Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M112382200 on February 25, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 19, 16928-16935, May 10, 2002
The High Specificities of Phaseolus
vulgaris Erythro- and Leukoagglutinating Lectins for Bisecting
GlcNAc or
1-6-Linked Branch Structures, Respectively, Are
Attributable to Loop B*
Yuko
Kaneda,
Robert F.
Whittier,
Hidenori
Yamanaka,
Enrique
Carredano
,
Masanori
Gotoh,
Hiroyuki
Sota,
Yukio
Hasegawa, and
Yasuro
Shinohara§
From Tokyo Research and Development, Amersham Biosciences, 3-25-1, Hyakunincho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 169-0073 Japan and
Uppsala Research and Development, Amersham Biosciences,
Bjorkgatan 30, Uppsala, SE-751 25, Sweden
Received for publication, December 26, 2001, and in revised form, February 25, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
Despite very similar tertiary structures based
upon a common framework, legume lectins exhibit an amazing variety of
sugar binding specificities. While most of these lectins recognize
rather discrete sugar linkages, Phaseolus vulgaris
erythroagglutinating and leukoagglutinating lectins (E4-
and L4-PHA) are unique in recognizing larger structures.
E4- and L4-PHA are known to recognize complex
type N-glycans containing bisecting GlcNAc or a
1,6-linked branch, respectively. However, the detailed mechanisms of
molecular recognition are poorly understood. In order to dissect the
contributions of different portions of each lectin, we carried out
region-swapping mutagenesis between E4- and
L4-PHA. We prepared six chimeric lectins by exchanging
different combinations of loop B and the central portion of loop C, two
of four loops thought to be important for the recognition of
monosaccharides (Sharma, V., and Surolia, A. (1997) J. Mol.
Biol. 267, 433-445). The chimeric lectins' sugar binding
activities were evaluated quantitatively by surface plasmon resonance.
These comparisons indicate that the high specificities of
E4- and L4-PHA toward bisecting GlcNAc and
1,6-linked branch structures are almost solely attributable to loop
B. The contribution of the central portion of loop C to the recognition
of those structural motifs was found to be negligible. Instead,
it modulates affinity toward LacNAc residues present at the nonreducing
terminus. Moreover, some of the chimeric lectins prepared in this study
showed even higher specificities/affinities than native E4-
and L4-PHA toward complex sugar chains containing either a
bisecting GlcNAc residue or a
1,6-linked branch.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The legume lectins are a family of sugar-binding
proteins found mainly in the seeds of plants belonging to the
Leguminosae family (1-3). Lectins from leguminous plants
constitute a large family of homologous proteins displaying remarkable
divergence in their carbohydrate specificity. Elucidation of the
mechanism by which these lectins can possess such a broad range of
binding specificities while maintaining a strikingly similar
three-dimensional monomer structure will be key to understanding the
essence of carbohydrate-protein interactions.
At present, the crystal structures of ~20 legume lectins have been
solved.1 These various lectin
monomers share a common so-called "jellyroll" structure composed
primary of a six- and a seven-stranded antiparallel
-sheet. Each
monomer binds a manganese and a calcium ion that are both essential for
carbohydrate binding. Amino acid sequence comparisons, x-ray
crystallographic analysis, and mutagenesis studies revealed that the
differences in carbohydrate specificity appear to be due primarily to
differences in amino acid residues residing in loops adjacent to the
carbohydrate binding site.
The primary carbohydrate-binding site of legume lectins is a shallow
depression on loops associated with the concave face of the
seven-stranded curved
-sheet (5). It is constructed mainly by
residues from four sequentially separate regions, which are described
by Sharma and Surolia (6) as loops A, B, C, and D. Side chains of two
highly conserved residues, Asp and Asn (contributed by loops A and C,
respectively), together with the backbone chain NH of a Gly or
Arg residue from loop B, play crucial roles in carbohydrate
recognition, since they participate in four key hydrogen bonds with the
monosaccharide. The carbohydrate is further stabilized by stacking
interactions with hydrophobic residues present in loop C. Gross
differences in the size of loop D were shown to be crucial for
distinguishing between Man/Glc and Gal/GalNAc (6).
Although legume lectins have been subdivided into categories based on
their monosaccharide specificities (1, 7), there are marked differences
in the fine specificities of the lectins within a single category.
Despite clear delineation of the primary binding site, the mechanism by
which legume lectins expand fine specificities and improve binding
affinity by subsite multivalence (8) is largely unknown.
Among legume lectins, E4- and
L4-PHA2 are
exceptional in displaying considerably greater degrees of
oligosaccharide specificity than had previously been appreciated. Both
are isolectins isolated from Phaseolus vulgaris (red kidney
bean) seeds (9). Despite differences in binding specificities and
hemagglutinating properties, subunits from E4- and
L4-PHA are similar in molecular weight as well as
carbohydrate and amino acid compositions. E4- and
L4-PHA exhibit greatest affinity toward complex type
N-glycans containing either bisecting GlcNAc or
1,6-linked LacNAc, respectively (10-14). The rather narrow
differences between these two lectins make them well suited for the
elucidation of subsite multivalence. Mirkov and Chrispeels (15)
reported that mutation of Asn128 to Asp in loop C of
L4-PHA eliminates carbohydrate binding and biological
activity, suggesting that this residue plays a key role in primary
recognition. However, the mechanism of L4-PHA specificity
toward
1,6-linked branch structures is not known. Although the
three-dimensional structure of L4-PHA has been recently solved (16, 17), neither the crystal structure of the complex nor the
three-dimensional structure of E4-PHA has yet been reported.
In light of these outstanding questions, we chose to
evaluate the effect of loop substitution on the sugar binding
specificities for the identification of subsites. To be concrete, the
primary sequences of E4- and L4-PHA were
compared, and loop B and the central portion of loop C were chosen for
swapping, since the biggest differences among the four loops (A-D)
were concentrated in these two. Sugar binding specificities of six
prepared chimeric lectins were extensively analyzed using a
quantitative assay system based on immobilized oligosaccharides. This
study clearly suggested that each loop functions to recognize different
parts of an oligosaccharide, and the combination of these loops
determines both the specificities and affinities of sugar binding.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials and Instrumentation--
Fetuin (insolubilized on 4%
beaded agarose) was purchased from Sigma. BIACORE®
(BIACORE AB, Uppsala, Sweden), which are based on surface plasmon resonance (SPR), were used to measure the biomolecular interactions. E4- and L4-PHA were purchased from Honen
Corp. (Tokyo, Japan). The abbreviations and structures of the
oligosaccharides used in this study are shown in Fig. 1. All of the
oligosaccharides, except for NA4-HD, shown in Fig.
1, were purchased from Oxford GlycoSystems (Abingdon, UK). The BIACORE SensorChip SA, Surfactant P20
was obtained from BIACORE AB. The HBS buffer comprised 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM CaCl2 and 0.05% Surfactant P20 in distilled
water. Lectins were purified by Superdex® 200, PC3.2/30 (Amersham
Biosciences) using the HBS buffer as a solvent. Quantitation of the
lectin was carried out with ultraviolet absorbance at 280 nm monitored
by a SMART® (Amersham Biosciences) UV monitor.
4-(Biotinamido) phenylacetylhydrazide (BPH) was synthesized as
previously reported (18).
Preparation of Total RNA from P. vulgaris and First-strand
cDNA Synthesis--
Total RNA was isolated from midmaturation
cotyledons (0.7 g total weight, 7-10 mm in length) of P. vulgaris cv. Tendergreen, according to the procedure reported by
Hoffman et al. (19), using the QuickPrep® Total RNA
Extraction Kit (Amersham Biosciences). RNA quantitation was done by
extinctional measurement of 260 nm. First-strand cDNA was
synthesized from total RNA described previously, using the First-Strand
cDNA Synthesis Kit (Amersham Biosciences).
PCR Amplification of Products for Cloning--
All PCRs used for
cloning purposes were carried out with the proofreading enzyme KOD
polymerase (Toyobo) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Cloning of E4-PHA and L4-PHA
cDNAs and Removal of Signal Peptide Coding
Regions--
E4- and L4-PHA cDNAs were
amplified from the first-strand cDNA via the PCR. For amplifying
L4-PHA, we used the oligonucleotide primers
5'-CATGAATTCATCCATGGCTTCCTCCAAGTTCT-3' and
5'-TGGAGTTTGGATCCTAGAGGATTTTGTTGAGGA-3', and for E4-PHA, we
used the primers 5'-CATGAATTCATCCATGGCTTCCTCCAACTTAC-3' and
5'-GTGGAGATGGATCCTAGAGGATTTGGTTGAGGA-3'. After digestion with EcoRI, each PCR-generated fragment was inserted into the
SmaI and EcoRI site of pBluescript II SK(+)
(TOYOBO, Osaka, Japan). From these clones, gene sequences lacking
the signal peptide regions (L4-PHA, amino acids 1-20; E4-PHA,
amino acids 1-21) (20) were amplified by PCR using oligonucleotide
primers 5'- CTCACCCACGCAATCATGAGCAACGATATCTAC-3' (L-forward),
5'-GGTCGACTCTAGAACTAGTGG-3' (L-reverse, for L4-PHA), 5'-CTCACCCACGCAACCATGGCCAGCCAAACCTCC-3' (E-forward), and
5'-GGTCGACTCTAGAACTAGTGG-3' (E-reverse, for E4-PHA). The
two PCR-generated fragments were each cloned separately into the
SmaI site of pUC18 using the SureCloneTM
Ligation Kit (Amersham Biosciences).
Hydrophobicity Comparison--
E4-PHA and
L4-PHA were compared along their length with respect to
hydrophobicity using Grease software based on the algorithms of Kyte
and Doolittle (21) and Pearson and Lipman (22).
Lectin Domain Swapping and Construction of Expression
Plasmids--
The E4- and L4-PHA genes each
contain two EcoO109I sites flanking the region encoding the
divergent B loop along with most of the divergent C loop. To facilitate
use of these sites for domain swapping, the genes lacking signal
peptides were subcloned via SalI and EcoRI from
their pUC18 constructs into a pBluescript II SK(+) derivative from
which the unique EcoO109I site had been removed. Following
restriction digestion, the EcoO109I fragments were exchanged
to create E-bLcL and
L-bEcE. In order to construct chimeric genes
encoding independent variation in loop B and loop C, overlap extension
PCR was used for site-directed mutagenesis of the short segment
encoding the two variant amino acids (VH or KD) at the center of loop
C. In detail, overlapping NH2- and COOH-terminal encoding
halves of each construct were amplified using appropriate outer primers
(L-forward and L-reverse or E-forward and E-reverse) together with
mutagenic overlapping inner primers, and the two amplified halves were
combined in the overlap extension step. The overlapping primers for
converting PHAE residues to PHAL residues were
5'-TGGGGTCCCAGTCCTTGTTGTAGAGGGTGTC-3' (L-BND-RV) and
5'-GACACCCTCTACAACAAGGACTGGGACCCCA-3' (L-BND-FW), while the opposite
conversion was accomplished with the overlapping primers 5'-TGGGGTCCCAGTGAACGTTGTAGAGGGTGTC-3' (E-BND-RV) and
5'-GACACCCTCTACAACGTTCACTGGGACCCCA-3' (E-BND-FW). In this way,
E-cL and L-cE were derived from
E4-PHA and L4-PHA, respectively, and
E-bL and L-bE were similarly derived from
E-bLcL and L-bEcE.
