![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 2, 932-936, January 11, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the
Received for publication, July 13, 2001, and in revised form, October 15, 2001
A key early event in the development
of atherosclerosis is the oxidation of low density lipoprotein (LDL)
via different mechanisms including free radical reactions with both
protein and lipid components. Nitric oxide (·NO) is capable of
inhibiting LDL oxidation by scavenging radical species involved in
oxidative chain propagation reactions. Herein, the diffusion of
·NO into LDL is studied by fluorescence quenching of pyrene
derivatives. Selected probes 1-(pyrenyl)methyltrimethylammonium (PMTMA)
and 1-(pyrenyl)-methyl-3-(9-octadecenoyloxy)-22,23-bisnor-5-cholenate (PMChO) were chosen so that they could be incorporated at different depths of the LDL particle. Indeed, PMTMA and PMChO were located in the
surface and core of LDL, respectively, as indicated by changes in
fluorescence spectra, fluorescence quenching studies with water-soluble
quenchers and the lifetime values ( Lipid accumulation in the vascular wall is a characteristic
feature of the early pathogenesis of atherosclerosis, with associated lipoprotein oxidation representing a critical component of endothelial dysfunction and foam cell formation (1, 2). Low density lipoprotein
(LDL)1 is the major vehicle
for cholesterol transport in human plasma and, in a modified-oxidized
form, serves as the major source of cholesteryl ester deposited in
atheroma (3, 4). Indeed, oxidized LDL becomes suitable for uptake by
macrophages through the scavenger-receptor pathway, promoting the
formation of cholesteryl ester-containing foam cells, one of the
initial events in atheroma formation (5-9).
The LDL particle (~2.5 MDa) consists of an apolar core of cholesteryl
esters and triglycerides, surrounded by a monolayer of phospholipids,
unesterified cholesterol, and one molecule of apolipoprotein B-100
(4,536 amino acids, 550 kDa) (10, 11). LDL is ~22 nm in diameter and
contains 42% cholesteryl ester, 6% triglyceride, 8% cholesterol,
22% phospholipid, and 22% apoB-100 by weight. Thus, each LDL particle
would contain about 1600 molecules of cholesteryl ester, 170 of
triglyceride, 700 of phospholipid, and 600 molecules of free
cholesterol (12). About 50% of esterified fatty acids in the different
lipid classes of LDL are polyunsaturated (12), an important
attribute considering the sensitivity of these species to oxidative
reactions in the lipoprotein particle. Cholesteryl esters are the most
abundant lipid class in LDL, with cholesteryl linoleate being the
principal oxidizable lipid in the hydrophobic core of LDL (12).
Human LDL contains a number of antioxidants that inhibit lipid
oxidation, with Low density lipoprotein oxidation is inhibited by both chemically and
cell-derived nitric oxide (·NO) (17-21). Nitric oxide has
multiple physicochemical qualities that make it a potentially more
effective lipid antioxidant than Nitric oxide production by vascular endothelium (28) and its diffusion
into LDL can represent a key antioxidant mechanism, by acting in the
hydrophobic core of LDL where the ratio of oxidizable lipids to
endogenous antioxidants is much greater than at the LDL particle
surface. The present work supports these concepts by revealing the
diffusion of ·NO into the surface and the core of LDL via
fluorescence quenching of pyrene derivatives incorporated at different
depths of the lipoprotein.
Chemicals--
Nitric oxide and argon were purchased from AGA SA
(Montevideo, Uruguay). Pyrene derivatives
1-(pyrenyl)methyltrimethylammonium (PMTMA) and
1-(pyrenyl)methyl-3-(9-octadecenoyloxy)-22,23-bisnor-5-cholenate (PMChO) were from Molecular Probes (Eugene, OR). NOC-7
(3-(2-hydroxy-1-methyl-2-nitrosohydrazino)-N-methyl-1-propanamine) was from Dojindo (Kumamoto, Japan). All other chemicals were of reagent
grade and purchased from Sigma. Since PMChO is insoluble in
water, ethanol was used as solvent when studies in solution were required.
LDL Preparation--
LDL from normolipidemic donors was obtained
as previously (29). Briefly, it was first isolated from fresh plasma by
ultracentrifugation (368,000 × g, 2.5 h) through
a potassium bromide gradient (~5 mg/ml in protein) and further
purified by size exclusion-high performance liquid chromatography on a
column of Superose 6 HR 10/30 with UV detection at 280 nm (29). The LDL
preparation obtained (native LDL, n-LDL) was ~1.5 mg/ml in protein
and was stored at 4 °C under argon in the dark until used (within 2 days).
Oxidation of LDL--
High performance liquid
chromatography-purified LDL was autoxidized as previously (30). LDL
(0.5 mg/ml in 100 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.4) was
transferred (8 ml) to a dialysis bag (Spectrapor tubing, number 4, MWCO: 12-14,000) and the bag was immersed in 250 ml of buffer. Oxygen
was bubbled into the mixture through a plastic tube located outside of
the dialysis bag, for up to 48 h at 37 °C. Oxidation was
confirmed by measuring the formation of thiobarbituric acid-reactive
substances, conjugated dienes, and the relative electrophoretic
mobility of LDL in agarose gels (31).
Fluorescent Probe Incorporation--
The fluorescent probes
(PMTMA and PMChO) were incorporated into LDL (0.5 mg/ml protein) by
adding aliquots of an ethanolic stock solution probe (final ethanol
concentration <0.1% and probe concentration 10 Lifetime of Excited Probes ( Preparation of ·NO Solutions--
Stock ·NO
solutions were prepared by dissolving pure ·NO gas anaerobically
in aqueous solution as previously (23). Briefly, the gas sampling tube
was filled with 50 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, and
deoxygenated by flushing with argon ~30 min. Then, ·NO gas
that had been previously washed with 5 M NaOH to eliminate contaminating nitrous oxide and nitrogen dioxide was bubbled for ~15
min, to achieve close to saturation levels, i.e. 1.7 mM at 37 °C. The final ·NO concentration was
measured before experiments with an electrochemical ·NO sensor
(WPI Model ISO-NO) and by the oxyhemoglobin reaction (33, 34).
Importantly, since nitrite moderately quenches pyrene fluorescence
(KSV for PMTMA in erythrocyte membranes = 0.05 mM Fluorescence Quenching Analyses--
These experiments were
performed by measuring steady-state fluorescence intensities of free
and LDL-incorporated pyrene derivatives (
As previously (23), the apparent second-order quenching constants
(kNO) between the excited state probe and
·NO were calculated from the slope of Stern-Volmer plots,
KSV (Equations 2 and 3),
The structures of the hydrophilic and hydrophobic pyrene
derivatives are shown in Fig. 1. The
characteristic fine structure of the emission spectra of these pyrene
derivatives in solution (Fig.
2A) is less defined once they
are incorporated into the lipid environment of the LDL and an increase
in the emission at 396 nm is observed (Fig. 2B). The
fluorescence spectra of PMTMA and PMChO in oxidized LDL were the same
as in native LDL (not shown). The selected pyrene probes were chosen so
that they could be incorporated at different depths of the LDL
particle, with the pyrene moiety responsible for fluorescence emission
being effectively quenched by ·NO. Pyrene is readily solubilized
by membranes and located in the hydrocarbon core of the lipid bilayer
(32). A strongly cationic derivative like PMTMA is expected to be
adsorbed only at the surface of LDL, a microenvironment rich in
negatively charged phospholipids. The PMChO derivative is expected to
penetrate to the hydrophobic core of LDL due to a structure analogous
to esterified cholesterol. The degree of penetration of different
pyrene derivatives into membranes has been characterized by proton and
carbon NMR (35) and susceptibility to quenching by highly hydrophilic
quenchers (36). Herein we observed that both probes incorporated into LDL were significantly protected from deactivation by iodide and tryptophan (water soluble quenchers), and that the resistance of PMChO
to quenching by water-soluble species is at least 10-fold greater than
for PMTMA (Table I, n-LDL column). If the
KSV values of Table I are converted to
kNO (Equation 3) using The half-lives obtained from the exponential fluorescence decay of the
excited pyrene derivatives in different environments including native
(n-LDL) and oxidized LDL (ox-LDL), are summarized on Table II. The
fluorescence lifetime of PMChO in both native and oxidized
LDL was greater than for the corresponding Fig. 3 shows Stern-Volmer plots for PMTMA
and PMChO fluorescence quenching by ·NO following probe
incorporation into native and oxidized LDL. From the slope of these
lines (KSV) the kNO
values were calculated and are collected in Table II. Also, data taken
from our previous work using PMTMA incorporated into erythrocyte plasma
membranes is included for comparative purposes (23).
Diffusion of Nitric Oxide into Low Density Lipoprotein*
,
,
Department of Physical Biochemistry,
Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República, 11400 Montevideo, Uruguay, the § Department of Biochemistry,
Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de la República, 11800 Montevideo, Uruguay, the
Department of Chemistry, Universidad de
Santiago de Chile, Santiago 2, Chile, and the ** Department
of Anesthesiology, Center for Free Radical Biology, University of
Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35233
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
o) of the excited probes.
The apparent second order rate quenching constants of ·NO
(kNO) for both probes were 2.6-3.8 × 1010 M
1 s
1 and
1.2 × 1010 M
1
s
1 in solution and native LDL, respectively, indicating
that there is no significant barrier to the diffusion of ·NO to
the surface and core of LDL. Nitric oxide was also capable of diffusing
through oxidized LDL. Considering the preferential partitioning of
·NO in apolar milieu (6-8 for n-octanol:water) and
therefore a larger ·NO concentration in LDL with respect to the
aqueous phase, a corrected kNO value of
~0.2 × 1010 M
1
s
1 can be determined, which still is sufficiently large
and consistent with a facile diffusion of ·NO through LDL.
Applying the Einstein-Smoluchowsky treatment, the apparent diffusion
coefficient
(D'NO) of
·NO in native LDL is on average 2 × 10
5
cm2 s
1, six times larger than that
previously reported for erythrocyte plasma membrane. Thus, our
observations support that ·NO readily traverses the LDL surface
accessing the hydrophobic lipid core of the particle and affirm a role
for ·NO as a major lipophilic antioxidant in LDL.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-tocopherol the most abundant (~6
-tocopherol molecules per LDL particle), and other antioxidants (e.g.
carotenoids, ubiquinol-10) present in much lower abundance (12).
-Tocopherol, localized at the surface of the LDL particle, provides
minimal protection to lipid components in the hydrophobic core of LDL. Indeed, the principal oxidizable lipid, cholesteryl linoleate, is
localized in the core of the lipoprotein, away from the more polar
tocopherols (13-16).
-tocopherol. Nitric oxide
(a) readily crosses cell membranes and concentrates in
lipophilic milieu by virtue of its uncharged character, low molecular
mass, and relatively high lipid/water partition coefficient
(n-octanol:water partition coefficient of 6-8:1) (22, 23)
and (b) reacts to terminate propagation reactions catalyzed
by lipid alkoxyl and peroxyl radical species (24-26). Thus, by virtue
of its high reactivity with lipid radical species, ·NO can spare
lipophilic antioxidants (e.g.
-tocopherol) from oxidation
(27).
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
6
M to avoid excimer formation) and incubating overnight at
4 °C. The excess fluorescent probe was removed by elution on a PD-10 column (Sephadex G-25, Amersham Bioscience, Inc.) equilibrated with 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer, pH 7.4. The absence of free
fluorescent probe in LDL was confirmed by the lack of fluorescence quenching by 15 mM acrylamide. Indeed, acrylamide is
extremely effective for the quenching of pyrene derivative fluorescence in aqueous environments, but it is totally ineffective when the probe
is incorporated into lipid domains (32). The absence of excimers was
confirmed by the lack of fluorescence emission at 470 nm (32). Once
incorporated, LDL-PMTMA was used within a short period of time (<5 h)
since leakage of the probe at longer times was observed. LDL-associated
PMChO did not leak from LDL throughout a 5-h observation period.
o)--
Lifetimes of
excited probes in solution and incorporated into native or oxidized LDL
were measured by kinetics of fluorescence decay after excitation with a
nitronite nitrogen laser in argon. Fluorescence decay was recorded in a
Tektronik 7633 oscilloscope and fitted to Equation 1,
where I represents fluorescence intensity,
t is the time after excitation with the laser, and
(Eq. 1)
o the lifetime of the excited fluorescent probe.
1), alkaline washing of ·NO gas
was essential for accurate and reproducible results. A 100 mM stock NOC-7 solution was prepared in alkaline pH (2 mM potassium phosphate buffer, pH 11.0) to avoid its
decomposition before addition to the reaction mixture containing
LDL.
exc = 337 nm,
em = 396 nm) at different ·NO concentrations in a
Aminco-Bowman spectrofluorometer (Aminco SLM 2). Briefly, 2.5 ml of 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, were deoxygenated by
bubbling argon for 15 min in an anaerobic fluorometer cuvette. Then
0.05-0.25 ml of LDL preparation (native or oxidized) was added through
a rubber septum to obtain a final protein concentration of 0.03 mg/ml.
The mixture was very gently bubbled with argon since extensive bubbling
disrupted the LDL particle and tended to cause aggregates. The
fluorescence intensity was recorded as Io and then
aliquots from a freshly prepared stock ·NO solution were added
with a gas-tight syringe through the rubber septum, gently mixed, and
the decrease in fluorescence intensity registered as a function of
·NO concentration. Extensive deoxygenation before ·NO
addition was critical since oxygen also quenches pyrene fluorescence (23). For quenching experiments in solution, the concentration of the
pyrene derivative used was 4 µM in buffer or ethanol for PMTMA and in ethanol for PMChO. Additionally, a limited number of
experiments were performed exposing PMChO-containing LDL to the
·NO donor NOC-7 under anaerobic conditions. In this case, the
fluorescence quenching by NOC-7-derived fluxes of ·NO was
followed continuously over a 5-min period. All experiments were
conducted at 22 °C.
(Eq. 2)
where
(Eq. 3)
o is the lifetime of the excited probe in the
absence of quencher. In addition, pyrene fluorescence quenching experiments were performed using the water-soluble quenchers iodide (0 to 4 mM) and tryptophan (0 to 2 mM).
![]()
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
o reported in
Table II, the relative tendencies of
hydrophilic and hydrophobic pyrene probe deactivation have even greater
differences. These results indicate a differential distribution of the
two probes in LDL and confirm that PMChO is located deeper into the LDL
structure.

View larger version (12K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Chemical structures of the pyrene
derivatives. A, 1-(pyrenyl)methyltrimethylammonium,
PMTMA, a positively charged pyrene derivative that locates on the
surface of the LDL particle. B, PMChO, a cholesteryl ester
derivative of pyrene that penetrates into the core of the LDL
particle.

View larger version (7K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Emission spectra of PMTMA. A,
emission spectrum of PMTMA (4 µM) in 50 mM
phosphate buffer, pH 7.4. B, emission spectrum of PMTMA once
incorporated into LDL (0.1 mg/ml in buffer). The excitation wavelength
used was 337 nm. Similar spectra were obtained for PMChO in ethanol and
LDL, respectively.
Deactivation of fluorescent probes by iodide and tryptophan
Lifetimes (
O), Stern-Volmer slopes (KSV) and
quenching rate constants by ·NO (kNO)
0 for PMTMA
(2.5-fold). This agrees with previous results showing that the undecyl
derivative analog (PUTMA) had a 2-fold greater half-time than PMTMA in
biomembranes (23). Since the lifetime of the probe is sensitive to the
polarity changes of its surroundings, this result also supports a
differential location of the two pyrene derivatives, with PMChO being
situated in a more hydrophobic environment than PMTMA.

View larger version (18K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Stern-Volmer plots for the fluorescence
quenching of pyrene derivatives by ·NO. PMTMA
(circles) or PMChO (triangles)
fluorescence in LDL was quenched by increasing concentrations of
·NO. The LDL suspensions contain 0.03 mg of protein/ml.
Solid symbols represent LDL in the native
conformation and open symbols represent oxidized LDL. Data
shown are mean values ± S.D. of six independent experiments. The
slopes of these plots are summarized in Table II as
KSV.
These results (Table II, Fig. 3) reveal critical features of the interaction of ·NO with the LDL particle. First, ·NO is capable of quenching fluorescence of pyrene derivatives located both at the hydrophilic surface and the hydrophobic core of LDL, indicating that ·NO can diffuse through and into the LDL particle. Second, we found that ·NO diffusion readily occurs in both native and oxidized LDL.
To further investigate the diffusion of ·NO into LDL,
PMChO-containing LDL was exposed to a ·NO flux
generated from the decomposition of the NOC-7 (t1/2 ~30 min under our experimental conditions). There was a concentration and time-dependent quenching of PMChO fluorescence from
NOC-7 (Fig. 4), in agreement with the
access of increasing concentrations of ·NO into the hydrophobic
core of LDL.
|
Considering LDL a more viscous environment than that of aqueous
solutions, one would expect a slower diffusion of ·NO through
the particle; however, the apparent quenching rate constants
(kNO) obtained in LDL are large (1.2-2.5 × 1010 M
1 s
1),
with values approximating those for quenching in solution. However, an
important consideration is that the x axis values in Fig. 3
refer to the ·NO concentration in the aqueous phase and it
should be noted that ·NO will partition into the lipid phase
(37), resulting in an increased concentration of quencher in the region
surrounding the fluorophore. While the partition coefficient of
·NO in LDL is not known, a good estimate can be adapted from
knowledge of ·NO partitioning into non-polar solvents, being
6-8 in n-octanol:water (38). Importantly, even when
considering a ·NO concentration in LDL six times greater than in
the aqueous phase, corrected kNO values would be
as high as 0.2-0.4 × 1010
M
1 s
1, indicating that LDL
offers no significant barrier to the diffusion of ·NO. In
addition, similar kNO values for PMTMA and PMChO
were obtained for LDL, confirming that ·NO can easily diffuse to
the hydrophobic core of LDL as well.
The determination of the exact diffusion coefficients of ·NO in
the surface and core of LDL is precluded by the lack of knowledge of the actual concentration of ·NO in the lipophilic
environments where the bimolecular quenching process occurs. However,
apparent diffusion coefficients (D'NO) can be
estimated using the Einstein-Smoluchowsky equation according to
previously (23),
|
(Eq. 4) |
8 cm and
9.1 × 10
8 cm for PMTMA and PMChO plus ·NO,
respectively) and N Avogadro's number. The apparent
diffusion coefficients of ·NO in native LDL from this approach
were 2.3 × 10
5 cm2 s
1 in
the surface and 1.7 × 10
5 cm2
s
1 in the hydrophobic core of LDL, i.e.
2.0 × 10
5 cm2 s
1 on
average, half of the value obtained for ·NO in aqueous buffers
(23), whereas the D'NO in erythrocyte plasma
membrane is six times less (Table II). This result indicates that
diffusibility of ·NO in LDL exceeds that of biomembranes.
Nitric oxide induced ~2-fold greater pyrene derivative quenching for oxidized LDL, compared with native LDL (Fig. 3 and Table II), possibly due to oxidative modification of the lipoprotein rendering a more open structure that exposes the fluorescent probe to the solvent. This hypothesis is supported by the much larger quenching of pyrene fluorescence in oxidized LDL by the water-soluble quenchers iodide and tryptophan in oxidized LDL (Table I).
The concentrations of ·NO in the subendothelium of small
arterioles have been estimated in the range of 250-500 nM
(reviewed in Ref. 39), and these concentrations seem to be more than
sufficient to exert antioxidant actions in LDL (17, 40). The fact that ·NO can readily diffuse to native, as well as oxidized LDL (Fig. 3) makes, at a first glance, less likely the possibility that LDL
oxidation may be promoted by a poor diffusion of ·NO toward
sites of ongoing lipid oxidation. Indeed, an impairment of
·NO-mediated antioxidant actions within LDL may be primarily
related to a deficit of ·NO bioavailability, which may in turn
be due to decreased production or alternative reactions with radical
species (e.g. superoxide (O

), an oxidant
capable of initiating LDL oxidation (8, 44, 48, 49). However, it is
important to recognize that there is heterogeneity in the size and
fatty acid composition of LDL among individuals and there may be
scenarios under which small decreases in ·NO diffusion
maintained over long periods of time might facilitate the initiation of
oxidation processes. In this context, the diffusion of ·NO to
the small (<25 nm diameter) and dense LDL particles versus that of the more common, large and buoyant ones that may have different
proatherogenic potential (50, 51) should be studied. Additionally, the
influence of fatty acids that diminish atherogenic risk
(i.e. fatty acids contained in oil fish) (52, 53) on ·NO diffusion in LDL needs to be addressed. These considerations may help to better define the role of LDL structure and composition and
its interactions with ·NO in the inhibition/promotion of atherogenesis.
In summary, our work reveals that ·NO readily diffuses to the
hydrophilic surface and hydrophobic core of LDL, supporting the concept
that ·NO can serve as an antioxidant in the vascular
compartment, thus protecting LDL from oxidation and accounting for one
component of the anti-atherogenic actions of ·NO.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
|---|
We thank Dr. Jack R. Lancaster, Jr. for critical reading of the manuscript.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grants R03 TW00999 and TW001493 (to B. A. F., A. D., H. R., and R. R.), Swedish Agency for Research Cooperation (Sweden), International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (Italy), and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (to R. R.), Third World Academy of Sciences (Italy), and Comisión Sectorial de Investigación Cientifica, Universidad de la República (Uruguay) (to A. D.), and Pfizer-Fundación Manuel Pérez (to H. R. and C. B.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶ Partially supported by a fellowship from PEDECIBA, Uruguay.

International Research Scholar of the Howard Hughes Medical
Institute. To whom correspondence should be addressed: Departamento de
Bioquímica, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de la
República, Avda. Gral. Flores 2125, 11800 Montevideo, Uruguay.
E-mail: rradi@fmed.edu.uy.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, October 31, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M106589200
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: LDL, low density lipoprotein; PMTMA, 1-(pyrenyl)methyltrimethylammonium; PMChO, 1-(pyrenyl)-methyl-3-(9-octadecenoyloxy)-22,23-bisnor-5-cholenate; NOC-7, 3-(2-hydroxy-1-methyl-2-nitrosohydrazino)-N-methyl-1-propanamine; n-LDL, native low density lipoprotein; ox-LDL, oxidized low density lipoprotein.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Steinberg, D., Parthasarathy, S., Carew, T. E., Khoo, J. C., and Witztum, J. L. (1989) N. Engl. J. Med. 320, 915-924 |
| 2. | Chisolm, G. M., and Steinberg, D. (2000) Free Radic. Biol. Med. 28, 1815-1826 |
| 3. | Goldstein, J. L., Hazzard, W. R., Schrott, H. G., Bierman, E. L., and Motulsky, A. G. (1973) J. Clin. Invest. 52, 1533-1543 |
| 4. | Steinberg, D. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 20963-20966 |
| 5. | Goldstein, J. L., Ho, Y. K., Brown, M. S., Innerarity, T. L., and Mahley, R. W. (1980) J. Biol. Chem. 255, 1839-1848 |
| 6. | Brown, M. S., Ho, Y. K., and Goldstein, J. L. (1980) J. Biol. Chem. 255, 9344-9352 |
| 7. | Steinbrecher, U. P., Lougheed, M., Kwan, W. C., and Dirks, M. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 15216-15223 |
| 8. | Guy, R. A., Maguire, G. F., Crandall, I., Connelly, P. W., and Kain, K. C. (2001) Atherosclerosis 155, 19-28 |
| 9. | Boullier, A., Gillotte, K. L., Horkko, S., Green, S. R., Friedman, P., Dennis, E. A., Witztum, J. L., Steinberg, D., and Quehenberger, O. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 9163-9169 |
| 10. | Schuster, B., Prassl, R., Nigon, F., Chapman, M. J., and Laggner, P. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 2509-2513 |
| 11. | Orlova, E. V., Sherman, M. B., Chiu, W., Mowri, H., Smith, L. C., and Gotto, A. M., Jr. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 8420-8425 |
| 12. | Esterbauer, H., Gebicki, J., Puhl, H., and Jurgens, G. (1992) Free Radic. Biol. Med. 13, 341-390 |
| 13. | Fielding, C. J. (1984) J. Lipid Res. 25, 1624-1628 |
| 14. | Thomas, J. P., Kalyanaraman, B., and Girotti, A. W. (1994) Arch Biochem. Biophys. 315, 244-254 |
| 15. | Kenar, J. A., Havrilla, C. M., Porter, N. A., Guyton, J. R., Brown, S. A., Klemp, K. F., and Selinger, E. (1996) Chem. Res. Toxicol. 9, 737-744 |
| 16. | Handelman, G. J., Frankel, E. N., Fenz, R., and German, J. B. (1993) Biochem. Mol. Biol. Int. 31, 777-788 |
| 17. | Rubbo, H., Parthasarathy, S., Barnes, S., Kirk, M., Kalyanaraman, B., and Freeman, B. A. (1995) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 324, 15-25 |
| 18. | Hogg, N., Kalyanaraman, B., Joseph, J., Struck, A., and Parthasarathy, S. (1993) FEBS Lett. 334, 170-174 |
| 19. | Hogg, N., Struck, A., Goss, S. P., Santanam, N., Joseph, J., Parthasarathy, S., and Kalyanaraman, B. (1995) J. Lipid Res. 36, 1756-1762 |
| 20. | Goss, S. P., Hogg, N., and Kalyanaraman, B. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 21647-21653 |
| 21. | Carr, A. C., and Frei, B. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 1822-1828 |
| 22. | Malinski, T., Taha, Z., Grunfeld, S., Patton, S., Kapturczak, M., and Tomboulian, P. (1993) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 193, 1076-1082 |
| 23. | Denicola, A., Souza, J. M., Radi, R., and Lissi, E. (1996) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 328, 208-212 |
| 24. | Rubbo, H., Radi, R., Trujillo, M., Telleri, R., Kalyanaraman, B., Barnes, S., Kirk, M., and Freeman, B. A. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 26066-26075 |
| 25. | Padmaja, S., and Huie, R. E. (1993) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 195, 539-544 |
| 26. | O'Donnell, V. B., Chumley, P. H., Hogg, N., Bloodsworth, A., Darley-Usmar, V. M., and Freeman, B. A. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 15216-15223 |
| 27. | Rubbo, H., Radi, R., Anselmi, D., Kirk, M., Barnes, S., Butler, J., Eiserich, J. P., and Freeman, B. A. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 10812-10818 |
| 28. | Furchgott, R. F., and Zawadzki, J. V. (1980) Nature 288, 373-376 |
| 29. | Batthyány, C., Santos, C., Botti, H., Cerveñansky, C., Radi, R., Augusto, O., and Rubbo, H. (2000) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 384, 335-340 |
| 30. | Yang, C., Gu, Z. W., Yang, M., Lin, S. N., Siuzdak, G., and Smith, C. V. (1999) Biochemistry 38, 15903-15908 |
| 31. | Puhl, H., Waeg, G., and Esterbauer, H. (1994) Methods Enzymol. 233, 425-441 |
| 32. | Sepulveda, P., Gallardo, S., and Lissi, E. A. (1992) J. Colloid Interface Sci. 152, 104-113 |
| 33. | Feelisch, M., Kubitzek, D., and Werringloer, J. (1996) in Methods in Nitric Oxide Research (Feelisch, M. , and Stamler, J., eds) , pp. 455-478, John Wiley & Sons |
| 34. | Malinski, T., and Czuchajowski, L. (1996) in Methods in Nitric Oxide Research (Feelisch, M. , and Stamler, J., eds) , pp. 319-339, John Wiley & Sons |
| 35. | Gratzel, M., Kalyanasundaram, K., and Thomas, J. K. (1974) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 96, 7869 |
| 36. | Lissi, E. A., and Caceres, T. (1989) J. Bioenerg. Biomembr. 21, 375-385 |
| 37. | Liu, X., Miller, M. J., Joshi, M. S., Thomas, D. D., and Lancaster, J. R., Jr. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 2175-2179 |
| 38. | Malinski, T., Radomski, M. W., Taha, Z., and Moncada, S. (1993) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 194, 960-965 |
| 39. | Buerk, D. G. (2001) Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 3, 109-143 |
| 40. | Trostchansky, A., Batthyány, C., Botti, H., Radi, R., Denicola, A., and Rubbo, H. (2001) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 395, 225-232 |
| 41. | Kissner, R., Nauser, T., Bugnon, P., Lye, P. G., and Koppenol, W. H. (1997) Chem. Res. Toxicol. 10, 1285-1292 |
| 42. | Eiserich, J. P., Butler, J., van der Vliet, A., Cross, C. E., and Halliwell, B. (1995) Biochem. J. 310, 745-749 |
| 43. | Coffey, M. J., Natarajan, R., Chumley, P. H., Coles, B., Thimmalapura, P.-R., Nowell, M., Kuhn, H., Lewis, M. J., Freeman, B. A., and O'Donnell, V. B. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98, 8006-8011 |
| 44. | Wattanapitayakul, S. K., Weinstein, D. M., Holycross, B. J., and Bauer, J. A. (2000) FASEB J. 14, 271-278 |
| 45. | Warnholtz, A., Nickenig, G., Schulz, E., Macharzina, R., Brasen, J. H., Skatchkov, M., Heitzer, T., Stasch, J. P., Griendling, K. K., Harrison, D. G., Bohm, M., Meinertz, T., and Munzel, T. (1999) Circulation 99, 2027-2033 |
| 46. | Cominacini, L., Pasini, A. F., Garbin, U., Davoli, A., Tosetti, M. L., Campagnola, M., Rigoni, A., Pastorino, A. M., Lo, Cascio, V., and Sawamura, T. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 12633-12638 |
| 47. | Griendling, K. K., Sorescu, D., and Ushio-Fukai, M. (2000) Circ. Res. 86, 494-501 |
| 48. | Graham, A., Hogg, N., Kalyanaraman, B., O'Leary, V., Darley-Usmar, V., and Moncada, S. (1993) FEBS Lett. 330, 181-185 |
| 49. | White, C. R., Brock, T. A., Chang, L. Y., Crapo, J., Briscoe, P., Ku, D., Bradley, W. A., Gianturco, S. H., Gore, J., Freeman, B. A., and Tarpey, M. M. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 1044-1048 |
| 50. | Mykkanen, L., Kuusisto, J., Haffner, S. M., Laakso, M., and Austin, M. A. (1999) Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 19, 2742-2748 |
| 51. | Campos, H., Moye, L. A., Glasser, S. P., Stampfer, M. J., and Sacks, F. M. (2001) J. Am. Med. Assoc. 286, 1468-1474 |
| 52. | (1999) Lancet 354, 447-455 |
| 53. | Lopez, D., Caballero, C., Sanchez, J., Puig-Parellada, P., and Mitjavila, M. T. (2001) Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 280, H2929-2935 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Miersch, M. G. Espey, R. Chaube, A. Akarca, R. Tweten, S. Ananvoranich, and B. Mutus Plasma Membrane Cholesterol Content Affects Nitric Oxide Diffusion Dynamics and Signaling J. Biol. Chem., July 4, 2008; 283(27): 18513 - 18521. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Zhang, Y. Xu, J. Joseph, and B. Kalyanaraman Intramolecular Electron Transfer between Tyrosyl Radical and Cysteine Residue Inhibits Tyrosine Nitration and Induces Thiyl Radical Formation in Model Peptides Treated with Myeloperoxidase, H2O2, and NO2-: EPR SPIN TRAPPING STUDIES J. Biol. Chem., December 9, 2005; 280(49): 40684 - 40698. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. J. Schopfer, P. R. S. Baker, G. Giles, P. Chumley, C. Batthyany, J. Crawford, R. P. Patel, N. Hogg, B. P. Branchaud, J. R. Lancaster Jr., et al. Fatty Acid Transduction of Nitric Oxide Signaling: NITROLINOLEIC ACID IS A HYDROPHOBICALLY STABILIZED NITRIC OXIDE DONOR J. Biol. Chem., May 13, 2005; 280(19): 19289 - 19297. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Moller, H. Botti, C. Batthyany, H. Rubbo, R. Radi, and A. Denicola Direct Measurement of Nitric Oxide and Oxygen Partitioning into Liposomes and Low Density Lipoprotein J. Biol. Chem., March 11, 2005; 280(10): 8850 - 8854. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Benito, S. Buxaderas, and M. T. Mitjavila Flavonoid metabolites and susceptibility of rat lipoproteins to oxidation Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2004; 287(6): H2819 - H2824. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Kalyanaraman Nitrated lipids: A class of cell-signaling molecules PNAS, August 10, 2004; 101(32): 11527 - 11528. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Lopez, X. Orta, K. Casos, M. P. Saiz, P. Puig-Parellada, M. Farriol, and M. T. Mitjavila Upregulation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase in rat aorta after ingestion of fish oil-rich diet Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, August 1, 2004; 287(2): H567 - H572. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-y. Morita, M. Kawabe, A. Sakurai, K. Okuhira, A. Vertut-Doi, M. Nakano, and T. Handa Ceramide in Lipid Particles Enhances Heparan Sulfate Proteoglycan and Low Density Lipoprotein Receptor-related Protein-mediated Uptake by Macrophages J. Biol. Chem., June 4, 2004; 279(23): 24355 - 24361. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Radi Nitric oxide, oxidants, and protein tyrosine nitration PNAS, March 23, 2004; 101(12): 4003 - 4008. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. S. Lima, P. Di Mascio, and D. S. P. Abdalla Cholesteryl nitrolinoleate, a nitrated lipid present in human blood plasma and lipoproteins J. Lipid Res., September 1, 2003; 44(9): 1660 - 1666. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. G. Lim, S. Sweeney, A. Bloodsworth, C. R. White, P. H. Chumley, N. R. Krishna, F. Schopfer, V. B. O'Donnell, J. P. Eiserich, and B. A. Freeman Nitrolinoleate, a nitric oxide-derived mediator of cell function: Synthesis, characterization, and vasomotor activity PNAS, December 10, 2002; 99(25): 15941 - 15946. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | |