![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 19, 16791-16797, May 10, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the
Received for publication, June 25, 2001, and in revised form, February 7, 2002
The human thromboxane A2 (TP)
receptor, a member of the G protein-coupled receptor superfamily,
consists of seven transmembrane segments. Attempts to elucidate the
specific segment(s) that define the receptor ligand-binding pocket have
produced less than definitive and sometimes conflicting results. On
this basis, the present work identified an amino acid sequence of the
TP receptor that is directly involved in ligand binding. Mapping of
this domain was confirmed by two separate approaches: photoaffinity
labeling and site-specific antibodies. The newly synthesized,
biotinylated photoaffinity probe, SQBAzide, was first shown to
specifically label TP receptor protein. Sequential digestion of this
protein with CNBr/trypsin revealed photolabeling of a 2.9-kDa peptide. Using anti-peptide antibodies directed against different regions of the
receptor protein, it was established that this peptide represents the
predicted cleavage product for CNBr/trypsin and corresponds to amino
acids Arg174-Met202 of the receptor
protein. Furthermore, antibody screening revealed that inhibition of
the amino acid region Cys183-Asp193 was
critical for radioligand binding and platelet aggregation, whereas
inhibition of Gly172-Cys183 was not.
Collectively these findings provide evidence that ligands interact with
amino acids contained within the C-terminal portion of the third
extracellular domain (ED3) of the receptor protein. This information
should be of significant value in the study of TP receptor structure
and signaling.
Clinical evidence suggests that inhibition of platelet thromboxane
A2
(TXA2)1
production provides a therapeutic basis for the treatment and/or prevention of certain thrombotic disease states (1-8). Indeed the
ability of aspirin to inhibit TXA2 synthesis is the primary rationale for the widespread use of this agent in recurrent myocardial infarction and more recently in thromboembolic stroke (9, 10). However,
despite the clear importance of TXA2 in these disease processes, the molecular interaction of TXA2 with its
receptor protein remains unknown. To date, the information available
concerning the TP receptor ligand-binding domain(s) has been mostly
limited to mutational analyses using receptor chimeras or expressed
receptor protein containing site-specific mutations as well as ligand
interactions with modified receptor peptides or molecular modeling.
Collectively results from these studies have implicated transmembrane
domains I, III, IV, V, VI, and VII as well as extracellular domains II and III as potential regions for ligand coordination sites (11-18). Since all of the cited receptor regions would not be expected to
participate in or form the ligand-binding domain, it would seem that
the interpretation of some of these results may be limited by the
potential for gross alterations in receptor tertiary structure. Based
on this consideration, the present study used two different approaches
to identify critical ligand coordination sites in the TP receptor
protein. The first of these approaches utilized a novel and recently
characterized bifunctional TP receptor antagonist, SQBAzide, to
irreversibly label and track ligand-binding sites; the second approach
utilized site-specific antibodies to probe different regions of the TP
receptor protein. Our results indicate that the C-terminal portion of
ED3 may form a critical ligand-binding domain for the TP receptor protein.
Materials--
CHAPS, thrombin, A23187, rabbit preimmune IgG,
streptavidin, fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated goat anti-rabbit
immunoglobulin, trypsin, and CNBr were purchased from Sigma. U46619 and
SQ29,548 were obtained from Cayman Chemicals (Ann Arbor, MI).
[3H]SQ29,548 and Na125I were purchased
from PerkinElmer Life Sciences. The continuous elution electrophoresis
apparatus and Whole Gel Eluter were provided by Bio-Rad Laboratories.
Outdated human platelet phoresis units (5-10 days postdraw) were
acquired from Heartland Blood Services (Aurora, IL). Site-specific
peptides were synthesized and purified to >95% purity by Multiple
Peptide Systems (San Diego, CA). Dynex Technologies (Chantilly, VA)
produced the Immulon 2HB microtiter plates used in enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assays (ELISAs). Flow cytometric experiments were
conducted using a Becton Dickinson FACStar analyzer and Calibrite beads
(San Jose, CA).
Site-directed Antibody Production--
Sequence-specific
antibodies were raised by previously described procedures (19) against
the following receptor peptide segments: ED2 (ED2Ab:
His89-Val98), the N-terminal segment of ED3
(ED3aAb: Gly172-Cys183), the C-terminal
segment of ED3 (ED3bAb: Cys183-Asp193), and
the N-terminal segment of ED4 (ED4Ab:
Thr268-Met276) (Fig.
1A). Each of these antibodies
was reactive against their cognate peptide (shown by ELISA; data not
shown). In separate studies, immunoblots against solubilized platelet
membranes revealed immunoreactivity at 55 kDa that was blocked by
preincubation of the antibodies with their cognate peptides (100 µM; Fig. 1B). Additional experiments
demonstrated that the affinity-purified antibodies also recognized
solubilized TP receptors coated to ELISA plates (Fig. 1C) as
well as TP receptors present on intact platelets (determined by flow
cytometry; Fig. 1D). Thus, these antibodies are capable of
interacting with their peptide targets in the denatured receptor
conformation, in the native receptor conformation, and in the
membrane-imbedded conformation.
