Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M107139200 on October 26, 2001
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 2, 1002-1012, January 11, 2002
ERM Transactivation Is Up-regulated by the Repression of DNA
Binding after the PKA Phosphorylation of a Consensus Site at the Edge
of the ETS Domain*
Jean-Luc
Baert
,
Claude
Beaudoin
§,
Laurent
Coutte¶, and
Yvan
de Launoit
§
From the
UMR 8526 CNRS/Institut Pasteur de Lille,
Institut de Biologie de Lille, BP 447, 1 rue Calmette, 59021 Lille
Cedex, France and the ¶ Laboratoire de Virologie
Moléculaire, Faculté de Médecine,
Université Libre de Bruxelles, CP 614, 808 route de Lennik,
1070 Brussels, Belgium
Received for publication, July 27, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
The final step of the transduction pathway is the
activation of gene transcription, which is driven by kinase cascades
leading to changes in the activity of many transcription factors. Among these latter, PEA3/E1AF, ER81/ETV1, and ERM, members of the well conserved PEA3 group from the Ets family are involved in these processes. We show here that protein kinase A (PKA) increases the
transcriptional activity of human ERM and human ETV1, through a Ser
residue situated at the edge of the ETS DNA-binding domain. PKA
phosphorylation does not directly affect the ERM transactivation domains but does affect DNA binding activity. Unphosphorylated wild-type ERM bound DNA avidly, whereas after PKA phosphorylation it
did so very weakly. Interestingly, S367A mutation significantly reduced the ERM-mediated transcription in the presence of the kinase,
and the DNA binding of this mutant, although similar to that of
unphosphorylated wild-type protein, was insensitive to PKA treatment.
Mutations, which may mimic a phosphorylated serine, converted ERM from
an efficient DNA-binding protein to a poor DNA binding one, with
inefficiency of PKA phosphorylation. The present data clearly
demonstrate a close correlation between the capacity of PKA to increase
the transactivation of ERM and the drastic down-regulation of the
binding of the ETS domain to the targeted DNA. What we thus demonstrate
here is a relatively rare transcription activation mechanism through a
decrease in DNA binding, probably by the shift of a non-active form of
an Ets protein to a PKA-phosphorylated active one, which should be in a
conformation permitting a transactivation domain to be active.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The regulation of gene expression by specific signal transduction
pathways is tightly connected to cell phenotype. Several molecules
involved in intracellular signaling are encoded by oncogenes, which
directly link their potential aberrant expression to cell transformation or altered proliferation. The final step of the transduction pathway is the activation of nuclear transcription factors. For example, the cyclic-AMP- and calcium-regulated nuclear factor is activated through the protein kinase A
(PKA)1 pathway via
phosphorylation. The differential phosphorylation of transcription
factors by signal transduction pathways such as the mitogen-activated
protein kinase (MAPK) plays a crucial role in the regulation of gene
expression. This is the case for the c-fos gene expression,
which is regulated by the binding to DNA of the Elk/TCF factor after
phosphorylation through the MAPK pathway. The activation of MAPK
cascades leads to changes in the activity of many Ets factors such as
Elk/TCF (for reviews, see Refs. 1 and 2).
The Ets family of transcription factors, which includes more than 30 members from sponges to humans (for reviews, see Refs. 2 and 3), has
been involved in both tumorigenesis and a number of developmental
processes. They all contain the ETS domain (4), a domain of 85 amino
acids structured as a winged helix-turn-helix structure and responsible
for DNA inding to the specific core sequence GGA(A/T) (for review, see
Refs. 2). These factors can be subclassified primarily because of the
amino acid conservation in their ETS domains and also because of the
conservation of other domains generally characterized as transactivating.
In the case of the PEA3 group, which is made up of three members, PEA3
(also called E1AF in the human or ETV4) (5, 6), ER81 (also called ETV1
in the human) (7-9), and ERM (also called ETV5) (10-12), these
factors are more than 95% identical in the ETS domain and more than
85% in the NH2-terminal 32 residue acidic domain, and
almost 50% identical in the final 61 residues corresponding to the
carboxyl-terminal tail of the proteins (carboxyl-terminal domain) (for
review, see Ref. 13). The transactivating activity of these factors is
because of the two conserved acidic and carboxyl-terminal domains (11,
14-16).
Although the putative target genes of these three transcription factors
are multiple, their most frequently studied role concerns their
involvement in breast cancer metastasis (17, 18), probably by
activating the transcription of matrix metalloproteinases (19, 20).
Concerning their expression in the adult, although pea3/e1af and er81/etv1 display more restricted expression patterns
(5, 7-10, 12), erm has been characterized as a more
ubiquitously expressed gene with its highest expression in the brain
(10). Recently, it has been demonstrated that ERM is induced by
interleukin-12 through a Stat4-dependent pathway in Th1 and
could play a highly specific role by inducing Th1 differentiation in
the mouse (21).
The transcription capacities of mouse and zebrafish PEA3, mouse and
human ER81/ETV1, and human ERM are increased by components of the MAPK
cascades, Ras, Raf-1, MEK, and the MAPK ERK-1 and ERK-2; this suggests
that these factors may contribute to the nuclear response to cell
stimulation and Ras-induced cell transformation (15, 16, 22, 23).
Interestingly, PKA is also able to increase the transcriptional
activity of human ERM (15), human ETV1 (24), and zebrafish PEA3 (23)
probably through phosphorylation since we have previously demonstrated
that ERM can be phosphorylated in vitro by active PKA (15).
In this study we show that, in contrast to human ERM and ETV1, PKA is
not able to significantly increase the transcriptional activity of
mouse PEA3. In fact, this transcription factor lacks a classical PKA
phosphorylation site present at the beginning of the ETS domain of ERM
and ETV1; this domain is phosphorylated by PKA, and is necessary for
the activation of ERM by the kinase. We further show that the increase in ERM transcriptional activity after PKA phosphorylation is closely correlated with a drastic reduction in the DNA binding of the transcription factor. These results indicate that the phosphorylation of ERM by PKA is involved in ERM-mediated transcription and suggest that the activation of ERM is probably related to conformational changes.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Cell Lines--
Rabbit kidney epithelial-like RK13 cells (ATCC
number CCL 37), HeLa and COS-7 cells were maintained at 37 °C in a
humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 in Dulbecco's medium
supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (Invitrogen).
Plasmids--
The 3xE74-tk-Luc reporter plasmid and the
overexpression vectors for the catalytic subunit of PKA have
been described previously (15, 25). The plasmid
517/+63 Coll-Luc
containing the indicated region of the human collagenase 1 promoter
sequence linked to a luciferase gene (20) has been described.
The full-length region of human ERM (10), human ETV1 (8), and mouse
PEA3 (5) were amplified by PCR, digested, and subcloned in the
EcoRI and BglII sites of the pSV vector, an
expression vector which provides an amino-terminal hemagglutinin tag
(14), to produce pSV-ERM, pSV-ETV1, and pSV-PEA3, respectively. The point mutations of ERM were generated by the double PCR method: oligonucleotide 5'-AGAGGCGAGGTNNNCTTCAGCTGT-3' where NNN corresponded to GCC, GAT, and GAG and its antisense counterpart, generated a
specific mutation of Ser367 into alanine, aspartic acid,
and glutamic acid, respectively. The final PCR fragments were subcloned
as SmaI-BstEII fragments into the SmaI
and BstEII sites of pSV-ERM yielding pSV-ERM S367A, pSV-ERM
S367D, and pSV-ERM S367E. The ERM mutant containing a deletion of amino
acids 226-250 was constructed by the double PCR method using
oligonucleotides 5'-CAGAGACAACTGTCTGAACCT-3' (nucleotides
849-870) and
5'-TTTCAGAGACAACTGTCTGAACCTATTGTC-3' (nucleotides 922-951); the underlined nucleotides indicate changes in
nucleic acid bases to optimize overlapping in the second round of PCR.
The PCR fragment was cloned as a BglII-SmaI
fragment into the BglII-SmaI sites of the pSV-ERM
and pSV-ERM S367A to generate pSV-ERM
and pSV-ERM
S367A,
respectively. The full-length region of ERM wild-type and ERM S367A was
also subcloned in the EcoRI and BamHI sites of
the pEFIN3 vector to produce pEFIN-ERM and pEFIN-ERM S367A, respectively.
The glutathione S-transferase (GST) fusion protein
expression vectors pGEX-ERM-(12-510) and pGEX-ERM-(354-510) have been
described previously (17). Expression vectors generating truncated ERM gene products (ERM-(1-226), ERM-(1-298), and ERM-(1-363)) were constructed by PCR and subcloned into pGEX-1
T. To generate pGEX-ERM S367A, pGEX-ERM
, and pGEX-ERM
S367A, the pSV-ERM vectors
carrying the corresponding mutations were digested by BglII
and BstEII and the resulting fragments were cloned in the
BglII and BstEII sites of pGEX-ERM-(12-510).
GAL4-ERM fusions were made by cloning parts of the human ERM coding
region in-frame with the DNA-binding domain of yeast
GAL4-(1-147) in pGAP (26). The 5xGAL4 Luc plasmid containing
five GAL4-binding sites upstream of the luciferase gene has been
described earlier (14). All the mutations and PCR products were
verified by dideoxy sequencing.
Transactivation Analyses--
RK13 cells grown in 6-well plates
were transfected in triplicate using the PEI Exgen 500 procedure
(Euromedex, France) with a total of 300 ng of DNA, including 50 ng of
reporter plasmid, 50 ng of pSV expression vectors and, when mentioned,
150 ng of PKA expression vector. Luciferase activity was determined
24-48 h after transfection and normalized to transfection efficiency by assaying for
-galactosidase activity expressed from 50 ng of
co-transfected Rous sarcoma virus-
-galactosidase plasmid. Typically,
the results are given as a mean ± S.E. of three independent experiments. HeLa cells were transfected using the same procedure except that 100 ng of pEFIN3 expression plasmid
(Euroscreen, Belgium) was used with a total of 350 ng of DNA. COS-7
cells were transfected using the same procedure with a total of 1 µg
of DNA including 150 ng of reporter plasmid, 300 ng of pSV expression
vectors and, when mentioned, 150 ng of a pSV-PKA expression vector.
Labeling of Transfected Cells and Immunoprecipitation--
The
cells were allowed to grow for 40 h before the labeling
experiments were performed. Transiently transfected cells were placed
into Met/Cys-free or phosphate-free Dulbecco's modified Eagle's
medium for 2 h. 100 µCi of [35S]Met/Cys per ml or
1 mCi of [32P]orthophosphate per ml were added to the
medium and left for 3 h. At the end of the labeling period the
cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline and lysed in an
ice-cold radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer containing 1 mM phenylmethylsulfoxyl fluoride, 1% (v/v) aprotinin, 2 mM Na3VO4, 40 mM
-glycerophosphate, and 25 mM pyrophosphate. The cells
debris was centrifuged and the supernatant subjected to
immunoprecipitation using anti-ERM antibody (15, 17) and protein
A-Sepharose CL-4B (Amersham Bioscience, Inc.) overnight at 4 °C.
After washing and elution, a second immunoprecipitation step was
performed with the anti-hemagglutinin antibody as described previously
(17). The immunocomplexes were then eluted in Laemmli sample buffer and
analyzed by SDS-PAGE and autoradiographed.
Protein Expression--
GST-ERM fusion proteins were expressed
in bacteria and purified, essentially as described (17), using
glutathione-Sepharose beads (Amersham Bioscience, Inc.). The
concentrations of GST fusion proteins were estimated by SDS-PAGE
analysis. In vitro transcription-translation reactions were
performed using the TNT-coupled reticulocyte lysate system (Promega)
with 1 µg of DNA template and [35S]methionine. One µl
of the reaction products was separated by electrophoresis followed by autoradiography.
In Vitro Phosphorylation and Dephosphorylation--
The in
vitro phosphorylation by PKA was performed for 1 h at
30 °C using the catalytic subunit of PKA from a bovine heart (Sigma)
in a reaction buffer containing 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl, 12 mM MgCl2, and 1 mM dithiothreitol in the presence of GST-ERM fusion
proteins or the products of in vitro translation reactions.
Assays were carried out in the presence of either non-radiolabeled ATP
(EMSA) or [
32P]ATP. The specific inhibition of the
PKA activity was performed by adding 1 µg of the peptide inhibitor
PKI (Sigma) to the reaction buffer. The dephosphorylation of in
vitro translated ERM with bacterial alkaline phosphatase was
carried out in 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 12 mM
MgCl2, 100 mM NaCl for 1 h at
30 °C.
Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay (EMSA)--
The effect of
phosphorylation and dephosphorylation on DNA binding by ERM protein was
tested by first treating the ERM proteins as described above. A portion
of the reaction was mixed with 1 ng of the 32P-labeled E74
probe (sense strand: 5'-GAGCTGAATAACCGGAAGTAACTCAT-3') or the
32P-labeled Coll1 probe (sense strand:
5'-CTAATCAAGAGGATGTTATAAAGC-3') in the presence of 25 mM
Hepes, pH 7.9, 50 mM KCl, 5 mM
MgCl2, 0.5 mM EDTA, 10% glycerol, 1 mM dithiothreitol, and 1 µg of poly(dI-dC). The mixture
was incubated for 1 h at room temperature and loaded onto a 6%
polyacrylamide gel. The gel was run at 4 °C in a 0.5 × Tris
borate EDTA buffer at 180 V. EMSA were also performed using nuclear
extracts made by standard procedures (27). The specificity of the
DNA-protein interaction was established by supershift assays using a
goat polyclonal antibody generated against the carboxyl-terminal 20 amino acids of human ERM (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA).
Western Blot Analysis--
COS-7 cells were lysed in SDS sample
buffer and total cell lysates were subjected to SDS-PAGE. Proteins were
transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Millipore), and the
blots were probed with anti-ERM antibodies and horseradish
peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies. Immune complexes were
visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence.
 |
RESULTS |
Activation of the PEA3 Group Members by PKA--
Although human
ERM and ETV1 are targeted by the PKA signaling pathway (15, 24), no
information is available concerning the transactivation of mammalian
PEA3 through PKA activation. We therefore began by comparing the effect
of the PKA pathway on the transactivation capacities of human ERM,
human ETV1, and mouse PEA3 in transient transfection experiments. Based
on previous experiments showing that the E74 reporter plasmid is not
activated by PKA in RK13 cells (15, 24), we used this system to compare the activation of the PEA3 group members by the kinase. In the absence
of a PKA expression vector none of the three proteins was found to
stimulate the transactivation of the E74 reporter plasmid (Fig.
1). In contrast, the expression of these
transcription factors led to a 30-70% transcription repression when
compared with the basal level. The co-transfection of a PKA expression vector did not increase the basal transactivation on the E74 reporter. However, as previously reported, the expression of PKA significantly increased transactivation when ETV1 or ERM were coexpressed. Concerning PEA3, the coexpression of PKA only abolished the repression on the
reporter since no significant increase in transactivation was observed
as compared with the basal level. These data clearly show that of the
three mammalian PEA3 group members, only ERM and ETV1 are targeted by
the PKA pathway on the E74 reporter.

View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
The induction of PEA3 group member
transactivation by PKA. RK13 cells were transfected with 50 ng of
expression vector (pSV control, pSV-ERM, pSV-ETV1, or pSV-PEA3), 50 ng
of Rous sarcoma virus- -galactosidase normalization vector, and 50 ng
of the reporter plasmid 3xE74-tk80-Luc in either the absence or the
presence of 150 ng of PKA plasmid. The data are presented as fold
activation with respect to the pSV control plasmid in the absence of
exogenous kinase.
|
|
Mapping of the Major ERM Phosphorylation Sites--
As previously
described (15), ERM is phosphorylated in vitro by purified
PKA. The examination of the ERM amino acid sequence for phosphorylation
consensus sites by known kinases revealed a single consensus PKA
phosphorylation site (RRGS367) in a region located at the
beginning of the DNA-binding ETS domain. Furthermore, the amino acid
sequence of the region including this site is well conserved among the
PEA3 group members of different species. Interestingly, only mouse and
human PEA3 contain an alanine substitution at the putative serine
phosphoacceptor site (RRGA, Fig.
2A). Since PKA is also able to
putatively phosphorylate other sites present in the protein
(RXXS or RXS (28)), we first determined the
regions of ERM that are phosphorylated in vitro by this
kinase. We thus expressed human ERM (aa 12-510) and mutants lacking
portions of the NH2 or COOH termini as GST fusion proteins
in Escherichia coli (Fig.
3A). Partially purified
proteins were then tested for their ability to serve as substrates for
purified PKA (Fig. 3B).

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Potential PKA phosphorylation sites in the
PEA3 group of Ets proteins. The putative phosphorylation sites are
shown in bold. Amino acid sequences are shown for human
(h), mouse (m), and chicken (ck)
proteins. The numbers indicate the amino acid in the human
proteins.
|
|

View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
ERM is phosphorylated in vitro
by PKA in different regions. A, a schematic
representation of the GST fusion proteins used in B and
C. B, an electrophoresis analysis of partially
purified GST fusion proteins: Coomassie Blue-stained gel. The molecular
masses are shown on the left. C, the
corresponding autoradiogram of equal amounts of protein after in
vitro phosphorylation by purified PKA.
|
|
The results indicate that phosphorylation occurred at the COOH-terminal
end of ERM since ERM-(354-510), which contains the consensus PKA
phosphorylation site, was an excellent substrate for the kinase (Fig.
3C). However, the proteins of the 363 and 298 residues
obtained by the COOH-terminal truncation of ERM were also efficiently
phosphorylated by the kinase, whereas further COOH-terminal truncation
of ERM to a protein with 226 residues led to a severe reduction in
phosphorylation. Accordingly, when ERM-(199-283) was used as a
substrate, there was efficient phosphorylation of the fusion protein,
and only the GST moiety was not phosphorylated (data not shown). Thus,
by deletion analysis, the PKA phosphorylation domains of ERM were
located both at the COOH-terminal region including the consensus PKA
phosphorylation site (Ser367), and at a central region
between residues 226 and 298. This latter domain contains two
contiguous potential sites for PKA phosphorylation
(Arg-Pro-Ser242-Tyr-His-Arg-Gln-Met-Ser248),
the first being specific to human and mouse ERM and the second shared
by ERM and ETV1 (Fig. 2B).
To specify the PKA phosphorylation sites, mutations within the mapped
regions were generated in the GST-ERM protein, i.e. GST-ERM
S367A, in which the serine indicated was mutated into an alanine,
GST-ERM
, in which the 226-250 region was deleted and GST-ERM
S367A, which combined the two mutations. When compared with GST-ERM, a
significant decrease in 32P incorporation was observed in
the GST-ERM S367A following incubation with PKA (Fig.
4A, compare lanes 1 and 2). Similarly, the GST-ERM
exhibited substantially
less total phosphorylation (lane 3). A combination of the
two mutations eliminated nearly all the ERM phosphorylation (lane
4). Since a Coomassie Blue stain of the same gel indicated that
approximately equal amounts of the four substrates were present in the
kinase reaction (Fig. 4B), these data show that the in
vitro PKA phosphorylation of ERM is mainly dependent on
Ser367 and Ser242 or/and
Ser248.

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
In vitro PKA assay with wild-type
and ERM mutants as substrates. A, ERM-(12-510) (ERM
wt), ERM S367A, ERM 226-250 (ERM ), and ERM 226-250 S367A
(ERM S367A) produced as GST fusion proteins were phosphorylated
in vitro by PKA and analyzed by SDS-PAGE and
autoradiography. The molecular masses are shown on the left.
B, Coomassie Blue staining of the same gel.
|
|
Mutation of Ser367 Phosphorylation Site Reduces ERM
Transcriptional Capacity by PKA--
To analyze the functional role of
phosphoacceptor sites in the activity of ERM protein we assessed
whether the mutated proteins were still transcriptionally active in the
presence of PKA. In the absence of the PKA expression vector, the
co-transfection of RK13 cells with the E74 reporter and plasmids
expressing either wild-type ERM or mutant ERMs (ERM S367A, ERM
, and
ERM
S367A) resulted in similar levels of luciferase activity, which
were slightly lower than the basal level (Fig.
5A). In contrast, when the
catalytic subunit of PKA was coexpressed, wild-type ERM gave a 7.4-fold
transcription activation in relation to ERM alone, which was very
similar to that seen with ERM
(7.7-fold activation). However, a
significantly lower level of transcription activation was observed when
Ser367 was mutated into alanine, i.e. in cells
expressing ERM S367A (3.2-fold activation) and ERM
S367A (2.3-fold
activation). Under the conditions used for the transcriptional assays
it was very difficult to determine the expression level of the
wild-type and mutant ERM proteins. Nevertheless, an immunoprecipitation
analysis of 35S-radiolabeled RK13 cells co-transfected with
higher concentrations of the ERM effectors demonstrated that the
Ser367 mutation did not affect the relative expression
level of the mutated ERM protein compared with the expression level of
the wild-type protein in either the absence or presence of coexpressed PKA (Fig. 5B). Taken together, these data indicate that
whereas mutating Ser367 to alanine results in a protein
with a reduced transcriptional enhancement capacity by PKA, the PKA
phosphorylation site located in the central part of the protein does
not affect ERM in response to the kinase. Furthermore,
immunoprecipitation assays were also performed on co-transfected cells
labeled with [32P]orthophosphate to investigate in intact
cells whether the expression of PKA alters ERM phosphorylation. As
shown in Fig. 5C, the incorporation of
[32P]orthophosphate into immunoprecipitated wild-type ERM
or ERM S367A was observed in cells in the absence of PKA. Concerning wild-type ERM this incorporation was, however, increased in cells co-transfected with the PKA catalytic subunit as compared with cells in
the absence of active kinase. In contrast, the phosphorylation of ERM
S367A was relatively unaffected in the cells expressing the kinase.
These results therefore strongly suggest that ERM is the subject of PKA
phosphorylation in intact cells and that the activation of ERM
transcriptional activity in the presence of PKA is associated with the
phosphorylation of Ser367.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
The induction of the transactivation of ERM
and its mutants through the PKA pathway. A, RK13 cells
were transfected as described in the legend to Fig. 1 with 50 ng of the
expression vector, pSV (control), wild-type ERM (ERM
wt), or the ERM mutant S367A (ERM S/A), 226-250
(ERM ) or 226-250 S367A (ERM
S/A) inserted into pSV with (+) or without ( ) 150 ng of
PKA plasmid. The data are presented as a fold activation with respect
to the pSV control plasmid in the absence of PKA. B and
C, RK13 cells were transfected as described in A
except for the presence of 100 ng of the pSV expression vector. After 2 days, the cells were metabolically labeled with
[35S]Met/Cys (B) or
[32P]orthophosphate (C), and cell extracts
were immunoprecipitated as described under "Experimental
Procedures." The location of ERM is indicated by the
arrow.
|
|
The PKA-dependent activation of ERM was also tested on
another Ets-responsive reporter construct, the human collagenase 1 (Coll1 (20)). Neither wild-type ERM nor ERM S367A was able to activate
the promoter in RK13 cells and coexpression of PKA resulted in
induction of promoter activity by wild-type ERM (about 10-fold) whereas
ERM S367A was less efficient in activating the promoter under these
conditions (about 5-fold, Fig. 6). Thus,
while Ets proteins are described as weak activators of transcription,
ERM was unable to activate the E74 and Coll1 promoters in the absence of PKA in RK13 cells. However, since the transcriptional activity of
ERM has been reported to behave differently depending of the cell type,
we consequently examined the transcriptional activation of ERM on the
E74 and Coll1 promoters in another cell line, i.e. HeLa
cells. In contrast to the results obtained in RK13 cells, expression of
wild-type ERM induced an increase in the activity of the promoters
used. While the luciferase activity was slightly above background level
for the E74 promoter (about 2-fold activation), activation of the Coll1
promoter was significantly higher (about 7-fold, Fig. 6). This
activation, absent in RK13 cells, was not linked to the endogenous
level of PKA in HeLa cells since the induction effect of exogenous ERM
was unaffected when the transfected cells were treated with the PKA
inhibitor H89 (data not shown). Accordingly, similar
ERM-dependent transactivation was obtained with wild-type
and S367A-mutated molecules. When PKA was expressed, transcription in
the absence of exogenous ERM was not significantly modified indicating
that endogenous Ets proteins do not affect the activity of the
promoters in the presence of the kinase. However, PKA expression led to
a marked transactivation increase by the wild-type ERM (about 15- and
12.5-fold activation on the E74 and Coll1 reporters, respectively) and
the magnitude of this activation was lower for the ERM S367A mutant
protein (about 4- and 5.5-fold activation on the E74 and Coll1
reporters, respectively). These observations are therefore consistent
with a PKA-dependent phosphorylation effect on ERM
transcriptional activity in two different reporter systems, and argue
that the ERM residue Ser367 is a PKA target in cells.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Comparison of the effect of PKA on the
transactivation of E74 and collagenase 1 promoters by wild-type and
mutant ERM in RK13 and HeLa cells. Expression plasmids for ERM wt
or ERM S367A (ERM S/A) were co-transfected in RK13 cells
with the E74 or the 157/+63 collagenase 1 (Coll1) reporter plasmids
in both the absence ( ) or presence of the PKA expression plasmid as
described in the legend to Fig. 5. Transient co-transfections of HeLa
cells were performed as described above with the pEFIN3-ERM
or pEFIN3-ERM S367A expression vectors.
|
|
PKA Does Not Directly Affect the ERM Transactivation
Domains--
ERM was shown to contain two transactivation domains: the
NH2-terminal part of the protein including the acidic
domain (amino acids 1-72), and the last 61 residues of the protein
(14). We had previously reported that the deletion of the COOH-terminal transactivation domain did not affect the PKA-dependent
activation of ERM. In contrast, the deletion of the
NH2-terminal transactivation domain nearly eliminated the
transcriptional activation of the protein in the presence of PKA (15).
We therefore investigated whether the ERM NH2-terminal
transactivation domain was capable of responding to PKA when fused to a
heterologous DNA-binding domain, i.e. that of the yeast
protein GAL4. We consequently fused full-size ERM and various
Ct-truncated mutants to the GAL4 DNA-binding domain and tested the
transcriptional activity in the context of a luciferase reporter
construct driven by GAL4-binding sites. A marked increase in basal
transcription in the RK13 cells was observed with the GAL4-(1-72) and
GAL4-(1-122) constructs. However, the expression of PKA exhibited no
significant effect on transactivation (Fig.
7A). This agrees with the fact
that no PKA phosphorylation site has been identified in the
NH2-terminal region. As reported before, a dramatic
reduction of activation was observed from GAL4-(1-181) to
GAL4-(1-370), a phenomenon probably because of the presence of a
negative regulatory domain in the region from residues 166 to 326 (11).
Again, the coexpression of PKA did not affect the activation potential
of these fusion proteins even in the case of GAL4-(1-370), which
contains the Ser367 phosphorylation site. Finally,
GAL4-(1-510), which is transcriptionally inactive, was also
unresponsive to PKA (Fig. 7A). However, when this fusion
protein of the GAL4 DNA-binding domain and full-length ERM was assayed
with the Coll1 reporter, it was active and a PKA-mediated activation
was observed. Furthermore, mutation of Ser367 into Ala in
the fusion protein resulted in a large decrease in transcription
activity only when PKA was expressed in the transfected cells (Fig.
7B). It thus seems likely that the ERM
NH2-terminal transactivation domain is not directly
targeted by PKA, and that the kinase is unable to activate ERM in the
context of GAL4 fusion proteins when tested with a GAL4-binding
site-driven reporter.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
The transcriptional activity of GAL4-ERM
fusion proteins. A, the activation of the transcription
from a GAL4-binding site-driven luciferase reporter construct by
various GAL4-ERM fusions was measured in the absence as well as in the
presence of co-transfected PKA. The chimeras (50 ng) were
co-transfected in RK13 cells with 5xGAL4 Luc reporter plasmid (50 ng)
in both the presence and absence of PKA plasmid. B, the
activation of the transcription from a collagenase 1 reporter construct
by the GAL4-ERM and GAL4-ERM S/A fusion proteins was measured in the
absence as well as in the presence of co-transfected PKA. The chimeras
(100 ng) were co-transfected in HeLa cells with the Coll1 reporter
plasmid (50 ng) in both the presence and absence of the PKA
plasmid.
|
|
PKA Phosphorylation Affects the DNA Binding Activity of
ERM--
Because of the fact that the functional PKA phosphorylation
site of ERM is situated at the edge of the ETS domain, we wondered whether PKA phosphorylation alters the capacity of ERM to interact with
DNA. For this study we used gel mobility shift assays with the
full-length GST-ERM protein, which was first subjected to different
kinase reactions and then used for DNA-binding assays. As in the
absence of PKA (Fig. 8A,
lanes 1-2), in the presence of PKA but in the
absence of ATP (lane 3), ERM was able to interact with an
E74 oligonucleotide probe. However, the binding of ERM was nearly
eliminated (lane 4) upon the addition of ATP and PKA, and
addition of the PKA inhibitor PKI to the phosphorylation reaction eliminated the effect of PKA on the DNA binding activity of the wild-type ERM (lane 5). It must be noted that a remaining
DNA binding was observed for the PKA-phosphorylated ERM when a higher amount of protein was used (Fig. 8B). In the two remaining
ERM-DNA complexes detected, the faster migrating complex most probably corresponded to the remaining unphosphorylated ERM. On the other hand,
the slowly migrating complex was specifically observed after the PKA
phosphorylation, so indicating that phosphorylation may have induced a
conformational change in ERM.

View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
The effect of the in vitro
phosphorylation by PKA of ERM on DNA binding activity.
A, bacterially produced GST-ERM-(12-510) and
GST-ERM-(12-510) S367A were treated in the presence (+) or absence
( ) of purified PKA with or without ATP or the PKA inhibitor PKI, and
tested in gel mobility shift assays using an E74 double strand
oligonucleotide probe. B, GST-ERM-(12-510) was treated and
analyzed as in A except that the experiment was performed
with double the amount of proteins. C, bacterially produced
GST-ERM-(12-510) and GST-ERM-(12-510) S367A were treated in the
presence (+) or absence ( ) of purified PKA and tested in gel mobility
shift assays using a collagenase 1 double strand oligonucleotide probe.
D and E, full-size ERM and its S367A mutant were
produced in reticulocyte lysate, incubated in the presence (+) or
absence ( ) of PKA (D) or alkaline phosphatase
(E) and tested in gel mobility shift assays using an E74
probe.
|
|
These results thus strongly suggest that phosphorylation causes the
large decrease in DNA binding activity. However, it was not possible to
deduce from our in vitro analysis whether phosphorylation at
Ser367 was solely responsible for the change in DNA binding
activity since in vitro, PKA phosphorylates another site in
the central part of ERM. For this reason we examined whether
phosphorylation by PKA was able to alter the capacity of ERM S367A to
interact with DNA. As shown in Fig. 8A the incubation of
GST-ERM S367A with PKA and ATP did not impair the DNA binding activity
of the mutated protein as compared with the other corresponding
conditions used (compare lane 9 to lanes 6-8 and
10). In agreement with this observation, whereas
phosphorylation of GST-ERM
eliminated its DNA binding activity, the
DNA-binding capacity of GST-ERM
S367A remained unaffected by PKA
treatment (data not shown). These results indicate that the consensus
PKA-dependent phosphorylation site located at the beginning
of the DNA-binding domain plays a crucial role in modulating ERM DNA
binding activity on an E74 probe. Furthermore, as illustrated in Fig.
8C for a collagenase 1 probe, similar results were obtained
with other Ets-binding sites.
To ensure that the variation observed in DNA binding was not because of
the GST portion of the fusion proteins we also performed experiments
with ERM synthesized in rabbit reticulocyte lysate. As for the GST
fusion protein, preincubation with PKA and ATP nearly eliminated the
DNA binding activity of wild-type ERM (Fig. 8D, compare
lanes 1 and 3), while the binding of ERM S367A
was apparently unchanged (compare lanes 2 and 4).
It must, however, be noted that we always observed a lower degree of
DNA binding in the case of wild-type ERM when compared with mutated
ERM. This difference in DNA binding of the reticulocyte proteins was
not because of less wild-type ERM because the amounts of protein used were equalized through normalization to [35S]methionine
incorporation (data not shown). Since this difference was not detected
with bacterially produced proteins, this finding suggests that DNA
binding might be modulated by Ser367 phosphorylation in
reticulocytes. To test this hypothesis the two reticulocyte proteins
were treated with alkaline phosphatase prior to gel shift assays. As
illustrated in Fig. 8E, whereas dephosphorylation treatment
did not significantly alter binding by the serine to alanine mutant
(compare lanes 2 and 4), it enhanced the DNA
binding of the wild-type protein (compare lanes 1 and 3), which appeared similar to that of the mutant protein.
This observation strongly suggests that the S367A mutation does not interfere with DNA binding, and that the phosphorylation of
Ser367 by a protein kinase present in reticulocytes is
responsible for a slight inhibition of the DNA binding in
reticulocyte-translated wild-type ERM.
EMSAs were finally performed to determine whether PKA regulated binding
of ERM in transfected cells. Comparison was made using equal amounts of
nuclear extracts derived from COS-7 cells transfected with expression
vectors encoding either wild-type ERM or ERM S367A alone or together
with a PKA expression plasmid (Fig. 9).
In comparison to control cells (lane 1, Fig. 9A),
a band was detected in nuclear extracts of cells transfected with
wild-type ERM or ERM S367A alone (lanes 2 and 3)
and these complexes bound to the E74 probe were supershifted by the
addition of an ERM antibody (Fig. 9B). However, when PKA was
co-expressed in transfected cells, the binding of wild-type ERM was
significantly reduced (lane 5, Fig. 9, A and
B) whereas that of ERM S367A was unaffected (lane
6, Fig. 9, A and B). This result was not
because of less wild-type ERM in cells co-transfected with PKA since
immunoblot analysis revealed equivalent levels of protein expression
for wild-type ERM and ERM S367A in PKA-transfected cells (Fig.
9C). Taken together, all the results are consistent with the
notion that PKA-mediated phosphorylation of Ser367 acts to
negatively regulate the DNA binding activity of ERM.

View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
The effect of PKA overexpression on the DNA
binding activity of ERM in transfected cells. A, COS-7
cells were transfected with the indicated ERM expression vector or the
parental pSV expression vector in the absence or presence of an
expression vector encoding PKA. Nuclear extracts were then prepared and
included in EMSAs with a 32P-labeled E74 probe. The
arrow indicates the DNA-ERM complexes. B, the
labeled probe was incubated with the nuclear extracts described in
A in the presence of a specific ERM antibody. Supershifted
complexes are indicated by an arrow. C, Western
analysis of cellular proteins from COS-7 transfected as described in
A. The expression level of ERM was examined with a
polyclonal anti-ERM antibody.
|
|
DNA Binding Capacity of the PEA3 Group Members Phosphorylated by
PKA--
The above results indicate that Ser367
phosphorylation by PKA changes the DNA binding capacity of ERM. Since
the site for PKA phosphorylation identified in ERM was present at the
same location in human ETV1 but absent in human PEA3 (Fig.
2A), we evaluated the possible effects of PKA
phosphorylation on the DNA binding of these other two PEA3 group
members. To this end full-length ERM, ETV1, and PEA3 were synthesized
in rabbit reticulocyte lysate, treated with or without purified PKA and
subjected to gel shift assays. ETV1 and PEA3 bound to the E74 probe
after treatment without PKA (Fig.
10A, left-hand panel) as did
ERM. It must, however, be observed that PEA3 bound to DNA more avidly
than ERM or ETV1. This difference was not because of more PEA3, since
the experiment was performed with roughly equal amounts of the proteins
(Fig. 10B). Furthermore, a significant difference in DNA
binding was still observed after alkaline phosphatase treatment of the
three reticulocyte-translated proteins, so indicating that the lower binding capacity of ERM and ETV1 as compared with PEA3 cannot be
explained by the phosphorylation of these two proteins in reticulocytes (data not shown). After in vitro PKA treatment, similar
results were obtained for ERM and ETV1, i.e. phosphorylation
by the kinase eliminated the DNA binding. On the other hand, the DNA
binding of PEA3 following PKA treatment was similar to that of the
untreated protein (Fig. 10A, right-hand panel). It thus
appears that ERM and ETV1, both of which are transcriptionally
activated by PKA, show altered properties in DNA binding following
in vitro PKA phosphorylation whereas PEA3, which is not
significantly transcriptionally activated by PKA, is not affected in
its DNA binding after PKA treatment.

View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 10.
The effect of the in vitro
phosphorylation by PKA of PEA3 group members on DNA binding
activity. A, full-length ERM, ETV1, and PEA3 were
produced in reticulocyte lysate, incubated in the absence ( ) or
presence (+) of PKA and tested in mobility shift assays using an E74
probe. B, the electrophoretic analysis of radiolabeled
proteins used in A. Note that the in vitro
translated proteins give a two-band pattern because of internal
methionine initiation: the slowly migrating bands are the
hemagglutinin-tagged full-length proteins, while the faster migrating
bands represent non-tagged full-length proteins.
|
|
Effect of Mutation of Ser367 into Acidic Residues on
ERM Properties--
Since the phosphorylation of Ser367
influences the capacity of ERM DNA binding activity, we employed
site-directed mutagenesis to change this phosphoacceptor site into
either aspartic acid or glutamic acid, which may mimic a phosphorylated
serine. The mutated cDNAs encoding full-length ERM S367D and ERM
S367E were transcribed and translated in vitro, and the
mutant proteins were examined for DNA binding. In contrast to the
result obtained for ERM S367A (Fig.
11A, lane 2), we
found that the substitution of serine for glutamic acid converted ERM
from an efficient DNA-binding protein into a poor DNA binding one
(compare lanes 1 and 3). Similar data were
obtained with a mutated protein created by inserting aspartic acid in
place of serine (data not shown), and the variation observed in binding
between wild-type and mutant proteins was not because of differences in
protein amounts (Fig. 11B). When the proteins were submitted
to PKA phosphorylation before the gel shift assays, no significant
change in DNA binding was observed for the two mutated proteins ERM
S367A and ERM S367E, while the binding of wild-type ERM was nearly
eliminated (Fig. 11A). This confirms that mutating
Ser367 into non-phosphorylatable residues results in
mutated proteins unresponsive to PKA in terms of DNA-binding capacity
and clearly shows that inserting acidic residues in place of
Ser367 decreases ERM DNA binding, but not to the same
extent as after the PKA-dependent phosphorylation of the
wild-type protein.

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 11.
The effects of
Ser367 for glutamic acid substitution
on ERM properties. A, pSV plasmids encoding wild-type
ERM, ERM S367A, or ERM S367E were transcribed and translated in
vitro. The reticulocyte proteins were then incubated in the
presence or absence of PKA and used in gel retardation assays with an
E74 probe. B, the electrophoretic analysis of radiolabeled
proteins used in A. C, the expression plasmids
encoding wild-type ERM, ERM S367E, or ERM Y419P were co-transfected in
RK13 and HeLa cells with the reporter plasmid 3xE74-tk80-Luc with or
without a PKA expression plasmid as described in the legend to Fig.
6.
|
|
We also tested whether the substitution of serine for glutamic acid in
ERM led to changes in the transcriptional activation of the E74
reporter in RK13 and HeLa cells. In the absence of the PKA expression
vector, the expression of ERM S367E led to a weak activation of
transcription as compared with wild-type ERM (Fig. 11C).
Further activation was observed in cells co-transfected with the PKA
expression vector. However, the degree of activation in the presence of
PKA was lower than that obtained for wild-type ERM, but greater than
that observed for ERM S367A (compare Fig. 11C and Fig. 6).
Similar results were also obtained with ERM S367D (data not shown).
These results indicate that: 1) the substitution of serine for glutamic
or aspartic acid leads to an increase in transcriptional activity for
the mutated proteins in the absence of PKA, but is not sufficient to
mimic serine phosphorylation; and 2) the variations in ERM-mediated E74
activation by PKA are closely correlated with changes in DNA binding
activity. However, as illustrated in Fig. 11C, mutation of
Tyr419 to Pro in the ETS domain of ERM, which abolishes DNA
binding (14), generated a protein unable to activate transcription in the presence or the absence of PKA. This indicates that ERM binding is
a prerequisite for transcriptional activation by PKA.
 |
DISCUSSION |
In the present investigation, we confirm that ERM is targeted by
the PKA pathway, and we show that of the two other known mammalian
members of the PEA3 group of Ets-related transcription factors,
i.e. ETV1 and PEA3, only ETV1 is significantly activated transcriptionally by PKA. Our results indicate that Ser367
plays a crucial role in the transcriptional activation of ERM by PKA
inasmuch as its mutation into non-phosphorylatable alanine significantly reduces ERM-mediated transcription in the presence of the
kinase. This residue, which is in a favorable consensus sequence, is
phosphorylated by PKA in vitro as well as in vivo and, interestingly, the corresponding region in mouse ETV1 is also
highly phosphorylated by PKA in vitro (16). In fact, this region of the protein is well conserved in the three PEA3 group members. However, while the RRGS367 motif of this region is
conserved in ERM and ER81/ETV1, a substitution of serine for alanine is
found in mouse and human PEA3, thus strongly suggesting that the
presence of this site is necessary for the transcriptional activation
of PEA3 group members by PKA. In support of this conclusion there is
the recent observation that zebrafish PEA3, which contains this
consensus site along with the serine residue, is activated
transcriptionally in the presence of PKA (23).
We show here that the phosphorylation of ERM by PKA greatly decreases
the amount of protein bound to Ets-binding sites. This effect is due
specifically to the phosphorylation of Ser367 since no
change in DNA binding activity is observed after the phosphorylation of
ERM S367A. Since the phosphorylation site is located near the
DNA-binding domain, we envisaged that phosphorylation could interfere
with DNA binding by electrostatic repulsion, or by inhibiting contacts
between the protein and the DNA by steric hindrance. To examine these
possibilities, we replaced Ser367 with either aspartic or
glutamic acid in an attempt to mimic phosphorylation in the ERM
molecule. Both mutant proteins had the same DNA-binding capacity and
were insensitive to PKA action, so confirming the role of
Ser367 in the change of ERM DNA binding activity upon PKA
phosphorylation. However, both ERM mutants exhibited lower DNA binding
activity as compared with the wild-type non-phosphorylated protein, but the effect was not as pronounced as that of the phosphorylation of
Ser367 in the wild-type protein. This indicates that not
only phosphorylation can act by electrostatic repulsion and/or steric
hindrance, but also that other mechanisms may be key determinants.
Particularly, structural differences between phosphorylated and
non-phosphorylated ERM may be critical for DNA binding. Indeed, we have
shown that the phosphorylation of ERM by purified PKA alters the
mobility of the remaining ERM-DNA complexes, so suggesting that the
DNA-binding conformations before and after phosphorylation are
distinct. Furthermore, conformational rearrangements have been shown to
be related to the regulation of DNA binding in Ets proteins. A more
extensively studied example is Ets-1, whose DNA binding activity is
inhibited by a module consisting of two
-helices located
NH2-terminal to the ETS domain, and a single COOH-terminal
-helix. A conformational change involving the unfolding of one of
the NH2-terminal helices is associated with the relief of
this intramolecular inhibition (29, 30). This conformation is thought
to be stabilized through protein interactions with inhibitory regions
(29, 31). Furthermore, it has been shown that the phosphorylation of
Ets-1 in the NH2-terminal inhibitory region results in the
inhibition of Ets-1 binding to DNA (32-34), favoring a shift of the
conformational equilibrium toward a folded state (35). It has also been
proposed that the phosphorylation of Elk-1 induces a conformational
change in its structure, which affects its ability to bind DNA
(36-38).
While the ability of PKA-phosphorylated ERM to bind DNA in
vitro is decreased, PKA stimulates ERM-dependent
transcription in transient transfected cells. In fact, the ability of
ERM to bind DNA is correlated with its transactivation activity. First, ERM and ETV1 avidly bound the E74 probe, although the proteins did not
or modestly transactivate the E74 reporter, while an important decrease
in DNA binding for the PKA-phosphorylated proteins is associated with
PKA-mediated transactivation in transfected cells. In contrast, PEA3,
which also avidly binds the probe but is unresponsive to PKA in terms
of DNA binding, is not significantly transcriptionally activated in the
presence of PKA. Second, the mutation of Ser367 into
alanine eliminates the apparent reduction in DNA binding following PKA
phosphorylation and leads to a marked decrease of ERM transcriptional
activation in the presence of PKA. Finally, the mutation of
Ser367 into aspartic acid or glutamic acid leads to the
formation of an ERM protein with a moderate reduction in DNA binding
and which is transcriptionally more active than the wild-type protein.
Interestingly, this latter observation has been made on transfected
cells in the absence of PKA, thus indicating that the decrease in DNA
binding and the increase in transcriptional activity are intimately
related. However, the interaction of ERM with DNA is essential since a mutant version of ERM which does not bind DNA because of a single mutation in its ETS-domain (ERM Y419P (14)) is transcriptionally inert
in the absence or presence of PKA.
Although often described (25, 39), increased transcriptional activation
does not necessarily correlate with enhanced transcription factor
binding to a promoter. In a recent work (40) on the transcription factor B-Myb, it has been shown that mutation of a single
phosphorylation site enhanced binding to a Myb-binding sequence but
decreased B-Myb transactivation potential. Furthermore, there is
growing evidence that high affinity binding does not always lead to
transactivation. Thus, some NF-
B DNA-binding sites have been found
to be very poorly activated by NF-
B proteins (41) and high affinity
binding of GATA-1 to a reporter gene does not necessarily induce
transactivation (42). Concerning Ets proteins, it has recently been
described that some natural promoter sites do not correspond to high
consensus sites derived from in vitro studies of isolated
Ets proteins (43). Moreover it has been observed that the Ets protein
Erg activates the collagenase 1 promoter while any binding of the Erg
protein is detected to the promoter, whereas the protein binds to the stromelysin I promoter but does not activate this Ets-regulated gene
(44). A major factor that plays a role in Ets protein-DNA recognition
is cooperative protein-protein interactions between Ets proteins and
other factors that can alter the affinity of the Ets proteins for DNA
(2). Thus, considering the ability of transcriptional regulators to
adapt their structures to the particular DNA sequence that they
recognize (42, 45, 46), it is possible that an Ets protein can bind to
some Ets-binding sites without engaging protein-protein contacts or
appropriate interactions with protein partners. This would induce an
inability or a poor capacity to activate transcription. We therefore
propose that phosphorylation of the transcription factor may affect its activity by altering its ability to interact with DNA and other proteins. In this model, the events which lead to decreased ERM DNA-binding capacity would result in conformational changes of the ERM
molecule favoring its association with proteins involved in
transcription. As suggested above, it is likely that decreased DNA
binding of phosphorylated ERM is at least partially because of
structural change. Furthermore, it cannot be excluded that a change in
the DNA binding activity of phosphorylated ERM might lead to an altered
conformation of the ERM-DNA complex affecting the protein interaction
capacities of the bound protein. This would explain why the GAL4/ERM
fusion protein is unresponsive to PKA when assayed with the
GAL4-binding site-driven reporter while it is activated by the kinase
when tested on an Ets-binding site reporter. Thus, enhanced
protein-protein interactions could stabilize the interaction of the
protein with DNA to overcome the decrease in DNA binding of the
PKA-phosphorylated protein and favor the formation of a multiprotein
complex to activate transcription.
A comparison in transfected cells of the properties of
wild-type ERM with those of mutant versions carrying Ser367
for alanine substitutions has shown that this site is necessary for
mediating a full transcriptional response with respect to PKA. However,
mutating this site is insufficient to fully eliminate the effect
observed since residual activation is still detected in the mutated
proteins as compared with the wild-type protein in the absence of PKA.
This residual activation cannot be attributed to the phosphorylation of
the other PKA site identified in the central part of the protein since
mutant ERM carrying an Ser367 for alanine substitution and
the deletion of the second PKA-targeted region is still weakly
activated transcriptionally when the kinase is expressed. An
explanation would be that the residual transactivation effect is
mediated by a PKA-activated kinase. Indeed, PKA may activate the MAP
kinase ERK via a Ras-independent pathway (47), and ERK regulates
several downstream signaling events, including the function of the ERM
transcription factor (15). However, the inhibitor PD 98059, previously
shown to selectively inhibit the ERK1/ERK2 MAPK pathway (48), did not
reduce the PKA-induced ERM transcriptional activity (data not shown).
Another possibility is that PKA may activate protein partners acting in
concert with the PEA3 group members to activate transcription. This
would explain why PEA3 which does not contain the PKA site is weakly
activated by PKA. It must also be mentioned that the PKA-mediated
activation of the ERM S367A protein occurs similarly in both RK13 and
HeLa cells but that this effect is more pronounced on the Coll1
promoter as compared with the E74 one (about 50 and 25% of wild-type
ERM activation, respectively). An activation mediated indirectly
through other proteins might thus be promoter-dependent and
the activation level might reflect differences in the ability of ERM to
interact with these proteins depending of the binding site it
recognizes. Thus these observations suggest a model in which PKA
phosphorylation might not only increase the interaction of ERM with
protein partners but also activate these partners to obtain a full
transcriptional response.
At the present time, little is known about the protein partners of ERM.
We have shown that this protein is able to physically interact with
TBP, TAF II 40 and 60 (26) as well as the androgen receptor (20).
However, one interesting candidate is the important transcriptional
coactivator CBP/p300. Indeed, phosphorylation of transcription factors
including cyclic-AMP- and calcium-regulated nuclear factor (49), p53
(50), NF-
B (51), and SMAD (52) increases their interactions with
CBP/p300 and Ets proteins recruit this coactivator acting as a bridging
molecule between DNA-binding factors and basal transcription machinery,
so resulting in transcriptional activation (53-56). Of particular
interest is that ER81/ETV1, which is activated by PKA, interacts with
CBP/p300 to regulate gene transcription. Moreover the complex
ER81·p300 is able to recruit an unidentified kinase that can
phosphorylate ER81 on serine residues distinct from the
PKA-phosphorylation site described in this study and negatively
regulate ER81-dependent transcription (57). Thus it
is tempting to speculate that phosphorylation of ER81 by
different kinases might have opposite effects on the
recruitment of CBP/p300 to control ER81-dependent transcription.
In conclusion, we provide evidence that the Ets transcription factor
ERM and the closely related factor ETV1 are direct targets of PKA, and
that activation of PKA signaling is sufficient to activate them via an
unexpected mechanism, i.e. the decrease in DNA binding. To
our knowledge, this is the first example of PKA-dependent phosphorylation regulating the activity of a member of the Ets family.
In addition to regulation at an artificial ETS-binding site, E74 site,
the PKA-mediated activation of ERM occurs at another Ets-binding site
located in the collagenase 1 promoter, thus suggesting a potential
regulatory mechanism for ERM functions at different promoters via the
PKA-signaling pathway. Furthermore, it should be noted that, in
contrast to ERM and ER81/ETV1, PEA3/E1AF the third PEA3 group member is
not directly activated by PKA. Since the three PEA3 group members
display similar DNA binding specificities (23) and have been reported
to be co-expressed (17, 58, 59), it is conceivable that specific
promoters may therefore be targeted by different PEA3 group members
depending on the kinases that phosphorylate them.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We are grateful to Isabelle Damour,
Anne-Sophie Debrie, Ludovic Huot, and Laurent Pouilly for their
excellent technical assistance.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by the "Center National de
la Recherche Scientifique" (France), the "Institut Pasteur de
Lille," the "Association pour la Recherche contre le Cancer"
(France), and "Communauté Française" (Belgium) Grant
ARC 98/03-224.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
Holder of a Medical Research Council fellowship.
To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Tel.:
33-320-87-11-26; Fax: 33-320-87-10-19; E-mail:
ylaunoit@ulb.ac.be.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, October 26, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M107139200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
PKA, protein
kinase A;
MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinse;
ERK, extracellular
regulated kinase;
GST, glutathione S-transferase;
EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Treisman, R.
(1996)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
8,
205-215
|
| 2.
|
Sharrocks, A. D.,
Brown, A. L.,
Ling, Y.,
and Yates, P. R.
(1997)
Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol.
29,
1371-1387
|
| 3.
|
Dittmer, J.,
and Nordheim, A.
(1998)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1377,
F1-F11
|
| 4.
|
Karim, F. D.,
Urness, L. D.,
Thummel, C. S.,
Klemsz, M. J.,
McKercher, S. R.,
Celada, A.,
Van Beveren, C.,
Maki, R. A.,
Gunther, C. V.,
Nye, J. A.,
and Graves, B. J.
(1990)
Genes Dev.
4,
1451-1453
|
| 5.
|
Xin, J. H.,
Cowie, A.,
Lachance, P.,
and Hassell, J. A.
(1992)
Genes Dev.
6,
481-496
|
| 6.
|
Higashino, F.,
Yoshida, K.,
Kamio, K.,
and Fujinaga, K.
(1993)
Nucleic Acids Res.
21,
547-553
|
| 7.
|
Brown, T. A.,
and McKnight, S. L.
(1992)
Genes Dev.
6,
2502-2512
|
| 8.
|
Jeon, I. S.,
Davis, J. N.,
Braun, B. S.,
Sublett, J. E.,
Roussel, M. F.,
Denny, C. T.,
and Shapiro, D. N.
(1995)
Oncogene
10,
1229-1234
|
| 9.
|
Monté, D.,
Coutte, L.,
Baert, J.-L.,
Angeli, I.,
Stéhelin, D.,
and de Launoit, Y.
(1995)
Oncogene
11,
771-780
|
| 10.
|
Monté, D.,
Baert, J.-L.,
Defossez, P.-A.,
de Launoit, Y.,
and Stéhelin, D.
(1994)
Oncogene
9,
1397-1406
|
| 11.
|
Nakae, K.,
Nakajima, K.,
Inazawa, J.,
Kitaoka, T.,
and Hirano, T.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
23795-23800
|
| 12.
|
Chotteau-Lelièvre, A.,
Desbiens, X.,
Pelczar, H.,
Defossez, P.-A.,
and De Launoit, Y.
(1997)
Oncogene
15,
937-952
|
| 13.
|
de Launoit, Y.,
Baert, J.-L.,
Chotteau, A.,
Monté, D.,
Defossez, P.-A.,
Coutte, L.,
Pelczar, H.,
and Leenders, F.
(1997)
Biochem. Mol. Med.
61,
127-135
|
| 14.
|
Laget, M.-P.,
Defossez, P.-A.,
Albagli, O.,
Baert, J.-L.,
Dewitte, F.,
Stéhelin, D.,
and de Launoit, Y.
(1996)
Oncogene
12,
1325-1336
|
| 15.
|
Janknecht, R.,
Monté, D.,
Baert, J.-L.,
and de Launoit, Y.
(1996)
Oncogene
13,
1745-1754
|
| 16.
|
Janknecht, R.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
1551-1556
|
| 17.
|
Baert, J.-L.,
Monte, D.,
Musgrove, E. A.,
Albagli, O.,
Sutherland, R. L.,
and de Launoit, Y.
(1997)
Int. J. Cancer
70,
590-597
|
| 18.
|
Trimble, M. S.,
Xin, J. H.,
Guy, C. T.,
Muller, W. J.,
and Hassell, J. A.
(1993)
Oncogene
8,
3037-3042
|
| 19.
|
Higashino, F.,
Yoshida, K.,
Noumi, T.,
Seiki, M.,
and Fujinaga, K.
(1995)
Oncogene
10,
1461-1463
|
| 20.
|
Schneikert, J.,
Peterziel, H.,
Defossez, P.-A.,
Klocker, H.,
de Launoit, Y.,
and Cato, A. C. B.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
23907-23913
|
| 21.
|
Ouyang, W.,
Jacobson, N. G.,
Bhattacharya, D.,
Gorham, J. D.,
Fenoglio, D.,
Sha, W. C.,
Murphy, T. L.,
and Murphy, K. M.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
3888-3893
|
| 22.
|
O'Hagan, R. C.,
Tozer, R. G.,
Symons, M.,
McCormick, F.,
and Hassell, J. A.
(1996)
Oncogene
13,
1323-1333
|
| 23.
|
Brown, L. A.,
Amores, A.,
Schilling, T. F.,
Jowett, T.,
Baert, J.-L.,
Ingham, P. W.,
de Launoit, Y.,
and Sharrocks, A. D.
(1998)
Oncogene
17,
93-104
|
| 24.
|
Coutte, L.,
Monté, D.,
Imai, K.,
Pouilly, L.,
Dewitte, F.,
Vidaud, M.,
Adamski, J.,
Baert, J.-L.,
and de Launoit, Y.
(1999)
Oncogene
18,
6278-6286
|
| 25.
|
Viollet, B.,
Kahn, A.,
and Raymondjean, M.
(1997)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17,
4208-4219
|
| 26.
|
Defossez, P.-A.,
Baert, J.-L.,
Monnot, M.,
and de Launoit, Y.
(1997)
Nucleic Acids Res.
25,
4455-4463
|
| 27.
|
Andrews, N. C.,
and Faller, D. V.
(1991)
Nucleic Acids Res.
19,
2499
|
| 28.
|
Kennelly, P. J.,
and Krebs, E. G.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
15555-15558
|
| 29.
|
Jonsen, M.,
Petersen, J., Xu, Q.,
and Graves, B.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
2065-2073
|
| 30.
|
Petersen, J. M.,
Skalicky, J. J.,
Donaldson, L. W.,
Mcintosh, L. P.,
Alber, T.,
and Graves, B. J.
(1995)
Science
269,
1866-1869
|
| 31.
|
Kim, W. Y.,
Sieweke, M.,
Ogawa, E.,
Wee, H. J.,
Englmeier, U.,
Graf, T.,
and Ito, Y.
(1999)
EMBO J.
18,
1609-1620
|
| 32.
|
Fisher, R. J.,
Fivash, M.,
Casas-Finet, J.,
Erickson, J. W.,
Kondoh, A.,
Bladen, S. V.,
Fisher, C.,
Watson, D. K.,
and Papas, T.
(1994)
Protein Sci.
3,
257-266
|
| 33.
|
Hodge, D. R.,
Robinson, L.,
Watson, D.,
Lautenberger, J.,
Zhang, X. K.,
Venanzoni, M.,
and Seth, A.
(1996)
Oncogene
12,
11-18
|
| 34.
|
Rabault, B.,
and Ghysdael, J.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
28143-28151
|
| 35.
|
Cowley, D. O.,
and Graves, B. J.
(2000)
Genes Dev.
14,
366-376
|
| 36.
|
Janknecht, R.,
Zinck, R.,
Ernst, W. H.,
and Nordheim, A.
(1994)
Oncogene
9,
1273-1278
|
| 37.
|
Sharrocks, A. D.
(1995)
FEBS Lett.
368,
77-80
|
| 38.
|
Yang, S. H.,
Shore, P.,
Willingham, N.,
Lakey, J. H.,
and Sharrocks, A. D.
(1999)
EMBO J.
18,
5666-5674 |