Using the BamHI and NcoI sites present in the
outer forward and reverse primers, all eight PHA gene sequence variants
(including wild types) were introduced individually into pET-11d
(Stratagene) for expression.
Expression of PHA and PHA Mutants in Escherichia coli--
The
constructed plasmids were introduced into E. coli BL21(DE3)
grown on an LB plate containing 100 µg/ml ampicillin. The BL21(DE3)
cells containing the plasmids were grown to the midlog phase at
37 °C in LB medium with 0.1 mg/ml ampicillin and then induced by the
addition of isopropyl-
-thiogalactoside to 1 mM. Cells were harvested by centrifugation at 6,000 × g
for 10 min.
Protein Extraction and Purification--
Extracts of expressed
cells were obtained by sonicating cells in phosphate-buffered saline
and collecting the supernatant after centrifugation at
20,000 × g for 10 min. The collected supernatant was
applied to a fetuin-agarose (Sigma) column, which had been equilibrated
with 7.5 volumes of HBS buffer at 4 °C. After washing the column
with HBS buffer, protein was eluted with 50 mM
H3PO4, followed by desalting using a PD-10
column (Amersham Biosciences). The protein was concentrated by
lyophilization and purified by Superdex 200, PC3.2/30 (Amersham
Biosciences) using HBS as the running buffer.
BPH Tagging of the Oligosaccharides--
BPH tagging of
oligosaccharides was performed under the previously reported conditions
(18). Briefly, the oligosaccharide dissolved in water was incubated
with a 4-fold molar excess of BPH in 30% acetonitrile at 90 °C for
1 h. After the reaction, 50 mM formate buffer (pH 3.5)
was added and stored at 4 °C for 12 h to promote
tautomerization from the acyclic Schiff base type hydrazone to stable
-glycosides. The reaction mixture was injected directly into reverse
phase high pressure liquid chromatography to purify the BPH adducts.
Binding Activity Analysis by SPR Biosensor--
Oligosaccharide
binding activities of E4-PHA, L4-PHA, and PHA
mutants were measured by SPR using a BIACORE instrument. In this
system, a BPH-labeled oligosaccharide (10 pmol) was introduced onto a
streptavidin sensor surface (SensorChip SA; BIACORE AB, Tokyo, Japan).
Lectins (10 µg/ml in HBS) were introduced onto the surface at a flow
rate of 20 µl/min. The interaction between lectin and oligosaccharide
was monitored as the change in SPR response at 25 °C. After 3 min,
flow was switched from sample to HBS buffer in order to initiate
dissociation. Sensor surfaces were regenerated with 50 mM
H3PO4.
The apparent kd was analyzed by fitting the
dissociation phase directly to the following equation,
|
(Eq. 1)
|
using nonlinear least squares analysis (23, 24).
R0 represents the amplitude of the dissociation
process. The ka was then analyzed by fitting the
association phase directly to the following equation,
|
(Eq. 2)
|
where Rmax represents the maximum
lectin-oligosaccharide complex concentration (in resonance
units), and C is the constant concentration of injected lectin.
The area under the curve (AUC) for both association and dissociation
phases was calculated using the trapezoidal rule. AUCd was
extrapolated over an infinite time interval using nonlinear regression.
Substituting Equation 1 into Equation 3, and integration from
t0, when dissociation was initiated, to
gives Equation 4,
|
(Eq. 4)
|
Substituting Equation 2 into Equation 3 and integration from 0 to t0 gives the following.
|
(Eq. 5)
|
Modeling--
The program package SYBYL® version
6.7 (Tripos Inc.) was used for all modeling. All computations have been
carried out in a Silicon Graphics OCTANETM work station
provided with two 195-MHz R10000 processors.
The molecules to be docked were first built with the correct chirality
using the builder module in SYBYL and then minimized (500 cycles) using
the MMFF94s force field (25).
All docking simulations were carried out with the program
FlexXTM (26), which is part of the SYBYL package. FlexX
uses a fast docking method that allows flexibility in the ligands,
keeping the receptor fixed. It places ligands into the active site
starting with one fragment and consequently building the whole molecule into the binding site, fragment by fragment. FlexX uses formal charges,
which were turned on during the docking simulations. All of the
relevant receptor information necessary for the docking simulations is
stored in the receptor definition file (rd file or rdf). The protein
structure used was the 2.8-Å resolution structure of
phytohemagglutinin-L (17) with accession code 1FAT in the Protein Data
Bank. The coordinates of chain B were used, since this chain was not
broken. Defaults have been used when creating the rd file and no
special customizations have been done. The residues belonging to the
binding site file in the rd file are Gln-19, Arg-20, Gly-44, Leu-46,
Arg-48, Gly-83, Pro-84, Ala-85, Asp-86, Pro-94, Gly-96, Ser-97, Gln-98,
Pro-99, Lys-100, Asp-101, Lys-102, Gly-103, Gly-104, Phe-105, Leu-106,
Gly-107, Phe-109, Asp-110, Gly-111, Ser-112, Asn-113, Ser-114, Asn-115,
Phe-116, His-117, Leu-126, Tyr-127, Asn-128, Lys-129, Asp-130, Trp-131, Asp-132, Asn-143, Ser-144, Ile-145, Arg-146, Thr-210, Thr-211, Gly-212,
Ile-213, Asn-214, Lys-215, Gly-216, Asn-217, and Val-218. These
residues were chosen because they surround the binding site formed
between and around loops B and C.
