Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M109518200 on February 26, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 19, 16559-16566, May 10, 2002
Calcium Influx Factor from Cytochrome P-450 Metabolism and
Secretion-like Coupling Mechanisms for Capacitative Calcium Entry
in Corneal Endothelial Cells*
Qiang
Xie,
Yan
Zhang,
Changbin
Zhai, and
Joseph A.
Bonanno
From the School of Optometry, Indiana University,
Bloomington, Indiana 47405
Received for publication, October 2, 2001, and in revised form, February 19, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
Notwithstanding extensive efforts, the mechanism
of capacitative calcium entry (CCE) remains unclear. Two seemingly
opposed theories have been proposed: secretion-like coupling
(Patterson, R. L., van Rossum, D. B., and Gill, D. L. (1999) Cell 98, 487-499) and the calcium influx factor
(CIF) (Randriamampita, C., and Tsien, R. Y. (1993)
Nature 364, 809-814). In the current study, a
combinatorial approach was taken to investigate the mechanism of CCE in
corneal endothelial cells. Induction of cytochrome P-450s by
-naphthoflavone (BN) enhanced CCE measured by Sr2+ entry
after store depletion. 5,6-Epoxyeicosatrienoic acid (5,6-EET), a
proposed CIF generated by cytochrome P-450s (Rzigalinski, B. A.,
Willoughby, K. A., Hoffman, S. W., Falck, J. R., and
Ellis, E. F. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 175-182), induced Ca2+ entry. Both BN-enhanced CCE and the
5,6-EET-induced Ca2+ entry were inhibited by the CCE
blocker 2-aminoethoxydiphenyl borate, indicating a role for
cytochrome P-450s in CCE. Treatment with calyculin A (CalyA), which
causes condensation of cortical cytoskeleton, inhibited CCE. The actin
polymerization inhibitor cytochalasin D partially reversed the
inhibition of CCE by CalyA, suggesting a secretion-like coupling
mechanism for CCE. However, CalyA could not inhibit CCE in BN-treated
cells, and 5,6-EET caused a partial activation of CCE in CalyA-treated
cells. These results further support the notion that cytochrome P-450
metabolites may be CIFs. The vesicular transport inhibitor brefeldin A
inhibited CCE in both vehicle- and BN-treated cells. Surprisingly,
Sr2+ entry in the absence of store depletion was enhanced
in BN-treated cells, which was also inhibited by 2-aminoethoxydiphenyl
borate. An integrative model suggests that both CIF from cytochrome
P-450 metabolism and secretion-like coupling mechanisms play roles in CCE in corneal endothelial cells.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
A wide variety of ligands initiate responses through the
process of calcium signaling (1). Ligand-induced generation of intracellular calcium signaling involves generation of inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate
(IP3)1 and
diacylglycerol by phospholipase C. The binding of IP3 to IP3 receptors (IP3R), which are located in the
membrane of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), activates the intrinsic
Ca2+ channel and releases Ca2+ from the ER (the
Ca2+ stores) into the cytosol. The release of
Ca2+ is closely followed by entry of extracellular
Ca2+ into the cytoplasm across the plasma membrane (PM).
This process is called "capacitative calcium entry" (CCE) or
"store-operated calcium entry" (2-4). The signal for activation of
PM Ca2+ channels, termed store-operated Ca2+
channels (SOC), appears to be the depletion of the ER Ca2+
stores. CCE can be alternatively induced by emptying the
Ca2+ store with the use of inhibitors of the
sarco-endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ ATPase (SERCA), which
actively transports Ca2+ from the cytosol into the ER (3).
For CCE, answers to two main questions remain elusive: 1) What are the
molecular identities of SOCs? and 2) What are the mechanisms linking
store depletion to calcium influx? Recently, homologues of
Drosophila transient receptor potential (TRP) channels have been postulated to be SOCs (5, 6). In the current study, we addressed
the second question only. The conformational coupling model, suggesting
that IP3Rs activate SOCs/TRPs, was recently favored
(7-12). However, this model was challenged by the finding that cells
lacking IP3R have normal SOC activity (13, 14). Furthermore, 2-aminoethoxydiphenyl borate (2-APB), a drug thought to be
a specific inhibitor of IP3R, blocks the CCE pathway
independently of IP3R (13-18). Alternatively, a
secretion-like coupling model was put forward based on the fact that
reorganization of the cortical actin cytoskeleton modulates CCE (19).
Formation of a tight actin layer subjacent to the PM displaces the
cortical ER and inhibits CCE, whereas CCE is not affected by whole cell
actin disassembly. The secretion-like coupling model was further
supported by a study in Xenopus oocytes, showing that
SNAP-25, a component of the vesicle fusion machinery, is required for
CCE (20). However, the secretion-like coupling model was also
challenged by a study on the rat basophilic cell line (21), showing
that none of the maneuvers that alter the actin cytoskeleton affects
Icrac, the best characterized
store-operated Ca2+ current. It seems that different cells
may possess distinct mechanisms for CCE. A seemingly opposed model
suggests that store depletion causes release of a soluble factor called
calcium influx factor (CIF), which activates SOCs in the PM. Extraction
of CIFs has been documented by several groups (22-24). However, the
chemical nature of CIFs has not been resolved. Cytochrome P-450
metabolites have been proposed to act as CIFs based on the finding that
cytochrome P-450 inhibitors inhibit CCE (25-29). Several recent
studies provided more evidence for the role of cytochrome P-450s in CCE
(29-31). In particular, 5,6-epoxyeicosatrienoic acid (5,6-EET), one of the metabolites of cytochrome P-450 epoxygenases, was suggested to act
as a CIF (29, 30). Several recent reviews on the CCE mechanism are
available (4, 12, 32).
The corneal endothelium is a monolayer of cells located at the
posterior surface of the cornea. This cell layer plays a critical role
in regulating the hydration and transparency of the cornea. Ion and
fluid transport by the corneal endothelium control the connective
tissue (stroma) hydration (33, 34). In corneal endothelial cells,
purinergic agonists and the SERCA inhibitor CPA induce CCE (35). CCE is
also important in regulating bicarbonate flux across the corneal
endothelium,2 which is
essential for the transparency of the cornea.
In the current study, the secretion-like coupling and CIF models were
examined using a combinatorial approach in corneal endothelial cells.
The CCE blocker 2-APB inhibited both
-naphthoflavone (BN)-enhanced CCE and 5,6-EET-induced [Ca2+]i elevation,
indicating that cytochrome P-450 metabolites of arachidonic acids (AA)
may be CIFs. Treatment with calyculin A (CalyA) inhibited CCE, which
was partially reversed by cytochalasin D, suggesting a secretion-like
coupling mechanism for CCE. However, CalyA had no effect on BN-enhanced
CCE. The vesicular transport inhibitor brefeldin A (BFA) inhibited CCE
in both vehicle- and BN-treated cells. Surprisingly, Sr2+
entry without store depletion was enhanced in BN-treated cells, which
was inhibitable by 2-APB. These results suggest that both the
secretion-like coupling and CIF mechanisms play roles in CCE. An
integrative model of CCE is discussed.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Cell Culture--
Bovine corneal endothelial cells were cultured
to confluence on glass coverslips. Briefly, primary cultures from fresh
cow eyes were established in T-25 flasks in 3 ml of Dulbecco's
modified Eagle's medium, 10% bovine calf serum with antibiotic
antimycotic agents (100 units/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin,
and 0.25 µg/ml fungizone); gassed with 5% CO2-95% air
at 37 °C; and fed every 2-3 days. These cells were subcultured to
coverslips. The cells were transferred to 0.5% serum with Dulbecco's
modified Eagle's medium for at least 12 h before experiments.
Solutions and Chemicals--
The composition of
Ca2+-rich Ringer solution was 157.7 mM
Na+, 4 mM K+, 0.61 mM
Mg2+, 1.4 mM Ca2+, 151.02 mM Cl
, 1 mM
HPO
, 10 mM HEPES, 12.7 mM gluconate
, and 5 mM glucose.
Ca2+-free solution was composed of 157.7 mM
Na+, 4 mM K+, 0.61 mM
Mg2+, 148.22 mM Cl
, 1 mM HPO
, 10 mM HEPES, 12.7 mM gluconate
, 0.5 mM EGTA, and 5 mM glucose. Sr2+
solution was made by replacing Ca2+ with Sr2+
in Ca2+-rich solution. For all solutions, the osmolarity
was adjusted to 300 ± 5 mOsm with sucrose, and the pH was
adjusted to 7.5.
Fura-2 acetoxymethyl ester was obtained from Molecular Probes (Eugene,
OR). Cell culture supplies were obtained from Invitrogen. Calyculin A
was purchased from LC Labs (Woburn, MA). 5,6-EET was purchased from
Cayman Chemical (Ann Arbor, MI). 5,6-EET was prepared in the same
manner as the manufacturer's protocol and as described by Rzigalinski
et al. (29). 2-APB and brefeldin A were obtained from
Calbiochem (San Diego, CA). All other chemicals were obtained from
Sigma. Stock solutions of the above chemicals were stored desiccated at
20 °C.
Measurements of Intracellular Ca2+
([Ca2+]i)--
Intracellular Ca2+
([Ca2+]i) was measured with Fura-2, a
calcium-sensitive fluorescent dye. The cells on coverslips were loaded
with Fura-2 by incubation in Ca2+-rich Ringer containing 5 µM Fura-2/AM for 30 min at room temperature. Then cells
were washed for 45 min in Ca2+-rich Ringer without Fura-2.
The coverslips were placed in a perfusion chamber designed for an
inverted microscope (Diaphot; Nikon). Ca2+ measurements
were done at room temperature using a microscope fluorimeter (Photon
Technology International, Lawrenceville, NJ). Fura-2 was excited at 340 and 380 nm, whereas fluorescence emission was monitored at 505 nm.
Ca2+ measurements are shown as 340/380 nm ratios obtained
from groups of 10-15 cells.
Protocols for Studying CCE--
CCE was studied by two
protocols: 1) for Ca2+-rich protocol, CPA was applied in
Ca2+-rich solution; the sustained
[Ca2+]i elevations after 10-min applications of
CPA were used as relative levels of CCE (see Fig. 2A) (36,
37) and 2) for Sr2+ add-back protocol, store depletion was
achieved by application of 100 µM ATP or 20 µM CPA in Ca2+-free solution. After allowing
the [Ca2+]i to peak and then decrease to a
steady-state level (normally 6-10 min for ATP and 12-15 min for CPA),
1.4 mM Sr2+ was introduced. Because
Sr2+ acts similar to Ca2+ in interactions with
Fura-2 (38, 39), we used Sr2+ entry as a quantitative
measurement of CCE. Intracellular Ca2+ release,
i.e. the Ca2+ store size, was assayed by the
peak elevation of fluorescence ratios after application of ATP or CPA
in Ca2+-free medium (a Ca2+-free protocol, as
seen in Fig. 2B) (36, 37). SPSS (Chicago, IL) software was
used for statistical analysis. Student's t test was used to
analyze most of the data, except a two-way analysis of variance was
used to analyze the difference between the increase of Sr2+
entry after store depletion and the increase of basal Sr2+
entry in BN-treated cells; p < 0.05 was considered
significant. The means and standard errors are shown in all inset
histographs in the figures.
 |
RESULTS |
Both BN-enhanced CCE and 5,6-EET-induced
[Ca2+]i Elevation Were Inhibited by the CCE
Inhibitor 2-APB--
Although originally recognized as an
IP3R inhibitor, 2-APB has recently been shown to block the
CCE pathway independent of the IP3R (13-18).
Electrophysiological studies have shown that 2-APB acts at the external
surface of the cell rather than intracellularly (16, 21, 40, 41).
Although 2-APB may act on a target upstream from SOCs (11, 14, 15, 42),
it has been shown to be rather selective for SOCs because it has no
effect on voltage-dependent (18, 43, 44),
S-nitrosylation-activated (45),
diacylglycerol-activated (11, 46), or arachidonic acid-gated
Ca2+ channels (18, 47). To determine whether cytochrome
P-450 metabolites are involved in the activation of SOCs in corneal endothelial cells, we first examined whether enhancement of CCE by the
cytochrome P-450 inducer BN could be inhibited by the CCE blocker
2-APB. BN is a well known cytochrome P-450 inducer in vascular
endothelium (30, 48). Induction of cytochrome P-450s by BN potentiated
agonist-induced Ca2+ and Mn2+ influx in
cultured endothelial cells from human umbilical veins, whereas
intracellular Ca2+ release remained unchanged (30).
Similarly, BN did not affect agonist-induced intracellular
Ca2+ release or base-line fluorescence ratio in corneal
endothelial cells (data not shown). Fig.
1A shows that after store
depletion by ATP in the absence of Ca2+, we observed robust
Sr2+ entry in BN-treated cells, significantly greater than
that in vehicle-treated cells using the Sr2+ add-back
protocol. BN also enhanced Ca2+ entry after store depletion
using the Ca2+ add-back protocol (data not shown). Fig.
1A shows that 2-APB significantly inhibited Sr2+
entry in vehicle-treated cells. Interestingly, 2-APB also inhibited Sr2+ entry in BN-treated cells to the same level as in
vehicle-treated cells (Fig. 1A, inset, compare
Con + 2-APB with BN + 2-APB; p > 0.33). Additionally, less selective CCE blockers La3+ (100 µM) and SKF 96365 (50 µM) completely
blocked Sr2+ entry in both vehicle- and BN-treated cells
(data not shown), further supporting the role of BN-induced cytochrome
P-450 activity in CCE.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Both BN-enhanced CCE and the 5,6-EET induced
Ca2+ entry was inhibited by the CCE blocker 2-APB.
A, 2-APB inhibited Sr2+ entry in both vehicle-
and BN-treated cells. Cultured bovine corneal endothelial cells were
treated in culture medium containing 3 µM BN dissolved in
Me2SO or in Me2SO (0.1% v/v) alone (control)
for 2.5 days. The cells were then pretreated with 100 µM
ATP for 6-10 min in Ca2+-free solution to deplete the
Ca2+ stores. 150 µM 2-APB was added 2 min
before Sr2+ was introduced. Representative traces of at
least five independent experiments are shown. The inset
compares peak ratio changes (Peak Ratio) after
Sr2+ addition. Con, control. *,
p < 0.05, compared with the control; **,
p < 0.05, compared with BN-treated cells without 2-APB
pretreatment. There was no significant difference between Con + 2-APB and BN + 2-APB (p > 0.33).
B, 2-APB inhibited 5,6-EET-induced Ca2+ entry.
The cells were pretreated with 150 µM 2-APB
(n = 5) or vehicle (n = 4) for 5 min
before the addition of 1.25 µM 5,6-EET. The
inset shows the comparison of 5,6-EET-induced peak ratio
changes (Peak Ratio) in the presence or absence of
2-APB. *, p < 0.05.
|
|
5,6-EET, one of the products of cytochrome P-450 metabolism of AA, has
been proposed to be a CIF in vascular endothelial cells and astrocytes
(29, 30). 5,6-EET-activated Ca2+ channels were also
permeable to Mn2+ and Ba2+ and sensitive to
Ni2+ and La3+, characteristics of SOCs (30). In
Fig. 1B, we tested whether 5,6-EET could induce
Ca2+ entry in the absence of store depletion. Although the
vehicle had no effect (not shown), 5,6-EET caused a small but
significant [Ca2+]i elevation in
Ca2+-rich medium. In Ca2+-free medium, 5,6-EET
did not affect [Ca2+]i (not shown), indicating
that 5,6-EET acts on Ca2+ entry but not Ca2+
release from the intracellular Ca2+ stores (29, 30). To
test whether 5,6-EET was activating SOCs, we examined the effects of
the CCE blocker 2-APB on 5,6-EET-induced [Ca2+]i
elevation. Because 2-APB alone could partially release the
Ca2+ store and increase
[Ca2+]i3 (43, 49, 50), we pretreated
cells with 2-APB until the traces became steady, usually for 5 min,
before 5,6-EET was introduced. Consistent with the results on
BN-enhanced Sr2+ entry, 2-APB significantly inhibited
5,6-EET-induced Ca2+ entry (Fig. 1B). Thus, both
BN-enhanced CCE and 5,6-EET-induced Ca2+ entry were
inhibited by 2-APB, indicating that cytochrome P-450 metabolites may be
the chemical messengers for CCE. The elevation of
[Ca2+]i caused by 5,6-EET is smaller than that
caused by CPA (Fig. 2A). One
possible reason is the labile nature of 5,6-EET. Another possibility is
that 5,6-EET may be just one of the metabolites that activate SOC and
that the full activation of CCE needs multiple cytochrome P-450
metabolites.

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Treatment with CalyA and BFA, but not CytD,
inhibited CCE in corneal endothelial cells. A, CalyA
and BFA treatment significantly attenuated CCE. The cells were
incubated in Ca2+-rich solution containing CalyA (200 nM), CytD (20 µM), or Me2SO
(0.1% v/v) for 1 h. To study the role of exocytosis in CCE, the
cells were exposed to BFA (100 µM) or its vehicle,
methanol (0.1% v/v) (Met), for 12 h. In
Ca2+-rich solution, 20 µM CPA caused a
two-phase [Ca2+]i elevation. The inset
compares the fluorescence changes ( Ratio) after 10 min
of CPA application. The data from at least five independent experiments
are shown. *, p < 0.05 compared with the vehicle
control (Me2SO and Met for CalyA and BFA, respectively).
There was no significant difference between Me2SO and CytD
(p > 0.17) or Me2SO and Met
(p > 0.43). B, CalyA, CytD, and BFA did not
alter intracellular Ca2+ releases in Ca2+-free
medium. Test compounds and their control vehicles were used to treat
cells as described above for A. At the beginning of
experiments, 20 µM CPA was added in Ca2+-free
medium. The traces are representative of at least five
experiments. The inset compares peak ratio changes
(Peak Ratio) with different treatments. There was no
significant difference between Me2SO and CalyA
(p > 0.64), Me2SO and CytD
(p > 0.23), Met and BFA (p > 0.71),
or Me2SO and Met (p > 0.96).
|
|
A Secretion-like Coupling Mechanism in Corneal Endothelial
Cells--
In contrast to the CIF model for CCE, a seemingly opposed
model suggests that a secretion-like coupling mechanism is required for
the activation of SOCs (19). The primary evidence for the secretion-like coupling model was the observation that manipulation of
the actin cytoskeleton could modulate CCE. However, these two models
may not be mutually exclusive if the key protein/enzyme producing CIFs
needs to be "secreted" in the proximity of the PM to exert their
effects, especially if the CIFs are ephemeral. To explore this
possibility, we first attempted to test whether a secretion-like
coupling mechanism exists in corneal endothelial cells. The effects of
rearranging the actin cytoskeleton on CCE were examined using
cytochalasin D (CytD), which inhibits actin polymerization (51), and
CalyA, which induces translocation of actin to the subplasmalemmal
region (19). Cultured corneal endothelial cells form a confluent
monolayer of hexagonal cells while grown on coverslips. Incubation of
corneal endothelial cells with 20 µM CytD caused
significant alterations in cellular shape. The monolayer was disrupted,
with cells assuming a more rounded morphology (not shown), in a similar
manner as observed in NIH3T3 cells (52), smooth muscle cell lines (19),
and vascular endothelial cells (53). CCE was examined with the
Ca2+-rich protocol, whereas the size of the releasable
Ca2+ stores was examined using the Ca2+-free
protocol (see "Materials and Methods"). Fig. 2A shows
that, in the presence of Ca2+, addition of the SERCA
inhibitor CPA caused an initial rapid increase of the fluorescence
ratio followed by a sustained elevation, which reflects a relative
level of CCE (36, 37). The base-line fluorescence ratios of
Me2SO- and CytD-treated cells were not significantly
different (not shown), indicating that CytD did not alter the basic
Ca2+ homeostasis inside the cell. Furthermore, Fig.
2B shows that treatment with CytD did not alter the peak
Ca2+ response in Ca2+-free medium compared with
the vehicle control, indicating that CytD did not affect the
intracellular Ca2+ release. Fig. 2A also shows
that CytD did not affect the sustained [Ca2+]i
elevation in Ca2+-rich medium relative to control cells,
suggesting that CytD does not affect CCE in corneal endothelial cells.
Consistent with the Ca2+-rich protocol, CytD did not alter
the CCE level when the Sr2+ add-back protocol was used
(Fig. 3).

View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
CytD partially reversed the inhibition of CCE
by CalyA. The secretion-like coupling mechanism was further
studied with a combination of CytD and CalyA. (Con),
cells were treated with Me2SO (0.1% v/v) for 1.5 h;
, cells were treated with CalyA (200 nM) alone for
1 h and washed in Ca2+-rich solution without CalyA for
25 min; , cells were treated with CytD (20 µM) only;
(CalyA + CytD), cells were treated with CalyA (200 nM) for 1 h followed by incubation with CytD (20 µM) for 25 min. The Sr2+ add-back protocol
was used to examine the effects of these treatments on CCE. The cells
were pretreated in Ca2+-free solution with CPA (20 µM) for 12-15 min. The traces are
representative of at least five experiments. The inset
compares the peak ratio changes (Peak Ratio) after
Sr2+ addition. *, p < 0.05, compared with
the vehicle control; **, p < 0.05, compared with CalyA
treatment alone; #, p < 0.05, compared with CalyA + CytD. There was no significant difference between CytD and the control
(p > 0.32).
|
|
In numerous cells, application of the phosphatase inhibitor CalyA
induces condensation of the actin cytoskeleton at the PM (15, 17, 44,
45). CalyA enhances association of ezrin, radixin, and moesin proteins,
powerful mediators of actin cross-linking, with the PM (54, 55). After
treatment of corneal endothelial cells with 200 nM CalyA
for 1 h, cells lost their hexagonal appearance, becoming thickened
on the periphery (not shown), as observed in many other cell types (19,
21, 56, 57). The base-line fluorescence ratios of Me2SO-
and CalyA-treated cells were not significantly different (not shown),
indicating that CalyA did not alter the basic Ca2+
homeostasis inside the cell. However, Fig. 2A shows that the sustained [Ca2+]i elevation after a 10-min
application of CPA was significantly smaller in CalyA-treated cells
than in the control cells, suggesting that CalyA inhibited CCE. There
was no significant difference in the peaks of
[Ca2+]i between CalyA-treated and vehicle-treated
cells in Ca2+-free medium (Fig. 2B), indicating
that the effects of CalyA on CCE were not due to a change in the
intracellular Ca2+ release.
Using the Sr2+ add-back protocol after store depletion with
CPA, we observed a similar decrease in Sr2+ entry in
CalyA-treated cells (Fig. 3), even after a 25-min wash of the
CalyA-treated cells. In CytD-treated cells, Sr2+ entry was
not significantly different from the control. Another significant
feature of the secretion-like coupling model is the restoration of the
CalyA-blocked CCE by disassembly of membrane-associated actin
cytoskeleton with CytD (19). Fig. 3 shows that treatment with CytD for
25 min after incubation of cells with CalyA for 1 h led to a
partial recovery of CCE, similar to that observed in smooth muscle
cells (19) and consistent with a secretion-like coupling mechanism for
CCE in corneal endothelial cells.
To further assess the involvement of a secretion-like coupling
mechanism in corneal endothelial cells, we examined the effects of BFA,
an inhibitor of exocytosis, on CCE (20). Neither BFA nor the vehicle
(methanol) changed the base-line fluorescence ratio (data not shown).
Treatment with BFA for 2 or 5 h did not affect CCE (not shown).
However, Fig. 2A shows that treatment with BFA for 12 h
significantly decreased the sustained Ca2+ entry induced by
CPA, suggesting that BFA inhibited CCE. This decrease was not due to a
change in the store size because the peak elevations of fluorescence
ratios in methanol and BFA-treated cells were not significantly
different in Ca2+-free medium (Fig. 2B). Using
the Sr2+ add-back protocol after store depletion with CPA,
we observed a similar decrease in Sr2+ entry in cells
treated with BFA for 12 h (see Fig. 6).
Enhancement of CCE by BN Induction of Cytochrome P-450s Was
Insensitive to CalyA but Inhibited by BFA Treatment--
From the
above studies, it seems that both CIF from cytochrome P-450 metabolism
and secretion-like coupling mechanisms work in corneal endothelial
cells. Which mechanism is more important? If CIFs work by directly
activating SOCs on the PM, one would expect that overproduction of CIFs
could activate SOCs even when the secretion-like mechanism is
inhibited. Interestingly, although CalyA treatment blocked
Sr2+ entry in control cells after store depletion,
BN-enhanced Sr2+ entry was only slightly reduced by CalyA
treatment after store depletion with ATP (Fig.
4A, compare BN with
BN + CalyA; p > 0.10). To confirm that the
effects of BN were on CCE rather than receptor-operated entry, we did
the same experiments as in Fig. 4A except for using the
SERCA inhibitor CPA to empty the store. Fig. 4B shows that CalyA could not inhibit BN-enhanced Sr2+ entry after store
depletion by CPA. These results suggest that some chemical messengers
overproduced by BN-induced cytochrome P-450s may overcome the
cytoskeleton barrier formed by CalyA treatment.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
BN-enhanced CCE after store depletion with
ATP or CPA was insensitive to CalyA treatment. The effects of
CalyA treatment on BN-enhanced Sr2+ entry in store-depleted
cells were studied. Both insets in A and
B compare peak ratio changes (Peak Ratio)
after Sr2+ addition. A, BN-enhanced
Sr2+ entry after store depletion with ATP was insensitive
to CalyA treatment. The cells were first treated in medium containing 3 µM of BN dissolved in Me2SO or in an equal
volume of Me2SO (0.1%, control) for 2.5 days. The cells
were then incubated in Ca2+-rich solution containing CalyA
(200 nM) or Me2SO for 1 h. All cells were
pretreated with 100 µM ATP for 6-10 min in
Ca2+-free solution to deplete the Ca2+ stores
before Sr2+ was introduced. Representative traces of at
least five independent experiments are shown. *, p < 0.05, compared with the control. There was no significant difference
between BN and BN + CalyA (p > 0.10). B,
BN-enhanced Sr2+ entry after store depletion with CPA was
insensitive to CalyA treatment. The cells were treated in the same
manner as in A except that CPA (20 µM)
pretreatment for 12-15 min was used to deplete the Ca2+
stores. Representative traces of at least five independent experiments
are shown. *, p < 0.05 compared with the control.
There was no significant difference between BN and BN + CalyA
(p > 0.70).
|
|
Because 5,6-EET is a cytochrome P-450 metabolite that may be a CIF
(29), we speculated that exogenous 5,6-EET could increase CCE even if a
cytoskeletal barrier is formed underneath the PM. Thus, we studied the
effects of 5,6-EET on control and CalyA-blocked CCE. Fig.
5 shows that 5,6-EET did not affect
control Sr2+ entry after store depletion. This is
consistent with other reports that the effect of 5,6-EET on
Ca2+ entry was not additive to CCE, suggesting that 5,6-EET
and store depletion may activate the same Ca2+ entry
pathway (CCE) (29, 30). Interestingly, 5,6-EET caused a small but
significant increase in Sr2+ entry in cells treated with
CalyA (Fig. 5). Together with the result that 5,6-EET-induced
[Ca2+]i elevation could be inhibited by 2-APB
(Fig. 1B), 5,6-EET appears to directly or indirectly
activate SOCs. Thus, the effect of 5,6-EET was insensitive to the
thickening of cortical cytoskeleton by CalyA treatment. Again, the
partial activation of Sr2+ entry by 5,6-EET could be due to
the ephemeral nature of EETs or the requirement of multiple cytochrome
P-450 metabolites for the full activation of SOCs. The results in Figs.
4 and 5 further support the role for CIFs derived from cytochrome P-450
metabolism in CCE.

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
5,6-EET enhanced Sr2+ entry in
CalyA-treated cells. The cells were incubated in
Ca2+-rich solution containing CalyA (200 nM) or
in Me2SO for 1 h. All of the cells were pretreated
with 100 µM of ATP for 6-10 min in Ca2+-free
solution to deplete the Ca2+ store before Sr2+
was introduced as indicated. For the 5,6-EET-treated cells, 1.25 µM 5,6-EET was added 1 min before Sr2+ was
introduced. Representative traces of at least five independent
experiments are shown. The inset compares the effects of
5,6-EET on Sr2+ entry in vehicle and CalyA-treated cells.
*, p < 0.05, compared with the control; **,
p < 0.05, compared with CalyA-treated cells. There was
no significant difference between Con and Con + 5,6-EET
(p > 0.80).
|
|
To further examine the role of exocytosis in CCE, we examined whether
inhibition of exocytosis by BFA could affect BN-enhanced CCE. Fig.
6 shows that, in contrast to
CalyA-treated cells, BFA treatment (for 12 h) inhibited
Sr2+ entry in both vehicle- and BN-treated cells to the
same level (compare BFA with BN + BFA;
p > 0.8). This may indicate that cytochrome P-450
metabolites, which were overproduced by BN induction, activated the
same channels as SOCs that were activated by store depletion and
sensitive to BFA treatment. Because overproduction of cytochrome P-450
metabolites induced by BN could not increase CCE in BFA-treated cells,
we suspected that 5,6-EET could not increase CCE in BFA-treated cells
as well. Not surprisingly, in contrast to the enhancing effect of
5,6-EET on CalyA-blocked CCE (Fig. 5), 5,6-EET did not increase
Sr2+ entry in BFA-treated cells (not shown). These results
suggest that exocytosis plays a role in CCE and that increased
cytochrome P-450 metabolites could not overcome the blockade of CCE by
the inhibition of exocytosis.

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
BN-enhanced CCE was inhibited by BFA
treatment. BN treatment was carried out in the same manner as in
Fig. 1A. Methanol (0.1%, Con) and BFA (100 µM) dissolved in methanol were used to treat corneal
endothelial cells for 12 h. All of the cells were pretreated in
Ca2+-free solution with CPA (20 µM) for
12-15 min. Representative traces of at least five independent
experiments are shown. The inset compares the effects of BFA
on Sr2+ entry in vehicle- and BN-treated cells. *,
p < 0.05 compared with the vehicle control; **,
p < 0.05 compared with BN treatment alone. There was
no significant difference between BFA and BN + BFA (p > 0.80).
|
|
Sr2+ Entry without Store Depletion Was Enhanced by BN,
Which Was Inhibited by 2-APB--
Finally, we examined the effects of
BN on Sr2+ entry in the absence of store depletion. Fig.
7 shows that, in the absence of any
agonists, Sr2+ entry in BN-treated cells was remarkably
increased. This result indicates that overexpression of cytochrome
P-450s may form basic metabolites that act as chemical messengers to
stimulate Sr2+ entry. Notably, the BN-induced increase of
CCE relative to the control (Fig. 1A) is significantly
greater than the BN-enhanced basal Sr2+ entry
(p < 0.05), further suggesting that BN induced
overproduction of cytochrome P-450 metabolites is capable of activating
CCE. To confirm that these metabolites were activating the CCE pathway, we tested the effects of the CCE blocker 2-APB on BN-enhanced basal
Sr2+ entry. Fig. 7 shows that 2-APB inhibited
Sr2+ influx in BN-treated cells in the absence of store
depletion. Because 2-APB alone can induce basal Sr2+ entry
(0.061 ± 0.008) (not shown), which was indistinguishable from the
Sr2+ entry of BN+2-APB (0.071 ± 0.009)
(p = 0.80), 2-APB appears to completely inhibit
BN-enhanced basal Sr2+ entry. This nonspecific effect of
2-APB may be caused by its partial release of the Ca2+
store (43, 49, 50) and partial activation of CCE. In addition, we
observed a complete inhibition of the BN-enhanced basal
Sr2+ entry by a less selective CCE blocker La3+
(100 µM) (not shown). These results suggest that
overproduction of cytochrome P-450 metabolites may activate SOCs even
without store depletion and further support a role for cytochrome P-450 metabolites in CCE.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Sr2+ entry without agonist
stimulation was enhanced by BN, which was inhibited by the CCE blocker
2-APB. The cells were treated in medium containing 3 µM of BN dissolved in Me2SO or in an equal
volume of Me2SO (0.1% v/v, control) for 2.5 days. The
cells were pretreated with 2-APB (150 µM) or an equal
volume of Me2SO (0.1% v/v) in Ca2+-free
solution for 6-10 min before Sr2+ was added. Please note
that no agonist such as ATP or CPA was added in these experiments. The
traces are representative of at least five independent
experiments. The inset compares peak ratio changes
(Peak Ratio) after Sr2+ addition. *,
p < 0.005 compared with the control; **,
p < 0.05 compared with BN-treated cells without 2-APB
pretreatment. Also notably, the BN-induced increase of the peak ratio for Sr2+ entry (the difference between Con
and BN) in this figure was significantly smaller than the
BN-induced increase of peak ratio for Sr2+ entry after
store emptying (the difference between Con and BN
in Fig. 1A) (p < 0.05).
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
In this study, we examined the roles of secretion-like coupling
and diffusible CIF mechanisms on CCE in corneal endothelial cells. Our
results show that both CIF and secretion-like coupling mechanisms may
play roles in CCE. We provide further evidence supporting a role of
cytochrome P-450 metabolites as CIFs.
The effects of rearranging the cytoskeleton on Ca2+
signaling have been studied extensively. The most commonly used
manipulation is to break down the actin cytoskeleton by CytD treatment.
CytD has been reported to inhibit CCE in vascular endothelial cells (53), astrocytes (58), platelets (59), erythroleukemia cells (60), and
a hepatocellular carcinoma cell line (61). However, CytD had no effect
on CCE in smooth muscle cell lines (19), a rat basophilic cell line
(21), or corneal endothelial cells (Fig. 2). Similarly, CalyA treatment
inhibited CCE in smooth muscle cells (19), platelets (59),
TRP3-transfected HEK293 cells (11), and corneal
endothelial cells (Fig. 2), whereas CalyA had no effect on
Icrac in a rat basophilic cell line (21).
Interestingly, CytD can reverse the inhibition of CCE by CalyA in
smooth muscle cell lines (19) and corneal endothelial cells (Fig. 3).
These data support the possibility of a secretion-like coupling
mechanism for CCE. The reasons for the conflicting results concerning
the effects of CytD and CalyA may be that: 1) different mechanisms exist for different cell types and 2) different cells have distinct cytoskeletal structures so that the sensitivity to CytD and CalyA varies.
Although the evidence obtained from cytoskeletal reorganization
implicates the secretion-like coupling model, a detailed description of
the secretion process may be needed to fully explain the activation of
SOCs. A weak link in this model seems to be the lack of an activator of
SOCs. Therefore, in this study, we searched for the possibility that a
CIF mechanism may also be present and attempted to find the
"activator" of SOCs, even though we have shown a role for
secretion-like coupling in corneal endothelial cells. We found that
cytochrome P-450 metabolites, including 5,6-EET, are likely SOC
activators. First, the CCE blocker 2-APB inhibited CCE in both vehicle-
and BN-treated cells, and 5,6-EET induced [Ca2+]i
elevation (Fig. 1). Furthermore, 2-APB inhibited Sr2+ entry
in BN-treated cells to the same level as in vehicle-treated cells,
although BN enhanced Sr2+ entry significantly. These
results suggest that cytochrome P-450 metabolites may activate SOCs.
Second, condensation of the cortical cytoskeleton by CalyA could not
inhibit BN-enhanced CCE, and 5,6-EET could increase CCE in
CalyA-treated cells (Figs. 4 and 5). If thickening of the
subplasmalemmal cytoskeleton by CalyA prevented the moving/secretion of
ER components to the PM, overproduction of CIFs by cytochrome P-450s on
the ER membranes may overcome the spatial hindrance because these
cytochrome P-450 metabolites are relatively small and diffusible.
Because EETs are ephemeral (62), SOC activation may need movement of
cytochrome P-450/ER to the PM to provide proximal CIFs. However, the
movement of cytochrome P-450s may not be a necessity if cytochrome
P-450s are already close to the PM in resting states. This may explain
why CytD and CalyA did not have any effect on CCE in some cell types.
Third, BFA treatment inhibited BN-enhanced CCE to the same level as in vehicle-treated cells (Fig. 6), implying that cytochrome P-450 metabolites, which were overproduced by BN induction, may activate the
same channel/SOCs on the PM that were activated by store depletion and
sensitive to BFA treatment (discussed below). Finally, under conditions
without agonist-induced store depletion, Sr2+ entry was
elevated dramatically in BN-treated cells, and this elevation of
Sr2+ entry was also inhibited by 2-APB (Fig. 7). This
indicates that increased production of cytochrome P-450 metabolites, in
the absence of store depletion, can activate SOCs and further supports
the notion that SOCs can be activated by soluble factors produced by
cytochrome P-450s. Evidence from other cell types for the involvement of cytochrome P-450s in CCE includes: 1) depletion of Ca2+
stores by IP3, thapsigargin, CPA, or chelating of luminal
Ca2+ in the ER with oxalate stimulated cytochrome P-450
activity (31); 2) numerous cytochrome P-450 inhibitors, econazole,
thiopentone sodium, SKF525A, or MS-PPOH inhibited CCE (25-29),
although some of them may have other nonspecific actions in addition to
inhibition of CCE (63-65); 3) induction of cytochrome P-450s in some
systems yields increases in CCE without alteration of the
Ca2+ stores (30, 31); and 4) 5,6-EET-activated
Ca2+ channels were also permeable to Mn2+ and
Ba2+, sensitive to Ni2+, La3+, and
membrane depolarization, and insensitive to the organic Ca2+ antagonist nitrendipine, all of which are
characteristics of SOCs (30).
In parallel with the secretion-like coupling model, an exocytotic
mechanism was also implicated in multiple cells types. In the current
study, we used the exocytotic pathway inhibitor BFA to examine the
involvement of exocytosis in CCE. BFA was reported to inhibit CCE in
hepatocytes (66), platelets (59), and HEK293 cells (67). But it did not
affect CCE in Xenopus oocytes (20) and Reuber hepatoma cells
(68). In corneal endothelial cells, treatment with BFA (100 µM) for 12 h inhibited CCE in both vehicle- and
BN-treated cells (Fig. 6). Interestingly, 5,6-EET did not increase CCE
in BFA-treated cells, although it could increase CCE in CalyA-treated
cells (Fig. 5). Several possibilities may explain the effects of BFA on
CCE. First, BFA may inhibit the secretion of the enzyme producing CIFs.
This seems unlikely because overproduction of cytochrome P-450
metabolites (Fig. 6) or exogenous 5,6-EET could not increase CCE in
BFA-treated cells. However, we cannot rule out the possibility that the
secretion of a conformational coupler/activator of SOCs such as
IP3R or ryanodine receptors (RyR) was blocked by BFA.
Second, BFA may inhibit the trafficking of SOCs and reduce the number
of SOCs in the PM, whereas this trafficking may not be one of the
activation processes of CCE. Finally, BFA may inhibit the secretion or
exocytosis of SOCs, which is one of the activation mechanisms for CCE.
Because BFA inhibits the constitutive secretory pathway exiting from
the Golgi apparatus (20) and the inhibitory effect by BFA needed a high concentration and a long exposure time in the current study, we surmise
that the inhibitory effects of BFA on CCE in corneal endothelial cells
may be due to the reduction of the SOC number on the PM, although the
explanation that exocytosis of SOCs to the PM or a conformational
coupler (the IP3R or RyR) is one of the activation mechanisms for CCE cannot be excluded.
Although the conformational coupling model was supported by several
studies (7-12), it was recently challenged by the findings that cells
lacking IP3R have normal SOC activity (13, 14), and 2-APB,
a drug thought to be a specific inhibitor of IP3R, actually
blocks the CCE pathway independent of the IP3R (13-18). Recently, TRPs, candidates for SOCs (5, 6), were reported to interact
with IP3R in vitro (10, 69).
Co-immunoprecipitation of TRPs and IP3R were demonstrated
in TRP-transfected HEK293 cells (8, 10), platelets (12), and human
submandibular gland cells (36). Dominant negative experiments also
supported a role of IP3R in CCE (8, 10). In the DT40 avian
B lymphocytes, human TRP3 forms channels that were
store-operated by both IP3R-dependent and
IP3R-independent mechanisms (70). In addition to the
IP3R, RyRs were also reported to couple to TRP3
and regulate its activity (71). More interestingly, in the
IP3R-deficient DT40 cells, it was found that RyRs could
gate Icrac (72), suggesting that the
conformational coupling model may still be valid in these IP3R-deficient cells. However, to study CCE in more detail,
it may be necessary to differentiate activation mechanisms from
regulatory mechanisms. Even though IP3R may not be required
to activate SOCs, they could be regulatory components in CCE. It would
be interesting to examine whether cytochrome P-450 metabolites could
modulate the conformational coupling process.
EETs have been favorite candidates for the endothelium-derived
hyperpolarizing factor, which is released by vascular endothelium and
activates smooth muscle K+ channels (73). EETs were also
shown to hyperpolarize vascular endothelial cells (31). In corneal
endothelial cells, CCE was inhibited by the K+ channel
blocker tetrabutylammonium3
and high [K+]
depolarization.4 Although
hyperpolarization itself could not increase
[Ca2+]i in vascular endothelial cells (74) and
corneal endothelial cells,3 we speculate that cytochrome
P-450 metabolites may additionally enhance CCE by hyperpolarizing the
cell membrane through activating K+ channels.
Fig. 8 shows an integrative model of CCE.
In this model, store depletion causes AA release and activates
cytochrome P-450s in the ER membrane. There is direct evidence that AA,
the substrate for EETs, is mobilized by store depletion (29, 75, 76). Furthermore, CCE was inhibited by specific inhibitors of the cytosolic phospholipase A2 that may be responsible for AA release
(29, 75, 76). Upon agonist stimulation, cytosolic phospholipase A2 may translocate to the membranes of the ER and nuclear
envelope (77). Metabolism of AA by cytochrome P-450s nearby forms CIFs, which may be EETs and diffuse to activate SOCs. Movement or
"secretion" of cytochrome P-450s/ER may be necessary in some cells
for the proximity of activation of SOCs by ephemeral CIFs. Although
there has been evidence for the role of 5,6-EET to be a CIF (29, 30), no direct examination of its action on SOCs has been made. Thus, we
could not rule out the possibility that CIFs may be further metabolites
of EETs. It is also possible for EETs to activate a target upstream of
SOCs rather than directly on the channels. This model does not exclude
the conformational coupling model, which may be essential in some cell
types while being regulatory in others. In addition, an exocytotic
process involving the secretion of a conformational coupler
(IP3R or RyRs) or SOCs themselves to the PM may also be one
of the regulatory mechanisms for CCE. Of particular interest, Kiselyov
and Muallem (9) discussed a model integrating the regulation by lipids
of TRP channels and the conformational coupling mechanism. Further
investigations are needed to reveal how lipids such as
phosphoinositides, AA, diacylglycerol, and EETs modulate TRP/SOC
channels.

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
An integrative model for CCE. In this
model, store depletion induces: 1) AA release by cytosolic
phospholipase A2 (29,75,76), 2) activation of cytochrome
P-450s in the ER membrane that may form CIFs from AA (indicated by the
solid curved arrow in the figure) (31), and 3) movement or
secretion of cytochrome P-450s/ER (indicated by the bold dashed
arrows) toward the PM to provide enough proximity for the
ephemeral CIFs to activate SOCs, which is inhibitable by the thickening
of cortical actin cytoskeleton (indicated by the dashed
lines between the ER and PM). Small solid circles are
the symbols for Ca2+. Bold solid arrows indicate
stimulatory function. The diamond headed arrow indicates
inhibitory action. Thin arrows indicate fluxes of ions or
movement of small molecules (AA, Ca2+, and
IP3). R, receptor; cPLA2,
cytosolic phospholipase A2; TG,
thapsigargin; PLC, phospholipase C; P450,
cytochrome P-450.
|
|
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Miao Cui and Kah Tan Allen for
excellent technical support. We also thank Dr. S. P. Srinivas for
helpful discussions.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: School of Optometry,
Indiana University, 800 E. Atwater Ave., Bloomington, IN 47405. Tel.: 812-856-5977; Fax: 812-855-7045; E-mail:
jbonanno@indiana.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, February 26, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M109518200
2
Y. Zhang, Q. Xie, and J. A. Bonanno,
unpublished observation.
3
Q. Xie and J. A. Bonanno, unpublished observation.
4
S. P. Srinivas, personal communication.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
IP3, inositol trisphosphate;
2-APB, aminoethoxydiphenyl borate;
BFA, brefeldin A;
BN,
-naphthoflavone;
CalyA, calyculin A;
CCE, capacitative calcium entry;
CIF, calcium influx factor;
CPA, cyclopiazonic acid;
CytD, cytochalasin D;
EET, epoxyeicosatrienoic
acid;
ER, endoplasmic reticulum;
IP3R, IP3 receptor(s);
PM, plasma membrane;
RyR, ryanodine receptor;
SERCA, sarco-endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase;
SOC, store-operated Ca2+ channel;
TRP, transient receptor
potential;
AA, arachidonic acid(s).
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Berridge, M.
(2000)
Nat. Rev.
1,
11-21
|
| 2.
|
Putney, J. W., Jr.
(1986)
Cell Calcium
7,
1-12[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Parekh, A. B.,
and Penner, R.
(1997)
Physiol. Rev.
77,
901-930[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 4.
|
Putney, J. W., Jr.,
Broad, L. M.,
Braun, F.-J.,
Lievremont, J.-P.,
and Bird, G. S. J.
(2001)
J. Cell Sci.
114,
2223-2229[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Zhu, X.,
Jiang, M.,
Peyton, M.,
Boulay, G.,
Hurst, R.,
Stefani, E.,
and Birnbaumer, L.
(1996)
Cell
85,
661-671[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Clapham, D. E.,
Runnels, L. W.,
and Strübing, C.
(2001)
Nat. Rev. Neurosci.
2,
387-396[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Kiselyov, K., Xu, X.,
Mozhayeva, G.,
Kuo, T.,
Pessah, I.,
Mignery, G.,
Zhu, X.,
Birnbaumer, L.,
and Muallem, S.
(1998)
Nature
396,
478-482[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Kiselyov, K.,
Mignery, G. A.,
Zhu, M. X.,
and Muallem, S.
(1999)
Mol. Cell
4,
423-429[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Kiselyov, K.,
and Muallem, S.
(1999)
Trends Neurosci.
22,
334-337[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Boulay, G.,
Brown, D. M.,
Qin, N.,
Jiang, M.,
Dietrich, A.,
Zhu, M. X.,
Chen, Z.,
Birnbaumer, M.,
Mikoshiba, K.,
and Birnbaumer, L.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
14955-14960[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Ma, H.-T.,
Patterson, R. L.,
Van Rossum, D. B.,
Birnbaumer, L.,
Mikoshiba, K.,
and Gill, D. L.
(2000)
Science
287,
1647-1651[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Rosado, J. A.,
and Sage, S. O.
(2000)
Trends Cardiovasc. Med.
10,
327-332[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Broad, L. M.,
Braun, F.-J.,
Lievremont, J.-P.,
Bird, G. S. J.,
Kurosaki, T.,
and Putney, J. W., Jr.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
15945-15952[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Ma, H.-T.,
Venkatachalam, K., Li, H.-S.,
Montell, C.,
Kurosaki, T.,
Patterson, R. L.,
and Gill, D. L.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
18888-18896[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Ma, H. T.,
Venkatachalam, K.,
Parys, J. B.,
and Gill, D. L.
(2002)
J. Biol. Chem.
277,
6915-6922[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Prakriya, M.,
and Lewis, R. S.
(2001)
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
536,
3-19[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Dobrydneva, Y.,
and Blackmore, P.
(2001)
Mol. Pharmacol.
60,
541-552[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Putney, J. W., Jr.
(2001)
Mol. Interventions
1,
84-94[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Patterson, R. L.,
van Rossum, D. B.,
and Gill, D. L.
(1999)
Cell
98,
487-499[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Yao, Y.,
Ferrer-Montiel, A. V.,
Montal, M.,
and Tsien, R. Y.
(1999)
Cell
98,
475-485[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Bakowski, D.,
Glitsch, M. D.,
and Parekh, A. B.
(2001)
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
532,
55-71[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Randriamampita, C.,
and Tsien, R. Y.
(1993)
Nature
364,
809-814[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Csutora, P., Su, Z.,
Kim, H. Y.,
Bugrim, A.,
Cunningham, K. W.,
Nuccitelli, R.,
Keizer, J. E.,
Hanley, M. R.,
Blalock, J. E.,
and Marchase, R. B.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
121-126[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Trepakova, E. S.,
Csutora, P.,
Hunton, D. L.,
Marchase, R. B.,
Cohen, R. A.,
and Bolotina, V. M.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
26158-26163[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Alonso, M. T.,
Alvarez, J.,
Montero, M.,
Sanchez, A.,
and Garcia-Sancho, J.
(1991)
Biochem. J.
280,
783-789[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Alvarez, J.,
Montero, M.,
and Garcia-Sancho, J.
(1991)
Biochem. J.
274,
193-197[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Montero, M.,
Alvarez, J.,
and Garcia-Sancho, J.
(1992)
Biochem. J.
288,
519-525[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Alonso-Torre, S. R.,
Alvarez, J.,
Montero, M.,
Sanchez, A.,
and Garcia-Sancho, J.
(1993)
Biochem. J.
289,
761-766[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Rzigalinski, B. A.,
Willoughby, K. A.,
Hoffman, S. W.,
Falck, J. R.,
and Ellis, E. F.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
175-182[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Graier, W.,
Simecek, S.,
and Sturek, M.
(1995)
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
482,
259-274[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Hoebel, B.,
Kostner, G.,
and Graier, W.
(1997)
Br. J. Pharmacol.
121,
1579-1588[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Birnbaumer, L.,
Boulay, G.,
Brown, D.,
Jiang, M.,
Dietrich, A.,
Mikoshiba, K.,
Zhu, X.,
and Qin, N.
(2000)
Recent Prog. Horm. Res.
55,
127-161[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Maurice, D. M.,
and Giardini, A. A.
(1951)
Br. J. Ophthalmol.
35,
791-797[Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Sun, X. C.,
Bonanno, J. A.,
Jelamskii, S.,
and Xie, Q.
(2000)
Am. J. Physiol.
279,
C1648-C1655
|
| 35.
|
Srinivas, S. P.,
Yeh, J. C.,
Ong, A.,
and Bonanno, J. A.
(1998)
Curr. Eye Res.
17,
994-1004[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Singh, B. B.,
Liu, X.,
and Ambudkar, I. S.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
36483-36486[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
|
Liu, X.,
Wang, W.,
Singh, B. B.,
Lockwich, T.,
Jadlowiec, J.,
O'Connell, B.,
Wellner, R.,
Zhu, M. X.,
and Ambudkar, I. S.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
3403-3411[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Schilling, W.,
Rajan, L.,
and Strobl-Jager, E.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
12838-12848[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 39.
|
Kwan, C. Y.,
and Putney, J. W., Jr.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
678-684[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Braun, F.-J.,
Broad, L. M.,
Armstrong, D. L.,
and Putney, J. W., Jr.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
1063-1070[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 41.
|
Kukkonen, J. P.,
Lund, P. E.,
and Akerman, K. E.
(2001)
Cell Calcium
30,
117-129[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 42.
|
Chorna-Ornan, I.,
Joel-Almagor, T.,
Ben-Ami, H. C.,
Frechter, S.,
Gillo, B.,
Selinger, Z.,
Gill, D. L.,
and Minke, B.
(2001)
J. Neurosci.
21,
2622-2629[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 43.
|
Maruyama, T.,
Kanaji, T.,
Nakade, S.,
Kanno, T.,
and Mikoshiba, K.
(1997)
J. Biochem. (Tokyo)
122,
498-505[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 44.
|
Ascher-Landsberg, J.,
Saunders, T.,
Elovitz, M.,
and Phillippe, M.
(1999)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
264,
979-982[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 45.
|
van Rossum, D. B.,
Patterson, R. L., Ma, H.-T.,
and Gill, D. L.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
28562-28568[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 46.
| Tesfai, Y., Brereton, H. M., and Barritt, G. J. (2001)
Biochem. J. 358,
|
| 47.
|
Luo, D.,
Broad, L. M., St. J.,
Bird, G.,
and Putney, J. W., Jr.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
5613-5621[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 48.
|
Pinto, A.,
Abraham, N. G.,
and Mullane, K. M.
(1986)
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.
236,
445-451[Abstract/Free Full Text] |