![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 2, 1066-1075, January 11, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Fachbereich Medizinische Biochemie und Molekularbiologie, Fachrichtung Theoretische Medizin, Universität des Saarlandes, D-66421 Homburg, Germany
Received for publication, August 7, 2001, and in revised form, October 19, 2001
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
p68 and p72 are two highly related DEAD box
proteins with similar biochemical activities in the nucleus of
vertebrate cells; it is unknown whether they have redundant or
differential in vivo functions. We report on a third member
of this subfamily that is alternatively expressed from p72 mRNA. A
detailed analysis of HeLa p72 mRNA was performed. It has an overall
length of more than 5 kb and contains a 0.75-kb 5'-untranslated region
and a 3'-untranslated region of 2.5 kb. Its open reading frame extends to nucleotide Control of transcription is generally considered the main
regulation level of mammalian gene expression, although mRNA
maturation and modulation of mRNA stability or translational
efficiency also contribute to expression control (1). Generation of
protein variants by alternative pre-mRNA splicing or alternative
initiation of mRNA translation enlarges the coding capacity and may
explain the relatively low number of genes actually found in the human genome. According to recent estimations, on average one gene encodes three proteins (2).
Although the 5'-untranslated leader sequences
(UTRs)1 of most vertebrate
mRNAs are less than 100 nucleotides (nt) long (3), those of tightly
controlled genes usually are longer and are GC-rich. Such
structure-prone 5'-UTRs can modulate translation by the presence of
upstream (up) open reading frames (ORFs) in addition to the main ORF,
by formation of secondary structures, and/or by RNA-protein interactions (4). Indeed, they appear particularly characteristic of
mRNAs encoding growth factors, receptor proteins, transcription factors, signal transduction components, proto-oncogenes, tumor suppressor proteins, and even proteins that mostly are constitutively expressed at a low level ("housekeeping" proteins).
DEAD/DEXH box proteins belonging to superfamily II of RNA
helicases play a universal role in RNA metabolism of pro- and
eukaryotes. Not surprisingly, they are involved in gene expression
control, for instance during germ cell and embryonic development or in cell proliferation and differentiation (5). This in turn requires tight
control of at least some DEAD/DEXH box proteins like CsdA of
Escherichia coli, which is regulated by an 11-nt "cold
box" sequence in its 5'-UTR (6), or the Saccharomyces
cerevisiae Dbp2, the gene of which contains an unusually large
intron that is part of a post-transcriptional autoregulatory feedback
loop (7). A similarly complex transcription regulation has been shown
for nuclear p68 (8), a mammalian homologue of Dbp2. In addition, the
5'-UTR of p68 mRNA is long (170 nt) and GC-rich (57.6% as compared
with a genome-wide average of 41%; see Ref. 9). This suggests a
regulatory mechanism of p68 expression on mRNA level and thus an
important cellular function of the protein. In fact, p68 is
differentially expressed during embryogenesis, and its expression is
induced by serum (10, 11).
p72, another human DEAD box protein (12), is highly homologous to p68.
It is, like p68, transcribed in a tissue-specific manner and seems to
be involved in neuronal differentiation (13). p68 and p72 share 78.6%
homology (identical amino acids plus conservative substitutions). The
two proteins (plus possibly not yet identified ones) apparently form a
subfamily of DEAD box proteins. p68 and p72 are
ATP-dependent RNA helicases with similar biochemical
properties, and both proteins show RNA annealing activity (14).
In vitro, p68 and p72 are capable of catalyzing RNA
secondary structure rearrangements in an ATP-dependent
manner via the formation of RNA branch migration structures (14). Both
proteins may therefore participate in structural reorganization of
ribonucleoprotein assemblies in vivo. In fact, p68 has been
found in spliceosomes (15) and in a protein-RNA complex of
5-methylcytosine-DNA glycosylase (16). A recently reported (17)
interaction with protein kinase A anchoring protein AKAP95 supports a
role of p68 in hormonally responsive transcription complexes, and
indeed, p68 and p72 act as transcriptional co-activators of estrogen
receptor Recently, several transcription factors and other regulatory proteins
have attracted great interest due to the existence of alternatively
transcribed/translated species, and functional importance is attributed
to this feature. Intriguingly, two different p72-specific RNAs (5.3 and
9.3 kb) occur in vertebrate cells that are much longer than the p72
coding sequence (cds; 1953 nt, GenBankTM accession number
NM_006386; see Ref. 12). It is unknown as yet which of those RNAs
represents the p72 mRNA. In this work, p72 mRNA including its
5'- and 3'-UTRs has been analyzed in detail. We report that in
vitro and in vivo translation of the complete ORF of
the p72 mRNA leads to an alternative polypeptide, p82, in addition
to p72. The specific biochemical activities of p82 isolated from HeLa
cells are characterized and compared with those of p72 and p68.
Reagents and Routine Procedures--
Restriction endonucleases
were purchased from Roche Molecular Biochemicals or MBI Fermentas, and
plasmids pGEM7Zf( Oligonucleotides, Probes, and Antibodies--
Oligonucleotides
used are listed in Table I. For HeLa
For preparation of p82-specific antibodies ( Genomic Sequence Analysis and Predictions--
DNA and protein
sequence homology searches were done using the BLAST and FASTA service
of the NCBI (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) and the ExPASY Molecular Biology
server (www.expasy.ch/). Gene sequence analysis was carried out using
the Baylor College of Medicine Search Launcher
(searchlauncher.bcm.tmc.edu/) and splice site prediction by Neural
Network (www.fruit fly.org/se). RNA secondary structure predictions
were performed with mfold version 3.1 (26) that gives credible results
for RNAs up to 1 kb (27).
RNA Isolation from HeLa Cells, Northern Blotting, Reverse
Transcription, and RT-PCR--
Poly(A)+ RNA was isolated
from 3.6 × 107 HeLa cells using the Oligotex Direct
mRNA kit (Qiagen) according to supplier's recommendations except
that RNA was eluted with 200 µl of preheated (85 °C) elution buffer. Northern blotting of HeLa poly(A)+ RNA was carried
out using dig-labeled probes (Digoxigenin System, Roche Molecular
Biochemicals) corresponding to p72 gene exon 13-specific antisense RNA
and to p72 gene intron 11-specific antisense RNA, respectively, and
detected with CSPD (Roche Molecular Biochemicals). For HeLa
cDNA synthesis, 1 µg of poly(A)+ RNA and 10 pmol of
Marathon cDNA synthesis primer (CLONTECH) were
heated at 70 °C for 2 min and immediately chilled on ice. Then,
first and second strand DNA synthesis was performed exactly as
described by the Marathon cDNA amplification protocol
(CLONTECH). RT-PCRs with DNase-treated HeLa
poly(A)+ RNA as the template were performed according to a
two-step protocol using M-MLV reverse transcriptase, RNase H minus
(Promega), 1 µg of RNA, 1 µg of the respective 3'-oligonucleotide
primer (Table I) at 42 °C for 1 h. Taq (Amersham
Biosciences) or Pfu DNA polymerase (Promega) were used in
the subsequent PCR. In respective negative controls, the
poly(A)+ RNA was directly used in PCRs and reconfirmed the
absence of traces of genomic DNA. Sequences of the RT-PCR products were
analyzed by DNA sequencing.
