|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 2, 1524-1530, January 11, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the
Received for publication, August 13, 2001, and in revised form, November 7, 2001
Glycogen-targeting subunits of protein
phosphatase-1 facilitate interaction of the phosphatase with enzymes of
glycogen metabolism. Expression of one family member, PTG, in the liver
of normal rats improves glucose tolerance without affecting other
plasma variables but leaves animals unable to reduce hepatic glycogen
stores in response to fasting. In the current study, we have tested
whether expression of other targeting subunit isoforms, such as the
liver isoform GL, the muscle isoform
GM/RGl, or a truncated version of
GM/RGl termed GM Hepatic glycogen storage is impaired in all major forms of
diabetes, contributing to the development of hyperglycemia (1-3). This
suggests that one possible means of improving glycemic control might be
to enhance glucose disposal by stimulating hepatic glycogen synthesis.
One method for increasing liver glycogen content is to increase the
activity of the glucose phosphorylating enzyme, glucokinase.
Indeed, overexpression of this enzyme in liver of normal rats (4) or
mice (5, 6) lowers blood glucose levels with a commensurate increase in
glycogen stores. However, these changes are accompanied by increases in
circulating free fatty acids, triglycerides, and lactate (4),
consistent with the large increase in glycolytic flux caused by
overexpression of glucokinase in hepatocytes or hepatoma cells (7,
8).
More specific stimulation of glycogen synthesis in liver may be
achievable by manipulation of the expression of proteins that function
distal to the glucose phosphorylation step. In particular, recent
studies have highlighted an important role for glycogen-targeting subunits of protein phosphatase-1
(PP-1)1 in spatial
organization and regulation of glycogen metabolism (9). Prominent
members of this gene family include GM or RGl (hereafter referred to as GM/RGl), expressed
primarily in striated skeletal muscle (10), GL, expressed
primarily in liver (11), and protein targeting to glycogen (PTG) (12,
13) and PPPR6 (14), expressed in a wide range of tissues. These
proteins bind to glycogen and protein phosphatase-1 and have
differential capacities for binding to glycogen synthase, glycogen
phosphorylase, and phosphorylase kinase (9-14).
It has become apparent that a major challenge inherent in considering
glycogen-targeting subunits as molecules for enhancing hepatic glucose
disposal is to choose or design a protein with the optimal combination
of regulatory features. Thus, overexpression of glycogen-targeting
subunits reveals that all family members tested stimulate glycogen
deposition in rat hepatocytes but with clear differences in potency in
the order GL > PTG > GM/RGl
(15). Cells with overexpressed targeting subunits also exhibit
differences in response to glycogenolytic agents such as glucagon and
forskolin in the order (from more to less responsive) of
GM/RGl > GL These findings have recently led us to design and test a novel form of
glycogen-targeting subunit derived from GM/RGl
(16). Native GM/RGl is distinct from other
members of its gene family in that it contains two consensus sequences
for protein kinase A-mediated serine phosphorylation. One of these
sites resides within the PP-1 binding site of
GM/RGl, and its phosphorylation leads to
dissociation of the phosphatase, contributing to inactivation of
glycogen synthesis (10, 18, 19). GM/RGl is also
distinguished from other targeting subunits by virtue of its large C
terminus that includes a hydrophobic domain that mediates binding of
the protein to sarcoplasmic reticulum in muscle (10, 20). Removal of
735 C-terminal amino acids from native GM/RGl
yields a 275-amino acid molecule that we have termed GM Animal Maintenance and Administration of Recombinant
Adenoviruses--
All procedures were carried out in accordance with
animal care guidelines of the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas and the National Research Council. Male Wistar rats
(Charles River Laboratories, Wilmington, MA and Harlan Tekland Laboratory, Winfield, IA) weighing 175-200 g were housed on a 12-h
light-dark cycle and were allowed free access to water and either
standard laboratory chow (65% carbohydrate, 4% fat, 24% protein;
Harlan Tekland Laboratory diet 7001) or high fat diet (19% lard, 1%
corn oil; Harlan Tekland Laboratory diet 96001) unless otherwise
specified. The rats were housed under these conditions for 7 weeks
before adenovirus administration. Rats were treated with cyclosporin
(15 mg/kg; Calbiochem) for 3 consecutive days starting on the day prior
to adenovirus administration and Depo-Medrol (1.5 mg/kg; Pharmacia & Upjohn, Kalamazoo, MI) on the day of adenoviral treatment. The
preparation and testing of recombinant adenoviruses containing the
cDNAs encoding GL (AdCMV-GL),
GM/RGl (AdCMV-GM/RGl), a truncated form of GM/RGl with its 735 C-terminal amino acids deleted (AdCMV-GM Animal Studies--
Two experimental protocols were performed.
In the first, animals were infused with AdCMV-GL,
AdCMV-GM/RGl, AdCMV-GM Measurement of Glycogen-targeting Subunit Expression in Liver or
Muscle by Semiquantitative Multiplex RT-PCR--
The procedure used
was based on methods described previously (15, 17). Total RNA was
extracted from powdered liver or muscle tissue using RNeasy spin
columns (Qiagen Inc., Valencia, CA) following the instructions of the
manufacturer. First-strand cDNA was prepared using 0.5 µg of
total RNA, the Superscript RT kit, and random hexamer primers
(Invitrogen) according to the instructions of the manufacturer. The
cDNA was diluted 1:6 in distilled water, and PCR was carried out
using 5 µl of the diluted cDNA and a PCR mix containing
Taq DNA polymerase (2.5 units) and buffer (Promega Corp.,
Madison, WI), dNTP mix (final concentrations of 40 mM of
each dNTP except dCTP, which was present at 20 mM; Invitrogen) and with or without 1.25 µCi of
[ Plasma and Tissue Analysis--
Plasma insulin levels were
measured by radioimmunoassay (Linco Research, St. Charles, MO). Plasma
triglyceride, ketone, and lactate levels were measured using kits
from Sigma Chemical Co. Plasma free fatty acids were measured using a
kit from Roche Molecular Biochemicals. Plasma glucose was measured
using a HemoCue Glucose Analyzer (HemoCue AB, Angelholm, Sweden). Liver
glycogen content was measured by an amyloglucosidase-based assay as
described elsewhere (24).
Statistical Analysis--
Data are expressed as the mean ± S.E. Statistical significance was determined by unpaired Student's
t test using the statistics module of Microsoft Excel
(version 5.0; Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA). Statistical significance
was assumed at p < 0.05.
Expression of Glycogen-targeting Subunits in Rat
Liver--
Adenovirus-mediated expression of the various
glycogen-targeting subunit isoforms in liver was evaluated by
semiquantitative multiplex RT-PCR analysis in animals fed on the high
fat diet (HF). A representative gel is shown in Fig.
1A. Animals treated with
AdCMV- OGTT in Wistar Rats with Adenovirus-mediated GL,
GM Effects of GL, GM Effects of Glycogen-targeting subunit Overexpression on Circulating
Metabolites and Hormones after OGTT--
A large aliquot of blood was
collected from animals at the conclusion of the OGTT experiment
summarized in Fig. 2 (180-min time point), allowing several plasma
variables to be measured. As summarized in Table
I, in HF animals, overexpression of the various glycogen-targeting subunit isoforms had no effect on
circulating free fatty acids, ketones, lactate, or insulin relative to
AdCMV- Reversal of Glucose Intolerance in AdCMV-GM Regulation of Glycogen Metabolism in Response to Fasting and
Feeding in HF Rats with Hepatic Overexpression of Glycogen-targeting
Subunits--
In an effort to better understand the differential
effects of GM
As shown in Fig. 6,
AdCMV- Effects of Glycogen-targeting Subunit Overexpression on
Circulating Metabolites and Hormones in Fasted and Fed Rats--
The
same group of plasma variables assayed after OGTT (Table I) was
measured in fed and 20-h fasted HF rats treated with the various
recombinant adenoviruses (Table II).
Animals treated with AdCMV- Regulation of carbohydrate metabolism in liver is perturbed in
type 2 diabetes, resulting in increased hepatic glucose production. Factors contributing to this imbalance include increased
gluconeogenesis and impairment of hepatic glycogen storage. One
approach to improving hepatic glucose balance in diabetes might be to
increase the glycolytic rate or, conversely, to decrease the rate of
gluconeogenesis. Consistent with this idea, hepatic overexpression of
glucokinase (4-6, 25) or
6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase (26) has been
shown to lower blood glucose levels in normal or diabetic animals.
Furthermore, overexpression of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (27),
the glucose-6-phosphatase catalytic subunit (28), or the
transcriptional co-activator PGC-1, which stimulates expression of the
genes encoding several gluconeogenic enzymes (29), all result in
hyperglycemia. However, overexpression of glucokinase or
6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase results in
increases in the levels of circulating lipids (4, 26), raising the
concern that therapies that enhance glycolytic rate may also exacerbate
the hyperlipidemia associated with type 2 diabetes. It has also been
surprising to learn that liver-specific knockout of phosphoenolpyruvate
carboxykinase has minimal effects on glucose homeostasis but causes
hepatic steatosis (30), suggesting an important role for this enzyme in
integration of carbohydrate and lipid metabolism that may preclude its
use as a target in diabetes therapy.
In light of the potential complications associated with drugs directed
at enzymes of glycolysis or gluconeogenesis, our group has been
investigating the utility of glycogen-targeting subunits of protein
phosphatase-1 for lowering of blood glucose in diabetes. The advantage
of this approach would be to stimulate glucose disposal by diverting it
into an inert storage polymer, glycogen, and away from the glycolytic
pathway. Some support for the concept was gained in studies involving
overexpression of PTG in liver of normal rats fed on standard chow,
which resulted in a modest improvement in oral glucose tolerance and no
discernable perturbation of lipid homeostasis (17). However, these
animals had significant increases in hepatic glycogen stores in the fed
state and, of greater concern, failed to lower glycogen levels in
response to fasting, thus resembling patients with glycogen storage diseases.
More recently we have learned that the various glycogen-targeting
subunit isoforms affect regulation of glycogen and glucose metabolism
in different ways when overexpressed in isolated hepatocytes. One set
of studies revealed that while overexpression of the muscle-specific isoform GM/RGl had the weakest effect on
glycogen synthesis, it also allowed cells to retain appropriate
regulation of glycogenolysis by forskolin, a property not equally
shared by cells with overexpressed PTG or GL (15). These
findings led us to investigate the possibility that the glycogenic
impact of GM/RGl could be improved by deletion of its unique C-terminal tail that includes a putative sarcoplasmic reticulum association domain. To this end, we prepared a truncated form
of GM/RGl (GM These in vitro findings led us to compare, in the current
study, the metabolic effects of hepatic overexpression of
GM The explanation for the difference in effect of GM What then is the real therapeutic potential of the approach outlined
here? One important concern is that while hepatic overexpression of
GM The contrasting effects of GL and GM It is also unclear how GM We are grateful to Kimberly Jones-Ross and
Paul Anderson for expert technical assistance and Dr. Per Bo Jensen for
assistance with multiplex RT-PCR.
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grant P01 DK58398 (to C. B. N.) and DK36569 (to A. A. D.-R.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Touchstone Center
for Diabetes Research, Rm. Y8.212, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX 75390. Fax: 214-648-9191; E-mail: newgard@utsw.swmed.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, November 13, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M107744200
2
C. Clark, J. Donkor, and R. Fehn, unpublished observations.
The abbreviations used are:
PP-1, protein
phosphatase-1;
PTG, protein targeting to glycogen;
HF, high fat diet;
OGTT, oral glucose tolerance test;
RT, reverse transcription;
TG, triglyceride.
Reversal of Diet-induced Glucose Intolerance by Hepatic
Expression of a Variant Glycogen-targeting Subunit of Protein
Phosphatase-1*
,
,
,
¶
Departments of Biochemistry and Internal
Medicine and the Touchstone Center for Diabetes Research, University of
Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75390 and the
§ Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Indiana
University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
C in liver
ameliorates glucose intolerance in rats fed on a high fat diet (HF). HF
animals overexpressing GM
C, but not GL or
GM/RGl, exhibited a decline in blood glucose of
35-44 mg/dl relative to control HF animals during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) such that levels were indistinguishable from
those of normal rats fed on standard chow at all but one time point.
Hepatic glycogen levels were 2.1-2.4-fold greater in GL-
and GM
C-overexpressing HF rats compared with control HF animals following OGTT. In a second set of studies on fed and 20-h
fasted HF animals, GM
C-overexpressing rats lowered their liver glycogen levels by 57% (from 402 ± 54 to 173 ± 27 µg of glycogen/mg of protein) in the fasted versus
fed states compared with only 44% in GL-overexpressing
animals (from 740 ± 35 to 413 ± 141 µg of glycogen/mg of
protein). Since the OGTT studies were performed on 20-h fasted rats,
this meant that GM
C-overexpressing rats synthesized much
more glycogen than GL-overexpressing HF rats during the
OGTT (419 versus 117 µg of glycogen/mg of protein, respectively), helping to explain why GM
C preferentially
enhanced glucose clearance. We conclude that GM
C has a
unique combination of glycogenic potency and responsiveness to
glycogenolytic signals that allows it to be used to lower blood glucose
levels in diabetes.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
PTG (15, 16). To
date, we have performed one in vivo study in which hepatic
overexpression of PTG in normal rats was shown to improve glucose
tolerance without perturbation of lipid homeostasis (17). However,
these animals also had markedly elevated liver glycogen levels in the
fed state and almost no reduction in hepatic glycogen stores in
response to an overnight fast, suggesting that they might be more
susceptible to perturbations in glycemic control during prolonged
fasting, sustained exercise, or other stressful circumstances.
C
that can be directly aligned with the similarly sized native
GL and PTG proteins. Overexpression of GM
C
and native GM/RGl in hepatocytes reveals that
the former protein is more effective at stimulating glycogen synthesis
(16). Moreover, unlike PTG- or GL-overexpressing cells,
cells with GM
C overexpression retain responsiveness to
glycogenolytic signals such as forskolin or lowering of media
glucose concentrations. These promising findings have led us, in the
current study, to compare the metabolic impact of GM
C,
GL, and GM/RGl overexpression in
whole animals. These studies have been performed in rats fed on a high
fat diet for 7 weeks to cause a syndrome of insulin resistance and
glucose intolerance such as is seen in early stage type 2 diabetes. We
find that GM
C is unique among the molecules tested in
its capacity to reverse diet-induced glucose intolerance.
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
C), or
-galactosidase (AdCMV-
GAL) have been described previously
(15-17, 21). Aliquots of these viruses were amplified and purified for
the current study as described previously (22). Between 0.5 and
1.5 × 1012 recombinant adenovirus particles were
administered via tail vein injection to rats anesthetized with Nembutal
(50 µg/g of body weight intraperitoneally; Abbott Laboratories, North
Chicago, IL) or a 50:5:1 mixture of ketamine (Avoco, Fort Dodge, IA),
Rompun (Avoco), and acepromazine (Haver, Shawnee, KS) as described
elsewhere (4, 23). After viral administration, animals were
individually caged to allow monitoring of food intake and body weight
before initiation of experiments.
C, or AdCMV-
GAL viruses. Ninety hours after virus administration, animals were fasted for 20 h with free access to water. An oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was performed by anesthetizing animals with Nembutal (50 µg/g of body weight intraperitoneally) and
administration of a bolus of 2 g of glucose/kg of body weight by
gavage of a 45% solution of glucose in water. Blood samples (~20
µl/sample from the tail vein) were collected immediately before
administration of the bolus and at 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, and 180 min
after the bolus for measurement of circulating glucose concentrations.
Animals were sacrificed immediately after the 180-min time point for
collection of blood and liver. The liver samples were rapidly frozen in
liquid nitrogen and stored at
70 °C until further analysis. In the
second protocol, animals were infused with AdCMV-GL,
AdCMV-GM
C, or AdCMV-
GAL viruses. Ninety hours after
virus administration, animals were either fasted for 20 h or
allowed to continue feeding ad libitum. Thereafter, all
animals were anesthetized with Nembutal (50 µg/g of body weight
intraperitoneally), blood samples were taken, and liver was excised and
rapidly frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at
70 °C until
further analysis.
-33P]dCTP (2,000 Ci/mmol; PerkinElmer Life Sciences)
in a 25-µl reaction volume. Four primer sets (5 pmol of each primer)
were used in these studies. The first set specifically amplified a
181-bp fragment from the GL transgene and did not amplify
endogenous rat GL because the upstream primer
hybridizes to 5' untranslated sequence derived from the
adenovirus vector (5' primer, CGAGCTCGGTACCAACTTC; 3' primer,
GAAGGTGAAGCGCTCTCTG). The second set amplified a 162-bp product
from either the full-length endogenous GM/RGl
or GM
C transgene as described previously (15). The third
oligonucleotide pair specifically amplified a 900-bp fragment of
GM
C derived by expression from the
AdCMV-GM
C adenovirus because the upstream primer
hybridizes to sequence within the GM
C cDNA sequence,
while the 3' primer hybridizes to the 3' untranslated region derived from the adenovirus vector (5' primer, CTCAAAGGAAGATCTTATGCAAC; 3'
primer, GGTAGTTTGTCCAATTATGTCAC). The last oligonucleotide pair
amplified one of the following as internal standards: a 186-bp fragment
of the endogenous TATA-binding protein transcript, a 201-bp fragment of
the elongation factor-1
(EF-1
) mRNA (17), or a 250-bp
fragment of the
-tubulin gene (5' primer, GCGTGAGTGTATCTCCATCCA; 3'
primer, GGTAGGTGCCAGTGCGAACTT). In experiments involving inclusion of
[
-33P]dCTP, PCR conditions were an initial incubation
at 95 °C for 5 min followed by 22 or 24 cycles (the latter only when
studying full-length GM/RGl transgene
expression) of 95 °C for 45 s, 55 °C for 30 s, and
72 °C for 30 s. The final PCR products were mixed with
98% formamide denaturing loading buffer and separated on a 6% (w/v)
polyacrylamide gel containing 7 M urea. The gel was subsequently dried and exposed to a PhosphorImager screen, and the
resulting scan was analyzed using ImageQuant from Molecular Dynamics
(Sunnyvale, California). In the experiments designed to assess
expression of the GM
C transgene in extrahepatic tissues, PCRs were carried out in the absence of [
-33P]dCTP.
For these experiments, PCR conditions were an initial incubation at
95 °C for 1 min followed by 30 cycles of 95 °C for 1 min,
55 °C for 1 min, and 72 °C for 2 min. 5 µl of the PCR product was resolved on an agarose gel, and products were visualized by incubation of the gel with 0.6 µg/ml ethidium bromide.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
GAL exhibited either no signal or background at the positions
expected for the reverse-transcribed and amplified fragments of
GL, GM
C, or GM/RGl.
Rats infused with AdCMV-GL,
AdCMV-GM/RGl, or AdCMV-GM
C
showed clear expression of the respective transgene mRNAs. When
normalized to the internal control, TATA-binding protein, GL and GM
C mRNA levels were found to be
indistinguishable and ~3-fold greater than the levels of
GM/RGl transgene RNA (Fig. 1B). The
lower apparent efficiency of GM/RGl
overexpression relative to the other two targeting subunits is
consistent with our previous findings in isolated hepatocytes (15, 16).
No attempt could be made to correct for the clearly lower level of
GM/RGl expression since infusion of higher
viral titers began to have toxic effects as assessed by an increase in
the activity of a liver enzyme, aspartyl aminotransferase (PGOT)
in the blood of these animals (data not shown). It should also be
pointed out that our main goal was to compare the highly glycogenic
targeting subunit GL with our novel construct
GM
C.

View larger version (69K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Expression of the GL,
GM/RGl, and
GM
C transgenes in liver after
OGTT. Male Wistar rats were fed a high fat diet for 7 weeks. At
the end of this period, animals were treated with the AdCMV-
GAL,
AdCMV-GL, AdCMV-GM/RGl, or
AdCMV-GM
C adenoviruses and allowed to feed ad
libitum for 90 h after viral administration. Animals were
then fasted for 20 h before receiving an oral glucose bolus of 2 g/kg of body weight. Animals were sacrificed 180 min after the oral
glucose challenge for collection of liver samples. A portion of these
samples was used to prepare total RNA and to examine transgene
expression by multiplex PCR as described under "Materials and
Methods." A, representative gel displaying RT-PCR results
for two to four animals in each treatment group. TATA-binding protein
(TBP) was used as an internal control. Note that endogenous
GL was not amplified as primers specific for the
GL transgene were used. B, quantitative analysis
of the ratio of each transgene:TATA-binding protein (TBP)
for all animals included in the OGTT protocol. Data represent mean ± S.E. for a total of six GL-, seven
GM/RGl-, and seven
GM
C-overexpressing animals. Symbols * and *** indicate
significant differences between the GM
C- and
GL-overexpressing groups relative to the
GM/RGl-overexpressing group with levels of
significance of p < 0.05 and p < 0.0001, respectively. Expression levels in the GL- and
GM
C-overexpressing groups were not significantly
different.
C, or GM/RGl Overexpression in
Liver--
To test the capacity of the various glycogen-targeting
subunits to improve glucose homeostasis, we performed OGTTs in the HF
animals evaluated for targeting subunit expression in Fig. 1 as well as
a group of rats that were fed on normal chow and infused with
AdCMV-
GAL. As shown in Fig. 2,
AdCMV-
GAL-treated animals fed on normal chow had normal glucose
tolerance with a rapid decline of blood glucose from a maximum of 170 mg/dl at 30 min after the glucose load and a return to basal levels by 150 min. In sharp contrast, AdCMV-
GAL-treated HF rats were clearly glucose-intolerant with a higher excursion of blood glucose to a peak
value of 210 mg/dl at 60 min after the glucose bolus and a slow decline
thereafter that failed to approach baseline values by 180 min.
Surprisingly, HF rats treated with AdCMV-GM/RGl
or AdCMV-GL exhibited no significant improvement in glucose
tolerance during OGTT. In contrast, HF animals treated with
AdCMV-GM
C had glucose levels indistinguishable from
those of AdCMV-
GAL-treated rats fed on normal chow, except at 150 min where glucose was slightly elevated compared with the standard chow
controls but still lower than that in the other three treatment
groups.

View larger version (27K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Oral glucose tolerance test. Animals
were treated as described in the legend for Fig. 1. Tail vein blood
samples were taken, and glucose levels were measured at the indicated
times after the glucose bolus. Data are mean ± S.E. for 12
-galactosidase (
GAL)-, six GL-, seven
GM/RGl-, and seven
GM
C-overexpressing animals. The symbol * indicates those
time points at which blood glucose levels were significantly lower in
HF AdCMV-GM
C-treated rats versus HF
AdCMV-
GAL-treated controls with p < 0.05. A second
control group of animals fed a standard chow diet for 7 weeks and
infused with AdCMV-
GAL (std. chow, n = 8)
was also included in this protocol. Note that
GM
C-overexpressing animals had glucose levels
indistinguishable from those of standard chow-fed control animals with
the exception of one time point (#, p < 0.01).
C, or
GM/RGl Overexpression on Liver Glycogen
following OGTT--
To determine whether the differential effects of
the various glycogen-targeting subunits on glucose levels in the OGTT
were related to glycogen deposition, liver glycogen levels were
measured in animals at the conclusion of the experiment (180-min time
point) summarized in Fig. 2. Fig. 3 shows
that high fat feeding per se did not increase liver glycogen
stores relative to feeding with normal chow (both of these control
groups were treated with AdCMV-
GAL). Treatment of HF rats with
AdCMV-GM/RGl did not enhance glycogen accumulation compared with either control group. However, treatment of
HF animals with AdCMV-GL or AdCMV-GM
C
resulted in 108 and 138% increases in liver glycogen, respectively,
relative to the AdCMV-
GAL-treated HF controls. Thus, both
GL- and GM
C-overexpressing animals had
higher liver glycogen levels following OGTT, but only the
AdCMV-GM
C-treated rats had improved glucose
tolerance.

View larger version (32K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Liver glycogen levels after the OGTT.
Animals were sacrificed for collection of liver samples at the 180-min
point of the OGTT shown in Fig. 2. Data represent mean ± S.E. for
six GL-, seven GM/RGl-, and seven
GM
C-overexpressing HF rats and 12
-galactosidase-overexpressing HF (
GAL) and eight
-galactosidase-overexpressing standard chow-fed
(
GAL/std. chow) rats. The symbols * and **
indicate that GL- and GM
C-overexpressing
animals stored more glycogen than HF
-galactosidase controls with
levels of significance of p < 0.001 and
p < 0.05, respectively.
GAL-treated controls. Treatment of animals with
AdCMV-GL or AdCMV-GM/RGl also did
not alter circulating triglyceride (TG) levels. However,
AdCMV-GM
C treatment did cause an 80% increase in TG
levels relative to those of AdCMV-
GAL-treated controls that was
significant at the level of p = 0.045.
Plasma variables in AdCMV-
GAL-, AdCMV-GL-,
AdCMV-GM/RGl-, and AdCMV-GM
C-treated rats
after the OGTT protocol
GAL, AdCMV-GL,
AdCMV-GM/RGl, or AdCMV-GM
C adenoviruses and
were allowed to feed ad libitum for 90 h after viral
administration. Animals were then fasted for 20 h before receiving
an oral glucose bolus (2 g/kg). Blood samples were collected after the
180-min time point of the OGTT for analysis of the indicated plasma
variables. Data are mean ± S.E. for the number of animals
indicated in each group. The symbol * indicates a significant
difference compared to the AdCMV-
GAL-treated control group with
p = 0.045. FFAs, free fatty acids.
C-infused
Rats Is Not Due to "Leaky" Expression of the Transgene in
Muscle--
In previous studies involving systemic infusion of
recombinant adenoviruses to deliver the glucokinase or
glucose-6-phosphatase genes in rats, we found no evidence of transgene
expression in extrahepatic tissues such as muscle, fat, brain, or
kidney and only very low levels of expression in lung (4, 28). However, even modest expression of targeting subunits in a large tissue mass
such as muscle could potentially affect the conclusions of the current
study. To eliminate this possibility, we used RT-PCR to measure
expression of the GM
C transcript in liver and skeletal muscle of AdCMV-
GAL- and AdCMV-GM
C-infused animals.
This assay used an oligonucleotide pair that specifically amplifies the
transcript derived from the adenovirus construct and not endogenous
GM/RGl. As a positive control, treatment of 293 cells with AdCMV-GM
C and RT-PCR analysis of RNA derived
from such cells resulted in amplification of a band of the predicted
size of 900 nucleotides (Fig. 4). RT-PCR
analysis was also performed on RNA isolated from liver and muscle
samples taken from three AdCMV-
GAL- or three AdCMV-GM
C-treated rats subjected to OGTT. As shown
in Fig. 4, a band of the same size as that in the
AdCMV-GM
C-treated 293 cells was clearly detected in
liver samples of AdCMV-GM
C-treated, but not
AdCMV-
GAL-treated, rats. However, a band of this size was not
amplified from muscle RNA regardless of whether the animals were
treated with AdCMV-GM
C. These findings clearly
demonstrate that the improved glucose tolerance reported in Fig. 2 is
due to expression of GM
C in liver and not in muscle.

View larger version (37K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
RT-PCR analysis of
GM
C transgene expression in liver
and muscle. Oligonucleotides specific to the GM
C
gene product expressed from the AdCMV-GM
C adenovirus or,
as an internal control, to
-tubulin were used for multiplex RT-PCR
analysis of liver and muscle samples from a subset of the animals used
for OGTT as described in Figs. 1-3. As an additional control, the same
oligonucleotides were used to analyze an RNA sample from cultured 293 cells treated with AdCMV-GM
C. Note that a band of 900 bp
(labeled GM
C Transgene), as
predicted only in cells with adenovirus-mediated expression of
GM
C, is found in liver of
AdCMV-GM
C-treated rats or in 293 cells treated with this
virus but not in liver samples from AdCMV-
GAL-treated rats or in any
of the muscle samples.
C and GL overexpression on
glucose tolerance (Fig. 2), we next studied liver glycogen levels in
fed and fasted HF animals treated with AdCMV-GM
C or
AdCMV-GL. Multiplex RT-PCR analysis of transgene expression
levels in these animals is summarized in Fig.
5. In both the AdCMV-GL- and
AdCMV-GM
C-treated groups, transgene expression tended to
be lower in fasted animals, but this difference was not significant in
either group. Comparison of GM
C to GL
mRNA levels in fed versus fed or fasted
versus fasted groups also revealed no significant
differences.

View larger version (23K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Expression of the GL and
GM
C transgenes in liver of fasted
and ad libitum fed rats. Animals were treated as
described in the legend to Fig. 1 with either the AdCMV-GL
or AdCMV-GM
C adenoviruses. 90 h after virus
infusion, animals were either allowed to continue feeding ad
libitum on the high fat diet (white bars) or were
fasted for 20 h (dark bars). Livers were collected, and
transgene expression was measured by multiplex RT-PCR. Band intensities
were normalized to EF-1
as the internal control. Results represent
mean ± S.E. for the following number of animals: fed
GL, n = 8; fasted GL,
n = 5; fed GM
C, n = 10;
fasted GM
C, n = 11. No significant
differences were found when comparing expression levels in fed and
fasted animals within a virus treatment group or when comparing fed to
fed or fasted to fasted animals between viral treatment groups.
GAL-treated HF rats contained 317 ± 46 µg of
glycogen/mg of protein in the fed state and depleted this reserve by
68%, to 103 ± 15 µg of glycogen/mg of protein, in response to
a 20-h fast. Interestingly, fed AdCMV-GL-treated rats
accumulated 740 ± 35 µg of glycogen/mg of protein, 2.3 times more than fed AdCMV-
GAL-treated controls, and were only able to
lower glycogen by 44% in response to fasting to a level of 413 ± 141 µg of glycogen/mg of protein. In sharp contrast, fed AdCMV-GM
C-treated rats contained 402 ± 54 µg of
glycogen/mg of protein in liver and reduced their glycogen stores by
57% in response to the 20-h fast to 173 ± 27 µg of glycogen/mg
of protein, a value slightly higher than that in fasted
AdCMV-
GAL-treated controls. Importantly, the liver glycogen level in
fasted AdCMV-GL-treated rats was 80% of that in
AdCMV-GL-treated rats following OGTT. In contrast, liver
glycogen content in fasted AdCMV-GM
C-treated rats was
only 29% of that in AdCMV-GM
C-treated rats following OGTT. In other words, AdCMV-GM
C-treated rats synthesized
419 µg of glycogen/mg of protein during the OGTT compared with an increment of only 117 µg of glycogen/mg of protein in
AdCMV-GL-treated animals (values obtained by subtracting
the glycogen levels in fasted rats shown in Fig. 6 from the glycogen
levels after OGTT shown in Fig. 3; note that animals were fasted for
20 h prior to OGTT). This suggests that the differential potency
of GM
C and GL for lowering of blood glucose
in glucose-intolerant HF rats may have been due in part to the high
basal glycogen levels in GL-overexpressing rats that
impaired further glycogen storage during OGTT.

View larger version (24K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Liver glycogen levels in fasted and ad
libitum fed rats. Animals were treated as described in
the legend to Fig. 1. 90 h after virus administration, animals
were either allowed to continue feeding ad libitum
(white bars) or were fasted for 20 h (dark
bars). Liver samples were taken for measurement of glycogen
content. Results are mean ± S.E. for the following number of
animals: fed GL, n = 8; fasted
GL, n = 5; fed GM
C,
n = 10; fasted GM
C, n = 11. The symbols ** and *** denote differences between the indicated
groups at levels of significance of p < 0.01 and
p < 0.0001, respectively.
GAL, AdCMV-GL, or
AdCMV-GM
C all showed expected changes in plasma glucose,
free fatty acids, lactate, and ketones as a function of fasting and
feeding. Insulin levels remained high in the fasted state in all three
groups of animals, but this is not unexpected given the known effect of
high fat feeding to cause insulin resistance and consequent fasting
hyperinsulinemia (23). Circulating TGs were more than twice as high in
fed compared with fasted AdCMV-
GAL- or
AdCMV-GM
C-treated rats. However, in
AdCMV-GL-treated animals, TG remained low in the fed state
and was indistinguishable from fasted values. Lactate levels in fasted
AdCMV-GL-infused rats were also lower than in
AdCMVGM
C- or AdCMV-
GAL-treated animals
(p < 0.05).
Plasma variables in fed and fasted AdCMV-
GAL-, AdCMV-GL-,
and AdCMV-GM
C-treated rats
GAL-treated
group with p
0.05. FFAs, free fatty acids.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
C) and demonstrated
that its overexpression in hepatocytes had a more potent glycogenic
effect than native GM/RGl but with retention of
glycogenolytic responsiveness to forskolin, a fall in media
glucose, or the combination of both glycogenolytic signals (16).
C, native GM/RGl, and the most
glycogenic of all the targeting subunits, GL. These studies
were performed in Wistar rats fed on a high fat diet for a period of 7 weeks, a regimen that causes a syndrome resembling early stage type 2 diabetes, including glucose intolerance, mild fasting hyperglycemia,
insulin resistance, hyperinsulinemia, increased circulating and tissue
lipids, and hyperleptinemia (23). This study reveals that at similar
levels of overexpression in liver, GM
C but not
GL lowers blood glucose levels toward normal during OGTT in
insulin-resistant, glucose-intolerant, HF rats. Native
GM/RGl, which consistent with our previous
findings could not be overexpressed as efficiently as the other
targeting isoforms (15, 16), also did not improve glucose tolerance.
C and
GL appears to be that animals with overexpressed
GM
C experience a larger increment in hepatic glycogen
storage during OGTT than animals with overexpressed GL,
probably related to the much higher fasting liver glycogen levels in
the latter group. Thus, at the time that the OGTT begins in fasted
GL-overexpressing animals, liver glycogen levels are
already higher than in the fed state in AdCMV-
GAL controls, probably
limiting the further capacity for glycogen storage. In contrast, fasted
GM
C-overexpressing animals have levels of liver glycogen
that are only slightly higher than fasted AdCMV-
GAL controls and are
also able to store much more during the subsequent OGTT than the
controls due to the glycogenic effect of the overexpressed targeting
subunit. Interestingly, liver glycogen content in fed
GM
C-overexpressing rats was slightly but not
significantly higher than that in AdCMV-
GAL-treated controls. This
suggests that glycogen metabolism is regulated in a near-normal fashion
during typical physiologic cycles (e.g. overnight fasting and feeding) but that GM
C contributes to enhanced
efficiency of glucose disposal when the system is challenged, such as
during the OGTT experiment. Consistent with this notion, plasma
variables such as glucose, insulin, free fatty acids, and TG
were normal in ad libitum fed and 20-h fasted
GM
C-overexpressing rats. Thus, the new
GM
C molecule appears to combine just the right level of
glycogenic potency with retention of sensitivity to diverse glycogenolytic signals, allowing it to minimally perturb fuel homeostasis under normal conditions but to assist in disposing of a
glucose load in otherwise glucose-intolerant animals.
C appears to ameliorate glucose intolerance induced by
high fat feeding, it does not reduce the high fasting insulin levels in
these animals (Table II). We have previously shown that the elevated
insulin levels in rats fed on the high fat diet is linked to insulin
resistance and that insulin levels can be normalized in these animals
by infusion of a recombinant adenovirus containing the leptin cDNA
(23). One mechanism by which GM
C might have reversed
insulin resistance is via activation of fatty acid oxidation in liver
to compensate for the diversion of glucose away from glycolysis and
oxidative pathways and into the glycogen storage pathway. If liver
becomes more dependent on fat for energy production as a result of
GM
C overexpression, this could potentially enhance mobilization of lipids from peripheral tissues such as muscle and fat.
Given the correlation between intramyocellular lipid stores and insulin
resistance (31, 32), this could ultimately lead to an increase in
insulin sensitivity. Perhaps the duration of transgene expression in
the current study (5 days) was simply too short to reveal such an
effect, or alternatively, an improvement in insulin sensitivity
occurred that was not linked to a fall in circulating insulin levels.
Further work will be required to test these possibilities. Until such
work is carried out, our method should be treated simply as a means of
improving glucose tolerance.
C
overexpression on circulating TG levels also deserve mention.
GM
C-overexpressing animals experienced a mild elevation
in TG following OGTT but had normal TG levels in the ad
libitum fed or fasted states, while GL-overexpressing rats had decreased TG levels in the fed state. Interestingly, GL but not GM
C overexpression caused fat to
accumulate in liver.2 This
may be related to the tendency to saturate hepatic glycogen stores in
GL-overexpressing animals but not
GM
C-overexpressing animals, which in turn may have
modulated hepatic lipid metabolism and/or mobilization of lipids from
peripheral tissues. These issues will require further investigation.
C or a related activity might
be introduced into liver of patients with diabetes. Current viral and
nonviral methods for hepatic gene delivery are not sufficiently robust
or safe for human therapy. Until gene delivery methods are improved, a
better approach may be to develop drugs that interact with endogenous
targeting subunit isoforms. This will require a better understanding of
the structure/function relationships that govern isoform-specific
function (progress in this area has been recently reviewed in Ref. 9).
Such insights may ultimately allow the differences in glycogenic
potency on the one hand and the differential responses to
glycogenolytic signals on the other to be understood in terms of
protein domains that can be specifically targeted with small molecules.
It is interesting to note that the group of Treadway and associates
(33) has reported on the use of a small molecule inhibitor of liver
glycogen phosphorylase in lowering of blood glucose levels in diabetic
rodents. Surprisingly, this agent did not cause hypoglycemia even in
normal fasted animals. With our approach it appears even less likely
that hypoglycemia would occur given that we are stimulating hepatic
glucose disposal rather than inhibiting glucose production while
leaving regulation of glycogen phosphorylase largely intact. Further
testing of both approaches under more stressful conditions will be required.
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Magnusson, I.,
Rothman, D. L.,
Katz, L. D.,
Shulman, R. G.,
and Shulman, G. I.
(1992)
J. Clin. Invest.
90,
1323-1327
2.
Cline, G. W.,
Rothman, D. L.,
Magnusson, I.,
Katz, L. D.,
and Shulman, G. I.
(1994)
J. Clin. Invest.
94,
2369-2376
3.
Velho, G.,
Petersen, K. F.,
Perseghin, G.,
Hwang, J. H.,
Rothman, D. L.,
Pueyo, M. E.,
Cline, G. W.,
Froguel, P.,
and Shulman, G. I.
(1996)
J. Clin. Invest.
98,
1755-1761
4.
O'Doherty, R. M.,
Lehman, D.,
Telemaque-Potts, S.,
and Newgard, C. B.
(1999)
Diabetes
48,
2022-2027
5.
Hariharan, N.,
Farrelly, D.,
Hagan, D.,
Hillyer, D.,
Arbeeny, C.,
Sabrah, T.,
Treloar, A.,
Brown, K.,
Kalinowski, S.,
and Mookhtiar, K.
(1997)
Diabetes
46,
11-16
6.
Niswender, K. D.,
Shiota, M.,
Postic, C.,
Cherrington, A. D.,
and Magnuson, M. A.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
22570-22575
7.
O'Doherty, R. M.,
Lehman, D. L.,
Seoane, J.,
Gomez-Foix, A. M.,
Guinovart, J. J.,
and Newgard, C. B.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
20524-20530
8.
Valera, A.,
and Bosch, F.
(1994)
Eur. J. Biochem.
222,
533-539
9.
Newgard, C. B.,
Brady, M. J.,
O'Doherty, R. M.,
and Saltiel, A. R.
(2000)
Diabetes
49,
1967-1977
10.
Tang, P. M.,
Bondor, J. A.,
Swiderek, K. M.,
and DePaoli-Roach, A. A.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
15782-15789
11.
Doherty, M. J.,
Moorhead, G.,
Morrice, N.,
Cohen, P.,
and Cohen, P. T.
(1995)
FEBS Lett.
375,
294-298
12.
Printen, J. A.,
Brady, M. J.,
and Saltiel, A. R.
(1997)
Science
275,
1475-1478
13.
Doherty, M. J.,
Young, P. R.,
and Cohen, P. T.
(1996)
FEBS Lett.
399,
339-343
14.
Armstrong, C. G.,
Browne, G. J.,
Cohen, P.,
and Cohen, P. T.
(1997)
FEBS Lett.
418,
210-214
15.
Gasa, R.,
Jensen, P. B.,
Berman, H. K.,
Brady, M. J.,
DePaoli-Roach, A. A.,
and Newgard, C. B.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
26396-26403
16.
Yang, R.,
Cao, L.,
Gasa, R.,
Brady, M. J.,
Sherry, A. D.,
and Newgard, C. B.
(2002)
J. Biol. Chem.
277,
1514-1523
17.
O'Doherty, R. M.,
Jensen, P. B.,
Anderson, P.,
Jones, J. G.,
Berman, H. K.,
Kearney, D.,
and Newgard, C. B.
(2000)
J. Clin. Invest.
105,
479-488
18.
Dent, P.,
Lavoinne, A.,
Nakielny, S.,
Watt, P.,
and Cohen, P.
(1990)
Nature
348,
302-308
19.
Wu, J.,
Kleiner, U.,
and Brautigan, D. L.
(1996)
Biochemistry
35,
13858-13864 .20)
20.
Hubbard, M. J.,
Dent, P.,
Smythe, C.,
and Cohen, P.
(1990)
FEBS Lett.
189,
245-249
21.
Herz, J.,
and Gerard, R. D.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
2812-2816
22.
Becker, T.,
Noel, R.,
Coats, W. S.,
Gomez-Foix, A.,
Alam, T.,
Gerard, R. D.,
and Newgard, C. B.
(1994)
Methods Cell Biol.
43,
161-189
23.
Buettner, R.,
Newgard, C. B.,
Rhodes, C. J.,
and O'Doherty, R. M.
(2000)
Am. J. Physiol.
278,
E563-E569
24.
Newgard, C. B.,
Hirsch, L.,
Foster, D. W.,
and McGarry, J. D.
(1983)
J. Biol. Chem.
258,
8046-8052
25.
Ferre, T.,
Pujol, A.,
Efren, R.,
Bosch, F.,
and Valera, A.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
93,
7225-7230
26.
Wu, C.,
Okar, D. A.,
Newgard, C. B.,
and Lange, A. J.
(2001)
J. Clin. Invest.
107,
91-98
27.
Valera, A.,
Pujol, A.,
Pelegrin, M.,
and Bosch, F.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
9151-9154
28.
Trinh, K.,
O'Doherty, R.,
Anderson, P.,
Lange, A. J.,
and Newgard, C. B.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
31615-31620
29.
Yoon, J. C.,
Puigserver, P.,
Chen, G., Wu, Z.,
Rhee, J.,
Adelmant, G.,
Stafford, J.,
Kahn, C. R.,
Granner, D.,
Newgard, C. B.,
and Spiegelman, B. M.
(2001)
Nature
413,
131-138
30.
She, P.,
Shiota, H.,
Shelton, K. D.,
Chalkley, R.,
Postic, C.,
and Magnuson, M. A.
(2000)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20,
6508-6517
31.
Stein, D. T.,
Dobbins, R.,
Szczepanik, L.,
Malloy, C.,
and McGarry, J. D.
(1997)
Diabetes
46 Suppl. 1,
23A (abstr.)
32.
Krssak, M.,
Petersen, K. F.,
Dresner, A.,
DiPietro, L.,
Vogel, S. M.,
Rothman, D. L.,
Shulman, G. I.,
and Roden, M.
(1999)
Diabetologia
42,
113-116
33.
Martin, W. H.,
Hoover, D. J.,
Armento, S. J.,
Stock, I. A.,
Mcpherson, R. K.,
Danley, D. E.,
Stevenson, R. W.,
Barrett, E. J.,
and Treadway, J. L.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
1776-1781
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Pautsch, N. Stadler, O. Wissdorf, E. Langkopf, W. Moreth, and R. Streicher Molecular Recognition of the Protein Phosphatase 1 Glycogen Targeting Subunit by Glycogen Phosphorylase J. Biol. Chem., April 4, 2008; 283(14): 8913 - 8918. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-B. Kim, O. D. Peroni, W. G. Aschenbach, Y. Minokoshi, K. Kotani, A. Zisman, C. R. Kahn, L. J. Goodyear, and B. B. Kahn Muscle-Specific Deletion of the Glut4 Glucose Transporter Alters Multiple Regulatory Steps in Glycogen Metabolism Mol. Cell. Biol., November 1, 2005; 25(21): 9713 - 9723. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Collier and D. K. Scott Sweet Changes: Glucose Homeostasis Can Be Altered by Manipulating Genes Controlling Hepatic Glucose Metabolism Mol. Endocrinol., May 1, 2004; 18(5): 1051 - 1063. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. CEULEMANS and M. BOLLEN Functional Diversity of Protein Phosphatase-1, a Cellular Economizer and Reset Button Physiol Rev, January 1, 2004; 84(1): 1 - 39. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. C. Greenberg, K. N. Meredith, L. Yan, and M. J. Brady Protein Targeting to Glycogen Overexpression Results in the Specific Enhancement of Glycogen Storage in 3T3-L1 Adipocytes J. Biol. Chem., August 15, 2003; 278(33): 30835 - 30842. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Yang and C. B. Newgard Hepatic Expression of a Targeting Subunit of Protein Phosphatase-1 in Streptozotocin-diabetic Rats Reverses Hyperglycemia and Hyperphagia Despite Depressed Glucokinase Expression J. Biol. Chem., June 20, 2003; 278(26): 23418 - 23425. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||