![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 19, 16505-16511, May 10, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
§,
,
,
**
From the
National Jewish Medical and Research Center,
Denver, Colorado 80206, the ** Department of Cell and
Structural Biology, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center,
Denver, Colorado 80220, the ¶ Department of Molecular and
Structural Biology, Århus University, DK-8000 Århus, Denmark, and
the
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Odense
University, DK-5230 Odense, Denmark
Received for publication, June 12, 2001, and in revised form, February 2, 2002
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Extracellular superoxide dismutase (EC-SOD) is an
antioxidant enzyme that attenuates brain and lung injury from oxidative stress. A polybasic region in the carboxyl terminus distinguishes EC-SOD from other superoxide dismutases and determines EC-SOD's tissue
half-life and affinity for heparin. There are two types of EC-SOD that
differ based on the presence or absence of this heparin-binding region.
It has recently been shown that proteolytic removal of the
heparin-binding region is an intracellular event (Enghild, J. J.,
Thogersen, I. B., Oury, T. D., Valnickova, Z., Hojrup, P.,
and Crapo, J. D. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 14818-14822). By using mammalian cell lines, we have now determined
that removal of the heparin-binding region occurs after passage through
the Golgi network but before being secreted into the extracellular space. Specific protease inhibitors and overexpression of intracellular proteases implicate furin as a processing protease. In
vitro experiments using furin and purified EC-SOD suggest that
furin proteolytically cleaves EC-SOD in the middle of the polybasic
region and then requires an additional carboxypeptidase to remove the
remaining lysines and arginines. A mutation in Arg213
renders EC-SOD resistant to furin processing. These results indicate that furin-dependent processing of EC-SOD is important for
determining the tissue distribution and half-life of EC-SOD.
The superoxide dismutases
(SOD)1 catalyze the
dismutation of two superoxide radicals into hydrogen peroxide and
oxygen. There are three mammalian superoxide dismutase (SOD) enzymes as
follows: an intracellular SOD (CuZn-SOD or SOD1), a mitochondrial SOD
(MnSOD or SOD2), and an extracellular SOD (EC-SOD or SOD3). EC-SOD is highly expressed in lungs and vascular tissues and is the major SOD in
the extracellular space (1). In animal models, EC-SOD has been shown to
attenuate tissue injury from hyperoxia (2), ischemia/reperfusion
(3-6), and hemorrhage (7).
A distinguishing feature of EC-SOD is its high affinity for heparin and
the extracellular matrix. Six basic amino acid residues (Arg-Lys-Lys-Arg-Arg-Arg) within the last 13 amino acid residues (8)
are essential for this high affinity (9, 10). Mutations within this
region lead to elevations of EC-SOD in plasma, presumably from
decreased affinity toward the extracellular matrix (11-13). Removal of
the polybasic region decreases the tissue half-life of EC-SOD by
~10-fold but does not affect the enzymatic activity of EC-SOD (14).
Therefore, the most likely function of the polybasic region is to
determine the bioavailability of EC-SOD within the extracellular matrix.
We have reported recently (15) that EC-SOD can be secreted in two forms
that have a different carboxyl terminus. These different forms of
EC-SOD are not because of mRNA differences but instead are due to
intracellular proteolytic processing of the carboxyl terminus
containing the polybasic residues. The cleaved EC-SOD has lower heparin
affinity because the heparin-binding region is absent. The proteolytic
removal of the carboxyl terminus could serve as a regulatory step by
altering the affinity of EC-SOD for the extracellular matrix. Indeed,
variability in the ratio of cleaved and intact EC-SOD has been observed
among different mouse tissues (15) and during lung development (16),
suggesting that there might be both spatial and temporal expression
patterns of proteolytic processing of EC-SOD.
To explore fully the significance of the heparin-binding region of
EC-SOD, it is necessary to determine how proteolytic processing occurs;
however, neither the mechanism nor the responsible processing protease
has been identified. In this current study we characterize the EC-SOD
processing pathway, and we identify furin as a putative processing
protease. The location of processing is shown to occur in a stretch of
6 consecutive basic amino acids within the last 13 amino acids and
depends on the presence of an arginine residue at position 213.
Reagents--
ECL Plus Western blotting detection reagents were
from Amersham Biosciences. RPMI 1640 medium, the RPMI 1640 medium
select amine kit, phosphate-buffered saline, Earle's balanced salt
solution, and penicillin/streptomycin were from Invitrogen. Protease
inhibitors of 3,4-dichloroisocoumarin, 1,10-phenanthroline (ICN), and
E64 (ICN) were kept in stock solution at Metabolic Labeling and Pulse Analysis--
Cells were grown in
tissue culture plates until 80% confluent according to the ATCC or
supplier guidelines. The cells were then washed twice with Earles'
balanced salt solution and incubated for 30 min in methionine-deficient
RPMI media. The cells were then incubated for 30 min in media
containing [35S]methionine (ICN). Cells were then rinsed
twice with serum-free media and incubated with unlabeled serum-free
media for 3 h.
Immunoprecipitations--
A polyclonal antiserum directed
against EC-SOD and monoclonal antibody for nerve growth factor
(provided by Dr. Rae Nishi, Oregon Health Sciences
University) were used to recover [35S]methionine-labeled
proteins as described previously (19-21). In brief, media from
metabolically labeled cells were removed, and protease inhibitors were
added (final concentration of 0.2 mM
3,4-dichloroisocoumarin, 0.04 mM E64, and 4 mM
1,10-phenanthroline). Cells were then washed twice with
phosphate-buffered saline and scraped free in 1 ml of lysis buffer (25 mM Tris-HCl, 500 mM NaCl, 5 mM
EDTA, pH 7.5, with 0.5% Triton X-100, and protease inhibitors). Cell
debris was pelleted by centrifugation. Samples were cleared by adding
10 µl of preimmune antiserum and 40 µl of protein G-Sepharose FF
(Amersham Biosciences), rotating at room temperature for 1 h,
pelleting by centrifugation, and then removing the supernatant. Subsequently 10 µl of primary antiserum and 40 µl of protein
G-Sepharose were added, and the mixture was rotated overnight at
4 °C. The following day the protein G-Sepharose-primary antibody
complex was pelleted by centrifugation and then washed five times with 500 mM NaCl, 25 mM Tris-HCl, 5 mM
EDTA, pH 7.5, with 0.5% Triton X-100, spun through 1 M
sucrose, 500 mM NaCl, 25 mM Tris-HCl, 5 mM EDTA, pH 7.5, and finally washed twice in 10 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM EDTA. The radiolabeled
proteins were recovered by boiling in reducing SDS sample buffer with
50 mM dithiothreitol and analyzed by PAGE.
PAGE--
We used SDS-12% polyacrylamide gels. Proteins were
visualized by immunoblotting with a polyclonal EC-SOD antibody or
autoradiography using a PhosphorImaging system (Molecular Dynamics).
Recombinant Virus Infections--
Vaccina viruses overexpressing
furin, PC6, and nerve growth factor using a cytomegalovirus promoter
were kindly provided by Dr. Gary Thomas, Vollum Institute. Adenovirus
overexpressing human EC-SOD using a cytomegalovirus promoter was
purchased from Gene Transfer Vector Core, University of Iowa College of
Medicine, Iowa City. Optimal multiplicity of infection (m.o.i.) was
determined empirically in each cell line in a 6-well plate. LoVo cells
were infected at 80% confluence; C6 and L2 cells were infected at 50% confluence. Virus was added to 700 µl of fresh media for each well
and then incubated at 37 °C. After 1 h, 3 ml of additional fresh media were added to each well, and the cells were kept overnight at 37 °C. Because LoVo cells secreted only a very small amount of
EC-SOD and the vaccinia virus was mildly toxic to these cells at our
working m.o.i., we augmented the secretion of EC-SOD in LoVo cells by
co-infecting them with an adenoviral vector that increased secretion of
EC-SOD. Nerve growth factor was used as a positive control for furin
activity and was completely processed at an m.o.i. of 20.
In Vitro Furin Activity Assays--
One unit of human
recombinant furin (~0.19 pmol) (Alexis) is defined as that able to
cleave 1 pmol of fluorescent substrate t-butoxycarbonyl-Arg-Val-Arg-Arg-7-amino-4-methylcoumarin
(Alexis) in 1 min. For both the mutant and wild type EC-SOD, 1 unit of furin was added per 100 pmol of EC-SOD in 25 µl of buffer (100 mM HEPES, 1 mM CaCl2, 0.5% Triton
X-100, 1 mM Protein Structure Determination--
The amino terminus was
sequenced using automated Edman degradation carried out in an Applied
Biosystems 477A automated protein sequencer with on-line analysis of
the phenylthiohydantoin using an Applied Biosystems 120A high pressure
liquid chromatography. The carboxyl terminus was determined by
electrospray mass spectrometry as follows. Four µl of EC-SOD (0.9 µg/µl) was reduced to 0.5 µl of EC-SOD with 1.55 M
dithiothreitol for 30 min. One µl of this solution was applied to a
microseparation gel loader tip packed with Poros 1 and eluted with 5 µl of 50% MeOH and 5% formic acid in water. The sample was then
analyzed on a Micromass Q-time of flight mass spectrometer
with a nanoflow source using the same solvent. Carbohydrate
residues were determined by measuring mass before and after treatment
with the exoglycosidase neuraminidase.
EC-SOD Processing Varies among Tissues and Cell
Lines--
Comparative immunoblotting of different human organs (Fig.
1A) revealed that the total
amount of EC-SOD protein was most abundant in the lung and least
abundant in the brain, similar to that reported previously (22) in
tissue activity assays. Moreover, immunoblotting revealed two distinct
isoforms of EC-SOD migrating as 34- and 32-kDa species. We have
demonstrated recently (15) that the lower molecular weight band
represents EC-SOD that is missing the 13 carboxyl-terminal amino acids
that are essential for heparin binding. Processing of EC-SOD varied
among tissues, being higher in lung, liver, and heart yet notably low
in the kidney and brain. The differences persisted from experiment to
experiment, suggesting that the presence of the heparin-binding region
might be more important in the kidney and brain.
To study intermediates in the processing of EC-SOD, we screened 15 mammalian cell lines (see "Experimental Procedures") for secretion
of EC-SOD. Cells were screened by pulse labeling with [35S]methionine and then immunoprecipitating the media
and lysate. In addition to the rat lung L2 cell line described
previously, we identified rat glial C6 cells as capable of secreting
EC-SOD (Fig. 1B). Both L2 and C6 lines secreted EC-SOD with
two molecular weights corresponding to the intact and proteolytically
processed EC-SOD. The difference in molecular weight persisted when
immunoprecipitates were treated with peptide:N-glycosidase
F, which removes carbohydrate chains from N-linked residues
by cleaving the asparagine-GlcNAc bond (23) (data not shown). This
suggested that the lower molecular weight EC-SOD secreted into cell
culture was not a glycosylation variant. Interestingly, the (L2) lung
cells had a similar percentage of processing as lung tissue (42 ± 3 versus 45 ± 3%), and the brain cells had a similar
level of processing as brain tissue (21 ± 4 versus
19 ± 7%).
Although other cell lines, such as human aortic smooth muscle cells,
are known to make EC-SOD mRNA (24), we were unable to detect
secretion of EC-SOD protein by immunoblotting or pulse-chase analysis
in these cell lines. Because EC-SOD is a matrix protein, its secretion
may dependent on the presence of an intact extracellular matrix.
Therefore, the cell lines were grown on Matrigel and retested for
secretion of EC-SOD. Neither additional EC-SOD secretion nor a change
in the ratio of intact to cleaved EC-SOD was noted when cells were
grown on Matrigel. Therefore, secretion and proteolytic processing of
EC-SOD appear to be unaffected by the extracellular matrix.
Studies with Inhibitors of Secretory Vesicle
Trafficking--
Proteins that are destined for secretion pass from
the endoplasmic reticulum, through the Golgi network (TGN), and then
exit via the plasma membrane into the extracellular space. Although prior work (15) had suggested that EC-SOD was proteolytically processed
before it reached the extracellular space, we did not know the step at
which this processing occurred. To answer this question, we used
several techniques in an attempt to trap proteolytically processed
EC-SOD in cells. For instance, brefeldin A and nocodazole were used to
block transit from the endoplasmic reticulum, and the cells were held
at 20 °C to accumulate cargo proteins in the TGN. These experiments
neither diminished the percentage of cleaved EC-SOD in the media nor
caused an intracellular accumulation of cleaved EC-SOD (Fig.
2). Thus, proteolytic processing of
EC-SOD appeared to occur after passage through the TGN. To determine whether processing occurred in a pH-sensitive vesicle, similar experiments were performed with bafilomycin; however, bafilomycin treatment did not inhibit proteolytic processing. The sensitivity of
EC-SOD processing to calcium concentrations remains unknown because we
were unable to remove calcium completely from the media without causing
severe cell toxicity (25). Thus, proteolytic processing of EC-SOD most
likely occurs after transit through the Golgi and before reaching the
extracellular space.
EC-SOD Proteolytic Processing by Proprotein Convertases--
Many
extracellular proteins undergo proteolytic processing during their
transit through the secretory pathway. To facilitate characterization
and identification of the class of EC-SOD processing protease, protease
inhibitors were added during the pulse-chase experiments. At multiple
concentrations, neither cysteine protease inhibitors (E64), serine
protease inhibitors (phenylmethysulfonyl fluoride), nor matrix
metallo-protease inhibitors (1,10-phenanthroline) were able to inhibit
selectively secretion of cleaved EC-SOD without causing significant
cell toxicity. Because a few extracellular proteins have been reported
to be proteolytically processed by cytosolic proteasomes, the
proteasome inhibitor lactacystin was added during the chase (26);
however, there was no inhibition of proteolytic cleavage. The failure
to prevent processing using broad inhibitors of vesicular trafficking
and protease activity led us to consider more specific approaches to
identify the processing protease.
Because proteolytic processing occurred near polybasic residues and
after transit through the TGN, the role of the PC proteases was
examined. We found that a previously described inhibitor of PC
proteases, decanoyl-Arg-Val-Lys-Arg-chloromethyl ketone
(Dec-RVKR-CMK), blocked proteolytic processing of EC-SOD at low
micromolar concentrations (Fig. 3). At
similar concentrations neither the related elastase inhibitor
N-methoxysuccinyl-Ala-Ala-Pro-Val-chloromethyl ketone nor
the trypsin inhibitor tosyl-L-lysine chloromethyl ketone
had any effect on proteolytic processing of EC-SOD. These results suggested that the PC family of proteases is required for EC-SOD processing.
To study the PC family of proteases, we used multiple different
approaches, all of which implicated furin as an EC-SOD processing protease. First, we examined whether a cell line that lacked PC activity would proteolytically process EC-SOD. LoVo cells, which are
well known to be deficient in furin activity (27), secreted only intact
EC-SOD (Fig. 4A). Second,
overexpression of furin enhanced EC-SOD processing in C6 and L2 cells
(Fig. 4B) and restored EC-SOD processing in the
furin-deficient LoVo cells (Fig. 4C). Overexpression of a
related PC protease, PC6, did not restore EC-SOD processing in LoVo
cells. Third, we found that recombinant furin was capable of cleaving
both purified and recombinant human EC-SOD in vitro (Fig.
5).
Determination of the Amino Acid Residues Involved in Proteolytic
Processing of EC-SOD by Furin--
Although these experiments strongly
suggested that furin was involved in EC-SOD processing, several
observations led us to examine further the proteolytic processing of
EC-SOD by furin. First, although both recombinant furin and purified
furin were capable of proteolytically processing intact EC-SOD in
vitro, immunoblotting revealed that the molecular weight of the
furin treated EC-SOD was higher than that of cleaved EC-SOD (Fig. 5). This suggested that furin cleaved EC-SOD after
Glu209 and that there might be an additional
protease that trimmed the remaining amino acid residues to
Glu209. To test this hypothesis we treated EC-SOD first
with furin and then with carboxypeptidase B. After only 30 min, all of
the furin-processed EC-SOD migrated the same distance as cleaved
EC-SOD, suggesting that a carboxypeptidase was capable of rapidly
trimming the remaining basic residues from furin-treated EC-SOD.
Although the identity of the EC-SOD carboxypeptidase is unknown, it has
been reported recently (28-30) that intracellular carboxypeptidases D
and E are capable of removing carboxyl-terminal basic residues of
peptide hormones such as insulin. Furin processing was also inhibited by specific inhibitors such as Dec-RVKR-CMK (Fig. 5) and nonspecific inhibitors such as zinc chloride (Fig. 5) and EDTA (not shown).
The second line of evidence that suggested that furin was not the only
processing protease was prior work in our laboratory that showed that
the carboxyl-terminal sequence of cleaved EC-SOD is
Glu206-His207-Ser208-Glu209
(15). This cleavage site is not consistent with previously published
data (31) that suggest that furin preferentially recognizes the
cleavage site sequence Arg-Xaa-(Lys/Arg)-Arg. Based on this consensus
site, one should expect furin to cleave EC-SOD after Arg210-Lys211-Lys212-Arg213.
However, human pro-parathyroid hormone (32), proalbumin (33), and
pro-protein C (34) also serve as furin substrates but do not have basic
P4 residues, although their P6 residues are all either Arg or Lys. Thus, an alternative cleavage site for EC-SOD could
be after
Arg210-Lys211-Lys212-Arg213-Arg214-Arg215.
In an attempt to resolve these discrepancies, purified human recombinant EC-SOD and furin were incubated at 37 °C and then subjected to protein sequencing. Edman degradation revealed that the
amino terminus was intact, suggesting that furin was indeed processing
the carboxyl terminus of EC-SOD. Mass spectrometric analysis of the
furin-cleaved EC-SOD revealed a number of peaks that could be
related to carboxyl-terminal cleavage (Table
I). Surprisingly, the mass spectrometry
results suggested that the carboxyl-terminal amino acids were both
Glu206-His207-Ser208-Glu209-Arg210-Lys211
and
His207-Ser208-Glu209-Arg210-Lys211-Lys212.
These results suggest that furin cleaves in the heparin-binding region
but left some ambiguity as to which residue was crucial for furin
processing. Although a silver stain of the recombinant furin
preparations revealed that the predominant protein was furin, we cannot
exclude that there was a small amount of carboxypeptidase activity
responsible for the loss of the carboxyl-terminal arginines.
Because furin typically processes proteins with consensus sites
RX(K/R)R or (K/R)XXX(K/R)R (31), we suspected
that the two potential cleavage sites would be at Arg213 or
Arg215. To help determine which of these two were most
likely, we purified EC-SOD from the serum of a patient homozygous for a
Arg213 In this report we have identified furin as an EC-SOD processing
candidate, at least for the initial step of proteolytic processing. Several lines of evidence strongly implicate furin as the processing protease in vivo. 1) LoVo cells, which are deficient in
furin activity, do not secrete cleaved EC-SOD. 2) EC-SOD can be cleaved by recombinant purified furin in vitro. 3) Processing is
inhibited by a specific furin inhibitor. 4) Processing occurs after
passage through the Golgi, consistent with the subcellular localization of furin (31); mutation within the furin consensus sequence hinders
processing both in vivo and in vitro. 5) Although
the carboxyl-terminal amino acid in fully processed EC-SOD is
Glu209, a carboxypeptidase is capable of trimming the
remaining basic residues back to Glu209, which is the
actual carboxyl-terminal amino acid in cleaved EC-SOD. Therefore,
proteolytic processing of EC-SOD likely occurs via a multistep
mechanism. In the first step, the endoprotease furin cleaves EC-SOD
within its polybasic site at Arg213. Subsequently, a
carboxypeptidase trims the remaining basic amino acid residues back to
Glu209. Although the carboxypeptidase that completes these final
step(s) has not yet been identified, potential candidates include
carboxypeptidase D and E (28-30).
Re-examining the results of several studies published previously
strengthens the evidence for a multistep mechanism. First, ~2-4% of
the population has a variant EC-SOD gene in which Arg213 is
substituted to Gly213 (11-13, 35). This mutation results
in the absence of cleaved EC-SOD in the serum (12, 18), and we found
that it rendered EC-SOD resistant to furin processing. Thus,
Arg213 was likely to play a crucial role in the initial
processing step. Second, studies of EC-SOD mutants revealed that when
the carboxyl-terminal residue is arginine, all the carboxyl-terminal
basic residues are rapidly removed by an unknown intracellular protease
(10). This strongly suggests the existence of an in vivo
carboxypeptidase that trims the remaining basic residues in a second
processing step.
The variability of EC-SOD processing among tissues might be explained
by two mechanisms. First, within organs, some cell types could secrete
only intact EC-SOD and some could secrete only cleaved EC-SOD. Second,
different cell types could secrete different ratios of intact to
cleaved EC-SOD depending on the efficiency of furin processing within
these cells. We identified three cell lines that consistently secrete
different ratios of cleaved and intact EC-SOD, suggesting that
individual cells might regulate intracellular proteolytic processing
EC-SOD. In LoVo cells, we were able to demonstrate that EC-SOD
processing could go from 0 to 100% depending on the relative
amounts of furin.
We propose that secretion of intact EC-SOD is useful for highly
localizing EC-SOD activity, whereas secretion of cleaved EC-SOD is
useful for a more generalized EC-SOD activity. For instance, organs
that are composed of millions of small identically functioning units,
such as the alveoli in the lung and the acinii in the liver, may not
need EC-SOD to be confined to the small functioning unit that secreted
it. In these organs, we found a mix of cleaved and intact EC-SOD. On
the other hand, organs such as the brain and kidney have millions of
units that do not function identically. In these organs we found mostly
intact EC-SOD. The diffuse distribution of EC-SOD in the lung (36) and
the highly localized distribution in the brain regions (37) have been
confirmed by immunolocalization, but these studies did not distinguish
between the distribution of intact and cleaved EC-SOD. Thus the
putative physiologic role of EC-SOD processing remains speculative, and
we are currently attempting to develop techniques that will distinguish
intact from cleaved EC-SOD in situ. Using intracellular
endoproteolytic cleavage to localize a protein is not unique to EC-SOD.
Bone morphogenetic protein 2/4 is hypothesized to have short or long
range activity, depending on the order of processing by intracellular
endoprotease (38-40). Thus, we propose that tissues regulate how
tightly localized their EC-SOD activity is by regulating the amount and
percentage of EC-SOD that is proteolytically cleaved.
The molecular mechanisms that affect tissue distribution likely involve
regulation of the polybasic residues within the intact carboxyl
terminus (41-44). Two lines of evidence suggest that proteolytic processing of the heparin-binding region is paramount. First, EC-SOD
variants that do not have the heparin-binding region have markedly
shortened tissue half-lives (14, 45). Second, mutations within the
heparin-binding region increase the plasma levels of EC-SOD (12, 46,
47). Thus, proteolytic processing of EC-SOD by furin is likely to be
important in determining both the location and half-life of EC-SOD in
the extracellular matrix. The clinical significance of proteolytic
processing remains unknown, but it has been shown recently (13) that it
inversely correlates with multiple risk factors for cardiovascular disease.
Our results demonstrate that furin is capable of proteolytic processing
of EC-SOD in a two-step process. In the first step, furin cleaves
EC-SOD within the heparin-binding polybasic region. A second
carboxypeptidase is then necessary to remove remaining basic residues
so that the final carboxyl-terminal residue is glutamic acid. Other
intracellular processing proteases related to furin, such as PC7, have
similar consensus sites and therefore cannot be ruled out as the
authentic processing proteases in vivo. The consequence of
processing is that it diminishes the affinity of EC-SOD toward heparin.
This potential regulatory mechanism could be exploited to change the
tissue mobility of EC-SOD; however, because furin is an essential,
ubiquitous enzyme, manipulation of its activity would have to be
localized to specific organs.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
20 °C. All other reagents were purchased from Sigma. Human endothelial cells HUV-EC-C (CRL-1730), RAW cells (TIB-71), transformed bronchial epithelial BEAS-2B
(CRL-9609), rat glial tumor C6 (CCL-107), rat lung L2 epithelial-like
cells (CCl-149), human foreskin fibroblasts (CRL-2076; CRL-1881), mouse embryo fibroblasts (CCL-96), A549 human lung epithelial (CCL-185), human aortic smooth muscle (CRL-1999), LoVo human intestinal (CCL-229), mouse mast (CRL-8306), and RL-65 rat epithelial (CRL-10354) cells were
obtained from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA). Human
aortic (AOSMC 5720-1) and pulmonary artery (PASMC 1018) smooth muscle
cells were obtained from BioWhittaker. Human tissue was obtained from
multiple autopsy specimens of apparently healthy tissue. EC-SOD was
purified as described previously (17). Human recombinant EC-SOD was
produced in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Mutant human furin was
obtained by purifying EC-SOD from the plasma of a subject who was
homozygous for the Arg213
Gly mutation. This mutation
is due to a C to G transversion and is associated with markedly
elevated levels of EC-SOD in the serum (18).
-mercaptoethanol, pH 7.5) and incubated at
37 °C overnight. Reactions were stopped with 5 volumes of 1 mM ZnCl2 and protease inhibitors (final
concentration of 2 mM 3,4-dichloroisocoumarin, 0.4 mM E64, and 40 mM 1,10-phenanthroline). After
reactions were stopped, the samples were immediately boiled for 5 min
in SDS samples buffer with 50 mM dithiothreitol. Furin activity was confirmed using a Spectrofluorometer (380 nm excitation and 460 nm emission) and the fluorescent furin substrate. EC-SOD processing was determined by Western blotting and quantitated using ECL
imaging system (Molecular Dynamics).
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (24K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
The ratio of intact to cleaved EC-SOD varies
among tissue types and cell types. A, 50 µg of lung tissue
and 100 µg of homogenized kidney, liver, heart, and brain tissue were
submitted to reducing SDS-PAGE followed by immunoblotting for EC-SOD.
The lung had the highest amount of EC-SOD, followed by the kidney,
liver, heart and brain (exposure time for lung 10 s, kidney
30 s, liver and heart 1 min, and brain 10 min) Processing of
EC-SOD was lowest in brain and highest in the lung. B,
pulse-chase labeling followed by immunoprecipitation with EC-SOD
antibody also revealed different ratios of intact and cleaved EC-SOD
among cells lines. The L2 cell line (rat lung epithelial derived)
secreted more processed EC-SOD than the C6 cell line (rat glial
cell).

View larger version (41K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Inhibition of the secretory pathway does not
lead to accumulation of cleaved EC-SOD. If the secretory pathways
were blocked after proteolytic processing of EC-SOD, we might expect an
intracellular accumulation of cleaved EC-SOD. To test this hypothesis,
various techniques were used to block the secretory pathway. First, L2
cells were grown to confluence and then pulsed for 15 min with
[35S]methionine. A, control pulse-chase at
37 °C. There is only intact EC-SOD in the lysate, but both cleaved
and intact are present in the media after 1 h. B,
brefeldin A, which prevents transit from the endoplasmic reticulum to
the Golgi complex, inhibits secretion of EC-SOD but does not lead to
intracellular accumulation of EC-SOD. C, reduction of
temperature to 20 °C leads to accumulation of cargo proteins in the
TGN, but does not lead to intracellular accumulation of cleaved EC-SOD.
Secretion of EC-SOD is delayed but appears normal. These experiments
suggest that proteolytic processing occurs after transit through the
TGN.

View larger version (14K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
A furin convertase inhibitor specifically
inhibits proteolytic processing of EC-SOD in cells. L2 cells were
labeled with [35S]methionine and then chased for 2 h
in the presence of the protease inhibitors. A furin-specific inhibitor
(Dec-RVKR-CMK) prevented proteolytic processing at micromolar
concentrations. Similar results were seen when the experiment was
repeated with C6 cells.

View larger version (19K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Furin is the EC-SOD-processing protease.
A, LoVo cells, which are deficient in furin activity (27),
have only intact EC-SOD in both the lysate and media. B,
overexpression of furin with a recombinant vaccina virus
(VVfurin) increased proteolytic processing in both
L2 and C6 cell lines. C, when EC-SOD is overexpressed in
LoVo cells using an adenoviral vector
(AdEC-SODD), there is still no
processing. When LoVo cells are infected with both AdEC-SOD
and VVfurin, processing increases with increasing m.o.i. of
VVfurin. Co-infection with AdEC-SOD and a
vaccinia viral vector that expresses the intracellular
processing protease PC6 (VVPC6) did not result in EC-SOD
processing.

View larger version (15K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Proteolytic processing of EC-SOD in
vitro. A, 1 unit of furin was added to 150 pmol of
human EC-SOD either purified from aortas or made recombinantly in
Chinese hamster ovary cells. Immunoblotting revealed that the molecular
weight of EC-SOD decreased after treatment with furin; however, the
high molecular weight band did not migrate completely to the position
of the fully processed EC-SOD band, suggesting that there was
incomplete proteolytic processing. Subsequent treatment with 1 unit of
carboxypeptidase B (CPB) resulted in complete processing
after 30 min. Furin processing was inhibited in the presence of a furin
specific inhibitor (Dec-RVKR-CMK) 1.3 µM and
ZnCl2 1 mM. B, scanning densitometry
of the 1st three lanes of the purified EC-SOD shows that the
intermediate band of furin-treated EC-SOD migrates to position of the
fully processed EC-SOD after treatment with carboxypeptidase B.
Mass spectrometric analysis of EC-SOD treated with furin
Gly mutation. Western blot of this protein
showed predominantly unprocessed EC-SOD (Fig.
6). Furthermore, this mutation rendered the protein resistant to proteolytic processing by furin but not other
proteases that can proteolytically cleave EC-SOD in vitro (e.g. trypsin). This suggested that furin processes EC-SOD
at Arg213 and then a carboxypeptidase trims the remaining
basic residues back to Glu209 (Fig.
7).

View larger version (11K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
The Arg213
Gly mutation prevents furin processing. Western blotting of
10 ng of EC-SOD reveals that wild type EC-SOD exists as a mixture of
cleaved and intact protein, but EDC-SOD from a subject homozygous for
the Arg213
Gly mutation is associated with
predominantly unprocessed protein. Furthermore, this mutation renders
EC-SOD resistant to proteolytic processing by furin but not other
proteases such as trypsin.

View larger version (15K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Suggested scheme for proteolytic processing
of EC-SOD. Furin cleaves intact EC-SOD (A) within the
polybasic region (cross-hatched) of the carboxyl terminus.
The resulting EC-SOD protein is partially processed and has a carboxyl
terminus of Arg213. B, an unknown
carboxypeptidase(s) then trims the remaining carboxyl-terminal residues
to glutamic acid to yield fully processed EC-SOD (C). The
Arg213
Gly mutation prevents furin from proteolytically
processing EC-SOD.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants HL-04407, HL-31992, and HL-42444.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§ To whom correspondence should be addressed: National Jewish Medical and Research Center, K736A, 1400 Jackson St., Denver, CO 80206. Tel.: 303-398-1639; Fax 303-270-2249; E-mail: BowlerR@njc.org.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, February 22, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M105409200
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: SOD, superoxide dismutase; EC-SOD, extracellular superoxide dismutase; m.o.i., multiplicity of infection; TGN, trans-Golgi network; Dec-RVKR-CMK, decanoyl-Arg-Val-Lys-Arg-chloromethyl ketone; PC, proprotein convertase.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Marklund, S. L.
(1982)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
79,
7634-7638 |
| 2. |
Folz, R. J.,
Abushamaa, A. M.,
and Suliman, H. B.
(1999)
J. Clin. Invest.
103,
1055-1066[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 3. |
Chen, E. P.,
Bittner, H. B.,
Davis, R. D.,
Folz, R. J.,
and Van Trigt, P.
(1996)
Circulation
94, suppl. II,
412-417 |
| 4. |
Chen, E. P.,
Bittner, H. B.,
Davis, R. D.,
Van Trigt, P.,
and Folz, R. J.
(1998)
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.
115,
450-459 |
| 5. |
Sheng, H.,
Brady, T. C.,
Pearlstein, R. D.,
Crapo, J. D.,
and Warner, D. S.
(1999)
Neurosci. Lett.
267,
13-16[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 6. |
Sheng, H.,
Kudo, M.,
Mackensen, G. B.,
Pearlstein, R. D.,
Crapo, J. D.,
and Warner, D. S.
(2000)
Exp. Neurol.
163,
392-398[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 7. |
Bowler, R. P.,
Arcaroli, J.,
Crapo, J. D.,
Ross, A.,
Slot, J. W.,
and Abraham, E.
(2001)
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.
164,
290-294 |
| 8. |
Hjalmarsson, K.,
Marklund, S. L.,
Engstrom, A.,
and Edlund, T.
(1987)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
84,
6340-6344 |
| 9. |
Adachi, T.,
Kodera, T.,
Ohta, H.,
Hayashi, K.,
and Hirano, K.
(1992)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
297,
155-161[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 10. |
Sandstrom, J.,
Carlsson, L.,
Marklund, S. L.,
and Edlund, T.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
18205-18209 |
| 11. |
Adachi, T.,
Morihara, N.,
Yamazaki, N.,
Yamada, H.,
Futenma, A.,
Kato, K.,
and Hirano, K.
(1996)
J. Biochem. (Tokyo)
120,
184-188 |
| 12. |
Adachi, T.,
Yamada, H.,
Yamada, Y.,
Morihara, N.,
Yamazaki, N.,
Murakami, T.,
Futenma, A.,
Kato, K.,
and Hirano, K.
(1996)
Biochem. J.
313,
235-239[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 13. |
Marklund, S. L.,
Nilsson, P.,
Israelsson, K.,
Schampi, I.,
Peltonen, M.,
and Asplund, K.
(1997)
J. Intern. Med.
242,
5-14[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 14. |
Karlsson, K.,
Sandstrom, J.,
Edlund, A.,
and Marklund, S. L.
(1994)
Lab. Invest.
70,
705-710[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 15. |
Enghild, J. J.,
Thogersen, I. B.,
Oury, T. D.,
Valnickova, Z.,
Hojrup, P.,
and Crapo, J. D.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
14818-14822 |
| 16. |
Nozik-Grayck, E.,
Dieterle, C. S.,
Piantadosi, C. A.,
Enghild, J. J.,
and Oury, T. D.
(2000)
Am. J. Physiol.
279,
L977-L984 |
| 17. |
Oury, T. D.,
Crapo, J. D.,
Valnickova, Z.,
and Enghild, J. J.
(1996)
Biochem. J.
317,
51-57[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 18. |
Folz, R. J.,
Peno-Green, L.,
and Crapo, J. D.
(1994)
Hum. Mol. Genet.
3,
2251-2254 |
| 19. |
Salvesen, G.,
and Enghild, J. J.
(1991)
Biomed. Biochim. Acta
50,
665-671[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 20. | Salvesen, G., and Nagase, H. (1989) in Proteolytic Enzymes: A Practical Approach (Beynon, R. J. , and Bond, J. S., eds) , pp. 259-264, IRL Press at Oxford University Press, Oxford |
| 21. |
Thogersen, I. B.,
and Enghild, J. J.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
18700-18709 |
| 22. |
Marklund, S. L.
(1984)
J. Clin. Invest.
74,
1398-1403[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 23. |
Plummer, T. H.,
Elder, J. H.,
Alexander, S.,
Phelan, A. W.,
and Tarentino, A. L.
(1984)
J. Biol. Chem.
259,
10700-10704 |
| 24. |
Fukai, T.,
Siegfried, M. R.,
Ushio-Fukai, M.,
Griendling, K. K.,
and Harrison, D. G.
(1999)
Circ. Res.
85,
23-28 |
| 25. |
Vey, M.,
Schafer, W.,
Berghofer, S.,
Klenk, H. D.,
and Garten, W.
(1994)
J. Cell Biol.
127,
1829-1842 |
| 26. |
Fenteany, G.,
Standaert, R. F.,
Lane, W. S.,
Choi, S.,
Corey, E. J.,
and Schreiber, S. L.
(1995)
Science
268,
726-731 |
| 27. |
Takahashi, S.,
Kasai, K.,
Hatsuzawa, K.,
Kitamura, N.,
Misumi, Y.,
Ikehara, Y.,
Murakami, K.,
and Nakayama, K.
(1993)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
195,
1019-1026[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 28. |
Song, L.,
and Fricker, L. D.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
25007-25013 |
| 29. |
Varlamov, O., Wu, F.,
Shields, D.,
and Fricker, L. D.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
14040-14045 |
| 30. |
Fricker, L. D.
(1988)
Annu. Rev. Physiol.
50,
309-321[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 31. |
Nakayama, K.
(1997)
Biochem. J.
327,
625-635[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 32. |
Hendy, G. N.,
Bennett, H. P.,
Gibbs, B. F.,
Lazure, C.,
Day, R.,
and Seidah, N. G.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
9517-9525 |
| 33. |
Misumi, Y.,
Oda, K.,
Fujiwara, T.,
Takami, N.,
Tashiro, K.,
and Ikehara, Y.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
16954-16959 |
| 34. |
Drews, R.,
Paleyanda, R. K.,
Lee, T. K.,
Chang, R. R.,
Rehemtulla, A.,
Kaufman, R. J.,
Drohan, W. N.,
and Lubon, H.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
10462-10466 |
| 35. |
Karlsson, K.,
Sandstrom, J.,
Edlund, A.,
Edlund, T.,
and Marklund, S. L.
(1993)
Free Radic. Biol. Med.
14,
185-190[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 36. |
Oury, T. D.,
Chang, L. Y.,
Marklund, S. L.,
Day, B. J.,
and Crapo, J. D.
(1994)
Lab. Invest.
70,
889-898[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 37. |
Oury, T. D.,
Card, J. P.,
and Klann, E.
(1999)
Brain Res.
850,
96-103[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 38. |
Cui, Y.,
Jean, F.,
Thomas, G.,
and Christian, J. L.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
4735-4743[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 39. |
Nabarra, B.,
Casanova, M.,
Paris, D.,
Paly, E.,
Toyoma, K.,
Ceballos, I.,
and London, J.
(1997)
Mech. Ageing Dev.
96,
59-73[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 40. |
Nakayama, T.,
Cui, Y.,
and Christian, J. L.
(2000)
Cell. Mol. Life Sci.
57,
943-956[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 41. |
Adachi, T.,
Ohta, H.,
Yamada, H.,
Futenma, A.,
Kato, K.,
and Hirano, K.
(1992)
Clin. Chim. Acta
212,
89-102[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 42. |
Adachi, T.,
Yamazaki, N.,
Tasaki, H.,
Toyokawa, T.,
Yamashita, K.,
and Hirano, K.
(1998)
Biol. & Pharm. Bull.
21,
1090-1093[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 43. |
Karlsson, K.,
Edlund, A.,
Sandstrom, J.,
and Marklund, S. L.
(1993)
Biochem. J.
290,
623-626[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 44. |
Lookene, A.,
Stenlund, P.,
and Tibell, L. A.
(2000)
Biochemistry
39,
230-236[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 45. |
Kalra, J.,
Rajput, A. H.,
Mantha, S. V.,
and Prasad, K.
(1992)
Mol. Cell. Biochem.
110,
165-168[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 46. |
Yamada, H.,
Yamada, Y.,
Adachi, T.,
Fukatsu, A.,
Sakuma, M.,
Futenma, A.,
and Kakumu, S.
(2000)
Nephron
84,
218-223[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 47. |
Yamada, H.,
Yamada, Y.,
Adachi, T.,
Goto, H.,
Ogasawara, N.,
Futenma, A.,
Kitano, M.,
Miyai, H.,
Fukatsu, A.,
Hirano, K.,
and Kakumu, S.
(1997)
Jpn. J. Hum. Genet.
42,
353-356[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. V. Petersen, T. Kristensen, J. S. Petersen, L. Ramsgaard, T. D. Oury, J. D. Crapo, N. C. Nielsen, and J. J. Enghild The Folding of Human Active and Inactive Extracellular Superoxide Dismutases Is an Intracellular Event J. Biol. Chem., May 30, 2008; 283(22): 15031 - 15036. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R P Young, R Hopkins, P N Black, C Eddy, L Wu, G D Gamble, G D Mills, J E Garrett, T E Eaton, and M I Rees Functional variants of antioxidant genes in smokers with COPD and in those with normal lung function Thorax, May 1, 2006; 61(5): 394 - 399. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Tan, J. S. Lee, M. L. Manni, C. L. Fattman, J. M. Tobolewski, M. Zheng, J. K. Kolls, T. R. Martin, and T. D. Oury Inflammatory Cells as a Source of Airspace Extracellular Superoxide Dismutase after Pulmonary Injury Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., February 1, 2006; 34(2): 226 - 232. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. D. Nguyen, S. Itoh, V. Jeney, H. Yanagisawa, M. Fujimoto, M. Ushio-Fukai, and T. Fukai Fibulin-5 Is a Novel Binding Protein for Extracellular Superoxide Dismutase Circ. Res., November 26, 2004; 95(11): 1067 - 1074. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Tan, C. L. Fattman, S. C. Watkins, and T. D. Oury Redistribution of pulmonary EC-SOD after exposure to asbestos J Appl Physiol, November 1, 2004; 97(5): 2006 - 2013. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. P. Bowler, M. Nicks, K. Tran, G. Tanner, L.-Y. Chang, S. K. Young, and G. S. Worthen Extracellular Superoxide Dismutase Attenuates Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Neutrophilic Inflammation Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., October 1, 2004; 31(4): 432 - 439. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. B. Mamo, H. B. Suliman, B.-L. Giles, R. L. Auten, C. A. Piantadosi, and E. Nozik-Grayck Discordant Extracellular Superoxide Dismutase Expression and Activity in Neonatal Hyperoxic Lung Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., August 1, 2004; 170(3): 313 - 318. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Aa. Olsen, S. V. Petersen, T. D. Oury, Z. Valnickova, I. B. Thogersen, T. Kristensen, R. P. Bowler, J. D. Crapo, and J. J. Enghild The Intracellular Proteolytic Processing of Extracellular Superoxide Dismutase (EC-SOD) is a Two-step Event J. Biol. Chem., May 21, 2004; 279(21): 22152 - 22157. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. V. Petersen, T. D. Oury, L. Ostergaard, Z. Valnickova, J. Wegrzyn, I. B. Thogersen, C. Jacobsen, R. P. Bowler, C. L. Fattman, J. D. Crapo, et al. Extracellular Superoxide Dismutase (EC-SOD) Binds to Type I Collagen and Protects Against Oxidative Fragmentation J. Biol. Chem., April 2, 2004; 279(14): 13705 - 13710. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
< |