![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 18, 16022-16027, May 3, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the
Received for publication, November 15, 2001, and in revised form, January 15, 2002
Expression of gelatinase B (matrix
metalloprotease 9) in human placenta is developmentally regulated,
presumably to fulfill a proteolytic function. Here we
demonstrate that gelatinolytic activity in situ, in tissue
sections of term placenta, is co-localized with gelatinase B. Judging
by molecular mass, however, all the enzyme extracted from this tissue
was found in a proform. To address this apparent incongruity, we
examined the activity of gelatinase B bound to either gelatin- or type
IV collagen-coated surfaces. Surprisingly, we found that upon
binding, the purified proenzyme acquired activity against both the
fluorogenic peptide (7-methoxycoumarin-4-yl)-acetic acid
(MCA)-Pro-Leu-Gly-Leu-3-(2,4-dinitrophenyl)-L-2,3-diaminopropionyl-Ala-Arg-NH2 and gelatin substrates, whereas its propeptide remained intact. These results suggest that although activation of all known
matrix metalloproteases in vitro is accomplished by
proteolytic processing of the propeptide, other mechanisms, such as
binding to a ligand or to a substrate, may lead to a disengagement of
the propeptide from the active center of the enzyme, causing its activation.
Morphogenesis (1, 2), tissue repair (3, 4), angiogenesis
(5, 6), uterine involution, and bone resorption (7) are
characterized by intensified tissue remodeling that begins with
degradation of the existing extracellular matrix. Resident cells of
tissues can secrete a specialized group of enzymes, matrix
metalloproteases (MMPs)1 (8),
that can degrade extracellular matrix macromolecules such as collagens
and proteoglycans (9). Malignant cells can exploit these same proteases
to promote tumor invasion and metastasis (10, 11). MMPs are secreted in
a proenzyme form. The activation of MMPs and interaction with their
specific inhibitors, TIMPs, (12-23) determine the fate of these
enzymes in the extracellular space. Since we initially demonstrated
(24) that the propeptide of interstitial collagenase (MMP-1) is cleaved
upon activation, proteolytic processing became a generally accepted
pathway for activation of MMPs. In vitro, the processing of
the propeptide leads to the removal of a conserved Cys residue,
triggering the "cysteine switch" activation mechanism (25) and a
loss of about 10 kDa in molecular mass. Processing of a propeptide can
be initiated by a variety of agents and usually includes an
autocatalytic step. Activation of both the monomer and the dimer of
purified gelatinase B (GelB) (26) is no exception to this rule
(27).
The role of proteolytic processing in the mechanism of MMP activation
in vivo remains poorly understood. In most cases, the physiological role of GelB is inferred based on its correlation with
enzyme expression, although neither enzyme activation nor the
appearance of a proteolytically activated form has been demonstrated (28-32). Proteolytically activated species of GelB have not been found
in the in vivo model of dermal-epidermal separation
triggered by antibodies to the hemidesmosomal protein BP-180 (28, 33). In this model, cleavage of serpin a1 proteinase inhibitor by GelB is a
critical event. The data gleaned from the literature demonstrate no
evidence of proteolytically activated species of GelB in a number of
normal and pathological conditions. For example, an increased level of
GelB, exclusively in its proenzyme form, was found in samples of
synovial fluid and tissue from patients with inflammatory arthritis
(29). Mice injected with lymphoma cells expressing GelB developed
thymic lymphoma more rapidly than those injected with control lymphoma
cells; however, no activated enzyme form was detected (30). Expression
of GelB has been found to be conducive to the formation of metastases
by murine prostate tumor cells, but the presence of activated
enzyme was not evident (31). GelB was implicated in the pathogenic
mechanism of autoimmune encephalomyelitis (32), whereas only the
proform of the enzyme was present in cerebrospinal fluid.
Expression of GelB in the placenta is developmentally regulated, and it
is commonly accepted that this enzyme plays an important role in
implantation, placental development, and the invasion of the
trophoblast into the uterine epithelium (34-42). Again, there is no
evidence of a proteolytically activated species of GelB in human
placental tissue (35, 39, 43). Is expression of GelB incidental to the
processes of tissue metabolism, or does a nonproteolytic mechanism of
GelB activation exist?
Here we report that the mere binding of the GelB proenzyme to gelatin
or type IV collagen substrates induces its enzymatic activity without
cleavage of its propeptide. These results, together with the in
situ zymography experiments on tissue sections of human placenta,
suggest that GelB activation in vivo may occur via an
alternative mechanism.
Enzyme Purification and Activation--
The proform of GelB
enzyme was purified from conditioned medium of transfected p2AHT2a
cells as described previously (27). Monomer and dimer forms of the
enzyme were separated by elution from gelatin-Sepharose (Sigma)
affinity column using a 0-10% Me2SO gradient. Purified
enzyme was activated with stromelysin (MMP-3) (MMP-3/MMP-9 ratio = 1:40 (w/w)) at 37 °C for periods of 1-3 h in 5 mM
Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) buffer containing 0.005% Brij-35 and 1 mM CaCl2. The activated stromelysin used for
GelB activation was obtained by treatment of stromelysin proenzyme with
L-1-tosylamide-2-phenylethylchloromethyl ketone
(TPCK)-treated trypsin at 1:20 (w/w) ratio for 20 min at 20 °C. Trypsin was inhibited with an 8-fold excess of soybean trypsin inhibitor before the addition of stromelysin to the MMP-9 activation reaction.
Gelatinolytic Activity (in Situ Zymography) in Sections of Human
Placenta--
Fresh tissue of human term placenta was a kind gift of
Dr. Yoel Sadovsky (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine). Frozen sections of tissue were blotted
to remove excess liquid and incubated with either TBS (control), TBS
containing 1-10 nM TIMP-1, or inhibitory mouse monoclonal antibodies to human GelB (clone GE-213; Chemicon
International) or gelatinase A (MMP-2) (clone CA-4001; Chemicon
International) at a concentration of 5-60 µg/ml for 30 min at room
temperature. Slides were dipped into an autoradiography emulsion (NTB2;
Eastman Kodak Co.) diluted 2.5 times with Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) buffer
containing 4 mM CaCl2 and preheated to
40 °C. In a separate experiment, slides were incubated with emulsion
containing 5 mM EDTA instead of CaCl2. The
coated slides were incubated in a humid chamber for 16-32 h,
developed, and photographed under the light microscope. The transparent
pattern on a black background reflects zones of gelatinolytic activity.
Immunohistochemistry--
Frozen sections of human term placenta
were fixed with 3.5% paraformaldehyde and incubated with monoclonal
antibodies to human GelB (clone GE-213; Chemicon International), human
gelatinase A (clone CA-4001; Chemicon International), rabbit anti-mouse
GelB (Chemicon International catalogue number AB19047), and collagen type IV (clone col-94; Sigma) as indicated. The reactions were developed with secondary antibodies: fluorescein
isothiocyanate-conjugated AffinPure donkey anti-rabbit IgG (catalogue
number 711-095-152) and tetramethylrhodamine isothiocyanate-conjugated
AffinPure donkey anti-mouse IgG (catalogue number 715-025-150),
both from Jackson Immunoresearch Laboratories.
Binding of GelB to Gelatin and to a Type IV Collagen-coated
Surface--
96-Well plates (Costar Tissue culture or Dynex
Technologies Microfluor 2) were incubated overnight at room temperature
with 150 µl/well Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) buffer containing either enzyme immuno assay grade gelatin (Bio-Rad; 1 mg/ml) or 150 µl of 125 µg/ml bovine type IV collagen (CC083; Chemicon International). The
plates were blocked with bovine serum albumin (1 mg/ml) for 1 h
and washed with the same buffer. Various forms of GelB were added at
the indicated concentrations in 100 µl of TBS buffer containing
0.005% Brij-35, and the plates were incubated at 4 °C with
agitation. The bound enzyme was extracted with 100 µl of 12.5 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) buffer containing 40% glycerol, 5% SDS, and 0.02% bromphenol blue and analyzed using either gelatin zymography or Western blot as described previously (44). Control experiments using [35S]methionine metabolically labeled
pro-GelB and active GelB enzymes demonstrated the 95% effectiveness of
the extraction method (data not shown). Quantitation of each sample was
accomplished by scanning gels with a UMAX UC1260 scanner and analyzing
the images by comparison with the known concentration of MMP-9 enzyme
using Collage 2.7 software.
Assay of GelB Activity--
Measurement of GelB activity against
the fluorogenic peptide substrate
MCA-Pro-Leu-Gly-Leu-Dpa-Ala-Arg-NH2 (Calbiochem) was performed in Microfluor 2 plates filled with 50 mM Tris-HCl
(pH7.5) buffer (100 µl/well) containing 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM CaCl2, 0.005% Brij-35, and 10-30
µM substrate. The reaction was monitored with a
fluorometer (PerkinElmer Life Sciences LS50B) running FLDM software at
Inhibition of Gelatin-bound GelB with TIMP-1--
Wells
containing GelB bound to gelatin were preincubated with TIMP-1 for 15 min at room temperature in 100 µl of 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH7.5) buffer containing 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM
CaCl2, 0.005% Brij-35, and 1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin.
The fluorogenic peptide substrate was then added to the wells, and
enzymatic activity was measured as described above.
Ki values for pro-GelB and activated GelB were
calculated with the assumption that the binding of TIMP-1 to the
immobilized enzyme is simple noncooperative binding and that the
remaining enzyme activity at any inhibitor concentration is
proportional to the remaining free enzyme. Hence, the remaining enzyme
activity at any inhibitor concentration is given by the following
equation: a0 × {1 Gelatinolytic Activity in Term Placenta Is Co-localized with GelB
with Intact Propeptide--
GelB is secreted in a proenzyme form and
can be activated in vitro by proteolytic processing of the
propeptide (27, 45-47) with a corresponding loss of apparent molecular
mass. In tissues where GelB is expressed and presumably active, the
presence of the proteolytically activated form of the enzyme has not
been demonstrated (28-32, 35, 39, 43). To address this apparent incongruity, we have investigated the gelatinolytic activity in human
placenta in situ. Immunohistochemical staining of tissue sections from term placenta revealed the presence of GelB at the placental villus margin, corresponding with the location of the trophoblast bilayer, with minimal expression in the villus core (Fig.
