![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 18, 16179-16188, May 3, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
§,
,
,
,
,
,
, and
**
From the
Exploratory Research, ¶ Proteins and
Assays, and
Life Science Informatics, LION Bioscience
Ktiengesellschaft, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
Received for publication, August 14, 2001, and in revised form, December 21, 2001
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Thermostable DNA polymerases are an important
tool in molecular biology. To exploit the archaeal repertoire of
proteins involved in DNA replication for use in PCR, we elucidated the
network of proteins implicated in this process in Archaeoglobus
fulgidus. To this end, we performed extensive yeast two-hybrid
screens using putative archaeal replication factors as starting points.
This approach yielded a protein network involving 30 proteins
potentially implicated in archaeal DNA replication including several
novel factors. Based on these results, we were able to improve PCR
reactions catalyzed by archaeal DNA polymerases by supplementing the
reaction with predicted polymerase co-factors. In this approach we
concentrated on the archaeal proliferating cell nuclear antigen
(PCNA) homologue. This protein is known to encircle DNA as a ring in
eukaryotes, tethering other proteins to DNA. Indeed, addition of
A. fulgidus PCNA resulted in marked stimulation of PCR
product generation. The PCNA-binding domain was
determined, and a hybrid DNA polymerase was constructed by
grafting this domain onto the classical PCR enzyme from Thermus
aquaticus, Taq DNA polymerase. Addition of PCNA to
PCR reactions catalyzed by the fusion protein greatly stimulated
product generation, most likely by tethering the enzyme to DNA. This
sliding clamp-induced increase of PCR performance implies a promising
novel micromechanical principle for the development of PCR enzymes with
enhanced processivity.
For all forms of life, the process of DNA-replication is essential
in the propagation of genetic information. A complex multiprotein machinery including DNA polymerases, processivity factors,
proof-reading, repair, and regulatory activities (1-3) has evolved to
handle the tasks associated with this process. The importance of
replication is demonstrated by the fact that its central features are
highly conserved among all cellular organisms, while the protein
sequences of some of the factors are not. This is exemplified by the
processivity factors of DNA polymerases. Processivity is defined as the
number of polymerization events during a single contact between
polymerase and template. To prevent dissociation off the template DNA,
many polymerases are bound by a protein that encircles the DNA in a ring-like structure. Together with the polymerase, the ring appears to
move along the DNA as replication proceeds. Such "sliding clamps" exist both for eubacteria (the Such analyses support the notion that archaebacteria, although
possessing metabolic features that are quite similar to bacterial processes, are more closely related to eukaryotes when translation, transcription, and replication proteins are compared. For example a
clear homologue of PCNA can be found in all published archaebacterial genomes, (9) but no homologues for the eubacterial In other cases, the situation is not as straightforward. For the
eukaryotic five-subunit clamp loader RFC, only two homologues could be
identified so far in archaea (10, 11). Furthermore, relatively recent
work detected a completely novel two-subunit DNA polymerase (DP1 and
DP2) with assumed replicative function in thermophilic archaea, the
large subunit of which displays no significant homology to any other
DNA polymerase (12, 13).
Due to their use in DNA-sequencing and PCR applications, heat-stable
DNA polymerases are technically and economically important enzymes.
Current PCR reactions rely on single enzymes, which like the DNA
polymerase from Thermus aquaticus (Taq) often
originate from cellular DNA repair polymerases (14). Others represent potential replicative enzymes such as Pfu and
Pwo (15), but are employed in the absence of any accessory
replication factor. For longer PCR templates, artificial enzyme mixes
with compromised fidelity are the state of the art (16). Remarkably,
however, these reactions are orders of magnitude less efficient than
the in vivo DNA replication process with respect to
fidelity, speed, and product size. The replacement of current monomeric
PCR enzymes by a selected subset of proteins taken from the replication
machinery of a thermophilic archaebacterium may hence open new chances
to improve PCR.
In this report a biochemical, bioinformatic, and functional proteomic
approach was undertaken to deepen our understanding of archaeal
replication to use this knowledge for the improvement of PCR
applications. We demonstrate that processivity factors can enhance PCR
catalyzed by archaeal polymerases. Finally, we show that by tethering
Taq polymerase to a sliding clamp via a PCNA-interaction
domain one can generate PCR enzymes with increased performance.
Bioinformatic Analysis of Replication Proteins in Archaeoglobus
fulgidus--
In the first step of the bioinformatics analysis most of
the key components of the DNA replication machinery in humans were identified. The following sequences were retrieved from the SWISSPROT database (26): AC11_HUMAN, AC12_HUMAN, AC13_HUMAN, AC14_HUMAN, AC15_HUMAN, PCNA_HUMAN, DPD2_HUMAN, and DPOD_HUMAN. In a first step,
these sequences were compared with BLASTP (27) against a non redundant
database of all publicly available protein sequences. In a next step,
homologous sequences from related organisms including Homo
sapiens, Mus musculus, Drosophila
melanogaster, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae from the
blast result were used to generate a multiple-sequence alignment using
the ClustalW program (28). Based on the obtained alignment a Hidden
Markov Model was generated with the HMMER software package (version
1.8, Sean Eddy, Dept. of Genetics, Washington University School of
Medicine, St. Louis, MO). This model includes the highly conserved
regions but also the less homologous parts of the sequence alignment in
between. Now the non-redundant sequence database was again searched
with the HMMER program for distantly related homologues especially in
A. fulgidus. Based on the sequence information of TIGR (8),
a database of all A. fulgidus sequences was generated. This
database was also searched in parallel. The following sequences were
identified: AF2060 homologous to AC11_HUMAN, AC12_HUMAN, AC13_HUMAN,
and AC14_HUMAN; AF1195 homologous to AC15_HUMAN; AF0335 homologous to
PCNA_HUMAN; AF1790 homologous to DPD2_HUMAN; and AF0497 homologous to
DPOD_HUMAN. Another protein with polymerase activity was identified by
applying the same methods starting from a recently published sequence
in P. furiosus: DP2L_PYRFU (12). This protein is homologous
to AF1722.
Using these strategies we retrieved sequences from A. fulgidus, which are likely part of the replication machinery. The
analysis was performed using the described bioinformatics tools, which were implemented in bioSCOUT (LION bioscience AG, Heidelberg, Germany,
lionbioscience.com/solutions/bioscout), a multifunctional sequence analysis program package. bioSCOUT also includes all publicly
available databases as well as proprietary and in-house databases. All
sequence analysis runs were made on LION's in-house servers on database
content of about one terabyte. An automatic alert service implemented
in bioSCOUT was used to retrieve all newly entered sequences in all
major sequence databases (e.g. NCBI, EMBL, SWISSPROT, PIR),
related to the described project.