 |
RESULTS |
Quantitative Assay to Establish Sugar Binding Specificity Profiles
for Native E4- and L4-PHA--
Five
oligosaccharides (NGA2, NA2, NA2B, NA3, and NA4) were chosen as model
oligosaccharides based on the known sugar binding specificities of
E4- and L4-PHA. These were biotinylated with BPH and then immobilized onto streptavidin-coated sensor surfaces. The
molar amount of each immobilized oligosaccharide is presumed to be
nearly constant, since the amount of streptavidin was constant, and an
excess of purified BPH-oligosaccharide was introduced (18). A solution
containing the lectin was passed over the sensor surface, and binding
was monitored as changes in the SPR signal.
The sensorgrams obtained for native E4- and
L4-PHA with these model oligosaccharides are shown in Fig.
2. E4-PHA exhibited the
greatest increases in resonance signal with NA2, NA2B, and NA3, and the
maximum response with each was nearly equal although the patterns for
the association and dissociation phases differed quite markedly.
E4-PHA also interacted with NGA2 and NA4, displaying smaller increases in resonance signals. The apparent rate constant values were calculated for NA2, NA2B, and NA3 by fitting their sensorgrams using a simple one-to-one interaction model, and these are
summarized in Table I. The differences in
apparent ka were rather small, whereas the apparent
kd differed by up to an order of magnitude. The
other sensorgrams were difficult to fit to this model. In order to
obtain quantitative values for comparison among all the sensorgrams,
the AUCs for both the association and dissociation phases were
calculated (see details under "Experimental Procedures"). As shown
in Fig. 3a, the calculated
AUCd0
was extremely high for NA2B, and the
other values in descending order were NA3 > NA2 > NGA2
NA4. This is a reasonable order in view of the previously
reported sugar binding specificity of immobilized E4-PHA
during affinity chromatography (12, 14, 27).

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Sensorgrams showing the interaction of
E4-PHA (a) and L4-PHA
(b) with immobilized NGA2, NA2, NA2B, NA3, and
NA4. Each lectin was introduced onto the surface at a
concentration of 10 µg/ml. RU, response units.
|
|

View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Calculated AUCa (black
bar) and AUCd0
(white bar) for the interactions of
E4-PHA (a) and L4-PHA
(b) with immobilized NGA2, NA2, NA2B, NA3, and
NA4. After the injection of each lectin at a concentration of 10 µg/ml, association and dissociation were monitored for 3 min,
respectively. The AUCs for both phases was calculated using the
trapezoidal rule. AUCd was extrapolated over an infinite time
interval using nonlinear regression. RU, response
units.
|
|
As for L4-PHA, it also bound to all of the
oligosaccharides. The peak resonance signals obtained in descending
order were NA2 > NA4 > NGA2 > NA2B
NA3.
Patterns for association and dissociation phases again varied
dramatically. As shown in Fig. 3b, the calculated AUCd0
was extremely high for NA4 and
decreased for the remaining four oligosaccharides in the order NA2 > NA3 > NGA2
NA2B. This also agreed well with the
order previously reported for elution from immobilized
L4-PHA during analytical affinity chromatography (10, 12,
28). These results demonstrated the validity of this method as a
quantitative procedure for comparing sugar binding specificities of
chimeric lectins. The calculated AUCa showed no correlation with the results from affinity chromatography.
The other main observation from this study is that the
AUCd0
values calculated for
E4-PHA with the various oligosaccharides were generally
higher than those for L4-PHA. The calculated
AUCd0
value of NA2B was 1,400-fold higher for
E4-PHA than for L4-PHA. The only exception,
NA4, exhibited a value 1.7-fold higher for L4- than for
E4-PHA. The calculated AUCd0
values for the remaining oligosaccharides were uniformly higher with
E4- than L4-PHA (by 70-270-fold).
Selection of Regions to Be Swapped among Two PHA Lectins--
The
oligosaccharide binding profiles confirmed that both native lectins can
recognize fairly long sequences and that the lectins' binding
specificities can differ considerably from each other. Whereas these
differences must reflect differences in their structures, the
three-dimensional structure of E4-PHA has yet to be solved, so no direct three-dimensional comparison can be made. Therefore, primary structures of four loops thought to play important roles in
sugar recognition were compared (Fig. 4).
The greatest differences resided in loop B; of 26 amino acid residues
composing this loop in E4-PHA, five differed in identity,
and two were absent altogether from L4-PHA. To date, the
extent of knowledge about the role of loop B in legume lectins is that
a Gly or Arg residue therein hydrogen-bonds with monosaccharides (6).
How this longest loop contributes to fine sugar recognition is not
known and therefore merits study. Moreover, two of four variant
residues in loop C were also chosen. This loop contains calcium-binding
sites and a strikingly important Asn residue, whose substitution to Asp eliminates sugar binding activity (15, 29). These amino acid differences between E4- and L4-PHA were clearly
reflected in a hydrophobicity scale comparison (Fig.
5). Averaged over an 11-residue window,
E4-PHA is markedly less hydrophobic than L4-PHA
in the C-terminal portion of loop B, whereas the opposite pattern
exists for loop C. Due to the reasons described, we focused on those two loops, and six chimeric lectins were designed for the study of
their sugar binding specificities.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Comparison of hydrophobicity profiles between
E4- and L4-PHA. Hydrophobicity
values were computed according to Kyte and Doolittle (21) using a
window size of 11 residues. The scoring matrix for individual amino
acids varies from 4.5 for hydrophilic Arg to +4.5 for hydrophobic
Ile. The break in the hydrophobicity curve of L4-PHA
corresponds to an alignment gap at residues 112 and 113. The positions
of loops A, B, C, and D are indicated above the plots.
|
|
Preparation of Chimeric Lectins--
Plasmid pET-11d, containing
either L4-, E4-PHA, E-bL,
E-cL, E-bLcL, L-bE,
L-cE, or L-bEcE cDNA, was
expressed in E. coli. Each PHA was separated and purified by
fetuin-agarose affinity chromatography followed by gel filtration
chromatography. Purified proteins were analyzed by SDS-PAGE. Silver
staining detected only a single band for each purified lectin (data not
shown). Although their molecular weights were slightly reduced compared
with native PHA, this reduction was most likely attributable to the
absence of glycosylation. The result of gel filtration chromatography indicated that all recombinant PHAs were tetrameric, just as the native
PHAs. Therefore, the valence of each lectin should be unchanged.
Quantitative Sugar Binding Specificity Analysis of Each Chimeric
Lectin--
The sugar binding specificities of all six chimera lectins
were analyzed quantitatively by the method described above. The calculated AUCd0
values are summarized in
Fig. 6.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Sugar binding specificities of chimera
lectins. AUCa (black bar) and
AUCd0 (white bar) were
calculated for the interactions of E-bL, E-cL,
E-bL/cL, L-bE, L-cE,
and L-bE/cE with immobilized NGA2, NA2, NA2B,
NA3, and NA4. After the injection of each lectin at a concentration of
10 µg/ml, association and dissociation were monitored for 3 min,
respectively. The AUCs for both phases was calculated using the
trapezoidal rule. AUCd was extrapolated over an infinite time
interval using nonlinear regression. RU, resonance
units.
|
|
Comparing E-bL with native E4-PHA, loop B
substitution decreased the calculated AUCd0
for NA2B by 20-fold, while increasing that for NA4 by 12.8-fold. The
effects of this loop substitution on NGA2, NA2, and NA3 binding were
rather small.
In contrast, loop C substitution (E-cL) reduced the
calculated AUCd0
values by a fairly uniform
order of magnitude without altering the relative specificities.
Substitution of both loops yielded a pattern of sugar binding
specificities quite similar to that of native L4-PHA, as
reflected by the calculated AUCd0
values for
E-bLcL. The AUCd0
obtained for NA4 increased by more than 50-fold compared with native
E4-PHA and even exceeded that of native L4-PHA
by 28-fold. Thus, this chimeric lectin acquired even higher specificity
and affinity toward NA4 than native L4-PHA.
The specificity pattern obtained for L-bE was similar to
that of E4-PHA. Compared with native L4-PHA,
the AUCd0
obtained for NA2B increased by
15-fold, while decreasing by a drastic 120-fold for NA4. Although the
AUCd0
for NA2B was still 2 orders of
magnitude lower than that of native E4-PHA, the specificity
was improved, since cross-reactivity with NA2 and NA3 was relatively reduced.
Swapping of only the C loop (L-cE) increased the calculated
AUCd0
for all oligosaccharides. This effect
was most pronounced for NA2, whose value increased by 41-fold.
When both B and C loops were introduced from E4- into
L4-PHA (L-bEcE), like
L-bE, the specificity pattern was similar to that of
E4-PHA. Moreover, the AUCd0
calculated for NA2B was comparable with that of native
E4-PHA, and the specificities toward NA2 and NA3 were
relatively decreased compared with E4-PHA, making this
chimera lectin even more specific than the native E4-PHA
for NA2B while maintaining substantial affinity.
 |
DISCUSSION |
Structure binding activity relationship analyses were performed
for E4-PHA and L4-PHA using region-swapping mutagenesis.
To evaluate the effect of structural changes on sugar binding
specificities and binding affinity, we first established an evaluation
system, in which we could detect binding to immobilized oligosaccharides. The sugar binding specificities of lectins have been
traditionally evaluated by retardation or binding of oligosaccharides and/or glycopeptides on immobilized lectin affinity chromatography. Clearly, such an approach has limited quantitative potential. Since
lectins are often used to detect glycosylation pattern of cells or
tissues, and many sugar-lectin interactions take place on cell walls or
membranes, a solid phase surface with immobilized oligosaccharides has
great advantages in mimicking the natural situation. In this study, we
were able to improve quantitation of interactions by monitoring lectin
binding to oligosaccarides immobilized onto a sensor surface.
We employed AUC as a quantitative index for evaluating sensorgrams
obtained from interactions between lectins and immobilized oligosaccharides. Since this method does not require model fitting except for extrapolation using nonlinear regression, the obtained values are free from miscalculations due to inadequate models. We
observed good correlation between AUCd0
and
elution order derived from immobilized lectin affinity chromatography. The AUCd0
is a meaningful parameter, which is
described by R0/kd if the
interaction can be approximated by a one-to-one interaction model (see
"Experimental Procedures").
Although the binding specificities of E4- and
L4-PHA are similar qualitatively, they differ
quantitatively. In agreement with affinity chromatography studies using
immobilized lectins, we found that E4- and
L4-PHA most strongly recognized NA2B and NA4, respectively.
However, since those oligosaccharides were only retarded by affinity
chromatography and did not require hapten injection for elution, our
results seemed to magnify the differences in relative sugar binding
specificities. This magnification of relative binding strength may be
explained by an enhanced subunit multivalence effect whereby
immobilization of oligosaccharide and free multivalent lectin made the
binding conditions nonhomogeneous (8, 30). The large differences in
binding specificities we observed parallels the exclusivity of their
erythro- (E4) and leuko- (L4) agglutinating
activities (31). This analysis also showed that the high
AUCd0
values observed for NA2B and NA4 were
due mainly to their extremely slow apparent dissociation rates.
Quantitative sugar binding activity analysis of each chimeric
lectin revealed distinct functions of loop B and C in subsite multivalence. One of the clear conclusions from this study is that the
high specificities of E4- and L4-PHA toward
bisecting GlcNAc and a
1,6-linked branch, respectively, were
attributable almost solely to loop B. This conclusion can be drawn from
the observations that 1) those binding specificities were destroyed by
removing this loop from native PHAs and 2) those binding specificities can be transferred by swapping this loop between the two lectins. To
our knowledge, the only known function in sugar recognition previously
attributed to this longest loop lay in hydrogen bonding through the
backbone chain NH group of the Gly or Arg residue located at the end of
this loop. The current study reveals its central contribution to
subsite multivalence for the first time.
On the other hand, the replacements of loop C neither destroy nor
transfer those sugar binding specificities. Instead, loop C was found
to modulate affinity toward LacNAc residues present at a nonreducing
terminus. This loop also contains the Asn residue whose substitution to
Asp has been shown to eliminate sugar binding activity (15, 29).
Furthermore, this loop is reported to be the primary binding site for
mono- and disaccharides (32, 33). P. vulgaris contains two
proteins with no known carbohydrate binding activity: the
-amylase
inhibitor (
-AI) and arcelin. Both proteins share about 50-60%
sequence identity with E4- and L4-PHA. The crystal structures of arcelin variant 5a and
-AI variant 1 have been
solved (34, 35), and both lack loop C.
As is clear from the quantitative comparison of binding specificities
between E4- and L4-PHA, the relative
AUCd0
value obtained for each immobilized
oligosaccharide was always much higher for E4-PHA than for
L4-PHA except in the case of NA4. E-cL
maintained the relative sugar binding preferences of native E4-PHA, whereas AUCd0
values were
markedly decreased. On the other hand, the opposite loop swap
(L-cE) markedly increased AUCd0
for all tested oligosaccharides. These results suggest that loop C is
important for both lectins in the recognition of terminal LacNAc
residue(s), with the loop from E4-PHA conferring a much higher relative affinity than that from L4-PHA.
From the crystal structure of L4-PHA (17), it can be seen
that Gly-111 from loop B is located at one of the turns of the loop
(see Fig. 7), and the insertion of two
additional residues next to it would modify the topology considerably.
In an attempt to explain how this modification would interfere with the
binding of NA4, hendecasaccharide, NA4-HD (Fig. 1), was docked to the binding site formed in between and around loops B and C. For
comparison, NA2 and NA2B were also docked to this site. It was found
that NA4-HD and NA2 dock favorably to the binding site with the ranking NA4-HD > NA2. Moreover, it was found that NA2B does not dock
favorably to the binding site, all of this in agreement with the
sensorgrams shown in Fig. 1b and the
bars of Fig. 2b. Also, the docking conformation suggests a plausible explanation to why NA4 does not bind to
E4-PHA, L-bE, and
L-bE/cE, since all of these have two extra
residues inserted in the B loop. From Fig. 7 it is quite clear that
such an insertion would introduce prohibitive steric hindrance at the binding site.

View larger version (144K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Ribbon diagram
representing the trace of L4-PHA focused at the
carbohydrate binding site formed around and in between loops B
(yellow) and C (green). Part of
loop D (magenta) contributes slightly. A chicken net
lipophillic color-coded Connolly surface is shown, where
brown denotes lipophilic, green polar, and
blue charged areas. Shown in sticks are NA4-HD
docked to the structure of L4-PHA at the binding site and
some of the residues that may be particularly important for the
specificity. To the left and coming from loop C, mutation
N128D would cause electrostatic repulsion from the neighboring
Asp-132 side chain. The side chain of the residue at position 128 would
then provide steric hindrance to carbohydrate binding. To the
right, in loop B, changes D110N and G111K together
with the additional two residues present in between these in
E4-PHA would alter the topology of the binding site, most
probably providing steric hindrance to the binding of NA4-HD.
|
|
Although both native E4- and L4-PHA are
glycoproteins, none of the chimeric lectins prepared were glycosylated.
At least with respect to L4-PHA, however, studies have
shown that recombinant lectin produced in E. coli retains
mitogenic and erythroagglutinating activities similar to those of
native L4-PHA (36). To date, no similar studies have been
reported for E4-PHA. To confirm this possibility, sugar
binding specificities of recombinant E4-PHA produced in
E. coli were compared with those of native
E4-PHA. No difference was observed either qualitatively or
quantitatively (data not shown). Therefore, it is quite unlikely that
glycosylation differences significantly affected our measurements for
the chimeric lectins.
All of the chimeric lectins prepared in this study showed qualitatively
similar sugar binding specificities to E4- and
L4-PHA. They are also quantitatively similar to either
E4- or L4-PHA. However, some of them showed
even higher specificities/affinities toward complex sugar chains
containing either bisecting GlcNAc or a
1,6-linked branch. For
instance, E-cL, L-bE, and
L-bE/cE showed greater specificity toward NA2B
than native E4-PHA, suggesting that they may be more useful
for the specific detection of complex type oligosaccharides having
bisecting GlcNAc. Similarly, E-bL/cL acquired
greater specificity and binding affinity toward
1,6-linked branch structures.
These chimeric lectins may be useful for the histochemical study of
N-glycans, since the carbohydrate moieties of cell surface glycoconjugates are known to play important roles in cell adhesion and
metastasis (37). Increased expression of tri- or tetra-antennary
1,6-GlcNAc-bearing N-glycans has been correlated with
metastatic potential in rodent tumor models (38) and also has been
shown to be a marker of tumor progression in human breast and colon neoplasia (39). It has been recently reported that a shift in the
expression of bisecting GlcNAc to highly branched
1,6-GlcNAc N-glycans plays an important role in modulating the function
of cell surface glycoproteins involved in human glioma
invasivity (40).
These findings may be further applicable to the rational design of
de novo lectins whose sugar binding specificities could be
highly tailored. Recently, Yamamoto et al. proposed the
concept of artificial lectins with distinct and desired carbohydrate
specificities. They introduced random mutations affecting loop C of
Bauhinia purpurea lectin (4). An improved understanding of
how lectin subsites contribute to the recognition of fairly long glycan
sequences will improve the outlook for the fine engineering of sugar
binding specificities in artificial lectins.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was performed under the management of the Research
Association for Biotechnology as part of the R&D Project on Basic Technology for Future Industries supported by the New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization in the Ministry of
Economy, Trade, and Industry.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail:
yasuro.shinohara@jp.amershambiosciences.com.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, February 25, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M112382200
1
The 3D Lectin Data Bank is available on the
World Wide Web at webenligne.cermav.cnrs.fr/databank/lectine/.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
E4-PHA, P. vulgaris erythroagglutinating lectin;
L4-PHA, P. vulgaris leukoagglutinating lectin;
AUC, area under the
curve;
AUCa, AUC of the association phase;
AUCd0
, AUC of dissociation phase extrapolated
over an infinite time interval;
E-bL, chimera lectin of
E4-PHA of which loop B is replaced with that of
L4-PHA;
E-cL, chimera lectin of
E4-PHA of which the central portion of loop C is replaced
with that of L4-PHA;
E-bLcL, chimera lectin of E4-PHA of which loop B and the central
portion of loop C are replaced with those of L4-PHA;
L-bE, chimera lectin of L4-PHA of which loop B
is replaced with that of E4-PHA;
L-cE, chimera
lectin of L4-PHA of which the central portion of loop C is
replaced with that of E4-PHA;
L-bEcE, chimera lectin of L4-PHA of
which loop B and the central portion of loop C are replaced with those
of E4-PHA;
LacNAc, N-acetyllactosamine;
BPH, 4-(biotinamido) phenylacetylhydrazide;
SPR, surface plasmon
resonance;
NA2, NA2B, NA3, NA4, and NGA2, see Fig. 1;
NA4-HD, NA4
hendecasaccharide.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Sharon, N.,
and Lis, H.
(1990)
FASEB J.
4,
3198-3208[Abstract]
|
| 2.
|
Loris, R.,
Hamelryck, T.,
Bouckaert, J.,
and Wyns, L.
(1998)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1383,
9-36[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Etzler, M. E.
(1998)
Trends Glycosci. Glycotech.
10,
247-255
|
| 4.
|
Yamamoto, K.,
Maruyama, I. N.,
and Osawa, T.
(2000)
J. Biochem. (Tokyo)
127,
137-142[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Young, N. M.,
and Oomen, R. P.
(1992)
J. Mol. Biol.
228,
924-934[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Sharma, V.,
and Surolia, A.
(1997)
J. Mol. Biol.
267,
433-445[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Goldstein, I. J.,
and Poretz, R. D.
(1986)
in
The Lectins: Properties, Functions and Applications in Biology and Medicine
(Liener, I. E.
, Sharon, N.
, and Goldstein, I. J., eds)
, pp. 33-247, Academic Press, Inc., New York
|
| 8.
|
Rini, J. M.
(1995)
Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct.
24,
551-577[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Leavitt, R. D.,
Felsted, R. L.,
and Bachur, N. R.
(1977)
J. Biol. Chem.
252,
2961-2966[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Cummings, R. D.,
and Kornfeld, S.
(1982)
J. Biol. Chem.
257,
11230-11234[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Hammarstrom, S.,
Hammarstrom, M. L.,
Sundblad, G.,
Arnarp, J.,
and Lonngren, J.
(1982)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
79,
1611-1615[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Green, E. D.,
and Baenziger, J. U.
(1987)
J. Biol. Chem.
262,
12018-12029[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Bierhuizen, M. F., De,
Wit, M.,
Govers, C. A.,
Ferwerda, W.,
Koeleman, C.,
Pos, O.,
and Van Dijk, W.
(1988)
Eur. J. Biochem.
175,
387-394[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Kobata, A.,
and Yamashita, K.
(1989)
Methods Enzymol.
179,
46-54[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Mirkov, T. E.,
and Chrispeels, M. J.
(1993)
Glycobiology
3,
581-587[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Dao-Thi, M. H.,
Hamelryck, T. W.,
Poortmans, F.,
Voelker, T. A.,
Chrispeels, M. J.,
and Wyns, L.
(1996)
Proteins
24,
134-137[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Hamelryck, T. W.,
Dao-Thi, M. H.,
Poortmans, F.,
Chrispeels, M. J.,
Wyns, L.,
and Loris, R.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
20479-20485[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Shinohara, Y.,
Sota, H.,
Gotoh, M.,
Hasebe, M.,
Tosu, M.,
Nakao, J.,
Hasegawa, Y.,
and Shiga, M.
(1996)
Anal. Chem.
68,
2573-2579[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Hoffman, L. M., Ma, Y.,
and Barker, R. F.
(1982)
Nucleic Acids Res.
10,
7819-7828[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Hoffman, L. M.,
and Donaldson, D. D.
(1985)
EMBO J.
4,
883-889[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Kyte, J.,
and Doolittle, R. F.
(1982)
J. Mol. Biol.
157,
105-132[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Pearson, W. R.,
and Lipman, D. J.
(1988)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
85,
2444-2448[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
O'Shannessy, D. J.,
Brigham-Burke, M.,
Soneson, K. K.,
Hensley, P.,
and Brooks, I.
(1993)
Anal. Biochem.
212,
457-468[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Karlsson, R.,
Roos, H.,
Fagerstam, L.,
and Persson, B.
(1994)
Methods
6,
99-110[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Mastryukov, V. S.,
Chen, K.,
Yang, L. R.,
and Allinger, N. L.
(1993)
Theochem.
99,
199-204
|
| 26.
|
Rarey, M.,
Kramer, B.,
Lengauer, T.,
and Klebe, G.
(1996)
J. Mol. Biol.
261,
470-489[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Kobata, A.,
and Endo, T.
(1992)
J. Chromatogr.
597,
111-122[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Bierhuizen, M. F. A.,
Tedzes, H.,
Schiphorst, W. C. M.,
Van den Eijnden, D. H.,
and Van Dijk, W.
(1988)
Glycoconj. J.
5,
85-97
|
| 29.
|
van Eijsden, R. R.,
Hoedemaeker, F. J.,
Diaz, C. L.,
Lugtenberg, B. J.,
de Pater, B. S.,
and Kijne, J. W.
(1992)
Plant Mol. Biol.
20,
1049-1058[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Shinohara, Y.,
Hasegawa, Y.,
Kaku, H.,
and Shibuya, N.
(1997)
Glycobiology
7,
1201-1208[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Egorin, M. J.,
Bachur, S. Z.,
Felsted, R. L.,
Leavitt, R. D.,
and Bachur, N. R.
(1979)
J. Biol. Chem.
254,
894-898[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Konami, Y.,
Yamamoto, K.,
and Osawa, T.
(1992)
J. Chromatogr.
597,
213-219[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Yamamoto, K.,
Konami, Y.,
Osawa, T.,
and Irimura, T.
(1992)
J. Biochem. (Tokyo)
111,
436-439[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Hamelryck, T. W.,
Poortmans, F.,
Goossens, A.,
Angenon, G.,
Van Montagu, M.,
Wyns, L.,
and Loris, R.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
32796-32802[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Bompard-Gilles, C.,
Rousseau, P.,
Rouge, P.,
and Payan, F.
(1996)
Structure
4,
1441-1452[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Hoffman, L. M.,
and Donaldson, D. D.
(1987)
Bio/Technology
5,
157-160
|
| 37.
|
Hakomori, S.
(1996)
Cancer Res.
56,
5309-5318[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Asada, M.,
Furukawa, K.,
Segawa, K.,
Endo, T.,
and Kobata, A.
(1997)
Cancer Res.
15,
1073-1080
|
| 39.
|
Fernandes, B.,
Sagman, U.,
Auger, M.,
Demetrio, M.,
and Dennis, J. W.
(1991)
Cancer Res.
51,
718-723[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Yamamoto, H.,
Swoger, J.,
Greene, S.,
Saito, T.,
Hurh, J.,
Sweeley, C.,
Leestma, J.,
Mkrdichian, E.,
Cerullo, L.,
Nishikawa, A.,
Ihara, Y.,
Taniguchi, N.,
and Moskal, J. R.
(2000)
Cancer Res.
60,
134-142[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
K Klisch, A Boos, M Friedrich, K Herzog, M Feldmann, N. Sousa, J. Beckers, R Leiser, and G Schuler
The glycosylation of pregnancy-associated glycoproteins and prolactin-related protein-I in bovine binucleate trophoblast giant cells changes before parturition.
Reproduction,
November 1, 2006;
132(5):
791 - 798.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Handerson, R. Camp, M. Harigopal, D. Rimm, and J. Pawelek
{beta}1,6-Branched Oligosaccharides Are Increased in Lymph Node Metastases and Predict Poor Outcome in Breast Carcinoma
Clin. Cancer Res.,
April 15, 2005;
11(8):
2969 - 2973.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Nakajima, M. Kinoshita, Y. Oda, T. Masuko, H. Kaku, N. Shibuya, and K. Kakehi
Screening method of carbohydrate-binding proteins in biological sources by capillary affinity electrophoresis and its application to determination of Tulipa gesneriana agglutinin in tulip bulbs
Glycobiology,
September 1, 2004;
14(9):
793 - 804.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
| This Article |
 |
 |
| |