![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 19, 17161-17169, May 10, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the
Received for publication, December 15, 2001, and in revised form, February 17, 2002
Serine hydroxymethyltransferase (SHMT), a member
of the Serine hydroxymethyltransferase
(SHMT;1 EC 2.1.2.1) is a
PLP-dependent enzyme that plays a central role in the
one-carbon metabolism. It catalyzes the reversible inter-conversion of
serine and tetrahydrofolate to glycine and 5,10-methylene
tetrahydrofolate, a key intermediate in the biosynthesis of purine,
thymidine, choline, and methionine (1, 2). In addition to this
physiological reaction, SHMT has also been shown to catalyze
THF-independent aldolytic cleavage, decarboxylation, racemization, and
transamination reactions (3). The importance of SHMT in DNA synthesis
coupled with the observed high level of enzyme activity in rapidly
proliferating cells has focused attention on SHMT as a potential target
for the development of anticancer and antimicrobial agents (4-6).
Several mechanisms have been proposed for the hydroxymethyl
transfer, the most favored being the retroaldol cleavage (7, 8). The
crystal structures of human liver SHMT (hcSHMT) and rabbit liver SHMT
(rcSHMT) and Escherichia coli SHMT (eSHMT) as well as murine
cytoplasmic SHMT (mcSHMT) have been reported (9-12). The structure of
a reduced form of rcSHMT representing a gem diamine equivalent has also been reported (10). Although these structures have
provided a wealth of information regarding the architecture of the
enzyme, active site, and residues involved in substrate binding and
catalysis, several aspects of SHMT catalytic mechanism remain uncertain
(7, 13). A detailed comparison and analysis of several structures of
the enzyme corresponding to different intermediate steps and in complex
with various substrates, substrate analogs, and product analogs are
required to unravel the finer molecular details of the catalytic
mechanism. Furthermore, it would be better if these structures could be
compared from the same enzyme to eliminate the ambiguities arising from
differences in sequence, crystallization conditions, and crystal
packing. In this paper we describe and compare the crystal structures
of SHMT from Bacillus stearothermophilus (bsSHMT) in its
internal aldimine form, external aldimine form with bound serine and
glycine, and as a ternary complex with glycine and FTHF. Although the
structures of the internal aldimine form and ternary complex have been
reported earlier (9-12), the external aldimine form with bound serine
and glycine are presented in this paper for the first time. A detailed analysis of bsSHMT structures and a comparison with previously reported
structures allows an accurate determination of conformational changes
in protein structure, orientation of the PLP ring, and key amino acid
residues during different stages of catalysis. An analysis of these
results provides structural evidence for a direct transfer mechanism
for the SHMT catalyzed reaction.
Overexpression and Purification--
The SHMT gene was
PCR-amplified from B. stearothermophilus genomic DNA using
the following primers: sense primer,
5'-GGGGGAGCTACATATGAACTACTTGCCAC-3', and antisense primer,
5'-GAGCGGAAACGGATCCGTCAAAGCGGCGAC-3', containing NdeI and BamHI restriction sites (underlined
nucleotides). The primers were designed using the sequence of SHMT gene
from B. stearothermophilus available in the data base
(GenBankTM accession number E02190). The PCR product was
digested with NdeI and BamHI and cloned into
pRSET C vector at the same sites. The clones were screened by
restriction digestion and confirmed by sequencing. The resulting
plasmid designated PR bsSHMT was transferred into E. coli
BL21(DE3) pLysS strain. A single colony was inoculated into 50 ml of LB
medium containing 50 µg/ml ampicillin and grown overnight at
30 °C. These cells were used to inoculate 1 liter of terrific broth
medium containing 50 µg/ml ampicillin. After 4 h of growth at
30 °C, the cells were induced with 0.3 mM
isopropyl-1-thio- Crystallization--
SHMT protein crystals were grown by hanging
drop vapor diffusion method at 25 °C. Protein crystals were obtained
by mixing 4 µl of protein solution with 4 µl of reservoir solution
containing 100 mM Hepes buffer, pH 7.5, 0.2 mM
EDTA, 5 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 50%
2-methyl-2,4-pentanediol. Crystals started appearing within 4-5 days
and grew to a maximum size in 5-10 days. SHMT crystals complexed with
serine and glycine were obtained under the same condition as that of
the native protein, except that the reservoir solution contained
additional 10 mM serine or glycine. The ternary complex
crystal of SHMT with glycine and 5-formyl tetrahydrofolate (Sigma) were
obtained by adding FTHF to the protein solution (2 mM final
concentration) and 10 mM glycine to the reservoir solution. The hanging drops were incubated for 3 h at 18-20 °C and
subsequently transferred to room temperature (25 °C).
X-ray Diffraction Data Collection and Processing--
Crystals
were soaked for a few seconds in a harvesting solution containing 100 mM Hepes buffer, pH 7.5, 0.2 mM EDTA, 5 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 50% 2-methyl-2,4-pentanediol, and
25% glycerol and flash-frozen in a nitrogen stream (Oxford
cryosystems) at 100 K. X-ray diffraction data were collected on a
Rigaku Ru-300 x-ray generator using MAR345 image plate detector. The
HKL suite was used for data reduction and scaling (14). The
native crystals as well as the serine and glycine complex crystals
belonged to the space group P21212 with one
monomer in the asymmetric unit. These crystals diffracted to better
than a 2 Å resolution. Final data sets were collected to a 1.93 Å resolution. The ternary complex crystals with glycine and FTHF belonged
to the space group P21 with a dimer in the asymmetric unit
and diffracted poorly compared with the native crystals. The final data
set was collected to a resolution of 2.7 Å. Details of cell dimensions
and data collection statistics for the native and various complex
crystals are shown in Table I.
Structure Determination and Model Building--
Initially the
structure of the internal aldimine form (native form) was determined by
molecular replacement technique. A polyalanine model of the structure
of E. coli SHMT, which shows a sequence identity of 60.8%
with the bsSHMT sequence, served as an excellent search model (Protein
Data Bank entry 1df0). The final model was composed of residues 5-403
of the E. coli structure, modified by omission of residues
243-245 corresponding to insertion in the E. coli sequence,
based on sequence alignments using CLUSTALW (15). Rotation and
translation searches were made using the CCP4 (16) program AMoRe (17).
Best solutions were obtained using the data between 10 and 3 Å of
resolution. The transformed model was subjected to rigid body
refinement using the program XPLOR (18). The N- and C-terminal domains
(residues 5-280 and 281-403) of the model were refined independently
during rigid body refinement. The phases were improved and extended to
1.93 Å of resolution by solvent flattening using the program DM (19). These phases were used to calculate a 2Fo
The electron density maps for the serine and glycine complex crystals
were computed using data to a 1.93 Å resolution from these crystals
and refined phases from the native SHMT model without PLP and solvent
molecules. The models for the serine- and glycine-bound form were
subsequently refined in the same manner as the native form. The model
for the ternary form with bound glycine and FTHF was obtained by
molecular replacement searches using the native form as the search
model. The two monomers in the asymmetric unit were subjected to rigid
body refinement before manual model building and subsequent refinement.
Strict non-crystallographic symmetry restraints (tight restraints for
main chain and medium restraints for the side chain) were applied
during refinement. The non-crystallographic symmetry restraints were
gradually reduced and completely relaxed during the final round of
refinement. Although one of the subunits showed a good electron density
for the bound FTHF molecule, the other subunit revealed a much weaker
density for the FTHF, and there was no appreciable density for the
monoglutamate side chain. Initially the FTHF molecule from the E. coli structure was manually adjusted and built into the electron
density map for the subunit, showing good density for the bound FTHF.
During the final stages of refinement, part of the FTHF molecule
(without the monoglutamate side chain) for the other subunit was also
included in the model.
Comparison of the bsSHMT structures and earlier reported structures
were carried out by manual superposition followed by rigid body
refinement option in TURBO-FRODO as well as with the CCP4 program
LSQKAB. Differences between the structures were detected visually and
by calculating the distances between corresponding C SHMT Structure--
The final model of bsSHMT consists of 405 (1-405) residues, including the N-terminal methionine. Seventeen
residues were inserted at the C terminus due to the cloning strategy
employed. These residues were not visible in the electron density map
and, consequently, were not included in the final model. The overall
fold of the native enzyme is very similar to that of other known SHMT
structures and other PLP-dependent enzymes of the
Serine and Glycine External Aldimine Complexes--
The structures
of the serine and glycine complexes of bsSHMT are virtually identical
to that of the native enzyme except for local conformational changes
involving the PLP ring and side-chain atoms in the active site region.
When compared with the native structure, the serine and glycine
complexes show a root mean square deviation of 0.11 and 0.13 Å,
respectively, over the 405 superposed C
The electron density for the bound amino acid substrates was very
clear, allowing the substrate to be placed unambiguously. The electron
density around the bound serine substrate is shown in Fig.
2. The PLP ring in the serine complex
rotates by ~24° (primarily around the C5-C5' bond) compared with
its internal aldimine form (Fig. 3). A
similar rotation of the PLP ring has been reported for aspartate
aminotransferase (~25°) and between the reduced and unreduced forms
of rcSHMT structures (31, 32, 10). In contrast, only a small rotation
of the PLP ring (~8°) has been reported in the E. coli
ternary complex structure relative to the unliganded hc- and rcSHMT
structures (11). However, the PLP ring in the E. coli
structure shows a rotation of about 21° compared with the native form
of bsSHMT. The orientation of the PLP is very similar between the two
external aldimine forms of the bsSHMT, except for minor movements in
the serine complex, to accommodate the additional interactions due to
the hydroxyl group of the serine.
The bound serine substrate makes several interactions with both the
monomers of the protein. The bound glycine shows exactly the same
interactions, except for those formed by the hydroxyl group of the
serine. The hydroxyl group of serine is in close proximity of the
carboxylate group of GluB53 (2.5 Å). It is also within
hydrogen-bonding distance from the imidazole group of HisA122 (2.80 Å). The carboxylate group of serine forms a tight ion pair with
ArgA357. In addition, one of the oxygen atoms of the carboxylate group
also interacts with the imidazole of HisA200, and the other can form
hydrogen bonds with the side chains of SerA31 and TyrB61. An
interesting conformational change observed is that of Tyr-61 (Fig. 3).
In the native structure, the side chain of TyrB61 is within
hydrogen-bonding distance from ArgA357 (2.72 Å), away from GluB53 (5 Å). However, in the serine complex, it flips toward GluB53, away from
ArgA357, presumably due to the interaction of the substrate carboxylate
group with ArgA357. This conformational change leads to new interaction
of TyrB61 with GluB53 and serine carboxylate group and brings the
hydroxyl group of TyrB61 close to the C The Ternary Complex--
The ternary complex of bsSHMT with bound
glycine and FTHF shows small but significant conformational changes
compared with the native structure, similar to that observed in the
structures of mc- and eSHMT (11, 12). A remarkable feature of the
ternary complex structure of bsSHMT is the lack of structural symmetry and differences in the FTHF interaction between the two monomers of the
dimer. Although one of the monomers showed a strong density for the
FTHF molecule (monomer A), the other monomer revealed a much weaker
density, and there was no appreciable density for the monoglutamate
part of the molecule in that monomer (monomer B; see
"Discussion").
The first clue toward the asymmetry between the two monomers came from
the breakdown of orthorhombic symmetry in the crystals of the ternary
complex. The crystals of the native and aldimine forms belong to the
orthorhombic system with a monomer in the asymmetric unit, whereas the
ternary complex crystals belong to the monoclinic system, with a dimer
in the asymmetric unit, although the cell dimensions were not very
different from the other three forms (Table
I). When compared with the native form,
both the monomers of the ternary complex show movements in the
C-terminal domain (residues 280-405) and parts of the N-terminal
domain, particularly around the active site region. The difference
between the two monomers of the dimer in the ternary complex appear to be mainly in the extent of these movements. A comparison of the monomer
A (showing good density for FTHF) of the bsSHMT ternary complex to the
native structure shows a difference of about 4° in the hinge angle
between the N- and C-terminal domains, whereas this difference is only
2.5° in the monomer B.
A superposition of the monomer A of the bsSHMT ternary complex with the
native structure is shown in Fig. 4.
Apart from an overall movement of the C-terminal domain, the ternary
complex structure reveals most obvious differences in the region of
residues 315-330 and 342-352 of the C-terminal domain and, to a
lesser extent, in the regions 27-31 and 114-118 of the N-terminal
domain compared with the native structure. Differences in similar
regions have been reported in the structures of the ternary complexes of the mc- and eSHMT (11, 12). The carboxylate group of glycine substrate interacts with the hydroxyl group of Ser-31. Furthermore, the
region of residues 27-31 is sandwiched between the regions 336-339
and 358-362 of the C-terminal domain. The interaction of Ser-31 with
the carboxylate group of glycine substrate appears to cause a small
movement in this region, which is further enhanced by the overall
movement of the C-terminal domain. The exocyclic nitrogen of the
pteridine ring of FTHF interacts with the main chain carbonyl oxygens
of the residues Leu-117, Gly-120, and Gly-121, inducing a small
movement in the region 114-119. The position of the loop region
342-352 appears to be important for the FTHF binding. The major
difference between the two monomers of bsSHMT appears to be in this
loop region. The structural basis for the conformational change in the
protein as well as the asymmetric binding of the FTHF will be discussed
in the next section.
The bound FTHF molecule is involved in several interactions with the
protein. Briefly, the carboxylate group of Glu-53 interacts with the
formyl oxygen atom and the N10 atom of the FTHF. The side chain of
Asn-341 is within hydrogen-bonding distance from N1 and N8 atoms of the
pteridine ring. The C2 amino group of FTHF interacts with the main
chain carbonyl oxygen atoms of residues Leu-117, Gly-120, and Gly-121.
The main chain carbonyl oxygen of the residue Gly-121 and the amide
group of the residue Leu-123 forms hydrogen bonds with the N3 and O4
atoms of FTHF molecule. The p-aminobenzoic acid moiety of
the FTHF stacks against the side chain of Tyr-60. The monoglutamate
part of the molecule makes only one significant interaction with the
hydroxyl group of Ser-349 (only in monomer A). A stereo view of the
FTHF binding site is shown in Fig. 5, and
details of the interactions made by FTHF in both the monomers are
presented in Table II. The overall
position and orientation of FTHF molecule in bsSHMT is similar
to that in the E. coli structure. Between the two monomers
of bsSHMT, the pteridine ring and the phenyl ring of the FTHF reveal
small displacements, and there was no density for the monoglutamate part of the FTHF in the monomer B. The average temperature factor associated with the FTHF in monomer B (~45) was higher when
compared with that in monomer A (~37). Furthermore, the interactions
of FTHF in monomer B are much weaker compared with those in monomer A
(Table II).
PLP Binding Site--
Details of interactions made by the PLP in
the four structures of bsSHMT are presented in Table
III. The overall environment of the PLP,
including the interacting protein ligand groups and the ring stacking
histidine, is very similar to that found in the known SHMT structures
(9-12). It is clear from Table III that these interactions are mostly
conserved during different intermediate steps of the catalytic cycle.
The interaction of the N Structural Basis for the Conformational Changes and
Asymmetric Binding of the FTHF--
The crystal structures of the
ternary complexes of E. coli, murine, and bsSHMT clearly
establish a small but significant conformational change in the protein
compared with the native form, similar to those observed in aspartate
aminotransferase (11, 12, 34). In all three structures, the C-terminal
domain moves relative to the N-terminal domain, and most obvious
differences are observed in the loop region 342-352 (390-400 in
mcSHMT, around 350 in eSHMT). The position of this loop appears to be
important for the binding of the folate cofactor. Although it was
suggested in the mcSHMT structure that the binding of the folate
induces a shift in this region, the structural requirement for such a
movement was unclear (12). A superposition of the ternary complex of
bsSHMT with the native form reveals that the side chain of Phe-351 in
the native structure sterically prevents the monoglutamate side chain of the FTHF from binding in that position unless the loop is moved away
from that region (Fig. 6). The
monoglutamate side chain of the FTHF molecule in the bsSHMT (monomer A)
occupies the same position as the side chain of Phe-351 in the native
structure, necessitating a movement of this region away from the
monoglutamate binding site. The interaction of Asn-341 with N1 and N8
atoms of the pteridine ring appears to facilitate the shift in this loop position.
The spectral and titration calorimetric studies on the rcSHMT have
indicated that the ternary complex of the enzyme with glycine and FTHF
exists in equilibrium consisting of quinonoid, external aldimine, and
gem diamine forms (3, 25, 35), which is confirmed by the
crystal structure of the mcSHMT (12). In the mcSHMT structure, the two
obligate dimers forming the tetramer reveal asymmetric binding of the
FTHF, and a loop region (B154-B160) has been implicated in this (12).
In contrast, all the active sites of the two dimers in the eSHMT appear
to bind glycine and FTHF in a very similar manner (11). The differences
in the FTHF binding properties of the murine and E. coli
SHMT has been attributed to the tetrameric nature of the mammalian
enzyme and critical residues in the tetrameric contact region, which
are lacking in the E. coli enzyme (12). The bsSHMT ternary
complex exhibits asymmetric binding of FTHF despite being a dimeric
enzyme and lacking the residues corresponding to the loop region
154-160 in the murine structure. The most likely candidate
causing the asymmetric binding of FTHF in bsSHMT appears to be the
stacking interaction of the imidazole ring of His-108 from the two
monomers at the dimer interface of the molecule (Fig. 7). The binding of the folate cofactor
results in a small shift in the region 114-119. This movement could be
transmitted to the same region of the other subunit via the stacking
interaction of the His108 from the two monomers. In other words the
displacement in the region 114-119 of the monomer A prevents a similar
movement in the monomer B, affecting the binding of FTHF in the monomer B. In the mcSHMT structure, a similar stacking interaction was observed
involving His-135 residues (equivalent of His-108) belonging to the two
dimers (A-C, B-D) of the tetramer. It is interesting to note that
although the asymmetry is found between the two monomers of the dimer
of bsSHMT, it is observed between the two obligate dimers of the
mcSHMT. In eSHMT on the other hand, which does not exhibit asymmetry in
FTHF binding, the residue corresponding to His-108 is a proline (P112),
and consequently, no stacking interaction is observed in that
structure.
Mechanistic Implications--
Several reaction mechanisms have
been proposed for the cleavage and transfer of the hydoxymethyl group
of serine, the favored mechanism being the retroaldol cleavage (7). The
retroaldol cleavage mechanism (Scheme I)
requires a catalytic base to abstract a proton from the
The absence of a cysteine residue in close proximity of the
active site clearly rules out the possibility of a thiohemiacetal mechanism, which involves nucleophilic attack of a cysteine residue on
the We thank Dr. D. K. Dixit for helpful discussions.
*
This work was supported by the Indian Council of Medical
Research, New Delhi, India. This is Central Drug Research
Institute communication No. 6249.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The atomic coordinates and the structure factors (code 1KKJ, 1KKP, 1KL1, and 1KL2) have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank, Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ (http://www.rcsb.org/).
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.:
91-522-221411; Fax: 91-522-223405; E-mail:
subshs@rediffmail.com.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, February 27, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M111976200
The abbreviations used are:
SHMT, serine
hydroxymethyltransferase;
bsSHMT, SHMT from Bacillus
stearothermophilus;
rcSHMT, rabbit liver SHMT;
eSHMT, Escherichia coli SHMT;
THF, tetrahydrofolate;
FTHF, 5-formyl
tetrahydrofolate.
Crystal Structure of Binary and Ternary Complexes
of Serine Hydroxymethyltransferase from Bacillus
stearothermophilus
INSIGHTS INTO THE CATALYTIC MECHANISM*
,
,
¶
Molecular and Structural Biology Division,
Central Drug Research Institute, Chattar Manzil Palace, Mahatma Gandhi
Marg, P. B. No. 173, Lucknow 226001, India and
§ Department of Biochemistry, Indian Institute of Science,
Bangalore 560012, India
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-class of pyridoxal phosphate-dependent enzymes,
catalyzes the reversible conversion of serine to glycine and
tetrahydrofolate to 5,10-methylene tetrahydrofolate. We present here
the crystal structures of the native enzyme and its complexes with
serine, glycine, glycine, and 5-formyl tetrahydrofolate (FTHF) from
Bacillus stearothermophilus. The first structure of the
serine-bound form of SHMT allows identification of residues involved in
serine binding and catalysis. The SHMT-serine complex does not show any
significant conformational change compared with the native enzyme,
contrary to that expected for a conversion from an "open" to
"closed" form of the enzyme. However, the ternary complex with FTHF
and glycine shows the reported conformational changes. In contrast to
the Escherichia coli enzyme, this complex shows asymmetric
binding of the FTHF to the two monomers within the dimer in a way
similar to the murine SHMT. Comparison of the ternary complex with the
native enzyme reveals the structural basis for the conformational
change and asymmetric binding of FTHF. The four structures presented
here correspond to the various reaction intermediates of the catalytic
pathway and provide evidence for a direct displacement mechanism for
the hydroxymethyl transfer rather than a retroaldol cleavage.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-D-galactopyranoside for 5 h. The
isopropyl-1-thio-
-D-galactopyranoside-induced cells were
harvested, resuspended in buffer A (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM 2-mercaptoethanol), and
sonicated. The supernatant was loaded on a MonoQ column equilibrated
with buffer A. The protein was eluted using a linear gradient with
buffer A containing 1 M NaCl. The fractions containing the
protein were pooled and loaded on a phenyl Superose column equilibrated
with buffer A containing 1 M ammonium sulfate. The protein
was eluted using the same buffer without ammonium sulfate. The
fractions containing the protein were pooled and precipitated using
ammonium sulfate (65% saturation). The pellet was resuspended in
buffer B (100 mM Hepes buffer, pH 7.5, 0.2 mM
EDTA, 5 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 100 mM NaCl) and
further purified on a Superdex-200 (Amersham Biosciences) gel
filtration column equilibrated with buffer B. Peak fractions
corresponding to the dimer were pooled and concentrated to 15 mg/ml
using a 50-kDa cutoff Centricon (Amicon).
Fc map and visualized using the graphics program TURBO-FRODO
(20). The map was readily interpretable, and the electron density for the PLP cofactor, which was omitted from the model, was clearly visible. Most of the side chains were built into the map, and the model
was refined using maximum likelihood positional refinement in REFMAC,
with restrained temperature factors (21). After each cycle of
refinement, manual rebuilding was performed wherever necessary, and
previously undefined side chains were built into the electron density
map. The PLP molecule from the eSHMT structure was manually adjusted
and built into the electron density map. Solvent molecules were added
during final cycles of refinement. The crystallographic free R-factor
(22) was monitored at each stage to prevent model bias. The quality of
the structure was evaluated using the Ramachandran plot and the program
PROCHECK (23). Statistics on the final model are presented in Table
I.
atoms.
Differences in the orientation of the PLP ring were calculated using
the CCP4 program GEOMCALC.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-class, such as aspartate aminotransferase. Briefly, the monomer
fold comprises two major domains, the N-terminal domain (residues
1-279) and a C-terminal domain (280-405). The N-terminal domain can
be further divided into two sub-domains, a small N-terminal sub-domain
(residues 1-80) and a larger PLP binding domain (residues 81-279).
The small N-terminal domain comprises three
-helices and one
-strand, whereas the larger N-terminal domain folds into an


structure consisting of a seven-stranded mixed
-sheet
flanked by
-helices on both sides. The C-terminal domain folds into
an 
sandwich. All the SHMTs studied to date are either homodimers
or homotetramers, the dimer being the minimum structure necessary for
the catalytic activity. The four known structures of SHMT (hc-, rc-,
mc-, and eSHMT) are all reported to be tetramers, although the
quaternary organization of eSHMT structure is different from the
mammalian SHMT structures (9-12). In contrast, the quaternary
structure of bsSHMT is a dimer. The crystallographic asymmetric unit
consists of a monomer, and the two monomers of the dimer are related by the crystallographic symmetry. No tetrameric contacts are visible in
the crystal structure. This is consistent with the gel filtration experiments (data not shown), which shows that the protein elutes at a
position corresponding to a dimer. The overall structure of the bsSHMT
is depicted in Fig. 1.

View larger version (71K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
The overall fold of the dimer of native
bsSHMT, prepared using the program MOLSCRIPT (41). The cofactor
PLP is shown in the ball and stick
representation.
atoms. Several studies have
suggested that SHMT undergoes a conformational change upon binding of
substrates with a 3-hydroxyl group, resembling the transition that
occurs in aspartate aminotransferase from an "open" to "closed"
form on binding of the aspartate or 2-methylaspartate substrates
(24-26). Thermal stability of the SHMT increases upon binding of
serine, and this change in thermal stability of the enzyme has been
attributed to a conformational change in SHMT, like that in aspartate
aminotransferase (27-30). The crystal structures of mcSHMT and eSHMT
complexed to glycine and FTHF indeed show a conformational change
compared with the unliganded hc- and rcSHMT structures. However, the
observed conformational changes have been largely attributed to the
binding of the amino acid substrate (11). The structures of serine and
glycine aldimine forms of bsSHMT clearly show that the amino acid
substrate binding alone does not induce significant conformational
changes in the protein. The conformational changes observed earlier
could be a result of FTHF binding. The reported thermal stability of
the enzyme is most likely due to the interaction of the serine with the
enzyme, particularly those that bridge the two monomers of the dimer,
and filling the active site cavity.

View larger version (33K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Electron density around the cofactor PLP and
serine at the active site of bsSHMT serine complex. The electron
density shown is from a Fo
Fc omit map
calculated from the final refined phases. Some of the key residues at
the active site are shown in stick representation. The figure was
prepared using TURBO-FRODO.

View larger version (22K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Stereoview of the superposition of active
site regions in the internal aldimine and external aldimine structures
of bsSHMT showing the rotation of the PLP ring and conformational
change in the Tyr-61 residue. The carbon atoms belonging to the
internal aldimine and external aldimine structures are shown in
dark green and light green colors, respectively.
The nitrogen atoms are shown in blue, oxygen atoms are shown
in red, and phosphorous atoms are shown in
magenta. The figure was prepared using the program MOLSCRIPT
(41).
of serine (2.81 Å).
Statistics for data collection and structure determination

View larger version (52K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Stereoview of the overlaid structures of the
monomer A (showing good density for the FTHF) of bsSHMT ternary complex
(red) and the native structure
(green) showing differences in the conformations of
the C-terminal domain and parts of the N-terminal domain. The
program MOLSCRIPT (41) was used to prepare this figure.

View larger version (21K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Stereoview of the active site region in the
monomer A of bsSHMT ternary complex showing the FTHF and key residues
interacting with the FTHF molecule. The figure was prepared using
the program MOLSCRIPT (41).
Interactions of the FTHF in the monomer A and monomer B of the ternary
complex structure of bsSHMT
atom of the Lys-226 with the Thr-223 is
particularly interesting. The Thr-223 (226 in eSHMT) has been
implicated in stabilizing the external aldimine form based on
mutational studies (33), which was further confirmed by the crystal
structures. In the external aldimine structures of bsSHMT, Lys-226
forms strong hydrogen-bonding interaction with this residue (2.89 Å),
similar to that in the eSHMT structure. However, in the ternary
complex, this interaction is much weaker, particularly in the monomer B
(3.17 Å), and instead, a stronger interaction is made between Lys-226
and TyrB51 (2.8 Å). Tyr-51 appears to play a role in the conversion of
the enzyme from its internal aldimine to the external aldimine
form, apart from Thr-223.
Interactions of the PLP group in the four structures of bsSHMT
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (30K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
The overlaid structures of the native form
and the ternary complex (monomer A) of bsSHMT around the monoglutamate
binding site. The difference in the conformations of the loop
region (residues 342-352) is depicted. The monoglutamate side chain of
FTHF sterically clashes with the Phe-351 residue of the native
structure unless this region is moved away from the monoglutamate
binding site. The carbon atoms belonging to the native and ternary
complex structures are shown in dark green and light
green colors, respectively. The nitrogen atoms are shown in
blue, and oxygen atoms are shown in red. The
figure was prepared using the program MOLSCRIPT (41).

View larger version (28K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Stacking interaction made by His-108 residues
in the bsSHMT structure and His-135 residues in the mcSHMT
structure. a, stereoview of the region around the
His-108 residues at the dimer interface of bsSHMT. b,
stereoview of the region around the His-135 residues at the tetramer
interface of the mcSHMT structure. The His-135 residues in the four
subunits are labeled as A, B, C, and D. The figure was prepared using
the program MOLSCRIPT (41).
-hydroxyl
group of serine and a favorable conformation of the bound substrate for
the cleavage reaction to occur. The structure of bsSHMT serine complex
reveals two possible candidates for the base, which abstracts a proton
from the hydroxyl group of the serine. The side chain carboxylate of
Glu-53 and the imidazole group of His-122 (stacking with PLP) are in
close proximity of the hydroxyl group of the serine. The side chain
carboxylate of Glu-53 has been reported to be in its acid form
(protonated), not the conjugated base, in the crystal structure of
eSHMT (11). The interaction of Glu-53 in the structure of bsSHMT
further confirms this observation. The Glu-53 interacts with 5-formyl
oxygen of FTHF in the ternary complex and with immobilized water
molecules in the native glycine aldimine as well as in the ternary
complex structures of bsSHMT, indicating that it is in its protonated form. Mutation of the equivalent residue in scSHMT (E74Q) has suggested
that this residue is not involved in proton abstraction (36). If Glu-53
is in a protonated state, then the only other candidate for the base
involved in proton abstraction is His-122. A substantial amount of
activity is retained upon mutation of the corresponding residue in
sheep liver cytosolic SHMT (H147N), and this residue has been
implicated in PLP binding rather than proton abstraction (37). The most
favored conformation for this type of cleavage reaction is an
antiperiplanar geometry of the atoms involved in electron movement
(38). However, the geometry at the C
atom of the serine substrate in
the external aldimine complex of bsSHMT is not antiperiplanar, instead
showing a N-C
-C
-O
dihedral angle of 40°, which is not most
favorable for the retroaldol cleavage. Thus, the lack of suitable base
for proton abstraction as well as the unfavorable conformation of the
bound serine suggests the need to consider alternative mechanisms for
catalysis more seriously.

View larger version (32K):
[in a new window]
Schemes I and II. Schematic representation of the
mechanisms proposed for the reaction catalyzed by SHMT. I,
retroaldol cleavage mechanism; II, direct displacement mechanism.
-carbon of the serine. Another possible mechanism is the direct
displacement of the C
bond of the serine aldimine by the phenolate
ion of the Tyr-61 residue, leading to the formation of a hemiacetal
intermediate. As discussed earlier, Tyr-61 residue undergoes a
conformational change upon serine binding and approaches the C
atom
of the serine (2.8 Å). However, this type of nucleophilic substitution
mechanism (SN2 attack) requires that the nucleophile attacks the carbon atom from the side opposite bond to the leaving group at an angle roughly 180° to the carbon bond of the leaving group (39). The hydroxyl group of Tyr-61 in bsSHMT makes an angle
C
-C
-O of 94°, which is orthogonal to the carbon bond of the
leaving group and, therefore, not favorable for such a mechanism. Furthermore, mutation analysis of the corresponding residue in the
eSHMT as well as sheep liver cytosolic SHMT do not suggest the formation of a hemiacetal intermediate (36, 40). However, the
structures of the bsSHMT with serine and ternary complex favors a
direct attack of the THF on the serine aldimine (direct displacement mechanism; Scheme II). Assuming no further changes in the position or
conformation of the bound serine, a superposition of the serine and
ternary complex structures reveals a distance of 2.5 Å between the N5
atom of FTHF and the
-carbon of the serine, optimal for a
nucleophilic attack. Furthermore, the angle for nucleophilic attack in
this model (as determined by the angle N5-C
-C
) is ~135°. Both
the distance and angle are appropriate for a direct attack by the N5
atom of THF at the
-carbon of the serine aldimine. Taken together,
these results appear to favor a direct displacement mechanism for the
conversion of serine to glycine by SHMT. However, the THF-independent
cleavage of other
-hydroxyamino acids could still proceed by a
retroaldol cleavage mechanism.
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
![]()
FOOTNOTES
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Blakely, R. L.
(1995)
Biochem. J.
61,
315-323 2.
Appling, D. R.
(1991)
FASEB J.
5,
2645-2651[Abstract] 3.
Schirch, L.
(1984)
in
Folates and Proteins: Chemistry and Biochemistry of Folates
(Blakely, R. L.
, and Benkovic, S. J., eds)
, pp. 399-412, Wiley Interscience, New York
4.
Thorndike, J.,
Pelliniemi, T. T.,
and Beck, W. S.
(1979)
Cancer Res.
39,
3435-3440 5.
Eichler, H. G.,
Hubbard, R.,
and Snell, K.
(1981)
Biosci. Rep.
1,
101-106[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 6.
Appaji Rao, N.
(1991)
in
New Trends in Biological Chemistry
(Ozawa, T., ed)
, pp. 333-340, Japan Scientific Press, Tokyo
7.
Matthews, R. G.,
and Drummond, J. T.
(1990)
Chem. Rev.
90,
1275-1290[CrossRef] 8.
Jordan, P. M.,
and Akhtar, M.
(1970)
Biochem. J.
247,
372-379 9.
Renwick, S. B.,
Snell, K.,
and Baumann, U.
(1998)
Structure (Lond.)
6,
1105-1116[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 10.
Scarsdale, J. N.,
Kazanina, G.,
Radaev, S.,
Schirch, V.,
and Wright, H. T.
(1999)
Biochemistry
38,
8347-8358[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 11.
Scarsdale, J. N.,
Radaev, S.,
Kazanina, G.,
Schirch, V.,
and Wright, H. T.
(2000)
J. Mol. Biol.
296,
155-168[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 12.
Szebnyi, D. M. E.,
Liu, X.,
Kriksunov, I. A.,
Stover, P. J.,
and Thiel, D. J.
(2000)
Biochemistry
39,
13313-13323[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 13.
Matthews, R. G.,
Drummond, J. T.,
and Webb, H. K.
(1998)
Adv. Enzyme Regul.
8,
377-392 14.
Otwinowski, Z.,
and Minor, W.
(1997)
Methods Enzymol.
276,
307-326 15.
Thompson, J. D.,
Higgins, D. G.,
and Gibson, T. J.
(1994)
Nucleic Acids Res.
22,
4673-4680 16.
Collaborative Computing Project No. 4.
(1994)
Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr.
50,
760-763[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 17.
Navaza, J.
(1994)
Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A
50,
157-163[CrossRef] 18.
Brunger, A. T.,
Karplus, M.,
and Petsko, G. A.
(1989)
Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A
45,
50-61[CrossRef] 19.
Cowtan, K. (1994) Joint CCP4 and ESF-EACBM Newsletter on Protein
Crystallography, Vol. 31, pp. 34-38
20.
Roussel, A.,
and Cambillau, C.
(1989)
Silicon Graphics Geometry Partner Directory
, pp. 77-78, Silicon Graphics, Mountain View, CA
21.
Murshudov, G. N.,
Vagin, A. A.,
and Dodson, E. J.
(1997)
Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr.
53,
240-245[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 22.
Brunger, A. T.
(1992)
Nature
355,
472-474[CrossRef] 23.
Laskowski, R. A.,
MacArthur, M. W.,
Moss, D. S.,
and Thornton, J. M.
(1993)
J. Appl. Crystallogr.
26,
283-291[CrossRef]
24.
Stover, P.,
and Schirch, V.
(1992)
Biochemistry
31,
2155-2164[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 25.
Huang, T.,
Wang, C.,
Maras, B.,
Barra, D.,
and Schirch, V.
(1998)
Biochemistry
37,
13536-13542[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 26.
Schirch, V.,
Shostak, K,
Zamora, M.,
and Gautam-Basak, M.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
759-764 27.
Stover, P.,
Zamora, M.,
Shostak, K.,
Gautam-Basak, M.,
and Schirch, V.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
17679-17687 28.
McPhalen, C. A.,
Vincent, M. G.,
Picot, D.,
Jansonius, J. N.,
Lesk, A. M.,
and Chotia, C.
(1992)
J. Mol. Biol.
227,
197-213[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 29.
Okamoto, A.,
Higuchi, T.,
Hirotsu,
Kuramitsu, S.,
and Kagamiyama, H.
(1994)
J. Biochem.
116,
95-107 30.
Bhaskar, B.,
Prakash, V.,
Savithri, H. S.,
and Rao, N. A.
(1994)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1209,
40-50[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 31.
Jager, J.,
Moser, M.,
Sauder, U.,
and Jansonius, J. N.
(1994)
J. Mol. Biol.
239,
285-305[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 32.
Arnone, A.,
Bogers, P. H.,
Hyde, C. C.,
Briley, P. D.,
Mrtzler, C. M.,
and Metzler, D. E.
(1985)
in
Transaminases
(Christen, P.
, and Metzler, D. E., eds)
, pp. 138-155, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York
33.
Angelaccio, S.,
Pascarella, S.,
Fattori, E.,
Bossa, F.,
Strong, W.,
and Schirch, V.
(1992)
Biochemistry
31,
155-162[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 34.
McPhalen, C. A.,
Vincent, M. G.,
and Jansonius, J. N.
(1992)
J. Mol. Biol.
225,
495-517[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 35.
Stover, P.,
and Schirch, V.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
1543-1550 36.
Rao, J. V. K.,
Prakash, V.,
Rao, N. A.,
and Savithri, H. S.
(2000)
Eur. J. Biochem.
267,
5967-5976[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 37.
Jagath, J. R.,
Sharma, B.,
Rao, N. A.,
and Savithri, H. S.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
24355-24362 38.
Gorb, C. A.
(1969)
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl.
8,
535-543[CrossRef] 39.
March, J.
(1999)
Advanced Organic Chemistry, Reaction, Mechanism, and Structure
, 4th Ed.
, pp. 294-295, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Singapore
40.
Contestabile, R.,
Angelaccio, S.,
Bossa, F.,
Wright, T. H.,
Scarsdale, N.,
Kazanina, G.,
and Schirch, V.
(2000)
Biochemistry
39,
7492-7500[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 41.
Kraulis, P. J.
(1991)
J. Appl. Crystallogr.
24,
946-950[CrossRef]
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. N. Bhatt and V. Bhakuni Characterization of Pyridoxal 5'-Phosphate-Binding Domain and Folding Intermediate of Bacillus subtilis Serine Hydroxymethyltransferase: an Autonomous Folding Domain J. Biochem., September 1, 2008; 144(3): 295 - 303. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Cellini, M. Bertoldi, A. Paiardini, S. D'Aguanno, and C. B. Voltattorni Site-directed Mutagenesis Provides Insight into Racemization and Transamination of Alanine Catalyzed by Treponema denticola Cystalysin J. Biol. Chem., August 27, 2004; 279(35): 36898 - 36905. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. N. Bhatt, M. Y. Khan, and V. Bhakuni The C-terminal domain of dimeric serine hydroxymethyltransferase plays a key role in stabilization of the quaternary structure and cooperative unfolding of protein: Domain swapping studies with enzymes having high sequence identity Protein Sci., August 1, 2004; 13(8): 2184 - 2195. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Angelaccio, R. Chiaraluce, V. Consalvi, B. Buchenau, L. Giangiacomo, F. Bossa, and R. Contestabile Catalytic and Thermodynamic Properties of Tetrahydromethanopterin-dependent Serine Hydroxymethyltransferase from Methanococcus jannaschii J. Biol. Chem., October 24, 2003; 278(43): 41789 - 41797. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T.-F. Fu, E. S. Boja, M. K. Safo, and V. Schirch Role of Proline Residues in the Folding of Serine Hydroxymethyltransferase J. Biol. Chem., August 15, 2003; 278(33): 31088 - 31094. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. A. Zanetti and P. J. Stover Pyridoxal Phosphate Inhibits Dynamic Subunit Interchange among Serine Hydroxymethyltransferase Tetramers J. Biol. Chem., March 14, 2003; 278(12): 10142 - 10149. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T.-F. Fu, J. N. Scarsdale, G. Kazanina, V. Schirch, and H. T. Wright Location of the Pteroylpolyglutamate-binding Site on Rabbit Cytosolic Serine Hydroxymethyltransferase J. Biol. Chem., January 17, 2003; 278(4): 2645 - 2653. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||