Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M112401200 on March 4, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 19, 17154-17160, May 10, 2002
Role of p21 in Apoptosis and Senescence of Human
Colon Cancer Cells Treated with Camptothecin*
Zhiyong
Han
§,
Wenyi
Wei
,
Stephen
Dunaway
¶,
James W.
Darnowski
,
Paul
Calabresi
,
John
Sedivy
,
Eric A.
Hendrickson**,
Kannan V.
Balan
,
Panayotis
Pantazis
, and
James
H.
Wyche
From the
Department of Molecular Biology, Cell
Biology, and Biochemistry, Brown University, Providence, Rhode
Island 02912, the ¶ Department of Pharmacology, UMDNJ-Robert Wood
Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, the
Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Rhode Island Hospital,
Providence, Rhode Island 02903, and the ** Department of
Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Biophysics, University of Minnesota
Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455
Received for publication, December 27, 2001, and in revised form, February 14, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
Treatment of cells with the anti-cancer drug
camptothecin (CPT) induces topoisomerase I (Top1)-mediated DNA damage,
which in turn affects cell proliferation and survival. In this report, we demonstrate that treatment of the wild-type HCT116 (wt HCT116) human
colon cancer cell line and the isogenic p53
/
HCT116 and p21
/
HCT116 cell lines with a high
concentration (250 nM) of CPT resulted in apoptosis,
indicating that apoptosis occurred by a p53- and p21-independent
mechanism. In contrast, treatment with a low concentration (20 nM) of CPT induced cell cycle arrest and senescence of the wt HCT116 cells, but apoptosis of the p53
/
HCT116 and
p21
/
HCT116 cells. Further investigations indicated
that p53-dependent expression of p21 blocked apoptosis of
wt HCT116 cells treated with 20 nM, but not 250 nM CPT. Interestingly, blocking of the apoptotic pathway,
by Z-VAD-FMK, in p21
/
HCT116 cells following treatment
with 20 nM CPT did not permit the cells to develop
properties of senescence. These observations demonstrated that p21 was
required for senescence development of HCT116 cells following treatment
with low concentrations of CPT.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The "p53
p21 pathway" is activated in cells after DNA
damage. Activation of this pathway temporarily arrests cells at the G1 and G2 checkpoints of the cell cycle, and
terminates DNA replication and cell division (1-3). These events
provide the cells with enough time to repair damaged DNA and prevent
accumulation of deleterious mutations in the genome that would
otherwise be subsequently transferred to daughter cells (4, 5). DNA
damage is sensed by the ataxia-telangiectasia mutated protein,
which is a member of the phosphoinositol-3 lipid kinase family (6, 7).
p53 is one of the key targets that are subjected to activation by ataxia-telangiectasia mutated catalyzed phosphorylation (7). Activated
p53, in turn, induces the expression of many proteins including p21,
which is a universal inhibitor of the cyclin-dependent kinases (Cdks)1 (8), and is
required to arrest cells at the G1 and G2
checkpoints of the cell cycle after DNA damage (9-11).
DNA damaging agents including
-irradiation and inhibitors of the
nuclear topoisomerases I and II (Top1 and Top2) are widely included in
therapies for cancer patients. The development of many types of human
cancers (>50%) is associated with the loss of p53 or mutations in p53
(5). Therefore, the relationship between p53 status and the sensitivity
of cancer cells to a variety of drugs, especially DNA damaging agents,
has been extensively investigated (12-14). Initially, a relationship
was established between p53 and drug sensitivity in mouse embryonic
fibroblasts (MEFs) transformed by ras and E1A
oncogenes, showing that p53+/+ MEFs were more sensitive
than p53
/
MEFs to the apoptotic effect of
-irradiation or DNA damaging drugs (15). In contrast, p21 was not
required for apoptosis of the MEFs after DNA damage (9). This led to
the hypothesis that apoptosis of cancer cells after DNA damage was
p53-dependent, but p21-independent, and that cancer cells
containing a mutated p53 gene should be resistant to chemotherapies
that utilize DNA damaging agents (12). However, this view was
re-investigated when, by utilizing clonogenicity assays rather than
short-term apoptosis assays, researchers were led to the conclusion
that the p53 status was unrelated to the long-term survival of
transformed MEFs after DNA damage (14). Also, studies of the RKO human
colon cancer cell line and its derivative cell lines with altered p53 status led to the conclusion that the long-term survival of the cells
after DNA damage was independent of p53 (16). In contrast, the
apoptotic effect of DNA damaging agents on the HCT116 human colon
cancer cells was shown to be blocked by p21, which was expressed by a
p53-dependent mechanism (17, 18). Once again, subsequent results obtained from a clonogenicity assay led to the conclusion that
the long-term survival of HCT116 cells after DNA damage was independent
of either p53 or p21 (14). Therefore, these studies collectively
indicate that the requirement for p53 in the process of apoptosis
depends on whether the cells are of rodent or human origin. In
addition, contradictory conclusions can be drawn about the relationship
between p53 and drug sensitivity because of variability in the
experimental conditions applied to investigate the effect of DNA
damaging agents (14).
Nevertheless, it remains to be elucidated why short-term survival,
unlike long-term survival, of some cells after DNA damage is affected
by p53 and/or p21. Furthermore, it should be noted that the loss of
clonogenicity of cells does not necessarily result from loss of cell
viability. In this context, it was demonstrated that normal human
fibroblasts entered a state of senescence after DNA damage (19).
Therefore, it is possible that loss of clonogenicity of cancer cells
after DNA damage can result from an irreversible arrest of the cell
cycle rather than loss of viability. Pertinent to this is the
demonstration that p53 and p21 play important roles in senescence
development of normal human cells (20-24). Accordingly, it is
plausible that p53 and p21 are required for senescence development of
human cancer cells after DNA damage. To address this issue, we
investigated both long- and short-term effects of CPT-induced and
Top1-mediated DNA damage on wild-type HCT116 (wt HCT116) and isogenic
p53
/
p21+/+ (p53
/
) and
p53+/+ p21
/
(p21
/
) HCT116
cells (17, 18). Our results demonstrated that under treatment with a
high concentration (250 nM) of CPT, wt HCT116, p53
/
HCT116, and p21
/
HCT116 cells
underwent apoptosis indicating that apoptosis was independent of the
cellular status of p53 and p21 status under this treatment. In
contrast, treatment of p53
/
HCT116 and
p21
/
HCT116 cells with 20 nM CPT resulted
in them becoming apoptotic whereas wt HCT116 cells did not lose their
viability but lost their clonogenicity. These results indicated that
p53 and p21 were required to block apoptosis of HCT116 cells treated
with 20 nM CPT. The loss of clonogenicity of wt HCT116
cells treated with 20 nM CPT was not due to the loss of
long-term viability, but was rather the result of senescence
development. Our results imply that the expression of p21 by a
p53-dependent mechanism is required to fully develop
senescent properties after DNA damage.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials--
Fetal bovine serum, X-gal, antibodies to
BrdUrd (clone BU-33), Cy3- or fluorescein
isothiocyanate-conjugated antibodies, and camptothecin (CPT) were
obtained from Sigma. The pan-caspase inhibitor, Z-VAD-FMK, was obtained
from BIOMOL Inc. (Plymouth Meeting, PA). Antibodies to p53 (FL-393;
sc-6243), p21 (C19, sc-397), cyclin A (C19, sc-596), cyclin B1 (GNS1,
sc-245), and Cdk2 (M2, sc-163) were obtained from Santa Cruz
Biotechnologies, Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA). Antibodies to Cdk1 (68516E), Rb
(G3, 245), Top1 (556597), and Top2 (T90920) were obtained from BD
Pharmingen (San Diego, CA); and the antibody (9284) to phosphoserine 15 of p53 was obtained from New England Biolabs, Inc. (Beverly, MA). The
human autoimmune antibody to Top1 (614-451-5810) used for
immunocytochemistry studies was obtained from TopoGEN, Inc. (Columbus, OH).
Cells and Culture Conditions--
The HCT116 human colon cancer
cell lines (wt, p53
/
, and p21
/
) were
generously provided by Dr. Bert Vogelstein (Johns Hopkins University).
The cells were grown in McCoy's 5A medium supplemented with 10%
fetal bovine serum and antibiotics. All cell cultures were incubated at
37 °C in a humidified incubator containing 5% CO2.
Detection of Apoptosis--
Apoptotic fractions in cultures of
control and drug-treated cells were identified by flow cytometry
analysis of cells stained with propidium iodide (25).
Western Blot Analysis--
Aliquots of whole cell extracts
containing 50 µg of protein were used for Western blot analysis as
described (26, 27).
SA-
-Galactosidase Activity--
To detect senescence
associated
-galactosidase (SA-
-galactosidase) activity, cells
were washed in PBS, fixed in 0.5% glutaraldehyde in PBS at room
temperature for 15 min, washed three times in PBS (pH 6.0), and then
incubated for 20 h in X-gal/PBS solution (pH 6.0) as described
(28).
BrdUrd Incorporation and Immunofluorescence Assays--
DNA
synthesis was determined by measuring BrdUrd incorporation into DNA as
described (29). Briefly, cells were incubated with BrdUrd (24 h for
normal cells, and 72 h for CPT-treated cells), fixed for 20 min in
2% glutaraldehyde in PBS at room temperature, and the cell membranes
were permeabilized with acetone and methanol (1:1). The cells were then
incubated for 30 min in 2 M HCl followed by a 30-min
incubation in 0.1 M sodium borate (pH 8.5), washed three
times in PBS, incubated for 60 min in 1% bovine serum albumin/PBS, and
followed by a 45-min incubation in PBS containing 2 µg/ml mouse
monoclonal antibody to BrdUrd. The cells were then washed three times
in PBS (10 min per wash), incubated with a Cy3-conjugated secondary
antibody (1:200) against mouse IgG for 30 min, and washed three times
in PBS (20 min per wash). BrdUrd-labeled nuclei were observed and
photographed under a fluorescent microscope. The protocols for
immunofluorescent detection of various cellular proteins have been
described (30).
Clonogenicity Assays--
Approximately 300 cells were seeded
into each well of a 6-well cell culture plate, and then incubated in 5 ml of medium for 2 weeks or longer. Subsequently, the medium was
removed, and the cells were fixed for 5 min in 5 ml of methanol. The
methanol was removed, the wells were rinsed with water, the cell
colonies stained for 10 min in 2 ml of 4% (w/v) methylene blue
solution in PBS, washed once again with water, and then counted.
 |
RESULTS |
Effects of Camptothecin on HCT116 Cell Lines--
To induce
Top1-mediated DNA damage, wt HCT116, p21
/
HCT116 and
p53
/
HCT116 cell lines were treated with CPT (31).
Cells were exposed either to low (i.e. 20 nM) or
high (i.e. 250 nM) concentrations of CPT, and
the effects on cell proliferation and survival were monitored.
Treatment of all three HCT116 cell lines with either concentration of
CPT for 24 h was sufficient to induce cell cycle arrest (data not
shown). Treatment with 250 nM CPT resulted in apoptosis of
all three cell lines (Fig.
1A), whereas treatment with 20 nM CPT resulted in significant apoptosis only of
p53
/
HCT116 and p21
/
HCT116 cell lines
(Fig. 1A). Thus, the response of HCT116 cells to the
apoptotic effect of low and high concentrations of CPT was
differentially affected by the p53 and p21 status.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Effects of CPT on HCT116 cell lines.
A, HCT116 cell lines (wt, p53 / , and
p21 / ) were treated with 20 or 250 nM CPT
for the indicated time, and apoptosis was determined by flow cytometry.
B, whole cell extracts were prepared from wt,
p53 / , and p21 / HCT116 cells treated
with 20 nM CPT for 0, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h, and then
subjected to Western blot analysis for the presence of p53,
phosphoserine 15 in p53, and p21.
|
|
Western blot analysis of proteins from the wt HCT116 cells, treated
with 20 nM CPT, demonstrated accumulation and
phosphorylation of Ser15 in p53, i.e. activation
of p53, and expression of p21 (Fig. 1B). In contrast, a very
delayed expression of a small amount of p21 was detected in the
CPT-treated p53
/
HCT116 cells (Fig. 1B),
indicating that most p21 expression in HCT116 cells after CPT treatment
required a p53-dependent mechanism. Also, an accumulation
and phosphorylation of Ser15 in p53, i.e.
activation of p53, was observed in p21
/
HCT116 cells
treated with 20 nM CPT (Fig. 1B). Taken
together, these results suggested that p53-dependent
expression of p21 was required to block the apoptotic effect of 20 nM CPT on HCT116 cells. Since the effect of long-term
treatment of cancer cells with low doses of CPT appears to be
beneficial clinically (32, 33), the HCT116 cell lines were treated with
20 nM CPT in subsequent experiments.
CPT-treated wt HCT116 Cells Are Senescent--
Treatment of wt
HCT116 cells with CPT for 24, 48, 72, and 96 h inhibited, in a
time-dependent fashion, expression of cyclin A, cyclin B1,
Cdk1, E2F1, and activated, as shown by dephosphorylation, by the Rb
protein (Fig. 2A). Of
interest, an initial decrease in Top1 expression was observed at
24 h of CPT treatment, but no further decrease was detected
thereafter (Fig. 2A). In contrast, Top2 expression was
dramatically down-regulated after 48 h of CPT treatment, and
virtually no expression was detected at 72 and 96 h of treatment
(Fig. 2A). The CPT-induced suppression of the expression of
cyclin A, cyclin B1, Cdk1, E2F1, and Top2 was irreversible, because it
remained unaltered for a prolonged period of time after CPT was removed
from the culture medium as assessed by immunofluorescence studies of
the cells (Fig. 2B). Although the expression level of Cdk2
was not significantly altered during CPT treatment (Fig.
2A), it was reduced to an undetectable level in the
senescent cells after the treatment was terminated (Fig. 2B). Thus, it appeared that down-regulation of Cdk2 was a
very late event.

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
CPT induces down-regulation of cell cycle
regulators in wt HCT116 cells. A, wild type (wt) HCT116
cells were treated with 20 nM CPT for 0, 24, 48, 72, and
96 h, then whole cell extracts were prepared and subjected to
Western blot analysis for the presence of the indicated proteins.
B, after a 96-h treatment with 20 nM CPT, wt
HCT116 cells were incubated in CPT-free medium for 6 days with a medium
change on the third day. Then, the cells were stained by
immunofluorescent detection for the presence of the indicated proteins.
The cells were also stained with 4,6,diamidono-2-phenylindole
(DAPI) to visualize nuclear DNA.
|
|
After a 96-h treatment of wt HCT116 cells with CPT, the size of the
cells had dramatically increased, the nuclei were enlarged and
prominent, and the nucleolar content was highly heterochromatic (Fig.
3A). Also, the CPT-treated
cells stained positive, at pH 6.0 for SA-
-gal activity in the
cytoplasm (Fig. 3A). SA-
-gal has been identified as a
specific marker for senescent cells (29, 34-36). This suggested that
the CPT-treated wt HCT116 cells had acquired properties of senescence.
To confirm this, wt HCT116 cells were treated with CPT for 72 h,
and then cultured in CPT-free medium for 6 days. Subsequently, control
and CPT-treated cells were assayed for their ability to synthesize DNA
(i.e. to incorporate BrdUrd into DNA), proliferate, and form
colonies. The results showed that there was practically no BrdUrd
incorporation into the DNA of the CPT-treated cells (Fig.
3B), and concurrently these cells had completely lost their
clonogenicity (Fig. 3C). The changes described above (Figs.
2 and 3) are characteristic of senescent cells (20, 23, 29, 35-41),
and thus indicated that the CPT-treated wt HCT116 cells became
senescent and concurrently lost their clonogenicity.

View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
CPT-treated wt HCT116 cells developed
properties of senescence. A, wt HCT116 cells
were left untreated (control) or were treated with 20 nM
CPT for 96 h. The cells were then fixed, washed, and incubated
with X-gal at pH 6.0 for 20 h to detect SA- -gal activity.
B, alternatively, the CPT-treated cells were incubated in
CPT-free medium for 6 days with a medium change on the third day, and
then incubated with BrdUrd (24 h for untreated cells, and 72 h for
the CPT-treated cells). BrdUrd incorporation into nuclear DNA and the
4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI)-stained DNA were
detected by immunofluorescence. C, untreated and CPT-treated
cells were cultured in CPT-free medium for 2 weeks, and then fixed and
stained with methylene blue.
|
|
Selective Defect in the Apoptotic Pathway Activated by DNA Damage
in the CPT-treated wt HCT116 Cells--
The results described above
demonstrated that the presence of p21 in CPT-treated wt HCT116 cells
enabled them to escape apoptosis and enter senescence, thus maintaining
their viability. Therefore, the question raised by this observation was
whether p21 selectively blocked the apoptotic pathway activated by DNA
damage or whether it impaired the process of apoptosis in general. To
investigate this, the CPT-treated wt HCT116 cells were also treated
with 1 µM staurosporine to induce apoptosis by a pathway
that is not associated with DNA damage (26, 42-44). The cells were
sensitive to the apoptotic effect of staurosporine at all time points
tested (Fig. 4). These results indicated
that the CPT-treated wt HCT116 cells were selectively defective, in the
presence of p21, in the apoptotic pathway activated by DNA damage
signals.

View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
CPT-treated wt HCT116 cells are sensitive to
the apoptotic effect of staurosporine. wt HCT116 cells were
treated with 20 nM CPT for 4 days, then cultured in
CPT-free medium for 20 days with a medium change every 5 days. The
apoptotic fraction in the cell culture was determined on days 5, 10, 15, and 20. Alternatively, the cells were treated with 1 µM staurosporine on days 5, 10, 15, and 20 for 24 h,
and subsequently, the apoptotic fractions were determined.
|
|
Development of Senescence Requires p21--
The findings described
above raised the issue of how p21 affects senescence of CPT-treated wt
HCT116 cells. Is p21 required to simply block apoptosis and thus
provide the cells time to develop into senescence? Or, is p21 required
for blocking both apoptosis and inducing senescence? To investigate
whether the CPT-treated p21
/
HCT116 cells were able to
enter senescence while the apoptotic pathway was blocked, the cells
were treated for 48 h, and 96 h with CPT in presence of 100 µM Z-VAD-FMK, a pan-caspase inhibitor that blocks
apoptosis of cells subjected to various apoptotic conditions. The
presence of Z-VAD-FMK blocked apoptosis (Fig. 5A). At the end of the
treatment, the cells stained positive for the presence of SA-
-gal
activity (Fig. 5B), suggesting that they had become
senescent. However, the expression and nuclear localization of cyclin
A, cyclin B1, Cdk1, Cdk2, E2F1, and Top2 remained essentially unaltered
(Figs. 5C and 6). Furthermore,
these cells rapidly underwent apoptosis upon withdrawal of CPT and
Z-VAD-FMK from the medium (Fig. 5D). Collectively, these
results indicated that blocking apoptosis alone in the CPT-treated
p21
/
HCT116 cells was insufficient to allow them to
develop full senescent properties. Therefore, p21 appeared to be
required not only to block apoptosis but also induce senescence of
HCT116 cells after CPT treatment.

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Blockage of apoptosis in CPT-treated
p21 / HCT116 cells does not permit the cells
to develop senescence. A, p21 / HCT116
cells were left untreated or treated with 20 nM CPT in the
absence or presence of 100 µM Z-VAD-FMK and then examined
for induction of apoptosis (B), and expression of
SA- -gal. C, whole cell extracts prepared from untreated
(0 h) and CPT-treated (48 and 96 h) cells were subjected to
Western blot analysis for the proteins indicated. D,
p21 / HCT116 cells were treated with 20 nM
CPT in presence of 100 µM Z-VAD-FMK for 96 h, then
incubated in Z-VAD-FMK/CPT-free medium and apoptosis was determined at
0, 24, 48, and 72 h (D).
|
|

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Nuclear localization of proteins in
CPT-treated p21 / HCT116 cells.
p21 / HCT116 cells were treated with 20 nM
CPT in the presence of 100 µM Z-VAD-FMK for 96 h,
and then fixed, and subjected to immunofluorescence detection of the
proteins indicated. Nuclear DNA was stained with
4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI).
|
|
Apoptosis Is the Fate of wt HCT116 Cells Treated with 250 nM CPT--
Treatment of wt HCT116 cells with 250 nM CPT induced the stable accumulation of p53, transient
phosphorylation of Ser15 on p53, and the up-regulation of
p21 expression (Fig. 7). This treatment
did not significantly alter the expression level of Cdk1 and Cdk2, but
induced down-regulation of the expression of cyclin A, cyclin B1, Rb,
and Top2, and degradation of Top1 (Fig. 7). However, the E2F1
expression level was increased in the cells following drug treatment
(Fig. 7). Nevertheless, the elevated presence of p21 suggested that it
might be possible for wt HCT116 cells to develop along the senescent
pathway following treatment with 250 nM CPT if the
apoptotic pathway could be blocked. However, although the apoptotic
effect of 250 nM CPT on the wt HCT116 cells was blocked by
the presence of 100 µM Z-VAD-FMK (Fig.
8A), the cells did not develop
any senescent properties, including the expression of SA-
-gal
activity (Fig. 8A). Furthermore, the cells rapidly underwent
apoptosis after withdrawal of both Z-VAD-FMK and CPT from the medium
(Fig. 8B). Thus, even in the presence of elevated p21
levels, wt HCT116 cells were unable to escape apoptosis induced by a
high concentration of CPT and enter senescence.

View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Effects of 250 nM CPT on
expression of cell cycle regulators. wt HCT116 cells were treated
with 250 nM CPT for the indicated period of time and then
whole cell extracts were prepared and subjected to Western blot
analysis for the presence of the proteins of interest.
|
|

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
The apoptotic fate of wt HCT116 cells treated
with 250 nM CPT. A, wt HCT116 cells were
left untreated or treated for 72 h with 250 nM CPT in
the absence or presence of 100 µM Z-VAD-FMK and
then examined for induction of apoptosis and expression of
SA- -gal. B, alternatively, the cells were incubated in
Z-VAD-FMK/CPT-free medium and subsequently apoptosis was
determined.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The Relationship between p21 and Transduction of Apoptotic Signals
Induced by DNA Damage--
In this study, we demonstrated that
Top1-mediated DNA damage induced by 20 nM CPT resulted in
the apoptotic death of p53
/
and the
p21
/
HCT116 cells, both of which were deficient in p21
expression (Fig. 1B). In contrast, wt HCT116 cells that
expressed robust levels of p21 became senescent, and remained viable
for a prolonged period of time (Figs. 1, 3, and 4). Furthermore, we
demonstrated that the CPT-treated wt HCT116 cells that remained viable
were still sensitive to the apoptotic effect of staurosporine (Fig. 4).
Staurosporine is an inhibitor of many protein kinases and triggers
apoptotic signals in the absence of DNA damage (26, 42, 44). Therefore,
our results indicated that the ability of p21 to block apoptosis was
selectively associated with the apoptotic pathway activated by a
nuclear DNA damage signal (DDS) in CPT-treated cells (Fig.
9).

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
A hypothesis of how p21 regulates apoptosis
and senescence after CPT-induced DNA damage. Treatment of cells
with low and high concentrations of CPT induces limited and extensive
DNA damage, respectively, and consequently p53 activation, which in
turn induces expression of p21 and other genes. p21 is capable of
blocking the apoptotic effect of low but not high strength DDS. Also,
senescence development is induced by p21 in cells with limited DNA
damage. In contrast, senescence development is impaired in cells with
p21 and extensive DNA damage.
|
|
Although p21 expression was also induced in wt HCT116 cells treated
with 250 nM CPT (Fig. 7), it failed to prevent the cells from undergoing apoptosis (Figs. 1A, 3, and 8). Since it has
been shown that the extent of CPT-induced DNA damage in cells is
proportional to the concentration of CPT used (45), it is very likely
that the amount of DNA damage in HCT116 cells caused by 250 nM CPT was more extensive than that caused by 20 nM CPT. Thus, when HCT116 cells (wt, p53
/
,
and p21
/
) were exposed to only 20 nM CPT a
limited amount of DNA damage should have been produced, resulting in
the production of a low strength DDS which was nonetheless sufficient
to induce apoptosis. In wt HCT116 cells, however, this low dose of CPT
resulted in the p53-dependent induction of p21 (Fig. 1). As
a consequence of p21 induction, the commitment to apoptosis was blocked
and senescence was instead induced (Fig. 9). When wt HCT116 cells were
treated with 250 nM CPT, extensive DNA damage presumably occurred in the cells, which, in turn, resulted in the production of a
high strength DDS. Although the high strength DDS induced expression of
p21 in wt HCT116 cells by a p53-dependent mechanism, the
presence of elevated p21 failed to override the apoptotic effect of the
signal (Fig. 9). This observation also suggests that the mechanism
mediating the apoptotic effect of 250 nM CPT (or high
strength DDS) on wt HCT116 cells was in this instance not regulated by
p21 but by another, unidentified, factor(s) that was defective in the
cells. The fact that blocking apoptosis with the use of Z-VAD-FMK of
the wt HCT116 cells treated with 250 nM CPT failed to
enable the cells to decrease the level of proteins, such as Cdk1 and
E2F, and enter senescence (Fig. 8), suggests that the molecular
mechanism for senescence was impaired in the wt HCT116 cells treated
with 250 nM CPT. Moreover, these data imply that senescence
and apoptosis are not competing pathways per se.
p21 Involvement in Development of Senescence after DNA
Damage--
p21 has been identified as a senescent cell-derived
inhibitor of DNA synthesis (20), and other reports on the development of senescence in human fibroblasts also demonstrated an association with increased expression of p53 and p21 (46-48). Finally, the requirement of p21 for human cell senescence was established by the
demonstration that normal human fibroblasts, with a targeted knock-out
of the p21 gene, bypassed senescence (22), and that ectopic expression
of p21 in human fibroblasts forced their entry into a state of
premature senescence (49). In this context, our studies demonstrated
that subsequent to p53-dependent expression of p21 in the
wt HCT116 cell treated with 20 nM CPT, inhibition of
expression of cyclin A, cyclin B1, and Cdk1 (Fig. 2), activation of Rb
(Fig. 2), lack of BrdUrd incorporation into DNA, loss of clonogenicity,
and expression of SA-
-gal activity occurred (Fig. 3). These events
collectively characterize cell senescence (21, 38, 48, 50-53).
Therefore, the loss of clonogenicity of the CPT-treated wt HCT116 cells
was likely a consequence of the development of senescence.
We have demonstrated that blocking the apoptotic pathway by Z-VAD-FMK
in the CPT-treated p21
/
HCT116 cell did not allow the
cells to reduce the expression of cyclin A, cyclin B1, Cdk1, and Top2
(Fig. 5C) but did result in elevated SA-
-gal activity
(Fig. 5B). These results indicated that the cells were
unable to develop full senescent properties in the absence of p21.
Given the fact that CPT-treated p21
/
HCT116 cells
expressed active p53 (Fig. 1C), our results strongly suggest
that p21 is the salient downstream target of p53, which is required not
only for blocking apoptosis but also inducing senescence development of
colon cancer cells after exposure to DNA damage.
Recently, it was demonstrated that SA-
-gal activity can be expressed
by a mechanism independent of p53 and p21 in several cancer cell lines
including the HCT116 cell line after DNA damage (54). Thus, it was
suggested that senescence development of the cells was independent of
p53 and p21 (54). It should be noted, however, that although SA-
-gal
expression has been primarily associated with development of cell
senescence under various conditions (23, 29, 34-36, 55, 56),
SA-
-gal activity has also been detected in cultured aging human
fibroblasts before they enter senescence (28) as well as in other
non-senescent cells (57). We have demonstrated that CPT-treated
p21
/
HCT116 cells, in which apoptosis was suppressed by
Z-VAD-FMK, expressed SA-
-gal activity (Fig. 5B),
indicating that expression of SA-
-gal is independent of p21.
However, these cells were not senescent (Fig. 5). Therefore, the
presence of SA-
-gal activity alone in cells lacking p53 or p21 is
not necessarily indicative of senescence development.
How does p21 induce senescence? Recently, it was shown that ectopic
overexpression of p21, in a p21-deficient human osteosarcoma cell line,
resulted in altered expression patterns of many genes including
down-regulation of the expression of cyclin A, Cdk1, and Top2 mRNAs
(58). In this study, we observed that 20 nM CPT treatment
induced down-regulation of cyclin A, cyclin B1, Cdk1, E2F1, and Top2 in
the wild-type, but not p21
/
, HCT116 cells (Figs. 2 and
5). Therefore, it appears that p21, in addition to inhibiting Cdks and
inducing cell cycle arrest, also affects indirectly, via the inhibition
of Cdks, expression of genes required to regulate other cellular
activities such as senescence (Fig. 9).
It is of particular interest to note that the down-regulation of E2F1
expression occurred in wt HCT116 cells treated with 20 nM
(Fig. 2A), but not 250 nM, CPT (Fig. 7). In
fact, the E2F1 level was increased in wt HCT116 cells following
treatment with 250 nM CPT (Fig. 7). Therefore, E2F1
regulation was associated with the fate of HCT116 cells treated with
CPT. Down-regulation of E2F1 has been shown to be intimately associated
with senescence development of human fibroblasts (39, 59), whereas
ectopic expression of E2F1 in presence of MDM2 in senescent human
fibroblasts stimulated DNA synthesis (60), suggesting that
down-regulation of E2F1 is critical for the maintenance of senescence.
Thus, the down-regulation of E2F1 expression in wt HCT116 cells treated with 20 nM CPT is probably an important event for the
p21-dependent senescent program. However, it should also be
noted that severe DNA damage in cells can result in stabilization and
thus accumulation of E2F1 (61) (Fig. 7), and E2F1 is required for DNA
damage-induced apoptosis (61-64). Therefore, as was observed, the
elevated levels of E2F1 in wt HCT116 treated with 250 nM
CPT and in p21
/
HCT116 cells treated with 20 nM CPT facilitated apoptosis, whereas the down-regulation
of E2F1 in wt HCT116 cells treated with 20 nM CPT reduced
the apoptotic potential of the cells.
The Apoptotic Activity and Anti-cancer Efficacy of CPT--
In the
past decade, studies on mechanisms mediating the anti-cancer effect of
a broad spectrum of drugs have led to the suggestion that the ability
of a drug to cause apoptosis of cancer cells is an important
determinant for the drugs' efficacy. In addition, cancer cells
exhibiting no apoptotic response to a drug are assumed to have
developed resistance to this drug (12, 65-69). Consequently, studies
of cellular factors that regulate apoptosis have become very important
for either the development of new anti-cancer drugs or the improvement
of the efficacy of existing anti-cancer agents (66, 70-75). However,
caution should be taken in the initial phase of drug discovery if the
apoptotic action of a drug against cultured cancer cells is the sole
criterion determining whether further studies of the drug should be
conducted. We have demonstrated that a low concentration (20 nM) of CPT treatment induced apoptosis of the
p53
/
HCT116 and p21
/
HCT116 cell lines,
whereas the same drug concentration induced senescence of the wt HCT116
cell line. In contrast, a high concentration (250 nM) of
CPT treatment induced apoptosis of all three cell lines. Thus, there is
no simple answer to the question of how CPT induces apoptosis of
colon cancer cells in the presence or absence of p53 and p21.
Nevertheless, it is difficult to achieve high CPT concentrations in
patient's plasma without causing severe toxicity (32, 33). In
addition, it has been suggested that administration of low doses of CPT
or its derivatives for extensive periods of time would be more
beneficial for the patient than administration of high doses for short
periods of time (32, 33, 76-78). Therefore, the observed apoptotic
effect of 250 nM CPT on both p53-containing and
p53-deficient colon cancer cells is unlikely of great clinical
importance, whereas the effect of 20 nM CPT may be more
relevant to clinical applications. However, it still remains to be
investigated how patients with p53+/+/p21+/+,
p53
/
, and p21
/
colon cancers respond to
treatment with CPT analogues.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
We thank Dr. B. Vogelstein (Johns Hopkins
University, Baltimore, MD) for kindly providing us the p53 and p21 null
HCT116 cell lines.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by National Science Foundation Grant
MB 763455 (to J. W. W.), National Institutes of Health Grants AI35763 (to E. A. H.) and AG16694 (to J. S.), and a
T. J. Martell grant (to J. D.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Brown University, Dept.
MCB, Rm. 130, 69 Brown St., Providence, RI 02912. Tel.: 401-863-9648;
Fax: 401-863-2421; E-mail: zhiyong_han@brown.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, March 4, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M112401200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
Cdk, cyclin-dependent kinase;
Top, topoisomerase;
MEF, mouse enbryonic fibroblasts;
BrdUrd, 5-bromodeoxyuridine;
CPT, camptothecin;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
X-gal, 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-
-D-galactopyranoside;
-gal,
-galactosidase;
DDS, DNA damage signal.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Bartek, J.,
and Lukas, J.
(2001)
FEBS Lett.
490,
117-122[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Taylor, W. R.,
and Stark, G. R.
(2001)
Oncogene
20,
1803-1815[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Colman, M. S.,
Afshari, C. A.,
and Barrett, J. C.
(2000)
Mutat. Res.
462,
179-188[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Lane, D. P.
(1992)
Nature
358,
15-16[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Levine, A. J.
(1997)
Cell
88,
323-331[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Jeggo, P. A.,
Carr, A. M.,
and Lehmann, A. R.
(1998)
Trends Genet.
14,
312-316[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Lavin, M. F.,
and Khanna, K. K.
(1999)
Int. J. Radiat. Biol.
75,
1201-1214[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Xiong, Y.,
Hannon, G. J.,
Zhang, H.,
Casso, D.,
Kobayashi, R.,
and Beach, D.
(1993)
Nature
366,
701-704[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Deng, C.,
Zhang, P.,
Harper, J. W.,
Elledge, S. J.,
and Leder, P.
(1995)
Cell
82,
675-684[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Bunz, F.,
Dutriaux, A.,
Lengauer, C.,
Waldman, T.,
Zhou, S.,
Brown, J. P.,
Sedivy, J. M.,
Kinzler, K. W.,
and Vogelstein, B.
(1998)
Science
282,
1497-1501[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Waldman, T.,
Kinzler, K. W.,
and Vogelstein, B.
(1995)
Cancer Res.
55,
5187-5190[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Lowe, S. W.
(1995)
Curr. Opin. Oncol.
7,
547-553[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Morgan, S. E.,
and Kastan, M. B.
(1997)
Adv. Cancer Res.
71,
1-25[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Brown, J. M.,
and Wouters, B. G.
(1999)
Cancer Res.
59,
1391-1399[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Lowe, S. W.,
Ruley, H. E.,
Jacks, T.,
and Housman, D. E.
(1993)
Cell
74,
957-967[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Slichenmyer, W. J.,
Nelson, W. G.,
Slebos, R. J.,
and Kastan, M. B.
(1993)
Cancer Res.
53,
4164-4168[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Waldman, T.,
Lengauer, C.,
Kinzler, K. W.,
and Vogelstein, B.
(1996)
Nature
381,
713-716[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Bunz, F.,
Hwang, P. M.,
Torrance, C.,
Waldman, T.,
Zhang, Y.,
Dillehay, L.,
Williams, J.,
Lengauer, C.,
Kinzler, K. W.,
and Vogelstein, B.
(1999)
J. Clin. Invest.
104,
263-269[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Robles, S. J.,
and Adami, G. R.
(1998)
Oncogene
16,
1113-1123[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Noda, A.,
Ning, Y.,
Venable, S. F.,
Pereira-Smith, O. M.,
and Smith, J. R.
(1994)
Exp. Cell Res.
211,
90-98[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Wynford-Thomas, D.
(1996)
J. Pathol.
180,
118-121[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Brown, J. P.,
Wei, W.,
and Sedivy, J. M.
(1997)
Science
277,
831-834[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Chen, Q. M.,
Bartholomew, J. C.,
Campisi, J.,
Acosta, M.,
Reagan, J. D.,
and Ames, B. N.
(1998)
Biochem. J.
332,
43-50
|
| 24.
|
Itahana, K.,
Dimri, G.,
and Campisi, J.
(2001)
Eur. J. Biochem.
268,
2784-2791[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Pantazis, P.,
Early, J. A.,
Mendoza, J. T.,
DeJesus, A. R.,
and Giovanella, B. C.
(1994)
Cancer Res.
54,
771-776[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Han, Z.,
Chatterjee, D.,
Early, J.,
Pantazis, P.,
Hendrickson, E. A.,
and Wyche, J. H.
(1996)
Cancer Res.
56,
1621-1628[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Han, Z.,
Pantazis, P.,
Wyche, J. H.,
Kouttab, N.,
Kidd, V. J.,
and Hendrickson, E. A.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
38748-38754[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Wei, W.,
and Sedivy, J. M.
(1999)
Exp. Cell Res.
253,
519-522[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Wei, W.,
Hemmer, R. M.,
and Sedivy, J. M.
(2001)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
21,
6748-6757[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Mohamood, A. S.,
Gyles, P.,
Balan, K. V.,
Hollis, V. W.,
Eckberg, W. R.,
Asseffa, A.,
Han, Z.,
Wyche, J. H.,
and Anderson, W. A.
(1997)
J. Submicrosc. Cytol. Pathol.
29,
1-17[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Liu, L. F.,
Desai, S. D., Li, T. K.,
Mao, Y.,
Sun, M.,
and Sim, S. P.
(2000)
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.
922,
1-10[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Gerrits, C. J.,
de Jonge, M. J.,
Schellens, J. H.,
Stoter, G.,
and Verweij, J.
(1997)
Br. J. Cancer
76,
952-962[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
O'Leary, J.,
and Muggia, F. M.
(1998)
Eur. J. Cancer
34,
1500-1508[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Dimri, G. P.,
Lee, X.,
Basile, G.,
Acosta, M.,
Scott, G.,
Roskelley, C.,
Medrano, E. E.,
Linskens, M.,
Rubelj, I.,
and Pereira-Smith, O.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
9363-9367[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Dimri, G. P.,
Itahana, K.,
Acosta, M.,
and Campisi, J.
(2000)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20,
273-285[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Serrano, M.,
Lin, A. W.,
McCurrach, M. E.,
Beach, D.,
and Lowe, S. W.
(1997)
Cell
88,
593-602[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Stein, G. H.,
Beeson, M.,
and Gordon, L.
(1990)
Science
249,
666-669[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Richter, K. H.,
Afshari, C. A.,
Annab, L. A.,
Burkhart, B. A.,
Owen, R. D.,
Boyd, J.,
and Barrett, J. C.
(1991)
Cancer Res.
51,
6010-6013[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 39.
|
Dimri, G. P.,
Hara, E.,
and Campisi, J.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
16180-16186[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Wong, H.,
and Riabowol, K.
(1996)
Exp. Gerontol.
31,
311-325[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 41.
|
Vaziri, H.,
and Benchimol, S.
(1999)
Oncogene
18,
7676-7680[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 42.
|
Ishizaki, Y.,
Voyvodic, J. T.,
Burne, J. F.,
and Raff, M. C.
(1993)
J. Cell Biol.
121,
899-908[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 43.
|
Jacobson, M. D.,
Burne, J. F.,
and Raff, M. C.
(1994)
Biochem. Soc. Trans.
22,
600-602[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 44.
|
Weil, M.,
Jacobson, M. D.,
Coles, H. S.,
Davies, T. J.,
Gardner, R. L.,
Raff, K. D.,
and Raff, M. C.
(1996)
J. Cell Biol.
133,
1053-1059[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 45.
|
Kaufmann, W. K.,
Boyer, J. C.,
Estabrooks, L. L.,
and Wilson, S. J.
(1991)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
11,
3711-3718[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 46.
|
Tahara, H.,
Sato, E.,
Noda, A.,
and Ide, T.
(1995)
Oncogene
10,
835-840[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 47.
|
Alcorta, D. A.,
Xiong, Y.,
Phelps, D.,
Hannon, G.,
Beach, D.,
and Barrett, J. C.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
13742-13747[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 48.
|
Stein, G. H.,
Drullinger, L. F.,
Soulard, A.,
and Dulic, V.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
2109-2117[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 49.
|
McConnell, B. B.,
Starborg, M.,
Brookes, S.,
and Peters, G.
(1998)
Curr. Biol.
8,
351-354[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 50.
|
Bayreuther, K.,
Rodemann, H. P.,
Hommel, R.,
Dittmann, K.,
Albiez, M.,
and Francz, P. I.
(1988)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
85,
5112-5116[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 51.
|
Goldstein, S.
(1990)
Science
249,
1129-1133[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 52.
|
Cristofalo, V. J.,
and Pignolo, R. J.
(1996)
Exp. Gerontol.
31,
111-123[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 53.
|
Smith, J. R.,
and Pereira-Smith, O. M.
(1996)
Science
273,
63-67[Abstract]
|
| 54.
|
Chang, B. D.,
Xuan, Y.,
Broude, E. V.,
Zhu, H.,
Schott, B.,
Fang, J.,
and Roninson, I. B.
(1999)
Oncogene
18,
4808-4818[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 55.
|
Ogryzko, V. V.,
Hirai, T. H.,
Russanova, V. R.,
Barbie, D. A.,
and Howard, B. H.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
5210-5218[Abstract]
|
| 56.
|
Suzuki, K.,
Mori, I.,
Nakayama, Y.,
Miyakoda, M.,
Kodama, S.,
and Watanabe, M.
(2001)
Radiat. Res.
155,
248-253[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 57.
|
Severino, J.,
Allen, R. G.,
Balin, S.,
Balin, A.,
and Cristofalo, V. J.
(2000)
Exp. Cell. Res.
257,
162-171[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 58.
|
Chang, B. D.,
Watanabe, K.,
Broude, E. V.,
Fang, J.,
Poole, J. C.,
Kalinichenko, T. V.,
and Roninson, I. B.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
97,
4291-4296[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 59.
|
Good, L.,
Dimri, G. P.,
Campisi, J.,
and Chen, K. Y.
(1996)
J. Cell. Physiol.
168,
580-588[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 60.
|
Sarraj, S.,
Farb, R.,
and Martell, R. E.
(2001)
Exp. Cell Res.
270,
268-276[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 61.
|
Lin, W. C.,
Lin, F. T.,
and Nevins, J. R.
(2001)
Genes Dev.
15,
1833-1844[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 62.
|
Huang, Y.,
Ishiko, T.,
Nakada, S.,
Utsugisawa, T.,
Kato, T.,
and Yuan, Z. M.
(1997)
Cancer Res.
57,
3640-3643[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 63.
|
Nip, J.,
Strom, D. K.,
Fee, B. E.,
Zambetti, G.,
Cleveland, J. L.,
and Hiebert, S. W.
(1997)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17,
1049-1056[Abstract]
|
| 64.
|
Phillips, A. C.,
Ernst, M. K.,
Bates, S.,
Rice, N. R.,
and Vousden, K. H.
(1999)
Mol. Cell
4,
771-781[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 65.
|
Hickman, J. A.,
Potten, C. S.,
Merritt, A. J.,
and Fisher, T. C.
(1994)
Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Biol. Sci.
345,
319-325[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 66.
|
Reed, J. C.,
Miyashita, T.,
Takayama, S.,
Wang, H. G.,
Sato, T.,
Krajewski, S.,
Aime-Sempe, C.,
Bodrug, S.,
Kitada, S.,
and Hanada, M.
(1996)
J. Cell. Biochem.
60,
23-32[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 67.
|
McGill, G.
(1997)
Front. Biosci.
2,
353-379
|
| 68.
|
Gelmon, K. A.,
Eisenhauer, E. A.,
Harris, A. L.,
Ratain, M. J.,
and Workman, P.
(1999)
J. Natl. Cancer Inst |