![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 19, 16412-16418, May 10, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Endocrinology and Reproduction Research Branch, NICHD,
National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-4510
Received for publication, December 28, 2001, and in revised form, February 21, 2002
It is well established that G
protein-coupled receptors stimulate nitric oxide-sensitive soluble
guanylyl cyclase by increasing intracellular Ca2+ and
activating Ca2+-dependent nitric-oxide
synthases. In pituitary cells receptors that stimulated adenylyl
cyclase, growth hormone-releasing hormone, corticotropin-releasing
factor, and thyrotropin-releasing hormone also stimulated calcium
signaling and increased cGMP levels, whereas receptors that
inhibited adenylyl cyclase, endothelin-A, and dopamine-2 also inhibited
spontaneous calcium transients and decreased cGMP levels. However,
receptor-controlled up- and down-regulation of cyclic nucleotide
accumulation was not blocked by abolition of Ca2+
signaling, suggesting that cAMP production affects cGMP accumulation. Agonist-induced cGMP accumulation was observed in cells incubated in
the presence of various phosphodiesterase and soluble guanylyl cyclase
inhibitors, confirming that Gs-coupled receptors stimulated de novo cGMP production. Furthermore, cholera toxin (an
activator of Gs), forskolin (an activator of adenylyl
cyclase), and 8-Br-cAMP (a permeable cAMP analog) mimicked the
stimulatory action of Gs-coupled receptors on cGMP
production. Basal, agonist-, cholera toxin-, and forskolin-stimulated
cGMP production, but not cAMP production, was significantly reduced in
cells treated with H89, a protein kinase A inhibitor. These results
indicate that coupling seven plasma membrane-domain receptors to an
adenylyl cyclase signaling pathway provides an additional
calcium-independent and cAMP-dependent mechanism for
modulating soluble guanylyl cyclase activity in pituitary cells.
Soluble guanylyl cyclases
(sGC)1 catalyze the formation
of cGMP in response to a wide variety of agents including hormones and
neurotransmitters acting through G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs).
Stimulation of sGC is especially well established for GPCRs that signal
through phospholipase C- and adenylyl cyclase (AC)-dependent pathways. It is generally accepted that
calcium mediates the coupling of these receptors to sGC (1). Activation of the phospholipase C signaling pathway leads to inositol
trisphosphate-induced Ca2+ mobilization accompanied by
facilitation of voltage-sensitive and/or -insensitive Ca2+
influx (2), whereas activation of the AC signaling pathway usually
facilitates Ca2+ influx without affecting Ca2+
mobilization (3). Both cAMP and protein kinase A stimulate voltage-gated Ca2+ influx, the former through activation of
cyclic nucleotide-gated channels (4) and the latter by activating
nonselective cationic channels (5, 6). The rise in intracellular
calcium concentration ([Ca2+]i)
induced by these receptors is sufficient to stimulate two nitric-oxide
(NO) synthase (NOS) enzymes, endothelial (eNOS) and neuronal (nNOS)
(7). Because sGC is activated by NO, either as an intracellular or
plasma membrane permeable agonist (8), calcium-dependent NO
production should result in stimulation of sGC.
Several lines of evidence support the operation of the NOS/sGC
signaling system in the anterior pituitary. In normal and immortalized pituitary cells, calcium-sensitive nNOS and eNOS were detected (9-15).
The activity of these enzymes was confirmed by measurements of NO,
NO2, and NO3 under different experimental
paradigms (16, 17). sGC is also expressed in pituitary tissue and
dispersed cells, enriched lactotrophs and somatotrophs, and
GH3-immortalized cells. This enzyme is exclusively
responsible for cGMP production in unstimulated cells (18). Consistent
with the Ca2+-calmodulin sensitivity of nNOS (19), agonists
that increase [Ca2+]i, including
the Ca2+-mobilizing thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) and
Ca2+ influx-dependent growth hormone-releasing
hormone (GHRH), were found to modulate NO levels and hormone secretion
(10, 17, 20-23). Furthermore, basal sGC activity is partially
dependent on spontaneous voltage-gated calcium influx (18). These
findings support a generally accepted view about the relevance of
calcium in activation of the NOS/sGC signaling pathway by GPCRs. Recent studies have also indicated that high
[Ca2+]i inhibits cGMP
accumulation, an action presumably mediated by direct inhibitory
effects of [Ca2+]i on sGC activity
(24, 25).
Here we addressed the hypothesis that cAMP, in addition to
[Ca2+]i, mediates the action of
GPCRs on sGC-controlled cGMP production. Experiments were done in
cultured pituitary cells and immortalized GH3 cells. We
focused investigations on two receptors signaling through a
Gs pathway, GHRH and corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF)
receptors; two receptors signaling through a
Gq/G11 pathway, TRH receptor (that also couples
to a Gs signaling pathway) (26) and the endothelin (ET)-A
receptor that couples to a Gi/Go signaling
pathway (27, 28); and the dopamine D2 receptor that signals
through a Gi/Go pathway without activating
phospholipase C (29). GHRH receptors are expressed in somatotrophs and
immortalized GH3 pituitary cells (30). CRF receptors are
expressed in corticotrophs (31). TRH receptors are expressed in
thyrotrophs, lactotrophs, and GH3-immortalized cells (32).
D2 receptors are expressed in lactotrophs and somatotrophs
(29), whereas ETA receptors are expressed in all secretory
cell types (33-35).
Cell Cultures and Treatments--
Experiments were performed on
anterior pituitary cells from normal female Sprague-Dawley rats
obtained from Taconic Farms (Germantown, NY) and immortalized
GH3 cells. Pituitary cells were dispersed as described
previously (36). Cells were cultured in medium 199 containing Earle's
salts, sodium bicarbonate, 10% horse serum, and antibiotics.
GH3 cells were cultured in F12K nutrient mixture containing
1.5 g/liter NaHCO3, 2.5% fetal bovine serum, and 15%
horse serum. Cells were stimulated by GHRH, CRF, TRH (from Bachem,
Torrance, CA), forskolin, and 8-Br-cAMP (from RBI, Natick, MA).
Phosphodiesterases (PDEs) were inhibited by 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine
(IBMX), dipyridamole, and zaprinast from Sigma-RBI. Two compounds,
4H-8-bromo-1,2,4-oxadiazolo(3,4-d)benz(b)(1,4)oxazin-1-one (NS
2028) from Sigma-RBI and
1H-[1,2,4]oxadiazolo[4,3-a]quinoxalin-1-one (ODQ) from Sigma
were used to inhibit sGC.
cGMP and cAMP Measurements--
Cells (1 × 106
per well) were plated in 24-well plates in serum-containing M199 and
incubated overnight at 37 °C under 5% CO2/air and
saturated humidity. Experiments were done in cells 16 h after dispersion. Prior to the experiments, medium was removed, and cells
were washed with serum-free M199 and stimulated at 37 °C under 5%
CO2/air and saturated humidity. Cells were stimulated with
GHRH, CRF, and TRH in serum-free medium and in the absence or presence
of PDE inhibitors. At the end of the incubation period cells were
dialyzed in an IBMX-containing medium, and cyclic nucleotide concentrations were determined by radioimmunoassay in medium and in
dialyzed cells as previously described (24) using specific antisera
provided by Albert Baukal, (NICHD, National Institutes of Health,
Bethesda, MD).
Measurements of Intracellular Calcium Ion Concentration--
For
[Ca2+]i measurements, cells were
incubated in Krebs-Ringer buffer supplemented with 2 µM
fura-2/AM (Molecular Probes, Eugene OR) at 37 °C for 60 min.
Coverslips with cells were washed with this buffer and mounted on the
stage of an Axiovert 135 microscope (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany)
attached to the Attofluor Digital Fluorescence Microscopy System (Atto
Instruments, Rockville, MD). Cells were examined under a ×40 oil
immersion objective during exposure to alternating 340 and 380 nm light
beams, and the intensity of light emission at 520 nm was measured. The
ratio of light intensities, F340/F380, which
reflects changes in Ca2+ concentration, was followed in
several single cells simultaneously.
Calculations--
cAMP and cGMP data are shown as total (cell
content + medium) nucleotide levels. The results shown are means ± S.E. from sextuplicate determination in one of at least three
similar experiments. Asterisks indicate a significant difference among
means, estimated by Student's t test.
GPCRs Stimulate sGC Activity--
In a mixed population of
pituitary cells bathed in medium containing no PDE inhibitors, basal
cGMP was about 1-2 pmol/well (Fig.
1A, right panel).
Addition of 1 mM IBMX, a nonselective inhibitor of PDEs,
increased cGMP levels to about 10 pmol/well (Fig. 1B,
right panel) suggesting that PDEs participate in the control
of basal cGMP levels in pituitary cells. As shown in Fig. 1C, right panel, no further increase in cGMP
levels was observed in cells bathed in medium containing 1 mM IBMX together with two cGMP-specific PDE inhibitors,
dipyridamole (50 µM) and zaprinast (50 µM).
Basal cAMP levels also increased in cells bathed in 1 mM
IBMX-containing medium (Fig. 1, A versus
B, left panels), whereas the addition of all
three PDE inhibitors did not further elevate cAMP levels (Fig.
1C, left panel). These results suggest that 1 mM IBMX is sufficient to silence PDEs in anterior pituitary cells.
GHRH, CRF, and TRH induced significant elevations in cGMP levels
comparable to basal levels. As shown in Fig. 1, right
panels, all three agonists stimulated cGMP accumulation when PDEs
were not silenced (A), but also in cells bathed in
IBMX-containing medium (B), and medium containing a mixture
of three inhibitors (C). Agonist-induced cGMP accumulation
was also observed in cells treated with 50 µM zaprinast
and 50 µM dipyridamole alone (Table I). GHRH-induced cGMP accumulation was
observed in cells bathed in medium containing 10 µM
vinpocetine, a specific PDE1 inhibitor (basal, 3.44 ± 0.04; 1 nM GHRH-treated, 5.04 ± 0.235 pmol/well; p < 0.05). GHRH, CRF, and TRH also induced a
significant and PDE-independent increase in cAMP accumulation (Fig. 1,
left panels and Table I). These data indicate that an
agonist-induced rise in cGMP levels does not result from modulation of
PDE activity but represents de novo cGMP production.
To identify which guanylyl cyclase, particulate or soluble, is
responsible for agonist-induced cGMP production, cells were incubated
in the presence of ODQ and NS 2028, two inhibitors of sGC (37, 38). As
shown in Fig. 2A, left
panel, ODQ significantly inhibited basal and GHRH-induced cGMP
production in two doses, 0.1 µM and 1 µM,
in cells bathed in medium without PDE inhibitors. NS 2028 also
inhibited basal and GHRH-induced cGMP accumulation in a
concentration-dependent manner with an estimated
EC50 of about 100 nM when cells were bathed in
1 mM IBMX-containing medium (Fig. 2B, left
panel). None of these inhibitors affected basal and GHRH-induced
cAMP production (right panels). NS 2028 also inhibited CRF and
TRH-induced cGMP production when added in 1 µM
concentration (not shown). These results indicate that basal and
agonist-induced cGMP production in pituitary cells is mediated by
sGC.
Calcium Independence of Agonist-induced cGMP Production--
GHRH
and CRF increased [Ca2+]i in cells
bathed in 2 mM Ca2+-containing medium (Fig.
3, A and B,
left traces) but not in 10 µM
Ca2+-containing medium (right traces),
indicating that [Ca2+]i transients
induced by these agonists were dependent on Ca2+ influx.
TRH-induced Ca2+ response (Fig. 3C, left
trace) was not abolished by depletion of extracellular
Ca2+ (not shown). However, when cells were bathed in
Ca2+-deficient medium in the presence of 1 µM
thapsigargin for 30 min prior to addition of TRH, no response in
[Ca2+]i was observed (right
trace) indicating that the Ca2+-signaling action of
this agonist was abolished when the intracellular Ca2+ pool
was depleted.
In cells bathed in Ca2+-deficient medium, GHRH and CRF
induced a significant increase in cGMP accumulation (Fig. 3,
D and E, right panels). TRH was also
able to stimulate cGMP production when bathed in
Ca2+-deficient and thapsigargin-containing medium (Fig.
3F, right panel). Agonist-induced cAMP accumulation was also
not blocked by abolition of the Ca2+-signaling function of
these receptors (Fig. 3, D-F, left panel). These
results indicate that all three GPCRs can stimulate cGMP production and
cAMP production in a
[Ca2+]i-independent manner.
Correlation between cAMP and cGMP Production--
When stimulated
with 100 nM agonist concentrations, the amplitudes of cGMP
responses were highest in GHRH-stimulated cells followed by CRF and
TRH. The same order was observed in cells bathed in
Ca2+-containing medium with and without PDE inhibitors
(Fig. 1) and in cells bathed in Ca2+-deficient medium (Fig.
3). In all experimental conditions cGMP production paralleled cAMP
production raising the possibility that cAMP, in addition to
[Ca2+]i, mediates the action of
these receptors on cGMP production.
To further compare cAMP and cGMP production, cells bathed in 1 mM IBMX-containing medium were stimulated with increasing
concentrations of GHRH, CRF, and TRH, and both nucleotides were
measured from the same samples. Fig.
4A illustrates the
concentration-dependent effects of these agonists on cAMP
production (left panel) and cGMP production (right
panel). In all concentrations tested the Ca2+-mobilizing TRH was less potent stimulating cGMP
production and cAMP production compared with CRF and GHRH. Correlation
analysis of these data combined revealed the existence of a significant linear relationship between cAMP and cGMP production (Fig.
4B).
Further experiments were done with GH3-immortalized cells
expressing both GHRH and TRH receptors. As in pituitary cultured cells,
GHRH and TRH stimulated cAMP and cGMP production in a
concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 4C). There
was also a parallel in cAMP and cGMP accumulation, as illustrated by
linear regression in Fig. 4D, derived from these two
experiments. In contrast to primary culture, in GH3 cells GHRH- and TRH-induced cAMP and cGMP responses were almost comparable, suggesting that the cross-coupling of TRH receptors to Gs
is more effective in these cells than in pituitary cells.
Dependence of Receptor-induced cGMP Production on
Gs Coupling--
Dissociation between Ca2+
signaling and cGMP production and parallelism between cAMP and cGMP
production suggest that coupling of GHRH, CRF, and TRH receptors to the
Gs signaling pathway accounts for their actions on cGMP
production. To test this hypothesis more directly, cells were treated
with 10 ng/ml CTX, an activator of Gs, for variable times.
During a 2-h incubation in the presence of 1 mM IBMX this
treatment significantly increased cAMP production (Fig.
5A, left panel) as
well as cGMP production (Fig. 5A, right panel).
As in agonist-stimulated cells (Fig. 4), there was a linear relationship between cAMP and cGMP levels in untreated (Fig.