1A). A small quantity of
gelatinase A was also found (Fig. 1B). Double immunostaining
with antibodies against GelB and type IV collagen showed a complete
overlap of the two proteins at the trophoblast basal membrane (Fig. 1,
C
Comparison of immunohistochemical staining of sections of placental
villi with an in situ zymogram assay (Fig.
2) revealed that the gelatinolytic
activity and GelB were co-localized. Inclusion of EDTA in emulsion
completely abolished the gelatinolytic activity in this assay.
Preincubation of the tissue sections with TIMP-1 (see "Experimental
Procedures") inhibited gelatinolytic activity at TIMP-1
concentrations as low as 3 nM. This activity was also inhibited (Fig. 2B) in a dose-dependent fashion
by preincubation of the sections with monoclonal inhibitory antibody
against GelB (clone GE-213). Inhibition could be observed at an
antibody concentration of 5 µg/ml (data not shown), whereas almost
complete inhibition was achieved at an antibody concentration of 60 µg/ml. Monoclonal inhibitory antibody against gelatinase A (clone
CA-4001) had no noticeable effect on the in situ
gelatinolytic activity (Fig. 2C). These observations suggest
that the gelatinolytic activity in term placenta is due to the presence
of GelB. We next examined whether an active form of GelB, as judged by
the presence of lower molecular mass enzyme species, could be detected
in the placenta tissue. The extracts from excised tissue sections were
subjected to zymogram and Western blot analysis (Fig.
3). Both monomer and dimer forms of GelB
were found to have a molecular mass corresponding to that of an
unprocessed proenzyme form. These data, together with the
immunohistochemical staining and in situ zymography results, suggest that the GelB present in human placenta is enzymatically active, despite the fact that its proteolytically activated form cannot
be detected.
Substrate Binding of GelB Proenzyme Is Accompanied by Partial
Activation in the Absence of the Proteolytic Processing of the
Propeptide--
In view of the results described above, we examined
whether the interaction of GelB with physiologically relevant ligand(s) can induce enzyme activation in the absence of proteolytic processing of the propeptide. The results presented in Fig.
4 show the effect of gelatin substrate
binding on the activity of GelB compared with the enzyme in solution.
Average specific activities of pro-GelB and activated GelB (either free
or gelatin-bound) are summarized in Table
I. No significant changes in
specific activity were observed upon binding to gelatin of
proteolytically activated GelB. In contrast, binding of GelB proenzyme
to gelatin induced an approximate 600-fold increase in specific
activity compared with that of the proenzyme in solution. The specific
activity of bound proenzyme, however, was about 10-fold lower than that of activated GelB. We next examined whether the increase in activity upon binding of GelB proenzyme to gelatin could be attributed to the
appearance of the proteolytically activated enzyme species. To
investigate this possibility, SDS extracts of gelatin-bound enzyme were
subjected to Western blot analysis (Fig.
5). The control experiments with
[35S]methionine-labeled enzyme showed that 95% of the
gelatin-bound enzyme is recovered using the SDS extraction procedure
(data not shown). Because the activity of bound proenzyme was 10-fold
lower than that of activated GelB, the amount of activated enzyme in the extracts is expected to reach a level of at least 10%. The quantitative comparison of the extracts with mixtures of pro-GelB and
activated GelB of known ratios (Fig. 5) showed that the amount of the
activated enzyme form in the extracts did not exceed 0.25-0.5%. This
number is at least 20-fold lower than that expected if the activity of
the bound proenzyme is to be explained by the presence of the
proteolytically activated enzyme species. These results suggest that
the increase in proteolytic activity of GelB upon binding to gelatin
can be attributed to an enzyme with an unprocessed propeptide.
To examine whether this activity is limited to a small fluorogenic
peptide substrate, we assayed the activity of bound proenzyme against a
gelatin substrate. The wells of FlashPlates were coated with
[3H]gelatin, and its release was followed after binding
of the enzyme. The specific activity of the bound enzyme (Table I) was
calculated based on the amount of released gelatin and the amount of
enzyme bound to a well, determined as described above after extraction. The results of this experiment show that both pro-GelB and activated GelB were active against [3H]gelatin with specific
activities of 27.5 and 242.5 pg gelatin/min/ng, respectively. The ratio
of specific activities of bound activated versus GelB
proenzyme against [3H]gelatin is in good agreement with
that obtained for the peptide substrate.
To further characterize the gelatin-bound GelB, we examined the
inhibitory activity of TIMP-1 against both proenzyme and activated forms of the enzyme (Fig. 6). The GelB
bound to gelatin-coated wells was incubated with TIMP-1 (concentration,
0-30 nM). Fitting the inhibition curves to the equation
for simple noncooperative binding gave Ki values of
9.3 ± 3.4 and 2.2 ± 1.0 nM for the activated
and proenzyme forms, respectively. These results show that the
enzymatic activity of either enzyme form when bound to gelatin was
inhibited by TIMP-1 with similar kinetics.
Although gelatin presents a most effective substrate for the study of
gelatinases, GelB can bind a number of extracellular matrix components,
including laminin, fibrin, and type I and type IV collagens (52,
55). Hence, we compared the effect of GelB proenzyme binding to
gelatin and to type IV collagen on its enzymatic activity. The results
indicate that binding to either substrate induces proteolytic activity
of the proenzyme to a similar degree, whereas the GelB propeptide
remained unprocessed (data not shown).
Matrix metalloproteases are secreted as proenzymes and can be
activated in solution by a variety of agents. Initially, we showed (24,
48, 49) that activation of purified pro-MMP1, induced by either partial
proteolysis or treatment with organomercurial compounds, resulted in
the removal of the propeptide with a corresponding loss in molecular
mass of the active enzyme species. Since then, it has been established
that activation of all known enzymes of this family is accompanied by
the proteolytic processing of a propeptide, with removal of the
conserved cysteine residue triggering a "cysteine switch"
activation mechanism (25). The more detailed analysis of the pathway of
MMP-1 activation using organomercurials (24, 48, 49) showed that the
initial activation of the proenzyme occurred without a loss of
molecular mass. Subsequently, the enzyme undergoes autoproteolytic
conversion to a 44-kDa intermediate and finally to the 42-kDa stable
active enzyme (48, 49). This result indicates that enzyme activity can
develop even in the presence of the unprocessed propeptide. Mutagenesis
of the conserved propeptide sequence in stromelysin (MMP-3) produced
enzyme variants with an increased tendency to undergo spontaneous
activation (50), also suggesting that destabilizing the propeptide may
lead to the development of proteolytic activity.
Purified GelB can be converted in vitro to an active form by
cleavage of the propeptide by metalloproteases MMP-1, MMP-2, MMP-3,
MMP-7, tissue kallikrein, and plasminogen activator (34). The
role of proteolytic processing of the propeptide in the physiological activation mechanism of GelB remains unclear (see "Introduction"). Using in situ zymography and inhibitory antibodies in
combination with immunohistochemistry, we have shown that GelB
expressed in human placental tissue is co-localized with type IV
collagen and is enzymatically active. This occurs despite the fact that
its proteolytically processed forms cannot be detected in tissue
extracts. We have also shown that the mere binding of GelB to gelatin-
or type IV collagen-coated surfaces was sufficient to induce
proteolytic activity of the enzyme. Activation of the proform of GelB,
resulting from its binding to a substrate, is not accompanied by a loss of its NH2-terminal propeptide, indicating that its
activation is due to a conformational change. Absence of a detectable
amount of NH2-terminal-truncated species in this
model also suggests that the enzymatically active proform of GelB that
is bound to gelatin is not capable of autocatalytic cleavage of the
propeptide under these conditions.
The specific activity of bound pro-GelB against the peptide substrate
is about 600-fold higher than the background specific activity of
pro-GelB in solution. However, it is about 10-fold lower than that of
either free or bound proteolytically activated enzyme. The simplest
explanation for the relatively low specific activity of bound pro-GelB
is that a conformational change induced by binding results in a lesser
accessibility of its active center compared with the enzyme with a
processed propeptide. However, this interpretation is not plausible
because the ratios of specific activities of bound activated GelB to
bound proenzyme against the small peptide substrate and high molecular
mass substrate, gelatin, are essentially the same. Similar inhibition
of activated and proenzyme forms of GelB bound to gelatin by TIMP-1
also argues against this possibility. Alternatively, one can speculate
that only a fraction of substrate-bound pro-GelB is activated, so that interaction with only a subset of the heterogeneous binding sites can
support the conformational rearrangements needed for enzyme activation.
Heterogeneous, low and high affinity collagen type I binding sites for
pro-MMP-9 with Kd values in the 6 × 10 Our results suggest that binding of pro-GelB to the extracellular
matrix in vivo may represent a physiological pathway of enzyme activation. GelB can potentially bind a number of extracellular matrix molecules and cell surface receptors (51). Which of these interactions can mediate GelB activation remains to be elucidated. Further investigation of the relationship between GelB binding and
activation is needed for a better understanding of the mechanisms of
its physiological function.
We thank Dr. Yoel Sadovsky for the generous
gift of samples of human placenta. We thank Drs. Arthur Eisen and Yoel
Sadovsky of Washington University School of Medicine for critical
reading of the manuscript.
*
This work was supported by Grants R01 AR40618 and R01
AR39472 from the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (National Institutes of Health).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Washington
University School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid Ave., St. Louis, MO 63110. Tel.: 314-362-8172; Fax: 314-362-8159; E-mail:
goldberg@medicine.wustl.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, February 11, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M110931200
The abbreviations used are:
MMP, matrix
metalloprotease;
TIMP, tissue inhibitor of metalloprotease;
GelB, gelatinase B;
TBS, Tris-buffered saline.
Substrate Binding of Gelatinase B Induces Its Enzymatic Activity
in the Presence of Intact Propeptide*
,
,
,
, and
§¶
Department of Medicine, Division of
Dermatology and § Department of Biochemistry and Molecular
Biophysics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis,
Missouri 63110
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
ex 328 nm and
em 393 nm at room
temperature. To assay the activity of bound GelB against gelatin, a
mixture of cold gelatin and denatured [3H]collagen (rat
type I; 0.28 mCi/mg; PerkinElmer Life Sciences) was adjusted to a final
total protein concentration of 2.8 µCi/100 µg/ml and used to coat
the 96-well FlashPlates (PerkinElmer Life Sciences) as described above.
Fifty µl of pro-MMP-9 or activated MMP-9 dimer at a concentration of
1.4 mg/ml in TBS containing 0.005% Brij-35 and 0.5 mM EDTA
were added to the well in triplicate, and plates were incubated at
4 °C for 30 min. Unbound enzyme was removed using three washes with
cold TBS buffer containing 0.005% Brij-35 and 5 mM
CaCl2. The last wash was replaced with 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) buffer containing 100 mM NaCl and 10 mM CaCl2. The digestion of gelatin was measured
by counting the radioactivity associated with the well during the 0-70
min time interval using a Packard TopCount scintillation counter.
i0/(1 + Ki × i0)}, where a0 is the
activity in the absence of inhibitor, Ki is the
inhibitory binding constant, and i0 is the
concentration of free inhibitor.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
E). In addition, microcapillaries inside the villi devoid
of type IV collagen also have a small amount of GelB (Fig.
1E).

View larger version (58K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Localization of GelB and gelatinase A in
tissue of human placenta. Immunohistochemistry was
performed as described under "Experimental Procedures." Sections of
human placenta were stained with either (A) mouse anti-human
GelB or (B) anti-human gelatinase A monoclonal antibodies.
The GelB protein is associated with the outer surface of trophoblast
villi. The gelatinase A protein is localized in a few scattered cells.
×75; scale bars, 100 mm. Double immunostaining
(C
E) was performed using rabbit anti-mouse GelB and
anti-type IV collagen monoclonal antibodies. The sections were than
decorated with fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated AffinPure
donkey anti-rabbit IgG and tetramethylrhodamine
isothiocyanate-conjugated AffinPure donkey anti-mouse IgG secondary
antibodies. The secondary antibodies were visualized using a filter
allowing visualization of only fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated
IgG (GelB; C) or tetramethylrhodamine
isothiocyanate-conjugated IgG (collagen type IV; D) and
double exposure (E) for simultaneous visualization of both
proteins. Yellow is developed where the two antigens (GelB
and type IV collagen) are co-localized. Green indicates the
presence of GelB antigen alone. ×186; scale bars, 40 mm.

View larger version (86K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Gelatinolytic activity (in situ
zymography) in sections of human placenta. In
situ zymography was performed as described under "Experimental
Procedures." The tissue sections were preincubated for 30 min with
(A) buffer, (B) 20 µg/ml inhibitory antibodies
against GelB (clone GE-213; Chemicon International), and (C)
60 µg/ml inhibitory antibodies against gelatinase A (clone CA-4001;
Chemicon International). The tissue sections were coated with emulsion
and incubated for an additional 38 h to develop gelatinolytic
activity. Gelatinolytic activity is associated with trophoblast villi
and is co-localized with GelB (see Fig. 1).

View larger version (38K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Zymogram and Western blot analysis of MMP-9
extracted from tissue sections of human placenta. Sections of
human placenta were extracted with 2× electrophoresis sample buffer
(12.5 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 40% glycerol, and 5% SDS),
and zymography and Western blot analysis were performed as described
under "Experimental Procedures." Lane 1, purified
pro-GelB dimer; lane 2, purified activated GelB dimer;
lane 3, purified pro-GelB monomer; lane 4, purified activated GelB monomer; lanes 5 -7, various
amounts of extract of human placenta sections. Lanes 8 and
9, Western blot analysis of placenta tissue extracts with
monoclonal antibodies against human GelB (clone GE-213).
Proteolytically processed forms of GelB dimer or monomer cannot be
detected in placenta tissue extracts by zymography or Western blot
analysis.

View larger version (27K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Proteolytic activity of pro-GelB and
stromelysin-activated GelB. Enzymatic activity of pro-GelB and
stromelysin-activated GelB in solution (A) or bound to
gelatin-coated surface (B) was measured as described under
"Experimental Procedures" using fluorogenic peptide as a substrate.
The amount of GelB bound to gelatin was determined using
quantitative zymography of the extracted enzyme as described under
"Experimental Procedures." A, 1 and
2, activated dimer (4 and 2 ng, respectively); 3,
activated monomer (2 ng); 4, proform of dimer (2800 ng); and
5, proform of monomer (3000 ng). B, 1,
activated dimer (2.1 ng); 2 and 5, proform of
dimer (17.1 and 10.2 ng, respectively); 3, activated monomer
(2.3 ng); 4, proform of monomer (12.7 ng). Specific
activities calculated from these data are summarized in Table I.
Specific activities of soluble and substrate-bound gelatinase B
![]()
View larger version (27K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Western blot analysis of molecular species of
GelB extracted from gelatin-coated wells. Lanes 1 and
2 contain 10 ng of purified pro-GelB and the activated form
of GelB, respectively. Lanes 3-7 contain a mixture of 10 ng
of purified pro-GelB with decreasing amounts of activated enzyme
(lane 3, 10%; lane 4, 5%; lane 5, 2%; lane 6, 1%; and lane 7, 0.5%). Lanes
8-10 contain 5, 10, and 20 ng of GelB extracted from
gelatin-coated wells.

View larger version (12K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
TIMP-1 inhibition of pro-GelB and activated
GelB bound to gelatin-coated wells. Pro-GelB (open
squares) and activated GelB (closed squares) bound to
gelatin-coated wells were preincubated with TIMP-1 at the
indicated concentrations, and enzyme activity was measured as described
under "Experimental Procedures" using the fluorogenic peptide as a
substrate. Fitting of the inhibition curves to the equation for simple
noncooperative binding gave a Ki of 9.3 ± 3.4 and 2.2 ± 1.0 nM for activated GelB and pro-GelB,
respectively.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
13 to 9 × 10
8 M range
have been reported (52). Denatured collagen, gelatin, may present an
even more complex mixture of binding sites (53). The crystal structure
of latent gelatinase A, an enzyme closely related to GelB, reveals that
the propeptide of this molecule interacts with the fibronectin-like
gelatin binding domain through hydrogen bonding and a salt bridge (54).
Hence, binding of the fibronectin-like domain to gelatin can
potentially disrupt its interaction with the propeptide, destabilizing
its interaction with the active center and consequently leading to
enzyme activation.
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Damsky, C. H.,
Moursi, A.,
Fisher, S. J.,
and Globus, R. K.
(1997)
Kidney Int.
51,
1427-1433[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 2.
Werb, Z.,
and Chin, J. R.
(1998)
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.
857,
110-118[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 3.
Chiquet, M.
(1999)
Matrix Biol.
18,
417-426[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 4.
Trojanowska, M.,
LeRoy, E. C.,
Eckes, B.,
and Krieg, T.
(1998)
J. Mol. Med.
76,
266-274[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 5.
Friedl, P.,
and Brocker, E. B.
(2000)
Cell. Mol. Life Sci.
57,
41-64[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 6.
Norrby, K.
(1997)
Acta Pathol. Microbiol. Immunol. Scand.
105,
417-437 7.
Karsenty, G.
(1999)
Genes Dev.
13,
3037-3051 8.
Massova, I.,
Kotra, L. P.,
Fridman, R.,
and Mobashery, S.
(1998)
FASEB J.
12,
1075-1095 9.
Vu, T. H.,
and Werb, Z.
(2000)
Genes Dev.
14,
2123-2133 10.
Kleiner, D. E.,
and Stetler-Stevenson, W. G.
(1999)
Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol.
43 (suppl.),
S42-S51[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 11.
Woodhouse, E. C.,
Chuaqui, R. F.,
and Liotta, L. A.
(1997)
Cancer
80 (suppl.),
1529-1537[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 12.
Albini, A.,
Melchiori, A.,
Santi, L.,
Liotta, L. A.,
Brown, P. D.,
and Stetler-Stevenson, W. G. J.
(1991)
J. Natl. Cancer Inst.
83,
775-779 13.
Welgus, H. G.,
Stricklin, G. P.,
Eisen, A. Z.,
Bauer, E. A.,
Cooney, R. V.,
and Jeffrey, J. J.
(1979)
J. Biol. Chem.
254,
1938-1943 14.
Welgus, H. G.,
Jeffrey, J. J.,
Eizen, A. Z.,
Roswit, W. T.,
and Stricklin, G. P.
(1985)
Collagen Relat. Res.
5,
167-179 15.
Carmichael, D. F.,
Sommer, A.,
Thompson, R. C.,
Anderson, D. C.,
Smith, C. G.,
Welgus, H. G.,
and Stricklin, G. P.
(1986)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
83,
2407-2411 16.
Docherty, A. J.,
Lyons, A.,
Smith, B. J.,
Wright, E. M.,
Stephens, P. E.,
Harris, T. J.,
Murphy, G.,
and Reynolds, J. J.
(1985)
Nature
318,
66-69[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 17.
Gasson, J. C.,
Golde, D. W.,
Kaufman, S. E.,
Westbrook, C. A.,
Hewick, R. M.,
Kaufman, R. J.,
Wong, G. G.,
Temple, P. A.,
Leary, A. C.,
Brown, E. L.,
et al..
(1985)
Nature
315,
768-771[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 18.
Goldberg, G. I.,
Marmer, B. L.,
Grant, G. A.,
Eisen, A. Z.,
Wilhelm, S.,
and He, C. S.
(1989)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
86,
8207-8211 19.
DeClerck, Y. A.,
Yean, T. D., Lu, H. S.,
Ting, J.,
and Langley, K. E.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
3893-3899 20.
De Clerck, Y. A.,
Yean, T. D.,
Ratzkin, B. J., Lu, H. S.,
and Langley, K. E.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
17445-17453 21.
Boone, T. C.,
Johnson, M. J., De,
Clerck, Y. A.,
and Langley, K. E.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
2800-2804 22.
Stetler-Stevenson, W. G.,
Brown, P. D.,
Onisto, M.,
Levy, A. T.,
and Liotta, L. A.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
13933-13938 23.
Stetler-Stevenson, W. G.,
Krutzsch, H. C.,
and Liotta, L. A.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
17374-17378 24.
Grant, G. A.,
Eisen, A. Z.,
Marmer, B. L.,
Roswit, W. T.,
and Goldberg, G. I.
(1987)
J. Biol. Chem.
262,
5886-5889 25.
Van Wart, H. E.,
and Birkedal-Hansen, H.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
5578-5582 26.
Wilhelm, S. M.,
Collier, I. E.,
Marmer, B. L.,
Eisen, A. Z.,
Grant, G. A.,
and Goldberg, G. I.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
17213-17221 27.
Goldberg, G. I.,
Strongin, A.,
Collier, I. E.,
Genrich, L. T.,
and Marmer, B.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
4583-4591 28.
Zhi, L.,
Zhou, X.,
Shapiro, S. D.,
Shipley, J. M.,
Twining, S. S.,
Diaz, L. A.,
Senior, R. M.,
and Werb, Z.
(2000)
Cell
102,
647-655[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 29.
Ahrens, D.,
Koch, A. E.,
Pope, M.,
Stein-Picarella, M.,
and Niedbala, M. J.
(1996)
Arthritis Rheum.
39,
1576-1587[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 30.
Aoudjit, F.,
Masure, S.,
Opdenakker, G.,
Potworowski, E. F.,
and St-Pierre, Y.
(1999)
Int. J. Cancer
82,
743-747[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 31.
Sehgal, G.,
Hua, J.,
Bernhard, E. J.,
Sehgal, I.,
Thompson, T. C.,
and Muschel, R. J.
(1998)
Am. J. Pathol.
152,
591-596[Abstract] 32.
Gijbels, K.,
Proost, P.,
Masure, S.,
Carton, H.,
Billiau, A.,
and Opdenakker, G.
(1993)
J. Neurosci. Res.
36,
432-440[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 33.
Stahle-Backdahl, M.,
Inoue, M.,
Giudice, G. J.,
and Parks, W. C.
(1994)
J. Clin. Investig.
93,
2022-2030[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 34.
Vu, T. H.,
and Werb, Z.
(1998)
in
Matrix Metalloproteinases
(Parks, W. C.
, and Mecham, R. P., eds)
, pp. 115-148, Academic Press, San Diego, CA
35.
Simonovitz, S.,
Hurwitz, A.,
Dushnik, M.,
Anteby, E.,
Geva-Eldar, T.,
and Yagel, S.
(1994)
Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.
171,
832-838[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 36.
Librach, C. L.,
Werb, Z.,
Fitzgerald, M. L.,
Chiu, K.,
Corwin, N. M.,
Esteves, R. A.,
Grobelny, D.,
Galardy, R.,
Damsky, C. H.,
and Fisher, S. J.
(1991)
J. Cell Biol.
113,
437-449 37.
Reponen, P.,
Leivo, I.,
Sahlberg, C.,
Apte, S. S.,
Olsen, B. R.,
Thesleff, I.,
and Tryggvason, K.
(1995)
Dev. Dyn.
202,
388-396[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 38.
Alexander, C. M.,
Hansell, E. J.,
Behrendtsen, O.,
Flannery, M. L.,
Kishnani, N. S.,
Hawkes, S. P.,
and Werb, Z.
(1996)
Development
122,
1723-1736[Abstract] 39.
Niu, R.,
Okamoto, T.,
Iwase, K.,
Nomura, S.,
and Mizutani, S.
(2000)
Life Sci.
66,
1127-1137[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 40.
Polette, M.,
Nawrocki, B.,
Pintiaux, A.,
Massenat, C.,
Maquoi, E.,
Volders, L.,
Schaaps, J. P.,
Birembaut, P.,
and Foidart, J. M.
(1994)
Lab. Invest.
71,
838-846[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 41.
Behrendtsen, O.,
Alexander, C. M.,
and Werb, Z.
(1992)
Development
114,
447-456[Abstract] 42.
Hurskainen, T.,
Hoyhtya, M.,
Tuuttila, A.,
Oikarinen, A.,
and Autio- Hermainen, H.
(1996)
J. Histochem. Cytochem.
44,
1379-1388[Abstract] 43.
Maj, J. G.,
and Kankofer, M.
(1997)
Placenta
18,
683-687[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 44.
Collier, I. E.,
Wilhelm, S. M.,
Eisen, A. Z.,
Marmer, B. L.,
Grant, G. A.,
Seltzer, J. L.,
Kronberger, A., He, C.,
Bauer, E. A.,
and Goldberg, G. I.
(1988)
J. Biol. Chem.
263,
6579-6587 45.
Nagase, H.
(1997)
Biol. Chem.
378,
151-160[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 46.
Okada, Y.,
Gonoji, Y.,
Naka, K.,
Tomita, K.,
Nakanishi, I.,
Iwata, K.,
Yamashita, K.,
and Hayakawa, T.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
21712-21719 47.
Tschesche, H.,
Knauper, V.,
Kramer, S.,
Michaelis, J.,
Obernhoff, R.,
and Reinke, H.
(1992)
Matrix
Suppl. 1,
245-255 48.
Stricklin, G. P.,
Jeffrey, J. J.,
Roswit, W. T.,
and Eisen, A. Z.
(1983)
Biochemistry
22,
61-68[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 49.
Grant, G. A.,
Goldberg, G. I.,
Wilhelm, S. M., He, C.,
and Eisen, A. Z.
(1992)
Matrix
Suppl. 1,
217-223 50.
Sanchez-Lopez, R.,
Nicholson, R.,
Gesnel, M.-C.,
Matrisian, L. M.,
and Breathnach, R.
(1988)
J. Biol. Chem.
263,
11892-11899 51.
Yu, Q.,
and Stamenkovic, I.
(1999)
Genes Dev.
13,
35-48 52.
Allan, J. A.,
Docherty, A. J. P.,
and Murphy, G.
(1994)
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.
732,
365-366[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 53.
Collier, I. E.,
Saffarian, S.,
Marmer, B. L.,
Elson, E. L.,
and Goldberg, G.
(2001)
Biophys. J.
81,
2370-2377 54.
Morgunova, E.,
Tuuttila, A.,
Bergmann, U.,
Isupov, M.,
Lindqvist, Y.,
Schneider, G.,
and Tryggvason, K.
(1999)
Science
284,
1667-1670 55.
Olson, M.,
Toth, M.,
Gervasi, D. C.,
Sado, Y.,
Ninomiya, Y.,
and Fridman, R.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
10672-10681
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. M. Wilczynski, F. A. Konopacki, E. Wilczek, Z. Lasiecka, A. Gorlewicz, P. Michaluk, M. Wawrzyniak, M. Malinowska, P. Okulski, L. R. Kolodziej, et al. Important role of matrix metalloproteinase 9 in epileptogenesis J. Cell Biol., March 5, 2008; 180(5): 1021 - 1035. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. R. Radjabi, K. Sawada, S. Jagadeeswaran, A. Eichbichler, H. A. Kenny, A. Montag, K. Bruno, and E. Lengyel Thrombin Induces Tumor Invasion through the Induction and Association of Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 and {beta}1-Integrin on the Cell Surface J. Biol. Chem., February 1, 2008; 283(5): 2822 - 2834. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Vempati, E. D. Karagiannis, and A. S. Popel A Biochemical Model of Matrix Metalloproteinase 9 Activation and Inhibition J. Biol. Chem., December 28, 2007; 282(52): 37585 - 37596. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. C. Ardi, T. A. Kupriyanova, E. I. Deryugina, and J. P. Quigley Human neutrophils uniquely release TIMP-free MMP-9 to provide a potent catalytic stimulator of angiogenesis PNAS, December 18, 2007; 104(51): 20262 - 20267. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Meraz-Cruz, A. Ortega, G. Estrada-Gutierrez, A. Flores, A. Espejel, C. Hernandez-Guerrero, and F. Vadillo-Ortega Identification of a calcium-dependent matrix metalloproteinase complex in rat chorioallantoid membranes during labour Mol. Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2006; 12(10): 633 - 641. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. R. Lee, L. Lamplugh, B. Kluczyk, J. S. Mort, and C. P. Leblond Protease Analysis by Neoepitope Approach Reveals the Activation of MMP-9 Is Achieved Proteolytically in a Test Tissue Cartilage Model Involved in Bone Formation J. Histochem. Cytochem., September 1, 2006; 54(9): 965 - 980. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Pardo and M. Selman Matrix metalloproteases in aberrant fibrotic tissue remodeling. Proceedings of the ATS, January 1, 2006; 3(4): 383 - 388. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Saghizadeh, A. A. Kramerov, J. Tajbakhsh, A. M. Aoki, C. Wang, N.-N. Chai, J. Y. Ljubimova, T. Sasaki, G. Sosne, M. R. J. Carlson, et al. Proteinase and Growth Factor Alterations Revealed by Gene Microarray Analysis of Human Diabetic Corneas Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., October 1, 2005; 46(10): 3604 - 3615. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Daimon and Y. Wada Role of Neutrophils in Matrix Metalloproteinase Activity in the Preimplantation Mouse Uterus Biol Reprod, July 1, 2005; 73(1): 163 - 171. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Baluk, W. W. Raymond, E. Ator, L. M. Coussens, D. M. McDonald, and G. H. Caughey Matrix metalloproteinase-2 and -9 expression increases in Mycoplasma-infected airways but is not required for microvascular remodeling Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, August 1, 2004; 287(2): L307 - L317. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Bjorklund, P. Heikkila, and E. Koivunen Peptide Inhibition of Catalytic and Noncatalytic Activities of Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 Blocks Tumor Cell Migration and Invasion J. Biol. Chem., July 9, 2004; 279(28): 29589 - 29597. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Owen, Z. Hu, C. Lopez-Otin, and S. D. Shapiro Membrane-Bound Matrix Metalloproteinase- |