Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M109097200 on November 7, 2001
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 2, 1195-1202, January 11, 2002
Inhibitory Analogs of Ubiquinol Act Anti-cooperatively on the
Yeast Cytochrome bc1 Complex
EVIDENCE FOR AN ALTERNATING, HALF-OF-THE-SITES MECHANISM OF
UBIQUINOL OXIDATION*
Emma Berta
Gutierrez-Cirlos and
Bernard L.
Trumpower
From the Department of Biochemistry, Dartmouth Medical School,
Hanover, New Hampshire 03755
Received for publication, September 20, 2001, and in revised form, November 5, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
The cytochrome bc1
complex is a dimeric enzyme that links electron transfer from ubiquinol
to cytochrome c by a protonmotive Q cycle mechanism in
which ubiquinol is oxidized at one center in the enzyme, referred to as
center P, and ubiquinone is re-reduced at a second center, referred to
as center N. To understand better the mechanism of ubiquinol oxidation,
we have examined the interaction of several inhibitory analogs of
ubiquinol with the yeast cytochrome bc1
complex. Stigmatellin and methoxyacrylate stilbene, two
inhibitors that block ubiquinol oxidation at center P, inhibit the
yeast enzyme with a stoichiometry of 0.5 per
bc1 complex, indicating that one molecule of
inhibitor is sufficient to fully inhibit the dimeric enzyme. This
stoichiometry was obtained when the inhibitors were titrated in
cytochrome c reductase assays and in reactions of quinol
with enzyme in which the inhibitors block pre-steady state reduction of
cytochrome b. As an independent measure of inhibitor
binding, we titrated the red shift in the optical spectrum of
ferrocytochrome b with methoxyacrylate stilbene and thus
confirmed the results of the inhibition of activity titrations. The
titration curves also indicate that the binding is anti-cooperative, in that a second molecule of inhibitor binds with much lower affinity to a
dimer in which an inhibitor molecule is already bound. Because these
inhibitors bind to the ubiquinol oxidation site in the
bc1 complex, we propose that the yeast
cytochrome bc1 complex oxidizes ubiquinol by an
alternating, half-of-the-sites mechanism.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Electron transfer through the cytochrome
bc1 complex occurs by the protonmotive Q cycle
mechanism in which ubiquinol is oxidized at one center, referred to as
center P, and ubiquinone is re-reduced at a second center, referred to
as center N (1). Crystal structures of the bovine (2, 3), chicken (4),
and yeast (5) cytochrome bc1 complexes have
revealed that the mitochondrial cytochrome bc1
complex is a symmetrical dimer. The role of the dimeric structure in
the Q cycle mechanism is not fully understood. It is not known whether
each monomer operates independently or whether there is electron
transfer between the two monomers.
There are numerous inhibitors that block electron transfer within the
bc1 complex by acting specifically at center P
or center N. The so-called Qp inhibitors block oxidation of ubiquinol
at center P and prevent reduction of the high potential redox centers of the bc1 complex. Stigmatellin,
hydroxyquinones, and methoxyacrylates such as myxothiazol and
MOA1 stilbene, all act at
center P (6). The Qn inhibitors block re-reduction of ubiquinone by
cytochrome b at center N and block reduction of cytochrome
b that otherwise can occur by reversal of this reaction.
Antimycin, one of the most extensively studied inhibitors of the
bc1 complex, acts at center N (6, 7).
In the experiments reported here, we show that some of the inhibitors
that block ubiquinol oxidation at center P inhibit the yeast enzyme
with a stoichiometry of 0.5 per bc1 complex,
indicating that one molecule of inhibitor is sufficient to fully
inhibit the dimeric enzyme. The titration curves also indicate that the binding is anti-cooperative, in that a second molecule of inhibitor binds with markedly lower affinity to the dimer in which an inhibitor molecule is already bound. As an independent measure of inhibitor binding, we titrated the red shift in the optical spectrum of ferrocytochrome b with MOA stilbene and found that the
inhibitor binds to the dimeric enzyme at two sites with two very
different affinities, consistent with a model in which a second
molecule of inhibitor does not bind to an enzyme dimer until all of the dimers are occupied by one inhibitor.
To test the possible involvement of ubiquinone in the anti-cooperative
behavior of the inhibitors, we titrated stigmatellin and MOA stilbene
in a yeast mutant that lacks ubiquinone. The titer for the two
inhibitors in the mutant was also 0.5 inhibitor per enzyme monomer,
indicating that ubiquinone is not responsible for the anti-cooperative
interactions in the dimeric enzyme. These results are discussed in the
context of the crystal structures of the bc1
complex and the implications for the mechanism of ubiquinol oxidation.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials--
Dodecylmaltoside was obtained from Roche
Molecular Biochemicals. DEAE-Bio-Gel was obtained from Bio-Rad. Yeast
extract and peptone were from Difco. Antimycin, myxothiazol,
diisopropyl fluorophosphate, phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride,
menaquinone, horse heart cytochrome c, and decylubiquinone
were purchased from Sigma. Stigmatellin was purchased from Fluka. MOA
stilbene was obtained from Dr. U. Brandt (University of Frankfurt).
Purification of bc1 Complexes--
Yeast cytochrome
bc1 complexes were isolated from Red Star cake
yeast as described previously (8, 9). The
coq2 yeast mutant was obtained from Dr. C. Clarke (UCLA). The wild-type yeast strain, W303a, and the
coq2 yeast mutant were grown in
1% yeast extract, 2% peptone, 2% dextrose medium and harvested by centrifugation.
Reduction of Decylubiquinone--
The ubiquinol analog,
decylubiquinol (DBH2), was used as substrate in the
ubiquinol-cytochrome c reductase assays and was obtained by
reducing the quinone as described by Trumpower and Edwards (10).
One-hundred mg of decylubiquinone were dissolved in 5 ml of ethanol and
then mixed with 10 ml of a buffer containing 25 mM
potassium phosphate, pH 7.2, and 25 µM EDTA. The mixture was reduced by slowly adding solid sodium dithionite and then solid
sodium borohydride. The reduced mixture was extracted with 16 ml of
cyclohexane and the fractions washed with buffer. The cyclohexane was
evaporated with a stream of argon and the reduced quinol was dissolved
in 2 ml of ethanol containing 10 mM HCl.
Determination of Inhibitor Concentrations--
Each of the
inhibitors was diluted in ethanol, and the concentration was determined
from optical spectra obtained in an Aminco DW2aTM
UV-visible spectrophotometer with the OLIS DW2 conversion and OLIS
Software. The difference spectrum, after subtracting the ethanol
background, was recorded from 250 to 400 nm. To determine accurately
the concentration for each inhibitor, the absorbance was measured at
concentrations that yielded 0.1-0.15 absorbance units after diluting
stock solutions of the inhibitors. To minimize random dilution errors,
each dilution was performed 5 or 6 times, and the diluted solutions
were combined. The extinction coefficients used to calculate the
concentrations of the stock solutions are as follows: for stigmatellin,
65.5 mM
1 cm
1 at 300 nm; for
myxothiazol, 10.5 mM
1 cm
1 at
313 nm; for antimycin, 4.8 mM
1
cm
1 at 320 nm (6); and for MOA stilbene, 26.5 mM
1 cm
1 at 300 nm (11). All of
the inhibitor dilutions were prepared daily, and the concentrations
were determined before a titration was started.
Ubiquinol-Cytochrome c Reductase Assays with 2.5 nM
bc1 Complex--
Ubiquinol-cytochrome c
reductase activities of the purified bc1 complex
were assayed at room temperature in an assay buffer containing 50 mM potassium phosphate, pH 7.0, 250 mM sucrose, 1 mM sodium azide, 0.2 mM EDTA, 0.01% Tween
20, and 50 µM cytochrome c. Cytochrome
bc1 complex was added to a final concentration
of 2.5 nM and allowed to equilibrate with inhibitor by
stirring for 2 min in the cuvette. Potassium cyanide was added to a
final concentration of 0.5 mM. The reaction was started by
adding 50 µM DBH2 (final concentration), and
reduction of cytochrome c was monitored at 550-539 nm with
the Aminco DW2aTM spectrophotometer in the dual wavelength
mode. The extinction coefficient used to calculate cytochrome
c reduction was 21.5 mM
1
cm
1 at 550-539 nm (12).
For each inhibitor titration, the bc1 complex
was pre-diluted in assay buffer minus cytochrome c and the
concentration determined by difference spectra recorded in the Aminco
DW2aTM spectrophotometer. The cytochrome
c1 concentration was determined from the
difference spectrum of the ascorbate reduced versus
ferricyanide-oxidized enzyme, using an extinction coefficient of 17.5 mM
1 cm
1 at 553-548 nm (13).
Cytochrome b concentration was determined from the
difference spectrum of the sodium dithionite reduced versus
ferricyanide-oxidized enzyme, using an extinction coefficient of 25 mM
1 cm
1 at 563-578 nm (13).
This pre-diluted enzyme was considered the stock solution, and the
concentration was usually 3 µM cytochrome c1. The activity of this stock solution of
enzyme was stable for a week at 4 °C.
After determining the bc1 complex concentration,
the enzyme was diluted daily a second time, to 33 nM, and
incubated on ice for 30 min prior to the activity measurements. To
initiate the assay an aliquot of the 33 nM dilution was
diluted to a final concentration of 2.5 nM in assay buffer
containing 50 µM cytochrome c and 0.5 mM KCN. The activity of the bc1
complex without inhibitor and after stirring 2 min in the assay buffer
was determined at the beginning of each titration. This was taken as
100% activity for the inhibitor titration, or
V0. At the end of each titration the activity of
the bc1 complex without inhibitor was again
determined to check the stability of the enzyme during the experiment.
The non-enzymatic reduction of cytochrome c by
DBH2 was subtracted from each activity trace. Because the
enzyme was preincubated with inhibitors in the assay buffer containing
cytochrome c, we could not correct for the non-catalytic
rate of cytochrome c reduction by DBH2 at the
beginning of each measurement. However, we found that this rate was
less than 1% of the catalytic rate; therefore, an average of two
non-catalytic rates of cytochrome c reduction was subtracted
from the catalytic rate.
Ubiquinol-Cytochrome c Reductase Assays with 50 nM
bc1 Complex--
Ubiquinol-cytochrome c
reductase activities using the higher enzyme concentration were assayed
at room temperature by stopped flow rapid scanning spectroscopy, using
an OLIS-Rapid Scanning Monochromator (On-Line Instrument Systems Inc.
Bogart, GA) equipped with a 1200 lines/mm grating blazed at 500 nm.
This produced a spectrum of 75 nm width, centered at 550 nm, with a
resolution of 0.4 nm. The dead time of the instrument was ~2 ms, and
the end of this period were chosen as time 0. Data were collected at
1000 scans/s.
Reactions were started by mixing 100 nM
bc1 complex in assay buffer with 0.5 mM potassium cyanide and 100 µM
DBH2 against an equal volume of 100 µM
cytochrome c in assay buffer. The inhibitors were added to
the bc1 complex and incubated with the enzyme
for 2 min before mixing into the stopped flow chamber. The
non-enzymatic rate of reduction of cytochrome c by
DBH2 was obtained by mixing equal volumes of 100 µM cytochrome c in assay buffer against 100 µM DBH2 in assay buffer. The reaction was
followed for 2 s. For each inhibitor concentration, four data sets
were averaged, and the non-enzymatic rate was subtracted from each
scan. From the three-dimensional data set composed of wavelength,
absorbance, and time, the time course of cytochrome c
reduction was extracted using the OLIS software. The rate of cytochrome
c reduction was calculated from the absorbance increase at
550 nm, using an extinction coefficient of 18.5 mM
1 cm
1 (14).
Pre-steady State Reduction of Cytochrome b--
Pre-steady state
reduction of cytochrome b was followed at room temperature
by stopped flow rapid scanning spectroscopy using the OLIS Rapid
Scanning Monochromator. The rationale for this pre-steady state
kinetics method was discussed previously (15).
Reactions were started by rapid mixing of 3 µM
bc1 complex in assay buffer containing 50 mM potassium phosphate, pH 6.0, 250 mM sucrose,
1 mM sodium azide, 0.2 mM EDTA, and 0.01%
Tween 20 against an equal volume of the same buffer containing 50 µM menaquinol. The bc1 complex was
diluted shortly before each titration, and the exact concentration was
determined as described above. A fresh solution of menaquinol substrate
was prepared before every experiment as described previously (15). The
inhibitors were incubated with the enzyme 2 min before starting the
reaction. An oxidized spectrum was obtained by mixing the oxidized
bc1 complex against assay buffer and averaging
the data sets to a single scan. For each inhibitor concentration, three
data sets were averaged, and the oxidized spectrum was subtracted from
each scan. From the three-dimensional data set composed of wavelength,
absorbance, and time, the time course and amplitude change for
cytochrome b reduction at 563 nm was extracted using the
OLIS software.
Oxidant-induced Reduction of Cytochrome b--
Prior to mixing
to initiate the oxidant-induced reduction, 3 µM
bc1 complex was incubated for 15 min with 8 µM antimycin in assay buffer, pH 7.0, and 30 µM DBH2 to partially reduce the enzyme. Varying amounts of stigmatellin were added to the
bc1 complex after the incubation with
DBH2 and incubated for 2 min prior to mixing with the
oxidase and cytochrome c. Oxidant-induced reduction reactions were started by mixing the partially reduced enzyme against
an equal volume of buffer containing 6 µM cytochrome
c oxidase and 30 µM cytochrome c. A
spectrum of the oxidized mixture of cytochrome c plus
cytochrome c oxidase was obtained by mixing with an equal
amount of buffer and averaging the data set to one scan. The
oxidant-induced reduction of cytochrome b was followed at
room temperature by stopped flow rapid scanning spectroscopy using the
OLIS-Rapid Scanning Monochromator. For each inhibitor concentration,
three data sets were averaged, and the oxidized spectrum was subtracted
from each scan. From the data sets the amplitude change for cytochrome
b reduction was obtained as described above.
Measurement of the Red Shift in the Cytochrome b
Spectrum--
The bc1 complex was diluted to an
approximate concentration of 3 µM in assay buffer, and
the exact concentration was determined as described above. A base line
was obtained by reducing the bc1 complex with
dithionite in both sample and reference cuvettes in the Aminco
DW2aTM spectrophotometer. Increasing amounts of MOA
stilbene or myxothiazol were added to the sample cuvette and an equal
amount of ethanol to the reference cuvette. After allowing the
inhibitor to equilibrate with the enzyme for 2 min, a difference
spectrum was recorded for each concentration of inhibitor added. A
2-fold excess of inhibitor was added at the end of the titration to
establish the maximum change of the red shift. For each inhibitor
concentration the absorbance difference at 568-560 nm, for MOA
stilbene, or at 564-559 nm, for myxothiazol, was measured.
 |
RESULTS |
Titration of the bc1 Complex with Antimycin--
In
the experiments reported below we show that some inhibitors of the
bc1 complex that block ubiquinol oxidation at
center P fully inhibit the enzyme with a stoichiometry of 0.5 inhibitor per enzyme monomer. As a control for these experiments, we performed a
set of inhibitor titrations with antimycin, which inhibits the enzyme
at center N. The results in Fig.
1A show the inhibition of
ubiquinol-cytochrome c reductase activity by antimycin in a catalytic assay using 2.5 nM bc1
complex. The dashed line shows the fitting of a linear
titration curve with an intercept of one inhibitor per enzyme.
Antimycin fully inhibits the enzyme at a titer of one inhibitor per
enzyme, although there is a significant hysteresis in the titration
curve at low antimycin concentrations. An explanation for the
hysteresis is discussed below.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Titration of the
bc1 complex with antimycin.
A shows an antimycin titration of the ubiquinol-cytochrome
c reductase activity with 2.5 nM
bc1 complex in the assay. Activities are
expressed as percentage of the activity without inhibitor and plotted
versus the ratio of antimycin per bc1
complex. The activity of the enzyme without inhibitor was 184 s 1. B shows a titration of the pre-steady
state reduction of cytochrome b with 1.5 µM
enzyme in the assay. The bc1 complex was
pre-mixed with 2 eq of stigmatellin to block reduction of cytochrome
b through center P and then reduced with 50 µM
menaquinol. Reduction of cytochrome b was followed at 563 nm. The dashed lines show the linear fitting to 1 eq of
inhibitor per bc1 complex.
|
|
In establishing optimal conditions for the ubiquinol-cytochrome
c reductase assays, we found that a buffer containing 0.01% Tween 20 and 250 mM sucrose was essential to obtain
consistently turnover numbers greater than 100 s
1. In
addition, when the yeast enzyme was diluted to 3 µM in
this buffer, it remained stable for 1 week at 4 °C. A similar result was reported previously for the bovine bc1
complex (14).
We also found that it was necessary to incubate the enzyme with
inhibitor for 2 min in the assay buffer before beginning the reaction,
to obtain maximum inhibition, particularly in cytochrome c
reductase assays using low (2.5 nM) concentrations of
bc1 complex. Lack of equilibration of inhibitor
with enzyme may account for the higher inhibitor stoichiometries
observed in some studies, as discussed below.
To establish that the titer for inhibition by antimycin is independent
of enzyme concentration, we also performed a titration using 1.5 µM bc1 complex, following the
pre-steady state reduction of cytochrome b. In this assay a
stoichiometric excess of stigmatellin is included to block reduction of
cytochrome b through center P, and the reduction of
cytochrome b through center N is inhibited by varying
amounts of antimycin. As shown in Fig. 1B, at this high
bc1 complex concentration, the stoichiometry of
antimycin per bc1 complex is also 1:1. In this
assay also there was a slight hysteresis in the titration curve at low
antimycin concentrations. From titrating the inhibitor with 2.5 nM or 1.5 µM bc1
complex, it is clear that the stoichiometry for inhibition of the yeast bc1 complex by antimycin is one inhibitor per
enzyme monomer. This agrees with previous results for titration of the
yeast enzyme with this inhibitor (16).
Titration of the bc1 Complex with
Stigmatellin--
Fig. 2A
shows the inhibition of ubiquinol-cytochrome c reductase
activity by stigmatellin in a catalytic assay using 2.5 nM bc1 complex. The dotted line shows a
theoretical linear titration curve with a slope of 2, which would
correspond to a titer of 0.5 eq of inhibitor per enzyme monomer. At low
inhibitor concentrations, the data points in the titration fall on the
theoretical titration curve and extrapolate to a titer of 0.5.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Titration of the
bc1 complex with stigmatellin.
A shows a stigmatellin titration of the ubiquinol-cytochrome
c reductase activity with 2.5 nM
bc1 complex in the assay. The activity without
inhibitor was 147 s 1 and was used as 100% activity for
the plot. B shows a titration of 50 nM yeast
bc1 complex in the cytochrome c
reductase assay. The activity of the bc1 complex
without inhibitor was 130 s 1. For each inhibitor
concentration an average of four assays was used. C shows
the titration of 1.5 µM yeast bc1
complex with stigmatellin in an assay that measures pre-steady-state
reduction of cytochrome b. The enzyme was pre-mixed with 2 eq of antimycin to block reduction of b through center N. Reduction of cytochrome b was followed at 563 nm and is
plotted against the ratio of stigmatellin per
bc1 complex. Each data point is the average of
three pre-steady state reactions in the stopped flow spectrophotometer.
The dashed lines show the linear fitting to 0.5 eq of
inhibitor per bc1 complex.
|
|
Because these results were unexpected, we repeated this titration with
different preparations of enzyme and made measurements in triplicate
each time. We also took special care to determine accurately the
concentrations of inhibitor and bc1 complex for each experiment as described under "Experimental Procedures." With
14 preparations of enzyme, which differed in activity from 140 to 240 s
1, which we attribute to different degrees of
delipidation during the ion-exchange chromatography in the presence of
detergent, we found that there were slight variations in the degree of
linearity of the titration curves, but the data consistently indicated
a titer that ranged from 0.45 to 0.55 eq of inhibitor per enzyme monomer.
The deviation from linearity of the titration curve in Fig.
2A would be expected if the Kd value of
the inhibitor is comparable with or greater than the enzyme
concentration in the assay, because a portion of the inhibitor would
not be bound to the enzyme. To test this possibility, we repeated the
titration with stigmatellin, using 50 nM
bc1 complex in a ubiquinol-cytochrome c reductase assay. At this high enzyme concentration,
reduction of cytochrome c occurs so rapidly that the
reaction must be followed in a stopped flow spectrophotometer, and data
points are collected over a 2-s interval. As shown in Fig.
2B, at the higher enzyme concentration the experimental
points fit the theoretical linear titration curve very well, and at 0.5 eq of stigmatellin per bc1 monomer more than
95% of the enzyme is inhibited.
We also examined the amount of stigmatellin required for inhibition of
cytochrome b reduction in a pre-steady state assay in which
the bc1 complex is present at 1.5 µM (Fig. 2C). In this assay a stoichiometric
excess of antimycin is included to block reduction of cytochrome
b through center N, and the reduction of cytochrome
b through center P is inhibited by varying amounts of
stigmatellin. In this assay also 0.5 eq of stigmatellin fully inhibit
the enzyme.
The results from the titrations of cytochrome c reductase
activity and pre-steady state reduction of cytochrome b
indicate that one molecule of stigmatellin fully inhibits the dimeric
yeast bc1 complex. Furthermore, the lack of
displacement to values greater than 0.5 eq per cytochrome
c1 in the linear titration curves indicates that
the inhibitor binds in an anti-cooperative manner, i.e. a second molecule of inhibitor does not bind to a dimer to which one
molecule of inhibitor is already bound.
Titration of the Oxidant-induced Reduction of Cytochrome b with
Stigmatellin--
As a further measure of the stoichiometry of
stigmatellin interaction with the bc1 complex,
we examined the amount of stigmatellin required to inhibit the
oxidant-induced reduction of cytochrome b. Binding of
stigmatellin depends on the redox state of the Rieske iron-sulfur
protein (6, 17), and in this reaction the antimycin-inhibited bc1 complex is partially reduced with
DBH2. This reduces the iron-sulfur protein, cytochrome
c1, and a portion of the high potential
cytochrome b and the quinone pool. Subsequent addition of
cytochrome c plus cytochrome c oxidase then
elicits additional reduction of cytochrome b concomitant
with oxidation of cytochrome c1 and the Rieske
protein. The inset in Fig. 3
shows the redox status of the cytochromes in partially reduced
bc1 complex and the increment in cytochrome b reduction that results from the oxidation of the high
potential redox components.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Titration of oxidant-induced reduction of
cytochrome b with stigmatellin. The
bc1 complex was pre-mixed with 2 eq of antimycin
and 30 µM DBH2. Oxidant-induced reduction was
initiated by mixing the partially reduced enzyme at a final
concentration of 1.5 µM bc1
complex with 3 µM cytochrome c oxidase + 15 µM cytochrome c in the stopped flow
spectrophotometer. Reduction of cytochrome b was measured at
563 nm 3 s after the addition of oxidase and is plotted against
the ratio of stigmatellin to bc1 complex. The
inset shows spectra from 540-580 nm extracted from the
kinetic data after the partial reduction with 30 µM
DBH2 and after the oxidant-induced reduction. Each of the
data points in the titration is an average of three reactions in the
stopped flow spectrophotometer. The dashed line shows a
fitted curve with an intercept of 0.5 eq of inhibitor per enzyme.
|
|
As seen from the titration results in Fig. 3, 0.5 eq of stigmatellin
fully inhibits the oxidant-induced reduction of cytochrome b. This result is the same as that obtained from the
titrations of cytochrome c reductase activity and pre-steady
state reduction of cytochrome b, but in this case there is a
pronounced hysteresis in the titration curve. A possible explanation
for this hysteresis is discussed below.
Titration of the bc1 Complex with MOA
Stilbene--
MOA stilbene is a member of the methoxyacrylate class of
inhibitors that includes myxothiazol, strobilurin, and oudemansin (6).
These inhibitors block ubiquinol oxidation at center P, but they differ
from stigmatellin in that they prevent reduction of the Rieske
iron-sulfur cluster (17), whereas stigmatellin allows reduction of the
cluster and locks the Rieske protein in the reduced conformation,
proximal to cytochrome b (4, 5).
A representative titration of the ubiquinol-cytochrome
c reductase activity of the bc1
complex with MOA stilbene is shown in Fig.
4A. Under these conditions,
using 2.5 nM bc1 complex in the
standard catalytic assay, the binding of the inhibitor is not
sufficiently tight to extrapolate a stoichiometry of binding directly
from the titration curve. However, if 50 nM
bc1 complex is used for the cytochrome
c reductase assay, the data from the inhibitor titration
fits well to a linear curve corresponding to 0.5 molecules of inhibitor
per bc1 monomer, as shown in Fig. 4B.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Titration of the
bc1 complex with MOA stilbene. The
figure shows titrations of bc1 complex with MOA
stilbene, using the same methods to determine the inhibitor
stoichiometries as used with stigmatellin in Fig. 2. A shows
an inhibitor titration of the ubiquinol-cytochrome c
reductase activity with 2.5 nM bc1
complex in the assay. The activity without inhibitor was 164 s 1 and was used as 100% of the activity for constructing
the plot. B shows a cytochrome c reductase assay
titration with 50 nM yeast bc1
complex. The activity of the enzyme without inhibitor was 126 s 1. C shows the titration of the pre-steady
state cytochrome b reduction with 1.5 µM
enzyme. The enzyme was pre-mixed with 2 eq of antimycin to block
reduction through center N. Each data point is the average of three
reactions in the stopped flow spectrophotometer. The dashed
line shows a fitted curve with an intercept of 0.5 eq of inhibitor
per enzyme.
|
|
The difference in the titration curves in Fig. 4, A and
B, suggests that the Ki of MOA stilbene
for the bc1 complex is in the range of the 2.5 nM enzyme concentration used in the standard catalytic
assay. Further evidence to this effect was obtained by titrating the
pre-steady state reduction of cytochrome b, using 1.5 µM bc1 complex in the assay.
Varying amounts of MOA stilbene were used to inhibit cytochrome
b reduction through center P, while blocking reduction
through center N with an excess of antimycin. As seen in Fig.
4C, there is a slight hysteresis in the titration curve at
low inhibitor concentrations, but the reduction of cytochrome
b is fully inhibited at 0.5 eq of MOA stilbene per bc1 monomer.
Titration of Inhibitors into bc1 Complex Lacking
Endogenous Ubiquinone--
Inhibition of the dimeric
bc1 complex by 0.5 eq of inhibitor per
bc1 monomer and the anti-cooperative nature of
the inhibition indicate that binding of the inhibitor in one monomer
prevents oxidation of ubiquinol or binding of a second molecule of
inhibitor at the second ubiquinol oxidation site in the dimer. To test
whether this behavior is dependent on the endogenous ubiquinone in the bc1 complex, we repeated these experiments with
bc1 complex from the
coq2
yeast mutant that lacks endogenous quinone (18). The titration curves
in Fig. 5 show inhibition of the
pre-steady state reduction of cytochrome b by stigmatellin
(Fig. 5A) and MOA stilbene (Fig. 5B). With both
inhibitors the reduction of cytochrome b is completely
blocked by 0.5 eq of inhibitor per bc1 monomer. These results establish that ubiquinone is not responsible for the
anti-cooperative binding of these two Qp inhibitors in the yeast
bc1 complex.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Titration of the pre-steady state reduction
of cytochrome b in bc1
complex from a mutant lacking ubiquinone. A shows a
stigmatellin titration of the pre-steady state reduction of cytochrome
b, using 1.4 µM bc1
complex in the presence of excess antimycin. Each point in the
titration represents the average of 3 reactions. B shows a
MOA stilbene titration of the pre-steady state reduction of cytochrome
b, using 1.15 µM bc1
complex in the presence of excess antimycin. The dotted
lines show fitted curves with an intercept of 0.5 eq of inhibitor
per enzyme.
|
|
Measurement of the Stoichiometry of MOA Stilbene Binding from the
Red Shift in the Cytochrome b Spectrum--
Methoxyacrylates cause a
red shift in the
band of the reduced cytochrome b when
they bind to the bc1 complex (6, 19). We used
this characteristic to obtain a titer for binding of MOA stilbene to
the bc1 complex that does not depend on
inhibition of electron transfer within the enzyme. The results of such
a titration with bc1 complex from a wild-type
yeast strain are shown in Fig.
6A. The inset shows
the difference spectrum that results from the red shift and the
increment in absorbance at 568 nm versus 560 nm that was
used to quantitate binding of the inhibitor. As increasing amounts of
MOA stilbene were added to the enzyme, the absorbance increased in a
linear manner until 0.5 eq of inhibitor per bc1
monomer was bound.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Titration of the red shift in the
cytochrome b spectrum with MOA stilbene.
A, 2.8 µM bc1 complex
from the wild-type yeast strain, W303a, was reduced with dithionite and
titrated with increasing amounts of MOA stilbene. The inset
shows the difference spectrum resulting from the red shift in the
optical spectrum of the reduced b upon binding of MOA
stilbene and the method used to measure the absorbance increment at
568-560 nm due to the red shift. B, 2.8 µM
bc1 complex from the coq2
mutant was titrated with increasing amounts of MOA stilbene. The
absorbance change at each inhibitor concentration was measured as in
A and plotted against the ratio of inhibitor per
bc1 complex. The dashed lines show
fitted curves, assuming high affinity binding of one inhibitor molecule
per dimer and binding of a second inhibitor molecule at a low affinity
site.
|
|
A similar result was obtained when the red shift was titrated in the
coq2 mutant (Fig. 6B), although the
titration curve is less linear, suggesting that the inhibitor binds
somewhat less tightly in the mutant. With bc1
complexes from both the wild-type strain and the
coq2 mutant, a second line can be fitted where the
absorbance signal increases only slightly, attributable to lower
affinity binding in the second monomer. It is not possible to determine
accurately the binding constant for the low affinity site from these
data, because of the anti-cooperative nature of the interaction between
the high and low affinity sites. However, one can estimate from the
linear nature of the pre-steady state titration curves at 1.5 µM enzyme (Fig. 4C) and the biphasic titration of the red shift at 2.8 µM enzyme that the
Kd value for the low affinity MOA stilbene site must
fall between these two concentrations.
Titration of the bc1 Complex with
Myxothiazol--
Myxothiazol is a methoxyacrylate that blocks
ubiquinol oxidation at center P in a manner like MOA stilbene. The two
inhibitors differ, however, in the manner in which they inhibit the
yeast bc1 complex. When ubiquinol-cytochrome
c reductase activity of the bc1
complex is titrated with myxothiazol, the experimental points fit very
well to a theoretical titration curve with a stoichiometry of one
inhibitor per bc1 monomer (Fig.
7A). When the inhibitor is
titrated in a cytochrome c reductase assay, using 50 nM bc1 complex, some of the data
points fall below the theoretical curve for a titer of one inhibitor
per bc1 monomer (Fig. 7B). However, this result was difficult to reproduce, and when myxothiazol is used to
inhibit pre-steady state reduction of cytochrome b, using 1.5 µM yeast bc1 complex in the
assay, the titer for full inhibition is one myxothiazol per
bc1 monomer (Fig. 7C).

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Titration of the
bc1 complex with myxothiazol. The
figure shows titrations of bc1 complex with
myxothiazol, using the same methods to determine the inhibitor
stoichiometries as used with stigmatellin and MOA stilbene.
A shows an inhibitor titration of the ubiquinol-cytochrome
c reductase activity with 2.5 nM enzyme. The
activity without inhibitor was 156 s 1. B shows
a cytochrome c reductase assay titration with 50 nM yeast bc1 complex. The activity
of the bc1 complex without inhibitor was 149 s 1. Each point in the titration represents the average of
four reactions. C shows the myxothiazol titration of the
pre-steady state reduction of cytochrome b with 1.5 µM enzyme pre-mixed with 2 eq of antimycin. Each point is
the average of three reactions. The dashed lines in the
three panels show fitted curves with an intercept of 1 eq of inhibitor
per enzyme monomer.
|
|
We also measured myxothiazol binding to the bc1
complex by titrating the red shift in the optical spectrum of
ferrocytochrome b. As can be seen in Fig.
8, 1 eq of myxothiazol per
bc1 monomer is required to saturate the shift in
the optical spectrum, confirming the results obtained by titrating the
inhibitor against electron transfer activities. At higher amounts of
myxothiazol there is an additional increment in the optical spectrum
beyond a titer of one inhibitor per binding site. This might indicate
double occupancy of the myxothiazol binding site or nonspecific binding of the inhibitor at another site on the enzyme.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Titration of the red shift in the cytochrome
b spectrum with myxothiazol. Cytochrome
bc1 complex (2.4 µM) was reduced
with dithionite and titrated with increasing amounts of myxothiazol.
The inset shows the difference spectrum resulting from the
red shift in the optical spectrum of the reduced b upon
binding of myxothiazol and the method used to measure the absorbance
increment at 564-559 nm due to the red shift. The absorbance change at
each inhibitor concentration was measured and plotted against the ratio
of inhibitor per bc1 complex. The dashed
line shows fitted curves, assuming high affinity binding of one
inhibitor molecule per cytochrome bc1 complex
monomer and binding of a second inhibitor molecule at a low affinity
site.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
To understand better the mechanism of ubiquinol oxidation by the
cytochrome bc1 complex, we investigated the
interaction of several inhibitors that act on the ubiquinol oxidation
site with the isolated yeast bc1 complex. We
found that stigmatellin fully inhibits the enzyme at 0.5 eq per
bc1 monomer; in other words occupancy of half of
the inhibitor-binding sites in the dimer fully inhibits the enzyme.
This behavior was not noticed when stigmatellin was initially tested in
isolated mitochondria of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae
(20), but this difference can readily be attributed to difficulties in
achieving complete equilibration of the inhibitor with the enzyme. The
present study is the first to report the titration of the isolated
yeast enzyme with stigmatellin. We have shown that one molecule of
stigmatellin fully inhibits the dimeric yeast
bc1 complex in two cytochrome c
reductase assays with significantly different concentrations of enzyme
and in two pre-steady state assays in which cytochrome b was
reduced through center P.
The extrapolated intercepts of the titration curves also indicate that
the binding of stigmatellin is anti-cooperative. Inhibitor binding in
one monomer interferes with inhibitor binding to the second monomer.
The anti-cooperative binding does not preclude binding of inhibitor to
the second monomer. Rather, the binding affinity for the second
inhibitor is decreased sufficiently that inhibitor does not bind at the
second site in the dimeric enzyme until half of the sites in all of the
dimers are occupied with inhibitor. Although the binding of
stigmatellin is too tight to accurately determine a
Kd value for the high affinity site from these
titration curves, the curvilinear and linear titration curves obtained
with 2.5 and 50 nM enzyme, respectively, are consistent with a Kd for stigmatellin between these two
concentrations. Stigmatellin is seen in both halves of the dimer in the
yeast enzyme (5), which is crystallized at a concentration of 1 µM in the presence of a slight excess of stigmatellin,
whereas the pre-steady state titration curve (Fig. 2C) is
nearly linear at an enzyme concentration of 1.5 µM.
Together these results suggest that the Kd value of
the second site for stigmatellin is ~1-1.5 µM.
The anti-cooperative, half-of-the-sites inhibitor binding appears to be
exclusive to center P inhibitors. In control titrations with antimycin,
which inhibits electron transfer at center N, we found that this
inhibitor acted with a stoichiometry of one per enzyme monomer, using a
low (2.5 nM) or a high (1.5 µM) enzyme concentration. However, in titrating the bc1
complex with antimycin, we consistently observed a significant lag, or
hysteresis, in the titration curves at low antimycin concentrations.
This was especially pronounced in the cytochrome c reductase
assays but was also observed, although to a lesser extent, in the
pre-steady state reduction of cytochrome b. A survey of the
literature shows that this effect is observed in most antimycin
titrations, if data points are reported for low antimycin concentrations.
Hysteresis in an inhibitor titration curve, appearing as a lag in the
titration curve at low inhibitor concentrations, indicates that
inhibitor is binding without inhibiting the enzyme activity. Binding of
the inhibitor to a sub-population of enzyme that is inactive would
result in such a titration curve. However, when we examined the
antimycin titration curves with different enzyme preparations that
varied in activity from 140 to 240 s
1, we found that the
more active preparations showed the most pronounced hysteresis. The
opposite would be expected if binding to a sub-population of inactive
enzyme were occurring.
An alternative explanation for the hysteresis is that there is electron
crossover between the two monomers. The proximity of the
bL hemes in the crystal structures of the
bc1 complex (2-5) would allow for electron
transfer from the bL heme in one monomer to the
other. Another mechanism for inter-monomer electron transfer is that
superoxide anion produced by aberrant reactivity of a low potential
semiquinone anion at center P could act as a mediator, carrying an
electron out of one monomer to reduce the bL heme of
the other monomer. The generation of superoxide radicals by the
bc1 complex has been reported when antimycin is
bound to the enzyme (21-22).
Electron transfer between the bL hemes, either
directly or mediated by superoxide anion, could account for the
hysteresis that is observed in the inhibitor titration curves in the
cytochrome c reductase assays or the oxidant-induced
reduction of cytochrome b, because in these reactions
electrons are entering the b hemes via center P. Either of
these mechanisms is also consistent with the observation that the
hysteresis in the antimycin titration curve is less pronounced during
the pre-steady state reduction of cytochrome b in which
electrons enter the b hemes via center N. Under these
conditions there would likely be less electron crossover between the
bL hemes, because access to the bL hemes is limited due to inhibition of center P
with an excess of stigmatellin, and less superoxide anion would be formed by the relatively stable semiquinone at center N. Additional experimentation is in progress to test these possible mechanisms.
To test whether the anti-cooperative, half-of-the-sites binding is
exclusive to stigmatellin, we investigated the interaction of two
additional Qp site inhibitors, MOA stilbene and myxothiazol, with the
yeast bc1 complex. These methoxyacrylates differ
from stigmatellin in their mechanism of inhibition in that they inhibit electron flow from ubiquinol to the iron-sulfur protein. Stigmatellin allows iron-sulfur protein reduction and traps the reduced iron-sulfur protein in a position proximal to cytochrome b, thus
preventing its oxidation by cytochrome c1 (4,
23).
MOA stilbene also exhibited anti-cooperative, half-of-the-sites binding
to the bc1 complex, but this was less obvious
than it was with stigmatellin. This difference can be attributed to a
lower affinity of MOA stilbene for the yeast enzyme. In the standard
cytochrome c reductase assay the titer of 0.5 MOA stilbene per enzyme monomer was not as obvious as it was with stigmatellin, due
to the curvilinear nature of the titration curve. In this assay the
concentration of bc1 complex is 2.5 nM. The reported Ki value for MOA
stilbene is 14 nM (19), and a similar value was reported
for an independently measured Kd = 19 nM
(11). Although these values were obtained with the bovine enzyme, they
are consistent with the results we obtained, in which the assays with
50 nM or 1.5 µM bc1
complex revealed the half-of-the-sites titer most clearly. The titer of
0.5 eq of inhibitor per bc1 monomer was
confirmed by following the red shift in the cytochrome b
spectrum induced by MOA stilbene binding to the reduced
bc1 complex. This binding-dependent
parameter was measured at enzyme concentrations well above the reported
Kd value of the inhibitor and is independent of
electron transfer.
Myxothiazol was not an anti-cooperative inhibitor for the yeast
bc1 complex, even at high enzyme concentrations.
By titrating cytochrome c reductase assays, pre-steady state
reduction of cytochrome b, and the red shift in the optical
spectrum of the reduced bc1 complex, we found a
stoichiometry for myxothiazol of one inhibitor per enzyme monomer. The
titer of one inhibitor per enzyme monomer and lack of
anti-cooperativity with myxothiazol was somewhat surprising, because
myxothiazol is a methoxyacrylate, like MOA stilbene. The difference in
mode of binding of these two structurally related inhibitors implies
that very subtle differences in ligand-protein interaction can have
profound effects on the binding behavior. Previous titrations with the
yeast bc1 complex reported a titer for
myxothiazol of 1.6 molecules of inhibitor per
bc1 complex, extrapolated from the amounts
required for 50% inhibition (16). Based on our experience with these
inhibitors, we attribute the higher titer in these earlier experiments
to incomplete equilibration of the inhibitor with the enzyme.
Anti-cooperative binding in a dimeric enzyme requires that a structural
interaction must be transmitted from the ligand-binding site in one
monomer to the other. Because the crystal structures of the
mitochondrial bc1 complex show that ubiquinone
occupies a cleft that spans the dimer (3-5), we tested whether the
anti-cooperative binding of stigmatellin or MOA stilbene was dependent
on the presence of endogenous ubiquinone. We found that
anti-cooperative binding of stigmatellin and MOA stilbene was retained
in a yeast mutant completely devoid of endogenous ubiquinone.
Although the anti-cooperative binding was retained in the
ubiquinone-deficient mutant, the titration of the red shift in the cytochrome b spectrum indicated subtle differences in the
titration curves in the mutant compared with the wild-type
bc1 complex, as if binding of the
methoxyacrylate to the ubiquinone-deficient mutant was not as
profoundly anti-cooperative as in the wild-type strain. Because the
anti-cooperative nature of the binding was retained, but slightly
diminished, in the bc1 complex from the
coq2 mutant, this subtle difference is most likely due to
structural changes in the enzyme resulting from lack of ubiquinone
during enzyme assembly, and not due to transmission of a structural
change within the dimer by ubiquinone. We have found that the
bc1 complex isolated from the
ubiquinone-deficient mutant is only about 25% as active as the enzyme
from wild-type yeast (results not shown), and others have found that
the respiratory enzyme complexes are thermolabile in
ubiquinone-deficient strains (24).
Another possible explanation for the anti-cooperative binding is that
the side chain of stigmatellin or MOA stilbene in one monomer extends
into the other monomer and inhibits binding of a second molecule of
inhibitor by interfering with entry of the side chain into the free
monomer. Similarly, one might envision an inhibitor in one monomer
might block access of the ubiquinol side chain to the second monomer.
We think this explanation can be ruled out by two observations. The
crystal structure of the stigmatellin-liganded
bc1 complex (4, 5) shows no direct interaction
between stigmatellin molecules, which are 29 Å apart at the closest
point in the symmetrical dimer. Also, the half-of-the-sites inhibition
was observed in the pre-steady state reduction of cytochrome b by menaquinol, a substrate that has no side chain, which
precludes the possibility of contact between this substrate in one
monomer and stigmatellin in the other.
It seems most likely that the anti-cooperative binding of stigmatellin
and MOA stilbene involves transmission of a subtle structural change
from the center P of one monomer to the other via an interaction
between the iron-sulfur protein and cytochrome b. The
iron-sulfur protein extends its cluster-containing domain to form the
ubiquinol oxidation site in one monomer, while its transmembrane helix
abuts the cytochrome b helices in the other monomer. In the
available crystal structures of the bc1 complex, there are multiple van der Waals contacts in the abutting regions of
these two proteins that could transmit such a change across the dimer.
When stigmatellin binds to the bc1 complex the
flexible linker between the extrinsic domain and the transmembrane
helix extends and the extrinsic domain of the iron-sulfur protein
rotates ~57°. Simultaneously, there is movement of up to 2.3 Å,
mainly in the
-cd1 and
-cd2 helices and the
E-
F linker, in
cytochrome b (25).
The crystal structures of the bc1 complexes with
stigmatellin bound have shown the inhibitor bridging the imidazole ring
of His-181 and a carboxyl oxygen of Glu-272 (4, 5). If ubiquinol must
similarly bridge these two residues to allow a concerted (26) or
thermodynamically linked (27) oxidation mechanism, it is easy to
envision how small changes in the distance or relative orientation of
these two residues could impact significantly on substrate or inhibitor
binding. It has been shown already that changes in the structure of the
ubiquinol oxidation site inferred from changes to the length of the
flexible linker region can have profound effects on the
Km value for ubiquinol and the Ki
value for stigmatellin (28). At present the only crystal structure of
the yeast bc1 complex is with stigmatellin bound
(5). When structures of the yeast bc1 complex in
the native state and with MOA stilbene and myxothiazol bound are
obtained, these should provide insight into the structural basis for
the anti-cooperative, half-of-the-sites reactivity of this dimeric enzyme.
Stigmatellin and the methoxyacrylate part of MOA stilbene are
structurally related to ubiquinol, and it is generally thought that
their binding mimics a transition state in ubiquinol oxidation (27).
This leads us to propose that ubiquinol binding is likewise anti-cooperative, and that ubiquinol oxidation alternates between the
two monomers, with only half-of-the sites reactive at any one time.
There have been two previous reports in the literature that
could be interpreted as indicating that the bc1
complex exhibits half-of-the sites reactivity toward ubiquinol or
inhibitory analogs. In experiments with Rhodobacter
capsulatus chromatophores in which the redox poise was clamped at
Eh ~250 mV and the
ubiquinone pool was expected to be fully oxidized, it was found that
one molecule of ubiquinol per bc1 dimer remained
reduced for an interval as long as several minutes (29). Subsequent
flash activation resulted in oxidation of this ubiquinol on the first
flash. Although this result was interpreted as indicating a dimeric Q
cycle mechanism, it is also consistent with a half-of-the sites
mechanism for ubiquinol oxidation of the type we propose.
Also, Fernandez-Velasco and Crofts (30) found a stoichiometry of
0.33-0.4 mol of stigmatellin per mol of cytochrome
bH in inhibitor titrations using
Rhodobacter sphaeroides chromatophores, although they
interpreted their results as indicating that the bc1 complex is dimeric and forms ternary
complexes in chromatophores. In these experiments the stoichiometry for
stigmatellin was not altered by the redox state of the quinone pool.
This result agrees with our finding that anti-cooperative binding of
stigmatellin is not altered by the absence of quinone in the
bc1 complex.
