nm.

Orientation of Dimer Interactions-- Previous studies with Ca2+-dependent E-CAD12 suggest that Trp2 plays a crucial role in initiating the homophilic trans-interaction of one dimer with another (17). To determine whether the bead-like structures observed in the electron micrographs are made up of cis-E-CAD1dm (parallel) or trans-E-CAD1dm (antiparallel), Trp2 was substituted with alanine to yield the recombinant E-CAD1W2A fragment. Following its expression and purification, E-CAD1W2A was further fractionated by size-exclusion gel chromatography. Interestingly, the chromatogram from the size-exclusion column revealed three peaks with the same profile as wild-type E-CAD1, but this time the percentage area of peak 1 from E-CAD1W2A decreased significantly compared with that from wild-type E-CAD1 (Table II). Thus, although the Trp2 mutation did not completely annul the formation of E-CAD1oc, it can be inferred that E-CAD1dm trans-dimerizes to form E-CAD1oc.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II
Determination of eluted peak areas of E-CAD1 fragments by size-exclusion column chromatography


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Previously, the structure of N-CAD1 revealed a dimer (9) as opposed to the crystallographic structure E-CAD1 (7), whereas the cooperative binding of Ca2+ enhanced the cis-dimerization of E-CAD12 (11, 17). It was found that the Ca2+-binding interface located between E-CAD1 and E-CAD2 mediates this dimer arrangement (27). In this present work, we further show the existence of a novel E-CAD1 dimer linked by a disulfide bond via its Cys9. The same disulfide bond was also formed when we overexpressed the extended E-CAD12 (the second repeat does not contain cysteine).2 This peculiar phenomenon was not previously observed with N-CAD1, E-CAD1, or E-CAD12. Thus, dimerization of our E-CAD1 appears to be promoted by the disulfide bond, regardless of the presence of Ca2+. The assumption that dimerization can occur with E-CAD12 only because of the Ca2+-binding interface located between the first and second repeats therefore may not hold true.

It is interesting to note that the x-ray structure of the E-CAD12 dimer displays each thiol group protruding inwardly with the sulfur atoms separated by 14.8 Å, which appears to sterically hinder the formation of the disulfide bond. Our results suggest that, in solution, the beta A-region of E-CAD1dm undertakes a less rigid conformation, rendering the thiol group more exposed for pairing to form the disulfide bond. Indeed, our thermodynamic simulation using the coordinates from the x-ray structure of the E-CAD12 dimer demonstrates that a disulfide bond can be optimally formed at a pairing distance of 2.1 Å without the necessity of large-scale changes in the protein. In relation to this finding, it remains unclear what mechanical force causes N-CAD1 to dimerize in the absence of a disulfide (7) given the fact that N-CAD1 does not contain cysteine (28).

The absence of disulfide formation in previous E-CAD1 and E-CAD12 structures may arise because of the expression system used to produce these recombinant fragments. The latter were overexpressed in the cytoplasmic compartment of E. coli cells (8, 11), a condition that prevents formation of structural disulfide bonds due to its reducing environment (29, 30). In contrast, our present E-CAD1 was expressed and exported into the E. coli periplasm, the oxidizing environment of which promotes disulfide formation (28, 29). More importantly, the presence of thiol-disulfide oxidoreductases (i.e. DsbA and DsbC) (31-34) in the periplasmic compartment may contribute significantly to the favorable arrangement and pairing of the neighboring thiol side chain from each E-CAD1 monomer to promote dimerization.

Intriguingly, the E-CAD1 dimer can, in fact, form oligomeric complexes. MALDI-TOF analysis of E-CAD1m/E-CAD1dm using the less acidic matrix condition for noncovalent protein-protein studies revealed masses at m/z 66,585 and 133,257, which are calculated to correspond to a tetramer (66,585/16,910 = 3.94) and an octamer (133,257/16,910 = 7.90), respectively. No higher masses were observed, which was due presumably to the instability of the higher oligomeric complexes under this condition. Indeed, when the dimer band in peak 1 was cross-linked, a smeared band with apparent molecular masses in the range of 180-210 kDa was observed. Furthermore, light scattering of peak 1 revealed a mixture of species of different masses, with a molecular mass distribution ranging from 140 to 300 kDa. This observation strongly suggests that this peak is polydisperse and contains different oligomeric complexes. The E-CAD1oc dissociation rate constant (kd) was calculated to be 23 × 10-4 s-1 at 22 °C, which indicates that the complexes may not be too stable.

Additionally, the oligomerization of E-CAD1 appears to be stabilized by the formation of the disulfide bond. In the presence of the reducing agent DTT, peak 1 was eliminated. Similarly, when Cys9 was replaced with alanine (E-CAD1C9A), the same chromatographic profile as obtained with DTT was produced.

Electron microscopic images of E-CAD1m/E-CAD1dm showed particles of various sizes, consisting mainly of single or longer bead-like molecules. However, these particles did not clearly show whether they adopted a cis-orientation (parallel) or a trans-orientation (antiparallel). Studies with E-CADCOMP demonstrated that docking of the second tryptophan residue (Trp2) into the hydrophobic cavity (79HAV81) of the same molecule is important for adhesive trans-interactions (17, 27). Mutation of Trp2 in E-CAD12COMP abolished the trans-dimer interaction, but not the cis-dimerization. In our case, substituting Trp2 with alanine (E-CAD1W2A) led to the partial reduction of oligomeric complexes without affecting dimerization. Full abrogation of the E-CAD1W2A oligomeric complexes was not observed, probably due to other intermolecular forces influencing the trans-dimerization. Among such factors is the presence of the disulfide bond, which may substantially alleviate the mutational effect of tryptophan. Taken together, however, our data support the presumption that the oligomeric complex of E-CAD1 adopts an antiparallel orientation.

From the x-ray crystallography of N-CAD1, a dimer size of 38 × 38 Å was obtained (7), whereas the size for the E-CAD1 dimer derived from the x-ray crystallography of E-CAD12 was 46 × 48 Å (11). Given the condition under which two E-CAD1 dimers trans-interact with one another, then total sizes of 2 × 38 = 76 Å for N-CAD1 and 2 × 46 = 92 Å (width) by 2 × 48 = 96 Å (length) for E-CAD1 are predicted. Consequently, a particle size of 80 × 102 Å derived from the electron microscopy is in close agreement with two dimers trans-interacting (hence, a 67-kDa tetramer). The E-CAD1 trans-dimer has a smaller width than that of the predicted E-CAD1 trans-dimer derived from E-CAD12 crystallography, but closer to that of N-CAD1. We speculate that the smaller width may be due to the presence of the disulfide, which brings the interfacial surfaces of the two monomers closer to one another. It is to be noted, however, that neither the monomeric nor the dimeric E-CAD1 particle was detected, probably due to its minute size. Meanwhile, a particle size of 254 × 118 Å appears to correspond to six dimers trans-interacting (hence, a 200-kDa dodecamer). Much longer bead-like structures of different lengths were also detected by electron microscopy. Because of their nonlinear elongated shapes, measurement of these dimensions could not be carried out accurately. Nevertheless, by estimating the tetrameric repeats contained in these long bead-like particles, an apparent molecular mass range of ~240-340 kDa was deduced.

Thus, the overall molecular mass range observed by electron microscopy is consistent with both the MALDI-TOF results and the molecular mass distribution of peak 1 obtained by the HPLC/dynamic light scattering method. This information provides strong evidence for the existence of trans-oligomeric complexes of E-CAD1.

Despite the fact that molecular force measurements between antiparallel oriented monolayers of the Xenopus C-cadherin extracellular repeats may indicate that cadherin binding involves distinct multiple repeats for trans-interactions (35-37), several lines of evidence, including our present data, suggest the possible homophilic cadherin trans-interaction taking place at the N terminus to form a zipper-like molecule (7, 19, 20, 39, 40). Indeed, a cryoelectron microscopy study by rapid-freeze deep-etching of the adherens junction in retinal pigment epithelium showed that the extracellular domain of E-cadherin forms zipper-like molecules within the intercellular space (41). These molecules consist of combined rods and globules, the rod being the dimerized E-cadherin and the globule being the enlarged trans-contact regions between the first or second repeat of E-cadherin.

The biological implication of this disulfide bond suggests an alternative means of regulation of E-cadherin by a redox mechanism. Redox modulation at specific cysteine residues was observed to influence the function of hemoglobin (42), the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (43), and integrin alpha IIbbeta 3 (38). Under oxidative stress, it may be possible that a redox switch from an unpaired Cys9 to a paired cysteine affects the conformation of the extracellular domains, stabilizing further E-cadherin cell-mediated adhesion. In retrospect, more work will be required to confirm this possibility.

In summary, our data provide clear evidence supporting the idea that the first repeat is involved in the trans-dimerization of E-cadherin. It is further demonstrated that a disulfide bond not only appears to be a decisive factor in promoting the dimerization of the first repeat, but also acts as a stabilizing force toward formation of trans-dimeric complexes of E-CAD1.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We are grateful to Dr. David Rimm for providing the full-length human E-cadherin cDNA. We also thank Ewa Folta-Stogniew (Yale University) and Dr. Yongbo Hu for their technical assistance and Nancy Harmony for reviewing this manuscript.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grant EB-00226 and the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America Foundation (to P. D. N.). This work was presented in part in abstract form at the Experimental Biology Annual Meeting, March 31 to April 4, 2001, Orlando, FL.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§ Present address: Hisamitsu Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tsukuba Laboratories, Kannondai 1-25-11, Tsukuba 305, Japan.

** To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of Kansas, Simons Bldg., 2095 Constant Ave., Lawrence, KS 66047. Tel.: 785-864-7327; Fax: 785-864-5736; E-mail: Siahaan@ku.edu.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, February 20, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M200916200