Two-hybrid Methods--
For the construction of a genomic
library of the 2,178,400-bp sized A. fulgidus genome for
yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) screening, genomic DNA was fragmented by
sonication and cloned into pGAD424; 16 µg of genomic DNA of A. fulgidus (obtained from the German Collection of Microorganisms
and Cell Cultures) were sonicated for 8 s, such that fragments
ranging from 0.1 to 5 kb were generated. To minimize the cloning bias,
the ligations and transformations were done in two size classes in
separate reactions. Size classes were 0.3-0.7 kb (small, the S
fraction) and 0.7-2.5 kb (large, the L fraction). DNA fragments of the
two size classes were isolated by cutting out the respective areas of a
1% agarose gel after electrophoretic isolation in TBE. 300 ng and 450 ng of sonicated DNA of the S and L fractions, respectively, were filled
in with 2.5 units of Pwo polymerase (Roche Molecular
Biochemical) and 35 µM of an equimolar dNTP mix (Roche
Molecular Biochemical) for 30 min at 72 °C in the buffer provided
with the Pwo polymerase. After the reaction, the DNA was
purified using the QIAquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen). 5 µg of
pGAD424 were digested with SmaI (New England Biolabs)
and dephosphorylated with calf intestine phosphatase, (Roche
Molecular Biochemical) and purified from an agarose gel after
electrophoresis. The DNA fragments were ligated into the linearized
vector at 16 °C overnight using 5 units of T4 DNA ligase
(United States Biochemicals) each time in 50 µl using the
buffer provided by the manufacturer and a total amount of DNA of 170 or
300 ng for the S and L fraction, respectively. The optimal ratio of
vector to insert mass had been determined beforehand and was 1:1.5 for
the small fraction, and 1:2 for the large fraction. The library was
transformed into DH10B Escherichia coli cells by
electroporation, yielding 2 × 105 and 3.5 × 105 independent colonies for the S and L fractions,
respectively. Colonies were washed off, DNA was prepared, and the
library was transformed into haploid yeast PJ69-4
For the generation of a library of fragments of the AF0497/PolB gene,
we followed the same protocol as for the generation of the library with
the following alterations. We subjected a PCR fragment representing the
coding region of the gene to sonication for 20 s. Fragment size
was 0.05-0.3 kb. Blunt fragment ends were generated using
Pwo polymerase as described above, and fragments were cloned
into SmaI-linearized pGBDU and pGAD424. 104
independent colonies were collected for both vectors after
transformation in E. coli. DNA was prepared and transformed
into PJ69- and PJ69-4
Bait and prey vectors were generated by the two-step PCR
protocol as described in Hudson et al. (17). 5' extension
for the 2nd PCR was GAATTCGGTACCACCACCATG, and 3' extension was GATCCCCGGGAATTGCCATGTC.
For the mating of yeast cells, bait proteins were cultured overnight to
an OD600 of 1-2 in selective medium. For each bait construct, four independent clones were cultured and mixed in equal
amounts of cells, to minimize the chances of working with a clone
carrying detrimental mutations from the PCR reactions. Library cells
were thawed out and allowed to recover for 1 h at ambient
temperature. For screens, an 0.5-OD solution of the bait mix was
prepared in YPDA. 10 µl of the library were transferred from the
library plates to new 96 deep well plates that contained 10 µl of
YPDA and allowed to recover for 2 h at 30 °C. After the incubation, 90 µl of the bait solution were added. Mating was allowed overnight, shaking at 1000 rpm in a microtiterplate shaker. The
mating mixture was then diluted with 1.1 ml of SD-HUL containing varying amounts of 3-amino triazole and cultivated for 6-10 days at
30 °C.
For the pairwise mating, the bait mix and the prey mix were prepared at
a concentration of 1 OD/ml in SD-HUL and SD-L, respectively. 50 µl of each were mixed together for the mating. The mating mixture was
then diluted with 1.1 ml of SD-HUL containing varying amounts of
3-amino triazole and cultivated for 6-10 days at 30 °C.
However, mating efficiencies were not satisfying in microtiterplates,
and mating in flasks proved to be the superior method in our hands.
Thus, for the second round of library screens, the small and large
fractions of the library were combined into two separate pools, and
mating was done in 50-ml Erlenmeyer flasks in YPDA at an OD of 1.0 in a
total volume of 10 ml, shaking for 5 h at 100 rpm. In this case,
after the mating cells were washed in selective medium lacking
histidine, uracil, and leucine (SD-HUL), and aliquoted into
microtiterplates in the same medium.
For both protocols as well as for library screens, after 6-10 days the
cells were passaged once to microtiterplates containing fresh selection
medium and allowed to grow for 2-4 days. Potential positives were
identified from wells displaying cell growth. The activation of the
secondary reporter genes ADE2, lacZ, and
Mel1 was determined, and double-positive cells were
collected. For ease of measurement, activation of Mel1 was
determined using
5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indoyl-a-D-galactopyranoside (X- DNA Polymerization Assays Using Activated DNA in Filter-binding
Assays--
Polymerization reactions were set up in a volume of 50 µl of 10 mM Tris/Cl, pH 7.5, 50 mM KCl, 4 mM MgCl2, 0.2 µg/µl bovine serum albumin,
0,5 mM digoxigenin dUTP (Roche Molecular Biochemical), 12 ng/µl activated calf thymus DNA, and 100 µM each of the
four dNTPs. Incubation after addition of proteins as indicated in the figures was for 30 min at 68 °C. After precipitation by
ethanol/sodium acetate samples were resuspended in 20 µl of 100 mM Tris/Cl, pH 7.9, and 10 µl of each sample were dotted
into the wells of a 96-well silent screen plate with Nylon 66 Biodyne B
0.45 µM pore membrane (Nunc). Nucleic acids were fixed on
the membrane by baking at 70 °C for 10 min. Detection of
incorporated digoxigenin was performed with the DIG luminescent
detection kit for nucleic acids (Roche Molecular Biochemical) as
recommended by the manufacturer.
DNA Polymerization Assays Using Primer Extension
Analysis--
For primer extension analysis with the A. fulgidus proteins, a CGCGCGGGGAGAGGCGGTTTGC primer was
annealed to single-stranded circular M13mp18 DNA, and 1 µg of the
primed DNA were incubated for 4 min at 68 °C with recombinant
proteins as described in the figure legends in a buffer containing 50 mM KCl, 4 mM MgCl2, 10 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 20 µM digoxigenin dUTP, and
25 µM each of the four dNTPs. Total reaction volume was
50 µl, and reactions were terminated by phenol/chloroform extraction.
Nucleic acids were then precipitated with ethanol/sodium acetate, and
pellets were resuspended in 5 µl of 20 mM NaOH, 20%
glycerol, 0,1% bromphenol blue. Samples were loaded onto an 1%
agarose gel containing 25 mM NaOH and 2 mM
EDTA. After electrophoresis the gel was blotted onto a Biodyne A
membrane and detection of digoxigenin labeled DNA was performed with
the DIG luminescent detection kit for nucleic acids (Roche Molecular
Biochemical) as recommended by the manufacturer.
For primer extension analysis with the chimeric Taq
polymerase, a IRD 700-labeled M13 primer was annealed to 1 µg of M13
plasmid construct at 53 °C for 10 min after 5 min of denaturation at
95 °C in a buffer containing 50 mM KCl, 2 mM
MgCl2, 10 mM Tris, pH 7.5, and 25 µM each of the four dNTPs. At the start of the annealing heat-purified chimeric Taq polymerase was added with
different amounts of A. fulgidus PCNA and then incubated for
15 min at 68 °C. The reactions at a volume of 50 µl were
terminated by phenol/chloroform extraction. Nucleic acids were then
precipitated with ethanol/sodium acetate, and pellets were resuspended
in 2 µl of formamide. 0.2 µl of the concentrated solution was then
resolved by 4% PAGE on a LICOR DNA sequencer Long READIR 4200 (LICOR,
Lincoln, NE) under standard electrophoresis conditions.
PCR Reactions Using Polymerases of A. fulgidus--
PCR
reactions were performed in a Stratagene robocycler gradient. If not
stated otherwise in the figure legends, reactions were performed in a
total volume of 50 µl of 1 × PCR buffer containing 2 mM MgCl2, 50 mM KCl, and 10 mM Tris/Cl (pH 8.3 for Taq reactions and pH 7.5 for all reactions performed by A. fulgidus enzymes) at a
deoxynucleotide concentration of 200 µM each. Because
stimulation of the polymerase by PCNA is
magnesium-dependent (data not shown), reactions were
supplemented with MgCl2 to a final concentration of 4 mM where appropriate. Primer concentrations were 300 nM in all cases, and for each reaction 20 ng of template
DNA were employed. Two amplicons were used for the experiments
presented here. For amplification of a 420-bp product from M13 mp18
closed circular single-stranded DNA, primer sequences were
GGATTGACCGTAATGGGATAGGTTACGTT and AGCGGATAACAATTTCACACAGGAAACAG,
respectively. Cycle number was as indicated in the figures, and
individual cycles were 30 s at 95 °C, 30 s at 59 °C,
and 60 s at 68 °C. For amplification of a 3395-bp construct
from a pQE30 plasmid harboring the coding sequence of AF 1722 cloned
into the BamHI/KpnI site of pQE 30, the same
primers were employed, which were previously used to amplify the insert
DNA from a genomic A. fulgidus template
(ACGCGCGGATCCGATGCAACTCTTGACAGGTTC and ACGGGGTACCAAATCCTTCTCGTCCACAGG).
For amplification of this construct, an initial denaturation step
of 180 s at 95 °C was followed by 35 cycles of 30 s at
95 °C, 30 s at 55 °C, and 360 s at 68 °C, and the
last cycle was extended for 10 min at 68 °C. After cycling 5 µl of
all PCR reactions were subjected to electrophoresis on 0.8% agarose
gels run in 1 × TBE.
Generation of the Chimeric Taq DNA Polymerase--
In an
overlapping PCR reaction, a fusion construct was generated comprising
the DNA sequence of the Taq DNA polymerase and the
Afu polB carboxyl-terminal terminal 50 amino
acids. First, via PCR the gene of Taq DNA polymerase
(GenBankTM accession no. J04639) was amplified from
a T. aquaticus strain YT-1 (ATCC-25104, Manassas, VA). For
amplification of this construct with the primers Taqfw,
GGATGCTGCCCCTCTTTG, and Taqrev, TGGCCGCGGCCGCGGTGGTCACTCCTTGGCGGAGAGC, an initial denaturation step of 180 s at 94 °C was followed by 30 cycles of 30 s at 94 °C, 30 s at 55 °C, and 120 s at 72 °C, and the last cycle was extended for 7 min at 72 °C.
The primer at the 3' end was designed with an overhang sequence
comprising the linker sequence (TGGCCGCGGCCGCGGTGG). Additionally in a
second PCR reaction the region of the 50 carboxyl-terminal amino acids of Afu polB has been amplified with a primer at the 3' end
having the complementary linker sequence. For amplification of this
fragment with the primers AfupolBfw
(CCACCGCGGCCGCGGCCAAAGAGCGGAATAGAGATA) and AfupolBrev
(TTATGCGAATATTCCAG), an initial denaturation step of 180 s at
94 °C was followed by 30 cycles of 30 s at 94 °C, 30 s
at 55 °C, and 120 s at 72 °C, and the last cycle was
extended for 7 min at 72 °C. By adding now both constructs in a
third PCR reaction with the primers Taqfw and AfupolBrev, the total
chimeric Taq DNA polymerase was assembled. PCR was carried
out with an initial denaturation step of 180 s at 94 °C and was
followed by 30 cycles of 30 s at 94 °C, 30 s at 55 °C,
and 360 s at 72 °C, and the last cycle was extended for 7 min
at 72 °C. Cloning into the pQE expression vector (Qiagen), DNA
sequencing, and expression (see "Protein Expression") of this
construct revealed a functionally active variant with no sequence variations.
PCR Reactions Using the PCNA Guided Derivative of Taq DNA
Polymerase--
PCR reactions showing the stimulating effect of
AF0335/PCNA on chimeric Taq polymerase were performed as
follows. The reactions took place in a total volume of 50 µl of 10 mM Tris-HCl, 50 mM KCl, pH 8.3, 8% glycerol,
and 5 mM MgCl2 at 20 °C, at a
deoxynucleotide concentration of 200 µM each. Primer
concentrations were 20 pmol for each primer. Three different amplicons
were used for the experiments presented. (i) For amplification of the
463-bp product from pCR 2.1 plasmid DNA, 200 ng of plasmid DNA were
employed to the reaction. Primer sequences were AGGGCGTGGTGCGGAGGGCGGT
and TCGAGCGGCCGCCCGGGCAGGT, respectively. Cycles were performed as
follows: 5 min at 95 °C denaturing, 30 cycles of 30 s at
95 °C, 30 s at 55 °C, and 40 s at 72 °C, and an
additional 7 min at 72 °C. (ii) For the amplification of the 500-bp
and 1-kb fragment of the human p53 gene from human genomic DNA (Roche
Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) 200 ng of the genomic DNA were employed
for the reaction using the following primers: p53fw1
(CTTGTGCCCTGACTTTCAACTCT) and p53rev1 (CTTTGCACATCTCATGGGGTTAT) (500 bp), and p53fw2 (CTCATCTTGGGCCTGTGTTATC) and p53rev2
TGGTATAAGTTGGTGTTCTGAAGTTAG) (1 kb). For amplification of this
construct, an initial denaturation step of 180 s at 95 °C was
followed by 30 cycles of 20 s at 95 °C, 30 s at 60 °C,
and 60 s at 72 °C, and the last cycle was extended for 7 min at
72 °C. (iii) For the amplification of a 5-kb fragment of the
mitochondrial genome, 200 ng human genomic DNA (Roche Diagnostics) were
employed in the reaction using the following primers mtDNAfw (AGGAACAACATATGACGCACTCT) and mtDNArev (TAGGTGGCCTGCAGTAATGTTAG). For
amplification of this construct, an initial denaturation step of
180 s at 95 °C as followed by 30 cycles of 30 s at
95 °C, 30 s at 55 °C, and 300 s at 72 °C, and the
last cycle was extended for 7 min at 72 °C. In all cases 5 µl of
all PCR reactions were subjected to electrophoresis after the cycling
on 0.8-1% agarose gels run in 1 × TBE.
Protein Expression--
After amplification from genomic
A. fulgidus DNA, expression constructs were cloned in frame
into the polylinker of pQE 30 (Qiagen), and sequence integrity was
verified by redundant sequencing. Expression was performed in E. coli M15 (prep 4) (Qiagen), a strain that overexpresses the
LAC repressor and hence efficiently prevents expression of pQE 30 constructs in the absence of an inductor. Transformation, growth, and
induction were performed as depicted in the third edition of the
QIAexpressionist (Qiagen). Induction by 1 mM
isopropyl-1-thio- Elucidation of the Network of Replication Factors in A. fulgidus--
We wanted to adapt archaebacterial proteins involved in
DNA-replication for the development of improved PCR protocols. As a
first step, we were interested in determining all the cofactors potentially involved in DNA-replication in an archaebacterial genome/proteome. A. fulgidus was chosen as a model organism
because its genome has been completely sequenced, there are no inteins in A. fulgidus proteins, and the patent situation is not
prohibitive. First, we identified homologues to proteins known to be
involved in DNA replication by an extensive bioinformatic analysis (see "Experimental Procedures" for details). However, bioinformatic predictions of protein functions based on homology are limited in scope
because they are extrapolations from existing data and depend on
detectable conservation of primary protein sequence. To get a more
complete picture of the set of proteins involved in DNA-replication in
A. fulgidus, we approached the problem from a different
angle; mapping out the network of protein-protein interactions
surrounding the central proteins of DNA-synthesis should unravel the
relationships of known factors and identify novel archaebacterial
replication factors. To this end, we made use of the Y2H system.
Interaction Mapping Strategy--
Our approach consisted of two
parts. (i) In a systematic library screening approach, we used
predicted replication factors as baits to try and identify interacting
proteins in a genomic DNA library. (ii) In a second, independent
approach, interactions of all candidate proteins were tested directly
in all possible combinations and orientations. This latter strategy of
matrix mating turned out to be useful both to detect interactions that were missed in the screens, as well as to allow verification of interactions found in the screen.
For the systematic screening approach, a genomic A. fulgidus
Y2H library was constructed (see "Experimental Procedures" for details). Bait and prey expression plasmids were generated using a
two-step PCR strategy followed by gap repair in yeast cells (17). Each
bait was then mated to the yeast cells containing the library, and
clones displaying reporter gene activation were isolated. Most steps of
the Y2H protocols were done in microtiterplates, allowing
straightforward automation of the method. To further extend the
network, identified interactors were in turn used as baits for a second
round of screens (see Table I for
details). This procedure of "proteome walking" allowed the
generation of a local protein interaction map centered around the well
known replication factors. Details on which bait was used in the first and second rounds of screening can be found in Table I.
In the matrix-mating approach, full-length versions of the proteins
were used as bait and prey and directly tested for interaction in the
Y2H system. This was done for all possible combinations of the
available proteins. Only protein pairs that caused reporter activation
repeatedly in multiple independent trials were considered as
interacting partners.
In addition to the use of multiple reporter systems and the retesting
of protein-protein interactions in the matrix mating approach, we
excluded all clones that were found only once with a given bait, as
well as clones that were found with multiple, non-related baits
("sticky" proteins). Only proteins that were found as
multiple independent clones with a given bait were considered as
potentially interacting proteins.
Predicted Protein Interactions Involving A. fulgidus Replication
Factors--
The combined results of the two independent approaches
(screening and matrix-mating) are listed in Table I. The source of information is indicated, as well as the reason as to why the proteins
were included as baits. In short, we started with a set of screens
including nine putative replication factors. In a second set of
screens, we included proteins identified in the first set of screens,
as well as proteins that were implicated in DNA replication by homology
to proteins binding to the DP2 DNA polymerase of Pyrococcus furiosus (19).
A graphical representation of the interactions can be seen in Fig.
1, A and
B. Our efforts resulted in a network connecting 32 protein
nodules, 30 of which are part of a single coherent network. Tentative
functional annotations are listed in Table II. The majority of proteins are directly
or indirectly implicated in DNA-replication. Interestingly, two of the
proteins identified in our initial screens (AF1194 and AF0735) have
been found in a physical complex with the DP2 DNA polymerase of
P. furiosus (19). This complex includes three more proteins,
which were also used as baits (AF1558, AF0130, and AF1650). Of these,
AF1558 and AF0130 both interacted with proteins of the main replication network (see also "Discussion"). For AF1650, however, we did not find additional evidence for its involvement in DNA replication.
The Binding Motif of PCNA-interacting Proteins in A. fulgidus--
Among the PCNA-binding proteins, we found subunits of
archaeal DNA polymerases, a homologue of the replication factor RFC, AF1195/RFC-53, the putative single-stranded DNA binding factor AF0780/RPA-36, and AF0621/RNaseHII as well as AF0264/Rad2. In addition,
a novel interactor, AF1347, was identified. Interestingly, AF1347
indirectly binds AF1558/SMC-1 via AF1559. AF1558/SMC-1 has previously
been isolated in a physical complex with the DP2 polymerase of P. furiosus. We did not see direct binding of AF1558/SMC-1 to the DP2
polymerase. Based on our data, this interaction appears to be indirect,
involving a putative complex of proteins including the polymerase
AF1722/DP2, AF0335/PCNA, AF1347, and AF1559 as well as AF1558/SMC-1.
The AF1558/SMC-1 and AF1559 genes are located next to each other on the
A. fulgidus genome, separated by only 36 base pairs, and it
appears likely that the two genes are part of the same operon and thus
functionally related.
Given the diversity of proteins binding to PCNA, we were interested in
determining the molecular basis for these interactions. To this end, we
isolated PCNA-interacting clones from a library of gene fragments of
AF0497/PolB (see "Experimental Procedures" for details). All but
one clone correspond to the extreme carboxyl-terminal end of the
protein (Fig. 2A). Identical
results were obtained for the homologous proteins from Pyrococcus
horikoshii (Fig. 2B). Thus, the PCNA-binding
sequence is located within the last 50 amino acids of
AF0497/PolB.
A conserved PCNA binding peptide can be found in a variety of proteins
interacting with PCNA in different species ranging from yeast to man.
Inspection of the carboxyl-terminal sequences of the isolated PCNA
interacting proteins revealed a conserved nonapeptide similar to the
canonical PCNA binding peptide (Ref. 21 and Fig. 2B). This
motif is present in all PCNA-binding proteins of A. fulgidus, apart from AF1790 and AF0780.
A search in the A. fulgidus genome using a hidden Markov
model based on the alignment of these genes revealed an additional protein that carries the motif within its carboxyl terminus, AF1590. For unknown reasons, we did not find AF1590 in our screens. Remarkably this protein is part of a protein family including the putative PCNA-binding protein AF1347, as well as AF1346. Given its homology to
PCNA-binding proteins and its genomic co-localization with AF1347,
AF1346 is likely to be functionally involved in DNA metabolism as well.
Thus, we propose a novel group of proteins related to DNA replication,
consisting of the AF1346, AF1347, and AF1590 family of proteins. This
group of proteins seems to be restricted to archaebacteria, and their
actual role in replication remains to be elucidated.
PCR Reactions Using Polymerases of A. fulgidus--
Next, we
established PCR reactions using the proteins predicted to be involved
in DNA replication in A. fulgidus, with the aim to use
processivity factors to stimulate the reaction. Open reading frame
AF0497/PolB of A. fulgidus encodes a family B
type DNA polymerase that displays significant homology to the largest subunit of eukaryotic DNA polymerase Enhanced PCR-reactions Using Processivity Factors--
Our Y2H
data predict that AF0497/PolB binds the sliding clamp AF0335/PCNA. To
test whether PCNA can stimulate AF0497 polymerase activity, we analyzed
nick-translated DNA or specific primer extension products in a
filter-binding assay. Using nicked DNA as template, we observed a
significant stimulation of AF0497 polymerase activity by PCNA (Fig.
3B). Similarly, we found that in primer extension experiments addition of PCNA not only increased the overall amount of
product but also shifted the most prominent products to a higher molecular weight range (Fig. 3C). To analyze whether
A. fulgidus PCNA was able to stimulate polymerase activity
in PCR, we employed suboptimal amounts of Af0497/PolB for amplification
of a 3.5-kb insert from plasmid DNA. Under standard PCR conditions,
PCNA was able to dramatically stimulate polymerase activity (Fig.
3D).
The proteins AF1195/RFC-35 and AF2060/RFC-53 are homologous to subunits
of the eukaryotic clamp-loading complex and are predicted to interact
with each other as well as PCNA (Fig. 1B). Therefore, we
included both proteins in primer extension and PCR reactions performed
by AF0497/PolB (Fig. 3E). Neither RFC-53 alone nor RFC-35 alone had a significant effect on the activity of the polymerase. However, in the presence of PCNA, RFC-35 alone had a dramatic effect on
polymerase activity, which was further stimulated by the simultaneous
addition of RFC-53. This effect was also apparent in PCR-reactions,
where the addition of RFC-35 alone or RFC-53 and RFC-35 together
stimulated product generation by the polymerase in the presence of
suboptimal amounts of PCNA. In summary, we demonstrate that it is
possible to enhance PCR reactions catalyzed by archaeal polymerases by
supplementation with the appropriate replication factors.
Design of a PCNA-guided Derivative of Taq Polymerase and Its Use in
PCR--
Taq polymerase is one of the most used polymerases
for PCR applications. However, despite its robustness and reliability
in activity, Taq DNA polymerase has the considerable
drawback of a high error rate (22) and the lack of the ability to
synthesize products larger than 5 kb. We reasoned that it might be
possible to enhance the activity of Taq by grafting onto it
the PCNA binding peptide. The delineation of the PCNA-binding domain in
AF0497/PolB allowed us to put this idea to the test. We constructed a
fusion protein of Taq that has a carboxyl-terminal extension
(23) based on the sequence of the AF0497/PolB protein, encompassing the
sequence required for binding to PCNA as detailed in Fig.
4A. In PCR reaction, this
protein was active, albeit slightly attenuated compared with the wild
type counterpart (Fig. 4B). Addition of PCNA had no effect on wild type Taq activity. However, PCNA dramatically
stimulated product generation by the hybrid protein. This was evident
when plasmid or mitochondrial DNA was used as a template (Fig.
4C). We then tested if this increase in product generation
was accompanied by an increase in processivity in primer extension
experiments. As shown in Fig. 4D, the fusion protein had a
slightly reduced processivity when compared with wild type
Taq. The inclusion of PCNA in the reaction lead to an
increase in the amount of product and also shifted the products to a
higher molecular weight, indicating a gain in processivity. No effect
of PCNA on wild type Taq could be observed. We then tested
if the increased processivity of the PCNA-supplemented PCR reaction
allowed us to amplify larger DNA products. Indeed, we observed that the
PCNA-stimulated fusion protein was able to PCR out a 5-kb product from
genomic DNA, whereas wild type Taq was not (Fig.
4C and data not shown).
Thus, the fusion of the last 50 amino acids of AF0497/PolB to the
carboxyl terminus of Taq render the polymerase responsive to
PCNA, most likely by tethering it to DNA (24). The success of this
naive approach was somewhat surprising since we expected the
localization of the domain on Taq to be crucial and that a graft at the carboxyl terminus might block enzymatic activity as we
initially found for fusion of the PCNA interaction peptide to the amino
terminus of Taq, which did not result in a functional polymerase (data not shown). We expect that optimization of the construction of similar hybrid proteins with respect to sequence and
position of the grafted domain should allow us to significantly extend
the capabilities of established PCR enzymes or other DNA modifying enzymes.
The DNA Replication Protein Network of A. fulgidus--
In this
report, we have described the development of PCR protocols aiming at
increased polymerase processivity. The selection of protein components
for such reactions was based on the elucidation of the network of
proteins involved in DNA replication in the archaebacterium A. fulgidus. To identify the individual components of this archaeal
replication machinery two supplementary approaches were followed.
First, proteins involved in DNA replication of A. fulgidus
were predicted by homology searches based on known eukaryotic and
prokaryotic replication proteins employing BLAST and hidden
Markov model algorithms. To verify the results of these searches and to
additionally identify potential archeal replication proteins without
known homologues in other organisms, we performed yeast two hybrid
analysis for A. fulgidus. To this end, we employed the
proteins identified by in silico analysis as baits for a
genome-wide screen. This approach revealed a network connecting
32 protein nodules, 30 of which are part of a single coherent network.
The net contains multiple closed circles, involving 13 of the proteins. Two distinct domains can be considered within this net. One group comprises the PCNA-binding proteins, including the DNA polymerases and
the clamp-loading proteins, and the other group centers around the
putative single-stranded DNA-binding proteins AF0382/RPA-26 and
AF0780/RPA-36 (Fig. 1B). Within the latter group, a
conspicuous number of proteins with a potential role in DNA metabolism
and repair are clustered together, including a putative DNA
endonuclease, putative single-stranded DNA exonucleases, and three
proteins implicated in nucleotide metabolism. Interestingly, this part of the network is linked via AF0699/RecJ-2 to three proteins with homology to histidine kinases. Proteins of this class play a role in
signal transduction processes (20). Thus, it is tempting to speculate
that these signal transducing proteins link DNA replication and repair
to external or internal regulatory signals. In summary, we believe that
the close clustering of functionally related proteins provides
confidence in the relevance of the predicted interactions (18).
However, since sliding clamps are known to be the most important
processivity factors and not much is known about their functionality in
archaea, we focused our interest on the PCNA-binding proteins and the
molecular basis for these interactions. The sequence motif responsible
for PCNA binding was found to be located at the carboxyl terminus of
AF0497/PolB. An evolutionary conserved PCNA binding motif was found to
be present in all PCNA-binding proteins of A. fulgidus,
apart from AF1790 and AF0780. A search in the A. fulgidus
genome using a hidden Markov model based on the alignment of these
genes revealed an additional protein that also carries the motif within
its carboxyl terminus, AF1590 (Fig. 2B). Remarkably, this
protein is part of a family of sequence-related proteins including the
novel PCNA-binding protein AF1347 as well as its genomic neighbor
AF1346 (29). Given the presence of the conserved PCNA binding motif in
AF1590 and the genomic co-localization of AF1346 with AF1347, this
family of proteins is likely to be functionally involved in DNA
metabolism. Thus, we propose a novel set of proteins related to DNA
replication, consisting of the AF1346, AF1347, and AF1590 group of
proteins. This class of proteins seems to be restricted to
archaebacteria, and their actual role in replication will be an
interesting area of future investigations.
PCR Reactions Using Archaeal Replication
Proteins--
To verify assumed functionalities, we employed the
proteins predicted to be involved in DNA replication in A. fulgidus for PCR reactions. Again, emphasis was on
processivity-related factors and the corresponding polymerases. We
found that AF0497/PolB protein, a family B-type DNA polymerase with
significant homology to the largest subunit of eukaryotic DNA
polymerase
Our experiments show that PCNA is able to improve the processivity of
the AF0497 DNA polymerase. Surprisingly, this was even true when a
closed circular DNA structure was used as a template in the absence of
specific clamp loader proteins. Interestingly, similar stimulation of
polymerases by archaebacterial PCNA on closed circles of DNA in the
absence of clamp loaders has been reported by Cann et al.
(9). Future experiments will have to reveal the mechanistic
reasons for this unexpected phenomenon that stands in contrast to the
observations made for eukaryotic PCNA.
The proteins AF1195/RFC-35 and AF2060/RFC-53 are homologous to subunits
of the eukaryotic clamp-loading complex. In line with their interaction
predicted by the Y2H study, in PCR and primer extension experiments,
RFC-35 and RFC-53 had a dramatic effect on polymerase activity in the
presence of PCNA. However, in conflict with results obtained for the
homologous eukaryotic proteins, this influence was not
ATP-dependent. We consider it likely that ATP will have an
effect on the activity of the RFC-complex in experimental conditions
that have yet to be defined. We would like to speculate that the higher
temperatures used for the archaebacterial DNA replication reaction
could partially relieve the requirement for energy in this process of
protein rearrangement.
Introduction of Functional Interaction Sites for A. fulgidus PCNA
on a Heterologous Polymerase Can Increase Processivity in the Presence
of A. fulgidus PCNA--
Taq DNA polymerase is a
repair-type eubacterial enzyme. It is one of the most widely used PCR
enzymes due to its robust activity, but it lacks the possibility to
bind PCNA or any other known processivity factor in its wild type form.
Aiming at the improvement of PCR performance of Taq
polymerase, we have attached the PCNA binding peptide derived from the
A. fulgidus analysis to the carboxyl terminus of this
polymerase. Primer extension experiments show that addition of PCNA to
the modified Taq polymerase results in an increased
processivity. This effect can also be seen in PCR; amplification
of a 5-kb product, which could not be yielded with Taq
alone, was possible with the chimeric system in a
PCNA-dependent way. Further optimizations of the chimeric
protein with respect to the structural binding properties and the
additional use of stabilizing and perhaps even further stimulating
replication proteins should allow us to significantly extend the
capabilities of processivity-driven PCR enzymes.
Taken together, we show here that the comprehension of cofactor
proteins can stimulate PCR reactions catalyzed by both archaeal as well
as chimeric prokaryotic DNA polymerases engineered to bind archeal
PCNA. We expect that putting to practice the principles we have
demonstrated in this report will facilitate the design of better PCR systems.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-subunit of the polymerase) and for
eukaryotes (PCNA),1 and the
structures of these proteins are almost superimposable (4). However,
the proteins are highly deviant in primary sequence. This situation of
sequence divergence and functional conservation is also evident for the
proteins responsible for loading the sliding clamp onto the DNA.
Whereas in eukaryotes the clamp loader is a heteropentameric complex
called RFC (2, 5), the eubacterial clamp loader is represented by the
pentameric so called
-complex (6, 7). Until recently very little was
known about replication in the third domain of life, the
archaebacteria. In part, this is probably due to the difficult culture
conditions for these often extremophile organisms. Only with the recent
availability of the genomes of several archaea (8) have these organisms become amenable for bioinformatic and functional genomic analyses.
-clamp or other
eubacterial replication factors have been discovered. Furthermore,
bona fide homologues of the eukaryotic DNA polymerase
can be identified in archaea (10).
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
(25) using 200 and 300 15-cm dishes for the small and large insert fractions, each
plate containing 1000-2000 colonies. Each plate was then washed off with YPDA containing 20% glycerol and stored separately in the wells
of 2-ml deep well microtiterplates at
80 °C. Thus, one copy of the
library was contained in a set of five microtiterplates. As working
stocks, the library was diluted to an optical density at 600 nm
(OD600) of 5.0. The final library included roughly 500,000 independent clones. Thus, fusion proteins will be generated every 4.4 bases, resulting in an in-frame fusion every nine amino acids, on average.
, to yield 5 × 105 yeast
colonies. Cells were washed off the plates as described above and
frozen. These libraries were used to isolate clones coding for protein
fragments interacting with AF0335/PCNA by mating of yeast cells as
described below.
-Gal,
CLONTECH) and scoring for blue color. The inserts
were amplified by PCR from the yeast cells, sequenced, and analyzed using standard bioinformatic methods as well as bioSCOUT for
annotation. Interaction networks were visualized using the automated
viewer piSCOUT® and reviewed for sticky proteins
identified with multiple unrelated baits.
-D-galactopyranoside was performed for 12-18 h at 37 °C. Cells were harvested by centrifugation for 15 min
at 5000 × g. For the preparation of heat-purified
protein extracts, pellets were resuspended in 100 ml/liter culture of 50 mM Tris/Cl, pH 7.9, 50 mM glucose, and 1 mM EDTA, washed once with the same buffer, and then
resuspended in 50 ml/l culture of the same buffer supplemented with 4 mg/ml lysozyme. After 15 min at room temperature an equal amount of 10 mM Tris/Cl, pH 7.9, 50 mM KCl, 1 mM
EDTA, 0,5% Tween 20, and 0.5% IGPAL was added, and E. coli proteins were denatured by incubation at 75 °C for 60 min.
Denatured proteins were removed by centrifugation at 27000 × g for 15 min, and the supernatant was dialyzed 2 × 8 h against 50 volumes of 10 mM Tris/Cl, pH 7.9, 50 mM KCl, 1 mM EDTA, 50% glycerol, 1 mM dithiothreitol, and 0.5 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. Optionally proteins were further
purified by Ni-NTA agarose making use of the His tag provided by the
pQE vector. Purification was performed according to the instructions of
the manufacturer (Qiagen).
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
Interactions of proteins as determined by Y2H

View larger version (51K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Graphical representation of the
interactions. A, representation in matrix. Rows show
proteins fused to the Gal4 DNA-binding domain; columns show
proteins fused to the Gal4 activation domain. Interactions found in
screens against the genomic library are represented as green
squares, interactions detected in the matrix mating are
represented in blue, and interactions found with both
methods are indicated in black. Reciprocal interactions,
i.e. interactions detected irrespective of which partner was
fused to the DNA-binding or activation domains, are marked by a bold outline. Proteins that have not been
used as baits are not included as well as their binding partners.
B, representation as a network. Double arrows
indicate reciprocal interactions. The group of proteins centered around
PCNA, tentatively implicated in DNA replication, are marked in
blue and the group of proteins tentatively implicated in DNA
repair are stained in pink. Putative histidine kinases are
stained green. Proteins that were used in screens are
depicted as normal rectangles and proteins that have
not been used as baits are depicted as rectangles with rounded
corners.
Functional assignments to A. fulgidus proteins

View larger version (22K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
The carboxyl terminus of
archaebacterial PolB interacts with PCNA. A, a library
directing expression of fragments of the PolB proteins of A. fulgidus (top) or P. horikoshii
(bottom) was screened to isolate the domains that interacted
with PCNA from the respective species. Green arrows indicate
fragments obtained from a library of fragments fused to the DNA-binding
domain of Gal4 and blue arrows indicate fusion with the
activation domain. B, the PCNA binding motif of A. fulgidus proteins. The last 40 amino acids of the indicated
proteins were aligned using the ClustalW program within bioSCOUT. The
consensus motif can be found at residues 33-41. A consensus sequence
based on a 60% threshold of occurrence is included. Color code:
blue, aliphatic; pink, negatively charged;
red, positively charged; green, polar; and
yellow, helix breaking. The motif of the protein AF1590 was
predicted by homology searches based on the motif present in the other
proteins (see "Discussion").
and to the commercially available PCR enzymes Pfu and Pwo. Since these
two enzymes can perform PCR in the absence of auxiliary proteins, we
tested whether their recombinant A. fulgidus homologue
AF0497/PolB can be employed for the same purpose. Fig.
3A shows that in fact
AF0497/PolB protein can be successfully used for standard PCR
reactions. In contrast, we failed to obtain PCR products with the
A. fulgidus homologues of the recently described DP2/DP1
polymerase (AF1722 and AF 1790, data not shown). In our hands the only
activity assignable to this enzyme was observed in a simpler one-cycle
primer extension reaction (data not shown). In this case, both
subunits, AF1722 and AF1790, were needed to obtain primer extension
activity consistent with their interaction predicted by the Y2H
analysis.

View larger version (20K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
A. fulgidus replication proteins can be
used in PCR. A, PCR activity of AF0497/PolB using
M13mp18 DNA as a template was assayed as described under
"Experimental Procedures." For the upper panel 1 unit of
Taq polymerase was employed, whereas the lower
panel depicts PCR activity of 0.2 µg of a heat-purified fraction
of A. fulgidus AF0497 in each lane. To compare performance
of the two polymerases, 5-µl aliquots were taken from the reactions
after 16, 21, 26, 28, 30, 32, and 34 cycles (lanes 1-7) and
loaded into two rows of wells of a 1% agarose gel so that after
electrophoresis the AF0497 products are located directly beneath the
Taq products. Previous experiments proved that both
polymerases yield products of the same size (not shown). For cycling
conditions see "Experimental Procedures." B,
stimulation of AF0497/PolB activity using a filter-binding
assay. A non-radioactive filter-binding assay using activated calf
thymus DNA as template was performed as described under "Experimental
Procedures." Dot 1 represents the background of an
enzyme-free reaction; for dots 3 and 4,
0.4 and 0.8 µg, respectively, of affinity-purified A. fulgidus PCNA were added to the reaction in addition to the
polymerase. C, stimulation of AF0497/PolB by AF0335/PCNA in
primer extension analysis. Primer extension reaction for all lanes was
performed with 0.2 µg of a heat-purified fraction of A. fulgidus AF0497. For lanes 2-4, 0.2, 0.4, and 0.8 µg
of affinity-purified A. fulgidus PCNA were added
supplementarily. AF0497 under these conditions produces mainly products
of 400-600 nt. In the presence of PCNA, the average size of the
products triples, and some products reach a length of more than 4000 nt. D, stimulation of AF0497/PolB PCR activity by PCNA. 0.2 µg of heat-purified AF0497 polymerase were employed in the absence
(lane 2) or presence (lane 3) of 1.6 µg of
affinity-purified A. fulgidus PCNA for standard PCR
reactions from the AF1722 plasmid template as described under
"Experimental Procedures". In lane 1, a DNA size marker
is shown. E, stimulation of AF0497/PolB and AF0335/PCNA PCR
activity by clamp loaders. PCR template and cycling conditions
were as for panel D and are described in detail under
"Experimental Procedures." All reactions contained 0.2 µg of
heat-purified AF0497/PolB polymerase, which was supplemented
for lanes 5-7 with 0.6 µg of affinity-purified A. fulgidus PCNA. In addition to polymerase and PCNA, 0.8 µg of
affinity-purified A. fulgidus RFC-53 were added to
lanes 6-7, and the sample presented in lane 7 was further supplemented by 0.4 µg of affinity-purified A. fulgidus RFC-35. Lane 3 depicts the effect of 0.4 µg
of affinity-purified A. fulgidus RFC-35 on polymerase
activity in the absence of PCNA, and the same control is shown
for 0.8 µg of affinity-purified A. fulgidus RFC-53 in
lane 4. In lane 1 a DNA size marker is
shown.

View larger version (33K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Processivity of a chimeric Taq
can be stimulated by PCNA. A, delineation of the
chimeric Taq protein comprising the 832 amino acids of
Taq DNA polymerase, with a linker comprising six amino acids
attached at the carboxyl terminus of Taq followed by the 50 carboxyl-terminal amino acids of AF0497/PolB. B, activity
and stimulation of Taq DNA polymerase and the chimeric
variant in PCR. The activity of Taq DNA polymerase in
comparison with the chimeric variant of Taq DNA polymerase
in PCR and the influence of AF0335/PCNA on its activity was
investigated. 1 unit of Taq DNA polymerase and 0.9 µg of
heat-purified chimeric Taq DNA polymerase were comparatively
employed for standard PCRs (150 ng of plasmid DNA pCR 2.1 vector), and
addition of AF0335/PCNA had no stimulating effect on the wild type
variant of Taq DNA polymerase (lanes 1-3). When
applying the chimeric Taq DNA polymerase (0.9 µg) with 0, 0.4, and 0.8 µg of AF0335/PCNA (lanes 4-6), the amount of
PCR product increased tremendously. C, stimulation of
chimeric variant of Taq DNA polymerase in PCR on genomic
DNA. We employed 0.3 µg of chimeric Taq DNA polymerase
with 0, 0.4, and 0.8 µg of AF0335/PCNA for the amplification of a
0.5-kb fragment (lane 2-4) and a 1-kb (lane
5-7) fragment of the human p53 gene and 5-kb fragment of a
mitochondrial gene (lane 8-10). Under standard PCR
conditions, AF0335/PCNA was able to dramatically stimulate the activity
of the chimeric protein in all cases. Sizes are indicated in kb.
D, stimulation of chimeric Taq DNA polymerase by
AF0335/PCNA in primer extension analysis. The primer extension
reactions were performed with wild type Taq polymerase (1 unit), lane 1-3, or 0.9 µg of a heat-purified fraction of
the chimeric Taq DNA polymerase (lanes 4-6). 0, 0.4, and 0.8 µg of affinity-purified A. fulgidus PCNA were
added in lanes 1-3 and 4-6, resulting in an
increased processivity of the chimeric Taq polymerase. The
sizes of the products were roughly 90 nt for Taq DNA
polymerase (lanes 1-3) and up to 250 nt for the chimeric
Taq polymerase supplemented with Afu PCNA
(lanes 4-6).
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
and to the commercially available PCR enzymes
Pfu and Pwo, can be successfully used for standard PCR reactions. More unexpectedly, the A. fulgidus
homologues of the recently described DP2/DP1 polymerase (AF1722 and
AF1790) failed in PCR. Although the DP2/DP1 enzyme from P. furiosus were shown to work well for PCR (12, 19), our results
match the data obtained with Methanococcus jannaschii
DP2/DP1, for which only very weak primer extension activity could be shown.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§ Both authors contributed equally to this work.
** To whom correspondence should be addressed: LION bioscience AG, Im Neuenheimer Feld 515-519, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany. Tel.: 49-6221-40-38-140; Fax: 49-6221-40-38-401; E-mail: manfred.koegl@lionbioscience.com.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, January 22, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M107793200
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: PCNA, proliferating cell nuclear antigen; RFC, replication factor C; Y2H, yeast two-hybrid; S, small fraction; L, large fraction; YPDA, yeast extract/peptone/dextrose with adenine; SD-HUL, synthetic medium-histidine, uracil, and leucine.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Keck, J. L.,
and Berger, J. M.
(2000)
Chem. Biol.
7,
R63-R71[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 2. |
Waga, S.,
and Stillman, B.
(1998)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
67,
721-751[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 3. |
Zannis-Hadjopoulos, M.,
and Price, G. B.
(1999)
J. Cell. Biochem.
32,
1-14 |
| 4. |
Tsurimoto, T.
(1998)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1443,
23-39[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 5. |
Mossi, R.,
and Hubscher, U.
(1998)
Eur. J. Biochem.
254,
209-216[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 6. |
Maki, S.,
and Kornberg, A.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
263,
6547-6554 |
| 7. |
Onrust, R.,
Finkelstein, J.,
Turner, J.,
Naktinis, V.,
and O'Donnell, M.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
13348-13357 |
| 8. | www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Entrez/Genome/org.html |
| 9. |
Cann, I. K.,
Ishino, S.,
Yuasa, M.,
Daiyasu, H.,
Toh, H.,
and Ishino, Y.
(1999)
J. Bacteriol.
181,
6591-6599 |
| 10. |
Cann, I. K.,
and Ishino, Y.
(1999)
Genetics.
152,
1249-1267 |
| 11. |
Kelman, Z,
and Hurwitz, J. A
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
7327-7336 |
| 12. |
Uemori, T.,
Sato, Y.,
Kato, I.,
Doi, H.,
and Ishino, Y.
(1997)
Genes Cells
2,
499-512[Abstract] |
| 13. |
Cann, I. K.,
Komori, K.,
Toh, H.,
Kanai, S.,
and Ishino, Y. A.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
14250-14255 |
| 14. |
Saiki, R. K.,
Gelfand, D. H.,
Stoffel, S.,
Scharf, S. J.,
Higuchi, R.,
Horn, G. T.,
Mullis, K. B.,
and Erlich, H. A.
(1987)
Science.
239,
487-491 |
| 15. |
Lundberg, K. S.,
Shoemaker, D. D.,
Adams, M. W.,
Short, J. M.,
Sorge, J. A.,
and Mathur, E. J.
(1991)
Gene.
108,
1-6[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 16. |
Barnes, W. M.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
91,
2216-2220 |
| 17. |
Hudson, J. R., Jr.,
Dawson, E. P.,
Rushing, K. L.,
Jackson, C. H.,
Lockshon, D.,
Conover, D.,
Lanciault, C.,
Harris, J. R.,
Simmons, S. J.,
Rothstein, R.,
and Fields, S.
(1997)
Genome Res.
7,
1169-1173 |
| 18. |
Walhout, A. J.,
Sordella, R., Lu, X.,
Hartley, J. L.,
Temple, G. F.,
Brasch, M. A.,
Thierry-Mieg, N.,
and Vidal, M.
(2000)
Science
287,
116-122 |
| 19. | Uemori, T., et al. (August 1, 1999) Japanese Patent WO99/00506 |
| 20. |
Grebe, T. W.,
and Stock, J. B.
(1999)
Adv. Microb. Physiol.
41,
139-227[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 21. |
Warbrick, E.
(2000)
Bioessays
20,
195-199[CrossRef] |
| 22. |
Eckert, K. A.,
and Kunkel, T. A.
(1991)
PCR Methods Applications
1,
17-24[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 23. |
Gulbis, J. M.,
Kelman, Z.,
Hurwitz, J.,
O'Donnell, M.,
and Kuriyan, J.
(1996)
Cell.
87,
297-306[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 24. |
Hingorani, M. M.,
and O'Donnell, M.
(2000)
Curr. Biol.
10,
R25-R29[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 25. |
James, P.,
Halladay, J.,
and Craig, E. A.
(1996)
Genetics
144,
1425-1436[Abstract] |
| 26. |
Bairoch, A.,
and Apweiler, R.
(2000)
Nucleic Acids Res.
28,
45-48 |
| 27. |
Altschul, S. F.,
Madden, T. L,
Schaffer, A. A.,
Zhang, J.,
Zhang, Z.,
Miller, W.,
and Lipman, D. J.
(1997)
Nucleic Acids Res.
25,
3389-3402 |
| 28. |
Thompson, J. D.,
Higgins, D. G.,
and Gibson, T. J.
(1994)
Nucleic Acids Res.
22,
4673-4680 |
| 29. |
Klenk, H. P.,
Clayton, R. A.,
Tomb, J. F.,
White, O.,
Nelson, K. E.,
Ketchum, K. A.,
Dodson, R. J.,
Gwinn, M.,
Hickey, E. K.,
Peterson, J. D.,
Richardson, D. L.,
Kerlavage, A. R.,
Graham, D. E.,
Kyrpides, N. C.,
Fleischmann, R. D.,
Quackenbush, J.,
Lee, N. H.,
Sutton, G. G.,
Gill, S.,
Kirkness, E. F.,
Dougherty, B. A.,
McKenney, K.,
Adams, M. D.,
Loftus, B.,
Venter, J.,
et al..
(1997)
Nature
390,
364-370[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Tori, M. Kimizu, S. Ishino, and Y. Ishino DNA Polymerases BI and D from the Hyperthermophilic Archaeon Pyrococcus furiosus Both Bind to Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen with Their C-Terminal PIP-Box Motifs J. Bacteriol., August 1, 2007; 189(15): 5652 - 5657. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Jokela, A. Eskelinen, H. Pospiech, J. Rouvinen, and J. E. Syvaoja Characterization of the 3' exonuclease subunit DP1 of Methanococcus jannaschii replicative DNA polymerase D Nucleic Acids Res., April 30, 2004; 32(8): 2430 - 2440. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Wang, D. E. Prosen, L. Mei, J. C. Sullivan, M. Finney, and P. B. Vander Horn A novel strategy to engineer DNA polymerases for enhanced processivity and improved performance in vitro Nucleic Acids Res., February 18, 2004; 32(3): 1197 - 1207. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Albert, S. Gaudan, H. Knigge, A. Raetsch, A. Delgado, B. Huhse, H. Kirsch, M. Albers, D. Rebholz-Schuhmann, and M. Koegl Computer-Assisted Generation of a Protein-Interaction Database for Nuclear Receptors Mol. Endocrinol., August 1, 2003; 17(8): 1555 - 1567. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Shen, X.-F. Tang, and I. Matsui Subunit Interaction and Regulation of Activity through Terminal Domains of the Family D DNA Polymerase from Pyrococcus horikoshii J. Biol. Chem., May 30, 2003; 278(23): 21247 - 21257. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |