![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 19, 17002-17008, May 10, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Department of Biochemistry, Osaka University Medical
School, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
Received for publication, January 17, 2002, and in revised form, February 28, 2002
Angiogenesis is the first regulatory
step of tumor progression. Herein, we report on some findings that show
that Angiogenesis represents an obligatory step in cancer
progression (1, 2). A variety of factors, such as fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2),1 vascular
endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and interleukin-8, contribute
to tumor growth. The production of these factors and cytokines is
controlled by complicated mechanisms, which include increased gene
expression, posttranslational modifications, and interactions with the
extracellular matrix.
Many growth factors and their receptors, some of which play a role in
tumor angiogenesis, are glycoproteins. Recent studies employing
glycosyltransferase gene manipulation have revealed that changes in the
oligosaccharide structure of these receptors bring about alterations in
intracellular signaling, thus leading to cellular transformation
(3-6). Clinical studies have shown increases in GnT-V activity in breast and
hepatocellular carcinomas (10, 11). In human breast cancer cells, a
positive correlation was observed between GnT-V activity and tumor size
(11). We have found that the expression of GnT-V in human colon cancer
tissues was correlated with a poor prognosis and distant metastasis
(12). This suggests that GnT-V level should be indicative of a poor
prognosis in cases of colorectal cancer. These results strongly suggest
that GnT-V plays a pivotal role in tumor malignancy. However, the
detailed mechanisms of the regulation via GnT-V with respect to tumor
size or metastasis remain unknown.
To address this issue, we established GnT-V transfectants and examined
the metastatic potentials of these cells. In the course of this study,
we found that GnT-V transfectants induced dramatic increase in
angiogenic activity. The induction of tumor angiogenesis by GnT-V is
thought to be due to 1) increases in the expression/production of
angiogenic factors, 2) changes in their function via the addition of
Cell Cultures and Transfection--
A human colon carcinoma cell
line, WiDr was cultured in RPMI 1640 containing 10% of fetal bovine
serum (Invitrogen) and antibiotics (penicillin and
streptomycin). Gene transfection was performed using the CELL FECTINTM
reagent (Invitrogen). Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC)
were isolated as described previously (13), and cultured in MCDB131
medium (Invitrogen) containing 10% of fetal bovine serum, human FGF-2
(10 ng/ml), and antibiotics.
Transplantation of the Tumor Cells to Nude Mice--
5 × 105 cells of each glycosyltransferase transfectant were
injected into the back of athymic mice. After 1 month, the mice were
sacrificed. Tumor formation and angiogenesis were observed macroscopically.
Chick Embryo Chorioallantoic Membrane (CAM)-Angiogenesis
Assay--
The CAM assay was performed as described previously with
slight modifications (14, 15). CAMs from 8-day-old fertilized white
Leghorn chicken embryos were used in this assay. The cells were seeded
onto a collagen sponge at a density of 1 × 105 cells
and then incubated for 4 h. Collagen sponges were deposited onto
5-mm round silicon rings on the CAM. In the case of purified GnT-V
proteins, each GnT-V mutant protein was placed on 1% methylcellulose. Each sample was deposited onto 5-mm round silicon rings on the CAM. The
CAMs were incubated for 48 h and photographed using a digital camera.
HUVEC Proliferation Assay--
HUVEC were seeded in a 96-well
plate coated with type I collagen (2 × 103
cells/well). After 24 h, the medium was replaced with MCDB131 medium containing 0.1% bovine serum albumin and starved for 24 h.
The medium was then replaced with the conditioned medium from glycosyltransferase transfectants or MCDB131 medium containing human
FGF-2 (Dainippon Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.), GnT-V Preparation of Purified Recombinant GnT-V--
Two types of
GnT-V proteins, GnT-V
SDS-PAGE was performed according to Laemmli (18). Each GnT-V mutant
protein (100 ng) was subjected to 10% SDS-PAGE under reducing
conditions. The proteins were visualized by silver staining.
Peptide Synthesis--
The KRKRKK peptide, corresponding to
amino acids 264-269 of human GnT-V, and the FSGGPL peptide (amino
acids 291-296) were synthesized using a Peptide Synthesizer A432
(Applied Biosystems). They were purified using reverse-phase high
performance liquid chromatography, and their mass and purity were
verified by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight
mass spectrometry (Voyager-DETM RP; PerSeptive Biosystems).
FGF-2 Measurement--
The concentration of FGF-2 was measured
as described previously (19). HUVEC cells, seeded at 5 × 104 cells/well onto collagen-coated 12-well plates, were
washed twice with PBS, and then the medium was then replaced with
MCDB131 plus 0.1% BSA (0.5 ml/well), in the presence or absence of
each molecule: GnT-V Transplantation of GnT-V Transfectants Induces Hypervascularization
in Athymic Mice--
Our previous studies demonstrated that the
expression level of GnT-V is highly correlated with a poor prognosis in
colorectal cancer (12). Therefore, we established stable transfectants of it using the human colon cancer cell line WiDr, along with control
transfectants of GnT-V Transfectants Induced Angiogenesis--
To verify the
induction of angiogenesis by the GnT-V transfectants, the
chorioallantoic membrane of chick embryo (CAM assay) was employed (14,
15). An increased invasion of blood capillaries into the collagen
sponge was observed only in the case of the GnT-V transfectants (Fig.
1B). This angiogenesis was also observed when the GnT-V gene
was transiently expressed in WiDr, COS-1, and Chinese hamster ovary
cells (data not shown). These data suggest that the induction of
angiogenesis is a common effect of GnT-V gene transfection rather than
a unique phenomenon limited to the WiDr clones.
Conditioned Medium from GnT-V Transfectants Stimulates HUVEC
Proliferation--
To evaluate the induction of angiogenesis in the
GnT-V transfectants, we measured their effects on DNA synthesis in
human umbilical vein epithelial cells (HUVEC) (20). DNA synthesis of
HUVEC was increased as the result of replacement with the conditioned medium from the GnT-V transfectants, whereas no effects were detectable when the conditioned medium from the other transfectants was used (Fig.
1C). These data indicate that the GnT-V transfectants
secreted a growth-stimulating factor for HUVEC. The addition of fresh
medium (CTR) increased the HUVEC proliferation to a higher
level than that of the conditioned medium from the GnT-V transfectants.
This is probably due to a supply of growth-stimulating factors such as
FGF-2 that are contained in fetal bovine serum.
Effect of Recombinant GnT-V on HUVEC Proliferation--
Next,
angiogenic activity in the conditioned medium from the GnT-V
transfectants was characterized using column chromatography, monitoring
HUVEC proliferation-stimulating activity. With heparin affinity
chromatography, a high activity fraction was eluted with 0.3 M NaCl (data not shown). This characteristic is completely different from hitherto known angiogenic factors (e.g.
FGF-1, FGF-2, VEGF, placental growth factor (PlGF), and hepatocyte
growth factor), which are eluted with 0.8-1.5 M NaCl
(21-25). When Western blot analysis of the eluted fractions was
performed using an anti-GnT-V antibody, its reactivity corresponded to
the HUVEC proliferation activity (data not shown). It is known that
GnT-V, as well as other glycosyltransferases, is secreted from tumor
cells (26-30), although the physiological significance of this remains
unknown. To address the hypothesis that a secreted type of GnT-V itself induces the proliferation of HUVEC, we prepared a special type of
recombinant GnT-V, referred to as GnT-V Domain Analysis of GnT-V Affecting HUVEC Proliferation--
To
determine which domain of GnT-V contains the HUVEC
growth-stimulating activity, we analyzed several types of deletion
mutants of GnT-V (Fig. 2, B and C).
GnTV Identification of a Basic Amino Acid-clustered Region of GnT-V to
Induce Angiogenesis--
There is a markedly basic region,
corresponding to amino acids 254-269, of human GnT-V, whose sequence,
KSLAEKQNLEKRKRKK, is very similar to the sequence of amino acid
142-157 of VEGF189 (21) (Fig.
3A). In addition, the context
of basic amino acids in this region is conserved in PlGF-2 and heparin
binding type epidermal growth factor-like growth factor (HB-EGF) and
serves as a heparin-binding motif (21). Barillari et al.
(19) reported that a basic peptide, GRGKRR, derived from the sequence
of PlGF-2, induced the growth of endothelial cells by releasing FGF-2
from HSPG on the cell surface and/or extracellular matrix. Therefore, we synthesized a basic peptide, KRKRKK, corresponding to amino acids
264-269 of GnT-V and a nonbasic control peptide, FSGGPL (corresponding
to amino acids 291-296 of GnT-V), and examined their effects
on the growth of HUVEC. The amount of FGF-2 released from
HSPG on HUVEC was measured after various truncated GnT-Vs and
synthesized peptides were administrated to a culture medium of HUVEC at
4 °C. GnT-V In Vivo Angiogenesis by GnT-V Protein--
The induction of
angiogenesis was also observed in other in vitro angiogenic
assays, such as the capillary-like tube formation (32) and the
migration assays (33) using HUVEC (data not shown). In order to
investigate the angiogenic activity of GnT-V ex vivo, a CAM
assay using GnT-V Angiogenesis is one of the key regulatory steps necessary for
tumor malignancy. Several endogenous stimulators and inhibitors of
angiogenesis have been identified, and the net balance of these regulators represents the angiogenic phenotype of tumor cells. These
include several types of molecules, the functions of which were
originally thought to be related to events other than angiogenesis. For
instance, angiostatin and endostatin are produced by the proteolysis from plasminogen and type XVIII collagen, respectively (34, 35). In the
present study, we found that a secreted type of GnT-V protein induces
angiogenesis that is unrelated to the usual glycosyltransferase
activity of GnT-V. Although a variety of previous studies indicate that
GnT-V is directly linked to tumor metastasis, the mechanistic details
of its action at the molecular level remain unknown (6-9). Dennis's
group reported that oligosaccharide structures that are modified by
GnT-V on an integrin or T cell receptor affect cell-cell or
cell-extracellular matrix interactions in the processes of tumor
metastasis and the immune system (7, 36). The present study proposes a
new mechanism of GnT-V-related tumor metastasis, which is not
mediated by glycosylation. Namely, it appears that GnT-V is capable of
acting as a bifunctional protein. GnT-V is a Golgi enzyme but is also
secreted by some cultivated cells (26, 27). The concentration of GnT-V
sufficient to induce angiogenesis is within the range of concentration
that is actually observed in the conditioned medium of B16-F10 cells.
Our hypothesis regarding the action of GnT-V in angiogenesis is
schematically summarized in Fig. 5. It is
thought that GnT-V secreted from cancer cells releases a deposited
FGF-2 from HSPG in the extracellular matrix by competition for binding,
and subsequently the released FGF-2 binds to the FGF-2 receptor,
forming a ternary complex with the receptor and associated heparan
sulfate, and this interaction generates a signal leading to stimulation
of angiogenesis. No GnT-V receptor/binding protein on the HUVEC surface
was detected by cross-linking analysis using 125I-labeled
GnT-V, suggesting that GnT-V does not directly bind to HUVECs but acts
indirectly to stimulate signal transduction (data not shown). This
hypothesis is supported by the report that when endothelial cells were
precultured with VEGF, the addition of a protein containing a basic
amino acid cluster like GnT-V induced a release of VEGF from HSPG (19).
Furthermore, the growth-stimulating effect of GnT-V was also observed
in other cell lines, such as breast carcinoma cell lines MCF-7 and
MDA-MB231 (data not shown), which are known to respond to FGF-2 (37,
38). These findings suggest that GnT-V might act as a general growth
factor or a differentiation factor via a mechanism similar to that
proposed here.
The angiogenic potential of GnT-V relates to a basic region that is
conserved in the heparin-binding domains of hitherto known angiogenic
growth factors. It is noteworthy in this respect that VEGF189 contains the same basic peptide KRKRKK as GnT-V
(Fig. 3A). VEGF189 is known to exist on the cell
surfaces as a cell-associated form, distinct from the secretable
isoforms of VEGF121 and VEGF165. To associate
with a cell surface, the basic region of the C terminus of
VEGF189, including the KRKRKK sequence, is required (39). However, there is no evidence that VEGF189 induces the
release of FGF-2 from HSPG. In contrast, a secretable factor, PlGF-2, which contains the basic region, induces the release of FGF-2 (19). It
appears that a secretable factor that contains a basic amino acid
cluster might effect a release of a FGF-2 associated with HSPG.
Although FGF-2 was identified as a target of the secreted type of GnT-V
in this study, other growth factors associated with HSPG also might be
released by GnT-V.
A considerable body of data has accumulated to date on the involvement
of GnT-V in cancer progression (7-12). Therefore, inhibiting the
action of GnT-V is considered a reasonable strategy against cancer
progression. Five mechanisms have been proposed to suppress GnT-V
function. First is the inhibition of the
N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase enzyme reaction in cancer
cells by the administration of a specific inhibitor. Actually, the
development of such reagents is ongoing (40). The second involves the
suppression of gene expression of GnT-V. Since Ets-1 is one of the most
important transcriptional factors in up-regulating GnT-V gene
expression (41), Ets-1 may be a target for suppressing GnT-V
expression. The third is to inhibit the secretion of GnT-V in cancer
cells, although the secretion mechanism remains to be solved. The
fourth is to mask the basic domain of GnT-V with some reactive acidic
reagents. The fifth is the enhancement of the degradation of the
secreted GnT-V by proteolysis. First, the issue of whether GnT-V
contributes to cancer progression as a glycosyltransferase or an
angiogenic factor needs to be determined in individual cancer cases. A
specific inhibitor for the N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase
reaction may solve this problem. In conclusion, we report on a novel
mechanism in which a secreted type of GnT-V protein itself plays a
critical role in tumor angiogenesis, acting as an angiogenic cofactor
of FGF-2.
We thank Dr. Seiji Takashima for technical
support and critical discussions. We are grateful for the criticism
of Dr. Yasuhide Miyamoto. Technical supports were provided by
Dr. Katsuhisa Noda, Hideyuki Ihara, Takatoshi Kitada,
Yukinao Shibukawa, Haruhiko Sakiyama, Susumu Nakahara,
and Yoshie Tawara. We also thank Dr. H. F. Deutsch for critically
reading the manuscript.
*
This work was supported by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific
Research (S) No. 13854010 from the Japan Society for the promotion of
Science.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, February 28, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M200521200
The abbreviations used are:
FGF, fibroblast
growth factor;
VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor;
GnT-V,
A Secreted Type of
1,6-N-Acetylglucosaminyltransferase V (GnT-V) Induces
Tumor Angiogenesis without Mediation of Glycosylation
A NOVEL FUNCTION OF GnT-V DISTINCT FROM THE ORIGINAL
GLYCOSYLTRANSFERASE ACTIVITY*
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1,6-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase V (GnT-V)
functions as an inducer of angiogenesis that has a novel and completely
different function from the original function of glycosyltransferase. A
secreted type of GnT-V protein itself promoted angiogenesis in
vitro and in vivo at physiological concentrations. The highly basic domain of GnT-V induced the release of fibroblast growth factor-2 from heparan sulfate proteoglycan on the cell surface
and/or extracellular matrix, leading to angiogenesis. These findings
provide some novel information on the relationship between GnT-V and
tumor metastasis. The inhibition of GnT-V secretion or its expression
represents a novel potential strategy for the inhibition of tumor angiogenesis.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1,6-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase V (GnT-V or
mannoside acetylglucosaminyltransferase 5 (Mgat5)), which catalyzes the
formation of
1-6 branching on N-glycans, has been
proposed as one of the most important glycosyltransferases associated
with tumor metastasis (7, 8). Furthermore, a recent study of
GnT-V-deficient mice indicates that it is essential for tumor
metastasis as well as for tumor growth (9).
1-6 branching, and 3) other unknown mechanisms. In the present study, we have investigated the mechanisms of tumor angiogenesis by
GnT-V, and the findings herein show that a secreted type of GnT-V
itself was able to induce angiogenesis with no detectable mediation of
glycosylation. In addition, we also found that a basic domain in GnT-V
caused the direct release of FGF-2 from heparan sulfate proteoglycan
(HSPG) on the cell surface and/or extracellular matrix. Our findings
here strongly suggest that GnT-V is a bifunctional protein and that a
secreted type of GnT-V protein itself plays a critical role in tumor
angiogenesis, acting as an angiogenic cofactor of FGF-2.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
73,
188,
233,
or
436, with or without a neutralizing antibody against FGF-2
(R & D systems). After 24 h, the cells were incubated with [3H]thymidine (1 µCi/ml) for 8 h. Incorporation
was evaluated by a Micro96 Harvester (SKATRON) and then analyzed with a
MicroBeta-Counter (Wallac). The results represent the average ± S.E. of samples assayed in six wells. All experiments were repeated at
least three times, and essentially the same results were obtained in
each case.
73 and
188, both of which are soluble
forms, were prepared in a baculovirus-insect cell system (16). For the
construction of a transfer plasmid for GnT-V
233, the plasmid for
GnT-V
187 was digested with EcoRI and EagI. The
resulting 1521-bp fragment, which includes
Glu234-Leu741 of hGnT-V and the C terminus
polyhistidine tag, was then ligated into the
EcoRI-EagI site of a transfer vector, pAcGP67-A
(PharMingen). For the construction of a transfer plasmid for
GnT-V
436, the plasmid for GnT-V
187 was digested with
EcoRV and EagI. The resulting 912-bp fragment,
which includes Ile437-Leu741 of hGnT-V and the
C terminus polyhistidine-tag, was then ligated into the
EcoRV-EagI site of the pAcGP67-A vector. The
resulting transfer plasmids were transfected into Sf21 cells in
order to produce a recombinant virus by methods described previously
(17). The recombinant enzymes derived from the infected Sf21
cells were then purified by Ni2+-chelating affinity
chromatography (16).
73, GnT-V
436, the KRKRKK peptide, the FSGGPL
peptide, and heparin. Cells were incubated for 2 h on a rotating
plate at 4 °C. The supernatants were collected and centrifuged at
3000 rpm for 5 min at 4 °C to remove debris. These samples were
assayed using an FGF-2 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay system
(R & D Systems) according to the manufacturer's recommendations.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1,4-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase-III and
1,6-fucosyltransferase. WiDr cells express the above
glycosyltransferases at very low or negligible levels. When these
transfectants were transplanted to athymic mice, transplanted tumors of
GnT-V transfectants showed a dramatic hypervascularization, compared
with the other transplants (Fig.
1A).

View larger version (56K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
GnT-V transfectants induce angiogenic
response in vivo. A, marked
angiogenesis induced by GnT-V-transfected WiDr cells transplanted
subcutaneously into athymic mice. The arrowheads indicate
blood vessels. B, CAM assay using collagen sponges
that contain the indicated transfectants. C, HUVEC
proliferation after treatment with culture medium from the indicated
glycosyltransferase transfectants. CTR, normal fresh medium
used in the HUVEC culture as a positive control.
73, which lacks the transmembrane domain but in which glycosyltransferase activity is
retained (16). HUVEC proliferation was increased as a result of the
administration of GnT-V
73 in a dose-dependent manner
(Fig. 2A). The utilized
concentration appears to be within the physiological range. The
concentration of GnT-V in conditioned medium from the GnT-V
transfectants was determined to be 140 ng/ml on the basis of the
specific activity of GnT-V
73. Furthermore, conditioned medium from
B16-F10 mouse melanoma cells, which have a high endogenous GnT-V
activity, contained ~70 ng/ml GnT-V. B16-F10 cells also showed an
angiogenic activity similar to the GnT-V transfectants in the CAM assay
(data not shown), suggesting that the GnT-V secreted from B16-F10 cells
can stimulate angiogenesis in this assay system. In addition, the
administration of recombinant
1,6-fucosyltransferase indicated the
absence of any HUVEC growth-stimulating activity (data not shown).
These data indicate that a secreted type of GnT-V within the
physiological concentration range has growth-stimulating activity for
HUVEC.

View larger version (29K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Purified recombinant GnT-V proteins
accelerate HUVEC proliferation. A, HUVEC proliferation
promoted by the administration of GnT-V
73. B, constructs
of deletion mutants of GnT-V. Black box, the
basic region; TM, the transmembrane domain; Stem,
stem region of GnT-V. C, SDS-PAGE of purified GnT-V mutants.
D, HUVEC proliferation assay after the addition of 100 ng/ml
each purified GnT-V mutant protein.
73,
188, and
233 mutants stimulated HUVEC
proliferation, whereas
436 did not (Fig. 2D). GnT-V
73 and
188 have GlcNAc transferase activity, but
233 and
436 do not. These data indicate that the HUVEC growth-stimulating activity is
located in the region corresponding to amino acids 234-436 of GnT-V,
which does not encompass glycosyltransferase activity.
73 and peptide KRKRKK induced the release of FGF-2,
whereas GnT-V
436 and peptide FSGGPL had no effect (Fig. 3B). Both GnT-V
188 and
233, as well as GnTV
73, also
induced the release of FGF-2 (data not shown). Similarly, heparin,
which is known to release HSPG-binding molecules by competing for their heparin-binding site (31), also induced the release of FGF-2. The
phosphorylation of FGF receptors on HUVEC by stimulation of the
released FGF-2 was confirmed (data not shown). The peptide KRKRKK
promoted the growth of HUVEC to an extent similar to GnT-V
73 (Fig.
3C). This effect was completely suppressed by the
co-addition of a neutralizing antibody against FGF-2 (Fig.
3C). These results suggest that the KRKRKK region is
sufficient for HUVEC growth-stimulating activity and that the GnT-V
protein stimulates angiogenesis by releasing FGF-2 from HSPG on
endothelial cells via the action of the basic region of the
protein.

View larger version (24K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
The basic region of GnT-V induces
angiogenesis. A, alignment of the basic region of GnT-V
with the heparin-binding domains of VEGF189, PlGF-2, and
HB-EGF. The initial amino acid in each protein is numbered at the
left. Gray boxes, basic amino acids
lysine (K) and arginine (R). Boxes,
basic amino acids that are identical in at least three proteins.
B, the amount of FGF-2 released from HUVEC after treatment
with GnT-V
73 (100 ng/ml),
436 (100 ng/ml), KRKRKK peptide (1 ng/ml), FSGGPL peptide (1 ng/ml), and heparin (30 µg/ml).
C, the basic peptide KRKRKK stimulates HUVEC proliferation.
HUVEC cells were stimulated with FGF-2 (5 ng/ml), GnT-V
73 (100 ng/ml), GnT-V
436 (100 ng/ml), KRKRKK peptide (1 ng/ml), and FSGGPL
peptide (1 ng/ml) in the presence (+) or absence (
) of a neutralizing
antibody against FGF-2 (100 ng/ml).
73 protein was performed. GnT-V
73 induced angiogenesis of chick microvessels as well as FGF-2 (Fig.
4). Moreover, the KRKRKK peptide even
induced a similar angiogenesis, and the induction of angiogenesis by
GnT-V
73 and peptide KRKRKK was inhibited by treatment with a
neutralizing antibody against FGF-2. In contrast, neither GnTV
436
nor the control peptide had any angiogenic activity. These results
indicate that a secreted type of GnT-V and GnT-V-derived
peptide KRKRKK induce angiogenesis via the action of FGF-2. Considering
the results relative to HUVEC proliferation, the basic region of GnT-V
may cause the release of FGF-2 from HSPG on endothelial cells.

View larger version (95K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
GnT-V protein induces in vivo
angiogenesis. Shown are CAM assays using methylcellulose
disks that contain BSA (1 µg) (A), FGF-2 (50 ng)
(B and C), GnT-V
73 (1 µg) (D and
E), GnT-V
436 (1 µg) (F), FSGGPL (10 ng)
(G), or KRKRKK (10 ng) (H and I), in
the presence (C, E, and I) or absence
(A, B, D, F, G,
and H) of a neutralizing antibody against FGF-2
(nAb) (1 µg).
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (16K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Schematic illustration of the induction of
tumor angiogenesis by secreted GnT-V. A secreted type of GnT-V
that contains the basic amino acid-clustered domain competes with FGF-2
to bind HSPG to the cell surface, resulting in the release of FGF-2 and
stimulation of its receptor on the target cells.
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 81-6-6879-3421;
Fax: 81-6-6879-3429; E-mail: proftani@biochem.med.osaka-u.ac.jp.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
1,6-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase V;
HSPG, heparan
sulfate proteoglycan;
HUVEC, human umbilical vein endothelial cell(s);
PlGF, placental growth factor;
CAM, chorioallantoic membrane.
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Folkman, J.
(1971)
N. Eng. J. Med.
285,
1182-1186[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 2.
Folkman, J.
(1972)
Ann. Surg.
175,
409-416[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 3.
Yamashita, K.,
Tachibana, Y.,
Ohkura, T.,
and Kobata, A.
(1985)
J. Biol. Chem.
260,
3963-3969 4.
Pierce, M.,
and Arango, J.
(1986)
J. Biol. Chem.
261,
10772-10777 5.
Zhu, T. Y.,
Chen, H. L, Gu,
Zhang, Y. K.,
and Zhang, R. A.
(1997)
J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol.
123,
296-299[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 6.
Petretti, T.,
Kemmner, W.,
Schulze, B.,
and Schlag, P. M.
(2000)
Gut
46,
359-366 7.
Demetriou, M.,
Nabi, I. R.,
Coppolino, M.,
Dedhal, S.,
and Dennis, J. W.
(1995)
J. Cell Biol.
130,
383-392 8.
Dennis, J. W.,
Laferte, S.,
Waghorn, C.,
Breitman, M. L.,
and Kerbel, R. S.
(1987)
Science
236,
582-585 9.
Granovsky, M.,
Fata, J.,
Pawling, J.,
Muller, W. J.,
Khokha, R.,
and Dennis, J. W.
(2000)
Nat. Med.
6,
306-312[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 10.
Yao, M.,
Zhou, D. P.,
Jiang, S. M.,
Wang, Q. H.,
Zhou, X. D.,
Tang, Z. Y.,
and Gu, J. X.
(1998)
J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol.
124,
27-30[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 11.
Dennis, J. W.,
and Laferte, S.
(1989)
Cancer Res.
49,
945-950 12.
Murata, K.,
Miyoshi, E.,
Kameyama, M.,
Ishikawa, O.,
Kabuto, T.,
Sasaki, Y.,
Hiratsuka, M.,
Ohigashi, H.,
Ishiguro, S.,
Ito, S.,
Honda, H.,
Takemura, F.,
Taniguchi, N.,
and Imaoka, S.
(2000)
Clin. Cancer Res.
6,
1772-1777 13.
Suzuki, K.,
Tatsumi, H.,
Satoh, S.,
Senda, T.,
Nakata, T.,
Fujii, J.,
and Taniguchi, N.
(1993)
Am. J. Physiol.
265,
H1173-H1178[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 14.
Yen, L.,
You, X. L.,
Moustafa, A. A.,
Batist, G.,
Hynes, N. E.,
Mader, S.,
Meloche, S.,
and Alaoui-Jamali, M. A.
(2000)
Oncogene
19,
3460-3469[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 15.
Bernardini, G.,
Spinetti, G.,
Ribatti, D.,
Camarda, G.,
Morbidelli, L.,
Ziche, M.,
Santoni, A.,
Capogrossi, M. C.,
and Napolitano, M.
(2000)
Blood
96,
4039-4045 16.
Sasai, K.,
Ikeda, Y.,
Fujii, T.,
Tsuda, T.,
and Taniguchi, N.
(2002)
Glycobiology
12,
119-127 17.
Ikeda, Y.,
Koyota, S.,
Ihara, H.,
Yamaguchi, Y.,
Korekane, H.,
Tsuda, T.,
Ken, S.,
and Taniguchi, N.
(2000)
J. Biochem. (Tokyo)
128,
609-619 18.
Laemmli, U. K.
(1970)
Nature
227,
680-685[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 19.
Barillari, G.,
Albonici, L.,
Franzese, O.,
Modesti, A.,
Liberati, F.,
Barillari, P.,
Ensoli, B.,
Manzari, V.,
and Santeusanio, G.
(1998)
Am. J. Pathol.
152,
1161-1166[Abstract] 20.
Soker, S.,
Gollamudi-Payne, S.,
Fidder, H.,
Charmahelli, H.,
and Klagsburn, M.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
31582-31588 21.
Hauser, S.,
and Weich, H. A.
(1993)
Growth Factor
9,
259-268[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 22.
Gohda, E.,
Tubouchi, H.,
Nakayama, S.,
Hirono, S.,
Sakiyama, O.,
Takahashi, K.,
Miyazaki, H.,
Hashimoto, S.,
and Daikuhara, Y.
(1998)
J. Clin. Invest.
81,
414-419 23.
Marez, A.,
N'Guyen, T.,
Chevallier, B.,
Clement, G.,
Dauchel, M. C.,
and Barritault, D.
(1987)
Biochimie (Paris)
69,
125-129 24.
Risau, W.,
Gautschi-Sova, P.,
and Bohlen, P.
(1988)
EMBO J.
7,
959-962[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 25.
Rothenthal, R. A.,
Megyesi, J. F.,
Henzel, W. J.,
Ferrara, N.,
and Folkman, J.
(1990)
Growth Factor
4,
53-59[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 26.
Chen, L.,
Zhang, N.,
Adler, B.,
Browne, J.,
Freigen, N.,
and Pierce, M.
(1995)
Glycoconj. J.
12,
813-823[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 27.
Gu, J.,
Nishikawa, A.,
Turuoka, N.,
Ohno, M.,
Yamaguchi, N.,
Kangawa, K.,
and Taniguchi, N.
(1993)
J. Biochem. (Tokyo)
113,
614-619 28.
MaCaffery, G.,
and Jamison, J. C.
(1993)
Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B.
104,
91-94[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 29.
Ugarte, M. A.,
and Rodriguez, P.
(1991)
Int. J. Biochem.
23,
719-726[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 30.
Strous, G. J.
(1986)
CRC Crit. Rev. Biochem.
21,
119-151[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 31.
Biard, A.,
Schubert, D.,
Ling, N.,
and Guillemin, R.
(1988)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
85,
2324-2328 32.
Ashoton, A. W.,
Yokota, R.,
John, G.,
Zhao, S.,
Suadicani, S. O.,
Spray, D. C.,
and Ware, J. A.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
35562-35570 33.
Zeng, H.,
Sanyal, S.,
and Mukhopadhyay, D.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
3271-3279 34.
O'Reilly, M. S.,
Holmgren, L.,
Shing, Y.,
Chen, C.,
Rosenthal, R. A.,
Moses, M.,
Lane, W. S.,
Cao, Y.,
Saga, E. H.,
and Folkman, J.
(1994)
Cell
79,
315-328[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 35.
O'Reilly, M. S.,
Boehm, T.,
Shing, Y.,
Fukai, N.,
Vasios, G.,
Lane, W. S.,
Flynn, E.,
Birkhead, J. R.,
Olsen, B. R.,
and Folkman, J.
(1994)
Cell
88,
277-285 36.
Demetriou, M.,
Granovsky, M.,
Quaggin, S.,
and Dennis, J. W.
(2001)
Nature
409,
733-739[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 37.
Delehedde, M.,
Deudon, E.,
Boilly, B.,
and Hondermarck, H.
(1996)
Exp. Cell Res.
229,
398-406[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 38.
Nurcombe, V.,
Smart, C. E.,
Chipperfield, H.,
Cool, S. M.,
Boilly, B.,
and Hondermarck, H.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
30009-30018 39.
Tischer, E.,
Mitchell, R.,
Hartman, T.,
Silva, M.,
Gospodarowicz, D.,
Fiddes, J. C.,
and Abraham, J. A.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
11947-11954 40.
Lu, P. P.,
Hindsgaul, O.,
Compston, C. A.,
and Palcic, M. M.
(1996)
Bioorg. Med. Chem.
4,
2011-2022[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 41.
Ko, J. H.,
Miyoshi, E.,
Noda, K.,
Ekuni, A.,
Kang, R.,
Ikeda, Y.,
and Taniguchi, N.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
22941-22948
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. M. Beedle, P. M. Nienaber, and K. P. Campbell Fukutin-related Protein Associates with the Sarcolemmal Dystrophin-Glycoprotein Complex J. Biol. Chem., June 8, 2007; 282(23): 16713 - 16717. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Nakahara, T. Saito, N. Kondo, K. Moriwaki, K. Noda, S. Ihara, M. Takahashi, Y. Ide, J. Gu, H. Inohara, et al. A secreted type of {beta}1,6 N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase V (GnT-V), a novel angiogenesis inducer, is regulated by {gamma}-secretase FASEB J, December 1, 2006; 20(14): 2451 - 2459. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Hagisawa, C. Ohyama, T. Takahashi, M. Endoh, T. Moriya, J. Nakayama, Y. Arai, and M. Fukuda Expression of core 2 {beta}1,6-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase facilitates prostate cancer progression Glycobiology, October 1, 2005; 15(10): 1016 - 1024. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Dosaka-Akita, E. Miyoshi, O. Suzuki, T. Itoh, H. Katoh, and N. Taniguchi Expression of N-Acetylglucosaminyltransferase V Is Associated with Prognosis and Histology in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers Clin. Cancer Res., March 1, 2004; 10(5): 1773 - 1779. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. El-Battari, M. Prorok, K. Angata, S. Mathieu, M. Zerfaoui, E. Ong, M. Suzuki, D. Lombardo, and M. Fukuda Different glycosyltransferases are differentially processed for secretion, dimerization, and autoglycosylation Glycobiology, December 1, 2003; 13(12): 941 - 953. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Hakomori Glycosylation defining cancer malignancy: New wine in an old bottle PNAS, August 6, 2002; 99(16): 10231 - 10233. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |