Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M109480200 on November 7, 2001
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 2, 1210-1216, January 11, 2002
Creation of an Allosteric Phosphofructokinase Starting with a
Nonallosteric Enzyme
THE CASE OF DICTYOSTELIUM DISCOIDEUM
PHOSPHOFRUCTOKINASE*
Belén
Santamaría,
Antonio M.
Estévez
,
Oscar
H.
Martínez-Costa, and
Juan J.
Aragón¶
From the Departamento de Bioquímica and Instituto de
Investigaciones Biomédicas Alberto Sols UAM-CSIC, Facultad de
Medicina de la Universidad Autónoma, 28029 Madrid, Spain
Received for publication, October 2, 2001, and in revised form, November 4, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
An allosteric phosphofructokinase (PFK) was
created by sequence manipulation of the nonallosteric enzyme from the
slime mold Dictyostelium discoideum (DdPFK). Most amino
acid residues proposed as important for catalytic and allosteric sites
are conserved in DdPFK except for a few of them, and their reversion
did not modify its kinetic behavior. However, deletions at the unique C-terminal extension of this PFK produced a markedly allosteric enzyme.
Thus, a mutant lacking the last 26 C-terminal residues exhibited
hysteresis in the time course, intense cooperativity (nH = 3.8), and a 200-fold decrease in the
apparent affinity for fructose 6-phosphate (S0.5 = 4500 µM), strong activation by fructose 2,6-bisphosphate
(Kact = 0.1 µM) and fructose
1,6-bisphosphate (Kact = 40 µM),
dependence on enzyme concentration, proton inhibition, and subunit
association-dissociation in response to fructose 6-phosphate versus the nonhysteretic and hyperbolic wild-type enzyme
(nH = 1.0; Km = 22 µM) that remained as a stable tetramer. Systematic
deletions and point mutations at the C-tail region of DdPFK identified
the last C-terminal residue, Leu834, as critical to produce
a nonallosteric enzyme. All allosteric mutants were practically
insensitive to MgATP inhibition, suggesting that this effect does not
involve the same allosteric transition as that responsible for fructose
6-phosphate cooperativity and fructose bisphosphate activation.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Phosphofructokinase
(PFK,1 EC 2.7.1.11) catalyzes
the first irreversible reaction specific for glycolysis, the
phosphorylation of fructose 6-phosphate (Fru-6-P) by MgATP, to produce
fructose 1,6-bisphosphate (Fru-1,6-P2) and MgADP. Extensive
studies established PFK as an example of a complex allosteric enzyme
whose activity is thought fundamental for the control of energy
production and is tightly regulated by a variety of allosteric
mechanisms (reviewed in Refs. 1-3). Thus, it shows a very high degree
of positive cooperativity (sigmoidal kinetics) as well as a high
S0.5 for Fru-6-P and is sensitive to a number of effectors.
Fructose bisphosphates are the most potent regulators (reviewed in Ref.
4), although some isozymes, such as the mammalian C type (5) or that
from yeast (6), are only sensitive to Fru-2,6-P2 (active in
the micromolar range). ATP binding to its inhibitory site is regarded as central for the function of PFK, since it influences the action of
other ligands (7-9). Hysteresis in the time courses of PFK reaction is
also characteristic of several eukaryotic isozymes (7, 10-12). The
regulatory properties of this enzyme are pH and concentration
dependent, which operate by altering its oligomeric structure. A
tetramer was demonstrated to be the smallest active form of rabbit
muscle PFK (13), which upon protonation (14) reversibly isomerizes to
an inactive form and then slowly dissociates to dimers and monomers.
Increasing concentrations of enzyme promote self-association that can
lead to aggregates larger than tetramer, as reported for muscle (15)
and liver (16) PFK. This phenomenon involves pronounced changes in the
kinetic properties (9, 11, 15, 16) and can be important in accounting
for its function in vivo (17).
The allosteric nature of PFK has been verified in the simple
prokaryotic enzyme by three-dimensional structure and specific mutation
analyses (Refs. 18-21, and references therein). However, our knowledge
of the structural changes that support the allosteric behavior of
eukaryotic PFK is considerably lower. This is a more complex form of
enzyme in both structure and regulation (1, 2, 22) and no crystal
structure for it has been provided yet. Eukaryotic PFKs are about twice
the size of the bacterial enzyme as a result of duplication, fusion,
and mutation of an ancestral prokaryotic gene, thus leading to the
formation of new allosteric sites (22). Therefore, structure/function
data from the prokaryotic enzyme are difficult to extrapolate to
eukaryotic isozymes, although several site-directed mutagenesis studies
to identify amino acid residues implicated in ligand-binding sites have
been carried out recently with the latter PFK types (23-26). We have
used the nonallosteric enzyme from the slime mold Dictyostelium discoideum (DdPFK) as an alternative way to investigate the
molecular bases of control mechanisms of PFK from eukaryotic cells.
Despite having a marked degree of similarity to other isozymes (27), DdPFK is unusual among eukaryotic PFKs in that it displays hyperbolic kinetics, exhibiting a high affinity for Fru-6-P and no sensitivity to
any of the characteristic effectors of other isoforms (28). DdPFK is
also devoid of a concentration-dependent activity, being a
stable tetramer (28). Therefore, this enzyme is particularly suitable
to undertake at least partial restoration of an allosteric behavior by
mutations. In addition to leading to the structural reasons for its
lack of specific control properties, this approach could provide
valuable information into the molecular mechanisms underlying Fru-6-P
cooperativity and its relation with the action of allosteric effectors.
We have found that deletions at the C-tail region of DdPFK convert it
into an allosteric enzyme, displaying intense Fru-6-P cooperativity,
strong activation by fructose bisphosphates, and subunit
association-dissociation, among other properties characteristic of
regulatory PFKs, although remaining practically insensitive to ATP
inhibition. Further analyses indicated that deletion, or substitution,
of the final C-terminal residue is enough to generate an allosteric
behavior. These findings provide new insight into the allosteric
control of PFK.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials--
All chemical reagents and enzymes used in genetic
assays and protein purification were obtained from Roche Molecular
Diagnostics, Amersham Bioscience, Inc., or Sigma. The
SculptorTM In vitro Mutagenesis System for
site-directed mutagenesis was purchased from Amersham Bioscience, Inc.
Oligonucleotides were from MedProbe. The auxiliary enzymes and
biochemicals for the PFK assay were from Sigma. Other reagents were
obtained from commercial sources and were of the best grade available.
Site-directed Mutagenesis and Genetic Manipulations--
Point
mutations were created according to the manufacturer's protocol for
the SculptorTM In vitro Mutagenesis System,
using the single-stranded DNA derived from the plasmid pMDdPFK. This
plasmid contained the full-length cDNA of DdPFK and was constructed
by cloning the 2.7-kb BamHI fragment from our previously
obtained pE3 (27) into the M13mp19 vector. The mutagenic primers used
are described in Table I. C-terminal
deletion mutants were constructed by PCR employing mutagenic primers
that generated the TAA stop codon at the desired position and an
EcoRI site at the 3' end of the mutated pfk gene. To obtain the
26 mutant, the 634-bp fragment of the 3' end of DdPFK
cDNA were isolated from the plasmid pE3 (27) by
NheI-digestion, blunt-ending, and SpeI-digestion,
and then cloned into pBluescript II SK+ that had been
XbaI-digested, blunt-ended, and SpeI-digested
yielding pMUT1, which was used as a template. The PCR product was
NheI-EcoRI-digested and ligated with a
HindIII-NheI fragment from pE3 (containing the
remained 2002 bp of the 5' end of DdPFK cDNA) and
HindIII-EcoRI-digested pBluescript II
SK+ to give pMUT2. The plasmid pMUT1 was used as a template
to generate all other deletion mutants and their corresponding PCR
products were cloned as NheI-EcoRI fragments into
pMUT2. All mutants were verified by DNA sequencing. For expression in
yeast, mutant pfk genes were inserted as BamHI
fragments downstream of the PFK2 promoter of
Saccharomyces cerevisiae in the plasmid pJJH71 (29).
Expression and Purification of Recombinant Enzymes--
The
plasmids containing either wild-type (29) or mutant PFK cDNA were
expressed in a S. cerevisiae strain HD152-1D (5) carrying
deletions in both yeast PFK genes. Transformation of yeast
cells, media, and carbon sources were as described previously (29).
Yeast transformants were grown in 1 liter of rich medium containing
glucose to early stationary phase and recombinant enzymes were purified
by 10% (w/v) polyethylene glycol (PEG) fractionation and
chromatography on DE52 and blue Sepharose CL-6B as described previously
(29), except that PFK activity was eluted from the latter column with a
100-ml linear gradient of 0-1.5 M KCl in equilibration
buffer. All final preparations of recombinant enzymes were judged to be
homogeneous by SDS-PAGE analysis on 10% gels and Coomassie Blue
staining (28) (Fig. 1).
Enzyme Assay--
PFK activity was measured in an assay mixture
that unless otherwise indicated contained 50 mM Hepes, 100 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, pH 7.2, 0.15 mM NADH, 1 mM MgATP, 1.2 units of aldolase, 10 units of triose-phosphate isomerase, 1 unit of glycerol-3-P
dehydrogenase, and 5-10 µl of the purified enzyme in a total volume
of 1 ml. After 5 min, the reaction was started by adding 1 mM Fru-6-P and was followed by measuring the absorbance
change at 340 nm at 25 °C. When PFK activity was assayed in
permeabilized cells, Glu-6-P was added to Fru-6-P in a
proportion 3:1. When the effect of Fru-1,6-P2 was examined,
pyruvate kinase (1 unit) and lactate dehydrogenase (1 unit) were used
as coupling enzymes in the presence of 0.2 mM
P-enolpyruvate. Auxiliary enzymes were desalted by centrifugation and
dialysis against 10 mM Hepes, pH 7.0, 20% (v/v) glycerol. One unit of activity is defined as the amount that catalyzes the conversion of 1 µmol/min of substrate at 25 °C.
FPLC Size-exclusion Chromatography--
PFK samples dialyzed
against 50 mM Na2HPO4, 100 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, pH 6.8, were applied to a Amersham Bioscience, Inc. Superose 6 HR 10/30 column equilibrated and eluted with the same
buffer at a flow rate of 0.3 ml/min. When indicated, the elution buffer
contained 6 mM Fru-6-P. Fractions of 0.11 ml were collected
and tested for enzyme activity and ELISA analysis. For calibration,
standard proteins ranging from 13.7 to 669 kDa were used.
Other Methods--
Protein was determined by the method of
Bradford (30). Permeabilization of yeast cells was carried out with a
toluene/ethanol/Triton X-100 mixture as described in Ref. 31. Mass
spectrometry of recombinant enzymes was performed on a Bruker (Bremen,
Germany) Reflex II matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometer. ELISA analysis was performed in
antibody capture mode (32) using 1/2,000 dilution of polyclonal rabbit antibody against DdPFK (28) and assaying peroxidase (32); samples
containing no antigen were used as a blank. Prediction of secondary
structure was obtained from the PHD server (33).
 |
RESULTS |
A Deletion of the C-tail Region of the Nonallosteric
DdPFK Converts It into an Allosteric Enzyme--
DdPFK has been
reported to share about a 40% identity with other isozymes (27). Most
amino acid residues involved in putative binding sites of substrates
and allosteric effectors are conserved in this enzyme, except for a few
changes located at the sites assigned to ADP/AMP activation (Arg
Ser288), Fru-2,6-P2/Fru-1,6-P2
activation (Ser
Ala568), and ATP inhibition (Arg
Val775) (Fig. 2). The rabbit muscle PFK sequence
H763AHLEHISR at the C termini, identified by Valaitis
et al. (34) as critical for ATP inhibition, is absent in
DdPFK. Our initial approach to generate allosteric properties in DdPFK
was to reverse the single changes by site-directed mutagenesis. The
corresponding cDNAs were expressed in a PFK-deficient strain of
S. cerevisiae (5) and enzyme mutants were purified (Fig.
1) and characterized. However, neither
S288R and A568S mutants (Table II) nor
the V775R mutant (to be reported elsewhere) exhibited kinetic
properties significantly different from those of the nonallosteric
wild-type enzyme, nor they were sensitive to other effectors such as
AMP/ADP, citrate, Pi, or
NH
. Then the lack of control
properties in DdPFK could be related to: (i) other unidentified residues important for the binding of specific ligands; (ii) the changes observed at the putative ATP inhibitory site, since ATP inhibition was proposed as basic for PFK regulatory characteristics (9); or (iii) that some of the structural motifs unique to this isozyme
prevent allosteric transitions in some way. Regarding the latter
possibility, the highest variability among PFK sequences is exhibited
at the C-tail region, from about position 770 of DdPFK (Fig.
2). Additionally, this enzyme contains a
C-terminal extension of 20-40 amino acids with respect to other
eukaryotic PFKs. A deletion of the 26 C-terminal residues (
26) was
made in DdPFK to test the role of this extension and the mutant enzyme was obtained as above. Surprisingly, this mutant exhibited dramatic changes in its kinetic behavior versus the wild-type enzyme.
Whereas the initial rate of product formation of wild-type DdPFK was
linear (28), a pronounced lag phase before attaining the steady state, i.e. hysteresis (35), was observed with the
26 mutant
when the assay was initiated with Fru-6-P (Fig.
3). The duration of the lag time (
)
was in the order of minutes and decreased with increasing Fru-6-P
concentration, which at 2.5 mM augmented
2-fold. This
hysteretic behavior, typical of allosteric PFKs (7, 10-12), was not
observed when the reaction was initiated with ATP and was not modified
by increasing the concentration of coupling enzymes. These data
prompted a detailed characterization of the regulatory and physical
properties of the deleted enzyme.

View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
SDS-PAGE of purified mutants and wild-type
DdPFK. Two to ten µg of purified enzymes were loaded per lane.
Positions of molecular mass markers are shown on the right.
Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass
spectrometry confirmed the molecular masses of deletion mutants that
were within the discrimination limit of this technique ( 36 to
4).
|
|

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Sequence alignments of amino acid residues of
selected regions of PFKs from various organisms showing the changes in
ligand binding sites of the D. discoideum enzyme
(asterisks). Sequences are from D. discoideum (Dd), mouse liver (Ml), rabbit
muscle (Rm), ascites tumor cells (C-type) (At),
S. cerevisiae (Sc), Bacillus
stearothermophilus (Bs), and Escherichia
coli (Ec). The bottom alignment comprises
the C-tail region of listed PFKs. Amino acids identical to DdPFK are
shaded. Black triangles indicate putative residues assigned
to the binding of several allosteric effectors (22, 53). A nonapeptide
located in the C-terminal end of rabbit muscke PFK (RmPFK),
which was identified as the ATP inhibition site (34), is boxed.