5B, left panel) and CTX-treated cells
(right panel). In cells treated with CTX for 12 h and
24 h without IBMX, then washed, and incubated for an additional 60 min in the presence of 1 mM IBMX, cAMP production was
several fold higher than in controls (Fig. 5C, left
panel). In these cells cGMP production was also significantly
elevated (right panel). The addition of 1 µM
forskolin, an AC activator (Fig. 5D, left panel),
and 8-Br-cAMP, a permeable cAMP analog, also induced the
time-dependent rise in cGMP production in cells bathed in 1 mM IBMX-contained medium (Fig. 5D, right
panel). Thus, the nonreceptor-mediated activation of the
Gs-AC signaling pathway also leads to stimulation of sGC
activity.
To test the specificity of AC-dependent signaling in
GPCR-controlled cGMP production, in further experiments we stimulated cells with ET-1, an agonist for ETA receptors and
apomorphine, a specific agonist for D2 receptors. Both
agonists abolished spontaneous [Ca2+]i transients in pituitary
cells (Fig. 6, A and
B). ET-1, but not apomorphine, also stimulated
Ca2+ mobilization resulting in a rapid and transient
[Ca2+]i response. In accord with
literature data (27, 39), ET-1 and apomorphine inhibited cAMP
production in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig.
6C), and this inhibition was accompanied by a decrease in
cGMP production (Fig. 6D). Consistent with the role of
Ca2+ mobilization in activation of NOS/sGC (7), inhibition
of cGMP production was less prominent in ET-1 than
apomorphine-stimulated cells.
To test the hypothesis that protein kinase A mediates the action of
cAMP on stimulation of sGC activity, cells were treated with 1 µM H89, a concentration that predominantly inhibits
protein kinase A. Addition of H89 for 15 min prior to stimulation with agonists resulted in a significant reduction of receptor-induced cGMP
production (Fig. 7A).
Forskolin and CTX-induced cGMP production was also reduced in the
presence of 1 µM H89 (Fig. 7B). On the other hand, cAMP levels measured in the same samples were not affected
by H89 (Table II).
It is generally accepted that GPCRs stimulate NO-sensitive sGC by
increasing [Ca2+]i and activating
Ca2+-dependent nNOS and/or eNOS (1, 18). In
accordance with this hypothesis, earlier studies have indicated that
sGC is expressed in pituitary cells as well as nNOS and eNOS, and that
spontaneous electrical activity and calcium signaling provide an
effective mechanism for activation of NOS and subsequent stimulation of sGC (18, 24). Here we extended these investigations by studying the
actions of several GPCRs on cGMP production. The focus in investigations was on receptors that stimulate and inhibit spontaneous, voltage-gated calcium influx-dependent
[Ca2+]i transients, as well as on
receptors that facilitate calcium release from intracellular
Ca2+ pools.
In cultured pituitary cells, ETA and D2
receptors inhibited spontaneous
[Ca2+]i transients and decreased
cGMP production, whereas GHRH, CRF, and TRH elevated
[Ca2+]i and stimulated cGMP
production. Both ETA and D2 receptors signal
through Gi/o pathways leading to inhibition of AC and
stimulation of inward rectifier potassium current that hyperpolarizes
cells, terminates spontaneous firing of action potentials, and
abolishes voltage-gated Ca2+ influx (27, 39). On the other
hand, GHRH and CRF receptors stimulate AC activity through
Gs (30, 31). Somatotrophs respond to GHRH with a robust
increase in cAMP production and stimulation of nonselective cationic
channels, presumably through protein kinase A, depolarization of cells,
and facilitation of voltage-gated Ca2+ influx (5, 6,
40-42). CRF receptors also increase excitability of corticotrophs and
facilitate voltage-gated calcium influx (43, 44). Finally, TRH receptor
is a member of the Gq/11-coupled calcium-mobilizing
receptors whose activation leads to inositol trisphosphate-induced
Ca2+ release followed by facilitated calcium influx (32).
This receptor is also cross-coupled to the Gs-AC signaling
pathway (26), and protein kinases A and C pathways may play an
important role in controlling the sustained voltage-gated
Ca2+ influx by inhibiting spontaneously active
inward-rectified potassium channels (3). Thus, Ca2+
signaling by these receptors is consistent with the
[Ca2+]i dependence of sGC-derived
cGMP production.
Several lines of evidence presented here, however, indicate that
Ca2+ is not an exclusive signaling pathway for stimulation
of cGMP production by GPCRs. GHRH and CRF were found to stimulate sGC in cells bathed in Ca2+-deficient medium, a treatment that
abolished agonist-induced Ca2+ influx. The
Ca2+-mobilizing action of TRH, but not the
agonist-induced cGMP accumulation, was abolished in cells with
intracellular Ca2+ pools depleted by thapsigargin. In
contrast to [Ca2+]i signals, cGMP
production was found to correlate well with cAMP levels, suggesting
that GPCRs stimulate the NOS/sGC signaling pathway through the
cAMP-dependent mechanism. A decrease in cGMP production
observed in cells stimulated with ET-1 and apomorphine also paralleled
a decrease in cAMP production. The dependence of cGMP accumulation on
cAMP levels was further documented in experiments with CTX, a treatment
that elevated the levels of both nucleotides. To directly activate AC,
we treated cells with forskolin. Furthermore, to exclude AC-independent
actions of forskolin, cells were treated with 8-Br-cAMP, a permeable
cAMP analog. In both experiments, a significant increase in cGMP
production was observed confirming a hypothesis that cAMP mediates the
action of GHRH, CRF, and TRH on cGMP production. Finally, receptor-, CTX-, and forskolin-induced stimulation of cGMP production, but not
cAMP production, was reduced in the presence of H89. These results
indicate that GPCRs can modulate sGC activity through the AC signaling pathway.