In Vitro Transcription and Translation--
A p72 cDNA
(position Transient Expression in COS Cells--
Stop codons (TGA) were
removed from the cDNA of clones 2423 and 1953, respectively, and an
oligonucleotide coding for the 10C4 epitope
(5'-GCTCAAAAGTATGTTGGTGCAAAGCCC-3') was introduced by PCR cloning at
the 3' ends of their coding sequences with primers i11 (containing an
NcoI site) and 10C472 (containing an XhoI site; Table I). The cDNAs obtained were then recloned into pCMV, a vector
suitable for transient expression in COS cells, yielding pCMVp82 and
pCMVp72, respectively. DNA constructs were verified by nucleotide
sequencing. Particular attention was paid to avoid any vector-based ATG
in front of the p72 5'-ORF. COS cell transfection was done by the
DEAE-dextran method using 10 µg of pCMVp82 and pCMVp72, respectively.
SDS-PAGE, Autoradiography, and Western Blotting--
Standard
SDS-PAGE gels were prepared and run according to Ref. 28. For
autoradiography, gels containing 35S-labeled protein
samples were incubated in enhancer solution (2 M salicylic
acid, pH 8) for 30 min, dried, and exposed at Immunoprecipitation--
3.6 × 109 HeLa cells
were harvested by centrifugation at 300 × g for 5 min,
resuspended in 1 ml of lysis buffer (10 mM MES, pH 6.2, 10 mM NaCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 5 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10% glycerol, 1% Nonidet P-40, supplemented with Complete Protease Inhibitor Mixture (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) according to manufacturer's recommendations), and recentrifuged at 3000 × g for 5 min. Nuclei were
extracted at pH 10.5 as described previously (29) and mixed with
protein A-Sepharose-coupled antibodies. After washing with NET buffer (50 mM Tris·Cl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 0.05% Nonidet P-40), bound proteins were eluted
with SDS-PAGE loading buffer and directly analyzed by SDS-PAGE and
Western blotting.
Metabolic 33P Labeling of HeLa Cells--
HeLa cells
grown to 80% confluency were incubated in phosphate-free medium
supplemented with 250-500 µCi of [33P]orthophosphate
for 16 h. A nuclear extract of the cells was prepared and
subjected to immunoprecipitation with the indicated antibodies as
described. Immunoprecipitation of p53 was carried out as a positive
control with antibody PAb421 (30). Immunoprecipitates were
subsequently analyzed by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography.
Purification of p82 from HeLa Cells--
A nuclear extract was
subjected to hydroxyapatite chromatography and ammonium sulfate
precipitations according to Ref. 29. Briefly, the buffered (pH 8.3)
nuclear extract was applied to a hydroxyapatite column (10 × 30 mm) and washed with 50 mM potassium phosphate, pH 8.0, containing 10 mM ATPase Assays--
ATP hydrolysis was assayed according to Ref.
31. Standard 50-µl assays contained varying amounts of p82 in 35 mM HEPES, pH 7.8, 7.5 mM MgCl2, 2 mM dithiothreitol, 1% glycerol, 0.1 mg/ml bovine serum
albumin, 4 µg of poly(C) or poly(A)+ RNA, 0.1 mM ATP, and 0.5 µCi of [ RNA Binding Assays--
Binding of p82 to RNA that had been
32P-labeled by in vitro transcription of
HaeIII-digested pGEM-CAT was assayed by nitrocellulose filter retention of the respective protein-RNA complex as described previously (14).
RNA Helicase Assays--
The 17-bp partial dsRNA substrate, the
3'-substrate (25-bp ds region), and the 5'-substrate (28-bp ds region)
were constructed exactly as described (32). One strand of the 44-bp
substrate was produced by run-off transcription of
NheI-linearized plasmid pGEM3 by T7 RNA polymerase. The
other strand was transcribed by SP6 RNA polymerase from
EcoRI-linearized pGEM-MO1/2 (32). Hybridization of both
transcripts yielded the 44-bp substrate. RNA helicase activity assays
of p82 were performed exactly as described (14).
Structure of the p72 mRNA--
The mRNA of p72 was
analyzed by RT-PCR and by Northern blotting (Fig.
1 and Table
I). When a p72 cDNA was used as a
probe in these experiments, a prominent p72-specific RNA species of 5.3 kb was detected. This RNA contains the entire p72 cds region without
introns and hence seems to represent functional p72 mRNA. In
addition, after overexposure of the Northern blot, much less abundant
smaller and one larger (9.3 kb) RNA species became visible. The smaller
RNAs varied in size from experiment to experiment, while the 9.3-kb
species was also detected with a p72 intron 11-specific probe (Fig.
1A, lane 2), and according to our RT-PCR analysis includes
intron 9 (0.25 kb) and intron 11 (4 kb) or intron 11 only in addition
to the p72 cds. The occurrence of partially unspliced p72 RNA in the
poly(A)+ RNA fraction may hint at a post-transcriptional
autoregulatory mechanism of p72 similar to that of the highly related
DEAD box protein p68 (21) and its yeast homologue Dbp2 (7). Expression of a p72 mRNA containing introns 9 or 11 would lead to polypeptides of 363 and 407 amino acids, respectively, which were not detected in
HeLa cells (see below). Two p72 RNA species of about 5 and 9 kb had
also been found previously in Northern blot analyses of human tissues
(12) and vertebrate cell lines (13) in variable amounts and ratios.
The size of the 5.3-kb p72 mRNA indicates the existence of long
untranslated region(s). To rationalize the molecular weight of p72
mRNA, we analyzed the genomic sequence of p72 (encoded by human
chromosome 22; GenBankTM accession number NT_011520.4) with
respect to potential promoters and polyadenylation signals. In good
agreement with the Northern blotting experiments, these studies
predicted a p72 mRNA of 5213 nt (Fig. 1C), provided that
no splicing occurs in the UTR(s). However, the use of a potential
alternative promoter positioned about 3 kb further upstream could as
well result in a similarly sized mRNA, but only if the 5'-UTR was
processed by splicing. To distinguish between these two possibilities,
the 3'- and 5'-UTRs of p72 mRNA were analyzed by scanning RT-PCR
(followed by DNA sequencing) with oligonucleotide primers (Table I)
derived from the genomic sequences adjacent to the p72 cds (Fig. 1,
B and C). The p72 3'-UTR found by this approach
consists of 2.5 kb and represents the uninterrupted gene sequence
downstream of the p72 cds. Its 3' end does not match with the poly(A)
addition sites predicted in positions +4441 or +4449 (the A of the p72
AUG initiator codon is designated as +1, with positive and negative
integers proceeding 3' and 5', respectively) just behind the
polyadenylation signal consensus sequence in position 4428, rather it
appears to be located at least 50 nt further downstream; an alternative
polyadenylation signal (AGTAAA) is found in position +4663 (Fig. 1,
B and C).
The p72 5'-UTR (upstream of the first in-frame AUG, the p72 translation
initiation site identified previously (12)) verified by RT-PCR and DNA
sequencing is 0.75 kb long and GC-rich (60.2%) and also corresponds to
the respective continuous gene sequence. The transcription initiation
site is predicted in position
Inspection of the genomic sequence revealed no AUG triplet which could
be used as a translation start codon in this additional part of the
ORF. Furthermore, a careful analysis of the sequencing data (not shown)
obtained from RT-PCR products also excluded an RNA editing event in
this part of the RNA which might create an upstream AUG start codon in
a relevant portion of the p72 mRNA population.
Initiation of p72 mRNA Translation from a Non-AUG Codon in
Vitro and in Vivo--
Few eukaryotic mRNAs are known in which a
non-AUG codon serves as translation initiation site in addition to an
AUG triplet located further downstream (33). To analyze whether the p72 5'-ORF possesses a similar capability, in vitro translation
experiments were performed in a rabbit reticulocyte lysate with RNA
obtained by in vitro transcription of clone 2423. This clone
contains the p72 sequence from position
Rabbit reticulocytes are highly specialized cells containing an
ill-balanced translation system (34). Therefore, expression of the p72
cDNAs from clones 2423 and 1953 was analyzed by transient expression studies in COS cells (Fig. 3).
To provide a specific means of detection of the heterologous p72
cDNA-derived polypeptides, the p72 cDNAs from clones 2423 and
1953 were tagged at their 3' ends with the coding sequence of an
unrelated epitope recognized by monoclonal 10C4 antibody and
subsequently cloned into pCMV, a eukaryotic expression vector, to yield
pCMVp82 and pCMVp72, respectively. In a nuclear extract from COS cells
transfected with pCMVp82, the 10C4 antibody clearly recognized two
polypeptides of 82 and 72 kDa in a Western blot analysis (Fig.
3A). As both proteins were expressed at a similar
concentration, a non-AUG start codon in addition to the previously
identified p72 AUG is efficiently used for translation initiation in a
p72 mRNA containing part of the 5'-UTR (up to nt p82 Is a Native Constituent of Higher Eukaryotic Cells--
To
investigate whether endogenous p72 mRNA is subject to alternative
translation initiation yielding p82 and to confirm the presence of the
p82-specific N-terminal peptide, an antiserum directed against amino
acids in putative positions 23-37 of p82,
COS and HeLa cells expressed p72 and p82 under normal growth
conditions, although the expression level of both proteins seemed to be
lower in COS cells (Fig. 3C). p82 and p72 are overexpressed in COS cells after transfection with the respective expression plasmids
(Fig. 3, B and C).
Although
No clue was found for the existence of an individual p82 cDNA in a
respective HeLa cDNA by PCR experiments using degenerate oligonucleotide primers (Table I) deduced from amino acid sequences of
the Biochemical Characterization of p82 RNA Helicase--
Apparently,
the additional N-terminal amino acids do not alter the cellular
localization of p82 but might affect the biochemical activities of the
protein. p72 has been shown to be an RNA-dependent ATPase
(14), and we found that p82 purified from HeLa cells (Fig.
4A) is capable of this
activity in the presence of poly(C) or poly(A)+ RNA as well
but not in the absence of nucleic acids (data not shown). RNA binding
by p82 was confirmed in a nitrocellulose filter binding assay (not
shown).
To test for p82 RNA helicase activity, we used partial dsRNA substrates
formed from appropriate in vitro transcripts. A 17-bp substrate was efficiently unwound by purified p82 in an
ATP-dependent manner (Fig. 4A), and the helicase
activity co-sedimented with p82 in a sucrose gradient. As checked by
Western blotting with
The helicase activities of p68 and p72 slightly differ with respect to
their optimum reaction conditions as has been reported recently (14).
p82 resembles p72 regarding its (d)ATP specificity (Fig.
4B), whereas p68 RNA helicase is less nucleotide-specific (35). Also, the optimum salt concentration of p82 in the helicase assay
was similar to that of p72 (0-25 mM NaCl; not shown) and differed from that of p68 which is considerably higher (80-100 mM NaCl) (35).
Phosphorylation modulates the activity of several RNA helicases, like
eIF4A8 (36) and human Upf1 RNA helicase (37), and hence could be
regulative for p72 and p82 RNA helicase activity as well.
Phosphorylation of p72 and p82 has been checked by metabolic labeling
of HeLa cells with inorganic 33P (Fig.
5). Weak signals of
33P-labeled p72 and p82 were observed after
immunoprecipitation with The size of full-length p72 mRNA determined by scanning RT-PCR
is 5.25 kb. It contains the p72 cds (12) and additional long upstream
and downstream sequences, which correspond to the respective continuous
gene regions (Fig. 1). A much less abundant 9.3-kb RNA (cf.
Fig. 1A and Ref. 12) was found to represent a partially unspliced p72 gene transcript, containing intron 11 or introns 9 and 11 in addition to the aforementioned sequences. Interestingly, partially
unspliced p68 RNA species have also been reported, the abundance of
which increases upon overexpression of p68 suggesting post-transcriptional expression control (21) similar to that found with
Dbp2 of S. cerevisiae (7).
The 2.5-kb p72 3'-UTR ends downstream of the poly(A) addition sites in
positions +4441 and +4449. Vertebrate 3'-UTRs are on average 500 bases,
some up to 1 kb long. Extended 3'-UTRs have been ascribed a regulative
function in protein expression by affecting message stability and/or
translational efficiency by long range interactions with the 5'-UTR
(38). Whereas most of the 3' elements analyzed so far are
gene-specific, AU-rich elements (consensus sequence, 5'-AUUUA-3' in
U-rich stretches) have been detected in several mRNAs and seem to
affect mRNA stability. The AUUUA motif occurs twice in the p72
3'-UTR in a moderately U-rich region. However, AU-rich element-directed
turnover mechanisms differ in extent of decay as well as in decay
characteristics (39), and the stability of p72 mRNA needs to be
analyzed in detail.
The 5'-UTR of p72 mRNA is 0.75 kb (Fig.
6), and even when compared with those of
highly regulated proteins like c-Myc (0.56 kb (40)) and FGF-2 (0.3 kb
(41)), this is an unusual size. It resides entirely within a CpG island
(GC content 65%) which may explain why it could not be amplified by
rapid amplification of cDNA ends
experiments.2 Secondary
structure prediction confirmed that the sequence is structure-prone
with an extensively base-paired stem (positions
243 upstream of the first in-frame AUG (A in the AUG
triplet is +1) which serves as the p72 translation initiator codon. We
provide evidence that alternative translation at a non-AUG within the
extra coding region of this mRNA yields an 82-kDa protein (p82).
Immunological studies substantiate that p82 is a naturally existing p72
variant and that both proteins are expressed at similar concentrations.
p82 purified from HeLa cells is an ATP-dependent RNA
helicase with biochemical properties almost identical to those of p72.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
in cooperation with an RNA co-activator (18, 19).
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
) and pGEM3 were from Promega. pMOS, chromatography
media, and columns were supplied by Amersham Biosciences. All other
reagents were of the highest purity grade commercially available.
cDNA library screening, PCR, cloning procedures, plasmid
preparations, and electrophoreses were carried out according to
standard protocols (20). DNA sequencing was done by SEQLAB GmbH,
Goettingen, Germany.
cDNA library screening, a
p72-specific digoxigenin-labeled cDNA probe (dig-p72), which
corresponds to positions +93 to +631 of p72 cDNA, was synthesized
by PCR of human p72 cDNA using oligonucleotide primers dig5 and
dig3. A p72 gene exon 13-specific antisense RNA probe (complementary to
nt 1467-1986 of the p72 cDNA) was synthesized for Northern
blotting by AvaII digest of clone 2423 (see below), followed
by transcription with T7 RNA polymerase to yield the respective
antisense RNA. A p72 gene intron 11-specific probe was prepared by
RT-PCR of HeLa poly(A)+ RNA with primers 5_i11 and 3_i11,
followed by XhoI/BamHI recloning into pGEM7Zf(
)
and transcription with SP6 RNA polymerase.
-p82N), a
peptide (NH2-TVASATGDSASERES-COOH) corresponding
to p82-specific N-terminal amino acids (cf. Fig. 6) was
chemically synthesized on an Applied Biosystems 433A Peptide
Synthesizer, coupled to hemocyanin, and used as an antigen for multiple
immunizations of rabbits. Antibodies
-p72C were raised
against a p72 deletion mutant (consisting of amino acids 437-650)
expressed in E. coli (21). Antibodies
-p68-(45-59) (22)
were raised against an N-terminal peptide of p68 (amino acids 45-59)
and also recognized p72, which contains two conservative substitutions
in this sequence. Affinity purification of polyclonal antibodies was
carried out on N-hydroxysuccinimide-activated Sepharose 4 Fast Flow (Amersham Biosciences) to which the respective antigen had
been coupled. C10 is a p68-specific monoclonal antibody directed against the C-terminal amino acids 600-614 (23). DEAD box-specific monoclonal antibody MaD1 (24) is directed against the amino acid
sequence NH2-LVLDEADRMLDMGFEPQ-COOH. Monoclonal
antibody 10C4 was raised against a peptide (NH2-VGAKP-COOH)
of Tms1 protein of Schizosaccharomyces pombe
(25).
297 to position +2125) was obtained by HeLa
cDNA
library screening with the dig-p72 probe, cloned into pMOS, and
subsequently recloned into pGEM7Zf(
) via EcoRI to yield
clone 2423. The p72 cds was PCR-amplified with BamHI- and
HindIII-tagged primers BamN72 and HinC72 (Table I) and
cloned into pGEM7Zf(
) to yield clone 1953. Insert sequences were
verified by DNA sequencing. Plasmids were linearized by XhoI
digest and transcribed in vitro with SP6 RNA polymerase
using the Riboprobe run-off system (Promega) to yield clone 2423 RNA
and clone 1953 RNA, respectively. Concentrations of transcripts were
determined photometrically, and their quality was checked by agarose
gel electrophoresis. In vitro translation in a reticulocyte
lysate was performed using [35S]methionine according to
the Flexi Rabbit protocol (Promega).
70 °C for 5-16 h.
Western blotting was carried out according to Ref. 20 using alkaline
phosphatase and nitro blue tetrazolium/5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate for detection.
-mercaptoethanol, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. Proteins were eluted from
the column by a salt gradient (starting from 50 to 350 mM
potassium phosphate). p82-containing fractions were subjected to a
fractionated ammonium sulfate precipitation (15 and 33% saturation,
respectively). Proteins precipitated at 15-33% saturation were washed
in 25 mM Tris·Cl, pH 8.5, 2 mM EDTA, 10 mM
-mercaptoethanol, 7.5% glycerol, 300 mM
NaCl, diluted 2-fold and applied to a DEAE-Sepharose Fast Flow column,
followed by a HiTrap Heparin HP column. p82 was eluted by a salt
gradient (270 mM to 1 M NaCl), diluted to 100 mM NaCl (final concentration), and applied onto an ssDNA
cellulose column, from which it was eluted by a salt gradient (150-700
mM NaCl). p82 fractions were pooled and dialyzed in 25 mM Tris·Cl, pH 7.8, 50 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 10 mM
-mercaptoethanol, 20%
glycerol, 0.1% Triton X-100. Sucrose gradient (5-15%) centrifugation
was performed with 2 µg of p82 in a Beckman SW55 rotor at
270,000 × g, 0 °C for 24 h. Aldolase (160-kDa
tetramer) and bovine serum albumin (68 kDa) were carried along as
external 7.4 S and 4.2 S sedimentation markers, respectively.
-32P]ATP. To
check for RNA dependence of the p82 ATPase activity, poly(C) or
poly(A)+ RNA was omitted from the respective samples.
Incubation was carried out at 37 °C for 45 min, stopped by addition
of 200 mg/ml activated charcoal (which binds remaining ATP), and
centrifuged at 20,000 × g for 5 min. Amounts of
released 32Pi in the supernatants were
determined by scintillation counting.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (33K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Structure of the p72 mRNA.
A, p72-specific RNA in HeLa cells. Northern blot analysis of
poly(A)+ RNA performed with an exon 13-specific (lane
1) or an intron 11-specific (lane 2) p72 antisense RNA.
The position of RNA size markers is given on the left, and
the arrows indicate the p72 RNAs. B, RT-PCR
analysis of the p72 5'- (lanes 2-4) and 3'-UTRs
(lanes 6-11). Poly(A)+ RNA prepared from HeLa
cells was subjected to reverse transcription and PCR with the
oligonucleotide primer pairs indicated above the lanes
followed by agarose gel electrophoresis and DNA sequencing of the
amplified fragments. M1 and M2 (lanes 1, 5, and
12) denote DNA markers, the sizes of which are shown on the
left and right, respectively. C,
comparison of the p72 mRNA structure predicted from the genomic
sequence with that found by RT-PCR analysis. Sizes of amplification
products obtained with the indicated primer pairs (cf.
B) are shown.
Oligonucleotides employed
772, i.e. 25 nt upstream of
the 5' end verified by RT-PCR, and just behind a weak TATA box
(TATAGGA, position
798; cf. Fig. 6). Interestingly, the
p72 ORF extends up to nt
243 upstream of the p72 translation initiator AUG.
297 to +2125, i.e.
the complete p72 ORF plus parts of its 5'- and 3'-UTRs, isolated from a
HeLa
cDNA expression library. An in vitro transcript
of clone 1953 (containing the p72 cds, nt +1 to +1953) served as a
control. Both transcripts were of similar quality as checked by agarose gel electrophoresis (Fig. 2A).
