Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M107882200 on October 31, 2001
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 2, 1148-1157, January 11, 2002
Human Relaxin Gene 3 (H3) and the Equivalent Mouse
Relaxin (M3) Gene
NOVEL MEMBERS OF THE RELAXIN PEPTIDE FAMILY*
Ross A. D.
Bathgate
,
Chrishan S.
Samuel,
Tanya C. D.
Burazin§,
Sharon
Layfield,
Antonia A.
Claasz,
Irna Grace T.
Reytomas,
Nicola F.
Dawson,
Chongxin
Zhao,
Courtney
Bond¶,
Roger J.
Summers¶,
Laura J.
Parry
,
John D.
Wade, and
Geoffrey W.
Tregear
From the Howard Florey Institute of Experimental Physiology and
Medicine, University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010 and the
¶ Department of Pharmacology, Monash University, Clayton,
Victoria 3800, Australia
Received for publication, August 16, 2001, and in revised form, October 4, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
We have identified a novel human relaxin gene,
designated H3 relaxin, and an equivalent relaxin
gene in the mouse from the Celera Genomics data base. Both genes encode
a putative prohormone sequence incorporating the classic two-chain,
three cysteine-bonded structure of the relaxin/insulin family and,
importantly, contain the RXXXRXX(I/V) motif in
the B-chain that is essential for relaxin receptor binding. A peptide
derived from the likely proteolytic processing of the H3 relaxin
prohormone sequence was synthesized and found to possess relaxin
activity in bioassays utilizing the human monocytic cell line, THP-1,
that expresses the relaxin receptor. The expression of this
novel relaxin gene was studied in mouse tissues using RT-PCR, where
transcripts were identified with a pattern of expression distinct from
that of the previously characterized mouse relaxin. The highest levels
of expression were found in the brain, whereas significant expression
was also observed in the spleen, thymus, lung, and ovary. Northern
blotting demonstrated an ~1.2-kb transcript present in mouse brain
poly(A) RNA but not in other tissues. These data, together with the
localization of transcripts in the pars ventromedialis of the dorsal
tegmental nucleus of C57BLK6J mouse brain by in situ
hybridization histochemistry, suggest a new role for relaxin in
neuropeptide signaling processes. Together, these studies describe a
third member of the human relaxin family and its equivalent in the mouse.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Relaxin is a 6-kDa polypeptide hormone that is secreted by the
ovary into the peripheral circulation in highest amounts during pregnancy and has a number of functions in mammals that are generally associated with female reproductive tract physiology (1). To date, only
one relaxin gene has been characterized in most mammalian species, with
the exception of the human where two separate genes have been
described, designated H1 (2) and H2 (3) relaxin. The peptide encoded by the H2 gene is the major stored and
circulating form in the human (4). H1 relaxin expression is restricted to the decidua, placenta, and prostate (5); however, the H1 peptide has
similar biological activity to that of H2 relaxin in a rat atrial
bioassay (6). The actions of relaxin include an ability to inhibit
myometrial contractions, to stimulate remodeling of the connective
tissue, and to induce softening of the tissues of the birth canal.
Additionally, relaxin increases growth and differentiation of the
mammary gland and nipple and induces the breakdown of collagen, one of
the main components of connective tissue. Relaxin decreases collagen
synthesis and increases the release of collagenases (7). These findings
were recently confirmed by the establishment of the relaxin
gene-knockout mouse (8), which exhibited a number of phenotypic
properties associated with pregnancy. Female mice lacking a
functionally active relaxin gene failed to relax and elongate the
interpubic ligament of the pubic symphysis and could not suckle their
pups, who in turn died within 24 h unless cross-fostered to
relaxin wild type or relaxin heterozygous foster mothers.
Evidence has accumulated to suggest that relaxin is more than a hormone
of pregnancy and acts on cells and tissues other than those of the
female reproductive system. Relaxin causes a widening of blood vessels
(vasodilatation) in the kidney, mesocecum, lung, and peripheral
vasculature, which leads to increased blood flow or perfusion rates in
these tissues (9). It also stimulates an increase in heart rate and
coronary blood flow and increases both glomerular filtration rate and
renal plasma flow (9). The brain is another target tissue for relaxin,
where the peptide has been shown to bind to receptors (10, 11) in the
circumventricular organs to affect blood pressure and drinking
(12-14). Finally, binding sites have been identified in the prostate
gland, implicating increased relaxin production with increased
prostatic hyperplasia in older mammals (15).
Although the progressively increasing actions of relaxin appear to now
affect many tissues and cells outside the female reproductive tract, to
date only limited sources of relaxin production have been reported.
Within the female reproductive tract, relaxin is primarily produced by
the corpus luteum (CL)1 in
both pregnant and nonpregnant mammalian species, although it attains
the highest plasma levels during pregnancy (1). Depending on the
species, relaxin is also produced by the decidua, placenta, and
endometrium and in thecal and granulosa cells (16) of the ovarian
follicle (1). Another minor source of relaxin production in the female
guinea pig is the mammary gland (17), whereas the prostate appears to
be the major source of relaxin in the male (18, 19). Immunoreactive
relaxin levels and binding sites for relaxin have also been detected in
many organs and cells, such as in the heart and brain (1). Even though
relaxin is clearly a paracrine factor, the known sources of relaxin
production do not correlate with all the sites of expression. Hence, it
is quite possible that other relaxin-like molecules exist, which may
contribute to the functions of relaxin described to date and possible
additional new functions.
Relaxin sequences from many species have been characterized, and it is
now well established that relaxin is structurally related to the
insulin/IGF family of peptide hormones (1). All relaxins have a
two-chain structure comprising an A- and B-peptide chain linked by
disulfide bonds with an intra-chain disulfide bond in the A-chain,
analogous to that of insulin. Recently, two new insulin-like members of
this peptide family have been identified in the expressed sequence tag
(EST) data base (20, 21). The availability of the human genome sequence
provides a unique opportunity to discover other novel relaxin and
relaxin-related genes. This study describes the use of the Celera
Discovery System and Celera Genomics associated data bases to identify
a new human and mouse relaxin gene.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Sequence Identification--
The Celera Discovery System and
Celera Genomics associated data bases were searched for novel relaxin
homologues. Six sequences classified by computational annotation were
identified in the biomolecular library, designated as protein subfamily
of signaling molecules, protein/peptide hormone, relaxin-related. Two
of these sequences corresponded to the previously characterized H1 and H2 relaxins, and three others corresponded to human insulin 4 (INSL4),
insulin 5 (INSL5), and insulin 6 (INSL6). The final sequence encoded a
peptide with relatively low homology to H1 and H2 relaxin but
containing the key structural elements of relaxin peptides. This
sequence (Celera accession number CSN002;
www.celera.com/publicationlibrary) did not correspond to any
sequences in the public data base but had significant homology to a rat
EST clone. A subsequent BlastN search of the incomplete mouse genome
data base in Celera, using the human sequence, identified genomic
fragments with high homology to the human gene. A complete coding
sequence was assembled from multiple genome fragments that displayed a
similar genomic structure to the human gene. Subsequently, the
availability of the complete mouse genome enabled confirmation of this
coding sequence and assembly of the entire gene locus. Like the human
gene, this sequence (Celera accession number CSN003) did not correspond
to any sequence in the public data base but aligned with the same rat
EST clone. Phylogenetic analysis was conducted on the human and mouse
sequences compared with mouse relaxin and human members of the
relaxin/insulin/IGF family using the Megalign program in Lasergene
(DNASTAR Inc., Madison, WI). The peptides and their appropriate
GenBankTM accession numbers are as follows: mouse relaxin
(Z27088), human insulin (XM 028180), INSL3 (XM 009297), INSL4 (L
34838), INSL5 (XM 001861), INSL6 (NM 007179), IGF1 (NM 000618), and
IGF2 (NM 000612).
