![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 2, 1182-1189, January 11, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Center for Marine Biotechnology and Biomedicine, Scripps
Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La
Jolla, California 92093-0202
Received for publication, August 21, 2001, and in revised form, October 10, 2001
A linear fucose sulfate polymer (FSP),
>106 daltons, is a major component of sea urchin egg
jelly. FSP induces the sperm acrosome reaction (AR), an exocytotic
process required for animal fertilization. Two Ca2+
channels activate during AR induction, the first opens 1 s after FSP addition, and the second opens 5 s after the first. Mild acid hydrolysis of FSP results in a linear decrease in polymer size. The
ability of FSP to induce the AR and activate sperm Ca2+
channels decreases with increasing time of hydrolysis. Hydrolyzed FSP
of ~60 kDa blocks intact FSP from inducing the AR. At 44 µg/ml hydrolyzed FSP, Ca2+ entry into sperm is almost equal to
that occurring in 3.8 µg/ml intact FSP; however the AR is not
induced. The shape of the [Ca2+]i increase curve
and use of the Ca2+ channel blockers nifidipine and
Ni2+ indicate that hydrolyzed FSP opens the second
Ca2+ channel, but not the first, and thus does not induce
the AR. The giant size of intact FSP is required to open both
Ca2+ channels involved in triggering the AR.
The sperm acrosome reaction
(AR)1 is required for animal
fertilization and is a potential target for the development of novel methods of non-hormonal contraception. Sea urchin spermatozoa are ideal
for studying signal transduction underlying the animal sperm AR because
they can be obtained as pure cells in vast quantities at low cost. The
AR is triggered when sperm contact the jelly layer surrounding the egg
(EJ). Morphologically, the AR involves the exocytosis of the acrosomal
vesicle and the polymerization of actin to form the acrosomal process;
both events are required for sperm to bind to and fuse with eggs.
Physiologically, the AR requires the influx of Ca2+ and
Na+ and the efflux of H+ and K+
ions (1, 2). There are two plasma membrane Ca2+ channels
involved in AR induction: the first is receptor-operated and opens
1 s after sperm contact EJ, the second opens 5 s after the
first in response to increased intracellular pH (pHi). The
second channel can also transport Mn2+ (2-4). The
Ca2+ channel blocker nisoldipine does not block
Mn2+ movement through the second channel but does block the
first channel and hence also blocks the AR (3).
Eighty percent of the mass of sea urchin EJ is a fucose sulfate polymer
(FSP) of >1 million daltons (5). Purified FSP, having no amino acid
content, induces the AR (5, 6). However, oligosaccharides of EJ
glycoproteins substantially potentiate the FSP-induced AR, suggesting
there is more than one receptor system regulating ion channels that
trigger the AR (7).2 FSP is a
linear polymer of Receptor for egg jelly-1 (REJ1) is a 1450-amino acid glycoprotein
located in the plasma membrane over the sea urchin sperm acrosomal
vesicle and also on the sperm flagellum. Available data support the
hypothesis that REJ1 is at least one of the sperm receptors for FSP (6,
12). Purified REJ1 neutralizes the AR activity of EJ (12). An affinity
column of REJ1 binds only FSP when crude EJ is applied (6). Monoclonal
antibodies to REJ1 induce Ca2+ influx into sperm (13) and
induce the AR (14). Approximately 1000 residues of REJ1 consist of a
domain named "the REJ module," which is found in only one other
protein family, the polycystin-1s (PKD1; Refs. 12 and 15). PKD1 is
mutated in 85% of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease, the
most frequent human genetic disease (16). The polycystin-1 proteins are
a new class of signaling molecules whose function remains to be
clarified. Recent work shows that they may be regulators or subunits of
nonselective cation channels (17). The "REJ module" homology
between REJ1 and PKD1 is restricted to extracellular regions. Both
proteins have carbohydrate binding, C-type lectin domains (12, 18). Ligands for PKD1 remain unknown.
FSP is the only ligand known to bind to a protein containing a REJ
module. Because FSP is a giant polymer, we studied what effect
reduction of its size might have on sperm physiology. Mild acid
hydrolysis of purified FSP randomly cleaves the large polymer to
smaller size. Treatment of sperm with fragmented FSP triggers the
opening of the second but not the first Ca2+ channel and
also fails to induce the AR. Further results suggest that intact and
fragmented FSP compete for the same binding site(s) and that the
binding of fragmented FSP greatly desensitizes the AR response. The
giant size of intact FSP is therefore required for the normal opening
of both sperm Ca2+ channels involved in AR induction.
Chemicals--
Fura-2/AM, BCECF/AM, and nigericin were from
Molecular Probes (Eugene, OR). Dimethyl sulfoxide was from Research
Organics (Cleveland, OH). Rhodizonic acid disodium and
L-ascorbic acid were from Aldrich. Ionomycin was
from Calbiochem. Other biochemical reagents were from Sigma.
Gamete Handling and Purification of FSP--
Sea urchins
(Strongylocentrotus purpuratus) were injected with 0.5 M KCl, and eggs spawned into seawater-filled beakers.
Settled eggs were washed once and passed though 250-µm Nitex
mesh. Eggs were acid-treated to solubilize EJ by adjusting the pH of
seawater to 5.0 (2 min) with 0.1 N HCl. Solubilized EJ was
recovered by gentle hand centrifugation to sediment dejellied eggs, and
the supernatant was then centrifuged at 30,000 × g for
20 min. This crude EJ supernatant was stored at Fragmentation of FSP by Mild Acid Hydrolysis--
The purified
FSP (1 mg of fucose/ml) was subjected to mild acid hydrolysis (50 mM sodium citrate, pH 3.9, at 80 °C). Hydrolysis was
followed with time by removing 1-ml aliquots and adding 0.1 ml of HEPES
buffer (1 M HEPES, pH 8.0 at 4 °C). Cleavage of the glycan chains was assessed by SDS-PAGE using a 2-15% linear gradient of polyacrylamide gel, followed by toluidine blue staining (0.1% toluidine blue in 20% methanol, 7% acetic acid; Ref. 6). The hydrolysates were dialyzed against either ddH2O for
chemical analyses or artificial seawater (for Ca2+-free,
450 mM NaCl, 48 mM MgSO4, 9 mM KCl, 6 mM NaHCO3; for
Ca2+-plus, add 10 mM CaCl2) for
biological assays. The size of the hydrolyzed FSP (hFSP) was estimated
by Sepharose CL-6B gel filtration chromatography (Amersham
Biosciences, Inc.). Samples of ~1 mg of FSP were applied to the
column (1.2 × 60 cm) equilibrated with 10 mM
HEPES-buffered seawater (pH 8.0), and every fraction was tested with
the metachromatic assay (8). The void and total volume of the column
was determined with dextrans.
Analytical Methods--
Sugar concentrations of intact FSP
(iFSP) and hFSP were determined by the phenol-sulfuric acid assay (20).
One hundred µl of sample was placed in a clean glass tube and mixed
with 100 µl of 5% phenol. One ml of concentrated sulfuric acid was
then added, and the tube was vortexed vigorously and left for 10 min to
cool, the absorbance at 490 nm was read, and the sugar concentrations were determined using L-fucose as a standard. The
concentration of reducing sugar was determined by the Park-Johnson
method (21). One hundred µl each of sample, ferricyanide solution
(0.5 g/liter K3Fe(CN)6), and carbonate cyanide
solution (50 mM Na2CO3, 8.7 mM KCl) were mixed in a glass tube and heated in a boiling
water bath for 15 min. After cooling to room temperature, 0.5 ml of ferric iron solution (1.5 g of
FeNH4(SO4)2, 1 g of SDS in 1 liter of 0.05 N H2SO4) was added,
and the absorbance was read at 690 nm. Sulfate content in hFSP was
determined by the rhodizonate method (22). Samples containing 0-2 µg
of sulfate was placed in 1.5-ml Eppendorf tubes without sealing and
hydrolyzed with 100 µl of 1 N HCl at 80 °C in a heat
block until dry. The contents of the tubes were dissolved in 100 µl
of water, and 400 µl of 100% ethanol was added. To each tube, 200 µl of BaCl2 solution (5 mM BaCl2,
20 mM NaHCO3 in 2 M acetic acid)
and 300 µl of rhodizonate solution (5 mg of sodium rhodizonate, 100 mg of L-ascorbic acid in 100 ml of 80% ethanol) were
added, the tubes were incubated for 10 min in the dark, and the
absorbance was read at 520 nm.
Measurements of Intracellular Ca2+ and pH--
Sperm
obtained within 12 h were used for the measurements of both
intracellular Ca2+ and pH. All procedures for loading
indicator compounds were done on ice and in the dark. Undiluted semen
(4 × 1010 cells/ml) was suspended in 4 volumes of dye
loading buffer (artificial seawater containing 10 mM HEPES,
1 mM CaCl2, and 0.1 mg/ml soybean trypsin
inhibitor at pH 7.0; Ref. 4). The sperm suspension was placed in a
15-ml round bottom polystyrene tube with dimethyl sulfoxide (final
concentration 0.6%) containing either fura-2/AM or BCECF/AM at a final
concentration of 12 µM, and the tube was incubated at
least 8 h before washing. To wash the cells free of the dyes,
sperm suspensions were sedimented in a swinging bucket rotor at
430 × g for 7 min. The resulting supernatants were
removed, and 4 volumes of fresh dye loading buffer were added, followed by gentle mixing until the pellet of sperm was completely resuspended. This washing procedure was repeated twice. The final cell pellet was
resuspended in 4 volumes of fresh dye loading buffer without soybean
trypsin inhibitor and stored on ice in the dark. For the measurement of
intracellular Ca2+, 50 µl of fura-2-loaded sperm (2 × 108 cells/ml) or 10 µl of BCECF-loaded sperm was
placed in an 11-mm diameter glass tube containing 1.5 ml of 10 mM HEPES-buffered artificial seawater, pH 8.0 (HEPES-ASW).
The tube was mounted in a temperature-controlled cell holder (16 °C)
in a FluoroMax-2 fluorometer (JOBIN YVON-SPEX), and the fluorescence at
excitation/emission wavelength pairs of 380/500 and 340/500 nm (for
fura-2) and 490/510 and 440/510 nm (for BCECF) were recorded while
continuously being stirred with a micromagnetic bar. Fura-2 signals are
calibrated as the ratio of 340/380 nm (Figs. 2 and 5) or as
[Ca2+]i/Kd (23) and presented
as an increased [Ca2+]i/Kd
value (
The calibration of pHi was performed as described (24) with
modifications. Briefly, 10 µl of BCECF-loaded sperm are diluted in
1.5 ml of calibration buffer (280 mM NaCl, 210 mM KCl, 27 mM MgCl2, 11 mM CaCl2, 29 mM MgSO4,
2 mM NaHCO3, 10 mM HEPES at pH
values between 7.0 and 8.2), and the fluorescence values with two
different excitation/emission pairs (490/510 and 440/510) were recorded
after the addition of 5 µM nigericin.
Assay for the AR--
The AR was evaluated by scoring the number
of acrosome-reacted sperm under a phase contrast microscope at ×1200
magnification (25). For the assay, fresh undiluted semen was kept on
ice and diluted 50-fold in HEPES-ASW on ice. The sperm suspension was prepared fresh and used within 30 min. Thirty µl of HEPES-ASW including the material to be tested was placed in a 1.5-ml Microfuge tube, and 10 µl of diluted sperm were added. After 5 min of
incubation at 16 °C, the sample was fixed with 40 µl of 6%
glutaraldehyde in seawater. For the competition assay, 30 µl of hFSP
at concentrations ranging from 0 to 65 µg of fucose/ml were
preincubated with a 10-µl sperm suspension in HEPES-ASW for 5 min at 16 °C; then 0.67 µg of fucose/ml of FSP was subsequently
added for another 5 min at 16 °C before fixation with 50 µl of 6%
glutaraldehyde in seawater. A minimum of 200 cells were scored for AR
per data point.
Mild Acid Hydrolysis of FSP--
The Relationship between the Size of FSP and Increase in Intracellular
Ca2+ and pH--
FSPs of various hydrolysis times were
dialyzed against seawater and tested for AR induction. All samples were
diluted with seawater to the point at which iFSP yielded 80% AR. The
AR activity of FSP decreased with increasing times of acid hydrolysis
(Fig. 2A). The AR activity
reached a minimum of 8% after 3 h of hydrolysis (compared with
3% in the no FSP control). Experiments were performed to determine if
the decrease in AR activity was due to a loss of Ca2+
influx. hFSP at final concentrations of 14.1 µg of fucose/ml from
various hydrolysis times were mixed with fura-2-loaded sperm (Fig.
2B). With iFSP (0 h), the level of
[Ca2+]i reached a plateau in 100 s and
continued for more than 300 s (Fig. 2B). This maximum
level of [Ca2+]i decreased as a function of FSP
hydrolysis time. hFSP from 0.5-5 h of hydrolysis did not trigger the
rapid increase in [Ca2+]i seen in iFSP. hFSP from
2-5 h of hydrolysis caused a small, continuous increase in
[Ca2+]i. From these data, we conclude that FSP of
larger molecular mass is needed to induce the normal opening of sperm
Ca2+ channels.
High Concentrations of 5h-hFSP Induce Elevated
[Ca2+]i and pHi but Do Not Induce the
AR--
The effects of treating sperm with high concentrations of
5h-hFSP were also studied. The increase in
[Ca2+]i by either iFSP or 5h-hFSP is linear when
plotted on a logarithmic scale (Fig.
3A). The plots intersect the
horizontal axis at ~0.1 µg of fucose/ml, suggesting that the
threshold concentrations to evoke Ca2+ influx by iFSP and
5h-hFSP are similar. This also suggests that the affinities of iFSP and
5h-hFSP for the sperm surface are comparable. The difference in
[Ca2+]i levels becomes larger as the
concentrations of both FSPs increase. However, 5h-hFSP is much poorer
at opening sperm Ca2+ channels than is iFSP.
A mandatory increase in pHi of about 0.2 unit
occurs along with Ca2+ influx to trigger the AR (2).
Results similar to the
hFSP Blocks AR Induction by iFSP--
One explanation for the loss
of biological activity of hFSP is the loss of affinity for its
receptor. Another explanation is that hFSP retains the capability to
bind to its receptor, but this does not open sperm Ca2+
channels. In the later case, hFSP would be expected to act as an
antagonist and competitively block the AR triggered by iFSP. Sperm were
preincubated for 5 min with 5h-hFSP and then mixed with iFSP (final
concentration 0.67 µg of fucose/ml) under conditions yielding 70% AR
in the control. The iFSP-induced AR was blocked by 5h-hFSP in a
dose-dependent manner (Fig.
4A). Next, 5h-hFSP was mixed
with iFSP prior to the addition of sperm, and the cells were fixed
after 5 min and scored for AR induction. The percentage AR declined in
a similar manner (Fig. 4A). The IC50 of 5h-hFSP was estimated to be 4 µg of fucose/ml in both experiments. This amount is 6-fold greater than that of iFSP needed to induce 70% AR.
The inhibition curve shows two phases, the first being a steep decline
from 0-4 µg of fucose/ml and a second, gradual decline from 4-65
µg of fucose/ml.
Sperm were pretreated for 5 min with 5h-hFSP at a concentration of 4 µg of fucose/ml, then various concentrations of iFSP were added, and
the cells were fixed in 5 min. High concentrations of iFSP induced the
AR (Fig. 4B). These concentrations of iFSP are at least 10 times higher than those required to induce similar percentages of AR
without prior treatment with 5h-hFSP (Fig. 4A). These data
indicate that iFSP and hFSP recognize the same binding site(s) on
sperm. The increase in [Ca2+]i in response to
5h-hFSP and iFSP was measured. Sperm treated with 5h-hFSP increased
[Ca2+]i in a concentration-dependent
manner (Fig. 4C, filled columns) and reached a
steady state after 5 min (data not shown). Subsequently, 5 µg of
fucose/ml of iFSP was added, and [Ca2+]i was
recorded for 5 min. The increase in the
[Ca2+]i/Kd value decreased
with increasing concentrations of 5h-hFSP (Fig. 4C,
open columns). The percentage AR also decreased with
increasing concentrations of 5h-hFSP. Reductions in
The AR Depends on a Rapid, Transient Increase in
[Ca2+]i--
When iFSP was added at 3.8 µg of
fucose/ml, sperm [Ca2+]i increased rapidly and
then decreased to a steady level (Fig. 5). As found by others, this rapid
transient peak in [Ca2+]i represents the opening
of the first Ca2+ channel (4). The peak was maximum at
20-30 s after iFSP addition. Occasionally, at higher concentrations of
iFSP, the first peak is obscured by the subsequent, sustained rise in
[Ca2+]i through the second channel (Fig.
2B). However, the rapid, transient Ca2+ peak is
not observed in 5h-hFSP at any concentration (4.6-44 µg of
fucose/ml) tested (Fig. 5). The steady state
[Ca2+]i level produced by 0.5 µg of fucose/ml
of iFSP was similar to that of 22 µg of fucose/ml of 5h-hFSP. In
agreement with the results mentioned above, 65% AR occurred in 0.5 µg of fucose/ml of iFSP, whereas only 2% AR occurred in 22 µg of
fucose/ml of 5h-hFSP. A striking difference between iFSP and 5h-hFSP is that only iFSP evokes the rapid, transient Ca2+ peak.
However, a relatively large amount of 5h-hFSP (44 µg of fucose/ml)
causes a rapid increase (within a few seconds) in
[Ca2+]i but does not induce the AR. These results
suggest that 5h-hFSP does not open the first Ca2+ channel
but at high enough concentrations does open the second channel.
Nifedipine, a Ca2+ Channel Blocker Specific for the
First Ca2+ Channel, Does Not Block hFSP-induced
Ca2+ Influx--
Ca2+ channel antagonists such
as the dihydropyridines (DHPs) and verapamil, inhibit the AR (26).
Nisoldipine selectively blocks the first Ca2+ channel but
not the second channel (3). Ca2+ influx is absent when
sperm are treated with 10 µM nisoldipine prior to the
addition of FSP (3), suggesting that the second Ca2+
channel is up-regulated by the opening of the first channel. Because an
increase in [Ca2+]i triggered by hFSP occurs
without a rapid, transient peak, we postulated that 1) hFSP regulates
Ca2+ channels other than the first channel or 2) the
FSP-triggered transient Ca2+ peak is due to the opening and
closing of the first channel. To test the first hypothesis we asked
whether DHPs would block the 5h-hFSP-triggered Ca2+ influx.
We chose nifedipine instead of nisoldipine because nifedipine has
been most frequently used among DHPs, and it also blocks the mammalian
sperm AR (27, 28). IC50 for inhibition of the AR by this
compound has been determined to be 26 µM (26). In the absence of nifedipine, 3.6 µg/ml iFSP increased the
[Ca2+]i/Kd by 0.13 in 60 s. However, in the presence of 50 µM nifedipine, this
value was only 0.05, and in the seawater control, 0.04 (Fig.
6A). With 10.6 µg/ml
5h-hFSP, the increased [Ca2+]i/Kd value was 0.08 both
with and without nifedipine, whereas seawater control was 0.03 (Fig.
6B). We conclude that, although the rates of
[Ca2+]i increase differ in the two sets of
experiments, nifedipine does not block Ca2+ influx
triggered by hFSP. The data suggest that hFSP regulates Ca2+ channels other than the first Ca2+
channel.
Ni2+, an Inhibitor of the Second Ca2+
Channel Blocks the hFSP-triggered Ca2+
Influx--
Ni2+ is known to block Ca2+ influx
through the second, but not the first, Ca2+ channel (4). To
test whether 5h-hFSP opens the second channel, Ni2+ was
used at 300 µM, a concentration at which neither a
sustained [Ca2+]i increase nor the AR are induced
(4). A rapid, transient [Ca2+]i increase followed
by a sustained [Ca2+]i increase is observed when
10 µg of fucose/ml iFSP is added to sperm (Fig.
7A). However, in the presence
of Ni2+ only a rapid, transient
[Ca2+]i increase is observed. In contrast, with
50 µg of fucose/ml of 5h-hFSP, only the sustained
[Ca2+]i increase occurs, but it is completely
blocked by Ni2+ (Fig. 7B). From the above data
it is concluded that 5h-hFSP opens the second, but not the first,
Ca2+ channel. Although the [Ca2+]i
level is elevated by hFSP, it is insufficient to induce AR.
Linear polymers of In the present study, the fragmentation of purified FSP was achieved by
mild acid hydrolysis, creating a size-heterogeneous population of
fragments (Fig. 1A). Glycosidic bond cleavage was confirmed
by an increase in reducing sugar with time (Fig. 1B). By 30 min of hydrolysis, gel analysis shows that FSP is still relatively
large; however, it has already lost much of its ability to induce
Ca2+ influx (Fig. 2B). By 2 h of hydrolysis
about 13% of the sulfate groups are lost (Fig. 1D); however
the percent AR induction has decreased from 80 to 20% (Fig.
2A). By 5 h of hydrolysis gel filtration shows that FSP
chromatographs as a broad peak with a relative mass of 60 kDa (Fig.
1C). We cannot distinguish whether the small amount of
sulfate loss, or the decrease in polymer size, are singly, or in
combination, responsible for the loss of biological activity of hFSP.
However, physically braking FSP by sonication at pH 8.0 yields the same
data presented in Figs. 1A and 4A, suggesting that loss of polymer size is responsible for the characteristics of
hFSP described herein (date not shown). In starfish, the giant pentasaccharide repeat polymer of EJ contains two sulfate groups per
repeat. Solvolysis of the polymer shows that the loss of one sulfate
per repeat greatly decreases its ability to induce the AR of starfish
sperm (33).
hFSP samples showed a marked decrease in the ability to induce
Ca2+ influx after 30 min of hydrolysis (Fig.
2B), yet the polymer size was still relatively large (Fig.
1A). The concentration dependences of iFSP and 5h-hFSP to
stimulate increases in Ca2+ and pHi and to induce
the AR show that iFSP is always a more potent inducer than 5h-hFSP
(Fig. 3). 5h-hFSP blocked iFSP from inducing the AR, and this
inhibitory effect was restored by an excess amount of iFSP, suggesting
that both types of FSP bind the same site(s) (Fig. 4, A and
B). Although 22 µg/ml hFSP induced a final
[Ca2+]i elevation equivalent to 0.5 µg/ml iFSP,
AR did not occur in the hFSP-treated cells (Fig. 5). As previously
documented by others, nisoldipine blocks the first Ca2+
channel but not the second (3). Our experiments show that the
hFSP-induced increase in Ca2+ is not inhibited by 50 µM nifedipine, suggesting that hFSP up-regulates the
second channel but not the first (Fig. 6B). This hypothesis is supported by the data showing that Ni2+, which blocks
the second sperm Ca2+ channel but not the first (4),
completely blocks the 5h-hFSP-induced increase in Ca2+
(Fig. 7).
In regard to the mechanism of AR induction in different animal species,
the egg ligands and their sperm receptors appear to be highly variable
and evolutionarily unrelated (34). However, the intracellular mechanism
of the animal sperm AR appears to be conserved in that elevation of
Ca2+ and pHi are required in all species (2). For
example, planar lipid bilayer experiments show that sea urchin and
mouse sperm possess a readily detectable, Ca2+-selective,
sperm-specific, high conductance, multistate,
voltage-dependent channel with similar voltage dependence
(35, 36).
In the NH2-terminal extracellular portion of both proteins
called the "REJ module," sea urchin REJ1 and human PKD1 have
structural motifs identifying them as "C-type lectin-like,"
carbohydrate-binding proteins (12, 18). Ligands for PKD1 are unknown,
but the available evidence suggests that FSP binds REJ1 with high
affinity (6). REJ1 has two carbohydrate recognition domains (CRDs) that
could bind FSP (12). REJ1 has only one transmembrane segment at its extreme COOH terminus with only 15 residues being putatively
cytoplasmic; therefore, REJ1 cannot be a pore-forming ion channel
subunit. Because some (but not all) monoclonal antibodies to REJ1
induce Ca2+ elevations and the AR, REJ1 must be a regulator
of sperm Ca2+ channels (12, 13). The location of REJ1 over
the acrosomal vesicle supports its role in AR regulation.
Given a molecular mass of ~60 kDa in 5h-hFSP and an average molar
ratio of 1.1 sulfate groups per fucose residue (8), the average 5h-hFSP
fragment has about 220 fucosyl residues. This would seem large enough
to bridge many CRDs of many REJ1 proteins. In addition to binding the
plasma membrane receptor REJ1, egg FSP also has affinity for bindin,
the protein released from the acrosomal vesicle that
species-specifically attaches the sperm to the sea urchin egg (37).
Studies on how the size of FSP affects its affinity to bindin have
shown that the large size is again important. Little binding occurred
below an FSP average size of 15 kDa. In addition, sulfate groups were
essential for the binding of FSP to bindin (38). Why is such a giant
size of FSP required for the normal physiological response of opening
both Ca2+ channels? As with other CRD-containing proteins
(39), the two CRDs of REJ1 should recognize terminal sugar residues of
oligosaccharides; therefore, perhaps only the first and last residues
bind REJ1. 5h-hFSP must bind REJ1 receptors because its AR-inhibiting
activity is overridden by an excess amount of iFSP, and it can also
induce Ca2+ increases in sperm.
Our data, and the data of others (4), show that mere elevation of
[Ca2+]i to a certain concentration is not what
induces the AR; it is the pathway leading to induction that is
important. It could be that hFSP uncouples components of the pathway, a
phenomenon that can be demonstrated in these cells by other means. For
example, seawater is ~10 mM Ca2+. Treatment
of sperm with EJ in 2 mM Ca2+ makes the cells
refractory to AR induction and to increases in [Ca2+]i when the Ca2+ is returned to
10 mM (40, 41). This AR inactivation is hypothesized to
result from uncoupling the linkage between the sperm EJ receptors and
Ca2+ channels. Pretreatment of sperm with 5h-hFSP causes a
marked decrease in the AR response, yet [Ca2+]i
increases to reasonably high levels. Desensitization of the AR response
by hFSP is thus different from AR inactivation. This might be due to
opening of the second Ca2+ channel before the first channel
opens, the order of opening being crucial to the AR. Normally, the
first channel causes rapid increases in [Ca2+]i,
whereas the second is responsible for the sustained high level of
[Ca2+]i. The first channel may be activated by
the binding of FSP to REJ1 (6), whereas the second channel, which is
normally activated by the up-regulation of the first channel, has
characteristics of a store-operated channel (4). That binding of hFSP
to the cell surface bypasses the first channel and up-regulates the
second channel suggests that the sensor regulating the second channel could involve unidentified cell surface receptors.
We thank Drs. B. Hayes, A. Varki, J. Esko,
and H. van Halbeek for helpful discussions. We thank Dr. B. Galindo and
Sheryl Huffman for technical suggestions and discussions.
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grants HD12986 and 1P50DK57325.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, November 7, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M108046200
2
N. Hirohashi and V. D. Vacquier, manuscript
in preparation.
The abbreviations used are:
AR, acrosome
reaction;
EJ, egg jelly;
FSP, fucose sulfate polymer;
iFSP, intact FSP;
hFSP, hydrolyzed FSP;
5h-hFSP, FSP fragments generated by 5 h
hydrolysis;
REJ, receptor for egg jelly;
PKD1, polycystin-1;
ASW, artificial seawater;
BCECF, 2',7'-bis-(2-carboxyl)-5-(and-6-)-carboxyfluorescein;
DHP, dihydropyridine;
CRD, carbohydrate recognition domain.
High Molecular Mass Egg Fucose Sulfate Polymer Is Required for
Opening Both Ca2+ Channels Involved in Triggering the Sea
Urchin Sperm Acrosome Reaction*
and
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-L-1,3-fucose with a species-specific pattern of sulfation of the fucosyl residues (8). The sulfation pattern
is responsible for FSP's species-specific induction of the AR (9, 10).
FSP is also a potent inhibitor of human blood coagulation through its
high affinity binding to heparin cofactor II (11).
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
20 °C. Sperm were
collected as undiluted semen and stored on ice. The purification of FSP was performed as described before (5) with some modifications. Egg
jelly was precipitated by the addition of an equal volume of 95%
ethanol. The precipitate was sedimented at 1000 × g
for 5 min and redissolved in distilled water.
-Elimination was
performed by making this solution 0.05 N KOH containing 1 M NaBH4 (24 h at 45 °C). An equal volume of
acetate buffer (50 mM sodium acetate, pH 5.0) was then
added, followed by the addition of 2 M acetic acid to
adjust the pH to 5.0. SDS-PAGE followed by silver staining confirmed
that the EJ proteins were completely degraded. This solution was
applied to a DEAE-cellulose column (14 × 60 mm) equilibrated with
the above acetate buffer. After washing with 5-column volumes of
acetate buffer, bound material was eluted by a linear gradient of NaCl
(0-2.5 M) in acetate buffer. Each fraction was tested by
the metachromatic assay for sulfated glycans (19) and the phenol-sulfuric assay for neutral sugars (20). The FSP peak was eluted
between 1.5 and 2.5 M NaCl. Fractions containing FSP were
pooled, precipitated with 50% ethanol, dissolved in deionized distilled water (ddH2O), and dialyzed against
ddH2O.
[Ca2+]i/Kd) obtained
after 5 min of recording (Figs. 3, 6, and 7). Briefly, if
F1 is the fluorescence intensity at excitation
wavelength 340 nm, F2 is the fluorescence
intensity at excitation wavelength 380 nm, and r = F1/F2, then the free Ca2+ concentration can be shown as
where Rmax is the limiting value of the
ratio R when 3 µM ionomycin is added, and
Rmin is the limiting value of the ratio R when 3 µM ionomycin followed by 15 mM MnCl2 is added.
Sf,2/Sb,2 is simply the ratio of the measured fluorescence intensity at 380 nm
when all of the fura-2 is Ca2+-free (3 µM
ionomycin and 15 mM MnCl2) to the intensity
measured when all of the fura-2 is Ca2+-bound (3 µM ionomycin).
(Eq. 1)
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-eliminated, DEAE-purified
FSP was subjected to mild acid hydrolysis in 0.1 M sodium
citrate, pH 3.9, 80 °C for up to 5 h. The hydrolysates were
neutralized and analyzed on 2-15% gradient SDS-PAGE gels, which were
stained with toluidine blue (Fig.
1A). The apparent size of FSP
decreases with time, the toluidine blue staining appearing as a more
diffuse band, suggesting that variable length fragments are created by
randomly breaking glycosidic bonds. A similar pattern of FSP
fragmentation was observed either in acetate or citrate buffers, pH
3.9, or in 0.1 mN HCl (data not shown). During acid
hydrolysis, the generation of reducing sugar was linear with time, and
a decrease in FSP size was seen up to 5 h, the last time point
taken (Fig. 1, A and B). The size of FSP
fragments generated by 5-h hydrolysis was estimated by Sepharose CL-6B
gel filtration chromatography. The peak appeared at an average estimated molecular mass of 60 kDa, whereas intact FSP eluted in the
void volume fractions (Fig. 1C). Considering a molar ratio of 1.1 to 1.0 sulfate groups per fucose (8), the average FSP fragment
after 5 h of hydrolysis has about 220 fucosyl residues. Loss of
sulfate groups during hydrolysis was examined by the rhodizonate assay.
After 5 h of hydrolysis, 66.2% of the sulfate groups remained, whereas 82.0% of the fucose was recovered (Fig. 1D). The
actual loss of sulfate groups from the retained fucose polymer was
19.3%. However, acid treatment with 0.1 mN HCl caused a
56% loss of sulfate groups after 5 h at 80 °C (data not
shown). For this reason, subsequent hydrolysis of FSP to hFSP was done
in citrate buffer.

View larger version (41K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Fragmentation of FSP of sea urchin EJ by mild
acid hydrolysis. A, hydrolyzed FSPs of various
incubation times were subjected to separation on 2-15% SDS-PAGE and
stained with 0.1% toluidine blue. The arrow indicates the
bottom of the 5% stacking gel. The majority of the FSP in the first
three lanes remains in the stacking gel. Five µg of FSP was loaded
per lane. B, the increase in reducing sugar upon hydrolysis
of FSP in 0.05 M sodium citrate, pH 3.9. FSP was at a
fucose concentration of 340 µg/ml (n = 3).
C, FSPs obtained either before (
) or after (
) 5-h
hydrolysis were chromatographed on Sepharose CL-6B. The
arrows indicate the estimated relative molecular masses as
determined by dextran standards. D, each hydrolysate time
point was quantified for fucose (
) and sulfate (
)
(n = 3).

View larger version (20K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
The relationship between AR induction and
intracellular Ca2+ when sperm are treated with hFSP of
various times of hydrolysis. A, FSP samples were tested
for AR induction. At least 200 sperm were scored per sample
(n = 3). B, the time course of
[Ca2+]i increase was determined with
fura-2-loaded sperm mixed with various hFSPs at the point indicated by
the arrow. hFSP of various hydrolysis times are indicated on
the right. The [Ca2+]i level is
presented as a ratio of two fluorescence intensities
(FI).

View larger version (15K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Comparisons of the elevation in
[Ca2+]i, pHi, and induction of
the AR triggered by 5h-hFSP and iFSP. The increases in both
[Ca2+]i (A) and pHi
(B), triggered by either FSP (
) or 5h-hFSP (
), are
plotted on a logarithmic scale (main panels) of fucose
concentrations and on a linear scale (insets).
[Ca2+]i/Kd and
pHi were calculated as the difference of
[Ca2+]i levels before and 220 s after iFSP
or 5h-hFSP addition. The calibration of
[Ca2+]i/Kd and pHi was
performed as described under "Experimental Procedures."
C, the samples used for [Ca2+]i
experiments were scored for AR induction. Sperm used for
[Ca2+]i and pHi measurements were
obtained from the same male. These experiments are representative
experiments.
[Ca2+]i/Kd curve (Fig.
3A) were obtained when
pHi was measured, except
that the curve for iFSP was not linear (Fig. 3B). The
threshold values for
pHi were higher than those for
[Ca2+]i/Kd (Fig.
3A compared with 3B). The sperm used for
[Ca2+]i measurements were immediately fixed and
scored for AR (Fig. 3C). The AR plots for iFSP are similar
to those obtained in the [Ca2+]i experiments. In
contrast, the percentage of AR triggered by 5h-hFSP was very low even
when [Ca2+]i and pHi were increased with
high concentrations of 5h-hFSP. For example, the equivalent increases
in [Ca2+]i and pHi caused by 3 µg of
fucose/ml of iFSP were observed at 50 µg fucose/ml of 5h-hFSP.
However, when 50% AR was obtained in 3 µg of fucose/ml of iFSP, only
10% AR was induced by 50 µg of fucose/ml of 5h-hFSP. These data show
that high concentrations of hFSP induce the increases in both
[Ca2+]i and pHi but do not induce the
AR.

View larger version (11K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Inhibitory effect of 5h-hFSP on the
iFSP-induced AR. A, sperm (2 × 108
cells/ml) were preincubated with 5h-hFSP at the indicated
concentrations for 5 min. Subsequently, 0.67 µg/ml iFSP was added
(
), or 5h-hFSP and iFSP were mixed together, and then sperm were
added (
). After 5 min the sperm were fixed with 6% glutaraldehyde
in seawater. Approximately 70% AR occurred in the absence of 5h-hFSP.
Data represent two separate experiments, 200 sperm were counted per
data point. B, sperm were pretreated with 4 µg of
fucose/ml of 5h-hFSP for 5 min, and then various concentrations of iFSP
were added. After a 5-min incubation, sperm were fixed and assayed for
AR. C, [Ca2+]i increase in response to
5h-hFSP (0-20 µg of fucose/ml), and the subsequent responses to iFSP
at 4 µg of fucose/ml were measured. The increased
[Ca2+]i values after 5 min of 5h-hFSP
(filled columns) or iFSP (open columns) were
presented as
[Ca2+]i/Kd.
Five min after iFSP addition, a sperm aliquot was fixed and counted for
AR. The percentages of AR were indicated in each column.
[Ca2+]i/Kd and in AR are
not equivalent. For example, sperm treated with 10 µg of fucose/ml of
5h-hFSP showed 26.3% reduction in
[Ca2+]i/Kd, whereas
they were reduced by 85.1% in AR induction. Although the AR
induction is tightly associated with the increase in
[Ca2+]i (Fig. 3, A and B),
pretreatment of sperm with hFSP somehow desensitizes the sperm's
response to the iFSP-induced AR. The desensitization does not involve
blocking Ca2+ uptake.

View larger version (19K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
iFSP and hFSP induce different patterns of
[Ca2+]i increases in sperm.
Either iFSP (bold lines) or 5h-hFSP was mixed with
fura-2-loaded sperm at 80 s. Concentrations of iFSP and 5h-hFSP
used are indicated on the right. After 300 s, sperm
were fixed and scored for AR. The percentage AR is indicated in the
parentheses on the right.

View larger version (27K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Effects of nifedipine on
[Ca2+]i influx triggered by iFSP and
5h-hFSP. iFSP at a final concentration of 3.6 µg/ml
(A) or 5h-hFSP at 10.6 µg/ml (B) was added to
fura-2-loaded sperm in the presence (+Nif) or absence
(
Nif) of 50 µM nifedipine. The
arrows indicate time of iFSP/hFSP additions. Seawater
(SW) was added as a negative control.

View larger version (12K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Effects of Ni2+ on iFSP- and
hFSP-induced increase in
[Ca2+]i.
A, top trace shows the increase in
[Ca2+]i induced by iFSP added at the
arrow. The second trace shows the
[Ca2+]i increase by iFSP in 300 µM
NiCl2. The trace shows increasing and decreasing of
[Ca2+]i regulated by the first Ca2+
channel. B, same conditions as above except that 5h-hFSP was
added instead of iFSP. Bottom trace is the seawater control
in 300 µM NiCl2.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-L-1,3-sulfofucose are only
known in echinoderms (10), the single invertebrate phylum leading to
the evolution of vertebrates (29). In addition to egg jelly coats, these polymers are also found in the extracellular matrix of the adult
body wall in echinoderms (30). The egg FSPs mediate signal transduction
in sperm and are also potent inhibitors of human blood coagulation (11,
31). Their biosynthesis has not been studied, and glycosidases that
degrade them have not been described. The mouse sperm AR is also
triggered by carbohydrate components of the egg's extracellular
matrix; however these are oligosaccharide chains of unknown structure
of the glycoprotein ZP3 (32). Also of interest is the fact that the
sulfation pattern of FSP is responsible for its species-specific
induction of the AR (8-10). Sulfation pattern is a relatively unknown
structural mechanism to confer specificity on a cell-cell interaction
leading to signal transduction and physiological activation. It is also
unusual that a pure carbohydrate, completely lacking amino acids (6),
should induce signal transduction leading to exocytosis in animal cells.
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 858-534-2146;
Fax: 858-534-7313; E-mail: nhirohashi@ucsd.edu.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Schackmann, R. W.,
and Shapiro, B. M.
(1981)
Dev. Biol.
81,
145-154
2.
Darszon, A.,
Labarca, P.,
Nishigaki, T.,
and Espinosa, F.
(1999)
Physiol. Rev.
79,
481-510
3.
Guerrero, A.,
and Darszon, A.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
19593-19599
4.
Gonzalez-Martinez, M. T.,
Galindo, B. E., De La,
Torre, L.,
Zapata, O.,
Rodriguez, E.,
Florman, H. M.,
and Darszon, A.
(2001)
Dev. Biol.
236,
220-229
5.
SeGall, G. K.,
and Lennarz, W. J.
(1979)
Dev. Biol.
71,
33-48
6.
Vacquier, V. D.,
and Moy, G. W.
(1997)
Dev. Biol.
192,
125-135
7.
Keller, S. H.,
and Vacquier, V. D.
(1994)
Dev. Biol.
162,
304-312
8.
Alves, A. P.,
Mulloy, B.,
Moy, G. W.,
Vacquier, V. D.,
and Mourao, P. A.
(1998)
Glycobiology
8,
939-946
9.
Alves, A. P.,
Mulloy, B.,
Diniz, J. A.,
and Mourao, P. A.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
6965-6971
10.
Vilela-Silva, A. C.,
Alves, A. P.,
Valente, A. P.,
Vacquier, V. D.,
and Mourao, P. A.
(1999)
Glycobiology
9,
927-933
11.
Pereira, M. S.,
Mulloy, B.,
and Mourao, P. A.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
7656-7667
12.
Moy, G. W.,
Mendoza, L. M.,
Schulz, J. R.,
Swanson, W. J.,
Glabe, C. G.,
and Vacquier, V. D.
(1996)
J. Cell Biol.
133,
809-817
13.
Trimmer, J. S.,
Schackmann, R. W.,
and Vacquier, V. D.
(1986)
Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. U. S. A.
83,
9055-9059
14.
Trimmer, J. S.,
Ebina, Y.,
Schackmann, R. W.,
Meinhof, C. G.,
and Vacquier, V. D.
(1987)
J. Cell Biol.
105,
1121-1128
15.
Wu, G.,
and Somlo, S.
(2000)
Mol. Genet. Metab.
69,
1-15
16.
Arnaout, M. A.
(2001)
Annu. Rev. Med.
52,
93-123
17.
Gonzalez-Perret, S.,
Kim, K.,
Ibarra, C.,
Damiano, A. E.,
Zotta, E.,
Batelli, M.,
Harris, P. C.,
Reisin, I. L.,
Arnaout, M. A.,
and Cantiello, H. F.
(2001)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
98,
1182-1187
18.
Weston, B. S.,
Bagneris, C.,
Price, R. G.,
and Stirling, J. L.
(2001)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1536,
161-176
19.
Farndale, R. W.,
Buttle, D. J.,
and Barrett, A. J.
(1986)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
883,
173-177
20.
Dubois, M.,
Gilies, J. A.,
Hamilton, J. K.,
Robers, P. A.,
and Smith, F.
(1956)
Anal. Chem.
28,
350-356
21.
Park, J.,
and Johnson, M. J.
(1949)
J. Biol. Chem.
181,
149-151
22.
Terho, T. T.,
and Hartiala, K.
(1971)
Anal. Biochem.
41,
471-476
23.
Kao, J. P. Y.
(1994)
Methods Cell Biol.
40,
155-181
24.
Morris, S. J.,
Wiegmann, T. B.,
Welling, L. W.,
and Chronwall, B. M.
(1994)
Methods Cell Biol.
40,
183-220
25.
Vacquier, V. D.
(1986)
Methods Cell Biol.
27,
15-39
26.
Kazazoglou, T.,
Schackmann, R. W.,
Fosset, M.,
and Shapiro, B. M.
(1985)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
82,
1460-1464
27.
Benoff, S.
(1998)
Frontiers Biosci.
3,
1220-1240
28.
Publicover, S. J.,
and Barratt, C. L. R.
(1999)
Human Reprod.
14,
873-879
29.
Mengerink, K. J.,
and Vacquier, V. D.
(2001)
Glycobiology
11,
37-43
30.
Ribeiro, A. C.,
Vieira, R. P.,
Mourao, P. A.,
and Mulloy, B.
(1994)
Carbohydr. Res.
255,
225-240
31.
Farias, W. R.,
Valente, A. P.,
Pereira, M. S.,
and Mourao, P. A.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
29299-29307
32.
Wassarman, P. M.
(1999)
Cell
96,
175-183
33.
Koyota, S.,
Wimalasiri, K. M.,
and Hoshi, M.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
10372-10376
34.
Vacquier, V. D.
(1998)
Science
281,
1995-1998
35.
Beltran, C.,
Darszon, A.,
Labarca, P.,
and Lievano, A.
(1994)
FEBS Lett.
338,
23-26
36.
Lopez-Gonzalez, I., De La,
Vega-Beltran, J. L.,
Santi, C. M.,
Florman, H. M.,
Felix, R.,
and Darszon, A.
(2001)
Dev. Biol.
236,
210-219
37.
Vacquier, V. D.,
Swanson, W. J.,
and Hellberg, M. E.
(1995)
Dev. Growth Differ.
37,
1-10
38.
DeAngelis, P. L.,
and Glabe, C. G.
(1987)
J. Biol. Chem.
262,
13946-13952
39.
Weis, W. I.,
Taylor, M. E.,
and Drickamer, K.
(1998)
Immunol. Rev.
163,
19-34
40.
Guerrero, A.,
and Darszon, A.
(1989)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
980,
109-116
41.
Guerrero, A.,
Garcia, L.,
Zapata, O.,
Rodriguez, E.,
and Darszon, A.
(1998)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1401,
329-338
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
V. H Pomin and P. A S Mourao Structure, biology, evolution, and medical importance of sulfated fucans and galactans Glycobiology, December 1, 2008; 18(12): 1016 - 1027. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. H. Pomin, A. P. Valente, M. S. Pereira, and P. A.S. Mourao Mild acid hydrolysis of sulfated fucans: a selective 2-desulfation reaction and an alternative approach for preparing tailored sulfated oligosaccharides Glycobiology, December 1, 2005; 15(12): 1376 - 1385. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Mah, W. J. Swanson, and V. D. Vacquier Positive Selection in the Carbohydrate Recognition Domains of Sea Urchin Sperm Receptor for Egg Jelly (suREJ) Proteins Mol. Biol. Evol., March 1, 2005; 22(3): 533 - 541. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. T Neill and V. D Vacquier Ligands and receptors mediating signal transduction in sea urchin spermatozoa Reproduction, February 1, 2004; 127(2): 141 - 149. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Berteau and B. Mulloy Sulfated fucans, fresh perspectives: structures, functions, and biological properties of sulfated fucans and an overview of enzymes active toward this class of polysaccharide Glycobiology, June 1, 2003; 13(6): 29R - 40R. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Hirohashi and V. D. Vacquier Egg Sialoglycans Increase Intracellular pH and Potentiate the Acrosome Reaction of Sea Urchin Sperm J. Biol. Chem., March 1, 2002; 277(10): 8041 - 8047. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||