Clone 1953 RNA was efficiently translated into a 72-kDa product,
whereas clone 2423 RNA gave rise to a, albeit weaker, single
polypeptide band of 82 kDa (p82; Fig. 2B). This result
implied that translation had started upstream of the p72 translation
initiator AUG at the beginning of the ORF at a non-AUG start codon,
leading to an N-terminal extension of the p72 polypeptide of 80-90
amino acids. The low translational efficiency apparently results from
the usage of a non-AUG start codon, whereas the p72 AUG start codon was
not at all used for translation initiation of clone 2423 RNA in the
reticulocyte lysate. This result and the absence of higher molecular
weight products in the clone 1953 translation sample renders p82
generation by post-translational modification in the reticulocyte
lysate unlikely. Also, translation efficiency and quality of both p72
RNAs was independent of the presence or absence of a 5'-cap structure
(data not shown).

View larger version (29K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
In vitro translation of p72 RNA
containing part of the 5'-UTR. A, analysis of in
vitro transcribed RNA from clone 2423 (nucleotides
297 to +2125
of the p72 cDNA sequence; lane 3), clone 1953 (p72
coding sequence; nucleotides +1 to +1953; lane 4), and
luciferase cDNA (positive control; lane 1) by agarose
gel electrophoresis. The sizes of RNA marker fragments (M,
lane 2) are given on the left. B,
in vitro translation products of the transcripts shown in
A were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography. Translation
of clone 2423 RNA yields an 82-kDa product (lanes 2 and
3), whereas p72 cds RNA is translated into a 72-kDa product
(lanes 4 and 5) as indicated on the
right. Translational efficiency was compared with that of
luciferase RNA used as a positive control. The sizes of protein
molecular weight markers are shown on the left.
297). As
expected, transfection of plasmid pCMVp72 into COS cells led to the
expression of only the 72-kDa polypeptide (Fig. 3A).

View larger version (36K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
p82 and p72 are expressed from one mRNA
and are native constituents of HeLa and COS cells. A Western blot
analysis of nuclear extracts of HeLa cells and COS cells is shown. The
sizes of protein molecular weight markers are shown on the
left and the positions of p82, p72, and p68 on the
right of each panel, respectively. pCMVp82 contains the p72
cDNA sequence from nucleotide
297 to +2125 under the control of
the human cytomegalovirus major immediate early gene promoter
3'-terminally tagged with nucleotides encoding the epitope of
monoclonal antibody 10C4. pCMVp72 is identical to pCMVp82 except that
it contains the p72 cDNA sequence from nucleotide +1 to +1953.
pCMV, used as a negative control, is the expression vector without p72
insert. A-C, lanes 1-3, respectively, were loaded with
aliquots of the same samples. A, detection of polypeptides
expressed from plasmids transiently transfected in COS cells by 10C4.
p72 is expressed from pCMVp72 (lane 1), and p82 and p72 are
expressed from pCMVp82 (lane 2). Lane 3, negative
control. B,
-p82N antibodies specifically
identify p82. p82 is detected in COS cells (lanes 1 and
3) and HeLa cells (lane 4) as a native protein
and is overexpressed in COS cells after transfection with pCMVp82
(lane 2) but not with pCMVp72 (lane 1) or pCMV
(lane 3). Lanes 5 and 6 represent an
analysis of an immunoprecipitation obtained from a HeLa nuclear extract
with pre-immune serum (lane 5) and
-p72C
(lane 6). C,
-p72C antibodies
verify alternative expression of p82 and p72 from pCMVp82. Only p72 is
expressed from pCMVp72 (lane 1), and p82 and p72 are
expressed from pCMVp82 (lane 2). Endogenous p82 and p72 is
detected in COS cells (lane 3) and HeLa cells (lane
4). D, the p68 subfamily of DEAD box proteins
recognized by an antibody raised against a p68 N-terminal peptide
(
-p68-(45-59)). Endogenous p82, p72, and p68 are detected in HeLa
nuclear extracts by
-p68-(45-59) and MaD1 (lanes 1 and
2), and C10, which binds to the p68 C terminus, recognizes
p68 only (lane 3).
-p82N, was
produced in rabbits using the respective oligopeptide as an antigen.
Indeed, 82-kDa endogenous proteins were specifically detected by
-p82N in the nuclear fraction of HeLa, COS (Fig.
3B), and mouse 3T3 cells indicating that they contain the
amino acids encoded by the 5'-extended p72 ORF. Moreover,
affinity-purified antibodies, raised against amino acids 437-650 of
p72 (
-p72C), recognized both p72 and p82 (Fig.
3C). When HeLa cell nuclear extracts were immunoprecipitated
with
-p72C, the 82-kDa protein was recognized by
-p82N in a Western blot of the immunoprecipitate (Fig.
3B). However, when immunoprecipitation was performed with
-p82N, p82 was not detected with
-p72C in
a subsequent Western blotting experiment, indicating that the epitope
of
-p82N is not exposed in the native protein thus
precluding it from precipitation. Furthermore, p82 and p72 were
detected in nuclei exclusively (not in the cytoplasm; not shown) and
can only be extracted under stringent conditions (pH 10.5;
cf. "Experimental Procedures") like it had been
demonstrated for p68 which is closely associated with the nuclear
matrix (17, 29).
-p72C did not detect p68 (Fig. 3C),
most probably due to the less conserved C-terminal part of the two
proteins (amino acids 433-650 of p72, 50% homology of p72 and p68),
-p68-(45-59) antibodies (raised against amino acids 45-59 of p68)
bound to p68, p72, and p82 (Fig. 3D) which was expected
because p72 (and hence p82) and p68 differ only by two conservative
amino acid substitutions in this region. All three proteins were also
recognized by monoclonal antibody MaD1, which is directed against the
p68 DEAD box motif common also to p72 (and p82). Although the Western blots were certainly not in the linear range allowing quantitation, the
p72 signal obtained with MaD1 suggested a very low p72 in vivo level relative to p82 and p68. However, we note that the relative intensity of this signal increased after a hydroxyapatite affinity chromatographic step (see "Purification of p82 from HeLa Cells" under "Experimental Procedures"), indicating a masking effect. Indeed, a Coomassie-stained gel loaded with an
immunoprecipitate obtained with
-p72C antibodies showed
similar amounts of p72 and p82 in nuclear extracts (Fig. 5, lane
5). Not surprisingly, monoclonal antibody C10 (raised against
C-terminal amino acids 600-614 of p68) recognized neither p72 nor p82
(Fig. 3D).
-p68-(45-59) and MaD1 antibody-binding sites (not shown). In
conclusion, endogenous p82, as well as recombinant p82 expressed from
pCMVp82, represents an alternatively translated p72 variant, distinguished from p72 by the amino acids encoded by the 5'-extended ORF of the p72 mRNA.

View larger version (43K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
RNA helicase activity of p82. The
helicase assays were performed with 0.25 nM partially dsRNA
substrates (with one strand 32P-labeled) at 37 °C for 30 min and monitored by gel shift analysis. A, co-sedimentation
of p82 and RNA helicase activity in a sucrose gradient. The left
panel shows a Coomassie-stained SDS-PAGE of p82, purified from
HeLa cells, after the ammonium sulfate precipitation and the ssDNA
chromatography steps. Sizes of protein molecular weight markers are
shown on the left. The upper right
panel shows a Western blot analysis of sucrose gradient
fractions with
-p68-(45-59) antibodies. The position of p82 is
indicated on the right. The lower panel
represents RNA helicase activity of the respective sucrose gradient
fractions with a 17-bp dsRNA substrate. The positions of dsRNA and
ssRNA are marked. B, nucleotide specificity of p82 RNA
helicase. Unwinding of a 17-bp substrate was monitored using the
indicated NTPs (lanes 3-6). p72 RNA helicase activity
(lanes 9-12) was carried along as a control. Native
(lanes 1 and 7) and denatured substrates
(lanes 2 and 8) indicate the positions of the
respective dsRNA and released ssRNA. Similar results were obtained with
dNTPs used instead of the respective NTPs. C, direction of
dsRNA unwinding. RNA helicase assays were performed with substrates
containing 3' (lanes 1-5) and 5' single-stranded overhangs
(lanes 6-10) as shown schematically. Native (lanes
1 and 6) and denatured substrates (lanes 2 and 7) indicate the positions of the respective dsRNA and
ssRNA. The reaction was carried out with 1 ng of p82 (lanes
4 and 9) or 2 ng of p82 (lanes 5 and
10). Lanes 3 and 8, samples contained
2 ng of p82 but ATP was omitted.
-p68-(45-59) antibodies, the gradient
fractions did not contain traceable amounts of p68 and/or p72 (Fig.
4A). The strands of RNA substrates with double-stranded
regions longer than 40 bp could not be separated by the p82 in the RNA
helicase assay, and this result resembles a feature of p68 and p72
(data not shown). As was observed with p68 (29) and p72 (14), ATP
hydrolysis is essential for the helicase activity of p82 (Fig. 4,
B and C). Also, a 3'-ss overhang of the RNA
substrate is crucial for dsRNA unwinding by p82, and no helicase
activity was observed when a 5'-ss overhang was present only (Fig.
4C).
-p72C and SDS-PAGE followed by
autoradiography. Notably, there was no indication for a preferred
labeling of p82 as compared with p72 excluding that p82 represents a
highly phosphorylated form of p72. p68, on the other hand, was not at
all phosphorylated under these conditions (Fig. 5). In addition, no
other post-translational modifications like glycosylation or
sumosylation were observed with p72 and p82 (data not shown).

View larger version (63K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
In vivo phosphorylation of p82 and
p72. Metabolic labeling of HeLa cells was performed with inorganic
33P followed by immunoprecipitation with pre-immune serum
(lane 3) or
-p72C (lanes 4 and
5), SDS-PAGE and autoradiography (lanes 3 and
4) or Coomassie staining (lane 5). An
immunoprecipitate with the p68-specific monoclonal antibody C10
(lane 2) shows that p68 is not phosphorylated. An
immunoprecipitate with the p53-specific monoclonal antibody PAb421
(lane 1) served as a control and shows phosphorylated
p53.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
590 to
436 and
222 to
116;
G =
80 kcal/mol) and an overall free energy of
250 kcal/mol. Such a leader sequence is expected to
reduce markedly translation of the respective mRNA (33) at least
under certain conditions (42) most probably because the 40 S scanning
ribosomal subunit is inefficient in resolving hairpin structures with
G >
50 kcal/mol. Nevertheless, several cellular, highly structured mRNAs have been reported to be translated,
although at reduced efficiency, even under conditions where
cap-dependent translation is inhibited (43).

View larger version (50K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Structure of the complete 5'-UTR of the
p82/p72 mRNA. The TATA box and initiator element
(Inr) are indicated in boldface type. The
predicted transcription start site in position
772 is double
underlined. The 5'-most nucleotide (position
747) verified by
RT-PCR is boxed. The upstream ORFs are marked by wavy
lines, and their respective start and stop codons are in
boldface type. Position
297 denotes the 5' end of clone
2423 cDNA. The p82/p72 ORF (italic lowercase letters)
starts in position
243 downstream of the boxed stop codon.
The positions of the upstream
237CUG (along with the
calculated molecular weight of the polypeptide) and other theoretical
non-AUG translation initiators (uppercase letters,
underlined) are given. The peptide sequence of the
-p82N epitope is indicated below the
respective nucleotide sequence (positions
171 to
127), and the
first six triplets encoding p72 are depicted in larger type size.
Cap-independent initiation of translation is thought to function via internal ribosome entry sites (IRES; reviewed in Refs. 44-46), yet convincing evidence for IRES-mediated translation initiation of cellular mRNAs is difficult to obtain (47). In our studies, part of the natural p72 mRNA 5'-UTR (in clone 2423 RNA) leads to a complete inhibition of p72 translation in the reticulocyte lysate system (Fig. 2B), and it remains to be analyzed whether the full-length 5'-UTR of p72 mRNA exerts a similar inhibitory effect known for other mRNAs with long 5'-UTRs as well, like that of c-Myc (48, 49). Interestingly, various picornavirus-encoded IRES elements (type I) generally also function poorly in standard cell-free systems (see Ref. 50 and reviewed in Ref. 44), supporting the idea that p72 (and possibly also c-Myc) translation may similarly be started by internal ribosome loading. Moreover, the function of viral IRES elements is independent of any virus-encoded protein(s). Therefore, the host cell translation apparatus must be capable of performing internal initiation, possibly using cellular trans-acting factor(s) that may be expressed in a cell type-specific manner and seem(s) to be absent, e.g. in the reticulocyte lysate.
Another feature not uncommon to tightly regulated genes is the
occurrence of upstream ORFs, which according to the ribosome scanning
mechanism throttle translation of the main ORF (51). It is beginning to
be understood, however, that upstream ORFs participate in translational
control by different mechanisms (52), and efficient translation of
mammalian NF-
B-repressing factor mRNA has been described despite
the presence of multiple upstream ORFs (53). Upstream of the main ORF,
the p72 5'-UTR contains three short upstream ORFs consisting of 32, 9, and 53 potential codons, respectively (Fig. 6). As deduced from the
considerable expression of endogenous p72 and p82 in HeLa cells (Fig.
3, see below), their 5'-UTR seems to have no general inhibitory effect on the expression of both proteins in vivo. In conclusion,
our studies on the structure of cellular p72 RNAs show that the 5.3-kb species is the functional mRNA from which p82 and p72 are
alternatively translated. Therefore, we propose to actualize the gene
nomenclature into "p82/p72 gene."
Sequence analysis (Fig. 6) as well as in vitro translation
studies implicated that synthesis of p82 results from the usage of a
non-AUG translation initiator codon, most probably from the
237CUG triplet. Natural non-AUG initiator codons
are very rare in eukaryotes but have been found in the expression of
some growth factors like c-Myc (54) and FGF-2 (41) where initiation
takes place at respective upstream CUG triplets in addition to the
first in-frame AUG codons. "Standard" non-AUG codons in eukaryotes
(CUG, GUG, and ACG; see Refs. 55 and 56) mostly are poor initiators and
depend on an optimal translation initiation context (particularly A
3 and/or G+4) even more than conventional
AUG start codons (33). +1AUG, the translational start site
of p72, as well as
237CUG both have an A in the
3
position, but no G in the +4 position and thus can be regarded as
moderate translation initiators whereby
237CUG should
work even less efficiently. Yet, p72 and p82 seem to occur at similar
concentrations in HeLa and COS cells (Fig. 5, lane
5).2 Initiation in a suboptimal context may be aided
by pausing of the scanning ribosome subunit at a moderately stable
downstream secondary structure (57), and indeed, a small hairpin
(
G =
8 kcal/mol) is predicted about 10 nt
downstream of
237CUG. Leaky ribosome scanning beyond this
start site might lead to initiation of p72 translation at
+1AUG, alternative to the hypothesis of an internal
ribosome entry mechanism discussed above. In any case, the long p72
5'-UTR seems to represent a means to regulate differentially the
synthesis of p82 and p72 under specific conditions or in different
tissues (13). Translation of c-Myc, for instance, constantly proceeds from an upstream CUG, whereas translation starting from the first in-frame AUG is developmentally controlled (58).
p82 was shown to be a native component of HeLa and COS cells by our
immunological studies using an antibody (
-p82N) produced
against the N-terminal most hydrophilic 15 amino acid stretch of p82
(Fig. 6). In this context, we detected lower levels of endogenous p72
and p82 in COS as compared with HeLa cells. Reduced affinities of the
antibodies used due to possible interspecies amino acid sequence
differences seem unlikely on the basis of the high homology of human,
rat, and chick p72 (13). Lower p72 and p82 levels in COS cells (which
are SV40-transformed) may be due to the presence of SV40 T antigen,
which is an RNA helicase and might render cellular helicases
unnecessary. Remarkably, the ratio of endogenous p82 to p72 is not
changed at the lower expression rate, indicating that alternative
translation is not affected.
Alternatively translated proteins, like FGF-2, may differ in their
subcellular localization (59), but we found that p82, like p72 and p68,
is exclusively located in the nucleus. On the other hand, addition of
N-terminal amino acids could affect functional activities of a protein.
Biochemical characterization of p82 revealed that it is an
ssRNA-dependent ATPase and an RNA helicase, thus the
possibility that it might represent an inactive precursor or storage
form of p72 can be dismissed. Biochemical activities of p82 closely
resemble those of p72 (14) and p68 (35). The p82 RNA helicase proceeds
in 3'
5' direction with regard to the binding strand (Fig.
4C), and like p72, it shows a low processivity. Whereas p68,
albeit less efficiently, instead of (d)ATP can use (d)CTP, UTP, and
dTTP for RNA unwinding (35), p82 and p72 are strictly dependent on
(d)ATP (Fig. 4B). In addition, the helicase activity of p82,
like that of p72, is salt-sensitive. Remarkably, p82 and p72 appear to
be phosphorylated in HeLa cells, whereas p68 is not. It remains to be
elucidated, however, whether the phosphorylation state of p82 and p72
modulates their functional activities. Very recently, an
ATP-independent RNA annealing activity of p68 and p72 has been
described. This novel activity in conjunction with the helicase
function enables these proteins to catalyze RNA strand exchange
reactions (14). Preliminary studies show that p82 mediates annealing of
partially complementary RNA strands as well. One could envision that
catalysis of RNA secondary structure rearrangements is a specific
feature of all p68 subfamily members, although it is unknown how these
activities are connected to their in vivo roles. Given the
co-activator function of p68 and p72 (19), it will be of particular
interest to uncover possible specific functions of p82 and p72 in transcription.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We are grateful to S. Jungbluth for excellent technical assistance. We thank W. Nastainczyk and P. Scholtes for peptide synthesis and immunization of rabbits. 10C4 was kindly provided by M. Montenarh and pCMV by G. Thiel (Universität des Saarlandes, Homburg, Germany). MaD1 was a kind gift of R. Iggo (Swiss Institute for Experimental Cancer Research, Epalinges, Switzerland).
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.:
49-6841-16-26019; Fax: 49-6841-16-26521; E-mail:
bchsta@med-rz.uni-saarland.de.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, October 23, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M107535200
2 H. Uhlmann-Schiffler, O. G. Rössler, and H. Stahl, unpublished results.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: UTR, untranslated region; ORF, open reading frame; nt, nucleotide; RT, reverse transcriptase; MES, 4-morpholineethanesulfonic acid; ds, double-stranded; ss, single-stranded; cds, coding sequence; dig, digoxigenin; IRES, internal ribosome entry sites; CSPD, disodium 3-(4-methoxyspiro{1,2-dioxetane-3,2'-(5'-chloro)tricyclo[3.3.1.13,7]decan}-4-yl)phenyl phosphate.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Beyersmann, D. (2000) EXS (Basel) 89, 11-28 |
| 2. | Galas, D. J. (2001) Science 291, 1257-1260 |
| 3. | Kozak, M. (1987) Nucleic Acids Res. 15, 8125-8148 |
| 4. | Gray, N. K., and Wickens, M. (1998) Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 14, 399-458 |
| 5. | Lüking, A., Stahl, U., and Schmidt, U. (1998) Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 33, 259-296 |
| 6. | Fang, L., Hou, Y., and Inouye, M. (1998) J. Bacteriol. 180, 90-95 |
| 7. | Barta, I., and Iggo, R. D. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 3800-3808 |
| 8. | Rössler, O. G., Hloch, P., Schütz, N., Weitzenegger, T., and Stahl, H. (2000) Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 932-939 |
| 9. | International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium. (2001) Nature 409, 860-921 |
| 10. | Stevenson, R. J., Hamilton, S. J., MacCallum, D. E., Hall, P. A., and Fuller-Pace, F. V. (1998) J. Pathol. 184, 351-359 |
| 11. | Seufert, D. W., Kos, R., Erickson, C. A., and Swalla, B. J. (2000) J. Exp. Zool. 28, 193-204 |