Human Relaxin (H3) Studies
Solid Phase Synthesis--
A putative peptide
sequence encoded by the H3 gene was assembled by solid phase
synthesis procedures based on the predicted signal peptide and
proteolytic enzyme cleavage sites between the signal peptide and the
B-chain, and the B/C- and C/A-chain junctions of the H3 relaxin
prohormone (see "Results" for details). For ease of synthesis we
chose to prepare the A- and B-peptides as their C-terminal-amide
derivatives. Selectively S-protected A- and B-chains were synthesized
on a 0.1 mmol scale by the continuous flow Fmoc
(N-(9-fluorenyl)methoxycarbonyl) solid phase method as
described previously (22). Selective S-protection was afforded for the
following cysteine residues: trityl (Trt) for A10,15 and
B22, tert-butyl for A24, and
acetamidomethyl for A11 and B10 (see Fig.
2A for numbering of amino acid residues).
On completion of the syntheses, the S-protected A- and B-chains were
cleaved from the solid supports and simultaneously side chain-deprotected by treatment with trifluoroacetic acid in the presence of scavengers. Selective disulfide bond formation was achieved
essentially as described for the synthesis of bombyxin (23).
Peptide Characterization--
Peptides were quantitated by
duplicate amino acid analysis of 24-h acid hydrolysates on a GBC
automatic analyzer (Melbourne, Australia). MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry
(MS) was performed in the linear mode at 19.5 kV on a Bruker Biflex
instrument (Bremen, Germany) equipped with delayed ion extraction.
Other Relaxin and Insulin Peptides--
Human INSL3 was
synthesized using the same methodology used for ovine INSL3 (22) and
was characterized by MS and amino acid analysis as outlined above. H1
relaxin was synthesized previously (24); recombinant H2 relaxin was a
gift from the Connetics Corp. (Palo Alto, CA), and bovine insulin was
purchased from Roche Molecular Biochemicals.
THP-1 Cell Bioassay--
The ability of H3 relaxin to induce
cAMP production in the human monocytic cell line (THP-1) was compared
with H1 and H2 relaxin following the procedure of Parsell and
colleagues (25), with the following modifications: THP-1 cells that had
been viability tested using trypan blue were resuspended in media and
transferred to a 96-well plate at a density of 60,000 cells/well.
Peptides (H1, H2, H3 relaxin, human INSL3, and bovine insulin) were
added to the wells together with 1 µM forskolin and 50 µM isobutylmethylxanthine in RPMI media and incubated at
37 °C for 30 min. The plate was then briefly centrifuged; the media
were removed and the cells resuspended in lysis buffer. cAMP levels
were measured in the lysates using the cAMP Biotrak EIA system
(Amersham Biosciences). The results are expressed as the maximum
relaxin response (percent) in comparison to the maximum stimulation of
cAMP achieved with H2 relaxin. Data represent the mean ± S.E. of
three experiments performed in quadruplicate and are plotted using
PRISM (Graphpad Inc., San Diego, CA).
THP-1 Cell Binding Assay--
THP-1 cells were spun down and
resuspended in binding buffer (20 mM HEPES, 50 mM NaCl, 1.5 mM CaCl2, 1% bovine
serum albumin, 0.1 mg/ml lysine, 0.01% NaN4, pH 7.5) (25)
to give 2 × 106 cells/well in a 96-well plate. The
cells were incubated in binding buffer with 33P-labeled H2
(B33) relaxin (100 pM), labeled as previously described (11) at 25 °C for 90 min in the absence or presence of increasing concentrations of unlabeled H1, H2 and H3 relaxin (100 pM
to 30 nM)). Nonspecific binding was defined with H2 relaxin
(1 µM). Cells were harvested using a Packard 96-well
plate cell harvester, and Whatman GF/C glass fiber filters were treated
with 0.5% polyethyleneimine. The filters were washed three times with
modified binding buffer (20 mM HEPES, 50 mM
NaCl, 1.5 mM CaCl2), dried in a 37 °C oven, and the radioactivity counted by liquid scintillation spectrometry (TopCountTM, Packard Instrument Co.).
Antibody Cross-reactivity--
The ability of well characterized
human relaxin antibodies to recognize H3 relaxin was tested in
comparison to H1 and H2 relaxins by radioimmunoassay. Briefly, goat
anti-H2 relaxin (26) was coated onto 96-well ELISA plates (Disposable
Products, Adelaide, Australia) at a dilution of 1:1000 with 0.05 M sodium carbonate buffer at 4 °C overnight. After
washing twice with PBS-T (phosphate buffered saline; 0.05% Tween 20, pH 7.4), dilutions of human relaxin peptides dissolved in 50 µl of
assay buffer (1% bovine serum albumin in PBS-T) were added together
with 50,000 cpm 125I-labeled relaxin in 50 µl of assay
buffer. H2 relaxin was 125I-labeled and purified by high
pressure liquid chromatography (27). After an overnight incubation at
4 °C, the plates were washed twice with PBS-T. The antibody-bound
125I-labeled H2 relaxin was collected by the addition of 1 M NaOH and decanted into tubes for counting on a Packard
5010 gamma counter (Packard Instrument Co.). Experiments were performed
at least twice and similar results obtained. Data were plotted as the
mean ± S.E. from one representative experiment performed in
triplicate and plotted using PRISM.
Mouse Relaxin (M3) Studies
Animals--
All male and female mice used in these studies were
age-matched and had the same background (C57BLK6J). Animals were housed in a controlled environment and maintained on a 14-h light, 10-h dark
schedule with access to rodent lab chow (Barastock Stockfeeds, Melbourne, Australia) and water. Female mice (3.5 months old) were
mated, and pregnancy was timed from the identification of the vaginal
plug. At day 7.5, 10.5, and 18.5 of pregnancy, mice were sacrificed for
tissue collection. Tissues were also collected from nonpregnant female
and male mice (4 months old). These experiments were approved by the
Howard Florey Institute's Animal Experimental Ethics Committee, which
adheres to the Australian Code of Practice for the care and use of
laboratory animals for scientific purposes.
Tissue Collection--
Animals were killed with an overdose of
Isofluorane (Abbott Australasia Pty. Ltd., Sydney, Australia). The
brain, heart, thymus, spleen, lung, liver, kidneys, skin, and gut were
collected along with the reproductive organs from female (ovary,
endometrium, myometrium, cervix, vagina; n = 2 for each
pregnancy stage) and male (testes, epididymis, prostate;
n = 3) mice. From additional animals, male brains
(n = 3) were dissected into specific regions including
the hypothalamus, cortex, hippocampus, thalamus, medulla, and
cerebellum and immediately placed in liquid nitrogen and stored at
80 °C until used for RNA preparation. Female brains
(n = 3) were collected and immediately frozen over dry
ice for in situ hybridization histochemistry (28). Human CL
from women in early pregnancy undergoing surgery for ectopic
pregnancies were utilized with the approval of the Howard Florey
Institute Human Ethics Committee and the written consent of the patients.
Tissue RNA/DNA Extraction and RT-PCR--
Human genomic DNA was
extracted from human CL using standard protocols (29). Human CL and
mouse tissues were finely diced in the presence of liquid nitrogen and
immediately homogenized with RNAWiz reagent (Ambion Inc., Austin, TX),
and the RNA was extracted according to the manufacturer's
instructions. Total RNA (5 µg) from each sample was used for the
reverse transcription (RT) reaction, which was performed using the
Superscript II RT-PCR kit (Invitrogen) in a 20-µl volume according to
the manufacturer's instructions. A 50-µl reaction containing 100 ng
of primers and 150 ng of the cDNA template was used for all PCRs.
Mouse tissues were screened for M3 relaxin expression using
specific forward (5'-TGCGGAGGCTCACGATGGCGC-3') and reverse
(5'-GACAGCAGCTTGCAGGCACGG-3') primers, which generated a 319-bp
product. Mouse relaxin (M1) expression was determined using a specific
forward (5'-GTGAATATGCCCGTGAATTGATC-3') and reverse
(5'-AGCGTCGTATCGAAAGGCTCT-3') primer based on the published sequence
(30), generating a 150-bp product. Human CL cDNA was used in
RT-PCRs with specific primers for H3 relaxin, forward 1 (5'-ACGTTCAAAGCGTCTCCGTCC-3'), forward 2 (5'-CGGTGGAGACGATCAGACATC-3'), and reverse (5' ATGGCAGGACTGGGGCATTGG-3'), generating products of 504- and 310-bp for forward 1/reverse and forward 2/reverse, respectively.
All primer combinations crossed the single introns in the mouse and
human relaxin sequences, respectively, so as to control for genomic DNA
contamination. In all experiments GAPDH forward
(5'-TGATGACATCAAGAAGGTGG-3') and reverse (5'-TTTCTTACTCCTTGGAGGCC-3') primers generating a product of 246 bp were used in separate PCRs to control for quality and equivalent loading of the cDNA. M3 relaxin expression by RT-PCR was performed on cDNA samples
extracted from at least two animals, although the results from only one representative experiment are shown. The mouse PCRs were completed in a
PerkinElmer Life Sciences Gene Amplifier using the following (touch
down) annealing temperatures: 64 (2 cycles), 63 (2 cycles), 62 (2 cycles), 61 (2 cycles), and 60 °C (32 cycles). H3 relaxin expression
in human CL cDNA was performed by RT-PCR at the following annealing
temperatures: 60 (2 cycles), 59 (2 cycles), 58 (2 cycles), 57 (2 cycles), and 56 °C (32 cycles). Aliquots of the PCR products were
electrophoresed on 2% (w/v) agarose gels stained with ethidium bromide
and photographed. Mouse tissue samples were transferred to Hybond NX
membranes (Amersham Biosciences) for Southern blot analysis.
An additional PCR was performed using mouse brain and ovarian cDNA
using the reverse M3 primer (above) and a forward primer from in
front of the ATG start codon (5'-GGGTCGCAGGCATCTCAACTG-3'). The
resulting product contained the full coding sequence and therefore confirmed the Celera-based sequence. PCR was performed as above but
with the following annealing temperatures: 60 (2 cycles), 59 (2 cycles), 58 (2 cycles), 57 (2 cycles), and 56 °C (32 cycles). To
generate a specific H3 relaxin cDNA probe for 32P
labeling and to utilize it for subsequent probing of a human multitissue array, RT-PCR was performed on human genomic DNA (50 ng).
Specific forward (5'-CGGATGCAGATGCTGATGAAG-3') and reverse (5'-GTGCCTGAGCCCACAGTGCCT-3') primers from the exon II sequence of the H3 relaxin gene were used at the following annealing
temperatures: 60 (2 cycles), 59 (2 cycles), 58 °C (2 cycles), 56 (2 cycles), and 54 °C (32 cycles). These products as well as the mouse
PCR products described above were separated on 2% agarose gels. Bands were detected of the expected size under UV light (mouse 319 and 478 bp; human 374 bp), excised, and eluted from the gel using the
Ultraclean TM 15 DNA purification kit (Geneworks Pty. Ltd., Adelaide,
Australia). The bands were subsequently subcloned into the pGEM-T
vector (Promega, Madison, WI), and multiple subclones were then
sequenced on both strands using the ABI PRISM 377 automatic DNA
sequencer, according to the manufacturer's instructions (Applied Biosystems, Melbourne, Australia).
Southern Blot Analysis--
PCR products on membranes were
hybridized against specific internal oligonucleotide primers for
the M1 relaxin (5'-CAAGCAGAGCTGGCTCCTCCTGGCTCAAAGCCAATCTTC-3') and M3
relaxin (5'-AATTTGGCTCTTGCTACAGCCCCACTCGCAGCAACTGCT-3') cDNA
sequences, which had been labeled using T4 polynucleotide kinase and
[
-32P]ATP. Hybridization was performed at 55 °C
overnight in 5× SSC (1× SSC: 0.15 M NaCl, 15 mM sodium citrate, pH 7), 5× Denhardt's, 1% SDS, and 100 µg/ml sonicated herring sperm. Membranes were washed three times for
5 min in 2× SSC, 0.1% SDS at room temperature followed by a 30-min
wash at 55 °C in 0.1× SSC, 0.1% SDS, before being exposed to
BioMAX MR film (Eastman Kodak Co.) for 24 h at room temperature.
Northern Blot Analysis--
To examine further the expression of
M3 relaxin compared with M1 relaxin mRNA, total RNA (5-25 µg)
from the heart, brain, lung, thymus, and spleen of male mice and ovary,
endometrium, myometrium, cervix, and vagina of female mice pooled from
day 7.5, 10.5, and 18.5 of pregnancy were run on standard
MOPS/formaldehyde gels. RNA was then transferred to optimized Hybond-NX
membranes and probed for M3 and M1 relaxin and GAPDH mRNA with
32P-labeled probes corresponding to the PCR products
generated by specific primers (see above). These products were labeled
with [
-32P]dCTP using the specific reverse primers
(above) and T7 polymerase as described previously (31). The membrane
was hybridized at 65 °C overnight in 0.25 M
NaH2PO4, pH 7.2, 1 mM EDTA, 20%
SDS, followed by three washes for 5 min in 2× SSC, 0.1% SDS at room temperature, and finally a 30-min wash at 65 °C in 0.1× SSC, 0.1% SDS. Membranes were first exposed to a PhosphorImager plate for 48 h at room temperature before being analyzed in a FujiX 2000 PhosphorImager (Fuji Photo Co., Japan) and then exposed to BioMAX MS
film (Integrated Sciences, Melbourne, Australia) together with a
Hyperscreen (Amersham Biosciences) at
80 °C. In a separate experiment, total RNA (200 µg) from the male brain was purified to
poly(A) RNA using an mRNA purification kit (Amersham Biosciences), and Northern blotting together with total RNA from day 18.5 ovary (5 µg) was performed as described above. A human multiple tissue expression array (CLONTECH laboratories, Palo Alto,
CA) was hybridized with a 32P-labeled H3 relaxin-specific
probe according to the manufacturer's recommendations. The 374-bp
fragment of the H3 relaxin sequence isolated from genomic DNA was
labeled with [
-32P]dCTP using the H3 relaxin-specific
reverse primer (described above) and T7 polymerase (31). The membrane
was exposed to a PhosphorImager plate and BioMAX film as described above.
In Situ Hybridization Histochemistry--
Coronal sections (14 µm) were cut on a cryostat at
16 °C and mounted on silane-coated
slides. Sections were delipidated in chloroform for 10 min,
rinsed, and stored in 100% ethanol at 4 °C. Three oligonucleotides
(39-mers), 5'-GGTGGTCTGTATTGGCTTCTCCATCAGCGAAGAAGTCCC-3', 5'-AATTTGGCTCTTGCTACAGCCCCACTCGCACGAACTGCT-3', and
5'-TAAGGAGACAGTGGACCCCTTGGTGCCTCGCCTGTAGGA-3', of the M3 relaxin
mRNA sequence, and three oligonucleotides, 5'- GCACATCCGAATGAATCCGTCCATCCACTCCTCCGAGAC-3',
5'-CAAGCAGAGCTGGCTCCTCCTGGCTCAAAGCCAATCTTC-3', and
5'-GTTGTAGCTCTGGGAGCGAGGCCTGAGCCTCAGACAGTA-3', of the previously known M1 relaxin sequence (30) were prepared commercially (Geneworks Pty. Ltd.). Probes were labeled with [
-35S]dATP (1200 Ci/mmol; Amrad, Melbourne, Australia) to a specific activity of 1 × 109 dpm/µg using terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase
(Roche Molecular Biochemicals (32)). Screening of the sequences used
against gene sequence data bases (Celera, EMBL. and
GenBankTM; NCBI/National Institutes of Health Blast
Service) revealed homology only with the appropriate M1 and M3 relaxin mRNAs.
Sections were incubated overnight at 42 °C with multiple
35S-labeled probes (30 fmol each probe/slide) in
hybridization buffer containing 50% formamide, 4× SSC, 10% dextran
sulfate, and 0.2 M dithiothreitol. Slides were washed in
1× SSC at 55 °C for 1 h, rinsed in 0.1× SSC, and then
dehydrated before being apposed to Kodak BioMAX MR for 10 days.
The authenticity of the hybridization was confirmed by the
demonstration that the signal could be successfully blocked in all
areas by the addition of a 100-fold excess of unlabeled probes to the
hybridization buffer, except those that corresponded to nonspecific or
background hybridization (data not shown). In addition, three
oligonucleotide probes were used that were complementary to different,
nonoverlapping regions of the M3 relaxin gene sequence.
 |
RESULTS |
Characterization of H3 and M3 Relaxin Gene Sequences--
Searches
of the Celera Discovery System and Celera Genomics associated data
bases resulted in the identification of a novel human relaxin gene. A
novel mouse relaxin gene was also discovered by using the human
sequence to search by using BlastN the incomplete mouse data base. The
mouse sequence was initially constructed from the incomplete mouse data
base by assembly of aligned 500-700-bp fragments of the mouse genome.
Subsequently, the fully annotated mouse sequence has become available
in the Celera data base and has allowed the confirmation of the gene
sequence including determination of the exact intron size (1446 bp).
Furthermore, the mouse coding region sequence has been confirmed by
sequencing of multiple subclones of RT-PCR products from the mouse
ovary and brain (see below). The human sequence has been designated
H3 relaxin, for human gene 3, as it is the third relaxin
gene to be discovered in the human. We have designated the mouse
sequence as M3 relaxin for consistency, although there is
currently only one other relaxin gene identified in the mouse (30).
Both novel relaxin sequences contain features representative of
functional genes (Fig. 1, A,
human, and B, mouse). Each contains a putative TATA box for
initiation of transcription 65 and 59 bp upstream of putative ATG start
codons for human and mouse, respectively. A polyadenylation signal is
present in the 3'-untranslated region of both genes, in a position 582 and 448 bp downstream from an in-frame TAG stop codon for the human and
mouse genes, respectively. A single intron interrupts the coding region
in an identical position in the sequence of both genes, corresponding to a similar position to that of other relaxin and insulin family members (2, 30, 33). The H3 relaxin gene is localized on chromosome 19 at 19p13.3, whereas the mouse gene is located on chromosome 8 at 8C2. The derived coding regions of the H3
and M3 relaxin genes were 142 and 141 amino acids,
respectively.

View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Assembled DNA sequence of the
H3 (A) and M3
(B) genes. Start and stop codons as well as
predicted TATA boxes and polyadenylation sequences are
underlined. The positions of the putative signal peptide and
B-, C-, and A-chain peptide sequences are indicated by
arrows. A- and B-chain sequences are boxed, and
the residues implicated in relaxin receptor binding are
shaded. The intron sequence, which is at an identical
position in the C-chain in both sequences, is indicated by
lowercase letters, and the exact size of the intron is
marked. These data were generated through use of the Celera Discovery
System and Celera Genomics associated data bases.
|
|
The human sequence was characterized within the Celera Discovery System
data base as relaxin-related, based on the homology of the B-chain
peptide motif to relaxin. Specifically, the cysteine residues necessary
for disulfide bond formation are retained in the correct positions,
together with conserved glycine residues necessary for flexibility
around the cysteine linkages (34). Most importantly, the residues
demonstrated to be essential for relaxin receptor binding in the core
of the B-chain (RXXXRXXI) (35) have been retained
in both the human and mouse sequences. Therefore, although the human
sequence most closely resembles the hINSL5 peptide sequence on direct
amino acid homology, the presence of this binding motif indicates that
the peptide is more like a relaxin peptide. Interestingly, the M3
relaxin A-chain conforms to the cysteine pattern of family members,
whereas the previously characterized M1 relaxin sequence contains an
extra tyrosine residue before the final cysteine residue (Fig.
2A).

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Sequence comparisons of H3 and M3 relaxin
with other relaxin and insulin family members. Alignments of A-
and B-chain sequences from H3 and M3 relaxin with other human and mouse
relaxin sequences (A). The consensus sequences are
boxed. Cons 1-3, consensus sequence between
human relaxins 1-3. Cons 3, consensus sequence between H3
and M3 relaxin for the B-chain and H3, R3, and M3 relaxin for the
A-chain. Cons Mouse, consensus sequence between M1 and M3
relaxin. The rat sequence is derived from an EST clone (see
"Results" for details). + denotes a conservative
substitution; . denotes no homology. B, phylogenetic tree of
evolution of H3 and M3 relaxin full-length sequences with human
sequences of the relaxin/insulin/IGF superfamily.
|
|
The H3 and M3 sequences share greater than 70% homology in the coding
region at the nucleotide level. However, the homology is most striking
in the derived amino acid sequence. Both derived pro-hormone sequences
contain a typical signal sequence after the ATG start codon which is
likely to be cleaved at an identical position between alanine and
arginine in both the human and mouse peptides (36). The
arginine-arginine pair of basic amino acids at the B/C junction found
with other members of the relaxin family strongly suggests cleavage
between tryptophan and arginine. Similarly, cleavage at the C/A
junction is most likely to occur between the arginine and aspartic acid
as indicated in Fig. 1, A and B, as this
corresponds to a weak furin (proprotein convertase) cleavage site (37).
Therefore, we predict that both H3 and M3 relaxins comprise a B-chain
of 27 amino acids, a C-peptide of 66 amino acids, and an A-chain of 24 amino acids.
A comparison of the A- and B-chain sequences of H3 and M3 relaxin with
H1, H2, and M1 relaxin is outlined in Fig. 2A. There are
only two amino acid differences in both the A- and B-chains between the
M3 and H3 sequences, of which three of these changes are conserved. In
contrast, the homology between M1 and H2 relaxin is only 42 and 45% in
the A- and B-chains, respectively. Furthermore, other than the key core
elements in the B-chain and the key structural elements in the A-chain,
there is very little homology between H2 and H3 relaxin and between M1
and M3 relaxin. Interestingly, H3 and M3 relaxin show high homology of
the C-peptide domain (73%), compared with less than 20% homology in
this region of other insulin/relaxin family members. The C-peptide
lengths of H3 and M3 relaxin are 65 and 66 amino acids, respectively,
and are much shorter than that of other relaxins (102 amino acids for
H1 and H2 and 99 amino acids for M1 relaxin). The C-peptide chain
length and sequence homology is most similar to INSL5 (24%).
The full-length amino acid sequences of the two genes were aligned to
other members of the insulin/relaxin family, and a phylogenetic tree
was generated (Fig. 2B). The H3 and M3 relaxin sequences are
grouped under a separate branch, indicating that the evolution of these
particular relaxins diverged from other relaxins early in evolution.
This was also the case for INSL5 within this analysis, which
interestingly shares closest primary structural similarity to H3 relaxin.
Significant homology at the nucleotide level to any sequences in the
public data bases were not found, except for two rat EST clones. These
two clones (GenBankTM accession numbers AW 521175 and AW
523625) were identical partial sequences from a rat brain subtracted
cDNA library (Research Genetics, Huntsville, AL). The predicted
amino acid sequences from these partial clones encode a sequence
including all of the A-chain of the rat (R3) relaxin homologue (Fig.
2A) as well as three amino acids (GRR) from the C-peptide
chain. This sequence is identical to the M3 relaxin sequence, apart
from the substitution of arginine for serine in the C-peptide chain.
Peptide Synthesis--
H3 relaxin was prepared by solid phase
synthesis in low overall yield (0.7%). MALDI-TOF MS showed a single
product with an MH+ of 5,494.7 (theoretical value,
5,497.5). Amino acid analysis also confirmed its correct composition.
Demonstration of Relaxin Activity of Synthetic H3
Relaxin--
Synthetic H3 relaxin C-terminal amide derivatives were
tested for relaxin activity in a relaxin receptor expressing cell line, THP-1 (25). H2 relaxin produces a dose-dependent increase
in cAMP production from these cells (Fig.
3A). Synthetic H3 relaxin also
stimulated a dose-dependent increase in cAMP
(pEC50 = 8.68 ± 0.08 (2.11 nM);
n = 3), albeit with slightly lower activity than H1
(pEC50 = 9.10 ± 0.05 (0.794 nM);
n = 3) and H2 (pEC50 = 9.67 ± 0.11 (0.214 nM); n = 3) relaxin. The specificity
of this response was demonstrated by the inability of bovine insulin
(bINSL) or human insulin 3 (hINSL3) to stimulate cAMP responses at
doses up to 1 µM.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Bioactivity of H3 compared with H1 and H2
relaxin in a human relaxin receptor expressing cell line.
