![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 19, 16968-16975, May 10, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the
Received for publication, September 26, 2001, and in revised form, February 26, 2002
UDP-glucuronate decarboxylase (UGD) catalyzes the
formation of UDP-xylose from UDP-glucuronate. UDP-xylose is then used
to initiate glycosaminoglycan biosynthesis on the core protein of proteoglycans. In a yeast two-hybrid screen with the protein kinase Akt
(protein kinase B), we detected interactions with a novel sequence, which we cloned and expressed. The expressed protein displayed UGD activity but did not display the activities of homologous nucleotide sugar epimerases or dehydratases. We did not detect phosphorylation of UGD by Akt nor did we detect any influence of Akt on
UGD activity. Effects of UGD on Akt kinase activity were also absent.
Northern blot and Western blot analyses revealed the presence of UGD in
multiple tissues and brain regions. Subcellular studies and
histochemistry localized UGD protein to the perinuclear Golgi where
xylosylation of proteoglycan core proteins is known to occur.
Once thought to function only as structural proteins,
proteoglycans are now known to be crucially involved in a number of signaling pathways in animals, especially during development (1, 2).
Glycosaminoglycan (GAG)1
moieties of proteoglycans are polymeric, unbranched polysaccharides that can serve as co-receptors by binding a variety of secreted growth
factors such as fibroblast growth factor, transforming growth
factor- Proteoglycans are comprised of a core protein covalently connected to
GAG chains. Multiple different GAG chains exist, including chondrotin
sulfate, dermatan sulfate, and heparan sulfate/heparin. While the
disaccharide repeat units comprising the polymeric chains differ, each
of these shows a common form of covalent attachment to the core
protein. Specifically, they attach to a serine of the core protein by a
tetrasaccharide that serves as a primer for polysaccharide growth. This
tetrasaccharide comprises a xylose (which is O-linked to
serine), galactose, galactose, and glucuronate (Fig.
1). Participation in the GAG linkage
appears to be the sole established function of xylose in vertebrate
biology. Xylose is formed by the decarboxylation of UDP-glucuronate to
UDP-xylose (Fig. 1). The UDP group is removed by xylosyltransferase,
which directly attaches xylose to serine (16). The enzyme activity responsible for the formation of UDP-xylose via decarboxylation of
UDP-glucuronate has been characterized for over 30 years. However, despite its importance as a regulatory and possibly rate-limiting enzyme in GAG biosynthesis, UDP-glucuronate decarboxylase (UGD) has
been difficult to purify and clone, presumably because of its very low
abundance in most tissues. Very recently a fungal form of the enzyme
has been cloned (17). Utilizing a yeast two-hybrid screen to isolate
Akt (protein kinase B) protein-binding partners/substrates, we
identified UGD as an Akt-interacting protein. In the present study, we
report the molecular cloning and characterization of UGD in mammalian
tissues and identify a selective localization to the Golgi.
Yeast Two-hybrid Screen--
Full-length rat Akt was cloned by
reverse transcriptase-PCR from adult rat brain total RNA.
Utilizing PCR-based mutagenesis we constructed a triple mutant
activated, kinase-dead Akt (Akt*KD, T308D, S473D, and
K179A) (18, 19). Wild type Akt, activated Akt (Akt*, T308D, S473D),
kinase-dead Akt (AktKD, K179A), and activated kinase-dead
Akt (Akt*KD) were evaluated for expression and enzymatic
activity by GST- or HA-tagged fusion protein plasmid expression in
HEK293T cells. The activity characterization agreed with previously
published data (18, 19). Akt*KD was subcloned as bait into
yeast expression vector pPC97 containing the GAL4 binding domain and
used to screen a rat hippocampal and cortical cDNA library in pPC86
expressing the GAL4 transactivation domain (20). The plasmids were
introduced sequentially by LiAc-mediated transformation (21) into the
PJ69 yeast strain. A total of 1.0 × 107 independent
clones were screened. Positive interactions were identified by
selecting for histidine and adenine prototrophy. Positive clones were
further evaluated for Rat Brain cDNA Library Screen and Probe Generation--
A
rat brain cDNA library in Epimerase Activity Assay--
UDP-galactose-4-epimerase activity
was assayed essentially as described previously (22). Modifications
included the use of 100 µg of lysates from GST-UGD transformed
bacteria and 0.011 units of UDP-glucose dehydrogenase (Sigma) per a
final reaction volume of 500 µl.
Dehydratase Activity Assay--
The assay described by Vara
et al. (23) was modified by the use of unlabeled TDP-glucose
as substrate and NaB3H4 for the reduction of a
4-keto reaction product. Reaction products were separated by thin layer
chromatography on aluminum-backed silica plates with a solvent mixture
of pyridine, ethyl acetate, and water 26:66:8 (v/v/v). Dried plates
were visualized by autoradiography and stained by spraying with a
solution of 10% H2SO4 in ethanol followed by
heating for 20 min at 120 °C. Alternatively, the plates were scraped
and assayed by scintillation counting.
We also assayed for a dehydratase product spectrophotometrically as
described previously (24). Bacterially expressed RmlB (24) was used as
a positive control for dehydratase activity.