| 12. | Lamm, G. M., Nicol, S. M., Fuller-Pace, F. V., and Lamond, A. I. (1996) Nucleic Acids Res. 24, 3739-3747 |
| 13. | Ip, F. C. F., Chung, S. S. K., Fu, W.-Y., and Ip, N. C. (2000) Neuroreport 11, 457-462 |
| 14. | Rössler, O. G., Straka, A., and Stahl, H. (2001) Nucleic Acids Res. 29, 2088-2096 |
| 15. | Neubauer, G., King, A., Rappsilber, J., Calvio, C., Watson, M., Ajuh, P., Sleeman, J., Lamond, A. I., and Mann, M. (1998) Nat. Genet. 20, 46-50 |
| 16. | Jost, J.-P., Schwarz, S., Hess, D., Angliker, H., Fuller-Pace, F. V., Stahl, H., Thiry, S., and Siegmann, M. (1999) Nucleic Acids Res. 27, 3245-3252 |
| 17. | Akileswaran, L., Taraska, J. W., Sayer, J. A., Gettemy, J. M., and Coghlan, V. M. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 17448-17454 |
| 18. | Endoh, H., Maruyama, K., Masuhiro, Y., Kobayashi, Y., Goto, M., Tai, H., Yanagisawa, J., Metzger, D., Hashimoto, S., and Kato, S. (1999) Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 5363-5372 |
| 19. | Watanabe, M., Yanagisawa, J., Kitagawa, H., Takeyama, K., Ogawa, S., Arao, Y., Suzawa, M., Kobayashi, Y., Yano, T., Yoshikawa, H., Masuhiro, Y., and Kato, S. (2001) EMBO J. 20, 1341-1352 |
| 20. | Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , 2nd Ed , Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY |
| 21. | Rössler, O. G. (2000) Ph.D. thesis , University of the Saarland, Saarbrücken, Germany |
| 22. | Hloch, P. (1995) Ph.D. thesis , University of Konstanz, Germany |
| 23. | Reim, P. (1993) Diploma Thesis, University of Konstanz, Germany |
| 24. | Iggo, R., Picksley, S., Southgate, J., McPheat, J., and Lane, D. P. (1990) Nucleic Acids Res. 18, 5413-5417 |
| 25. | Schneider, E., Fuchs, A., Nastainczyk, W., Montenarh, M., and Wagner, P. (1995) Hybridoma 14, 329-333 |
| 26. | Mathews, D. H., Sabina, J., Zuker, M., and Turner, D. H. (1999) J. Mol. Biol. 288, 911-940 |
| 27. | Chen, Y., Carlini, D. B., Baines, J. F., Parsch, J., Braverman, J. M., Tanda, S., and Stephan, W. (1999) Genes Genet. Syst. 74, 271-286 |
| 28. | Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Nature 227, 680-685 |
| 29. | Hirling, H., Scheffner, M., Restle, T., and Stahl, H. (1989) Nature 339, 562-564 |
| 30. | Harlow, E., Crawford, L. V., Pim, D. C., and Williamson, N. M. (1981) J. Virol. 39, 861-869 |
| 31. | Grifo, J. A., Abramson, R. D., Satler, C. A., and Merrick, W. C. (1984) J. Biol. Chem. 259, 8648-8654 |
| 32. | Scheffner, M., Knippers, R., and Stahl, H. (1989) Cell 57, 955-963 |
| 33. | Kozak, M. (1996) Mamm. Genome 7, 563-574 |
| 34. | Kozak, M. (1989) Mol. Cell. Biol. 9, 5073-5080 |
| 35. | Straka, A. (1995) Ph.D. thesis , University of Konstanz, Germany |
| 36. | op den Camp, R. G. L., and Kuhlemeier, C. (1998) Nucleic Acids Res. 26, 2058-2062 |
| 37. | Pal, M., Ishigaki, Y., Nagy, E., and Maquat, L. E. (2001) RNA (New York) 7, 5-15 |
| 38. | Day, D. A., and Tuite, M. F. (1998) J. Endocrinol. 157, 361-371 |
| 39. | Guhaniyogi, J., and Brewer, G. (2001) Gene (Amst.) 265, 11-23 |
| 40. | Watt, R., Nishikura, K., Sorrentino, J., Ar-, Rushdi, A., Croce, C. M., and Rovera, G. (1983) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 80, 6307-6311 |
| 41. | Prats, H., Kaghad, M., Prats, A. C., Klagsbrun, M., Lelias, J. M., Liauzun, P., Chalon, P., Tauber, J. P., Amalric, F., Smith, J. A., and Caput, D. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 86, 1836-1840 |
| 42. | Nielsen, F. C., Ostergaard, L., Nielsen, J., and Christiansen, J. (1995) Nature 377, 358-362 |
| 43. | Johannes, G., Carter, M. S., Eisen, M. B., Brown, P. O., and Sarnow, P. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 13118-13123 |
| 44. | Sachs, A. B., Sarnow, P., and Hentze, M.W. (1997) Cell 89, 831-838 |
| 45. | van der Welden, A. W., and Thomas, A. A. M. (1999) Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 31, 87-106 . |
| 46. | Hellen, C. U. T., and Sarnow, P. (2001) Genes Dev. 15, 1593-1612 |
| 47. | Kozak, M. (2001) Mol. Cell. Biol. 21, 1899-1907 |
| 48. | Darveau, A., Pelletier, J., and Sonenberg, N. (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 82, 2315-2319 |
| 49. | Carter, P. S., Jarquin-Pardo, M., and De Benedetti, A. (1999) Oncogene 18, 4326-4335 |
| 50. | Borman, A. M., Bailly, J. L., Girard, M., and Kean, K. M. (1995) Nucleic Acids Res. 23, 3656-3663 |
| 51. | Kozak, M. (1991) J. Cell Biol. 115, 887-903 |
| 52. | Morris, D. R., and Geballe, A. P. (2000) Mol. Cell. Biol. 20, 8635-8642 |
| 53. | Oumard, A., Hennecke, M., Hauser, H., and Nourbakhsh, M. (2000) Mol. Cell. Biol. 20, 2755-2759 |
| 54. | Hann, S. R., King, M. W., Bentley, D. L., Anderson, C. W., and Eisenman, R. N. (1988) Cell 52, 185-195 |
| 55. | Peabody, D. S. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262, 11847-11851 |
| 56. | Mehdi, H., Ono, E., and Gupta, K. C. (1990) Gene (Amst.) 91, 173-178 |
| 57. | Kozak, M. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87, 8301-8305 |
| 58. | Creancier, L., Mercier, P., Prats, A. C., and Morello, D. (2001) Mol. Cell. Biol. 21, 1833-1840 |
| 59. | Bugler, B., Amalric, F., and Prats, H. (1991) Mol. Cell. Biol. 11, 573-577 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Shin, K. L. Rossow, J. P. Grande, and R. Janknecht Involvement of RNA Helicases p68 and p72 in Colon Cancer Cancer Res., August 15, 2007; 67(16): 7572 - 7578. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Jalal, H. Uhlmann-Schiffler, and H. Stahl Redundant role of DEAD box proteins p68 (Ddx5) and p72/p82 (Ddx17) in ribosome biogenesis and cell proliferation Nucleic Acids Res., June 28, 2007; 35(11): 3590 - 3601. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. V. Fuller-Pace DExD/H box RNA helicases: multifunctional proteins with important roles in transcriptional regulation Nucleic Acids Res., September 10, 2006; 34(15): 4206 - 4215. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Uhlmann-Schiffler, C. Jalal, and H. Stahl Ddx42p--a human DEAD box protein with RNA chaperone activities Nucleic Acids Res., January 5, 2006; 34(1): 10 - 22. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Shin and C. Park N-terminal Extension of Canine Glutamine Synthetase Created by Splicing Alters Its Enzymatic Property J. Biol. Chem., January 9, 2004; 279(2): 1184 - 1190. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. C. Ogilvie, B. J. Wilson, S. M. Nicol, N. A. Morrice, L. R. Saunders, G. N. Barber, and F. V. Fuller-Pace The highly related DEAD box RNA helicases p68 and p72 exist as heterodimers in cells Nucleic Acids Res., March 1, 2003; 31(5): 1470 - 1480. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Yan, J.-F. Mouillet, Q. Ou, and Y. Sadovsky A Novel Domain within the DEAD-Box Protein DP103 Is Essential for Transcriptional Repression and Helicase Activity Mol. Cell. Biol., January 1, 2003; 23(1): 414 - 423. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||