2 I. T. Makagiansar, P. D. Nguyen, and T. J. Siahaan, unpublished data.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: MALDI-TOF, matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight; HPLC, high pressure liquid chromatography; DTT, dithiothreitol; SBMD, stochastic boundary molecular dynamics.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Takeichi, M. (1991) Science 251, 1451-1455[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2. Larue, L., Ohsugi, M., Hirchenhain, J., and Kemler, R. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 8263-8267[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Beavon, I. R. (2000) Eur. J. Cancer 36, 1607-1620[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Perl, A. K., Wilgenbus, P., Dahl, U., Semb, H., and Christofori, G. (1998) Nature 392, 190-193[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Masur, K., Lang, K., Niggemann, B., Zanker, K. S., and Entschladen, F. (2001) Mol. Biol. Cell 12, 1973-1982[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Pokutta, S., Herrenknecht, K., Kemler, R., and Engel, J. (1994) Eur. J. Biochem. 223, 1019-1026[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Shapiro, L., Fannon, A. M., Kwong, P. D., Thompson, A., Lehmann, M. S., Grubel, G., Legrand, J. F., Als-Nielsen, J., Colman, D. R., and Hendrickson, W. A. (1995) Nature 374, 327-337[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Tong, K. I., Yau, P., Overduin, M., Bagby, S., Porumb, T., Takeichi, M., and Ikura, M. (1994) FEBS Lett. 352, 318-322[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Overduin, M., Harvey, T. S., Bagby, S., Tong, K. I., Yau, P., Takeichi, M., and Ikura, M. (1995) Science 267, 386-389[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Overduin, M., Tong, K. I., Kay, C. M., and Ikura, M. (1996) J. Biomol. NMR 7, 173-189[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Nagar, B., Overduin, M., Ikura, M., and Rini, J. M. (1996) Nature 380, 360-364[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Tamura, K., Shan, W. S., Hendrickson, W. A., Colman, D. R., and Shapiro, L. (1998) Neuron 20, 1153-1163[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Yap, A. S., Brieher, W. M., Pruschy, M., and Gumbiner, B. M. (1997) Curr. Biol. 7, 308-315[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Alattia, J. R., Ames, J. B., Porumb, T., Tong, K. I., Heng, Y. M., Ottensmeyer, P., Kay, C. M., and Ikura, M. (1997) FEBS Lett. 417, 405-408[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Murase, S., Hirano, S., Wang, X., Kitagawa, M., Natori, M., Taketani, S., and Suzuki, S. T. (2000) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 276, 1191-1198[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Tomschy, A., Fauser, C., Landwehr, R., and Engel, J. (1996) EMBO J. 15, 3507-3514[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Pertz, O., Bozic, D., Koch, A. W., Fauser, C., Brancaccio, A., and Engel, J. (1999) EMBO J. 18, 1738-1747[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Blaschuk, O. W., Sullivan, R., David, S., and Pouliot, Y. (1990) Dev. Biol. 139, 227-229[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Nose, A., Tsuji, K., and Takeichi, M. (1990) Cell 61, 147-155[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Kitagawa, M., Natori, M., Murase, S., Hirano, S., Taketani, S., and Suzuki, S. T. (2000) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 271, 358-363[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Mach, H., Volkin, D. B., Burke, C. J., and Middaugh, C. R. (1995) Methods Mol. Biol. 40, 91-114[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Farmer, T. B., and Caprioli, R. M. (1998) J. Mass Spectrom. 33, 697-704[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Woods, A. S., and Huestis, M. A. (2001) J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 12, 88-96[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Jorgensen, W. L., Chandrasekhar, J., Madura, J. D., Impey, R. W., and Klein, M. L. (1983) J. Chem. Phys. 79, 926-935[CrossRef]
25. Brooks, C. L., III, Karplus, M., and Pettitt, B. M. (1988) Proteins: A Theoretical Perspective of Dynamics, Structure, and Thermodynamics , 2nd Ed. , John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York
26. Brooks, B. R., Bruccoleri, R., Olafson, B., States, D., Swaminathan, S., and Karplus, M. (1983) J. Comp. Chem. 4, 187-217[CrossRef]
27. Koch, A. W., Bozic, D., Pertz, O., and Engel, J. (1999) Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 9, 275-281[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Reid, R. A., and Hemperly, J. J. (1990) Nucleic Acids Res. 18, 5896[Free Full Text]
29. Skerra, A., and Pluckthun, A. (1988) Science 240, 1038-1041[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Derman, A. I., and Beckwith, J. (1991) J. Bacteriol. 173, 7719-7722[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31. Wunderlich, M., Jaenicke, R., and Glockshuber, R. (1993) J. Mol. Biol. 233, 559-566[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Wunderlich, M., and Glockshuber, R. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 24547-24550[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33. Jonda, S., Huber-Wunderlich, M., Glockshuber, R., and Mossner, E. (1999) EMBO J. 18, 3271-3281[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Zapun, A., Missiakas, D., Raina, S., and Creighton, T. E. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 5075-5089[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Corada, M., Liao, F., Lindgren, M., Lampugnani, M. G., Breviario, F., Frank, R., Muller, W. A., Hicklin, D. J., Bohlen, P., and Dejana, E. (2001) Blood 97, 1679-1684[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36. Chappuis-Flament, S., Wong, E., Hicks, L. D., Kay, C. M., and Gumbiner, B. M. (2001) J. Cell Biol. 154, 231-243[Abstract/Free Full Text]
37. Sivasankar, S., Gumbiner, B., and Leckband, D. (2001) Biophys. J. 80, 1758-1768[Abstract/Free Full Text]
38. Yan, B., and Smith, J. W. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 39964-39972[Abstract/Free Full Text]
39. Takeda, H., Shimoyama, Y., Nagafuchi, A., and Hirohashi, S. (1999) Nat. Struct. Biol. 6, 310-312[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40. Makagiansar, I. T., Avery, M., Hu, Y., Audus, K. L., and Siahaan, T. J. (2001) Pharm. Res. 18, 446-453[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
41. Miyaguchi, K. (2000) J. Struct. Biol. 132, 169-178[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
42. Jia, L., Bonaventura, C., Bonaventura, J., and Stamler, J. S. (1996) Nature 380, 221-226[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
43. Kim, W. K., Choi, Y. B., Rayudu, P. V., Das, P., Asaad, W., Arnelle, D. R., Stamler, J. S., and Lipton, S. A. (1999) Neuron 24, 461-469[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
L. Kao, P. Sassani, R. Azimov, A. Pushkin, N. Abuladze, J. Peti-Peterdi, W. Liu, D. Newman, and I. Kurtz
Oligomeric Structure and Minimal Functional Unit of the Electrogenic Sodium Bicarbonate Cotransporter NBCe1-A
J. Biol. Chem., September 26, 2008; 283(39): 26782 - 26794.
[Abstract] [Full Text]