We had suggested previously that the yeast bc1
complex exhibits half-of-the-sites reactivity toward cytochrome
c (31), and our current work suggests that a similar
mechanism applies to oxidation of ubiquinol. Interestingly, a recent
crystal structure of the yeast bc1 complex
co-crystallized with cytochrome c shows only one molecule of
cytochrome c bound to the dimeric enzyme, and ubiquinone is
present in only one-half of the
dimer.2
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grant GM 20379 and a postdoctoral fellowship from the American Heart Association, New England affiliate (to E. G.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of
Biochemistry, Dartmouth Medical School, 7200 Vail, Hanover,
NH 03755. Tel.: 603-650-1621; Fax: 603-650-1389; E-mail:
Trumpower@Dartmouth.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, November 7, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M109097200
2
C. Hunte, personal communication.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
MOA, methoxyacrylate;
DBH2, decyl ubiquinol.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Mitchell, P.
(1976)
J. Theor. Biol.
62,
327-367
|
| 2.
|
Xia, D., Yu, C. A.,
Kim, H.,
Xia, J. Z.,
Kachurin, A. M.,
Zhang, L., Yu, L.,
and Deisenhofer, J.
(1997)
Science
277,
60-66
|
| 3.
|
Iwata, S.,
Lee, J. W.,
Okada, K.,
Lee, J. K.,
Iwata, M.,
Rasmussen, B.,
Link, T. A.,
Ramaswamy, S.,
and Jap, B. K.
(1998)
Science
281,
64-71
|
| 4.
|
Zhang, Z.,
Huang, L.,
Schulmeister, V. M.,
Chi, Y.-I.,
Kim, K.-K.,
Hung, L.-W.,
Crofts, A. R.,
Berry, E. A.,
and Kim, S.-H.
(1998)
Nature
392,
677-684
|
| 5.
|
Hunte, C.,
Koepke, J.,
Lange, C.,
Rossmanith, T.,
and Michel, H.
(2000)
Struct. Fold. Des.
8,
669-684
|
| 6.
|
Von Jagow, G.,
and Link, T. A.
(1986)
Method Enzymol.
126,
253-271
|
| 7.
|
Slater, E. C.
(1973)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
301,
129-154
|
| 8.
|
Ljungdahl, P. O.,
Pennoyer, J. D.,
Robertson, D. E.,
and Trumpower, B. L.
(1987)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
891,
227-241
|
| 9.
|
Snyder, C. H.,
and Trumpower, B. L.
(1998)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1365,
125-134
|
| 10.
|
Trumpower, B. L.,
and Edwards, C. A.
(1979)
J. Biol. Chem.
254,
8697-8706
|
| 11.
|
Brandt, U.,
and von Jagow, G.
(1991)
Eur. J. Biochem.
195,
163-170
|
| 12.
|
Margoliash, E.,
and Walasek, O. F.
(1967)
Methods Enzymol.
10,
339-348
|
| 13.
|
Cavazzoni, M.,
Svobodova, J.,
Desantis, A.,
Fato, R.,
and Lenaz, G.
(1993)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
303,
246-254
|
| 14.
|
Kubota, T.,
Yoshikawa, S.,
and Matsubara, H.
(1992)
J. Biochem. (Tokyo)
111,
91-98
|
| 15.
|
Snyder, C. H.,
and Trumpower, B. L.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
31209-31216
|
| 16.
|
Tsai, A. L.,
Kauten, R.,
and Palmer, G.
(1985)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
806,
418-426
|
| 17.
|
Link, T. A.,
Haase, U.,
Brandt, U.,
and von Jagow, G.
(1993)
J. Bioenerg. Biomembr.
25,
221-232
|
| 18.
|
Ashby, M. N.,
Kutsunai, S. Y.,
Ackerman, S.,
Tzagoloff, A.,
and Edwards, P. A.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
4128-4136
|
| 19.
|
Brandt, U.,
Shägger, H.,
and von Jagow, G.
(1988)
Eur. J. Biochem.
173,
499-506
|
| 20.
|
Thierbach, G.,
Kunze, B.,
Reichembach, H.,
and Höfle, G.
(1984)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
765,
227-235
|
| 21.
|
Ksenzenko, M.,
Konstantinov, A. A.,
Khomutov, G. B.,
Tikhonov, A. N.,
and Ruuge, E. K.
(1983)
FEBS Lett.
155,
19-24
|
| 22.
|
Zhang, L., Yu, L.,
and Yu, C. A.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
33972-33976
|
| 23.
|
Von Jagow, G.,
and Ohnishi, T.
(1985)
FEBS Lett.
185,
311-315
|
| 24.
|
Do, T. Q.,
Hsu, A. Y.,
Jonassen, T. L.,
Lee, P. T.,
and Clarke, C. F.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
18161-18168
|
| 25.
|
Berry, E. A.,
Huang, L.-S.,
Zhang, Z.,
and Kim, S.-H.
(1999)
J. Bioenerg. Biomembr.
31,
177-190
|
| 26.
|
Snyder, C. H.,
Gutierrez-Cirlos, E. B.,
and Trumpower, B. L.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
13535-13541
|
| 27.
|
Crofts, A. R.,
Barquera, B.,
Gennis, R. B.,
Kuras, R.,
Guergova Kuras, M.,
and Berry, E. A.
(1999)
Biochemistry
38,
15807-15826
|
| 28.
|
Nett, J. H.,
Hunte, C.,
and Trumpower, B. L.
(2000)
Eur. J. Biochem.
267,
5777-5782
|
| 29.
|
Gopta, O.,
Feniouk, B. A.,
Junge, W.,
and Mulkidjanian, A. Y.
(1998)
FEBS Lett.
431,
291-296
|
| 30.
|
Fernandez-Valesco, J.,
and Crofts, A. R.
(1991)
Biochem. Soc. Trans.
19,
588-593
|
| 31.
|
Schmitt, M. E.,
and Trumpower, B. L.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
17005-17011
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Gurung, L. Yu, and C.-A. Yu
Stigmatellin Induces Reduction of Iron-Sulfur Protein in the Oxidized Cytochrome bc1 Complex
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 17, 2008;
283(42):
28087 - 28094.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Covian, K. Zwicker, F. A. Rotsaert, and B. L. Trumpower
Asymmetric and Redox-specific Binding of Quinone and Quinol at Center N of the Dimeric Yeast Cytochrome bc1 Complex: CONSEQUENCES FOR SEMIQUINONE STABILIZATION
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 17, 2007;
282(33):
24198 - 24208.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Covian, T. Kleinschroth, B. Ludwig, and B. L. Trumpower
Asymmetric Binding of Stigmatellin to the Dimeric Paracoccus denitrificans bc1 Complex: EVIDENCE FOR ANTI-COOPERATIVE UBIQUINOL OXIDATION AND COMMUNICATION BETWEEN CENTER P UBIQUINOL OXIDATION SITES |