UDP-glucuronate Decarboxylase Assay--
Decarboxylase activity
was assayed as described previously (25). Briefly, lysates from
GST-UGD-transformed bacteria or alternatively from transfected HEK293T
cells, 2 mM NAD+, and 750 µM
unlabeled UDP-glucuronate (Sigma) were incubated in the presence of 0.2 µCi of uniformly labeled
[glucuronyl-U-14C]UDP-glucuronate (ICN
Biomedicals, Inc.). Where indicated, cell lysates from untransfected
HEK293T were used alone or in combination with lysates from transfected
cells for activity assays. Reaction buffer consisted of 0.1 M NaH2PO4, 0.5 g/liter EDTA, and 5 ml/liter HPLC--
Enzyme reactions for HPLC analysis were conducted as
described above utilizing 25,000-50,000 cpm of uniformly labeled
[glucuronyl-U-14C]UDP-glucuronate. Uniformly
labeled [xylose-U-14C]UDP-xylose was
obtained from American Radiolabeled Chemicals Inc. Assays were quenched
with ice-cold perchloric acid and neutralized as described previously
(26). Where indicated, the enzyme was heat-inactivated by incubation
for 5 min at 100 °C. HPLC analysis of reaction products and standard
was conducted using a Zorbax SAX column (Hewlett-Packard) that was
eluted with a gradient generated by mixing solution A (1 mM
Na2EDTA) and buffer B (solution A plus 1.3 M
(NH4)2HPO4, pH 3.85 with
H3PO4) as follows: 0-5 min, 0% buffer B;
5-65 min, 0-30% buffer B; 65-75 min, 100% buffer B; 75-90 min,
0% buffer B. The fractions (0.5 ml) were collected and counted using 5 ml of Ultima-Flo AP LCS mixture (Packard, Downers Grove, IL).
Electrospray Mass Spectrometry--
Enzyme reactions were
conducted as described above with 1 mg of lysates from
GST-UGD-transformed bacteria. Alternatively, the enzyme was
heat-inactivated by incubation for 5 min at 100 °C. Samples were
desalted and prepared for mass spectrometry analysis of nucleotide
sugars by charcoal adsorption and elution as has been described
previously (27). Samples were diluted in the elution solvent
(ethanol/water/concentrated ammonia, 600/400/6.5 (v/v/v)) so that a 30 µM concentration of original UDP-glucuronate (as
calculated from starting material) was obtained. This was then directly
injected into a PE SCIEX API 150EX mass spectrometer with an
electrospray source at a flow rate of 9 µl/min. Negative ion spectra
were obtained.
Northern Analysis--
A multiple tissue Northern blot membrane
(CLONTECH) containing 2 µg of mRNA/lane was
hybridized using Expresshyb (CLONTECH) according to
manufacturer's instructions with a probe generated from the yeast
two-hybrid fragment by random priming (Invitrogen) in the presence of
[ Transient Transfections and Bacterial Transformations for UGD
Activity Assay--
HEK293T cells were transiently transfected using
LipofectAMINE 2000 (Invitrogen) as per the manufacturer's protocol.
Cells were lysed (after 48 h) in the following buffer: 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 0.1% Triton X-100, 1 mM
EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 50 mM NaF, 10 mM
DH5 In Vitro Binding Assays--
HEK293T cells were co-transfected
using LipofectAMINE 2000 (Invitrogen) with GST-UGD and HA-AKT,
HA-AKTKD, HA-AKT*, or an unrelated fusion protein
designated HA-X. Similar experiments were performed with HA-UGD and the
corresponding GST-Akt plasmids (data not shown). After 48 h, cells
were lysed in the following buffer: 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 50 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 2 mM EGTA, 0.1% Triton X-100, 0.1% Nonidet P-40, 50 NaF, 20 mM
Antibody Generation--
A rabbit polyclonal antibody was raised
against GST-tagged UGD yeast two-hybrid fragment (Covance). The
antibody was affinity-purified as described previously (28).
Immunoblots were performed with a primary antibody dilution of
1:1000.
Subcellular Fractionation--
Brains from five male adult rats
were homogenized in 100 ml of 0.32 M sucrose with a
glass/Teflon homogenizer. Homogenate was centrifuged for 10 min at
800 × g to give pellet (P1) and supernatant (S1). S1
was centrifuged for 15 min at 9200 × g to give pellet
(P2) and supernatant (S2). S2 was centrifuged for 90 min at
100,000 × g to give pellet (P3) and supernatant (S3). The P2 fraction was resuspended in 3 ml of 0.32 M sucrose
and hypotonically lysed in 27 ml of ice-cold water. Lysate was
homogenized with a glass/Teflon homogenizer. Hepes (2 M; pH
7.4) was added to a final concentration of 50 mM, and the
sample was centrifuged for 20 min at 25,000 × g to
give pellet (LP1) and supernatant (LS1). LS1 was centrifuged for 90 min
at 165,000 × g to give pellet (LP2) and supernatant
(LS2). Protein concentration of the fractions was determined, and 12 µg of protein from each fraction was separated by SDS-PAGE followed
by immunoblot.
In Vivo Enzyme Localization--
HEK293T cells were transiently
co-transfected with a total of 2 µg of pDsRed-UGD and either
pEYFP-Golgi or pEYFP-ER (CLONTECH) using
LipofectAMINE 2000 according to the manufacturer's directions (Invitrogen). pEYFP-Golgi encodes a fusion protein consisting of
enhanced yellow fluorescent protein (EYFP) and a sequence encoding the
NH2-terminal 81 amino acids of human
Molecular Cloning of UGD, an Akt Yeast Two-hybrid
Interactor--
In an effort to identify protein-binding partners of
the signaling protein kinase Akt (protein kinase B), we utilized
a yeast two-hybrid analysis with an activated, but kinase-dead, form of Akt as bait. We identified two interactors, one of which remains uncharacterized. The other interactor, which we determined to be UGD,
was identified six times in the two-hybrid screen. A rat brain cDNA
library was screened utilizing the UGD yeast two-hybrid fragment as
probe. Four interacting library fragments were recovered. A full-length
cDNA sequence of UGD was assembled from two of the rat brain
cDNA fragments, the yeast two-hybrid fragment (encompassing amino
acids 32-420), and database analysis (Fig.
2). The starting methionine was assigned
to the first in-frame AUG codon preceded by an upstream stop codon. The
full-length open reading frame of UGD contains 1260 nucleotides coding
for a protein of 420 amino acids with a predicted molecular mass
of 47 kDa (Fig. 2). Data base analysis revealed varying homology with
putative and established UDP-glucuronate decarboxylases, nucleotide
sugar epimerases, and nucleotide sugar dehydratases. Based on homology
with UDP-galactose-4-epimerase, regions of UGD were identified that may
be important in substrate and NAD+ binding. Specifically,
UDP-galactose-4-epimerase and UGD contain a critical threonine or
serine required for binding to the 4-hydroxyl group of the sugar
substrates. Also, a conserved YXXXK motif for binding to
NAD+ is present in both UGD and UDP-galactose-4-epimerase
(29) (Fig. 2). Data base analysis suggested that UGD is highly
conserved across a wide evolutionary range from plants to mammals (Fig. 3). Hydropathy plot analysis (30) of the
UGD protein indicated a single putative transmembrane domain at
residues 20-38. Consistent with a type II transmembrane protein
topololgy, the analysis predicted a short NH2-terminal
segment most likely protruding into cytoplasm and a longer luminal
carboxyl-terminal domain. Such a topology also exists in the putative
homologs of UGD in Mus musculus, C. elegans, and
Drosophila melanogaster but not in Filobasidiella neoformans or Pisum sativum.
Identification of UDP-glucuronate Decarboxylase
Activity--
Based on sequence similarities, we assayed our cloned,
expressed protein for UDP-galactose-4-epimerase activity,
dTDP-glucose-4,6-dehydratase activity, and UGD activity. We assayed for
epimerase activity by spectrophotometrically monitoring the production
of UDP-glucose from UDP-galactose via coupling to NAD+ in
the presence of UDP-glucose dehydrogenase (22). Our clone failed to
demonstrate any epimerase activity in this assay (data not shown).
We examined dehydratase activity (conversion of dTDP-glucose to
dTDP-4-keto-6-deoxyglucose) in two ways. First, we reduced the 4-keto
product of the reaction with tritiated NaBH4 and separated the reaction mixture with silica TLC. With direct visualization, autoradiography, and scintillation counting, we were unable to detect
production of any tritiated, 6-deoxy reaction products by our clone. We
also spectrophotometrically assayed for the production of the 4-keto
product (24, 31), but were unable to detect any product in the presence
of our clone (data not shown).
We monitored UGD activity in three ways. Employing uniformly labeled
[glucuronyl-U-14C]UDP-glucuronate, we measured
the evolution of 14CO2 (25). In this assay we
detected robust, dose-dependent activity of our GST-tagged
clone in transiently transfected HEK293T cell lysates (Fig.
4). Glutathione precipitation and
thorough washing confirmed that the activity resulted from our clone
(data not shown). This activity obeys Michaelis-Menten kinetics with a
Km near 1 mM (data not shown). As the
starting material was uniformly labeled on the glucuronyl moiety, we
could not assert definitively that the evolved CO2
originated from the decarboxylation of the 6-carbon. To further
characterize the biosynthesis of UDP-xylose by our clone, we incubated
GST-tagged clone with uniformly labeled [glucuronyl-U-14C] UDP-glucuronate and
separated the reaction products by HPLC. In the presence of boiled
GST-tagged enzyme (Fig. 5C) or
an unrelated GST-tagged protein (data not shown), only a single sharp
peak appeared with an elution time corresponding to that of the
starting material. However, incubation with our native, tagged clone
resulted in the appearance of a second sharp peak (Fig. 5A)
with an elution time identical to that of authentic uniformly labeled
[xylose-U-14C]UDP-xylose (Fig. 5B).
To obtain definitive evidence that UDP-xylose was the product of our
assay, we performed electrospray mass spectrometry. Negative ion
spectra of reaction mixtures in the presence of heat-inactivated enzyme
(Fig. 6B) only showed peaks
corresponding to UDP-glucuronate ([M-H] Molecular and Functional Analysis of Akt/UGD
Interactions--
Since UGD was cloned based on its interactions with
Akt, we wondered whether such interactions are physiologic. In HEK293T cells transfected with GST-UGD and HA-Akt or with HA-UGD and GST-Akt, pull-down of GST-Akt brought down HA-UGD (data not shown) and pull-down
of GST-UGD brought down HA-Akt, while an unrelated protein did not
co-precipitate with UGD (Fig. 7).
We wondered whether there are any functional interactions between Akt
and UGD. We have been unable to demonstrate alterations in Akt activity
with UGD transfection in basal, serum-starved, or insulin-like growth
factor-stimulated HEK293T cells (data not shown). Although UGD
does not contain the canonical Akt phosphorylation motif
(RXRXXS/TX) present in many known Akt
substrates (32), we examined the possibility of Akt phosphorylation of
UGD. We were unable to detect phosphorylation of GST-UGD by activated HA-Akt in an in vitro kinase reaction nor did we detect any
influence of activated HA-Akt on UGD activity (data not shown).
Tissue Localization of UGD--
Northern analysis revealed the
highest densities of UGD mRNA in heart, brain, and testes (Fig.
8A). Substantial levels were also evident in kidney, liver, and lung with much lower densities in
spleen and skeletal muscle. Northern analysis of transformed cell lines
revealed substantial levels of UGD mRNA in 3T3, RBE7, and PC12 cell
lines but little to no transcript in 293T, HeLa, COS-1, Jurkat, or 9L
glioma cell lines (Fig. 8B). In all of these tissues and
cell lines we detected a single transcript of about 2.1 kb, suggesting
that there is no significant alternative splicing.
For immunochemical studies we developed a rabbit polyclonal antibody to
GST-UGD. The antibody recognized a band of 47 kDa in transiently
transfected cells (data not shown) as well as in native rat tissues
(Fig. 9). Additionally, in all tissues an
additional band of about 70 kDa was evident (data not shown). Kidney
samples contained a second 38-kDa cross-reactive band recognized by the antibody. Preabsorption of purified antibody with GST-UGD eliminated the 47-kDa band in all tissues. Preabsorption of purified antibody with
GST alone or agarose beads did not alter the 47-kDa band (Fig.
9A).
UGD protein was most enriched in kidney, liver, and brain with
negligible staining in Western blots of heart, spleen, skeletal muscle,
lung, and testes (Fig. 9B). This pattern differed from the
distribution of UGD mRNA, which was highly concentrated in testes
and heart (Fig. 8A). Within the central nervous system, UGD
protein distribution varied with the highest amounts in the cerebellum,
thalamus, and spinal cord and much lower levels in cerebral cortex,
hippocampus, corpus striatum, and olfactory bulb (Fig.
9B).
Subcellular Localization of UGD--
The addition of xylose in the
biosynthesis of GAGs begins in the late endoplasmic reticulum and/or at
the ER-to-Golgi interface and continues in the Golgi (33-35).
Furthermore, UGD activity has been found in chick chondrocytes to
co-localize with xylosyltransferase activity in subcellular fractions
(35). To evaluate the intracellular localization of UGD, we conducted
subcellular fractionations (Fig. 9C). UGD protein was
predominantly particulate with highest densities in the crude
microsomal fraction of whole brain (P3). To assess localization to
synaptic vesicle fractions and other membranes within nerve terminals,
we lysed the synaptosome-nerve terminal containing P2 fraction, which
provides the LP1 (lysate) and LS1 (lysate supernatant fractions).
Centrifugation of LS1 yielded a supernatant LS2 fraction and a crude
synaptic vesicle fraction, LP2. UGD was detected in LP2 and LS2 but not
in LP1 fractions.
To assess the intracellular localization of UGD in intact cells, we
conducted histochemistry. Because of the low levels of endogenous UGD,
we were unable to conduct immunohistochemistry for native UGD.
Accordingly, we transfected HEK293 cells with DsRed2-labeled UGD and
compared its localization with co-transfected EYFP-ER and EYFP-Golgi,
fusion protein markers for the endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi,
respectively. We observed intense staining for UGD in the perinuclear
Golgi (Fig. 10).
In the present study, we present the molecular cloning and
characterization of mammalian UGD. UGD is evolutionarily highly conserved with 75-80% amino acid sequence identity and 90%
similarity between plants and mammals. Although we discovered UGD based
on its binding to Akt, we have failed to thus far identify any major regulatory interactions between the two proteins.
Data base analysis revealed similarity of UGD to
UDP-galactose-4-epimerase and TDP-glucose-4,6-dehydratase. These
similarities may be based on properties shared by UGD and these other
enzymes. These enzymes all employ NAD+ as a co-factor and
bind UDP or TDP sugars. All of them are hypothesized to share an
initial catalytic step involving oxidation of the 4-carbon of the sugar
to a ketone. This is the sole function of the sugar dehydratase. The
epimerase asymmetrically reduces the 4-ketone to stereospecifically
produce the C-4 epimer, while UGD is thought to proceed through
Subcellular fractionation and histochemical studies localized UGD
primarily to the Golgi. Consistent with this, hydropathy plot analysis
of the protein sequence indicated a putative type II transmembrane
topology common to Golgi-localized proteins (36). Previous studies of
UGD activity in cultured chick chondrocytes as well as mouse mast cell
tumors have localized the activity to the particulate cell fractions
(35, 37, 38). Studies of xylose biosynthesis and xylosylation in intact
cells, which monitor transformation of UDP-glucuronate to UDP-xylose in
permeabilized chick chondrocytes, indicate predominant localizations to
the Golgi and endoplasmic reticulum (34, 35). Consistent with our
hydropathy analysis, these studies evaluated the possible luminal or
cytosolic orientation of membrane-associated enzyme activity by
monitoring trypsin sensitivity and found UGD activity was lost in the
presence of trypsin only when organelle membranes were disrupted (35).
While UDP-xylose transport into the Golgi has been described (33, 35),
it has been suggested to be the result of nonspecific nucleotide sugar
transport associated with other nucleotide sugar transporters (35). In
contrast to our cloned sequence and its mammalian, C. elegans, and D. melanogaster homologs, hydropathy
plot analysis of homologous sequences of plant and fungal origin showed
no predicted membrane spanning domains; consistent with this, previous
studies of plant and fungal UGD activity have found them to be
associated with soluble cell fractions (39, 40). Indeed, the recent
cloning of UGD from the pathogenic fungus Cryptococcus
neoformans found the expressed enzyme to localize primarily to
soluble cell fractions (17).
The enzymes crucial for GAG biosynthesis and their importance for
proper growth and differentiation have been well characterized in
C. elegans (13-15). In this species, epithelial
invagination of the vulva is a major, developmentally regulated event.
Screening for mutations that interfere with this process led to the
identification of eight specific "squashed vulva" (SQV)
genes (14). Seven of these eight genes have been cloned. Notably, all
are involved in GAG biosynthesis or transport (13, 15, 41).
SQV-1 is the only one of these not yet cloned. C. elegans genetic map data base analysis reveals a close proximity
of a UGD ortholog to SQV-1 on chromosome IV. It is likely
that UGD and SQV-1 are identical. If so, this would imply a
critical role for UGD in embryonic development.
We thank Bahman Aghdasi, Jamie Cheah,
Christopher Ferris, Adolfo Saiardi, Kristin Whitford, Keqiang Ye, and
Alec Resnick for technical assistance and insightful comments. We are
also indebted to Michael McNeil for generous contribution of RmlB
transformed bacteria for use as positive controls in our dehydratase assays.
*
This work was supported by United States Public Health
Service Grant MH18501 (to S. H. S.), Research Scientist Award
DA-00074 (to S. H. S.), and Training Programs in Neuroscience
MH20062 (to K. J. H. and A. C. R.) and NS37096 (to
R. L. S.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EBI Data Bank with accession number(s) AF482705.
**
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Neuroscience,
Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 725 N. Wolfe St., Baltimore, MD
21205. Tel.: 410-955-3024; Fax: 410-955-3623; E-mail:
ssnyder@bs.jhmi.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, February 27, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M109316200
The abbreviations used are:
GAG, glycosaminoglycan;
DsRed, Discosoma sp. Red;
EYFP, enhanced
yellow fluorescent protein;
GST, glutathione S-transferase;
HA, hemagglutinin;
HPLC, high performance liquid chromatography;
TDP, thymidine 5'-diphosphate;
UDP, uridine 5'-diphosphate;
UGD, UDP-glucuronate decarboxylase;
ER, endoplasmic reticulum.
UDP-glucuronate Decarboxylase, a Key Enzyme in Proteoglycan
Synthesis
CLONING, CHARACTERIZATION, AND LOCALIZATION*
,
,
**
Departments of Neurological Surgery,
§ Neuroscience, ¶ Pharmacology and Molecular Sciences,
and
Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins School
of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
/bone morphogenetic proteins, and hedgehog (3-12). Recent
identification of several Caenorhabditis elegans mutants deficient in GAG biosynthesis and transport has demonstrated a critical
role for GAGs in growth and development (13-15).

View larger version (15K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Schematic representation of UDP-xylose
synthesis from UDP-glucuronic acid by UGD (*). Enzymatic
attachment of UDP-xylose to the core protein (via a serine hydroxyl)
then initiates proteoglycan synthesis by the formation of the linker
tetrasaccharide and subsequent GAG attachment and elongation.
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-galactosidase expression on plates containing
5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-
-D-galactopyranoside (X-gal).
Plasmids rescued from positive clones were retransformed into the HF7C
yeast strain (CLONTECH) and once again selected for
histidine prototrophy and evaluated for
-galactosidase expression by
nitrocellulose filter lift assays (21).
ZAPII (Stratagene) was screened per
the manufacturer's protocol. The probe was generated from the UGD
yeast two-hybrid fragment by random priming (Invitrogen) in the
presence of [
-32P]dATP and dCTP (PerkinElmer Life
Sciences). Full-length UGD was subsequently subcloned into
pCMV-HA and pCMV-GST vectors.
-mercaptoethanol. Detection of UDP-glucuronate
decarboxylase activity was based on the detection of released
14CO2. During the reaction, released
14CO2 was trapped in an inner tube containing
0.2 ml of ethanolamine and 2-methoxyethanol, 1:2 (v/v). Released
14CO2 was then determined in a liquid
scintillation counter.
-32P]dATP and dCTP (PerkinElmer Life Sciences).
Multiple cell line blots were prepared from cell lysates using Trizol
(Invitrogen) as per the manufacturer's protocol. Each lane contained
20 µg of total RNA. Equal amounts of ribosomal RNA and
-actin were present in each lane.
-glycerol phosphate, 5 mM pyrophosphate, 1 mM NaOV4, 0.1%
-mercaptoethanol, 1 µM microcystin. Lysates were briefly sonicated, centrifuged at 16,000 × g for 15 min, and the
supernatant used in activity assays.
subcloning efficiency Escherichia coli (Invitrogen)
were transformed with a GST-UGD plasmid, and fusion protein expression was induced as per the manufacturer's protocol. Cell lysates were sonicated, centrifuged at 16,000 × g for 15 min, and
the supernatant used in activity assays or snap-frozen and kept at
80 °C for up to 3 months without loss of activity.
-glycerol phosphate, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 100 mg/liter phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and protease inhibitor
mixture (Sigma). Lysates were briefly sonicated and centrifuged at
16,000 × g for 15 min. After centrifugation, 1.0 mg of
the supernatants was incubated with a 50% slurry of prepared
glutathione-Sepharose (Amersham Biosciences) for 1.5 h at
4.0 °C with slow rotation. Samples were washed five times with
phosphate-buffered saline (Invitrogen). The agarose was resuspended in
sample loading buffer, separated by SDS-PAGE, and immunoblotted using
the indicated antibodies. Anti-GST (Sigma) and anti-HA (Covance)
primary antibodies were both used at dilutions of 1:2000.
-1,4-galactosyltransferase; pEYFP-ER encodes a fusion protein
consisting of EYFP, the ER targeting sequence of calreticulin, and the
ER retrieval sequence KDEL. Cells were grown on four-well glass
microscope slides and were processed for enzyme localization studies
48 h after transfection. Photomicrographs shown in Fig. 10 were
obtained with a Nikon Eclipse TE300 inverted microscope and captured
with Openlab (Improvision).
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (37K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Full-length nucleotide and amino acid
sequence for rat UGD. Underlined sequences represent
hydroxyl-containing amino acids and an YXXXK motif
potentially involved in substrate and NAD+ binding,
respectively (see text for details).

View larger version (95K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
CLUSTAL-W alignment of UGD
(top) and putative orthologs in M. musculus
(GenBankTM accession number AAK85410), C. elegans (GenBankTM accession number T15892),
D. melanogaster (GenBankTM accession
number AAF50474), F. neoformans (GenBankTM
accession number AAK59981), and P. sativum
(GenBankTM accession number
BAB40967).
= 579.3),
NAD+ ([M-H]
= 662.3), and a
NAD+ degradation product ([M-H]
= 540; loss
of niacinamide). In the presence of our putative UGD, an additional
peak appeared corresponding to the mass of UDP-xylose
([M-H]
= 535.2) (Fig. 6A). Minor peaks were
evident corresponding to the masses of mono- and disodiated
UDP-glucuronate and UDP-xylose.

View larger version (10K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Augmented evolution of
14CO2 from
[glucuronyl-U-14C]-labeled
UDP-glucuronate with increasing amounts of UGD. Each of the four
reactions utilized a total of 1 mg of cell lysate with varying
proportions of transfected (GST-UGD) and untransfected (293T) lysates.
Evolved 14CO2 was determined in a liquid
scintillation counter. These results were reproduced in nine similar
experiments with both mammalian and bacterial cell lysates.

View larger version (10K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
HPLC analysis of UGD reaction products.
A, enzyme reaction with native UGD utilizing uniformly
labeled [glucuronyl-U-14C]UDP-glucuronate.
B, HPLC elution of uniformly labeled
[xylose-U-14C]UDP-xylose standard.
C, heat-inactivated enzyme reaction utilizing uniformly
labeled [glucuronyl-U-14C]UDP-glucuronate.
HPLC elution fractions (0.5 ml) were collected and counted in a liquid
scintillation counter. These results were reproduced in six separate
experiments.

View larger version (19K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Electrospray negative ion spectra of enzyme
reaction products with active UGD (A) or with
heat-inactivated UGD (B). In addition to the
UDP-glucuronate peak ([M-H]
= 579.3), a second
significant peak appeared in the analyses reflecting the presence of
monosodiated UDP-glucuronate ([M+Na-2H]
= 601.3).
Reactions with heat-inactivated enzyme (B) also displayed
mass peaks corresponding to NAD+ ([M-H]
= 662.3) and its degradation product ([M-H]
= 540.4)
(reflecting the loss of niacinamide from NAD+). Analysis of
reactions containing active UGD (A) revealed additional
peaks corresponding to UDP-xylose ([M-H]
= 535.2) and
monosodiated UDP-xylose ([M+Na-2H]
= 557.1).
y axis scale is in millions.

View larger version (37K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Western blot analysis of GST-UGD and HA-Akt
co-precipitation experiments. Glutathione bead pull-down of
GST-tagged UGD co-precipitated HA-AKT from 1 mg of cell lysates from
HEK293 cells transiently co-transfected with GST-UGD and
HA-AktWT, HA-AktKD, or HA-Akt*WT.
Glutathione pull-down of GST-tagged UGD from transiently co-transfected
cells failed to co-precipitate an unrelated, HA-tagged protein
(HA-X). Load: HA-tagged protein content in 20 µg of transfected cell lysates; Pulldown: GST-UGD bound to
glutathione-Sepharose beads after incubation with transfected cell
lysates; Co-precipitate: HA-tagged proteins co-precipitating
with glutathione-Sepharose-bound GST-UGD.

View larger version (43K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 8.
Expression pattern of UGD in multiple rat
tissues (A) and multiple cell lines
(B) determined by Northern blot analysis. A
single ~2.1-kb transcript is identified in multiple tissues and cell
lines.

View larger version (30K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 9.
Antibody characterization and UGD
distribution in rat tissues. Western blot demonstration that
preabsorption of rabbit polyclonal anti-UGD antibody with GST-UGD
resulted in the disappearance of the 47-kDa band, while preabsorption
with GST or agarose beads alone did not (A).
B, multiple tissue and multiple brain region Western blots
depicting tissue and central nervous system distribution of UGD are
shown (CTX, cortex; CBL, cerebellum;
HC, hippocampus; STR, corpus striatum;
OB, olfactory bulb; Thal, thalamus;
SC, spinal cord). C, Western blot analysis of
subcellular fractions demonstrating predominance of UGD in P3,
consistent with Golgi localization.

View larger version (11K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 10.
Localization of UGD in intact, living
cells. HEK-293T cells were co-transfected with DsRed2-UGD
and either EYFP-ER (A-C) or EYFP-Golgi (D-F).
EYFP-ER encodes a fusion protein consisting of enhanced yellow
fluorescent protein, the sequence encoding the endoplasmic reticulum
targeting sequence of calreticulin, and the sequence encoding the ER
retrieval sequence (KDEL). EYFP-Golgi encodes a fusion protein
consisting of enhanced yellow fluorescent protein and a sequence
encoding the N-terminal 81 amino acids of human
-1-4-galactosyltransferase. EYFP-ER expression (A) and
DsRed2-UGD (B) displayed some overlap (C).
Expression of EYFP-Golgi (D) and DsRed2-UGD (E)
displayed nearly identical co-localization, suggesting predominately
perinuclear Golgi localization of UGD. Scale bar shown
corresponds to 10 µm.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-decarboxylation of the 6-carbon followed by sterospecific reduction
of the 4-carbon (28, 29).
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Bernfield, M.,
Gotte, M.,
Park, P. W.,
Reizes, O.,
Fitzgerald, M. L.,
Lincecum, J.,
and Zako, M.
(1999)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
68,
729-777[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 2.
Lander, A. D.,
and Selleck, S. B.
(2000)
J. Cell Biol.
148,
227-232 3.
Haerry, T. E.,
Heslip, T. R.,
Marsh, J. L.,
and O'Connor, M. B.
(1997)
Development (Camb.)
124,
3055-3064[Abstract] 4.
Hacker, U.,
Lin, X.,
and Perrimon, N.
(1997)
Development (Camb.)
124,
3565-3573[Abstract] 5.
Binari, R. C.,
Staveley, B. E.,
Johnson, W. A.,
Godavarti, R.,
Sasisekharan, R.,
and Manoukian, A. S.
(1997)
Development (Camb.)
124,
2623-2632[Abstract] 6.
Jackson, S. M.,
Nakato, H.,
Sugiura, M.,
Jannuzi, A.,
Oakes, R.,
Kaluza, V.,
Golden, C.,
and Selleck, S. B.
(1997)
Development (Camb.)
124,
4113-4120[Abstract] 7.
Bellaiche, Y.,
The, I.,
and Perrimon, N.
(1998)
Nature
394,
85-88[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 8.
Tsuda, M.,
Kamimura, K.,
Nakato, H.,
Archer, M.,
Staatz, W.,
Fox, B.,
Humphrey, M.,
Olson, S.,
Futch, T.,
Kaluza, V.,
Siegfried, E.,
Stam, L.,
and Selleck, S. B.
(1999)
Nature
400,
276-280[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 9.
Lin, X.,
and Perrimon, N.
(1999)
Nature
400,
281-284[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 10.
Lin, X.,
Buff, E. M.,
Perrimon, N.,
and Michelson, A. M.
(1999)
Development (Camb.)
126,
3715-3723[Abstract] 11.
The, I.,
Bellaiche, Y.,
and Perrimon, N.
(1999)
Mol. Cell
4,
633-639[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 12.
Selleck, S. B.
(2000)
Trends Genet.
16,
206-212[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 13.
Herman, T.,
and Horvitz, H. R.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
974-979 14.
Herman, T.,
Hartwieg, E.,
and Horvitz, H. R.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
968-973 15.
Bulik, D. A.,
Wei, G.,
Toyoda, H.,
Kinoshita-Toyoda, A.,
Waldrip, W. R.,
Esko, J. D.,
Robbins, P. W.,
and Selleck, S. B.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
97,
10838-10843 16.
Prydz, K.,
and Dalen, K. T.
(2000)
J. Cell Sci.
113,
193-205[Abstract] 17.
Bar-Peled, M.,
Griffith, C. L.,
and Doering, T. L.
(2001)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
98,
12003-12008 18.
Alessi, D. R.,
Andjelkovic, M.,
Caudwell, B.,
Cron, P.,
Morrice, N.,
Cohen, P.,
and Hemmings, B. A.
(1996)
EMBO J.
15,
6541-6551[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 19.
Burgering, B. M.,
and Coffer, P. J.
(1995)
Nature
376,
599-602[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 20.
Li, X. J., Li, S. H.,
Sharp, A. H.,
Nucifora, F. C., Jr.,
Schilling, G.,
Lanahan, A.,
Worley, P.,
Snyder, S. H.,
and Ross, C. A.
(1995)
Nature
378,
398-402[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 21.
Chevray, P. M.,
and Nathans, D.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
5789-5793 22.
Ng, W. G.,
Donnell, G. N.,
Hodgman, J. E.,
and Bergren, W. R.
(1967)
Nature
214,
283-284[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 23.
Vara, J. A.,
and Hutchinson, C. R.
(1988)
J. Biol. Chem.
263,
14992-14995 24.
Ma, Y.,
Stern, R. J.,
Scherman, M. S.,
Vissa, V. D.,
Yan, W.,
Jones, V. C.,
Zhang, F.,
Franzblau, S. G.,
Lewis, W. H.,
and McNeil, M. R.
(2001)
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
45,
1407-1416 25.
John, K. V.,
Schutzbach, J. S.,
and Ankel, H.
(1977)
J. Biol. Chem.
252,
8013-8017 26.
Shears, S.
(1997)
Signalling by Inositides: A Practical Approach (The Practical Approach Series)
, IRL Press at Oxford University Press, Oxford
27.
Mandeles, S.,
and Kammen, H. O.
(1966)
Anal. Biochem.
17,
540-544[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 28.
Bar-Peled, M.,
and Raikhel, N. V.
(1996)
Anal. Biochem.
241,
140-142[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 29.
Thoden, J. B.,
Hegeman, A. D.,
Wesenberg, G.,
Chapeau, M. C.,
Frey, P. A.,
and Holden, H. M.
(1997)
Biochemistry
36,
6294-6304[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 30.
Krogh, A.,
Larsson, B.,
von Heijne, G.,
and Sonnhammer, E. L.
(2001)
J. Mol. Biol.
305,
567-580[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 31.
Zarkowsky, H.,
and Glaser, L.
(1969)
J. Biol. Chem.
244,
4750-4756 32.
Alessi, D. R.,
Caudwell, F. B.,
Andjelkovic, M.,
Hemmings, B. A.,
and Cohen, P.
(1996)
FEBS Lett.
399,
333-338[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 33.
Nuwayhid, N.,
Glaser, J. H.,
Johnson, J. C.,
Conrad, H. E.,
Hauser, S. C.,
and Hirschberg, C. B.
(1986)
J. Biol. Chem.
261,
12936-12941 34.
Vertel, B. M.,
Walters, L. M.,
Flay, N.,
Kearns, A. E.,
and Schwartz, N. B.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
11105-11112 35.
Kearns, A. E.,
Vertel, B. M.,
and Schwartz, N. B.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
11097-11104 36.
Colley, K. J.
(1997)
Glycobiology
7,
1-13 37.
Silbert, J. E.,
and DeLuca, S.
(1967)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
141,
193-196[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 38.
John, K. V.,
Schwartz, N. B.,
and Ankel, H.
(1977)
J. Biol. Chem.
252,
6707-6710 39.
Ankel, H.,
and Feingold, D. S.
(1965)
Biochemistry
4,
2468-2475 40.
Ankel, H.,
and Feingold, D. S.
(1966)
Biochemistry
5,
182-189[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 41.
Berninsone, P.,
Hwang, H. Y.,
Zemtseva, I.,
Horvitz, H. R.,
and Hirschberg, C. B.
(2001)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
98,
3738-3743
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. Irie, A. Preston, and M. H. Yuk Expression of the Primary Carbohydrate Component of the Bordetella bronchiseptica Biofilm Matrix Is Dependent on Growth Phase but Independent of Bvg Regulation. J. Bacteriol., September 1, 2006; 188(18): 6680 - 6687. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Ashikov, F. Routier, J. Fuhlrott, Y. Helmus, M. Wild, R. Gerardy-Schahn, and H. Bakker The Human Solute Carrier Gene SLC35B4 Encodes a Bifunctional Nucleotide Sugar Transporter with Specificity for UDP-Xylose and UDP-N-Acetylglucosamine J. Biol. Chem., July 22, 2005; 280(29): 27230 - 27235. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Suzuki, Y. Suzuki, and S. Kitamura Cloning and expression of a UDP-glucuronic acid decarboxylase gene in rice J. Exp. Bot., August 1, 2003; 54(389): 1997 - 1999. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Jonsson, E. Eklund, L.-A. Fransson, and A. Oldberg Initiation of the Decorin Glycosaminoglycan Chain in the Endoplasmic Reticulum-Golgi Intermediate Compartment J. Biol. Chem., June 6, 2003; 278(24): 21415 - 21420. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. D. Harper and M. Bar-Peled Biosynthesis of UDP-Xylose. Cloning and Characterization of a Novel Arabidopsis Gene Family, UXS, Encoding Soluble and Putative Membrane-Bound UDP-Glucuronic Acid Decarboxylase Isoforms Plant Physiology, December 1, 2002; 130(4): 2188 - 2198. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||