The dependence of sGC activity on the protein kinase A signaling
pathway is consistent with several reports indicating that phosphorylation of eNOS makes this enzyme active in the absence of
[Ca2+]i signaling. The
serine/threonine protein kinase Ark/PKB-induced phosphorylation of eNOS
is well established (45, 46). One report also suggests that eNOS from
endothelial cells is activated and becomes calcium independent upon
phosphorylation by cyclic nucleotide-dependent protein
kinases (47). Earlier studies have also indicated that protein kinase C
and protein kinase A can phosphorylate sGC in vitro, leading
to the facilitation of enzyme activity (48, 49). In intact PC12 cells,
phorbol ester-activated protein kinase C also phosphorylates sGC and
increases the enzyme activity (50). At the present time, our
experiments cannot distinguish between the possible direct actions of
protein kinase A on sGC from that mediated by NOS. However, it is
unlikely that phosphorylation of eNOS accounts for GHRH-induced cGMP
production in somatotrophs because these cells do not express eNOS, but
do express nNOS (18), phosphorylation of which leads to a decrease in
NO production (51).
A calcium-independent increase in cGMP levels observed in
agonist-stimulated cells is also compatible with findings that this ion
plays an important role in the control of PDE1 activity in a
calmodulin-dependent manner. Phosphorylation of PDEs by
protein kinases A and G also modulates the activity of these enzymes
(52-54). Thus, calcium depletion/repletion in culture media in our
experiments could influence the rate of cGMP degradation. However, that
does not provide a rationale for agonist-induced cGMP accumulation, because it was also observed in cells bathed in medium containing 1 mM IBMX, an inhibitor that blocks PDE1 with an
IC50 of 4 µM, as well as PDEs 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, and 11, with IC50 values of 2-100 µM
(52). Agonist-induced cGMP accumulation was also observed in cells
bathed in the presence of vinpocetine, a specific PDE1 inhibitor, as
well as in the presence of specific inhibitors of
cGMP-dependent PDEs, dipyridamole, and zaprinast (52). The ability of GHRH, CRF, and TRH to stimulate cGMP accumulation in cells
bathed in medium containing a mixture of three PDE inhibitors in high
concentrations further argues against the hypothesis that protein
kinase A-dependent phosphorylation of PDEs, specifically PDE1A, accounts for down-regulation of their activities and elevation in cGMP levels.
In conclusion, here we show that GHRH, CRF, and TRH receptors in
pituitary cells stimulate sGC activity and that this stimulation also
occurs when Ca2+ signaling is abolished. The experiments
argue against the action of these receptors on PDE activity and support
the hypothesis that de novo cGMP production accounts for a
Ca2+-independent increase in cGMP levels. Our results
further indicate that the coupling of GHRH and CRF receptors and
cross-coupling of the TRH receptor to the Gs signaling
pathway represents the main mechanism for stimulation of sGC, whereas
the coupling of receptors to the Gi/o signaling pathway
leads to inhibition of cGMP production. The results also indicate that
Gs-mediated activation of AC and subsequently protein
kinase A is required for stimulation of sGC activity. Thus, in addition
to [Ca2+]i, up- and
down-regulation of AC activity by GPCRs provides an effective mechanism
for control of cGMP production.
*
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, February 26, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M112439200
The abbreviations used are:
sGC, soluble
guanylyl cyclase;
GPCRs, G protein-coupled receptors;
GHRH, growth
hormone-releasing hormone;
CRF, corticotropin-releasing hormone;
TRH, thyrotropin-releasing hormone;
ET, endothelin;
NOS, nitric-oxide
synthase;
eNOS, endothelial NOS;
nNOS, neuronal NOS;
AC, adenylyl
cyclase;
PDEs, phosphodiesterases;
IBMX, 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine;
CTX, cholera toxin;
ODQ, 1H-[1,2,4]oxadiazolo[4,3-a]quinoxalin-1-one;
NS 2028, 4H-8-bromo-1,2,4-oxadiazolo(3,4-d)benz(b)(1,4)oxazin-1-one;
8-Br-cAMP, 8-bromo-cAMP.
Calcium-independent and cAMP-dependent Modulation of
Soluble Guanylyl Cyclase Activity by G Protein-coupled Receptors in
Pituitary Cells*
,
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (25K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Agonist-induced cyclic nucleotide production
in pituitary cells. Effects of 100 nM GHRH, CRF, and
TRH on cAMP (left panels) and cGMP (right panels)
accumulation during a 60-min incubation in medium containing no PDE
inhibitors (A), 1 mM IBMX (B), and 1 mM IBMX, 50 µM dipyridamole, and 50 µM zaprinast (C). In this and the following
figures, data shown are means ± S.E. from sextuplicate
incubations in one from at least three similar experiments. cAMP and
cGMP were determined from the same samples. Asterisks
indicate significant differences between untreated and agonist-treated
cells, p < 0.05.
Effects of dipyridamole (50 µM) and zaprinast (50 µM) on agonist (100 nM)-induced cyclic
nucleotide accumulation in anterior pituitary cells during a 60-min
incubation

View larger version (25K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Effects of sGC inhibitors on GHRH-induced
cyclic nucleotide production in pituitary cells.
A, concentration-dependent effects of ODQ
on cGMP (left panel) and cAMP (right panel)
production in unstimulated (Basal) and GHRH-stimulated cells
bathed in medium without PDE inhibition. B,
concentration-dependent effects of NS2028 on cGMP
(left panel) and cAMP (right panel) production in
cells stimulated with GHRH in 1 mM IBMX-containing
medium.

View larger version (26K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Independence of agonist-induced cyclic
nucleotide production of calcium signaling in pituitary cells.
A-C, left traces, agonist-induced rise in
[Ca2+]i in somatotrophs
(A), corticotrophs (B), and lactotrophs
(C) bathed in medium containing 2 mM
Ca2+. Right traces, the lack of effects of
agonists on [Ca2+]i in cells
bathed in Ca2+-deficient medium (A and
B) and in cells treated for 30 min with 1 µM
thapsigargin in Ca2+-deficient medium (C).
D-F, agonist-induced cyclic nucleotide production in cells
bathed in Ca2+-deficient medium (D and
E) and Ca2+-deficient medium in the presence of
thapsigargin (F). The estimated Ca2+
concentration in Ca2+-deficient medium was about 10 µM. In these and experiments shown in Figs. 4-7,
incubation was done in medium containing 1 mM IBMX.
B, basal cyclic nucleotide production.

View larger version (30K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Parallelism in cAMP and cGMP production in
agonist-stimulated pituitary cells. A,
concentration-dependent effects of GHRH (empty
circles), CRF (filled circles), and TRH
(triangles) on cyclic nucleotide production in pituitary
cells. B, correlation between cAMP and cGMP levels. Derived
from experiments shown in panel A. C,
concentration-dependent effects of GHRH (empty
circles) and TRH (filled circles) on cyclic nucleotide
production in GH3-immortalized pituitary cells.
D, correlation between cAMP and cGMP levels. Derived from
experiments shown in panel C. r, Pearson's
coefficient of correlation.

View larger version (22K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Dependence of cGMP production on
Gs signaling pathway in pituitary cells. A,
short-term effects of CTX on cAMP (left panel) and cGMP
(right panel) production in pituitary cells.
B, correlation between cAMP and cGMP levels in
untreated (left panel) and CTX-treated (right
panel) cells. Derived from experiments shown in panel A. C, long term effects of CTX on cAMP (left panel) and
cGMP (right panel) levels. Cells were treated with 10 ng/ml
CTX or solvent for 12 or 24 h, washed, and incubated for an
additional 60 min. D, dependence of cGMP production on cAMP
levels in pituitary cells. Left panel, time course of
forskolin effects on cAMP and cGMP production. Basal cAMP and cGMP
levels were subtracted. Right panel, time course of
8-Br-cAMP effects on cGMP production. Asterisks indicate
significant differences between the pairs, p < 0.05.

View larger version (27K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Characterization of ET-1 and apomorphine
actions on calcium signaling and cyclic nucleotide production in
pituitary cells. Left panels, inhibition of spontaneous
[Ca2+]i transients by ET-1
(A) and apomorphine (APO) (B).
Right panels, inhibition of cAMP (C) and cGMP
(D) production by ET-1 and apomorphine. Asterisks
indicate significant differences between the pairs, p < 0.05.

View larger version (20K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Dependence of cGMP production on protein
kinase A activation. A, effects of H89 on basal and
agonist-induced cGMP production. B, effects of H89 on
forskolin and CTX-induced cGMP production. Asterisks indicate
significant differences between stimulated cells in the presence and
absence of H89.
cAMP levels in anterior pituitary cells treated with agonists (100 nM) for 60 min in 1 mM IBMX-containing medium
in the absence and presence of 1 µM H89
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
FOOTNOTES
To whom correspondence should be addressed: NICHD, Section on
Cellular Signaling, ERRB/NICHD, Bldg. 49, Room 6A-36, 49 Convent Dr.,
National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-4510. Tel.:
301-496-1638; Fax: 301-594-7031; E-mail: stankos@helix.nih.gov.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Christopoulos, A.,
and El-Fakahany, E. E.
(1999)
Life Sci.
65,
1-15[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 2.
Berridge, M. J.
(1993)
Nature
361,
315-325[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 3.
Stojilkovic, S. S.,
Tomic, M.,
Koshimizu, T.,
and Van Goor, F.
(2000)
in
Principles of Molecular Regulation
(Conn, P. M.
, and Means, A. R., eds)
, pp. 149-185, Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ
4.
Zagotta, W. N.,
and Siegelbaum, S. A.
(1996)
Annu. Rev. Neurosci.
19,
235-263[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 5.
Takano, K.,
Takei, T.,
Teramoto, A.,
and Yamashita, N.
(1996)
Am. J. Physiol.
270,
E1014-E1057 6.
Naumov, A. P.,
Herrington, J.,
and Hille, B.
(1994)
Pflugers Arch.
427,
414-421[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 7.
Xu, X.,
Zeng, W.,
Diaz, J.,
Lau, K. S.,
Gukovskaya, A. C.,
Brown, R. J.,
Pandol, S. J.,
and Muallem, S.
(1997)
Cell Calcium
22,
217-228[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 8.
Lucas, K. A.,
Pitary, G. M.,
Kazerounian, S.,
Ruiz-Stewart, I.,
Park, J.,
Schultz, S.,
Chepenik, K. P.,
and Waldman, S. A.
(2000)
Pharmacol. Rev.
52,
375-413 9.
Xu, X.,
and Miller, K. J.
(2000)
Biochem. Pharmacol.
59,
509-516[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 10.
Lozach, A.,
Garrel, G.,
Lerrant, Y.,
Berault, A.,
and Counis, R.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Endocrinol.
143,
43-51[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 11.
Vancelecom, H.,
Matthys, P.,
and Denef, C.
(1997)
J. Histochem. Cytochem.
45,
847-857 12.
Wolff, D.,
and Datto, G. A.
(1992)
Biochem. J.
128,
201-206 13.
Garrel, G.,
Lerrant, Y.,
Siriostis, C.,
Berault, A.,
Marge, S.,
Bouchaud, C.,
and Counis, R.
(1998)
Endocrinology
139,
2163-2170 14.
Imai, T.,
Hirata, Y.,
and Marumo, F.
(1992)
Biomed. Res.
13,
371-374 15.
Ceccatelli, S.,
Hulting, A. L.,
Zhang, X.,
Gustafsson, L.,
Villar, M.,
and Hokfelt, T.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
11292-11296 16.
Ohita, K.,
Hirata, Y.,
Imai, T.,
and Marumo, F.
(1993)
J. Endocrinol.
138,
429-435 17.
Tsumori, M.,
Murakami, Y.,
Koshimura, K.,
and Kato, Y.
(1999)
J. Neuroendocrinol.
11,
451-456[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 18.
Kostic, T. S.,
Andric, S. A.,
and Stojilkovic, S.
(2001)
Mol. Endocrinol.
15,
1010-1022 19.
Griffith, O. W.,
and Stuehr, D. J.
(1995)
Annu. Rev. Physiol.
57,
707-736[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 20.
Kato, M.
(1992)
Endocrinology
131,
2133-2138[Abstract] 21.
Vesely, D. L.
(1985)
Mol. Cell. Biochem.
66,
145-149[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 22.
Bugajski, J.,
Borycz, J.,
Gadek-Michalska, A.,
and Glod, R.
(1998)
J. Physiol. Pharmacol.
49,
607-616[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 23.
Antoni, F. A.,
and Dayanithi, G.
(1989)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
158,
824-830[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 24.
Andric, S. A.,
Kostic, T. S.,
Tomic, M.,
Koshimizu, T.,
and Stojilkovic, S. S.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
844-849 25.
Parkinson, S. J.,
Jovanovic, A.,
Jovanovic, S.,
Wagner, F.,
Terzic, A.,
and Waldman, S. A.
(1999)
Biochemistry
38,
6441-6448[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 26.
Allgeier, A.,
Offermanns, V. S. J.,
Spicher, K.,
Schultz, G.,
and Dumont, J. E.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
13733-13735 27.
Tomic, M.,
Zivadinovic, D.,
Van Goor, F.,
Yuan, D.,
Koshimizu, T.,
and Stojilkovic, S. S.
(1999)
J. Neurosci.
19,
7721-7731 28.
Burris, T. P.,
Kanyicska, B.,
and Freeman, M. E.
(1991)
Eur. J. Pharmacol.
198,
223-225[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 29.
Freeman, M. E.,
Kanyicska, B.,
Lernat, A.,
and Nagy, G.
(2000)
Physiol. Rev.
80,
1523-1631 30.
Bluet-Pajot, M.-T.,
Epelbaum, J.,
Gourdji, D.,
Hammond, C.,
and Kordon, C.
(1998)
Cell. Mol. Neurobiol.
18,
101-123[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 31.
Abou-Samra, A.-B.,
Harwood, J. P.,
Manganiello, V. C.,
Catt, K. J.,
and Aguilera, G.
(1987)
J. Biol. Chem.
262,
1129-1136 32.
Hinkle, P. M.,
Nelson, E. J.,
and Ashworth, R.
(1996)
Trends Endocrinol. Metab.
7,
370-374[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 33.
Stojilkovic, S. S.,
Balla, T.,
Fukuda, S.,
Cesnjaj, M.,
Merelli, F.,
Krsmanovic, L. Z.,
and Catt, K. J.
(1992)
Endocrinology
130,
465-474[Abstract] 34.
Kanyicska, B.,
and Freeman, M. E.
(1993)
Am. J. Physiol.
265,
E601-E608[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 35.
Samson, W. K.
(1992)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
187,
590-595[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 36.
Koshimizu, T.,
Tomic, M.,
Wong, A. O. L.,
Zivadinovic, D.,
and Stojilkovic, S. S.
(2000)
Endocrinology
141,
4091-4099 37.
Garthwaite, J.,
Southam, E.,
Boulton, C. L.,
Nielsen, E. B.,
Schmidt, K.,
and Mayer, B.
(1995)
Mol. Pharmacol.
48,
184-188[Abstract] 38.
Olesen, S.-P.,
Drejer, J.,
Axelsson, O.,
Moldt, P.,
Bang, L.,
Nielsen-Kudsk, J. E.,
Busse, R.,
and Mulsch, A.
(1998)
Br. J. Pharmacol.
123,
299-309[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 39.
Missale, C.,
Nash, R.,
Robinson, S. W.,
Jaber, M.,
and Caron, M. G.
(1998)
Physiol. Rev.
78,
189-225 40.
Lussier, B. T.,
French, M. B.,
Moor, B. C.,
and Kraicer, J.
(1991)
Endocrinology
128,
592-603[Abstract] 41.
Lussier, B. T.,
French, M. B.,
Moor, B. C.,
and Kraicer, J.
(1991)
Endocrinology
128,
570-582[Abstract] 42.
Kwiecien, R.,
Tseeb, V.,
Kurchikov, A.,
Kordon, C.,
and Hammond, C.
(1997)
J. Physiol.
499,
613-623 43.
Guerineau, N.,
Corcuff, J.-B.,
Tabarin, A.,
and Mollard, P.
(1991)
Endocrinology
129,
409-420[Abstract] 44.
Kuryshev, Y. A.,
Childs, G. V.,
and Ritchie, A. K.
(1995)
Endocrinology
136,
3925-3935[Abstract] 45.
Fulton, D.,
Gratton, J.-P.,
McCabe, T. J.,
Fontana, J.,
Fujio, Y.,
Wlsh, K.,
Franke, T. F.,
Papapetropoulos, A.,
and Sessa, W. C.
(1999)
Nature
399,
65-70 46.
Dimmeler, S.,
Fleming, I.,
Fissithaler, B.,
Hermann, C.,
Busse, R.,
and Zeiher, A. M.
(1999)
Nature
399,
601-605[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 47.
Butt, E.,
Bernhardt, M.,
Smolenski, A.,
Kotsonis, P.,
Frohlich, L. G.,
Sickmann, A.,
Meyer, H. E.,
Lohmann, S. M.,
and Schmidt, H. H. H. W.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
5179-5187 48.
Zwiller, J.,
Revel, M. O.,
and Malvia, A. N.
(1985)
J. Biol. Chem.
260,
1350-1353 49.
Zwiller, J.,
Revel, M. O.,
and Basse, P.
(1981)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
101,
1383-1387 50.
Louis, J. C.,
Revel, M. O.,
and Zwiller, J.
(1993)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1177,
299-306[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 51.
Bredt, D. S.,
Ferris, C. D.,
and Snyder, S. H.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
10976-10981 52.
Beavo, J. A.
(1995)
Physiol. Rev.
75,
725-748 53.
Conti, M.
(2000)
Mol. Endocrinol.
14,
1317-1327 54.
Rybalkin, S. D.,
Rybalkina, I. G.,
Feil, R.,
Hofmann, F.,
and Beavo, J. A.
(2002)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
3310-3317
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Tsaneva-Atanasova, A. Sherman, F. van Goor, and S. S. Stojilkovic Mechanism of Spontaneous and Receptor-Controlled Electrical Activity in Pituitary Somatotrophs: Experiments and Theory J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2007; 98(1): 131 - 144. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Jiang and S. S Stojilkovic Molecular cloning and characterization of {alpha}1-soluble guanylyl cyclase gene promoter in rat pituitary cells J. Mol. Endocrinol., December 1, 2006; 37(3): 503 - 515. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Andric, T. S. Kostic, and S. S. Stojilkovic Contribution of Multidrug Resistance Protein MRP5 in Control of Cyclic Guanosine 5'-Monophosphate Intracellular Signaling in Anterior Pituitary Cells Endocrinology, July 1, 2006; 147(7): 3435 - 3445. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Agullo, D. Garcia-Dorado, N. Escalona, M. Ruiz-Meana, M. Mirabet, J. Inserte, and J. Soler-Soler Membrane association of nitric oxide-sensitive guanylyl cyclase in cardiomyocytes Cardiovasc Res, October 1, 2005; 68(1): 65 - 74. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. S. Kostic, S. A. Andric, and S. S. Stojilkovic Receptor-Controlled Phosphorylation of {alpha}1 Soluble Guanylyl Cyclase Enhances Nitric Oxide-Dependent Cyclic Guanosine 5'-Monophosphate Production in Pituitary Cells Mol. Endocrinol., February 1, 2004; 18(2): 458 - 470. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||