Arrows indicate deletions introduced in the DdPFK sequence.
|
|

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Time course of the PFK reaction of
mutant 26 at different concentrations of
Fru-6-P. Assay was performed at pH 7.2 with 3 mM MgATP
and the indicated concentration of Fru-6P. A340 is the
absolute value of the absorbance at 340 nm. Inset,
A, plot of transition time ( ) versus Fru-6-P
concentration; B, reaction time course of wild-type PFK and
26 at 3 mM Fru-6-P.
|
|
As shown in Fig. 4, the
26 mutant
exhibited an intense positive cooperativity for Fru-6-P with a Hill
coefficient of 3.8 and a 200-fold decrease in the apparent affinity for
this substrate with respect to the hyperbolic
(nH = 1.0) wild-type enzyme (S0.5 and Km values of 4500 and 22 µM,
respectively). As seen in Table II,
26 showed about a 3-fold
decrease in the Kcat value, which was not large,
indicating that catalysis was not grossly affected by the deletion. In
contrast to the nonallosteric wild-type enzyme, this mutant was
strongly activated by 1 µM Fru-2,6-P2, which
shifted to the left the Fru-6-P saturation curve (Fig. 4), abolishing
the cooperativity (nH = 1.05) and reducing the
S0.5 value to 0.5 mM without significant effect
on the Vmax. A Kact value
of 0.1 µM was obtained for Fru-2,6-P2 and a
similar activation effect was observed with Fru-1,6-P2, but
with a higher Kact value of 40 µM
(Table II). The
26 mutant also exhibited a
concentration-dependent activity as shown by including an
aggregating agent, PEG (36), in the assay, this elicited an effect on
the Fru-6-P saturation curve similar to that exerted by the addition of
1 µM Fru-2,6-P2. This observation was
confirmed by studying the truncated enzyme in permeabilized cells (the
mutant producing yeast), i.e. in situ, where the
enzyme is concentrated and the S0.5 and
nH values decreased to 0.25 mM and
1.5, respectively, from 11 mM and 3.0, respectively, in a
dialyzed cell-free extract assayed in dilute solution (data not shown).
A concentration-dependent behavior is absent in the wild-type enzyme (28).

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Fru-6-P saturation curve and effect of
Fru-2,6-P2 and polyethylene glycol on the mutant
26. MgATP concentration was 3 mM
and the pH was 7.2. PFK activity was determined in the absence ( )
and presence of either 1 µM Fru-2,6-P2 ( )
or 10% PEG ( ). Inset, wild-type PFK without
additions.
|
|
The binding of Fru-6-P to the
26 mutant, as analyzed by
protection against thermal inactivation of the enzyme, was found to be
cooperative with an nH value of 3.7 and an
apparent dissociation constant of 4.5 mM, whereas that of
the wild-type enzyme was hyperbolic (Fig.
5). Thus, the kinetic curve of the mutant
did practically not deviate from the binding curve, meaning that the
enzymic cooperativity of
26 was due solely to equilibrium binding of
Fru-6-P and not to change in the catalytic rate constants of the
various enzyme-substrate complexes (37).

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Protection of the mutant
26 ( ) and wild-type PFK ( ) against thermal
inactivation. The enzymes were incubated for 5 min at 55 °C in
50 mM Hepes, 100 mM KCl, 5 mM
MgCl2, pH 7.2, in the presence of the indicated
concentration of Fru-6-P. Inset, 26 ( , ) and
wild-type PFK ( , ) were incubated for the time indicated under
similar conditions in the absence ( , ) and presence of 1 ( ) or
10 mM Fru-6-P ( ). The residual activity remaining after
incubation is expressed. The higher Kd value of
wild-type PFK, as compared with its Km value of 22 µM (Fig. 4), is suggestive of an additional, low
affinity, binding of Fru-6-P to the nonfunctional
Fru-2,6-P2 allosteric site demonstrated in DdPFK
(28).
|
|
The kinetic properties of the
26 mutant with respect to MgATP were
not significantly different from those of the wild-type enzyme (Table
II), except that it was moderately inhibited by this compound (59%
inhibition at 10 mM MgATP). Among other PFK effectors,
neither ADP, AMP, citrate, Pi, nor P-enolpyruvate modified the activity of this mutant assayed at 3 mM Fru-6-P and 5 mM MgATP, and only a 66% activation was elicited by
NH
, each of these compounds being used
at a concentration of 2 mM (data not shown).
Proton inhibition of animal PFK is well known to work by decreasing
Fru-6-P affinity (7), which can be concomitant with an increase in
cooperativity (38), and by increasing the affinity for binding of MgATP
to its inhibitory site (39). Fig. 6 shows the inhibitory effect of pH on the Fru-6-P saturation curve of two
different C-terminal deletions. An increase in the cooperativity of the
26 mutant was apparent, although not intense, when lowering the pH
value from 8.0 to 7.2 or 6.4 (Fig. 6A). This effect was more
noticeable (Fig. 6B) in a
8 mutant (see below), which
kinetic behavior was similar to that of
26 but was insensitive to
ATP inhibition (Table II). Apparent affinity of these mutants for Fru-6-P was less significantly affected. The kinetics of the wild-type enzyme was reported (28) to remain hyperbolic even at pH 5.5. It
is noteworthy that in addition to high Fru-6-P concentration, all the
above conditions that decreased Fru-6-P cooperativity of the
26
mutant, also decreased hysteresis in the time courses of the PFK
reaction (data not shown).

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Influence of pH on the Fru-6-P saturation
curves of mutants 26 (A)
and 8 (B). MgATP
concentration was 3 mM and the pH was varied as indicated.
Assay buffers were 50 mM Hepes, pH 8.0, and 7.2, and 50 mM Mes, pH 6.4. Insets, S0.5 an
nH values calculated from the data.
|
|
The oligomeric state of the
26 mutant was analyzed by FPLC
size-exclusion chromatography, to test its relation with enzyme function. As shown in Fig. 7, the
truncated DdPFK eluted basically as inactive dimers and monomers that
slowly reactivated upon incubation with 5 mM Fru-6-P. In
addition, the
26 mutant stabilized into an active tetramer when
chromatographed in the presence of this ligand. In contrast, the
wild-type enzyme eluted as an active tetrameric form independently of
the presence of Fru-6-P. Increasing the concentration of KCl from 0.1 to 0.5 M in the equilibration and elution buffers, which
favors protein-protein interactions, also shifted the
association-dissociation equilibrium of the mutant enzyme to the active
tetramer, which then contributed 61% to the eluted protein (data not
shown). This behavior is consistent with the dilution-mediated
inactivation/dissociation of muscle (40) and liver (41) PFK prevented
by Fru-6-P.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Elution profile of the mutant
26 ( , ) and wild-type PFK ( ) from
size-exclusion FPLC. Elution was carried in the absence ( , )
and presence ( ) of 6 mM Fru-6-P added to the buffer. PFK
activity was measured at 2 mM Fru-6P, 1 mM
MgATP, 1 µM Fru-2,6-P2, pH 7.2. Fractions
eluted without Fru-6-P were inactive and required incubation with 5 mM of this metabolite at 25 °C for at least 60 min prior
to enzyme activity determination. Enzyme loading samples contained 0.3 mg of protein/ml (1.3 to 2.0 units), and the recoveries were 84%
( ), 6% ( ), and 87% ( ). Similar profiles were obtained when
PFK protein was analyzed by ELISA. Elution of wild-type PFK in the
presence of Fru-6-P did not modify its chromatographic profile.
Arrows indicate the theoretical elution volumes of 26
forms corresponding to tetramer, trimer, dimer, and monomer and their
calculated Mr values in kDa. Dissociation of
26 oligomers in the absence of Fru-6-P appears to occur during the
chromatographic run, as suggested by the presence of a peak
intermediate to dimer and monomer.
|
|
Identification of the C-terminal Motifs Involved in the Lack of
Allosteric Properties of DdPFK--
C-terminal deletions of longer
(
36) and shorter (
14) extension than
26 were first carried out
for a structure/function characterization of the C-tail region of
DdPFK. Analysis of their properties led us to construct progressively
shorter deletions, in combination with single-point mutations, to
identify the structural motifs responsible for the role of this region
in preventing allosteric transitions. Table II shows that deletion
mutants
36,
14,
8,
4, and, interestingly, even
2,
exhibited characteristics that were very close to those of the
26
mutant, i.e. low apparent affinity (S0.5 values
from 5 to 1 mM) and cooperative kinetics for Fru-6-P
(nH values from 3.8 to 2.0), strong activation
by Fru-2,6-P2 (Kact values from 0.04 to 0.2 µM) and Fru-1,6-P2
(Kact values from 30 to 200 µM),
no significant change in MgATP kinetics with respect to the wild-type
enzyme, and Kcat values within the same range.
None of these deletion mutants showed MgATP inhibition. These data
suggested an important function for either, or both, of the last two
C-terminal amino acids of DdPFK in accounting for its peculiar
behavior. Deletion of the last residue, Leu834 (
1
mutant), was enough to generate an allosteric PFK sensitive to a very
potent stimulation by Fru-2,6-P2/Fru-1,6-P2
(Kact values of 0.02 and 12 µM,
respectively), although with lower degree of cooperativity
(nH = 1.6) and some higher apparent affinity for Fru-6-P (S0.5 = 0.55 mM) than the
26 mutant
(but still 1 order of magnitude lower than that of the hyperbolic
wild-type enzyme). Replacement of this residue by an alanine (L834A
mutant) virtually reproduced the kinetic behavior of the
1 mutant,
whereas a similar mutation of the one before last residue (T833A
mutant) did not introduce any change in the kinetic properties of the
wild-type enzyme. This confirms the critical role of Leu834
among the last two residues of the C-tail of DdPFK.
 |
DISCUSSION |
In this study, we have introduced specific mutations in the
sequence of the nonregulatory PFK from D. discoideum to
generate an allosteric behavior. A deletion of the 26 C-terminal
residues resulted in drastic changes in the kinetic and physical
properties of the enzyme endowing it with regulatory capabilities, that
were qualitatively and quantitatively similar to those characteristic of allosteric PFKs (1-3, 5, 7, 10).
The hysteretic response of the
26 mutant to Fru-6-P correlated well
with cooperativity. Thus suggesting that both phenomena represent the
same process, as shown for regulated PFKs (12, 42). The question arises
as to how the marked cooperativity in Fru-6-P binding to the mutant
enzyme is generated. The truncated DdPFK is subject to subunit
dissociation/reassociation in dependence of this ligand (Fig. 7), or
ionic strength. However, reactivation to a tetramer by Fru-6-P took
much longer (at least 60 min for partial reactivation) than the time
required to measure initial velocity. The purified mutant enzyme must
be predominantly in this form, since it eluted from the last
chromatography column at 0.7 M KCl and over 60% of the
protein behaved as a tetramer on FPLC size-exclusion chromatography in
0.5 M KCl. These data indicate that the minimal active form
of the
26 mutant in the kinetic assay is the tetramer, and that
subunit reassociation is not directly involved in hysteresis and
cooperativity. The great decrease in cooperativity observed with the
aggregating agent PEG, or in situ, paralleled the behavior
reported for mammalian PFKs under similar conditions (9, 17, 43) or at
increasing concentrations of enzyme that promoted aggregation beyond
the active tetramer (15, 16, 36), thus suggesting that subunit interactions in the mutant DdPFK are large enough to elicit
polymerization of the tetramer. Ligand-linked changes in the
self-association equilibria of the oligomeric enzyme could also
originate cooperativity (37). Nevertheless, aggregation of the
truncated enzyme is not expected during the regular kinetic assay,
since enzyme concentration was 1-2 µg/ml and no species larger than
the tetramer were detected by FPLC gel filtration performed at a
protein concentration of 300 µg/ml in the presence of Fru-6-P (Fig.
7). Therefore, our results indicate that cooperativity, and hysteresis
occur within the tetramer and that it is mediated by the isomerization
of a less active conformation (T) to a more active one (R) as Fru-6-P shifts the equilibrium toward the favoring binding conformation (R).
The fact that wild-type DdPFK is locked in a stable tetrameric R-like
conformation supports that subunit interactions underlying the R/T
transition eventually lead to reversible subunit dissociation. This
interpretation coincides with the model of Frieden and co-workers (14,
38, 40) for the regulation of muscle PFK. Accordingly, proton
inhibition of the deleted enzyme fits the proposal of these authors
stating that protonation of certain ionizable groups promotes inactivation by isomerization of the tetramer. Nevertheless, the pH
effect on deleted PFKs (Fig. 6) was less intense than those exhibited
by animal PFKs (7, 12, 38), reflecting mostly a change on the
protonation state of catalytic groups at the active site. Since MgATP
inhibition was scarce or absent in DdPFK mutants, this suggests that
proton enhanced binding of MgATP at its inhibitory site (39)
contributes in a major extent to the decrease in Fru-6-P affinity
and/or cooperativity upon protonation of animal PFKs (7, 12, 38).
The above description of Fru-6-P cooperativity of deletion mutants is
consistent with the two-state concerted model of allosteric regulation
(44). The interdependence of this phenomenon and MgATP inhibition led
several authors (7, 38, 45) to interpret cooperativity in terms of the
heterotropic interactions (44) between binding of Fru-6-P and MgATP at
the active site and inhibitory site, respectively. This interpretation
was also supported by chemical (46-48) and proteolytic (34)
modifications of eukaryotic PFKs that abolished or reduced both
properties to a similar extent. However, our results with truncated
DdPFKs (Table II) show that it is possible to have a highly cooperative
enzyme completely insensitive to inhibition by MgATP. Although this
observation was made by endowing with cooperativity a previously
nonallosteric PFK, rather than by eliminating MgATP inhibition from a
normal allosteric form, it suggests that these two phenomena can be
decoupled and therefore may not be related to the same allosteric
transition as required in the concerted model of Monod et
al. (44). In fact, a similar suggestion was previously made by Rao
et al. (49) with the allosterically regulated PFK from
Ascaris suum. Nevertheless, this does not imply that both
properties do not interact to provide a finer modulation of PFK
activity. The mechanistic separation between cooperativity and MgATP
inhibition may explain several previous observations that did not
follow heterotropic cooperativity. For instance, (i) animal (17) or
yeast (50) PFK exhibits normal cooperativity when ITP is used as a
phosphoryl donor, despite that this compound is not a PFK inhibitor (8,
51), and (ii) cooperativity of yeast PFK does not substantially change
at different degrees of MgATP inhibition (31).
Although DdPFK is not activated by Fru-2,6-P2, it
efficiently binds this compound (Kd = 0.9 µM; see Ref. 28), despite containing an alanine residue
(position 568) instead of a conserved serine assigned to the
Fru-2,6-P2/Fru-1,6-P2 allosteric site (Fig. 2).
This alanine corresponds to an active site aspartate of bacterial PFK
after gene duplication and fusion (22). Our results indicate that the
replaced serine is also unnecessary for the subsequent allosteric
transition, since all deletion mutants, as well as the L834A mutant,
were as strongly activated by Fru-2,6-P2 and Fru-1,6-P2 as eukaryotic PFKs are stimulated by both
regulators (4), whereas the A568S mutant was not affected by these
compounds (Table II). As mutation of the yeast PFK serine to aspartate
abolished Fru-2,6-P2 activation (24), the data herein
suggest that removal of the negatively charged aspartate at the
duplicated site was more important than the presence of the serine
itself to generate the new allosteric site. The behavior of the
cooperative DdPFK mutants indicates that the insensitivity of the
wild-type enzyme to fructose bisphosphates is not related to its lack
of inhibition by MgATP, but to the absence of cooperativity (being in a
conformation of maximal affinity for Fru-6-P), since it became potently
activated by both effectors as soon as cooperativity was generated
(
1 and L834A mutants; Table II). Therefore, fructose bisphosphates
operate on the same R/T transition that accounts for cooperativity,
analogously to the concerted model of allosteric regulation (44).
Although the Fru-2,6-P2/Fru-1,6-P2 activation
of PFK is clearly affected by MgATP inhibition (1, 4), our data
indicate that the actions of fructose bisphosphates and MgATP are also
not coupled, i.e. that they are not brought about by a
unique R/T transition as assumed by the model of Monod et
al. (44). Reversion of the change R775V at the putative ATP
inhibition site did not re-establish this property in DdPFK. Therefore,
it is tempting to relate its lack to the absence of a C termini
nonapeptide sequence (Fig. 2) identified as crucial for ATP inhibition
(34). This in turn could also be related to the insensitivity of DdPFK
to inhibitors that act synergistically with MgATP, like citrate or
P-enolpyruvate (8). Nevertheless, our results indicate that the
proposal of ATP inhibition as the basic mechanism for the operation of
PFK regulatory characteristics (9) was an oversimplification, since at
least some of them, as the effect of enzyme concentration, fructose
bisphosphates activation and, in part, proton inhibition, operate on
Fru-6-P cooperativity in a way primarily independent of inhibition by MgATP.
The findings presented here show that the unique C-terminal extension
of DdPFK (Fig. 2) is responsible for its lack of allosteric transitions. Systematic sequence manipulation of this region (a predicted loop) suggests that its function is to serve as an arm to
position the last leucine residue, so that the latter hydrophobically interacts with some unknown group to maintain the protein as a stable
tetramer. Thus, evolution to generate the hyperbolic behavior of DdPFK
appears to have operated not by additional point mutations but by the
acquisition of an extra C-terminal sequence, that somehow locks the
enzyme in an R-like conformation preventing the intersubunit communication responsible for cooperativity (44, 52) and reversible subunit dissociation. Identification of the involved amino acid interactions and elucidation of the structural changes brought about by
the C-tail region of DdPFK awaits determination of the three-dimensional structure of both the wild-type enzyme and at least
some of the allosteric truncated mutants.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by Grants PB95-0209 and PB98-0058
from the Dirección General de Enseñanza Superior e
Investigación Científica.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Present address: Zentrum für Molekulare Biologie, Im
Neuenheimer Feld 282, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
¶
To whom all correspondence should be addressed: Departamento
de Bioquímica, Facultad de Medicina de la Universidad
Autónoma de Madrid, Arzobispo Morcillo 4, 28029 Madrid. Spain.
Tel.: 34-91-3975332; Fax: 34-91-3975353; E-mail:
juanjose.aragon@uam.es.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, November 7, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M109480200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
PFK, phosphofructokinase;
Fru-6-P, fructose 6-phosphate;
Fru-1, 6-P2, fructose 1,6-bisphosphate;
Fru-2, 6-P2, fructose 2,6-bisphosphate;
DdPFK, the
phosphofructokinase from Dictyostelium discoideum;
PEG, polyethylene glycol;
ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay;
Mes, 4-morpholineethanesulfonic acid;
FPLC, fast protein liquid
chromatography.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Uyeda, K.
(1979)
Adv. Enzymol. Relat. Areas Mol. Biol.
48,
193-244
|
| 2.
|
Sols, A.
(1981)
Curr. Top. Cell Regul.
19,
77-101
|
| 3.
|
Kemp, R. G.,
and Foe, L. G.
(1983)
Mol. Cell. Biochem.
57,
147-154
|
| 4.
|
Van Schaftingen, E.
(1987)
Adv. Enzymol.
59,
315-395
|
| 5.
|
Sánchez-Martínez, C.,
Estévez, A. M.,
and Aragón, J. J.
(2000)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
271,
635-640
|
| 6.
|
Bartrons, R.,
Van Schaftingen, E.,
Vissers, S.,
and Hers, H.-G.
(1982)
FEBS Lett.
143,
137-143
|
| 7.
|
Reinhart, G. D.,
and Lardy, H. A.
(1980)
Biochemistry
19,
1477-1484
|
| 8.
|
Colombo, G.,
Tate, P. W.,
Girotti, A. W.,
and Kemp, R. G.
(1975)
J. Biol. Chem.
250,
9404-9412
|
| 9.
|
Boscá, L.,
Aragón, J. J.,
and Sols, A.
(1985)
J. Biol. Chem.
260,
2100-2107
|
| 10.
|
Emerk, K.,
and Frieden, C.
(1975)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
168,
210-218
|
| 11.
|
Bär, J.,
Hübner, G.,
and Kopperschläger, G.
(1986)
Eur. J. Biochem.
156,
311-315
|
| 12.
|
Cook, P. F.,
Rao, G. S. J.,
Hofer, W.,
and Harris, B. G.
(1987)
J. Biol. Chem.
262,
14063-14067
|
| 13.
|
Hesterberg, L. K.,
and Lee, J. C.
(1980)
Biochemistry
19,
2030-2039
|
| 14.
|
Bock, P. E.,
and Frieden, C.
(1976)
J. Biol. Chem.
251,
5630-5636
|
| 15.
|
Luther, M. A.,
Hesterberg, L. K.,
and Lee, J. C.
(1985)
Biochemistry
24,
2463-2470
|
| 16.
|
Reinhart, G. D.,
and Lardy, H. A.
(1980)
Biochemistry
19,
1491-1495
|
| 17.
|
Aragón, J. J.,
and Sols, A.
(1991)
FASEB J.
5,
2945-2950
|
| 18.
|
Schirmer, T.,
and Evans, P. R.
(1990)
Nature
343,
140-145
|
| 19.
|
Auzat, I.,
Byrnes, W. M.,
Garel, J.-R.,
and Chang, S.
(1995)
Biochemistry
34,
7062-7068
|
| 20.
|
Auzat, I., Le,
Bras, G.,
and Garel, J.-R.
(1997)
J. Mol. Biol.
267,
476-480
|
| 21.
|
Pham, A. S.,
and Reinhart, G. D.
(2001)
Biochemistry
40,
4150-4158
|
| 22.
|
Poorman, R. A.,
Randolph, A.,
Kemp, R. G.,
and Heinrikson, R. L.
(1984)
Nature
309,
467-469
|
| 23.
|
Li, J.,
Zhu, X.,
Byrnes, M.,
Nelson, J. W.,
and Chang, S. H.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
24599-24606
|
| 24.
|
Heinisch, J. J.,
Boles, E.,
and Timple, C.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
15928-15933
|
| 25.
|
Li, Y.,
Rivera, D., Ru, W.,
Gunasekera, D.,
and Kemp, R. G.
(1999)
Biochemistry
38,
16407-16412
|
| 26.
|
Rodicio, R.,
Strauß, A.,
and Heinisch, J. J.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
40952-40960
|
| 27.
|
Estévez, A. M.,
Martínez-Costa, O. H.,
Sánchez, V.,
and Aragón, J. J.
(1997)
Eur. J. Biochem.
243,
442-451
|
| 28.
|
Martínez-Costa, O. H.,
Estévez, A. M.,
Sánchez, V.,
and Aragón, J. J.
(1994)
Eur. J. Biochem.
226,
1007-1017
|
| 29.
|
Estévez, A. M.,
Heinisch, J. J.,
and Aragón, J. J.
(1995)
FEBS Lett.
374,
100-104
|
| 30.
|
Bradford, M. M.
(1976)
Anal. Biochem.
72,
248-254
|
| 31.
|
Aragón, J. J.,
and Sánchez, V.
(1985)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
131,
849-855
|
| 32.
|
Harlow, E.,
and Lane, D.
(1988)
Antibodies: A Laboratory Manual
, pp. 553-612, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
|
| 33.
|
Rost, B.,
and Sander, C.
(1993)
J. Mol. Biol.
232,
584-589
|
| 34.
|
Valaitis, A. P.,
Foe, L. G.,
and Kemp, R. G.
(1987)
J. Biol. Chem.
262,
5044-5048
|
| 35.
|
Frieden, C.
(1970)
J. Biol. Chem.
245,
5788-5799
|
| 36.
|
Reinhart, G. D.,
and Hartleip, S. B.
(1987)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
258,
65-76
|
| 37.
|
Neet, K. E.
(1988)
Methods Enzymol.
64,
139-192
|
| 38.
|
Frieden, C.,
Gilbert, H. R.,
and Bock, P. E.
(1976)
J. Biol. Chem.
251,
5644-5647
|
| 39.
|
Pettigrew, D. W.,
and Frieden, C.
(1970)
J. Biol. Chem.
254,
1887-1895
|
| 40.
|
Bock, P. E.,
and Frieden, C.
(1976)
J. Biol. Chem.
251,
5637-5643
|
| 41.
|
Reinhart, G. D.,
and Lardy, H. A.
(1980)
Biochemistry
19,
1484-1490
|
| 42.
|
Ramaiah, A.,
and Tejwani, G. A.
(1973)
Eur. J. Biochem.
39,
183-192
|
| 43.
|
Reinhart, G. D.
(1980)
J. Biol. Chem.
255,
10576-10578
|
| 44.
|
Monod, J.,
Wyman, J.,
and Changeux, J. P.
(1965)
J. Mol. Biol.
12,
88-118
|
| 45.
|
Hill, D. E.,
and Hammes, G. G.
(1975)
Biochemistry
14,
203-213
|
| 46.
|
Kemp, R. G.
(1969)
Biochemistry
8,
3162-3168
|
| 47.
|
Rao, G. S. J.,
Wariso, B. A.,
Cook, P. F.,
Hofer, H. W.,
and Harris, B. G.
(1987)
J. Biol. Chem.
262,
14068-14073
|
| 48.
|
Setlow, B.,
and Mansour, T. E.
(1970)
J. Biol. Chem.
245,
5524-5533
|
| 49.
|
Rao, G. S. J.,
Cook, P. F.,
and Harris, B. G.
(1999)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
365,
335-343
|
| 50.
|
Atkinson, D. E.,
Hathaway, J. A.,
and Smith, E. C.
(1965)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
18,
1-5
|
| 51.
|
Uyeda, K.,
and Racker, E.
(1965)
J. Biol. Chem.
240,
4682-4688
|
| 52.
|
Koshland, D. E., Jr.,
Nemethy, G.,
and Filmer, D.
(1966)
Biochemistry
5,
365-385
|
| 53.
|
Shirakihara, Y.,
and Evans, P. R.
(1988)
J. Mol. Biol.
204,
973-994
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.