ELISA--
ELISAs were performed to test peptide purified
antibody reactivity against conjugate peptide as well as native
receptor protein. Immulon 2HB microtiter plates were coated with either
12.5 µg/well synthetic peptide or 125 µg/well solubilized platelet
membranes for 18-24 h at room temperature. Following the incubation,
the plates were washed three times with 200 µl/well modified
Tyrode's buffer (0.1% bovine serum albumin, 5 mM
dextrose, 1 mM CaCl2, 5 mM HEPES,
pH 7.4), and then nonspecific sites were blocked by incubation for
1 h with 5% bovine serum albumin (200 µl/well) in the same
buffer. Plates were again washed three times with the modified
Tyrode's buffer prior to applying serial dilutions of various peptide
purified site-specific antibodies to the wells in triplicate.
Antibodies were allowed to incubate for 1 h followed by three more
washes. Antibodies bound to the immobilized peptide or protein were
detected by incubation (1 h) with goat anti-rabbit IgG (heavy + light) conjugated to horseradish peroxidase. The wells were then
washed a final time before the addition of the horseradish peroxidase
substrate solution (50 µl of 0.4 mg/ml o-phenylenediamine,
0.012% H2O2 in 80 mM citrate
phosphate, pH 5). After a 10-min incubation in the dark, the reaction
was quenched with 2 N H2SO4 (200 µl/well). The presence of specific antibodies was measured by the
absorbance at 490 nm.
Flow Cytometry--
Resuspended platelets (20) at a
concentration of 1 × 107 platelets/ml were incubated
with various peptide purified site-specific antibodies (1:100 (v/v))
for 1 h. Samples were washed twice prior to the addition of
fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulin
(1:80 (v/v)). Samples were incubated for an additional hour prior to
analysis. A Becton Dickinson FACStar analyzer was used to perform
single-color analysis on the samples. The fluorescence channel was
calibrated with 2-µm Calibrite beads and adjusted to reflect
logarithmic output. A lower limit threshold was set for data
acquisition thereby eliminating background scatter.
Photoaffinity Labeling--
CHAPS-solubilized platelet membranes
were incubated with SQBAzide (2 µM) for 15 min in the
dark, and the samples were then subjected to photolysis with
ultraviolet light for 1 min at a distance of 5 cm using a 100-watt
Olympus mercury lamp. Photolysis was terminated by the addition of
dithiothreitol (4 mM) to the samples followed by a 10×
concentration of the product by centrifugal filtration through 0.1-µm
low binding Durapore membranes from Millipore (Bedford, MA). Proteins
within the concentrated samples were separated by SDS-PAGE, and the
entire gel was transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane. The
receptor protein was then blocked for 1 h with 5% nonfat dried
milk and probed for irreversibly bound SQBAzide by incubating the
membrane for 2 h with 5% nonfat dried milk containing 37.5 nM 125I-streptavidin (which binds the biotin
functional groups of SQBAzide). After washing with 0.1% Tween in 5%
nonfat dried milk for 1 h, autoradiography of the membrane was performed.
CNBr Digestion--
Chemical digestion of TP receptors was
performed with CNBr according to the method described by Gross (21). In
this procedure, receptor protein was suspended in 70% formic acid
resulting in a final protein concentration of 1 mg/ml. CNBr crystals
were then added in 100× molar excess over methionine residues in the
protein with digestion carried out at room temperature while tilting
the solution for 24-36 h in the dark. Digestion was terminated by diluting the sample solution to 7% formic acid with deionized water
immediately followed by lyophilization.
SDS-Continuous Elution Electrophoresis (CEE)--
Receptor
proteins were partially purified by the technique of SDS-CEE as
described previously (22). In this procedure, using a continuous
elution electrophoresis apparatus, a typical SDS-polyacrylamide gel was
cast in a cylindrical electrophoresis tube bathed in a tank of running
buffer. Solubilized platelet membranes in sample buffer were then
applied to the top of the tube gel. The apparatus was operated at 2 watts constant power until the dye front migrated through the tube gel.
At this time, an outlet connection at the bottom of the tube gel was
connected to a peristaltic pump (rate = 0.1 ml/min), and 1-ml
fractions containing proteins of decreasing electrophoretic mobilities
were isolated over a 16-h period. A modification of this technique was
used to fractionate receptor protein fragments following chemical
digestion (23). To isolate these low molecular weight proteins, 16.5%
Tricine gels were cast in the tube gel system using
buffers as first described by Schagger and von Jagow (24). Protein
digests were then electrophoresed at 4 watts and fractionated as
described above.
Immunoprecipitation--
Immunoprecipitation was performed with
either ED3aAb or rabbit preimmune IgG. Specifically 400 µl of
antibody (1 mg/ml) was incubated with 400 µl of receptor digestion
fragments overnight followed by addition of protein A-Sepharose beads
(200 µl) for 4 h at 4 °C. Samples were washed three times
with 400 µl of 10 mM CHAPS in phosphate-buffered saline.
After the final wash, the supernatant was removed and the remaining
beads were boiled for 5 min and then microcentrifuged for 2 min. The
supernatant served as the immunoprecipitated product.
Tryptic Digestion--
Protein fragments were dialyzed and
lyophilized to dryness prior to resuspension in 100 mM
ammonium bicarbonate, pH 8.0. The samples were subsequently incubated
with trypsin at a 1:50 dilution of enzyme:substrate for 4 h at
37 °C.
Competition Binding--
CHAPS-solubilized platelet membranes
(100 µl; 2 mg/ml protein) were incubated with
[3H]SQ29,548 (2 nM) for total binding
samples. [3H]SQ29,548 (2 nM) plus unlabeled
SQ29,548 (2 µM) were co-incubated in the nonspecific
binding samples, and [3H]SQ29,548 (2 nM) plus
various amounts of site-specific antibodies or rabbit preimmune IgG (1 nM-1 µM) were co-incubated in the
competition binding samples. After a 30-min incubation at room
temperature, the protein samples were immobilized on Whatman GF/B glass
fiber filters (presoaked in 0.3% polyethyleneimine for 1 h) by
vacuum filtration and immediately washed twice with 5 ml of buffer (25 mM Tris base, 5 mM MgCl2, pH 7.4;
4 °C). The filters were assayed for radioactivity by liquid
scintillation spectroscopy using a Beckman LS 6800.
Aggregation in Resuspended Platelets--
Resuspended platelets
used in the aggregation studies were prepared from platelet-rich plasma
obtained from the University of Illinois Hospital Blood Bank (Chicago,
IL) according to the method of Kattelman (20). Briefly platelet-rich
plasma was treated with aspirin (3 mM) to inhibit
endogenous platelet production of TXA2. The platelet-rich
plasma was then centrifuged at 1400 × g for 15 min at
22 °C to pellet the platelets, and the pellet was resuspended in
modified Tyrode's buffer. Platelets were counted and adjusted to a
cell count of ~1.0 × 109 platelets/ml. The
platelets were incubated with indomethacin (20 µM). In
the aggregation studies, various site-specific antibodies or rabbit
preimmune IgG (200 nM) were incubated at room temperature with the platelets for 30 min prior to the addition of submaximal concentrations (eliciting ~80% maximal aggregation) of the TP receptor agonist U46619 (200 nM), thrombin (1 unit/ml), or the divalent cation ionophore A23187 (2 µM). The
aggregatory response was measured on a model 400 Lumi-aggregometer.
SQBAzide (25) represents a unique probe that combines a
photolabile azide moiety with a biotin functional group (Fig.
2A). To assess the ability of
SQBAzide to specifically and irreversibly label TP receptor protein,
competition photoaffinity labeling studies were first performed.
Labeling of solubilized platelet membranes with SQBAzide followed by
SDS-PAGE and autoradiography with 125I-streptavidin
revealed intense labeling of TP receptors at 55 kDa. The specificity of
this labeling for ligand-binding sites was demonstrated by the finding
that two structurally different receptor antagonists, SQ29,548 (Fig.
2B) and BM13.505 (data not shown), effectively competed for
the bulk of the 55 kDa photolabeling. In subsequent experiments, the
photolabeled TP receptors were partially purified using SDS-CEE (22).
The eluted fraction containing the 55-kDa proteins was chemically
digested on the C-terminal side of methionine residues using CNBr. The
predicted CNBr cleavage sites of TP receptor protein would be expected
to yield peptide fragments of varying size between 27.4 and 0.7 kDa
(Table I). It was found that Tricine gel
electrophoresis (24) of the digestion products followed by
autoradiography with 125I-streptavidin yielded a major
labeled fragment that corresponds to one of these predicted fragments,
i.e. an 8.1-kDa peptide (Fig. 2C and Table I).
The presence of this 8.1-kDa fragment suggests that photolabeling of
the receptor protein occurs within a peptide sequence spanning amino
acids Ala127 through Met202, which represents a
region between ID2 and the leading edge of transmembrane domain V
(TM5).
The sequence identity of this labeled 8.1-kDa fragment was next
investigated by studies using a new library of rabbit antibodies (see
"Experimental Procedures") directed against different peptide regions of the TP receptor protein. It can be seen that when this putative amino acid sequence (Ala127-Met202)
was probed with antibodies against ED2 (ED2Ab:
His89-Val98), ED3 (ED3aAb:
Gly172-Cys183; ED3bAb:
Cys183-Asp193), and ED4 (ED4Ab:
Thr268-Met276) no immunoreactivity was
observed in the region of ED2 or ED4 (Fig.
3A). On the other hand,
positive immunoreactivity was observed for both ED3aAb and ED3bAb (Fig.
3A), which target the sequence between Gly172
and Asp193 comprising ED3. These findings therefore
indicate that the 8.1-kDa photolabeled fragment contains an amino acid
sequence (Gly172-Asp193) known to be present
in ED3 and that the presence of this sequence in the CNBr digest is
consistent with the known CNBr cleavage sites.
Mapping of a Ligand-binding Site for the Human Thromboxane
A2 Receptor Protein*
,
,
¶
Department of Pharmacology, University of
Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60612 and
§ Vectorologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, CNRS-UMR
133, Ecole Nationale Supérieure de Chimie de Paris, 75231 Paris,
France
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (28K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
TP receptor protein recognition by
site-specific antibodies. A, location of peptides used
for site-specific antibody production within the putative structure of
the TP receptor. The model depicts TP receptor topology based upon
hydrophobicity plots and indicates the positions of peptides used to
raise antisera (filled circles). The dark filled
circle represents an overlapping peptide sequence. B,
immunoblot of solubilized platelet membranes probed with various
site-specific an tibodies in the presence (+) or absence (
) of
cognate peptides (100 µM) and detected by enhanced
chemiluminescence. PI represents preimmune control.
C, reactivities of anti-ED2 (
), anti-ED3a (
),
anti-ED3b (
), and anti-ED4 (
) IgG against solubilized platelet
membranes as detected by ELISAs. Each point represents the mean ± S.E. of triplicate values from three separate experiments in which
preimmune base-line values have been subtracted. D, flow
cytometric analysis of site-specific antibody binding to intact
platelets for ED2Ab (I), ED3aAb (II), ED3bAb
(III), and ED4Ab (IV) as compared with preimmune
control. Values obtained represent the mean fluorescence intensity for
10,000 events.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (36K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Photoaffinity labeling of TP receptor
protein. A, structure of the biotinylated photoaffinity
probe SQBAzide. B, competition photoaffinity labeling of
platelet TP receptors. CHAPS-solubilized platelet membranes were
photolabeled with SQBAzide (2 µM) in the absence
(lane 1) or presence (lane 2) of competing
antagonist SQ29,548 (10 µM). Proteins were separated by
SDS-PAGE, immobilized on polyvinylidene difluoride membranes, and
probed for irreversibly bound SQBAzide with
125I-streptavidin. C, photolabeled TP receptors
were partially purified by electroelution of 55-kDa bands from
SDS-polyacrylamide gels and chemically digested with CNBr. The
incorporation of SQBAzide into a receptor fragment was determined by
Tricine SDS-PAGE, electrophoretic transfer to polyvinylidene difluoride
membranes, and identification with 125I-streptavidin.
Predicted major CNBr cleavage fragments of the human TP receptor

View larger version (23K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Receptor localization of a photolabeled,
CNBr-generated fragment of the TP receptor. A,
immunoblot of the photolabeled and purified 8.1-kDa CNBr digestion
product of the TP receptor with site-specific antibodies directed
against the TP receptor extracellular domains. B,
immunoprecipitation of photolabeled TP receptor digestion products by
the anti-peptide antibody ED3aAb. The 8.1 ± 1-kDa CNBr-digested,
photolabeled TP receptor fragment was isolated by Tricine SDS-CEE (23)
and concentrated. Equal amounts of the sample were subjected to
immunoprecipitation with ED3aAb or rabbit preimmune IgG. The
immunoprecipitate from each sample was then transferred onto
polyvinylidene difluoride membranes under vacuum filtration and
dot-blotted with 125I-streptavidin. Dots were punched out
uniformly and counted on a
counter. PI, preimmune
IgG.
The sequence identity of the 8.1-kDa labeled fragment was further confirmed by immunoprecipitation studies. Specifically samples containing the 8.1 ± 1-kDa CNBr digest were pooled, concentrated, and immunoprecipitated with ED3aAb, which recognizes the N-terminal half of ED3 containing amino acids Gly172-Cys183. The immunoprecipitated protein was then probed by dot blot analysis using 125I-streptavidin for assessment of SQBAzide photolabeling. It can be seen (Fig. 3B) that relative to preimmune IgG, ED3aAb immunoprecipitated the SQBAzide-photolabeled 8.1-kDa CNBr fragment. Thus, the predicted chemical CNBr cleavage sequence for the 8.1-kDa fragment (Ala127-Met202) was confirmed by immunoblotting, and photolabeling of this predicted sequence was confirmed by immunoprecipitation.
However, while the above studies establish that the Gly172-Cys183 sequence constitutes a portion of the 8.1-kDa labeled fragment, they do not determine whether photolabeling occurs within the Gly172-Cys183 sequence itself. This possibility was investigated by a series of experiments in which the concentrated 8.1-kDa sample was subjected to further digestion with trypsin. Specifically the concentrated 8.1-kDa CNBr digest was divided into two samples. One sample was treated with trypsin vehicle, and the other sample was digested with trypsin as described under "Experimental Procedures." Each sample was then subjected to SDS-CEE. To determine the efficiency of tryptic digestion, fragments in each sample migrating to 8.1 ± 1 kDa were collected, pooled, and concentrated. Furthermore, since tryptic digestion of the CNBr 8.1-kDa fragment is predicted to yield a 2.9-kDa peptide (Arg174-Met202) containing ED3 (previously shown to be immunoreactive against ED3aAb and ED3bAb; Fig. 3A), fractions migrating to 2.9 ± 1 kDa were also collected, pooled, and concentrated. The SDS-CEE fractions corresponding to the following molecular masses were collected: the 8.1-kDa fraction (no trypsin), the 2.9-kDa fraction (no trypsin), the 8.1-kDa fraction (plus trypsin), and the 2.9- kDa fraction (plus trypsin). These fractions were then immunoprecipitated with ED3aAb. The immunoprecipitated protein was probed by dot blot analysis using 125I-streptavidin for assessment of SQBAzide photolabeling and normalized for nonspecific immunoprecipitation by using preimmune serum.
Table II illustrates that the efficiency of trypsin digestion was ~60%, i.e. the counts in the 8.1-kDa fragment decreased from 16,758 to 6,480 cpm. It can also be seen that following trypsin digestion the bulk of the counts shifted to the 2.9-kDa fragment. More importantly, however, the decrease in counts in the 8.1-kDa fragment can be completely accounted for by the increase in counts in the 2.9-kDa fragment. This finding establishes that the labeling of the 8.1-kDa fragment is exclusively localized in the 2.9-kDa subfragment. Furthermore, the ability of ED3aAb to immunoprecipitate this 2.9-kDa fragment is consistent with the known cleavage sites for both CNBr and trypsin and provides evidence that SQBAzide photolabels the amino acid sequence Arg174-Met202 of the TP receptor protein.
|
Subsequent competition radioligand binding studies confirmed this
notion and identified a subregion of the
Arg174-Met202 sequence that is required for
ligand interaction. Specifically affinity-purified antibodies against
ED2 (ED2Ab), ED3 (ED3aAb and ED3bAb), and ED4 (ED4Ab) were tested for
their ability to compete with binding of the TP receptor antagonist
[3H]SQ29,548 to solubilized TP receptors. It was found
(Fig. 4, A and B)
that throughout the concentration range of
10
9-10
6 M, ED2Ab
(His89-Val98) or ED4Ab
(The268-Met276) had no measurable effect on
[3H]SQ29,548 binding. This finding may be expected since
neither antibody targets the photolabeled sequence
(Arg174-Met202). Furthermore, when the
N-terminal portion of this sequence was probed with ED3aAb
(Gly172-Cys183), again no effect on ligand
binding was observed (Fig. 4C). This lack of
inhibition cannot be due to an inability of ED3aAb to interact with
membrane-associated TP receptors since this antibody was shown by flow
cytometry to react with intact platelet TP receptors (Fig.
1D). Thus, the N-terminal portion of ED3 does not appear to
be critical for ligand interaction. In contrast, the same concentration range of ED3bAb, which targets the C-terminal portion of ED3
(Cys183-Asp193), produced a
dose-dependent inhibition of binding with the highest concentration resulting in an 80% reduction of binding activity (Fig
4D). Furthermore, evidence that this inhibition was
sequence-specific was provided in additional experiments in which
ED3bAb was preabsorbed with its cognate peptide. Under these
conditions, the ability of the antibody to inhibit binding was reversed
(data not shown). Based on these considerations, it appears that the
C-terminal (Cys183-Asp193) and not the
N-terminal portion (Gly172-Cys183) of ED3 is
important for ligand coordination.
|
Since the above results demonstrate that ED3bAb blocks TP receptor
ligand binding, it might be expected that this antibody should also
affect TP receptor-mediated platelet aggregation. This was indeed found
to be the case. In these experiments, resuspended platelets were
treated with ED3bAb or preimmune IgG prior to addition of the
TXA2 mimetic U46619. It was found that 200 nM
of this antibody produced substantial inhibition of platelet
aggregation (Fig. 5A). In
separate experiments it was shown that preabsorption of ED3bAb with its
cognate peptide completely reversed this antibody inhibition of
aggregation. Furthermore, this same concentration of ED3bAb had no
effect on aggregation induced by either thrombin or the divalent cation
ionophore A23187 (Fig. 5, B and C). These results
indicate that antibody interaction with the C-terminal segment
(Cys183-Asp193) of ED3 specifically blocks
platelet aggregation mediated through the TP receptor pathway. ED3bAb
therefore represents the first functional antibody against the TP
receptor protein. Additional studies with ED2Ab and ED3aAb revealed no
effect on U46619-induced aggregation (Fig.
6). However, ED4Ab was found to produce
limited inhibition. Since this antibody had no effect on radioligand
binding (Fig. 4B), the nature of the inhibition is unclear.
Finally, none of these antibodies had any effect on thrombin- or
A23187-induced aggregation (data not shown).
|
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The present experiments combined two separate approaches to map a ligand-binding site in human TP receptors. The biotinylated photoaffinity probe SQBAzide was shown to specifically label TP receptor protein, and digestion of this protein with CNBr revealed that the bulk of the photolabeling appeared in an 8.1-kDa fragment predicted to represent the receptor segment between Ala127-Met202. The identity of this predicted sequence and the location of labeling within this sequence was next determined by the application of site-specific antibodies directed against different regions of the receptor protein. Consistent with the predicted cleavage sites for CNBr, it was found that the labeled 8.1-kDa CNBr fragment was not recognized by antibodies against sequences in ED2 (His89-Val98) or ED4 (Thr268-Met276) but could be immunoblotted and immunoprecipitated by antibodies raised against contiguous sequences in ED3, i.e. Gly172-Cys183 and Cys183-Asp193. Furthermore, the digestion of this CNBr fragment with trypsin yielded a labeled 2.9-kDa fragment with a predicted sequence of Arg174-Met202. This predicted sequence was in turn confirmed by immunoprecipitation studies using an antibody (ED3aAb) that recognizes the Gly172-Cys183 sequence contained within ED3. Subsequent studies used different antibodies to probe the subregion of the 2.9-kDa fragment that is involved in ligand binding. It was found that only ED3bAb effectively blocked [3H]SQ29,548 binding, suggesting that the sequence Cys183-Asp193 may contain a critical ligand coordination site. The inability of the other antibodies to interfere with binding cannot be due to slight differences in affinity for TP receptors (Fig. 1D) since the radioligand binding studies were conducted over a 3 log unit antibody concentration range.
The importance of the region containing the Cys183-Asp193 sequence was confirmed in platelet aggregation studies that revealed that ED3bAb specifically blocked U46619-induced aggregation, while antibodies against other receptor regions (ED2Ab and ED3aAb) were without effect. On the other hand, these studies also showed that ED4Ab produced modest inhibition of U46619-induced aggregation (Fig. 6). However, since ED4Ab did not interfere with radioligand binding to TP receptors (Fig. 4B), the observed inhibition may derive from secondary causes, e.g. allosteric effects on receptor-G protein coupling. This mechanism presumably does not play an important role in ED3bAb inhibition since a given concentration of ED3bAb produced similar inhibition of ligand binding and aggregation (50 and 70%), suggesting a direct relationship between reduced ligand binding and reduced aggregation. Taken together the present results therefore indicate that the third extracellular receptor domain contains an important ligand-binding site in the region of amino acids Cys183-Asp193.
In contrast to the aforementioned data, much of the previous work done
to elucidate a ligand-binding domain on the TP receptor and other G
protein-coupled receptors has centered on the participation of
transmembrane regions. This focus can be traced to earlier studies done
on bacteriorhodopsin and its G protein-coupled receptor homolog,
rhodopsin, that revealed a binding pocket in the seventh membrane-spanning region of the receptor protein (26). The
subsequent cloning of several of the G protein-coupled receptors
identified a family of proteins not only sharing structural similarity
but also notable transmembrane sequence homology with rhodopsin. As a
result, the majority of investigations into the composition of the
ligand-binding pocket for these receptors hypothesized transmembrane
involvement. In this regard, experiments performed on two of the most
extensively studied seven transmembrane receptors, the
2- and
2-adrenergic receptors, suggested
that the fourth and seventh transmembrane regions, respectively,
participate in ligand binding (27, 28).
Since the TP receptor belongs to the seven transmembrane-spanning class of receptors, it was originally proposed that the binding domain of this receptor may also reside in TM7 (11). Other investigators (14) proposed that while TM7 interacts with the ligand carboxyl group, separate transmembrane regions also participate in ligand binding, i.e. TM3 coordinates with the prostanoid ring, and the TM4 and TM5 regions interact with the alkyl chains. More recently site-directed mutagenesis studies have investigated the ligand coordination site for TP receptors. Specifically, Funk et al. (12) obtained four mutants with point mutations at TM7 of the TP receptor, i.e. between Leu291 and Trp299. Three of these mutants completely lost binding activity to both antagonists and agonists. Although the fourth mutant, W299L, did not recognize the TP receptor antagonist SQ29,548, it was capable of binding two different TP receptor agonists with the same affinity as that observed for the wild type receptor. In addition, Chiang et al. (15) reported that mutations of S201A and S255A at TM5 and TM6, respectively, caused altered affinity to the agonist I-BOP but had no effect on binding SQ29,548. Collectively these latter results indicate that alterations in either the TM5, TM6, or TM7 region can diminish ligand binding to TP receptors. Separate studies by Dorn et al. (17) used receptor chimeras to evaluate ligand binding activity. We concluded that residues in TM1 constitute an important portion of the TP receptor binding site. Finally, reports from two different groups suggested that the putative disulfide bond between Cys105 and Cys183/184 in ED2 and ED3, respectively, plays a critical role in receptor-ligand binding. In particular, mutants C105A and C183A from the human placenta TP receptor (15) and mutants C105S and C184S from human K562 TP receptors (16) did not show binding activity of either agonists or antagonists. In addition, both groups reported that Cys102, which is conserved in most seven transmembrane-spanning receptors including the TP receptor (but absent in other prostanoid receptors), also plays an important, yet unspecified role in ligand binding.
Thus, the previous results point to multiple sites in the TP receptor that may seem critical for ligand binding, i.e. transmembrane regions I, III, IV, V, VI, and VII as well as cysteine residues in ED2 and ED3. However, since alterations in either hydrophobic segments or the elimination of disulfide bonds can lead to significant effects on protein structure, at least some of these receptor alterations may not be at the critical ligand coordination site(s). Based on this consideration, the existence of a definitive transmembrane ligand-binding domain for the TP receptor has yet to be established.
Regarding other possible ligand-binding sites, evidence also exists to
support the notion that ligands can coordinate with extracellular
domains. Specifically our previous results using the biotinylated TP
receptor antagonist SQB (29) demonstrated that SQB can
simultaneously bind to intact platelet TP receptors and the 68-kDa
protein avidin. On the other hand, molecular dynamic simulations
revealed that the SQB extended conformation is only 20.5 Å, and the
relaxed conformation is considerably less. On this basis, we proposed
that the ligand coordination site(s) for the TP receptor must reside at
or near the external aspect of the plasma membrane. Furthermore, work
done on the bradykinin B2 receptor using site-specific antibodies has
identified the N-terminal portion of ED3 as crucial to both ligand
binding and agonist function (30). More recently a constrained peptide
containing amino acids representing ED3 of the TP receptor was shown to
change conformation in response to the TP receptor antagonist SQ29,548 (18). These results in combination with the present data suggest that
extracellular regions of seven transmembrane receptors may represent
important ligand coordination sites. For the TP receptor we have
provided evidence that one of these extracellular regions may reside in
the C-terminal portion of ED3 that contains amino acids
Cys183-Asp193. On the other hand, this finding
does not exclude the possibility that other amino acid sequences in the
receptor may also participate in ligand coordination. Nevertheless it
is believed that identification of this specific amino acid region will
serve as an important reference point for future modeling studies
describing the three-dimensional structure of the TP receptor binding
pocket. This information should, in turn, facilitate our understanding
of the molecular mechanism by which TXA2 binds to this
biologically important receptor protein.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant HL24530 (to G. C. L.), the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (to G. C. L. and K. A.), the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America Foundation (to J. W. T.), and the Chateaubriand Fellowship Program offered by the Office for Science and Technology of the Embassy of France in the United States (to J. W. T.) and was conducted under the auspices of the Association for United States-French Biomedical Cooperation.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Pharmacology, University of Illinois at Chicago, College of Medicine, 835 S. Wolcott Ave. (M/C 868), Chicago, IL 60612. Tel.: 312-996-4929; Fax: 312-996-1225; E-mail: gcl@uic.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, March 4, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M105872200
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: TXA2, thromboxane A2; TP receptor, thromboxane A2 receptor; ID, intracellular domain; ED, extracellular domain; CHAPS, 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonic acid; Ab, antibody; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; CEE, continuous elution electrophoresis; TM, transmembrane domain; Tricine, N-[2-hydroxy-1,1-bis(hydroxymethyl)ethyl]glycine.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Moncada, S.,
and Vane, J. R.
(1978)
Pharmacol. Rev.
30,
293-331[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 2. |
Ogletree, M. L.
(1987)
Fed. Proc.
46,
133-138[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 3. |
FitzGerald, G.,
Healey, C.,
and Daugherty, J.
(1987)
Fed. Proc.
46,
154-158[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 4. |
Oates, J. A.,
FitzGerald, G. A.,
Branch, R. A.,
Jackson, E. K.,
Knapp, H. R.,
and Roberts, L. J.
(1988)
N. Engl. J. Med.
319,
689-767[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 5. |
Patrono, C.,
Ciabattoni, G.,
and Davi, G.
(1990)
Stroke
21, Suppl. IV,
130-133 |
| 6. |
Antiplatelet Trialists' Group.
(1994)
Br. Med. J.
308,
81-106 |
| 7. |
Antiplatelet Trialists' Group.
(1994)
Br. Med. J.
308,
159-168 |
| 8. |
Antiplatelet Trialists' Group.
(1994)
Br. Med. J.
308,
235-246 |
| 9. |
Clarke, R. J.,
Mayo, G.,
Price, P.,
and FitzGerald, G. A.
(1991)
N. Engl. J. Med.
325,
1137-1141[Abstract] |
| 10. |
Patrono, C.
(1994)
N. Engl. J. Med.
330,
1287-1294 |
| 11. |
Hirata, M.,
Hayashi, Y.,
Ushikubi, F.,
Yokota, Y.,
Kageyama, R.,
Nakanishi, S.,
and Narumiya, S.
(1991)
Nature
349,
617-620[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 12. |
Funk, C. D.,
Furci, L.,
Moran, N.,
and FitzGerald, G. A.
(1993)
Mol. Pharmacol.
44,
934-939[Abstract] |
| 13. |
Yamamoto, Y.,
Kamiya, K.,
and Terao, S.
(1993)
J. Med. Chem.
36,
820-825[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 14. |
Narumiya, S.,
Hirata, N.,
Namba, T.,
Hayashi, Y.,
Ushikubi, F.,
Sugimoto, Y.,
Negishi, M.,
and Ichikawa, A.
(1993)
J. Lipid Mediat.
6,
155-161[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 15. |
Chiang, N.,
Kan, W. M.,
and Tai, H.-H.
(1996)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
334,
9-17[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 16. |
D'Angelo, D. D.,
Eubank, J. J.,
Davis, M. G.,
and Dorn, G. W., II
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
6233-6240 |
| 17. |
Dorn, G. W., II,
Davis, M. G.,
and D'Angelo, D. D.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
12399-12405 |
| 18. |
Ruan, K.-H., So, S.-P., Wu, J., Li, D.,
Huang, A.,
and Kung, J.
(2001)
Biochemistry
40,
275-280[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 19. |
Borg, C.,
Lam, C.-T.,
Dieter, J. P.,
Lim, C. T.,
Komiotis, D.,
Venton, D. L.,
and Le Breton, G. C.
(1993)
Biochem. Pharmacol.
45,
2071-2078[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 20. |
Kattelman, E. J.,
Venton, D. L.,
and Le Breton, G. C.
(1986)
Thromb. Res.
41,
471-481[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 21. |
Gross, E.
(1967)
Methods Enzymol.
11,
238-253 |
| 22. | Hager, K. M., and Wright, E. M. (1994) Bulletin 1685 , Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA |
| 23. | Turek, J. W., and Le Breton, G. C. (1998) Bulletin 2344 , Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA |
| 24. |
Schagger, H.,
and von Jagow, G.
(1987)
Anal. Biochem.
166,
368-379[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 25. |
Halmos, T.,
Turek, J. W., Le,
Breton, G. C.,
and Antonakis, K.
(1999)
Bioorg. & Med. Chem. Lett.
9,
2963-2968[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 26. |
Findlay, J. B. C.,
and Pappin, D. J. C.
(1986)
Biochem. J.
238,
625-642[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 27. |
Matsui, H.,
Lefkowitz, R.,
Caron, M.,
and Regan, J.
(1989)
Biochemistry
28,
4125-4130[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 28. |
Wong, S. K.-F.,
Slaughter, C.,
Ruoho, A.,
and Ross, E.
(1988)
J. Biol. Chem.
263,
7925-7928 |
| 29. |
Komiotis, D.,
Wencel-Drake, J. D.,
Dieter, J. P.,
Lim, C. T.,
and Le Breton, G. C.
(1996)
Biochem. Pharmacol.
52,
763-770[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 30. |
Alla, S. A.,
Quitterer, U.,
Grigoriev, S.,
Maidhof, A.,
Haasemann, M.,
Jarnagin, K.,
and Muller-Esterl, W.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
1748-1755 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. T. Khasawneh, J.-S. Huang, J. W. Turek, and G. C. L. Breton Differential Mapping of the Amino Acids Mediating Agonist and Antagonist Coordination with the Human Thromboxane A2 Receptor Protein J. Biol. Chem., September 15, 2006; 281(37): 26951 - 26965. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. G. Mishra, F. Z. Stanczyk, K. A. Burry, S. Oparil, B. S. Katzenellenbogen, M. L. Nealen, J. A. Katzenellenbogen, and R. K. Hermsmeyer Metabolite ligands of estrogen receptor-{beta} reduce primate coronary hyperreactivity Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 2006; 290(1): H295 - H303. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. G. Mishra, R. K. Hermsmeyer, K. Miyagawa, P. Sarrel, B. Uchida, F. Z. Stanczyk, K. A. Burry, D. R. Illingworth, and F. J. Nordt Medroxyprogesterone Acetate and Dihydrotestosterone Induce Coronary Hyperreactivity in Intact Male Rhesus Monkeys J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2005; 90(6): 3706 - 3714. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Ding, F. Tuluc, K. R. Bandivadekar, L. Zhang, J. Jin, and S. P. Kunapuli Arg333 and Arg334 in the COOH terminus of the human P2Y1 receptor are crucial for Gq coupling Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, March 1, 2005; 288(3): C559 - C567. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Wilson, A. M. Roche, E. Kostetskaia, and E. M. Smyth Dimerization of the Human Receptors for Prostacyclin and Thromboxane Facilitates Thromboxane Receptor-mediated cAMP Generation J. Biol. Chem., December 17, 2004; 279(51): 53036 - 53047. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Qiao, D. Reynaud, P. Demin, P. V. Halushka, and C. R. Pace-Asciak The Thromboxane Receptor Antagonist PBT-3, a Hepoxilin Stable Analog, Selectively Antagonizes the TP{alpha} Isoform in Transfected COS-7 Cells J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., December 1, 2003; 307(3): 1142 - 1147. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-P. So, J. Wu, G. Huang, A. Huang, D. Li, and K.-H. Ruan Identification of Residues Important for Ligand Binding of Thromboxane A2 Receptor in the Second Extracellular Loop Using the NMR Experiment-guided Mutagenesis Approach J. Biol. Chem., March 21, 2003; 278(13): 10922 - 10927. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Sachon, G. Bolbach, G. Chassaing, S. Lavielle, and S. Sagan Cgamma H2 of Met174 Side Chain Is the Site of Covalent Attachment of a Substance P Analog Photoactivable in Position 5 J. Biol. Chem., December 20, 2002; 277(52): 50409 - 50414. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||