A, cAMP accumulation in THP-1 cells upon stimulation with
peptides. Data are expressed as mean ± S.E. of the maximum
response (%) to H2 relaxin (n = 3). The response to
bovine insulin (bINSL) and human INSL3 (hINSL3)
are also shown to highlight the specificity of the assay.
H1, H2, and H3, human 1, 2, and 3 relaxin, respectively. B, the ability of H1
(n = 7), H2 (n = 11), and H3
(n = 3) relaxin peptides to compete for
33P-labeled H2 relaxin (B33) binding to THP-1 cells. Data
are expressed as mean ± S.E. of the specific binding (%).
|
|
Synthetic H3 relaxin was also tested for its ability to compete for
33P-labeled H2 relaxin binding to relaxin-binding sites in
THP-1 cells (Fig. 3B), with an affinity
(pKi = 7.5 ± 0.16; n = 3)
lower than that of H2 (pKi = 8.74 ± 0.11;
n = 11) and H1 (pKi = 9.0 ± 0.11; n = 7) relaxin. Nevertheless, these data provide
definitive evidence that the synthetic H3 relaxin peptide binds to and
elicits a second messenger response by stimulating human relaxin receptors.
Ability of a Well Characterized H2 Relaxin Antibody to Recognize H3
Relaxin--
The ability of a well characterized anti-H2 relaxin
antibody to recognize H1 and H3 relaxin was tested by radioimmunoassay. As shown in Fig. 4, H2 relaxin was able
to displace 125I-labeled H2 relaxin binding to the anti-H2
relaxin antibody with high specificity. In contrast, H1 and H3 relaxin
showed poor cross-reactivity with the antisera as determined by their
poor ability to displace 125I-labeled H2 relaxin binding.
Furthermore, the non-parallelism of the displacement curves indicates
that not all the antibody epitopes are recognized by the two
peptides.

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Ability of a well characterized H2 relaxin
antibody to recognize H3 relaxin. The H2 relaxin antibody was
immobilized onto ELISA plates, and a competition experiment was
performed using H1, H2, and H3 relaxin against 125I-labeled
H2 relaxin. Results are mean ± S.E. of the specific binding (%)
of triplicate determinations from a representative assay.
|
|
Relaxin Gene Expression in the Mouse--
The expression of M3
relaxin mRNA was compared with M1 relaxin mRNA expression using
Southern blotting of RT-PCR products. Although this technique is only
semi-quantitative, it enabled us to determine the potential sites of
expression of M3 relaxin compared with M1 relaxin. The results of a
representative experiment are shown (Fig.
5), and duplicate experiments gave
identical results. M3 relaxin mRNA was expressed in a number of
tissues in C57BLK6J mice where M1 relaxin was found, but the pattern of
expression between the two mouse relaxins was different. In male
non-reproductive tissues (Fig. 5A), the highest levels of M1
relaxin expression were seen in the brain, moderate levels in the
thymus, heart, and kidney, lower levels in the lung, spleen, and skin,
with no expression seen in the gut. Interestingly, M3 relaxin
expression was detected at highest levels in brain; however, it was
expressed at moderate levels in the thymus, lung, and spleen, only at
very low levels in the heart and liver, and not at all in the kidney, skin, and gut. Female mice showed an almost identical pattern of
expression for both genes in these tissues (data not shown). In male
reproductive tissues M3 relaxin mRNA was significantly expressed
only in the testis, whereas M1 relaxin mRNA was detected in the
testis, epididymis, and prostate (Fig. 5B). Both relaxins were also detected in female reproductive organs in the mammary gland,
ovaries of non-pregnant, pregnant, and lactating mice, and the
endometrium and myometrium of pregnant mice (Fig. 5C). Significant expression of M3 relaxin mRNA was observed in all ovarian stages, whereas M1 relaxin expression was higher in ovaries of
late gestation compared with ovaries from non-pregnant and lactating
mice. High levels of M3 relaxin mRNA were detected in the brain,
and further analysis of this tissue revealed that both relaxins were
expressed in several distinct regions (Fig. 5B). Whereas M1
relaxin mRNA was consistently expressed in the hypothalamus, hippocampus, cortex, thalamus, pons/medulla, and cerebellum, M3 relaxin
mRNA was found to be highly expressed in the thalamus and
pons/medulla, thus suggesting that the two relaxins may play distinct
roles in the mouse brain.

View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Southern blot analysis of M1 and M3 relaxin
gene expression in the mouse. Southern blots were conducted on
RT-PCR products (from various male and female mouse tissues) using
specific internal oligonucleotide primers to M1 and M3 relaxin
cDNA, respectively. UV photographs of GAPDH PCR products are shown
as controls for quality, and equivalent loading, of the cDNA. Water
(H2O) replaced cDNA in negative control reactions for
each PCR. Relaxin mRNA expression was determined in a number of
non-reproductive male tissues (A), in reproductive tissues
and specific brain regions of the male (B), and in female
reproductive tissues at different stages of pregnancy
(C).
|
|
Northern Analysis--
Tissues in which M1 and M3 relaxin mRNA
were positively identified by RT-PCR and Southern blot analysis were
further examined by Northern blotting. Total RNA (5-25 µg) from the
heart, brain, lung, thymus, spleen, ovary, endometrium, myometrium,
cervix, and vagina were initially probed with a 32P-labeled
M3 relaxin specific probe, but no specific hybridizing bands were found
in any tissue (Fig. 6A). In
contrast a strong hybridizing signal was seen in the ovary (~1 kb)
using a 32P-labeled M1 relaxin-specific probe. Poly(A) RNA
from the brain (15 µg) together with day 18.5 ovarian total RNA were
then analyzed for M3 and M1 mRNA expression, and a specific
~1.2-kb hybridizing band was identified using the
32P-labeled M3 relaxin probe in the brain only (Fig.
6B). The obtained transcript size was consistent with the
predicted size based on the M3 relaxin transcript sequence (~1 kb)
plus a poly(A) tail (~200-bp). In contrast, no M1 expression was seen
in brain poly(A) RNA although a strong signal was seen in the ovarian
total RNA of the same size as that seen in the total RNA blot and
consistent with the size (~1 kb) published previously (30).

View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Northern blot analysis of M1 and M3 relaxin
mRNA expression in the mouse. Total RNA (5-25 µg) from male
non-reproductive and female pregnant reproductive mouse tissues
(A) were hybridized separately with 32P-labeled
single-stranded M3 relaxin, M1 relaxin, and GAPDH probes. The RNA from
the female reproductive tissues was pooled from day 7.5, 10.5, and 18.5 of pregnancy. B, poly(A) RNA from male brain (15 µg;
purified from 200 µg of total RNA) and total RNA (5 µg) from the
pregnant (day 18.5) ovary (B) were also probed with the M3
relaxin, M1 relaxin, and GAPDH probes. The positions of a 0.24-9.5-kb
RNA ladder are indicated. Note the specific signals for M1 relaxin
(~1 kb) in the ovary and for M3 relaxin (~1.2 kb) in brain poly(A)
RNA.
|
|
Expression of H3 Relaxin in Human Tissues--
A
CLONTECH Multitissue Expression Array was used to
examine the possible sites of expression of H3 relaxin in human
tissues. The array contained normalized poly(A) RNA (50-750 ng) from
76 different human tissues including 8 different control RNAs and DNAs,
spotted onto a nylon membrane. The array was probed with a
32P-labeled 374-bp H3 relaxin-specific gene fragment from
the 3' end of the H3 relaxin transcript, generated from genomic DNA. This DNA fragment was sequenced on both strands and found to be identical to the Celera sequence. Very weak hybridizing signals were
observed in spleen, thymus, peripheral blood leukocytes, lymph node,
and testis; however, these signals were barely discernible above
background, and hence, the data are not shown. RT-PCR was also
performed on human CL from early pregnancy using two different primer
combinations based on the H3 relaxin sequence. No specific bands were
observed in any PCR even after changing the PCR conditions, whereas
transcripts for H2 relaxin and GAPDH were easily amplified (data not
shown), confirming the integrity of the cDNA.
Distribution of Relaxin mRNA in the Mouse Brain--
Given the
high levels of M3 relaxin mRNA expression detected by RT-PCR and
Northern blotting in the brain, its distribution was further examined
using in situ hybridization histochemistry (28). Multiple
specific 35S-labeled oligonucleotide probes were utilized
to determine the cellular distribution of M3 relaxin mRNA
throughout the rostro-caudal extent of the female C57BLK6J mouse brain.
M3 relaxin mRNA was not widely detected throughout brain nuclei but
was most strongly detected in the pons/medulla (Fig.
7). The strongest level of M3 relaxin
mRNA was present in the pars ventromedialis of the dorsal tegmental
nucleus. In addition, M3 relaxin mRNA was also detected, albeit at
far lower levels, in the hippocampus and olfactory regions. Brain
regions containing low levels of mRNA encoding M3 relaxin may not
have been detected in the current study due to sensitivity limitations
associated with in situ hybridization histochemistry. The
distribution of M3 relaxin mRNA in the brain differs from that of
M1 relaxin mRNA, as no M1 relaxin mRNA was detected in the pars
ventromedialis of the dorsal tegmental nucleus (data not shown).

View larger version (126K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
In situ hybridization
histochemical localization of M3 relaxin mRNA in mouse brain.
A near adjacent thionin-stained section (A) reveals the
distribution of M3 relaxin mRNA (B) to be localized to
the pars ventromedialis of the dorsal tegmental nucleus
(vmDTg), situated ventral to the dorsal tegmental nucleus
(DTg), within the pons/medulla. An x-ray film image of M3
relaxin mRNA enriched in the pars ventromedialis of the dorsal
tegmental nucleus of the mouse pons/medulla (B), but not in
the cerebellum (Cb). Scale bar: A, 1 mm;
B, 0.5 mm.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
In recent years many new members of the relaxin/insulin/IGF
superfamily have been identified, either by differential cloning or by
screening of the EST data bases using A- and B-chain motifs (20, 21,
38). The availability of the human genome sequence provides an ideal
tool to screen for other novel relaxin genes. Searching of the Celera
Discovery System and Celera Genomics associated data bases resulted in
the identification of a novel human and mouse relaxin gene. The derived
amino acid sequences of these genes reflect the characteristics of
members of the relaxin/insulin family of peptide hormones. Although the
sequences show highest amino acid homology to INSL5, the presence of an
amino acid motif in the B-chain (RXXXRXXI), which
is essential for relaxin receptor binding (35), indicates that these
sequences are more relaxin-like than insulin-like. Furthermore, the
A-chain of M3 relaxin is more typical in structure to other members of
the relaxin peptide family, wherein the terminal A-chain cysteine
residue is separated from the intra-disulfide bond-linked cysteine by
eight amino acids. The previously characterized M1 relaxin peptide
stands out from all the known relaxin sequences by having nine residues
in this sequence region (30). It remains to be seen if the relaxin
bioactivity of M3 is greater than that of M1 relaxin. The homology of
relaxin peptides between species is generally quite low with H2 and M1 relaxin sharing only 43% homology in the peptide domains. Conversely, H3 and M3 relaxin share 93% homology in the A- and B-domains. It is
difficult to speculate what the significance of this homology is. The
homology of the C-peptide chain between relaxins is also generally
quite low; however, H3 and M3 relaxin show very high homology in this
region and are also much shorter than other relaxins. Again, it is
difficult to speculate on the reason for this difference, but it may
reflect differences in the functioning of the C-chain. Interestingly,
the H3 relaxin B-chain sequence shares 59% sequence homology to a
newly discovered frog relaxin sequence, although it only shares 38%
homology in the A-chain and 14% homology in the C-chain (39).
Considering the high homology between the H3, M3, and R3 relaxins in
the A-chain sequence, it is unlikely that this frog sequence is an H3 homologue.
The H3 relaxin gene is localized on chromosome 19 at 19p13.3
in close proximity (~5 Mb) to INSL3 (19p13.2). In
contrast, H1 and H2 relaxin are in close
proximity on chromosome 9 at 9p24 together with INSL4 and
INSL6, whereas human insulin (11p15) and INSL5 (1p31) are at different locations. The situation is
similar in the mouse where the M3 gene is localized on chromosome 8 at 8C2 about 13 Mb from mouse INSL3 at 8B3.2, whereas
M1 relaxin and INSL6 are localized in a similar
region of chromosome 19 at 19B. These data match the data obtained from
phylogenetic analysis indicating that the novel relaxin genes are
grouped under a separate branch and that this peptide family may have
diverged from other relaxins early in evolution.
A series of relaxins have been successfully prepared in our laboratory
by simple combination of the two fully unprotected A- and B-chains in
solution at high pH (24, 40, 41). Like insulin chain folding and
combination, relaxin chains have a high propensity for correct pairing
and alignment in solution, although yields are often low, due largely
to the poor solubility of the B-chain. However, efforts to use a
similar approach for the preparation of H3 relaxin were unsuccessful
despite the use of many variations of reaction conditions including
temperature, pH, chain ratios, and oxidation buffer. It appears that
the flexible multiserine N-terminal region of the A-chain results in
less successful formation of the
-helix that is an essential
initiation element for subsequent chain combination (42). Consequently,
alternative means of preparation of the H3 relaxin were investigated,
and use of S-selective thiol protection and regioselective disulfide
bond formation was selected. This approach has been successfully used
for the synthesis of other members of the insulin superfamily including
bombyxin and H2 relaxin (23, 43). The strategy employed for bombyxin
afforded H3 relaxin synthesis, albeit in very low overall yield, due to the difficulty in assembly of the A-chain, the poor solubility of the
B-chain under certain conditions, and the large number of intermediate
manipulation and purification steps involved in the chain combination.
Further optimization and refinement of the procedure is currently under
way. Nevertheless, the synthetic H3 relaxin peptide was confirmed to be
homogeneous by chemical characterization using MALDI-TOF MS and
analytical reverse phase-high pressure liquid chromatography.
The synthetic H3 relaxin peptide was tested for its ability to bind to,
and elicit a biological response from, a human cell line (THP-1) that
expresses the relaxin receptor and that is used routinely as an
in vitro relaxin bioassay in our laboratory and elsewhere
(25). The synthetic H3 relaxin peptide was able to compete with
33P-labeled relaxin-binding sites on THP-1 cells with
somewhat lower affinity than H2 or H1 relaxin. Furthermore, stimulation
of THP-1 cells with the synthetic H3 relaxin peptide resulted in a
dose-dependent increase in cAMP production, again with
slightly lower activity than seen with H1 and H2 relaxin. Importantly,
both hINSL3 and bINSL (1 µM) do not stimulate cAMP
production from THP-1 cells. Although the relaxin receptor has yet to
be cloned, relaxin has been clearly demonstrated to bind to cell
surface receptors distinct from insulin, IGF, or INSL3 receptors (44,
45). Furthermore, we have recently shown (46, 47) that a synthetic
sheep INSL3 peptide modified to contain the full relaxin-binding motif
in the same position in the B-chain as relaxin has only minimal relaxin activity. Therefore, our data provide conclusive evidence that this
novel peptide retains the structural features necessary for interaction
with, and activation of, relaxin receptors and can therefore be termed
a "relaxin." Considering the sequence homology between the M3 and
H3 relaxins, it is also likely that a peptide derived from the mouse
sequence should also be considered a relaxin.
Many studies have reported circulating levels of relaxin in human
subjects using an ELISA developed by Genentech (26). We have tested the
ability of the anti-H2 relaxin antibody used in this ELISA to recognize
H1 and H3 relaxins. These results clearly demonstrate poor recognition
of H1 or H3 relaxin by the antisera. Therefore, it can be concluded
that previous studies measuring circulating relaxin levels have only
measured H2 relaxin. Studies currently under way involve the
development of specific antibodies to H3 relaxin to establish an assay
to measure circulating levels and to locate storage sites.
M1 and M3 relaxin gene expression were identified in tissues of the
female reproductive tract and in extra-ovarian tissues such as the
brain, spleen, thymus, and lung, confirming that relaxin is not just a
hormone of pregnancy. Although PCR data suggest that the M3 relaxin
gene is expressed in the ovary, it seems unlikely that it is a luteal
cell product like H2 (3) and M1 relaxin (30). Northern blot analyses
and preliminary in situ hybridization histochemistry data of
ovaries from late pregnant mice failed to detect any specific
expression, and PCR studies using human CL of early pregnancy failed to
amplify a specific transcript. In contrast, a strong hybridizing signal
was seen in the ovary with an M1 relaxin probe, consistent with strong
M1 relaxin expression in the CL during late pregnancy as shown
previously (30). The specific cellular localization of the ovarian
source of the newly discovered relaxin is therefore still to be
determined. This paper demonstrates for the first time M1 relaxin
mRNA expression in the mammalian liver, lung, thymus, spleen,
kidney, skin, testis, epididymis, and myometrium. Furthermore, we show
that M3 relaxin mRNA is present in several tissues including the
brain, thymus, spleen, lung, testis, ovary, and mammary gland and
weakly expressed in the heart, liver, epididymis, prostate, and uterus,
suggesting similar but separate function(s) of the two mouse relaxins.
It should be noted that M3 and M1 relaxin mRNA were only detected in these tissues by RT-PCR, and M3 mRNA expression was only shown in the brain by Northern blot analysis of poly(A) RNA. Alignment of the
relevant M3 probe nucleotide sequence used in the Northern blots with
the nucleotide sequences in this region of other members of the
insulin/relaxin family shows less than 50% nucleotide homology and,
importantly, never in blocks of more than 7 nucleotides. The highest
homology is in fact with the M1 relaxin sequence at 47%, and as the
Northern blots did not show any specific hybridization of the M3 probe
to ovarian RNA, it clearly indicates that it does not cross-react with
M1 relaxin mRNA. It is therefore not possible that the specific
signal that we are demonstrating for the new relaxin gene (M3) in the
brain is the result of hybridization to mRNA of another family
member. Furthermore, M3 relaxin mRNA has been clearly demonstrated
to be expressed in distinct brain regions to that of M1 relaxin
mRNA by in situ hybridization. It is also probable that
M3 and M1 relaxin expression in other tissues detected by RT-PCR
resides in specific cell types within each tissue. Similarly, results
for H3 relaxin expression in the human multitissue array reflect very
low levels of poly(A) RNA (50-750 ng) for each tissue. These levels
correlate to less than 20 µg of total RNA for each tissue and
therefore mirror the results obtained for total RNA in Northern blots
detected with mouse tissues. These findings suggest that the newly
discovered relaxin may play a role in both male and female
reproduction, in addition to serving functions outside the mammalian
reproductive tract.
The strongest evidence supporting a functional role for the newly
discovered relaxin in mammals is the presence of M3 relaxin mRNA
expression, as detected by Northern blot analysis and in situ hybridization histochemistry, in the mouse brain. In the pons/medulla, M3 relaxin mRNA was highly abundant in cells
encompassing the pars ventromedialis of the dorsal tegmental nucleus
and the dorsal part of the reticular tegmental nucleus of female
C57BLK6J mice. M3 relaxin mRNA was also detected in CA1-3 fields
of the hippocampus. In contrast, M1 relaxin mRNA was detected in
the olfactory system and CA1-3 fields of the hippocampus but was not detected within the pars ventromedialis of the dorsal tegmental nucleus
or the reticular tegmental nucleus, thus suggesting possible differential functions of these two relaxin genes in the mouse brain.
Little is known about the connections or functions of the pars
ventromedialis of the dorsal tegmental nucleus. According to its
location and cytoarchitecture, the pars ventromedialis is reported to
correspond to nucleus O in the rabbit (48). Interestingly, large
numbers of retrogradely labeled neurons have been reported in layer V
of the prefrontal and cingulate cortices and in olfactory areas of the
rat (49), which correspond to regions of the brain previously described
to contain relaxin-binding sites (10). More recently, direct
projections from the pars ventromedialis of the dorsal tegmental
nucleus were demonstrated to the frontal and temporal cortices, and it
was proposed that this nucleus may be involved in the modulation of
cortical activity (50). Behavioral studies suggest an influence of this
nucleus on the regulation of forebrain activity mainly in delayed
motivational, emotional, and associative functions (51). Clearly,
further studies are necessary and are currently under way to better
define the possible role(s) of this novel relaxin neuropeptide in this
specific region of the human and mouse brain.
The availability of the human and mouse genome sequences provides a
unique opportunity to discover novel relaxin genes. This paper
describes the identification, sequencing, activity, and expression of a
novel relaxin gene in the human and mouse, and we are currently
undertaking experiments to define the function of relaxin-3 in the
human, mouse, and rat, particularly in the brain. These studies confirm
that relaxin has many functions outside the female reproductive tract
and point to a role of relaxin in neuropeptide signaling.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We gratefully acknowledge Dr. Marc Mathieu
for valuable input and critique of the manuscript, Dr. Ping Fu for
synthesis of human INSL3, Kathryn Smith for amino acid analysis,
and Tracey Wilkinson for help with data base searching and sequence alignments.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by a block grant to the
Howard Florey Institute (Reg Key 983001) from the National Health and
Medical Research Council of Australia.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
Recipient of a Peter Doherty Postdoctoral fellowship (National
Health and Medical Research Council of Australia).
Recipient of an Australian Research Council QEII fellowship.
Recipient of a National Health and Medical Research Council
of Australia R. D. Wright fellowship. To whom correspondence
should be addressed. Tel.: 61-3-8344-5648; Fax: 61-3-9348-1707;
E-mail: r.bathgate@hfi.unimelb.edu.au.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, October 31, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M107882200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
CL, corpus luteum;
IGF, insulin-like growth factor;
EST, expressed sequence tag;
MALDI-TOF, matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization/time of flight;
MS, mass spectrometry;
ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay;
GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase;
RT, reverse transcription;
MOPS, 4-morpholinepropanesulfonic acid.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Sherwood, O. D.
(1994)
in
The Physiology of Reproduction
(Knobil, E.
, and Neill, J. D., eds), 2nd Ed.
, pp. 861-1009, Raven Press, Ltd., New York
|
| 2.
|
Hudson, P.,
Haley, M.,
Cronk, M.,
Crawford, R.,
Haralambidis, J.,
Tregear, G.,
Shine, J.,
and Niall, H.
(1983)
Nature
301,
628-631
|
| 3.
|
Hudson, P.,
John, M.,
Crawford, R.,
Haralambidis, J.,
Scanlon, D.,
Gorman, J.,
Tregear, G.,
Shine, J.,
and Niall, H.
(1984)
EMBO J.
3,
2333-2339
|
| 4.
|
Winslow, J. W.,
Shih, A.,
Bourell, J. H.,
Weiss, G.,
Reed, B.,
Stults, J. T.,
and Goldsmith, L. T.
(1992)
Endocrinology
130,
2660-2668
|
| 5.
|
Hansell, D. J.,
Bryant-Greenwood, G. D.,
and Greenwood, F. C.
(1991)
J. Clin. Endocrinol. & Metab.
72,
899-904
|
| 6.
|
Tan, Y. Y.,
Wade, J. D.,
Tregear, G. W.,
and Summers, R. J.
(1998)
Br. J. Pharmacol.
123,
762-770
|
| 7.
|
Unemori, E. N.,
and Amento, E. P.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
10681-10685
|
| 8.
|
Zhao, L.,
Roche, P. J.,
Gunnersen, J. M.,
Hammond, V. E.,
Tregear, G. W.,
Wintour, E. M.,
and Beck, F.
(1999)
Endocrinology
140,
445-453
|
| 9.
|
Bani, D.
(1997)
Gen. Pharmacol.
28,
13-22
|
| 10.
|
Osheroff, P. L.,
and Phillips, H. S.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
6413-6417
|
| 11.
|
Tan, Y. Y.,
Wade, J. D.,
Tregear, G. W.,
and Summers, R. J.
(1999)
Br. J. Pharmacol.
127,
91-98
|
| 12.
|
Parry, L. J.,
Poterski, A. J. S.,
and Jones, S. A.
(1990)
J. Neuroendocrinol.
2,
53-58
|
| 13.
|
Summerlee, A. J.,
Hornsby, D. J.,
and Ramsey, D. G.
(1998)
Endocrinology
139,
2322-2328
|
| 14.
|
Sinnayah, P.,
Burns, P.,
Wade, J. D.,
Weisinger, R. S.,
and McKinley, M. J.
(1999)
Endocrinology
140,
5082-5086
|
| 15.
|
Hornsby, D. J.,
Poterski, R. S.,
and Summerlee, A. J. S.
(2001)
in
Relaxin 2000: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Relaxin and Related Peptides
(Tregear, G. W.
, Ivell, R.
, Bathgate, R. A.
, and Wade, J. D., eds)
, Kluwer Academic Publishers Group, Dordrecht, Netherlands, in press
|
| 16.
|
Stewart, D. R.,
and VandeVoort, C. A.
(1999)
Hum. Reprod.
14,
338-344
|
| 17.
|
Peaker, M.,
Taylor, E.,
Tashima, L.,
Redman, T. L.,
Greenwood, F. C.,
and Bryant-Greenwood, G. D.
(1989)
Endocrinology
125,
693-698
|
| 18.
|
Ivell, R.,
Hunt, N.,
Khan-Dawood, F.,
and Dawood, M. Y.
(1989)
Mol. Cell. Endocrinol.
66,
251-255
|
| 19.
|
Gunnersen, J. M., Fu, P.,
Roche, P. J.,
and Tregear, G. W.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Endocrinol.
118,
85-94
|
| 20.
|
Conklin, D.,
Lofton-Day, C. E.,
Haldeman, B. A.,
Ching, A.,
Whitmore, T. E.,
Lok, S.,
and Jaspers, S.
(1999)
Genomics
60,
50-56
|
| 21.
|
Hsu, S.
(1999)
Mol. Endocrinol.
13,
2163-2174
|
| 22.
|
Dawson, N. F.,
Tan, Y. Y.,
Macris, M.,
Otvos, L., Jr.,
Summers, R. J.,
Tregear, G. W.,
and Wade, J. D.
(1999)
J. Pept. Res.
53,
542-547
|
| 23.
|
Maruyama, K.,
Nagata, K.,
Tanaka, M.,
Nagasawa, H.,
Isogai, A.,
Ishizaki, H.,
and Suzuki, A.
(1992)
J. Protein Chem.
11,
1-12
|
| 24.
|
Wade, J. D.,
Lin, F.,
Salvatore, D.,
Otvos, L., Jr.,
and Tregear, G. W.
(1996)
Biomed. Pept. Protein Nucleic Acids
2,
27-32
|
| 25.
|
Parsell, D. A.,
Mak, J. Y.,
Amento, E. P.,
and Unemori, E. N.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
27936-27941
|
| 26.
|
Lucas, C.,
Bald, L. N.,
Martin, M. C.,
Jaffe, R. B.,
Drolet, D. W.,
Mora-Worms, M.,
Bennett, G.,
Chen, A. B.,
and Johnston, P. D.
(1989)
J. Endocrinol.
120,
449-457
|
| 27.
|
Palejwala, S.,
Stein, D.,
Wojtczuk, A.,
Weiss, G.,
and Goldsmith, L. T.
(1998)
Endocrinology
139,
1208-1212
|
| 28.
|
Burazin, T. C. D.,
Larm, J. A.,
and Gundlach, A. L.
(2001)
J. Neuroendocrinol.
13,
358-370
|
| 29.
|
Sambrook, J.,
Fritsch, E. F.,
and Maniatis, T.
(1989)
Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual
, 2nd Ed.
, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
|
| 30.
|
Evans, B. A.,
John, M.,
Fowler, K. J.,
Summers, R. J.,
Cronk, M.,
Shine, J.,
and Tregear, G. W.
(1993)
J. Mol. Endocrinol.
10,
15-23
|
| 31.
|
Bathgate, R.,
Moniac, N.,
Bartlick, B.,
Schumacher, M.,
Fields, M.,
and Ivell, R.
(1999)
Biol. Reprod.
61,
1090-1098
|
| 32.
|
Wisden, W.,
and Morris, B. J.
(1994)
in
In Situ Hybridization Protocols for the Brain
(Wisden, W.
, and Morris, B. J., eds)
, pp. 9-34, Academic Press, London
|
| 33.
|
Ivell, R.
(1997)
Rev. Reprod.
2,
133-138
|
| 34.
|
Büllesbach, E. E.,
and Schwabe, C.
(1995)
Int. J. Pept. Protein Res.
46,
238-243
|
| 35.
|
Büllesbach, E. E.,
and Schwabe, C.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
35276-35280
|
| 36.
|
Nielsen, H.,
Engelbrecht, J.,
Brunak, S.,
and von Heijne, G.
(1997)
Protein Eng.
10,
1-6
|
| 37.
|
Nakayama, K.
(1997)
Biochem. J.
327,
625-635
|
| 38.
|
Adham, I. M.,
Burkhardt, E.,
Benahmed, M.,
and Engel, W.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
26668-26672
|
| 39.
|
de Rienzo, G.,
Aniello, F.,
Branno, M.,
and Minucci, S.
(2001)
Endocrinology
142,
3231-3238
|
| 40.
|
Wade, J. D.,
Lin, F.,
Talbo, G.,
Otvos, L.,
Tan, Y. Y.,
and Tregear, G. W.
(1997)
Biomed. Pept. Protein Nucleic Acids
2,
89-92
|
| 41.
|
Wade, J. D.,
Layden, S. S.,
Lambert, P. F.,
Kakouris, H.,
and Tregear, G. W.
(1994)
J. Protein Chem.
13,
315-321
|
| 42.
|
Qiao, Z. S.,
Guo, Z. Y.,
and Feng, Y. M.
(2001)
Biochemistry
40,
2662-2668
|
| 43.
|
Büllesbach, E. E.,
and Schwabe, C.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
10754-10761
|
| 44.
|
Büllesbach, E. E.,
Steinetz, B. G.,
and Scwabe, C.
(1995)
in
Progress in Relaxin Research: The Proceedings of the Second International Congress on the Hormone Relaxin
(MacLennan, A. H.
, Tregear, G. W.
, and Bryant-Greenwood, G. D., eds)
, pp. 145-158, Global Publications, Singapore
|
| 45.
|
Büllesbach, E. E.,
and Schwabe, C.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
22354-22358
|
| 46.
|
Claasz, A. A.,
Bathgate, R. A. D.,
Dawson, N. F.,
Summers, R. J.,
Otvos, L, Jr.,
Tregear, G. W.,
and Wade, J. D.
(2001)
in
Relaxin 2000: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Relaxin and Related Peptides
(Tregear, G. W.
, Ivell, R.
, Bathgate, R. A.
, and Wade, J. D., eds)
, Kluwer Academic Publishers Group, Dordrecht, Netherlands, in press
|
| 47.
|
Tan, Y. Y.,
Dawson, N. F.,
Kompa, A. R.,
Bond, C.,
Claasz, A.,
Wade, J. D.,
Tregear, G. W.,
and Summers, R. J.
(2001)
in
Relaxin 2000: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Relaxin and Related Peptides
(Tregear, G. W.
, Ivell, R.
, Bathgate, R. A.
, and Wade, J. D., eds)
, Kluwer Academic Publishers Group, Dordrecht, Netherlands, in press
|
| 48.
|
Meessen, H.,
and Olszewski, J.
(1949)
Cytoarchitectonic Atlas of the Rhombencephalon of the Rabbit
, Karger, New York
|
| 49.
|
Liu, R.,
Chang, L.,
and Wickern, G.
(1984)
Brain Res.
310,
123-132
|
| 50.
|
Herrero, M. T.,
Insausti, R.,
and Gonzalo, L. M.
(1991)
Neurosci. Lett.
123,
144-147
|
| 51.
|
Wilson, P. M.
(1985)
Brain Res. Rev.
10,
85-118
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea