![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 19, 16952-16959, May 10, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the
Received for publication, January 22, 2002, and in revised form, February 14, 2002
Understanding mitochondrial transcription is a
requisite first step toward understanding the regulation of
mitochondrial gene expression in kinetoplastids. Here we report the
identification and functional characterization of a mitochondrial RNA
polymerase (mtRNAP) from Trypanosoma brucei, the first
trans-acting factor involved in kinetoplast mitochondrial
transcription to be identified. Using sequences conserved among the
catalytic domains of the single-subunit mtRNAPs, we were able to obtain
a full-length sequence for a candidate mtRNAP from T. brucei. Sequence comparison indicates that it shares homology in
its catalytic domain with other single-subunit mtRNAPs, including
functionally conserved residues that are identical in all
single-subunit RNAPs. We used RNA interference to functionally knock
out the gene product to determine whether the candidate gene represents
an mtRNAP. As predicted for a mitochondrial specific RNA polymerase,
reduction of the gene product resulted in a specific decrease of
mitochondrial versus nuclear transcripts. Additionally, similar to the mtRNAP of other organisms, the mtRNAP characterized here
is involved in replication of the mitochondrial genome. Thus, based on
sequence comparison and functional studies, we have cloned an mtRNAP
from trypanosomes.
The mitochondrial genome of kinetoplastids is unusual in that it
is comprised of large and small circular DNAs, maxicircles and
minicircles, respectively, catenated into a giant network called
kinetoplast DNA (1-3). Little is known of the mechanisms regulating
gene expression of either maxicircles or minicircles. In
Trypanosoma brucei, the 23-kb maxicircles represent the
typical mitochondrial DNA, coding for rRNAs and several proteins
involved in mitochondrial respiration. Similar to other organisms,
numerous polycistronic transcripts have been detected, indicating that maxicircles are transcribed polycistronically (4-6). No maxicircle promoter has yet been identified, although a precursor extending at
least 1200 nucleotides upstream of the 12 S rRNA has been detected and
may represent an initiation site for transcription (7).
Many maxicircle genes encode cryptic transcripts that require the
post-transcriptional insertion or deletion of uridines to produce a
functional mRNA, which is a process known as RNA editing (Ref. 8;
for reviews see Ref. 9-11). The information for the editing of
maxicircle transcripts is provided by small RNAs termed guide RNAs
(gRNAs).1 With the exception
of gMurfII-1 and gMurfII-2 (guide RNAs 1 and 2, respectively, for
maxicircle unidentified reading frame II) found on the maxicircle,
gRNAs are encoded by the second component of the kinetoplast, the
minicircles (12-14). In T. brucei, minicircles are ~1-kb
circular DNA molecules, and there are several thousand copies/kinetoplast network. Despite some conserved features,
they are heterogeneous in sequence and provide the 250-300
sequence classes necessary to edit maxicircle transcripts
(15, 16).
Each minicircle of T. brucei contains three or four
potential gRNA transcription units, and minicircles also appear to be transcribed polycistronically (17). Like maxicircles, no promoter has
been identified for minicircles. However, each gRNA transcription unit
is flanked by 18-bp imperfect inverted repeats that have been proposed
to function in gRNA expression, because transcription initiates 31-32
bp downstream of the 5' inverted repeat at the conserved sequence
5'-RYAYA-3' in the gRNA gene (12). The function of the 18-bp inverted
repeats in transcriptional initiation, termination, or processing
remains to be determined.
In addition to a lack of knowledge concerning cis-acting
sequences within the mitochondrial genome, neither the mitochondrial RNA polymerase (mtRNAP) nor any transcription factor has been identified in trypanosomes. The search for cis-elements or
trans-acting factors involved in kinetoplastid mitochondrial
transcription has been hindered by the lack of a functional assay to
either test putative promoter elements or purify the transcriptional complex. In contrast to the multisubunit RNAPs of the nucleus, the
catalytic domains of mtRNAPs in all organisms identified to date are
related to the single-subunit RNA polymerases, similar to the T7
bacteriophage polymerase (18-20). Using conserved sequences in the
catalytic domains of single-subunit RNA polymerases, a sequence was
identified in the trypanosome genome data base as a candidate fragment
of mtRNAP (21). As expected because mtRNAP would be required in active
mitochondria, functional knockout of the candidate gene was lethal in
procyclic form trypanosomes. Recently, a full-length sequence has been
reported that represents the same candidate mtRNAP (22). However, there
remains no functional demonstration that it is a mtRNAP.
In this paper, we report the sequence of the full-length gene for a
candidate mtRNAP in T. brucei. Comparison of the predicted amino acid sequence of the putative T. brucei mtRNAP with
those of other organisms provides evidence that we have identified an mtRNAP and that it is the same candidate mtRNAP reported earlier (21,
22). We demonstrate that the gene is in fact a mitochondrial specific
RNA polymerase through functional analyses using RNA interference
(RNAi). RNAi is a phenomenon by which the introduction of
double-stranded RNA results in the specific degradation of a transcript
sharing the same sequence. Although the mechanism of RNAi is a subject
of intense study, RNAi is also rapidly becoming a convenient method of
genetic manipulation (for reviews see Refs. 23-27). As predicted for
an mtRNAP, functional knockout resulted in a specific decrease of
mitochondrial transcripts versus nuclear RNAs. Additionally,
we find a corresponding decrease in maxicircle abundance, suggesting
that as in other organisms, the T. brucei mtRNAP also
functions in replication of the mitochondrial genome. With the
identification of a mtRNAP, functional assays can now be developed to
determine promoter sequences and other trans-acting factors
involved in mitochondrial transcription of the kinetoplast.
Growth of Cells and Preparation of RNA--
Procyclic T. brucei TREU 667 cells were grown at 26 °C in Cunningham medium
supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (28). RNA was isolated using
TriPure isolation reagent (Roche Molecular Biochemicals), and
poly(A)+ RNA was selected using a Dynabeads mRNA
purification kit (Dynal A. S.) according to manufacturer's
instructions. The RNAi vector and cell line has been described
previously (21). Briefly, procyclic T. brucei strain 29-13 (a gift from Drs. Elizabeth Wirtz and George Cross), which harbors
integrated genes for T7 RNA polymerase and the tetracycline repressor,
were transfected with the stem-loop vector into which a 470-bp fragment
of the mtRNAP was cloned in opposite orientation separated by a
~550-bp irrelevant stuffer region. Transcription from a
tetracycline-inducible procyclin promoter then produces a dsRNA as a
stem-loop structure. The cells were adapted to Cunningham medium
supplemented with 15% fetal bovine serum (heat-inactivated at 55 °C
for 30 min) and maintained with 15 µg/ml G418, 50 µg/ml hygromycin
B, and 2.5 µg/ml phleomycin. The cells were induced with 1 µg/ml
tetracycline and harvested at indicated times post-induction. Total RNA
was isolated using TriPure isolation reagent (Roche Molecular Biochemicals).
RT-PCR Analysis--
RT-PCR was performed as previously
described using 0.6-1.0 µg of total RNA/reaction (17). To map the 5'
splice site, 5' spliced leader
(5'-CGCTATTATTAGAACAGTTTCTGTACTATATTG-3') and 3' KIP
(5'-CTTTATCGGTGCCAGACTCAACCG-3') primers were used. Another primer set
was also tested, 5' spliced leader 2 (5'-CGCTATTATTAGAACAGTTTCTGTAC-3') and 3' GVE (5'-CCCCACCTCCACGTACGG-3'), followed by nested PCR with primer 3' KIP. All PCR reactions to map the 5' splice site were
performed at an annealing temperature of 50 °C. To map the 3'
polyadenylation site, 3' poly(T)
(5'-AGCTCGGATCCGTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT-3') and 5' AIE
(5'-GCAATAGAAATGCAAAACCTTGG-TCT-3') primers were used at an annealing
temperature of 60 °C. The Expand High Fidelity PCR system (Roche
Molecular Biochemicals) was used in all PCR reactions. PCR products
were cloned into TA vector (Invitrogen). Sequencing was performed with
[ Northern Blot Analysis--
Total RNA (5 or 10 µg) was
run on 1% methyl mercury-agarose gels and stained with ethidium
bromide. RNAs were transferred via capillary blot to GeneScreen Plus
(PerkinElmer Life Sciences) nylon membranes in 10× SSC (1.5 M NaCl, 0.15 M sodium citrate, pH 7.0)
according to the manufacturer's instructions. The blots were
cross-linked using a Bio-Rad GS Gene Linker according to the
manufacturer's instructions. The membranes were prehybridized at
42 °C in 50 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.4, 0.9 M NaCl, 5× Denhardt's, 10% dextran sulfate, 5 mM EDTA, 0.1% SDS, 40% formamide, and 0.1 mg/ml salmon
sperm DNA for 2-6 h. Probes were added, and hybridization was
overnight. The filters were washed with 2× SSC at room temperature; 2× SSC, 1% SDS at 60 °C; and 0.1× SSC at room temperature. the oligonucleotides were used in PCR reactions with 2 ng of genomic DNA to
generate PCR products for use in random primer labeling reactions:
mtRNAP, 5' mtRNAP (5'-AGCTCGGATCCCCCATTATGACTCAAGTGTATGGC-3') and 3'
mtRNAP (5'-AGCTCGGATCCAGACCAAGGTTTTGCATTTCTATTGC-3'); Dot Blot Analysis of Maxicircle and Minicircle Abundance
following Induction of RNAi--
Mid-log phase cells (~5 × 106 cells/ml) were harvested and washed once with NET-100
(10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 100 mM NaCl, 100 mM EDTA) and resuspended in NET-100 at a density of 2 × 108 cells/ml. The cells were lysed in 0.5% SDS
containing 0.2 mg/ml proteinase K (56 °C, 4 h) and then treated
with 0.1 mg/ml RNase A (37 °C, 15 min). The cell lysate was
extracted with phenol/chloroform, DNA was precipitated with 2-propanol,
and the pellet was washed with 70% ethanol.
DNA from 1 × 106 cell equivalents was treated with
0.15 M HCl for 10 min, denatured in 0.4 M NaOH,
25 mM EDTA, and then transferred to GeneScreen Plus nylon
membranes using a dot blot apparatus. 32P-Radiolabeled
probes were made by random priming PCR products specific for
minicircles (30), maxicircles (31), or nuclear DNA (trypanosome hexose
transporter 1 gene family). DNA amounts were determined by phosphorimaging.
Cloning a Candidate Mitochondrial RNA
Polymerase--
Mitochondrial RNA polymerases share significant
sequence homology in their catalytic domains with the single-subunit
RNA polymerases such as that of T7 bacteriophage (18). Using conserved
sequences in the catalytic domain, we identified a 470-bp sequence in
the trypanosome genome data base
(www.tigr.org/tdb/mdb/tbdb) as a candidate fragment of
the T. brucei mtRNAP. Using the combined methods of RT-PCR
and genomic PCR, we were then able to identify an open reading frame of
3,828 nucleotides, preceded by a stop codon ~200 nucleotides upstream
and terminating with a pair of stop codons (Fig.
1). There are a number of potential
candidates for the initiating methionine downstream of the 5' end stop
codon. Because a 39-nucleotide spliced leader RNA is
trans-spliced onto the 5' end of all trypanosome nuclear
encoded mRNAs, we used RT-PCR with spliced leader RNA and
gene-internal primers to identify the initiating methionine. The splice
site mapped to 29 nucleotides upstream of a methionine, resulting in a
relatively short 5'-untranslated region. Only one site was obtained in
three clones, and this site agrees with the consensus splice acceptor
site, containing an upstream polypyrimidine-rich tract and being
preceded immediately by an AG dinucleotide (Fig. 1,
underlining and dots beneath sequence, respectively). Two sites of polyadenylation at 9 and 50 nucleotides after the 3' end stop codon were mapped using RT-PCR with poly(T) and
gene internal oligonucleotides (Fig. 1, arrows). Using the original 470-bp fragment in Southern mapping suggests the gene is
single-copy, and an ~4 kb transcript detected by Northern blot is in
congruence with the predicted open reading frame (data not shown).
The Predicted Protein Shares Homology with Other mtRNAPs--
The
full-length protein has a predicted molecular mass of 144 kDa.
Comparison of the predicted amino acid sequence of the putative
T. brucei mtRNAP with those of other organisms supports that
we have identified a mitochondrial specific RNA polymerase (Fig.
2A). First, because the gene
is encoded by the nucleus, we would expect the protein to contain a
mitochondrial localization signal to be imported into the
mitochondrion. Indeed, the amino acid sequence of the candidate mtRNAP
contains a predicted mitochondrial localization signal of 30 amino
acids at the N terminus. Other than containing a mitochondrial
localization signal, mtRNAPs do not share homology in their N termini,
and this region accounts for most of the size variability among them.
Similarly, the N terminus of the T. brucei protein accounts
for its size variability when compared with other mtRNAPs.
Second, the mtRNAPs of all organisms identified to date are conserved
in their catalytic domains, delineated as subdomains III-X (18, 32).
The putative T. brucei mtRNAP shares overall amino acid
sequence homology (~50% identity and ~70% similarity) with other
mtRNAPs in these subdomains, including many residues that are identical
(Fig. 2B). In addition to overall sequence homology, amino
acids that are present in the active site and are thought to be
involved in catalytic function of the single-subunit RNAPs have been
mapped for T7 RNAP (33). These are identical in all mtRNAPs and are
present in the T. brucei sequence (Fig. 2B). For
example, Asp537 and Asp812 of T7 RNAP
are involved in binding metal ions at the active site (34, 35);
Lys631 and His811 may facilitate phosphodiester
bond formation (34). Residue His811 along with
Phe882 appear to function in ribonucleotide binding
(33-36), and residue Tyr639 is involved in discrimination
of the enzyme for rNTPs versus dNTPs (37, 38). Thus,
sequence comparison with other mtRNAPs supports that the gene is a
T. brucei mtRNAP. It is also apparent from sequence analysis
that we have, using an independent method, identified an identical
candidate mtRNAP recently reported by another group (22).
RNA Interference Analysis of the Putative mtRNAP--
RNAi is a
recently discovered phenomenon in which introduction of a specific
dsRNA into cells results in the degradation of the specific cellular
mRNA (for reviews see Refs. 23-27). As such, it is rapidly
becoming a powerful tool for the genetic manipulation of trypanosomes
(21, 39, 40). A major advantage of using RNAi to produce functional
knockouts is that only partial sequence is necessary to induce the
specific degradation of any given target mRNA. Hence, Wang et
al. (21) cloned the 470-bp sequence obtained from the data base
into an RNAi vector and subsequently integrated it into a
nontranscribed region of the genome to produce a stable cell line.
Expression of the dsRNA is regulated by a tetracycline-inducible promoter. After induction of dsRNA with tetracycline, there is a
~95% reduction in transcript abundance of an ~4-kb mRNA after 24 h, and there is growth inhibition 6 days after induction
followed by cell death (21).
To determine whether our candidate gene was in fact the mtRNAP, we
wanted to further analyze the phenotype of these cells. Similar to what
has been reported, we find the cells stop dividing 3-4 days after
tetracycline induction, eventually succumbing to cell death ~6 days
after induction (Fig. 3A). A
lethal phenotype was expected because mitochondrial function is
required in procyclic cells. Likewise by Northern blot analysis, the
~4-kb transcript of the candidate mtRNAP had decreased by ~80%
after 24 h of tetracycline induction, whereas dsRNA production was
already near its maximal levels (Fig. 3B). Reduction of the
~4-kb transcript occurs rapidly after tetracycline induction as seen
in a time course, with 50% reduction in transcript abundance as early
as 7 h post-induction (data not shown). After 3 days of
tetracycline induction, there is a 95% reduction in transcript
abundance. On days 1-3 after RNAi induction we observed faint bands
migrating slightly faster than the full-length mtRNAP transcript that
may represent partially degraded mtRNAP mRNA (Fig.
3B).
If the candidate gene is a mtRNAP, we would predict that a functional
knockout of the mtRNAP would result in a specific decrease in
mitochondrial transcripts versus those of the nucleus. To
test this, RNA was isolated from cells after 0-3 days of tetracycline induction and analyzed by Northern blot. For nuclear transcripts, the
mRNA levels of
In contrast to the nuclear transcripts, the abundance of all
mitochondrial transcripts, cytochrome oxidase subunits I and II (COI
and COII, respectively), Cyb, NADH dehydrogenase subunits 1 and 4 (ND1
and ND4, respectively) decreased over 3 days after tetracycline
induction (Fig. 4B). The kinetics of mRNA decrease were
variable for the different maxicircle genes. The simplest pattern
occurred for COI and ND1, with mRNA steadily decreasing over the
course of 3 days. Transcript levels of Cyb and ND4 are not as
straightforward, as they actually increase by 36 and 85%, respectively, after 1 day of tetracycline induction. The cause for this
increase is unknown. The steady-state abundance of COII only modestly
increases by 6%, so that the profile of COII may result from a slower
turnover rate of the COII mRNA versus that of COI and
ND1 mRNAs. A larger COII transcript also increases after
tetracycline induction. This larger transcript has previously been
described as either a polycistronic precursor or the result of the
addition of a long poly(A) tail (41, 42). That this transcript
increases with overall declining mRNA levels may indicate a
coordination of transcription and RNA processing. Despite the differences in the rate of decline, the steady-state abundance of all
mitochondrial mRNAs examined decreased considerably with functional
knockout of the candidate mtRNAP. The difference in the reduction rates
of the candidate mtRNAP transcript (Fig. 3B) versus that of the mitochondrial transcripts (Fig.
4B) probably reflects the active degradation of the ~4-kb
transcript by RNAi versus the variation in mRNA turnover
rates for the other transcripts following loss of mtRNAP function. The
finding that functional knockout of the ~4-kb transcript results in
the specific decrease in mitochondrial versus nuclear
transcripts is consistent with the gene representing an mtRNAP of
T. brucei.
Analysis of Maxicircle and Minicircle Abundance--
The mtRNAP of
other organisms functions in the transcription of the mitochondrial
genome as well as in initiation of DNA replication. In both humans and
yeast, replication of one mitochondrial DNA strand utilizes an RNA
primer made by the mtRNAP, whereas replication of the other strand uses
primers generated by a mitochondrial primase (for review see Ref. 43).
To determine whether the T. brucei mtRNAP is also involved
in replication of the kDNA, the abundance of minicircles and
maxicircles was determined using dot blot analysis with specific
probes. After 3 days of tetracycline induction, the abundance of
minicircles remains relatively unchanged at 97.9% of preinduction
levels, whereas maxicircle abundance decreases to 57% of preinduction
levels (Fig. 5). After 4 days of
tetracycline induction, both minicircle and maxicircle abundance continues to decrease reaching 85.6 and 30.7% of preinduction levels,
respectively. However, after 4 days of tetracycline induction, the
level of nuclear transcripts also decreases (data not shown), suggesting that the cells have become compromised so that the decrease
in minicircle abundance may not be directly attributable to loss of the
mtRNAP. Taken together, these results suggests that the mtRNAP is
involved in maxicircle replication but not minicircle replication.
To understand mitochondrial gene regulation in
trypanosomes, we must understand transcription of the unusual
kinetoplast DNA. However, no cis-elements or
trans-acting factors had been characterized for the
transcription of either component of kinetoplast DNA. Using conserved
sequences among mtRNAPs, we identified a 470-bp fragment in the
T. brucei genome data base representing a portion of a
candidate mtRNAP. RT-PCR and genomic PCR then enabled us to obtain
full-length sequence of the gene. Sequence analysis indicates that it
shares overall homology in its catalytic domain, including functionally
conserved residues, with other single-subunit RNA polymerases. As
expected for an mtRNAP, functional knockout of the gene product using
RNAi resulted in the specific decrease of mitochondrial
versus nuclear transcripts. Additionally, functional knockout of the mtRNAP resulted in a decrease in maxicircle abundance. This suggests that as in other organisms, the T. brucei
mtRNAP also functions in replication of the mitochondrial genome,
specifically that of maxicircles. Thus, sequence comparison and
functional studies indicate that we have cloned an mtRNAP in trypanosomes.
In the simplest model of kinetoplastid mitochondrial transcription,
maxicircles and minicircles would share promoter elements and
transcriptional complexes. Alternatively in a more complicated system,
different promoter elements could vary in their ability to recruit a
transcriptional complex or could recruit different trans-acting factors, utilizing distinct mtRNAPs or
transcription factors. We show that the mtRNAP described here
transcribes numerous genes on the maxicircle, but we were unable to
analyze minicircle transcription, probably because of the relatively
low abundance of gRNAs. Thus, we were unable to determine whether the
mtRNAP described here functions in minicircle transcription. However, we were able to demonstrate that this mtRNAP is involved in replication of the maxicircles but not of the minicircles. This suggests that replication of minicircles may involve a different mtRNAP or perhaps the mtDNA primase previously reported (48).
Although it is possible that two mtRNAPs transcribe the two
distinct components of the kinetoplast, this would be unprecedented in
mitochondria. However, it has been shown that chloroplasts contain both
an eubacteria-like RNAP, coded by the chloroplast genome (PEP for
plastid-encoded polymerase) and a single-subunit RNAP, coded by the
nucleus (NEP for nuclear-encoded polymerase) and imported into the
chloroplast (for reviews see Refs. 44 and 45). Reduction of the
maxicircle transcripts results in cell death after 6 days of
tetracycline induction. This suggests that, if there is another RNAP,
the two are not functionally redundant, and any minicircle-specific RNA
polymerase cannot compensate in transcription of the maxicircle.
Furthermore, data base searches using the conserved catalytic domain
failed to identify other candidate sequences, and Southern analysis has
indicated a single-copy gene. Thus, if there is an additional mtRNAP,
it may not be related to the single-subunit RNAP we describe here. It
is possible that a second mtRNAP would resemble the multi-subunit
eubacterial RNAP as in the chloroplast. In fact, genes for the
multi-subunit eubacteria-like RNAP have been found in the mitochondrial
genome of jakobid flagellates (46, 47). However, this is based solely
on genetic data, and it is unknown whether these produce a functional
mitochondrial polymerase and/or whether these organisms also contain a
single-subunit mtRNAP.
Regardless of whether there is more than one RNAP in the
trypanosome mitochondrion, we have demonstrated the specific reduction of several maxicircle transcripts and in maxicircle abundance following
functional knockout of the putative mtRNAP. Kinetic analysis suggests
that the reduction of mitochondrial transcripts is not simply a result
of a decrease in the maxicircle abundance. With a decrease in
maxicircle abundance to 87% after 1 day of tetracycline induction,
there is a decrease of COI and ND1 transcripts to 65.4 and 53.6%,
respectively. After 2 days of tetracycline induction, maxicircle
abundance has decreased to 77.5%, whereas COI and ND1 transcripts have
decreased to 17.4 and 29%, respectively. Furthermore, the transcript
levels of Cyb and ND4 surprisingly increase by 36 and 85%,
respectively, after 1 day of tetracycline induction. We cannot explain
the initial increase in the abundance of these transcripts. However,
during the first 24 h post-induction of RNAi, the transcript
abundance of mtRNAP is reduced ~80% (Fig. 4B), suggesting
that there remains a potentially active pool of mtRNAP. The initial
increase in these transcripts may then reflect a preferential
recruitment of residual transcriptional complexes to the Cyb or ND4
promoters over the promoters utilized in the transcription of COI,
COII, and ND1.
We do not know how the mtRNAP is involved in maxicircle replication.
One possibility is that the mtRNAP synthesizes nascent transcripts that
serve as leading strand primers at the origin of maxicircle
replication. Alternatively, the mtRNAP may synthesize the primers for
Okazaki fragments for lagging strand replication. Another mitochondrial
protein was isolated, from a related kinetoplastid, with primase
activity in vitro (48). The biological function of this
protein and its possible relationship to the mtRNAP has not been
established. Finally, it is possible that the mtRNAP is not a primase
but that maxicircle transcription may stimulate DNA replication as
reported for bacterial lambda (49).
Identification of cis- and trans-acting factors
in the transcription of kinetoplast DNA is the requisite first step
toward understanding kinetoplast gene expression. With identification of the first factor involved in mitochondrial transcription, functional assays may now be developed to aid in the search for promoter elements
and other trans-acting factors and to begin to dissect how
transcription and RNA processing are coordinated in the regulation of
gene expression.
We thank members of the Hajduk
laboratory and Robert Sabatini for useful discussion and criticism.
*
This work was supported by National Institutes
of Health Grant AI21401 (to S. L. H.), Medical Scientist
Training Program Grant 5T32GM08361 (to J. G.), and National
Institutes of Health Grant GM27608 (to P. T. E.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.:
205-934-6033; Fax: 205-934-0758; E-mail: shajduk@uab.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, February 21, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M100662200
The abbreviations used are:
gRNA, guide RNA;
mtRNAP, mitochondrial RNA polymerase;
RNAP, RNA polymerase;
RNAi, RNA
interference;
dsRNA, double-stranded RNA;
ISP, Rieske iron sulfur
protein;
COI and COII, cytochrome oxidase subunits I and II,
respectively;
Cyb, apocytochrome b;
ND1 and ND4, NADH
dehydrogenase subunits 1 and 4, respectively;
RT, reverse
transcriptase.
A Trypanosome Mitochondrial RNA Polymerase Is Required for
Transcription and Replication*
,
¶
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular
Genetics, Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alabama,
Birmingham, Alabama 35294 and the § Department of Biological
Chemistry, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine,
Baltimore, Maryland 21205
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-35S]dATP (PerkinElmer Life Sciences) and Sequenase
(Amersham Biosciences).
-tubulin, 5'
tub (5'-CCGTGGCATATGGCAAG-3') and 3' tub (5'-GGGGGTCGCACTTTGTC-3'); RNAP II, 5' RNAP II (5'-TACGGCGAAGACGGTCTT-3') and 3' RNAP II (5'-CATTTGTGTGGCAGGTTC-3'); ISP, 5' ISP (5'-AAGCAACTTGAAGGTTCC-3') and
3' ISP (5'-GTCCGTTTCGGGATGC-3'); COI, 5' COI (5'-ATATCATAATTCTACCTG-3') and 3' COI (5'-TACAAACTGGTACTCATG-3'); COII, 5' COII
(5'-GATATTTTTAATGGATTC-3') and 3' COII (5'-AATAGGCATAAAACCGTG-3'); and
Cyb, 5' Cyb (5'-TTTGATTTGGGTTTTGTG-3') and 3' Cyb
(5'-CCAATTTATAAATATAACATAC-3'). The probes were generated using 25 ng
of gel-purified PCR products with the Random Primers DNA Labeling
System (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Quantitation was carried out using a Molecular Dynamics PhosphorImager.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (142K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Nucleotide and predicted amino acid sequences
of the candidate mtRNAP in T. brucei.
Arrowhead, mapped splice site immediately preceding the 3'
acceptor site; underlining, polypyrimidine-rich tract;
dots under sequence, AG dinucleotide; asterisks,
in-frame stop codons; arrows, polyadenylation sites.

View larger version (62K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Mitochondrial RNA polymerases share homology
in their catalytic domains with single-subunit RNA polymerases.
A, diagram comparing the Triticum aestivum
(wheat), Saccharomyces cerevisiae (yeast), and Homo
sapiens (human) mtRNAPs and T7 bacteriophage RNA polymerase with
the candidate mtRNAP in T. brucei. MLS,
mitochondrial localization signals as predicted by MitoProt II 1.0a4
(www.mips.biochem.mpg.de/cgi-bin/proj/medgen/mitofilter).
Open boxes, nonconserved N termini; hatched
boxes, conserved catalytic domains among single-subunit RNA
polymerases. B, amino acid sequence comparison of the
catalytic domains of indicated organisms. Tb, T. brucei; Ta, T. aestivum; Sc,
S. cerevisiae; Hs, H. sapiens;
T7, T7 bacteriophage; green, similarity in
at least 60% of sequences; yellow, identity in at least
60% of sequences; blue, identity in all; 1,
residues involved in coordination of divalent metal ions in the active
site; 2, residues involved in phosphodiester bond formation;
3, residues involved in binding rNTPs or in rNTP
discrimination.

View larger version (16K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
The candidate mtRNAP is essential in
procyclic trypanosomes. A, growth curve of cells
transfected with the 470-bp fragment of the putative mtRNAP. The cells
stop dividing after 3-4 days and die after 6 days of tetracycline
induction (open circles). Closed circles, no
tetracycline. The cell densities were determined by hemocytometer
counting and plotted as the product of cell density and total dilution.
The cells were harvested on day 0 and on 1, 2, and 3 days after RNAi
addition of tetracycline. B, Northern blot analysis of
mtRNAP transcript abundance in RNA samples taken after tetracycline
induction. The steady-state abundance of the mtRNAP transcript
decreases by 80% after 1 day of tetracycline induction and continues
to decrease by 95% after 3 days of tetracycline induction
(closed boxes). The dsRNA increases to near 100%
steady-state abundance after 1 day of tetracycline induction
(open boxes).
-tubulin, the nuclear RNA polymerase II (RNAP II), and a protein that is imported into the mitochondrion, the Rieske
ISP, were assayed (Fig. 4A).
The steady-state abundance of all three nuclear transcripts remained
comparable with preinduction with tetracycline (0 days of tetracycline
induction).

View larger version (38K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Functional knockout of the putative mtRNAP
results in a specific decrease of mitochondrial versus
nuclear transcripts. A, Northern blot analysis
and quantitation (graph) of nuclear transcripts after
induction of dsRNA with tetracycline. 0 days, preinduction;
1-3 days, 1-3 days after tetracycline induction;
open squares, tubulin; open circles, nuclear RNA
polymerase II (RNAP II); open triangles, nuclear encoded
ISP. B, Northern blot analysis and quantitation
(graph) of mitochondrial transcripts after induction of
dsRNA with tetracycline. Open circles, ND4; open
downward triangles, Cyb; open upward triangles, COII;
open squares, COI; open diamonds, ND1.

View larger version (18K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
The mtRNAP is also involved in maxicircle
replication. Dot blot analysis using total DNA harvested after
induction of dsRNA with tetracycline is shown. The dot blots were
probed with minicircle-, maxicircle-, and nuclear-specific probes.
Minicircle and maxicircle results were normalized to the
nuclear-specific results. Open squares, minicircle
abundance; closed squares, maxicircle abundance.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Klingbeil, M. M.,
Drew, M. E.,
Liu, Y.,
Morris, J. C.,
Motyka, S. A.,
Saxowsky, T. T.,
Wang, Z.,
and Englund, P. T.
(2001)
Protist
152,
255-262[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 2.
Shapiro, T. A.,
and Englund, P. T.
(1995)
Annu. Rev. Microbiol.
49,
117-143[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 3.
Simpson, L.
(1986)
Int. Rev. Cytol.
99,
119-179[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 4.
Feagin, J. E.,
Jasmer, D. P.,
and Stuart, K.
(1985)
Nucleic Acids Res.
13,
4577-4596 5.
Read, L. K.,
Myler, P. J.,
and Stuart, K.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
1123-1128 6.
Koslowsky, D. J.,
and Yahampath, G.
(1997)
Mol. Biochem. Parasitol.
90,
81-94[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 7.
Michelotti, E. F.,
Harris, M. E.,
Adler, B.,
Torri, A.,
and Hajduk, S. L.
(1992)
Mol. Biochem. Parasitol.
54,
31-42[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 8.
Benne, R.,
van den Burg, J.,
Brakenhoff, J. P.,
Sloof, P.,
van Boom, J. H.,
and Tromp, M. C.
(1986)
Cell
46,
819-826[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 9.
Alfonzo, J. D.,
Thiemann, O.,
and Simpson, L.
(1997)
Nucleic Acids Res.
25,
3751-3759 10.
Stuart, K.,
Allen, T. E.,
Heidmann, S.,
and Seiwert, S. D.
(1997)
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
61,
105-120[Abstract] 11.
Hajduk, S. L.,
and Sabatini, R. S.
(1998)
in
Modification and Editing of RNA
(Grosjean, H.
, and Benne, R., eds)
, pp. 377-393, ASM Press, Washington, DC
12.
Pollard, V. W.,
Rohrer, S. P.,
Michelotti, E. F.,
Hancock, K.,
and Hajduk, S. L.
(1990)
Cell
63,
783-790[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 13.
Sturm, N. R,
and Simpson, L.
(1990)
Cell
61,
879-884[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 14.
van der Spek, H.,
Arts, G. J.,
Zwaal, R. R.,
van den Burg, J.,
Sloof, P.,
and Benne, R.
(1991)
EMBO J.
10,
1217-1224[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 15.
Steinert, M.,
and van Assel, S.
(1980)
Plasmid
3,
7-17[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 16.
Jasmer, D. P.,
and Stuart, K.
(1986)
Mol. Biochem. Parasitol.
18,
257-269[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 17.
Grams, J.,
McManus, M. T.,
and Hajduk, S. L.
(2000)
EMBO J.
19,
5525-5532[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 18.
Masters, B. S.,
Stohl, L. L.,
and Clayton, D. A.
(1987)
Cell
51,
89-99[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 19.
Cermakian, N.,
Ikeda, T. M.,
Cedergren, R.,
and Gray, M. W.
(1996)
Nucleic Acids Res.
24,
648-654 20.
Cermakian, N.,
Ikeda, T. M.,
Miramontes, P.,
Lang, B. F.,
Gray, M. W.,
and Cedergren, R.
(1997)
J. Mol. Evol.
45,
671-681[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 21.
Wang, Z.,
Morris, J. C.,
Drew, M. E.,
and Englund, P. T.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
40174-40179 22.
Clement, S. L.,
and Koslowsky, D. J.
(2001)
Gene (Amst.)
272,
209-218[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 23.
Fire, A.
(1999)
Trends Genet.
15,
358-363[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 24.
Bass, B.
(2001)
Nature
411,
235-238 25.
Hammond, S. M.,
Caudy, A. A.,
and Hannon, G. J.
(2001)
Nat. Rev. Genet.
2,
110-119[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 26.
Sharp, P. A.
(2001)
Genes Dev.
15,
485-490 27.
Tuschl, T.
(2001)
Chem. Biochem.
2,
239-245
28.
Cunningham, I.
(1977)
J. Protozool.
24,
325-329[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 29.
Zomerdijk, J. C. B. M.,
Ouellette, M.,
ten Asbroek, A. L. M. A.,
Kieft, R.,
Bommer, A. M. M.,
Clayton, C. E.,
and Borst, P.
(1990)
EMBO J.
9,
2791-2801[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 30.
Ntambi, J. M.,
and Englund, P. T.
(1985)
J. Biol. Chem.
260,
5574-5579 31.
Wang, Z.,
and Englund, P. T.
(2001)
EMBO J.
20,
4674-4683[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 32.
Li, J.,
Maga, J. A.,
Cermakian, N.,
Cedergren, R.,
and Feagin, J. E.
(2001)
Mol. Biochem. Parasitol.
113,
261-269[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 33.
Sousa, R.,
Chung, Y. J.,
Rose, J. P.,
and Wang, B.-C.
(1993)
Nature
364,
593-599[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 34.
Osumi-Davis, P. A.,
de Aguilera, M. C.,
Woody, R. W.,
and Woody, A.-Y. M.
(1992)
J. Mol. Biol.
226,
37-45[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 35.
Woody, A.-Y. M.,
Eaton, S. S.,
Osumi-Davis, P. A.,
and Woody, R. W.
(1996)
Biochemistry
35,
144-152[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 36.
Patra, D.,
Lafer, E. M.,
and Sousa, R.
(1992)
J. Mol. Biol.
224,
307-318[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 37.
Kostyuk, D. A.,
Dragan, S. M.,
Lyakkov, D. L.,
Rechinsky, V. O.,
Tunitskaya, V. L.,
Chernov, B. K.,
and Kochetkov, S. N.
(1995)
FEBS Lett.
369,
165-168[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 38.
Sousa, R.,
and Padilla, R.
(1995)
EMBO J.
14,
4609-4621[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 39.
Ngo, H.,
Tschudi, C.,
Gull, K.,
and Ullu, E.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
14687-14692 40.
Shi, H.,
Djikeng, A.,
Mark, T.,
Wirtz, E.,
Tschudi, C.,
and Ullu, E.
(2000)
RNA
6,
1069-1076[Abstract] 41.
Michelotti, E. F.,
and Hajduk, S. L.
(1987)
J. Biol. Chem.
262,
927-932 42.
Feagin, J. E.,
and Stuart, K.
(1988)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
8,
1259-1265 43.
Lecrenier, N.,
and Foury, F.
(2000)
Gene (Amst.)
246,
37-48[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 44.
Igloi, G. L.,
and Kossel, H.
(1992)
Crit. Rev. Plant Sci.
10,
525-558
45.
Gray, M. W.,
and Lang, B. F.
(1998)
Trends Microbiol.
6,
1-3[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 46.
Lang, B. F.,
Burger, G.,
O'Kelly, C. J.,
Cedergren, R.,
Golding, G. B.,
Lemieux, C.,
Sankoff, D.,
Turmel, M.,
and Gray, M. W.
(1997)
Nature
387,
493-497[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 47.
Lang, B. F.,
Seif, E.,
Gray, M.,
O'Kelly, C. J.,
and Burger, G.
(1999)
J. Eukaryot. Microbiol.
46,
320-326[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 48.
Li, C.,
and Englund, P. T.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
20787-20792 49.
Learn, B.,
Karzai, A. W.,
and McMacken, R.
(1993)
Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol.
58,
389-402
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Chandler, A. V. Vandoros, B. Mozeleski, and M. M. Klingbeil Stem-Loop Silencing Reveals that a Third Mitochondrial DNA Polymerase, POLID, Is Required for Kinetoplast DNA Replication in Trypanosomes Eukaryot. Cell, December 1, 2008; 7(12): 2141 - 2146. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Hans, S. L. Hajduk, and S. Madison-Antenucci RNA-editing-associated protein 1 null mutant reveals link to mitochondrial RNA stability RNA, June 1, 2007; 13(6): 881 - 889. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. L. Polosa, S. Deceglie, M. Falkenberg, M. Roberti, B. Di Ponzio, M. N. Gadaleta, and P. Cantatore Cloning of the sea urchin mitochondrial RNA polymerase and reconstitution of the transcription termination system Nucleic Acids Res., April 1, 2007; 35(7): 2413 - 2427. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Motyka, M. E. Drew, G. Yildirir, and P. T. Englund Overexpression of a Cytochrome b5 Reductase-like Protein Causes Kinetoplast DNA Loss in Trypanosoma brucei J. Biol. Chem., July 7, 2006; 281(27): 18499 - 18506. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. E. Shutt and M. W. Gray Homologs of Mitochondrial Transcription Factor B, Sparsely Distributed Within the Eukaryotic Radiation, Are Likely Derived from the Dimethyladenosine Methyltransferase of the Mitochondrial Endosymbiont Mol. Biol. Evol., June 1, 2006; 23(6): 1169 - 1179. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. M. El-Sayed, P. J. Myler, D. C. Bartholomeu, D. Nilsson, G. Aggarwal, A.-N. Tran, E. Ghedin, E. A. Worthey, A. L. Delcher, G. Blandin, et al. The Genome Sequence of Trypanosoma cruzi, Etiologic Agent of Chagas Disease Science, July 15, 2005; 309(5733): 409 - 415. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Penschow, D. A. Sleve, C. M. Ryan, and L. K. Read TbDSS-1, an Essential Trypanosoma brucei Exoribonuclease Homolog That Has Pleiotropic Effects on Mitochondrial RNA Metabolism Eukaryot. Cell, October 1, 2004; 3(5): 1206 - 1216. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Matsushima, R. Garesse, and L. S. Kaguni Drosophila Mitochondrial Transcription Factor B2 Regulates Mitochondrial DNA Copy Number and Transcription in Schneider Cells J. Biol. Chem., June 25, 2004; 279(26): 26900 - 26905. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Onn, N. Milman-Shtepel, and J. Shlomai Redox Potential Regulates Binding of Universal Minicircle Sequence Binding Protein at the Kinetoplast DNA Replication Origin Eukaryot. Cell, April 1, 2004; 3(2): 277 - 287. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. K. Avliyakulov, J. Lukes, and D. S. Ray Mitochondrial Histone-Like DNA-Binding Proteins Are Essential for Normal Cell Growth and Mitochondrial Function in Crithidia fasciculata Eukaryot. Cell, April 1, 2004; 3(2): 518 - 526. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Karlok, S.-H. Jang, and J. A. Jaehning Mutations in the Yeast Mitochondrial RNA Polymerase Specificity Factor, Mtf1, Verify an Essential Role in Promoter Utilization J. Biol. Chem., July 26, 2002; 277(31): 28143 - 28149. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||